ML101890073
| ML101890073 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Texas A&M University |
| Issue date: | 06/18/2010 |
| From: | Juzaitis R Texas A&M Univ |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| TAC ME1590 | |
| Download: ML101890073 (168) | |
Text
DWIGHT LOOK COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Department of Nuclear Engineering
- zý&
June 18, 2010 Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Docket No.50-059
SUBJECT:
Response to "Texas A&M University - Request for additional information regarding the Texas A&M University AGN-201M reactor (TAC. NO. ME1590),
October 9, 2009" In response to the RAI dated October 9, 2009, Texas A&M University is submitting the following documents to address the financial qualifications required by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
- Financial Report of Texas A&M University for the year ended August 31, 2009
- The Texas A&M University System Management's Discussion and Analysis for the year ended August 31, 2009
- Legislative Appropriations Request for the 81 st Legislative Session.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at: (979) 845-4161, or e-mail at rjuzaitisktamu.edu.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 18, 2010.
Enclosures 129 Zachry Engineering Center 3133 TAMU College Station, TX 77843-3133 Tel. 979.845.4161 Fax. 979.845.6443 http://nuclear.tamu.edu f~iR 4
SC?
Tie (fW. 77-;c Jc A
A(ýD k19-z
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL REPORT.
OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2009 WITH COMNARATIVE TOTALS FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2008 DR. R. BOWEN LOFTIN, INTERIM PRESIDENT TERRY A. PANKRATZ, VICE PRESIDENT FOR FINANCE, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
UNAUDITED TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY CURRENT YEAR STUDENT ENROLLMENT DATA
. TYPE OF STUDENT Texas Resident Out-of-Staie Foreign Total Students NUMBER OF STUDENTS BY SEMESTER FALL 2008 FALL 2009 41,313 41,537 2,519
.2,674 4,204 4,674 48,036 48,885 HISTORICAL STUDENT ENROLLMENT DATA (Fall Semester)
FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 HEADCOUNT 44,026 44,618 45,083 44,813 44,435 44,578 45,380 46,542 48,036 48,885 SEMESTER CREDIT HOURS 539,153 552,805 546,232 539,251
- 531,661 560,075 565,859 597,009 605,037 613,415 711 -
i
REFERENCE III IV IV-1 V
L-1 L-2 L-3 1-A 1-B 2-A 2-B 2-C 2-D 2-E 2-F THREE N-2 UNAUDITED TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY INDEX EXHIBITS Balance Sheet Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Assets Schedule of NACUBO Function to Natural Classification Matrix Statement of Cash Flows Combining Balance Sheet - Discretely Presented Proprietary Component Units Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Equity - Discretely Presented Proprietary Component Units Combining Statement of Cash Flows - Discretely Presented Component Units SCHEDULES Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Schedule of State Grant Pass Throughs From/To State Agencies Schedule of Miscellaneous Bond Information Schedule of Changes in Bonded Indebtedness Schedule of Debt Service Requirements Schedule of Analysis of Funds Available for Debt Service Schedule of Defeased Bonds Outstanding Schedule of Early Extinguishment and Refunding Schedule of Cash & Cash Equivalents Note 2 -Capital Assets PAGE 711-1-1 711-2-i 711-3-1 711-4-1 Schedule not used Schedule not used Schedule not used 711-8-1 711-9-1 Schedule not used Schedule not used Schedule not used Schedule not used Schedule not used Schedule not used 711-16-i 711-17-1 711 -
ii
UNAUDITED EXHIBIT III TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY BALANCE SHEET FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2009 CURRENT PRIOR YEAR YEAR TOTAL TOTAL ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS:
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS (SCHEDULE THREE]..
SECURITIES LENDING COLLATERAL.........
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS.........................................
RESTRICTED:
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS [SCHEDULE THREE]..
SHORT TERM INVESTM4ENTS........................................
LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS......................................
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET:
INTERGOVERNMENTAL:
FEDERAL RECEIVABLES.........................................
OTHER INTERGOVERNMENTAL RECEIVABLES..........................
INTEREST AND DIVIDENDS........................................
GIFTS AND DONATIONS RECEIVABLE................................
STUDENT RECEIVABLES...........................................
INVESTMENT TRADE RECEIVABLES..................................
OTHER RECEIVABLES.................
DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES............
DUE FROM OTHER PARTS............................................
DUE FROM OTHER FUNDS............................................
CONSUMABLE INVENTORIES..........................................
MERCHANDISE INVENTORIES.........................................
DEFERRED CHARGES................................................
LOANS AND CONTRACTS.............................................
INTERFUND RECEIVABLE............................................
OTHER CURRENT ASSETS............................................
56,526,767.83 $
123,742,805.60 8,007,204.26 10,498,266.72 34,327,062.70 18,829,622.78 3,732,315.54 14,316,223.55 10,370.09 18,748.20 9,200,153r59 8,524,184.77 8,797,610.61 7,566,711.58 33,311,210.67 36,875,991.12 2,063,371.22 1,796,900.60 66,478,187.51 56,578,159.80 15,240,171.82 14,014,079.95 2,988,066.62 3,332,668.40 11,716,128.29 14,918,531.95 38.761.939.89 38.541,498.90 TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS............................
291,160,560.64 $
349,554,383.92 NON-CURRENT ASSETS:
RESTRICTED:
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS (SCHDULE THREE]......................
ASSETS HELD BY SAGO-LCOJG TERM.................................
INVESTMENTS...................................................
LOANS, CONTRACTS AND OTHER....................................
PLEDGES RECEIVABLE...........................................
LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS.....................................
LOANS AND CONTRACTS............................................
ASSETS HELD BY SAGO-LONG TERM..................................
INVESTMENTS....................................................
INTERFUND RECEIVABLE...........................................
CAPITAL ASSETS, NON-DEPRECIABLE (NOTE 2)
LAND AND LAND IMPROVEMENTS....................................
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS......................................
OTHER CAPITAL ASSETS..........................................
CAPITAL ASSETS, DEPRECIABLE [NOTE 2]
BUILDINGS AND BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS...........................
INFRASTRUCTURE................................................
FACILITIES AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS.............................
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT......................................
- VEHICLES, BOATS, AND AIRCRAFT.................................
OTIHER CAPITAL ASSETS..........................................
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION........................................
ASSETS HE D IN TRUST............................................
OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS........................................
336,102,933.61 364,926,413.48 42,881,885.72 17,871,581.51 617,926,591.98 46,094,079.56 19,303,224.84 668,256,557.08 28,091,224.55 25,005,283.23 139,523,363.01 107,384,708.11 34,753,068.03 32,353,721.81 1,336,378,691.09 245,810,665.44 183,891,913.70 242,013,581.12 39,279,885.36 84,344,325.29 (1,339,236,223.15) 1,222,897,199.44 233,217,870.86 181,627,367.58 212,962,695.10 38,121,731.08 80,957,221.76 (1,275,563,760.73)
TOTAL NUN-CURRENT ASSETS............................................
$ 2,009,333,497.26 $ 1,957,544,313.20 TOTAL ASSETS........................................................
$ 2,300,494,057.90 $ 2,307,098,697.12 711-1 -
1
UNAUDITED EXHIBIT III TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY BALANCE SHEET FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2009.
CURRENT PRIOR YEAR YEAR TOTAL TOTAL LIABILITIES CURRENT LIABILITIES:
PAYABLES:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE..............................................
PAYROLL PAYABLE...............................................
INVESTMENT TRADE PAYABLES.....................................
OTHER PAYABLES................................................
INTERFUND PAYABLE.............................................
DUE TO OTHER AGENCIES...........................................
DUE TO OTHER FUNDS..............................................
DUE TO OTHER PARTS........................
FUNDS HELD FOR INVESTMENT........
DEFERRED REVENUES...............................................
EMPLOYEES'.COMPENSABLE LEAVE....................................
OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS..................................
SELF-INSURED ACCRUED LIABILITY..................................
NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE.........................................
BONDS PAYABLE...................................................
CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS.......................................
LIABILITIES PAYABLE FROM RESTRICTED ASSETS......................
FUNDS HELD FOR OTHERS...........................................
OBLIGATIONS/SECURITIES LENDING.........................
OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES.....
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES.........................................
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES INTERFUND PAYABLE...............................................
EMPLOYERS' COMPENSABLE LEAVE....................................
OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS...................................
SELF-INSURED ACCRUED LIABILITY..................................
NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE.........................................
BONDS PAYABLE...................................................
ASSETS HERD IN TRUST............................................
LIABILITIES PAYABLE FROM RESTRICTED ASSETS....................
FUNDS HELD FOR OTHERS...........................................
CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS.
OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES...................................
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES..............
TOTAL LIABILITIES...................
NET ASSETS INVESTED IN CAPITAL ASSETS.
NET OF DENT..........................
RESTRICTED FOR:
DEBT SERVICE....................................................
CAPITAL PROJECTS................................................
EDUCATION.......................................................
ENUOAM*ENT AND PERMANENT FUNDS:
NONEXPENDABLE.................................................
EXPENDABLE....................................................
UNRESTRICTED..
TOTAL NET ASSETS
[EXHIBIT IV]......................................
S 20,747,380.14 $
33,942,474.61 34,726,925.81.
511,444.56 33,746,539.99 148,411,461.36 2,763,438.39 13,915,600.00 32,744,136.77 40,189,467.64 10,885,618.54 496,374.30 74,007.66 18,101,376.40 217,160,474.13 2,406,501.40 14,250,302.00 174,014.61 271,109.88 8,037,664.92 8,715,697.41 5,223,949.66 3,963,626.95 302,200,894.5 B 349,258,693.08 809,427.51 $
1,321,172.85 43,443,585.72 37,885,249.71 65,961,629.00 33,397,878.00 1,148,092.94 1,250,014.01 20,218,392.67 20,137,717.38 131,581,127.24 $
93,992,031.95 433,782,021.29 443,250,725.03 975,661,004.44 $
838,253,414.35 15,261,150.38 17,166,668.63 129,960,195.72 114,295,585.88 189,321,426.66 271,106,817.58 67,597,940.95 32,465,717.79 488,91S0318.46 590,559,767.86
$ 1,866,712,036.61 $ 1,863,847,972.09 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS...................................
B 2,300,494,057.90 $ 2,307,098,697.12 711 -
1 - 2
UNAUDITED EXHIBIT IV TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY STATEMENT OF -REVENUES,
- EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2009 CURRENT PRIOR YEAR YEAR TOTAL TOTAL STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN REVENUES AND EXPENSES FROM OPERATIONS OPERATING REVENUES SALES OF GOODS AND SERVICES TUITION AND FEES-PLEDGED...................................
DISCOUNTS AND ALLOWANCES...................................
NET TUITION AND FEES -
NON-PLEDGED.........................
NET PROFESSIONAL FEES......................................
NET AUXILIARY ENTERPRISES..................................
NET OTHER SALES OF GOODS AND SERVICES......................
DISCOUNTS AND ALLOWANCES-SALES..
411,894,410.54 $
367,559,346.51 (88,742,120.00)
(69,192,532.00) 1,291,984.53 875,785.36 154,192,908.39 153,639,299.93 76,743,760.11 62,271,941.57 (11,658,459.00)
(9,606,516.00)
TOTAL SALES OF GOODS AND SERVICES.............................
543,722,484.57 $
505,547,32S.37 PREMIUM REVENUE...............................................
INTEREST REV E.............................................
NET INCREASE (DECREASE] IN FAIR VALUE.......................
FEDERAL REVENUE -
OPERATING..................................
FEDERAL PASS THROUGH REVENUE.................................
STATE GRANT REVENUE..........................................
STATE PASS THROUGH REVENUE...................................
OTHER GRANTS AND CONTRACTS -
OPERATING.......................
OTHER OPERATING REV E......
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES........................................
OPERATING EXPENSES INSTRUCTION..................................................
RESEARCH......................................................
PUBLIC SERVICE................................................
ACADEMIC SUPPORT..............................................
STUDENT SERVICES..............................................
INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT.........................................
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE OF PLANT..............................
MAJOR REPAIR & REHABILITATION OF PLANT........................
SCHOLARSHIPS & FELLOWSHIPS....................................
AUXILIARY.....................................................
DEPRECIATION..................
1,261,572.86 1,122,548.17 63,338,277.36 57,400,225.86 6,465,151.92 5,006,171.68 22,368,011.53 31,797,057.03 24,767,634.28 119,078,711.77 83,792,107.38 22,986,011.97 21,368,198.92 788,649,267.48 $
721,372,223.19 536,579,914.23 $
499,740,412.93 105,538,986.81 96,624,761.21 22,188,142.74 21,343,840.71 97,465,106.68 102,952,996.93 56,008,013.61 54,169,143.88 34.858,179.86 26,587,457.81 106,197,937.12 124,009,258.94 112,197.30 44,500,340.94 35,778,402,30 180,435,552.58 184,685,130.87 68,898,388.59 61,797,061.58 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
[SCHEDULE IV-1].......................
$ 1,252,782,760.46 $ 1,207,688,467.16 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES]...............................
NONOPERATING REVENUES [EXPENSES]
LEGISLATIVE REVENUE...............................................
FEDERAL REVENUE NON-OPERATING....................................
STATE PASS THROUGH NON-OPERATING.................................
GIFTS.............................................................
LAND INCOME.......................................................
INVESTMENT INCOME.................................................
LOAN PREMIUM/FEES ON SECURITIES LENDING...........................
INVESTING ACTIVITIES EXPENSE....................
INTEREST EXPENSE AND FISCAL CHARGES...............................
BORROWER REBATES AND AGENT FEES...................................
GAIN [LOSS] ON SALE OR DISPOSAL OF CAPITAL ASSETS.................
NET INCREASE (DECREASE] IN FAIR VALUE.............................
SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS..............................................
THE TAMUS AVAILABLE FUND INCOMME OTHER NONOPERATING REVE RUES E OTHER NONOPERATING [EXPENSES]..
(464,133,492.98)$
(486,316,243.97) 298,659,793.96 $
299,782,233.97 24,680,529.50 19,637,911.97 92,908,400.11 63,387,833.30 827,597.99 671,151.91 19,460,335.53 27,823,079.51 (2,115,771.32)
(1,155,088.06)
(150,232.82)
(152,042.86) 48,702.03 986,853.14 (98,230,217.48)
(69,796,116.92)
(502,827.25)
(1,025,250.29) 1,374,405.12 1,528,507.13 (3,844,919.61)
(1,395,960.12)
TOTAL NONOPERATING REVENUES [EXPENSES]..............................
333,115,795.76 $
340,343,112.68 INCOME [LOSS]
BEFORE OTHER REVENUES, EXPENSES, GAIN, LOSSES.........
(131,017,697.22)$
(145,973,131.29) 711 -
2 -
1
UNAUDITED EXHIBIT IV TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
- EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2009 CURRENT PRIOR YEAR YEAR TOTAL TOTAL OTHER REVENUES, EXPENSES, GAINS, LOSSES AND TRANSFERS CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS......................................
REF APPROPRIATION...............................................
ADDITIONS TO PERMANENT AND TRUE ENDOW4MENTS SPECIAL ITEMS..................................................
EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS............................................
TRANSFERS IN TRANSFERS FROM OTHER STATE AGENCIES...........................
TRANSFERS FROM UT SYSTEM AUF................................
MANDATORY TRANSFERS FROM OTHER PARTS..........................
NONMANDATORY TRANSFERS FROM OTHER PARTS.......................
NOERANDATORY TRANSFERS FROM PARTS OR AGENCIES -
CAP ASSETS....
TRANSFERS OUT TRANSFERS TO OTHER STATE AGENCIES.............................
TRANSFERS TO UT SYSTEM AUF...................................
MANDATORY TRANSFERS TO OTHER PARTS...........................
NONMANDATORY TRANSFERS TO OTHER PARTS........................
NON*ANDATORY TRANSFERS TO PARTS OR AGENCIES -
CAP ASSETS.....
LEGISLATIVE TRANSFERS -
IN.....................................
LEGISLATIVE TRANSFERS -
OUT...................
LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS LAPSED..............................
TOTAL CHANGE IN REVENUES, EXPENSES,
- GAIN, LOSSES AND TRANSFERS...
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS...............................................
1,260,169.49 772,204.00 683,192.38 1,714,195.29 2,806,862.50 2,960,507.50 131,054,7S5.96 106,790,864.64 145,948,713.02 41,609,606.23 (3,804,462.35)
(3,204,960.00)
(66,223,684.36)
(48,126,522.81)
(69,133,098.14)
(9,846,817.00)
(S19,374.44)
(470.532.05)
(6,774,586.00)
(6,772,031.00)
(1,415.40) 135.298,518.06 $
85,425,189.40 4,280,820.84 $
(60,547,941.89)
BEGINNING NET ASSETS, SEPTEMBER 1, 2008 AND 2007....................
$ 1,863,847,972.09 $ 1,926,811,492.54 RESTATEMENT.........................................................
(1,416,756.32)
(2,415,578.56)
BEGINNING NET ASSETS, SEPTEMBER 1, 2008 AND 2007 RESTATED............
$ 1,862,431,215.77 $ 1,924,395,913.98 NET ASSETS, AUGUST 31, 2009 AND 2008................................
$ 1,866,712,036.61 $ 1,863,847,972.09 711 - 2.- 2
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE IV-1 TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY NACUBO FUNCTION TO NATURAL CLASSIFICATION MATRIX FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2009 INSTRUCTION RESEARCH PUBLIC SERVICE ACADEMIC SUPPORT STUDENT SERVICES NATURAL CLASSIFICATION COST OF GOODS SOLD.........................
SALARIES & WAGES...........................
PAYROLL RELATED COSTS......................
PROFESSIONAL FEES & SERVICES...............
TRAVEL
.MATERIALS
& SUPPLIES.......................
COM4MUNICATION & UTILITIES..................
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE......................
RENTALS & LEASES...........................
PRINTING & REPRODUCTION....................
FEDERAL PASS-THROUGH.......................
STATE PASS-THROUGH.........................
DEPRECIATION & AMORTIZATION................
BAD DENT EXPENSE...........................
INTEREST SCHOLARSHIPS...............................
CLAIMS & LOSSES............................
OTHER.OPERATING EXPENSE....................
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE 3,650.00 $
342,970,286.08 94,210,899.93 23,296,764.50 11,239,027.66 39,432,185.70 2,855,155.62 3,540,402.74 7,720,816.07 852,319.75 14,586.75 579,118.16 61,080,325.30 14,885,634.94 7,256,321.64 3,193,118:23 6,927,833.61 606,218.93 1,472,507.96 3,036,185.56 573,310.97 904,683.07 79,630.94 8,634.70 2,058,758.53 1,082,877.95 $
9,113,799.81 1,975,280.97 1,828,191.58 737,246.25 1,503,676.13 1,180,818.43 378,724.48 1,021,526.16 557,521.25 238.11 50,664.75 3,648.72 $
50,808,422.14 11,255,255.77 6,469,728.24 3,399,760.74 15,050,514.74 1,357,567.35 1,928,045.31 1,431,959.82 1,358,461.27 54,234.52 3,107.96 156,761.95 400.00 29,998,938.91 9,788,229.82 2,141,214.58 1,916,814.98 3,799,865.84 685,624.53 710,521.05 1,642,822.29 858,903.35 39,903.00 1,164.96 (2,935.42) 9,864,701.27 3,455,822.43 2,757,576.87 4,187,638.15 4,426,545.72 536,579,914.23 $
105,538,986.81 $
22,188,142.74 $
97,465,106.68 $
56,008,013.61 711 -
3 I
NACUBO FUNCTION OPERATION &
MAJOR REPAIR INSTITUTIONAL MAINTENANCE REHANILITATION SCHOLARSHIPS SUPPORT OF PLANT OF PLANT FELLOWSHIPS AUXILIARY DEPRECIATION TOTAL PRIOR YEAR 12,447.00 5 26,051,284.02 12,002,001.48 281,125.19 436,739.39 2,421,549.68 (10,457,120.35) 660,139.44 (77,318.41)
- 125,472.19 503.93 7,399.32 607.51 $
31,985,269.28 10,745,028.23 3,884,155.26 21,873.36 2,543,068.01 37,321,177.93 16,644,256.75 1,164,675.65 19,235.53 112,197.30 8,886,482.63 $
2,077,746.44 61,832,133.18 198,446.46 17,619,490.97 150,695.29 18,676,231.14 85,096.66 6,376,048.10 62,743.13 15,495,683.02 20,311,056.00 14,633,477.38 207,937.72 2,918,550.00 1,075.33 1,430,469.85 5.70 13,108.22 41,623,306.80 1,975,477.18 9,990,113.81 $
615,918,205.16 172,680,268.57 63,984,427.42 27,405,725.37 87,237,119.86 53,860,498.44 40,080,272.41 19,067,154.86 5,776,769.49 958,917.59 79,630.94 68,898,388.59 68,898,388.59 39,903.00 46,459.17 46,448,551.27 10,106,725.82 564,821,613.20 177,809,583.61 59,673,214.26 28,504,666.88 84,104,042.08 72,516,553.13 38,423,256.45 22,961,442.51 5,845,923.02 480,580.33 79,480.15 61,797,061.58 42,251.00 67,794.18 40,821,312.38 5,108.84 3,393,956.98 1,863,480.77 93,287.41 10,267,344.91 40,310,354.51 39,632,966.58 34,858,179.86 $
106,197,937.12 $
112,197.30 $
44,500,340.94 S 180,435,552.58 $
68,898,388.59 $ 1,252,782.760.46 $ 1,207,688,467.16
[EXHIBIT IV 711 -
3 2
UNAUDITED EXHIBIT V TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2009 CURRENT PRIOR YEAR YEAR TOTAL TOTAL STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATINGACTIVITIES PROCEEDS RECEIVESD FROM STUDENTS.................................
PROCEEDS RECEIVED FROM CUSTOMERS................................
PROCEEDS FROM SPONSORED PROGRAMS................................
PROCEEDS FROM AUXILIARY ENTERPRISES.............................
PROCEEDS FROM LOAN PROGRAMS......................................
PROCEEDS FROM OTHER REVENUES....................................
PAYMENTS TO SUPPLIERS FOR GOODS AND SERVICES....................
PAYMENTS TO EMPLOYEES -
SALARIES.
PAYMENTS TO EMPLOYEES -
BENEFITS................................
PAYMENTS FOR LOANS PROVIDED.....................................
PAYMENTS FOR OTHER EXPENSES.....................................
292,129,426.73
ý326,076,217.11 78,088,388.85 46,641,176.17 219,966,516.93-207,643,426.52 1405,590,036.13 140,332,135.56 1,701,425.90 1,579,180.28 23,843,992.64 21,147,391.11 (363,640,732.31)
(362,563,915.21)
(613,773,539.69)
(562,534,699.48)
(142,837,823.63)
(126,727,824.22)
(360,521.17)
(3,073,492.37)
(54,919,929.86)
(67,087,836.94)
NET CASH PROVIDED [USED] BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES..................
(414,212,759.68)
(376,566,241.47)
CASH FLOWS PROM NONCAPITAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES PROCEEDS FROM STATE APPROPRIATIONS.
PROCEEDS FROM GIFTS.............................................
PROCEEDS FROM ENDOWMENTS PROCEEDS -
TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS..
PROCEEDS FROM OTHER GRANT REVENUE...............................
PROCEEDS FROM TANDS AVAILABLE FUND INCOME.......................
PROCEEDS FROM CONTRIBUTED CAPITAL...............................
PROCEEDS FROM OTHER REVENUES....................................
PAYMENTS OF INTEREST...........................................
PAYMENTS -
TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS............................
PAYMENTS FOR GRANT DISBURSEMENTS...............................
PAYMENTS FOR OTHER USES........................................
OTHER NONCAPITAL TRANSFERS FROM/TO SYSTE......................
TRANSFERS BETWEEN FUND GROUPS.................................
NET CASH PROVIDED (USED] BY NONCAPITAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES......
CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES PROCEEDS FROM SALE OF CAPITAL ASSETS...........................
PROCEEDS FROM CAPITAL DEBT ISSUANCE............................
PROCEEDS FROM STATE GRANTS AND CONTRACTS.......................
PROCEEDS FROM FEDERAL GRANTS AND CONTRACTS......................
PROCEEDS FROM GIFTS.............................................
PROCEEDS FROM INTERFUND LOANS...................................
PROCEEDS FROM OTHER FINANCING ACTIVITIES......
PAYMENTS FOR AUDITIONS TO CAPITAL ASSETS........................
PAYMENTS OF PRINCIPAL ON DEBT..................................
PAYMENTS FOR CAPITAL LEASES....................................
PAYMENTS FOR INTEREST ON CAPITAL RELATED DENT..................
PAYMENTS FOR INTERFUND LOANS....................
PAYMENTS OF OTHER COSTS ON DEBT ISSUANCE.......................
TRANSFER OF CAPITAL DENT PROCEEDS FROM SYSTEM (NONMANDATORY)....
TRANSFER TO SYSTEM FOR CAPITAL RELATED DENT (MANDATORY)........
TRANSFER FROM/TO SYSTEM FOR CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDS [NONMAND]....
NET CASH PROVIDED [USED] BY CAPITAL AND RELATED FINC. ACTIV......
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES PROCEEDS FROM SALES AND MATURITIES OF INVESTMENTS..............
SALES AND PURCHASES OF INVESTMENTS HELD BY SYSTEM..............
PROCEEDS FROM INTEREST AND INVESTMET INCOME...................
PAYMENTS TO ACQUIRE INVESTMENTS................................
NET CASH PROVIDED [USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES.................
283,162,354.04 95,744,633.70 683,192.38 2,757,391.36 35,264,437.51 1,617,686.62 290,929,232.41 68,576,906.25 1,714,195.29 3,116,417.37 17,436,084.95 1,515,527.69 (3,804,462.35)
(3,204,960.00)
(1,310,513.82)
'(2,241,053.27) 72,668,404.26 73,954,850.81 486,783,123.70 451,797,201.50 193,206.33 1,419,857.79 1,322,107.55 (70,119,159.05)
(149,815.58)
(496,675.08)
(82,678,856.90)
(i52,042.86)
(617,774.75) 9,429,735.20 11,931,544.66 (72,998,270.36)
(546898,553.81)
(7,734,754.50) 2,301,518.09 (140,553,625.49)
(122,694,307.78)
(19,076,772.51) 17,352,933.75 2,256,723.47 26,700,841.33 (1,723,838.76) 28,957,564.80 INCREASE [DECREASE] IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS....................
(69,707,100.23)
(20,507,782.95)
CASH AND CASE EQUIVALENTS, SEPTEMBER 1, 20D8 AND 2007..............
RESTATEMENTS TO BEGINNING CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS.................
RESTATED BEGINNING CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS........................
134,241,072.32 154,748,655.27 134,241,072.32 154,748,655.27 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, AUGUST 31, 2009 and 2008 (SCH THREE].....
1 $ -
64,533,972.09 134,241,072.32 711 -
4 -I
UNAUDITED EXHIBIT V TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2009 CURRENT PRIOR YEAR YEAR TOTAL TOTAL RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING INCOME [LOSS] TO NET CASH PROVIDED (USED] BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES OPERATING INCOME [LOSS)..........................
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE OPERATING INCOME TO NET CASH PROVIDED [USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION.....................................
BAD DEBT EXPENSE..................................................
OPERATING INCOME AND EXPENSE CLASSIFICATION DIFFERENCES...........
CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES:
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET.....................................
DUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES/FUNDS.................................
DUE FROM SYSTEM MEMBERS..:....................................
INVENTO RY.....................................................
DEFERRED CHARGES..............................................
PREPAID EXPENSES..............................................
LOANS AND CONTRACTS...........................................
OTHER ASSETS..................................................
PAYABLES......................................................
DUE TO OTHER AGENCIES/FUNDS...................................
DUE TO SYSTEM MEMBERS.........................................
DEFERRED REVENUE..............................................
DEPOSITS......................................................
COMPENSATED ABSENCES PAYABLE.:................................
OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS LIABILITY......................
SELF INSURED ACCRUED LIABILITY................................
OTHER LIABILITIES.............................................
TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS...............................................
NET CASH PROVIDED (USED] BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES..................
NON-CASH TRANSACTION NONMONETARY GIFTS, INCLUDING CAPITAL ASSETS.......................
NET INCREASE
[DECREASE] IN FMV OF INVESTMENTS.....................
GAIN/LOSS ON SALE OR DISPOSAL OF CAPITAL ASSETS...................
REFUNDING OF LONG TERM DEBT.......................................
AMORTIZATION OF BOND PREMIUMS AND DISCOUNTS.......................
OTHER.
S (464,133,492.98)
(486,316,243.97) 68,898,388.59 1,409,249.85 406,230.82 964,534.57 (216,999.48)
(913,171.95)
(881,490.09)
(98,464.36) 4,594,143.99 (121,986.63) 11,130,710.52 (74,007.66)
(5,783,389.41)
(68,747,660.27) 1,210,322.71 5,915,273.00 32,229,049.00 61,797,061.58 879,825.06 (14,86,305.78) 67,240.97 2,805,118.69 (127,221.38)
(19,748,180.26)
(2,575,645.38) 102,316.26 8,381,377.04 74,007.66 (2,787,133.80) 25,711,591.29 125,345.44 261,425.11 47,648,180.00 49.920.733.30 107,748,002.50 (414,212,759.68)
(378.568,241.47)
S (52,264,618.24)
(74,990,136.08) 48,702.03 986,653.14 145,429,338.58 41,156,574.18 711 -
4 -
2
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE I - A TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended August 31, 2069 Federal Grantor/Pass-through Grantor Prouram Title U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Fromý Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Pass-Through From:
Department of State Health Services Totals - U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Department of Commerce Coastal Zone Management Administration Awards Pass-Through From:
General Land Office Totals - U.S. Department of Commerce Agy/
CFDA Identifying Univ Number Number No.
Pass-through From Agencies or Non-State Universities Entities Amount Amount 10.557 537 151,648.50 151,648.50 11.419 305 U.S. Department of Defense Basic and Applied Scientific Research Basic Scientific Research Totals - U.S. Department of Defense U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Demolition and Revitalization of Severely Distressed Public Housing Direct Proarams:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Rural Housing and Economic Development Totals - U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development U.S. Department of the Interior Pass-Throauh From:
Clean Vessel Act Pass-Through From:
Parks and Wildlife Department TotaLs - U.S. Department of the Interior 1
12.300 12.431 426059 10/8/2008 426061 9/1/08 209.64 209.64 15,000.00 19,967.68 34,967.68 4,094.51 14.866 426047 12/10/07 14.000 CH-TEX-250D-300630 14.250 15.616 4,094.51 802 23,109.86 23,109.8.6 U.S. Department of Justice Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program Pass-Through From:
Governor - Fiscal Totals - U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Transportation Direct Proerams:
U.S. Department of Transportation Airport Improvement Program Totals - U.S. Department of Transportation General Services Administration Pass-Through From Donation of Federal Surplus Personal Property (Non-monetary)
Pass-Through From:
Texas Facilities Commission Totals - General Services Administration 16.607 300 8,699.27 8,699.27 20.000 HSTS0208HSLRO57 20.106 39.003 303 7,805.50 7,805.50 711 -
8 -
1
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE I - A TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended August 31,2009 Direct Total Pass-Agy/
Program Through From and Univ Amount Dirt PTogram No.
Agencies or Universities Amount Pass-through To Non-State Entities Amount Expensditusres Total Pass-Through To and Expenditures
-- S$
151,648.50 S
151,648.50 151,648.50 151,648.50 209.64
____________________209.64
-151,648.50 151,648.50 209.64 209.64
-209.64 209.64 15,000.00 19,967.68 34,967.68 15,000.00 15,000.00 19,967.68 19,967.68 34,967.68 34,967.68 4,094.51 93,330.00 4,094.51 93,330.00 4,094.51 93,330.00 93,330.00 636.49 636.49 93,966.49 98,061.00 636.49 636.49 636.49 97,424.51 98,061.00 23,109.86 23,109.86 23,109.86 23,109.86
.23,109.86 23,109.86 8,699.27 8,699.27 8,699.27 8,699.27 8,699.27 8,699.27 43,305.02 43,305.02 2,999,645.85 2,999,645.85 3,042,950.87 3,042,950.87 43,305.02 43,305.02 2,999,645.85 2,999,645.85 3,042,950.87 3,042.950.87 7,805.50 7,805.50 7,805.50 7,805.50
-7,805,50 7,805,50ý 711 -
8 -
2
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE I - A TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended August 31. 2009 Federal Grantor/Pass-through Grantor Program Title Agyl CFDA Identifying Univ Number Number No.
Pass-through From Agencies or Non-State Universities Entities Amount Amount National Aeronautics & Space Administration National Aeronautics & Space Administration Totals - National Aeronautics & Space Administration National Endowment For The Humanities Direct Programs:
National Leadership Grants National Leadership Grants Pass-Through To:
University ofHouston National Leadership Grants Pass-Through To:
Texas Tech University Pass-Through From:
Promotion of the Arts Partnership Agreements Pass-Through From:
Texas Commission on the Arts Totals - Notional Endowment For The Humanities 43.000 5/1/8 426055 8,211.30 8,21130 45.312 45.312 45.312 45.025 813.
720.00 720.00 1,983.40 1,983.40 National Science Foundation Education and Human Resources Totals - National Science Foundation 47.076 P0002450 U.S. Department of Energy Pass-Throuizh Fromý State Energy Program Pass-Through From:
Texas A&Mlntermatonal University Totals - U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Education Safe and Drag-Free Schools and Communities State Grants Direct Procrams:
Byrd Honors Scholarships Centers for Intemational Business Education Pass-Through From:
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Pass-Throutgh From:
Texas Higher Edtucation Coordinating Board Totals - U.S. Department of Education National Archives & Records Administration Direct Proctn National Historical Publications and Records Grants Totals - National Archives & Records Administration 81,041 761 1,276.20 1,276.20 84.186 2/23/09 426067 30,042.56 84.185 84.220 84.367 781 145,793.09 145,793.09 30,042.56 89.003 U.S. Department of Health and Human Sen-ices Rural Health Care Services Outreach and Rural Health Network Development Program Pass-Through From:
Developmental Disabilities Basic Support and Advocacy Giants Pass-Through From:
Texas Education Agency 93.912 11/3/06 426056 93.630 48,137.53 701 127,259.50 711 -
8 -
3
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE I - A TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended August 31, 2009 Direct
" Total Pass-Agy/
Program Through From and Univ Amount Direct PsTorwn No.
8,211.30 8,211.30 Agencies or Universities Amount Pass-through To Non-State Total Pass-Entities Through To and Amount Expenditures Expenditures
_____________8,211.30 8,211.30
-8,211.30 8,211.30 35,957.11 41,344.32 12,890.20 35,957.11 41,344.32 12,890.20 35,957.11 35,957.11 41,344.32 12,890.20 730 733 41,344.32 12,890.20 720.00 720.00 720.00 90,191.63 90,911.63
____________________1,983.40 1,983.40 54,234.52 36,677.11 90,911.63 1,983.40 1,983.40 1,983.40 1,983.40 1,276.20 1,276.20 1,276.20
___________________1,276.20
____________________________1,276.20 1,276.20 662,500.00 298,867.81 30,042.56 662,500.00 298,867.81
-145,793.09 30,042.56 662,500.00 298,867.81 145,793.09 30,042.56 662,500.00 298,867.81 145,79309 961,367.81 1,137,203.46 2,163,549.33 2,163,549.33 2,163,549.33 2,163,549.33 1,137,203.46 1,137,203.46 2,163,549.33 2,163,549.33 2,163,549.33 2,163,549.33 48,137.53 127,259.50 48,137.53 127,259.50 48,137.53 127,259.50 711 -
8 4
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE I - A TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended August 31. 2009 ruou-oIJouu,,1 rEam Federal Grantor/Pass-through Grantor Program Title CFDA Identifying Number Number Agy/
Agencies or Non-State Univ Universities Entities No.
Amount Amount Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse Pass-Through From:
Department of State Health Serrices Preventive Health and Health Services Block Grant Pass-Throtugh Ftom:
Deparittent of Stare Health Services Totals - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Corporation for National and Community Service AmeriCorps Totals - Corporation for National and Community Service Research & Development Cluster U.S. Department of Agriculture Direct programs:
Agricultural Research Basic and Applied Research Pess-Through From:
Special Supplemental Nutrition program for Women, Infants, and Children Pass-Throttgh From:
Texas AgriLife Reseatvh Totals - U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Department of Commerce Direct Prorasn-Su Sea Grant Support Sea Grant Support Pass-Through To:
Te.as AgriLife Research Sea Grant Support Pass-Thrtotgh To:
Texas Engineering ExperimenrStation Sea Grant Support Pass-Through To:
Texas A&M University at Galveston Sea Grant Support Past-Through To:
University of Texas at Austin Sea Grant Support Pass-Through To:
Tecas State University - San M4larcos Sea Grant Support Pass-Through To:
Texas A&M University -Corpus Christi Pass-Through From:
Coastal Zone Management Administration Awards Pass-Through From:
General Land Office Totals - U.S. Department of Commerce 93.959 93.991 537 537 144,880.14 125.38 272,265.02 48,137.53 23,917.44 23,917.44 94.006 15.0809.115-1 10.001 10.557 556 13,328.56 13,32&.56 __________
11.417 11.417 11.417 11.417 11.417 11.417 11.417 11.419 305 100,723.79 100,723.79 711 -
8 -
5
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE I - A TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended August 31, 2009 Direct Total Pass-Agy/
Agencies or Program Through From and Univ Universities Amount Direct Program No.
Amount 144,880.14 Pass-through To Non-State Total Pass-Entities Through To and Amount Expenditures Expenditures 144,880.14 144,880.14 125.38 12538 125.38 320,402.55
____________________23,917.44
~23,91 7.44
-320,402.55 320,402.55
____________________________23,917.44 23,917.4.4
-23,917.44 23,917.44 8,634.42 8,634.42 13,328.56 8,634.42 13,328.56 8,634.42 13.328.56 8,634.42 21,962.98
-21,962.98 23,962.98 1,373,664.93 136,087.58 58,952.69 229,601.65 171,289.59 1,373,664.93 136,087.58 58,952.69 229,601.65 171,289.59 40,104.38 83,638.77 100,723.79 1,373,664.93 556 712 718 721 754 760 136,087.58 58,952.69 229,601.65 171,289.59 40,104.38 83,638.77, 1,373,664.93 136,087.58 58,952.69 229,601.65 171,289.59 40,104.38 83,638.77 100,723.79 40,104.38 83,638.77 100,723.79 2,093,339.59 2,194,063.38 719,674.66 1.474,388.72 2,194,063.38 -
711 -.
8 -
6
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE I - A TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended August 31. 2009 Pass-through From Agy/
Agencies or Non-State CFDA Identifying Univ Universities Entities Number Number No, Amount Amount Federal Grantor/Pass-through Grantor Program Title U.S. Department of Defense Research and Technology Development 12.910 HR001 1-08-3-0004 60,737.79 Direct Procrams:
Basic Scentefic Research Language Grant Program Information Security Grant Program Research and Technology Development Pass-Throuch From:
Military Medical Research and Development Pass-Through From:
University ofTexas Health Science Center at Houston Totals - U.S. Department of Defense U.S. Department of The Interior Assistance to State Water Resources Research Institutes Pass-Through From:
Texas AgriLife Research Totals - U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of Transportation Highway Planning and Construction Totals - U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Personnel Management Direct Programs:
Intergovemmental Personnel Act (IPA) Mobility Program Totals - Office of Personnel Management National Aeronautics & Space Administration Pass-Throuah From:
Aerospace Education Services Program Pass-Through From:
University ofTexas at Austin Totals - National Aeronautics & Space Administration National Endowment For The Humanities Direct Programs:
Promotion of the Humanities Fellowships and Stipends Promotion of the Humanities Research Totals - National Endowment For The Humanities National Science Foundation Geosciances Education and Human Resources Office of Cybhrinfrastructure Direct Proaramsý National Science Foundation Engineering Grants.
12.431 12.900 12.902 12.910 12.420 744 295,047.82 295,047.82 60,737.79 15.805 556 6,933.54 6,933.54 57,101.56 35,461.99 1,113.08 93,676.63 20.205 09-101 09-102 10-101 27.011 43.001 721 4,220.45 4,220.45 45.160 45.161 47.050 JSAF703 JSFA7-05 2006-103 47.076 01 -TX-0733280 01-TX-0737669 47.080 EPS-0814417 6,400.00 2,306.98 7,596.45 112,860.98 127,822.02 64,390.81 47.000 47.041 7-MOR-1381 711 -
8 -
7
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE 1 - A TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended August 31, 2009 Direct Total Pass-Program Through From and Amount Direct Program Pass-through To.
Agy/
Agencies or Non-State Total Pass-Univ Universities Entities Through To and No, Amount Amount Expenditures Expenditures 40,244.51 24,056.08 30,852.83 489,062.22 60,737.79 40,244.51 24,056.08 30,852.83 489,062.22 295,047.82 16,071.56 60,737.79 24,372.95 24,056.08 30,852.83 489,062.22 295,047.82 60,737.79 40,244.51 24,056.08 30,852.83 489,06222 295,047.82 584,215.64
" 940,001.25 16,071.56 923,929.69 940,001.25 6,933.54 6,933.54 6,933.54 6,933.54 57,101.56 35,461.99 1,113.08 93,676.63 113,405.58 113,405.58 113,405.58 113,405.58 6,933.54 6,933.54 57,101.56 57,101.56 35,461.99 35,461.99 1,113.08 1,113.08 93,676.63 93,676.63 113,405.58 113,405.58 113,405.58 113,405.58 4,220.45 4,220.45 4,220.45 4,220.45
-4,220.45 4,220.45 45,209.06 45,209.06 47,362.59 47,362.59 92,571.65 92,571.65 45,209.06 45,209.06 47,362.59 47,362.59 92,571.65 92,571.65 6,400.00 2,306.98 7,596.45 112,860.98 127,822.02 64,390.81 1,893.95 101,641.67 6,400.00 2,306.98 7,596.45 112,860.98 127,822.02 64,390.81 1,893.95 101,641.67 6,400.00 2,306.98 7,596.45 112,860.98 127,822.02 64,390.81 1,893.95 101,641.67 1,893.95 101,641.67 711 -
8 -
8
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE 1-A TEXAS A&M UNAIERSITY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended August 31, 2009 Federal Grantor/Pass-through Grantor Pro-ram Title Pass-through From Agy/
Agencies or Non-State CFDA Identifying Univ Universities Entities Number Number No.
Amount Amount Mathematical and Physical Sciences Onosciences Computer and Information Science and Engineering Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences Education and Human Resources Education and Human Resources Pass-Through To:
West Texas A&M Unisersily Office of Cyberinfrastructuee Office of Cyberinfrastructure Pass-Through To:
Texas Engineering Extension Service TRANS-NSF RECOVERY ACT RESEARCH SUPPORT Totals - National Science Foundation Environmental Protection Agency Science To Achieve Results (STAR) Fellowship Program Totals - Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Financial Assistance Program Direct Procrams:
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Financial Assistance Program University Coal Reseach Stewardship Science Grant Program Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Information Dissemination. Outreach, Training P.ss-Throusth From:
Fossil Energy Research and Development Pass-Through From:
Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Totals -U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Education Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities National Programs Education Technology State Grants Direct Prograros:
Bilingual Education Professional Development Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need Education Research, Development and Dissemination Special Education - Personnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children Demonstration Proiects to Support Postsecondary Faculty, Staff, and Administrations in Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs Pass-Throuch From:
Adult Education - Basic Grants to States Pass-Through From:
Texas Education Agency Special Education Grants to States Pass-Through From:
T"exas Education Agency Mathematics and Science Partnerships Pass-Through From:
Texas Education Agency Totals - U.S. Department of Education 47.049 47.050 47.070 47.075 47.076 47.076 47.080 47.080 47.082 66.514 81.049 TUL-580-08/09 81.000 NO. 574628 -728404 81.049 81.057 81.112 81.117 81.089 321,377,24 42,826.62 760 61,540.75 61,540.75 42,826.62 84.184 Q184L050099 84.318 11/9/07 426046 69,643.07 100,339.08 84.195 84.200 84.305 84.325 84.333 84.334 84.002 84.027 84.366 701 701 701 1,227,489.55 600,784.45 974,400.05 2,802,674.05 169,982.15 711 -
8 -
9
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE I - A TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended August 31, 2009 Direct Total Pass-Agy/
Prograur Through From and Univ Amount Direct Prograun No.
Agencies or Universities Amount Pass-through To Non-State Entities Amount Expenditures 4,413.67 614,564.38 74,810.97 15,970.74 1,726,846.81 4,413.67 614,564.38 74,810.97 15,970.74 1,777,153.05 4,400.00 241,298.37 180,608.41 4,413.67 614,564.38 74,810.97.,
15,970.74 1,777,153.05 4,400.00 241,298.37 180,608.41 Total Pass-Through To and Expenditures 4,413.67 614,564.38 74,810.97 15,970.74 1,777,153.05 4,400.00 50,306.24 17,673.08 757 716 4,400.00 180,608.41 223,625.29 241,298.37 180,608.41 21,318.67 21,318.67 3,038,073.88 3,359,451.12 229.60 229.60 229.60 229.60 21,318.67 21,318.67 185,008.41 67,979.32 3,106,463.39 3,359,451.12 229.60 229,60 229.60 229.60 42,826.62 42,826.62 56,82857 2,341,738.61 81,836.21 204,276.40 52,824.04 56,828.57 2.341,738.61 81,836.21 204,276.40 52,824.04 30,714.37 56,828.57 2,341,738.61 51,121.84 204,276.40 52,824.04 42,826.62 56,828.57 2,341,138.61 81,836.21 204,276.40 52,824.04 61,540.75 61,540.75 61,540.75 2,737,503.83 2,841,871.20 30,714.37 2,811,156.83 2,841,871.20 136,840.98 149,404.65 337,653.34 583,250.03 223,270.28 304,468.90 69,643.07 100,339.08 136;840.98 149,404.65 337,653.34 583,250.03 223,270.28 304,468.90 1,227,489.55 600,784.45 974,400.05 87,421.90 139,244.81 69,643.07 100,339.08 136,840.98 149,404.65 250,231.44 583,250.03 223,270.28 165,224.09 1,227,489.55 600,784.45 599,400.05 69,643.07 100,339.08 136,840.98 149,404.65 337,653.34 583,250.03 223,270.28 304,468.90 1,227,489.55 600,784.45 974,400.05 375,000.00 1,734,888.18 4,707,544.38 601,666.71 4,105,877.67 4,707,544.38 711 -
8 10
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE I-A TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended August 31. 2009 Federal Grantor/Pass-through Grantor Proaran Title Agy/
Agencies or Non-State CFDA Identifying Univ Universities Entities Number Number No.
Amount Amount U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Health aind Human Servtces University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Education, Research, and Cardiovascular Diseases Research Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation Research Direct Proaramts:
Humans Genome Research Cancer Research Manpower Head Start Cardiovascular Diseases Research Child Health and Human Development Ex-tramural Research Pass-Through From:
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects ofRegional and National Pass-Through From:
Department of State Health Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Investigations and Technical Assistance Pass-Through From:
Department of State Health Services Demonstration to Maintain Independence and Employment pass-Through From:
University of Texas at Atustin HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Pass-Through From:
Department of State Health Sertices Cooperative Agreements to Support State-Based SafeMotherhood and Infant Health Pass-Thrugh From:
Department of State Health Serwces Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant to the States Pass-Through From:
Department of State Health Servtces Totals -U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 93.000 2XS197 93.632 FY2009-035 93.837 5/6/08 426049 93.855 DD/2134001 DDDH 192,971.04 8,094.73 63,562.56 62,662.89 93.172 93.398 93.600 93.837 93.865 93.243 93.283 93.769 93.940 93.946 93.994 537 537 721 537 537 537 285,216.08 159,992.61 626,579.83 290,949.21 36,938.72 Head Start Cluster U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Head Start Totals, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Employment Service Cluster U.S. Department of Labor Employment Service/Wagner-Peyser Funded Activities Totals - U.S. Department of Labor 93.600 7/29/07 426042 7/31/08 426053 17.207 2/23/09 426067 211,502.41 1,611,178.86 327,291.22 12,811.08 42,287.87 55,098.95 6,114.51 6,114.51 Special Education (IDEA) Ouster U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through From:
Special Education.Grants to States Pass-Through From:
Texas A&M University - Te.xarkana Totals - U.S. Department of Education 84.027 764.
40,378.17 40,378.17 711 -
8 -
11
UNAUDITED, SCHEDULE I - A TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCI4E.ULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended August 31, 2009 Direct Total Pass-Agy/
Agencies or Program Through From and Univ Universities Amount Direct Program No.
Amount.
Pass-through To Non-State Entities Amount Expenditures Total Pats-.
Through To and Expenditures 17,826.47 148.95 4,587.57 0.01 333,258.46 192,971.04 8,094.73 63,562.56 62,662.89 17,826.47 148.95 4,587.57 0.01 333,258.46 285,216.08 159,992.61 626,579.83 290,949.21 36,938.72 211,502.41 2,687.01 25,630.86
.192,971.04 8,094.73 63,562.56 62,662.89 17,826.47 148.95 1,900.56 0.01 307,627.60 285,216.08 159,992.61 626,579.83 290,949.21 36,938.72 211,502.41 192,971.04 8,094.73 63,562.56 62,662.89 17,826.47 148.95 4,587.57 0.01 333,258.46 285,216.08 159,992.61 626,579.83 290,949.21 36,938.72 211,502.41 355,821.46 2,294,291.54" 12,811.08 42,287.87 55,098.95 6,114.51 6,114.51 28,317.87 2,265.973.67 2,294,291.54 12,811.08 12,811.08 42,287.87 42,287.87 55,098.95 55,098.95 6,114.51 6,114.51 6,114.51 6,114.51 40,378.17 40,378.17 40,378.17 40,378.17
-40,378.17 40,378.17 711 -
8 -
12
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE I - A TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended August 31, 2009 Pass-through From Agy/
Agencies or Non-State Univ Universities Entities No.
Amount Amount Federal GrantoriPass-through Grantor Program Title CFDA Identifying Number Number Public Assistance Cluster U.S. Department of Homeland Security Pass-Throu.h From:
Disaster Grats - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters)
Pass-Through From:
Texas A&M University System Totals - U.S. Department of Homeland Security 97.036 710 925,404.35 925,404.35 Student Financial Assistance Cluster U.S. Department of Education Direct Proqrams:
Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants Federal Family Education Loans Federal Work-Study Program Federal Perkins Loan Program Federal Capital Contributions Federal Pell Grant Program Academic Competitiveness Grants National Science and Mathematics Access to Retain Talent (SMART) Grants Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants (TEACH Grants)
Totals - U.S. Department of Education U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Health Professions Student Loans, Including Primary Care Loans/Loans for Scholarships for Health Professions Students from Disadvantaged Backgrounds Totals - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 84.007 84.032 84.033 84.038 84.063 84.375 84.376 84.379 93.342 93.925 TANF Cluster U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Totals - U.S. Department of Health and Human Serviem 93.558 2/23/09 426067
__________________7,643.14
_________________7,643.14 S
6,472,957.42; S
1.236.102.67 Total Expenditures of Federal Awards 711 -
8 -
13
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE I - A TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended August 3 1;"2009 Direct Total Pass-Agy/
Agencies or Program Through From and Univ Universities Amount Direct Program No.
Amount Pass-through To Non-State Entities Amount Expenditures Total Pass-Through To and Expenditures 925,404.35 925,404.35 925,404.35
____________________925,404.35
-925,404.35 925,404.35 1,384,147.37 1,384,147.37 146,367,018.00 146,367,018.00 1,217,122.08 1,217,122.08 1,456,967.52 1,456,967.52 24,680,529.50 24,680,529.50 1,263,647.14 1,263,647.14 1,309,467.50 1,309,467.50 667,675.50 667,675.50 178,346,574.61 178,346,574.61 125,133.00 125,133.00 10,888.00 10,888.00 136,021.00 136,021.00 7,643.14 7,643.14 S
t95.593,05.57 S
203,02,65.66 1,384,147.37 146,367,018.00 1,217,122. 08 1,456,967.52 24,680,529.50 1,263,647.14 1,309,467.50
________________________________667,675.50 178,346,574.61 1,384,147.37 146,367,018.00 1,217,122.08 1,456,967.52 24,680,529.50 1,263,647.14 1,309,467.50 667,675.50 178,346.574.61 125,133.00 125,133.00 10,888.00 10,888.00 136,021.00 136,021.00 7,643.14 7,643.14 7,643.14 7,643.14 958,917.59 S
745,386.32 201,598,061.75 S
203,02,65.66 711 -
8, -
14
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE I - A TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended August 31, 2009 NOTE 1: NONMONETARY ASSISTANCE The Donation ofFederal Stuplus Personal Property is presented at 23.3% of the federal acquisition cost of $33,500. The surplus property is passed through from the Texas Facilities Conmmission. The federal grantor agency is the General Services Administration (GSA) and the federal CFDA number is 39.003.
The estimated fair value for the fiscal year 2009 is $7,805.50.
NOTE 2: RECONCILIATION OF REVENUES AND RECEIPTS TO EXPENDITURES AND DISBURSEMENTS (PASS THROUGHS)
FEDERAL REVENUES:
Federal Grants and Contracts - Operating Federal Grants and Contracts - Non-operating Federal Pass-Through Grants (State Agencies/Universities and TAMUS Members)
LESS Reconciling Items:
Donation of Federal Surplus Property Total Federal Pass-Through Grants Federal Appropriations Total Federal Revenue per Exhibit IV 6,472,95742 (7,805.50)
Reconciling Items:
ADD:
Non-Monetary Assistance [NOTE l]:
Donation of Federal Suaplus Property New Loans Processed [NOTE 3]:
Federal Family Education Loans Health Education Assistance Programs Health Professions Student Loans, Including Primary Care Loans / Loans for Disadvantaged Students Perkins Loans DEDUCT:
Federal Grants to/from TAMRF COBRA 65% Subsidy (CFDA Number 17,15 1)
Federal Contract Revenues - Vendor Relationship & Fixed Price Total Pass Throughs and Expenditures per Federal Schedule 63,338,277.36 24,610,529.50 6,465,151.92 94,483,958.78 7,805.50 146,367,019.00 125,133.00 1,324,049.52 (38,774,696.00)
(15,103.87)
(215,099.27) 203,302,365.66 711 -
8 -
15
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE I - A TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended August 31, 2009 NOTE 3: STUDENT LOANS PROCESSED AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS RECOVERED LOANS OR LOAN ADMINISTRATIVE GUARANTEES ENDING BALANCE COSTS OUTSTANDING OF PREVIOUS YEARS RECOVERED AT YEAR-END
- LOANS FEDERAL GRANT/PASS THROUGH GRANT OR PROGRAM TITLE U. S. Department of Education Federal Family Education Loans Federal Perkins Loan Program Federal Direct Student Loan Total, U. S. Department of Education U.S. Department of Health and Human Searices Health Professions Students Loans, Including Primary Care Loans and Loam for Disadvantaged Students Total, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Total Student Loans Processed and Administrative Costs Recovered CPDA NEW LOANS NUMIBER PROCESSED 84.032 5
146,367,018100 84.038
.1,324,049.52 84.268 147,691,067 52 132,918.00 19,358,821.04 20,724,507.73 132,918.00 19,358,921.04 20,724,507.73 93.342 125,133.00 565,913.64 532,224.02 125,13300 565,913.64 532,224.02 147,816,200.52 132,918.00 S
19,924,734.68 5
21,256,731.75 NOTE 4: DEPOSITORY LIBRARIES FOR GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS The University participates as a depository library in the Government Printing Office's Depository Libraries for Government Publication program, CFDA #40.001.
The University is the legal custbdian of government publications, which remain the property of the federal government. The publications are not assigned a value by the Government Printing Office.
NOTE 5: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FUNDS Not Applicable NOTE 6: REBATES FROM THE SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTAL FO6D PROGRAM FOR WOMEN, INFANT AND CHILDREN (WIC)
Not Applicable NOTE 7: FEDERAL DEFERRED REVENUE BEGINNING CFDA BALANCE NUMB 911/2008 Agricultural Research--Basic and Applied Research Spec Suppl Nutrition Prog for WIC Research and Technology Development Highway Planning and Construction Library of Congress National Aeronautics and Space Administration Promotion of the Humanities-Fellowships and Stipends Geosciences National Science Foundation Education and Human Resources Science To Achieve Results (STAR) Fellowship Program U.S. Department of Energy Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities--National Programs Byrd Honors Scholarships Safe and Dmg-Free Schools and CommunitiesState Grants Improving Teacher Quality State Grants SA & MH Svcs - Projects Regional & Natl Significance CDC and Prevention Investigations and Tech Assist Head Start Rural Health Care Svcs Outreach & RH Network Develop Prog 10.000 10.557 12.910 20.205 42.000 43.000 45.160 47.050 47.075 47.076 66.514 81.000 84.184 84.185 84.186 84.367 93.243 93.283 93.600 93.912 8,476.75 24,623.26 430,058.10 1,352.55 13,416.08 7,646.69 8,750.34 1,660.30 229.60 20,308.41 112,439.90 74,007.66 74,727.71 51,993.20 NET CHANGE (8,476.75)
(6,966.54)
(273,757.22) 0.08 (1,147.55)
(13,127.38)
(7,409.06).
19,249.66 (1,353.53) 150.00 (229.60) 2,010.34 37,856.93 10,625.00 35,570.79
.(16,292.35)
(74,727.71) 46.22 (42,287.87) 36,237.47 ENDING BALANCE 813112009 17,656.72 156,300.88 0.08 205.00 288.70 237.63 28,000.00 306.77 150.00 22,318.75 150,296.83 10,625.00 35,570.79 57,715.31 46.22 9,705.33 36,237.47 829,690.55 (304,029.07) 525,661.48 Deferred Revenue Explanation:
The deferred revenue consists of finds received from federal or federal pass through sponsors, but not expended from federal or federal pass through awards as of`08/31/2009.
711 -
8 -.
16
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE 1 - B TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF STATE GRANT PASS THROUGHS FROM/TO STATE AGENCIES For the Fiscal Year Ended August 31, 2009 Pass Through From:
Agency Name Program Name Agy#
Amount Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Advanced Research Program Incentive Funding College Work Study Program 5th Year Accounting Student Scholarship Grants Texas Grant Program The Health Disparities Academy: Developifig Scientist Practioners for Careers in Public Health, Mental Health and Allied Health Exploring Electrical and Computer Engineering at Texas A&M University Summer Arts and Humanities Institute for Urban Leadership State Engineering Scholarship Program Texas Education Agency Brazos Valley Rural Schools Collaborative Early College High School Initiative Online Bilingual Certification Project Lamar University Texas Hazardous Waste Research - Cyanide Remediation Enzyme Modification and Immobilization Texas Hazardous Waste Research - Cyanide Remediation: Evolving Improved Enzymes An Integrated Experimental and Modeling Study for Improving Mercury Chemical Mechanism in Atmospheric Mercury Models - FY 2008 An Integrated Experimental and Modeling Study for Improving Mercury Chemical Mechanism in Atmospheric Mercury Models - FY 2009 Texas Air Research Center-Developmentand Deployment of a FAGE Instrument for Urban HOx Measurements Relating Urban Turbulence and Trace Gas Flux Measurements from a Tall Tower to Surface Characteristics and Anthropogenic Activities - FY 2009 Relating Urban Turbulence and Trace Gas Flux Measurements from a Tall Tower to Surface Characteristics and Anthropogenic Activities - FY 2008 State of Energy Conservation Office Fuel Efficiency in the SE Shrimp Investigation & Demonstrations Comprehensive Community-Based Energy Management Program Texas Department of State Health Services HIV/AIDS Surveillance Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Study Prevention Resource Centers 781 (78,801.33) 6,336,948.00 155,078.00 28,779.00 20,974,982.00 158,647.00 11,111.11 187,500.00 195,000.00 701 734 27,617.53 75,418.90 9,661.17 206.35 7,450.43 8,396.39 24,994.57 24,723.96 3,726.72 3,958.20 37,288.35 2,180.92 95,269.96 26,791.02 907 537 711 -
9 -
1
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE 1 - B TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF STATE GRANT PASS THROUGHS FROM/TO STATE AGENCIES For the Fiscal Year Ended August 31, 2009 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Air Quality Study II Assistance Program Texas Department of Transportation Routine Airport Maintenance Program (RAMP) 582 601 252,933.64 3,907.86 The Texas A&M University System Intrasystem Pass Through From Total State Grant Pass-Throughs From State Agencies Pass Through To:
Agency Name Program Name The Texas A&M University System Intrasystem Pass Through To 3,223,287.28 31,797,057.03 (Exhibit IV)
Amount 79,630.94 ARY #
Total State Grant Pass-Throughs To State Agencies 79,630.94 (Schedule IV-1) 711 -
9 -
2
UNAUDITED TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 711 -
9 -
3
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE THREE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHEDULE OF CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2009 CURRENT YEAR TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS CURRENT ASSETS CASH ON HAND:
CASHIERS ACCOUNT..............................................
PETTY CASH DEPARTMENT WORKING FUND............................
TEMPORARY WORKING FUND........................................
TOTAL CASH ON HAND..............................................
CASH IN STATE TREASURY:
FUND 6242.....................................................
FUND 0901.....................................................
TOTAL CASH IN STATE TREASURY........................
REIMBURSEMENTS DUE FROM STATE TREASURY..
ASSETS HELD FOR INVESTMENT BY SYSTEM OFFICES-SHORT TERM.........
TOTAL CURRENT CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS [EXHIBIT III.............
RESTRICTED:
CASH ON HAND:
PETTY CASH DEPARTMENT WORKING FUND..........................
TOTAL RESTRICTED CASH ON HAND.................................
CASH IN BANK..................................................
CASH IN STATE TREASURY:
ASSETS HELD FOR INVESTXMET BY SYSTEM OFFICE-SHORT TERM........
TOTAL RESTRICTED CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS [EXHIBIT III]........
TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
[EXHIBIT V)..........................
11,110.00 270,240.99 2,208.00 283,558.99 18,606,760.90
. 10,552.50 18,617,313.40 1,415,381.42 36,210. 514.02 56,526,767.83 529,476.89 529,476.89 9
2.224,349.24 5,253,378.13 8,007,204.26 64,533,972.09 711 1
UNAUDITED SCHEDULE N-2 TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY NOTE 2 -
CAPITAL ASSETS FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2009 BALANCE 9-1-08 ADJUSTMENTS BUSINESS-TYPE ACTIVITIES:
NON-DEPRECIABLE ASSETS LAND AND LAND IMPROVEMENTS.............
25,005,283.23 115,250.29 CONSTRUCTION.IN PROGRESS...................
107,384,708.11 (2,516,769.85)
OTHER CAPITAL ASSETS.........................
32,353,721.81 22,000.00 COMPLETED CIP (146,446,226.68)
TOTAL NON-DEPRECIABLE ASSETS..............
164,743,713.15 (2,379,519.56)
(146,446,226.68)
DEPRECIABLE ASSETS BUILDINGS..............
$ 1,222,897,199.44 INFRASTRUCTURE........................
233,217,870.86 FACILITIES AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS........
181,627,367.58 FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT.....................
212,962,695.10
- VEHICLES, BOATS AND AIRCRAFT.............
38,121,731.08 OTHER CAPITAL ASSETS........................
80,957,221.76 (485,897.37)
(2,172.48)
(22,000.00) 112,728,713.06 12,592,794.58 2,264,546.12 18,860,172.92 TOTAL DEPRECIABLE ASSETS AT COST..........
$ 1,969,784,085.82 (510,069.85) 146,446,226.68 LESS ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION FOR:
BUILDINGS................................
(765,313,512.48)
INFRASTRUCTURE..............................
(157,938,689.71)
FACILITIES AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS........
(127,944,661.74)
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT......
(158,243,344.72)
- VEHICLES, BOATS AND AIRCRAFT.............
(22,334,381.44)
OTHER CAPITAL ASSETS........................
(43,789,170.64)
(318,066.91)
(682,140.03)
(29,084.28)
(984,419.70) 108.63 183,818.29 TOTAL ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION............
$(1,275,563,760.73)
(1,829,784.00)
BUSINESS-TYPE ACTIVITIES CAPITAL ASSETS, NET$
858,964,038.24 (4,719,373.41) 711 1
INC-INTERAGENCY DEC-INTERAGENCY BALANCE TRANSACTIONS TRANSACTIONS ADDITIONS DELETIONS 8-31-09 2,970,691.03 28,091,224.55 145,419,389.34 35,682,262.09 139,523,363.01 2,377,346.22 34,753,068.03 145,419,389.34 41,030,299.34 202,367,655.59 752,778.59
$ 1,336,378,691.09 245,810,665.44 183,891,913.70 926,075.25 (660,486.23) 17,169,834.45 (6,758,803.00) 242,013,591.12 257,511.32 1,937,822.26 (1,035,006.82) 39,279,885.36 3,676,629.84 (267,526.31) 84,344,325.29 1,183,586.57
'(660,486.23) 23,537,065.14 (8,061,336.13)
$ 2,131,719,072.00 (33,984,979.28)
(5,946,106.82)
(3,845,548.10)
(503,317.33) 141,111.79 (17,577,027.52) 6,524,776.45 (150,945.56)
(3,560,491.22) 1,018,685.66 (3,984,235.65) 25,399.16 (654,262.89) 141,111.79 (68,898,388.59) 7,568,861.27 145,948,713.02 (519,374.44)
(4,331,024.11)
(492,474.86)
(799,616,558.67)
(164,566,936.56)
(131,819,294.12)
(170,642,221.03)
(25,027,023.93)
(47,564,188.84)
$(1,339,236,223.15) 994,850,504.44 711 2
The Texas A&M University System Management's Discussion and Analysis For the year ended August 31, 2009 Unaudited The Texas A&M University System presents its financial statements for fiscal year 2009,_ with comparative data for fiscal years 2008 and 2007. The emphasis of discussion will be for the current year. There are three financial statements presented: the Statement of Net Assets; the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets; and the Statement of Cash Flows.
The statements as presented are for the combined Texas A&M System. The A&M System is composed of ten institutions of higher education, seven agencies, a health science center, and the System administrative offices. The report also includes a blended component unit, the Texas A&M Research Foundation.
The member institutions of higher education offer a broad range of undergraduate and graduate degrees.
With locations in Canyon, Stephenville, Commerce, Texarkana, College Station, Prairie View, Galveston, Corpus Christi, Kingsville, and 'Laredo, the A&M System strives to meet the education needs of Texas.
The agencies of the A&M System include both engineering and agricultural research and.
extension agencies. The agencies provide research, service, and instruction to benefit the state.
The A&M Health Science Center continues to grow and expand., It includes a college of medicine, a college of dentistry, school of rural public health, a school of nursing, a pharmacy school and research divisions.
The A&M System educates about 115,000 students and reaches another 15 million people through service each year. With nearly 27,000 faculty and staff, the A&M System has a physical presence in 250 of the state's 254 counties and a programmatic presence in every Texas county.
Overview of the Financial Statements and Financial Analysis The A&M System presents its financial statements for fiscal year 2009. The statements are prepared in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board pronouncements, the requirements of the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, and the guidelines from the National Association of College and University Business Officers.
Balance Sheet The Balance Sheet presents current and non-current assets and liabilities and net assets (assets minus liabilities) as of the end of the fiscal year. The statement presents a snapshot of the A&M System as of the end of the fiscal year. Current and non-current presentation is discussed in the notes to the financial statements.
Readers of the Balance Sheet are able to determine the assets available to continue the operations of the system. They are also able to determine the amount the system owes to vendors, investors, and lending institutions.
The statement also provides a picture of net assets (assets minus liabilities) and their availability for expenditure by the A&M System.
798-i
The Texas A&M University System Management's Discussion and Analysis For the year ended August 31, 2009' Unaudited Net assets are divided into three major categories. The first category, invested in capital assets, net of debt, provides the system's equity in property, plant and equipment owned by the system.
Restricted net assets are divided into two categories, non-expendable and expendable.
The corpus of the non-expendable restricted resources is available for investment purposes and the earnings are used for support of the institutions. The non-expendable restricted net assets consist of the system's endowment funds. Expendable restricted net assets are available for expenditure by the system, but must be spent for purposes as determined by donors and/or external entities that have placed time or purpose restrictions on the use of the assets. The final category is unrestricted net assets.
Unrestricted net assets are available for any lawful purpose of the system. Although unrestricted net assets are not subject to externally imposed stipulations, substantially all of the system's unrestricted net assets have been designated for various academic and research programs anid initiatives.
Balance Sheet (in millions of dollars) 2009 2008 2007 Assets Current Assets
$ 1,492
$1,424
$ 1,348 Capital Assets, Net 2,584 2,224 1,966 Other Assets 2,542 2,497 2,643 Total Assets 6,618
$6,145
$ 5,957 Liabilities Current Liabilities 976
$ 1,090
$ 1,018 Non-Current Liabilities 2,037 1,575 1,427 Total liabilities
-3, 013
$ 2,665
$ 2,445 Net Assets Invested in Capital Assets, Net of Debt
$1,085 928 729 Restricted Expendable 397 297 283 Non-Expendable 341 465 496 Unrestricted 1,782 1,790 2,004 Total Net Assets
$ 3,605
$ 3,480
$ 3,512 Total Liabilities & Net Assets
$ 6,618
$ 6,145
$5,957 The Balance Sheet indicates an increase in total assets of 7.7%. The most significant increase in assets is the 61% increase in construction in progress. The net capital assets in 2009 are $2.6 billion, an increase of $360 million from the 2008 balance of $2.2 billion.
Liabilities increased 13% from the 2008 amount of $2.7 billion to $3.0 billion in 2009. There are two significant factors in this increase.
The A&M System issued bonds in 2009 for a net 798-ii
'The Texas A&M University System Management's Discussion and Analysis For the year ended August 31, 2009 Unaudited increase in Bonds payable of $478 million. The A&M System recognized Other Postemployment Benefits of $80 million for a total recognized liability of $220 million. This accrued liability is being amortized over 30 years.
The final section of the statement presents the net assets of the system. Net assets increased approximately 3.6% from the 2008 amount of $3.48 billion to $3.6 billion in 2009. Invested in capital assets net of debt increased 18% in 2009 reflecting the increase in capital assets.
Endowment and permanent fund expendable restricted assets increased approximately 41.5%.
These are assets that have external restrictions and may be spent only in the manner defined by the external party. Endowment and permanent funds non-expendable net assets decreased to
$340 million from the 2008 amount of $453 million for a decrease of 25%. Non-expendable net assets represent the true endowments held by the A&M System.
The earnings from these endowments are available* for the use of the System as defined by the terms of the endowment.
Unrestricted net assets are primarily designated for the support of the A&M System.
The following table presents a summary of the commitments on unrestricted net assets.
Unrestricted Net Assets as of August 31, 2009 (in millions of dollars)
Reserwd For:
Accounts Receivable 673 Encumbrances 89 Capital Projects 110 Retirement of Indebtedness 103 Inventories 26 Higher Education Fund 25 Available University Fund 76 Self-Insured Plans 61 Prepaid.Expenses and Other Reserves 67 Other State Funds 76 Unreserved Allocated 355 Funds Functioning As Endowments 121 Total Unrestricted Net Assets
$ 1,782 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets The Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets presents the revenues earned and the expenses incurred during the year. Activities are reported as operating or-non-operating.
The Governmental Accounting Standards Board requires that state appropriations and federal Pell Grants be reported as non-operating revenue. This will generally result in an operating deficit for most public institutions.
The utilization of long-lived assets, referred to as Capital Assets, is reflected in the financial statements as depreciation, which amortizes the cost of an asset over its expected useful life.
798-iii
The Texas A&M University System Management's Discussion and Analysis For the year ended August 31, 2009 Unaudited The purpose of this statement is to present the revenues received by the A&M System, both operating and non-operating, and the expenses paid by the Ak)v System. both operating and non-operating and any other revenues, expenses, gains and losses received or spent by the system.
The change in total net assets as presented on the Statement of Net Assets is a result of these activities. -
Operating revenues are received for providing goods and services to the various customers and constituencies of the A&M System. Operating expenses are those expenses paid to acquire goods and services provided in return for the operating revenues. Non-operating revenues are revenues received for which goods and services are not provided. State capital appropriations and capital grants and gifts are considered neither operating nor non-operating revenues and are reported after "Income before other revenues, expenses, gains or losses."
The condensed Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets reflects a significant increase in Net Assets of $127 million for a 3.6% increase. This increase is primarily due to the increase in Available University Funds. The payroll related costs and related liability include $80 million for Other Postemployment Benefits.
Statement of Rewnues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets (in millions of dollars) 2009 2008 2007 Operating Revenues 1,800 1,677 1,605 Operating Expense (3,173)
(3,008)
(2,654)
Operating Income (Loss)
(1,373)
(1,331)
(1,049)
Non-Operating Revenues and Expense 1,072 1,087 1,185 Income (Loss) Before Other Revenues, Expenses, Gains orLosses (301)
(244) 136 Other Revenues, Expense, Gains (Losses) 428 216 159 Increase in Net Assets 127 (28) 295 Net Assets at Beginning of Year 3,480 3,512 3,222 Restatement of Prior Year Balance (2)
(4)
(5)
Net Assets at Beginning of Year-As Adjusted 3,478 3,508 3,217 Net Assets at End of Year 3,605
$ 3,480 3,512 Operating revenues of the A&M System increased 7.3% to $1.8 billion from the 2008 amount of
$1.7 billion. The increase is attributed to an increase in student enrollment and also an increase in designated tuition and student fees. Federal revenue increased $32.2 million or 7.6% from the 2008 $422.6 million total.
798-iv
The Texas A&M University System Management's Discussion and Analysis For the year ended August 31, 2009 Unaudited During the 2009 fiscal year, operating expense increased $164 million or 5.5%. Operating expense changes were seen in several categories of expense. The most significant changes were:
> Salaries and wages increased 8.3 )% or $111 million, this amount is comprised of faculty, staff, and hourly salaries.
Scholarships increased 14.1% from 2008 amount of $121.9 million to $139.1 million in.
2009.
> Payroll related costs decreased 8.4% to $428.4 million'in 2009 from the 2008 amount of
$467.8 million. The Other Post Employment Benefits recognition for 2009 is $40 million less in 2009 from the 2008 $120 million amount.
Non-operating Revenues and Expenses for 2009 is $1.07 billion, a reduction of 1.4% or $15.1 million from the 2008 amount of $1.1 billion. The decline in markets and unrealized losses on investments resulted in a reduction in investment income of ($140.8 million) for 2009 to net investment income of $54.9 million. Legislative revenue increased $17.5 million to $997.1 million from the 2008 amount of $979.6 million.
Other Revenues, Expense, Gains (Losses) and Transfers increased 97.9% to $428 million. The Available University Fund revenue amount increased from the 2008 amount of $154.7 million to
$376.8 million in 2009 for a 143.6% increase.
Net assets for 2009 increased $127.7 million to $3,605 million. This represents approximately a 4%. increase in net assets. The change in net assets represents the results of activities for 2009.
The following graph presents total revenues for 2009. Revenues are presented as operating and non-operating in the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets.
798-v
The Texas A&M University System Management's Discussion and Analysis For the year ended August 31, 2009 Unaudited 2009 Revenues
$3.4 Billion Non-Governmental Sponsored Programs, Other, 6.8%
0.1%
Federal, State and Local Grants; 15.4%
Auxiliary Enterprises, 6.3%
Net Other Sales and Services, 4.2%
Professional Fees, I
0.3%
Student Tuition and Fees, 17.0%
State Appropriations, 29.5%
Federal Appropriations &
Grants, 5.3%
Gifts, 4.3%
AUF Income, 10.8%
The following two'graphs present operating expenses of $3.2 billion. The first graph presents the operating expenses in the National Association of College and University Business Officer functional classification and the second graph presents operating expense in the natural classification.
798-vi
The Texas A&M University System Management's Discussion and Analysis For the year ended August 31, 2009.
Unaudited NACUBO Function 2009 Operating Expenses
$3.2 Billion Instruction, 32.72%
Depreciation, 4.81%
Auxiliary, 8.9 5 ° %
Scholarships &
Fellowships, 3.63%_
Operation &
Maintenance of Plant, 6.97%
Institutional J Support,7.10%
Student Service, 3.71%
Research, 19.4 1%
Public Service, 6.42%
\\
UAcademic Support, 6.28%
- 798-vii
The Texas A&M University System Management's Discussion and Analysis For the year ended August 31,2009 Unaudited Natural Classification 2009 Operating Expenses
$3.2 Billion Salaries, Wages, &
Other Operating..
Payroll Costs, Expense, 8.56%/
58.97%
Scholarships &
Fellowships, 4.39%
Depreciation, 4.81%
Repairs &
Maintenance, 2.74% Communication &
Utilities, 3.44%
Materials & Supplies, Travel, 2.21 Se Professiona, Fees &
7.55%
Expense of the System also includes non-operating expense of $79.7 million for $3.3 billion total expense. The non-operating expense is an 8.8% decrease from the 2008 $87.4 million. The decrease is due to decreased investing activities expense of 45% from $9.8 million in 2008 to
$5.3 million in 2009. Interest expense and fiscal charges also decreased by approximately $5 million.
Statement of Cash Flows The final statement presented is the Statement of Cash Flows. This statement presents detailed information about the cash activity during the year. The statement has 5 sections. The first section presents operating cash flows and the net cash used by operating activities. The next section presents the results of non-capital financing activities. This section includes the cash flows from state appropriations and other non-operating activities.
The capital and related financing activities section includes cash used for acquisition and construction of capital assets:
The investing activities section shows purchases, proceeds, and earnings from investments. The final section is a reconciliation of net cash from operations to operating income.
798-viii
The Texas A&M University System Management's Discussion and Analysis For the year ended August 31, 2009 Unaudited Statement of Cash Flois (in millions of dollars) 2009 2008 2007 Cash Provided (used) by:
Operating Activities
$ (1,144)
S (1,015)
(959)
Non-Capital Financing Activities 1,485 1,318 1,162 Capital and Related Financing Activities (158)
(294)
(314)
Investing Activities (176) 18 131 Net Change in Cash 7
27 20 Cash, Beginning of Year 285 259 239 Restatement, Beginning Cash
- (1) 285 258 239 Cash, End of Year 292 285 259 Capital Asset and Debt Administration The A&M System is committed to continuing to improve the quality of its academic, research, and service programs through the development and renewal of its capital assets. The System continues to implement its long-range plan to modernize its older teaching and research facilities along with plans for new construction.
The long-range plan includes the-planning and construction of four new campuses in-Bryan, San Antonio, Killeen and Texarkana.
Capitalized expenses for construction in progress during 2009 totaled $193 million as compared to $253 million.in 2008. This represents projects that have been substantially completed and moved to the appropriate capital asset categories.
The A&M System had significant capital asset additions for facilities in 2009. There are many construction projects in various stages of completion including major projects managed by the System Offices and minor projects managed by the members. These projects represent $434 million in payments for construction in progress during 2009. The major projects planned for the next two years are:
798-ix
The Texas A&M University System Management's Discussion, and Analysis For the year ended August 31, 2009 Unaudited Projected Fiscal Year Completion Projected Budget Campus/Project Name Texas A&M University Interdisciplinary Life Sciences Building Mitchell Physics Buildings McFerrin Athletic Center/Indoor Athletic Facility Veterinary Research Building Addition Reed Arena Expansion Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Facility Upgrade of Central and Southside Utility Plants Chemistry Complex Renovation Chemistry Building '72 Wing 4th floor Renovation Satellite Utility Plant Chiller I Upgrade Ross Street Utility Improvements Zachry Fire and Life Safety Upgrade Rehab/Strengthen Runway 16/34 Easterwood Airport High Mast Lighting Improvements Kyle Field Renovation Feasibility Study Student Health Center Feasibility Study Emerging Technologies & Economic Development Texas Institute for Pre-Clinical Studies University Apartments Lab Animal Resources and Research Facility Expansion YMCA Building Renovation Ross Street Extension and Paving Vet Imaging and Cancer Treatment Center Texas A&M University at Galveston Science Building The Texas A&M University System - Health Science Center IBT Animal Facility Renovation Health Professions Education Building Medical Research & Education Building
=
2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 2011 201 r 2011 2011 2011 2010 2010 2011 2011 96,857,276 82,500,000 35,600,000 25,477,265 22,021,000 15,426,600 13,500,000 11,447,736 9,850,000 9,600,000 4,645,000 4,300,000 3,345,000 582,000 425,000 175,000 104,000,000 47,807,029 35,500,000 12,914,680 12,000,000 6,469,200 4,500,000 53,200,000 4,852,874 68,000,000 63,372,000 798-x
The Texas A&M University System Management's Discussion and Analysis For the year ended August 31, 2009 Unaudited Prairie View A&M University John B. Coleman Library Exterior Repairs Sports Complex Development Plan Tarleton State University New Dining Hall Campus-Master Plan Central Plant Loop Dairy Center Nursing Building New Student Housing Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Wellness Center Harte Research Institute Building University Center Expansion Feasibility Study Island Hall Michael and Karen O'Connor Building Texas A&M International University Student Success Center Kinesiology Facilities Loop Road and Chill Water Loop Completion Fine Arts Theater Texas A&M University-Kingsville Recreation Sports Center Citrus Center Building Rhode Hall Renovation Memorial Student Union Feasibility Study West Texas A&M University Classroom Center Renovation Campus Master Plan Update Texas A&M University-Texarkana Science and Technology Building 2010 2010
.2010 2010.
2011 2011 2012 2012 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 3,749,660 227,000 12,996,000 450,000 15,500,000 11,124,000 21,693,010 13,800,000 21,800,000 17,375,000
.170,000 45,000,000 25,000,000 25,965,000 12,510,000 7,626,600 4,950,000 12,000,000 9,540,000 5,500,000 200,000 17,800,000 110,000 20,643,235 798-xi
The Texas A&M University System Management's Discussion and Analysis For the year ended August 31, 2009 Unaudited Texas A&M University-Commerce Music Building New Student Center 2010 2010 Texas A&M University-Central Texas Classroom/Office Building Texas A&M University-San Antonio Multipurpose Building Texas AgriLife Research Agriculture Headquarters Building Texas Engineering Extension Service Wastewater System Upgrade, Brayton Fire Training Field Texas Transportation Institute TTI State Headquarters and Research Building 2012 2012 2012 2010 2010 29,607,000 25,400,000 25,000,000 40,000,000 110,000,000 17,268,000 18,883,000 1,320,255,165 TOTAL The A&M System understands its role of financial stewardship and works to manage its resources effectively, including the prudent use of debt to finance capital projects.
During fiscal year 2009, the A&M System issued bonds under the Revenue Financing System debt program to refund a portion of the previously outstanding commercial paper notes and to provide approximately $286.7 million of funding for new projects and issuance costs.
The Revenue Financing System Bonds, Series 2009AB had a par amount of $329,820,000 with a true interest cost of 4.11%. Refunding associated with this bond issue resulted in over $885,000 of total savings or approximately $867,000 of net present value savings equating to a net present value benefit of 11.52%.
Revenue Financing System Commercial Paper was issued in the amount of $32,565,000 to provide interim funding for projects. In addition, the A&M System issued bonds under the Permanent University Fund debt program to refund a portion of previously outstanding bonds and commercial paper notes and to provide approximately $114.1 million of funding for new projects and issuance costs. The Permanent University Fund Bonds, Series 2009AB had a par amount of $218,895,000 with a true interest cost of 4.83%. Refunding 798-xii
The Texas A&M University System Management's Discussion and Analysis For the year ended August 31, 2009 Unaudited associated with this bond issue resulted in over $844,000 of total savings or approximately
$837,000 of net present value savinfgs equating to a net present value benefit of 6.21%.
Permanent University Fund Commercial Paper in the amount of $100 million was issued to fund eligible projects. In fiscal year 2010, it is anticipated that $5 million of Tuition Revenue Bond projects will be initiated. The A&M System has sufficient debt capacity to finance planned facilities and other capital improvements.
In addition, the State appropriated amounts are sufficient for the reimbursement of tuition used to pay the debt service on all outstanding and planned Tuition Revenue Bond debt for the 2010.--=2011 biennium. For additional information concerning Capital Assets and Debt Administration, see the Notes to the Financial Statements.
Economic Outlook The first half of fiscal year 2009 was marked with credit contraction, falling housing prices and declines in equities and commodities. Coordinated efforts globally brought some relief to the credit markets, but uncertainty, remained as the recession was deeper and more widespread than was anticipated.
The second half of the fiscal year saw dramatic rebounds in the markets and the global economy seems to be on the road to recovery. But the question remains as to whether the recovery can be sustained. Extraordinary government spending is one of the factors driving the increased economic activity and this cannot continue indefinitely without the possibility of higher inflation. Until consumer spending and business-expenditures pick up, the recovery will be difficult to maintain. Labor market conditions remain weak as businesses are reluctant to hire permanent staff and workers are experiencing wage freezes or reductions. Since the close of the fiscal year, economic conditions have continued to improve and the markets have continued to rally, albeit with some volatility. Investors seem to be gaining confidence as their appetite for riskier asset categories has increased.
The A&M System's investment pools are well diversified across asset classes; however, the declines experienced early in the fiscal year had negative impacts on nearly every investment type. As the economy showed signs of improvement and the stock market rallied, the A&M System's portfolios have participated in the market increases especially in the publicly traded assets. Private investments are still under pressure with values lower under the new marked to market guidelines and the lack of opportunities for exiting the investments. Risks remain that uncertainty in the market could lead to declines in equities; however, the market dislocations have and will continue to provide opportunities to acquire assets at substantial discounts that will benefit performance of the portfolios over longer-term investment periods.
Significant Events During fiscal year 2009, several leadership changes occurred in the A&M System. Those appointments include:
798-xiii
The Texas A&M University System Management's Discussion and Analysis For the year ended August 31, 2009 Unaudited R. Bowen Loftin named interim President of Texas A&M University
> William A. Dugas named interim Director of Texas A&M AgriLife Research
> G. Kemble Bennett confirmed by the Board of Regents as Director of Texas Engineering Experiment Station.
> Marilyn Fowle was confirmed by the Board of Regents as Vice President for Finance and Administration for Texas A&M University-Kingsville.
> Joan Beckham, Vice President for Finance and Administration for Texas A&M University-Texarkana retired in September 2009.
Randy Rikel has been named interim Vice President for Finance and Administration for Texas A&M University-Texarkana.
> Vic Seidel has been named Assistant Agency Director and Chief Financial Officer for Texas Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory.
> Dr. Larry Lemanski confirmed by the Board of Regents as Provost and Vice President of Academic Affairs for Texas A&M University-Commerce.
> Dr. Mary Hendrix confirmed by the Board of Regents as Vice President of Student Access and Success for Texas A&M University-Commerce.
Mr. Randy VanDeven confirmed by the Board of Regents as Vice President of Institutional Advancement for Texas A&M University-Commerce.
The Texas A&M System continues to focus on its mission to serve the needs of the state of Texas. The continued enrollment growth, expansion of sponsored project activity, and the successful capital campaigns are an integral part of the future of the A&M System.
798-xiv
UNAUDITED THE TEXAS'A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM COMBINED STATEMENTS THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 798 -. xv
LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST For the 8 1 st Legislative Session Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 I
Submitted to the Governor ' Office of Budget, Planning and Policy and the Legislative Budget Board October 15, 2008
Texas A&M University Table of Contents Adm inistrator's Statem ent.......................................................
I O rganization C hart..................................................
7
- C ertification Statem ent..........................................................
8 Summary of Request 2A. Summary of Base Request by Strategy 9......
9 2B. Summary of Base Request by Method of Finance.........
12 2C. Summary of Base Request by Object of Expense..........................
16 2D. Summary of Base Request Objective Outcomes......,...,
is18 2E. Summary of Exceptional Items Request 2........
I.
2F. Summary of Total Request by Strategy........
2.2....
2G. Summary of Total Request Objective Outcomes.....................
2 6
- GR and GR Dedicated Baseline Report 30, Strategy. Requests 1.1.01 Operations Support......
32 1.1.03 Growth Supplement.............
35 1.1.05 Staff Group Insurance Premiums 36 1.1.06 Workers' Compensation Insurance.................
.37 1.1.08 Texas Public Education Grants.........
3......
- 8*.
38 1.1.10 Organized Activities...................
,.3..9..
2.1.01 E& G Space Support.....................
2.1.02 Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement 4.....
3.1.04 K eep Texas Scholars.
3.1.05 U niversity Bound........
45...................
3.2.01 Cyclotron Institute............................
46......
3.2.02 Sea G rant Program...........................
',48..................
2 0 48 3.2.03 Energy Resources Program.....................................
3.2.04 Public Policy Resource Laboratory..
52 3.2.05 Real Estate Research Center..
53 3.2.08 Competitive Knowledge Fund............................
55 3.3.01 School of A rchitecture.........................
56............
3.4.01 Faculty Reinvestm ent.......................................
5.8.....
3.4.03 Institutional Enhancem ent............................................
.59 3.4.07 Sum m er School........................................................
61 Exceptional Item Request 4A. Exceptional Item Request Schedule........................................
4B. Exceptional Items Strategy Allocation Schedule.........................
4C. Exceptional Items Strategy Request.......................................
Supporting Schedules 6A. Historically Underutilized Business........................................
6G. Homeland Security Funding.............................................
6H. Estimated Sources Inside / Outside the GAA Bill Pattern.............
.61. Allocation of the Biennial 10 Percent Reduction to Strategies...........
I. lligher E'ducation Schedules
], #Schedule I*A* Other Educational and General Income..................
Schedule 2 Grand Total,rEdUcational, General, and Other Funds...........
- >Schedule 3B Staff GI-ofp) Insurance Data Elements...
Schedule 4, Computation of OAS].......
ScliUle 5, Calculation of Retirement Proportionality and O RP D ifferential.................
Schedule 6, Capital
- *1 ndin g...............................
, Schedule 7, CUefrnt and Local Fund (General) Balances......................
Schedule 8, Personnel.............................................................
> ehed ule 9 enifures Associated with Utility Operations.............
,SchedUle 1 OA,*T*ition Revenue Bond Projects.................................
Sýchedlule I1 pca Iteni Information 3.2.0* Cclotron Institute 0
3.2.02S*Sa Grant Program.....................................
3.2.03 Energy Resources Program................................
S3'.2.04 Public Policy.. Resource Laboratory............................
S23.2.05 Real Estate Research Center....................................
0.
3.3,OI School of Architecture (Colonias).............................
Schedule 12A, Reconciliation of Formula Strategies to NACUBO F un*ctions of C ost...............................................................
f Schedule 12B,. Objects of Expense Detail for Formula Strategies and NACUBO 1 Fuunctions of Cost...................................
64 67 70 73 75 78 79 81 85 88 91 92 93 95 96 98 99 102 104 106 108 109 110 112 113
This page is intentionally blank.
ADMINISTRATOR'S STATEMENT DATE:
8/6/2008 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 TIME:
12:15:30PM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
PAGE:
1 of 6
Agency code':
711 Agency name: Texas A&M University THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Bill Jones, Chairman, Austin, Term Expires February 1, 2009 Erie Nye, Dallas, Term Expires February 1, 2009 John D. White, Vice Chairman, Houston, Term Expires February 1, 2009 Anthony Cullins, Student Regent, Dallas, Term Expires May 31, 2009 Lupe Fraga, Houston, Term Expires February 1, 2011 Gene Stallings, Powderly, Term Expires February 1,2011 Ida Clement Steen, San Antonio, Term Expires February 1, 2011 Morris Foster, Houston, Term Expires February 1, 2013 J.L. Huffines, Dallas, Term Expires February 1, 2013 James P. Wilson, Sugar Land, Term Expires February 1, 2013 EXCEPTIONAL ITEM REQUESTS The Exceptional Items requested in Texas A&M University's Legislative Appropriations Request are as follows:
- 1.
University Bound!
- 2.
Keeping Texas Scholars in Texas TUITION REVENUE BOND REQUEST The Tuition Revenue Bond requested in Texas A&M University's Legislative Appropriations Request is for Facilities Renewal.
ADMINISTRATOR'S STATEMENT Texas A&M University's purpose is to "develop leaders of character dedicated to serving the greater good." This purpose statement reflects on the University's unique responsibility as a land-grant institution for the State of Texas and its founding heritage as the state's first institution of higher education in 1876 to essentially "educate the masses."
Today, Texas A&M holds the distinction as one of the few institutions nationwide that also holds sea-and space-grant status. As the flagship university for The Texas A&M University System, Texas A&M is recognized as a Tier One national research institution, with membership in the prestigious American Association of Universities.
Texas A&M's enrollment includes more than 46,500 students (fall 2007), which ranks seventh nationally, and the University conducts research valued at more than $550 million annually, which ranks among the top 20 institutions nationwide.
Texas A&M continues to be focused on one goal: to be one of the top 10 public institutions of higher education in the country by the year 2020. This ambitious goal is codified in the University's long-range strategic plan, better known as Vision 2020. Six imperatives, or areas of emphasis, have been established in order to better focus the Vision 2020 effort: Elevating the faculty, improving diversity and globalization, improving the undergraduate and graduate academic experience, enhancing physical space and infrastructure, enlightening governance and attaining resource parity. Adhering to these six imperatives has empirically moved Texas A&M forward and is essential to the University's contribution to the state's "Closing the Gaps" plan for higher education.
The state's current distribution methodology and level of base and formula funding is the foundation upon which~the University relies to fulfill its core missions of
2 ADMINISTRATOR'S STATEMENT DATE:
8/6/2008 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 TIME:
12:15:30PM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
PAGE:
2 of 6
Agency code:
711 Agency name: Texas A&M University teaching, research andpublic service. We are grateful for that funding and recognize that the legislature has the obligation to fund many other necessary and worthy state services. However, the level of funding does not fully address the costs of base operations for nationally competitive research universities, given their increased costs of faculty salaries, research support and equipment, and overall infrastructure demands. With several universities in Texas approaching research university status, Texas A&M respectfully asks that the legislature maintain, and intensify its funding for the state's two existing public research universities as it begins to provide the support needed for other universities to earn such status.
As we seek to earn legislative support for stronger base funding, we remain committed to keeping Texas A&M affordable and accessible for students across the state who hofd high academic, scholastic, and leadership promise. This past fall, the University held its increase in tuition and fees to 4.99%, or $7.25 per semester credit hour, the lowest such increase in nearly a decade.
Even with the rise in the cost of tuition, Texas A&M continues to attract record numbers of applicants, more than 24,000 students applied for admission for Fall 2008-an increase of 2,100 students over the previous year. The Class of 2012 includes more than 8,200 students, the largest freshman class in the university's 132-year history, signaling that Texas A&M is committed to "Closing the Gaps" and continues to be a good value, particularly for a Tier One research institution. The University continues to be ranked annually by "U.S. News & World Report" and "Kiplinger's"' in their "best value" categories.
Following is a summary of Texas A&M's progress in regards to Vision 2020, with related additional funding requests:
Elevating the Faculty: Through the support of the Texas Legislature, Texas A&M has reached the completion of its Faculty Reinvestment Initiative, a bold effort that was initiated in the 78th Session to add 447 members to the University's faculty over a five-year period. Noted as the most ambitious faculty expansion program in the history of U.S..higher education, the overall impact of this initiative has been a reduction in the University's faculty-student ratio and increased research expenditures, which are critical to a Tier One research institution.
More specifically, Texas A&M has replaced more than 115 faculty teaching and research positions that were lost between 1992 and 2002, which has contributed to the continuing decrease in the University's student-faculty ratio from 22.5:1 in 2001 to 19.5:1 in 2007. It must be noted that Texas A&M's overall enrollment has also increased by 2,000 students over this same time period. These faculty members have contributed greatly to the University's overall research portfolio. In Texas A&M's nationally ranked College of Engineering, the 103 faculty members added as part ofthe this Initiative have brought in more than $65 million in external research funding. Of these faculty, 3 were members of the National Academy of Engineering and 13 were recipients of the prestigious National Science Foundation award for junior faculty, contributing to the College of Engineering's national ranking of 7th for graduate programs and 9th for undergraduate programs. In addition, 7 of Texas A&M's II engineering degree programs are now ranked in the top 10 nationally.
While the Faculty Reinvestment Initiative addressed the need for additional teaching faculty on the Texas A&M campus, additional-funding through the Texas Competitive Knowledge Fund (CKF) is requested to provide an acceleration in research. Established in the 80th Session to support instructional excellence and research, $95 million was appropriated to the Fund, of which Texas universities with research expenditures in excess of $50 million annually are eligible to participate. Allocations from the Fund are based on these research expenditures - for every $10 million of research expenditures, the Legislature allocates $1 million to the university's budget. Based on FY2003 research expenditures, the Fund generated approximately $40 million for Texas A&M for the current biennium, which was used to support salary commitments through the Faculty Reinvestment Initiative.
Texas A&M requests that the Legislature increase the allocation to this incentive-based Fund and increase the distribution to the participating universities based on a $10
3 ADMINISTRATOR'S STATEMENT DATE:
8/6/2008 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 TIME:
12:15:30PM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
PAGE:
3 of 6
Agency code:
711 Agency name: Texas A&M University million to $2 million match. The resulting addition of at least $40 million in allocations to Texas A&M through the Fund would enable the University to recruit and hire approximately 20 established "superstar" researchers in specific areas of statewide importance, based on the institution's Academic Master Plan, who will then be able to leverage the state's investment to secure additional research funding. Additional funding will directly address the Academic Excellence and Research goals for the state outlined in "Closing the Gaps," in terms of the state's two flagship universities achieving top-10 status, increasing Texas' level of federal science and engineering research and development obligations, and increasing research expenditures. The overall benefit to the state will be accelerated science and technology contributions to the state's economy through new discoveries and technology commercialization.
Improving Diversity and Globalization: Texas A&M has made significant strides in increasing the number of underrepresented students on campus, particularly at the undergraduate level. The Class of 2012 is projected to include the highest number of Hispanic and African-American freshman in the University's history, with more than 1,400 and 300, respectively. These numbers represent a 20% increase over the previous year. In addition, approximately 25% of the freshman class are 1st generation college students, another key indicator that Texas A&M is serving the state's Underrepresented population. For graduate students, the University has experienced a 62.2%
increase in the number of African-Americans and a 37.9% increase in Hispanics pursuing advanced degrees since 2003.
Much of this success in diversifying Texas A&M's student body can be attributed to the University's 8 Prospective Student Centers located in key locations across the state. These'centers are jointly staffed with admissions and financial aid experts, with a goal of simplifying the pathway from high school to admission into Texas A&M. In addition, the University has focused on targeted, high-touch recruitment, earlier financial aid decisions and earlier admissions.
However, the number of Hispanic and African-American students at Texas A&M is still relatively small, and there is more the University can do to reach these populations.
The pool of Hispanic and African-American students from which Texas A&M can recruit is very small. According to the most recent data available, there were 76,000 Hispanic high school graduates in the state, with 40,000 of these students taking a college entrance placement exam. Of these 40,000 Hispanic students, only 4,450 scored at or above the TEA criterion score of either 1110 on the SAT or 24 on the ACT. For African-American students, there were 27,000 high school graduates, with 18,000 of these students taking a college entrance placement exam. Of these 18,000 students, only 1,400 scored at or above the criterion. Given this small pool, the competition for high-achieving Hispanic and African-American amongst the state's universities has become intense, and includes renowned out-of-state institutions such as Stanford, North Carolina, Harvard and others. This competition directly affects the number of minority students who actually enroll at Texas A&M.
To address this issue, Texas A&M requests an Exceptional Item titled "University Bound!" which builds upon. the Early College Education Program established by the 79th Legislature. This legislation authorized the use of funds to establish programs that provide college credit to high school students in grades 9-12. Initial indications are that these programs include larger percentages of underrepresented students who do better in school and are better prepared for college. Most of these Early College High Schools have partnered with community colleges, while a few have partnered with regional four-year institutions. Unfortunately, there is not an established pathway for these students to attend a flagship, Tier One institution such as TexasA&M.
The University requests $8 million over the biennium for the "University Bound!" program, which will hire 20 academic program counselors who will work with the Early College High Schools or other high schools with linkages to the Prospective Student Centers to provide direct support for students, families and teachers. These counselors will establish training programs for the college entrance exams and develop summer academic camps to transition students into Texas A&M. In addition, the University will provide matching scholarships from Texas A&M donors. This addresses the Participation and Success goals outlined in "Closing the Gaps" by increasing the participation in higher education by Hispanics and African-Americans, while also increasing the number of minorities completing degrees, particularly in engineering and the health sciences. These students will be afforded admission to a flagship institution, allowing them to receive a world-class education and be exposed to educational opportunities not offered by community colleges and regional universities.
4 ADMINISTRATOR'S STATEMENT DATE:
8/6/2008 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 TIME:
12:15:30PM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
PAGE:
4 of 6
Agency code:
.711 Agency name: Texas A&M University Improving Undergraduate and Graduate Academic Experience: At the core of this Vision 2020 imperative is the implementation of "The Murano Report," which is a series of recommendations based on the university-wide Report on Enhancing the Undergraduate Experience. Five overarching goals comprise The Murano Report: Enhance opportunities for undergraduates to participate in inquiry and research-based education, increase faculty interactions with undergraduates through smaller classes, assess undergraduate programs and advising, raise funds for study abroad scholarships, and increase opportunities for students to participate in learning communities.
Significant progress has been made toward these goals over the past few years. In Spring 2008, Texas A&M had its largest participation ever in Student Research Week, with 33% of the presenters representing the undergraduate ranks. The number of freshman classes at Texas A&M with fewer than 30 students has increased 15% over the past 4 years. More than 2,400 freshmen, or 32% of the incoming class, now participate in learning communities. The result has been a 15% increase in the University's 4-year'graduation rate over a 3-year period, while Texas A&M continues to significantly outpace the 4-, 5-and 6-year statewide graduation rates.
To address Texas A&M's graduate academic experience, the University requests an Exceptional Item to "Keep Texas Scholars in Texas." Graduate students are the key to building, maintaining and growing successful research programs for the State of Texas. Attracting high-tech companies to Texas hinges on the availability of a well-trained workforce With advanced degrees. Unfortunately, the state is experiencing a "brain drain" in terms of students pursing graduate degrees outside the state. Out of 48 Texas students who competed in the National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship Program, 32 of these left the state in pursuit of a graduate degree.
This Exceptional Item request will create an incentive fellowship program that entices students graduating from a Texas university with a bachelor's degree to pursue a graduate education in the state. Texas A&M requests $5.4 million over the biennium to support 60 graduate students for 2 years with an annual $30,000 stipend. This initiative is vital to stop the "brain drain" and ensure that Texas' best and brightest contribute to the economic growth of the state. This program will increase the pipeline for the next generation of scientists and university researchers in Texas. This Item addresses the Success goal for the state in "Closing the Gaps" by increasing the number of students completing doctoral degrees at Texas universities.
Enhancing Physical Space and Infrastructure: To meet the demand of the increased number of faculty and the overall growth of the student body, Texas A&M is in the midst of a major expansion of the physical campus. More than $800 million in new construction is either underway or in the planning stages, another record for the University and one of the largest such undertakings in higher education. Some of the more notable projects include the $100 million Interdisciplinary Life Sciences Building, 2 new physics buildings funded by a generous gift from George P. Mitchell'40, the Texas Institute for Preclinical Studies and the Veterinary Medicine Research Tower addition. These projects combine resources from the University, Texas Legislature, Permanent University Fund and fund raising with the assistance of Texas A&M former students. Texas A&M has also initiated a process in which future construction will, be prioritized according to the Academic Master Plan.
Despite the tremendous amount of new construction on the campus, adequate space for teaching and research by the University's world-class faculty is at a premium.
Many of Texas A&M's historical and heavily used buildings are in dire need of modern electrical and HVAC systems, technology-enabled classroom space and ADA accommodations. Infrastructure funds provided to the University by the Legislature have been used to cover the ever-escalating costs of utilities, leaving little funding for adequate maintenance of Texas A&M's existing buildings and infrastructure.
Texas A&M requests a Tuition Revenue Bond of $95 million to begin a Facilities Renewal process, which is expected to span over several Legislative Sessions. This initiative will'restore two key instructional facilities that are also of historic significance, while also providing for efficient, modern and safe classrooms and offices in other existing facilities across the campus. This TRB will significantly enhance Texas A&M's ability to address the Excellence goal outlined in "Closing the Gaps," in addition to enhancing the academic experience of students and the University's ability to recruit and retain top faculty.
5 ADMINISTRATOR'S STATEMENT DATE:
8/6/2008 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 TIME:
12:15:30PM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
PAGE:
5 of 6'
Agency code:
711 Agency name: Texas A&M University Enlightening governance: Texas A&M is committed to a culture of collaboration and communication amongst students, faculty and staff across the campus. Several university-wide councils have been established to supplement regular standing committees and provide an avenue for stakeholder groups to provide input, feedback and suggestions to University administrators and ensure that issues of importance are given proper attention and resolution. Newly formed groups include the Council on Climate and Diversity, which was established in Fall 2007, and University Staff Council, which began meeting in Fall 2008.
Attaining resource parity: In 2004, the percentage of Texas A&M's budget funded by tuition and fees surpassed the percentage of state appropriations for the first time in the University's history. In an era of increasing utilities and infrastructure costs and the highly competitive environment for research institutions, students and their families have had to shoulder this increasing burden through rising tuition and fees. Texas A&M is committed to addressing the rising costs of higher education through a partnership with the Texas Legislature, while also generating additional revenue streams through philanthropy, technology commercialization, sponsored research, corporate partnerships and other avenues.
As part of the Texas A&M University System, following is a summary of priority funding needs for all of higher education, policy statements regarding background checks and a summary of a 10% reduction.
Base funding: We request the legislature fund growth in all higher education formulas and using the Higher Education or another recognized cost index fund the increased cost of doing business for'basic, on-going educational, general and student support operations. This includes providing increased base funding for the Texas A&M System Agencies' core operations.
Teaching Excellence: Additional funding is requested to recognize and reward outstanding faculty. through the Chancellor's Teaching Excellence Awards initiative.
Facilities Renewal: As stated above in the TRB request for Texas A&M University, existing E&G and campus infrastructure have reached the point where the need to invest funds to renew these facilities is critical throughout the Texas A&M System.
StudentFinancial Aid: Texas A&M University joins in requesting increased funds for student financial aid to help make higher education more affordable for more Texas families, however, not at the expense of funding to the universities.
Incentive Funding: We support accountability and performance through incentive funding in addition to our base funding needs.
Research: As stated above, Texas A&M University requests the legislature increase funding for the Competitive Knowledge Fund and the Research Development Fund by increasing the appropriations in these funds.
Higher Education Group Health Insurance: We request the legislature fund the increases in health care costs and enrollment (employee/retiree) growth.
Background Checks: Texas A&M University conducts background checks in accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 411 Texas Education Code Section 51.215.
It is our policy to conduct such checks on all employees being considered for employment at Texas A&M University.
10% Budget Reduction: We have distributed the 10% reduction among special items, including the Competitive Knowledge Fund. A reduction to this.fund would cause a
6 ADMINISTRATOR'S STATEMENT 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
81612008 TIME:
12:15:30PM PAGE:
6 of 6
Agency code:
711 Agency name: Texas A&M University reduction in faculty numbers or a rise in tuition to cover the reduced funding.
In summary, Texas A&M University, working in partnership with the Texas A&M System and the Legislature, has made significant progress over the past decade. With the state providing sufficient General Revenue, Exceptional Item Funding and access to Tuition Revenue Bonds; the University effectively managing costs and enhancing efficiencies, increasing private and federal funding and judiciously planning programs; and students and their families paying a "fair share" for excellence in education, Texas A&M can uphold excellence in higher education and keep the opportunity to attend a flagship, Tier One institution affordable. Affordability without excellence, however, is a promise for a meager future for Texas students and the state, while excellence without affordability is no promise at all. Working in partnership, Texas can have both, ensuring a future that the state's citizens deserve.
Organizational Structure - Texas A&M University 7
Boar of Reet EX7ASA&M 2
J
8 CE'R TIEF IC. AT E Agofny NittwTekas' A&M tiniversi~ty (711)
Thi., k~ 16 Owt~yt iitl'Ornfation coniainud'in Thv aigency: [Legislativi: Appropflatiom. Reqties! riled with tile 1'cgislatiae lRudge ord I d
B 1
an41dfile Otwc'rllor's Ofce ol' Budget, piauinint wnd Policy W10QBPP) is 'uCCIII-itetotIlle bcsi t ~fnu knowictdge ard tiau tile electronic 'othmNsi,~on to tile [-fill %iatIII, AlitonWted 130dPCI 311d IViluation-S)%Rtnl of"I tcis (ABEST I) and the Sound jpapur copictS :lie&.iauicat Addilionaliv. shoul kiit lecoonici ke.lyjat any tote I lit tlnlpe'dend
.1late Ot il tre1way cout the ji LJM rind t11e CU11H1P will lie nttittlt,iii,l wrtifim itlf accr(nletflCill Adulu'J l\\tIxtI(Ott-'
GiA A).
C1114elf orPsid ing idg Elsa A.Murano, Printed Name President Chief Finriu*l *fl.cer Terry',
Pa nkratz.
Printed Naitne Vice., President:fbrfinanrc and CFO,.
Daite Board or CommissiOct eair S
ýnatureý Bill.iones-.
Printed Name Chlairmun.
Date "I
9 2.A.
SUMMARY
OF BASE REQUEST BY STRATEGY 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1, Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
9:59:33AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University Goal / Objective STRATEGY Exp 2007 Est2008 Bud 2009 Req 2010 Req 2011 I
Provide Instructional and Operations Support I
Provide Instructional and Operations Support I OPERATIONS SUPPORT 5 STAFF GROUP INSURANCE PREMIUMS 6 WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE 8 TEXAS PUBLIC EDUCATION GRANTS 10 ORGANIZED ACTIVITIES 258,241,946 8,776,130 847,404 8,780,043 0
267,504,675 8,282,878 1,096,943 8,905,943 0
276,816,984 9,067,830 1,117,837 9,061,837 0
0 9,395,574 2,025,818 9,161,517 13,500,000 0
9,658,061 2,025,818 9,161,517 14,000,000 TOTAL, GOAL t
2 Provide Infrastructure Support 1
Provide Operation and Maintenance of E&G Space 1 E&G SPACE SUPPORT 2 TUITION REVENUE BOND RETIREMENT
$276,645,523
$285,790,439
$296,064,488
$34,082,909
$34,845,396 8,098,141 16,020,649 10,997,299 0
0 237,574 6,772,031 6,774,586 6,771,788 6,773,988
$8,335,715
$22,792,680
$17,771,885
$6,771,788
$6,773,988 TOTAL, GOAL 2
3 Provide Special Item Support 1
Instructional Support Special Item Support 4 KEEP TEXAS SCHOLARS 5 UNIVERSITY BOUND 2
Research Special Item Support 1 CYCLOTRON INSTITUTE 2 SEA GRANT PROGRAM 3 ENERGY RESOURCES PROGRAM 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1,076,775 466,818 531,766 1,091,986 601,866 585,244 1,127,999 619,695 593,293 548,154 359,678 551,765 548,154 359,678 551,765 2.A. Page 1 of 3
10 2.A.
SUMMARY
OF BASE REQUEST BY STRATEGY 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System o'fTexas (ABES'T)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
9:59:33AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University Goal / Objective / STRATEGY 4 PUBLIC POLICY RESOURCE LABORATORY 5 REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CENTER 8 COMPETITIVE KNOWLEDGE FUND 3
Public Service Special Item Support 1 SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE 4
Institutional Support Special Item Support 1 FACULTY REINVESTMENT 3 INSTITUTIONAL ENHANCEMENT 7 SUMMER SCHOOL Exp 2007 82,667 2,713,177 0
Est 2008 93,613 3,100,000 20,263,734 883,057 0
0 31000,000 Bud 2009 96,726 3,020,000 20,263,732 Req 2010 41,244 3,296,652 0
750,274 0
4,417,488 0
Req 2011 41,244 3,375,206 0
817,641 910,249 750,274 23,390,043 0
0 0
0 0
0 4,417,488 0
TOTAL, GOAL 3
TOTAL, AGENCY STRATEGY REQUEST TOTAL, AGENCY RIDER APPROPRIATIONS REQUJEST*
$29,078,887
$29,619,500
$26,631,694
$9,965,255
$10,043,809
$314,060,125
$338,202,619
$340,468,067
$50,819,952
$51,663,193
$0
$0 GRAND TOTAL, AGENCY REQUEST
$314,060,125
$338,202,619
$340,468,067
$50,819,952
$51,663,193 2.A. Page 2 of 3
11 2.A.
SUMMARY
OF BASE REQUEST BY STRATEGY 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8(112008 TIME:
9:59:33AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University Goal / Objective / STRATEGY Exp 2007 Est 2008
,Bud 2009 Req 2010 Req 2011 METHOD OF FINANCING:
General Revenue Funds:
1 General Revenue Fund SUBTOTAL General Revenue Dedicated Funds:
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco 218,196,305
$218,196,305 245,757,297
$245,757,297 89,345,322
$89,345,322 242,459,023
$242,459,023 94,989,044
$94,989,044 15,466,209
$15,466,209 32,057,091
$32,057,091 15,468,409
$15,468,409 32,819,578
$32,819,578 93,150,643
$93,150,643 SUBTOTAL Other Funds:
969 Real Estate Trust Account SUBTOTAL TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCING
- Rider appropriations for the historical years are included in the strategy amounts.
2,713,177 3,100,000 3,020,000 3,296,652 3,375,206
$2,713,177
$3,100,000
$3,020,000
$3,296,652
$3,375,206
$314,060,125
$338,202,619
$340,468,067
$50,819,952
$51,663,193 2.A. Page 3 of 3
12
SUMMARY
OF BASE RECONCILIATION BY METHOD OF FINANCE 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE: 10/14/2008 TIME: 2:11:38PM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University METHOD OF FINANCING GENERAL REVENUE 1
General Revenue Fund REGULAR APPROPRIATIONS RIDER APPROPRIATION Article III Section 54 Special Item Appropriations
- TOTAL, General Revenue Fund Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 218,196,305 242,757,297 3,000,000
$245,757,297 242,459,023 0
0
$218,196,305
$242,459,023 TOTAL; ALL GENERAL REVENUE GENERAL REVENUE FUND - DEDICATED
$218,196,305
$245,757,297
$242,459,023 704 GR Dedicated - Estimated Board Authorized Tuition Increases Account No. 704 REGULAR APPROPRIATIONS Regular Appropriations Revised Receipts
- TOTAL, GR Dedicated - Estimated Board Authorized Tuition Increases Account No. 704 7,047,160 973,255
$8,020,415 7,601,991 879,209
$8,481,200 7,601,991 851,569
$8,453,560 708 GR Dedicated - Estimated Statutory Tuition Increases Account No. 708 REGULAR APPROPRIATIONS 2,522,337 0
0 lI.B. Page 1 of 4
13
SUMMARY
OF BASE RECONCILIATION BY METHOD OF FINANCE 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE: 10/14/2008 TIME: 2:11:38PM
- Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Tex METHOD OF FINANCING Revised Receipts
- TOTAL, GR Dedicated - Estimated Statutory Tuition Increases Account No. 708 xas A&M University Exp 2007
-429,556 Est 2008 0
Bud 2009 0
$2,092,781
$0
$0 770 GR Dedicated - Estimated Other Educational and General Income Account No. 770 REGULAR APPROPRIATIONS Revised Receipts Comments: FY07 - Adjust to actual revenue; FY08 - Adjust to expected revenue UNE,VPENDED BALANCES A UTH Art III Special Prov., Sec. 2, UB Comments: Unexpended balance from FY06 moved to FY07 Art IIl Special Prov., Sec. 2, UB Comments: Unexpended balance from FY08 moved to FY09
- TOTAL, GR Dedicated - Estimated Other Educational and General Income Account No. 770 TOTAL, ALL GENERAL REVENUE FUND - DEDICATED 71,271,266 7,144,885 4,621,296 0
74,035,551 10,647,217 74,465,869 8,961,087 0
-527,789 3,636,317
-3,818,646
$83,037,447
$80,864,122
$86,535,484
$93,150,643
$89,345,322
$94,989,044, OTHER FUNDS 969 Real Estate Fee Trust Account No. 969 REGULAR APPROPRIATIONS ll.B. Page 2 of 4
14
SUMMARY
OF BASE RECONCILIATION BY METHOD OF FINANCE 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Fvaiuation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency name:
Texas A&M University DATE: 10/14/2008 TIME: 2:11:38PM Agency code:
711 METHOD OF FINANCING Revised Receipts Comments: FY07 - Adjust to actual revenue; FY08 -Adjust to expected revenue UNEXPENDED BALANCES A UTH Art III Special Prov., Sec 2, UB Comments: Unexpended balances from FY07 moved to FY08
- TOTAL, Real Estate Fee Trust Account No. 969 Exp 2007 2,150,000 707,850
-144,673
$2,713,177 Est 2008 2,661,938 293,389 Bud 2009 2,721,100 298,900 144,673
.0
$3,100,000
$3,020,000 TOTAL, ALL OTHER FUNDS
$2,713,177
$3,100,000
$3,020,000
$314,060,125
$338,202,619
$340,468,067 GRAND TOTAL ll.B. Page 3 of 4
15
SUMMARY
OF BASE RECONCILIATION BY METHOD OF FINANCE DATE: 10/14/2008 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 TIME: 2:11:38PM Automated Budget and Evaluation System ofTexas (ABEST)
Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University METHOD OF FINANCING Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 FULL-TIME-EQUIVALENT POSITIONS REGULAR APPROPRIA TIONS Regular Appropriations 5,372.4 5,457.4 5,457.4 RIDER APPROPRIATION Art IX, See 6.14(a)(2), 2% FTE Reduction (2006-07 GAA)
-107.5 0.0
0.0 Comments
Mandated FTE Reduction REQUEST TO EXCEED ADJUSTMENTS Art IX, See 6.14(b), FTE Request to Exceed (2006-07 GAA) 309.5 0.0 0.0 Art IX, Sec 6.10(a), FTE Request to Exceed (2008-09 GAA) 0.0 193.5 283.9 UNA UTHORIZED NUMBER Adjust to Actual
-145.2
-100.1
-163.5 Comments: Adjust to actual average of the four quarterly FTE amounts reported to the State Auditor's office Total Adjusted FTES 5,429.2 5,550.8 5,577.8 NUMBER OF 100% FEDERALLY FUNDED FTEs 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.13. Page 4 of 4
16 2.C.
SUMMARY
OF BASE REQUEST BY OBJECT OF EXPENSE DATE:
8/I/2008 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 TIME:
10:01:41AM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University OBJECT OF EXPENSE Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL2010 BL 2011 1001 SALARIES AND WAGES
$97,762,779
$104,024,434
$94,047,394
$10,525,300
$10,586,451 1002 OTHER PERSONNEL COSTS
$5,918,766
$3,088,532
$5,654,222
$480,551
$493,600 1005 FACULTY SALARIES
$174,900,498
$192,177,399
$201,945,659
$4,523,391
$4,523,391 1010 PROFESSIONAL SALARIES
$3,847,634
$183,603
$121,475'
$125,119
$128,873 1015 PROFESSIONAL SALARIES
$2,083
$0
$0
$0
$0 2001 PROFESSIONAL FEES AND SERVICES
$1,681,673
$1,123,119
$996,960
$9,748
$9',748 2002 FUELS AND LUBRICANTS
$67,454
$59,274
$56,719
$3,826
$3,926 2003 CONSUMABLE SUPPLIES
$480,306
$468,696
$453,481
$37,748
$37,748 2004 UTILITIES
$2,229,045
$3,352,809
$3,019,897
$41,535
$42,035 2005 TRAVEL
$90,268
$130,323
$139,956
$121,972
$121,972 2006 RENT - BUILDING
$56,557
$42,293
$41,856
$17,353
$17,353 2007 RENT - MACHINE AND OTHER
$345,268
$257,016
$237,446
$39,012
$39,012 2008 DEBT SERVICE
$5,383
$5,317
$5,233
$0
$0 2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
$25,798,447
$33,121,263
$33,649,405
$34,894,397
$35,659,084 3001 CLIENT SERVICES
$128,483
$108,550
$98,364
$0
$0 3002 FOOD FOR PERSONS - WARDS OF STATE
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 4000 GRANTS
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 5000 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
$745,481
$59,991
$0
$0
$0 9999 NOT REL TO LBB TRACKING
$0
$0.
$0
$0
$0 2.C. Page I of 2
17 2.C.
SUMMARY
OF BASE REQU EST BY OBJECT OF EXPENSE 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
TIME:
911120%0 10:01:41AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University OBJECT OF EXPENSE Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011.
OOE Total (Excluding Riders)
OOE Total (Riders)
Grand Total
$314,060,125
$338,202,619
$340,468,067
$50,819,952
$51,663,193
$314,060,125
$338,202,619
$340,468,067
$50,819,952
$51,663,193 2.C. Page 2 of 2
18 2.D.
SUMMARY
OF BASE REQUEST OBJECTIVE OUTCOMES 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation system of Texas (ABEST)
Date : 8/1/2008 Time:
9:57:27AM Agency code: 711 Agency name:
Goal! Objective / Outcome Exp 2007 Est 2008 I
Provide Instructional and Operations Support 1 Provide Instructional and Operations Support KEY 1
% 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Frsh Earn Degree in 6 Yrs 76.90%
76.00%
2
% lst-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking White Frsh Earn Degree in 6 Yrs 78.20%
78.00%
3
% lst-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Hisp Frsh Earn Degree in 6 Yr 70.90%
69.00%
4
% 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Black Frsh Earn Degree in 6 Yrs 65.20%
64.00%
5
% 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Other Frsh Earn Deg in 6 Yrs 74.50%
73.50%
KEY 6
% 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs 36.50%
38.00%
7
% lst-time-Full-time, Degree-seeking White Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs 39.00%
42.50%
8 O/6 lst-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Hisp Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs 29.90%
32.00%
9
% 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Black Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs 22.20%
24.00%
10
% 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Other Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs 35.10%
36.00%
KEY 11 Persistence Rate of 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Frsh after lyr 89.20%
90.00%
12 Persistence Rate of 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking White Frsh-lyr 90.10%
91.00%
Texas A&M University Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 76.00%
78.00%
69.00%
64.00%
73.50%
39.00%
42.50%
32.50%
24.50%
36.50%
90.00%
91.00%
76.50%
78.00%
69.00%
65.00%
73.50%
40.00%
42.50%
32.50%
24.50%
37.00%
90.00%
91.00%
76.50%
78.00%
69.00%
65.00%
73.50%
41.00%
43.00%
33.00%
25.00%
37.50%
90.00%
91.00%
2.D. Page 1 of 3
19 2.D.
SUMMARY
OF BASE REQUEST OBJECTIVE OUTCOMES 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation system of Texas (ABEST)
Date:
8/1/2008 Time:
9:57:27AM Agency code: 711 Agency name:
Goal/ Objective / Outcome Exp 2007 Est 2008 13 Persistence Rate of lst-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Hisp Frsh-lyr 84.10%
86.00%
14 Persistence Rate of 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Black Frsh-lyr 87.90%
87.00%
15 Persistence lst-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Other Frsh after 1 Yr 85.20%
87.00%
16 Percent of Semester Credit flours Completed 96.10%
95.50%
KEY 17 Certification Rate of Teacher Education Graduates 94.40%
94.50%
18
% of Underprepared Students Who Satisfy a TSI Obligation 74.00%
75.00%
KEY 19
% of Baccalaureate Graduates Who Are 1st Generation College Graduates 30.70%
30.00%
20 Percent of Transfer Students Who Graduate within 4 Years 75.80%
75.00%
21 Percent of Transfer Students Who Graduate within 2 Years 11.70%
12.00%
KEY 22
% Lower Division Semester Credit Hours Taught by Tenured/Tenure Track 29.30%
30.00%
KEY 24 State Licensure Pass Rate of Engineering Graduates 84.00%
88.50%
KEY 27 State Licensure Examination Pass Rate of Veterinary Medicine Graduates 100.00%
99.00%
KEY 28 Dollar Value of External or Sponsored Research Funds (in Millions) 129.10 135.50 Texas A&M University Bud 2009 BBL 2010 BL 2011 86.50%
87.00%
87.00%
95.50%
94.50%
76.00%
30.00%
76.00%
13.00%
31.00%
88.50%
99.00%
139.60 86.50%
88.00%
87.00%
95.50%
95.00%
77.00%
30.00%
77.00%
14.00%
40.50%
88.50%
99.00%
143.80 86.50%
88.00%
87.00%
95.50%
95.40%
78.00%
30.00%
78.00%
15.00%
41.00%
88.50%
99.00%
148.10 2.1). Page 2 of 3
20 2.D.
SUMMARY
OFBASE REQUEST OBJECTIVE OUTCOMES Date : 8/1/2008 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Time:
9:57:27AM Automated Budget and Evaluation system of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code: 711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University Goal/ Objective / Outcome Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 29 External or Sponsored Research Funds As a % of State Appropriations 47.80%
46.55%
46.94%
48.35%
49.80%
30 External Research Funds As Percentage Appropriated for Research 8,600.93%
9,030.95%
9,301.78%
9,580.77%
9,868.21%
46 Value of Lost or Stolen Property 69,513.00 75,000.00 70,000.00 70,000.00 70,000.00 47 Percent of Property Lost or Stolen 0.16%
0.12%
0.10%
0.10%
0.10%
48 Percent of Endowed Professorships/Chairs Unfilled All/Part/Fiscal Year 13.70%
18.40%
18.40%
18.40%
18.40%
49 Average No Months Endowed Chairs Remain Vacant 10.60 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 2.D. Page 3 of 3
21 2.E.
SUMMARY
OF EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submissionr, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE: 8/1/2008 TIME : 10:02:45AM Agency code: 711 Agency name: Texas A&M University 2010 2011 Biennium GR and Item GR/GR Dedicated GR and FTEs GR Dedicated All Funds FTEs GR and GR Dedicated Priority All Funds All Funds I
University Bound!
2 Keeping Texas Scholars in Texas 3
Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement Total, Exceptional Items Request
$4,000,000
$1,800,000
$8,282,533
$4,000,000
$1,800,000
$8,282,533
$4,000,000
$3,600,000
$8,282,533
$4,000,000
$3,600,000
$8,282,533
$8,000,000
$5,400,000
$16,565,066
$29,965,066
$8,000,000
$5,400,000
$16,565,066
$29,965,066
$14,082,533
$14,082,533
$15,882,533
$15,882,533 Method of Financing General Revenue GeneralRevenue - Dedicated Federal Funds Other Funds
$14,082,533
$14,082,533
$15,882,533
$15,882,533
$29,965,066.
$29,965,066
$29,965,066
$29,965,066
$14,082,533
$14,082,533
$15,882,533
$15,882,533 Full Time Equivalent Positions Number of 100% Federally Funded FTEs 0.0 0.0 2.E. Page 1 ofl
22 2.F.
SUMMARY
OF TOTAL REQUEST BY STRATEGY 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME :
- 10:07:26AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University Base Base Exceptional Exceptional Total Request Total Request Goal/Objective/STRATEGY 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 I Provide Instructional and Operations Support 1 Provide Instructional and Operations Support 1 OPERATIONS SUPPORT 5 STAFF GROUP INSURANCEPREMIUMS 6 WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE 8 TEXAS PUBLIC EDUCATION GRANTS 10 ORGANIZED ACTIVITIES TOTAL, GOAL I 2 Provide Infrastructure Support I Provide Operation and Maintenance of E&G Space 1 E&G SPACE SUPP6RT 2 TUITION REVENUE BOND RETIREMENT TOTAL, GOAL 2
$0 9,395,574 2,025,818 9,161,517 13,500,000
$0 9,658,061 2,025,818 9,161,517 14,000,000
$0 0
0 0
0
$0 0
0 0
0
$0 9,395,574 2,025,818 9,161,517 13,500,000
$0 9,658,061-2,025,818 9,161,517 14,000,000
$34,082,909
$34,845,396
$0
$0
$34,082,909
$34,845,396 0
0 0
0 0
0 6,771,788 6,773,988 8,282,533 8,282,533 15,054,321 15,056,521
$6,771,788
$6,773,988
$8,282,533
$8,282,533
$15,054,321
$15,056,521 2.F. Page 1 of 4
23 2.F.
SUMMARY
OF TOTAL REQUEST BY STRATEGY 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME :
10:07:26AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University Base Base Exceptional Exceptional Total Request Total Request Goal/Objective/STRATEGY 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 3 Provide Special Item Support 1 Instructional Support Special Item Support 4 KEEP TEXAS SCHOLARS 5 UNIVERSITY BOUND 2 Research Special Item Support 1 CYCLOTRON INSTITUTE 2 SEA GRANT PROGRAM 3 ENERGY RESOURCES PROGRAM 4 PUBLIC POLICY RESOURCE LABORATORY 5 REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CENTER 8 COMPETITIVE KNOWLEDGE FUND 3 Public Service Special Item Support 1 SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE 4 Institutional Support Special Item Support
$0 0
548,154 359,678 551,765 41,244 3,296,652 0
750,274 0
4,417,488 0
$0 0
548,154 359,678 551,765 41,244 3,375,206 0
750,274 0
4,417,488 0
$1,800,000 4,000,000
$3,600,000 4,000,000 0
0 0
0 0
.0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
$1,800,000 4,000,000 548,154 359,678 551,765 41,244 3,296,652 0
750,274 0
4,417,488 0
$3,600,000 4,000,000 548,154 359,678 551,765 41,244 3,375,206 0
750,274 0
4,417,488 0
1 FACULTY REINVESTMENT 3 INSTITUTIONAL ENHANCEMENT 7 SUMMER SCHOOL TOTAL, GOAL 3 0
0 0
0
$9,965,255
$10,043,809
$5,800,000
$7,600,000
$15,765,255
$17,643,809 2.F. Page 2 of 4
24 2.F.
SUMMARY
OF TOTAL REQUEST BY STRATEGY 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME :
10:07:26AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University Base Base Exceptional Exceptional Total Request Total Request Goal/Objective/STRATEGY 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 TOTAL, AGENCY STRATEGY REQUEST TOTAL, AGENCY RIDER APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST GRAND TOTAL, AGENCY REQUEST
$50,819,952
$51,663,193
$14,082,533
$15,882,533
$64,902,485
$67,545,726
$50,819,952
$51,663,193
$14,082,533
$15,882,533
$64,902,485
$67,545,726 2.F. Page 3 of 4
25 2.F.
SUMMARY
OF TOTAL REQUEST BY STRATEGY 81st Regunar Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME :
10:07:26AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University Base Base Exceptional Exceptional Total Request Total Request Goal/Objective/STRATEGY 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 General Revenue Funds:
I General Revenue Fund
$15,466,209
$15,468,409
$14,082,533
$15,882,533
$29,548,742
$31,350,942 General Revenue Dedicated Funds:
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco Other Funds:
969 Real Estate Trust Account TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCING FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS
$15,466,209
$15,468,409
$14,082,533
$15,882,533
$29,548,742
$31,350,942 32,057,091 32,819,578 0
0
$32,057,091
$32,819,578
$32,057,091
$32,819,578
$0
$0
$32,057,091
$32,819,578 3,296,652 3,375,206 0
0
$3,296,652
$3,375,206
$3,296,652
$3,375,206
$0
$0
$3,296,652
$3,375,206
$50,819,952
$51,663,193
$14,082,533
$15,882,533
$64,902,485
$67,545,726 5,848.9 5,854.8 0.0 0.0 5,848.9 5,854.8 2.F. Page 4 of 4
26 2.G.
SUMMARY
OF TOTAL REQUEST.OBJECTIVE OUTCOMES 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation system of Texas (ABEST)
Date: 81112008 Time: 10:08:16AM Agency code: 711 Agency name: Texas A&M University Goal/ Objective /Outcome Total Total BL BL 2010 2011 Provide Instructional and Operations Support Provide Instructional and Operations Support KEY 1 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Frsh Earn Degree in 6 Yrs 76.50%
76.50%
2 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking White Frsh Earn Degree in 6 Yrs 78.00%
78.00%
3 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree2seeking Hisp Frsh Earn Degree in 6 Yr 69.00%
69.00%
4 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Black Frsh Earn Degree in 6 Yrs 65.00%
65.00%
5 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Other Frsh Earn Deg in 6 Yrs 73.50%
73.50%
KEY 6 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs 40.00%
41.00%
7 % 1st-time-Full-time, Degree-seeking White Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs 42.50%
43.00%
8 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Hisp Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs 32.50%
33.00%
Exep Excp Request Request 2010 2011 2010 2011 76.50%
78.00%
69.00%
65.00%
76.50%
78.00%
69.00%
65.00%
73.50%
73.50%
40.00%
41.00%
42.50%
43.00%
32.50%.
33.00%
2.G. Page 1 of 4
27 2.G.
SUMMARY
OF TOTAL REQUEST OBJECTIVE OUTCOMES 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation system of Texas (ABEST)
Date : 8/1/2008 Time: 10:08:16AM Agency code: 711 Agency name: Texas A&M University Goal! Objective / Outcome Total Total BL BL Excp Excp Request Request 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 9 % 1st-time, Full-ime, Degree-seeking Black Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs 24.50%
25.00%
24.50%
25.00%
10 % 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Other Frsh Earn Degree in 4 Yrs 37.00%
37.50%
37.00%
37.50%
KEY 11 Persistence Rate of 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Frsh after lyr 90.00%
90.00%
90.00%
90.00%
12 Persistence Rate of 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking White Frsh-lyr 91.00%
91.00%
91.00%
91.00%
13 Persistence Rate of lst-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Hisp Frsh-lyr 86.50%
86.50%
86.50%
86.50%
14 Persistence Rate of I st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Black Frsh-Iyr 88.00%
88.00%
88.00%
88.00%
15 Persistence 1st-time, Full-time, Degree-seeking Other Frsh after 1 Yr 87.00%
87.00%
87.00%
87.00%
16 Percent of Semester Credit Hours Completed 95.50%
95.50%
95.50%
95.50%
KEY 17 Certification Rate of Teacher Education Graduates 95.00%
95.40%
95.00%
95.40%
2.G. Page 2 of 4
28 2.G.
SUMMARY
OF TOTAL REQUEST OBJECTIVE OUTCOMES 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation system of Texas (ABEST)
Date : 8/1/2008 Time: 10:08:16AM Agency code: 711.
Agency name: Texas A&M University Goal/ Objective / Outcome Total Total BL BL Excp Excp Request Request 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 18 % of Underprepared Students Who Satisfy a TSI Obligation 77.00%
78.00%
77.00%
78.00%
KEY 19 % of Baccalaureate Graduates Who Are 1st Generation College Graduates 30.006%
30.00%
30.00%
30.00%
20 Percent of Transfer Students Who Graduate within 4 Years 77.00%
78.00%
77.00%
78.00%
21 Percent of Transfer Students Who Graduate within 2 Years 14.00%
15.00%
14.00%
15.00%
KEY 22 % Lower Division Semester Credit Hours Taught by Tenured/Tenure Track 40.50%
41.00%
40.50%
41.00%
KEY 24 State Licensure Pass Rate of Engineering Graduates 88.50%
88.50%
88.50%
88.50%
KEY 27 State Licensure Examination Pass Rate of Veterinary Medicine Graduates 99.00%
99.00%
99.00%
99.00%
KEY 28 Dollar Value of External or Sponsored Research Funds (in Millions) 143.80 148.10 143.80 148.10 29 External or Sponsored Research Funds As a % of State Appropriations 48.35%
49.80%
48.35%
49.80%
2.G. Page 3 of 4
29 2.G.
SUMMARY
OF TOTAL REQUEST OB.JECTIVE OUTCOMES 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation system of Texas (ABEST)
Date : 8/1/2008 Time: 10:08:16AM Agency code:. 711 Agency name: Texas A&M University Goal/ Objective / Outcome Total Total BL BL Excp Excp Request Request 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 30 External Research Funds As Percentage Appropriated for Research 9,580.77%
46 Value of Lost or Stolen Property 9,868.21%
70,000.00 9,580.77%
70,000.00 9,868.21%
70,000.00 70,000.00 47 Percent of Property Lost or Stolen 0.10%
0.10%
48 Percent of Endowed Professorships/Chairs Unfilled All/Part/Fiscal Year 18.40%
18.40%
0.10%
18.40%
10.40 0.10%
18.40%
49 Average No Months Endowed Chairs Remain Vacant 10.40 10.40 10.40 2.G. Page 4 of 4
310 GENERAL REVENUE (GR) & GENERAL REVENUE DEDICATED (GR-D) BASELINE REPORT 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE: 81112008 TIME: 10:09:41AM Agency code:
Agency name:
Texas A&M University GR Baseline Request Limit = $20,388,839 Strategy/Strategy Option/Rider GR-D Baseline Request Limit = $1 2010 Funds
?(1 I 1iindq Biennial Biennial FTEs Total GR Ded FTEs Total GR Ded Cumulative GR Cumulative Ded Page #
L Strategy: 1 1 4,896.0 4,896.0 Strategy: 1 - I - 5
0.0 Strategy
1 6
0.0 Strategy
1 8
0.0 Strategy
1 - I - 10
0.0 Strategy
2 1 865.1 Strategy: 2 - I - 2
0.0 Strategy
3 I 16.3 Strategy: 3 2 9:4 5,786.8 Strategy: 3 3
8.1 Strategy
3 4 2.3 Operations Support 0
0 0
4,896.0 0
0 0
4,896.0 0
3***GR-DBaseline Request Limit-S1****
0 Staff Group Insurance Premiums 9,395,574 0
9,395,574 Workers' Compensation Insurance 2,025,818 2,025,818 0
Texas Public Education Grants 9,161,517 0
9,161,517 Organized Activities 13,500,000 0
13,500,000 Educational and General Space Support 0
0 0
Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement 6,771,788 6,771,788 0
Cyclotron Institute 548,154 548,154 0
Sea Grant Program 359,678 359,678 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 870.4 0.0 16.5 9.5 5,792.4 9,658,061 2,025,818 9,161,517 14,000,000 0
6,773,988 548,154 359,678 0
2,025,818 0
0 0
6,773,988 548,154 359,678 9,658,061 0
19,053,635 0
4,051,636 19,053,635 9,161,517 4,051,636 37,376,669 14,000,000 4,051,636 64,876,669 0
4,051,636 64,876,669 0
1.7,597,412
'64,876,669 0
18,693,720 64,876,669 0
19,413,076 64,876,669
- GR Baseline Request Limit=-$20,388,839****** I I
Energy Resources Program 551,765 551,765 Public Policy Resource Laboratory 41,244 "
41,244 0
0 8.2 2.3 551,765 41,244 551,765 41,244 0
0 20,516,606 20,599,094 64,876,669 64,876,669 Page 1 of 2
31 GENERAL REVENUE (GR) & GENERAL REVENUE DEDICATED (GR-D) BASELINE REPORT 81st Regular Session, Agency'Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE: 8/1/2008 TIME: 10:09:41AM Agency code:
Agency name:
Texas A&M University GR Baseline Request Limit = $20,388,839 Strategy/Strategy Option/Rider GR-D Baseline Request Limit = $1 2010 Funds
,nhl n
Biennial Biennial FTEs Total GR Ded FTEs Total GR Ded Cumulative GR Cumulative Ded Page #
Strategy: 3 5 Real Estate Research Center 35.5 3,296,652 0
0 35.5 3,375,206 0
0 20,599,094 64,876,669 Strategy: 3 I School of Architecture 16.2 750,274 750,274 0
16.4 750,274 750,274 0
22,099,642 64,876,669 Strategy: 3 3 Institutional Enhancement 0.0 4,417,488 4,417,488 0
0.0 4,417,488 4,417,488 0
30,934,618 64,876,669 Excp Item: I University Bound - Success for Underrepresented Students at Texas A&M University and Other State Universities 0.0 4,000,000 4,000,000 0
0.0 4,000,000 4,000,000 0
38,934,618 64,876,669 Strategy Detail for Excp Item: I Strategy: 3 - I - 5 University Bound 0.0 4,000,000 4,000,000 0
0.0 4,000,000 4,000,000 0
Excp Item: 2 Keeping Texas Scholars in Texas Program 0.0 1,800,000 1,800,000 0
0.0 3,600,000 3,600,060 0
44,334,618 64,876,669 Strategy Detail for Excp Item: 2 Strategy: 3 4 Keep Texas Scholars 0.0 1,800,000 1,800,000 0
0.0 3,600,000 3,600,000 0
Excp Item: 3 Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement 0.0 8,282,533 8,282,533 0
0.0 8,282,533 8,282,533 0
60,899,684 64,876,669 Strategy Detail for Excp Item: 3 Strategy: 2 2 Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement 0.0 8,282,533 8,282,533 0
0.0 8,282,533 8,282,533 5,848.9
$64,902,485
$29,548,742
$32,057,091 5,854.8
$67,545,726
$31,350,942 32,819,578' Page 2 of 2
32 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST DATE:
911/2009 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 TIME:
10:10:45AM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
I Provide Instructional and Operations Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
1 Provide Instructional and Operations Support Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
1 Operations Support Service:
19 Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 Output Measures:.
I Number of Undergraduate Degrees Awarded 8,132.00 7,950.00 8,340.00 9,000.00 9,100.00 2 Numnber of Minority Graduates 1,198.00 1,130.00 1,280.00 1,3.80.00 1,480.00 3 Number of Students Who Successfully Complete Developmental 78.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 Education 4 Number of Two-Year College Transfers Who Graduate 2,226.00 2,246.00 2,266.00 2,288.00 2,306.00 Efficiency Measures:
KEY I Administrative Cost As a Percent of Operating Budget 4.10 %
4.30 %
4.50%
4.50 %
4.50%
Explanatory/Input Measures:
I Student/Faculty Ratio 19.50 19.50 19.00 19.00 19.00 2 Number of Minority Students Enrolled 6,947.00 7,200.00 7,400.00 7,600.00 7,800.00 3 Number of Community College Transfers Enrolled 6,481.00 6,500.00 6,520.00 6,540.00 6,580.00 Objects of Expense:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES
$89,710,034
$89,441,968
$84,249,254
$0
$0 1002 OTHER PERSONNEL COSTS
$4,451,140
$1,601,723
$3,725,118
$0
$0 1005 FACULTY SALARIES
$152,250,567
$168,694,123
$181,463,998
$0
$0 1010 PROFESSIONAL SALARIES
$2,964,228
$0
$0
$0
$0 1015 PROFESSIONAL SALARIES
$2,083
$0
_$0
$0
$0 2001 PROFESSIONAL FEES AND SERVICES
$658,687
$398,613
$369,973
$0
$0 2002 FUELS AND LUBRICANTS
$39,485
$42,418
$41,586
$0
$0 2003 CONSUMABLE SUPPLIES
$373,232
$385,200
$371,981
$0
$0 2004 UTILITIES
$1,859,944
$1,697,826
$1,582,913
$0
$0 2005 TRAVEL'
$10,675
$10,344
$9,758
$0
$0 2006 RENT - BUILDING
$34,485
$21,947
$20,633
$0
$0 2007 RENT - MACHINE AND OTHER
$123,487
$119,382
$112,574
$0
$0 3.A. Page 1 of 31
33 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/6/2008 TIME:
6:22:31PM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
- 1. Provide Instructional and Operations Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
Service Categories:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
1 Provide Instructional and Operations Support STRATEGY:
I Operations Support Service:
19 Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 2008 DEBT SERVICE 2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE 3001 CLIENT SERVICES 5000 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE Method of Financing:
1 General Revenue Fund SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
Method of Financing:
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS - DEDICATED)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
$5,383
$4,969,132
$128,483
$660,901
$258,241,946
$183,763,686
$183,763,686
$74,478,260
$74,478,260
$5,317
$4,967,273
$108,550
$9,991
$267,504,675
$199,831,910
$199,831,910
$67,672,765
$67,672,765
$5,233
$4,765,599
$98,364
$0
$276,816,984
$203,830,851
$203,830,851
$72,986,133
$72,986,133
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0 so
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$258,241,946
$267,504,675 4,658.2
$276,816,984 4,657.5' 4,316.4 4,882.8 4,883.1 STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
3.A. Page 2 of 31
34 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10"I0"4SAM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
I Provide Instructional and Operations Support OBJECTIVE:
I Provide Instructional and Operations Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
0 0
Service Categories:
Service:
19 Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3 Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 STRATEGY:
CODE 1
Operations Support DESCRIPTION The Operations Support formula includes not only salaries and wages of those teaching, but those supporting the instructional program such as deans, advisors, graduate assistants, and.clerical staff.
Salaries, wages, and other costs to support general administration, including business and fiscal management, executive management, human resources, development efforts, purchasink, security services, student services and other functions which benefit the institution as a whole are included. Previously the legislature has emphasized several strategies by providing supplemental finding, by increasing/decreasing formula funding rates, by appropriation riders or by comments made by state officials. Texas A&M University has tried to respond accordingly. For example, more full-time faculty have been assigned to teach undergraduate courses; administrative costs as a percentage of the E&G budget is one of the lowest in the state.
- Expenditures listed above do not include additional amounts expended from the Available University Fund (FY2007-$51,558,083; FY2008-$47,085,126; FY2009-$52,447,529) or Designated Tuition.
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
Several factors are resulting in increased enrollment and weighted semester credit hour production. To help meet the state's Closing the Gaps goals, we are continuing with our plan to add 2500 undergraduate and 1000 graduate students during the years FY2007 to FY201 1. We have been and will continue to increase both the size of our freshman class and the number of transfer students we accept from the community colleges. Our flat-rate tuition policy is increasing the average load of undergraduate students.
3.A. Page 3 of 31
35 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
I Provide Instructional and Operations Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
0 0
OBJECTIVE: -
. I Provide Instructional and Operations Support Service Categories:
Service:
19 STRATEGY:
3 Growth Supplement Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Explanatory/Input Measures:
1 Number of Semester Credit Hours Completed 2 Number of Semester Credit Hours 3 Number of Students Enrolled As of the Twelfth Class Day TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS) 556,099.00 580,026.00 46,542.00 Est2008 567,100.00 591,965.00 47,500.00 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 573,100.00 598,176.00 48,000.00 579,050.00 604,407.00 48,500.00 579,200.00 604,600.00 48,500.00 so so so
$0 FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
The growth supplement equals a projected headcount increase in fall enrollments in the biennium times a per capita dollar amount. The growth supplement is designed to assist institutions with growing enrollment, since the formula amounts are determined by enrollments in the base period year, prior to the year for which our appropriation is made.
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
Several factors are resulting in increased enrollment and weighted semester credit hour production. To help meet the state's Closing the Gaps goals, we are continuing with our plan to add 2500 undergraduate and 1000 graduate students during the years FY2007 to FY201 1. We have been and will continue to increase both the size of our freshman class and the number of transfer. students we accept from the community colleges. Our flat-rate tuition policy is increasing the average load of undergraduate students.
3.A. Page 4 of 31
36 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M.University GOAL:
1 Provide Instructional and Operations Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
Service Categories:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
I Provide Instructional and Operations Support STRATEGY:
5 Staff Group Insurance Premiums Service:
06 Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 Objects of Expense:
2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE Method of Financing:
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS - DEDICATED)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
$8,776,130
$8,776,130
$8,776,130
$8,776,130
$8,282,878
$8,282,878
$8,282,878
$8,282,878
$9,067,830
$9,067,830
$9,067,830
$9,067,830
$9,395,574
$9,395,574
$9,395,574
$9,395,574
$9,395,574
$9,395,574
$9,658,061
$9,658,061
$9,658,061
$9,658,061
$9,658,061
$9,658,061
$8,776,130
$8,282,878
$9,067,830 To provide legislatively authorized staff benefit for TAMU employees as provided in Article 3.50-3, the Texas Insurance Code.
mandated by the Texas State College and University Employee's Uniform Insurance Benefits Act.
This will provide employees with Basic Health Coverage as
- Expenditures listed above do not include additional amounts expended from Available University Fund (FY2007-$1,277,819; FY2008-$1,094,928; FY2009-$599,876) or Designated Tuition.
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
The number of claims filed by employees from one yearto the next will vary considerably. Programs are in place to contain costs, but illnesses and injuries are difficult to predict. The costs experienced in a given year will directly impact the costs of premiums the following year.
3.A. Page 5 of 31
37 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
GOAL:
OBJECTIVE:
STRATEGY:
711 6
Agency name:
Texas A&M University Provide Instructional and Operations Support Provide Instructional and Operations Support Workers' Compensation Insurance Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
Service Categories:
Service:
06 lncomc 0
0
- A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Objects of Expense:
2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE Method of Financing:
1 General Revenue Fund SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
Method of Financing:
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS - DEDICATED)
Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011
$847,404
$847,404
$847,031
$847,031
$373
$373
$1,096,943
$1,096,943
$1,096,555
$1,096,555
$388
$388
$1,117,837
$1,117,837
$1,117,442
$1,117,442
$2,025,818
$2,025,818
$2,025,818
$2,025,818
$2,025,818
$2,025,818
$2,025,818
$2,025,818
$395
$395
$0
$0
$0
$0 TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
$2,025,818
$2,025,818 TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$847,404'
$1,096,943
$1,11.7,837
$2,025,818
$2,025,818 FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
To provide legislatively authorized staff benefits for TAMU employees as provided in Title 5, Subchapter 502 of The Texas Labor Code.
- Expenditures listed above do not include additional amounts expended from Available University Fund (FY2007-$151,269; FY2008-$195,860; FY2009-$199,590) or Designated Tuition.
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
Continued emphasis on safety at both the state and federal level will help reduce the impact of accidental injury. However, there will always be injuries to some extent.
3.A. Page 6 of 31
38 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
1 Provide Instructional and Operations Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
1 Provide Instructional and Operations Support Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
8 Texas Public Education Grants Service:
20 Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 Objects of Expense:
2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
$8,780,043
$8,780,043
$8,780,043
$8,780,043
$8,905,943
$8,905,943
$8,905,943
$8,905,943
$9,061,837
$9,061,837
$9,061,837
$9,061,837 Method of Financing:
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS - DEDICATED)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$9,161,517
$9,161,517
$9, 161,517
$9,161,517
$9,161,517
$9,161,517
$9,161,517
$9,161,517
$9,161,517-
$9,161,517
$9,161,517
$9,161,517
$8,780,043
$8,905,943
$9,061,837 FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
To provide funds for grants of money to students attending institutions of higher education in Texas whose educational costs are not met in whole or in part from other sources and to provide funds to supplement and add flexibility to existing financial aid programs in accordance with Texas Education Code Section C, Section 56.0322.
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
3.A. Page 7 of 31
39 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
I Provide Instructional and Operations Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
I Provide Instructional and Operations Support Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
10 Organized Activities Service:
10 Income: A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp. 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 20 Objects of Expense:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES
$0
$0
$0
$7,000,000
$7,000,0i 2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
$0
$0
$0
$6,500,000
$7,000,04 TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
$0
$0
$0
$13,500,000
$14,000,04 Method of Financing:
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco
$0
$0
$0
$13,500,000
$14,000,0(
SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS - DEDICATED)
$0
$0
$0
$13,500,000
$14,000,0O TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
$13,500,000
$14,000,0O TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$0 so
$0
$13,500,000
$14,000,0O FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
Organized Activities represents expenditures related to the Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine Teaching Hospital. Funds appropriated for Organized Activities are not spent in this strategy. They were transferred and spent in the Operations Support strategy.
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
il11 O0 O0 O00 O0 O0 00 O00 3.A. Page 8 of 31
40 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL; 2
Provide Infrastructure Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
Service Categories:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
I Provide Operation and Maintenance of E&G Space
.STRATEGY:
I Educational and General Space Support Service:
10 Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 Efficiency Measures:
1 Space Utilization Rate of Classrooms 2 Space Utilization Rate of Labs Objects of Expense:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES 1002 OTHER PERSONNEL COSTS 1005 FACULTY SALARIES 35.50 27.19 1010
.2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 3001 3002 4000 5000 9999 PROFESSIONAL SALARIES PROFESSIONAL FEES AND SERVICES FUELS AND LUBRICANTS CONSUMABLE SUPPLIES UTILITIES TRAVEL RENT - BUILDING RENT - MACHINE AND OTHER DEBT SERVICE OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE CLIENT SERVICES FOOD FOR PERSONS - WARDS OF STATE GRANTS CAPITAL EXPENDITURES NOT REL TO LBB TRACKING
$3,814,893
$1,151,172
$0
$0
$1,011,455
$23,489
$87,634
$319,831
$0
$890
$176,479
$0
$1,512,298
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$8,098,141 36.00 27.00
$10,443,717
$1,040,603
$0
$0
$713,794
$12,679
$47,303
$1,608,835
$0
$480
$95,261
$0
$2,057,977
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$16,020,649 37.50 27.00
$5,638,541
$1,440,293
$0
$0
$616,573
$10,952
$40,861
$1,389,706
$0
$415
$82,285
$0
$1,777,673
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$10,997,299
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 38.00 27.00 38.00 27.00 TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE Method of Financing:
3.A. Page 9 of 31
41 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
9fIf200%
TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
2 Provide Infrastructure Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
Service Categories:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
I Provide Operation and Maintenance of E&G Space STRATEGY:
I Educational and General Space Support Service:
10 Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011
- 1.
General Revenue Fund SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
$7,139,980
$7,139,980
$958,161
$958,161
$11,537,301
$11,537,301
$4,483,348
$4,483,348
$7,124,450
$7,124,450
$3,872,849
$3,872,849
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 so Method of Financing:
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS - DEDICATED)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)*
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$0 so
$0
$0
. $0
$8,098,141
$16,020,649 806.9
$10,997,299 833.1
$0 FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
785.2 865.1 870.4 STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
Expenditures listed above exclude additional amounts expended from Available University Fund (FY 2007-$321,665;FY 2008-$12,319,574;FY 2009-$16,048,492) or Designated Tuition. Also expended are expenditures funded from contracts with TAMUS agencies and Health Science Center.
To maintain approximately nine million assignable square feet of E&G building space and approximately 2200 acres of high maintenance landscaping in support of the University's missions.
Responsibilities are to provide utilities, facilities maintenance, landscape maintenance, central receiving, administrative GIS, environmental health & safety and custodial services. Funding to support this strategy includes salaries, wages, purchased and generated utilities, supplies, materials, travel and equipment.
Two major challenges to all areas continue to be: 1) limited available resources in an environment of escalating costs, especially materials and purchased utilities; and 2) recruitment and retention of a skilled and professional workforce.
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
3.A. Page 10 of 31
42 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
2 Provide Infrastructure Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
Service Categories:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
1 Provide Operation and Maintenance of E&G Space STRATEGY:
I Educational and General Space Support Service:
10 Income: A.2 Age: '
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 Building Maintenance: Operational maintenance funding is strained due to construction of new E&G facilities and increase in student enrollment. Due to limited funds, existing E&G space, auxiliary space and campus infrastructure have received limited attention over the last three decades. Despite the significant investment in new facilities, the promise of excellence in our instructional and research missions is at risk. As stewards of this flagship university, we are proposing a multi-year "Facilities Renewal Program" to ensure that our teaching and research facilities will support the work of our faculty and students.
The Associated General Contractors of America reported the producer price index for materials used by the construction industry rose a cumulative 30.2 percent compared to 14.5 percent for the consumer price index from 2003 to 2008.
The State Fire Marshal's office adopted NFPA 101, Life Safety Code 2006 edition as the standard. This requires all fire alarm, sprinkler and standpipe systems to be tested and maintained in
- accordance with national consensus standards. Funding for this effort is being diverted from other university programs.
Utilities: $29 M in capital improvements will be completed by FY10. Higher commodity costs for purchased utilities (natural gas and electricity) in recent years has created funding challenges and increased the need for improved efficiency. Additional significant capital investment is required in the Central Utility Plant to replace and upgrade older inefficient production equipment.
3.A. Page II of 3.1
43 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
1010:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
2 Provide Infrastructure Support Statewide Goal/Benchrnark:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
I Provide Operation and Maintenance of E&G Space Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
2 Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement Service:
10 Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 Objects of Expense:
2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE Method of Financing:
1 General Revenue Fund SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$237,574
$237,574
$237,574
$237,574
$6,772,031
$6,772,031
$6,772,031
$6,772,031
$6,774,586
$6,774,586
$6,774,586
$6,774,586
$6,771,788
$6,771,788
$6,771,788
$6,771,788
$6,771,788
$6,771,788
$6,773,988
$6,773,988
$6,773,988
$6,773,988
$6,773,988
$6,773,988
$237,574
$6,772,031
$6,774,586 FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
Improve the infrastructure and construct and equip the Emerging Technologiesand Economic Development Interdisciplinary Building. The office and laboratory building will support research in area-associated with emerging technologies in physical science, engineering, life science, and 'other academic disciplines.
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
3.A. Page 12 of 31
44 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 91st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/I/2008.
TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
OBJECTIVE:
STRATEGY:
3 Provide Special Item Support 1
Instructional Support Special Item Support 4
Keep Texas Scholars Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
Service Categories:
Service:
NA Income: NA 0
0 Age:
NA CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 Objects of Expense:
2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE Method of Financing:
I I General Revenue Fund SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 so
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0.
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 3.A. Page 13 of 31
45 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 91st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
GOAL:
OBJECTIVE:
STRATEGY:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University 3
Provide Special Item Support I
Instructional Support Special Item Support 5
University Bound Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
. Service Categories:
Service:
NA Income: NA 0
0 Age:
NA BL 2011 CODE DESCRIPTION Objects of Expense:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE Method of Financing:
I General Revenue Fund SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010
$0
$0
$0
$o so
$0
$0
$0 so
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 so
$0
$0 so
$0 s0
$0 so
$0
$o so
$o EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
3.A. Page 14 of 31
46 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support OBJECTIVE:
2 Research Special Item Support STRATEGY:
1 Cyclotron Institute Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
'0 0
Service Categories:
Service:
21 Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Objects of Expense:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES 1002 OTHER PERSONNEL COSTS 1005 FACULTY SALARIES 1010 PROFESSIONAL SALARIES TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE Method of Financing:
1 General Revenue Fund SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$854,124
$12,456
$16,000
$194,195
$1,076,775
$1,076,775
$1,076,775
$863,955
$16,449
$211,582
$0
$1,091,986
$1,091,986
$1,091,986
$887,238
$22,832
$217,929
$0
$1,127,999
$1,127,999
$1,127,999
$431,178
$11,073
$105,903
,$0
$548,154
$548,154
$548,154
$548,154
$431,178
$11,073
$105,903
$0
$548,154
$548,154
$548,154
$548,154
$548,154
$1,076,775
$1,091,986
$1,127,999
$548,154 FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
15.4 15.9 16.1 16.3 16.5 STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
The Cyclotron Institute is jointly supported by the State of Texas and the U.S. Dept. of Energy. The institute develops and operates unique accelerator capabilities. These include a K500 superconducting cyclotron, one of only five in the world. Members of the Physics and Chemistry faculties lead the institute research groups. In addition to conducting basic research and educating graduate and undergraduate students and postdoctoral fellows in nuclear science and accelerator beam applications, the institute provides accelerator capabilities for a wide variety of applications in materials science, nuclear medicine, space science, and analytical procedures. Institute faculty publish 100+ original scientific papers per year in leading journals. The institute is also a major resource for development of important applied programs in the state. The facility radiation effects line is used for testing of aircraft, spacecraft, and satellite electronic parts by NASA, and a wide variety of aerospace and semiconductor manufacturers. The large molecule mass spectrometry program, originated at the institute, was the forerunner of a collaborative diagnostic program now being carried out between the College of Medicine and Scott and White Hospital. The Neutron Cancer Therapy Program developed at the institute with MD Anderson Hospital was the forerunner of the MDA accelerator program in Houston. Institute students employed in Texas industries and universities contribute strongly to the technological development of the state.
3.A. Page 15 of 31
47 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
2 Research Special Item Support Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
I Cyclotron Institute Service:
21 Income: 'A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
TheSpecial Item support of the Cyclotron Institute currently provides approximately 10% of the facility operations and research funding. The remaining 90% is obtained from external grants'and accelerator use. Thus the special item support leverages a 10-to-1 return in institute funding. The annual line item is currently $500,000 below the reqtuired amount to meet facility operating costs.
This has required TAMU to progressively divert, over ten years, an increasing amount of money from other funds, which could have otherwise been used in the research program. A major upgrade of the Cyclotron Instituteaccelerator facility is now underway after having secured several million dollars of capital funding from DOE and the Welch Foundation. Strong evidence of continued State interest and support is a critical element in continuing the upgrade and maintaining the Federal support for research and education.
- Expenditures and Budgets listed above do not include additional amounts expended from Designated Tuition.
3.A. Page 16 of 31
48 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST DATE:
8/l/2008 81st Regular Session; Agency Sulmission, Version 1 TIME:
10:10:45AM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
2 Research Special Item Support Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
2 Sea Grant Program Service:
21 Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 Objects of Expense:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES
$458,919
$516,354
$540,313
$313,603
$313,603 1002 OTHER PERSONNEL COSTS
$7,899
$8,667
$8,222
$4,748
$4,748 2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
$0
$76,845
$71,160
$41,327
$41,327 TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE
$466,818
$601,866
$619,695
$359,678
$359,678 Method of Financing:
1 General Revenue Fund
$357,048
$601,866
$619,695
$359,678
$359,678 SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
$357,048
$601,866
$619,695
$359,678
$359,678 Method of Financing:
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco
$109,770
$0
$0
$0
$0 SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS - DEDICATED)
$109,770
$0
$0
$0
$0 TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
$359,678
$359,678 TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$466,818
$601,866
$619,695
$359,678
$359,678 FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
8.8 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
3.A. Page 17 of 31
49 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
2 Research Special Item Support Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
2 Sea Grant Program Service:
21 Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL2010 BL 2011 The underlying strategy of the Texas Sea Grant College Program is to support marine-related research and conduct high quality marine extension, education and publication programs throughout the state of Texas. The program is one of 31 Sea Grant programs located in all the coastal and Great Lakes states, each of which is a university-based partnership with the Department of Commerce through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Texas Sea Grant (TSG) is committed to programs that will help ensure the sustainable use and conservation of the coastal, marine and watershed resources of the state of Texas. Special Item funding provides a portion of the required one-dollar of non-federal match for every two federal dollars received from NOAA.
Approximately 50 percent of the federal funding supports research by faculty and graduate students at institutions of higher education across Texas through a competitive process, with research priorities established by an advisory committee of leading academicians, natural resource agency personnel, along with representatives from nongovernmental organizations and the private sector.
Currently, research efforts are focused on coastal ecosystem health, coastal economic development and marine education. Research results from this program and other sources are interpreted and made available to stakeholders through a network of marine extension agents and specialists with Texas Sea Grant Extension and communications specialists associated with the Marine Information Service (MIS).,
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
The primary external factor affecting program strategy is key work with the Sea Grant Association to maintain and over time increase the federal Sea Grant budget. In addition, the broad talent found in marine sciences at Texas universities allows faculty to compete for grants through National Strategic Initiatives by the National Sea Grant Office.
Cooperating with other states along the Gulf of Mexico, Texas Sea Grant (TSG) obtained funding for a regional project that began in 2006. TSG became the north Texas coordinator for the National Ocean Science Bowl that gives high school students an opportunity to show their ocean science knowledge at the state level and national arena. TSG is involved with different committees at regional and national levels to help the bowl meet its mission.
Internally, projects are selected through a peer review process based on recommendations to the Director of TSG from an impartial review panel. In addition to the mentioned grants, modest amounts are set aside to provide opportunities, on a competitive basis, for TSG Extension agents to design and conduct research demonstration projects.
K-12 science is promoted internally through curriculum development and through operation of a floating classroom program that provides an opportunity for students to learn through experience.
TSG has formed partnerships with several of the state's agencies and TSG personnel serve on a number of vital research committees.
3.A. Page 18 of 31
50 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
.0 0
OBJECTIVE:
2 Research Special Item Support Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
3 Energy Resources Program Service:
21 Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 Objects of Expense:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES 1002 OTHER PERSONNEL COSTS 1010 PROFESSIONAL SALARIES 2003 CONSUMABLE SUPPLIES 2005 TRAVEL' 2007 RENT - MACHINE AND OTHER 2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE Method of Financing:
1 General Revenue Fund SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
Method of Financing:
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS - DEDICATED)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
$454,482
$12,575
$63,212
$827
$0
$(136)
$806'
$531,766
$531,258
$531,258
$121,469
$6,777
$56,221
$18,826
$46,263
$0
$335,688
$585,244
$585,244
$585,244
$88,124
$9,979
$0
$23,261
$57,162
$0
$414,767
$593,293
$593,293
$593,293
$81,992
$9,324
$0
$21,629
$53,082
$0
$385,738
$551,765
$551,765
$551,765
$0
$0
$551,765
$551,765
$81,992
$9,324
$0
$21,629
$53,082
$0
$385,738
$551,765
$551,765
$551,765
$0
$0
$551,765
$551,765
$508
$508
$0
$0
$0
$0
$531,766
$585,244
$593,293 9.8 8.0 8.0 8.1 8.2 3.A. Page 19 of 31
51 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST DATE:
8/1/2008 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 TIME:
10:10:45AM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
2 Research Special Item Support Service Categories:
STRATEGY:-
3 Energy Resources Program Service:
21 Income: A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 The Energy Resources Program (ERP) funds initiatives in advanced and emerging technologies in energy and environmental-related areas. The ERP allows researchers to develop programs across science, engineering, and other areas to address the state's immediate energy and environmental problems as well as fund developing research that will provide solutions to future challenges in these important areas.
This ERP will focus on advanced and emerging technologies while continuing to make significant contributions to the traditional areas important to energy and mineral issues. These funds will enhano the state's knowledge base in these areas while increasing the number of experts in the field through education in the near and long term. Our focus on alternative energies will allow Texas to diversify our energy resources, reduce our dependence on foreign energy sources, and create new technologies. The ERP invests in ideas and the development ofthose ideas through research that is not only critical to the State of Texas but has global implications.
Texas A&M University has been able to substantially leverage the ERP funds and build collaborations with state, federal, and private institutions and universities to increase the overall funding available for this important work. The ERP funding has made these partnerships possible by providing the resources to support emerging technologies that require quick action to generate data, personnel, equipment, or other resources needed to develop proposals and multi-discipline and multi-organizational collaborations.
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
According to the U.S. Department of Energy, two of most fundamental challenges our country faces are: improving our energy security and combating global climate change. The current high energy prices only underscore the urgency of these efforts.
A Department of Energy official stated that "States play critical role in adopting and implementing energy policies that address the serious challenge of global climate change while enhancing our economic growth and increased energy security."
Affordable energy is critical to the citizens of the State of Texas and to the nation as a whole. The increasing price of energy affects people at work and home. It is vitally important that non-OPEC producers keep up their production because a drop could result in even higher prices. Some of the factors that affect the ability of the non-OPEC producers to keep up their prices are:
- Enhancing oil recovery in existing domestic fields;
- Making better use of oil supplies;
- Determining ways to lower production costs; and
- Using alternative energy sources (There are currently five alternatives to oil for energy: natural gas, wind, solar, nuclear, and biofuels. As the cost of producing energy for these alternatives drops to the price of oil, we will see a significant impact throughout our economy in many areas).
Texas A&M University has been a leader in developing enhanced oil field recovery methodologies and converting natural gas to liquid gas. We are a leader in developing fuel cells and have a strong, nationally recognized Department of Nuclear Engineering.
3.A. Page 20 of 31
52 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
2 Research Special Item Support STRATEGY:
4 Public Policy Resource Laboratory Service Categories:
Service:
21 Income:
A.2' Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Objects of Expense:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES 1002 OTHER PERSONNEL COSTS TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE Exp 2007
$81,632
$1,035
$82,667
$82,667
$82,667 Est2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011
$92,608
$1,005
$93,613
$93,613
$93,613
$95,31.8
$1,408
- $96,726
$96,726
$96,726 Method of Financing:
I General Revenue Fund SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$40,643
$601
$41,244
$41,244
$41,244
$4i,244
$41,244
$40,643
$601
$41,244
$41,244
$41,244
$41,244
$41,244.
$82,667
$93,613 2.3
$96,726 2.3 FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
2.4 2.3 2.3 STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
This is a non-formula generated special item appropriation that produces significant extramural funding. In 2007, PPRL received a 50 to I return on state dollars used as seed money and to support research proposal development for projects that determine how millions of Texans are: represented in court, educated, receive health care, access mental health services and vote. PPRL continues to be one of the largest employers of students on the campus, providing 64,354 hours0.0041 days <br />0.0983 hours <br />5.853175e-4 weeks <br />1.34697e-4 months <br /> of paid student support in 2007 allowing more students to afford higher education.. PPRL has reached the point, however, where additional growth is not possible due to the lack of infrastructure support for proposal development, communication with potential funding agencies,'and basic staff functions. These
- are all activities, which cannot legitimately be charged to current projects and must be supported from other funds available to the program.
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
The delegation of numerous Federal programs to the states will increase the demand for the evaluation of governmental policy, educational policy, public health policy, and innovation and technology transfer. PPRL is currently working on evaluation of expanded physical health and mental health services, but current capabilities are strained. Without additional funding for basic operations, the future ability of PPRL to respond to these initiatives will be limited, since current funding will not support the infrastructure requirements to develop and perform additional projects.
3.A. Page 21 of 31
53 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
2 Research Special Item Support Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
5 Real Estate Research Center Service:
21 Income: A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est2008 Bud 2009 BL2010 BL 2011 Objects of Expense:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES 1002 OTHER PERSONNEL COSTS 1010 PROFESSIONAL SALARIES 2001 PROFESSIONAL FEES AND SERVICES 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 FUELS AND LUBRICANTS CONSUMABLE SUPPLIES UTILITIES TRAVEL RENT - BUILDING
$1,460,838
$261,654
$137,465
$9,385
$2,360
$9,890
$14,325
$49,851
$1,233
$22,091
$659,505
$84,580
$2,713,177
$2,713,177
$2,713,177 2007 RENT - MACHINE AND OTHER 2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE 5000 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE Method of Financing:
969 Real Estate Trust Account SUBTOTAL, MOF (OTHER FUNDS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
$1,814,185
$396,171
$127,382
$8,697
$2,187
$9,165
$13,275
$46,195
$1,143
$20,471
$611,129
$50,000
$3,100,000
$3,100,000
$3,100,000
$3,100,000 34.5
$1,797,003
$422,292'
$121,475
$8,293
$2,086
$8,740
$12,659
$44,053
$1,090
$19,522
$582,787
$0
$3,020,000
$3,020,000
$3,020,000
$3,020,000 35.5
$2,038,373
$434,960
$125,119
$8,000
$2,100
$9,000
$13,000
$45,000
$1,100
$20,000
$600,000
$0
$3,296,652
$3,296,652
$3,296,652
$3,296,652
$3,296,652
$2,099,524
$448,009
$128,873
$8,000
$2,200
$9,000
$13,500
$45,000
$1,100
$20,000
$600,000
$0
$3,375,206
$3,375,206
$3,375,206
$3,375,206
$3,375,206
$2,713,177 34.5 35.5 35.5 3.A. Page 22 of 31
54 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
2 Research Special Item Support Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
5 Real Estate Research Center Service:
21 Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 201`0 BL 2011
- Created in 1971 by Senate Bill.338, 62nd Legislature
- Funded primarily through fees collected from Texas real estate licensees (Brokers, $20/year), (Salespersons, $17.50/year)
- Fees are collected by Texas Real Estate Commission and disbursed to the Real Estate Center
- Additional funds are generated through seminars and sales of publications
- Nation's largest publicly funded real estate research organization
- Nine-person advisory committee appointed by the Governor As defined by statute, the Center's purposes, objectives and duties include:
- Conduct studies in all areas directly or indirectly related to real estate and publish and disseminate the findings and results.
- Prepare information of consumer interest describing Center functions and make the information available to the general public and appropriate state agencies
- Assist the real estate teaching programs offered by Texas colleges and universities as requested
- Develop and from time to time revise and update materials for extension courses in real estate offered by Texas universities and colleges when requested
- Publish Tierra Grande magazine on a quarterly basis and distribute to 150,000 people
- Center's web site with over 28,000 pages of information
- Other publications include "Home Buyer's Guide," "Home Seller's Guide," "Landlord & Tenant Guide" and English-Spanish Real Estate Glossary
- On-line newsletter, RECON (Real Estate Center Online News), distributed twice weekly to over 31,000 subscribers EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
Historical freedom to operate is expected to continue, as is support from industry and governor-appointed advisory committee.
3.A. Page 23 of 31
'r 55 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support OBJECTIVE:
2 Research Special Item Support STRATEGY:
8 Competitive Knowledge Fund Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
Service Categories:
Service:
NA Income:
A.2 0
0 Age:
B.3 BL 2011 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 Objects of Expense:
1005 FACULTY SALARIES TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE Method of Financing:
1 General Revenue Fund SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METIIOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$0 So
$20,263,734
$20,263,734
$20,263,732
$20,263,732
$20,263,732
$20,263,732
$0
$20,263,734
$0
$20,263,734
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$20,263,734
$20,263,732
$0 FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
The Texas Competitive Knowledge Fund (CKF) was newly created by the 80th Legislature. The CKF is intended to support faculty for the purpose of instructional excellence and research, including ways to improve research commercialization. Institutions with total research expenditures of $50 million were eligible and received funding on a formula based allocation. The allocation to Texas A&M University from this fund was approximately $40 million based on $400 million in research expenditures.
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
Research in higher education for Texas has garnered significant economic returns to the state. Remaining internationally and nationally competitive is vital to the state's economic well-being. In analyzing the top 23 research scientists at TAMU, the combined state investment over the last 5 years for these 23 has exceeded $16 million. Per year, this averages approximately $139k for each of the 23 scientists. Subsequently, these same scientists returned over $200 million in research expenditures to the state.
3.A. Page 24 of 31
56 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (AEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
Service Categories:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
3 Public Service Special Item Support STRATEGY:
I School of Architecture Service:
15 Income:
A.1 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 Objects of Expense:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES 1002 OTHER PERSONNEL COSTS 1005 FACULTY SALARIES 2001 PROFESSIONAL FEES AND SERVICES 2002 FUELS AND LUBRICANTS 2003 CONSUMABLE SUPPLIES 2004 UTILITIES 2005 TRAVEL 2006 RENT - BUILDING 2007 RENT - MACHINE AND OTHER 2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE Method of Financing:
I General Revenue Fund SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
Method of Financing:
770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS - DEDICATED)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
$662,878
$18,236
$0
$2,146
$2,120
$8,723
$34,945
$29,742
$19,949
$23,347
$15,555
$817,641
$770,243
$770,243
$730,178
$17,137
$7,960
$2,015
$1,990
$8,202
$32,873
$27,521
$18,723
$21,902
$14,556
$883,057
$883,057
$883,057
$751,603
$24,078
$0
$2,121
$2,095
$8,638
$34,619
$28,983
$19,718
$23,065
$15,329
$910,249
$910,249
$910,249
$619,511
$19,845
$0
$1,748
$1,726
$7,119
$28,535
$23,890
$16,253
$19,012
$12,635
$750,274
$750,274
$750,274
$619,511
$19,845
$0
$1,748
$1,726
$7,119
$28,535
$23,890
$16,253
$19,012
$12,635
$750,274
$750,274
$750,274
$47,398
$47,398
$0 so
$0
$0
$o
$0
$0 so
$750,274
$750,274
$750,274
$750,274
$817,641
$883,057 15.8
$910,249 16.0 14.1 16.2 16.4 3.A. Page 25 of 31
57 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
Service Categories:
- 0.
0 OBJECTIVE:
3 Public Service Special Item Support STRATEGY:
I School of Architecture Service:
15 Income: A.l Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
Funding through the Legislative Appropriation Request (LAR) for the Colonias Program of the Center for HIousing and Urban Development (CHUD) of the College of Architecture (CARC) enables Texas A&M University (TAMU) to respond to the original legislative intent established when this program was created in 1991: to provide residents of the Colonias (i.e., low-income settlements with dirt roads, and no or limited access to water, sewer, energy, and transportation services) access to educational services (e.g., literacy, GED, job training, dropout prevention), job referral, health, human services, and economic and community development assistance.
CHIUD's main strategy has been to establish and maintain physical, human, and mobility infrastructures to serve more than 500,000 residents of over 2,300 Colonias along the Texas/Mexico Rio Grande border, including as many as 200,000 children. CHUD currently has a central office in College Station, regional offices in El Paso, Laredo, and Weslaco, partnerships with 28 Community Resource and Service Centers throughout the region served, and a combined office and field staff that oscillates between 50 - 75 people on a regular basis.
To date, CHUD has partnered with over 400 local government, state and federal agencies, and nonprofit organizations in offering a wide range of services and programs for children, youth, adult women and men, and the elderly, to promote the active involvement of Colonias residents in reducing their isolation, increasing their ability to become self-sufficient, and enhancing their quality of life EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:.
Demographic changes in the next 20 years in Texas will inevitably place immense pressure on its urban areas, and lead to new and more complex challenges, such as new models of low cost, high performance, and socially acceptable housing. In addition, expansion of cities will place immense pressures upon civil infrastructure systems (e.g., water, energy, transportation), and the education, healthcare, and commercial bases, which must be relieved through carefully planned development. Finally, the Texas/Mexico border continues to face immigration and homeland security issues.
More specifically in the Colonias along the borde r counties within CHUD's service area, Texas is facing: a rapid growth of the Hispanic population; extreme shortage of affordable and quality housing; continued growth and development of unregulated human settlements; lack of transportation, water, energy, and communications systems; limited and poor economic opportunities and conditions, low income, limited mobility, and low English literacy and fluency. Furthermore, limited understanding of, information about, and accessibility to, basic services and prograims of town, school, and agency office systems, contribute to perpetuate the isolation of Colonias residents.
In general, the quality of life of Colonias residents is poor, and as a result, Colonias pose a serious challenge, within which, if the problems, needs, opportunities, and aspirations of colonia residents and their families are not addressed now, the costs of addressing them to the State and the Nation will only increase in the future.
3.A. Page 26 of 31
58 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
Service Categories:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
4 Institutional Support Special Item Support STRATEGY:
1 Faculty Reinvestment Service:
19 Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3.
CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 Objects of Expense:
- 1001 SALARIES AND WAGES 1002 OTHER PERSONNEL COSTS 1005 FACULTY SALARIES 1010 PROFESSIONAL SALARIES TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE I
$264,979
$2,599
$22,633,931
$488,534
$23,390,043
$23,390,043
$23,390,043
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 Method of Financing:
I General Revenue Fund SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 0.0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0 0.0
$23,390,043
$0 0.0
$0 0.0 FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
242.6 STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
The faculty reinvestment program is in its final stages. With the majority of the hires in place for Fall 2008. This program, when finalized, has allowed us to hire an additional 447 new faculty. The impact so far is fewer large classes, more small classes, more faculty diversity, and more research funding. Faculty reinvestmient has contributed both to the state goal of having a more diverse university faculty and to the "Closing the Gaps" goals of improving research and academic excellence.
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
3.A. Page 27 of 31
59 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST S81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
Service Categories:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
4 Institutional Support Special Item Support STRATEGY:
3 Institutional Enhancement Service:
19 Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 Objects of Expense:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES 1002 OTHER PERSONNEL COSTS 1005 FACULTY SALARIES 1010-PROFESSIONAL SALARIES TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE Method of Financing:
1 General Revenue Fund SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 so
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
'$o
$0
$o
$0
$0
$4,417,488
$0
$4,417,488
$4,417,488
$4,417,488
$4,417,488
$0
$0
$4,417,488
$0
$4,417,488
$4,417,488
$4,417,488
$4,417,488
$4,417,488
$0 so
$0
$0 0.0
$0 0.0
$4,417,488 FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
0.0 0.0 STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
3.A. Page 28 of 31
60 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
Service Categories:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
4 Institutional Support Special Item Support STRATEGY:
3 Institutional Enhancement Service:
19 Income: A.2 Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 The funds appropriated for Institutional Enhancement were not expended in this strategy. These funds were transferred to Operations Support for the purposes indicated below:
FY2008 - $4,417,488 School of Gov't and Public Service $809,023 Bush School $1,242,707 Radiological Safety $257,171 Outreach Centers $186,688 Faculty Salary Increases $1,921,899 FY2009 - $4,417,488 School of Gov't and Public Service $809,023 Bush School $1,242,707 Radiological Safety $257,171 Outreach Centers $186,688 Faculty Salary Increases $1,921,899 EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
3.A. Page 29 of 31
61 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:10:45AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special Item Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
4 Institutional Support Special Item Support Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
7 Summer School Service:
NA Income:
A.2 Age:
B.3.
CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est 2008.
Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 Objects of Expense:
1005 FACULTY SALARIES TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE Method of Financing:
I General Revenue Fund SUBTOTAL, MOF (GENERAL REVENUE FUNDS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS)
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS)
$0
$0
$0 so
$3,000,000
$3,000,000
$3,000,000
$3,000,000
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$o 0.0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 0.0
$0
$3,000,000 0.0
$o 0.0 FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION:
House Bill 1330 provided funding for a pilot program for reduced tuition. This applied for Texas Resident students taking one summer term. State mandated tuition was charged at 3A the current rate or $37.50/semester credit hour. Designated tuition was charged at the same rate, $37.50/semester credit hour. The funding provided was used to offset the lost revenue due to reduced tuition rates.
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING STRATEGY:
3.A. Page 30 of 31
62 3.A. STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/6/2008 TIME:
6:22:29PM
SUMMARY
TOTALS:
OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
METHODS OF FINANCE (INCLUDING RIDERS):
METHODS OF FINANCE (EXCLUDING RIDERS):
FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS:
$314,060,125
$314,060,125 5,429.2
$338,202,619
$338,202,619 5,550.8
$340,468,067
$340,468,067 5,577.8
$50,819,952
$50,819,952
$50,819,952 5,835.7
$51,663,193
$51,663,193
$51,663,193
- 5,841.9*
3.A. Page 31 of 31
63 3.C. RIDER APPROPRIATIONS AND UNEXPENDED BALANCES REQUEST Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
7/30/2008 TIME:
10:37:31AM Agency code:
Agency name:
RIDER STRATEGY METHOD OF FINANCING:
Total, Method of Financing Description/Justification for continuation of existing riders or proposed new riderNk 3.C. Page 1 of 2
64 4.A. EXCEPTIONAL ITEM REQUEST SCHEDULE 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
TIME:
8/1/2008 10:14:24AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University CODE DESCRIPTION Excp 2010 Excp 2011 Item Name:
University Bound - Success for Underrepresented Students at Texas A&M University and Other State Universities Item Priority:.
I Includes Funding for the Following Strategy or Strategies:
03-01-05 University Bound OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES 2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE METHOD OF FINANCING:
I General Revenue Frnd TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCING 2,000,000 2,000,000 L,Uuu,UUU L,IJUU,UUU
$4,000,000
$4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000
$4,000,000
$4,000,000 DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION:
The objective of the program is to increase the number of Hispanic and African-American students applying to, being accepted by, enrolling in and graduating from Texas A&M University and other state, four-year institutions. This program will: build on established linkages between TAMU and targeted high schools as well as leverage other existing positive relations with partners in the K-12 System; specifically focus on Early College High Schools (ECHS) which provide rigorous and personalized instruction with intense academic counseling in a small school environment; invest resources to produce college-ready African American and Hispanic students; enhance efforts on SAT and ACTpreparation; utilize A&M's seven Prospective Student Centers in key state locations; and, provide a commitment of admission to Texas A&M for ninth grade students, identifed by their schools and the University Bound program (subject to class rank and SA'TACT scores).
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS:
Bold education policies and practices are needed to ensure that more young people earn the college degree that is curcial to individual economic security and to the viability of the state's economy.
This initiative will significantly aid in the percentage increase of African American and Hispanic students graduating from high school and entering postsecondary education.
4.A. Page I of 3
65 4.A. EXCEPTIONAL ITEM REQUEST SCHEDULE 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
TIME:
8/1/2008 10:14:24AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University CODE DESCRIPTION Excp 2010 Excp 2011 Item Name:
Keeping Texas Scholars in Texas Program Item Priority:
2 Includes Funding for the Following Strategy or Strategies:
03-01-04 Keep Texas Scholars OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE METHOD OF FINANCING:
1 General Revenue Fund TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCING 1,800,000 3,600,000
$1,800,000
$3,600,000 1,800,000 3,600,000
$1,800,000
$3,600,000 DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION:
The objective of the program is to strengthen U.S. and Texas competitiveness and to sustain a leadership role in innovation by ensuring a domestic base of science and engineering expertise. This program will: create a graduate student fellowship program at TAMU for Texas students pursuing graduate degrees in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) fields; recognize an, support outstanding students in the relevant STEM disciplines with the focus on keeping the most talented graduate students in Texas; provide 60 awards in 2010 and an additional 60 awards in 2011. Awards are $30,000 per year for two years.
EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS:
This initiative supports the State's goals of furthering the development and application of knowledge through teaching, research and commercialization, and conserving and protecting our state's natural resources:
Studies at the state and national level report the need for more STEM and technology-oriented works to keep Texas and the nation competitive.
Texas A&M University has proven success in address the need for increased participation in education and careers in STEM areas.
Competition for graduate students, especially in these fields, remains an obstacle in sustaining a coordinated academic pipeline from the various undergraduate programs to the growing number of state-wide graduate programs.
4.A. Page 2 of 3
66 4.A. EXCEPTIONAL ITEM REQUEST SCIIEDULE 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
TIME:
8/1/2008 10:14:24AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University CODE DESCRIPTION Excp 2010 Excp 2011 Item Name:
Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement Item Priority:
3 Includes, Funding for the Following Strategy or Strategies:
02-01-02 Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
2008 DEBT SERVICE TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE 8,282,533 8,282,533
$8,282,533
$8,282,533 8,282,533 8,282,533
$8,282,533
$8,282,533 METHOD OF FINANCING:
1 General Revenue Fund TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCING DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION:
Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement EXTERNAL/INTERNAL FACTORS:
4.A. Page 3 of 3
67 4.13. EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS STRATEGY ALLOCATION SCHEDULE 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:15:13AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University Code Description Excp 2010 Excp 2011 Item Name:
University Bound -
Allocation to Strategy:
3-1-5 OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES 2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE METHOD OF FINANCING:
1 General Revenue Fund TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCING Success for Underrepresented Students at Texas A&M University and Other State Universities University Bound,
2,000,000 2,000,000
$4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
$4,000,000 4,000,000
.4,000,000
$4,000,000
$4,000,000 4.B. Page 1 of 3
68 4.B. EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS STRATEGY ALLOCATION SClIEDULE 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:15:13AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University Code Description Excp 2010 Excp 2011 Item Name:
Keeping Texas Sch Allocation to Strategy:
3-1-4 OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE METHOD OF FINANCING:
1 General Revenue Fund TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCING.
olars in Texas Program Keep Texas Scholars 1,800,000 3,600,000
$1,800,000
$3,600,000 1,800,000 3,600,000 S1,800,000
$3,600,000 4.B. Page 2 of 3
69 4.B. EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS STRATEGY ALLOCATION SCIIEDULE 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:15:13AM Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University Code Description Excp 2010 Excp 2011 Item Name:
Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement Allocation to Strategy:
OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
2008 DEBT SERVICE TOTAL, OBJECT OF EXPENSE METHOD OF FINANCING:
I General Revenue Fund TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCING 2-1-2 Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement 8,282,533 8,282,533
$8,282,533
$8,282,533 8,282,533 8,282,533
$8,282,533
$8,282,533 4.B. Page 3 of 3
70 4.C. EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency name:
Texas A&M University DATE:
8/6/2008 TIME:
6:24:28PM Agency Code:
GOAL:
OBJECTIVE:
STRATEGY:
711 2 Provide Infrastructure Support I Provide Operation and Maintenance of E&G Space 2 Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
Service Categories:
Service:
10 Income:
0 - 0 A.2
- Age:
B.3 CODE DESCRIPTION Exen 2fl10 E~en 2011 OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
2008 DEBT SERVICE Total, Objects of Expense METHOD OF FINANCING:
8,282,533 8,282,533
$8,282,533
$8,282,533 8,282,533 8,282,533
$8,282,533
$8,282,533 I General Revenue Fund Total, Method of Finance EXCEPTIONAL ITEM(S) INCLUDED IN STRATEGY:
Tuition Revenue Bond Retirement 4.C. Page 1 of 3
71 4.C. EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/6/2008 TIME:
6:24:28PM Agency Code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide Special tem Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
0 0
OBJECTIVE:
1 Instructional Support Special Item Support Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
4 Keep Texas Scholars Service:
NA Income:
NA Age:
NA CODE DESCRIPTION Excp 2010 Excp2011 OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE Total, Objects of Expense METHOD OF.FINANCING:
I General Revenue Fund Total, Method of Finance 1,800,000 3,600,000
$1,800,000
$3,600,000 1,800,000 3,600,000
$1,800,000 S3,600,000 EXCEPTIONAL ITEM(S) INCLUDED IN STRATEGY:
Keeping Texas Scholars in Texas Program 4.C. Page 2 of 3
72 4.C. EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS STRATEGY REQUEST 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/6/2008 TIME:
6:24:09PM Agency Code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University GOAL:
3 Provide SpecialItem Support Statewide Goal/Benchmark:
0 - 0 OBJECTIVE:
1 Instructional Support Special Item Support Service Categories:
STRATEGY:
5 University Bound Service: NA Income:
NA Age:
NA CODE DESCRIPTION Excp 2010 Excp 2011 OBJECTS OF EXPENSE:
1001 SALARIES AND WAGES 2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE Total, Objects of Expense METHOD OF FINANCING:
1 General Revenue Fund Total, Method of Finance 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
$4,000,000
$4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000
$4,000,000
$4,000,000 EXCEPTIONAL ITEM(S) INCLUDED IN STRATEGY:
University Bound - Success for Underrepresented Students at Texas A&M University and Other State Universities 4.C. Page 3 of 3
73 6.A. HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESS SUPPORTING SCHEDULE Date:
8/1/2008 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Time:
10:16:06AM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency Code:
711 Agency:
Texas A&M University COMPARISON TO STATEWIDE HUB PROCUREMENT GOALS A. Fiscal Year 2006 - 2007 HUB Expenditure Information Statewide Procurement HUB Expenditures FY 2006 Total Expenditures HUB Expenditures FY 2007 Total Expenditures HUB Goals Category
% Goal
% Actual Actual $
FY 2006
% Goal
% Actual Actual $
FY 2007 11.9%
Heavy Construction 72.1%
72.2%
$25,524
$35,374 77.0%
77.1%
$33,392
$43,319 26.1%
Building Construction 3.9%
3.9%
$95,792
$2,438,712 17.3 %
0.2%
$29,026
$16,746,503 57.2%
Special Trade Construction 59.5%
59.5%
$20,115,009
$33,781,088 62.8%
62.8%
$19,291,789
$30,703,563 20.0%
Professional Services 16.2 %
16.3%
$126,172
$775,908 5.6 %
5.6%
$58,112
$1,043,671 33.0%
Other Services 9.0 %
9.0%
$3,026,522
$33,604,469 10.4 %
10.4%
$3,635,554
$34,838,575 12.6%
Commodities 14.2%
14.2%
$14,704,129
$103,364,311 15.3 %
15.4%
$17,398,023
$113,165,966 Total Expenditures 21.9%
$38,093,148
$173,999,862 20.6%
$40,445,896
$196,541,597 B. Assessment of Fiscal Year 2006 - 2007 Efforts to Meet HUB Procurement Goals Attainment:
FY 2006 - Heavy Construction, Special Trade Construction and Commodities FY 2007 - Heavy Construction, Special Trade Construction and Commodities Applicability:
Factors Affecting Attainment:
The Texas A&M University Physical Plant's Resale Codes did not allow for accurate reporting of expenditures in the categories of Building Construction, Professional Services and Other Services.
"Good-Faith" Efforts:
Resale codes adjusted to include Physical Plant Expenditures in proper procurement category expenditures.
Personnel training of Physical Plant staff on use of correct resale codes that-will map to correct procurement category for expenditures. Partnership with Council of Business Administrators as a HUB Advisory Group which reviews good faith effort initiatives to strengthen university's commitment to HUB expenditure goals. Conduct quarterly vendor workshops that provide information to HUB vendors and vendors that meet the HUB criteria, to learn how to do business with the university. Transmit formal procurement opportunities in excess of $5000 to the Houston Minority Business Council and the Women's Business Enterprise Alliance membership.
6.A. Page 1 of I
74 6.B. Current Biennium One-time Expenditure Schedule 6.B. Page 1 of 1
75 DATE:
8/1/2008 6.G HOMELAND SECURITY FUNDING SCIIEDULE - PART A TERRORISM TIME:
10:16:52AM 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
.Agency code:.
711 Agency name:
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY CODE DESCRIPTION Exp 2007 Est2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 OBJECTS OF EXPENSE 1001 SALARIES AND WAGES
$401,552
$448,286
$402,536
$414,612
$427,051 1002 OTHER PERSONNEL COSTS
$52,375
$56,600
$59,308
$61,075
$62,881 2001 PROFESSIONAL FEES AND SERVICES
$3,217
$60,312
$27,500
$27,500
$27,500 2002 FUELS AND LUBRICANTS
$69
$51
$0
$0
$0 2003 CONSUMABLE SUPPLIES
$21,032
$517
$0
$0
$0 2004 UTILITIES
$2,962
$2,462
$0
$0
$0 2005 TRAVEL
$41,090
$23,424
$0
$0
$0 2006 RENT-BUILDING
$1,227
$11,709
$0
$0
$0 2007 RENT - MACHINE AND OTHER
$969
$31,917
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000 2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE
$52,529
$319,753
$193,866
$182,552
$184,799 5000 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
$40,000
$250,000
$0
$0
$0 TOTAL, OBJECTS OF EXPENSE
$617,022
$1,205,031
$711,210
$713,739
$730,231 METHOD OF FINANCING 1
General Revenue Fund
$558,417
$1,151,068
$654,802
$655,638
$670,387 Subtotal, MOF (General Revenue Funds)
$558,417
$1,151,068
$654,802
$655,638
$670,387 770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco
$58,605
$53,963
$56,408
$58,101
$59,844 Subtotal, MOF (Gr-Dedicated Funds)
$58,605
$53,963
- $56,408
$58,101
$59,844.
TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE
$617,022
$1,205,031
$711,210
$713,739
$730,231 FULL-TIME-EQUIVALENT POSITIONS 6.5 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.G. Page 1 of 7
76 6.G HOMELAND SECURITY FUNDING SCHEDULE - PART A TERRORISM DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:16:52AM 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency code:
711 Agency name:
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY CODE DESCRIPTION.
Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 BL 2010 BL 2011 USE OF HOMELAND SECURITY FUNDS Texas A&M does not receive any funding specifically for homeland security. The homeland security expenditures shown above are spent primarily in three separate areas. The first area is related to increased terrorism security provided by the University Police Department. The second area is The Integrative Center for Homeland Security. The Center explores the entire range of homeland security activities, identifies educational, research, and outreach needs, and helps match them against the many world class capabilities of the Texas A&M University System. The third area is the establishment of a Task Force on Campus Emergencies to seek and implement the best feasible solutions for managing emergency situations.
6.G. Page 2 of 7
77 6.G HOMELAND SECURITY FUNDING SCHEDULE - PART B NATURAL OR MAN-MADE DISASTERS 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (NBEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:16:52AM
.. Agency code:
711 Agency name:
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY CODE DESCRIPTION OBJECTS OF EXPENSE 1001 SALARIES AND WAGES 1002 OTHER PERSONNEL COSTS 2003 CONSUMABLESUPPLIES 2007 RENT --MACHINE AND OTHER 2009 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE TOTAL, OBJECTS OF EXPENSE Exp 2007
$137,270
$20,400
$30,000
$0
$17,782
$205,452
$168,183
$168,183
$37,269
$37,269
$205,452 1.8 Est 2008
$163,677
$24,495
$54,700
$42,000
$34,640
$319,512
$285,330
$285,330
$34,182
$34,182
$319,512 2.4 Bud 2009
$168,587
$25,230
$33,850
$42,000
$34,960
$304,627
$268,896
$268,896
$35,731
$35,731
$304,627 2.4-BL 2010
$173,645
$25,987
$13,000
$42,000
$35,288
$289,920
$253,117
$253,117
$36,803
$36,803
$289,920 BL 2011
$178,854
$26,767
$13,000
$42,000
$35,627
$296,248
$258,341
$258,341
$37,907
$37,907 METHOD OF FINANCING 1
General Revenue Fund Subtotal, MOF (General Revenue Funds) 770 Est Oth Educ & Gen Inco Subtotal, MOF (Gr-Dedicated Funds)
-TOTAL, METHOD OF FINANCE FULL-TIME-EQUIVALENT POSITIONS
$296,248 2.4 2.4 USE OF HOMELAND SECURITY FUNDS Expenditures related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita which were reimbursed by FEMA as well as a portion of the Task Force on Campus Emergencies.
6.G. Page 5 of 7
Texas A&M University 78 6.11. Estimated Sources Inside/Outside the GAA Bill Pattern 2008
- 2009 Biennium 2010 -2011 Biennium
_FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Biennium Percent FY 2010 FY 2011 Biennium Percent
&Actual Sources Actual Sourc s
Budeted Sources Total of Total Est. Sources Est. Sources Total of Total SOURCES INSIDE THE GAA StateAppropriatins 266,638,314 $
270,168,347 295,305,568 $
297,393,264 $
592,698,832 297,393,264 $
297,393,264 $
594,786,528 State Grants and Contracts 14,719,388 17,146,667 19,565,012 21,899,533 33,190,847 16,877,580 16,877,580 33,755,160 Research Excellence Funds (URFITEF HIgher Education Aslstance Funds Available U nlerslty Fund 82,476,500 82,476,500 82,476,500 91,100,000 173,576,500 91,100,000 91,100,000 182,200,000 Tuition and Fees (net of Discounts and Altowances) 48,397,212 65,234,478 56,886,228 69,477,926 126,364,154 69,477,926 69,477,926 138,955,852 Federal Grants and Contracts 10,344,376 7,585,483 8,770,523 9,817,032.
16,397,912 8,373,110 8,373,110 16,746,220 Endowment and Interest Income 2,875,089 3,598,812 2,473,420 2,923,420 5,396,840 2,923,420 2,923,420 5,846,840
,Other Gifts and Grants 1,010,160 1,327,187 1,349,311 1,510,313 Sales and Srvnices of Educational Activities (net) 11,030,476 12,509,819 9,004,720 9,504,720 18,509,440 9,504,720 9,504,720 19,009,440 1
Sales and Services of Hospitals (net)
Transfers In (From Other Agencies and TAMUS) 13,021 12,020 Real Estate Research Center (Fund 979) 2,661,938 2,150,000 2,150,000 2,150,000 4,300,000 2,150,000 2,150,000 4,300,000 Other Income 130,080 172,043 25,000 25,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 50,000 Total Sources lnstde the GAA 440,296,543 462,381,356 478,006,282 505,801,208 970,484,525 38.2%
497,825,020 497,825,020 995,650,040 38.0.%
SOURCES OUTSIDE THE GAA Unrestdcted Tuition and Fees (net of Discounts and Alt*wances) 1 193,722,448 $
206,261,495 221,285,255 $
247,318,624 $
468,603,879 247,318,624 $
247,318,624 $
494,637,248-_--
Federal Grants and Contracts 1,224,369 4,395,452 5,397,245 6,041,250 State Grants and Contracts 17,656,103 19,005,987 22,263,634 24,920,158 43,685,932 22,454,039 22,454,039 44,908,078 Other Gifts, Grants and Contracts 23,835,600 9,016,842 10,119,834 11,327,345 51,148,605 27,810,902 27,810,902 55,621,804 Investment Income 33,490,223 65,834,503 16,201,548 35,067,099 51,268,647 35,067,099 35,067,099 70,134,198 Sales and Seoices of Educational Activities net) 31,748,864 41,450,709 29,708,116
- 28,641,139 58,349,255 28,641,139 28,641,139 57,282,278 Auxriary Enterprises (net) 134,805,397 143,055,696 141,398,615 150,964,013 292,362,628 150,964,013 150,984,013 301,928,026 Transfers In 38,494 290,167 Other Income 12,594,287 14,896,185 11,838,845 12,982,797 24,821,642 12,982,797 12,982,797 25,965,594 Subtotal-Unrestricted 449,115,786 504,207,035 458,213,092 517,262,425 990,240,588 39.0%
525,238,613 525,238,613
, 1,050,477,226 40.0%
Restricted Federal Grants and Contracts 63,786,511 $
72,489,373 57,499,978 $
66,777,274 $
124,277,252 66,777,274 66,777,274 $
133,554,548 State Grants and Contracts 5,400,220 7,073,681 4,559,626 4,475,688 9,035,314 4,475,688 4,475,688 8,951,376
=
Other Gifts and Grants 66,139,388 92,841,777 120,325,428 107,774,583 228,100,011 107,774,583 107,774,583 215,549,166 Endowment,
- Gift, and Investment Income 5,366,137 5,946,639 7,025,263 5,932,213 12,957,476 5,932,213 5,932,213, 11,864,426 Sales and Services of Educational Activities (net) 4,495,657 6,220,667 5,179,595 4,004,310 9,183,905 4,004,310 4,004,310 8,008,620 1
OtherrIncome
.3,220,433 784,506 594,450 1,647,100 2,241,550
____1,647,100 1,647,100 3,294,200 Transfers In Restricted Gifts, Loans and Endowments 21,446,384 23,944,758 20,000,000 20,000,000 40,000,000 20,000,000 20,000,000 40,000,000 BOnd ptoeds transferred from System to fond Construction in Progress (Plant) 3,947,639 38,782,777 68,000,000 68,000,000 136,000,000 68,000,000 68,000,000 136,000,000 Commercial Paper transferred from System to fund Deferred Maintenance I Renovations (Plant) 18,534,079 11,467,972 9,800,000 9,800,000 19,600,000 9,800,000 9,800,000 19,600,000 Subtotal-Restricted 192,336,448 259,532,150 292,984,340 288,411,168 581,395,508 22.9%
288,411,168 1 288,411,168 576,822,336 22.0%
Totel sources outaide the GAA 641,452,234 763,739;185 751,197,432 805,673,593 1,571,636,096 61.8%
813,649,781 [
813,649,781 1,627,299,562 62.0%
TOTAL SOURCES 1,081,748,777 $
1,226,120,541 1,229,203,714 $
1,311,474,801 2,542,120,621 100.0%
$ 1,311,474,801 [
1,311,474,801 2,622,949,602 1 100.0%
79 6.1. 10 Percent Biennial Base Reduction Options Schedule Approved Reduction Amount
$2,038,884 Agenc, Code:
Agency Name:
FTE Reductions (FY Cumulative GR 2010-11 Base Revenue
. related Rank Reduction Item Biennial Application of 10% Percent Reduction Request Compared Impact?
reduction as a to Budgeted 2009)
Y/N
% of Approved t
29 Base Strat Name GR GR-Dedicated Federal Other All Funds FY 08 FY 09 1
Workers Compensation Insurance 142,634 142,634 y
0.7%
2 Cyclotron Institute 38,594 38,594 y
0.9%
3 Sea Grant Program 25,324 25,324 y
1.0%
4 Energy Resources Program 38,849 38,849 y
1.2%
5 Public Policy Resource Laboratory 2,904 2,904 y
1.2%
6 School of Architecture 52,825 52,825_
y 1.5%
7 Insitutional Enhancement 311,026 311,026
" y 3.0%
8 Competitive Knowledge Fund 1,426,728 1,426,728 y
10.0%
9 10.0%
10 10.0%
11 10.0%
12 10.0%
Agency Biennial Total 2,038,884 2,038,884 0.0 0.0 10.0%
Agency Biennial Total (GR + GR-D) 2,038,884 Rank / Name Explanation of Impact to Programs and Revenue Collections 1
Workers Compensation Insurance 2
Cyclotron Institute Continuing support from the State of Texas was critical to the Institute obtaining funding from DOE and the Welch Foundation for proceeding with an upgrade of the Institute facilities. The upgrade will assure competitive state-of-the art capabilities for at least the next 15 years. With these capabilities, external funding over the next 15 years should be - $ 100,000,000 (in current dollars). A cut in state support, without a commitment of replacement funds from the University, would lead to curtailed operations and almost certain loss of federal support for research and operations.
3 Sea G rant Prooramn The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) requires a one dollar state match for every two federal dollars allocated to the program. Special Item funding from the Texas Legislature historically has provided the vast majority of the match for this program, with the remainder coming from such sources as salary matching by investigators whose research is funded by the program. Lacking an appropriate level of in-kind match, the Texas Sea Grant College Program would be unable to participate fully in the program and would, in fact, have to refuse some of the federal funding. The 10% reduction would also mean having to reduce the number of investigators currently working on the projects.
4 Energy Resources Program Currently, there are limited sources for providing faculty and researchers with funds to pursue developmental and emerging research areas despite the importance of such investment in the state's economy. A 10%
reduction or loss of funding for this program would have a severe impact on the program due to the additional external funds gained from the State's investment in these critical areas. The reduction would hinder our ability to create a critical and significant mass of intellectual and human capital to help recruit and retain other faculty and researchers in the area.
6.1. Page 1 of 2
80 Rank / Name 5
Public Policy Resource Laboratory The Public Policy Resource Laboratory (PPRL) has been previously cited by the Texas A&M University System (TAMUS) as the most efficient research organization on any TAMUS campus. The PPRL currently has a leverage of state to federal dollars of over 50 to 1. This special item has been used to fund much needed administrative support personnel and activities that are vital, but not totally billable to extramural projects.
A 10% reduction would cause us to cut back in the area of support personnel.
6 School of Architecture Overal a 10% loss of funding-for the Colonias Program of the Center for Housing and Urban Development (CHUD) within the College of Architecture at Texas A&M University will result in the inability to meet the legislative intent that was established when the Colonias Program was created in 1991. Center for Housing and Urban Development (CHUD) would likely be forced to close one of its three regional offices, which could be, for example, the Weslaco Regional Office, which serves the Lower Rio Grande Region, given its current level of staffing and activities. They would likely be forced to reduce staff at the three CHUD Regional Offices as well as the College Station office where management and financial oversight are maintained. They could potentially be forced to stop the current expansion of its services from primarily serving rural Colonias to also serving urban Colonias.
7 Insitutional Enhancement Included in this strategy areactivities related to the Bush School of Government and Public Service, Radiological Safety, Prospective Student Outreach Centers, and Faculty Salary Increase funding. If funding is cut in this strategy, each of these programs will suffer. The impact to the Bush School of Government and Public Service would be substantial. It would reduce staff in the school's Institute for Science, Technology, and Public Policy. It would also reduce support for a newly emerging 15 credit hour graduate level certificate program in Homeland Security that is consistent with local, state, and national homeland security objectives.
8 Competitive Knowledge Fund Over the past 10 to 15 years, Texas A&M lost almost 115 tenured/tenure-track faculty members, causing a negative effect in the classrom. Since 2004, Texas A&M University has been undergoing an extensive faculty reinvestment initiative whereby we have hired or plan to hire a total of 447 new faculty over a five year period. The purpose of the initiative was to improve the student/faculty ratio and provide the opportunity for students to experience small classes. A 10% reduction to this funding could potentially jeopardize these performance measures. The reduction would cause us to reduce faculty numbers by 22 each year or raise tuition to cover the lost funding.
- 61. Page 2 of 2
Schedule IA: Other Educational and General Income DATE: 10/14/2008 81 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 TIME:
2:12:41PM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
PAGE:
1 of 3
Agency Code:
711 Agency Name:
Texas A&M University Act 2007 Act 2008 Bud 2009 Est 2010 Est 2011 Gross Tuition Gross Resident Tuition 59,670,547 61,098,106 62,056,758 62,752,064 62,752,064 Gross Nofi-Resident Tuition 50,873,909 53,014,829 53,086,937 53,879,533 53,879,533 Gross Tuition 110,544,456 114,112,935 115,143,695 116,631,597 116,631,597 Less: Remissions and Exemptions (29,778,595)
(30,600,065)
(30,866,798)
(30,700,000)
(30,700,000)
Less: Refunds 0
0 0
0 0
Less: Installment Payment Forfeits 0
0 0
0 0
Less: Board Authorized Tuition Increases (TX. Educ. Code Ann. Sec.
(8,020,415)
(8,479,220)
(8,453,560)
(8,618,171)
(8,618,171) 54.008)
Less: Tuition increases charged to doctoral students with hours in (821,215)
(1,023,172)
(144,369)
(150,000)
(150,000) excess of 100 (TX. Educ. Code Ann. Sec. 54.012)
Less: Tuition increases charged to undergraduate students with (700,000)
(669,102)
(700,000)
(700,000)
(700,000) excessive hours above degree requirements. (TX. Educ. Code Ann.
See. 61.0595)
Less: Tuition rebates for certain undergraduates (TX. Educ. Code (1,189,000)
(1,125,000)
(1,450,000)
(1,450,000)
(1,450,000)
Ann. Sec. 54.0065)
Plus: Tuition waived for Students 55 Years or Older (TX. Educ. Code 0
0 0
0 0
Ann. Sec. 54.013)
Less: Tuition for repeated or excessive hours (TX. Educ. Code Ann.
(784,270)
(1,209,182)
(1,094,407)
(1,000,000)
(1,000,000)
Sec. 54.014)
Plus: Tuition waived for Texas Grant Recipients (TX. Educ. Code 0
0 0
0 0
Ann. See. 56.307)
Subtotal 69,250,961 71,007,194 72,434,561 74,013,426 74,013,426 Less: Transfer of Tuition to Retirement of Indebtedness: 1) Skiles 0
0 0
0 0
Act Less: Transfer of funds for Texas Public Education Grants Program (8,780,043)
(8,905,943)
(9,061,837)
(9,161,517).
(9,161,517)
(Tex. Educ. Code Ann. Sec. 56c) and for Emergency Loans (Tex.
Educ. Code Ann. Sec. 56d)
Less: Transfer of Funds (2%) for Emergency Loans (Medical School) 0 0
0 0
0 Less: Transfer of Funds for Repayment of Student Loans of 0
0 0
0 0
Physicians (Tx. Educ. Code Ann. Sec. 61.539)
Less: Statutory Tuition (Tx. Educ. Code Ann. Sec. 54.051) Set Aside (172,422)
(164,694)
(174,452)
(175,000)
(175,000) for Doctoral Incentive Loan Repayment Program (Tx. Educ. Code Ann. Sec. 56.095)
Less: Other Authorized Deduction
Schedule IA: Other Educational and General Income DATE: 10/14/2008 82 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 TIME:
2:12:41PM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
PAGE:
2 of 3
Agency Code:
711.
Agency Name:
Texas A&M University Act 2007 Act 2008 Bud 2009 Est 2010 Est 2011 Net Tuition 60,298,496 61,936,557 63,198,272 64,676,909 64,676,909 Student Tecaching Fees 0
0 0
0 0
Special Course Fees 0
0 0
0 0
Laboratory Fees 553,989 540,350 500,000 500,000 500,000 Subtotal, Tuition and Fees (Formula Amounts for Health-Related Institutions) 60,852,485 62,476,907 63,698,272 65,176,909 65,176,909 OTHER INCOME Interest on General Funds:
Local Funds in State Treasury 3,591,173 3,936,231 2,916,249 2,900,000
.2,900,000 Funds in Local Depositories, e.g., local amounts 0
0 0
0 0
Other Income (Itemize)
Misc 28,510 3,156 28,510 28,510 28,510 Federal Land Grand Endowment 7,640 7,331 7,640 7,640 7,640 Sales and Services~
0 0
0 0
0.
Vet Med 0
0 0
0 0
Surplus 16,043 17,921 16,043 16,043 16,043 Other
.0 0
0 0
0 Subtotal, Other Income 3,643,366 3,964,639 2,968,442 2,952,193 2,952,193 Subtotal, Other Educational and General Income 64,495,851 66,441,546 66,666,714 68,129,102 68,1'29,102 Less: O.A.S.I. Applicable to Educational and General Local Funds (4,687,752)
(4,224,278)
(4,384,781)
(4,539,831)
(4,659,261)
Payrolls Less: Teachers Retirement System and ORP Proportionality for (4,083,5114)
(4,148,929)
(4,305,590)
(4,456,885)
(4,573,209)
Educational and General Funds Less: Staff Group Insurance Premiums (8,776,130)
(8,282,878)
(9,067,830)
(9,395,575)
(9,658,062)
Total, Other Educational and General Income (Formula Amounts for General Academic Institutions) 46,948,455 49,785,461 48,908,513
.49,736,811 49,238,570 Reconciliation to Summary of Request for FY 2007-2009:
Plus: Transfer of Tuition for Retirement of Indebtedness - Skiles Act 0
0 0
0 0
Plus: Transfer of Funds for Texas Public Education Grants Program 8,780,043 8,905,943 9,061,837 9,161,517 9,161,517 and Emergency Loans Plus: Transfer of Funds for Cancellation of Student Loans of 0
0 0
.0 0
Physicians Plus: Organized Activities 12,509,819 13,684,010 13,000,000 13,500,000 14,000,000
Schedule IA: Other Educational and General Income DATE: 10/14/2008 83 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 TIME:
2:12:41PM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
PAGE:
3 of 3
Agency Code:
711 Agency Name:
Texas A&M University Act 2007 Act 2008 Bud 2009 Est 2010 Est 2011 Plus: Staff Group Insurance Premiums 8,776,130 8,282,878 9,067,830 9,395,574 9,658,061 Plus: Board-authorized Tuition Income 8,020,415 8,479,220 8,453,560 8,618,171 8,618,171 Plus: Tuition Increases Charged to Doctoral Students with Hours in 821,215 1,023,172 144,369 150,000 150,000 Excess of 100 Plus: Tuition Increases Charged to Undergraduate Students with 700,000 669,102 700,000 700,000 700,000 Excessive Hours above Degree Requirements (TX. Educ. Code Ann.
Sec. 61.0595)
Plus: Tuition rebates for certain undergraduaies (TX Educ.Code 1,189,000 1,125,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 Ann. Sec. 54.0065)
Plus: Tuition for repeated or excessive hours (TX. Educ. Code Ann.
784,270 1,209,182 1,094,407 1,000,000 1,000,000 Sec. 54.014)
Less: Tuition Waived for Students 55 Years or Older 0
0 0
0 0
Less: Tuition Waived for Texas Grant Recipients 0
0 0
0 0
Plus: Indirect Cost Recovery 2007 (health-related institutions only) 0 0
0 0
0 Total, Other Educational and General Income Reported on Summary of Request 88,529,347 93,163,968 91,880,516 93,712,073 93,976,319
84 Schedule lb: llealth-related Institutions Patient Income Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE: 7/30/2008 TIME: 10:13:18AM PAGE:
1 of Agency Code:
711 Agency Name:
Gross Tuition Subtotal, Health-related Institutions Patient Income Total, Health-related Institutions Patient Income Reported on Summary of Base Request by Method of Financing and in Schedule 2, Item 4.
/
Schedule 2: Grand Total Educational,,General and Other Funds DATE: 10/14/2008 85 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 TIME:
2:13:29PM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
PAGE: 1 of 2 Agency Code:
711 Agency Name-Texas A&M University Act 2007 Act 2008 Bud 2009 Est 2010 Est 2011 Balances as of Beginning of Fiscal Year Encumbered and Obligated 38,679,846 48,637,629 48,637,629 48,637,629 48,637,629 Unencumbered and Unobligated 0
0 0
0 0
Capital Projects - Legislative Appropriations 0
0 0
0 0
Capital Projects - Other Educational and General Funds 0
0 0
0 0
General Revenue Appropriations Direct Appropriations 218,196,305 242,757,297 242,459,023 0
0 Less: Transfer Sec. 9-5.09(c), Expenditures for Commercial Air Travel 0
0 0
0 0
(2007)
Transfer from Office of the Governor Deficiency and Emergency 0
0 0
0 0
Grants Less: General Revenue Appropriations Lapsed 0
0 0
0 0
Plus: Additional General Revenue through Budget Execution 0
3,000,000 0
0 0
Other (Itemize)
Subtotal, General Revenue Appropriations 2.18,196,305 245,757,297 242,459,023 0
0 Other Educational and General Income 88,529,347 93,163,968 91,880,516 93,712,073 93,976,319 Other Appropriated Funds Income Health-related Institutions Patient Income (medical, dental, other) 0 0
0 0
0 Interagency contracts 0
0 0
0 0
Tobacco - Related Funds 0
0 0
0 0
Other (Itemize)
Texas Real Estate 2,857,850 2,955,327 3,020,000 3,296,652 3,375,206 TOTAL, EDUCATIONAL AND GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS 309,583,502 341,876,592 337,359,539 97,008,725 97,351,525 General Revenue Transfers Transfer from Coordinating Board for Advanced Research Program 0
0 0
0 0
Transfer from Coordinating Board for Texas College Work Study 166,105 188,642 136,917 0
0 Program (2007, 2008, 2009)
Transfer from Coordinating Board for the Cancer Registry (2007) 0 0
0 0
0 Transfer from Coordinating Board for Professional Nursing Shortage 0
0 0
0 0
Reduction Program Transfer of GR Group Insurance Premium from Comptroller (UT and 25,810,896 29,230,588 24,548,270 0
0 TAMU Components only).
Less: Transfer to Other Institutions 0
0 0
0 0
Less: Transfer to Department of Health, Disproportionate Share -
0 0
0 0
0 State-Owned Hospitals (2007, 2008, 2009)
Schedule 2: Grand Total Educational, General and Other Funds DATE: 10/14/2008 86 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 TIME:
2:13:29PM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
PAGE: 2 of 2 Agency Code:
711 Agency Name:
Texas A&M University Act 2007 Act 2008 Bud 2009 Est 2010 Est 2011 Other (Itemize)
Other: Fifth Year Accounting Scholarship 35,810 28,851 0
0 0
Texas Grants 16,143,602 18,796,042 19,665,760 0
0 Less: Transfer to System Administration 0
0 0
0 0
B-on-Time Program 1,404,569 2,899,479 3,575,313 0
0 Subtotal, General Revenue Transfers 43,560,982 51,143,602 47,926,260 0
0 General Revenue HEF for Operating Expenses 0
0 0
0 0
Transfer from Available University Funds (UT, A&M and Prairie View 54,695,488 60,695,487 69,295,488 0
0 A&M Only)
Other Additions (Itemize)
Increase Capital Projects - Educational and General Funds 0
0 0
0 0
Transfer from Department of Health, Disproportionate Share -
0 0
0 0
0 State-owned Hospitals (2007, 2008, 2009)
Transfers from Other Funds, e.g., Designated funds transferred for 0
0 0
0 0
educational and general activities (Itemize)
Other (Itemize)
Transfer from Plant 1,310,572 0
0 0
0 Transfers from Sago for Interest 12,020 0
0 0
0 Other Deductions (Itemize)
Decrease Capital Projects - Educational and General Funds 0
0 0
0 Other (Itemize)
Increase in ACAP (1,975,936) 0 0
0 0
Transfer to Plant Fund (3,671,144) 0 0
0 0
Total Funds 442,195,330 502,353,310 503,218,916 145,646,354 145,989,154 Less: Balances as of End of Fiscal Year Encumbered and Obligated (48,637,629)
(48,637,629)
(48,637,629)
(48,637,629)
(48,637,629)
Unencumbered and Unobligated 0
0 0
0 0
Capital Projects - Legislative Appropriations 0
0 0
0 0
Capital Projects - Other Educational and General Funds 0
0 0
0 0
Grand Total, Educational, General and Other Funds 393,557,701 453,715,681 454,581,287 97,008,725 97,351,525 Designated Tuition (Sec. 54.0513) 115,518,148 130,309,383 138,744,076 140,000,000 143,000,000 Indirect Cost Recovery (Sec. 145.001 (d))
14,032,553 1
14,237,410 14,110,413 14,000,000 14,000,000
87 Schedule 3A: Staff Group Insurance Data Elements (ERS) 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Date: 7/30/2008 Time: 10:49:07AM Page: 1 of 3
Agency Code:
711 Agency Code:
Texas A&M University GR-D/OEGI E&G Enrollment GR Enrollment Enrollment Total E&G (Check)
Local Non-E&G GR & GR-D Percentages GR %
0.00%
GR-D %
0.00%
Total Percentage 0.00%
FULL TIME ACTIVES la Employee Only 2a Employee and Children 3a Employee and Spouse 4a Employee and Family 5a Eligible, Opt Out 6a Eligible, Not Enrolled Total for This Section 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
PART TIME ACTIVES lb Employee Only 2b Employee and Children 3b Employee and Spouse 4b Employee and Family 5b Eligble, Opt Out 6b Eligible, Not Enrolled Total for This Section Total Active Enrollment 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00 0
88 Schedule 3B: Staff Group Insurance Data Elements (UT/A&M) 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Date: 816/2008 Time:
6:10:44PM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Page: 1 of 3
Agency Code:
711 Agency Code:
Texas A&M University GR-D/OEGI E&G Enrollment GR Enrollment Enrollment Total E&G (Check)
Local Non-E&G GR & GR-D Percentages GR%
77.12%
GR-D %
22.88%
Total Percentage 100.00%
FULL TIME ACTIVES la Employee Only 2a Employee and Children 3a Employee and Spouse 4a Employee and Family 5a Eligible, Opt Out 6a Eligible, Not Enrolled Total for This Section PART TIME ACTIVES I b Employee Only 2b Employee and Children 3b Employee and Spouse 4b Employee and Family 5b Eligble, Opt Out 6b Eligible, Not Enrolled Total for This Section Total Active Enrollment 1,659 632 652 1,056 160 11 4,170 1,279 487 503 814 123 8
3,214 969 25 39 42 62 87 1,224 380 145 149 242 37 3
956 288 7
12 13 19 26 365 1,659 632 652 1,056 160 11 4,170 1,747 602 474 862 163 7
3,855 1,257 32 51 55 81 113 1,589 1,257 32 51 55 81 113 1,589 919 28 45 55 79 71 1,197 5,759 4,438 1,321 5,759 5,052
89 Schedule 3B: Staff Group Insurance Data Elements (UT/A&M) 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Date: 8/6/2008 Time:
6:10:44PM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Page: 2 of 3
Agency Code:
711 Agency Code:
Texas A&M University GR-D/OEGI E&G Enrollment GR Enrollment Enrollment Total E&G (Check)
Local Non-E&G FULL TIME RETIREES by ERS Ic Employee Only 1,137 877 260 1,137 282 2c Employee and Children 43 33 10 43 11 3c Employee and Spouse 659 508 151 659 163
- 4c Employee and Family 60 46 14 60
.15 5c Eligble, Opt Out 18 14 4
18 4
6c Eligible, Not Enrolled 2
2 0
2 1
Total for This Section 1,919 1,480 439 1,919 476 PART TIME RETIREES by ERS ld Employee Only 0
0 0
0 0
2d Employee and Children 0
0 0
0 0
3d Employee and Spouse 0
0 0
0
.0 4d Employee and Family 0
0 0
0 0
5d Eligble, Opt Out 0
0 0
0 0
6d Eligible, NotEnrolled 0
0 0
0 0
Total for This Section 0
0 0
0 0
Total Retirees Enrollment 1,919 1,480 439 1,919 476 TOTAL FULL TIME ENROLLMENT le Employee Only 2,796 2,156 640 2,796 2,029 2e Employee and Children 675 520 155 675 613 3e Employee and Spouse 1,311 1,011 300 1,311 637.
4e Employee and Family 1,116 860 256 1,116 877 5e Eligble, Opt Out 178 137 41 178 167 6e Eligible, Not Enrolled 13 10 3
13 8
Total for This Section 6,089 4,694 1,395 6,089 4,331
90
-Schedule 3B: Staff Group Insurance Data Elements (UT/A&M) 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Date: 8/6/2008 Time: 6:10:17PM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Page: 3 of 3
Agency Code:
711 Agency Code:
Texas A&M University GR-D/OEGI E&G Enrollment GR Enrollment Enrollment.
Total E&G (Check)
Local Non-E&G TOTAL ENROLLMENT If Employee Only 2f Employee and Children 3f Employee and Spouse 4f Employee and Family 5f Eligble, Opt Out 6f Eligible, Not Enrolled Total for This Section 4,053 707 1,362 1,171 259 126 7,678 3,125 545 1,050 902 199 97 5,918 928 162 312 269 60 29 1,760 4,053 707 1,362 1,171 259 126 7,678 2,948 641 682 932 246 79 5,528
91 SCHEDULE 4: COMPUTATION OF OASI 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Date:
8/1/2008 Time:
10:20:45AM Page:
1 of I
Agency Code:
711 Agency:
Texas A&M University Gross Educational & General Payroll - Subject to OASI FTE Employees - Subject to OASI Average Salary (Gross Payroll / FTE Employees)
Employer OASI Rate 7.65% x Average Salary x FTE Employees Grand Total, OASI Actual Salaries &
Wages 2007
$244,915,218 5,286.1
$46,332
$3,544 5,286.1 S18,733,938 Actual Salaries &
Wages 2008
$250,699,020 5,410.5
$46,336
$3,545 5,410.5
$19,180,223 Budgeted Salaries &
Wages 2009
$258,219,990 5,433.1
$47,527
$3,636 5,433.1
$19,754,752 Estimated Salaries &
Wages 2010
$265,740,961 5,691.0
$46,695 Estimated Salaries &
Wages 2011
$273,261,931 5,697.2
$47,964
$3,572 5,691.0
$20,328,252
$3,669 5,697.2
$20,903,027 Proportionality Percentage Based on Comptroller Accounting Policy Statement #011, Exhibit 2
% to Allocation
% to Allocation
% to Allocation
% to Allocation
% to Allocation Total of OASI Total of OASI Total of OASI Total of OASI Total of OASI 0.7399
$13,861,241
.0.7712
$14,791,788 0.7697
$15,205,233 0.7685
$15,622,262 0.7692
$16,078,608 General Revenue (% to Total)
Other Educational and General Funds (% to Total)
Health-related Institutions Patient Income (% to Total) 0.2601 0.0000 4,872,697 0.2288 0
0.0000 4,388,435 0.2303 0
0.0000 4,549,5.19 0.2315 0
0.0000 4,705,990 0.2308 0
0.0000 4,824,419 0
Grand Total, OASI (100%)
1.0000
$18,733,938 1.0000
$19,180,223 1.0000
$19,754,752 1.0000
$20,328,252 1.0000
, $20,903,027
92 SCHEDULE 5: CALCULATION OF RETIREMENT PROPORTIONALITY AND ORP DIFFERENTIAL 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:21:39AM PAGE:
1 of 1 Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University Description Act 2007 Act 2008 Bud 2009 Est 2010 Est 2011 Proportionality Amounts Gross Educational and General Payroll - Subject to Retirement Employer Contribution to Retirement Programs Proportionality Percentage General Revenue Other Educational and General Income Health-related Institutions Patient Income Proportional Contribution Other Educational and General Proportional Contribution (Other E&G percentage x Total Employer Contribution to Retirement Programs)
HRU Patient Income Proportional Contribution (HRI Patient Income percentage x Total Employer Contribution To Retirement Programs)
Differential Gross Payroll Subject to Differential - Optional Retirement Program 270,977,870 16,258,672 284,112,667 18,694,614 77.12 %
22.88 %
-0.00 %
292,636,048 19,255,452 76.97%
23.03%
0.00%
301,415,129 19,816,290 310,457,583 20,377,129 73.99%
26.01%
0.00%
76.85 %
23.15 %
0.00 %
76.92 %
23.08 %
0.00 %
4,228,881 0
107,230,607 4,277,328 4,434,531 4,587,471 4,703,041 0
0 0
0 106,114,684 106,500,000 106,500,000 106,500,000 Total Differential 1,404,721 774,637 777,450 777,450 777,450
93 Schedule 6: Capital Funding Date:
8/1/2008 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Time: 10:22:30AM Automated Budget and Evalutation System of Texas (ABEST)
Page: 1 of 2,
Agency Code:
711 Agency Name:
Texas A&M University Activity Act 2007 Act2008 Bud 2009 Est 2010 Est 2011 I. Balances as of Beginning of Fiscal Year A. PUF Bond Proceeds 102,406,993 97,680,546 112,560,940 62,549,595 22,731,894 B. HEF Bond Proceeds 0
0 0
0 0
C. HEF Annual Allocations 0
0 0
0 0
D. TR Bond Proceeds 0
8,024,957 74,517,518 50,000,000 25,000,000
-1. Additions A. PUF Bond Proceeds Allocation 32,684,676 92,049,688 95,493,751 10,000,000 0
B. HEF-General Revenue Appropriation 0
0 0
0 0
C. HEF Bond Proceeds 0
0 0
0 0
D. TR Bond Proceeds 8,025,000 66,975,000 0
0 0
E. Investment Income on PUF Bond Proceeds 0
0 0
0 0
F. Investment Income on HEF Bond Proceeds 0
0 0
0 0
G. Investment Income on TR Bond Proceeds 0
0 0
0 0
H. Other (Itemize)
TR Bond Proceeds General Revenue Appropriations for TRB Debt Service 237,574
.6,772,031 6,774,586 6,771,788 6,773,988 HI. Total Funds Available - PUF, HEF, and TRB IV. Less: Deductions A. Expenditures (Itemize)
General Services Building Interdisciplinary Life Sciences Building Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Facility LARR Expansion Mitchell Physics Building Texas Institute for Preclinical Studies Emerging Technologies & Economic Dev Interdisciplinary Bldg Liberal Arts Building YMCA Renovations' Infrastructure Expansion - New Buildings Life Sciences - Finish Shell Space Faculty Reinvestment - Building Renovations Campus Renovations Upgrade of Central & South Utility Plants Chemistry Complex Renovations Satellite Utility Plant I Chiller Upgrade Central Utility Plant Steam Turbine Generator 4 Replacement\\
Ross Street Extension and Repaving Chemistry Building '72 Wing 4th Floor Renovation Library
$143,354,243
$271,502,222
$289,346,795
$129,321,383
$54,505,882 3,745,747 36,254 0
0 0
24,659,090 36,394,000 31,210,446 0
0 139,721 590,000 1,520,000 3,240,000 1,394,113 368,139 4,674,000 2,081,000 3,712,629 0
2,509,511 5,704,000 15,554,334 0
0 117 5,559,000 9,560,000 19,120,000 5,757,755 0
0 20,700,000 7,800,000 0
0 0
4,000,000 0
0.
0 0
2,280,000 4,860,000 4,860,000 862,957 1,124,000 16,763,043 0
0 0
0 300,000 1,600,000 4,050,000 3,531,455 542,230 8,848,650 0
0 224,359 1,491,000 21,963,579 0
0 507,592 11,605,000 1,379,968 0
0 576,325 9,299,958 0
0 0
0 0
4,800,000 4,800,000 "0
0 0
2,750,000 2,750,000 0
0 0
194,076 1,035,072 2,620,026 0
0 1,600,000 900,000 0
286,111 149,852 0
0 0
94 Schedule 6: Capital Funding 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evalutation System of Texas (ABEST)
Date: 8/1/2008 Time: 10:22:30AM Page: 2 of 2 Agency Code:
711 Agency Name:
Texas A&
Activity Emerging Technologies & Economic Dev Interdisciplinary Bldg B. Annual Debt Service on PUF Bonds C.I. Annual Debt Service on HEF Bonds - RFS Commercial Paper C.2. Annual Debt Service on IlIEF Bonds - RFS Bonds, Series 2001 D. Annual Debt Service on TR Bonds E. Other (Itemize)
Total, Deductions V. Balances as of End of Fiscal Year A.PUF Bond Proceeds B.HEF Bond Proceeds C.HEF Annual Allocations D.TR Bond Proceeds
- M University Act 2007 42 0
0 0
237,574 Act 2008 482,439 0
0 0
6,772,031 Bud 2009 24,517,518 0
0 0
6,774,586 Est 2010 25,000,000 0
0 0
6,771,788 Est 2011 25,000,000 0
0 0
6,773,988
$37,648,740
$84,423,764
$176,797,200
$81,589,489
$50,455,882 97,680,545 A 12,560,940 62,549,595 22,731,894 4,050,000 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 8,024,958 74,517,518 50,000,000 25,000,000 0
$105,705,503
$187,078,458
$112,549,595
$47,731,894
$4,050,000
95 SCHEDULE 7: CURRENT AND LOCAL FUND (GENERAL) BALANCES 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST).
DATE:
TIME:
PAGE:
8/1/2008 10:23:20AM 1
of I
Agency code:
711 Agency name:
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY Actual Actual Budgeted Estimated Estimated 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Balance of Current Fund in State Treasury Unobligated Balance in State Treasury Interest Earned in State Treasury Balance of Educational and General Funds in Local Depositories Unobligated Balance in Local Depositories Interest Earned in Local Depositories
$37,231,550
$0
$1,814,288
$8,700,564
$0
$1,776,884
$38,000,000
$0
$1,997,387
$9,000,000
$0
$1,699,775
$38,000,000
$0
$1,200,000
$9,000,000
$0
$1,716,249
$38,000,000
$0
$1,200,000
$9,000,000
$0
$1,700,000
$38,000,000
$0
$1,200,000
,$9,000,000
$0
$1,700,000
96 Schedule 8: PERSONNEL 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Agency name:
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY DATE:
8/1/2008
- TtME:
10:25:01AM PAGE:
1 of2 Agency code:
711 Actual 2007 Actual 2008 Budgeted 2009 Estimated 2010 Estimated 2011 Part A.
FTE Postions E & G Faculty Employees E & G Non-Faculty Employees SUBTOTAL, E&G Other Appropriated Funds SUBTOTAL, ALL APPROPRIATED Other Funds Employees SUBTOTAL, NON-APPROPRIATED GRAND TOTAL Part B.
Personnel Headcount E & G Faculty Employees E & G Non-Faculty Employees SUBTOTAL, E&G Other Appropriated Funds SUBTOTAL, ALL APPROPRIATED Other Funds Employees SUBTOTAL, NON-APPROPRIATED 1,667.6 4,641.5 1,809.3 3,205.8 5,015.1 1,807.0 3,228.3 5,035.3 1,879.7 3,406.6 5,286.3 1,877.4 3,408.1 5,285.5 787.7 535.7 542.5 549.4 556.4 5,429.2 5,550.8 5,577.8 5,835.7 5,841.9 5,044.5 5,163.9 5,182.2 5,202.5 5,218.2 5,044.5 5,163.9 5,182.2 5,202.5 5,218.2 10,473.7 10,714.7 10,760.0 11,038.2 11,060.1 1,656 1,805 1,952 2,030 2,028 3,546
- 3,852 4,487 4,735 4,737 5,202 1,018 6,220 7,541 7,541 5,657 689 6,346 7,752 7,752 6,439 697 7,136 7,849 7,849 6,765 706 7,471 7,877 7,877 6,765 715 7,480 7,908 7,908 GRAND TOTAL 13,761 14,098 14,985 15,348 15,388
97 Schedule 8: PERSONNEL 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
8/1/2008 TIME:
10:25:01AM PAGE:
2 of 2 Agency code:
711 Agency name:
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY Actual Actual Budgeted Estimated Estimated 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 PART C.
Salaries E & G Faculty Employees E & G Non-Faculty Employees SUBTOTAL, E&G Other Appropriated Funds SUBTOTAL, ALL APPROPRIATED Other Funds Employees SUBTOTAL, NON-APPROPRIATED
$152,520,142
$124,699,257
$277,219,399
$53,298,381
$330,517,780
$196,052,353
$196,052,353
$185,587,363
$136,966,143
$322,553,506
$55,963,300
$378,516,806
$201,933,923
$201,933,923
$191,154,983
$141,146,735
$332,301,718
$57,642,199
$389,943,917
$207,991,942
$207,991,942
$203,749,058
$153,264,353
$357,013,411
$59,371,465
$416,384,876
$214,231,700 S214,231,700
$209,861,530
$157,862,284
$367,723,814
$61,152,608
$428,876,422
$220,658,651
$220,658,651 GRAND TOTAL
$526,570,133
$580,450,729
$597,935,859
$630,616,576
$649,535,073
98 SCHEDULE 9: EXPENDITuIRES ASSOCIATED WITH UTILITY OPERATIONS 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
10/1512008.
TIME:
12:59:11PM PAGE:
1 OF I
Agency code:
711 Agency naine:
Texas A&M University Item Consumption Cost ENERGY COST (1) Purchased Electricity (KWH)
(2) Purchased Natural Gas (MCF)
(3) Purchased Thermal Energy (BTU)
WATER/WASTE.WATER (4) Water (1,000 gal.)
(5) Waste Water (1,000 gal.)
UTILITIES OPERATING COSTS (6) Personnel' (7) Maintenance and Operations (8) Renovation UTILITIES DEBT SERVICE (9) Revenue Bonds (10) Loan Star (11) Performance Contracts (12)
TOTAL 243,672,486
$20,088,804
$15,714,544 1,921,887
$0 6,171 4,073
$67,766
$15,404
$4,954,621
$12,329,875
$0
$4,024,566
$392,630
$0
$57,588,210 Items (1) through (5) above are for purchased utilities only. Costs of producing our own electricity, chilled'and hot water, domestic water and.providing our own waste water facilities are included in items (6) through (10).
Above costs are for providing utilities to Texas A&M University and the.following offices and agencies located in College Station: Texas A&M University Health Sciences Center, texas A&M University System Offices, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas Cooperative Extension, Texas Engineering Experiment Station, Texas Engineering Extension Services, Texas Transportation Institute, and Texas Forest Service.
Natural gas MCF was converted from MMBTU at the raio of 1.036 MMBTU = 1MCF
99 Schedule 1OA: Tuition Revenue Bond Projects gist Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version A Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE: 8/1/2008 TIME:
10:28:01AM PAGE:
I of I
Agency code:
711 Priority Number:
Agency Name:. "'exasA&M University Project Number:
Tuition Revenue Bond Request I
$ 95,000,000 Total Project Cost
$ 114,000,000 Cost Per Total Gross Square Feet
$ 353 Name of Proposed Facility:
Facilities Renewal Project Type:
Facilities Renewal Location of Facility:
Various Project Start Date:
09/01/2009 Gross Square Feet:
254,822 Type of Facility:
Various Project Completion Date:
08/31/2011 Net Assignable Square Feet in Project 151,218 Project Description The quality of existing E&G buildings and campus infrastructure has received limited attention over the last three decades. Consequently, the proihise. of excellence in our instructional and research missions is at risk. To enhance access to our university, address the statewide strategic initiatives of"Closing the Gaps", and expand our research capacity to meet the State's scientific, economic and educational future, TAMU has strategically invested resources in faculty and student initiatives. As stewards of this flagship university, we are proposing a Facilities Renewal Program to ensure that our teaching and research facilities will support the work of our faculty and students as they strive for excellence in our academic mission.This project includes restoration/renovation to preserve two Texas A&M University historically significant buildings and begin a campus wide Facilities Renewal Program. The project will provide for efficient, modern and safe classrooms and offices.
100 SCHEDULE 1OB: TUITION REVENUE BOND ISSUANCE HISTORY 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version I Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Date:
Time:
Page:
10/8/2008 12:57:50PM Page 1 of 1 Agency code:
711 Agency name:
Texas A&M University Authorized Amount Proposed Issuance Proposed Issuance Outstanding as of Date for Outstanding Amount for Outstanding Authorization Date Authorization Amount Issuance Date Issuance Amount 08/31/2008 Authorization Authorization 1997
$-12,500,000 Aug 9 1999 Jul 2 2001 Jul 23 2002 Oct 10 2002 Subtotal
$75,000,000 Aug 15 2007 Jul 24 2008 Subtotal
$1,000,000
$5,280,000
$3,520,000
$2,700,000
$12,500,000
$1,312,000
$6,713,000
$8,025,000
$0 2006
$66,975,000 Sep 1 2008
$66,975,000
101 Schedule 1OC: Revenue Capacity for Tuition Revenue Bond Projects 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
DATE:
TIME:
PAGE:
7/30/2008 10:43:49AM I
of 2
Agency Code:
711 Agency Name:
Texas A&M University Act 2007 Act 2008 Bud 2009 Est 2010 Est 2011 Gross Tuition Less: Remissions and Exemptions Less: Refunds Less: Installment Payment Forfeits Less: Board Authorized Tuition Increases (TX. Educ. Code Ann. Sec.
54.008)
Less: Statutory Tuition Increases (TX. Educ. Code Ann. Sec. 54.0512)
(2005, 2006, 2007)
Less: Tuition increases charged to doctoral students with hours in excess of 100 (TX. Educ. Code Ann. Sec. 54.012)
Less: Tuition increases charged to undergraduate students with excessive hours above degree requirements. (TX. Educ. Code Ann. Sec. 61.0595)
Less: Tuition rebates, for certain undergraduates (TX. Educ. Code Ann. Sec.
54.0065)
Plus: Tuition waived for students 55 years or older (TX. Educ. Code Ann.
Sec. 54.0013)
Plus: Tuition waived for Texas Grant Recipients (TX. Educ. Code Ann. Sec.
56.307*
[]
Subtot j
ý
'v Less: Transfer of Tuition to Retirement of Indebtedness: 1) Skiles Act Less: Transfer of Funds for Texas Public Education Grants Program (TX.
Educ. Code Ann. Sec. 56c) and for Emergency Loans (TX. Educ. Code Ann.
Sec. 56d)
Less: Transfer of Funds (2%) for Emergency Loans (Medical School)
Less: Transfer of Funds for Repayment of Student Loans of Physicians (TX. Educ. Code Ann. Sec. 61.539)
Less: Statutory Tuition (TX. Educ. Code Ann. Sec. 54.05 1) Set aside for Doctoral Incentive Loan Repayment Program (TX. Educ. Code Ann. Sec.
56:095)
Less: Other Authorized Deductions Total Net Tuition Available to Pledge for Tuition Revenue Bonds
$0
$0
$0
$0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0'
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 So 0
0 0
0 0
0 so Debt Service on Existing Tuition Revenue Bonds 0
. 0 Det erie n xitngTutonReeneBods00 0
0
102 SCHEDULE 11: SPECIAL ITEM INFORMATION Date:
8/1/2008 KIST REGULAR SESSION Time:
10:26:49AM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Page:
1 of 10 Agency Code:
711 Agency:
Texas A&M University Special Item:
1 Cyclotron Institute (1) Year Special item:
1965 (2) Mission of Special Item:
The Cyclotron Institute is a Department of Energy (DOE) Supported Center of Excellence, jointly supported by DOE and the State of Texas. It is a major technical and educational resource for the State and the nation. The primary functions of the Institute are to conduct basic research, to educate students in accelerator based science and technology, and to provide accelerator capabilities for a wide variety of applications in materials science, nuclear medicine, space science, and analytical procedures.
(3) (a) Major Accomplishments to Date:
The Institute is internationally recognized for its many important contributions to basic science. The Institute has developed unique technological capabilities in the state and has constructed two cyclotrons, the second a superconductingmachine making TAMU one of only two laboratories in the United State and of only four in the world to have such a facility. It has become a major resource for development of important applied programs in the state. In nuclear medicine this has included both diagnostic and therapy programs. The facility radiation effects line supports testing of aircraft, spacecraft, and satellite electronic parts for NASA and a number of aerospace contractors and semiconductor chip manufacturers (Boeing, McDonnell Douglas, Motorola, Lockheed, Loral Aerospace, Honeywell etc.).
(3) (b) Major Accomplishments Expected During the Next 2 Years:
The Institute began a major upgrade in January, 2005, which is leading to greatly expanded capabilities for new beams and new applications. This will make the facility internationally competitive for at least the next 15 years. The upgrade project is jointly funded by DOE, the Welch Foundation and Texas A&M University. The upgrade will continue during the next two years and the first rare-isotope beams from the upgraded facility will be produced. During this period we will continue to educate students, and postdoctoral fellows for careers in accelerator oriented research and technology, an important contribution to the technological development of the state. New experimental and theoretical techniques developed in the Institute will allow the precise measurement of important physical quantities not previously accessible and will greatly enhance our fundamental understanding of nuclear and astrophysical processes. Development of increased testing capabilities will support a broader range of testing and application activities for the radiation effects community.
(4) Funding Source Prior to Receiving Special Item Funding:
Funding by the U.S. Department-of Energy, The Robert A. Welch Foundation and the State were started simultaneously.
(5) Non-general Revenue Sources of Funding:
2008
$2,750,000 Department of Energy*
$250,000 National Science Foundation
$350,000 Robert A. Welch Foundation
$1,400,000 Industrial and Private Sources (estimate)
$478,577 Texas A&M University 2009
$2,850,000 Department of Energy
$350,000 National Science Foundation
$355,000 Robert A. Welch Foundation
103 SCHEDULE 11: SPECIAL ITEM INFORMATION Date:
8/1/2008 81ST REGULAR SESSION Time:
10:26:49AM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas( ABEST)
Page:
2 of 10 Agency Code:
711 Agency:
Texas A&M University
$1,600,000 Industrial and Private Sources
$511,052 Texas A&M University 2010
$3,250,000 Department of Energy
$375,000 National Science Foundation
$400,000 Robert A. Welch Foundation
$1,750,000 Industrial and Private Sources
$544,383 Texas A&M University 2011
$3,400,000 Department of Energy
$390,000 National Science Foundation
$420,000 Robert A. Welch Foundation
$1,900,000 Industrial and Private Sources
$578,715 Texas A&M University
- This includes $400,000 for the Cyclotron Institute Upgrade project which extends through 2008 (6) Consequences of Not Funding:
The special item support of the Cyclotron Institute currently provides approximately 10% of the facility funding. The remaining 90% is obtained from external grants and support from TAMU.
The special item, support leverages a nearly 9-to-I return in institute funding. It provides part of the continuing baseline support first agreed to by TAMU and DOE for this DOE Supported Center of Excellence. Since the state special item support has not increased in seventeen years the University has had to provide an increasing operations supplement and the Institute has had to direct an increasingly larger fraction of the federal support to facility operations rather than use it for the research program. The annual special item support is currently insufficient to meet needs for repair and replacement of key facility mechanical and electronic components. Continuing support from the State of Texas was critical to the Institute obtaining funding from DOE and the Welch Foundation for proceeding with an upgrade of the Institute facilities. The upgrade will assure competitive state-of-the art capabilities for at least the next 15 years. With these capabilities, external funding over the next 15 years should be - $ 100,000,000 (in current dollars). Loss of the state line item support without a commitment of replacement funds from the University would lead-to severely curtailed operations and almost certain loss of the federal support for research and operations.
104 SCHEDULE 11: SPECIAL ITEM INFORMATION Date:
8/1/2008 81ST REGULAR SESSION Time:
10:26:49AM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Page:
3 of 10 Agency Code:
711 Agency:
Texas A&M University Special Item:
2 Sea Grant College Program (1) Year Special Item:
1969 (2) Mission of Special Item:
Provide match for Sea Grant Funding awarded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
(3) (a) Major Accomplishments to Date:
-Supported research that is helping Texas Parks and Wildlife determine impacts/influences of their fish enhancement efforts on recovery of red drum and other species.
- TSG funding has resulted in the development of a GIS-based Internet Coastal Planning Atlas.
-Combined decades of bathymetric data into the first detailed maps of the TX-LA continental shelf, upper slope which are of use to oil and gas companies working in deep water for determining where to lay pipelines.
-Since April 1994, a cooperative program with TSG has trained over 3,125 drill conductors to ensure effective approaches to safety at sea through prevention, survival and self-rescue, and search and rescue.
-The Clean Texas Marina Program, directed by TSG staff, is the largest such program in the country. Seventy-one Texas marinas are certified and an additional 43 are on the program's pledge list out of 372 total coastal and inland facilities, more participation than any other state.
-Efforts by TSG extension specialists led to Texas shrimp fishermen becoming eligible for the first-ever USDA Trade Adjustment Assistance Program to include commercial fishermen. This resulted in over $4 million for the state's shrimp harvesters to lessen the impact of imported shrimp on traditional fishing economies of the Texas coast.
-Sea Grant's Floating Classroom Program, consisting of a 57-ft marine education vessel and shore-based activities, has included over 18,282 students and teachers since 2001.
(3) (b) Major Accomplishments Expected During the Next 2 Years:
-Because of assistance provided the Texas shrimp fishery in the installation and use of modified trawling gear, it is estimated that in 2008 the fleet will reduce fuel consumption by as much as 30 percent on boats that employ the new gear.
-Sea Grant research will lead to the development of genetic markers that will allow the determination of the effectiveness of enhancement stocking of spotted seatrout by the Texas Parks and Wildlife.
-A study on how the Texas brown tide organism responds to nutrient levels in the water may lead to enhanced ability to predict when brown tides will develop.
-The Coastal Research Review Team established in 2007 will provide a means, through the involvement of Sea Grant extension personnelý of determining the research needs at the local level that ca be met through Coastal Management Program grants and get that information to the Texas General Land Office to assist that agency with the development of their research priorities.
-Research supported by Sea Grant will determine the potential for seafood processing waste to be converted into a feed ingredient for cultured red drum or possibly be utilized as a source of biofuel.
-Tidal flow through tidal inlets along the Texas coast will be studied and the information will be used to predict how fish larvae may be distributed in Texas bays, thereby providing an indication of habitat utilization and therefore the importance of certain areas for supporting important living resources.
(4) Funding Source Prior to Receiving Special Item Funding:
Special Item funding was obtained when the Texas Sea Grant College Program was formed as a means of providing matching for NOAA funds that come from the U.S. Department of Commerce.
(5) Non-general Revenue Sources of Funding:
2005: $2,769,720. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Texas General Land Office, National Marine Fisheries Service.
105 SCHEDULE 11: SPECIAL ITEM INFORMATION Date:
8/1/2008 81ST REGULAR SESSION Time:
10:26:49AM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Page:
4 of 10 Agency Code:
711 Agency:
Texas A&M University 2006:
$2,408,936. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, National Marine Fisheries Service.
2007:
$2,423,212. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, National Science Foundation, Texas Energy Conservation Office.
2008:
$2,267,771. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Texas General Land Office, Council for Ocean Resources Education.
(6) Consequences of Not Funding:
The legislation that supports Sea Grant calls for one dollar of non-federal match for every two federal dollars made available to the state programs. Lacking an appropriate level of in-kind match, the Texas Sea Grant, College Program would be unable to participate fully in the program and would, in fact, have to refuse some of the federal funding. Most of the additional funding received from NOAA (for National Strategic Initiatives, also requires matching. As the program continues to successfully compete for additional base funding and extramural resources, the ability to provide matching becomes increasingly difficult. In order for Texas Sea Grant to remain competitive and successful, increases in state funding need to track increases obtained at the federal level. The state match provides strong leveraging of federal dollars in support of activities that benefit all Texans. Currently, state funding provides less than half of the required match. The Special Item funding supports the majority of the Sea Grant staff. Without that funding, the program could not function. The importance of Sea Grant was recognized by the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy in its report. Sea Grant is mentioned in excess of 50 times as the appropriate organization to implement many of the recommendations of the Commission.
106 SCHEDULE 11: SPECIAL ITEM INFORMATION Date:
8/1/2008 81ST REGULAR SESSION Time:
10:26:49AM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Page:
5 of 10 Agency Code:
711 Agency:
Texas A&M University Special Item:
3 Energy Resources Program (1) Year Special Item:
1976 (2) Mission of Special Item:
Development of the Energy Resources Program (ERP) was in response to the oil supply interruptions of the early 1970s. The ERP was charged with coordinating research, teaching, and public service activities directed at developing solutions to Texas' immediate energy and environmental problems. The ERP was also charged with educating the workforce that Texas would need to respond to the related challenges of the future by focusing on advanced and emerging technologies, while continuing to make significant contributions to the traditional areas that are important to Texas energy and environmental issues.
(3) (a) Major Accomplishments to Date:
The ERP has allowed Texas A&M to substantially leverage state money in critical areas of need for the state.
The ERP provided funding for the Immersive Visualization Center. The researchers, many with expertise in energy-related oil recovery systems and modeling fluid flow, will all be able to gain a better understanding of their research through visualization.
ERP funded the proposal writing effort for the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program worth $540 million over 10 years.
Texas A&M received a grant from KAUST to support research involving complex problems of global importance. The research will engage mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientistson problems thatspan many disciplines.
ERP funded research to be supported by SfNOPEC, which includes technical design for research for cave-fault-fracture carbonate reservoirs and offshore petroleum project safety evaluation.
Texas A&M partnered with Chinese researchers to as a part of the China-U.S. relations conference. Two ERP-related projects were 1) bioenergy development, climate change mitigation, and 2) energy security and electric energy for the 21st century.
ERP funded our internal grant program. A faculty committee reviewed proposals with an emphasis on work in alternative sources of energy to enhance Texas' ability to diversify and create companies. Three successful proposals were in production of hydrogen, refinements to biofuel production, and applications of nanotechnology to solar cells.
(3) (b) Major Accomplishments Expected During the Next 2 Years:
ERP funding at Texas A&M will continue to focus research initiatives in advanced and emerging technologies in energy to foster interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research programs to addres, immediate and, future energy needs of the State of Texas. Funds awarded through the ERP are expected to generate sufficient advances and other resources necessary for submission of competitive proposals and collaborations. The research supported by these grants will result in a major proposal application submission based on results from the ERP grant.
(4) FundingSource Prior to Receiving Special Item Funding:
None (5) Non-general Revenue Sources of Funding:
2005 $5,000,000 Federal and Private Sources 2006 $4,900,000 Federal and Private Sources 2007 $5,200,000 Federal and Private Sources
107 SCHEDULE 11: SPECIAL ITEM INFORMATION 81ST REGULAR SESSION Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Date:
8/1/2008 Time:
10:26:49AM Page:
6 of 10 Agency Code:
711 Ag~ency:
Texas A&M University 2008 $5,600,000 Federal and Private Sources (6) Consequences of Not Funding:
This funding is providing critical seed funding to the research programs at Texas A&M University and eriables researchers and research groups to respond to new opportunities to partner for external funds. State dollars are required to generate partnerships and to acquire external grants and contracts. Research ideas must be developed sufficiently ih order to then be funded by other sources. Also once.funded, the partnership will still require an investment by Texas A&M. However, these programs provide a large return on the state's investment. Most importantly, without the funding, Texas A&M would not be able to offer this program which is of critical importance, not only to the nation, but particular to the State of Texas.
108 SCHEDULE 11: SPECIAL ITEM INFORMATION Date:
8/1/2008 81ST REGULAR SESSION Time:
10:26:49AM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Page:
7 of 10 Agency Code:
711 Agency:
Texas A&M University Special Item:
4 Public Policy Resources Laboratory (1) Year Special Item:
1983 (2) Mission of Special Item:
To provide the legislature and state agencies with access to policy research capabilities within Texas A&M University.
(3) (a) Major Accomplishments to Date:
Since inception, the capabilities and public benefits of the Public policy Resources Laboratory (PPRL) have increased dramatically, but the clear focus on strengthening public policy through scientific research has continued. Given the challenges which confront the nation's second most populous state, Texas leaders are increasingly soliciting the assistance of university researchers to help them address important policy issues. PPRL is meeting the demands of providing both state and federal government with scientific research to assist them in making sound political and program decisions.
(3) (b) Major Accomplishments Expected During the Next 2 Years:
The overall organizationalobjective for PPRL is to become a nationally recognized social policy research center through the combination of state funds for support activities and external funds for program activities. Accomplishments in the next two years will involve contributions to state and national policy in the areas of health care, education, economic development, government policy, and public opinion surveying.
(4) Funding Source Prior to Receiving Special Item Funding:
PPRL did not exist prior to receiving special item appropriations.
(5) Non-general Revenue Sources of Funding:
2006 $2,459,284 2007 $2,980,406 2008 $3,074,000 2009 $3,150,000 (6) Consequences of Not Funding:
The state appropriation provides crucial support to PPRL and is central to its continued operations. Loss of this support would severely curtail the efforts to obtain external funding for projects and the ability to serve the needs of Texas policymakers. The larger result would be a substantial loss to the citizens of Texas of the availability of University expertise in sharing and evaluating programs which affect their daily lives.
109 SCHEDULE 11: SPECIAL ITEM INFORMATION Date:
8/1/2008 81ST REGULAR SESSION Time:
10:26:49AM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Page:
8 of 10 Agency Code:
711 Agency:
Texas A&M University Special Item:
5 Real Estate Research Center (1) Year Special Item:
1971 (2) Mission of Special Item:
As defined by statute, the Center's mission is:
-Conduct studies in all areas directly or indirectly related to real estate and publish and disseminate the findings and results.
(3) (a) Major Accomplishments to Date:
Produce Tierra Grande, circulation approximately 150,000. Provide website accessed by Texas consumers, governmental agencies and licensees (1.5 million to 2 million page views monthly).
Produce online newsletter twice weekly to 31,000 subscribers. In 2007 reached potential audience of 212 million households nationwide. Comprehensive market reports on 24 Texas MSAs assisting in economic development. Provide research upon request to Legislature, Comptroller, Governor and other statewide and local leaders, facilitating better public policy decisions.
(3) (b) Major Accomplishments Expected During the Next 2 Years:
Upgrade the Center's website. Continue assisting the Real Estate Commission by preparing courses and training instructors of mandated real estate courses. Expand breadth of topics researched.
Will continue to dothe things outlined in (3) (a).
(4) Funding Source Prior to Receiving Special Item Funding:
None (5) Non-general Revenue Sources of Funding:
A portion of real estate license fees.
(6) Consequences of Not Funding:
The Center Would cease to exist and could not operate without license fee revenues.
110 SCHEDULE I1: SPECIAL ITEM INFORMATION Date:
8/1/2008 81ST REGULAR SESSION Time-10:26:49AM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Page:
9 of 10 Agency Code:
711 Agency:
Texas A&M University Special Item:
6 School of Architecture (1) Year Special Item:
1992 (2) Mission of Special Item:
CHUD's vision is enhancing the quality of life for people and the quality of the place in which they live in the Colonias and beyond. This vision is being fulfilled through (l)integrated approach to practice, outreach, and service, through education and research; (2)a continuum of research, development, demonstration, deployment, evaluation, and dissemination; (3)the application of principles of sustainability, lean project delivery, and fully integrated and advanced technologies, in defining what CHUD's products, processes and resources are, and (4)partnerships with other organizations.
CHUD's mission is to conceive, develop, and deliver solutions to fulfill its vision, alone or with its partners. To enhance the quality of life, CHUD delivers: (])Health and human services focused on the well being of individuals, families, and communities; (2)Education and workforce development programs for young women and men, adult women and men, and the elderly; and (3)Economic development programs. To enhance the quality of the built environment, CHUD assists in the delivery of (l)Urban planning and design, and planning and design of semi-urban/semi-rural, and rural environments; (2)critical civil infrastructure systems, with an emphasis on water, energy, transportation/mobility, sewage and stormwater, and communications systems; and (3)housing and critical community facilities, with an emphasis on affordable housing and community resource/self help centers.
(3) (a) Major Accomplishments to Date:
CHUD's principal accomplishment to date has been to serve Colonias children, youth, adult women and men, and the elderly (over 2 million participants in 2005-2007 programs), through:
Assistance in planning, funding, design, construction, and operations of Community Resource and Service Centers (CRSCs) that serve as (l)hubs for dissemination of information on CHUD programs, and (2)mechanisms for various service providers to revamp and expand their methods of delivering services to meet the needs of Colonia residents.
Establishment of the CHUD Promotora Certification Program (CPCP) to recruit, hire, train, develop, and deploy selected Colonias residents to work as Promotoras, or Outreach Workers, who disseminate information on services and programs, through face-to-face contact. CHUD started this program 12 years ago, and has since been both a leader and an active contributor to the institutionalization of this program at the State level. More recently, CHUD created the CHUD Training Academy (CTA) to expand on the CPCP and offer programs for workforce development.
Establishment of the CHUD Transportation Program (CTP), which assists in purchasing passenger vans to transport Colonias residents from their homes to the CRSCs and other service locations. With initial assistance from the Texas State Energy Conservation Office, CHUD has had access to a fleet of 15-passenger vans, mobilizing almost 30,000 people in 2005, down to 19,600 in 2007 due to aging.
(3) (b) Major Accomplishments Expected During the Next 2 Years:
111 SCHEDULE 11: SPECIAL ITEM INFORMATION Date:
8/1/2008 81 ST REGULAR SESSION Time:
10:26:49AM Automated Budget and Evaluation System of Texas (ABEST)
Page:
10 of 10 Agency Code:
711 Agency:
Texas A&M University With the Colonias Program as a cornerstone of its current strategic plan, CI-UD will:
Continue and strengthen CHUD's current active participation in, and support of, Statewide initiatives within the scope of its legislative mandate, both in the State's legislative and executive branches Protect and strengthen current programs and services in existing CRSCs, and expand into additional non-border rural communities, and economically disadvantaged urban areas Expand the CPCP, the CTA, and the CTP Initiate new initiatives focused on urban development, civil infrastructure systems, and housing with a special emphasis on incorporating economic planning and development within their scope Continue securing funding from federal agencies and non-government organizations.
Follow a formal, explicit, systemic/systematic, proactive, and iterative process for developing and fulfilling CHUD's vision and accomplishing its mission Operate within a multidimensional culture, follow established performance excellence principles, and implement clear strategic goals to continuously provide clear indicators of where it is goin and how it is doing, each goal with well-defined tactical objectives, comprehensive operational plans of action, and appropriate performance indicators and metrics Institutionalize a Community of Practice, Outreach, Service, Education, and Research (COMPOSER) as the central core of its new organizational and operational paradigm (4) Funding Source Prior to Receiving Special Item Funding:
None (5) Non-general Revenue Sources of Funding:
Through grant, contracts, and contributions from multiple and diverse funding sources from the private sector and the public sector (at a federal, state, and local levels), CHUD has secured funding from non-general revenue sources, in the last five years, in the amount of:
2003 - $4,441,194 2004 - $2,486,358 2005 - $3,743,302 2006 -$1,574,266 2007 - $1,190,452 2008 - $1,701,485 (6) Consequences of Not Funding:
Loss of funding in the Legislative Appropriation Request for the Colonias Program will result in inability to meet the legislative intent established when the Colonias Program was created within CHUD in 1991.
Specifically, a loss of funding would pose significant negative impacts for the CH1UD Colonias Program in its ability to (l)Continuously seek and acquire external funding for a wide range of health and human services focused on the well being of individuals, families, and communities, education and workforce development programs for young women and men, adult women and men, and the elderly; and economic development programs offered at the CRSCs located throughout the geographical area of operations of the three regional offices (2)Maintain the extensive network of strategic alliances and partnerships with local government, state, and federal agencies, and nonprofit organizations (Note: CHUD is the only State organization that has a border-wide network of organizations serving specifically the Colonias)
(3)Serve as a catalyst that promotes and facilitates the active involvement of Colonia residents in strengthening the social infrastructure of their community (4)Maintain the visible, active, respected, and cohesive institutional presence of TAMU across the border, which currently provides a portal of access and a bridge of connectivity to the entire TAMU education, research, service, and outreach resource base for Colonia residents and service providers
112 Schedule 12A: Reconciliation of Formula Strategies to NACUBO Functions of Cost 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Agency Code:
711 Agency Name:
Texas A&M University Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009
SUMMARY
OF REQUEST FOR FY 2007-2009:
I A.1.1 Operations Support 2
A.1.21 Teaching Experience Supplement 3
B.I.1 E&G Space Support 4
Total, Formula Expenditures 258,241,946 8,098,141 267,504,675 16,020,649 276,816,984 10,997,299
~287,814,2~83 I6,S2(o340,087, 283,525,3214 RECONCILIATION TO NACUBO FUNCTIONS OF COST 5
Instruction Academic Support Student Services Institutional Support Research Scholarships & Fellowships 6
Subtotal 7
Operation and Maintenance of Plant Utilities 8
Subtotal 217,805,338 15,740,950 8,862,175 12,262,022 2,024,086 2,564,730
'259,2S0.300
$ý 231,858,935 16,756,613 9,433,995 13,053,212 2,154,687 2,730,216
~2~75,987.,659 235,366,324 17,010,095 9,576,705 13,250,672 2,187,282 2,771,517 2,S0,62,594 2,198,897 5,452,792 28.84.S 2,034,835 5,045,952 7,080,787 2,166,130 5,371,535 9
Total, Formula Expenditures by NACUBO Functions of Cost 26,340,087 2 235S25.324 10 check = 0
- 00) 0
113 Schedule 12B: Object of Expense Detail for Formula Strategies and NACUBO Functions of Cost 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Agency Code: 711 Agency Name: Texas A&M University, Exp'2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009
SUMMARY
OF REQUEST FOR FY 2007-2009:
I1 A.1.1 Operations Support 258,241,946 267,504,675 276,816,984 Objects of Expense:
a) 1001 - Salaries & Wages 89,144 828 92,342,312 95,556,910 1002 - Other Personnel Cost 4,423,097 4,581,746 4,741,245 1005 - Faculty 152,918,344 158,403,283 163,917,580 1010 - Prof-Fac Equiv 2,945,553 3,051,205 3,157,423 1015-Prof-Fac Equiv 2,070 2,144 2,219 2001 m ProfFees & Serv 654,538 678,015 701,618 2002 - Fuels & Lubricant 39,237 40,644 42,059 2003 - Consumable Supp 370,881 384,184 397,558 2004 - Utilities 1,848,226 1,914,519 1,981,167 2005 - Travel 10,608 10,989 11,371 2006 - Rent - Bldg 34,268 35,497 36,733 2007 - Rent - Equip 122,710 127,111 131,536 2008 - Debt Service 5,349 5,541 5,734 2009 - Other Operating 4,937,825 5,114,937 5,292,997 3001 - Client Services 127,674 132,253 136,857 5000 - Capital 656,737 680,294 703,976 Subtotal, Objects of Expense 258,241,946 $
267,504,675 $
276,816,984 check 0
(0) 12 A.1.2 Teaching Experience Supplement Objects of Expense:
b)
Subtotal, Objects of Expense check =0 14 B.I.1 E&G Space Support 8,098,141 16,020,649 10,997,299 Objects of Expense:
c) 1001 -Salaries & Wages 1002 - Other Personnel Cost 2001 - Prof Fees & Serv 2002 - Fuels & Lubricant 2003 - Consumable Supp 2004 - Utilities 2006 - Rent - Bldg 2007 - Rent - Equip 3,814,891 1,151,172 1,011,456 23,489 87,634 319,831 890 176,479 10,443,717 1,040,603 713,794 12,679 47,303 1,608,835 480 95,261 5,638,541 1,440,293 616,573 10,953 40,861 1,389,706 415 82,285
114 Schedule 12B: Object of Expense Detail for Formula Strategies and NACUBO Functions of Cost 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Agency Code: 711 Agency Name: Texas A&M University Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 2009 -Other Operating 1,512,299 2,057,977 1,777,673 Subtotal, Objects ofExpense' 8,098,141 $
16,020,649 $
10,997,299 check 0
0 RECONCILIATION TO NACUBO FUNCTIONS OF COST 16 Instruction 217,805,338 231,858,935
$S 235,366,324 Objects of Expense:
d) 1001-Salaries & Wages 54,395,855 *$
57,905,675 S
58,781,628 1002-Other Personnel Cost 3,325,441 3,540,011 3,593,562 1005 -Faculty 151,455,721 161,228,199 163,667,139 1010- Prof-Fac Equiv 2,715,373 2,890,579 2,934,305 1015 - Prof-Fac Equiv 2,061 2,194 2,228 2001 - ProfFees & Serv 480,044 511,018 518,748 2002-Fuels & Lubricant 28,240 30,062 30,517 2003 -Consumable Supp 310,793 330,846 335,851 2004-Utilities 1,488,837 1,584,902 1,608,878 2005-Travel 9,865 10,501
.10,660 2006-Rent - Bldg 28,388 30,220 30,677 2007-Rent-Equip 106,986 113,889 115,612 2008 - Debt Service 4,831 5,143 5,220 2009 - Other Operating 3,412,687 3,632,886 3,687,841 5000- Capital 40,217 42,812 43,459 Subtotal 217,805,338 $
231,858,935 $
235,366,324 check=0 0
0 (0)
Academic Support 15,740,950 16,756,613 17,010,095 Objects of Expense:
e) 1001 - Salaries & Wages 1002 - Other Personnel Cost 1005 - Faculty 1010 - Prof-Fac Equiv 2001 - Prof Fees & Serv 2002 - Fuels & Lubricant 2003 - Consumable Supp 2004 - Utilities 2005 - Travel 2006 - Rent - Bldg 2007 - Rent - Equip 2009 - Other Operating 5000 - Capital 13,7 10,615 390,434 689,338 217,823 110,498
.10,691 17,047 230,823 612 1,975 5,345 355,749 14,595,274 415,626 733,816 231,877 117,628 11,381 18,147 245,716 652 2,103 5,690 378,703 S
14,816,060 421,914 744,917 235,385 119,407 11,553 18,421 249,433 662 2,135 5,776 384,432
115 Schedule 12B: Object of Expense Detail for Formula Strategies and NACUBO Functions of Cost 81 st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1, Agency Code: 711 Agency Name: Texas A&M University Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 Subtotal 15,740,949 $
16,756,613 $
17,010,095 check=0 0
0 (0)
Student Services 8,862,175 9,433,995 9,576,705 Objects of Expense:
f) 1001 - Salaries& Wages 8,356,825 8,896,038 9,030,610 1002-Other Personnel Cost 264,556 281,627 285,887 1005 - Faculty 96,669 102,907 104,464 2001 - Prof Fees & Serv 4,281 4,558 4,627 2002 - Fuels & Lubricant 29 30 31 2003 - Consumable Supp 14,804 15,760 15,998 2004-Utilities 42,282 45,010 45,691 2006 - Rent-Bldg 2,056 2,188 2,221 2007 - Rent - Equip 9,569 10,186 10,340 2009 - Other Operating 71,104 75,692 76,837 Subtotal 8,862,175 $
9,433,995 $
9,576, 705 check=0 (0)
(0) 0 Institutional Support 12,262,022 13,053,212 13,250,672 Objectsof.Expense:
g).. 1001. - Salaries & Wages 1002 - Other Personnel Cost 1005 - Faculty 2001 - Prof Fees & Serv 2002 - Fuels & Lubricant 2003 - Consumable Supp 2004 - Utilities 2005 - Travel 2006 - Rent - Bldg 2007 - Rent - Equip 2009 - Other Operating 5000 - Capital Subtotal "
check= 0 10,931,996.06 393,960.96 2,968.54.
56,363.22 112.85 26,709.31 78,383.95 5.37 1,705.66 295.76 175,031.24 594,489.08 12,262,022 $
(0) $
11,637,368 419,381 3,160 60,000 120 28,433 83,442 6
1,816 315 186,325 632,848 11,813,410 425,725 3,208 60,908 122 28,863 84,704 6
1,843 320 189,143 642,421 13,250,672 (0) 13,053,212 0
116 Schedule 12B: Object of Expense Detail for Formula Strategies and NACUBO Functions of Cost 81st Regular Session, Agency Submission, Version 1 Agency Code: 711 Agency Name: Texas A&M University Exp 2007 Est 2008 Bud 2009 16 Research 2',024,086 2,154,687 2,187,282 Objects of Expense:
d) 1001 -Salaries & Wages 121,174 128,993 130,944 1002 -Other Personnel Cost 67,464 71,818 72,904 1005 - Faculty 10,843 11,543 11,717 2001 - Prof Fees & Serv 1,739,579 1,851,823 1,879,836 2002 -Fuels & Lubricant 24 26 26 2003 -Consumable Supp 14,326 15,250 15,481 2004 : Utilities 289 308 313 2005 -Travel 824 878 891 2006 - Rent - Bldg 1,339 1,426 1,447 2007-Rent - Equip 5,671 6,037 6,128 2009 - Other Operating 62,551 66,587 67,594
-Subtotal 2,024,086 $
2,154,687 2,187,282 check=0 (0) 0 (0) 16 Scholarships & Fellowships 2,564,730 2,730,216 2,771,517 Objects of Expense:
d) 2009 -Other Operating 2,564,730 2,730,216 2,771,517 Subtotal 2,564,730 $
2,730,216 $
2,771,517 check 0
0 8
Operation and Maintenance of Plant 2,034,835 2,166,130 2,198,897 Objects of Expense:
h) 1001 - Salaries & Wages 1,084,832 1,154,829 1,172,298 1002 -Other Personnel Cost 324,260 345,183 350,404 2001 -ProfFees & Serv 39,199 41,729 42,360 2002 - Fuels & Lubricant 6,680 7,111 7,218 2003 - Consumable Supp 24,920 26,528 26,930 2004 - Utilities 90,949 96,818 98,282 2006-Rent-Bldg 253 269 273 2007-Rent - Equip 50,185 53,423 54,231 2009 - Other Operating 413,556 440,240 446,900 Subtotal, Objects of Expense 2,034,835 2,166,130 2,198,897 check=0 (0) $
(0) 0 Utilities 5,045,952 5,371,535 5,452,792 Objects of Expense:
i) 2004 - Utilities Subtotal, Objects of Expense check=0 5,045,952 5, 045,952 $
5,371,535 5,371,535 0
5,452,792 5,452,792 (0)