ML12340A269

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Engineering Evaluation 12-E18, Revision 0, Attachment C - Page 76 of 322
ML12340A269
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/27/2012
From:
Zachry Nuclear
To:
Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NLS2012125 12-E18, Rev 0
Download: ML12340A269 (249)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 76 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 3 Status: YO Nil ULI Equipment ID No. RW-AOV-A094 Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description Drywell Equipment Drain Sump Discharge (SWC# WD-SWEL-027 & AWC# WB-005)Location: Bldg. RX Floor El. 881 Room, Area Above NW-Torus Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Anchor Valve Co. 3"-150# Gate with Piston Type Act Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[] No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YO NO Ur N/A0 YO NO U- N/A9 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO U" N/A0 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Valve, therefore no anchorage YO NO UO N/AZ Y0 NO UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 77 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN NOi UO Equipment ID No. RW-AOV-A094 Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description Drywell Equipment Drain Sump Discharge (SWC# WD-SWEL-027 & AWC# WBS005)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO Uf N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ1 NO U'- N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO U" N/AO YEI NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI UQ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Flex conduit up against yoke body (frame). Valve body is in contact with a trapeze support system. By engineering judgment, the support will assist in restraining the valve, no issue.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Flex conduit is rubbing against the operator. By engineering judgment, it has been determined that both are seismically rugged. In the event of a seismic event, the conductors within the conduit will be able to perform there function.Evaluated by: James McKinne" Justin Jackson Date: /o_ // ?_I-to"ýZ 6,11 -L Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 78 of 322 Status: YE NE] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RW-AOV-A094 Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description Drywell Equipment Drain Sump Discharge (SWC# WD-SWEL-027 & AWC# WB-005)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 79 of 322 Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YQ NN U[1 Equipment ID No. SW-AOV-TCV451A Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description REC Hx A Outlet (SWC# WD-SWEL-028 & AWC# WB-006)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 881 Room, Area NE Torus Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Masoneilon Model 35102, 12 Butterfly Valve with Piston -Tvoe Act.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and fi'dings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YO NO UQ NWAS YO NO UO NIAS 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UO N/A0 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NOI UO N/AO YZ NO UO Valve, therefore no anchorage 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIB Revision 0 Attachment C Page 80 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YO NN U'-Equipment ID No. SW-AOV-TCV451A Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description REC Hx A Outlet (SWC# WD-SWEL-028 & AWC# WB-006)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y(9 NO UQ N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y9 NO UQ N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NO U" N/AO YO NO UO Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO No UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

EQ panel TB-1210 attached to concrete bent requires bottom unistrut to provide adequate support. (CR-CNS-2012-06467) Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) CR-CNS-2012-06467 Evaluated by: Justin Jackson James McKinney MA-Date: 09/212012 09112/2012 Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 81 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW-AOV-TCV451A Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description REC Hx A Outlet (SWC# WD-SWEL-028 & A WC# WB-006)Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YE] NO U-]Photographs Note: Note: Note: MN Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 82 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CRD-AOV-CV126(26-Equip. Class' 7 27)Equipment Description Scram Inlet (SWC# WD-SWEL-029 & AWC# WB-017)Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y NZ] Ut]Location: Bldg. RX Floor El. 903 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) GE HCU Inlet Scram Valve Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is tile anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YE- N9 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Valve, has anchorage flange bolts to HCU frame (2 bolts)YEO NE) UE) N/A0 YE) NO) UE" NWAS YO) NiO UEI N/A0 YOJ NE) UE- N/AS Y NO U--I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 83 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YO NEI UL--Equipment ID No. CRD-AOV-CV126(26-Equip. Class' 7 27)Equipment Description Scram Inlet (SWC# WD-SWEL-029 & AWC# WB-017)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NOl 13 N/ADI 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO ND UI N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 ND UD N/ADl Y0 NEI U0I Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0D ND U13 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Anchors for HCU see accumulators (WD-SWEL-080) %Ww..Evaluated by: James McKinney Js 0 Justin Jackson (12a47 K/.,s42 Date: /a to/ 4/z tZ..19 , Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 84 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CRD-AOV-CV126t'26-Equip. Class' 7 27)Equipment Description Scram Inlet (SWC# WD-SWEL-029 & AWC# WB-O1 7)Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NI" UEI Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 85 of 322 Sheet 4 of 4 Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 86 of 322 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ Nn] ULit Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. MS-AOV-AO86D Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description Main Steam Isolation Valve D- Outboard (SWC# WD-SWEL-030 &AWC# WB-010)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 903 Room, Area Steam Tunnel Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchornae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YC NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NE UD N/AZ YO NO UO N/AI Y] NO UE N/AS YE NEI UEJ N/AO YO NO UO Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 87 of 322 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YO NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. MS-AOV-AO86D Equip. Class" 7 Equipment Description Main Steam Isolation Valve D -Outboard (SWC# WD-SWEL-030 & AWC# WB-010)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM ND U- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UQ N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NO UO N/AU YZ NO UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO UD adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Jur\', Evaluated by: William e James McKinnev '$4 yl2 Date: tO , ol /I]UI J Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 88 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YZ NM U0-Equipment ID No. MS-AOV-AO86D Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description Main Steam Isolation Valve D -Outboard (SWC# WD-SWEL-030 & AWC# WB-010)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 89 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 3 Status: YEI N[D U-]Equipment ID No. PC-PRV-PCV631 Equip. Class, 7 Fluid Operated Valves Equipment Description Nitrogen Supply to Drywell Inst. Air Header (SWC# WD-SWEL-031 & AWC# WB-023)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 903 Room, Area R-903-SE Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checkdist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? YO NO U" N/A0 YO NO UO N/AO 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO No UO N/AI 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Valve, therefore no anchors YO NE UO N/AO YS NO UO IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 90 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y(] NN UE]Equipment ID No. PC-PRV-PCV631 Equip. Class' 7 Fluid Operated Valves Equipment Description Nitrogen Supply to Drywell Inst. Air Header (SWC# WD-SWEL-031 & AWC# WB-023)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO U55 N/AQ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0D NO UO N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NO UO N/ACI YE) NO U'Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment?

line has no nearby seismic retraints (CR-CNS-2012-07576) YO NZ UO Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) CR-CNS-2012-07576 Evaluated by: Justin Jackson J James McKinney lin t Date: Il /'/? Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 91 of 322 Status: YE] NZ U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PC-PRV-PCV631 Equip. Class, 7 Fluid Operated Valves Equipment Description Nitrogen Supply to Drywell Inst. Air Header (SWC# WD-SWEL-031 & AWC# WB-023)Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 92 of 322 Sheet i of 3 Status: Y[] NED U['Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RMV-AOV-1IA V Equip. Class, 7 Fluid Oporated Valve Equipment Description RM- 4 Containment Isolation: Outboard (SWC# WD-SWEL-032 & AWC# WB-015)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 903 Room, Area Rx Building SE Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Copes Vulcan Incorporated, C6350 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 500/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See comments 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? Valve, no anchorage YO NO UQ W/AS YO NO U- NIAN YO NO U- N/AO YO NO Ui N/AO YO NO UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 93 of 322 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[3 N0R U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo. RMV-AOV-IIAV Equip. Class, 7 Fluid Operated Valve Equipment Description RM- 4 Containment Isolation: Outboard (SWC# WD-SWEL-032 & AWC# WB-015)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NOI U" N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NOI UQ N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NE UD N/AC YO NEI UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YO NEIUO Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Valve operator has anchor frame on it, attached to nearby concrete wall with baseplate and anchor bolts. The support is in good condition. (Not shown on valve drawing E-191721), confirm support on valve yoke is in accordance with Seismic Qualification Report (SQR) of valve and pipe stress analysis.CR-CNS-2012-07561 Evaluated by: Justin Jackson , 24-James Mc-Kinnev Aj Date: i0/2-6/12.- Il [I /l.býIz () Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 94 of 322 Status: YE] No U[I-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RMV-AOV-1IA V Equip. Class, 7 Fluid Operated Valve Equipment Description RM- 4 Containment Isolation; Outboard (SWC# WD-SWEL-032 & AWC# WB-015)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 95 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ NE] UE]Equipment ID No. SGT-AOV-250AV Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description SGT Unit B Inlet (SWC# WD-SWEL-033 & AWC# WB-030)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 976 Room, Area SGT Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Allis Chalmers Model 150 FR 12 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE N0@of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Support for valve has two (2) angle braces, anchored to wall. Each base plate has three (3) anchors, one (1) plate has an extra hole.Seismic Walkdown Engineers (SWEs) find this to be acceptable, since one plate does not have an extra hole indicating possible hole was not used due to encountering reinforcing when drilling anchor.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y-- NOl UO N/AI YO- NEI U'I N/AS 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEl Uil N/A(@5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NO UD NIA0 YN NEI UD'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 96 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y0 NEI U['Equipment ID No. SGT-AOV-250A V Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description SGT Unit B Inlet (SWC# WD-SWEL-033 & AWC# WB-030)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UO N/Al 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ No UEJ N/AC]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NO UO N/AC YO NO UC Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO N[ Ufl adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) MW4-ýýEvaluated by: William Price Date: 10I/10I L.-/ 0 I'/2..Patrick Yearlev r /'- Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 97 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SGT-AOV-250A V Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description SGT Unit B Inlet (SWC# WD-SWEL-033 & AWC# WB-030)Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YZ NO UO Photoaraphs Note: N/A Note: Note: N/A Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIB Revision 0 Attachment C Page 98 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SGT-AOV-DPCV546A Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YENI U[-]Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description SGT Unit A Discharge DPCV (SWC# WD-SWEL-034 & AWC# WB-030)Location: Bldg. RX Floor El. 976 Room, Area SGTRoom Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Allis Chalmers Model 150 FRIO Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Support is a multi-member frame which supports several components. The base plate(s) have (in some locations) a drilled hole with no anchor. Based on the amount of anchors which do exist, the Seismic Walkdown Engineers (SWEs) find this acceptable.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO UO N/AR YO NO UO N/AN YO NO UO N/A0 YO- NE UQ N/AS YZ NO UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-El8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 99 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SGT-AOV-DPCV546A Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] U[-]Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description SGT Unit A Discharge DPCV (SWC# WD-SWEL-034 & AWC# WB-030)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NiO UU- N/AU1 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO U'- N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NO U- N/AU YZ NNO UCI Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YO NEIUF Comiments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) ]Pvnl"ntýA hue Wifflo Dr;nn V WlIIIQ$11 Patrick Yearley Date: t0 -Io - Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 100 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y¥[ NE] U[Equipment ID No. SGT-AOV- Equip. Class' 7 DPCV546A Equipment Description SGT Unit A Discharcue DPCV (SWC# WD-SWEL-034 & AWC# WB-030)Photographs Note: Note:ý:Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 101 of 322 Sheet 4 of 4 Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 102 of 322 Sheet i of 3 Status: YZ NEI UJ-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment I) No. DGDO-SOV5029 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description DG2 Day Tank Inlet Fuel Safety Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-035 & AWC# WB-056)Location: Bldg. DG2 Floor El. 903 Room, Area Day Tank Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) ASCO Valve A4490 LB8210B35 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is tihe item one YE] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? In line valve 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage fi'ee of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NEI UE] N/AZ YE] NO] UE] NIAO YE] NE] UO N/AZ YE] NE] UO N/A0 YO NO U-I Enter tile equlpment class name frorn Appendix B.: Clases of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIB Revision 0 Attachment C Page 103 of 322 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NEI U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DGDO-SOV5029 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description DG2 Day Tank Inlet Fuel Safety Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-035 & AWC# WB-056)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NEI UO N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NC UC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y0 NC UC N/AO 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment fi-ee Y[R NC UC-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NC UJC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Date: I I -I q I-I'LI iI 111 /,~ Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 104 of 322 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YZ NE) Uol Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DGDO-SOV5029 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description DG2 Day Tank Inlet Fuel Safety Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-035 & AWC# WB-056)Photoranhs M I Note: N/A Note: N/A Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 105 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 3 Status: YZ NE] U[]Equipment ID No. RR-MOV-MO53B Equip. Class' 9 Motor-Operator & Solenoid-Operator Valve Equipment Description RR Pump B Discharge (SWC# WD-SWEL-036 & A WC# WB-058)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 888 Room, Area Drywell-888 (Northeast) Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Darling Valve, D0200 Mod S150W D0600 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO- N] U[-] N/A[YO- NEI UE- N/AN YE] NEI Url N/AR YE] NEI Ur] N/AZ YN NOrUI'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 106 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN NEI Ur-E Equipment ID No. RR-MOV-MO53B Equip. Class' 9 Motor-Operator & Solenoid-Operator Valve Equipment Description RR Pump B Discharge (SWC# WD-SWEL-036 & A WC# WB-058)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NO UQ N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO U- N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NO UO N/AU YN NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N" UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: William Price~+/-~zIi Date: -O- 7, 0 -Ao?- 6 /) Z.James McKinney (I Engineering Evaluation 12-EIB Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 Of 3 Page 107 of 322 Status: Y23 NEI UE-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RR-MOV-MO53B Equip. Class' 9 Motor-Operator & Solenoid-Operator Valve Equipment Description RR Pump B Discharge (SWC# WD-SWEL-036 & AWC# WB-058)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 108 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 3 Status: Y] NE] Un Equipment ID No. MS-MOV-M074 Equip. Class' 8 Motor-Operated & Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description Main Steam Lines Upstream of MSIV's (SWC# WD-SWEL-037 & AWC# WB-058)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 901 Room, Area Drywell-901 (East)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Anchor/Darling 3-900# Gate Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE] NEI U[] N/Ai YED NC3 U-- N/Al]4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] UE] N/AZ 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NO- U0 N/AO YZ NEI U I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 109 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NO] U-]Equipment ID No. MS-MOV-M074 Equip. Class' 8 Motor-Operated & Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description Main Steam Lines Upstream of MSIV's (SWC# WD-SWEL-037 & AWC# WB-058)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NJ-] UD N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NC UO N/AU and masonty block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NCI Ur- N/AC YE NO UI-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YR NO U'adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)-A%W(AvS~7 Evaluated by: William Price James McKinnev Date: 10 " V 7 Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 110 of 322 Status: YED NEI UEr Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. MS-MO V-M074 Equip. Class' 8 Motor-Operated & Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description Main Steam Lines Upstream of MSIV's (SWC# WD-SWEL-037 & AWC# WB-058)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIB Revision 0 Attachment C Page 111 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ NR3 UEI'Equipment ID No. HPCI-MOV-M015 Equip. Class' 8 Motor-Operated & Solenoid-Operated Valve Equipment Description Steam Supply Inboard Isolation (SWC# WD-SWEL-038 & AWC# WB-059)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 921 Room, Area Dr/well-921 (West, below grating)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Anchor Valve Co. 10-900 # Gate Valve Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NE UO N/AS YO NI UO N/AS YO NO UO N/AID YO NO UO N/AZ YZ NO UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 112 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN NO UE1-Equipment ID No. HPCI-MOV-M015 Equip. Class' 8 Motor-Operated & Solenoid-Operated Valve Equipment Description Steam Supply Inboard Isolation (SWC# WD-SWEL-038 & AWC# WB-059)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NEI UEII N/AEO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NO U' N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NO UO N/AO YE NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO Url adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) AMX_ýEvaluated by: William Price Date: 10 ' \'V 1ol! I -James McKinney C)_1 Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 113 of 322 Status: YO NO ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HPCI-MOV-M015 Equip. Class' 8 Motor-Operated & Solenoid-Operated Valve Equipment Description Steam Sunply Inboard Isolation (SWC# WD-SWEL-038 & AWC# WB-059)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 114 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 3 Status: YN N[] UM Equipment ID No. RCIC-MOV-MO15 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description RCIC Steam Inboard Isolation (SWC# WD-SWEL-039 & AWC# WB-059)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 921 Room, Area Drywell (East, PEN X-1I)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Anchor/Darlinci 6-900 # Gate Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YI] N 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage fiee of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage firee of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NiO UI] N/A2 YI] NEI U-1 N/AZ YO NI' UI] N/AO YI" NI] UEI N/AO YO NEUI--]1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 115 of 322 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y0 NEI UEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RCIC-MOV-M015 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description RCIC Steam Inboard Isolation (SWC# WD-SWEL-039 & A WC# WB-059)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets filee from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YX NEI U- N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YER NEI UF' N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NC UC N/AC Yi NO UD Other Adverse Conditions Il. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) A&XV-1" Evaluated by: William Price# ==James McKinnev Dae/00oq I Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 116 of 322 Status: Y¥ NEI UE-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo. RCIC-MOV-M015 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description RCIC Steam Inboard Isolation (SWC# WD-SWEL-039 & AWC# WB-059)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 117 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YM NR UE-Equipment ID No. RWCU-MOV-MO15 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Supply Inboard Isolation (SWC# WD-SWEL-040 & AWC# WB-059)Location: Bldg. RX Floor El. 921 Room, Area R-921-Drywell (Northwest) Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Anchor/Darling 6-900 # Gate Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YOi NO UQ N/AZ YO NEl U-I N/AS YO NO UO N/AN YE-1 NE U[ N/A0.YN NE UiI I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 118 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NEI UL-Equipment ID No. RWCU-MOV-M015 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Supply Inboard Isolation (SWC# WD-SWEL-040 & AWC# WB-059)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free firom impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE UD N/ACI 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yi No U[I N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment fi'ee of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NCI UQ N/AC Y0 NEI UC Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NCI UC)adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) A1p-W"11ý2 Evaluated by: William Price James McKinney Date: hO -I/- / Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 119 of 322 Status: YZ NEI Ufl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RWCU-MOV-M015 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description Supply Inboard Isolation (SWC# WD-SWEL-040 & AWC# WB-059)Photoaraphs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 120 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 3 Status: YO N[-' UE[" Equipment ID No. SW-MOV-37MV Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description SW Pumps Crosstie/Non-Critical Header (SWC# WD-SWEL-041 & AWC# WB-002)Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 903 Room, Area SWP Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) PraH 24-150# Butterfly Valve Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of.potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YQ- NEI UU] N/AO YEI NEI UI N/AO YD NEI U0 N/A&YI' NEI UEI N/AO YM NO UE]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 121 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NUl U---Equipment ID No. SW-MOV-37MV Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description SW Pumps Crosstie/Non-Critical Header (SWC# WD-SWEL-041 & AWC# WB-002)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U' N/AL 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NOI UO N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NOI UL N/AD YZ NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) wal."'n Evaluated by: William Price Patrick Yearley Date: 10//0 / 1 -V Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 122 of 322 Status: YZ N[[ UL]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW-MOV-37MV Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description SW Pumps Crosstie/Non-Critical Header (SWC# WD-SWEL-041 & AWC# WB-002)Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 123 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YO NM UM Equipment ID No. CS-MOV-MO 7A Equip. ClassI 8 Equipment Description Core Spray pump A Suction (SWC# WD-SWEL-042 & AWC# WB-014)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 859 Room, Area NE-QUAD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Anchor Valve company 14"L150# Gate Valve Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Valve, therefore no anchorage YO-- NO UE- N/AZ YO NEI- UO N/A0 YO NEl U'- N/A0 Yrll NEI UEl N/AN YN Nl U-I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIB Revision 0 Attachment C Page 124 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y0 NEI Ui-Equipment ID No. CS-MOV-MO7A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Core Spray pump A Suction (SWC# WD-SWEL-042 & AWC# WB-014)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UD N/Al 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO UI"I N/AD and masomny block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Overhead lighting 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Overhead lighting YZ NO UFI N/AO YM NI UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Valve (drawing 886-3, Revision N02) has auxiliary yoke support (drawing CS-MO-7A, Revision N02).Evaluated by: Justin Jackson Date: t o/1 /,l/0//(/.I James McKinnev q_17 It-Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 125 of 322 Status: YSI NE] UrI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CS-MOV-MO7A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description Core Spray pump A Suction (SWC# WD-SWEL-042 & AWC# WB-014)Note: N/A Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIB Revision 0 Attachment C Page 126 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y] NEI UL-Equipment ID No. RHR-MOV-MO13D Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description (SWC# WD-SWEL-043 & AWC# WB-O1 1)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 859'-9" Room, Area SW-QUAD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Anchor Valve Company 20-150# Gate Valve Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Y- NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Valve, therefore no anchorage Y-- NIl U-' N/AN YOi NEI UE] N/AN YO- NO- UL] N/AE YOj NiO U-- N/AZ YI NEI U-IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 127 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NEI UI-Equipment ID No. RHRMOV-MO3D Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description (SWC# WD-SWEL-043 & AWC# WB-01 1)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UO N/AU 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y9 NC] UE" N/A" and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ N['] UD N/AUl YZ NEI UO Other Adverse Conditions i1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UD adversely affect the safety fuictions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Close interaction on top of stem. Both components are seismically rugged and by engineering judgment, the contact of the conduit and valve stem will not affect the function of the system.Evaluated Date: It/. I 4 - Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 128 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YN NJ-' UL-Equipment ID No. RHR-MOV-MO13D Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description (SWC# WD-SWEL-043 & A WC# WB-01 1)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 129 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 3 Status: YZ NE] U[]Equipment ID No. CS-MOV-M026B Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description Core Spray pump B Test Line Isolation (SWC# WD-SWEL-044 & AWC# WB-004)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 881 Room, Area SE-QUAD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Anchor Valve Company 10-250# Globe Valve Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?In-line Valve 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO UI N/AS YO NOI UO N/AO YOI NO UQ- N/AO YOI NOI UO N/AZ YO NO UF]Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 130 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YS NEI U0]Equipment ID No. CS-MOV-MO26B Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description Core Spray pump B Test Line Isolation (SWC# WD-SWEL-044 & AWC# WB-004)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y9 ND UD N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NC UC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NCI UC N/AC YI NE U0 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YCI NCi UCI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) .4' 09=(J"\" Evaluated by: William Price Date:p.Patrick Vearle Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 131 of 322 Status: YN NEI UF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CS-MOV-MO26B Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Core Spray pump B Test Line Isolation (SWC# WD-SWEL-044 & AWC# WB-004)Photoaraphs Note: N/A Note: N/A Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 132 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 3 Status: Y[] NM UO" Equipment ID No. PC-MOV-1301MV Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Sup. Chmbr Dilution Sp/y iso V/v Train B (SWC# WD-SWEL-045 & AWC# WB-003)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 881 Room, Area SW-Torus Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Anchor Valve Company I -150# Gate Value Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YD NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? YO NO UQ N/AO YO NO U-I NIAO 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YQ No UD N/AZ 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Tube steel frame around 3 of 4 sides at bonnet interface. No anchorage to concrete, only structural steel attachment (welded).Reference Drawing SBNI-H66A (SH. I and 2) and ISO 0640-012-TAP-SBL-03 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13: Classes of Equipment. YO NO UO NWAS YO NO UO Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 133 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YE] NZ U(-]EquipmentIDNo. PC-MOV-1301MV Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Suppression Chamber Dilution Supply Isolation Valve Train B (SWC# WD-SWEL-045 & AWC# WB-003)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UC N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE] ND UD N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? 9, Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Rod Hanger ~1/4" from hanger, Rod hanger is not required per analysis. It also does not have enough relative mass to jeopordize the* functions ofthe system. If Impacted, will slide away due to clevis, no issue.YID NEI U" N/AD Y0 NI U-I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NC UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Tube steel documented in question 6 does not appear to be in a configuration acceptable by original analysis, further review required.CR-CNS-2012-07558 Evaluated by: James McKinney Justin Jackson L Date: /D/ f//i.2 Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 134 of 322 Status: YLI NO UE3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PC-MOV-1301MV Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Sup, Chmbr Dilution Sply Iso Vlv Train B (SWC# WD-SWEL-045 & AWC# WB-O031 Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 135 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 3 Status: YZ N-' U0 Equipment ID No. PC-MOV-230MV Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description 24" Butterfly Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-046 & AWC# WB-006)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 881 Room, Area NE-Torus Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Allis Chalmers Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO- NOl UE" N/AS YE] NO] Ui] N/AS YE] NOl U-- N/AO YO- NEI U-- N/AO YO NO UO Valve, therefore no anchorage I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 136 of 322 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NOJ UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PC-MOV-230MV Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description 24" Butterfly Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-046 & AWC# WB-006)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UQ N/AQ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NO UQ N/AO YZ NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NE UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Vwal"Utofl h 1 A110fin Asankqnn I/2'./-.7 e F James McKinnev Date: 09/1212012 09/12/2012 Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 137 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YZ No-- U--Equipment ID No. PC-MOV-230MV Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description 24" Butterfly Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-046 & AWC# WB-006)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 138 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YED NEI UE" Equipment ID No. CRD-SOV-SO117 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Scram Valve Solenoil Pilot Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-047 & AWC# WB-017)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 903-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) GE HCU Pilot Valve Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdowvn of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YO NO UI N/ACD YO NE U' N/AS 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UO N/AZ 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Valve, no anchorage YE NE UE N/AZ Y0 NO UO IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 139 of 322 Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Yo NE] UE]EquipmentIDNo. CRD-SOV-SO117 Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description Scram Valve Solenol Pilot Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-047 & AWC# WB-017)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NEI UO N/AU 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI Ul N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NEI UO N/AD YO NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NO UQ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: James Mckinnev AIA A IY& ZZ-4-4 Date: fo/01W .-b Justin Jackson Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 140 of 322 Status: YZ N["] U["]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CRD-SOV-SO117 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description Scram Valve Solenoil Pilot Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-047 & AWC# WB-017)Photo2ranhs Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 141 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 3 Status: YZ NEI U-Equipment ID No. CRD-SOV-SO140B Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Trip System B Backup Scram Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-048 & AWC# WB-015)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 903 Room, Area ASCO Valve A4490 Model NP8316E36E Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of'judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Valve, no anchorage YO- NO] UE- N/A0 YO- NO] UE- N/AO YO NE] U-' N/A0 YE] NO] UE- N/A0 YO NOl U Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 142 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YO N--] Ur-Equipment ID No. CRD-SOV-SO140B Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Trip System B Backup Scram Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-048 & AWC# WB-015)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets fiee from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NO UCI N/A[l 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NO UC' N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[0 NEI UD N/AC YZ NO2 UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N-- U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: James McKinney " Justin Jackson ,~ 2~~-Date: //o tl /cl/li Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 143 of 322 Status: YN NR[ UEJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CRD-SOV-SO140B Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Trip System B Backup Scram Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-048 & AWC# WB-015)Photo jraphs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIB Revision 0 Attachment C Page 144 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ N[:" UE"]Equipment ID No. PC-MOV-1312MV Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Motor Opererated & Solenoid-Operated V (SWC# WD-SWEL-049 & AWC# WB-012)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 903 Room, Area R-903-SW Manufacturer; Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Anchor Valve Company 1"-150# Gate Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraye 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Y-I NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Valve, no anchorage YI-j NEl U0 N/AZ YQI Nil UQI N/A[D YI- NFI UI- N/AZ YEI- NEI UI- N/AM YR NOl U1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 145 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YO NEI Un-Equipment ID No. PC-MOV-1312MV Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Motor Overerated & Solenoid-Operated V (SWC# WD-SWEL-049 & AWC# WB-012)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI UO N/AEl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UO N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?I 0. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NEI UE N/AEI YM NCI UII Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YiD NEI UEJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Justin Jackson ()Z (2-4 7 Date: ti/?Lt//[Jim McKinnev 7%lohtelm (J Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 146 of 322 Status: Yo NE ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PC-MOV-1312MV Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description Motor Opererated & Solenoid-Operated V (SWC# WD-SWEL-049 & AWC# WB-012)Photographs Note: N/A Note: N/A Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 147 of 322 Sheet I of 3 Status: YE] N[] UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RHR-MOV-MO12B Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description RHR HxB OUTLET (SWC# WD-SWEL-050 & AWC# WB-019)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 903 Room, Area R-903-B RHR Hx Rm. B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO UO N/AN YO NO UO N/AN YO NO UO N/AS YO NO UO N/AZ YN NEI UM Valve, therefore no anchorage I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 148 of 322 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YEI NO UMI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RHR-MOV-MO12B Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description RHR HxB OUTLET (SWC# WD-SWEL-050 & AWC# WB-019)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE UU N/AEl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO U- N/AU Y0 NO UD Kicker on seismic support 1" or less on yoke on backside (up on platform)

CR-CNS-2012-07564 Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NC UC:1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) CR-CNS-2012-07564 Evaluated by: James McKinney Date: /0/l1oI//z Justin Jackson 4:: V I I // 15-// L 1'r /"-w Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 149 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YO NO ULI Equipment ID No. RHR-MOV-MO12B Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description RHR HxB OUTLET (SWC# WD-SWEL-050 & AWC# WB-019)Photographs Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 150 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YfJ NZ UQ Equipment ID No. RHR-MOV-MO25A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description RHR-MOV-MO25A (SWC# WD-SWEL-051 & AWC# WB-028)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 903 Room, Area INJ V Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NN 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Valve, therefore no anchorage YO ND U" N/A0 YO NO UD N/A0 YO Nr UO N/A0 YED NEI UQ NWAS YN NE U-I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 151 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YEI NO ULI Equipment ID No. RHR-MOV-MO25A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description RHR-MOV-M025A (SWC# WD-SWEL-051 & AWC# WB-028)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UO N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO No UrJ N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Lighting acceptable

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Refer to Item 11 YO NEI UD N/AO YO NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO U13 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Conduit next to valve stem housing -112" (CR-CNS-2012-06257) Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Extensive rust on valve stem inside yoke assembly CR-CNS-2012-06256 CR-CNS-2012-06257 Evaluated by: Justin Jackson 64A a-?k/ A James McKinnev A Date: 11/iiLZLZ to /I/& z (1 4 Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 152 of 322 Status: YEO NO UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RHR-MOV-MO25A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description RHR-MOV-MO25A (SWC# WD-SWEL-051 & AWC# WB-028)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 153 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 3 Status: YN NEI U-Equipment ID No. RHR-MOV-MO3IB Equip. Class'Equipment Description Drvwe/I Spray Loop B Inboard Iso. VL V (SWC# WD-SWEL-052 & AWC# WB-012)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 903 Room, Area Over DW Hatch Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdowvn of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of conrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Valve, no anchorage YO- NOl UE- N/AI YE] NEI UE" N/AO YEi NO] UQ N/AS YEI NEI UD N/AO YZ NEI UI" I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 154 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YED NE] UM]Equipment ID No. RHR-MOV-MO31B Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description Drywell Spray Loop B Inboard iso. VLV (SWC# WD-SWEL-052 & AWC# WB-012)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NO UO N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NO UO N/AO YO NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NO U"I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) One Seismic Walkdown Engineer (SWE) on existing scaffolding with required fall protection (pictures were taken to confirm configurations for second SWE). Second SWE completed inspection per provided photos.~4 ~Date: /0//_,//Z._ Evaluated by: James McKinney Justin JRnkRnn 1Z 4,~-c5 L Justin Jackson Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 155 of 322 Status: N-' U["I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RHR-MOV-MO31B Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Drywell Spray Loop B Inboard Iso. VLV (SWC# WD-SWEL-052 & AWC# WB-012)Photoaravhs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 156 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YN NE- UQ-1 Equipment ID No. SW-MOV-888MV Equip. Classi 8 Equipment Description Motor-Operated/Solenoid-Operated Valves (SWC# WD-SWEL-053 & AWCG# WB-018)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 903 Room, Area NE (N of CR0 Accum)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Crane Company Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgrnents and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO- NEI UE" N/AZ YO NO) UD N/AS YE] NO UD N/A0 YE) NE) UE" N/AS YO NEI U-' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 157 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NFl UE--Equipment ID No. SW-MOV-888MV Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Motor-Operated/Solenoid-OPerated Valves (SWC# WD-SWEL-053 & AWC# WB-018)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NO UO N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 No UO N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO UD N/AUI YZ NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Justin Jackson a l Date: tit/o//i7 (I // Ia James McKinnev-.00AJ James McKinnev Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 158 of 322 Status: YN NE-] UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW-MOV-888MV Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Motor-Operated/Solenoid-Operated Valves (SWC# WD-SWEL-053 & AWC# WB-018)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 159 of 322 Sheet i of 3 Status: YEI NO U[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW-MOV-MO89B Equip. Class' 8 MOV Equipment Description RHR Hx B SW Outlet (SWC# WD-SWEL-054 & AWC# WB-019)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 903 Room, Area RHR Hx Rm. B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Anchor Valve 18-180# Globe Valve Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO- N1 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Valve, therefore no anchorage YO NO UU N/A0 YO NO UE- N/AN YO NO UE N/AI9 YO NO UQ N/A0 Yj@ NO UO IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIB Revision 0 Attachment C Page 160 of 322 Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YE[ NO Url Equipment ID No. SW-MOV-MO89B Equip. Class' 8 MOV Equipment Description RHR Hx B SW Outlet (SWC# WD-SWEL-054 & AWC# WB-019)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO U- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Adjacent lighting acceptable

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flex conduits appear too tight CR-CNS-2012-06657
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO U" N/AU YO NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UQ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) CR-CNS-2012-06657 Evaluated by: James McKinney v Justin Jackson ILe Date: I0/J -It/01/L7-/ / Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 161 of 322 Status: Y[-l UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW-MOV-MO89B Equip. Class' 8 MOV Equipment Description RHR Hx B SW Outlet (SWC# WD-SWEL-054 & AWC# WB-019)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 162 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ NE] UI]Equipment ID No. REC-MOV-697MV Equip. Class' 8 MOV Equipment Description North Critical loop Return (SWE# WD-SWEL-055 & AWC# WB-031)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 931 Room, Area NE- Above REC Pump B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraee 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Valve, therefore no anchorage YO" NO UO N/AZ YO NO UO N/AS YO NO UO NIAR YO NO UO NWAS YN NO UO'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 163 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[ NE' U[3 Equipment 1ID No. REC-MOV-697MV Equip. Class, 8 MOV Equipment Description North Critical loop Return (SWE# WD-SWEL-055 & AWC# WB-031)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO U- N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO No UD N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y(9 NO UO N/AO Y[ NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Grease appears to be leaking out of bonnet and yoke.CR-CNS-2012-06264 Evaluated by: Justin Jackson L ., James McKinnev Date: It/ol / tr Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 164 of 322 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YZ NE] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. REC-MOV-697MV Equip. Class' 8 MOV Equipment Description North Critical loop Return (SWE# WD-SWEL-055 & AWC# WB-031)Photoaraphs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 165 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YO NR] U[Equipment ID No. CS-MOV-MO12A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description Core Spray System A Iniection Block (SWC# WD-SWEL-056 & AWC# WB-029)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 931 Room, Area NE Platform Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora!e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%/ of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Valve, no anchorage YO NO UO N/AN YD NO UQ- N/A0 YO NO UO N/A0 YO NO UD N/A0 Yo NO UO' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 166 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CS-MOV-MO12A Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ No U[Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Core Spray System A Injection Block (SWC# WD-SWEL-056 & AWC# WB-029)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YI NO UO NIAQ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NEI UQ N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Light with bulbs removed 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO UO N/A0 Y0J NO U-Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 2 constant supports -one on each side -well supported. Nearby lateral strut on pipe, okay.Evaluated by: Justin Jackson dle /"z,, James McKinnev iI .//U Date: 141614-7'Ik -? Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 167 of 322 Status: YM N[] UU-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CS-MOV-MO12A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Core Spray System A Iniection Block (SWC# WD-SWEL-056 & AWC# WB-029)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 168 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YN NO- U'Equipment ID No. RHR-MOV-MO31A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description Drywall Spray Loop A Inboard Isolation (SWC# WD-SWEL-057 &AWC# WB-032)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 931 Room, Area NW (Next to IR25-5)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Anchor Valve Company 10-300# Gate Valve Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora~e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? In line valve with auxilary yoke support 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO YEI NI U- NWAS YO NO UO N/A0 YO NO UO N/AS YO NO UO N/AO YO NO UO IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 169 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN NEI UEýEquipment ID No. RHR-MOV-MO31A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description Drywell Spray Loop A Inboard Isolation (SWC# WD-SWEL-057 &AWC# WB-032)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UQ N/AU 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO N[ UU-) N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NOI U0 N/AU YM NEI UE'Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NO U[3 adversely affect the safety fimctions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) J", W 3z'\Evaluated by: William Price Date /ollt, Patrick Yearley Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 170 of 322 Status: Y[I NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RHR-MOV-MO31A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description Drywell Spray Loop A Inboard Isolation (SWC# WD-SWEL-057 &AWC# WB-032)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 171 of 322 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y] NO U'-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RR-SOV-SPV741 Equip. Class, 8 SOV Equipment Description Pilot Valve for RR-740A V (SWC# WD-SWEL-058 & AWC# WB-033)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 931 Room, Area SE (Near Rack 25-6)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Asco Valve, A4490 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraye 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? In line valve 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO YO" NO U' N/AO YO NO Ui N/AZ YO ND U- N/AO YO- NO U-- N/AO YO N" UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 172 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NEI U--Equipment ID No. RR-SOV-SPV741 Equip. Class, 8 SOV Equipment Description Pilot Valve for RR-740A V (SWC# WD-SWEL-058 & AWC# WB-033)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE UC" N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UF N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NO U' N/AC Y23 ND UCI Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO U'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) JQ4A Evaluated by: William Price Patrick Yeardev Date: (o1UQI'V Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 173 of 322 Status: Y[ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RR-SOV-SPV741 Equip. Class' 8 SOV Equipment Description Pilot Valve for RR-740A V (SWC# WD-SWEL-058 & AWC# WB-033)Photo2raphs Note: N/A Note: N/A Note: N/A Note: N/A Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 174 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ NE] U-Equipment ID No. SGT-FAN-(EF-R-IE) Equip. Class, 9 Fans Equipment Description SGT Unit A Fan (EF-R-IE) (SWC# WD-SWEL-059 & AWC# WB-030)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 976 Room, Area SGT Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) New York Blower Company Model G1 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Y0 NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In accordance with drawing #A524-5904 reference

  1. 453010576
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y0 NEI UO N/AC YN NOI U"] N/AC YZ NO U- N/AC Y(D NO UC N/AC YR NEI U1 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 175 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YED N-] UEr Equipment ID No. SGT-FAN-(EF-R-IE) Equip. Class 1 9 Fans Equipment Description SGT Unit A Fan (EF-R-IE) (SWC# WD-SWEL-059 & AWC# WB-030)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE UD N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo No UQ N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NEI UC N/AC YZ NO UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NC UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: William P Date: (0 1-7i.Patrick Yearlev Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 176 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YN NEI UM-Equipment ID No. SGT-FAN-(EF-R-IE) Equip. Class' 9 Fans Equipment Description SGT Unit A Fan (EF-R-IE) (SWC# WD-SWEL-059 & AWC# WB-030)Photographs Note: N/A Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 177 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 4 Status: Y[ NE U-]EquipmentIDNo. HV-AD-AD1407 Equip. Class' 10 Air Handlers Equipment Description Isolation Damper -RHR SWBP Room Supply Division I (SWC# WD-SWEL-060 &A WC# WR-040)Location: Bldg. C Floor El. 903 Room, Area RPS Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Ruskin, R41 10. Model CD82 AF4 PB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NN 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NI UO NWAS YO NEI UO N/AZ YO NO UD N/AZ YO NO UD NWAS YO NO UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 178 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YMI NEI UMI Equipment ID No. HV-AD-AD1407 Equip. Class' 10 Air Handlers Equipment Description Isolation Damper -RHR SWBP Room Supply Division I (SWC# WD-SWEL-060 &A WC# WB-040)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NEI UO NIAO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NOJ ULi N/A--and masomny block wvalls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NOl UOi N/AOl YO NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y(9 NEI Ui adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) ~4W2~q~Evaluated by: William Price Date: Ill! i "/? 11/12.Patrick Yearlev Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 4 Page 179 of 322 Status: Y[ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo. HV-AD-AD1407 Equip. Claiss l1 Air Handlers Equipment Description Isolation Damper -RHR SWBP Room Supply Division I (SWC# WD-SWEL-060 &AWC# WB-040)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 180 of 322 Sheet 4 of 4 Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 181 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YN NEI UnI EquipmentiDNo. HV-MO-AD1501 Equip. Class' 10 Air Handlers Equipment Description Battery Room 1B HVAC Supply Isolation Damper (SWC# WD-SWEL-061 & AWC#WB-049)Location: Bldg. C Floor El. 903 Room, Area Battery Room B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Y-I NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? YEI NEI U' NIAZ YE NEI UEr N/AO 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE N[: U[] N/AZ 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NE UU N/AO YZ NE UO' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 182 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NE" Uf'Equipment ID No. HV-MO-AD1501 Equip. Class' 10 Air Handlers Equipment Description Battery Room IB HVAC Supply Isolation Damper (SWC# WD-SWEL-061 & AWC#WB-049)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U[-] N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NEI U[-- N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NC UI" N/A[]YED NEI U" Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NC UC adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: William Price Patrick Yeariey<Pii 2-" Date: /0 -- /1 -/7,- Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 Of 4 Page 183 of 322 Status: YN NEI UF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HV-MO-AD1501 Equip. Class' 10 Air Handlers Equipment Description Battery Room 1B HVAC Supply Isolation Damper (SWC# WD-SWEL-061 & AWC#WB-049)Photoeratphs Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 184 of 322 Sheet 4 of 4 Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 185 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 3 Status: Y[ Nn] U[]Equipment ID No. HV-FAN-(FC-R-IF) Equip. Class' 10 Air handlers Equipment Description AlE QUAD RECIRC FAN (SWC# WD-SWEL-062 & AWC# WB-027)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 881 Room, Area NE-QUAD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) American Air Filter Company Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of'judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YN NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Consistent with -SEWS ID: HV-FAN-(FC-R-IF), Revision 0 and drawing No. MC-130-805

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YZ NEI UI] N/AE]Y0 NE] UE- N/AEI YN NEI UE] N/A" Y[D NEI U" N/AU YZ NEI U[-I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 186 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[ NED U[-]Equipment ID No. HV-FAN-(FC-R-IF) Equip. Class' 10 Air handlers Equipment Description NE QUAD RECIRC FAN (SWC# WD-SWEL-062 & AWC# WB-027)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free fiom impact by nearby equipment or structures? Duct expansion joint is fastened to fan on top and bottom of the four (4)sided frame using machine screws; found to be acceptable by Seismic Walkdown Engineers (SWEs).8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? YN NE U-- N/AU YO NE UfJ N/AU Note: Overhead light is not directly over fan, acceptable

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NO UD N/A'Y[R NO UF Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED N- UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: William Price Evaluated by: William Price Date: 1,0 1L I1-/Date: ~ 2 Patrick Yearley Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 187 of 322 Status: YZ NE UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HV-FAN-(FC-R-IF) Equip. Class' 10 Airhandlers Equipment Description NE QUAD RECIRC FAN (SWG# WD-SWEL-062 & AWG# WB-027)Photographs Note: N/A Note: N/A Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 188 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y[ NEI U--Equipment ID No. H V-AC-AC-C-IA Equip. Glass, II Equipment Description Control Room Chiller (SWC# WD-SWEL-063 & AWC# WS-051J Location: Bldg. C Floor El. 918 Room, Area Cable Spreading Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NED 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO UO N/AS YO NO UO N/AE YO NO U[] N/AZ YO NO UO N/AZ YEI NO UO3 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 189 of 322 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y] NE] Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HV-AC-AC-C-IA Equip. Class' II Equipment Description Control Room Chiller (SWC# WD-SWEL-063 & AWC# WB-051)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YX NEI Ul N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO U" N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YED NO UU N/AU YED NO UUD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YID NO UU adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated bv: William Prit-........ vj *Patrick Yearlv Ný / r,-Date: 09/18/2012 09/18/2012 Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 190 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y0 NE] UE" EquipmentID No. HV-AC-AC-C-1A Equip. Class'I I Equipment Description Control Room Chiller (SWC# WD-SWEL-063 & AWC# WB-051)Photographs Note: N/A Note: N/A Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 191 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YEK NEI UC Equipment ID No. DGSA-CPSR-2A Equip. Class' 12 Air Compressors Equipment Description Starting Air Comoressor 2A (SWC# WD-SWEL-064 & AWC# WB-044)Location: Bldg. DG2 Floor El. 903 Room, Area DG2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Colt Industries, Quincy Compression Division Model D51205 Compressor Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YE NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In accordance with drawing #51201120 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? YZ NU UL-- N/A-Y0 NO- U- N/A'-YZ NEI UU N/AU YZ NEI U" N/AU YZ NO U" Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 192 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[ NO UE" Equipment ID No. DGSA-CPSR-2A Equip. Class' 12 Air Compressors Equipment Description Starting Air Compressor 2A (SWC# WD-SWEL-064 & AWC# WB-044)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEi UI N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NE U- N/AE and masomny block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI UE N/AE YE NE U-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NE UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: William Price Evaluated by: William Price Date: (0 '( V7-Date: /01 /I Jo/,1/,/a Patrick Yearlev Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 193 of 322 Status: Nr-- ur--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DGSA-CPSR-2A Equip. Class' 12 Air Compressors Equipment Description Starting Air Compressor 2A (SWC# WD-SWEL-064 & AWC# WB-044)Note: N/A Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 194 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 3 Status: YO NEI UM-Equipment ID No. RRMG-GEN-MGA Equip. ClassW 13 Equipment Description Reactor Recirculation Pump MG Set IA (SWC# WD-SWEL-065 & AWC# WB-047)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 976 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YZ NE 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See drawing 791E602. Has top lateral supports to wall, acceptable.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO UQ N/AO YO NE UO N/AO YO NO UO N/AO Y0 NO UD N/AD Y0 NO UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 195 of 322 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RRMG-GEN-MGA Equip. Class, 13 Equipment Description Reactor Recirculation Pump MG Set IA (SWC# WD-SWEL-065 & AWC# WB-047)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? overhead piping well supported YED NE UQ N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Ys NO U0 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Okay, standing chain hung lights.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment firee of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NO UCI N/AO YZ NO U-Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[@ NO UO adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Date: Evaluated by: James McKinney Patrick Yearlev_J.D'04: I 1112J- 1-A-Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 196 of 322 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YN NEI Uf-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RRMG-GEN-MGA Equip. Class, 13 Equipment Description Reactor Recirculation Pump MG Set 1A (SWC# WD-SWEL-065 & AWC# WB-047)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 197 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ NE[] U Equipment ID No. RPS-EPA-1A4 Equip. Class, 14 Equipment Description RPS MG SetA Elect. Protection Assembly (SWC# WD-SWEL-067 & AWC# WB-040)Location: Bldg. C Floor El. 903 Room, Area RPS Room A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0 No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YZ NO U0 N/AO YO NO UO N/AO 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y0 NO UO N/AO 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) In accordance with drawing #914E1 75 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? YZ NO UO N/AO YE NO UO'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI1 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 198 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YO NEI- UI]Equipment ID No. RPS-EPA-1A4 Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description RPS MG Set A Elect. Protection Assembly (SWC# WD-SWEL-067 & AWC# WB-040)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS NEI UO N/A[J 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NO UI NMAE]and masom-y block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YED NEI ULJ N/AOI Y NE] U0 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI[ Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: William Price Patrick Yearley Date: /0/t/ 1-/O,/ Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 199 of 322 Status: Y[J N-- U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RPS-EPA-1A4 Equip. Class, 14 Equipment Description RPS MG Set A Elect. Protection Assembly (SWC# WD-SWEL-067 & AWC# WB-040)Photographs Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18-Revision 0 Attachment C Page 200 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y[D N[" u[I Equipment ID No. EE-PNL-CPP Equip. Class' 14 Distribution Panils Equipment Description Critical Inst & Control Power Panel CPP (SWC# WD-SWEL-068 &AWC# WB-050)Location: Bldg. C Floor El. 918 Room, Area Cable Room Man ufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchors not visible, 2 horizontal struts fasten to column, no gap between the strut and column. Considered acceptable by SWEs and field observation. YO- NEI U)- N/AN YO- NO) U"] N/AO YEO NEI Ur] N/AO YE) NEI U)] N/A[YO NO) UE' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revislon 0 1 .... ....---Attachment C Page 201 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[R NEI U[-Eoiiofeint ID No. --EE-PNL-CPP E4iptl-Cls-1014 Di-tributiri P-T61& ............ .Equipment Description Critical Inst & Control Power Panel CPP (SWC# WD-SWEL-068 &AWC# WB-050)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets fred from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI UD N/AU 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO UC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? .9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI UC N/ACl YN NI UUO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: William Price Date: 1.010 11'101/6/(/z Patrick Yearley _ _ -Ennineer.ng Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 202 of 322 Status: YE N[- UIE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)............ ..iti ii n D N .-E -r:c P ...... ................ .... E cii-C P -----C D i fb-u-ti' f- P ~ 1 ............... ......................... E4uipmenit ID N6 .--EEPNUCP14-- Equi.uCionsPane s Equipment Description Critical Inst & Control Power Panel CPP (SWC# WD-SWEL-068 &AWC# WB-050)Photographs .....Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 203 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YUJ Nil U[L]Equipment ID No. EE-PNL-LPCEMI Equip. Class, 14 Distribution Panels Equipment Description LkQhting Panel LRCEMI (SWC# WD-SWEL-069 & AWC# WB-042)Location: Bldg. C Floor El. 932 Room, Area Control Room, SE Comer Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YLI NC Ul] N/A0 YCI NO UI-- N/AZ YOJ NE] U-- N/A0 YEI NO] UEI N/AZ YN NO U--'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 204 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[K N[i] UV" Equipment ID No. EE-PNL-LPCEM1 Equip. Class' 14 Distribution Panels Equipment Description Lighting Panel LRCEMI (SWC# WD-SWEL-069 & AWC# WB-042)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NCI U- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y9 NE] UE- N/AL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NEI U- N/ALI YO NEI UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[:) Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Justin Jackson 4W& a.Z 4'James McKinnev Alt," j Date: l/l,//1.Z U! Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 205 of 322 Status: YIE NE" UE"]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. EE-PNL-LPCEMI Equip. Class' 14 Distribution Panels Equipment Description Liqhtinq Panel LRCEMI (SWC# WD-SWEL-069 & AWC# WB-042)Photoeravhs Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 206 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 3 Status: YZ Nn Uv Equipment ID No. EE-PNL-DG2 _ Equip. Class, 14 Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125 VDC Panel DG2 (SWC# WD-SWEL-070 & AWC# W8-044)Location: Bldg. DG2 Floor El. 903 Room, Area DG2- Next to East Door Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) GE G0800 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible.cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NEI UI" N/A0 YO NEI UO N/A[R YIO NO UOI N/AZ YO NO UI" N/A]YZ NO" U' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 207 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YO NE] uv" Equipment ID No. EE-PNL-DG2 Equip. Class' 14 Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125 VDC Panel DG2 (SWC# WD-SWEL-070 & AWC# WB-044)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free fi'om impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS NO U[ N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO- UD-- N/A[and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y(9 NE-I Ur N/AC YZ NEI UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UFCI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: William Price (AJ(I( U& vAz2 Patrick Yearley Date: 09/17/2012 09/17/2012 Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 208 of 322 Status: YZ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. EE-PNL-DG2 Equip. Class, 14 Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125 VDC Panel DG2 (SWC# WD-SWEL-070 & AWC# WB-044)Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 209 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ NEI UF Equipment ID No. EE-PNL-AA3 -Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description 125 VDC Panel AA3 (SWC# WDJ-SWEL-071 & AWC# WB-035)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 903 Room, Area NE-(behind MCC-K)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) GE GO800 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE! No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YO- NO Url N/AZ YO] NO- Ur- N/AZ 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE! NE! UE- N/A[@5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) 1/2" anchor bolts and spring nuts are inside cabinet and not visible.However, based on ends of two (2) unistrut that can be seen, it appears to match drawing EE-RBH1689.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN NO! UI- N/AE" Y0O NO UC]' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 210 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[D Nn UE" Equipment ID No. EE-PNL-AA3 Equip. Class, 14 Equipment Description 125VDC Panel AA3 (SWC# WD-SWEL-071 & AWC# WB-035)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NDI UI N/ADI 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE ND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Lighting is okay 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All attached to the same rigid concrete wall.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ ND UD N/AD YZ NO U" Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) A piece of metal found behind panel. Not found on configuration drawings. Should be removed for good housekeeping. CR-CNS-2012-06159 41-4 Evaluated by: James McKinney Date: Justin Jackson ci 1110t //Z Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 211 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YZ NO UE-Equipment ID No. EE-PNL-AA3 Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description 125VDC Panel AA3 (SWC# WD-SWEL-071 & AWC# WB-035)Photoaraphs Note: N/A Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 212 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ NF U-'Equipment ID No. EE-BAT-125(IA) Equip. Class' 15 Batteries on Racks Equipment Description 125VDC Station Service Batteries 1A (SWC# WD-SWEL-072 & AWC# WB-052)Location: Bldg. C Floor El. 903 Room, Area Battery Room A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) C&D Power System C1731 Mode/LCR-25 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YED NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In accordance with drawing #M08515, Revision No. 3 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? YZ ND UD N/Ar YO ND UD N/AD YZ NO UD N/AD Y10 NDI U- N/AD YN NEI U-I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-El8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 213 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN No UE" Equipment ID No. EE-BAT-125(IA) Equip. Class, 15 Batteries on Racks Equipment Description 125VDC Station Service Batteries IA (SWC# WD-SWEL-072 & AWC# WB-052)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YiD NO] U- N/A'-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U" N/Al and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NEI UEI N/AOl YM N- U" Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U]adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) A Evaluated by: William Price Date: (,'V I ' II 10114 12.-Patrick Yearley Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 214 of 322 Status: YN NEI U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. EE-BAT-125(IA) Equip. Class' 15 Batteries on Racks Equipment Description 125VDC Station Service Batteries 1A (SWC# WD-SWEL-072 & AWC# WB-052)Photoorahlis Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 215 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 3 Status: Y[ Nn U-Equipment ID No. EE-CHG-2500A) Equip. Class, 16 Battery Chargers & Inverters Equipment Description 250VDC Station Service Battery CharcqerIA(SWC# WD-SWEL-073 & AWC# WB-053)Location: Bldg. C Floor El. 903 Room, Area Switchgear Room A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) C&D Power System Cl 731, Model ARR26OK200F Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. !s the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YZ NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In accordance with SEWS #EE-CHG-250(IA), Revision 0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? Y0 NEI U0] N/A-'YZ NI] UI] N/ALD YZ NEI UL" N/A--YO NE] ULI N/A"l YED NEl Ur-I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIB Revision 0 Attachment C Page 216 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NEI UM Equipment ID No. EE-CHG-250(IA) Equip. Class, 16 Battery Chargers & lnverters Equipment Description 25OVDC Station Service Batter' ChargerlA(SWC# WD-SWEL-073 & AWC# WB-053)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free firom impact by nearby equipment or structures? YED NO UO N/AEI 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y(D NEl UU N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN Nfl UL N/A[l YE NEI UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI NFI Uf-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: William Price Patrick e 5 -Date: tY[(, a//0 /6/ Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision .0 Attachment C Sheet 3 Of 3 Page 217 of 322 Status: YEJ N[- Uf-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipiment ID No. EE-CHG-250(IA)- Equip. Class, 16 Battery Chargers & Inverters .Equipment Description 250VDC Station Service Battery CharqerlA(SWC# WD-SWEL-073 & AWC# WB-053)Photo2raphs Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 218 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DG-D-2 Equip, Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YCK N[] U']Equipment Description Diesel Generator Engine No.2 (SWC# WD-SWEL-074& AWC# WB-044)Location: Bldg. DG2 Floor El. 903 Room, Area DG2 Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YE NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent wvith plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In accordance with drawing #KSV-97-7, Revision 3 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? YZ NO UE N/AU YZ NO Ui N/A]YI NO UD N/AD YED ND UD N/AD1 Y0R NEI UO'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 219 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN NFI UM-Equipment ID No. DG-D-2 Equip. Class, 17 Equipment Description Diesel Generator Engine No.2 (SWC# WD-SWEL-074& AWC# WB-044)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UL- N/A'8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo N- U" N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NO U-' N/A[U YED NI UI-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: William Price Patrick Yearley Date: 1 a 1f Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 220 of 322 Status: Y[ NO UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DG-D-2 Equip. Class' 17 Equipment Description Diesel Generator Engine No.2 (SWC# WD-SWEL-074& AWC# WB-044)Photographs Note: N/A Note: N/A Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 221 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YN NM- UMZ Equipment ID No. HV-TC-1090 B Equip. Class' 18 Instruments on Racks Equipment Description HV-DG-D Chilled Water Controller (SWC# WD-SWEL-075 & AWC# WB-048)Location: Bldg. DG2 Floor El. 917 Room, Area DG (on Wall by Unit)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Honeywell Inc, H2600, Model TP954A Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YE] NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NEI UE] N/AO YE] NEI UI- N/A0 YE] NEI UE] N/A Y'I N[) U[] N/AO YO NEl UE I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 222 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ N-I U-]Equipment ID No. HV-TC-1090 B Equip. Class, 18 Instruments on Racks Equipment Description HV-DG-D Chilled Water Controller (SWC# WD-SWEL-075 & AWC# WB-048)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free forom impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO N[: UEI N/AEO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO UD N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NO UO N/AO Y9 NE UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UOI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) UAW-70ýEvaluated by: William Price Patrick Yeadev Date: I0/ o t--- '19 -tg - Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 223 of 322 Status: YZ NEI ULI" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HV-TC-1090 B Equip. Class' 18 Instruments on Racks Equipment Description HV-DG-D Chilled Water Controller (SWC# WD-SWEL-075 & AWC# WB-048)Photoyrai~hs Note: N/A Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 224 of 322 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y NilE Ut]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LRP-RACK (LIR-HV-DG-D) Equip. Class' 18 Instruments on Racks Equipment Description H&V LP-1-HV-DGID Local Instrument Rack(SWC# WD-SWEL-076 & AWC# WB-048)Location: Bldg. DG2 Floor El, 917 Room, Area DG2 North End Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Honeywell Process Control Instructions for Completing Clicklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YED N" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YI NO UC N/A'YU NO U- N/A-4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI U- N/AC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) In accordance with drawing # CNS-LRP-26

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yl NI UC N/AC YZ NO Ur-I Enler the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 225 of 322 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ N[-] UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LRP-RAC((LIR-HV-DG-D) Equip. Class, 18 Instruments on Racks Equipment Description H&V LP-1-HV-DGID Local Instrument Rack(SWC# WD-SWEL-076 & AWC# WB-048)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NO UO N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO UC N/AQ YO NEI UO Other Adverse Conditions 1 I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YO NOI U0 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated Date: I' -A -Patrick Yearley ..... Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 226 of 322 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y9J NE-l U[l]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LRP-RACK Equip. Class' 18 Instruments on Racks (LIR-HV-DG-D) Equipment Description H&VLP-1-HV-DGID Local Instrument Rack(SWC# WD-SWEL-076 & AWC# WB-048)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 227 of 322 Sheet 4 of 4 Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 228 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 3 Status: Y] Nil UF--Equipment ID No. MS-PS-300A Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description Instrument (SWC# WD-SWEL-077 & AWC# WB-059)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 921 Room, Area Drvwell-921 (North)Maanufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NE 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface.1 -,, YLJ NnJ UU1 N/AS YFL NEI UL-] N/Au 4. Is the anchorage fiee of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage firee of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO N(: ULJ NIA[YEI NEI UO N/AN YEDNEI UC1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes or Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 229 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment fD No. MS-PS-300A Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YE NE] U-Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description Instrument (SWC# WD-SWEL-077 & AWC# WB-059)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets firee firom impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ Nil UI-I N/AL]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO N[] UF- N/AF-1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? 9, Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment fi'ee of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NOL U-- N/A--Y NO Ur]Other Adverse Conditionis 11, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? YE)NEI UE]Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) .0i 1, vjkkv_ý, Evaluated by: William Price James McKinnev L,4_V._A2 -Date: /(I Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 230 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. MS-PS-300A Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description Instrument (SWC# WD-SWEL-077 & AWC# WB-059)Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YE NDI U-Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 231 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 3 Status: Y[ NE] U-Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-(25-62) Equip. Class' 18 Instruments on Racks Equipment Description RHR Instrument Rack CH B (SWC# WD-SWEL-078 & AWC# WB-011)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 859 Room, Area SW-QUAD (opposite south wall)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) GE Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Y0 NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Missing anchor left support, back anchor, consistent with plant drawing.(See question 5 below)3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing CNS-LRP-I Sheet 2 and 8 of 12 NEDC 86-1116 Revision 1 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? Y0 NO UO N/Al Y[ NO UQ N/AOI Y9 NO UL- N/AO YER NO UO N/AI-]YS NO UO IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-ElS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 232 of 322 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YO NFI U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-(2562) Equip. Class, 18 Instruments on Racks Equipment Description RHR Instrument Rack CH B (SWC# WD-SWEL-078 & AWC# WB-01 1)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NEI UEI N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Lighting appears okay 9, Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NE] UO N/AU YZ NO UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Conduit appears to be too close to adjacent conduit overhead.This is addressed in AWC# WB-01 I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: James McKinneya:"_ Date: /6// 1//z Ju~tin Jnckson (2K2~. (IL. La...I Justi Jacso Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 233 of 322 Status: Y0 NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-(25-62) Equip. Class' 18 Instruments on Racks Equipment Description RHR Instrument Rack CH B (SWC# WD-SWEL-078 & AWC# WB-011)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 234 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 4 Status: YE N[-] U-Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-(25-7) Equip. Classi 18 instrumentation Rack Equipment Description (SWC# WD-SWEL-079 & AWC# WB-025)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 859 Room, Area NW-QUAD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) GE Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Nl]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

SEWS noted 1i'2 diameter inserts and was verified by the Seismic Walkdown Engineering team.Drawing

  1. 4244 describes anchorage as 3/8" diameter (CR-CNS-2012-06163)

SWEs find the anchorage acceptable since the drawing of record is in accordance with the field as-built.YN NEI UU N/AU YO NE UO N/AU YO NO U-' N/AU1 YO NO UO N/Al I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 235 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YO NO UL-Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-(25-7) Equip. Class, 18 instrumentation Rack Equipment Description (SWC# WD-SWEL-079 & AWC# WB-025)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? YONEI Ut]Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[I Ut] N/At]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI Ut] N/AEJ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Overhead chain hung light (no bulbs), judged to be acceptable based on location.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YED NO Ut] N/At]YN Nt- UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NOI Ut]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) CR-CNS-2012-06163 Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C ,Page 236 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YO N[-] UE--Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-(25-7) Equip. Class' 18 instrumentation Rack Equipment Description (SWC# WD-SWEL-079 & AWC# WB-025)Evaluated by: William Price ' Date: .e L/-:2-.Patrick Yearlev/0 12-Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 237 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YO N-- UE]Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-(25-7) Equip. Class' 18 instrumentation Rack Equipment Description (SWC# WD-SWEL-079 & AWC# WB-025)Note: N/A Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 238 of 322 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Yo NO UI-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CRD-ACC-128(26-27) Equip. Class' 18 Instruments on Racks Equipment Description Nitrogen Accumulator (SWC# WD-SWEL-080 & A WC# WB-01 7)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 903 Room, Area R-903 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yo NU of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing 729E950 used to reference design configuration, bolt size unknown,but not called out on drawing. See comments below.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? Y0 NO U0 N/AU YO NEI U0 N/AU Y0 NEI U[ N/AUI YZ NE UQ1 N/AU YN NE U-]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 239 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NEI UTFI]Equipment ID No. CRD-ACC-128(26-27) Equip. Class' 18 instruments on Racks Equipment Description Nitrogen Accumulator (SWC# WD-SWEL-080 & A WC# WB-O1 7)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UO N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NO UD N/AO YZ NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Each HCU is bolted down in four (4) places (size not shown on drawing). To embedded unstrut channels in concrete housekeeping pad. Anchor bolts appear to be 1/2" diameter and based on engineering judgement appropriate for application. Same design is typical for dozens of HCUs Evaluated by: Justin Jackson 6a&Date: i (/,9 t (7//cl/H, Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 240 of 322 Status: Y0 N[I ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CRD-ACC-128(26-27) Equip. Class' 18 Instruments on Racks Equipment Description Nitrogen Accumulator (SWC# WD-SWEL-080 & AWC# WB-017)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 241 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ NE] U-'Equipment ID No. LRP-RACK-139 Equip. Class, 18 Instruments on Racks Equipment Description Contain. Pressure & Lvl Instruments Rack (SWC# WD-SWEL-081 & AWC# WB-034)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 958 Room, Area R-958-SE Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YZ ND 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In accordance with drawing # 117C3303 Sheet 4, Revision 10 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? YO NO UQ N/AD YZ NO Ui N/AO YO ND U[ N/AU YS NEI UO N/AC Y0 NE UO' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 242 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[D N[E UM Equipment ID No. LRP-RACK-139 Equip. Class, 18 Instruments on Racks Equipment Description Contain. Pressure & Lvi Instruments Rack (SWC# WD-SWEL-081 & AWC# WB-034)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NO] Ut N/At]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NiO Ut- N/At]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YI Nt] Ut] N/At]YM NEI Ut-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEI U-'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: William e Patrick Yearlevt"?("A Q/,-, Date: 11b" TO I// Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 243 of 322 Status: YZ NC- Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LRP-RACK-139 Equip. Class' 18 Instruments on Racks Equipment Description Contain. Pressure & LvI Instruments Rack (SWC# WD-SWEL-081 & AWC# WB-034)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 244 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ NM U-" Equipment ID No. HV-TE-1089B Equip. Class' 19 Temperature Sensor Equipment Description HV-DG-D Discharge Air Temperature (SWC# WD-SWEL-082 & AWC# WB-048)Location: Bldg. DG2 FloorEl. 917 Room, Area DG2 -917 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YO NO UO NWAS YO NO UD N/AS 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO ULJ NIA0 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO UO N/ACI I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 245 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y] NO U["E Equipment ID No. HV-TE-1089B Equip. Class' 19 Temperature Sensor Equipment Description HV-DG-D Discharge Air Temperature (SWC# WD-SWEL-082 & AWC# WB-048)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NEI UL N/A--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO U' N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free.of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NO UO N/AU YS NO UU Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: William Price Date: fV I U 1-~-Evaluated by: William Price 1Date:71-Patrick Yearley Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 246 of 322 Status: YMj NEI U[U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HV-TE-1089B Equip. Class' 19 Temperature Sensor Equipment Description HV-DG-D Discharge Air Temoerature (SWC# WD-SWEL-082 & A WC# WB-048)Photographs Note: N/A Note: N/A Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 247 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YN NEI UL-Equipment ID No. PC-TE-505C Equip. Class' 19 Equipment Description Zone 2B Area Temperature (DrVwell) (SWC# WD-SWEL-083 & AWG# WB-059)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 921 Room, Area Drywell-921 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Comax Coro. C5150. RTD Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of'judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO' N 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YOJ NO UO N/AM YO NEI UO N/AZ YO NO UE N/AN YOJ NO UL1 N/AS YO NEI U" I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 248 of 322 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PC-TE-505C Equip. Class, 19 Equipment Description Zone 2B Area Temperature (Drywell) (SWC# WD-SWEL-083 & AWC# WB-059)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ ND U= N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS ND UE) N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NEI UE] N/AD YO NEI UE" Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)(AL~4'v\Evaluated by: William Price James McKinney v ~. A~tOb, Z 4 L Date: 0" At: I'V 0/o/7,/4 L-, U LU Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 249 of 322 Status: YZ Nn UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PC-TE-505C Equip. Class, 19 Equipment Description Zone 2B Area Temperature (Drywell) (SWC# WD-SWEL-083 & AWC# WB-059)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E28 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 250 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y[ NO UM Equipment ID No. PC-TE-IH Equip. Class' 19 Equipment Description Torus Water Temperature Element (SWC# WD-SWEL-084 & AWC# WB-026)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 859 Room, Area Torus Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YOI N 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Temperature element anchored in torus. Anchorage was checked but is not considered part of the anchored list for this project because of similarities to in/ine valve anchorage (not anchored in concrete). Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. YOI NO Ur N/AI YUI NCI UQ N/A0 Y-J Nil U-- N/As YI- NEl U" N/AZ YZ NEI UO1 Engineering Evaluation 12-ElS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 251 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN NE) U-]Equipment ID No. PC-TE-IH Equip. Class, 19 Equipment Description Torus Water Temperature Element (SWC# WD-SWEL-084 & AWC# WB-026)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NO UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YED N- U- N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? No Overhead Equipment 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI U- N/AU YZ NO UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO UQ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) /2--, Fvaunhwtpri

h. hIttfin _lAev~nn j Date: 111o t11?/0 fr// r IZ James McKinnev w ----U C)

Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 252 of 322 Status: Y[ NFI-' U[-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PC-TE-IH Equip. Class' 19 Equipment Description Torus Water Temperature Element (SWC# WD-SWEL-084 & AWC# WB-026)Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 253 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YV N[-] UJ Equipment ID No. PC-TE-2G Equip. Class, 19 Equipment Description Torus Water Temperature Element (SWC# WD-SWEL-085 & AWC# WB-007)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 859 Room, Area Torus Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? YfOq NO U' N/A0 Y0- NO UO N/AZ 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO No UO N/A0 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Temperature element anchored by torus.YO NOI UO N/A0 YS NO UD IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 254 of 322 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NE] UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PC-TE-2G Equip. Class, 19 Equipment Description Torus Water Temperature Element (SWC# WD-SWEL-085 & AWC# WB-007)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YER Nil UC N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YED NCi UC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NC U0 N/AC Y0 NE UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YD NC UE" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Justin Jackson James McKinney Date: itLz 14 /12 It~ /92, (I 6/ Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 255 of 322 Status: Y[ N-I U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PC-TE-2G Equip. Class, 19 Equipment Description Torus Water Temperature Element (SWC# WD-SWEL-085 & AWC# WB-007)Photo2raphs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 256 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RHR-TE-94C Equip. Class' 19Temperature Senors Equipment Description RHR Hx A Outlet Temp (SWC# WD-086 & AWC# WB-037)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ NO UO Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 903 Room, Area A RHR Hx Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Conax Buffalo Cor9, C5150 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Temperature element, therefore no anchorage. YOI NO UQ N/AS YQ NO UC-l N/AZ YQ NO UO N/AO YO NE UO N/A!UO-I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 257 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[I NEI U[:]Equipment ID No. RHR-TE-94C Equip. Class' 19Temperature Senors Equipment Description RHR Hx A Outlet Tom= (SWC# WD-086 & AWC# WB-037)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y19 NE UI- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI UL N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO UD N/A-YO NEI U0 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI NOI U-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) ?x Lv:ý , Date: /0/" _(/_ z.Evaluated by: James McKinnev Justin Jackson (L 0/ 7* Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 258 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RHR-TE-94C Equip. Class' 19Temperature Senors Equipment Description RHR Hx A Outlet Temnp (SWC# WD-086 & AWC# WB-037)Sheet 3 Of 3 Status: Y0 N[] Un-'Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 259 of 322 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ ND U0)Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW-TE-94B Equip. Equipment Description Service Water Outlet From RHR Hx B (SWC# WD-SWEL 087 & AWC# WB-030)Location: Bldg. R&x Floor El. 976 Room, Area SGTRoom Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) New York Blower Company Model G1 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YO NO UC N/AZ YO NO UO N/AO 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UQI N/ACD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) In accordance with drawing #A524-5904 reference

  1. 453010576 6, Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO UQ N/AW YZ NO U1)SEnter lihe equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 260 of 322 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Yo N[] UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW-TE-94B Equip. Class' 19 Equipment Description Service Water Outlet From RHR Hx B (SWC# WD-SWEL-087 & AWG# WB-030)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UO N/Ag 8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NEI UO N/A]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YM NO UO N/A" YM NE UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YV NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated 1 Date: )i -i -tv Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 261 of 322 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YN NE] U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SW-TE-94B Equip. Class, 19 Equipment Description Service Water Outlet From RHR Hx B (SWC# WD-SWEL-087 & AWQ# WB-030)Photographs Note: N/A Note: N/A Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 262 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y] NEI UIj-Equipment ID No. RHR-TE-93A Equip. Class' 19 Temperature Sensors Equipment Description RHR Hx A inlet Temp (SWC# WD-SWEL-088 & AWC# WB-036)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 931 Room, Area A RHR Hx Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) NE&C NO700 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YE" NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE- NO UO- N/AN YQI NO UO- N/A0 YEI NEI U-1 N/AZ YO1 NO U-1 N/Ai YO NEI UOI I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 263 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YO NM UM Equipment ID No. RHR-TE-93A Equip. Class, 19 Temperature Sensors Equipment Description RHR Hx A inlet Temp (SWC# WD-SWEL-088 & AWC# WB-036)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO ND UQ N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y1 ND Uj-I N/AD and masomny block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO ND UD- N/AD YM NND UD-1 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM ND UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) u491c2KýEvaluated by: William Price Date: 10 1I '117-V 101/b 12--Patrick Ynarlfv--- ---..-. I -- -- Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 Of 3 Page 264 of 322 Status: YZ NE- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RHR-TE-93A Equip. Class, 19 Temperature Sensors Equipment Description RHR Hx A inlet Temp (SWC# WD-SWEL-088 & AWC# WB-036)Photographs Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 265 of 322 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y[ N7 U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-(9-33) N Equip. Class, 20 Instrument & Control Panel Equipment Description Eng. Safeguards Subsys I Relay Cabinet (SWC# WD-SWEL-089 & AWC# WB-055)Location: Bldg. C Floor El. 903 Room, Area C-903-Aux Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of'judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is tile item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Y(O NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

in accordance with drawing number CNS LRP 59.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? YR NEI UEI N/AEl YER NE] U" N/AOl YO NOi U"] N/AEJ YZ NEI U-1 N/A--Y] Nn UM I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI1 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 266 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y0 N7 U[]Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-(9-33) Equip. Class' 20 Instrument & Control Panel Equipment Description Eng. Safeguards Subsys I Relay Cabinet (SWC# WD-SWEL-089 & AWC# WB-055)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO N' UO- N/A-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[E UL- N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YIZ NEI UE- N/AU YN NE UD Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Small fluorescent lights in the cabinets, but no components directly below where they were located.Bolted to adjacent cabinet, all anchors in accordance with drawing CNSLRP59.'/7>Evaluated by: William Price D 0 1 Patrick Yearley Date: 09/27/2012 0912712012 Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 267 of 322 Status: Y[R NM- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-(9-33) Equip. Class" 20 Instrument & Control Panel Equipment Description Eng. Safeguards Subsys I Relay Cabinet (SWC# WD-SWEL-089 & AWC# WB-055)Photoeravhs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 268 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YN NO U[-Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-ISO-A Equip. Class' 20 Instrument & Control Panel Equipment Description Isolation Panel (SWC# WD-SWEL-090 & AWC# WB-050)Location: Bldg. C Floor El. 918 Room, Area Cabel Spread Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In accordance with SWE LRP-PNL-150-A

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN NEl UE' N/A[]YE NO UEr N/ACl YZ NEI Ui N/Ar YZ NI UEI] N/ArC YZ NO Ur I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 269 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y] N[] U0 Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-ISO-A Equip. Class' 20 Instrument & Control Panel Equipment Description Isolation Panel (SWC# WD-SWEL-090 & AWC# WB-050)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YV NO UEI N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NOI UQ N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment firee of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI U-i N/AUl YX NE-I rU Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UU adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) /1-4 Evaluated by: William Price Date: tO Patrick Yeadey Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 270 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YE NM- UE Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-ISO-A Equip. Class' 20 Instrument & Control Panel Equipment Description Isolation Panel (SWC# WD-SWEL-090 & AWC# WB-050)Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 271 of 322 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y[j NF UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-(9-4) Equip. Class, 20 Instrumental Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment Description Rx Water Cleanup Recirc Bench BD 9-4 (SWC# WD-SWEL-091 & AWC# WB-062)Location: Bldg. C Floor El. 932 Room, Area C-932 (Control Room)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) GE Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Not all visible 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Where visible 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Where visible YO NO YZ NO U- N/AD YS NO Ur N/AD 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the'anchors? YN NEI UO N/AD Where visible 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Consistent with SEWS ID: LRP-PNL-(9-3), Rev. 0 Approximate 2" long welds to embed plates 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? Y0 NI U- N/AD YO ND UD' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 272 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NE-] UL--Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-(9-4) Equip. Class' 20 Instrumental Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment Description Rx Water Cleanup Recirc Bench BD 9-4 (SWC# WD-SWEL-091 & AWC# WB-062)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YR NE U-- N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Small flourescent light fixtures inside panel bays have no cages.(CR-CNS-2012-06501) Ceiling tiles zip-tied to overhead framing, no issue.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NO U- N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?CPU sitting in tray not fastened down (CR-CNS-2012-06498) YZ NO UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NO U-adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) CR-CNS-2012-06501 CR-CNS-2012-06498 Date: /I /6_ _Z_.Evaluated by: 11/0/rJ?~ Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 273 of 322 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YN NnI UFI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-(9-4) Equip. Class t 20 Instrumental Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment Description Rx Water Cleanup Recirc Bench BD 9-4 (SWC# WD-SWEL-091 & AWC# WB-062)Photoaraphs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 274 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 3 Status: Y[ N[-] U-Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-H Equip. Classi 20 Equipment Description Primary Cont. Vent & Nitrogen Inert Vert BD-H (SWC# WD-SWEL-092 & AWC# 063)Location: Bldg. C Floor El. 932 Room, Area C-932 Control Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NED 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO- NO U] NIAN YO NO UO N/AI0 YD NO UC NIA0 YO NO U-] N/A9 YO NO UO IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 275 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ No UEI Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-H Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description Primary Cont. Vent & Nitrogen Inert Vert BD-H (SWC# WD-SWEL-092 & AWC# 063)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NOl UE" N/A-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NO UM N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? Overhead HVAC Duct properly supported, no issue.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NOI UOI N/AU YZ NO UOI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO N@ UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yellow wires and ethernet hub not attached to cabinet. Glue shoe clips have come loose. (CR-CNS-2012-06497) Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) CR-CNS-2012-06497 Evaluated by: James McKinney " O Justin Jackson al [z Z ý'Date: _ /1___/1_s _t 11/0 1 //Z. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 276 of 322 Status: YZ N[- UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-H Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description Primary Cont. Vent & Nitrogen Inert Vert BD-H (SWC# WD-SWEL-092 & AWC# 063)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 277 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 4 Status: Yo Nn'- U-Equipment ID No. DG1-EXCIT-REGPNL Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DGI Exciter Regulator PNL (SWC# WD-SWEL-093 & AWC# WB-O01)Location: Bldg. DG1 Floor El. 903 Room, Area DG1-903 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The voltage regulator cabinet DG 1 EXCIT REG PNL as-built configuration for connection to embedded equipment base differs from plant drawings CR-CNS-2012-06579 SWEs find the as-built anchorage to be acceptable. This is a drawing/ calculation update only.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? YO ND UU N/AD YO NEI ULJ N/AlU YO ND UL N/AU YCi NO UO N/A[U YO NEI UU I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 278 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ N[l UE-Equipment ID No. DGI-EXCIT-REGPNL Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DGI Exciter Regulator PNL (SWC# WD-SWEL-093 & AWC# WB-O01)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE3 UD N/AD3 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI0 NEI UQ N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YI ND UD N/AD YM NE UD Other Adverse Conditions It. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The voltage regulator cabinet DGI EXCIT REG PNL was found to have internal components attached with nuts and bolts that differ from adjacent nuts restraining the same component. SWEs find this condition acceptable. Since the nut in question only differs in the"across the flats" measurment, thus has equal thread stripping capacity.CR-CNS-2012-06582 -This is not a seismic issue, rather a configuration issue.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) CR-CNS-2012-06579 CR-CNS-2012-06582 Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 4 Page 279 of 322 Status: N[-I U[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DGI-EXCIT-REGPNL Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DGI Exciter Regulator PNL (SWC# WD-SWEL-093 & AWC# WB-0O1)Evaluated by: Patrick Yearly Date: William Price /'b 2-//')..- Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 280 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y0 NE U-Equipment ID No. DGI-EXCIT-REGPNL Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DGI Exciter ReczulatorPNL (SWC# WD-SWEL-093 & AWC# WB-O01)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 281 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YN NEI U-1 Equipment ID No. DG-PNL-DG2 (ECP) Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DG2 Generator Control Panel (SWC# WD-SWEL-094 & AWC# WB-044)Location: Bldg. DG2 Floor El. 903 Room, Area DG2-903 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Y0 NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

2" angle bolted to left and right side adjacent cabinets on top.(Reference drawing, CNS-DG-16 & G5-262-743 SH.22)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? YZ NO UO N/AO YS NO UC N/AO YZ NO UO N/AO YZ NO UO N/A[O YZ NO UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 282 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y{ N[] U-Equipment ID No. DG-PNL-DG2 (ECP) Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DG2 Generator Control Panel (SWC# WD-SWEL-094 & AWC# WB-044)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NrI U-1J N/AE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YCD NE] UC- N/A0l and masomny block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Conduit spans from the top of the cabinet to the first support on the adjacent wall, is in accordance with drawing CNS-DG-13.

YM NEL UI- N/A[i-Y0D NEI UUI Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0D No UQ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: James McKinnev Justin Jackson &67 Date: l (!,/Ii-Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 283 of 322 Status: Y0 NR UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DG-PNL-DG2 (ECP) Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DG2 Generator Control Panel (SWC# WD-SWEL-094 & AWC# WB-044)Photoeraphs Note: Note: Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIB Revision 0 Attachment C Page 284 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 3 Status: YZ NO UE]Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-S191 Equip. Class'Equipment Description SWPumps A&C Strainer S191 Control PaneI(SWC#WD-SWEL-095 & AWC#WB-002) Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 903 Room, Area SWP Room (North Wall)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Zum Industry Inc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YID NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In accordance with drawing number CNS-LRP-27 & SEWS: LRP-PNL 5191, Revision 0.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? YZ NOI UC N/AO YE NO UO N/AO Y0 NO U" N/AC YZ NO U- N/AC YV NO UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 285 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y] NE] U[-Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-S191 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SW Pumps A&C Strainer S191 Control Panel(SWC#WD-SWEL-095 & AWC#WB-002) Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NOj UO NIAO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UO N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NEI UD N/AE YN NEI Ur Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE UD adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) I A kanýEvaluated by: William Price Date: (10 %10 hs,//2'Patrick Yearlev[f Engineering Evaluation 12-ElS Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 286 of 322 Status: YZ NEi UE" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LRP-PNL-S191 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description SWPumps A&C Strainer S191 Control Panel(SWC#WD-SWEL-095 & AWC#WB-002) Photographs Note: N/A Note: N/A Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 287 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 3 Status: YO Nil UE" Equipment ID No. CM-TK-ECST(A) Equip. Class 1 21 Equipment Description Emergency Condensate Storage Tank A (SWC# WD-SWEL-096 & AWC# WB-054)Location: Bldg. C Floor El. 877 Room, Area CST Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YZ NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Retrieval

  1. 453010422

& Drawing #4171 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? Y9 NO U- N/AC Y0 NO UO N/AC YED NC U- N/AO YO NO UD N/AC YZ NO UO' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 288 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[ NE) U-]Equipment ID No. CM-TK-ECST(A) Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description Emergency Condensate Storage Tank A (SWC# WD-SWEL-096 & AWC# WB-054)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NI] UEJ N/A0 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ Ni] UFI N/AI]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YID NI] UQ N/AC]YZ NEI UE Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NI] UI]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Justin Jacksonf A-James McKinne Date: i oi Zr7/90(0/?1-1 Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 289 of 322 Status: Y[ NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CM-TK-ECST(A) Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description Emergency Condensate Storage Tank A (SWC# WD-SWEL-096 & AWC# WB-054)Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 290 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 3 Status: YZ NEI U[--Equipment ID No. DG-SA-RCVR-2A Equip. Class' 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Air Receiver 2A (SWC# WD-SWEL-097 & A WC# WB-00 1)Location: Bldg. DG1 Floor El. 903 Room, Area DG1 -903 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Cooper Bessemer Co., Model G19-1649-1A Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference Drawing LS-48-31A, G19-1649-1A and SEWS ID: DGSA-RCVR-IA

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YZ NEI UE' N/A[1 Y[ NEI U0 N/AE Y[ NEI UE- N/AE" YE NE1 UE[[ N/A[]YZ NEI UE1 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 291 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NE] UM Equipment ID No. DG-SA-RCVR-2A Equip. ClassI 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Air Receiver 2A (SWC# WD-SWEL-097 & AWC# WB-O01)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NJ-] UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI Ui N/AD YZ ND U-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: James McKinney Date:/eh &/2 (140 1 4 7 Justin Jackson Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 292 of 322 Status: YO NEI UE-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment liD No. DG-SA-RCVR-2A Equip. Class, 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Air Receiver 2A (SWC# WD-SWEL-097 & AWC# WB-O01)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIB Revision 0 Attachment C Page 293 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 3 Status: Y[ Nil U--Equipment ID No. DGJW-CT-DG2 Equip. Class 1 21 Equipment Description DG2 Jacket Water Stand Pipe (SWC# WD-SWEL-098 & AWC# WB-044)Location: Bldg. DG2 Floor El. 903 Room, Area DG2-903 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YU NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?The load path has a stand pipe bolted to the diesel skid and the diesel skid bolted to the concrete near the anchors.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In accordance with Drawing # BIM KSV-58-2 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? YZ NEI U- N/ADl YC9 NC UE- N/AC YE NC UC N/AO YE NO UC N/AC' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 294 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NEI U-I Equipment ID No. DGJW-CT-DG2 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description DG2 Jacket Water Sand Pipe (SWC# WD-SWEL-098 & AWC# WB-044)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI UQ N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE- N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEl UOI N/A" YED N-- UUE Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NCi UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) glklýýEvaluated by: William Price Patrick Yearlev U Date: 10 -l 11-10-17-12-- Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 295 of 322 Status: YS N[-] UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. DGJW-CT-DG2 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description DG2 Jacket Water Sand Pipe (SWC# WD-SWEL-098 & A WC# WB-044)Photographs Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 296 of 322 Sheet I of 3 Status: Y] NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IA-ACC-256G Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description MS-RV-71G Accumulator (SWC# WD-SWEL-099 & AWC# WB-059)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 921 Room, Area Drywell-921 (East)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Jelco Inc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YI- NOi UO] N/AZ YE] NEI UI- N/AI 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO] NEI U[] N/AZ 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NE-] Ut] N/AZ YZ NE] UtI I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 297 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YM NF- U[[Equipment ID No. IA-ACC-256G Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description MS-RV-71G Accumulator (SWC# WD-SWEL-099 & AWC# WB-059)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UMI N/A12 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NFI UL1 N/AD]and masomy block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NEI UE" N/AI" YO NO U'I Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Willaim Price Date: 0 -7't " I -L/D Ai /,-z--James McKinnev I _r l * * !Y J Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 298 of 322 Status: NL- U[---Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IA-ACC-2566 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description MS-RV-71G Accumulator (SWC# WD-SWEL-099 & AWC# WB-059)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIB Revision 0 Attachment C Page 299 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ NF-] U'Equipment ID No. RHR-Hx-A Equip. Class, 21 Equipment Description Residual Heat Removal Exchanger A (SWC# WD-SWEL- 100 & A WC# WB-036)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 931 Room, Area A RHR Hx RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YZ NNU]2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In accordance with drawing #M-82317 retrieval

  1. 491081217
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NEI Ur- N/A[YZ NO U[IJ N/A"]YO NEI UEI N/A--YN NEI UEI N/A-1 YZ NI U--I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 300 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ N[] U-Equipment ID No. RHR-Hx-A Equip. Class" 21 Equipment Description Residual Heat Removal Exchanger A (SWC# WD-SWEL-100 & AWC# WB-036)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YV NEI UE- N/AU 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ No U' N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NO U'I N/AO YO NEI UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI UO-" adversely affect the safety functions of tie equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: William Price Evaluated by: William Price Date: P~ IL' IV'Date: olIt,1I I'/Patrick Yearlev Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 301 of 322 Status: YO NO UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RHR-Hx-A Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description Residual Heat Removal ExchangerA (SWC# WD-SWEL-100 & AWC# WB-036)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 302 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ N-- U--Equipment ID No. SW-STNR-A Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description Service Water Strainer A (SWC# WD-SWEL-101 & AWC# WB-002)Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 903 Room, Area IS SWPump Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YE NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference Drawing 47736 and 4108 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? YO NO UI" N/AU YZ NO UI" N/AU Y(D NO U[I N/AU YED NO UU-] N/AU YEJ NEI UU I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 303 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[ N[-] U-Equipment ID No. SW-STNR-A Equip. Class, 0 Equipment Description Service Water Strainer A (SWC# WD-SWEL-101 & A WC# WB-002)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NO UDI N/ADl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NC U[] N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NE U- N/A[l YZ NJ UDE Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO UU adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: James McKinneo e .'q Patrick Yearley Date: /0//-/0/1 &z Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 304 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y[ NEI UI" Equipment ID No. SW-STNR-A Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description Service Water StrainerA (SWC# WD-SWEL-101 & AWC# WB-002)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 305 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y[ NE] U-I Equipment ID No. FPC-P-1A Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description Fuel Pool Pump 1A (SWC# WD-2-O01 & AWC# WB-057)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 958 Room, Area Spent Fuel Pool HX Cubicle (North West)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of'judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference drawing 2791810, 4081, and 4092)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? YE NO UO N/AI-Y21 NO U'- N/AE3 YZ NO U'I N/AU" Y[ NI UMI N/A-Y9 NEI U0 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 306 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YM NOI UFI Equipment ID No. FPC-P-1A Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description Fuel Pool Pump 1A (SWC# WD-2-O01 & AWC# WB-057)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U-1 N/AE3 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NEI UD] N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NO] U!1 N/AU YZNIOr U-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N!] UD]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: Justin Jackson A -Date: If/o ( /IZ I/6 //,// T~;~1&James McKinnev U (J Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 307 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FPC-P-IA Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description Fuel Pool Pump IA (SWC# WD-2-O01 & AWC# WB-057)Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y] Noi U--Photouraphs Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIB Revision 0 Attachment C Page 308 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 3 Status: YN NEI U'-E Equipment lID No, FPC- V-32 -Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description Diffuser Control Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-2-002 & AWC# WB-060)Location: Bldg. Rx FloorEl. 1001 Room, Area Spent Fuel Pool (Deck)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Dezurik Corp.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YrI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YQI NEI UQ N/AN YCI Nf-- UDZ N/AZ 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yfl NMl Ur N/A!5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YLJ NEI UQI N/A0 YZ NO UD I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 309 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ N[] UEL Equipment ID No. FPC-V-32 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description Diffuser Control Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-2-002 & AWC# WB-060)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NO UL- N/AL]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] U'- N/All and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NEl UEI- N/Al]YZ NO UL Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[D NO UL-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) A 1ýýEvaluated by: William Price James McKinnev Date: -0, A- I-V/o /az Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 310 of 322 Status: Y1 NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment lID No. FPC-V-32 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description Diffuser Control Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-2-002 & AWC# WB-060)Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-EIB Revision 0 Attachment C Page 311 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 3 Status: YE N[-] U[Equipment ID No. FPC-LSL-66 Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description SFP Level Switch Alarm Switches (SWC# WD-SWEL-2-003 & AWC# WB-061)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 976 Room, Area Spent Fuel Pool (Deck)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than, mild surface oxidation?

YE NEI UE- N/AM YEI NEI UE- N/AM 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE] UE] 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NEI U[E N/AM YZ NEI UEi I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 312 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN NEI ULI Equipment ID No. FPC-LSL-66 Equip. Class, 14 Equipment Description SFP Level Switch Alarm Switches (SWC# WD-SWEL-2-003 & AWC# WB-061)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[D NO UE- N/AU 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO UL N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y9 NO U] N/AUl YO Ni UL Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: William Price James MoKinney" 6 XZ Date: 10 t -I "-I//0 Z Engineering Evaluation 12-EI8 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 of 3 Page 313 of 322 Status: YN NEI UF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FPC-LSL-66 Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description SFP Level Switch Alarm Switches (SWC# WD-SWEL-2-003 & AWC# WB-061)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 314 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 3 Status: Y0 NF1 U[--Equipment ID No. FPC-TE-71 Equip. Class' 19 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool Heat Exch. Inlet Temp. Element (SWC# WD-2-004 & AWC# WB-057)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 958 Room, Area FPC Hx Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO-- NEI U1 N/AS YO NEI U'I N/AS YO NE] UD N/AZ YEI NOl UE] N/AN YZ NO UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 2 of 3 Page 315 of 322 Status: YN NE] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FPC-TE-71 Equip. Class' 19 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool Heat Exch. Inlet Temp. Element (SWC# WD-2-004 & AWC# WB-057)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UC- N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE U-I N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NC UC N/AC YZ NEI Un Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NC UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Reference Drawing 2707-5 and Retrieval Number 660315427 Evaluated by: Justin Jackson O a 5,--James McKinney Date: ( Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 316 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YN NEI UCI Equipment ID No. FPC-TE-71 Equip. Class, 19 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool Heat Exch. Inlet Temp. Element (SWC# WD-2-004 & AWC# WB-057)Photographs Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 317 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 3 Status: Y[ NRi U-l Equipment II) No. FPC-Hx-B Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description FPC-Hx-IB (SWC# WD-2-005 & AWC# WB-057)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 958 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Thermal En-gineering International Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? Y0D NE 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verified by drawing M-82057 Revision No. 1, retrieval number 453008708.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO UO NIAD Y0 NEI UO N/A" YZ NC U" N/A'YZ NO U' N/AC YO NEI UD Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-EI1 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 318 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[ NEI UE-Equipment ID No. FPC-Hx-B Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description FPC-Hx-IB (SWC# WD-2-005 & AWWC# WB-057)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NOD U N/AQ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UO N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YM NET UO N/AQ YO NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO U" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Small -2"line running right next to valve REC-64 but no references were available to determine the smaller line.Scaffolding <t18"to component on RHR-Hx-B. This component is not safety related and therefore does not have a necessary clearance under procedure 7.0.7 (Scaffolding Construction and Control)Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Neither is Class I or SSEL -Will not cause rapid drain down of the pool due to the size of the lines in question documented under question 11.Evaluated by: Justin Jackson James McKinnev Date: 2.(U/ Engineering Evaluation 12-EIS Revision 0 Attachment C Page 319 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FPC-Hx-B Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description FPC-Hx-IB (SWC# WD-2-005 & AWC# WB-057)Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YN NEI- UMI Photoaraphs Note: Note: Note: Note: Engineering Evaluation 12-E28 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 320 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ N- U[-'Equipment ID No. FPC-CV-I8CV Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description Diffuser Check Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-2-006 & AWC# WB-060)Location: Bldg. Rx Floor El. 1001 Room, Area Spent Fuel Pool (Deck)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? YO NO UO N/AO YO NO UO N/AE 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UO N/AO 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO UO N/AI YO ND UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Page 321 of 322 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ N[-] UO Equipment ID No. FPC-CV-18CV Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description Diffuser Check Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-2-006 & AWC# WB-060)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI U0 N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NE] U[O] N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NO U- N/AU Y0@ Nil U'-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated Date: 10 -I A ' I'/fr,/qI/z.- Engineering Evaluation 12-E18 Revision 0 Attachment C Sheet 3 Of 3 Page 322 of 322 Status: YZ NFil UFI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. FPC-CV-18CV Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description Diffuser Check Valve (SWC# WD-SWEL-2-006 & AWC# WB-060)Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note: NLS2012125 Attachment Page 1 of 2 NLS2012125 ATTACHMENT LIST OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS NLS2012125 Attachment Page 2 of 2 List of Regulatory Commitments The following table identifies those actions committed to by Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) in this document. Any other statements in this submittal are provided for information purposes and are not considered to be regulatory commitments. TYPE (Check One) SCHEDULED COMPLETION COMMITMENT ONE- DATE CONTINUING TIME COMPLIANCE (If Required)ACTION.. ....NPPD will perform walkdowns for the Prior to startup equipment that could not be inspected from Refueling as identified in Section 5.7 of the , Outage 28 Seismic Walkdown Report.NLS2012125-01 NPPD will resolve the potentially Prior to startup adverse seismic conditions as identified from Refueling in Section 6.1 of the Seismic " Outage 28 Walkdown Report.NLS2012125-02 NPPD will submit an updated Seismic Within 90 days Walkdown Report. after startup from Refueling Outage NLS2012125-03 28}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12340A269&oldid=929742"