|
|---|
Category:Memoranda
MONTHYEARML19317D0762019-11-18018 November 2019
Summary of Meeting Near Vermont Yankee Power Station Regarding Establishment and Opration of Community Advisory Boards
ML17271A0532017-09-29029 September 2017
2017 Summary of Annual Decommissioning Funding Status Reports for Reactors in Decommissioning
ML17143A1552017-06-0606 June 2017
Memorandum to C. Bladey Notice of Availability of Exemption for Entergy Energy Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
ML17045A5282017-05-25025 May 2017
Memo to C. Bladey Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Exemption Requ
ML17055A5042017-03-0101 March 2017
Revision of the NRC Vermont Yankee Decommissioning Webpage
ML16176A3392016-10-28028 October 2016
Decommissioning Lessons Learned Report and Transmittal Memorandum
ML16088A2042016-03-28028 March 2016
Memo T Bowers from s Ruffin, Technical Assistance Requests - Review 2015 Tri-Annual Decommissioning Funding Plans for Multiple Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations W/ Encl 2 (Template)
ML16088A2052016-03-28028 March 2016
Enclosure 1 - (72.30 DFP Reviews to Be Completed 2015) - Memo T Bowers from s Ruffin, Technial Assistance Requests - Review 2015 Tri-Annual Decommissioning Funding Plans for Multiple Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations
ML14209A7052014-08-0606 August 2014
Letter to FEMA Requesting Review and Concurrence of Certain Proposed Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Emergency Response Organization Changes to the Vermont Yankee Site Emergency Plan
ML14209A9352014-07-24024 July 2014
1st Quarter 2014 Performance Review
ML13150A2182013-05-31031 May 2013
6/12/13 Notice of Conference Call with Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. to Discuss Draft Request for Additional Information for Vermont Yankee NRC Order Number EA-12-049 Related to Mitigation Strategies
ML13108A3282013-04-22022 April 2013
Notice of Forthcoming Meeting with Petitioners Requesting Action Against Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Regarding Operations at FitzPatrick, Pilgrim, and Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Stations (TAC Nos. MF1092, MF1093, and MF1094)
ML12298A0882012-10-24024 October 2012
Forthcoming Meeting to Discuss Proposed License Amendment Request to Revise 10 CFR 50.63 Alternate AC Power Source to SBO EDG
ML13219A0472012-03-15015 March 2012
Memo from M. Murphy to G. Wilson, Subj: Safety Evaluation Regarding Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Core Plate Hold Down Bolt Inspection Plan and Analysis
ML13127A3692012-03-15015 March 2012
Memo from M. Murphy to G. Wilson, Subj: Safety Evaluation Regarding Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Core Plate Hold Down Bolt Inspection Plan and Analysis
ML11321A2282011-11-17017 November 2011
Third Quarter 2011 Performance Review Memorandum
ML11250A1712011-09-14014 September 2011
Notice of Forthcoming Meeting with Petitioner Requesting Action Under 10 CFR 2.206 Regarding Immediate Suspension of the Operating Licenses of General Electric (GE) Mark 1 Boiling Water Reactors (Bwrs)
ML1115704052011-06-0606 June 2011
Notice of Meeting with Entergy Operations, Inc., to Discuss Implementation of Quality Oversight and Verification Programs at Entergy Sites Including Actions Being Taken to Enhance Effectiveness
ML11126A0962011-05-12012 May 2011
Notice of Meeting with Petitioner Requesting Action Under 10CFR2.206 Regarding Immediate Suspension of Operating Licenses of General Electric Mark 1 Boiling Water Reactors
ML1107504052011-03-21021 March 2011
Notice of Meeting with Entergy Operations, Inc., to Discuss Fleetwide Submittal for Proposed Technical Specification and Quality Assurance Program Manual Changes Related to Unit Staff Qualification Requirements
ML1100502522011-02-0909 February 2011
Memo to Chairman Jaczko Fm R. W. Borchardt, EDO Initiatives for Improved Communication of Groundwater Incidents
ML1030101362010-10-28028 October 2010
Memorandum and Order (Ruling on Motion to Reopen Proffering New Contention) (LBP-10-19)
ML1009904582010-04-0808 April 2010
Deviation from the Reactor Oversight Process to Provide Increase NRC Oversight to Specific Issues at Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station
ML1009603212010-04-0505 April 2010
Request for Deviation from the Reactor Oversight Process Action Matrix to Provide Increased NRC Oversight of Specific Issues at Vermont Yankee
ML1006401882010-03-0505 March 2010
Charter for the Groundwater Contamination Task Force
ML0927301372009-10-0909 October 2009
Safety Evaluation by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Corporate Restructuring Conversion of Companies and Stock Split-Off by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc and Subsidiaries
ML0915200092009-06-0808 June 2009
Forwarding of Supplement 1 to NUREG 1907 to the ACRS
ML0913308232009-05-13013 May 2009
Summary of Annual Assessment Mtg - Vermont Yankee - 4/16/09
ML0904005422009-02-17017 February 2009
Audit Plan for Review of Confirmatory Analyses for the Core Spray and Reactor Recirculation Outlet Nozzles at the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station
ML0820601722008-08-0808 August 2008
Docketing of Additional Information Pertaining to the License Renewal Application of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station
ML0807400842008-03-14014 March 2008
Draft Regulatory Guide for Comment
ML0805606272008-02-27027 February 2008
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Review of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application - Safety Evaluation Report
ML0802205082008-01-31031 January 2008
01/08/2008 Summary of Meeting Between the NRC Staff and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. to Discuss the Response to a Request for Additional Information Pertaining to the Vermont Yankee License Renewal
ML0801505932008-01-17017 January 2008
December 2007 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 2.206
ML0733001522007-11-26026 November 2007
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on October 16, 2007, Between U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Concerning Audit Questions Pertaining to the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station License Renewa
ML0721804332007-08-0808 August 2007
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on July 18, 2007, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Concerning Requests for Additional Information Pertaining to the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power S
ML0721805222007-08-0808 August 2007
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held on June 29, 2007, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Concerning Request for Additional Information Pertaining to the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power St
ML0718301872007-07-10010 July 2007
06/01/2007 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Between the NRC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Concerning Items Pertaining to the Vermont Yankee License Renewal Safety Evaluation Report
ML0716303702007-07-10010 July 2007
Trip Report Summarizing May 29, 2007 Visit to Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant Regarding the License Renewal Environmental Review
ML0713103192007-05-0808 May 2007
FRN - Plant License Renewal, June 5, 2007
ML0706101802007-05-0101 May 2007
Trip Report for a Trip Taken to Vermont, Massachusetts and New Hampshire
ML0714104342007-04-25025 April 2007
Handouts to Applicants (Folder 3)
ML0707406912007-04-0303 April 2007
ACRS Review of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, License Renewal Application - Safety Evaluation Report
ML0705305612007-02-20020 February 2007
Y020070028 - E-mail Hoch, NRR, to Becker, State of Vermont, Seismic and Flood Questions from Anr
ML0704000852007-02-13013 February 2007
G20070068/LTR-07-0060/SECY-2007-0019 - Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Vermont Yankee - Letters to Senator Leahy, Senator Sanders, Representative Welch from Luis Reyes
ML0703605602006-11-0808 November 2006
Y020070028 - Informal Vermont Yankee Seismic and Hydrology Questions
ML0627900712006-10-12012 October 2006
2006/10/12-Summary of a Telephone Conference Call Held on September 14, 2006, Between the U.S. NRC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc, Concerning Information Pertaining to the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Applicatio
ML0627202182006-09-29029 September 2006
2006/09/29-Summary of a Telephone Conference Call Held on August 10, 2006, Between the U.S. NRC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Concerning Information Pertaining to the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application
ML0625801872006-09-14014 September 2006
2006/09/14-Audit Trip Report Regarding Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC, License Renewal Application for Vermont Yankee Power Station, Dated January 29, 2006
ML0617303972006-07-11011 July 2006
2006/07/11-Summary of Environmental Site Audit Related to the Review of the License Renewal Application for Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station
2019-11-18
[Table view]
Category:Status Report
MONTHYEARBVY 23-006, Status of Decommissioning and Spent Fuel Management Fund for Year Ending 20222023-03-29029 March 2023
Status of Decommissioning and Spent Fuel Management Fund for Year Ending 2022
CNRO-2019-00006, Stations - Status of Funding for Managing Irradiated Fuel for Year Ending December 31, 2018 - 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vii) - Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc2019-03-28028 March 2019
Stations - Status of Funding for Managing Irradiated Fuel for Year Ending December 31, 2018 - 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vii) - Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc
CNRO-2019-00005, Stations - Decommissioning Funding Status Report Per 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v) - Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc2019-03-28028 March 2019
Stations - Decommissioning Funding Status Report Per 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v) - Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc
ML18088B2462018-03-29029 March 2018
Status of Funding for Managing Irradiated Fuel for Year Ending December 31, 2017, Per 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vii)
CNRO-2017-00009, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. - Decommissioning Funding Status Report Per 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v)2017-03-31031 March 2017
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. - Decommissioning Funding Status Report Per 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v)
ENOC-17-00006, Status of Funding for Managing Irradiated Fuel for Year Ending December 31, 2016 - 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vii)2017-03-30030 March 2017
Status of Funding for Managing Irradiated Fuel for Year Ending December 31, 2016 - 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vii)
BVY 15-016, Fourth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Orders Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-51) and Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis..2015-02-27027 February 2015
Fourth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Orders Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-51) and Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis..
BVY 14-065, Third Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order EA-12-049) and Request to Rescind Order2014-08-28028 August 2014
Third Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order EA-12-049) and Request to Rescind Order
ENOC-14-00009, Decommissioning Funding Status Report Per 10 CFR Section 50.75(f)(1) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v) - Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc2014-03-28028 March 2014
Decommissioning Funding Status Report Per 10 CFR Section 50.75(f)(1) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v) - Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc
BVY 14-015, Vermont Yankee'S Second Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)2014-02-26026 February 2014
Vermont Yankee'S Second Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)
BVY 14-014, Vermont Yankee'S Second Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)2014-02-26026 February 2014
Vermont Yankee'S Second Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)
BVY 13-076, Vermont Yankee'S First Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)2013-08-28028 August 2013
Vermont Yankee'S First Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)
ML13247A0292013-08-28028 August 2013
Vermont Yankee'S First Six-Month Status Report in Response to Letter March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation
ENOC-13-00007, Decommissioning Funding Status Report Per 10 CFR Section 50.75(f)(1) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v) - Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc2013-03-29029 March 2013
Decommissioning Funding Status Report Per 10 CFR Section 50.75(f)(1) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v) - Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc
ML13031A6352012-08-12012 August 2012
Status Report on Unidentified Leakage for Vermont Yankee, Pilgrim, and Millstone, Units 2 and 3
ENOC-11-00005, Status of Decommissioning Funding for Plants Operated by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., for Year Ending December 31, 2010 - 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1)2011-03-31031 March 2011
Status of Decommissioning Funding for Plants Operated by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., for Year Ending December 31, 2010 - 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1)
ENOC-10-00010, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. - Status of Decommissioning Funding for Year Ending December 31, 20092010-03-31031 March 2010
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. - Status of Decommissioning Funding for Year Ending December 31, 2009
ENOC-08-00018, Stations - Decommissioning Fund Status Report for the Period Ending December 31, 20072008-03-26026 March 2008
Stations - Decommissioning Fund Status Report for the Period Ending December 31, 2007
ML0801505932008-01-17017 January 2008
December 2007 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 2.206
ML0516700862005-06-15015 June 2005
Vermont Yankee - NRC Staff'S Fourth Status Report on Review Schedule
ML0509503402005-04-21021 April 2005
March 2005 Report on Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206
JPN-05-005, Status of Decommissioning Funding for Plants Operated by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., for Year Ending December 31,2004 - 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1)2005-03-28028 March 2005
Status of Decommissioning Funding for Plants Operated by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., for Year Ending December 31,2004 - 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1)
JPN-03-007, Status of Decommissioning Funding for Plants Operated by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. for Year Ending December 31, 2002 - 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1)2003-03-31031 March 2003
Status of Decommissioning Funding for Plants Operated by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. for Year Ending December 31, 2002 - 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1)
ML0226002922002-09-17017 September 2002
Memorandum Regarding Report on the Status of Open TIAs Assigned to NRR
2023-03-29
[Table view] |
Text
January 17, 2008 MEMORANDUM TO: Luis A. Reyes Executive Director for Operations FROM: Bruce A. Boger /RA/
Associate Director for Operating Reactor Oversight and Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
DECEMBER 2007 REPORT ON THE STATUS OF PUBLIC PETITIONS UNDER TITLE 10 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS (10 CFR) SECTION 2.206 In accordance with SECY-93-355, AReview of Regulations and Practice Governing Citizen Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206,@ the enclosed report gives the status of petitions submitted under 10 CFR 2.206. As of December 31, 2007, there was one open petition accepted for review under the 2.206 process in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. Information that has changed since the last monthly report is highlighted. provides a detailed status of the open petitions as of December 31, 2007. provides the status of incoming letters that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff is reviewing to determine if they meet the criteria for review under the 2.206 process. shows the age statistics for the open 2.206 petitions as of December 31, 2007.
This report, Director=s Decisions, and other 2.206-related documents are placed in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System. By making these documents readily accessible to the public, the NRC staff is addressing the performance goal of ensuring openness in our regulatory process.
Enclosures:
As stated CONTACT: Holly Cruz, NRR/DPR 301-415-1053
January 17, 2008 MEMORANDUM TO: Luis A. Reyes Executive Director for Operations FROM: Bruce A. Boger /RA/
Associate Director for Operating Reactor Oversight and Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
DECEMBER 2007 REPORT ON THE STATUS OF PUBLIC PETITIONS UNDER TITLE 10 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS (10 CFR) SECTION 2.206 In accordance with SECY-93-355, AReview of Regulations and Practice Governing Citizen Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206,@ the enclosed report gives the status of petitions submitted under 10 CFR 2.206. As of December 31, 2007, there was one open petition accepted for review under the 2.206 process in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. Information that has changed since the last monthly report is highlighted. provides a detailed status of the open petitions as of December 31, 2007. provides the status of incoming letters that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff is reviewing to determine if they meet the criteria for review under the 2.206 process. shows the age statistics for the open 2.206 petitions as of December 31, 2007.
This report, Director=s Decisions, and other 2.206-related documents are placed in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System. By making these documents readily accessible to the public, the NRC staff is addressing the performance goal of ensuring openness in our regulatory process.
Enclosures:
As stated CONTACT: Holly Cruz, NRR/DPR 301-415-1053 DISTRIBUTION: WITS 200700062 See next page ADAMS Accession Number: ML080150593 NRR-106 OFFICE PM:PSPB LA:PSPB BC:PSPB DD:DPR ADRO NAME HCruz DBaxley SRosenberg HNieh BBoger 1/15/08 1/15/08 1/16/08 1/16/08 1/17/08 DATE OFFICIAL AGENCY RECORD
DISTRIBUTION FOR DECEMBER 2007 REPORT ON THE STATUS OF PUBLIC PETITIONS UNDER TITLE 10 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS, SECTION 2.206 Date: January 17, 2008 DISTRIBUTION: WITS 200700062 PUBLIC PSPB Reading File RidsEdoMailCenter EJulian PAnderson RidsNrrOd RidsNrrAdro RidsOgcMailCenter RidsOpaMail RidsOcaMailCenter RidsOeMailCenter RidsNrrWpcMail JDeCicco PRathbun NGarciaSantos GCaputo HCruz RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 DPickett JKim JBoska RidsNrrDpr RidsNrrDprPspb RidsNrrLADBaxley RidsNrrPMTMensah RidsRgn1MailCenter RidsRgn2MailCenter RidsRgn3MailCenter RidsRgn4MailCenter
Status of Open Petitions Facility Petitioner/EDO No. Page Vermont Yankee Raymond Shadis representing .1-2 New England Coalition (NEC)
G20070597 ENCLOSURE 1
Report on Status of Public Petitions Under 10 CFR 2.206 Facility: Vermont Yankee Petitioners: Raymond Shadis representing NEC Date of Petition: August 27, 2007 Directors Decision to be Issued by: NRR EDO Number: G20070597 Proposed DD Issuance: March 5, 2008 Final DD Issuance: TBD Last Contact with Petitioner: October 3, 2007 (teleconference)
Petition Manager: James Kim Case Attorney: Giovonna Longo Issues/Actions requested:
The petitioner asks that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) act immediately to restore reasonable assurance of adequate protection of public heath and safety that is now degraded by the failure of the licensee and its employees to report adverse conditions leading to a reduction in plant safety margins.
The petitioner requests:
- 1. NRC completion of a Diagnostic Evaluation Team examination or Independent Safety Assessment of Vermont Yankee to determine the extent of condition of non-conformances, reportable items, hazards to safety and the root causes thereof.
- 2. NRC completion of a safety culture assessment to determine why worker safety concerns were not previously reported and the why assessments of safety culture under the Reactor Oversight Process failed to capture the fact or reasons that safety concerns have gone unreported.
- 3. Derate Vermont Yankee to 50% of licensed thermal power with a mandatory hold at 50% until a thorough and detailed structural and performance analysis of the cooling towers, including the alternate cooling system, has been completed by the licensee; reviewed and approved by NRC; and until the above steps have been completed.
- 4. NRC investigation and determination of whether or not similar nonconforming conditions and causes exist at other Entergy-run nuclear power plants.
If prompt action can not be taken through the 10 CFR 2.206 process, NEC recommends the NRC exercise its statutory discretion to halt power operation until it can be determined to what extent Vermont Yankee is being operated in an unanalyzed condition and until it can be determined that reduction in margins of public health and safety have been restored and do so prior to screening NEC=s letter for acceptance into the 2.206 process.
Background:
On August 27, 2007, the petitioner filed a petition for an enforcement action pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206. On September 6, 2007, the petitioner was notified by telephone call that the requested immediate action to derate or shutdown the Vermont Yankee Power Plant was denied since the petition did not identify safety hazards sufficient to either derate or shutdown the plant.
On September 12, 2007, the NRC staff held a teleconference with the petitioner, providing the opportunity to address the Petition Review Board (PRB). The PRB made an initial recommendation that the petition met the criteria for review under 10 CFR 2.206, and notified the petitioner by telephone of its decision to accept the petition only with respect to the review of technical concerns with the cooling towers on September 26, 2007. The petitioner requested a second opportunity to address the PRB by teleconference. This teleconference was held on October 3, 2007. In an email dated October 3, 2007, the petitioner forwarded additional press articles to supplement the original petition request.
Current Status:
The PRB met on October 17, 2007, in an internal meeting to consider the additional information provided by the petitioner during the October 3, 2007, teleconference. In the meeting, it was determined that the information provided in the petition was credible and sufficient to warrant review under 10 CFR 2.206, with respect to the cooling tower collapse. The final PRB recommendation was provided in an acknowledgement letter to the petitioner on November 6, 2007 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML072920190). The Proposed Directors Decision will be issued by March 5, 2008.
Status of Potential Petitions Under Consideration Facility: Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 Petitioners: Friends United for Sustainable Energy (FUSE - Sherwood Martinelli)
Date of Petition: June 25, 2007 EDO Number: G20070540 PRB meeting: TBD Issues/Actions requested:
The petitioners state that current NRC regulations are prejudiced and biased, usurp Stakeholder rights and presume that license renewal is a foregone conclusion, so long as the licensee spends enough money, and follows guidelines essentially drafted by the powerful nuclear industry lobby, the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI).
- 1. The petitioners request that the NRC issue an order enjoining the NRC from considering any new license applications until the NRC regulations are revised to protect the Constitutional First Amendment Rights, as well as the Equal Protection and Due Process Rights of Stakeholders.
- 2. Based upon the safety and security concerns identified on pages 4-14 of the petition (allegations), the petitioner requests that all licenses for IP be suspended until the site is in full compliance with all local, state and federal laws, statutes, rules and regulations.
- 3. Request for rulemaking (Part 54).
Background:
On June 25, 2007, the petitioner filed a petition for an enforcement action pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206. On August 15, 2007, the petition manager contacted the petitioner to acknowledge receipt of the 2.206 petition. The petitioner requested that the allegations contained within the June 25, 2007, letter be handled in accordance with the 2.206 process.
The PRB met internally on August 20, 2007, and August 27, 2007, to discuss the petitioner=s requests for immediate action (Items #1 and #2). On September 5, 2007, the petition manager informed the petitioner of the PRB=s decision to deny the requests for immediate action. A teleconference was scheduled for the petitioner to address the PRB on September 6, 2007. On September 5, 2007, the petitioner requested that the PRB delay the teleconference until October 2007, so that FUSE could focus its resources on responding to the Opportunity for Hearing for the Indian Point License Renewal. Due to multiple failed attempts to contact the petitioner by telephone, the petition manager contacted the petitioner by email on September 26, 2007, to inform the petitioner of the current status of the petition and to coordinate a date for a PRB meeting. The PRB met internally on October 30, 2007, to make an initial recommendation.
ENCLOSURE 2
Current Status:
The petition manager contacted the petitioner on November 2, 2007, to inform the petitioner of the PRBs initial recommendation to accept the petition with respect to the concerns regarding the Indian Point sirens and groundwater, but deny the request for immediate shutdown. The petitioner requested an opportunity to address the PRB. On November 7, 2007, the NRC received notice that Sherwood Martinelli would be replacing Susan Shapiro as the FUSE point of contact for this petition. On December 21, 2007, the NRC staff held a teleconference with the petitioner, providing the opportunity to address the PRB. The PRB met internally on January 15, 2008, to review the teleconference transcript. An acknowledgement letter to the petitioner will be issued by February 4, 2008.
Facility: Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 Petitioners: Friends United for Sustainable Energy (FUSE-Sherwood Martinelli)
Date of Petition: September 28, 2007 EDO Number: G20070700 PRB meeting: TBD Issues/Actions requested:
The petitioner states Entergy has not taken adequate action to ensure the IP2 and 3 emergency sirens are fully operational.
- 1. The petitioner requests that the NRC issue an order to place IP2 and 3 in cold shutdown until their emergency sirens are fully approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the NRC, and the system is operating within 96 percent.
- 2. The petitioner requests the NRC fine Entergy $130,000 per day from September 28, 2007, forward until they have complied with the NRC's order.
Current Status:
By letter dated September 28, 2007, the petitioner filed a petition for an enforcement action pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206. The PRB met internally on October 30, 2007, to determine if the petition met the criteria for review under 10 CFR 2.206. The petition manager contacted the petitioner on November 1, 2007, to inform the petitioner of the PRBs initial recommendation to accept the petition with respect to the concerns regarding the Indian Point sirens, but deny the request for immediate shutdown. The petitioner requested an opportunity to address the PRB.
On December 21, 2007, the NRC staff held a teleconference with the petitioner, providing the opportunity to address the PRB. The PRB met internally on January 15, 2008, to review the teleconference transcript. An acknowledgement letter to the petitioner will be issued by February 4, 2008.
AGE STATISTICS FOR AGENCY 2.206 PETITIONS Assigned FACILITY/ Incoming PRB Acknowledgment Proposed Date for Comments if not meeting the Action Petitioner petition meeting1 letter/days from DD final Agency=s Completion Goals Office incoming2 issuance DD/age4 Date/age3 Delayed due to scheduling PRB NRR Vermont 08/27/07 09/12/07 11/06/07 03/05/08 TBD meetings with the petitioner, Yankee/ 10/03/07 71 120 providing the opportunity for the Raymond petitioner to provide Shadis - NEC supplemental information.
- 1) Goal is to hold a PRB meeting, which the petitioner is invited to participate in, within 2 weeks of receipt of petition.
- 2) Goal is to issue acknowledgment letter within 35 days of the date of incoming petition.
- 3) Goal is to issue proposed DD within 120 days of the acknowledgment letter.
- 4) Goal is to issue final DD within 45 days of the end of the comment period.
ENCLOSURE 3
