ML110060009
| ML110060009 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 01/06/2011 |
| From: | Peter Bamford Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Tom Loomis Exelon Corp |
| Bamford, Peter J., NRR/DORL 415-2833 | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML110060499 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC ME5182 | |
| Download: ML110060009 (1) | |
Text
From:
Bamford, Pe Sent:
Thursday, Ja To:
'thomas.loom Cc:
'david.helke
Subject:
Acceptance Ratio License By letter dated December 15, 2010 Company, LLC submitted a license a (LGS), Unit 2, proposing changes to minimum critical power ratios. The p performed for the upcoming LGS, U The purpose of this email is to provid (NRC) staff's acceptance review of t performed to determine if there is su NRC staff to complete its detailed te identify whether the application has characterization of the regulatory req The NRC staff has reviewed your ap information in sufficient detail to ena and make an independent assessm amendment in terms of regulatory re and the environment. If additional in review, you will be advised by separ Peter Bamford NRR/DORL/LPL 1-2 Limerick & TMI-1 Project Manager 301-415-2833 eter anuary 06, 2011 7:14 AM mis@exeloncorp.com' r@exeloncorp.com' Review of Limerick Unit 2 Safety Limit Minimum Criti e Amendment Request (TAC No. ME5182)
(ADAMS Accession No. ML103500180), Exelon amendment request (LAR) for Limerick Generatin o the Technical Specifications relating to the safet proposed changes are based on the cycle specif nit 2, Cycle 12.
de the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co this amendment request. The acceptance review ufficient technical information in scope and depth echnical review. The acceptance review is also in any readily apparent information insufficiencies i quirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
pplication and concluded that it does provide tech able the staff to proceed with its detailed technica ent regarding the acceptability of the proposed lic equirements and the protection of public health a nformation is needed for the staff to complete its t rate correspondence.
cal Power Generation ng Station ty limit fic analysis mmission w was to allow the ntended to n its hnical al review cense nd safety technical