|
---|
Category:Report
MONTHYEARML22119A0922022-05-0303 May 2022 Ril 2022-07, Assessment of San Onofre Concrete Susceptibility Against Irradiation Damage ML21280A1032021-12-0606 December 2021 Updated Biological Assessment of Impacts to Federally Listed Species Under NMFS Jurisdiction for SONGS Decommissioning ML21242A0592021-09-30030 September 2021 Biological Assessment of Impacts to Federally Listed Species Under NMFS Jurisdiction for SONGS Decommissioning ML21270A2172021-09-27027 September 2021 LTR-21-0264 David Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists, Letter Study Regarding Spent Fuel in Dry Storage at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ML21165A0822021-06-0303 June 2021 the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Facility Change Report, Summary Report of Commitment Changes ML20178A3632020-06-22022 June 2020 Defueled Safety Analysis Report ML20118D0742020-04-27027 April 2020 SONGS Spotlight Section FAQ Updated 3-31-2020 ML20113E9332020-04-22022 April 2020 SONGS CEP-SCE Joint Response to NEIMA 108 Questionnaire ML20034D9542020-02-0303 February 2020 Salvage 6-10 - Health Physics Sample Records ML20029D1642020-01-23023 January 2020 Additional Protocol No Changes Report for Reporting Year 2019 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Unit 2 ML19158A0922019-06-0404 June 2019 Facility Change Report, Summary Report of Commitment Changes, and Cycle Specific Technical Specification Bases Page Updates San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Units 1, 2, 3, and the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation ML19011A4572019-01-11011 January 2019 ISFSI Pad Surveys at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Final ML18330A0032018-11-16016 November 2018 Southern California Edison Company; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station; Non-proprietary Summary of the Holtec Proprietary MPC-37 Drop Analysis in Holtec Report Number HI-2188261 Rev. 3, November 16, 2018 ML18331A0192018-10-18018 October 2018 Southern California Edison Company; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station; Summary of the Root Cause and Apparent Cause Evaluations of August 2018 Download Event at SONGS ML18176A0352018-06-21021 June 2018 Defueled Safety Analysis Report ML18233A4692018-06-18018 June 2018 Comment Disposition for High Energy Arcing Faults (Heafs) in Electrical Equipment Phase 2 ML17037D1152017-02-0404 February 2017 SONGS ISFSI Only PSP Amendment Nshcd Pages ML20034E4702016-11-15015 November 2016 SCE Ltr to Don Transmitting RSCS Risk Analysis for Mesa Land ML16176A3392016-10-28028 October 2016 Decommissioning Lessons Learned Report and Transmittal Memorandum ML16190A4032016-06-27027 June 2016 Transmittal of Defueled Safety Analysis Report ML16181A3352016-06-27027 June 2016 Defueled Safety Analysis Report ML20034E4672016-05-19019 May 2016 Mesa Bounding Dose Evaluation Final Signed ML16111A0032016-04-25025 April 2016 Completion of Action Nos. 1a, 1b, and 2 Associated with Topic 1 of the San Onofre Steam Generator Tube Degradation Event Lessons Learned ML15159A1882015-06-0404 June 2015 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (Isfsi), Submittal of Summary Report of Commitment Changes, and Cycle Specific Technical Specification Bases Page Updates ML15015A4192015-03-0606 March 2015 Review of Lessons Learned from the San Onofre Steam Generator Tube Degradation Event ML15071A0202015-03-0303 March 2015 Enclosure 2, Current SONGS Synchronous Condenser Contamination Prevention Monitoring Program, RSCS Technical Support Document No. 14-140, Revision 0 ML15071A0192015-03-0303 March 2015 Enclosure 1, Current SONGS Switchyard Area Synchronous Condenser Footprint Proposed Characterization for Final Status Survey, Technical Data Record Document No. 12-9234618-001 ML15014A1202015-01-14014 January 2015 Feedback for Specific Public Meetings ML15014A0942015-01-14014 January 2015 SONGS Communications External Survey Results ML19311C7282014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 28 ML19311C7402014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 40 ML19311C7182014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 18 ML19311C7392014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 39 ML19311C7202014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 20 ML19311C7382014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 38 ML19311C7102014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 10 ML19311C7112014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 11 ML19311C7322014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 32 ML19311C7042014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 5 ML19311C7032014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 4 ML19311C7052014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 6 ML19311C7062014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 7 ML19311C7072014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 8 ML19311C7262014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 26 ML19311C7362014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 36 ML19311C7252014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 25 ML19311C7132014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 13 ML19311C7142014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 14 ML19311C7302014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 30 ML19311C7212014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 21 2022-05-03
[Table view] Category:Technical
MONTHYEARML22119A0922022-05-0303 May 2022 Ril 2022-07, Assessment of San Onofre Concrete Susceptibility Against Irradiation Damage ML21280A1032021-12-0606 December 2021 Updated Biological Assessment of Impacts to Federally Listed Species Under NMFS Jurisdiction for SONGS Decommissioning ML21270A2172021-09-27027 September 2021 LTR-21-0264 David Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists, Letter Study Regarding Spent Fuel in Dry Storage at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ML20178A3632020-06-22022 June 2020 Defueled Safety Analysis Report ML19158A0922019-06-0404 June 2019 Facility Change Report, Summary Report of Commitment Changes, and Cycle Specific Technical Specification Bases Page Updates San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Units 1, 2, 3, and the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation ML19011A4572019-01-11011 January 2019 ISFSI Pad Surveys at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Final ML18330A0032018-11-16016 November 2018 Southern California Edison Company; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station; Non-proprietary Summary of the Holtec Proprietary MPC-37 Drop Analysis in Holtec Report Number HI-2188261 Rev. 3, November 16, 2018 ML18176A0352018-06-21021 June 2018 Defueled Safety Analysis Report ML18233A4692018-06-18018 June 2018 Comment Disposition for High Energy Arcing Faults (Heafs) in Electrical Equipment Phase 2 ML17037D1152017-02-0404 February 2017 SONGS ISFSI Only PSP Amendment Nshcd Pages ML20034E4702016-11-15015 November 2016 SCE Ltr to Don Transmitting RSCS Risk Analysis for Mesa Land ML16190A4032016-06-27027 June 2016 Transmittal of Defueled Safety Analysis Report ML20034E4672016-05-19019 May 2016 Mesa Bounding Dose Evaluation Final Signed ML15071A0202015-03-0303 March 2015 Enclosure 2, Current SONGS Synchronous Condenser Contamination Prevention Monitoring Program, RSCS Technical Support Document No. 14-140, Revision 0 ML15071A0192015-03-0303 March 2015 Enclosure 1, Current SONGS Switchyard Area Synchronous Condenser Footprint Proposed Characterization for Final Status Survey, Technical Data Record Document No. 12-9234618-001 ML19311C7312014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 31 ML19311C7302014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 30 ML19311C7182014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 18 ML19311C7392014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 39 ML19311C7402014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 40 ML19311C7352014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 35 ML19311C7362014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 36 ML19311C7372014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 37 ML19311C7332014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 33 ML19311C7242014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 24 ML19311C7292014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 29 ML19311C7322014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 32 ML19311C7342014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 34 ML19311C7382014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 38 ML19311C7262014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 26 ML19311C7282014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 28 ML19311C7232014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 23 ML19311C7202014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 20 ML19311C7212014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 21 ML19311C7082014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 9 ML19311C7102014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 10 ML19311C7052014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 6 ML19311C7042014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 5 ML19311C7062014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 7 ML19311C7072014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 8 ML19311C7022014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 3 ML19311C7032014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 4 ML19311C7002014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 1 ML19311C7012014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 2 ML19311C7112014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 11 ML19311C7132014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 13 ML19311C7222014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 22 ML19311C7272014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38 - Part 27 ML19311C7162014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 16 ML19311C7142014-09-23023 September 2014 Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 14 2022-05-03
[Table view] |
Text
San Onofre Unit 1 DSAR ACCIDENT ANALYSIS 8.0 ACCIDENT ANALYSIS
8.1 INTRODUCTION
Unit 1 was licensed to operate in consideration of a spectrum of postulated accidents with offsite dose consequences. Decommissioning activities are permitted by this same license and are predicated on the objective of posing no greater risk to the public than that which existed when the reactor was operating. The guidelines selected by Southern California Edison to evaluate risk during Decommissioning are based on the conservative assessment that postulated accidents from Decommissioning activities are moderately frequent events, as described in Regulatory Guide 1.70, Standard Format and Content of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants (LWR Edition). The risk associated with an activity is acceptable if the potential accident dose consequences are a small fraction of the values established in 10 CFR Part 100, i.e., less than approximately 2.5 rem (whole body) and 30 rem (thyroid) for two-hour doses at the exclusion area boundary (EAB).
All spent fuel assemblies have been removed from the spent fuel pool and transferred to the ISFSI. The ability of the facility to withstand previously analyzed events such as natural phenomena and fires, is either unchanged from the previous operating plant licensing basis, or is improved in the defueled mode.
8.2 DELETED 8.2.1 DELETED 8.2.2 DELETED 8.2.3 DELETED 8.2.4 DELETED 8.2.5 DELETED 8.2.6 DELETED 8.3 LICENSING BASIS ACCIDENTS 8.3.1 REQUIREMENT FOR DECOMMISSIONING Unit 1 was licensed to operate in consideration of a spectrum of postulated accidents with offsite dose consequences. Decommissioning activities are permitted by this same license and are predicated on the objective of posing no greater risk to the public than that which existed when the reactor was operating. The guidelines selected by Southern California Edison to evaluate risk during Decommissioning are based on the conservative assessment that postulated accidents from Decommissioning activities are moderately frequent events, as described in Regulatory guide 1.70, Standard Format and Content of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants (LWR Edition). The risk associated with an activity is acceptable if the potential accident dose Amended: June 2010 8-1
San Onofre Unit 1 DSAR ACCIDENT ANALYSIS consequences are a small fraction of the values established in 10 CFR Part 100, i.e., less than approximately 2.5 rem (whole body) and 30 rem (thyroid) for two-hour doses at the exclusion area boundary (EAB). (It should be noted that, due to the decay of fission product gases, the possibility of a significant thyroid dose no longer exists.)
The moderately frequent event is considered an appropriate and conservative guideline for evaluating Decommissioning accidents because:
- 1. Decommissioning activities which have the potential to initiate an accident are carefully performed and controlled under existing site procedures and programs.
- 2. Decommissioning activities are comparable to previously accepted activities which were part of the operating plant licensing basis, e.g., processing radioactively contaminated ion exchange resins, managing the risk of radioactive exposure with an ALARA program.
- 3. The probabilities for specific accidents are low because the activities are performed infrequently.
8.3.2 EVALUATION OF ACCIDENTS DUE TO DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES Decommissioning activities, including dismantlement, demolition and waste handling, are reviewed to determine if the potential exists for an accident that might result in an unplanned release of radioactive material. Where the possibility of a release does exist, the accident is evaluated to ensure that the estimated dose consequences are a small fraction of 10 CFR Part 100. Decommissioning activities readily meet the above criteria.
Descriptions of potential accidents and results of the accident analyses are documented in the 10 CFR 50.59 evaluations for the subject activities. The assumptions and limitations presented in the evaluations are part of the SONGS 1 licensing basis for Decommissioning. The analyses of specific Decommissioning accidents with dose consequences within the moderate frequency guidelines will not be added to the DSAR.
8.3.3 DELETED 8.3.3.1 DELETED 8.3.3.2 DELETED 8.3.3.3 DELETED 8.3.4 ACCIDENTS THAT ARE NO LONGER RELEVANT 8.3.4.1 Loss of Offsite Power (Loss of Spent Fuel Pool Cooling)
The Loss of Offsite Power (LOP) is no longer safety significant to the fuel storage facility since all fuel assemblies have been transferred to the ISFSI and the fuel storage facility has been Amended: June 2010 8-2
San Onofre Unit 1 DSAR ACCIDENT ANALYSIS demolished. Loss of offsite power cannot affect radiological releases and need not be analyzed for consequences in accordance with the criteria of Regulatory Guide 1.70, Revision 3 8.3.4.1.1 DELETED 8.3.4.1.2 DELETED 8.3.4.2 Operating Basis Accidents Most of the accidents previously evaluated in UFSAR Chapter 15 for the operating plant were events that were directly related to power operation or the integrity of the reactor coolant system (RCS), such as turbine trip, loss of normal feedwater, rod ejection, fuel handling accident and steam generator tube rupture. Since the plant is permanently defueled and the RCS is demolished, such accidents are no longer applicable to Unit 1.
8.3.4.3 Fuel Handling Accident A Fuel Handling Accident (FHA) is no longer credible since the spent fuel assemblies have been transferred to the ISFSI.
8.4 SUPPORTING CALCULATIONS AND STUDIES The following evaluations were performed:
DC-3779 Removal of CREATS from the Unit 1 Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications This evaluation determined the impact of not crediting the Control Room Emergency Air Treatment System (CREATS) with Unit 1 permanently defueled. Fuel Handling and SFP Loss of Cooling accidents (Unit 1), and the limiting Unit 2 radiological accident requiring site evacuation (LOCA), were considered. The results are no longer applicable as all spent fuel is stored in the ISFSI and the operational-period control room has been dismantled.
8.5 OTHER APPLICABLE EVENTS, NATURAL PHENOMENA, FIRES Other events, natural phenomena, and fires that were relevant during power operation are not significant for Decommissioning and dismantlement. Natural phenomena (earthquakes, floods, tornadoes, tornado missiles), and fires were considered under the operating license requirements and bound any activity under Decommissioning.
The probability and consequences of these events are either reduced during Decommissioning or remain unchanged from those that applied when the reactor was licensed to operate Equipment brought on site for dismantlement activities, such as cranes, hoists, or other heavy vehicles will be located and/or secured when required by procedures, or other evaluations, such that they cannot become missiles during a tornado event Fire protection for dismantlement Amended: June 2010 8-3
San Onofre Unit 1 DSAR ACCIDENT ANALYSIS activities will be under the same administrative procedures and controls employed throughout the site for construction activities.
In summary, the safety significance of natural phenomena (earthquakes, floods, tornadoes, tornado missiles) and fires is either reduced during Decommissioning or remains unchanged from that which applied when the reactor was licensed to operate.
8.6 REFERENCES
- 1. Letter, Michael K. Webb (NRC) to Harold B. Ray (SCE), "Issuance of Amendment No.
155 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-13, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No. 1, Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications (TAC No. M86377),"
December 28, 1993.
- 2. Letter, Harold B. Ray (SCE) to NRC Document Control Desk," Docket No. 50-206, Amendment Application No. 211, Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, SONGS 1," May 12, 1993.
- 3. Letter, W. C. Marsh (SCE) to NRC Document Control Desk," Docket No. 50-206, Amendment Application No. 211, Supplement 1, Fuel Storage Facility Thermal and Structural Analyses, Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, SONGS 1," June 30, 1993.
- 4. Letter, W. C. Marsh (SCE) to NRC Document Control Desk, "Docket No. 50-206, Amendment Application No 211, Supplement 2, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1", November 23, 1993.
- 5. Letter, D. L. Zeiman (NRC) to R. Dietch (SCE) "Systematic Evaluation Program Topic XV-20, Radiological Consequences of Fuel Damaging Accidents Inside and Outside Containment," January 17, 1980.
Amended: June 2010 8-4
San Onofre Unit 1 DSAR ACCIDENT ANALYSIS Table 8-1 (Deleted)
Table 8-2 (Deleted)
Amended: June 2010 8-5