ML12296A931
| ML12296A931 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 10/22/2012 |
| From: | Thomas Wengert Plant Licensing Branch III |
| To: | Etheridge H, Scarpello M, Waters J Indiana Michigan Power Co |
| Wengert T | |
| References | |
| TAC ME9560, TAC ME9561 | |
| Download: ML12296A931 (1) | |
Text
From:
Wengert, Thomas Sent:
Monday, October 22, 2012 9:26 AM To:
mkscarpello@aep.com; hletheridge@aep.com; jrwaters@aep.com Cc:
Grover, Ravinder
Subject:
D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review of LAR to Revise TSs to Adopt TSTF-510, Rev. 2 Using CLIIP (TAC Nos. ME9560 and ME9561)
By letter dated September 12, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12268A047), Indiana Michigan Power Company submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to adopt Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF)-510, Revision 2, Revision to Steam Generator Program Inspection Frequencies and Tube Sample Selection, using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process for the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of the LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed license amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Tom Wengert Senior Project Manager U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DORL/LPL3-1 (301) 415-4037