ML111320637

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Summary of 3/31/11 Meeting with Representatives of Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Discuss Pre-Application for Seismic License Amendment Request for Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML111320637
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 05/13/2011
From: Wang A
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Markley M
Plant Licensing Branch IV
Polickoski J, NRR/DORL/LPL4, 415-5430
References
TAC ME5033, TAC ME5034
Download: ML111320637 (5)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:V-1I REGu{ ~~v'- ~"'01> 0 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555*0001

A

~ ~ ~ 't.l}****i<~o May 13,2011 LICENSEE: Pacific Gas and Electric Company FACILITY: Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF MARCH 31,2011, PRE-LICENSING MEETING WITH PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ON RESPONSES TO THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF'S QUESTIONS FROM THE PREVIOUS PUBLIC MEETING ON JANUARY 26,2011 (TAC NOS. ME5033 AND ME5034) On March 31, 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff, as noticed in letter dated March 18, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML110760112), conducted a Category 1 pre-licensing public meeting with representatives of Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) Company, licensee for Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP), Units 1 and 2, at NRC Headquarters, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the licensee's responses to the NRC staff's questions from the previous public meeting on January 26, 2011, as noticed and summarized in the ADAMS Accession Nos. ML110120564 and ML110420183, respectively. This previous meeting discussed the licensee's plans to submit an amendment request to incorporate a methodology for the review of new geotechnical information in the design and licensing basis for DCPP, Units 1 and 2. A list of attendees is provided in the Enclosure and a transcript of this meeting is provided in ADAMS Accession No. ML111020379. The licensee answered the agenda items addressing the NRC staff's questions from the January 26, 2011, public meeting utilizing the figures in ADAMS Accession Nos. ML110910132, ML110910146, and ML110910157. The licensee first discussed the entry conditions for the use of the Long Term Seismic Program (LTSP) flowchart and for what purposes this flowchart will specifically be used. This discussion included the licensee's historical perspective for the genesis of the LTSP in terms of License Condition 2.C.(7) and Supplemental Safety Evaluation Report (SSER) 34. The licensee then provided an overview of how and to the applicable standard that each flowchart step will be performed for its updated L TSP evaluation flowchart, "DCPP Long Term Seismic Program Update, Evaluation of Updated Seismic Hazard Information," draft dated March 29, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML110910132). Following the licensee's review of the L TSP evaluation flowchart, the NRC staff asked questions regarding how the word "significant" will be defined in terms of new seismic hazard information, the basis for the numeric value the licensee proposed for the minimum deterministic seismic margin, and the basis for the removal of a seismic core damage frequency value from the flowchart presented at the January 26, 2011, meeting. The staff emphasized that seismic margin values approved previously do not necessarily reflect what the staff would approve today, and staff approval would be dependent on the quality and content of the submittal. Following the NRC staffs questions, the licensee described that "significant" is a judgment decision by the PG&E Geosciences Department, and then reviewed the relationship between the Deterministic Ground Motion Response Spectrum (DGMRS), the High Confidence Low

- 2 Probability of Failure (HCLPF) Capacities, the L TSP response spectra, and the current design and licensing basis. For the remainder of the agenda items, the discussion between the licensee and the NRC staff focused on questions regarding the relationship between the L TSP evaluation methodology and its accompanying L TSP analysis flowchart with the current design and licensing basis as defined in DCPP's Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) in terms of the three design basis earthquakes, namely the Design Earthquake (DE), the Double Design Earthquake (DDE), and the Hosgri Earthquake (HE). The staff questioned why the DE and DDE are not discussed in the L TSP analysis flowchart or in the deterministic and probabilistic hazard curves (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML110910146 and ML110910157, respectively). The licensee stated that it would be able to include the DE and DDE on the curves and flowchart for clarification as to their places in the process. The staff and the licensee discussed staff questions regarding the relationship between how new seismic hazard information (ground motion) will be analyzed against the equipment and plant engineering performance criteria contained within the UFSAR requirements for the DE, DDE, and HE in order to understand equipment operability (e.g., American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code allowables for safety-related structures, systems, and components (SSCs)). Following the staff's questions, the licensee clarified that plant equipment installations and modifications are qualified per DE, DDE, and HE requirements for Seismic Category One equipment. Eight members of the public were in attendance. Public Meeting Feedback forms were not received. Please direct any inquiries to Jim Polickoski at 301-415-5430 or james.polickoski@nrc.gov. (~ ~Jcvv~ AI~n B. Wang, Project (MJnager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323

Enclosure:

List of Attendees cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv

LIST OF ATTENDEES U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION MARCH 31! 2011! MEETING WITH PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-275 AND 50-323 NRC

Participants:

Headquarters: Michael Markley, Chief, Plant Licensing Branch IV, NRR/DORL Kamal Manoly, Senior Level Advisor for Structural Mechanics, NRR/DE Annie Kammerer, Senior Seismologist/Geophysicist, Structural, Geotechnical & Seismic Engineering Branch, RESIDE Pat Hiland, Director, Division of Engineering, NRR/DE Goutam Bagchi, Senior Advisor (Geotechnical), Division of Site and Environmental Reviews, NRO/DSER Maxwell Smith, Attorney, Office of General Counsel Lloyd Subin, Attorney, Office of General Counsel Eric Oesterle, Senior Policy Analyst, Rulemaking, Guidance, and Advanced Reactor Branch, NROIDNRL Ata Istar, Structural Engineer, Aging Management of Structures, Electrical, and Systems Branch, NRR/DLR Steven Laur, Senior Technical Advisor for Risk Informed Initiatives, NRR/DRA See-Meng Wong, Senior Reactor Analyst, PRA Operational Support Branch, NRRlDRA Nate Ferrer, Project Manager, Projects Branch 2, NRRIDLR Carmen Fells, Project Manager, Projects Branch 2, NRRlDLR Alan Wang, Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV, NRR/DORL Balwant Singal, Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV, NRR/DORL James Polickoski, Project Manager, Plant licensing Branch IV, NRRIDORL Region IV: Rick Deese, Senior Project Engineer, Reactor Projects Branch B

  • Michael Peck, Senior Resident Inspector, Diablo Canyon Power Plant
  • Christie Denissen, Reactor Inspector, Engineering Branch 1
  • Jonathan Braisted, Project Engineer, Reactor Projects Branch C
  • Lara Uselding, Field Public Affairs Officer *
  • denotes participating via teleconference Enclosure

- 2 Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Participants:

Loren Sharp, Senior Director, Technical Services Norman Abrahamson, Principal Consulting Technology Seismologist, Geosciences Rich Klimczak, Manager, Design Engineering Nathan Barber, Engineer, Probabilistic Risk Assessment Bill Hourstman, Consulting Engineer, Civil Engineering Philippe Soenen, Licensing Supervisor, Regulatory Services Jennifer Post, Attorney, Environmental Compliance and Nuclear Members of the Public: David Repka, Winston &Strawn Jane Swanson, San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace

  • Greg Hardy, Senior Principal, Simpson, Gumpertz, and Heger David Nakaki, Simpson, Gumpertz, and Heger
  • Kimberly Keithline, Nuclear Energy Institute Caroline McAndrews, Southern California Edison
  • Bob Horton, South Carolina Electric and Gas
  • Wally Hafiz, Clinton Nuclear Power Station *
  • denotes participating via teleconference

Notice ML110760112 DORULPL41 - 2 Probability of Failure (HCLPF) Capacities, the L TSP response spectra, and the current design and licensing basis. For the remainder of the agenda items, the discussion between the licensee and the NRC staff focused on questions regarding the relationship between the L TSP evaluation methodology and its accompanying L TSP analysis flowchart with the current design and licensing basis as defined in DCPP's Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) in terms of the three design basis earthquakes, namely the Design Earthquake (DE), the Double Design Earthquake (DOE), and the Hosgri Earthquake (HE). The staff questioned why the DE and DOE are not discussed in the L TSP analysis flowchart or in the deterministic and probabilistic hazard curves (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML110910146 and ML110910157, respectively). The licensee stated that it would be able to include the DE and DOE on the curves and flowchart for clarification as to their places in the process. The staff and the licensee discussed staff questions regarding the relationship between how new seismic hazard information (ground motion) will be analyzed against the equipment and plant engineering performance criteria contained within the UFSAR requirements for the DE, DOE, and HE in order to understand equipment operability (e.g., American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code allowables for safety-related structures, systems, and components (SSCs)). Following the staff's questions, the licensee clarified that plant equipment installations and modifications are qualified per DE, DOE, and HE requirements for Seismic Category One equipment. Eight members of the public were in attendance. Public Meeting Feedback forms were not received. Please direct any inquiries to Jim Polickoski at 301-415-5430 or james.polickoski@nrc.gov. IRA! Alan B. Wang, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323

Enclosure:

List of Attendees cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION: PUBLIC RidsNrrPMDiabloCanyon Resource MSmith, OGC/GCHEAlAGCOR LPLIV r/f RidsResDe Resource AVegel, RIV RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsOcaMailCenter Resource RDeese, RIV RidsNroDser Resource RidsOgcRp Resource MPeck, RIV RidsNrrDe Resource RidsOpaMail Resource WMaier, RIV RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsRgn4MailCenter Resource SBush-Goddard. EDO RIV RidsNrrDorl Resource KManoly, NRR/DE VDricks, OPA RIV RidsNrrDorlLpl4 Resource AKammerer, RESIDE/SGSEB JPolickoski, NRR RldsNrrDra rESOURCE CSteger, NRR RidsNrrLAJBurkhardt Resource JWeil.OCA DORLlLPL4/PM JBurkhardt MMarkley

  • JPolickoski 11 5/12/11 5/13/11

===~==~~~"====~===~0~F~F~ICdIA7L~R=EC~O~R~DCOPY}}