ML081220819
| ML081220819 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 02/25/2008 |
| From: | Valos N Operations Branch III |
| To: | FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML080920714 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-346/08-301 | |
| Download: ML081220819 (9) | |
Text
VARIOUS CHECKLISTS FOR THE DAVIS-BESSE INITIAL EXAMINATION - FEBRUARY 2008
P Facility: Davis-Besse Date of Examination: 02/20 -29/2008 Examinations Developed by:
F I
/ NRC (circle one) 1 Target Date' I
-120
-120
-120 1
[-go]
7
(-75)
- 2.
- 3.
NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)
Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)
(-45) 26 J 36? J
-30
- 15. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)l
- 6.
Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-l's, ES-401-112, ES-401-3. and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and 1; C.3.d)
-14 N/A
- 2/. J
-1 4 8
Proposed examinations (mcldding written. walk-through JPMs. and scenarios. as applicable), supporting docbmenlatlon (Including Forms ES.301-3, ES-301-4. ES-301.5, ES-301-6. and ES-401-6), ano relerence materials due (C 1.e. I. g and n: C 3 0 )
-14
-7
-7
. 2 4 J
-7
- 12.
- 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)
(C.2.i; C.3.h) qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters
- 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if 210) applications audited to confirm sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4: ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)
-7 31n J 340 fi'? J Task Description (Reference)
Chief Examiner's Initials
- 1.
Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b)
I 2 H J
- 4.
Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)
I 2kJ (7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h: C.3.e)l
- 9.
Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.I; C.2.g; ES- !
% r j J 202)
I
%aJ
- 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)
- 15. Proctoringlwritten exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)
- 16. Approved scenarlos, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)
- Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only] (Does not apply) to examinations prepared by the NRC.
NUREGIOZl. Revisim 9
ES-201, Rev. 9 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 3 I f j Cf, ploy as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g.,
acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.Post-Examination To the best of my knowledp, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week@) ofLlV~*2(~5!dFrom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2)
DATE NOTE
1 i
1 0 ' d i d d i$
11BNHWd tJaNI1 W W 9 1 Z T I 889Z--B0-aW
ES201 Examinallon Security Agreemen!
Form ES-201-3
\\
1 1.
I I
..I
- 1.
Pre-Examinatnn
~..
as of the date d my rignatvn. I agree tha I will not ImoWngly dtvuba any inlorrnatm aboul these exarnlnatbns toany been authorued by the NRC (e.g.. acting ns a sAmu!atu boolh operator or communicata is ace-if the individual does not &d the training mlenl or provide direct or indirecl feedtask. FUmemrxe. I m awaru ofthe physicd security mca&n&amj doamenled lnlk hciSty license& procedures) and underPtPnd that violation d the c o n d i W d Ihk ag-a k i y r - l a k n of the exammalions andla an enforcement actiin a@mi me or mC faaRy ficmree. I will immediatdy-report to trcirm managarant a t h e NRC chief examiner any indiatims or suggesli~ns that earnidion +ecurily may have been cwnpmmired.
- 2.
Post-Eramination I
To the best of my knowledge. I administered d u m the week(s) examinations, uccepi as specmulty noted M o w and authorized by the NRC.
I adrnowledge that 1 ham acquired rpecis(ized kndedge about the NRC licensing eurniMtim6 sche+lej for the%&(s) of I
(=
I any unauitwized persons any informaticn ~0ncem~M-g the NRC licensing Baminaliom From the datu bat I mtemd 'do ths zecmty ageernmi unlil t b w o
n d emhation I I I
administration. I did not insmd. evaluate, or provids performance leadbadc to thaoe appliwnb Wts ware adrnin-d these liu?n6ing I
I NOTES:
NUREG-1021. Revision 9
Group 211 Tier I Randomly Reason for Rejection Selected WA 2 / 1 211 212 212 1 / I 1 / I 112 2 1 1 2 1 1 212 003 A4.07 008 G2.4.30 076 K1.05 015 K5.01 028 K2.01 062 G2.2.25 008 AA2.20 032 G2.1.27 005 G2.1.27 Q # I Reselected 003 A4.08 as RCPs do not have a seal bypass at this facility Q #8 Reselected WA to 2.4.31 due to WA importance rating of ~ 2. 5 for RO Q #25 Reselected K1.16 because system relationship does not exist for selected topic Q #30 Reselected 015 WA 5.10 used since K/A 5.01 is deleted from KA catalogue Q #32 Reselected 01 1 K2.02 because equipment is not used at facility Q #52 TS Basis for APE not applicable for RO knowledge. Reselected G2.4.4 Q #77 Difficulty in developing an SRO test item, and excessive overlap with other topics on exam. Reselected 008 AA2.30 Q #82 Difficulty in developing SRO topic to match KA. Reselected G2 1 23 Q #87 Difficulty in developing SRO topic to match KA Reselected G:) 1 22 Q #90 No condition specific to system that could yield an SRO level iesr lieni Reselected G2.1.12 Q #91 No action required for condition related to selected system. Reselected 02' G2'1'14 017 G2.4.31 Stem 016 NUREG-1 021 13
ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Item Description
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
Date of Exam: February 29,2008 Exam Level: RO /SRO 0
Facility: Davis-Besse Initials a
b C
2-6%
31 ad mu s w P-J&
- a d
- 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80 i2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, *4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
- e.
32-
- 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
& 2UiJ I
~~
r)
The facility reviewers sianature is not aDDlicable for examinations araded bv the NRC:
1
- 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training of questions missed by half or more of the applicants deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity I
two independent NRC reviews are required.
?l6J
ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Item Description
- 1.
- 2.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Facility: Davis-Besse Date of Exam: February 29,2009 Exam Level: RO / [SRO ]
I Initials a
b C
n & rnd 9L 4 4 asJ
- 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) ft 6k.C
- IGJ
- 4.
- 5.
- 5.
Grading for all borderline cases (80 ~ 2 %
overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, *4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants
- )
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC;
,322
- 4 J z, Lh
~~~
6 &u fib+.Ll