ML102371292

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8)
ML102371292
Person / Time
Site: Kewaunee Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 08/18/2010
From:
Dominion Energy Kewaunee
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
10-457, TAC ME2139
Download: ML102371292 (138)


Text

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 1 of 138 ITS NRC Questions Id 1731 NRC Question GMW-006 Number Category Technical ITS Section 3.8 ITS Number 3.8.6 DOC Various Number JFD Number JFD Bases Number Page Various Number(s)

NRC Reviewer Rob Elliott Supervisor Technical M. McConnell Branch POC Conf Call N

Requested NRC There have been several informal phone conversations between the NRC Question and the licensee regarding proposed industry changes related to the D C Sources-Operating, ITS 3.8.4, D C Sources-Shutdown, ITS 3.8.5, and the Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program, ITS 5.5.16. Kewaunees original ITS submittal was based on NUREG-1430 and industry guidance at the time of the submittal. Since the submittal, industry has proposed modified guidance related to the Technical Specifications and the Program. Kewaunee has expressed a desire to include these changes to ITS 3.8.4, 3.8.5, 3.8.6, and ITS 5.5.16 as applicable to KPS. Please provide the reviewer with the proposed change(s) to the submittal including the affected ITS Bases and all supporting documentation for proposed change (s).

Attach File 1

Attach File 2

Issue Date 2/19/2010 Added By Gerald Waig Date Modified Modified By Date Added 2/19/2010 10:44 AM Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 1 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=1731 06/03/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 2 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 2291 NRC Question GMW-006 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

2/25/2010 10:30 AM Date/Time Closure Statement Response Kewaunee Power Station (KPS) included in the ITS submittal the changes Statement identified in the most current revision of proposed TSTF-500. This is identified in Enclosure 3, page 4 of 4, of the ITS submittal letter. Since the ITS submittal, the NRC and industry have made changes to proposed TSTF-500. The NRC reviewer, during the informal phone conversations, requested that KPS review these changes. KPS has reviewed the changes and agrees to make the requested changes to be consistent with the NRC and industry agreements concerning TSTF-500. A draft markup regarding this change is attached. This change will be reflected in the supplement to this section of the ITS conversion amendment.

Question Closure Date Attachment GMW-006 Markup (2).pdf (1MB) 1 Attachment 2

Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Robert Hanley Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Gerald Waig Added By David Mielke Date Added 2/25/2010 10:35 AM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 2 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2291 06/03/2010

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 3 of 138 All changes are 1 DC Sources - Operating unless otherwise noted B 3.8.4 BASES SURVEILLANCE SR 3.8.4.1 for the batteries REQUIREMENTS Verifying battery terminal voltage while on float charge helps to ensure the effectiveness of the battery chargers, which support the ability of the batteries to perform their intended function. Float charge is the condition in which the charger is supplying the continuous charge required to overcome the internal losses of a battery and maintain the battery in a fully charged state while supplying the continuous steady state loads of the associated DC subsystem. On float charge, battery cells will receive times the adequate current to optimally charge the battery. The voltage number of requirements are based on the nominal design voltage of the battery and connected cells are consistent with the minimum float voltage established by the battery 10 manufacturer ([2.20] Vpc or [127.6] V at the battery terminals). This for a 59 2 2.22 voltage maintains the battery plates in a condition that supports cell battery 130.98 maintaining the grid life (expected to be approximately 20 years). The 7 day Frequency is consistent with manufacturer recommendations and IEEE-450 (Ref. 8). conservative when compared 6 Each of the battery chargers has been sized to recharge its associated partially discharged battery within 24 SR 3.8.4.2 hours, while carrying its normal load.

required 7

This SR verifies the design capacity of the battery chargers. According to Regulatory Guide 1.32 (Ref. 9), the battery charger supply is recommended to be based on the largest combined demands of the various steady state loads and the charging capacity to restore the battery from the design minimum charge state to the fully charged state, irrespective of the status of the unit during these demand occurrences.

The minimum required amperes and duration ensure that these requirements can be satisfied. s 150 This SR provides two options. One option requires that each battery charger be capable of supplying [400] amps at the minimum established 2 float voltage for [8] hours. The ampere requirements are based on the output rating of the chargers. The voltage requirements are based on the charger voltage level after a response to a loss of AC power. The time period is sufficient for the charger temperature to have stabilized and to have been maintained for at least [2] hours. 2 The other option requires that each battery charger be capable of recharging the battery after a service test coincident with supplying the combined largest coincident demands of the various continuous steady state loads (irrespective of the status of the plant during which these demands occur). This level of loading may not normally be available following the WOG STS B 3.8.4-8 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 3 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 4 of 138 All changes are 1 DC Sources - Operating unless otherwise noted B 3.8.4 BASES SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued) battery service test and will need to be supplemented with additional loads. The duration for this test may be longer than the charger sizing criteria since the battery recharge is affected by float voltage, temperature, and the exponential decay in charging current. The battery is recharged when the measured charging current is 

The Surveillance Frequency is acceptable, given the unit conditions required to perform the test and the other administrative controls existing to ensure adequate charger performance during these [18 month] 2 intervals. In addition, this Frequency is intended to be consistent with expected fuel cycle lengths.

SR 3.8.4.3 A battery service test is a special test of the battery capability, as found, to satisfy the design requirements (battery duty cycle) of the DC electrical power system. The discharge rate and test length should correspond to the design duty cycle requirements as specified in Reference 4. 6 The Surveillance Frequency of [18 months] is consistent with the 7 2 8 recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.32 (Ref. 9) and Regulatory Guide 1.129 (Ref. 10), which state that the battery service test should be 7 performed during refueling operations, or at some other outage, with intervals between tests not to exceed [18 months]. 2 This SR is modified by two Notes. Note 1 allows the performance of a modified performance discharge test in lieu of a service test.

The reason for Note 2 is that performing the Surveillance would perturb the electrical distribution system and challenge safety systems. This restriction from normally performing the Surveillance in MODE 1 or 2 is further amplified to allow portions of the Surveillance to be performed for the purpose of reestablishing OPERABILITY (e.g., post work testing following corrective maintenance, corrective modification, deficient or incomplete surveillance testing, and other unanticipated OPERABILITY concerns) provided an assessment determines plant safety is maintained or enhanced. This assessment shall, as a minimum, consider the potential outcomes and transients associated with a failed partial WOG STS B 3.8.4-9 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 4 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 5 of 138 All changes are 1 DC Sources - Operating unless otherwise noted B 3.8.4 BASES SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

Surveillance, a successful partial Surveillance, and a perturbation of the offsite or onsite system when they are tied together or operated independently for the partial Surveillance; as well as the operator procedures available to cope with these outcomes. These shall be measured against the avoided risk of a plant shutdown and startup to determine that plant safety is maintained or enhanced when portions of the Surveillance are performed in MODE 1 or 2. Risk insights or deterministic methods may be used for the assessment. Credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR.

REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 17.

6 Safety

2. Regulatory Guide 1.6, March 10, 1971.
3. IEEE-308-[1978].

U 3 4. FSAR, Chapter [8].

2

5. FSAR, Chapter [6].

14 4

6. FSAR, Chapter [15]. 2 U

5 7. Regulatory Guide 1.93, December 1974.

1987 6

8. IEEE-450-[1995]. 2 6 7
9. Regulatory Guide 1.32, February 1977.

7 8

10. Regulatory Guide 1.129, December 1974.

WOG STS B 3.8.4-10 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 5 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 6 of 138 Battery Parameters CTS 3.8.6 3.8 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS 3.8.6 Battery Parameters


REVIEWER'S NOTE-------------------------------------------------

Licensees must implement a program, as specified in Specification 5.5.17, to monitor battery parameters that is based on the recommendations of IEEE Standard 450-1995, "IEEE 1 Recommended Practice For Maintenance, Testing, And Replacement Of Vented Lead-Acid Batteries For Stationary Applications."

DOC A02, LCO 3.8.6 Battery parameters for Train A and Train B batteries shall be within limits.

3.7.a.6 electrical power subsystem 3.7.a APPLICABILITY: When associated DC electrical power subsystems are required to be OPERABLE.

ACTIONS


NOTE-----------------------------------------------------------

DOC L01 Separate Condition entry is allowed for each battery.

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME DOC L01 A. One [or two] batter[y][ies A.1 Perform SR 3.8.4.1. 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> on one train] with one or 2 more battery cells float AND voltage < [2.07] V.

A.2 Perform SR 3.8.6.1. 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> AND A.3 Restore affected cell 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> 2

voltage  

DOC L01 B. One [or two] batter[y][ies B.1 Perform SR 3.8.4.1. 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> 2

on one train] with float current > [2] amps. AND B.2 Restore battery float current [12] hours 2 to 

WOG STS 3.8.6-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 6 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 7 of 138 Battery Parameters CTS 3.8.6 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME DOC L01 F. Required Action and F.1 Declare associated battery Immediately associated Completion inoperable.

Time of Condition A, B, C, D, or E not met.

OR One [or two] batter[y][ies 2 on one train] with one or more battery cells float OR voltage < [2.07] V and 2 4

float current > [2] amps. SR 3.8.6.6 not met.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY DOC M02 SR 3.8.6.1 -------------------------------NOTE------------------------------

Not required to be met when battery terminal voltage is less than the minimum established float voltage of SR 3.8.4.1.

2 Verify each battery float current is  7 days float 4.6.b.1 SR 3.8.6.2 Verify each battery pilot cell voltage is   31 days 2 4.6.b.2 SR 3.8.6.3 Verify each battery connected cell electrolyte level is 31 days greater than or equal to minimum established design limits.

4.6.b.1 SR 3.8.6.4 Verify each battery pilot cell temperature is greater 31 days than or equal to minimum established design limits.

WOG STS 3.8.6-3 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 7 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 8 of 138 Battery Parameters CTS 3.8.6 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY 4.6.b.1 SR 3.8.6.5 Verify each battery connected cell voltage is 92 days 2

[2.07] V.

float 4.6.b.4 SR 3.8.6.6 -------------------------------NOTE------------------------------

This Surveillance shall not be performed in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4. However, portions of the Surveillance may be performed to reestablish OPERABILITY provided an assessment determines 5 the safety of the plant is maintained or enhanced.

Credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR.

Verify battery capacity is   60 months 2 manufacturer's rating when subjected to a performance discharge test or a modified AND performance discharge test.

12 months when battery shows degradation, or has reached 2



expected life with

  

of manufacturer's rating AND 24 months when battery has

 2 the expected life with capacity

 

manufacturer's rating WOG STS 3.8.6-4 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 8 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 9 of 138 Battery Parameters B 3.8.6 BASES ACTIONS (continued)

A discharged battery with float voltage (the charger setpoint) across its terminals indicates that the battery is on the exponential charging current portion (the second part) of its recharge cycle. The time to return a battery to its fully charged state under this condition is simply a function of the amount of the previous discharge and the recharge characteristic of the battery. Thus there is good assurance of fully recharging the battery 1

within [12] hours, avoiding a premature shutdown with its own attendant risk.

If the condition is due to one or more cells in a low voltage condition but still greater than [2.07] V and float voltage is found to be satisfactory, this 1 is not indication of a substantially discharged battery and [12] hours is a reasonable time prior to declaring the battery inoperable.

Since Required Action B.1 only specifies "perform," a failure of SR 3.8.4.1 acceptance criteria does not result in the Required Action not met.

However, if SR 3.8.4.1 is failed, the appropriate Condition(s), depending on the cause of the failure, is entered.

y C.1, C.2, and C.3 With one or more batteries in one train with one or more cells electrolyte 8 level above the top of the plates, but below the minimum established design limits, the battery still retains sufficient capacity to perform the intended function. Therefore, the affected battery is not required to be considered inoperable solely as a result of electrolyte level not met.

Within 31 days the minimum established design limits for electrolyte level must be re-established.

With electrolyte level below the top of the plates there is a potential for dryout and plate degradation. Required Actions C.1 and C.2 address this " 7 potential (as well as provisions in Specification 5.5.17, Battery Monitoring 2 15 and Maintenance Program). They are modified by a Note that indicates they are only applicable if electrolyte level is below the top of the plates.

Within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> level is required to be restored to above the top of the requirement plates. The Required Action C.2 requirement to verify that there is no 2 7 leakage by visual inspection and the Specification 5.5.17.b item to initiate Appendix action to equalize and test in accordance with manufacturer's 15 recommendation are taken from Annex D of IEEE Standard 450-1995.

They are performed following the restoration of the electrolyte level to 1987 above the top of the plates. Based on the results of the manufacturer's recommended testing the batter[y][ies] may have to be declared 8 inoperable and the affected cell[s] replaced.

(s)

WOG STS B 3.8.6-4 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 9 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 10 of 138 Battery Parameters B 3.8.6 BASES ACTIONS (continued) y D.1 With one or more batteries in one train with pilot cell temperature less 8 than the minimum established design limits, 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> is allowed to restore the temperature to within limits. A low electrolyte temperature limits the current and power available. Since the battery is sized with margin, while battery capacity is degraded, sufficient capacity exists to perform the intended function and the affected battery is not required to be considered inoperable solely as a result of the pilot cell temperature not met.

E.1 two With one or more batteries in redundant trains with battery parameters 8 not within limits there is not sufficient assurance that battery capacity has not been affected to the degree that the batteries can still perform their required function, given that redundant batteries are involved. With redundant batteries involved this potential could result in a total loss of function on multiple systems that rely upon the batteries. The longer 8 Completion Times specified for battery parameters on non-redundant batteries not within limits are therefore not appropriate, and the parameters must be restored to within limits on at least one train within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.

subsystem F.1 y or SR 3.8.6.6 With one or more batteries with any battery parameter outside the not met, allowances of the Required Actions for Condition A, B, C, D, or E, 8 sufficient capacity to supply the maximum expected load requirement is not assured and the corresponding battery must be declared inoperable. y Additionally, discovering one or more batteries in one train with one or more battery cells float voltage less than [2.07] V and float current greater 1 than [2] amps indicates that the battery capacity may not be sufficient to 1 perform the intended functions. The battery must therefore be declared inoperable immediately.

WOG STS B 3.8.6-5 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 10 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 11 of 138 Battery Parameters B 3.8.6 BASES 1

REFERENCES 1. IEEE-450-[1995].

-1987 U 4

2. FSAR, Chapter 8.
3. FSAR, Chapter [6].

U 14 1 3

4. FSAR, Chapter [15].

4 4

5. IEEE-485-[1983], June 1983.

WOG STS B 3.8.6-9 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 11 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 12 of 138 CTS Programs and Manuals 5.5 5.5 Programs and Manuals 5.5.16 Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program (continued) 6 14

1. Containment leakage rate acceptance criterion is  1.0 La. During the first unit startup following testing in accordance with this program, the leakage rate acceptance criteria are < 0.60 La for the Type B and C tests and [< 0.75 La for Option A Type A tests] [ 0.75 La for Option B Type A tests].
2. Air lock testing acceptance criteria are:

a) Overall air lock leakage rate is  [0.05 La] when tested at Pa. 19 b) For each door, leakage rate is  [0.01 La] when pressurized to

[ 10 psig].

e. The provisions of SR 3.0.3 are applicable to the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program.
f. Nothing in these Technical Specifications shall be construed to modify the testing Frequencies required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix J.

DOC 5.5.17 15 Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program 6 M10 This Program provides for battery restoration and maintenance, based on [the recommendations of IEEE Standard 450-1995, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Vented Lead-Acid Batteries for 24 Stationary Applications," or of the battery manufacturer] including the following:

which includes

a. Actions to restore battery cells with float voltage < [2.13] V, and 1 INSERT 8A 24
b. Actions to equalize and test battery cells that had been discovered with electrolyte level below the minimum established design limit. top of the plates; DOC 25 26 INSERT 8 M11
c. Actions to verify that the remaining cells are > 2.07 V when a pilot cell or cells have been found to be < [2.13] V. 1
d. Limits on average electrolyte temperature, battery connection resistance, and battery terminal voltage; and, 24
e. A requirement to obtain specific gravity readings of all cells at each discharge test, consistent with manufacturer recommendations.

WOG STS 5.5-18 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 12 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 13 of 138 INSERT 8A This Program provides controls for battery restoration and maintenance. The program shall be in accordance with IEEE Standard (Std) 450-2002, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Vented Lead-Acid Batteries for Stationary Applications," as endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.129, Revision 2 (RG), with RG exceptions and program provisions as identified below:

a. The program allows the following RG 1.129, Revision 2 exceptions:
1. Battery temperature correction may be performed before or after conducting discharge tests.
2. RG 1.129, Regulatory Position 1, Subsection 2, "References," is not applicable to this program.
3. In lieu of RG 1.129, Regulatory Position 2, Subsection 5.2, "Inspections," the following shall be used: "Where reference is made to the pilot cell, pilot cell selection shall be based on the lowest voltage cell in the battery.

4 In Regulatory Guide 1.129, Regulatory Position 3, Subsection 5.4.1, "State of Charge Indicator," the following statements in paragraph (d) may be omitted: "When it has been recorded that the charging current has stabilized at the charging voltage for three consecutive hourly measurements, the battery is near full charge. These measurements shall be made after the initially high charging current decreases sharply and the battery voltage rises to approach the charger output voltage."

5. In lieu of RG 1.129, Regulatory Position 7, Subsection 7.6, "Restoration", the following may be used: "Following the test, record the float voltage of each cell of the string."
b. The program shall include the following provisions:
1. Actions to restore battery cells with float voltage < 2.13 V;
2. Actions to determine whether the float voltage of the remaining battery cells is 2.13 V when the float voltage of a battery cell has been found to be < 2.13 V;
3. Actions to equalize and test battery cells that had been discovered with electrolyte level below the top of the plates;
4. Limits on average electrolyte temperature, battery connection resistance, and battery terminal voltage; and
5. A requirement to obtain specific gravity readings of all cells at each discharge test, consistent with manufacturer recommendations.

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 13 of 138

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 14 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 2901 NRC Question GMW-006 Number Select Application NRC Question Closure

Response

Date/Time Closure Statement Additional information, if required, will be requested via a separate Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database question.

Response

Statement Question Closure 5/10/2010 Date Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Added By Gerald Waig Date Added 5/10/2010 3:56 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 14 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2901 06/03/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 15 of 138 ITS NRC Questions Id 1931 NRC Question GMW-007 Number Category Technical ITS Section 3.8 ITS Number DOC Various Number JFD Number JFD Bases Number Page Various Number(s)

NRC Reviewer Rob Elliott Supervisor Technical M. McConnell Branch POC Conf Call N

Requested NRC In response to a request for additional information (GMW-006) dated Question 2/19/2010, Kewaunee Power Station (KPS) provided a marked-up copy of Standard Technical Specification (STS) Section 3.8, DC Sources, the affected STS 3.8 Bases, and STS Section 5.5, Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program, proposing changes to the original submittal. Please provide the reviewer with documentation to support the requested changes, specifically: a discussion of the proposed change (DOC) and, in all cases where a deviation from STS is proposed, a justification for the deviation (JFD). This information is needed by staff to evaluate the proposed changes and deviations.

Attach File 1 Attach File 2 Issue Date 3/18/2010 Added By Gerald Waig Date Modified Modified By Date Added 3/18/2010 3:46 PM Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 15 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=1931 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 4 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 16 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 2751 NRC Question GMW-007 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

4/12/2010 1:00 PM Date/Time Closure Statement

Response

Statement Changes to ISTS 3.8.4, "DC-Sources - Operating," ISTS 3.8.5, "DC Sources -

Shutdown," ISTS 3.8.6, "Battery Parameters," and ISTS 5.5.17, "Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program," were added to NUREG-1431, Rev. 2 as part of TSTF-360, Rev. 1, which was approved by the NRC on December 18, 2000 (documented in a letter from W. D. Beckner, NRC to A. R. Pietrangelo, NEI). In a subsequent NRC letter to the Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF), dated April 11, 2006, the NRC expressed concerns about certain aspects of the changes approved in TSTF-360, Rev.1. Since that time, the NRC and TSTF have had ongoing discussions concerning this program, and a new TSTF, proposed TSTF-500, Rev.

2, has been generated to resolve the NRC concerns. In the proposed TSTF, Section 4.7.1, there is a list of verifications required to adopt TSTF-500, Rev. 2. In addition, in Section 4.7.2 of the proposed TSTF, there is a list of Commitments required to adopt the TSTF. Listed below is each Verification and Commitment, and the KPS response to the Verifications and Commitments.

Section 4.7.1 Verifications

1. In an attachment to the LAR, the licensee must provide letters from the manufactures of the batteries used at the plant verifying the acceptability of using float current monitoring instead of specific gravity monitoring as a reliable and accurate indication of the state-of-charge of the battery and that this will hold true over the life of the battery.

KPS Response: KPS has requested a letter from the manufacturer of the batteries specified in ITS 3.8.4 and will be provided in a future response.

2. The licensee must verify that battery room temperature is routinely monitored such that a room temperature excursion could reasonably expect to be detected and corrected prior to the average battery electrolyte temperature dropping below the minimum electrolyte temperature.

KPS Response: The temperature of the battery rooms are checked twice daily (during day shift and night shift) and logged in the Equipment Operator logs.

The acceptance band for the temperature is 67ºF to 83ºF. If the temperature is outside this band, the procedure directs entry into the abnormal ventilation procedure, which identifies OPERABILITY limits for the batteries. The minimum electrolyte temperature is 67ºF. Thus, since the battery electrolyte temperature is not reasonably expected to decrease faster than the ambient room temperature, taking action when the room temperature is less than 67ºF should ensure the actual electrolyte temperature does not decrease below Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 16 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2751 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 2 of 4 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 17 of 138 67ºF.

3. The licensee must verify that the equipment that will be used to monitor float current under SR 3.8.6.1 will have the necessary accuracy and capability to measure electrical currents in the expected range.

KPS Response: KPS has procured a Fluke handheld unit with an accuracy of

+ 0.2 amps in the float current range (< 10 amps). KPS has performed field testing to verify that the meter can be used to monitor float current IAW SR 3.8.6.1 to assure that the meter has the necessary accuracy and capability to measure electrical currents in the expected range. The meter has been entered into the station maintenance and test equipment program to assure that accuracy and capability is maintained.

4. If the licensee requests a Completion Time greater than 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> for TS 3.8.4, Required Action A.3, and / or TS 3.8.5, Required Action A.3, the licensee must verify the availability of a spare battery charger that is appropriately sized. As stated in a Reviewer's Note in the Bases, a licensee wishing to adopt a longer Completion Time must also demonstrate that the Completion Time is appropriate for the plant in accordance with the guidance in Regulatory Guide 1.177, "An Approach for Plant-Specific, Risk-Informed Decisionmaking:

Technical Specifications," and Regulatory Guide 1.174, "An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis." Alternatively, the 7 day Completion Time can be justified by an acceptable alternate method, such as a regulatory commitment that an means to charge the batteries will be available that is capable of being supplied power from a power source that is independent of the offsite power supply.

KPS Response: KPS has not requested a Completion Time greater than 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> for the above Required Actions.

5. If the licensee requests a Completion Time greater than 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> for TS 3.8.4, Required Action B.1 or C.1, the licensee must demonstrate that the Completion Time is appropriate for the plant in accordance with the guidance in Regulatory Guide 1.177, "An Approach for Plant-Specific, Risk-Informed Decisionmaking: Technical Specifications," and Regulatory Guide 1.174, "An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis."

KPS Response: KPS has not requested a Completion Time greater than 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> for the above Required Actions.

6. The cell resistance limits in existing SR 3.8.4.5 are relocated to the Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program. Licensees must provide a brief description of the basis for the cell connection resistance limit based on the vendor specification of inter-cell resistance, voltage drop at the connection, or overall battery resistance.

KPS Response: Calculation C11723, Revision 1, Addendum B - "Inter-Tier and Inter-Rack Resistance Clarification" specifies " the inter-tier and inter-rack resistance of the batteries is to be no more than 90 µ§ for BRA-101 and 90

µ§ for BRB-101 per connection. There are 2 inter-tier connections and 1 inter-rack connection used for each battery resulting in a total inter-tier / inter-Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 17 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2751 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 3 of 4 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 18 of 138 rack resistance of 270 µ§ per battery. This value will be used for each battery in the ETAP model." Calculation C11723, Revision 1 supplies the basis for the specification of inter-cell resistance for overall battery resistance. The battery connections were also base lined during the initial installation (2008).

7. In order to delete the SR 3.8.4.7 (now SR 3.8.4.3) Note "once per 60 months" restriction on performing the modified performance discharge test instead of the service test, the licensee must confirm that the modified performance discharge test completely encompasses the load profile of the battery service test and that it adequately confirms the intent of the service test to verify the battery capacity to supply the design basis load profile.

KPS Response: Calculation Number: C11723, "125VDC Battery BRA-101 and BRB -101 Sizing, Voltage Drop, Short Circuit and Charger Sizing," defines the station battery design. Table 6.2.1 on page 25 of 333 contains the battery sizing summary. This calculation bounds the battery performance. KPS replaced the batteries in 2008 to the design specifications of C11723. These batteries satisfy the requirements of IEEE STD 450-2002 , which specifies that the modified performance discharge test completely encompass the load profile of the battery service test.

Section 4.7.2 Commitments

1. The [2] amp float current value is an indication that the battery is [95] percent charged. The licensee must provide a regulatory commitment to maintain a

[5] percent design margin for the batteries.

KPS Response: ITS SR 3.8.6.1 requires each battery float current to be < 2 amps and the 2 amp value is an indication that the battery is 95 percent charged. KPS will provide a commitment to maintain a 5% design margin for the batteries required by ITS 3.8.4 to ensure the 2 amp float current limit is conservative. The commitment will be provided in the supplement of the ITS conversion amendment.

2. The licensee-controlled program, required and described in TS Section 5.5, "Programs and Manuals," and titled the "Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program," will require verification of the selection of the pilot cell or cells when performing SR 3.8.6.5.

KPS Response: KPS will provide a commitment that the pilot cell selection criteria will be consistent with ITS 5.5.15.a.3. This section requires the battery pilot cell selection to be based on the lowest cell in the battery. Therefore, after each performance of ITS SR 3.8.6.5, the pilot cell will be evaluated based on the results of the SR. The commitment will be provided in the supplement of the ITS conversion amendment.

In addition, a new draft markup of the changes related to TSTF-500 is being provided. These changes supersede the markup provided in the KPS response to GMW-006. The only difference in the two markups is that the one attached to this response provides a revised JFD for the change to the Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program. A revised DOC (which justifies changes from the TS requirements to the new ITS requirements) is not necessary since the change is a More Restrictive change and all issues related to TSTF-500 are discussed above.

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 18 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2751 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 4 of 4 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 19 of 138 This change will be reflected in the supplement to these sections of the ITS conversion amendment.

Question Closure Date Attachment GMW-007 Markup rev 3.pdf (1MB) 1 Attachment 2

Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Gerald Waig Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 4/12/2010 1:08 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 19 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2751 07/08/2010

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 20 of 138 All changes are 1 DC Sources - Operating unless otherwise noted B 3.8.4 BASES SURVEILLANCE SR 3.8.4.1 for the batteries REQUIREMENTS Verifying battery terminal voltage while on float charge helps to ensure the effectiveness of the battery chargers, which support the ability of the batteries to perform their intended function. Float charge is the condition in which the charger is supplying the continuous charge required to overcome the internal losses of a battery and maintain the battery in a fully charged state while supplying the continuous steady state loads of the associated DC subsystem. On float charge, battery cells will receive times the adequate current to optimally charge the battery. The voltage number of requirements are based on the nominal design voltage of the battery and connected cells are consistent with the minimum float voltage established by the battery 10 manufacturer ([2.20] Vpc or [127.6] V at the battery terminals). This for a 59 2 2.22 voltage maintains the battery plates in a condition that supports cell battery 130.98 maintaining the grid life (expected to be approximately 20 years). The 7 day Frequency is consistent with manufacturer recommendations and IEEE-450 (Ref. 8). conservative when compared 6 Each of the battery chargers has been sized to recharge its associated partially discharged battery within 24 SR 3.8.4.2 hours, while carrying its normal load.

required 7

This SR verifies the design capacity of the battery chargers. According to Regulatory Guide 1.32 (Ref. 9), the battery charger supply is recommended to be based on the largest combined demands of the various steady state loads and the charging capacity to restore the battery from the design minimum charge state to the fully charged state, irrespective of the status of the unit during these demand occurrences.

The minimum required amperes and duration ensure that these requirements can be satisfied. s 150 This SR provides two options. One option requires that each battery charger be capable of supplying [400] amps at the minimum established 2 float voltage for [8] hours. The ampere requirements are based on the output rating of the chargers. The voltage requirements are based on the charger voltage level after a response to a loss of AC power. The time period is sufficient for the charger temperature to have stabilized and to have been maintained for at least [2] hours. 2 The other option requires that each battery charger be capable of recharging the battery after a service test coincident with supplying the combined largest coincident demands of the various continuous steady state loads (irrespective of the status of the plant during which these demands occur). This level of loading may not normally be available following the WOG STS B 3.8.4-8 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 20 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 21 of 138 All changes are 1 DC Sources - Operating unless otherwise noted B 3.8.4 BASES SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued) battery service test and will need to be supplemented with additional loads. The duration for this test may be longer than the charger sizing criteria since the battery recharge is affected by float voltage, temperature, and the exponential decay in charging current. The battery is recharged when the measured charging current is 

The Surveillance Frequency is acceptable, given the unit conditions required to perform the test and the other administrative controls existing to ensure adequate charger performance during these [18 month] 2 intervals. In addition, this Frequency is intended to be consistent with expected fuel cycle lengths.

SR 3.8.4.3 A battery service test is a special test of the battery capability, as found, to satisfy the design requirements (battery duty cycle) of the DC electrical power system. The discharge rate and test length should correspond to the design duty cycle requirements as specified in Reference 4. 6 The Surveillance Frequency of [18 months] is consistent with the 7 2 8 recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.32 (Ref. 9) and Regulatory Guide 1.129 (Ref. 10), which state that the battery service test should be 7 performed during refueling operations, or at some other outage, with intervals between tests not to exceed [18 months]. 2 This SR is modified by two Notes. Note 1 allows the performance of a modified performance discharge test in lieu of a service test.

The reason for Note 2 is that performing the Surveillance would perturb the electrical distribution system and challenge safety systems. This restriction from normally performing the Surveillance in MODE 1 or 2 is further amplified to allow portions of the Surveillance to be performed for the purpose of reestablishing OPERABILITY (e.g., post work testing following corrective maintenance, corrective modification, deficient or incomplete surveillance testing, and other unanticipated OPERABILITY concerns) provided an assessment determines plant safety is maintained or enhanced. This assessment shall, as a minimum, consider the potential outcomes and transients associated with a failed partial WOG STS B 3.8.4-9 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 21 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 22 of 138 All changes are 1 DC Sources - Operating unless otherwise noted B 3.8.4 BASES SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

Surveillance, a successful partial Surveillance, and a perturbation of the offsite or onsite system when they are tied together or operated independently for the partial Surveillance; as well as the operator procedures available to cope with these outcomes. These shall be measured against the avoided risk of a plant shutdown and startup to determine that plant safety is maintained or enhanced when portions of the Surveillance are performed in MODE 1 or 2. Risk insights or deterministic methods may be used for the assessment. Credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR.

REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 17.

6 Safety

2. Regulatory Guide 1.6, March 10, 1971.
3. IEEE-308-[1978].

U 3 4. FSAR, Chapter [8].

2

5. FSAR, Chapter [6].

14 4

6. FSAR, Chapter [15]. 2 U

5 7. Regulatory Guide 1.93, December 1974.

1987 6

8. IEEE-450-[1995]. 2 6 7
9. Regulatory Guide 1.32, February 1977.

7 8

10. Regulatory Guide 1.129, December 1974.

WOG STS B 3.8.4-10 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 22 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 23 of 138 Battery Parameters CTS 3.8.6 3.8 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS 3.8.6 Battery Parameters


REVIEWER'S NOTE-------------------------------------------------

Licensees must implement a program, as specified in Specification 5.5.17, to monitor battery parameters that is based on the recommendations of IEEE Standard 450-1995, "IEEE 1 Recommended Practice For Maintenance, Testing, And Replacement Of Vented Lead-Acid Batteries For Stationary Applications."

DOC A02, LCO 3.8.6 Battery parameters for Train A and Train B batteries shall be within limits.

3.7.a.6 electrical power subsystem 3.7.a APPLICABILITY: When associated DC electrical power subsystems are required to be OPERABLE.

ACTIONS


NOTE-----------------------------------------------------------

DOC L01 Separate Condition entry is allowed for each battery.

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME DOC L01 A. One [or two] batter[y][ies A.1 Perform SR 3.8.4.1. 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> on one train] with one or 2 more battery cells float AND voltage < [2.07] V.

A.2 Perform SR 3.8.6.1. 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> AND A.3 Restore affected cell 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> 2

voltage  

DOC L01 B. One [or two] batter[y][ies B.1 Perform SR 3.8.4.1. 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> 2

on one train] with float current > [2] amps. AND B.2 Restore battery float current [12] hours 2 to 

WOG STS 3.8.6-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 23 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 24 of 138 Battery Parameters CTS 3.8.6 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME DOC L01 F. Required Action and F.1 Declare associated battery Immediately associated Completion inoperable.

Time of Condition A, B, C, D, or E not met.

OR One [or two] batter[y][ies 2 on one train] with one or more battery cells float OR voltage < [2.07] V and 2 4

float current > [2] amps. SR 3.8.6.6 not met.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY DOC M02 SR 3.8.6.1 -------------------------------NOTE------------------------------

Not required to be met when battery terminal voltage is less than the minimum established float voltage of SR 3.8.4.1.

2 Verify each battery float current is  7 days float 4.6.b.1 SR 3.8.6.2 Verify each battery pilot cell voltage is   31 days 2 4.6.b.2 SR 3.8.6.3 Verify each battery connected cell electrolyte level is 31 days greater than or equal to minimum established design limits.

4.6.b.1 SR 3.8.6.4 Verify each battery pilot cell temperature is greater 31 days than or equal to minimum established design limits.

WOG STS 3.8.6-3 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 24 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 25 of 138 Battery Parameters CTS 3.8.6 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY 4.6.b.1 SR 3.8.6.5 Verify each battery connected cell voltage is 92 days 2

[2.07] V.

float 4.6.b.4 SR 3.8.6.6 -------------------------------NOTE------------------------------

This Surveillance shall not be performed in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4. However, portions of the Surveillance may be performed to reestablish OPERABILITY provided an assessment determines 5 the safety of the plant is maintained or enhanced.

Credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR.

Verify battery capacity is   60 months 2 manufacturer's rating when subjected to a performance discharge test or a modified AND performance discharge test.

12 months when battery shows degradation, or has reached 2



expected life with

  

of manufacturer's rating AND 24 months when battery has

 2 the expected life with capacity

 

manufacturer's rating WOG STS 3.8.6-4 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 25 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 26 of 138 Battery Parameters B 3.8.6 BASES ACTIONS (continued)

A discharged battery with float voltage (the charger setpoint) across its terminals indicates that the battery is on the exponential charging current portion (the second part) of its recharge cycle. The time to return a battery to its fully charged state under this condition is simply a function of the amount of the previous discharge and the recharge characteristic of the battery. Thus there is good assurance of fully recharging the battery 1

within [12] hours, avoiding a premature shutdown with its own attendant risk.

If the condition is due to one or more cells in a low voltage condition but still greater than [2.07] V and float voltage is found to be satisfactory, this 1 is not indication of a substantially discharged battery and [12] hours is a reasonable time prior to declaring the battery inoperable.

Since Required Action B.1 only specifies "perform," a failure of SR 3.8.4.1 acceptance criteria does not result in the Required Action not met.

However, if SR 3.8.4.1 is failed, the appropriate Condition(s), depending on the cause of the failure, is entered.

y C.1, C.2, and C.3 With one or more batteries in one train with one or more cells electrolyte 8 level above the top of the plates, but below the minimum established design limits, the battery still retains sufficient capacity to perform the intended function. Therefore, the affected battery is not required to be considered inoperable solely as a result of electrolyte level not met.

Within 31 days the minimum established design limits for electrolyte level must be re-established.

With electrolyte level below the top of the plates there is a potential for dryout and plate degradation. Required Actions C.1 and C.2 address this " 7 potential (as well as provisions in Specification 5.5.17, Battery Monitoring 2 15 and Maintenance Program). They are modified by a Note that indicates they are only applicable if electrolyte level is below the top of the plates.

Within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> level is required to be restored to above the top of the requirement plates. The Required Action C.2 requirement to verify that there is no 2 7 leakage by visual inspection and the Specification 5.5.17.b item to initiate Appendix action to equalize and test in accordance with manufacturer's 15 recommendation are taken from Annex D of IEEE Standard 450-1995.

They are performed following the restoration of the electrolyte level to 1987 above the top of the plates. Based on the results of the manufacturer's recommended testing the batter[y][ies] may have to be declared 8 inoperable and the affected cell[s] replaced.

(s)

WOG STS B 3.8.6-4 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 26 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 27 of 138 Battery Parameters B 3.8.6 BASES ACTIONS (continued) y D.1 With one or more batteries in one train with pilot cell temperature less 8 than the minimum established design limits, 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> is allowed to restore the temperature to within limits. A low electrolyte temperature limits the current and power available. Since the battery is sized with margin, while battery capacity is degraded, sufficient capacity exists to perform the intended function and the affected battery is not required to be considered inoperable solely as a result of the pilot cell temperature not met.

E.1 two With one or more batteries in redundant trains with battery parameters 8 not within limits there is not sufficient assurance that battery capacity has not been affected to the degree that the batteries can still perform their required function, given that redundant batteries are involved. With redundant batteries involved this potential could result in a total loss of function on multiple systems that rely upon the batteries. The longer 8 Completion Times specified for battery parameters on non-redundant batteries not within limits are therefore not appropriate, and the parameters must be restored to within limits on at least one train within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.

subsystem F.1 y or SR 3.8.6.6 With one or more batteries with any battery parameter outside the not met, allowances of the Required Actions for Condition A, B, C, D, or E, 8 sufficient capacity to supply the maximum expected load requirement is not assured and the corresponding battery must be declared inoperable. y Additionally, discovering one or more batteries in one train with one or more battery cells float voltage less than [2.07] V and float current greater 1 than [2] amps indicates that the battery capacity may not be sufficient to 1 perform the intended functions. The battery must therefore be declared inoperable immediately.

WOG STS B 3.8.6-5 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 27 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 28 of 138 Battery Parameters B 3.8.6 BASES 1

REFERENCES 1. IEEE-450-[1995].

-1987 U 4

2. FSAR, Chapter 8.
3. FSAR, Chapter [6].

U 14 1 3

4. FSAR, Chapter [15].

4 4

5. IEEE-485-[1983], June 1983.

WOG STS B 3.8.6-9 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 28 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 29 of 138 CTS Programs and Manuals 5.5 5.5 Programs and Manuals 5.5.16 Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program (continued) 6 14

1. Containment leakage rate acceptance criterion is  1.0 La. During the first unit startup following testing in accordance with this program, the leakage rate acceptance criteria are < 0.60 La for the Type B and C tests and [< 0.75 La for Option A Type A tests] [ 0.75 La for Option B Type A tests].
2. Air lock testing acceptance criteria are:

a) Overall air lock leakage rate is  [0.05 La] when tested at Pa. 19 b) For each door, leakage rate is  [0.01 La] when pressurized to

[ 10 psig].

e. The provisions of SR 3.0.3 are applicable to the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program.
f. Nothing in these Technical Specifications shall be construed to modify the testing Frequencies required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix J.

DOC 5.5.17 15 Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program 6 M10 This Program provides for battery restoration and maintenance, based on [the recommendations of IEEE Standard 450-1995, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Vented Lead-Acid Batteries for 24 Stationary Applications," or of the battery manufacturer] including the following:

which includes

a. Actions to restore battery cells with float voltage < [2.13] V, and 1 INSERT 8A 24
b. Actions to equalize and test battery cells that had been discovered with electrolyte level below the minimum established design limit. top of the plates; DOC 25 26 INSERT 8 M11
c. Actions to verify that the remaining cells are > 2.07 V when a pilot cell or cells have been found to be < [2.13] V. 1
d. Limits on average electrolyte temperature, battery connection resistance, and battery terminal voltage; and, 24
e. A requirement to obtain specific gravity readings of all cells at each discharge test, consistent with manufacturer recommendations.

WOG STS 5.5-18 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 29 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 30 of 138 INSERT 8A This Program provides controls for battery restoration and maintenance. The program shall be in accordance with IEEE Standard (Std) 450-2002, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Vented Lead-Acid Batteries for Stationary Applications," as endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.129, Revision 2 (RG), with RG exceptions and program provisions as identified below:

a. The program allows the following RG 1.129, Revision 2 exceptions:
1. Battery temperature correction may be performed before or after conducting discharge tests.
2. RG 1.129, Regulatory Position 1, Subsection 2, "References," is not applicable to this program.
3. In lieu of RG 1.129, Regulatory Position 2, Subsection 5.2, "Inspections," the following shall be used: "Where reference is made to the pilot cell, pilot cell selection shall be based on the lowest voltage cell in the battery.

4 In Regulatory Guide 1.129, Regulatory Position 3, Subsection 5.4.1, "State of Charge Indicator," the following statements in paragraph (d) may be omitted: "When it has been recorded that the charging current has stabilized at the charging voltage for three consecutive hourly measurements, the battery is near full charge. These measurements shall be made after the initially high charging current decreases sharply and the battery voltage rises to approach the charger output voltage."

5. In lieu of RG 1.129, Regulatory Position 7, Subsection 7.6, "Restoration", the following may be used: "Following the test, record the float voltage of each cell of the string."
b. The program shall include the following provisions:
1. Actions to restore battery cells with float voltage < 2.13 V;
2. Actions to determine whether the float voltage of the remaining battery cells is 2.13 V when the float voltage of a battery cell has been found to be < 2.13 V;
3. Actions to equalize and test battery cells that had been discovered with electrolyte level below the top of the plates;
4. Limits on average electrolyte temperature, battery connection resistance, and battery terminal voltage; and
5. A requirement to obtain specific gravity readings of all cells at each discharge test, consistent with manufacturer recommendations.

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 30 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 31 of 138 JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS ITS 5.5, PROGRAMS AND MANUALS provided consistent with CTS 6.20. This is acceptable since the generic specific information/value is revised to reflect the current plant design.

23. ISTS 5.5.16 (ITS 5.5.14) provides the requirements for the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program. The statement in ISTS 5.5.16.f that "Nothing in these Technical Specifications shall be construed to modify the testing Frequencies required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix J" has been deleted. This phrase is not consistent with the allowances in ISTS 5.5.16.a (ITS 5.5.14.a), which states that the program shall be in accordance with the guidelines contained in Regulatory Guide 1.163, "Performance-Based Containment Leak-Test Program," dated INSERT JFD 24 September, 1995, as modified by the following exceptions." These exceptions stated in ITS 5.5.14.a are modifications to the testing Frequencies required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix J.
24. Changes made to be consistent with proposed TSTF-500, Revision 1.
25. ISTS 5.5.18, "Setpoint Control Program (SCP)," has been added consistent with proposed TSTF-493, Revision 4. Any changes to the proposed program are discussed in other Justification for Deviations. In addition, the bracketed ISTS 5.5.3, "Post Accident Sampling," and the ISTS 5.5.6, "Pre-Stressed Concrete Containment Tendon Surveillance Program," are not included in the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS) ITS. Therefore, this Specification has been renumbered in the KPS ITS as 5.5.16.
26. Changes are made to be consistent with the LCO title in Section 3.3. In addition, ISTS 3.3.8 and 3.3.9 have not been adopted in the KPS ITS.

Kewaunee Power Station Page 4 of 4 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 31 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 32 of 138 INSERT JFD 24

24. ISTS 5.5.17, "Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program," was added to NUREG-1431, Rev. 2 as part of TSTF-360, Rev. 1, which was approved by the NRC on December 18, 2000 (documented in a letter from W. D. Beckner, NRC to A. R. Pietrangelo, NEI). In a NRC subsequent NRC letter to the Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF), dated April 11, 2006, the NRC expressed concerns about certain aspects of the changes approved in TSTF-360, Rev.1. Since that time, the NRC and TSTF have had ongoing discussions concerning this program, and a new TSTF, proposed TSTF-500, Rev. 2, has been generated to resolve the NRC concerns. KPS is proposing revisions to the program based this proposed TSTF. The proposed changes are discussed below.

The Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program is revised to reference IEEE-450-2002 and Regulatory Guide 1.129, Revision 2 (with exceptions), to require actions to equalize and test battery cells when the electrolyte level drops below the top of plates instead of when the electrolyte level drops below the minimum established design limit, to require actions to verify the remaining cells are > 2.13 V when a cell or cells have been found to be < 2.13 V.

The Program is also revised to state the license controlled program will contain limits on average electrolyte temperature, battery connection resistance, and battery terminal voltage; and a requirement to obtain specific gravity readings of all cells at each discharge test, consistent with manufacturer recommendations.

The exceptions to Regulatory Guide 1.129, Revision 2, are needed to make the Regulatory Guide requirements consistent with the proposed Technical Specification requirements, allow reasonable technical approaches, and be applicable to operating plants, as described below:

Exception 1: Regulatory Guide 1.129 states that temperature correction must be performed before and after the test. IEEE-450-2002 recommends performing temperature correction before or after the test and this is adequate to obtain accurate test results.

Exception 2: This change excludes the Regulatory Guide 1.129 referenced documents, as they are not relevant to the program.

Exception 3: Regulatory Guide 1.129, Regulatory Position 2, states, "Where reference is made to the pilot cell, pilot cell selection shall be based on finding an average cell that is representative of the entire batterys individual cell voltage and specific gravity readings." This position is inconsistent with the treatment of pilot cells in TSTF-500. As stated in the justification (above), "In the past, pilot cells were selected to represent average cells in the battery. The change to 2.07 V now requires pilot cells to be selected to represent the lowest voltage cells in the battery. This ensures that the other cells are above the pilot cell voltage which must remain above the TS limit."

Exception 4: The following statements are excluded from Regulatory Position 3, subsection 5.4.1, "When it has been recorded that the charging current has stabilized at the charging voltage for three consecutive hourly measurements, the battery is near full charge. These measurements shall be made after the initially high charging current decreases sharply and the battery voltage rises to approach the charger output voltage." This is inconsistent with the OPERABILITY requirements used in the KPS ITS, which state that verifying battery float current to be d 2 amps while on float charge determines the battery is fully charged (See SR 3.8.6.1).

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 32 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 33 of 138 Exception 5: Regulatory Guide 1.129, Regulatory Position 7, recommends recording the specific gravity and float voltage of each cell in the string following the test.

The Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program requires obtaining specific gravity readings of all cells at each discharge test, consistent with manufacturer recommendations. The provision to follow the manufacturer's recommendations is a reasonable allowance given that the battery manufacturer is qualified to determine the benefit of the readings.

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 33 of 138

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 3 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 34 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3461 NRC Question GMW-007 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

6/10/2010 10:45 AM Date/Time Closure Statement Response This response supplements our previous response to GMW-007 dated Statement 4/12/2010, which provided information related to the KPS adoption of proposed TSTF-500, Rev. 2, specifically the verifications and commitments required by Sections 4.7.1 and 4.7.2. The following paragraphs are numbered to correspond to the previous GMW-007 response. For clarity, the TSTF excerpt, previous Kewaunee response, and the supplemental response are included below. Where no supplemental response is needed it is so noted. Note that some of these supplemental responses are based in whole, or in part, on a letter from C&D Technologies, Inc., the battery vendor. This letter, dated May 28, 2010, is attached to this response.

Section 4.7.1 Verifications

1. In an attachment to the LAR, the licensee must provide letters from the manufacturer of the batteries used at the plant verifying the acceptability of using flow at current monitoring instead of specific gravity monitoring as a reliable and accurate indication of the state-of-charge of the battery and that this will hold true over the life of the battery.

KS Response (4/12/2010): KPS has requested a letter from the manufacturer of the batteries specified in ITS 3.8.4 and will be provided in a future response.

KPS Supplemental Response: C&D Technologies, Inc. has provided written response stating "The use of float current is an acceptable method to determine the state of charge of the battery that will hold true over the life of the batteries.

1. N/A - no supplemental response needed.
1. N/A - no supplemental response needed.
1. N/A - no supplemental response needed.

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 34 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3461 06/23/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 2 of 3 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 35 of 138

1. N/A - no supplemental response needed.
1. The cell resistance limits in existing SR 3.8.4.5 are relocated to the Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program. Licensees must provide a brief description of the basis for the cell connection resistance limit based on the vendor specification of inter-cell resistance, voltage drop at the connection, or overall battery resistance.

KPS response (4/12/2010): Calculation C11723, Revision 1, Addendum B - "Inter-Tier and Inter-Rack Resistance Clarification" specifies "the inter-tier and inter-rack resistance of the batteries is to be no more than 90 µ for BRA-101 and 90 µ for BRB-101 per connection. There are 2 inter-tier connections and 1 inter-rack connection used for each battery resulting in a total inter-tier/inter-rack resistance of 270 µ per battery. This value will be used for each battery in the ETAP model." Calculation C11723, Revision 1 supplies the basis for the specification of inter-cell resistance for overall battery resistance. The battery connections were also base lined during the initial installation (2008).

KPS Supplemental Response: C&D Technologies, Inc. has provided written response stating "In regards to the connection resistance, our battery capacity ratings include the voltage drop due to the resistance of one set of inter-cell connectors (lead-plated copper) for each cell. The use of inter-cell connector baseline resistances established when the batteries were initially installed can be considered a conservative value that is included by the battery ratings. The amount of resistance of cable connections that exceed the inter-cell connector baseline resistance would not be included in the battery discharge characteristics."

1. In order to delete the SR 3.8.4.7 (now SR 3.8.4.3) Note "once per 60 months" restriction on performing the modified performance discharge test instead of the service test, the licensee must confirm that the modified performance discharge test completely encompasses the load profile of the battery service test and that it adequately confirms the intent of the service test to verify the battery capacity to supply the design basis load profile.

KPS Response (4/12/2010): Calculation Number: C11723, "125VDC Battery BRA-101 and BRB-101 Sizing, Voltage Drop, Short Circuit and Charger Sizing," defines the station battery design. Table 6.2.1 on page 25 of 333 contains the battery sizing summary. This calculation bounds the battery performance. KPS replaced the Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 35 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3461 06/23/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 3 of 3 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 36 of 138 batteries in 2008 to the design specifications of C11723. These batteries satisfy the requirements of IEEE STD 450-2002, which specifies that the modified performance discharge test completely encompass the load profile of the battery service test.

KPS Supplemental Response: Refer to KPS response to GMW-013, and attachments, dated 5/24/2010.

Section 4.7.2 Commitments

1. N/A - no supplemental response needed.
1. N/A - no supplemental response needed.

Question Closure Date Attachment GMW-007 Second Response attachment.pdf (43KB) 1 Attachment 2

Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Victor Cusumano Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Ray Schiele Gerald Waig Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 6/10/2010 10:45 AM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 36 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3461 06/23/2010

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 37 of 138 1400 Union Meeting Road Blue Bell, PA 19422 Phone: (215) 775-1314 Fax: (215) 619-7887 Sent via Email to: Eric.E.Streich@dom.com May 28, 2010 Mr. Eric Streich Dominion Energy Kewaunee Power Station N490 Highway 42 Kewaunee, WI 54216

Subject:

Standard Technical Specification - NRC Questions

Dear Eric:

I consulted with colleagues regarding the questions that we discussed with Chuck Smoker and you during my recent visit to Kewaunee. The following is our feedback.

GMW-007:

Section 4.7.1, Item 1:

The use of float current is an acceptable method to determine the state of charge of the battery that will hold true over the life of the batteries.

Section 4.7.1, Item 6:

In regards to the connection resistance, our battery capacity ratings include the voltage drop due to the resistance of one set of inter-cell connectors (lead-plated copper) for each cell. The use of inter-cell connector baseline resistances established when the batteries were initially installed can be considered a conservative value that is included by the battery ratings. The amount of resistance of cable connections that exceed the inter-cell connector baseline resistance would not be included in the battery discharge characteristics.

Section 4.7.2, Item 1:

C&D agrees that a float current value of less than or equal to 2 amps is consistent with at least a 95% state of charge of the LCR-25 batteries at your facility.

GMW-009:

The qualified life of the LCR-25 batteries at Kewaunee Power Station is 20 years when operated and maintained in accordance with recommended procedures for operation in the service conditions specified in Specification E-38-1 dated 2/19/88.

Expected battery life when maintained at an average annual temperature of 80°F or below is 20 years.

(Continued)

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 37 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 38 of 138 Kewaunee Power Station May 28, 2010 Page 2 of 2 GMW-010:

Based on data collected during laboratory tests, the 2 amps float current value for the LCR-25 batteries is consistent with a state of charge of at least 95%.

GMW-014:

The answers above may provide the input required for this item. If you need additional details, please contact me and I will provide the information you require.

Regards, Larry A. Carson Nuclear Product Manager C&D Technologies, Inc.

Direct: 215-775-1314 lcarson@cdtechno.com cc: Scott Putnam, Kewaunee Power Station cc: Tony DiLuciano, C&D cc: John Parker, Standby Power system Consultants Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 38 of 138

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 3 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 39 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3741 NRC Question GMW-007 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

7/8/2010 3:35 PM Date/Time Closure Statement

Response

Statement This response supplements our first response to GMW-007 dated 4/12/2010 and supersedes the second response dated 6/10/2010, which provided information related to TSTF-500, Rev. 2, specifically the verifications and commitments required by Sections 4.7.1 and 4.7.2. The following paragraphs are numbered to correspond to the previous GMW-007 response. For clarity, the TSTF excerpt, previous Kewaunee response, and the supplemental response are included below. Where no supplemental response is needed it is so noted. Note that some of these supplemental responses are based in whole, or in part, on a letter from C&D Technologies, Inc., the battery vendor. This letter, dated May 28, 2010, is attached to this response.

Section 4.7.1 Verifications

1. In an attachment to the LAR, the licensee must provide letters from the manufacturer of the batteries used at the plant verifying the acceptability of using flow at current monitoring instead of specific gravity monitoring as a reliable and accurate indication of the state-of-charge of the battery and that this will hold true over the life of the battery.

KS Response (4/12/2010): KPS has requested a letter from the manufacturer of the batteries specified in ITS 3.8.4 and will be provided in a future response.

KPS Supplemental Response: C&D Technologies, Inc. has provided written response stating "The use of float current is an acceptable method to determine the state of charge of the battery that will hold true over the life of the batteries.

2.N/A - no supplemental response needed.

3.N/A - no supplemental response needed.

4.N/A - no supplemental response needed.

5.N/A - no supplemental response needed.

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 39 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3741 07/09/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 2 of 3 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 40 of 138 6.The cell resistance limits in existing SR 3.8.4.5 are relocated to the Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program. Licensees must provide a brief description of the basis for the cell connection resistance limit based on the vendor specification of inter-cell resistance, voltage drop at the connection, or overall battery resistance.

KPS response (4/12/2010): Calculation C11723, Revision 1, Addendum B - "Inter-Tier and Inter-Rack Resistance Clarification" specifies "the inter-tier and inter-rack resistance of the batteries is to be no more than 90 µ for BRA-101 and 90 µ for BRB-101 per connection. There are 2 inter-tier connections and 1 inter-rack connection used for each battery resulting in a total inter-tier/inter-rack resistance of 270 µ per battery. This value will be used for each battery in the ETAP model." Calculation C11723, Revision 1 supplies the basis for the specification of inter-cell resistance for overall battery resistance. The battery connections were also base lined during the initial installation (2008).

KPS Supplemental Response: C&D Technologies, Inc. has provided written response stating "In regards to the connection resistance, our battery capacity ratings include the voltage drop due to the resistance of one set of inter-cell connectors (lead-plated copper) for each cell. The use of inter-cell connector baseline resistances established when the batteries were initially installed can be considered a conservative value that is included by the battery ratings. The amount of resistance of cable connections that exceed the inter-cell connector baseline resistance would not be included in the battery discharge characteristics."

7.In order to delete the SR 3.8.4.7 (now SR 3.8.4.3) Note "once per 60 months" restriction on performing the modified performance discharge test instead of the service test, the licensee must confirm that the modified performance discharge test completely encompasses the load profile of the battery service test and that it adequately confirms the intent of the service test to verify the battery capacity to supply the design basis load profile.

KPS Response (4/12/2010): Calculation Number: C11723, "125VDC Battery BRA-101 and BRB-101 Sizing, Voltage Drop, Short Circuit and Charger Sizing," defines the station battery design. Table 6.2.1 on page 25 of 333 contains the battery sizing summary. This calculation bounds the battery performance. KPS replaced the batteries in 2008 to the design specifications of C11723. These batteries satisfy the requirements of IEEE STD 450-2002, which specifies that the modified performance discharge test completely encompass the load profile of the battery service test.

KPS Supplemental Response: Refer to KPS response to GMW-013, Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 40 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3741 07/09/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 3 of 3 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 41 of 138 and attachments, dated 5/24/2010.

Section 4.7.2 Commitments 1.N/A - no supplemental response needed.

2.N/A - no supplemental response needed.

Question Closure Date Attachment GMW-007 Third Response attachment.pdf (43KB) 1 Attachment 2

Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Gerald Waig Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 7/8/2010 3:39 PM Modified By Ray Schiele Date 7/9/2010 7:27 AM Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 41 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3741 07/09/2010

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 42 of 138 1400 Union Meeting Road Blue Bell, PA 19422 Phone: (215) 775-1314 Fax: (215) 619-7887 Sent via Email to: Eric.E.Streich@dom.com May 28, 2010 Mr. Eric Streich Dominion Energy Kewaunee Power Station N490 Highway 42 Kewaunee, WI 54216

Subject:

Standard Technical Specification - NRC Questions

Dear Eric:

I consulted with colleagues regarding the questions that we discussed with Chuck Smoker and you during my recent visit to Kewaunee. The following is our feedback.

GMW-007:

Section 4.7.1, Item 1:

The use of float current is an acceptable method to determine the state of charge of the battery that will hold true over the life of the batteries.

Section 4.7.1, Item 6:

In regards to the connection resistance, our battery capacity ratings include the voltage drop due to the resistance of one set of inter-cell connectors (lead-plated copper) for each cell. The use of inter-cell connector baseline resistances established when the batteries were initially installed can be considered a conservative value that is included by the battery ratings. The amount of resistance of cable connections that exceed the inter-cell connector baseline resistance would not be included in the battery discharge characteristics.

Section 4.7.2, Item 1:

C&D agrees that a float current value of less than or equal to 2 amps is consistent with at least a 95% state of charge of the LCR-25 batteries at your facility.

GMW-009:

The qualified life of the LCR-25 batteries at Kewaunee Power Station is 20 years when operated and maintained in accordance with recommended procedures for operation in the service conditions specified in Specification E-38-1 dated 2/19/88.

Expected battery life when maintained at an average annual temperature of 80°F or below is 20 years.

(Continued)

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 42 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 43 of 138 Kewaunee Power Station May 28, 2010 Page 2 of 2 GMW-010:

Based on data collected during laboratory tests, the 2 amps float current value for the LCR-25 batteries is consistent with a state of charge of at least 95%.

GMW-014:

The answers above may provide the input required for this item. If you need additional details, please contact me and I will provide the information you require.

Regards, Larry A. Carson Nuclear Product Manager C&D Technologies, Inc.

Direct: 215-775-1314 lcarson@cdtechno.com cc: Scott Putnam, Kewaunee Power Station cc: Tony DiLuciano, C&D cc: John Parker, Standby Power system Consultants Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 43 of 138

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 44 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3821 NRC Question GMW-007 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

7/16/2010 9:15 AM Date/Time Closure Statement Response During a phone conversation with the NRC reviewer, it was requested that Statement KPS modify the Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program requires, such that the pilot cell selection be based on the lowest voltage cell of the battery "every 92 days." After considering the request, KPS agrees to add this requirement into the KPS ITS. The attached markup reflects this change and supersedes previous markups. This change will be reflected in the supplement to this section of the ITS conversion amendment.

Question Closure Date Attachment GMW-007 Markup rev 4.pdf (1MB) 1 Attachment 2

Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Ray Schiele Gerald Waig Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 7/16/2010 9:17 AM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 44 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3821 07/22/2010

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 45 of 138 All changes are 1 DC Sources - Operating unless otherwise noted B 3.8.4 BASES SURVEILLANCE SR 3.8.4.1 for the batteries REQUIREMENTS Verifying battery terminal voltage while on float charge helps to ensure the effectiveness of the battery chargers, which support the ability of the batteries to perform their intended function. Float charge is the condition in which the charger is supplying the continuous charge required to overcome the internal losses of a battery and maintain the battery in a fully charged state while supplying the continuous steady state loads of the associated DC subsystem. On float charge, battery cells will receive times the adequate current to optimally charge the battery. The voltage number of requirements are based on the nominal design voltage of the battery and connected cells are consistent with the minimum float voltage established by the battery 10 manufacturer ([2.20] Vpc or [127.6] V at the battery terminals). This for a 59 2 2.22 voltage maintains the battery plates in a condition that supports cell battery 130.98 maintaining the grid life (expected to be approximately 20 years). The 7 day Frequency is consistent with manufacturer recommendations and IEEE-450 (Ref. 8). conservative when compared 6 Each of the battery chargers has been sized to recharge its associated partially discharged battery within 24 SR 3.8.4.2 hours, while carrying its normal load.

required 7

This SR verifies the design capacity of the battery chargers. According to Regulatory Guide 1.32 (Ref. 9), the battery charger supply is recommended to be based on the largest combined demands of the various steady state loads and the charging capacity to restore the battery from the design minimum charge state to the fully charged state, irrespective of the status of the unit during these demand occurrences.

The minimum required amperes and duration ensure that these requirements can be satisfied. s 150 This SR provides two options. One option requires that each battery charger be capable of supplying [400] amps at the minimum established 2 float voltage for [8] hours. The ampere requirements are based on the output rating of the chargers. The voltage requirements are based on the charger voltage level after a response to a loss of AC power. The time period is sufficient for the charger temperature to have stabilized and to have been maintained for at least [2] hours. 2 The other option requires that each battery charger be capable of recharging the battery after a service test coincident with supplying the combined largest coincident demands of the various continuous steady state loads (irrespective of the status of the plant during which these demands occur). This level of loading may not normally be available following the WOG STS B 3.8.4-8 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 45 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 46 of 138 All changes are 1 DC Sources - Operating unless otherwise noted B 3.8.4 BASES SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued) battery service test and will need to be supplemented with additional loads. The duration for this test may be longer than the charger sizing criteria since the battery recharge is affected by float voltage, temperature, and the exponential decay in charging current. The battery is recharged when the measured charging current is 

The Surveillance Frequency is acceptable, given the unit conditions required to perform the test and the other administrative controls existing to ensure adequate charger performance during these [18 month] 2 intervals. In addition, this Frequency is intended to be consistent with expected fuel cycle lengths.

SR 3.8.4.3 A battery service test is a special test of the battery capability, as found, to satisfy the design requirements (battery duty cycle) of the DC electrical power system. The discharge rate and test length should correspond to the design duty cycle requirements as specified in Reference 4. 6 The Surveillance Frequency of [18 months] is consistent with the 7 2 8 recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.32 (Ref. 9) and Regulatory Guide 1.129 (Ref. 10), which state that the battery service test should be 7 performed during refueling operations, or at some other outage, with intervals between tests not to exceed [18 months]. 2 This SR is modified by two Notes. Note 1 allows the performance of a modified performance discharge test in lieu of a service test.

The reason for Note 2 is that performing the Surveillance would perturb the electrical distribution system and challenge safety systems. This restriction from normally performing the Surveillance in MODE 1 or 2 is further amplified to allow portions of the Surveillance to be performed for the purpose of reestablishing OPERABILITY (e.g., post work testing following corrective maintenance, corrective modification, deficient or incomplete surveillance testing, and other unanticipated OPERABILITY concerns) provided an assessment determines plant safety is maintained or enhanced. This assessment shall, as a minimum, consider the potential outcomes and transients associated with a failed partial WOG STS B 3.8.4-9 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 46 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 47 of 138 All changes are 1 DC Sources - Operating unless otherwise noted B 3.8.4 BASES SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

Surveillance, a successful partial Surveillance, and a perturbation of the offsite or onsite system when they are tied together or operated independently for the partial Surveillance; as well as the operator procedures available to cope with these outcomes. These shall be measured against the avoided risk of a plant shutdown and startup to determine that plant safety is maintained or enhanced when portions of the Surveillance are performed in MODE 1 or 2. Risk insights or deterministic methods may be used for the assessment. Credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR.

REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 17.

6 Safety

2. Regulatory Guide 1.6, March 10, 1971.
3. IEEE-308-[1978].

U 3 4. FSAR, Chapter [8].

2

5. FSAR, Chapter [6].

14 4

6. FSAR, Chapter [15]. 2 U

5 7. Regulatory Guide 1.93, December 1974.

1987 6

8. IEEE-450-[1995]. 2 6 7
9. Regulatory Guide 1.32, February 1977.

7 8

10. Regulatory Guide 1.129, December 1974.

WOG STS B 3.8.4-10 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 47 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 48 of 138 Battery Parameters CTS 3.8.6 3.8 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS 3.8.6 Battery Parameters


REVIEWER'S NOTE-------------------------------------------------

Licensees must implement a program, as specified in Specification 5.5.17, to monitor battery parameters that is based on the recommendations of IEEE Standard 450-1995, "IEEE 1 Recommended Practice For Maintenance, Testing, And Replacement Of Vented Lead-Acid Batteries For Stationary Applications."

DOC A02, LCO 3.8.6 Battery parameters for Train A and Train B batteries shall be within limits.

3.7.a.6 electrical power subsystem 3.7.a APPLICABILITY: When associated DC electrical power subsystems are required to be OPERABLE.

ACTIONS


NOTE-----------------------------------------------------------

DOC L01 Separate Condition entry is allowed for each battery.

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME DOC L01 A. One [or two] batter[y][ies A.1 Perform SR 3.8.4.1. 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> on one train] with one or 2 more battery cells float AND voltage < [2.07] V.

A.2 Perform SR 3.8.6.1. 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> AND A.3 Restore affected cell 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> 2

voltage  

DOC L01 B. One [or two] batter[y][ies B.1 Perform SR 3.8.4.1. 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> 2

on one train] with float current > [2] amps. AND B.2 Restore battery float current [12] hours 2 to 

WOG STS 3.8.6-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 48 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 49 of 138 Battery Parameters CTS 3.8.6 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME DOC L01 F. Required Action and F.1 Declare associated battery Immediately associated Completion inoperable.

Time of Condition A, B, C, D, or E not met.

OR One [or two] batter[y][ies 2 on one train] with one or more battery cells float OR voltage < [2.07] V and 2 4

float current > [2] amps. SR 3.8.6.6 not met.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY DOC M02 SR 3.8.6.1 -------------------------------NOTE------------------------------

Not required to be met when battery terminal voltage is less than the minimum established float voltage of SR 3.8.4.1.

2 Verify each battery float current is  7 days float 4.6.b.1 SR 3.8.6.2 Verify each battery pilot cell voltage is   31 days 2 4.6.b.2 SR 3.8.6.3 Verify each battery connected cell electrolyte level is 31 days greater than or equal to minimum established design limits.

4.6.b.1 SR 3.8.6.4 Verify each battery pilot cell temperature is greater 31 days than or equal to minimum established design limits.

WOG STS 3.8.6-3 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 49 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 50 of 138 Battery Parameters CTS 3.8.6 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY 4.6.b.1 SR 3.8.6.5 Verify each battery connected cell voltage is 92 days 2

[2.07] V.

float 4.6.b.4 SR 3.8.6.6 -------------------------------NOTE------------------------------

This Surveillance shall not be performed in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4. However, portions of the Surveillance may be performed to reestablish OPERABILITY provided an assessment determines 5 the safety of the plant is maintained or enhanced.

Credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR.

Verify battery capacity is   60 months 2 manufacturer's rating when subjected to a performance discharge test or a modified AND performance discharge test.

12 months when battery shows degradation, or has reached 2



expected life with

  

of manufacturer's rating AND 24 months when battery has

 2 the expected life with capacity

 

manufacturer's rating WOG STS 3.8.6-4 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 50 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 51 of 138 Battery Parameters B 3.8.6 BASES ACTIONS (continued)

A discharged battery with float voltage (the charger setpoint) across its terminals indicates that the battery is on the exponential charging current portion (the second part) of its recharge cycle. The time to return a battery to its fully charged state under this condition is simply a function of the amount of the previous discharge and the recharge characteristic of the battery. Thus there is good assurance of fully recharging the battery 1

within [12] hours, avoiding a premature shutdown with its own attendant risk.

If the condition is due to one or more cells in a low voltage condition but still greater than [2.07] V and float voltage is found to be satisfactory, this 1 is not indication of a substantially discharged battery and [12] hours is a reasonable time prior to declaring the battery inoperable.

Since Required Action B.1 only specifies "perform," a failure of SR 3.8.4.1 acceptance criteria does not result in the Required Action not met.

However, if SR 3.8.4.1 is failed, the appropriate Condition(s), depending on the cause of the failure, is entered.

y C.1, C.2, and C.3 With one or more batteries in one train with one or more cells electrolyte 8 level above the top of the plates, but below the minimum established design limits, the battery still retains sufficient capacity to perform the intended function. Therefore, the affected battery is not required to be considered inoperable solely as a result of electrolyte level not met.

Within 31 days the minimum established design limits for electrolyte level must be re-established.

With electrolyte level below the top of the plates there is a potential for dryout and plate degradation. Required Actions C.1 and C.2 address this " 7 potential (as well as provisions in Specification 5.5.17, Battery Monitoring 2 15 and Maintenance Program). They are modified by a Note that indicates they are only applicable if electrolyte level is below the top of the plates.

Within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> level is required to be restored to above the top of the requirement plates. The Required Action C.2 requirement to verify that there is no 2 7 leakage by visual inspection and the Specification 5.5.17.b item to initiate Appendix action to equalize and test in accordance with manufacturer's 15 recommendation are taken from Annex D of IEEE Standard 450-1995.

They are performed following the restoration of the electrolyte level to 1987 above the top of the plates. Based on the results of the manufacturer's recommended testing the batter[y][ies] may have to be declared 8 inoperable and the affected cell[s] replaced.

(s)

WOG STS B 3.8.6-4 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 51 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 52 of 138 Battery Parameters B 3.8.6 BASES ACTIONS (continued) y D.1 With one or more batteries in one train with pilot cell temperature less 8 than the minimum established design limits, 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> is allowed to restore the temperature to within limits. A low electrolyte temperature limits the current and power available. Since the battery is sized with margin, while battery capacity is degraded, sufficient capacity exists to perform the intended function and the affected battery is not required to be considered inoperable solely as a result of the pilot cell temperature not met.

E.1 two With one or more batteries in redundant trains with battery parameters 8 not within limits there is not sufficient assurance that battery capacity has not been affected to the degree that the batteries can still perform their required function, given that redundant batteries are involved. With redundant batteries involved this potential could result in a total loss of function on multiple systems that rely upon the batteries. The longer 8 Completion Times specified for battery parameters on non-redundant batteries not within limits are therefore not appropriate, and the parameters must be restored to within limits on at least one train within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.

subsystem F.1 y or SR 3.8.6.6 With one or more batteries with any battery parameter outside the not met, allowances of the Required Actions for Condition A, B, C, D, or E, 8 sufficient capacity to supply the maximum expected load requirement is not assured and the corresponding battery must be declared inoperable. y Additionally, discovering one or more batteries in one train with one or more battery cells float voltage less than [2.07] V and float current greater 1 than [2] amps indicates that the battery capacity may not be sufficient to 1 perform the intended functions. The battery must therefore be declared inoperable immediately.

WOG STS B 3.8.6-5 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 52 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 53 of 138 Battery Parameters B 3.8.6 BASES 1

REFERENCES 1. IEEE-450-[1995].

-1987 U 4

2. FSAR, Chapter 8.
3. FSAR, Chapter [6].

U 14 1 3

4. FSAR, Chapter [15].

4 4

5. IEEE-485-[1983], June 1983.

WOG STS B 3.8.6-9 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 53 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 54 of 138 CTS Programs and Manuals 5.5 5.5 Programs and Manuals 5.5.16 Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program (continued) 6 14

1. Containment leakage rate acceptance criterion is  1.0 La. During the first unit startup following testing in accordance with this program, the leakage rate acceptance criteria are < 0.60 La for the Type B and C tests and [< 0.75 La for Option A Type A tests] [ 0.75 La for Option B Type A tests].
2. Air lock testing acceptance criteria are:

a) Overall air lock leakage rate is  [0.05 La] when tested at Pa. 19 b) For each door, leakage rate is  [0.01 La] when pressurized to

[ 10 psig].

e. The provisions of SR 3.0.3 are applicable to the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program.
f. Nothing in these Technical Specifications shall be construed to modify the testing Frequencies required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix J.

DOC 5.5.17 15 Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program 6 M10 This Program provides for battery restoration and maintenance, based on [the recommendations of IEEE Standard 450-1995, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Vented Lead-Acid Batteries for 24 Stationary Applications," or of the battery manufacturer] including the following:

which includes

a. Actions to restore battery cells with float voltage < [2.13] V, and 1 INSERT 8A 24
b. Actions to equalize and test battery cells that had been discovered with electrolyte level below the minimum established design limit. top of the plates; DOC 25 26 INSERT 8 M11
c. Actions to verify that the remaining cells are > 2.07 V when a pilot cell or cells have been found to be < [2.13] V. 1
d. Limits on average electrolyte temperature, battery connection resistance, and battery terminal voltage; and, 24
e. A requirement to obtain specific gravity readings of all cells at each discharge test, consistent with manufacturer recommendations.

WOG STS 5.5-18 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 54 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 55 of 138 INSERT 8A This Program provides controls for battery restoration and maintenance. The program shall be in accordance with IEEE Standard (Std) 450-2002, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Vented Lead-Acid Batteries for Stationary Applications," as endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.129, Revision 2 (RG), with RG exceptions and program provisions as identified below:

a. The program allows the following RG 1.129, Revision 2 exceptions:
1. Battery temperature correction may be performed before or after conducting discharge tests.
2. RG 1.129, Regulatory Position 1, Subsection 2, "References," is not applicable to this program.
3. In lieu of RG 1.129, Regulatory Position 2, Subsection 5.2, "Inspections," the following shall be used: "Where reference is made to the pilot cell, pilot cell selection shall be based on the lowest voltage cell in the battery every 92 days."

4 In Regulatory Guide 1.129, Regulatory Position 3, Subsection 5.4.1, "State of Charge Indicator," the following statements in paragraph (d) may be omitted: "When it has been recorded that the charging current has stabilized at the charging voltage for three consecutive hourly measurements, the battery is near full charge. These measurements shall be made after the initially high charging current decreases sharply and the battery voltage rises to approach the charger output voltage."

5. In lieu of RG 1.129, Regulatory Position 7, Subsection 7.6, "Restoration", the following may be used: "Following the test, record the float voltage of each cell of the string."
b. The program shall include the following provisions:
1. Actions to restore battery cells with float voltage < 2.13 V;
2. Actions to determine whether the float voltage of the remaining battery cells is 2.13 V when the float voltage of a battery cell has been found to be < 2.13 V;
3. Actions to equalize and test battery cells that had been discovered with electrolyte level below the top of the plates;
4. Limits on average electrolyte temperature, battery connection resistance, and battery terminal voltage; and
5. A requirement to obtain specific gravity readings of all cells at each discharge test, consistent with manufacturer recommendations.

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 55 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 56 of 138 JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS ITS 5.5, PROGRAMS AND MANUALS provided consistent with CTS 6.20. This is acceptable since the generic specific information/value is revised to reflect the current plant design.

23. ISTS 5.5.16 (ITS 5.5.14) provides the requirements for the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program. The statement in ISTS 5.5.16.f that "Nothing in these Technical Specifications shall be construed to modify the testing Frequencies required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix J" has been deleted. This phrase is not consistent with the allowances in ISTS 5.5.16.a (ITS 5.5.14.a), which states that the program shall be in accordance with the guidelines contained in Regulatory Guide 1.163, "Performance-Based Containment Leak-Test Program," dated INSERT JFD 24 September, 1995, as modified by the following exceptions." These exceptions stated in ITS 5.5.14.a are modifications to the testing Frequencies required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix J.
24. Changes made to be consistent with proposed TSTF-500, Revision 1.
25. ISTS 5.5.18, "Setpoint Control Program (SCP)," has been added consistent with proposed TSTF-493, Revision 4. Any changes to the proposed program are discussed in other Justification for Deviations. In addition, the bracketed ISTS 5.5.3, "Post Accident Sampling," and the ISTS 5.5.6, "Pre-Stressed Concrete Containment Tendon Surveillance Program," are not included in the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS) ITS. Therefore, this Specification has been renumbered in the KPS ITS as 5.5.16.
26. Changes are made to be consistent with the LCO title in Section 3.3. In addition, ISTS 3.3.8 and 3.3.9 have not been adopted in the KPS ITS.

Kewaunee Power Station Page 4 of 4 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 56 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 57 of 138 INSERT JFD 24

24. ISTS 5.5.17, "Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program," was added to NUREG-1431, Rev. 2 as part of TSTF-360, Rev. 1, which was approved by the NRC on December 18, 2000 (documented in a letter from W. D. Beckner, NRC to A. R. Pietrangelo, NEI). In a NRC subsequent NRC letter to the Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF), dated April 11, 2006, the NRC expressed concerns about certain aspects of the changes approved in TSTF-360, Rev.1. Since that time, the NRC and TSTF have had ongoing discussions concerning this program, and a new TSTF, proposed TSTF-500, Rev. 2, has been generated to resolve the NRC concerns. KPS is proposing revisions to the program based this proposed TSTF. The proposed changes are discussed below.

The Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program is revised to reference IEEE-450-2002 and Regulatory Guide 1.129, Revision 2 (with exceptions), to require actions to equalize and test battery cells when the electrolyte level drops below the top of plates instead of when the electrolyte level drops below the minimum established design limit, to require actions to verify the remaining cells are > 2.13 V when a cell or cells have been found to be < 2.13 V.

The Program is also revised to state the license controlled program will contain limits on average electrolyte temperature, battery connection resistance, and battery terminal voltage; and a requirement to obtain specific gravity readings of all cells at each discharge test, consistent with manufacturer recommendations.

The exceptions to Regulatory Guide 1.129, Revision 2, are needed to make the Regulatory Guide requirements consistent with the proposed Technical Specification requirements, allow reasonable technical approaches, and be applicable to operating plants, as described below:

Exception 1: Regulatory Guide 1.129 states that temperature correction must be performed before and after the test. IEEE-450-2002 recommends performing temperature correction before or after the test and this is adequate to obtain accurate test results.

Exception 2: This change excludes the Regulatory Guide 1.129 referenced documents, as they are not relevant to the program.

Exception 3: Regulatory Guide 1.129, Regulatory Position 2, states, "Where reference is made to the pilot cell, pilot cell selection shall be based on finding an average cell that is representative of the entire batterys individual cell voltage and specific gravity readings." This position is inconsistent with the treatment of pilot cells in TSTF-500. As stated in the justification (above), "In the past, pilot cells were selected to represent average cells in the battery. The change to 2.07 V now requires pilot cells to be selected to represent the lowest voltage cells in the battery. This ensures that the other cells are above the pilot cell voltage which must remain above the TS limit."

Exception 4: The following statements are excluded from Regulatory Position 3, subsection 5.4.1, "When it has been recorded that the charging current has stabilized at the charging voltage for three consecutive hourly measurements, the battery is near full charge. These measurements shall be made after the initially high charging current decreases sharply and the battery voltage rises to approach the charger output voltage." This is inconsistent with the OPERABILITY requirements used in the KPS ITS, which state that verifying battery float current to be d 2 amps while on float charge determines the battery is fully charged (See SR 3.8.6.1).

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 57 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 58 of 138 Exception 5: Regulatory Guide 1.129, Regulatory Position 7, recommends recording the specific gravity and float voltage of each cell in the string following the test.

The Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program requires obtaining specific gravity readings of all cells at each discharge test, consistent with manufacturer recommendations. The provision to follow the manufacturer's recommendations is a reasonable allowance given that the battery manufacturer is qualified to determine the benefit of the readings.

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 58 of 138

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 59 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3861 NRC Question GMW-007 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

7/16/2010 11:15 AM Date/Time Closure Statement Response During a recent phone conversation with the NRC reviewer, it was Statement requested that KPS modify the Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program requirements, such that the pilot cell selection be based on the lowest voltage cell of the battery "every 92 days." KPS agreed to do this and provided this change in the fourth response to GMW-007, dated 7/16/2010. However, it was subsequently noted that the ITS Surveillance Frequency for determining cell voltages of all the cell is performed every 92 days per SR 3.8.6.5. As allowed by SR 3.0.2, this Surveillance Frequency could be extended up to 25%. However, since the new words proposed in ITS 5.5.15 says to select a new pilot cell every 92 days, and the low voltage cell is selected based on this voltage check, KPS notes that this essentially means that SR 3.8.6.5 cannot use the allowance of SR 3.0.2. To correct this problem, KPS considered adding an SR 3.0.2 allowance to ITS 5.5.15 for this reason, but this 92 day selection requirement is not a Surveillance.

Thus SR 3.0.2 could not technically be used (because it states it is extending Surveillance Frequencies). To correct the problem, KPS will change the "every 92 days" requirement to "after each performance of SR 3.8.6.5." This will ensure that when SR 3.8.6.5 is performed, the data from the Surveillance will be used to determine the pilot cell through the next performance of SR 3.8.6.5. The draft markup regarding this change is attached and supersedes all previous markups. This change will be reflected in the supplement to this section of the ITS conversion amendment.

Question Closure Date Attachment GMW-007 Markup, Rev 5.pdf (1MB) 1 Attachment 2

Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Ray Schiele Gerald Waig Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 7/16/2010 11:18 AM Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 59 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3861 07/22/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 2 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 60 of 138 Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 60 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3861 07/22/2010

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 61 of 138 All changes are 1 DC Sources - Operating unless otherwise noted B 3.8.4 BASES SURVEILLANCE SR 3.8.4.1 for the batteries REQUIREMENTS Verifying battery terminal voltage while on float charge helps to ensure the effectiveness of the battery chargers, which support the ability of the batteries to perform their intended function. Float charge is the condition in which the charger is supplying the continuous charge required to overcome the internal losses of a battery and maintain the battery in a fully charged state while supplying the continuous steady state loads of the associated DC subsystem. On float charge, battery cells will receive times the adequate current to optimally charge the battery. The voltage number of requirements are based on the nominal design voltage of the battery and connected cells are consistent with the minimum float voltage established by the battery 10 manufacturer ([2.20] Vpc or [127.6] V at the battery terminals). This for a 59 2 2.22 voltage maintains the battery plates in a condition that supports cell battery 130.98 maintaining the grid life (expected to be approximately 20 years). The 7 day Frequency is consistent with manufacturer recommendations and IEEE-450 (Ref. 8). conservative when compared 6 Each of the battery chargers has been sized to recharge its associated partially discharged battery within 24 SR 3.8.4.2 hours, while carrying its normal load.

required 7

This SR verifies the design capacity of the battery chargers. According to Regulatory Guide 1.32 (Ref. 9), the battery charger supply is recommended to be based on the largest combined demands of the various steady state loads and the charging capacity to restore the battery from the design minimum charge state to the fully charged state, irrespective of the status of the unit during these demand occurrences.

The minimum required amperes and duration ensure that these requirements can be satisfied. s 150 This SR provides two options. One option requires that each battery charger be capable of supplying [400] amps at the minimum established 2 float voltage for [8] hours. The ampere requirements are based on the output rating of the chargers. The voltage requirements are based on the charger voltage level after a response to a loss of AC power. The time period is sufficient for the charger temperature to have stabilized and to have been maintained for at least [2] hours. 2 The other option requires that each battery charger be capable of recharging the battery after a service test coincident with supplying the combined largest coincident demands of the various continuous steady state loads (irrespective of the status of the plant during which these demands occur). This level of loading may not normally be available following the WOG STS B 3.8.4-8 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 61 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 62 of 138 All changes are 1 DC Sources - Operating unless otherwise noted B 3.8.4 BASES SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued) battery service test and will need to be supplemented with additional loads. The duration for this test may be longer than the charger sizing criteria since the battery recharge is affected by float voltage, temperature, and the exponential decay in charging current. The battery is recharged when the measured charging current is 

The Surveillance Frequency is acceptable, given the unit conditions required to perform the test and the other administrative controls existing to ensure adequate charger performance during these [18 month] 2 intervals. In addition, this Frequency is intended to be consistent with expected fuel cycle lengths.

SR 3.8.4.3 A battery service test is a special test of the battery capability, as found, to satisfy the design requirements (battery duty cycle) of the DC electrical power system. The discharge rate and test length should correspond to the design duty cycle requirements as specified in Reference 4. 6 The Surveillance Frequency of [18 months] is consistent with the 7 2 8 recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.32 (Ref. 9) and Regulatory Guide 1.129 (Ref. 10), which state that the battery service test should be 7 performed during refueling operations, or at some other outage, with intervals between tests not to exceed [18 months]. 2 This SR is modified by two Notes. Note 1 allows the performance of a modified performance discharge test in lieu of a service test.

The reason for Note 2 is that performing the Surveillance would perturb the electrical distribution system and challenge safety systems. This restriction from normally performing the Surveillance in MODE 1 or 2 is further amplified to allow portions of the Surveillance to be performed for the purpose of reestablishing OPERABILITY (e.g., post work testing following corrective maintenance, corrective modification, deficient or incomplete surveillance testing, and other unanticipated OPERABILITY concerns) provided an assessment determines plant safety is maintained or enhanced. This assessment shall, as a minimum, consider the potential outcomes and transients associated with a failed partial WOG STS B 3.8.4-9 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 62 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 63 of 138 All changes are 1 DC Sources - Operating unless otherwise noted B 3.8.4 BASES SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

Surveillance, a successful partial Surveillance, and a perturbation of the offsite or onsite system when they are tied together or operated independently for the partial Surveillance; as well as the operator procedures available to cope with these outcomes. These shall be measured against the avoided risk of a plant shutdown and startup to determine that plant safety is maintained or enhanced when portions of the Surveillance are performed in MODE 1 or 2. Risk insights or deterministic methods may be used for the assessment. Credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR.

REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 17.

6 Safety

2. Regulatory Guide 1.6, March 10, 1971.
3. IEEE-308-[1978].

U 3 4. FSAR, Chapter [8].

2

5. FSAR, Chapter [6].

14 4

6. FSAR, Chapter [15]. 2 U

5 7. Regulatory Guide 1.93, December 1974.

1987 6

8. IEEE-450-[1995]. 2 6 7
9. Regulatory Guide 1.32, February 1977.

7 8

10. Regulatory Guide 1.129, December 1974.

WOG STS B 3.8.4-10 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 63 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 64 of 138 Battery Parameters CTS 3.8.6 3.8 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS 3.8.6 Battery Parameters


REVIEWER'S NOTE-------------------------------------------------

Licensees must implement a program, as specified in Specification 5.5.17, to monitor battery parameters that is based on the recommendations of IEEE Standard 450-1995, "IEEE 1 Recommended Practice For Maintenance, Testing, And Replacement Of Vented Lead-Acid Batteries For Stationary Applications."

DOC A02, LCO 3.8.6 Battery parameters for Train A and Train B batteries shall be within limits.

3.7.a.6 electrical power subsystem 3.7.a APPLICABILITY: When associated DC electrical power subsystems are required to be OPERABLE.

ACTIONS


NOTE-----------------------------------------------------------

DOC L01 Separate Condition entry is allowed for each battery.

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME DOC L01 A. One [or two] batter[y][ies A.1 Perform SR 3.8.4.1. 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> on one train] with one or 2 more battery cells float AND voltage < [2.07] V.

A.2 Perform SR 3.8.6.1. 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> AND A.3 Restore affected cell 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> 2

voltage  

DOC L01 B. One [or two] batter[y][ies B.1 Perform SR 3.8.4.1. 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> 2

on one train] with float current > [2] amps. AND B.2 Restore battery float current [12] hours 2 to 

WOG STS 3.8.6-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 64 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 65 of 138 Battery Parameters CTS 3.8.6 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME DOC L01 F. Required Action and F.1 Declare associated battery Immediately associated Completion inoperable.

Time of Condition A, B, C, D, or E not met.

OR One [or two] batter[y][ies 2 on one train] with one or more battery cells float OR voltage < [2.07] V and 2 4

float current > [2] amps. SR 3.8.6.6 not met.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY DOC M02 SR 3.8.6.1 -------------------------------NOTE------------------------------

Not required to be met when battery terminal voltage is less than the minimum established float voltage of SR 3.8.4.1.

2 Verify each battery float current is  7 days float 4.6.b.1 SR 3.8.6.2 Verify each battery pilot cell voltage is   31 days 2 4.6.b.2 SR 3.8.6.3 Verify each battery connected cell electrolyte level is 31 days greater than or equal to minimum established design limits.

4.6.b.1 SR 3.8.6.4 Verify each battery pilot cell temperature is greater 31 days than or equal to minimum established design limits.

WOG STS 3.8.6-3 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 65 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 66 of 138 Battery Parameters CTS 3.8.6 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY 4.6.b.1 SR 3.8.6.5 Verify each battery connected cell voltage is 92 days 2

[2.07] V.

float 4.6.b.4 SR 3.8.6.6 -------------------------------NOTE------------------------------

This Surveillance shall not be performed in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4. However, portions of the Surveillance may be performed to reestablish OPERABILITY provided an assessment determines 5 the safety of the plant is maintained or enhanced.

Credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR.

Verify battery capacity is   60 months 2 manufacturer's rating when subjected to a performance discharge test or a modified AND performance discharge test.

12 months when battery shows degradation, or has reached 2



expected life with

  

of manufacturer's rating AND 24 months when battery has

 2 the expected life with capacity

 

manufacturer's rating WOG STS 3.8.6-4 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 66 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 67 of 138 Battery Parameters B 3.8.6 BASES ACTIONS (continued)

A discharged battery with float voltage (the charger setpoint) across its terminals indicates that the battery is on the exponential charging current portion (the second part) of its recharge cycle. The time to return a battery to its fully charged state under this condition is simply a function of the amount of the previous discharge and the recharge characteristic of the battery. Thus there is good assurance of fully recharging the battery 1

within [12] hours, avoiding a premature shutdown with its own attendant risk.

If the condition is due to one or more cells in a low voltage condition but still greater than [2.07] V and float voltage is found to be satisfactory, this 1 is not indication of a substantially discharged battery and [12] hours is a reasonable time prior to declaring the battery inoperable.

Since Required Action B.1 only specifies "perform," a failure of SR 3.8.4.1 acceptance criteria does not result in the Required Action not met.

However, if SR 3.8.4.1 is failed, the appropriate Condition(s), depending on the cause of the failure, is entered.

y C.1, C.2, and C.3 With one or more batteries in one train with one or more cells electrolyte 8 level above the top of the plates, but below the minimum established design limits, the battery still retains sufficient capacity to perform the intended function. Therefore, the affected battery is not required to be considered inoperable solely as a result of electrolyte level not met.

Within 31 days the minimum established design limits for electrolyte level must be re-established.

With electrolyte level below the top of the plates there is a potential for dryout and plate degradation. Required Actions C.1 and C.2 address this " 7 potential (as well as provisions in Specification 5.5.17, Battery Monitoring 2 15 and Maintenance Program). They are modified by a Note that indicates they are only applicable if electrolyte level is below the top of the plates.

Within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> level is required to be restored to above the top of the requirement plates. The Required Action C.2 requirement to verify that there is no 2 7 leakage by visual inspection and the Specification 5.5.17.b item to initiate Appendix action to equalize and test in accordance with manufacturer's 15 recommendation are taken from Annex D of IEEE Standard 450-1995.

They are performed following the restoration of the electrolyte level to 1987 above the top of the plates. Based on the results of the manufacturer's recommended testing the batter[y][ies] may have to be declared 8 inoperable and the affected cell[s] replaced.

(s)

WOG STS B 3.8.6-4 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 67 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 68 of 138 Battery Parameters B 3.8.6 BASES ACTIONS (continued) y D.1 With one or more batteries in one train with pilot cell temperature less 8 than the minimum established design limits, 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> is allowed to restore the temperature to within limits. A low electrolyte temperature limits the current and power available. Since the battery is sized with margin, while battery capacity is degraded, sufficient capacity exists to perform the intended function and the affected battery is not required to be considered inoperable solely as a result of the pilot cell temperature not met.

E.1 two With one or more batteries in redundant trains with battery parameters 8 not within limits there is not sufficient assurance that battery capacity has not been affected to the degree that the batteries can still perform their required function, given that redundant batteries are involved. With redundant batteries involved this potential could result in a total loss of function on multiple systems that rely upon the batteries. The longer 8 Completion Times specified for battery parameters on non-redundant batteries not within limits are therefore not appropriate, and the parameters must be restored to within limits on at least one train within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.

subsystem F.1 y or SR 3.8.6.6 With one or more batteries with any battery parameter outside the not met, allowances of the Required Actions for Condition A, B, C, D, or E, 8 sufficient capacity to supply the maximum expected load requirement is not assured and the corresponding battery must be declared inoperable. y Additionally, discovering one or more batteries in one train with one or more battery cells float voltage less than [2.07] V and float current greater 1 than [2] amps indicates that the battery capacity may not be sufficient to 1 perform the intended functions. The battery must therefore be declared inoperable immediately.

WOG STS B 3.8.6-5 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 68 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 69 of 138 Battery Parameters B 3.8.6 BASES 1

REFERENCES 1. IEEE-450-[1995].

-1987 U 4

2. FSAR, Chapter 8.
3. FSAR, Chapter [6].

U 14 1 3

4. FSAR, Chapter [15].

4 4

5. IEEE-485-[1983], June 1983.

WOG STS B 3.8.6-9 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 69 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 70 of 138 CTS Programs and Manuals 5.5 5.5 Programs and Manuals 5.5.16 Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program (continued) 6 14

1. Containment leakage rate acceptance criterion is  1.0 La. During the first unit startup following testing in accordance with this program, the leakage rate acceptance criteria are < 0.60 La for the Type B and C tests and [< 0.75 La for Option A Type A tests] [ 0.75 La for Option B Type A tests].
2. Air lock testing acceptance criteria are:

a) Overall air lock leakage rate is  [0.05 La] when tested at Pa. 19 b) For each door, leakage rate is  [0.01 La] when pressurized to

[ 10 psig].

e. The provisions of SR 3.0.3 are applicable to the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program.
f. Nothing in these Technical Specifications shall be construed to modify the testing Frequencies required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix J.

DOC 5.5.17 15 Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program 6 M10 This Program provides for battery restoration and maintenance, based on [the recommendations of IEEE Standard 450-1995, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Vented Lead-Acid Batteries for 24 Stationary Applications," or of the battery manufacturer] including the following:

which includes

a. Actions to restore battery cells with float voltage < [2.13] V, and 1 INSERT 8A 24
b. Actions to equalize and test battery cells that had been discovered with electrolyte level below the minimum established design limit. top of the plates; DOC 25 26 INSERT 8 M11
c. Actions to verify that the remaining cells are > 2.07 V when a pilot cell or cells have been found to be < [2.13] V. 1
d. Limits on average electrolyte temperature, battery connection resistance, and battery terminal voltage; and, 24
e. A requirement to obtain specific gravity readings of all cells at each discharge test, consistent with manufacturer recommendations.

WOG STS 5.5-18 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 70 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 71 of 138 INSERT 8A This Program provides controls for battery restoration and maintenance. The program shall be in accordance with IEEE Standard (Std) 450-2002, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Vented Lead-Acid Batteries for Stationary Applications," as endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.129, Revision 2 (RG), with RG exceptions and program provisions as identified below:

a. The program allows the following RG 1.129, Revision 2 exceptions:
1. Battery temperature correction may be performed before or after conducting discharge tests.
2. RG 1.129, Regulatory Position 1, Subsection 2, "References," is not applicable to this program.
3. In lieu of RG 1.129, Regulatory Position 2, Subsection 5.2, "Inspections," the following shall be used: "Where reference is made to the pilot cell, pilot cell selection shall be based on the lowest after each performance of voltage cell in the battery every 92 days."

SR 3.8.6.5 4 In Regulatory Guide 1.129, Regulatory Position 3, Subsection 5.4.1, "State of Charge Indicator," the following statements in paragraph (d) may be omitted: "When it has been recorded that the charging current has stabilized at the charging voltage for three consecutive hourly measurements, the battery is near full charge. These measurements shall be made after the initially high charging current decreases sharply and the battery voltage rises to approach the charger output voltage."

5. In lieu of RG 1.129, Regulatory Position 7, Subsection 7.6, "Restoration", the following may be used: "Following the test, record the float voltage of each cell of the string."
b. The program shall include the following provisions:
1. Actions to restore battery cells with float voltage < 2.13 V;
2. Actions to determine whether the float voltage of the remaining battery cells is 2.13 V when the float voltage of a battery cell has been found to be < 2.13 V;
3. Actions to equalize and test battery cells that had been discovered with electrolyte level below the top of the plates;
4. Limits on average electrolyte temperature, battery connection resistance, and battery terminal voltage; and
5. A requirement to obtain specific gravity readings of all cells at each discharge test, consistent with manufacturer recommendations.

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 71 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 72 of 138 JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS ITS 5.5, PROGRAMS AND MANUALS provided consistent with CTS 6.20. This is acceptable since the generic specific information/value is revised to reflect the current plant design.

23. ISTS 5.5.16 (ITS 5.5.14) provides the requirements for the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program. The statement in ISTS 5.5.16.f that "Nothing in these Technical Specifications shall be construed to modify the testing Frequencies required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix J" has been deleted. This phrase is not consistent with the allowances in ISTS 5.5.16.a (ITS 5.5.14.a), which states that the program shall be in accordance with the guidelines contained in Regulatory Guide 1.163, "Performance-Based Containment Leak-Test Program," dated INSERT JFD 24 September, 1995, as modified by the following exceptions." These exceptions stated in ITS 5.5.14.a are modifications to the testing Frequencies required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix J.
24. Changes made to be consistent with proposed TSTF-500, Revision 1.
25. ISTS 5.5.18, "Setpoint Control Program (SCP)," has been added consistent with proposed TSTF-493, Revision 4. Any changes to the proposed program are discussed in other Justification for Deviations. In addition, the bracketed ISTS 5.5.3, "Post Accident Sampling," and the ISTS 5.5.6, "Pre-Stressed Concrete Containment Tendon Surveillance Program," are not included in the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS) ITS. Therefore, this Specification has been renumbered in the KPS ITS as 5.5.16.
26. Changes are made to be consistent with the LCO title in Section 3.3. In addition, ISTS 3.3.8 and 3.3.9 have not been adopted in the KPS ITS.

Kewaunee Power Station Page 4 of 4 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 72 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 73 of 138 INSERT JFD 24

24. ISTS 5.5.17, "Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program," was added to NUREG-1431, Rev. 2 as part of TSTF-360, Rev. 1, which was approved by the NRC on December 18, 2000 (documented in a letter from W. D. Beckner, NRC to A. R. Pietrangelo, NEI). In a NRC subsequent NRC letter to the Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF), dated April 11, 2006, the NRC expressed concerns about certain aspects of the changes approved in TSTF-360, Rev.1. Since that time, the NRC and TSTF have had ongoing discussions concerning this program, and a new TSTF, proposed TSTF-500, Rev. 2, has been generated to resolve the NRC concerns. KPS is proposing revisions to the program based this proposed TSTF. The proposed changes are discussed below.

The Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program is revised to reference IEEE-450-2002 and Regulatory Guide 1.129, Revision 2 (with exceptions), to require actions to equalize and test battery cells when the electrolyte level drops below the top of plates instead of when the electrolyte level drops below the minimum established design limit, to require actions to verify the remaining cells are > 2.13 V when a cell or cells have been found to be < 2.13 V.

The Program is also revised to state the license controlled program will contain limits on average electrolyte temperature, battery connection resistance, and battery terminal voltage; and a requirement to obtain specific gravity readings of all cells at each discharge test, consistent with manufacturer recommendations.

The exceptions to Regulatory Guide 1.129, Revision 2, are needed to make the Regulatory Guide requirements consistent with the proposed Technical Specification requirements, allow reasonable technical approaches, and be applicable to operating plants, as described below:

Exception 1: Regulatory Guide 1.129 states that temperature correction must be performed before and after the test. IEEE-450-2002 recommends performing temperature correction before or after the test and this is adequate to obtain accurate test results.

Exception 2: This change excludes the Regulatory Guide 1.129 referenced documents, as they are not relevant to the program.

Exception 3: Regulatory Guide 1.129, Regulatory Position 2, states, "Where reference is made to the pilot cell, pilot cell selection shall be based on finding an average cell that is representative of the entire batterys individual cell voltage and specific gravity readings." This position is inconsistent with the treatment of pilot cells in TSTF-500. As stated in the justification (above), "In the past, pilot cells were selected to represent average cells in the battery. The change to 2.07 V now requires pilot cells to be selected to represent the lowest voltage cells in the battery. This ensures that the other cells are above the pilot cell voltage which must remain above the TS limit."

Exception 4: The following statements are excluded from Regulatory Position 3, subsection 5.4.1, "When it has been recorded that the charging current has stabilized at the charging voltage for three consecutive hourly measurements, the battery is near full charge. These measurements shall be made after the initially high charging current decreases sharply and the battery voltage rises to approach the charger output voltage." This is inconsistent with the OPERABILITY requirements used in the KPS ITS, which state that verifying battery float current to be d 2 amps while on float charge determines the battery is fully charged (See SR 3.8.6.1).

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 73 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 74 of 138 Exception 5: Regulatory Guide 1.129, Regulatory Position 7, recommends recording the specific gravity and float voltage of each cell in the string following the test.

The Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program requires obtaining specific gravity readings of all cells at each discharge test, consistent with manufacturer recommendations. The provision to follow the manufacturer's recommendations is a reasonable allowance given that the battery manufacturer is qualified to determine the benefit of the readings.

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 74 of 138

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 75 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3751 NRC Question GMW-007 Number Select Application NRC Question Closure

Response

Date/Time Closure Statement This question is closed and no further information is required at this time to draft the Safety Evaluation.

Response

Statement Question Closure 7/8/2010 Date Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Added By Gerald Waig Date Added 7/8/2010 3:46 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 75 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3751 07/09/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 76 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3941 NRC Question GMW-007 Number Select NRC Question Closure Application

Response

Date/Time Closure Based on the licensee 7/16/2010 11:15 AM response to GMW-007, this question is closed Statement and no further information is required at this time to draft the Safety Evaluation.

Response

Statement Question 7/21/2010 Closure Date Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Added By Gerald Waig Date Added 7/21/2010 3:01 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 76 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3941 07/22/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 77 of 138 ITS NRC Questions Id 1991 NRC Question GMW-009 Number Category Technical ITS Section 3.8 ITS Number 3.8.6 DOC L-5 Number JFD Number 5 JFD Bases Number Page 196 Number(s)

NRC Reviewer Gerald Waig Supervisor Technical M. McConnell Branch POC Conf Call N

Requested NRC 1. The purpose of ITS SR 3.8.6.6 is to verify that battery capacity is Question greater than or equal to 80% of the manufacturers rating when subjected to a performance discharge test. The performance frequency of this SR is 60 months AND 12 months when the battery shows degradation, or has reached 85% of the expected life with capacity less than 100% AND 24 months when the battery has reached 85% of the expected life with capacity greater than or equal to 100% of the manufacturers rating.

a. Provide the expected/qualified life of the safety-related station batteries at Kewaunee. Furthermore, provide a commitment to incorporate the expected/qualified life of the safety-related batteries in the Kewaunee Updated Final Safety Analysis Report and the TS Bases.

Attach File 1 Attach File 2 Issue Date 5/13/2010 Added By Gerald Waig Date Modified Modified By Date Added 5/13/2010 4:45 PM Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 77 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=1991 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 78 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3471 NRC Question GMW-009 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

6/10/2010 10:50 AM Date/Time Closure Statement Response In response to the NRC reviewer's first question requesting the Statement expected/qualified battery life, the battery supplier has affirmed, in written correspondence, that the qualified life of the 125V LCR-25 batteries (the type of batteries used to meet the ITS 3.8.4, 3.8.5, and 3.8.6 LCO requirements) at Kewaunee Power Station is 20 years. This qualified life assumes that the 125V batteries are operated at an average annual temperature of 80 deg. F or below, and they are maintained in accordance with recommended procedures for operation in the service conditions specified in specification E-38-1 dated 2/19/1988. The vendor letter is attached to the second response to GMW-007 Based upon discussion with the NRC the licensee will respond to the second question to "provide a commitment to incorporate the expected/qualified life of the safety-related batteries in the Kewaunee Updated Final Safety Analysis Report and the TS Bases" when some additional clarification is provided.

Question Closure Date Attachment 1

Attachment 2

Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Victor Cusumano Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Ray Schiele Gerald Waig Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 6/10/2010 10:48 AM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 78 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3471 06/23/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 79 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3531 NRC Question GMW-009 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

6/18/2010 8:10 AM Date/Time Closure Statement Response The NRC requested that the licensee "provide a commitment to Statement incorporate the expected/qualified life of the safety-related batteries in the Kewaunee Updated Final Safety Analysis Report and the TS Bases". DEK has obtained current industry information on TSTF-500 that indicates that this approach may be contested by the industry. Also, the regulatory basis for including this information into the USAR is unclear to DEK.

The NRC stated in recent conversations that the option of committing to include this information in the battery monitoring program and adding a reference to the battery monitoring program in the USAR is acceptable. To reach a timely resolution of this RAI, DEK has decided to commit to incorporating the expected/qualified life of the safety related batteries in the battery monitoring program that will be referenced in the USAR. This commitment will be reflected in a supplemental letter to the NRC.

Question Closure Date Attachment 1

Attachment 2

Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Victor Cusumano Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Ray Schiele Gerald Waig Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 6/18/2010 8:11 AM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 79 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3531 06/23/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 80 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3691 NRC Question GMW-009 Number Select Application NRC Question Closure

Response

Date/Time Closure Statement This question is closed and no further information is required at this time to draft the Safety Evaluation.

Response

Statement Question Closure 7/8/2010 Date Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Added By Gerald Waig Date Added 7/8/2010 1:46 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 80 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3691 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 81 of 138 ITS NRC Questions Id 2001 NRC Question GMW-010 Number Category Technical ITS Section 3.8 ITS Number 3.8.4 DOC Number JFD Number 1 JFD Bases Number Page 142 Number(s)

NRC Reviewer Gerald Waig Supervisor Technical M. McConnell Branch POC Conf Call N

Requested NRC Proposed ITS Limiting Condition for Operation 3.8.4 Required Question Action A.2 would require the licensee to verify that the battery float current is less than or equal to 2 amps.

Provide a detailed technical discussion on the proposed 2 amp float current value for indicating a batterys state-of-charge. In your response, discuss how this value was calculated and describe the key assumptions and margins that are being applied. Furthermore, confirm that each battery that has a 5% design margin and is charged to 95% is representative of a fully charged battery.

Attach File 1 Attach File 2 Issue Date 5/13/2010 Added By Gerald Waig Date Modified Modified By Date Added 5/13/2010 4:54 PM Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 81 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2001 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 82 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3491 NRC Question GMW-010 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

6/10/2010 2:15 PM Date/Time Closure Statement

Response

Statement The NRC reviewer requested a technical discussion of the proposed 2 amp float current value for indicating a batterys state-of-charge.

Per IEEE-450-1987, Section 4.5, a stabilized float current is a more accurate indicator of a batterys state of charge than electrolyte specific gravity.

The Standard states:

"State of charge is normally indicated by specific gravity readings.

However, specific gravity readings may not be accurate when the battery is on charge following a discharge or following the addition of water. When cell design permits, specific gravity reading accuracy can be improved by averaging several readings taken at different levels within a cell. A more accurate indicator of return to full charge is a stabilized charging or float current."

IEEE-450-2002, Section 5.4.1, "State of charge indicator," states:

"The following may be used as indicators of return to a fully charged state after a discharge (see Annex A):

Stabilized charging current when measured at the manufacturers recommended voltage and temperature for recharging the battery.

Assurance that the ampere hours returned to the battery are greater than the ampere hours removed plus the charging losses."

IEEE-450-2002, Sections 5.4.2, "Charging current indicator," states:

"After the battery has been charged, stabilized charging current may be used as an indicator that the battery is fully charged (see Annex A)."

IEEE-450-2002, Section A.2, "Stabilized charging current used to determine a fully charged condition," states, in part:

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 82 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3491 06/24/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 2 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 83 of 138 "When the charging current has stabilized at the charging voltage for three consecutive hourly measurements, the battery is near full charge. The expected charging current range applicable to each mode may be verified by test or in consultation with the manufacturer."

C&D Technologies, Inc., the battery supplier for the KPS safety related batteries covered by LCO 3.8.4, 3.8.5, and 3.8.6, affirms that float current is an acceptable method to determine a batterys state of charge (Reference C&D Technologies, Inc. letter, dated 5/28/2010, attached to KPS response to GMW-007.). Specifically, the manufacturer made the following three statements:

"The use of float current is an acceptable method to determine the state of charge of the battery that will hold true over the life of the batteries."

"C&D agrees that a float current value of less than or equal to 2 amps is consistent with at least a 95% state of charge of the LCR-25 batteries at your facility."

"Based on data collected during laboratory tests, the 2 amps float current value for the LCR-25 batteries is consistent with a state of charge of at least 95%."

In summary, Kewaunees proposed 2 amp float current value is based on the manufacturers recommendation and is consistent with IEEE-450.

Question Closure Date Attachment 1

Attachment 2

Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Victor Cusumano Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Ray Schiele Gerald Waig Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 6/10/2010 2:17 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 83 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3491 06/24/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 84 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3701 NRC Question Number GMW-010 Select Application NRC Question Closure Response Date/Time Closure Statement This question is closed and will be addressed in the licensee response to GMW-014.

Response Statement Question Closure Date 7/8/2010 Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Added By Gerald Waig Date Added 7/8/2010 2:06 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 84 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3701 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 85 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3891 NRC Question GMW-010 Number Select Application NRC Question Closure

Response

Date/Time Closure Statement This question is closed and no further information is required at this time to draft the Safety Evaluation.

Response

Statement Question Closure 7/19/2010 Date Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Added By Gerald Waig Date Added 7/19/2010 10:43 AM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 85 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3891 07/19/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 86 of 138 ITS NRC Questions Id 2011 NRC Question GMW-011 Number Category Technical ITS Section 3.8 ITS Number 3.8.6 DOC Number JFD Number JFD Bases Number Page Number 195 (s)

NRC Reviewer Gerald Waig Supervisor Technical M. McConnell Branch POC Conf Call N

Requested NRC Question ITS 3.8.6 SR 3.8.6.4 would require the licensee to verify that each battery pilot cell temperature is greater than or equal to minimum established design limits. In order to justify using a single cell to represent the temperature of the entire battery, provide the historical maximum temperature deviation across the battery.

Attach File 1 Attach File 2 Issue Date 5/13/2010 Added By Gerald Waig Date Modified Modified By Date Added 5/13/2010 5:00 PM Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 86 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2011 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 87 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3331 NRC Question GMW-011 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

5/27/2010 2:20 PM Date/Time Closure Statement Response NRC requested that KPS provide the historical maximum temperature Statement deviation across the battery. This was requested in order to justify using a single cell to represent the temperature of the entire battery.

Quarterly surveillance testing of the A and B safeguards batteries includes the measurement and recording of battery cell temperature for about every fifth cell, typically including from 11 to 14 cells for the 59-cell battery. Since the A and B safeguards batteries were replaced during the 2008 spring refueling outage, battery cell temperature data was reviewed for the first 7 instances of quarterly surveillance testing performed immediately thereafter.

For BRA101 (A train safeguards battery), the data indicates a maximum delta T, lowest measured cell temperature to highest measured cell temperature during any single quarterly surveillance, of 3.1 deg. F (71.9 -

75.0 deg. F). The average of battery cell temperatures for that same surveillance was 74.1 deg. F.

For BRB101 (B train safeguards battery), the data indicates a maximum delta T, lowest measured cell temperature to highest measured cell temperature during any single quarterly surveillance, of 4.7 deg. F (73.3 -

78.0 deg. F). The average of battery cell temperatures for that same surveillance was 75.1 deg. F.

Question Closure Date Attachment 1

Attachment 2

Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Victor Cusumano Jerry Jones Ray Schiele Gerald Waig Robert Wolfgang Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 5/27/2010 2:18 PM Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 87 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3331 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 2 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 88 of 138 Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 88 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3331 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 89 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3711 NRC Question GMW-011 Number Select Application NRC Question Closure

Response

Date/Time Closure Statement This question is closed and no further information is required at this time to draft the Safety Evaluation.

Response

Statement Question Closure 7/8/2010 Date Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Added By Gerald Waig Date Added 7/8/2010 2:07 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 89 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3711 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 90 of 138 ITS NRC Questions Id 2021 NRC Question GMW-012 Number Category Technical ITS Section 5.0 ITS Number 5.5 DOC Number JFD Number JFD Bases Number Page Number(s)

NRC Reviewer Gerald Waig Supervisor Technical Branch M. McConnell POC Conf Call N

Requested NRC Question Describe how the resistance values that will be located in proposed TS 5.5.15, Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program, were derived.

Attach File 1 Attach File 2 Issue Date 5/13/2010 Added By Gerald Waig Date Modified Modified By Date Added 5/13/2010 5:06 PM Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 90 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2021 07/01/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 91 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3481 NRC Question GMW-012 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

6/10/2010 11:00 AM Date/Time Closure Statement Response The 125V safety related Train A and B batteries covered by ITS 3.8.4, 3.8.5, Statement and 3.8.6 were installed and acceptance tested in accordance with the DCR3687 Installation Plan. This DCR complied with IEEE-484-1987, IEEE-450-2002, the manufacturers recommendations, and KPS surveillance procedures SP-38-182A, EDC-BRA101 Station Battery "A" Resistance Check Electrical Maintenance (QA-1) and SP-38-182B, EDC-BRB101 Station Battery "B" Resistance Check Electrical Maintenance (QA-1).

The installation included cleaning of terminal posts and connecting hardware, coating the contact surfaces with corrosion-inhibiting grease, making inter-cell connections with manufacturer approved connectors, tightening bolted connections to manufacturer approved torque values, and the measuring and recording of connections resistances. These resistance values were used to confirm acceptable installation and to establish initial baseline values. These baseline resistance values are used for comparison for the trending required by the ongoing surveillance testing via SP-38-182A and SP-38-182B, noted above.

Question Closure Date Attachment 1

Attachment 2

Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Victor Cusumano Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Ray Schiele Gerald Waig Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 6/10/2010 10:54 AM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 91 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3481 06/24/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 92 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3721 NRC Question GMW-012 Number Select Application NRC Question Closure

Response

Date/Time Closure Statement This question is closed and no further information is required at this time to draft the Safety Evaluation.

Response

Statement Question Closure 7/8/2010 Date Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Added By Gerald Waig Date Added 7/8/2010 2:08 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 92 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3721 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 93 of 138 ITS NRC Questions Id 2031 NRC Question GMW-013 Number Category Technical ITS Section 3.8 ITS Number 3.8.4 DOC M-3 Number JFD Number JFD Bases Number Page 143 Number(s)

NRC Reviewer Gerald Waig Supervisor Technical M. McConnell Branch POC Conf Call N

Requested NRC ITS SR 3.8.4.3 would require the licensee to verify the battery Question capacity is adequate to supply, and maintain OPERABLE status, the required emergency loads for the design duty cycle when subjected to a battery service test.

a. Note 1 of SR 3.8.4.3 would allow the modified performance test in SR 3.8.6.6 to be performed in lieu of SR 3.8.4.3. Provide a graphical chart to show that the modified performance discharge test envelopes the both the service and performance tests.
b. Note 2 of SR 3.8.4.3 states that the Surveillance shall not normally be performed in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4. However, portions of the Surveillance may be performed to reestablish OPERABILITY provided an assessment determines the safety of the plant is maintained or enhanced. Credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR. The staff is not aware of any circumstance that would require credit to be taken for portions of SR 3.8.4.3. Either provide a detailed technical justification, with examples of when this option may be used, for keeping the allowance to credit portions of this Surveillance or remove this allowance from the Note.

Attach File 1

Attach File Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 93 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2031 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 2 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 94 of 138 2

Issue Date 5/13/2010 Added By Gerald Waig Date Modified Modified By Date Added 5/13/2010 5:15 PM Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 94 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2031 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 3 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 95 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3131 NRC Question GMW-013 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

5/24/2010 1:35 PM Date/Time Closure Statement

Response

Statement This RAI included two questions. The first question requested a graphical chart to show that the modified performance discharge test envelops both the service and performance tests. This statement was made (i.e., that the modified performance discharge test envelops both the service test and the performance test) in the ITS Bases for SR 3.8.6.6, on Page 205 of 289 of this volume. However, these graphs are attached to this Response for both the Train A and Train B batteries. The information is in a single attachment, and the top of each page is identified as to which Train it is for. The first 6 pages are for the Train A Battery and the next 7 pages are for the Train B Battery. Furthermore, the following narrative is provided to assist in explaining the information on the attached file:

Train A Battery information (pages 1 through 6 of the attachment) -

includes excerpts from 1) KPS calculation C-038-002, Rev. 4, Addendum E, and 2) KPS Surveillance Procedure SP-38-102A, Rev. 7, Station Battery BRA101 Load Test Electrical Maintenance.

The first page of the Train A Battery information (page 1 of the attachment) is from the KPS calculation and is labeled "Attachment 1: Load Profile, Table 1.6, Battery BRA-101 Bounding Load Profile."

This Table depicts the bounding load profile for the "A" train station battery (safeguards). The Table includes a "pen and ink" change to the 0-1 minute rate (formally reviewed and approved July 28, 2008) and reflects a previously unaccounted for resistor in a motor starting circuit.

The remainder of the Train A Battery information (pages 2 through 6 of the attachment) are pages from Appendix A to SP-38-102A, Rev.

7. These pages are the test equipment setup steps/requirements for the battery discharge test. Of specific note, page 14 of 16, step 8.6.2 (page 4 of the attachment) prescribes the battery discharge test load profile.

A comparison of the Table profile and the battery discharge test load profile in step 8.6.2 clearly shows that the battery discharge test load profile envelopes both the service and performance tests. (Note that during the most recent performance of this surveillance the Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 95 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3131 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 2 of 3 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 96 of 138 electrolyte temperature was 74.5 deg F, for a K factor of 1.011.)

Train B Battery information (pages 7 through 13 of the attachment) -

includes excerpts from 1) KPS calculation C-038-002, Rev. 4, Addendum D, and 2) KPS Surveillance Procedure SP-38-102B, Rev. 9, Station Battery BRB101 Load Test Electrical Maintenance.

The first page of the Train B Battery information (page 7 of the attachment) is from the KPS calculation and is labeled "Attachment 1: Load Profile, Table 1.10, Battery BRB-101 Bounding Load Profile, is labeled Page 58 of 58 and, as the title states, depicts the bounding load profile for the B train station battery (safeguards).

The remainder of the Train B Battery information (pages 8 through 13 of the attachment) are pages from Appendix A to SP-38-102B, Rev.

9. These pages are the test equipment setup steps/requirements for the battery discharge test. Of specific note, page 14 of 17, step 8.6.2 (page 10 of the attachment) prescribes the battery discharge test load profile.

A comparison of the Table profile and the battery discharge test load profile in step 8.6.2 clearly shows that the battery discharge test load profile envelopes both the service and performance tests. (Note that during the most recent performance of this surveillance the electrolyte temperature was 74.0 deg F, for a K factor of 1.017.)

The second question requested a detailed technical justification to use a Note allowed by the ISTS for SR 3.8.4.3. KPS is aware that the industry provided an example of how the Note could be used to the NRC. This is documented in the Summary of the TSTF/NRC meeting of April 28, 2008.

Although, KPS is unaware of any previous ITS conversion having to provide a detailed justification for this specific Note, KPS will deviate from the NUREG-1431 as requested by the NRC reviewer and delete the portion of the Note requested. A draft markup regarding this change is attached.

This change will be reflected in the supplement to this section of the ITS conversion amendment.

Question Closure Date Attachment GMW-013 information.pdf (577KB) 1 Attachment GMW-013 Markup (2).pdf (849KB) 2 Notification Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Members Victor Cusumano Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 96 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3131 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 3 of 3 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 97 of 138 Ray Schiele Gerald Waig Robert Wolfgang Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 5/24/2010 2:06 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 97 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3131 07/08/2010

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 98 of 138 Train A Battery Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 98 of 138

Enclosure Train A Battery (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 99 of 138 BATTERY DISCHARGE TEST EQUIPMENT SETUP Reference drawing BCT-350-D1105 for the following:

1.0 Connect the BCT-128 cable leads to the cells 1.1 Lead 0V+ to positive post on Cell 1.

1.2 Lead 0 to positive post on Cell 1.

1.3 Lead 01 to positive post on Cell 2.

1.4 Lead 02 to positive post on Cell 3.

1.5 Continue this sequence to Lead 32 to the positive post of Cell 33.

1.6 The second harness has Lead 32A which also goes to the positive post on Cell 33.

1.7 Resume the sequence with Lead 33 connected to the positive post on Cell 34 and finish with Lead 58 on the positive post of Cell 59.

1.8 Lead 59 to the negative post of Cell 59.

1.9 Lead 0V- to the negative post of Cell 59.

2.0 Connect the Intertier jumpers.

2.1 IT/-1 to negative post of Cell 15 and IT/+1 to positive post of Cell 16.

2.2 IT/-2 to negative post of Cell 30 and IT/+2 to positive post of Cell 31.

2.3 IT/-3 to negative post of Cell 44 and IT/+3 to positive post of Cell 45.

3.0 Connect the power cords and control cables to the BCT-128 and the Control unit. (Reference drawing BCT-2436-D1110).

4.0 At the load bank, perform the following:

4.1 Connect the control cable between the BCT-128 and the load bank.

Note Do NOT turn on the AC control power to the load bank at this time.

4.2. Connect the AC power cord.

Note The Load bank unit has designated positive and negative terminals with a shunt located in the negative leg of the circuit.

4.3 Connect a voltmeter across the load bank shunt. Shunt value is 1200 amps = 100mv.

5.0 Connect a voltmeter across the battery terminals that is readable at the BCT-128 location.

6.0 Using a multimeter, VERIFY greater than 100k ohms resistance between the load bank unit positive and negative terminals.

Appendix A SP-38-102A Rev. 7 Date: SEP 1 2009 Page 12 of 16 CONTINUOUS USE Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 99 of 138

Train A Battery Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 100 of 138 BATTERY DISCHARGE TEST EQUIPMENT SETUP 7.0 Connect the load cables from the load bank terminals to the test breaker near the positive and negative battery terminal cabinets. Verify the breaker is in the OFF position.

8.0 Computer Setup:

8.1 Start the computer.

8.2 Select BCT2000 Icon.

8.3 Select Setup.

8.3.1 Select Location Screen.

8.3.2 Enter site name KPS.

Note The present date appended to the battery name is the default file name of the report generated at the time of test 8.3.4 Enter battery name (BRA-101).

8.3.5 Enter battery installation date (4/2008).

8.3.6 If desired and known, enter next scheduled test date.

8.3.7 Enter battery manufacturer (C&D).

8.3.8 Enter battery model (LCR-25).

8.3.9 Enter battery ID (BRA-101).

8.4 Select Strings screen.

8.4.1 Select Config Battery.

8.4.2 Enter total number of cells (59).

8.4.3 Ensure cell voltage is 2.

8.5 Select Test Setup screen.

8.5.1 Select Modified Performance.

8.5.2 Enter rated time (08:00:00).

8.5.3 Ensure power type is selected to Constant Current.

8.5.4 Ensure Temperature is 77ºF.

8.5.5 Ensure cell voltage is 2.

8.5.6 Ensure correction is None.

8.5.7 Enter cell warning (1.78).

Appendix A SP-38-102A Rev. 7 Date: SEP 1 2009 Page 13 of 16 CONTINUOUS USE Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 100 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 101 of 138 Train A Battery BATTERY DISCHARGE TEST EQUIPMENT SETUP 8.5.8 Enter 0V warning (106).

8.5.9 Intertier may be entered if desired or leave as 0.

8.5.10 Enter cell shutdown (0.0).

8.5.11 Enter 0V shutdown (105).

8.5.12 Enter Intertier shutdown (0.0).

8.6 Enter test steps as determined by method of test being performed:

Note For the step number, enter time duration of each step in format hh:mm:ss and enter desired current level for that step. See Table 1 of IEEE 450-1987 for K factor 8.6.1 Electrolyte Temperature factor K 8.6.2 Step Time BRA-101 1 00:01:00 1st minute discharge rate (392.66) divided by factor K________

2 00:02:00 Remaining discharge rate (221) divided by factor K_______

8.7 Select Intertier Screen.

8.7.1 Select Intertier cell assignment #1.

8.7.1.1 Select the cell of the intertier cable connection (Cell 15-16).

8.7.2 Select Intertier cell assignment #2.

8.7.2.1 Select the cell of the intertier cable connection (Cell 30-31).

8.7.3 Select Intertier cell assignment #3.

8.7.3.1 Select the cell of the intertier cable connection (Cell 44-45).

8.8 Select Load Bank screen (Password needed to change but not to view, if needed default password is alber).

8.8.1 VERIFY shunt rating is 1200 Amps per 100 mV.

8.8.2 VERIFY Auto Detect step resistance box is checked.

8.9 Close setup screen by clicking the x in the upper right corner (data will be retained for test).

Appendix A SP-38-102A Rev. 7 Date: SEP 1 2009 Page 14 of 16 CONTINUOUS USE Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 101 of 138

Train AEnclosure Battery (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 102 of 138 BATTERY LOAD TEST COMPUTER "RUN TEST" 1.0 VERIFY all data in setup section is correct.

2.0 Select Run Test.

3.0 VERIFY data logger unit is turned ON.

4.0 VERIFY cell connections and interier connections by noting that each cell is displaying information in a bar graph format.

4.1 VERIFY displayed readings of three cells and OV (overall voltage) with a digital voltmeter.

4.2 Normal graph color is green.

4.3 Yellow graphs indicate cells below warning voltage levels.

4.4 Red graphs indicate cells below shutdown levels.

4.5 Black graphs indicate cell reversal.

4.6 Attach test data for the first minute at 10 second intervals to this procedure.

[PCR030634, Ref. 10.20]

4.7 Attach test data for entire test at 15 minute intervals to this procedure.

[PCR030634, Ref. 10.20]

5.0 Turn on load bank.

5.1 Turn load bank breaker ON.

6.0 Press F1 to start the test.

6.1 Pressing F1 again will stop the test.

6.2 Pressing F2 will pause the test to allow jumpering of a cell or replacing leads that have come off, pressing F2 resumes the test.

6.3 Pressing F3 takes manual control of the load bank resistors if a problem is encountered such as the wrong current level is being sustained by the automatic controls.

7.0 To acknowledge cell warning alarms, click YES in the cell warning window when it appears.

Appendix B SP-38-102A Rev. 7 Date: SEP 1 2009 Page 15 of 16 CONTINUOUS USE Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 102 of 138

Train A Battery Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 103 of 138 BATTERY LOAD TEST COMPUTER "RUN TEST" 5.0 Equipment M&TE INSTRUMENT INSTRUMENT NO. Calibration/Functional. Due Date COMMENTS:

Performed By (Print Name) (Signature) Date Reviewed By (Print Name) (Signature) Date Appendix B SP-38-102A Rev. 7 Date: SEP 1 2009 Page 16 of 16 CONTINUOUS USE Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 103 of 138

Train B Battery C-038-002 Rev. 4, Add. D Attachment 1: Load Profile Page 58 of 58 Table 1.10 Battery BRB-101 Bounding Load Profile 300.00 274.01 250.00 203.01 199.37 200.00 181.79 177.82 167.39 150.00 142.20 Amps BRB-101 100.00 50.00 0.00 0-1 MIN. 1-2 MIN. 2-35 MIN. 35-45 MIN. 45 MIN. - 7HR 7HR 50MIN - 7HR 59MIN -

50MIN 7HR 59MIN 8HR Duty Cycle Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 104 of 138 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 104 of 138

Train B Battery Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 105 of 138 BATTERY DISCHARGE TEST EQUIPMENT SETUP Reference drawing BCT-350-D1105 for the following:

1.0 Connect the BCT-128 cable leads to the cells 1.1 Lead 0V+ to positive post on Cell 1.

1.2 Lead 0 to positive post on Cell 1.

1.3 Lead 01 to positive post on Cell 2.

1.4 Lead 02 to positive post on Cell 3.

1.5 Continue this sequence to Lead 32 to the positive post of Cell 33.

1.6 The second harness has Lead 32A which also goes to the positive post on Cell 33.

1.7 Resume the sequence with Lead 33 connected to the positive post on Cell 34 and finish with Lead 58 on the positive post of Cell 59.

1.8 Lead 59 to the negative post of Cell 59.

1.9 Lead 0V- to the negative post of Cell 59.

2.0 Connect the Intertier jumpers.

2.1 IT/-1 to negative post of Cell 15 and IT/+1 to positive post of Cell 16.

2.2 IT/-2 to negative post of Cell 30 and IT/+2 to positive post of Cell 31.

2.3 IT/-3 to negative post of Cell 44 and IT/+3 to positive post of Cell 45.

3.0 Connect the power cords and control cables to the BCT-128 and the Control unit. (Reference drawing BCT-2436-D1110).

4.0 At the load bank, perform the following:

4.1 Connect the control cable between the BCT-128 and the load bank.

Note Do NOT turn on the AC control power to the load bank at this time.

4.2. Connect the AC power cord.

Note The Load bank unit has designated positive and negative terminals with a shunt located in the negative leg of the circuit.

4.3 Connect a voltmeter across the load bank shunt. Shunt value is 1000 amps = 100mv.(Optional) 5.0 Connect a voltmeter across the battery terminals that are readable at the BCT-128 location.

Appendix A SP-38-102B Rev. 9 Date: SEP 1 2009 Page 12 of 17 CONTINUOUS USE Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 105 of 138

Train B Battery Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 106 of 138 BATTERY DISCHARGE TEST EQUIPMENT SETUP 6.0 Using a multimeter, VERIFY greater than 100k ohms resistance between the load bank unit positive and negative terminals.

7.0 Connect the load cables from the load bank terminals to the test breaker near the positive and negative battery terminal cabinets. Verify the breaker is in the OFF position.

8.0 Computer Setup:

8.1 Start the computer.

8.2 Select BCT2000 Icon.

8.3 Select Setup.

8.3.1 Select Location Screen.

8.3.2 Enter site name KPS.

Note The present date appended to the battery name is the default file name of the report generated at the time of test 8.3.4 Enter battery name (BRB-101).

8.3.5 Enter battery installation date (04/2008).

8.3.6 If desired and known, enter next scheduled test date.

8.3.7 Enter battery manufacturer (C&D).

8.3.8 Enter battery model (LCR-25).

8.3.9 Enter battery ID (BRB-101).

8.4 Select Strings screen.

8.4.1 Select Config Battery.

8.4.2 Enter total number of cells (59).

8.4.3 Ensure cell voltage is 2.

8.5 Select Test Setup screen.

8.5.1 Select Modified Performance.

8.5.2 Enter rated time (08:00:00).

8.5.3 Ensure power type is selected to Constant Current.

8.5.4 Ensure Temperature is 77ºF.

8.5.5 Ensure cell voltage is 2.

Appendix A SP-38-102B Rev. 9 Date: SEP 1 2009 Page 13 of 17 CONTINUOUS USE Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 106 of 138

Train B Battery Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 107 of 138 BATTERY DISCHARGE TEST EQUIPMENT SETUP 8.5.6 Ensure correction is None.

8.5.7 Enter cell warning (1.78).

8.5.8 Enter 0V warning (106).

8.5.9 Intertier may be entered if desired or leave as 0.

8.5.10 Enter cell shutdown (1.25).

8.5.11 Enter 0V shutdown (105).

8.5.12 Enter Intertier shutdown (0.0).

8.6 Enter test steps as determined by method of test being performed:

Note For the step number, enter time duration of each step in format hh:mm:ss and enter desired current level for that step. See Table 1 of IEEE 450-1987 for K factor.

8.6.1 Electrolyte Temperature factor K 8.6.2 Step Duration BRB-101 st 1 00:01:00 1 minute discharge rate (273.35) divided by K factor =

2 00:02:00 Remaining discharge rate (221) divided by K factor =

Appendix A SP-38-102B Rev. 9 Date: SEP 1 2009 Page 14 of 17 CONTINUOUS USE Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 107 of 138

TrainEnclosure B Battery (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 108 of 138 BATTERY DISCHARGE TEST EQUIPMENT SETUP 8.7 Select Intertier Screen.

8.7.1 Select Intertier cell assignment #1.

8.7.1.1 Select the cell of the intertier cable connection (Cell 15-16).

8.7.2 Select Intertier cell assignment #2.

8.7.2.1 Select the cell of the intertier cable connection (Cell 30-31).

8.7.3 Select Intertier cell assignment #3.

8.7.3.1 Select the cell of the intertier cable connection (Cell 44-45).

8.8 Select Load Bank screen (Password needed to change but not to view, if needed default password is alber).

8.8.1 VERIFY shunt rating is 1000 Amps per 100 mV.

8.8.2 VERIFY Auto Detect step resistance box is checked.

8.9 Close setup screen by clicking the x in the upper right corner (data will be retained for test).

Appendix A SP-38-102B Rev. 9 Date: SEP 1 2009 Page 15 of 17 CONTINUOUS USE Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 108 of 138

Train B Battery Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 109 of 138 BATTERY LOAD TEST COMPUTER "RUN TEST" 1.0 VERIFY all data in setup section is correct.

2.0 Select Run Test.

3.0 VERIFY data logger unit is turned ON.

4.0 VERIFY cell connections and interier connections by noting that each cell is displaying information in a bar graph format.

4.1 VERIFY displayed readings of three cells and OV (overall voltage) with a digital voltmeter.

4.2 Normal graph color is green.

4.3 Yellow graphs indicate cells below warning voltage levels.

4.4 Red graphs indicate cells below shutdown levels.

4.5 Black graphs indicate cell reversal.

4.6 Attach test data for the first minute at 10 second intervals to this procedure.

[PCR030635, Ref. 10.23]

4.7 Attach test data for entire test at 15 minute intervals to this procedure.

[PCR030635, Ref. 10.23]

5.0 Turn on load bank.

5.1 Turn Load Cell control toggle switch ON.

5.2 Turn load bank breaker ON.

6.0 Press F1 to start the test.

6.1 Pressing F1 again will stop the test.

6.2 Pressing F2 will pause the test to allow jumpering of a cell or replacing leads that have come off, pressing F2 resumes the test.

6.3 Pressing F3 takes manual control of the load bank resistors if a problem is encountered such as the wrong current level is being sustained by the automatic controls.

7.0 To acknowledge cell warning alarms, click YES in the cell warning window when it appears.

Appendix B SP-38-102B Rev. 9 Date: SEP 1 2009 Page 16 of 17 CONTINUOUS USE Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 109 of 138

TrainEnclosure B Battery (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 110 of 138 BATTERY LOAD TEST COMPUTER "RUN TEST" 5.0 Equipment M&TE INSTRUMENT INSTRUMENT NO. Calibration/Functional. Due Date COMMENTS:

Performed By (Print Name) (Signature) Date Reviewed By (Print Name) (Signature) Date Appendix B SP-38-102B Rev. 9 Date: SEP 1 2009 Page 17 of 17 CONTINUOUS USE Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 110 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 111 of 138 All changes are 1 DC Sources - Operating CTS 3.8.4 unless otherwise noted SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY DOC M03 SR 3.8.4.1 Verify battery terminal voltage is greater than or 7 days equal to the minimum established float voltage.

required 2 DOC M03 SR 3.8.4.2 Verify each battery charger supplies  [400] amps at [18] months greater than or equal to the minimum established float voltage for  [8] hours. 150 OR required 2

Verify each battery charger can recharge the battery to the fully charged state within [24] hours while supplying the largest combined demands of the various continuous steady state loads, after a battery discharge to the bounding design basis event discharge state.

DOC M03 SR 3.8.4.3 ------------------------------NOTES-----------------------------

1. The modified performance discharge test in SR 3.8.6.6 may be performed in lieu of SR 3.8.4.3.
2. This Surveillance shall not normally be performed in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4. However, 5

portions of the Surveillance may be performed to reestablish OPERABILITY provided an assessment determines the safety of the plant is maintained or enhanced. Credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR.

Verify battery capacity is adequate to supply, and [18] months maintain in OPERABLE status, the required emergency loads for the design duty cycle when subjected to a battery service test.

WOG STS 3.8.4-2 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 111 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 112 of 138 JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS ITS 3.8.4, DC SOURCES - OPERATING

1. The ISTS contains bracketed information and/or values that are generic to all Westinghouse vintage plants. The brackets are removed and the proper plant specific information/value is provided. This is acceptable since the generic specific information/value is revised to reflect the current plant design.
2. The term "required" has been added since the DC System has a spare battery charger that is common to both DC subsystems, and the spare charger can be used to meet the requirements of the LCO if the normal charger is inoperable.
3. The bracketed ISTS 3.8.4 ACTION B has been deleted since it is not necessary.

ISTS 3.8.4 ACTION C (ITS 3.8.4 ACTION B) covers the condition of an inoperable battery. Due to this deletion, the subsequent ACTIONS have been modified and renumbered, as necessary.

4. The Completion Time for ISTS 3.8.4 Required Action A.3 has been changed from 7 days to 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. This change is consistent with proposed TSTF-500.
5. This allowance in the Note to SR 3.8.4.3 has been deleted, as discussed in the response to RAI GMW-013.

Kewaunee Power Station Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 112 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 113 of 138 All changes are 1 DC Sources - Operating unless otherwise noted B 3.8.4 BASES SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued) battery service test and will need to be supplemented with additional loads. The duration for this test may be longer than the charger sizing criteria since the battery recharge is affected by float voltage, temperature, and the exponential decay in charging current. The battery is recharged when the measured charging current is 

The Surveillance Frequency is acceptable, given the unit conditions required to perform the test and the other administrative controls existing to ensure adequate charger performance during these [18 month] 2 intervals. In addition, this Frequency is intended to be consistent with expected fuel cycle lengths.

SR 3.8.4.3 A battery service test is a special test of the battery capability, as found, to satisfy the design requirements (battery duty cycle) of the DC electrical power system. The discharge rate and test length should correspond to the design duty cycle requirements as specified in Reference 4.

The Surveillance Frequency of [18 months] is consistent with the 7 2 8 recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.32 (Ref. 9) and Regulatory Guide 1.129 (Ref. 10), which state that the battery service test should be performed during refueling operations, or at some other outage, with intervals between tests not to exceed [18 months]. 2 This SR is modified by two Notes. Note 1 allows the performance of a modified performance discharge test in lieu of a service test.

The reason for Note 2 is that performing the Surveillance would perturb the electrical distribution system and challenge safety systems. This restriction from normally performing the Surveillance in MODE 1 or 2 is further amplified to allow portions of the Surveillance to be performed for the purpose of reestablishing OPERABILITY (e.g., post work testing 7 following corrective maintenance, corrective modification, deficient or incomplete surveillance testing, and other unanticipated OPERABILITY concerns) provided an assessment determines plant safety is maintained or enhanced. This assessment shall, as a minimum, consider the potential outcomes and transients associated with a failed partial WOG STS B 3.8.4-9 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 113 of 138

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 114 of 138 All changes are 1 DC Sources - Operating unless otherwise noted B 3.8.4 BASES SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

Surveillance, a successful partial Surveillance, and a perturbation of the offsite or onsite system when they are tied together or operated independently for the partial Surveillance; as well as the operator 7 procedures available to cope with these outcomes. These shall be measured against the avoided risk of a plant shutdown and startup to determine that plant safety is maintained or enhanced when portions of the Surveillance are performed in MODE 1 or 2. Risk insights or deterministic methods may be used for the assessment. Credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR.

REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 17.

6 Safety

2. Regulatory Guide 1.6, March 10, 1971.
3. IEEE-308-[1978].

U 3 4. FSAR, Chapter [8].

2

5. FSAR, Chapter [6].

14 4

6. FSAR, Chapter [15]. 2 U

5 7. Regulatory Guide 1.93, December 1974.

1987 6

8. IEEE-450-[1995]. 2 7
9. Regulatory Guide 1.32, February 1977.

8

10. Regulatory Guide 1.129, December 1974.

WOG STS B 3.8.4-10 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 114 of 138

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 115 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3981 NRC Question GMW-013 Number Select Application NRC Question Closure

Response

Date/Time Closure Statement This question is closed and no further information is required at this time to draft the Safety Evaluation.

Response

Statement Question Closure 7/26/2010 Date Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Added By Gerald Waig Date Added 7/26/2010 3:38 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 115 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3981 07/26/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 116 of 138 ITS NRC Questions Id 2041 NRC Question GMW-014 Number Category Technical ITS Section Change to USAR ITS Number DOC Number JFD Number JFD Bases Number Page Number(s)

NRC Reviewer Gerald Waig Supervisor Technical M. McConnell Branch POC Conf Call N

Requested NRC Question DEK proposes changes TS Section 3.8 consistent with proposed TSTF-500 (see DEK RAI response to GMW-006 and GMW-007).

The acceptability of the proposed changes depends, in part, on KPS acceptance of a commitment to revise the DEK USAR.

Provide license- specific applicability to revise the DEK USAR to incorporate the following:

a. The required design margin value that must be maintained (i.e.,

5%) to use float current monitoring as a state of charge indicator.

The description must describe how the design margin for the batteries corresponds to a 2 amp float current value indicating that the battery is 95 percent charged.

b. Minimum established design limit for battery terminal float voltage.
c. Minimum established design limit for electrolyte level.
d. Minimum established design limit for electrolyte temperature.
e. Minimum requirements for the alternate means (i.e., spare battery charger) that is used to obtain an extended battery charger CT.
f. A description that states that battery pilot cell(s) selection is Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 116 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2041 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 2 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 117 of 138 based on the lowest voltage cell in the battery and that cell selection is determined on a 92-day frequency.

Attach File 1 Attach File 2 Issue Date 5/13/2010 Added By Gerald Waig Date Modified Modified By Date Added 5/13/2010 5:36 PM Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 117 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2041 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 118 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3541 NRC Question GMW-014 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

6/18/2010 8:15 AM Date/Time Closure Statement Response The NRC requested that the licensee "provide a commitment to incorporate the Statement expected/qualified life of the safety-related batteries in the Kewaunee Updated Final Safety Analysis Report and the TS Bases". DEK has obtained current industry information on TSTF-500 that indicates that this approach may be contested by the industry. Also, the regulatory basis for including this information into the USAR is unclear to DEK.

The NRC stated in recent conversations that the option of committing to include this information in the battery monitoring program and adding a reference to the battery monitoring program in the USAR is acceptable. To reach a timely resolution of this RAI, DEK has decided to commit to incorporating a commitment to revise the battery monitoring program as applicable with an associated USAR reference to the program to include license- specific applicability to incorporate the following:

a. The required design margin value that must be maintained (i.e., 5%) to use float current monitoring as a state of charge indicator. The description must describe how the design margin for the batteries corresponds to a 2 amp float current value indicating that the battery is 95 percent charged.
b. Minimum established design limit for battery terminal float voltage.
c. Minimum established design limit for electrolyte level.
d. Minimum established design limit for electrolyte temperature.
e. Minimum requirements for the alternate means (i.e., spare battery charger) that is used to obtain an extended battery charger CT.
f. A description that states that battery pilot cell(s) selection is based on the lowest voltage cell in the battery and that cell selection is determined on a 92-day frequency.

These commitments will be reflected in a supplemental letter to the NRC.

Question Closure Date Attachment 1

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 118 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3541 06/24/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 2 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 119 of 138 Attachment 2

Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Ray Schiele Gerald Waig Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 6/18/2010 8:18 AM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 119 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3541 06/24/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 3 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 120 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3831 NRC Question GMW-014 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

7/16/2010 9:45 AM Date/Time Closure Statement

Response

Statement NRC question GMW-014 requested that DEK provide license-specific applicability to revise the DEK USAR to incorporate the following:

a. The required design margin value that must be maintained (i.e.,

5%) to use float current monitoring as a state of charge indicator.

The description must describe how the design margin for the batteries corresponds to a 2 amp float current value indicating that the battery is 95 percent charged.

b. Minimum established design limit for battery terminal float voltage.
c. Minimum established design limit for electrolyte level.
d. Minimum established design limit for electrolyte temperature.
e. Minimum requirements for the alternate means (i.e., spare battery charger) that is used to obtain an extended battery charger CT.
f. A description that states that battery pilot cell(s) selection is based on the lowest voltage cell in the battery and that cell selection is determined on a 92-day frequency.

DEK posted a response to this question on June 18, 2010; this response supersedes the June 18 response.

Based on discussions with the NRC staff, DEK commits to change or verify the Kewaunee USAR describes:

1 The requirement to maintain a 5% design margin for the batteries describing how this design margin is required to allow the use of a 2 amp float current value as an indication that the battery is at least 95 percent charged, 2 The minimum established design limit for battery terminal float voltage, 3 The minimum established design limit for electrolyte level, 4 The minimum established design limit for electrolyte temperature, and 5 The minimum requirements for the alternate means (i.e., spare battery charger) that is used to obtain an extended battery charger Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 120 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3831 07/19/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 2 of 3 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 121 of 138 CT.

Item f was determined to no longer be necessary as a requirement is being added to ITS Specification 5.5.15, Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program.

These commitments will be reflected in a supplemental letter to the NRC.

In addition, from KPS USAR Section 8.2.3.4, Although the batteries are sized for an eight hour period, they are only required to carry the loads for the four hour SBO duration. The manufacturers 8-hour rating for each of the DEK safeguards batteries is 1770 AH; a continuous rating of 221 amps for 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />, and a maximum momentary rating of 1557 amps for 1 minute.

The prescribed 8-hour surveillance test load profile bounds the actual (i.e.,

calculated) load profile for the 4-hour duty cycle (this test is then continued at a constant load of 221 amps for a total of approximately 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />, or a minimum 105 Vdc terminal voltage, as a demonstration of as-designed battery capacity). The total 4-hour surveillance test load draws approximately 890 AH; with a maximum momentary load of approximately 360 amps for the 1st minute, followed by a continuous load of 221 amps for the remaining 3 hrs 59 min.

Thus, when these batteries are fully charged, based on the manufacturers design rating (1770 AH, the batteries are nominally 199 % of the capacity necessary to satisfy the 4-hour surveillance test load (~890 AH) which bounds the 4-hour SBO duty cycle.

Also, in response to GMW-010 and GMW-015, note that the Fluke meter to be used for RTS charging current measurement has a +/-0.2 amp uncertainty. This minimal uncertainty is judged to be acceptable, particularly given the large battery capacity margin available while in the exponential decay charging regime Question Closure Date Attachment 1

Attachment 2

Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Ray Schiele Gerald Waig Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 7/16/2010 9:58 AM Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 121 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3831 07/19/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 3 of 3 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 122 of 138 Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 122 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3831 07/19/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 123 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3991 NRC Question GMW-014 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

7/27/2010 2:15 PM Date/Time Closure Statement

Response

Statement This response is a supplement to previous responses to GMW-014, and is intended to provide added detail regarding procedural methodology for the measurement of battery float current.

Based on follow-up discussions with NRC staff, DEK commits to change, or verify, procedure(s) to include the measuring and test equipment manufacturers recommended practice for instrument stabilization when measuring float current to confirm battery state of charge.

Question Closure Date Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Ray Schiele Gerald Waig Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 7/27/2010 2:16 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 123 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3991 07/28/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 124 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3881 NRC Question GMW-014 Number Select Application NRC Question Closure

Response

Date/Time Closure Statement This question is closed and no further information is required at this time to draft the Safety Evaluation.

Response

Statement Question Closure 7/19/2010 Date Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Added By Gerald Waig Date Added 7/19/2010 10:42 AM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 124 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3881 07/19/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 125 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 4001 NRC Question GMW-014 Number Select NRC Question Closure Application

Response

Date/Time Closure Statement Based on the 7/27/2010 supplemental RAI response, this question is closed and no further information is required at this time to draft the Safety Evaluation.

Response

Statement Question Closure 7/27/2010 Date Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Added By Gerald Waig Date Added 7/27/2010 3:17 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 125 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=4001 07/28/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 126 of 138 ITS NRC Questions Id 2161 NRC Question GMW-015 Number Category Technical ITS Section 3.8 ITS Number 3.8.5 DOC Number JFD Number JFD Bases Number Page Number(s)

NRC Reviewer Carl Schulten Supervisor Technical M McConnell Branch POC Conf Call N

Requested NRC 1) In response to RAI GMW-010, KPS provided information to support Question using float current monitoring versus specific gravity measurements to determine a batterys state-of-charge. During review of this response, staff identified that the licensee did not discuss how the 2-Amp float current limit was calculated and did not describe the key assumptions and margins that were applied. Please provide this information for staff review. In your response, include a discussion on how using a Fluke meter, which has a +/-.2A uncertainty, is sufficient to read the 2 A float current limit (e.g., discuss margins that are being credited).

Attach File 1 Attach File 2 Issue Date 6/15/2010 Added By Gerald Waig Date Modified Modified By Date Added 6/15/2010 2:49 PM Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 126 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2161 06/24/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 127 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3501 NRC Question GMW-015 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

6/17/2010 9:55 AM Date/Time Closure Statement

Response

Statement This RAI refers information in GMW-010. The NRC reviewer requested a discussion of how the 2-Amp float current limit was calculated including a description of the key assumptions and margins that were applied.

Further, the NRC reviewer requested a discussion of how using a Fluke meter with a +/-.2A uncertainty is sufficient to read the 2 A float current limit.

Regarding the first question, the 2A float current limit is not a calculation-derived value, but rather, is based on the manufacturers recommendation, substantiated by their testing.

As cited in the 1st KPS response to GMW-010, C&D Technologies, Inc., the battery supplier, affirms that float current is an acceptable method to determine a batterys state of charge (Reference C&D Technologies, Inc.

letter, dated 5/28/2010, attached to KPS response to GMW-007.):

z The use of float current is an acceptable method to determine the state of charge of the battery that will hold true over the life of the batteries.

z C&D agrees that a float current value of less than or equal to 2 amps is consistent with at least a 95% state of charge of the LCR-25 batteries at your facility.

z Based on data collected during laboratory tests, the 2 amps float current value for the LCR-25 batteries is consistent with a state of charge of at least 95%.

Again citing from the 1st KPS response to GMW-010, IEEE-450-2002, Subsection 5.4.1, State of Charge Indicator, states:

z The following may be used as indicators of return to a fully charged state after a discharge (see Annex A):

{ Stabilized charging current when measured at the manufacturers recommended voltage and temperature for recharging the battery.

{ Assurance that the ampere hours returned to the battery are greater than the ampere hours removed plus the charging losses.

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 127 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3501 06/24/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 2 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 128 of 138 NRC Regulatory Guide 1.129, Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Vented Lead-Acid Storage Batteries for Nuclear Power Plants, Rev. 2 (February 2007), stipulates that IEEE-450-2002, Subsection 5.4.1, State of Charge Indicator, should be supplemented with, in part, the following:

z

{ For nuclear power generating stations, the manufacturer should be consulted for the proper voltage and charging current ranges and durations.

Regarding the second question, historically typical stabilized charging current measures between 350 - 450 mA. Thus, even with maximum meter uncertainty i.e., +/- 200 mA), the resultant value (e.g., 650 mA) would still be substantially below the 2A float current limit and easily detected.

In summary, the 2A float current is based on the manufacturers recommendation, substantiated by their testing. The use of manufacturer-recommended charging method, as well as for the charging current and voltage parameters is endorsed by NRC Regulatory Guide1.129, Rev. 2 (February 2007). And, the use of a meter with +/- 200 mA uncertainty is adequate to measure, and allows subsequent detection of, stabilized charging current outside the historical norm.

Question Closure Date Attachment 1

Attachment 2

Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Victor Cusumano Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Ray Schiele Gerald Waig Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 6/17/2010 9:55 AM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 128 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3501 06/24/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 129 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3731 NRC Question Number GMW-015 Select Application NRC Question Closure Response Date/Time Closure Statement This question is closed and will be addressed by the licensee response to GMW-014.

Response Statement Question Closure Date 7/8/2010 Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Added By Gerald Waig Date Added 7/8/2010 2:10 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 129 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3731 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 130 of 138 ITS NRC Questions Id 2171 NRC Question GMW-016 Number Category Technical ITS Section 3.8 ITS Number 3.8.6 DOC Number JFD Number JFD Bases Number Page Number(s)

NRC Reviewer Carl Schulten Supervisor Technical M McConnell Branch POC Conf Call N

Requested NRC 1) In response to RAI GMW-013, KPS provided graphical charts that show Question the duty cycles for each battery and excerpts from plant procedures that show the discharge rates for testing each battery. During review of the response, staff identified that the procedures do not envelope the graphical charts (i.e., the documents do not show that the modified performance discharge test envelopes both the service and performance tests). Specifically, the last minute loading for KPS Battery BRA-101 shows 280.13 A versus a discharge rate of 221 A (as listed in Attachment A of KPS Surveillance Procedure SP-38-102A, Rev.

7, Station Battery BRA101 Load Test Electrical Maintenance). Also, the first minute loading of 274.01 is higher than the discharge rate of 273.35 (as listed in Appendix A of KPS Surveillance Procedure SP-38-102B, Rev. 9, Station Battery BRB101 Load Test Electrical Maintenance).

Based on this information, explain how you were able to conclude that these documents clearly show that the battery discharge test load profile envelopes both the service and performance tests for each KPS Battery.

Attach File 1

Attach File 2

Issue Date 6/15/2010 Added By Gerald Waig Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 130 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2171 06/24/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 2 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 131 of 138 Date Modified Modified By Date Added 6/15/2010 2:53 PM Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 131 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2171 06/24/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 132 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3511 NRC Question GMW-016 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

6/17/2010 10:00 AM Date/Time Closure Statement

Response

Statement This RAI relates to GMW-013. The NRC reviewer cited two specific examples from the previous submittal where it appeared that procedures do not show that the modified performance discharge test envelopes both the service and performance tests.

The KPS safeguards station batteries are rated at 1770 AH (Amp-Hours).

The battery load test is intended to demonstrate that the batteries can deliver the requisite total energy, in AH, over the duration of the test. In other words, the bounding load profile in the calculation must be integrated to determine the total requisite energy over the duration of the test; total AH consumed.

Thus, for the first example cited, the last 60 seconds of the load profile indicates 280.13A versus the procedurally prescribed 221A; a difference of 59.13A over the course of 1 minute, or, less than 1 AH.

Similarly, for the second example cited, the first 60 seconds of the load profile indicates 274.01A versus the procedurally prescribed 273.35A; a difference of 0.66A over the course of 1 minute, or, approximately 0.011 AH.

As noted above, the bounding load profile in the calculation must be integrated to determine the total requisite energy over the duration of the test. However, the actual total energy delivered, or AH out, is demonstrated by the ACTUAL (emphasis added) load test profile, and not the bounding load profile.

In the case of the actual load profiles, the batteries deliver substantially more than the bounding load profile for the 7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> 14 minutes immediately preceding the final minute of the bounding load profiles eight hour duration.

For example, for BRA-101 this represents a total of approximately 546 AH (approx. 76A for 7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> 5 minutes plus approx. 50.8A for 9 minutes) in excess of the bounding load profile. As noted above for the NRC reviewers first example, the cited apparent deviation from the bounding Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 132 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3511 06/24/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 2 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 133 of 138 load profile represents only 1 AH.

For BRB-101 the comparison is similar.

Question Closure Date Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Victor Cusumano Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Ray Schiele Gerald Waig Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 6/17/2010 10:00 AM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 133 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3511 06/24/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 134 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3951 NRC Question GMW-016 Number Select Application NRC Question Closure

Response

Date/Time Closure Statement This question is closed and no further information is required at this time to draft the Safety Evaluation.

Response

Statement Question Closure 7/21/2010 Date Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Added By Gerald Waig Date Added 7/21/2010 3:03 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 134 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3951 07/22/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 135 of 138 ITS NRC Questions Id 2181 NRC Question GMW-017 Number Category Technical ITS Section 3.8 ITS Number 3.8.6 DOC Number JFD Number JFD Bases Number Page Number (s)

NRC Reviewer Rob Elliott Supervisor Technical M. McConnell Branch POC Conf Call N

Requested NRC Question In response to RAI GMW-016, KPS provided a verbal description of the requested additional information to show that the modified station battery performance discharge test envelopes both the service and performance tests.

Please provide the actual load profiles graphs (as provided in the response to GMW-013) for each station battery which clearly shows that the modified battery performance discharge test envelopes both the service and performance tests to clarify the verbal description provided in response to GMW-016.

Attach File 1 Attach File 2 Issue Date 6/21/2010 Added By Gerald Waig Date Modified Modified By Date Added 6/21/2010 2:53 PM Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 135 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=2181 06/24/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 136 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3631 NRC Question GMW-017 Number Select Licensee Response Application

Response

6/28/2010 5:10 PM Date/Time Closure Statement Response The NRC acknowledged the response to RAI GMW-016 in which KPS Statement provided a description of the requested additional information (GMW-013) to show that the modified station battery performance discharge test envelopes both the service and performance tests. As a follow up via this RAI, GMW-017, NRC requested that KPS provide the actual load profiles graphs (as provided in the response to GMW-013) for each station battery which clearly shows that the modified battery performance discharge test envelopes both the service and performance tests to clarify the description provided in response to GMW-016.

Subsequently, KPS had an informal phone conversation with the NRC to more clearly understand the reviewers request. KPS provides the following clarifying information:

1. An apparent discrepancy is cited by the reviewer in GMW-016, the last minute loading for KPS Battery BRA-101 shows 280.13 A versus a discharge rate of 221 A. Based on this, the reviewer questions how it can be concluded that the battery discharge test load profile envelopes both the service and performance test.

KPS response: From KPS USAR Section 8.2.3.4, Although the batteries are sized for an eight hour period, they are only required to carry the loads for the four hour SBO duration. Thus, the mismatch occurs during the last minute of the eight hour load profile and test duration, well beyond the 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> requirement.

2. Another discrepancy is cited by the reviewer in GMW-016, Also, the first minute loading of 274.01 is higher than the discharge rate of 273.35. Based on this, the reviewer questions how it can be concluded that the battery discharge test load profile envelopes both the service and performance test.

KPS response: The first minute loading/discharge difference of 0.66 A (i.e., 274.01 - 273.35) identified by the reviewer has been determined to be a procedure discrepancy. A change to the controlling calculation revised the batterys bounding load profile for the 1st minute from 273.35 A to 274.01 A, an increase of 0.66 A.

Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 136 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3631 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 2 of 2 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 137 of 138 However, a follow on revision to the surveillance procedure, SP 102B, Station Battery BRB101 Load Test Electrical Maintenance was inadequate.

On Friday, June 25, 2010, Condition Report CR385890 was written to identify that the surveillance procedure, SP-038-102B, did not bound the calculation-based load profile for the 1st minute of the test.

Engineering evaluated the surveillance data from October 2009 and determined that battery voltage at the end of the 1st minute, the time period in question, was above the minimum required voltage, and thus acceptable. This CR specifically noted the need for a revision to the surveillance procedure, SP-38-102B to correct the required actual battery test load profile. The Corrective Action Program, via the Condition Report, will drive the necessary procedure revisions.

Question Closure Date Attachment 1

Attachment 2

Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Victor Cusumano Jerry Jones Bryan Kays Ray Schiele Gerald Waig Added By Robert Hanley Date Added 6/28/2010 5:08 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 137 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3631 07/08/2010

Kewaunee ITS Conversion Database Page 1 of 1 Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 138 of 138 Licensee Response/NRC Response/NRC Question Closure Id 3961 NRC Question GMW-017 Number Select Application NRC Question Closure

Response

Date/Time Closure Statement This question is closed and no further information is required at this time to draft the Safety Evaluation.

Response

Statement Question Closure 7/21/2010 Date Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Notification NRC/LICENSEE Supervision Added By Gerald Waig Date Added 7/21/2010 3:04 PM Modified By Date Modified Enclosure (3 of 4), Q&A to Attachment 1, Volume 13 (Section 3.8) Page 138 of 138 http://www.excelservices.com/rai/index.php?requestType=areaItemPrint&itemId=3961 07/22/2010