ML093360121

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Request for Additional Information Relief Request ISI-3-30
ML093360121
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 12/02/2009
From:
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To:
Southern California Edison Co
Hall, J R, NRR/DORL/LPL4, 301-415-4032
Shared Package
ML093360110 List:
References
TAC ME2340, TAC ME2341
Download: ML093360121 (1)


Text

ENCLOSURE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THIRD TEN-YEAR INSERVICE INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST ISI-3-30, INSPECTION OF REACTOR VESSEL HEAD IN-CORE INSTRUMENT NOZZLES SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON DOCKET NUMBERS: 50-361 AND 50-362 By letter dated October 2, 2009 (Agencywide Document Access and Management System Accession Number ML092790155), Southern California Edison (SCE) requested relief from the inspection coverage requirements of American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code Case N-729-1, as conditioned by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(D), for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), Units 2 and 3, for the third 10-year inservice inspection interval. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has reviewed the relief request and has determined that the information specified in this Request for Additional Information is needed to complete its evaluation.

1. Please describe the spatial extent, i.e., the distance above the root of the J-groove weld and the distance below the toe of the J-groove weld, of the eddy current (ECT) examination and the ultrasonic (UT) time of flight diffraction (TOFD) examination.
2. Please provide a best estimate of the fractional volume of the in-core instrument nozzle (ICI) nozzle material which could be successfully evaluated from the nozzle ID using UT TOFD examination for each ICI nozzle. This evaluation should be restricted to the volume of the nozzle from the root of the J-groove weld to 2 inches below the root or the end of the nozzle, whichever is less.
3. Please provide information on spatial extent (length, height) of compensatory manually delivered ECT examination performed on the nozzle outside diameter as the result of unacceptable quality UT TOFD data.