Text

Boiling Water Reactor (Lacbwr), Response to Request for Additional Information by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 2012 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor
	ML12235A299
Person / Time
Site:	La Crosse File:Dairyland Power Cooperative icon.png
Issue date:	08/13/2012
From:	Berg W; Dairyland Power Cooperative
To:	; Document Control Desk, NRC/FSME
References
	LAC-14249
	Download: ML12235A299 (82)
	v • d • e

WILLIAM L. BERG President and CEO DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE August 13, 2012 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c)

In reply, please refer to LAC-14249 DOCKET NO. 50-409 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

SUBJECT:

Dairyland Power Cooperative La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor (LACBWR)

Possession-Only License No. DPR-45 Response to Request for Additional Information by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 2012 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor

REFERENCES:

1) Letter, NRC Hickman to DPC dated July 18, 2012, Dairyland Power Cooperative, La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor Decommissioning Funding Status Report - Request for Additional Information

2) Letter, DPC Berg to NRC dated March 26, 2012, Annual Report on the Status of Decommissioning Funding

3) Letter, NRC Erickson to DPC dated August 7, 1991, Order to Authorize Decommissioning and Amendment No. 66 to Possession-Only License No. DPR-45 for La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor

4) Letter, DPC Berg to NRC dated July 25, 1990, Dairyland Power Cooperative Decommissioning Fund Report for the La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor

5) LACBWR Decommissioning Plan, Revised December 2011 Attachment 1 of this letter contains Dairyland Power Cooperative's (DPC) response to NRC request for additional information (RAI) of Reference 1 concerning LACBWR's Annual Report on the Status of Decommissioning Funding conveyed in Reference 2. Enclosed with this letter is the 2010 LACBWR Decommissioning& DecontaminationCost Study Update which is being included in its entirety as requested in RAI #2.

This letter and attached responses identify no new commitments and no revisions to existing commitments.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Don Egge of my staff at 608-689-4207.

Sincerely, William L. Berg, President and CEO WLB:JBM:jkl h5A-46Z0 A Touchstone Energy Cooperative ?0_;P(

3200 East Ave. S. e PO Box 817

La Crosse, WI 54602-0817 ° 608-787-1258 e 608-787-1469 fax

www.dairynet.com

Document Control Desk LAC-14249 Page 2 August 13, 2012

Attachment:

1) Response to Request for Additional Information Concerning Annual Report on the Status of Decommissioning Funding

Enclosure:

1) 2010 LACBWR Decommissioning & Decontamination Cost Study Update cc w/Attachment and

Enclosure:

John Hickman Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Charles Casto Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission STATE OF WISCONSIN )

)

COUNTY OF LA CROSSE )

ii Personally came before me this day of /17" +-", 2012, the above named, William L. Berg, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the same.

LAURIE A. ENGEN Notary Public NotyPublic, La Crosse County Mcon<

State of Wisconsin Mv commissin e-nres

,AJ *AAAAAAA*L*AA *Z*J[*'LA*

5 cR '- -

Document Control Desk LAC- 14249 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 August 13, 2012 Response to Request for Additional Information Concerning Annual Report on the Status of Decommissioning Funding RAI #1: Decommissioning Costs Provide the amount of decommissioningfindsestimated to be requiredbased on the formulafrom 10 CFR 50. 75(b) and (c). Provide the total and remaining decommissioning costs estimated to be required pursuant to 10 CFR 50. 75(b) and (c) as indicated in the most recent site-specific cost estimatefor LA CB WR.

DPC Response:

10 CFR 50.75(c)(1): Base Cost 1986 dollars is assumed to be $22,472,000. This value is equal to the 1983 estimate of $20,000,000, with 6% annual escalation beginning in 1984, accepted and approved by the NRC in Reference 3 as described below.

10 CFR 50.75(c)(2):

Estimated Cost 2011 = [Base Cost 1986] [ALx + BE, + CBx]

Where: A = .65 L, = Labor Cost Adjustment (for year x)

B =-.13 E, = Energy Adjustment Factor (for year x)

C = .22 Bx = Waste Burial Adjustment Factor (for year x)

From NUREG-1307, Revision 14:

L,/ECI = Base L./100 L, = (ECI) (Base Lx/100)

Where: ECI is the Employment Cost Index for the Midwest ( 4th Quarter, 2011) from the U.S.

Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and has the value of 113.9.

Base Lx is from Table 3.2, NUREG-1307, and has the value of 2.08 for the Midwest.

Lx = (113.9) (2.08/100)

L, = 2.37 E, = 0.54P, + 0.46F, Where: P,, is the BLS Producer Price Index (PPI) annual 2011 value for industrial electric power (PPI Commodity Code 0543) having a value of 203.5 and divided by the corresponding value of 114.5 for 1986.

Px = 203.5 - 114.5 = 1.777

Document Control Desk LAC-14249 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 August 13, 2012 F, is the BLS PPI annual 2011 value for light fuel oils (PPI Commodity Code 0573) having a value of 303.5 and divided by the corresponding value of 49.4 for 1986.

F, = 303.5 + 49.4 = 6.144 E, = [(0.54) (1.777) + (0.46) (6.144)] = [0.960 + 2.826]

Ex = 3.79 B,, = (12.540) (1.05) From Table 2.1, NUREG-1307, 2010 value for generic LLW disposal site assuming BWR direct disposal with vendors, escalated for 2011 by 5% in accordance with the Status Report of Reference 2 assumption (Burial - Radwaste).

B, = 13.17 Estimated Cost 2011 = [$22,472,000] [(0.65) (2.37) + (0.13) (3.79) + (0.22) (13.17)]

Estimated Cost 2011 = [$22,472,000] [1.54 + 0.49 + 2.90]

Estimated Cost 2011 = [$22,472,000] [4.93]

Estimated Cost 2011 = $110,786,960 Based on a 1983 decommissioning cost estimate of $20,000,000, DPC submitted to the NRC a decommissioning funding report for LACBWR on July 25, 1990 (Reference 4) in which DPC concluded that decommissioning would cost $90.9 million if decontamination and dismantling could begin in 2010.

Furthermore, DPC recognized that the funding plan contained in the Decommissioning Plan submitted to the NRC in December of 1987 contemplated that total decommissioning costs for LACBWR would be below the levels set forth in 10 CFR 50.57(c)(1). To the extent that such an exemption was deemed necessary by the NRC, DPC requested exemption from funding the Decommissioning Trust at the minimum amount established in 10 CFR 50.57(c)(1) and requested that the NRC approve the continued funding of the Decommissioning Trust at the level set forth in the previously filed Decommissioning Plan. DPC continued in the submittal of Reference 4 to describe "special circumstances" that clearly existed within the meaning of 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2) that warranted granting an exemption in this case.

The NRC approved a decommissioning cost of $92,000,000 in 2010 dollars in its Safety Evaluation contained in Reference 3 without exemption from 10 CFR 50.75(c)(1). The NRC cited the new decommissioning regulations as the basis for the approval (53 FR 24018, June 27, 1988, at page 24027, Column 1) stating that for reactors already shut down, "details concerning financial assurance.., would be decided on a case-by-case basis."

To be clear, the 2011 decommissioning funds estimated to be required based on the formula from 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c) as shown above have not been reduced in the amount of $24,127,338 for the cost of decommissioning activities that were completed during the timeframe of 2005 through 2007 for the removal and disposal of all Class B and Class C radioactive waste and the Reactor Pressure Vessel. Just

Document Control Desk LAC-14249 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 3 August 13, 2012 as importantly, the formula decommissioning funds estimate has not been reduced by the cost of removal and disposal of dismantlement waste to date in excess of 2 million pounds.

The total and remaining decommissioning costs estimated to be required are $69,846,063 in 2011 dollars as stated in the Status Report of Reference 2 and as approximated in the enclosed 2010 LACBWR Decommissioning & DecontaminationCost Study Update.

RAI #2: Citationfor Site-Specific Study Provide the most recent site specific cost estimatefor LA CB WR, unless it was previously submitted to the NRC. If the cost estimate was previously submitted to NRC, then provide reference to its submittal. The site-specific cost estimate should include a summary schedule of annual expenses, projected earnings, and end-of-yearfind balances, expressed in 2011 dollars. Pursuantto 10 CFR 50. 75(b), the cost estimate shall be in an amount that may be more, but not less, than the amount estimated to be required under to 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c).

DPC Response:

The most recent site-specific cost estimate, 2010 LACBWR Decommissioning & DecontaminationCost Study Update, is enclosed. This cost study update includes a summary schedule of annual expenses in 2010 costs based on a dismantlement and decommissioning period of seven years that is planned to commence in 2012. As described in Section 6.6 and depicted in Figure 6.2 of Reference 5, LACBWR final decommissioning could be completed as early as 2019. Because the December 31, 2011, Decommissioning Trust fund balance of $80,405,284 as shown in the Status Report of Reference 2 exceeds the site-specific estimated cost, projected earnings are not included.

Enclosure 1 LAC-14249 August 13, 2012 2010 LACBWR DECOMMISSIONING & DECONTAMINATION COST STUDY UPDATE Prepared by LACBWR Staff November 2010 Approved by ORC."ýý ý Date // o)0

LACBWR continues to be committed in its efforts to provide an accurate, realistic update to the estimated decommissioning cost every five years, or when significant changes have occurred.

This revised cost study is an addendum to the 1994 study performed by Sargent & Lundy. Since the original 1994 cost study was performed, many lessons learned from the experiences of others, and technological changes have allowed us to revise the overall scope of the dismantlement project at LACBWR. Updated decontamination factors, decontamination methods and cost containments have enabled us to update the original estimated burial volumes, contingencies, and escalators, to provide a more accurate full funding level. This revision provides an up-to-date study using new methods and actual lessons learned to ensure that Dairyland's financial planning is adequate to ensure sufficient funds will be available for the decommissioning of LACBWR after the removal of the spent fuel.

Reference Materials

1. Sargent & Lundy, "LACBWR Decommissioning Cost Study" (1994)

2. AIF/NESP-036, "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plants Decommissioning Cost Estimates" (1986)

3. LaGuardia, T., and Dietz, W., "Decommissioning Cost Estimates and Schedule,"

Chapter 13

4. TLG Services, "Trends in Nuclear Decommissioning Costs"

5. Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation, **Direct Testimony of Win. Manion," Feb. 2002

6. Main Yankee LTP, Section 7, "Update of Site Specific Decommissioning Costs"

7. U.S. Department of Labor - Bureau of Labor Statistics 1987-2007

8. Review of PGE's Decommissioning Plan for the Trojan Nuclear Plant

9. 1998 LACBWR Decommissioning and Decontamination Cost Study Update

10. 2000 LACBWR Decommissioning and Decontamination Cost Study Update

11. 2003 LACBWR Decommissioning and Decontamination Cost Study Update

12. 2007 LACBWR Decommissioning and Decontamination Cost Study Update

13. Sargent & Lundy "Independent Review of Decommissioning Cost Study for LACBWR" (SL010039, April 15, 2010)

14. AIF/NESP-036 Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates

15. 2004 DOE Study of Construction Technologies and Schedules, O&M Staffing and Cost, Decommissioning Cost and Funding Requirements for Advanced Reactor Designs

16. Energy Solutions Schedule of Charges Effective Date January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2016.

-1I-

Changes Since the 1994 study, technological changes have occurred in the dismantlement of a nuclear power station. New knowledge and experience in decommissioning methods and philosophies have been gained from actual plant dismantlement, not only at LACBWR but at other shutdown facilities. The disposal of radioactive waste, once a volatile market, has somewhat stabilized in recent years. Expected sharp rises in radioactive waste disposal costs have not been experienced as they were in the 1980's. Because of these changes, the original 1994 cost study methodologies, assumptions, contingencies, and escalators can be modified to provide a more accurate, more realistic cost study. contains a list of changes to the 1994 Cost Study from the previous revisions, (1998, 2000, 2003 and 2007)

Following are the latest revisions to the 1994 cost study:

- All costs have been adjusted, based on 2010 dollars.

. Spent fuel will be placed in dry storage at an onsite ISFSI in 2011. It will be sent to an offsite repository when one becomes available.

> Dismantlement of LACBWR will continue to be performed by plant personnel, in a limited fashion, until all spent fuel has been placed in dry storage.

"i> Once all spent fuel has been placed in dry storage, full-time dismantlement will commence. The work will be performed by DPC personnel and supplemented by contractors as necessary. This will begin as early as 2012 and is expected to last for approximately seven years.

?> Labor costs for 2010 will be based on a DPC labor cost for metal removal. Specialty contractor rate for concrete removal will be used on System IDs where concrete or soil removal is required.

Assumptions o DPC labor cost $68.30/hr o Contractor labor cost $83.20/hr o Contractor labor and equipment cost $145.60/hr o Blended rate (DPC and Contractor with equipment $106.95/hr)

> Each system ID was reviewed to determine all appropriate unit removal rate. This was accomplished using Reference 15 as recommended by Sargent & Lundy in Reference

13. The system unit removal rates are listed on Attachment 4.

> For the shipment of concrete and soils, voids in the packaging need to be considered.

Sargent & Lundy uses a 40% void factor. Shipping and burial costs for concrete and soil removal during decommissioning will be determined by applying a factor of 1.4 to the volumes removed.

'* As recommended by the Sargent & Lundy study (Reference 13), several contingency values have been updated to reflect the recommendations of AIF/NESP-036 (Reference 14).

o Materials - contingency has been raised from DPC's 10% to the recommended rate of 25%.

o DOC - contingency has been raised from DPC's 10% to the recommended rate of 15%.

o Reprocessing - contingency has been raised from DPC's 0% to the recommended rate of 5%.

> Due to the uncertainties of the burial rates in years beyond, DPC's pricing contract (Reference 16), which expires in 2016, the burial contingency for soil and concrete has been raised from 25% to 50%. This has been applied to the following System I.D.

numbers: 211/212/213/216/217/218/219.

. As per Reference 16, the annual escalated rates for Radwaste Recycling and Radwaste Burial will be 5%.

All costs for reprocessing and burial of radioactive material are based on Reference 16.

> System 221.3 - FESW removal including racks. System weight has been revised to reflect true weights found from system drawings

)> System 230 - Turbine 130,260 lbs. were removed from the total weight as this material has been sent to burial since 2007.

> System 230 - Main generator total weight was reduced by 10,000 lbs. due to the coolers being sent to burial since 2007.

> System 23 1 - Turbine lube oil. This system was removed except for the clean/dirty oil tank.

>,- Add System 1100 to cover cost of the ISFSI decommissioning. This will be a separate funded system number.

System Identification This revised cost study consists of two separate attachments covering each system and/or component to be removed. These attachments cover the dismantlement activities of the systems and/or components identified by the following ID number system:

ID 4 Components ID# Components Site Work - removal of contaminated 211 soil & riprap 231 Removal ot Turbine oil system Removal of Main Condenser &

212 Reactor Building Decon 232 Aessories Accessories 213 Turbine Building and Heater Bay 233/235 Removal of the T.B. Condensate Decon and Feedwater System 216 *WasteTreatment Building and 234 Removal of the TB Steam System Tunnel Decon 217 Gas Storage Vault Decon 236 Removal of TB CCW 218 Stack Decon 237 Removal of Alternate Core Spray 219 Penetration Area Decon 238 Removal of the 1IPSW system in Turbine Building Reactor Control Devices - upper Removal of Circulating Water system 221.2 CRD's/instrument tubes/valves and 238.1 in Turbine Building insulation 221.3 FESW Removal, including racks 238.2 Removal of LPSW system in Turbine Building 222.1 Removal of FCP System 240 Temporary Construction Electrical Work 222.2 Removal of Rx Main Steam System 241 Removal of Electrical 222.3 Removal of Decay Heat System 242 Station Service Equipment 222.4 Removal of Purification System 243 Misc. Electrical 222.5 Removal of Reactor Feedwater Sys. 251 Removal of Instrumnent/Service Air 223.2 Removal of FESW System 253 Removal of Heating Steam 223.3 Removal of Seal Injection System 300 Asbestos Removal 223.5 Removal of Overhead Storage Tank 600 Resin Management Normal Radioactive Waste 223.7 Removal of HVA System 700 madagmet Management 224.1/

227 Removal of Liquid Waste System 227 801 Temporary Facilities 224.2 Removal of Waste Gas System 802 Equipment Needs Removal of Solid Waste (Resin 224.3 Transfer) System 804 iE m Radiological Equipment & Supplies ID # Components ID# Components 225 Removal of Fuel Handling 805 Liquid and Solid Waste Removal 2 Equipment 226 Removal of Reactor Building CCW 807 Final Site Cleanup

_26__ System 807_FialSite___eanup 228.1 Removal of Reactor Building detain. 900 Indirect Costs Water system 228.2 Removal of Misc. Reactor Water 1000 Final Release Survey System 00 iaResS e 229 Removal of Reactor Support System 1100 ISFSI 230 Removal of Main Turbine 230.1 Removal of Main Generator The two attachments list such items as total weight, man-hours, expected personnel exposure, disposal rates, and contingencies.

o Attachment I provides a summary of costs o Attachment 2 provides an individual system cost breakdown As each system or component is removed and sent to disposal, its associated costs will be deducted from the decommissioning total, which will provide for an up-to-date cost estimate at any time in the future.

System Classification As a lesson learned from the dismantlement of other nuclear tacilities, removal costs and removal contingency percentages vary, depending upon whether the system is a contaminated system or can be classified as a potentially clean system. To more accurately determine LACBWR's final cost and to better apply reprocessing, labor, and burial costs, LACBWR dismantlement activities are broken into categories based on contamination levels as follows:

> > 20 mRem/hr general dose rate

> < 20 mRem/hr general dose rate

>> Potentially clean, < 0. 1 mnRem/hr general dose rate Potentially Clean ID # Components 211 Site Work - removal of contaminated soil & riprap 223.7 Removal of HVA System 226 Removal of Reactor Building CCW system 228.1 Removal of Reactor Building demain. water system 229 Removal of Reactor Support System 230.1 Removal of Main Generator 231 Removal of Turbine oil system 236 Removal of TB CCW 237 Removal of Alternate Core Spray 238 Removal of the HPSW system in Turbine Building 238.1 Removal of Circulating Water system in Turbine Building 238.2 Removal of LPSW system in Turbine Building 240 Temporary Construction Electrical Work 241 Removal of Electrical 242 Station Service Equipment 243 Misc. Electrical 251 Removal of Instrunment/Service Air 253 Removal of Heating Steam 801 Temporary Facilities 802 Equipment Needs 804 Radiological Equipment & Supplies 807 Final Site Cleanup 900 Indirect Costs 1000 Final Release Survey 1100 ISFSI

< 20 mRem/hr General Dose Rate ID # Components 212 Reactor Building Concrete Removal 213 Turbine Building and Heater Bay Decon 216 Waste Treatment Building and Tunnel Decon 217 Gas Storage Vault Decon 218 Stack Decon 219 Penetration Area Decon 222.2 Removal of Rx Main Steam System 222.3 Removal of Decay Heat System ID# Components 222.4 Removal of Purification System 222.5 Removal of Reactor Feedwater Sys.

223.2 Removal of FESW System 223.3 Removal of Seal Injection System 223.5 Removal of Overhead Storage Tank 224.1/227 Removal of Liquid Waste System 224.2 Removal of Waste Gas System 224.3 Removal of Solid Waste (Resin Transfer) System 225 Removal of Fuel Handling Equipment 228.2 Removal of Misc. Reactor Water System 230 Removal of the Main Turbine 232 Removal of Main Condenser & Accessories 233/235 Removal of the T.B. Condensate and Feedwater System 234 Removal of the TB Steam System 300 Asbestos Removal 700 Normal Radioactive Waste Management 805 Liquid and Solid Waste Removal

> 20 mRem/hr General Dose Rate ID # Components 221.2 Reactor Control Devices - upper CRD's/ instrument tubes/ valves and insulation 221.3 FESW Removal, including racks 222.1 Removal of FCP System 600 Resin Management Labor An extensive review of the labor rates was performed for this update to ensure realistic rates are used. Sargent & Lundy performed a review as found in Reference 13. In addition, DPC personnel conducted an independent review of appropriate labor rates. The following labor rates have been determined and are utilized in this update:

1. DPC personnel (LACBWR) cost = $68.30/hr

2. Contracted labor rate to DPC = $83.20/hr

3. Contracted labor rate with required equipment to DPC = $145.60/hr For this study, the DPC personnel labor cost of $68.30/hr will be used for all system IDs requiring the removal of metal.

For the removal of concrete or soils or blended crew of 50% DPC personnel and 50% contracted labor with equipment will be used for a blended labor rate of$106.95/hr.

Contingency estimates that are to be applied to all costs in this study were determined by reviewing references 1, 2, and 3.

The contingency estimates to be applied to labor costs vary slightly in the three referenced documents. Using the Sargent & Lundy 1994 report as our base reference, the following contingency estimates have been applied to LACBWR's dismantlement labor costs:

.- Contaminated component removal - 25% (Ref. 1)

>- Clean component removal - 15% (Ref. 2)

Contaminated concrete removal - 25% (Ref. 1)

Shipoina Transportation of material from LACBWR will be made by either truck or rail. In most cases, truck transport will be utilized because it is readily available and normally less expensive. Rail will be used to transport contaminated concrete and soils because of the large volumes of material needing transport.

Shipping costs have fluctuated slightly due to fuel costs since LACBWR's first cost study in 1994. Both Burlington Northern Railroad and Hittman Nuclear Transporters were contacted to obtain their transportation rates.

Contingency estimates are again determined by reviewing the documents listed in the labor section of this report. Using the Sargent & Lundy 1994 report as our base reference, the following contingency estimates will be applied to LACBWR's dismantlement shipping costs:

,> Conventional Radwaste shipping, both truck and rail - 15% (Ref. 2)

Due to the stability of transportation costs and expected increases as designated by our reprocessing contractor, an annual escalation of 3% per year will be used on all waste shipments.

8-

Radioactive Waste Recycling As tile decommissioning of nuclear power plants has moved from its infancy, a significant cost savings measure has been found. The use of radwaste processors has been found to consistently decrease the cost for direct burial of decommissioning waste by approximately 50% (Ref. 4).

LACBWR has been a long-time user of radwaste processors. Past experience of radioactive waste shipments from LACBWR, sent for processing, has shown that of the total material processed approximately 50% has been sent to burial. LACBWR will continue to process all of the Class A material removed, except concrete and soil, to reduce the total volume of waste material needing burial at Energy Solutions.

A unique aspect in the use of a radwaste processor is that, by signing an agreement for the processing, set rates are established between LACBWR and the processor. The processor's contracted rates cover both the processing and burial of materials sent to their facilities. These radwaste processing changes are fixed by contract. The pricing used in this update is per Reference 16. A Tennessee tax of $0.0115/lb. has been applied to the processing cost of the material sent to Tennessee for reprocessing.

As recommended by Sargent & Lundy in Reference 13, a 5% contingency rate has been added to the recycling fees to cover the uncertainty of the amount of material to be sent to the reprocessor.

Radwaste processing costs contain both the processing and disposal costs of all material.

Processor representatives were contacted to determine if there was a trend in cost escalation that could be found. All Class A material requiring burial will be sent to Energy Solutions for disposal. The current annual burial costs at Energy Solutions are escalating at a rate of 5%. This is the escalation rate used by LACBWR's processor as per Reference 16, and is used for this study.

Burial The cost of radioactive waste burial has been the most volatile element in determining the decommissioning cost of a nuclear power plant. These burial costs, however, have been much more stable in the last few years and have not displayed sharp increases as were seen in the 1990's.

All LACBWR Class A metallic waste and DAW (not concrete or soil) will be sent to a processor and are not considered in the burial costs. All concrete and soil produced in the decommissioning of LACBWR will be sent to Energy Solutions for direct burial. These shipments, due to volume. will be made by rail when possible. Class B and C waste, will not be created as a burial site is not available after 2008.

The pricing used in this update is per Reference 16. A 5.263% tax has been added to the burial fees for all material sent to direct burial at Clive, UT.

The contingency estimates to be applied to burial cost vary slightly in the reference documents.

This study uses the following contingency percentage as realistic values:

o Conventional radwaste burial - 25%

o Soil and concrete radwaste burial - 50%

The burial cost in this study will be routinely monitored, and any large cost fluctuations may require a reevaluation of LACBWR's decommissioning cost. This study uses the following annual escalation rates for burial of material.

> Energy Solutions 5%- as per Reference 16 by LACBWR's processor.

Materials The cost of materials/consumables throughout this process has remained relatively constant.

Therefore, no changes are made to this cost. The escalator rate of 4% and the contingency rate of 25% are as recommended in Reference 13.

Decommissioning Operations Contractor (DOC) - ID # 900 It was initially thought that a DOC needed to be hired by the utility to perform the dismantlement for the utility. Other decommissioning projects have demonstrated this to be a costly option.

Lessons learned have indicated that by the utility assuming the role of the prime contractor, and hiring specialty contractors as needed, an indirect cost savings of up to 20% is obtained. DPC has already assumed the prime contractor role through limited dismantlement and its efforts to place the fuel in dry storage.

The escalator rate of 4% and contingency rate of 15% as recommended in Reference 13.

- t0 -

Payout Afier the spent fuel has been removed firom the reactor building and placed in dry storage, LACBWR will enter a full dismantlement period. During this period, DPC will assume the role of the DOC, as stated above, and DPC employees will assume primary dismantlement duties.

They will be supplemented by contract specialists as is deemed necessary. Using this approach.

full dismantlement of LACBWR, once the fuel is removed, is estimated to be completed in seven years. Tasks will be completed in various time frames. The following is an assumed timetable:

Years I thru 4 All S&L ID #s not specifically stated in this table.

Plus 2/3 of period 3 and 4 indirect cost.

Years 5 and 6 S&L ID #s 211,212, 213,216, 217, 218, 219. Plus 1/3 of period 3 and 4 indirect cost.

Year 7 S&L ID #s 807 and 1000. Plus period 5 indirect costs.

This work schedule would cause the following payout schedule from the decommissioning fund:

2010 Costs % of Total Cost YEAR I $7,096,565 10.5%

YEAR 2 $7,096,565 10.5%

YEAR 3 $7,096,565 10.5%

YEAR 4 $7,096,565 10.5%

YEAR 5 $-13,904,804 20.5%

YEAR 6 $13,904,804 20.5%

YEAR 7 $11,637,216 17.0%

TOTAL $67,833,082

-I1 -

TABLE I 2010 Cost Study Contingency Estimates LABOR Contaminated component removal 25%

Contaminated concrete removal 25%

Clean component removal 15%

SHIPPING Contaminated material shipments 15%

RADWASTE RECYCLING 5%

RADIOACTIVE WASTE BURIAL Conventional radwaste burial 25%

Soil and concrete radwaste burial 50%

MATERIAL 25%

DOC 15%

TABLE 2 2010 Cost Study Annual Escalator Rates LABOR 4%

SHIPPING Contaminated material shipmnents 3%

RADWASTE RECYCLING 5%

(Includes burial at Energy Solutions)

RADWASTE BURIAL Energy Solutions (All soil and concrete) 5%

MATERIAL 4%

DOC 4%

TABLE 3 Yearly Escalated Costs 2011 $69,977,317 1 2020 S102,138,947 2012 $72,973,926 2021 $106,533,746 2013 $76,100,505 2022 $111,120,098 2014 $79.362,764 2023 $115,906,463 2015 $82,766,669 2024 $120,901,678 2016 $86,318,450 2017 $90,024,617 2018 $93,891,968 2019 $97,927,605 Attachment 1 IDENTIFICATION LABOR SHIPPING REPROCESSING BURIAL MATERIAL TOTAL TOTAL WITH NUMBER COST COST COST COST NEEDED COST CONTINGENCY 211 $101,338.00 $72,450.00 $0.00 $1,383,658.00 $0.00 $1,657,446.00 $2.275.343.20 212 $3,211,908.00 $519.033.00 S383.775.00 S8.088.339.00 50.00 $12,203,055.00 S17.147,245.20 213 $585,978.00 $280.00 $0.00 $5,268.00 $0.00 $591,526.00 S740.696.50 216 S331.718.00 S1.535.00 $0.00 $28,942.00 $0.00 $362,195.00 S459,825.75 217 S60,070.00 $178.00 $0.00 $3.353.00 50.00 $63,601.00 S80,321.70 218 $1.932.736.00 $1.242.00 S1.290.00 S16,421.00 SO.00 $1,981.689.00 12,443,334.30 219 S51,917.00 $315.00 $0.00 $5,953.00 $0.00 $58,186.00 S74.188.00

,22t1.I

' .... * .,oO- $-"To:1, :0':o0I 0l 0 . 46* . J"0 oOl.-.

221,2 $47,332.00 $1,559.00 $36,660.00 $0.00 $0.00 $85,561.00 $99,450.85 221.3 $11,611.00 50.00 50.00 $348,181.00 $0.00 $359,792.00 $362,694.75 222.1 $485,681.00 515,999.00 5376,153.00 $0.00 50.00 $877,833.00 S1.020,460.75 222.2 528.003.00 5923.00 $15,211.00 SO.00 $0.00 $44,137.00 552,036.75 222.3 $168,769.00 $5,560.00 $91,685.00 $0.00 $0.00 $266,014.00 S313,624.50 222.4 $101,289.00 $3,337.00 $55.029.00 $0.00 $0.00 $169,655.00 $188.229.25 222.5 537.837.00 $1,247.00 $20,565.00 $0.00 $0.00 $69,649.00 $70,323.55 223.2 $184.205.00 56,068.00 $100,051.00 50.00 $0.00 $290,324.00 $342,288.00 223.3 $56,533,00 $1,929.00 $31,806.00 $0.00 $0.00 $92,268.00 $108,780.90 223.5 $100,060.00 53,296.00 $54,352.00 $0.00 $0.00 $157,708.00 5185,935.00 223.7 $28.637.00 $1,254.00 57,192.00 $0.00 $0.00 $36,083.00 539,626.25 224.11227 S219,311.00 $7.224.00 S119,115.00 $0.00 SO.00 $345,650.00 $407,517.10 224.2 $544,214.00 $25,612.00 $422,319.00 50.00 50.00 $992,145.00 $1,153.156.25 224.3 S84,965.00 S3.999.00 $65,945.00 $0.00 $0.00 $154,909.00 $180.047.35 225 $13,660.00 $11,250.00 S185,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $210,410.00 $224,787.50 226 $80,526.00 $4.143.00 $23.755.00 $0.00 $0.00 $108,424.00 $122,312.10 228.1 $13,592.00 5640:00 $3,670.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,902.00 $20,220.30 228.2 $100.879.00 $3.323.00 $54,787.00 $0.00 $0.00 $168,989.00 $187,446.55 229 $177,034.00 $8.332.00 $47,773.00 $0.00 $0.00 $233,139.00 5263,332.55 230 $78.613.00 $64,728.00 51.067.302.00 50.00 50.00 $1,210,643.00 $1,293,370.55 230.1 $32,374.00 $26,666.00 $152,884.00 $0.00 $0.00 $211,924.00 S228,424.20 231 $14,138.00 $802.00 S4.596.00 $0.00 50.00 $19,536.00 $22,006.80 232 $463,483.00 $58.725.00 $968.310.00 50.00 $0.00 $1,490,518.09 $1,663,613.00 2331235 $51,635.00 $7,081.00 $116.763.00 $0.00 $0.00 $176,479.00 $195,288.05 234 $85,812.00 $7.853.00 $129.479.00 $0.00 $0.00 $223,144.00 $252.248.90 236 5108,590.00 $13,759.00 $78.884.00 $0.00 50.00 $201,233.00 5223,529.55 237 S28,478.00 $3,909.00 $22.411.00 $0.00 $0.00 $64,798.00 $60,776.60 238 S31,898.00 $3,502.00 $20,080.00 $0.00 SO.00 $66,478.00 $61,791.70 238.1 $59,728.00 $1,856.00 $10.643.00 $0.00 $0.00 $72,227.00 $81,996.7'5 238.2 $36.328.00 $3,989.00 522,871.00 s0.00 $0.00 $63,188.00 $70.379.10 240 $262,272.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $272,272.00 5314.112.80 2411245/249 5698,660.00 $16,875.00 $96,750.00 $0.00 $0.00 $810,286.00 $922,152.75 242 517,075.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,076.00 $19,636.25 243 $58,738.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $68,738.00 $67,548.70 251 $62,148.00 $2,327.00 $13,339.00 50.00 50.00 $77,814.00 $88,152.20 253 $25,145.00 $3,452.00 $19,789.00 50.00 $0.00 $48,386.00 $53,665.00 300 $47.507.00 S$,368.00 $55,389.00 $0.00 $0.00 $104,264.00 $119,115.40 600 $48,356.00 $44,250.00 $0.00 $511,360.00 $177,000.00 $780,966.00 5971,782.50 700 $48.220.00 $6.615.00 $215,502.00 $0.00 $0.00 $270,337.00 5294.159.35 801 $97,532.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $321,400.00 $418,932.00 $513.911.80 802 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 50.00 $1,070,000.00 $1,070,000.00 $1,337,500.00 804 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,141,300.00 $2,141,300.00 52.676,625.00

,805 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 50.00 5216,000.00 $216,000.00 $270,000.00 807 5601.286.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 515,000.00 $616,286.00 S710.228.90 900 $14,029,160.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,029,160.00 $18,133,534.00 1000 $9,238,528.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,238,628.00 S10,624,307.20 new TOTALS $34,983,505.00 $968,486.00 $5,091,626.00 $10,391,475.00 $3,960,700.00 $55,386,790.00 $67,833,081.95

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of Site Contaminated Soil and Riprap 1994 S&L ID#: 211 LACBWR System #: 25 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates: = Soil and debris disposal direct to Clive, UT 3

$65/ft 3 + 5.263% tax = $68.42/ft C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcarof 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 1.3 man hours/cy E Labor Rate: = Contract labor rate with equipment $145.60/hr F Weiahts Used for Conyversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = lbs NOTES: Soil by NW WTB = 1,080 ft3 Outfall Riprap = 13,365 ft 3 Total = 14,445 ft" (535 cy) 1.4 Void Factor - Burial Volume = 20,223 ft3 COSTS Assigned labor hours: 696 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $145.60/hr $101,338 15 $116,538 Shipping $6,100/car $72,450 15 $83,318 Reprocessing -

Burial $68.42ft 3 $1,383,658 50 $2,075,487 Material I

$1,557,446 = TOTAL $2,275,343

Attachment 2 System/Project: Reactor Building Concrete Removal 1994 S&L ID#: 212 LACBWR System #: 37 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = Airlock and rebar to Oak Ridge, TN, for GIC release

$0.63/lb. + $0.015 tax = $0.645/lb.

B Burial Rates: = Concrete disposal direct to Clive, UT 3

$65/ft + 5.263% tax = $68.42/ft 3

C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6, 100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 2.7 man hours/cy concrete / 0.05 man hours/lb, metal E Labor Rate: = Contract labor rate with equipment for concrete $146.60/hr

= Metal DPC rate $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 Ib/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 3

Normal concrete weight = 150 lbs/ft 40 lbs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8' valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components = lbs Others: Airlock 16,000 Ibs/rebar 579,000 lbs. lbs Concrete = 13,340,499 lbs. = lbs lbs Total weight t 13,935,499 lbs NOTES: Concrete sent to burial/metal reprocessed 10,285,499 lbs. of 150 lbs/ft J = 68,570 ft" 3,650,000 lbs. of 230 lbs/ftW = 15,870 ftV Total = 13,340,499 lbs/84,440 ft0/3127 cy Concrete = 1.4 Void Factor- Burial Volume = 118,216 ft3 COSTS Assigned labor hours-concrete: 8,049 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.1 Rem Assigned labor hours-metal: 29,750 hrs Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Concrete Labor $146.60/hr $1,179,983 25 $1,474,979 Metal Labor $68.30/hr $2,031,925 25 $2,539,906 Shipping-Concrete $6100/Car $452,095 15 $519,909 Shipping-Metal $4500/Truck $66,938 15 $76,979 Reprocessing $0.645/Ib $383,775 5 $402,964 3

Burial $68.42/ft $8,088,339 50 $12,132,509 Material

$12,203,055 TOTAL $17,147,245

Attachment 2 System/Project: Turbine Buildina and Heater Bay Decon 1994 S&L ID#: 213 LACBWR System #: 19 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessingq Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates: = Concrete disposal direct to Clive, UT 3

$65/ft 3 + 5.263% tax = $68.42/ft C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 2.1 man hours/cy E Labor Rate: = Contract labor rate $83.20/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 Ib/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 lbs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = lbs NOTES: 55 ft 3 of concrete removed from building decon (2 cy)

High labor hours are assigned as building decon is labor dependent 1.4 Void Factor - Burial Volume = 77 ft 3 COSTS Assigned labor hours: 7043 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.1 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $83.20/hr $585,978 25 $732,472 Shipping $6,100/car $280 15 $322 Reprocessing -

Burial $68.42/ft 3 $5,268 50 $7,902 Material -

$591,526 = TOTAL = $740,697

Attachment 2 System/Project: Waste Treatment Buildinci and Tunnel Decon 1994 S&L ID#: 216 LACBWR System #: 17 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing. Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates: = Concrete disposal direct to Clive,3 UT

$65/ft3 + 5.263% tax = $68.42/ft C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,1001railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 2.1 man hours/cy E Labor Rate: = Contract labor rate $83.20/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 lbs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft 2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = Ibs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = lbs NOTES: 302 ft3 of concrete removed for area decon (11 cv) 1.4 Void Factor - Burial Volume = 423 ft 3 High labor hours are assigned as area decon is labor dependent COSTS Assigned labor hours: 3,987 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.1 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $83.20/hr $331,718 25 $414,648 Shipping $6,100/car $1,535 15 $1,765 Reprocessing -

Burial $68.42/ft 3 $28,942 50 $43,413 Material - - - -

$362,195 = TOTAL $459,826

Attachment 2 System/Project: Gas Storage Vault Decon 1994 S&L ID#: 217 LACBWR System #: 25 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates: = Concrete disposal direct to Clive,3 UT

$65/ft 3 + 5.263% tax = $68.42/ft C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6, 100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 2.1 man hours/cy E Labor Rate: = Contract labor rate $83.20/hr F Weiahts Used for Cony'ersion

.... ii .. ... .. ... . . . .

Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" .Linearfeet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = lbs NOTES: 35 ft3 of concrete removed for area decon (1.3 cy) 1.4 Void Factor - Burial Volume = 49 ft3 High labor hours are assigned as area decon is labor dependent COSTS Assigned labor hours: 722 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.05 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $83.20/hr $60,070 25 $75,088 Shipping $6,100/car $178 15 $205 Reprocessing -

Burial $68.42/ft 3 $3.353 50 $5,030 Material -

$63,601 = TOTAL $80,322

Attachment 2 System/Project: Stack Decon 1994 S&L ID#: 218 LAC BWR System #: 25 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = Exhaust fans to Oak Ridge, TN, for GIC release

$0.63/lb + $0.015 tax = $0.645/lb B Burial Rates: = Concrete disposal direct to Clive, UT 3

$65/ft 3 + 5.263% tax = $68.42/ft C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,1 00/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 2.3 man hours/cy E Labor Rate: = Contract labor rate $83.20/hr F Weiahts Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 lbs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs Exhaust fans = 2000 lbs lbs Total weight = 2000 lbs NOTES: 100 ft3 of concrete removed for area decon (3.7 cy) 1.4 Void Factor- Burial Volume = 140 ftW plus 100 ftW of sand used for decon High labor hours are assigned as area decon is labor dependent COSTS Assigned labor hours: 23,230 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency, 2010 with Contingencies Labor $83.20/hr $1,932,736 25 $2,415,920 Shipping-Concrete $6100/Car $1,017 15 $1,170 Shipping-Metal $4500/Truck $225 15 $259 Reprocessing $0.64511b $1,290 5 $1,355 Burial $68.42/ft 3 $16,421 50 $24,632 Material - - -

$1,951,689 TOTAL $2,443,334

Attachment 2 System/Project: Penetration Area Decon 1994 S&L ID#: 219 LACBWR System #: 19 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates: = Concrete disposal direct to Clive, UT 3

$65/ft3 + 5.263% tax = $68.42/ft C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 2.1 man hours/cy E Labor Rate: = Contract labor rate $83.20/hr F Weiahts Used for Cony,ersion

.... i-l . . .. . . . ...... . .

Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 Ib/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft 2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = lbs NOTES: 62 ft 3 of concrete removed for area decon (2.3 cv) 1.4 Void Factor - Burial Volume = 87 ft3 High labor hours are assigned as area decon is labor dependent COSTS Assigned labor hours: 624 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.05 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $83.20/hr $51,917 25 $64,896 Shipping $6,100/car $315 15 $362 Reprocessing -

Burial $68.42/ft 3 $5,953 50 $8,930 Material -

$58,185 = TOTAL $74,188

Attachment 2 System/Project: Reactor Control Devices - Upper CRDs/Instrument TubesNalves 1994 S&L ID#: 221.2 LACBWR System #: 32 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = >20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$2.63/lb + $0.015/lb tax = $2.645/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.05 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larmer component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Liinear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Liinear feet = lbs Valves >8" lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: Upper CRDs - 9,860 lbs. lbs Tubes & Misc. - 4,000 lbs. = 13,860 lbs lbs Total weight = 13,860 lbs NOTES: Each Upper CRD weighs 340 lbs. There are 29 CRDs.

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 693 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.4 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $47,332 25 $59,165 Shipping $4,500/load $1,559 15 $1,793 Reprocessing $2.645/lb $36,660 5 $38,493 Burial _ _ _ _

Material

$85,551 TOTAL $99,451

Attachment 2 System/Project: FESW Removal - Including Racks 1994 S&L ID#: 221.3 LACBWR System #: 58 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessinq Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates:= Pricing per special quote #3283 from Energy Solutions for 5 Sea Vans to Clive, UT C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,11 00/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.002 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 lbs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Laraer component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available I I I I I MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = 85,078 lbs NOTES: Control rod storage rack - 560 lbs.

Core spray bundle rack - 6, 100 lbs.

Crash pad - 10, 000 lbs.

Fuel racks - 68,418 lbs.

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 170 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.13 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $11,611 25 $14,514 Shipping $4,500/load - 15 -

Reprocessing $2.85/lb. 5 -

Burial Quote# 3283 $348,181 - $348,181 Material .

$359,792 = TOTAL $362,695

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of FOP System 1994 S&L ID#: 222.1 LACBWR System #: 50 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing. Rates: = > 20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$2.63/lb + $0.015/lb tax = $2.645/Ib B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.05 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 lbs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 150 Linear feet = 1,149 lbs Piping > 2.5" 308 Linear feet = 17,864 lbs Valves >8" 4 = 3,200 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" lbs Plate steel from tanks or componen lbs Others: lbs Recirc pumps and roto valves = 120,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 142,213 lbs NOTES: Recirc pumps = 40,000 lbs. each Roto valves = 40,000 lbs.

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 7,111 hrs Assigned ManRem: 58.5 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $485,681 25 $607,101 Shipping $4,500/load $15,999 15 $18,399 Reprocessing $2.645/lb $376,153 5 $394,961 Burial - - -

Material -

$877,833 = TOTAL = $1,020,461

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of Main Steam System in Reactor Building 1994 S&L ID#: 222.2 LACBWR System #: 64 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = < 20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$1.84/lb + $0.015/lb tax = $1.855 B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.05 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 lbs/ft 3 40 lbs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet lbs Piping > 2.5" 100 Linear feet 5,800 lbs Valves >8" 3 2,400 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = 8,200 lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 410 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.4 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $28,003 25 $35,004 Shipping $4,500/load $923 15 $1,061 Reprocessing $1.855/lb $15,211 5 $15,972 Burial - - -

Material -

$44,137 = TOTAL = $52,037

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the Decay Heat Svstem 1994 S&L ID#'. 222.3 LACBWR System #: 56 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessinq Rates: = <20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$1.84/lb + $0.015 tax = $1.855/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.05 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Wei-ghts Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 lbs/ft3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Laraer component weigqhts are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 100 Linear feet = 766 lbs Piping > 2.5" 420 Linear feet = 24,360 lbs Valves >8" 1 = 800 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" 25 = 12,500 lbs Plate steel from tanks or componenIts lbs Others: lbs Cooler/pump/motor = 11,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 49,426 lbs NOTES: Cooler = 7,000 lbs.

Pump/motor =4,000 lbs.

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 2,471 hrs Assigned ManRem: 2.2 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $168,769 25 $210,961 Shipping $4,500/load $5,560 15 $6,394 Reprocessing $1.855/lb $91,685 5 $96,269 Burial _ _ _

Material

$266,014 = TOTAL = $313,624

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the Purification System 1994 S&L ID#: 222.4 LACBWR System #: 51 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = <20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$1.84/lb + $0.015 tax = $1.855/lb B Burial Rates: = NIA C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.05 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.,30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger II component I weights mm are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 370 Linear feet = 2,835 lbs Piping > 2.5" 35 Linear feet = 2,030 lbs Valves >8" 1 = 800 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" 6 = 3,000 lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs Cooler/Pump/Ion Exchanger = 21,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 29,665 lbs NOTES: Cooler/pump = 3,000 lbs.

[on Exchanger = 18,000 lbs.

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 1,483 hrs Assigned ManRem: 1.53 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $101,289 25 $126,611 Shipping $4,500/load $3,337 15 $3,838 Reprocessing $1.855/lb $55,029 5 $57,780 Burial _ _ _

Material -

$159,655 = TOTAL = $188,229

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of Reactor Feedwater System in Reactor Building 1994 S&L ID#: 222.5 LACBWR System #: 65 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = <20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$1.84/lb + $0.015 tax = $1.855/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.05 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 100 Linear feet = 766 lbs Piping > 2.5" 133 Linear feet = 7,720 lbs Valves >8" 2 = 1,600 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" lbs Plate steel from tanks or componer lbs Others: lbs Misc. = 1,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 11,086 lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 554 hrs Assigned ManRem: 8.42 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $37,837 25 $47,296 Shipping $4,500/load $1,247 15 $1,434 Reprocessing $1.855/lb $20,565 5 $21,593 Burial _ _- -

Material -

$59,649 = TOTAL = $70,323

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the FESW System 1994 S&L ID#: 223.2 LACBWR System #: 58 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = <20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$1.84/lb + $0.015 tax = $1.855/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.05 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft 2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 lbs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 Ibslft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larcier component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 100 Linear feet = 766 lbs Piping > 2.5" 435 Linear feet = 29,870 lbs Valves >8" 1 = 800 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" 29 = 14,500 lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs Cooler/pump/filter = 8,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 53,936 lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 2,697 hrs Assigned ManRem: 2.57 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $184,205 25 $230,256 Shipping $4,500/load $6,068 15 $6,978 Reprocessing $1.855/lb $100,051 5 $105,054 Burial _ _

Material

$290,324 = TOTAL $342,288

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of Seal Iniection System 1994 S&L ID#: 223.3 LACBWR System #: 52 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessinq Rates: = <20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$1.84/lb + $0.015 tax = $1.855/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.05 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weiahts Used for Conyversion F- , . . . . . . . . . . n. . . . . . . ..

Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 40 Ibs/ft 2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Lamer component weiahts are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 200 Linear feet = 1,532 lbs Piping > 2.5" 83 Linear feet = 4,814 lbs Valves >8" 1 = 800 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8"' lbs Plate steel from tanks or componen Ibs Others: lbs Pump/tanks/etc. = 10,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 17,146 lbs NOTES: Estimated pump weight 4,000 Ibs./each.

Misc. tank, etc. = 2,000 lbs.

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 857 hrs Assigned ManRem: 1.5 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $58,533 25 $73,166 Shipping $4,500/load $1,929 15 $2,218 Reprocessing $1.855/lb $31,806 5 $33,396 Burial - -_-

Material -

$92,268 = TOTAL $108,780

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the Overhead Storaqe Tank 1994 S&L ID#: 223.5 LACBWR System #: 69 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = <20 mRemlhr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$1.84/lb + $0.015 tax = $1.855/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.05 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 40 Ibs/ft 2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs OHST = 29,300 lbs lbs Total weight = 29,300 lbs NOTES: OHST weight from FSAR Sec 6.2-5 COSTS Assigned labor hours: 1,465 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.64 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $100,060 25 $125,075 Shipping $4,500/load $3,296 15 $3,790 Reprocessing $1.855/lb $54,332 5 $57,070 Burial _ _ _

Material

$157,708 = TOTAL = $185,935

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the HVA System 1994 S&L ID#: 223.7 LACBWR System #: 61 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = To Oak Ridge, TN, for GIC release

$0.63/lb + $0.015 tax = $0.645/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs 'of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.035 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Wei-ghts Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 lbs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Largcer component weiqhts are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 150 Linearfeet = 1,150 lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" lbs Plate steel from tanks or componer lbs Others: lbs Tank skid = 10,000 lbs lbs Totalweight= 11,150 lbs NOTES: HVA tank skid 10,000 lbs.

(this is an estimated weight)

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 390 hrs Assigned ManRem: 1.76 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $26,637 15 $30,635 Shipping .$4,500/load $1,254 15 $1,442 Reprocessing $0.645/lb $7,192 5 $7,551 Burial _

Material

$35,083 = TOTAL $39,628

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the Liquid Waste System 1994 S&L ID#: 224.1/227 LACBWR System #: 54 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = <20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$1.84/lb + $0.015 tax = $1.855/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.05 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 lbs/ft3 40 Ibs/ft 2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 5,000 Linear feet = 38,305 lbs Piping > 2.5" 61 Linear feet = 3,538 lbs Valves >8" lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" lbs Plate steel from tanks or componenits = 19,370 lbs Others: lbs Pumr )/misc. = 3,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 64,213 lbs NOTES: Retention tanks 13' 9" x 9' 6" (1/4" steel) 4500 waste tank 23' x 5' 8" (1/4" steel) 3000 waste tank 16' x 5' 9" (1/4" steel)

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 3211 hrs Assigned ManRem: 16.98 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $219,311 25 $274,139 Shipping $4,500/load $7,224 15 $8,308 Reprocessing $1.855/lb $119,115 5 $125,071 Burial - - _

Material

$345,650 TOTAL $407,518

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the Waste Gas System 1994 S&L ID#: 224.2 LACBWR System #: 55 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = <20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$1.84/lb + $0.015 tax = $1.855/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.035 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8?' valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 350 Linear feet = 2,680 lbs Piping > 2.5" 100 Linear feet = 5,800 lbs Valves >8" lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" lbs Plate steel from tanks or componer its = 129,185 lbs Others: lbs

= 90,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 227,665 lbs NOTES:

includes flues and ducts/blowers/steam ejector/exhaust fans/sump pump 10 min. holdup tank 9' x 6' x /2" with baffles Storage tanks 10.5' x 21' x 1 5/16" COSTS Assigned labor hours: 7968 hrs Assigned ManRem: 10.96 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $544,214 25 $680,268 Shipping $4,500/load $25,612 15 $29,454 Reprocessing $1.855/lb $422,319 5 $443,435 Burial _ _- -

Material -

$992,145 TOTAL $1,153,157

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the Solid Waste Svstem (Resin Transfer) 1994 S&L ID#: 224.3 LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = <20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$1.84/lb + $0.015 tax = $1.855/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.035 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 lbs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Laraer Im comoonent I weiahts II are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 300 Linear feet = 2,300 lbs Piping > 2.5" 200 Linear feet = 11,600 lbs Valves >8" 1 = 800 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" lbs Plate steel from tanks or componer its = 2,850 lbs Others: lbs Duct wor k/Misc. = 18,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 35,550 lbs NOTES: Spent resin receivinq tank- 6' x 12' x %"

Includes 10-ton WTB crane COSTS Assigned labor hours: 1244 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.44 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $84,965 25 $106,206 Shipping $4,500/load $3,999 15 $4,599 Reprocessing $1.855/lb $65,945 5 $69,243 Burial - -

Material -- -

$154,909 TOTAL = $180,048

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the Fuel Handling Equipment 1994 S&L ID#: 225 LACBWR System #: 35 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = <20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$1.84/lb + $0.015 tax = $1.855/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.002 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 lbs/ft3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 lbs/ft3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs

= 100,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 100,000 lbs NOTES: Overhead crane weiaht from FSAR 6.5-5 = 88.000 lbs.

Fuel handling bridge weight estimate = 12,000 lbs.

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 200 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.1 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $13,660 25 $17,075 Shipping $4,500/load $11,250 15 $12,938 Reprocessing $1.855/lb $185,500 0.5 $194,775 Burial - _ _

Material -

$210,410 = TOTAL = $224,788

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the CCW System in the Reactor Buildina 1994 S&L ID#: 226 LACBWR System #: 57 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = GIC to Oak Ridge, TN

$0.63/lb + $0.015/lb tax = $0.645/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,1 00/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.032 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 Ib/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weiahts are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 300 Linear feet = 2,300 lbs Piping > 2.5" 504 Linear feet = 29,230 lbs Valves >8" 1 = 800 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" 7 = 3,500 lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs Cooler = 1,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 36,830 lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 1179 hrs Assigned ManRem: 2.96 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.301hr $80,526 15 $92,605 Shipping $4,500/load $4,143 15 $4,764 Reprocessing $0.645/lb $23,755 5 $24,943 Burial - - _

Material

$108,424 = TOTAL = $122,312

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the Denim Water System in the Reactor Building 1994 S&L ID#: 228.1 LACBWR System #: 67 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = GIC to Oak Ridge, TN

$0.63/lb + $0.015/Ib tax = $0.645/Ib B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.035 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1n plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weigqhts are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 200 Linear feet = 1,530 lbs Piping > 2.5"' 32 Linear feet = 1,860 lbs Valves >8" 1 = 800 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" 1 = 500 lbs Plate steel from tanks or componer Itc lbs Others: lbs Tank/etc. 1,0 lbs lbs Total weight = 5,690 lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 199 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.11 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $13,592 15 $15,631 Shipping $4,500/load $640 15 $736 Reprocessing $0.645/lb $3,670 5 $3,854 Burial Material

$17,902 = TOTAL = $20,221

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of Misc. Reactor Water System 1994 S&L ID#: 228.2 LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = <20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$1.84/lb + $0.015 tax = $1.855/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6, 100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.05 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weiahts Used for Cony'ersion 3

Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 3

Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 lbs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 370 Linear feet = 2,835 lbs Piping > 2.5" 412 Linear feet = 23,900 lbs Valves >8" 1 800 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs Misc. = 2,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 29,535 lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 1477 hrs Assigned ManRem: 3.11 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $100,879 25 $126,099 Shipping $4,500/load $3,323 15 $3,821 Reprocessing $1.855/lb $54,787 5 $57,527 Burial _ _ _

Material

$158,989 = TOTAL = $187,447

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of Reactor Building Support System 1994 S&L ID#: 229 LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = GIC to Oak Ridge, TN

$0.63/lb + $0.015/lb tax = $0.645/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.035 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 lbs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 100 Linear feet = 766 lbs Piping > 2.5" 224 Linear feet = 13,000 lbs Valves >8" 1 = 800 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" 19 = 9,500 lbs Plate steel from tanks or componen Nt lbs Others: lbs

= 50,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 74,066 lbs NOTES:

Consists of air system/heating and cooling. No weights found for A/C units. Estimated weights = 20,000 lbs/each Estimated duct work weight = 10,000 lbs.

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 2592 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.32 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $177,034 15 $203,589 Shipping $4,500/load $8,332 15 $9,582 Reprocessing $0.645/lb $47,773 5 $50,161 Burial - _

Material -

$233,139 = TOTAL $263,332

Attachment 2 System/Project: Turbine 1994 S&L ID#: 230 LACBWR System #: 20 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = <20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$1.84/lb + $0.015 tax = $1.855/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,1 00/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.002 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weiahts Used for Cony'ersion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 lbs/ft3 40 lbs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" lbs Plate steel from tanks or componen its =575,365 lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = 575,365 lbs NOTES: LP Spindle = 47,000 lbs.

130,260 lbs. disposed of since 2007 COSTS Assigned labor hours: 1151 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.1 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $78,613 25 $98,266 Shipping $4,500/load $64,728 15 $74,437 Reprocessing $1.855/lb $1,067,302 5 $1,120,667 Burial _

Material -

$1,210,643 = TOTAL = $1,293,370

Attachment 2 System/Project: Main Generator 1994 S&L ID#: 230.1 LACBWR System #: 16 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = GIC to Oak Ridge, TN

$0.63/lb + $0.015/lb tax = $0.645/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.002 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 Ib/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs

= 237,030 lbs lbs Total weight = 237,030 lbs NOTES: Stator 224,000 lbs.

Skid/Spacers/Blockinq = 13,030 lbs.

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 474 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.1 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $32,374 15 $37,230 Shipping $4,500/load $26,666 15 $30,666 Reprocessing $0.645/Ib $152,884 5 $160,529 Burial _ _ _

Material -

$211,924 = TOTAL = $228,425

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the Turbine Oil Svstem 1994 S&L ID#: 231 LACBWR System #: 92 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = GIC to Oak Ridge, TN

$0.63/lb + $0.015/lb tax = $0.645/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.029 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 lbs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger II component I

weights II are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED '

Piping < 2.5" Liinear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Lii near feet = lbs Valves >8" lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" lbs Plate steel from tanks or components = 7,125 lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = 7,125 lbs NOTES: Clean/Dirty Oil Tank 7' x 9' x 24' = 7,125 lbs.

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 207 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.05 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $14,138 15 $16,259 Shipping $4,500/load $802 15 $922 Reprocessing $0.645/lb $4,596 5 $4,825 Burial _ _- -

Material -

$19,536 TOTAL $22,006

Attachment 2 SystemlProject: Removal of the Main Condenser and Accessories 1994 S&L ID#: 232 LACBWR System #: 64 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = <20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$1.84/lb + $0.015 tax = $1.855/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.013 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weiohts Used for Conyversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet lbs Valves >8" lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: Misc. = 52,000 lbs lbs Main Condenser = 470,000 lbs. = 522,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 522,000 lbs NOTES: Sludge will be disposed of under S&L ID# 805 COSTS Assigned labor hours: 6786 hrs Assigned ManRem: 1.49 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $463,483 25 $579,354 Shipping $4,500/load $58,725 15 $67,534 Reprocessing $1.855/lb $968,310 5 $1,016,726 Burial - -

Material

$1,490,518 = TOTAL $1,663,614

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the TB Condensate and Feedwater System 1994 S&L ID#: 233 & 235 LACBWR System #: 65/73/90/98 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessingq Rates: = <20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$1.84/lb + $0.015 tax = $1.855/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.012 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft 2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" lbs Plate steel from tanks or components = 4,245 lbs Others: lbs Reheaters = 58,700 lbs lbs Total weight = 62,945 lbs NOTES: 5 tanks -4 2245 lbs.

1 Reheater = 22,000 lbs.

2 Reheater = 18,800 lbs.

3 Reheater = 17,900 lbs.

(all piping and valves were removed under FC-90-96-03 COSTS Assigned labor hours: 756 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.4 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $51,635 25 $64,544 Shipping $4,500/load $7,081 15 $8,143 Reprocessing $1.855/lb $116,763 5 $122,601 Burial - _ -

Material -

$175,479 = TOTAL = $195,288

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the TB Main Steam Svstem 1994 S&L ID#: 234 LACBWR System #: 64 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = <20 mRem/hr metal to Oak Ridge, TN

$1.84/lb + $0.015 tax = $1.855/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.018 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights I

are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" 200 Linear feet = 11,600 lbs Valves >8" 2 = 1,600 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" lbs Plate steel from tanks or componer lbs Others: lbs Major Components = 56,600 lbs lbs Total weight = 69,800 lbs NOTES: Major Components: Steam-reheater = 25,000 lbs.

Flash Tank = 1,600 lbs.

Moisture separator = 30,000 lbs.

All piping and valves have been removed under FC-64-97-1 1, except for directly under the turbine.

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 1256 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.4 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $85,812 25 $107,265 Shipping $4,500/load $7,853 15 $9,031 Reprocessing $1.855/lb $129,479 5 $135,953 Burial - - -

Material -

$223,144 = TOTAL = $252,249

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of CCW System in the Turbine Buildina 1994 S&L ID#: 236 LACBWR System #: 57 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = GIC to Oak Ridge, TN

$0.63/lb + $0.015/lb tax = $0.645/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.013 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weiqhts Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 lbs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Laraer component weiahts are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 600 Linear feet = 4,600 lbs Piping > 2.5" 350 Linear feet = 20,300 lbs Valves >8" 10 8,000 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs Misc. = 89,400 lbs lbs Total weight = 122,300 lbs NOTES: Coolers = 42,200 lbs. each Pump/expansion tank = 5,000 lbs.

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 1590 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.1 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $108,590 15 $124,879 Shipping $4,500/load $13,759 15 $15,823 Reprocessing $0.645/lb $78,884 5 $82,828 Burial Material

$201,233 TOTAL $223,530

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the Alternate Core Spray System 1994 S&L ID#: 237 LACBWR System #: 38 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = GIC to Oak Ridge, TN

$0.63/lb + $0.015/lb tax = $0.645/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.012 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 40 Ibs/ft 2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 100 Linear feet = 766 lbs Piping > 2.5" 303 Linear feet = 17,580 lbs Valves >8" 3 2,400 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" 28 = 14,000 lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = 34,746 lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 417 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.25 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $28,478 15 $32,750 Shipping $4,500/load $3,909 15 $4,495 Reprocessing $0.645/lb $22,411 5 $23,532 Burial _ _ _

Material

$54,798 = TOTAL = $60,777

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the HPSW System in Turbine Building 1994 S&L ID#: 238 LACBWR System #: 75 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = GIC to Oak Ridge, TN

$0.63/lb + $0.015/lb tax = $0.645/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.015 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 lbs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft 2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 200 Linear feet = 1,532 lbs Piping > 2.5" 200 Linear feet = 11,600 lbs Valves >8" lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" 30 = 15,000 lbs Plate steel from tanks or componen Itl* lbs Others: lbs Surge tank/pump = 3,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 31,132 lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 467 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.1 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $31,896 15 $36,680 Shipping $4,500/load $3,502 15 $4,027 Reprocessing $0.645/lb $20,080 5 $21,084 Burial _ _ _

Material

$55,478 = TOTAL = $61,791

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of Circulatinq Water System in Turbine Building 1994 S&L ID#: 238.1 LACBWR System #: 76 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = GIC to Oak Ridge, TN

$0.63/lb + $0.015/lb tax = $0.645/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.053 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet lbs Piping > 2.5" 50 Linear feet = 2,900 lbs Valves >8" 2 = 1,600 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" 12 = 6,000 lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs 4-42" Butterfly valves = 6,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 16,500 lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 875 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.01 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $59,728 15 $68,687 Shipping $4,500/load $1,856 15 $2,134 Reprocessing $0.645/lb $10,643 5 $11,175 Burial ___ __

Material - - - -

$72,227 = TOTAL $81,996

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of LPSW System in Turbine Building 1994 S&L ID#: 238.2 LACBWR System #: 91 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = GIC to Oak Ridge, TN

$0.63/lb + $0.015/lb tax = $0.645/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.015 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 lbs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger II component m

weights m

are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 180 Linear feet = 1,379 lbs Piping > 2.5" 210 Linearfeet = 12,180 lbs Valves >8" 8 = 6,400 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" 31 = 15,500 lbs Plate steel from tanks or componen lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = 35,459 lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 532 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.01 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $36,328 15 $41,777 Shipping $4,500/load $3,989 15 $4,587 Reprocessing $0.645/lb $22,871 5 $24,015 Burial -_- -

Material -

$63,188 TOTAL $70,379

Attachment 2 System/Project: Temporary Construction Electrical Work 1994 S&L ID#: 240 LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = N/A E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft 2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 lbs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8' valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = lbs NOTES: Man hours for 1994 S&L Study COSTS Assigned labor hours: 3840 hrs Assigned ManRem: 5.15 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $262,272 15 $301,613 Shipping Reprocessing Burial Material $10,000 25 $12,500

$272,272 = TOTAL $314,113

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the Electrical System 1994 S&L ID#: 241 (245 & 249) LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = GIC to Oak Ridge, TN

$0.63/lb + $0.015ilb tax = $0.645/Ib B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.068 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Lii near feet lbs Piping > 2.5" Lii near feet lbs Valves >8" lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" Plate steel lbs from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs Actual weight unknown = 150,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 150,000 lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 10,200 hrs Assigned ManRem: 4.42 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $696,660 15 $801,159 Shipping $4,500/load $16,875 15 $19,406 Reprocessing $0.645/lb $96,750 5 $101,588 Burial - -

Material -

$810,285 = TOTAL = $922,153

Attachment 2 System/Project: Station Service Equipment 1994 S&L ID#: 242 LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessinq Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = N/A E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft 2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Laraer component weiahts are obtained from tech. manuals when available I I I I I MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 250 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.34 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $17,075 15 $19,636 Shipping -

Reprocessing -

Burial _ _

Material -

$17,075 = TOTAL = $19,636

Attachment 2 System/Project: Main Electrical 1994 S&L ID#: 243 LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = N/A E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 lbs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5"- 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 860 hrs Assigned ManRem: 1.15 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $58,738 15 $67,549 Shipping ....

Reprocessing .

Burial ....

Material .

$58,738 = TOTAL $67,549

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of Instrument/Service Air System 1994 S&L ID#: 251 LACBWR System #: 70 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = GIC to Oak Ridge, TN

$0.63/lb + $0.015/lb tax = $0.64511b B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.044 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1"plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger II component I

weights mI II are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 650 Linear feet = 5,000 lbs Piping > 2.5" 160 Linear feet = 9,280 lbs Valves >8" 1 = 800 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" Ibs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs Air compressor (A&B) receivers & dryers = 5,600 lbs lbs Total weight = 20,680 lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 910 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.63 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $62,148 15 $71,470 Shipping $4,500/load $2,327 15 $2,676 Reprocessing $0.645/lb $13,339 5 $14,006 Burial _ _ _

Material

$77,814 = TOTAL = $88,152

Attachment 2 System/Project: Removal of the Heating System 1994 S&L ID#: 253 LACBWR System #: 73 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = GIC to Oak Ridge, TN

$0.63/lb + $0.015/lb tax = $0.645/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.012 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30ihr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 40 lbs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" 1,000 Linear feet = 7,660 lbs Piping > 2.5" 290 Linear feet = 16,820 lbs Valves >8" 4 = 3,200 lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" 2 = 1,000 lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs Misc. = 2,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 30,680 lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 368 hrs Assigned ManRem: 1.34 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $25,145 15 $28,917 Shipping $4,500/load $3,452 15 $3,970 Reprocessing $0.645/lb $19,789 5 $20,778 Burial ___ __

Material

$48,386 = TOTAL = $53,665

Attachment 2 System/Project: Plant Asbestos Removal 1994 S&L ID#: 300 LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = Asbestos direct compact(ACF)to Oak Ridge, TN

$4.54/lb + $0.015/lb tax = $4.555/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = N/A E Labor Rate: = Contract Labor $83.20/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 lbs/ft2 of 1" plate steel 3 800 lbs for 8" valves High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = 12,160 lbs NOTES: Only misc. asbestos insulation remains COSTS Assigned labor hours: 571 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.75 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $83.20/hr $47,507 25 $59,384 Shipping $4,500/load $1,368 15 $1,573 Reprocessing $4.555/lb $55,389 5 $58,158 Burial _ _ _

Material

$104,264 = TOTAL = $119,115

Attachment 2 System/Project: Resin Management 1994 S&L ID#: 600 LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = N/A Burial Rates: B Burial dipoaat Clive, UT based on contingent containerized waste B disposal

$45,000/container + $13.636% tax = $51,136/container C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.012 man hours/lb E Labor Rate: = DPC labor $68.30/hr F Weiahts Used for Conversion 3

Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 3

Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel 3

High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: 3 3 lbs Resin - 50 lb/ft 1,180 ft 59,000 lbs lbs Total weight = 59,000 lbs NOTES: Annual resin usage thru 2011 = 36 f/year Final cleanup = 1,000 ft3 All resins will be Class A material Shipments based on 120 ft3 of resin per shipment (10 shipments)

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 708 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0.7 Rem 2010 with Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $48,356 25 $60,445 Shipping $4,500/load $44,250 15 $50,888 Reprocessing - -

Burial $51,136/container $511,360 25 $639,200 Material - $177,000 25 $221,250

$780,966 = TOTAL $971,783

Attachment 2 System/Project: Normal Radioactive Waste Management 1994 S&L ID#: 700 LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = Bulk DAW to Oak Ridge, TN, in B-25's

$3.65/lb + $0.015/lb tax = $3.665/lb B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.012 man hours/lb E Labor Rate: = DPC Labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 40 lbs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: 3 lbs 4,900 ft 58,800 lbs lbs Total weight = 58,800 lbs NOTES: Assume approximately 350 fW 3/year until 2024 12 lbs/ft' = DAW Non Compacted COSTS Assigned labor hours: 706 hrs Assigned ManRem: 2.2 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $68.30/hr $48,220 25 $60,275 Shipping $4,500/load $6,615 15 $7,607 Reprocessing $3.655/lb $215,502 5 $226,277 Burial - - _

Material

$270,337 = TOTAL $294,159

Attachment 2 System/Project: Temoorarv Facilities 1994 S&L ID#: 801 LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = N/A E Labor Rate: = DPC Labor $68.30/hr F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 ibs/ft 2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Laraer comoonent weiahts are obtained from tech. manuals when available m* m iA MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet lbs Piping > 2.5" Li near feet lbs Valves >8" lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 1,428 hrs Assigned ManRem: N/A Rem Work to be Accomplished 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Set up temporary trailers $7,000 25 $8,750 Trailer rent for 72 months $242,400 25 $303,000 Potable water hookup $8,000 25 $10,000 Waste/vent hookup $8,000 25 $10,000 Electrical hookup $13,000 25 $16,250 Phone hookup $7,000 25 $8,750 Sheds $36,000 25 $45,000 Labor $97,532 15 $112,162

$418,932 = TOTAL $513,912

Attachment 2 System/Project: Equipment Needs 1994 S&L ID#: 802 LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = N/A E Labor Rate: = N/A F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 lbs/ft3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 lbs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs Total weight = lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: N/A hrs Assigned ManRem: N/A Rem

% Contingency 2010 with Contingencies S&L Required Equipment Quantity 2010 Cost 50-ton forklift 1 $300,000 25 $375,000 2-ton flat rack truck 1 $55,000 25 $68,750 Pickup truck 3 $99,000 25 $123,750 6-ton fwd all-terrain forklift 1 $55,000 25 $68,750 Walk-about cherry picker 1 $55,000 25 $68,750 Front-end loader/hoe 1 $38,500 25 $48,125 Dump truck 1 $99,000 25 $123,750 Scaffold 6' 6" 24 $16,500 25 $20,625 Cutting torches 8 $8,800 25 $11,000 Vacuum truck 1 $275,000 25 $343,750 750 cfm air compressor 1 $55,000 25 $68,750 Dust suppression water supply and hoses 1$13,200 25 $16,500

$1,070,000 = Total = $1,337,500

Attachment 2 System/Project: Radiological Equipment and Supplies 1994 S&L ID#: 804 LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = N/A E Labor Rate: = N/A F Weiahts Used for Cony aersion

.... i1 .... ...................

Dirt Weight = 150 lbs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = lbs NOTES: HP eauiDment = $393.300 Consumables = $1,748,000 COSTS Assigned labor hours: N/A hrs Assigned ManRem: N/A Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor Shipping Reprocessing Burial Material $2,141,300 25 $2,676,625

$2,141,300 = TOTAL = $2,676,625

Attachment 2 System/Project: Liquid and Solid Waste Removal 1994 S&L ID#: 805 LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessingq Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = N/A E Labor Rate: = N/A F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft 2 of 1' plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Laraer component weiahts are obtained from tech. manuals when available I J I I I MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = lbs NOTES: Filter systems/evaporation/bottles solidification system DOT drums (2,153 at $16.70 each)

COSTS Assigned labor hours: N/A hrs Assigned ManRem: N/A Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor Shipping Reprocessing Burial Material $216,000 25 $270,000

$216,000 = TOTAL = $270,000

Attachment 2 System/Project: Final Site Cleanu8 1994 S&L ID#: 807 LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = N/A E Labor Rate: = Contract labor $83.20/hr F Weiahts Used for Conyrersion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 lbs/ft 3 40 lbs/ft 2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbsift of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 7,227 hrs Assigned ManRem: 0 Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $83.20 $601,286 15 $691,479 Shipping Reprocessing Burial Material $15,000 25 $18,750

$616,286 = TOTAL -- $710,229

Attachment 2 System/Project: Indirect Costs 1994 S&L ID#: 900 LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = N/A E Labor Rate: = N/A F Weights Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 3

Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel 3

High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Laraer component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED RECOST ANALYSIS Period 3 Period 4 Period 5 (Planning) (Dismantlement) (Release)

A/E Costs $1,720,680 $4,057,040 $169,600 $5,947,320 Construction Costs $916,760 $3,152,760 $50,400 $4,119,920 HP Costs $287,560 $3,515,720 $36,000 $3,806,880 Security Costs $21,840 $93,600 $7,200 $122,640 TOTALS $2,946,840 $10,819,120 $263,200 $14,029,160 COSTS Assigned labor hours: N/A hrs Assigned ManRem: N/A Rem 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies A/E Costs $5,947,320 Construction Costs $4,119,920 HP Costs $3,806,880 Security Costs $122,640 TOTALS $14,029,160 15 $16,133,534

Attachment 2 System/Project: Final Release Survey 1994 S&L ID#: 1000 LACBWR System #: NIA 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates: = N/A C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,100/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = N/A E Labor Rate: = Contract labor $83.20/hr F Wei-ghts Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft 2 of 1" plate steel High density concrete weight = 230 Ibs/ft 3 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = lbs NOTES:

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 111,040 hrs Assigned ManRem: N/A Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $83.20 $9,238,528 15 $10,624,307 Shipping Reprocessing Burial Material

$9,238,528 = TOTAL $10,624,307

Attachment 2 System/Project: ISFSI 1994 S&L ID#: 1100 LACBWR System #: N/A 2010 Rates Used to Determine Cost A Reprocessing Rates: = N/A B Burial Rates: = Concrete to Clive, UT

$65/ft 3 + $5.263% tax = $68.42/ft 3 C Transportation Cost: = $4,500/load of 40,000 lbs of waste material to Oak Ridge, Tenn.

= $6,1 00/railcar of 180,000 lbs of waste to Energy Solutions D Unit Removal Rate: = 0.006 man hours/lb.

E Labor Rate: = Contract labor $83.20/hr F Weiahts Used for Conversion Dirt Weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 7.66 lb/ft of 3" piping schedule 80 Normal concrete weight = 150 Ibs/ft 3 40 Ibs/ft2 of 1" plate steel 3

High density concrete weight = 230 lbs/ft 800 lbs for 8" valves 58 lbs/ft of 8" piping schedule 80 500 lbs for 3" - 8" valves G Larger component weights are obtained from tech. manuals when available MATERIAL REMOVED Piping < 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Piping > 2.5" Linear feet = lbs Valves >8" = lbs Valves 2.5" - 8" = lbs Plate steel from tanks or components lbs Others: lbs lbs lbs Total weight = lbs NOTES: 191 CY of concrete to dispose of (5,157 ft3)

This cost will not be added into LACBWR's decommissioning cost but Will be used to establish a separate fund for ISFSI decommissioninq.

COSTS Assigned labor hours: 4286 hrs Assigned ManRem: N/A Rem Rate 2010 Cost % Contingency 2010 with Contingencies Labor $83.20 $356,629 15 $410,084 Shipping $4,500/load $87,024 15 $100,078 Reprocessing Burial $68.42/ft 3 $352,842 25 $441,052 Material $115,642 10 $127,206

$912,137 = TOTAL = $1,078,420

Attachment 3 Cost Study Historical Chanoes A. Changes made ih tile 1998 revision to the 1994 cost study:

I. Schedule Because of new initiative in the area of dry cask storage, the tentative schedule for shipping spent fuel has been moved up. Tile most optimistic time frame for commencement of fuel shipping appears, at this time, to be in the year 2003. If the schedule can be met, then the other elements o.f the decommissioning tirneline shown in Section 5 of the study can also be adjusted.

2. Burial Costs Based on Weight vs. Volume The methods for establishing burial costs at South Caroline-s Barnwell disposal facility have been changed. Burial costs are now based on the weight of material being buried and no longer on volume at Barnwell. Presently the burial cost is approximately $6.50/lb. A second facility, located in Utah. is Envirocare which continues to charge for burial by volume. The current cost of burial at Envirocare is $150/fr'.

3. Disposal of Concrete in the Containment Building The concrete surfaces in the Containment Building will not be scabbled as was assumed in the S&L study. Rather. all concrete in the Containment Building will be demolished, surveyed, and sent to disposal as needed. All rebar removed friom the Containment Building will be sent to a recycler for decon and release. A decon rate of 90% is used only for the rebar. This assumption was changed due to new technology being used on site to reduce, radiologically monitor, and separate concrete rubble for proper disposal. This eliminates the concern for estimating how much concrete has been contaminated by leakage forn the spent fuel pool and subsequent contamination of tile Containment Building concrete friom the pool area to the steel containment shell. The current assumption reduces the variability and uncertainty for this task.

4. Reactor Vessel Removal Methodology TFhe reactor vessel may be removed in one piece through the freight door or an opening cut into the side of the Containment Building. A new cost estimate is being pursued but may not be available for this update.

5. Recycling of Material LACBWR's current policy is to send all material removed during dismantlement, except for concrete rubble and rep-rap. to a licensed recycler. Material may be surveyed and released at LACBWR on a case-by-case basis, but will not be considered the norm. Present cost to recycle dismantlement material is approximately $1.50/lb. Decontamination factors of 10% to 40% have been 1 of 7

Attachment 3 assigned to each system. These decon factors will change as we obtain additional decon rates from our recyclers as the type of dismantlement material changes.

6. Waste Volume Generated From tile experience of the last several years, it appears the amount of material that will have to be sent to burial will be substantially less than that reported in the 1944 study. Better decontamination methods and Factors, greater compaction, and metal melting techniques have contributed to this burial reduction.

LACBWR's present cost study has determined that the following material will be sent to recycling and/or burial during the dismantlement of LACBWR:

a) Normal rubbish - 5.400 ft3 - to local landfill b) Asbestos insulation - 2,690 ft3 - for compaction and burial at Barnwell c) Reactor vessel - 964,000 lbs. - directly to burial at Barnwell dI) Concrete - 101,060 ft3 - directly to Envirocare e) All others - 1,143,326 lbs. - to recycling. Of this material, it has been determined that 1,143.326 lbs. will be unconditionally released. This leaves 1,451,442 lbs. of material to be buried at Barnwell.

7. Labor Labor rates obtained from the local AFL-CIO offices will be used to determine labor costs necessary for dismantlement. The hourly wage rate and benefit costs for a union boilermaker will be applied to all labor hours. Some dismantlement may be performed by general workers at a lower labor rate. These hours, however, have not been considered. It has been determined that 1,246,883 man hours and 146 mnanRem will be required for the dismantlement of LACBWR.

8. Time Necessary to Achieve Full Funding Current estimates place the fund at greater than 60% of the full funding goal. Tile combination of further cash infusion, anticipated fund growth, and continued limited dismantlement may allow for full funding to be achieved by the optimistic spent fuel shipping completion date of 2003.

B. Changes Made in the 2000 Revision to the 1994 Cost Study I. Schedule Because of new initiatives in the area of dry cask storage. the tentative schedule for shipping spent fuel has been moved tip. The most optimistic time frame for commencement of fuel shipping appears. at this time, to be in tile year 2004. If 2 of 7

Attachment 3 the schedule can be [net. then the other elements of the decommissioning timeline shown in Section 5 of the 1994 Sargent & LundCy study can also be adjusted.

2. Burial Costs Based on Wei,,ht vs. Volume The methods for establishing burial costs at South Caroline's Barnwell disposal racility have been changed. Burial costs are now based on the weight of material being buried and no longer on volume at Barnwell. Presently the burial cost is approximately $6.50/lb. A second tFacility, located in Utah, is Envirocare which continues to charge for burial by volume. The current cost of burial at Envirocare is $71/tfr' through our reprocessor.

3. Burial Sites Prior to 1999, Dairyland disposed of its radioactive material at the Barnwell, South Caroline, disposal facility at a cost of $6.50/lb. In 1999, LACBWR personnel conducted an audit of the Envirocare disposal site. After the audit, it was detemr ined that the Envirocare tacility was operating as required. Dairyland then began using the Envirocare site for disposal of its radioactive material and has continued to use Envirocare exclusively since that time. We have given approval to our reprocessor to ship all material, which is not firee-released, to Envirocare for final disposal. Through our reprocessor, Dairyland's current disposal charge at the Envirocare fitacility is $7 lIft'. The disposal records of Dairyland's previous shipments to our reprocessor indicate that, after reprocessing and compaction, our waste density is approximately 70 lbs/ft3 or Si/lb. The following burial assumption were discussed and determined during a meeting of LACBWR's Operation Review Committee, ORC-00-12 on 10/26/00.

a) All concrete or soils removed would be sent to burial at Envirocare using the rate of $71/ft3 .

b) All DAW,. systems, and equipment removed from [LACBWR that require burial after reprocessing will be sent to Envirocare. For conservatism, it was determined to use a cost of $2/lb., because of the uncertainties associated with the compaction and disposal of carious material not yet evaluated by actual removal costs.

c) The reactor vessel and any resin generated at LACBWR will still need to be buried at the Barnwell facility because of their Part 61 classification.

This burial will remain at a cost $6.50/lb.

4. Reprocessing of"Material LACBWR's current policy is to send material removed during dismantlement, except for concrete rubble and rip-rap, to a licensed recycler. Material may be surveyed and released at LACBWR on a case-by-case basis, but will not be considered the norn. Present cost to process dismantlement material is approximately S1.50/lb. Decontamination ofactors of 10% to 40% have been 3 of 7

Attachment 3 assigned to each system. These decon factors will change as we obtain additional decon rates 11rom our reprocessor as the type of dismantlement material changes.

Our experience, obtained form the materials already sent to our reprocessor, indicates a current decon factor of 74-76%. However, we have not yet obtained enough actual reprocessing decon factors to justify updating the decon factors currently used. The variation in system materials, components, contamination levels, and potential activation of material is too significant to consider making any change at this time to the decon -factors currently in use.

5. Waste Volume Generated From the experience of the last several years, it appears the amount of material that will have to be sent to burial will be substantially less than that reported in the 1944 study. Better decontamination methods and factors, greater compaction, and metal melting techniques have contributed to this burial reduction.

LACBWR's present cost study has determined that the ftollowing material will be sent to recycling and/or burial during the dismantlement of LACBWR:

a) Normal rubbish - 5,400 O13- to local landfill b) Asbestos insulation - 2,000 ft3 - for compaction and burial c) Reactor vessel - 964,000 lbs. - directly to burial at Barnwell cI) Concrete - 101,060 ft3 - directly to Envirocare e) All others- 2,481,631 Ibs. - to reprocessing. Of this material, it has been determined that 1,091,918 lbs. will be unconditionally released. This leaves 1,389,713 lbs. of material to be buried.

6. Labor Labor rates obtained from the Local 434 Plumber and Steam Fitter's office will be used to determine labor costs necessary for dismantlement. The hourly wage rate and benefit costs for a union boilermaker will be applied to all labor hours. Some dismantlement may be pertformed by general workers at a lower labor rate. These hours, however, have not been considered. It has been determined that 1,244,714 man hours and 142 manRem will be required for the dismantlement of LACBWR.

7. Time Necessary to Achieve Full Funding Current estimates place the fund at greater than 60% of the full funding goal. The combination of further cash infusion, anticipated fund growth, and contintued limited dismantlement may allow for full funding to be achieved by the optimistic spent fuel shipping completion date of 2004.

4 of 7

Attachment 3 C) Changes Made in the 2003 Revision to tlie 1.994 Cost Study:

!> All costs have been adjusted, based on 2003 dollars.

> All Class A metallic radioactive waste and DAW will be sent to a reprocessor for survey, repackaging, burial or release, as determined by the reprocessor. All Class A waste requiring burial will be sent to Energy Solutions in Clive, Utah. As of 2003, Duratek located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, is LACBWR's reprocessor. They are operating under a fixed price contract.

> All Class A concrete and soil wastes will be sent directly to Envirocare for disposal.

The burial cost of this material has increased significantly from the 200 cost study rates.

This due to the change of reprocessing companies.

>- All Class B & C wastes will be sent directly to burial in Barnwell, S.C.

" Due to the amount of time that has now elapsed since plant shutdown, there has been a significant reduction of radionuclides as a result of natural decay. No system decon will be needed as originally thought.

1" Cost estimates for the removal of the following components or systems have been added to the study:

o 1230 Removal of Main Turbine o #230. 1 Removal of Main Generator o 923 1 Removal of Turbine Oil System o 12238 Removal of the H1PSW system in the Turbine Building o A238.1 Removal of Circulating Water System in Turbine Building o #238.2 Removal of LPSW System in Turbine Building The weight of the main condenser listed in ID #232 was found to be inaccurate. This weight has been corrected.

> Contingency % and escalator % will be changed based on the original 1994 cost study, along with knowledge gained firom our own research, which included various industrial reports published by cost study professionals.

- The weight of the reactor vessel listed in ID 1221.1 was found to be inaccurate. This weight has been corrected.

" DPC will act as its own Decommissioning Operations Contractor (DOC). Outside assistance will be contracted as needed, but the overall project management will be based in-house.

I Spent fuel will be placed in dry storage as soon as practical. It will be sent to an off'site ISFSI or repository when one becomes available, possibly as soon as 2005.

Dismantlement of LACBWR will continue to be performed by plant personnel, in a limited ffaslhion, until all spent fuel has been placed in dry storage.

- Once all spent fuiel has been placed in dry storage, full-time dismantlement will commence. The work will be performed by DPC personnel and supplemented by 5 of 7

Attachment 3 contractors as deemed necessary. This could begin as early as 2005 and isexpected to last for seven years.

D. Chanjes Made in the 2007 Revision to the 1994 Cost Study:

> All costs have been adjusted, based on 2007 dollars.

> All Class A metallic radioactive waste and DAW will be sent to a reprocessor for survey,. repackaging, burial or release, as determined by the reprocessor. All Class A waste requiring burial will be sent to Energy Solutions in Clive, Utah. As of 2007, Energy Solutions located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, is LACBWR's reprocessor. They are operating under a fixed price contract. LACBWR is currently pursuing a contract to utilize tile services of Studsvik Race a waste processor located in Memphis, TN.

> All Class A concrete and soil wastes will be sent directly to Energy Solutions in Utah for disposal.

>* All Class B & C wastes will be sent directly to burial in Barnwell. S.C. before 2008 as the Barnwell disposal site will close at this time and no other site will accept B & C waste at this time.

Due to the amount of time that has now elapsed since plant shutdown, there has been a significant reduction of radionuclides as a result of natural decay. No system decon will be needed as originally thought.

'> DPC will act as its own Decommissioning Operations Contractor (DOC). Outside assistance will be contracted as needed, but the overall project management will be based in-house.

Spent fuel will be placed in dry storage as soon as practical. It will be sent to an offsite ISFSI or repository when one becomes available, possibly as soon as 2010.

Dismantlement of LACBWR will continue to be performed by plant personnel, in a limited Fashion, until all spent fuel has been placed in dry storage.

- Once all spent fuel has been placed in dry storage, full-time dismantlement will commence. The work will be performed by DPC personnel and supplemented by contractors as deemed necessary. This could begin as early as 2014 and is expected to last for seven years.

> System I1) 4239 - (Removal of Misc. TB Steam Components) will be removed as all materials associated with this system has been removed and disposed of.

System ID #221.1 - (Reactor Vessel Removal) will be removed from tile study. The RPV was removed and disposed of in 2007.

> System ID #900 - (Indirect Costs) this value will be adjust to reflect DOC costs associated with the RPV removal.

5- All systenms in which material has been removed and disposed of since 2003 will be updated.

- System ID U#802 - the cost for rental of the 300 ton Manirowac rigger is removed (lue to RPV removal.

6 of 7

Attachment 3

" Labor costs For 2007 will be based on a steam fitters cost instead of a boilermaker.

Steam fitters are responsible from the first valve from the boiler out.

" Due to the closing of Barnwell in 2008 all B & C waste has been disposed of.

LACBWR will no longer create B & C waste. No shipments of radioactive material will be disposed of in Barnwell.

System ID 4230 - surveys taken inside the turbine covers indicate significant levels of radioactive contamination. This system is no longer classified as a clean system.

Material will be removed and buried at a rate of S2.19/lb.

7 of 7

MATERIAL REMOVAL RATE FACTORS Attachment 4 System Removal Rate System Removal Rate 211 1.3 man-hours/cubic yard 230.1 0.002 man-hours/cubic yard 212 2.7 man-hours/cubic yard 231 0.029 man-hours/cubic yard 213 2.1 man-hours/cubic yard 232 0.013 man-hours/cubic yard 216 2.1 man-hours/cubic yard 233/235 0.012 man-hours/cubic yard 217 2.1 man-hours/cubic yard 234 0.018 man-hours/cubic yard 218 2.3 man-hours/cubic yard 236 0.013 man-hours/cubic yard 219 2.1 man-hours/cubic yard 237 0.012 man-hours/cubic yard 221.2 0.05 man-hours/pound 238 0.015 man-hours/pound 221.3 0.002 man-hours/pound 238.1 0.053 man-hours/pound 222.1 0.05 man-hours/pound 238.2 0.015 man-hours/pound 222.2 0.05 man-hours/pound 240 N/A man-hours/pound 222.3 0.05 man-hours/pound 241 0.068 man-hours/pound 222.4 0.05 man-hours/pound 242 N/A man-hours/pound 222.5 0.05 man-hours/pound 243 N/A man-hours/pound 223.2 0.05 man-hours/pound 251 0.044 man-hours/pound 223.3 0.05 man-hours/pound 253 0.012 man-hours/pound 223.5 0.05 man-hours/pound 300 N/A man-hours/pound 223.7 0.035 man-hours/pound 600 0.012 man-hours/pound 224.1/227 0.05 man-hours/pound 700 0.012 man-hours/pound 224.2 10.035 man-hours/pound 801 N/A man-hours/pound 224.3 0.035 man-hours/pound 802 N/A man-hours/pound 225 0.002 man-hours/pound 804 N/A man-hours/pound 226 0.032 man-hours/pound 805 N/A man-hours/pound 228.1 0.035 man-hours/pound 807 N/A man-hours/pound 228.2 0.05 man-hours/pound 900 N/A man-hours/pound 229 0.035 man-hours/pound 1000 N/A man-hours/pound 230 0.002 man-hours/pound 1100 0.006 man-hours/pound

ML12235A299

Contents

Text

SUBJECT:

REFERENCES:

Attachment:

Enclosure:

Enclosure:

Navigation menu

ML12235A299

Text

SUBJECT:

REFERENCES:

Attachment:

Enclosure:

Enclosure:

Navigation menu

Search