ML102020325

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Issue Entry, Oc
ML102020325
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 05/07/2009
From: Vouglitois J
AmerGen Energy Co, Exelon Nuclear
To:
Office of Information Services
References
FOIA/PA-2009-0214
Download: ML102020325 (1)


Text

Exelon Nuclear Issue Entry Page 1 of 2 Create another New Issue ) Create another Issue from '009f6938' Print Close window

    • AS REQUIRED, PRINT ISSUE REPORT AND PROVIDE TO YOUR SUPERVISOR**

Note: This is your only notice. You will not have an opportunity to print this confirmation later.

Exelon Nuclear Issue - Statement of Confirmation Issue #: 00916938 Originator: JAMES J VOUGLITOIS Submit Date: May 7, 2009 Basic Information Oyster Creek Affected Facility:

05/07/2009 11:15 Dscv Date:

H02 How Discovered Code:

05/07/2009 11:15 Event Date:

NA Affected Unit:

Affected Sys:

NRC RECOMMENDS SAMPLING ADDITIONAL MONITORING WELL

Subject:

Required Informatior I1 While interviewing Chemistry staff regarding the groundwater monitoring program associated with the condensate leaks from Condition

Description:

buried pipes during an inspection visit, an NRC inspector recommended that an additional off-site well in the Kirkwood Aquifer (W-4K) be included in the monitoring program. The inspector understands that there is no technical reason to believe that the Kirkwood Aquifer has been contaminated. However, from a public relations point of view, he feels that we should include this Kirkwood monitoring well in our sampling program in order to provide assurance to the public that the on-site groundwater contamination is not migrating to off-site wells.

Discussed with Supervisor and wrote this IR.

Immediate actions taken:

Chemistry consider the NRC inspector's recommendation and determine if the additional well should be included in the Recommendation for action:

monitoring program.

Supervisor Verbally M. Nixon Contacted Optional Additional Information What activities, processes, or Interview with NRC inspector.

procedures were involved?

Why did the condition NA happen?

What are the consequences? Additional costs associated wilth more sampling and analysis.

Any procedural requirements None Impacted?

Identify any adverse physical NA conditions:

List of Knowledgeable J. Vouglitois, M. Nixon, J. Kan dasamy individuals:

Is this a repeat or similar No condition?

Routing A5332CAP http://eamgenco.ceco.com/cap/servlet/OriginatorServlet 5/7/2009