ML083360032

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary Ultrasonic Examination Results of Completed
ML083360032
Person / Time
Site: Oconee Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/20/2008
From: Baxter D
Duke Energy Carolinas
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
07-ON-004
Download: ML083360032 (4)


Text

Duke DAVE BAXTER Vice President

.Energy.

Oconee Nuclear Station November 20, 2008 Duke Energy Corporation ONO0 VP17800 Rochester Highway Seneca, SC 29672 864-885-4460 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 864-885-4208 fax Attn: Document Control Desk dabaxter@dukeenergy.com Washington, D.C. 20555

Subject:

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Docket No. 50-270 Summary Ultrasonic Examination Results of Completed Alloy 82/182 Weld Overlays Relief Request 07-ON-004 By letter dated September 13, 2007, Duke submitted Relief Request (RR) 07-ON-004 (ADAMS Accession # ML07260149), applicable to all three Oconee units, to seek relief related to full structural weld overlays on the Decay Heat Removal (DHR) Drop line to Hot Leg Nozzle welds. The RR included a commitment to provide the results of the Ultrasonic Test (UT) examinations of the weld overlays within 14 days of completion of the UT examinations. The NRC staff provided verbal approval of RR 07-ON-004 on November 27, 2007 and written approval on January 17, 2008 (ADAMS Accession #

ML073460027).

The Unit 2 UT examination of the DHR drop line weld overlays were completed November 15, 2008. No flaws outside the IWB-3514 criteria were identified, and no repairs were made to the weld overlays, the original base materials or original 82/182 weld materials. The attached Enclosure provides a report summarizing the results of these examinations, per the commitment contained in RR 07-ON-004.

If there are any questions, please contact Corey Gray at (864) 886-6325.

Very truly yours,

~

Dave Baxter, Vice President Oconee Nuclear Site Enclosure Au0?

www. duke-energy. com

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission November 20, 2008 Page 2 cc: Mr. John Stang, Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop: 8 G9A Washington, D.C 20555 Mr. Luis Reyes, Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region II 61 Forsyth St., SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Mr. Andy Hutto Senior Resident Inspector Oconee Nuclear Station Mrs. Susan Jenkins, Section Manager Bureau of Land and Waste Management SC Dept. of Health & Environmental Control 2600 Bull St.

Columbia, SC 29201

V,

,)

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission November 20, 2008 Enclosure Weld Overlays Ultrasonic Examination 2EOC23 Summary Report Decay Heat Removal Drop Line Weld Overlay Reference Relief Request 07-ON-004 Hot Leg Decay Heat Nozzle Welds:

2-53A-10-13V 1 of 2

U L¸*'

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission November 20, 2008 Ultrasonic Examination Procedure SI-UT-126, Revision 3, Procedure for the Phased Array Ultrasonic Examination of Weld Overlaid Similar and Dissimilar Metal Welds, was used for examinations of the Decay Heat Nozzle weld overlay (WOL). This procedure, and the examiner who applied the procedure, are qualified through the PDI Program at the EPRI NDE Center.

Decay Heat Nozzle (2-53A-10-1OA/ 2-PHA-17) Weld Overlay Examination Component Identification: DH Weld Overlay 2-53A-10-13V Examination Date: 1/15/2008 Examination Time: 20:25 - 21:22 Weld Overlay Regions Examined: Overlay, Weld and Base Material (Outer 25%)

Dissimilar Metal Examination Summary: No suspected flaw indications were observed during the examinations. The examination gain was adjusted to maintain the procedure-specified baseline noise level from 5% to 20% of full screen height. The lower range of examination angles detected responses from the inside surface of the component which were useful for monitoring search unit contact / coupling effectiveness during the examination. During the course of the examinations, 100% coverage of the weld overlay material and 100% coverage of the Code-required volume for the DM weld was achieved.

2 of 2