|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML22235A7862022-08-23023 August 2022 Acceptance Review: Exemption Request from 10 CFR 20, Appendix G, LLW Shipping Investigation Requirements ML21181A1882021-06-30030 June 2021 E-mail from S. Johnston, Holtec, to A. Snyder and F. Bower, NRC - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Readiness Status for ISFSI Only Inspection ML21175A2092021-06-24024 June 2021 E-mail from A. Sterdis to P. Longmire - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station: ISFSI-only Physical Security Plan (Stating Implementation Intent) ML21162A3602021-06-11011 June 2021 E-mail Response from the State of New Jersey Regarding the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status ML21162A1172021-06-11011 June 2021 E-mail to HDI: Acceptance Review - FOF Exemption ML21168A0172021-06-10010 June 2021 E-mail from HDI: RAI Response ML21161A2572021-06-0707 June 2021 State Consultation: ISFSI-only Physical Security Plan (Email Response) ML21175A0712021-06-0202 June 2021 Issuance of Request for Additional Information: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications ML21148A0562021-05-27027 May 2021 E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status ML21132A3182021-05-12012 May 2021 E-Mail from V. Gubbi, DEP to Z. Cruz, NRC - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - State of New Jersey Response to the Pending Revision to the Defueled Technical Specifications to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only ML21132A0312021-05-11011 May 2021 E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Physical Security Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status ML21119A1422021-04-28028 April 2021 E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status ML21113A0742021-04-23023 April 2021 Acceptance Review Email - April 20, 2021 Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from 10 CFR Part 73 Requirements Due to Covid ML21099A0382021-04-0808 April 2021 Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis - Request for Additional Information - HDI Request for Approval of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan ML21085A4872021-03-26026 March 2021 E-mail from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis - Acceptance Review: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications ML21064A2432021-03-0505 March 2021 Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review_ Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme ML21064A2392021-03-0202 March 2021 E-mail from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Physical Security Plan ML20345A1462020-12-0909 December 2020 E-mail - Response to Request for Additional Information: HDI Request for One-Time Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B FOF Requirements ML20335A3112020-11-30030 November 2020 Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for a one-time Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ML20332A1472020-11-24024 November 2020 Acceptance Review: November 20 2020 Exemption Request from 10 CFR Part 73 Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek ML20297A2372020-10-22022 October 2020 Request for Additional Information - HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program ML20279A5082020-10-0505 October 2020 Email to Holtec - Response to Notification of Oyster Creek Onsite Property Insurance Coverage ML20266G4032020-09-22022 September 2020 Acceptance Review Email - Request for Approval of HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, Revision 0 ML20134H8742020-05-12012 May 2020 Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Temporary Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B Requirements ML20133J9182020-05-11011 May 2020 Acceptance Review Email - Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from Part 73 Qualification Requirements ML20120A0252020-04-22022 April 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Oyster Creek Sea Turtle Handling and Conservation Recommendation Obligations NRC-2019-0073, Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-30-2019 R Discenza2019-10-30030 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-30-2019 R Discenza ML19344C8022019-10-20020 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-20-2019 a Dressler ML19344C8002019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 W Mcmullin ML19344C7982019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 M Noto ML19344C7992019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 s Feldman ML19344C7932019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 C Bischoff ML19344C7962019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 G Adams ML19344C7912019-10-0808 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-08-2019 J Branciforte ML19344C7902019-10-0808 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-08-2019 Anonymous ML19344C7892019-10-0505 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-05-2019 P Dressler ML19263D1222019-09-20020 September 2019 for Your Action Request for Additional Information Hdi Oyster Creek PSDAR ML19214A0452019-08-0202 August 2019 NRC to NMFS, Revised Proposed Action for Oyster Creek Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation ML19182A3422019-07-0101 July 2019 Transaction ML19178A0702019-06-26026 June 2019 Email to State of New Jersey - Oyster Creek - Request Comments on Proposed Amendment to Remove Reference to the Oyster Creek Cyber Security Plan and Update License Condition 2.C.(4) in the Renewed Facility License ML19196A3422019-06-20020 June 2019 Email: Courtesy Notice on the Issuance of the Oyster Creek License Transfer and Exemption (Sierra Club) ML19196A3342019-06-20020 June 2019 Email: Courtesy Notice on the Issuance of the Oyster Creek License Transfer and Exemption ML19162A2242019-06-11011 June 2019 NRC to NMFS, NRC Responses to NMFS Requests for Additional Information for Oyster Creek ESA Section 7 Consultation NRC-2018-0237, Comment from Paul Dressler of the Concerned Citizens for Lacey Coalition, Regarding the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Transfer Application2019-06-0707 June 2019 Comment from Paul Dressler of the Concerned Citizens for Lacey Coalition, Regarding the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Transfer Application ML19155A1182019-06-0404 June 2019 Incoming E-mail from State of New Jersey on the Oyster Creek Exemption for Reduced Insurances and Use of Decommissioning Trust Fund for Spent Fuel Management and Site Restoration ML19155A1192019-06-0404 June 2019 State of New Jersey Comments - Oyster Creek Conforming Amendment Associated with the Oyster Creek Generating Station License Transfer Application ML19154A0582019-05-31031 May 2019 E-mail Response from State of New Jersey Dated May 31, 2019, Notification-and-Request-Oyster Creek License Transfer Application L-2018-LLM-0002 ML19158A2912019-05-30030 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Oyster Creek ESA Consultation: Information Requests from NMFS ML19158A2772019-05-28028 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Oyster Creek ESA Consultation: Information Requests from NMFS ML19148A4392019-05-24024 May 2019 NMFS to NRC, Requests for Additional Information to Support Oyster Creek Reinitiated Section 7 Consultation 2022-08-23
[Table view] |
Text
Roberts, Darrell From: Peter Wilson Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2009 8:19 PM To: Bruce Mallett Cc: Sam Collins; Darrell Roberts
Subject:
FW: Issue Paper: Oyster Creek, Tritium Ground Water Contamination (Contains Diagrams Containing "'Security Sensitive Information")
Attachments: inside vault at intake pic 18.JPG; Oyster Creek Tritium Issue Paper.doc; Two Diagrams of Condensate Storage Tank Area.doc
- Bruce, Sam asked me to forward this e-mail summary of the tritium condamination at Oyster Creek so you would have it available Monday morning.
c*et*
Peter R Wilson Acting Deputy Director Division of Reactor Safety, Region I peter.wilson@nrc.gov (work) 610-337-5126 (cell)
From: John White Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2009 6:08 PM To: Sam Collins; Marc Dapas; Darrell Roberts; Peter Wilson; James Clifford; David Lew Cc: Ronald Nimitz; Ronald Bellamy; Marc Ferdas; Nancy McNamara; Doug Tifft; Diane Screnci; Neil Sheehan; Richard Barkley; Richard Conte; John Rogge; John Richmond; Paul Kaufman
Subject:
Issue Paper: Oyster Creek Tritium Ground Water Contamination (Contains Diagrams Containing "Security Sensitive Information")
This Issue Paper was developed by Ron Nimitz and John White.
The file "Two Diagrams of Condensate Storage Tank Area" should be handled as "Security Sensitive Information" and distribution should be controlled.
For review and comment.
Oyster Creek:
Tritium Contaminated Ground Water in the Vicinity of the Condensate Storage Tank Exelon Efforts and Results of Investigation:
On April 13,: 2009, Exelon (Oyster Creek) initiated maintenance activities which involved replacement of the 4160V electrical cable for the 1-2 Emergency Service Water (ESW) pump, an activity that required access to the ESW cable vault. The cable vault is located in the near vicinity of the Condensate Storage Tank (CST).
.information in this. record was deleted in accordance with the2FEdomr .n*fl tion I F01A-
p I
[See Attached Diagrams.] When the manway was opened, about 12" of standing water was observed inside the vault.
Subsequently, the water was sampled and analyzed for pH, gamma emitters, and tritium (H-3). On April 15 the analytical results were completed. The water was determined to have a pH of 7.62; and while no gamma emitters were identified, the H-3 concentration was reported as 102,000 pCi/I.
The water in the cable vault was subsequently pumped into 55 gallon drums for normal liquid radioactive waste processing and discharge. It was estimated that between 2000 and 3000 gallons of water was pump out of the cable vault.
[Note: Accordingly to Exelon, as part of its mid-voltage cable inspection program, the cable vault was last opened and inspected in'October 2008. At that time, about 2" of standing water was observed. Subsequent sampling and analysis did not indicate the presence of any radlonuclides (including H-3).
The H-3 concentration in the CST typically ranges from 7,000,000 to 9,000,000 pCi/i. The CST rests on a sand bed confined within a concrete retaining ring.]
In accordance with its agreement with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJ-DEP), i.e.,
to inform the State of New Jersey of any radiological condition involving tritium concentration in excess of 2000 pCi/I, and having potential to affect the environment, Exelon informed NJ-DEP of this condition; and subsequently, the NRC in accordance with IOCFR50.72 (relative to notification to other government agencies). Exelon also issued a news release on April 16, 2009, to inform the public of the condition.
Uponthe discovery of tritium contaminated water in the cable vault, Exelon initiated an aggressive effort to perform additional sampling of other on-site ground water monitoring wells and samples from the discharge canal; and an investigation effort to determine the source of the contaminated water.
On April 16, Exelon received analytical results from a monitoring well, MW-15K-1A, which indicated a H-3 concentration of about 4,500,000 pCi/I. MW-15K;1A is located in Very close proximity of the ESW cable vault and the CST. According to Exelon, MW-15K-1A was last sampled and analyzed March 11, 2009, in accordance with Exelon's on-going ground water monitoring program for Oyster Creek. At that time no detectable activity was observed.
Analytical results from all other monitoring wells and environmental sampling locations indicated H-3 concentrations less than the site's Minimum Detectable Activity (MDA), I.e., 2000 pCi/I. Subsequent analysis of these samples.by independent analytical laboratories having MDA's less than 200 pCi/I indicated no detectable act"ty in any of these other samples. In all cases, Exelon promptly communicated its results to the NJ-DEP and NRC.
An April17, Exelon issued another news release that updated the results of its efforts, including the discovery of the higher tritium concentration of about 4,500,000 pCi/A in MW-15K-1A, and noted that itwas in the vicinity of the CST.
As part of its effort to determine the source of-the contamination, Exelon initiated efforts to excavate trenches in the vicinity of the CST and associated piping. On April 18, water was observed, for a short time,. in one of the trenches (i.e., south trench) which contains 4 or more pipes that communicate with the CST and subsequently sampled. The H-3 concentration was determined to be about 1,560,000 pCi/L Sampling of the soil in the area indicated activity associated with Cs-137, Co-60, and Mn-54. (Mn-54 has a relatively short half-life of 312 days, indicating that tW material was relatively fresh, and was comparable to radionuclides contained in the CST.
'I On April 19, Exelon sampled and. analyzed water that is currently being observed seeping from one of the conduits in the ESW cable vault [Picture Attached.. Analysis indicated that the H-3 concentration is about 1,500,000 pCi/I.
(b)(5)
S3-NRC Assessment of Exelon Efforts and Results of Investigation:
(b)(5) 3