ML12275A492
| ML12275A492 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry  |
| Issue date: | 10/16/2012 |
| From: | Ellen Brown Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | James Shea Tennessee Valley Authority |
| Brown, Eva A. | |
| References | |
| TAC ME9176, TAC ME9177, TS-429 | |
| Download: ML12275A492 (3) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 16, 2012 Mr. Joseph W. Shea Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority 3R Lookout Place LP 3D-C 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 SUB.JECT:
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 2 AND 3 - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION CONCERNING DELETION OF LOW-PRESSURE COOLANT INJECTION MOTOR-GENERATOR SETS (TAC NOS. ME9176 AND ME9177) (TS-429)
Dear Mr. Shea:
By letter dated July 30, 2012, the Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee) submitted a proposed amendment for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit 2. The proposed amendment, if approved, would allow the licensee to delete Technical Specification (TS) Surveillance Requirement 3.5.1.12. This surveillance requires the verification of the capability to automatically transfer the power supply from the normal source to the alternative for each Low-Pressure Coolant Injection subsystem inboard injection valve and each recirculation pump discharge on a 24-month frequency. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this proposed amendment. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review.
The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
J. Shea
- 2 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (301) 415-2315.
Sincerely, IRA!
Eva A. Brown, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-260 and 50-296 cc: Distribution via Listserv
ML12275A492 OFFICE LPLlI-21PM LPLlI-21LA DORULPLlI-21BC(A)
NAME EBrown BClayton JQuichocho DATE 10/15/12 1019/12 10/16112