ML072960257

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)
ML072960257
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 10/19/2007
From: D'Antonio J
NRC Region 1
To:
Public Service Enterprise Group
D'Antonio J
Shared Package
ML062050204 List:
References
50-354/07-301, ES-201, ES-201-1 50-354/07-301
Download: ML072960257 (11)


Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: /-/OPL L A t C'U Date of Examination:  !/Lf - fa{ 37 Examinations Developed by: Facility / N q c i r c l e one) v I Target Chief Date' Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed(C.l .a; C.2.a and b)

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l .d; C.2.e) I

~ ~

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)

-120 4. CorDorate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

[-go1 5. Reference material due (C.l .e; C.3.c: Attachment 2)]

-75 6. Integratedexamination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2,ES-201-3.

ES-301-1, ES-301-2,ES-301-5. ES-D-l's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3,and ES-401-4,as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)

-70 7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback providedto facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)

-45 8. Proposed examinations (includingwritten, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios. as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4.ES-301-5,ES-301-6, and ES-401-6),and reference materials due (C.l .e. f, g and h; C.3.d)

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.l .I; C.2.g; ES-202)

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; ES-202)

~ ~

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review

~

(C.2.h; C.3.f) I /

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C~1.j;C.2.f and h; C.3.g)

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i: Attachment 4: ES-204) I

-7 15 Proctoringtwritten exam admin stration guoelincs revieweo w th facdity licensee (C 3 h)

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.

They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[ ] Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.

compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that I on'the form

. . task reDetitionfrom the last two NRC examinations is within'the (2) limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test@)

(4) the number of new or modifiedtasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the 1 c7Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected 1 4&

a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 7
d. NRC Supervisor Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination r-jO?cCPEE.KET 2007-0 I I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of p/zY/p7 - /Okb7 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowled e, I di f

during the week(s) of4kV 7 -lo .YF$ t ivulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered 8 the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY - SIGNATURSIl) DATE SIGNATURE E) DATE NOTE ES-201, Page 26 of 27

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination H<g-k&cl-/L zrr -2007 - 0 (

/

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 9 t/67- as o t i i lo;/

date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized 07 by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and I authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, Iam aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my know1 dg I did during the week(s) of 9 / t #?if4 7 .

ulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered m t e date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE ES-201, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: tfopL c?'%6<

1. General Criteria Date of Examination: 9 211z& 70peratir -

Test Number:

a Tne operat ng test conlorms with the prev ous y approve0 OJthne changes are consistent w m sampling reqmements (e.g , 10 CFR 55 45, operatonal .mporfance. safety ILncl on nistr.b~t'on).

b There s 100day-to.aay repel.tion DeMeen tnis and otner operaling tests to be anm nisterea dLr'ng ths examinal on C. The U p d l Iiy I ~ Sstiall I no1aLpIcaIe 'terns lrom , t teSt(SJ.{see Section D 1 a

!ne applicants' ad ,

0 Ouerlap hilh Ine writfen examination ana ochveen a.tlerent pans 01 the opcrat ng lest 1s w In n acceptab e ..m Is.

e I1 appears that the operating lest will dinerentlate netween Competent and less.than.compelen1

2. Walk-Through Criteria a

Each JPM .nclunes tne following a5 applica0.e nil at condit ons in tiathg c,es references ann 100~s. ncuding assoc ated proceadres

  • reamable and uatnaled i m e tcmits ,average time a owea lor comp et.on) ana specif c acsignation 11aeemea to oe t me-crir cal oy me Iacilliy licensee
  • operatlona.,y imponant specif.c performance criteria that nc doe.

- ocmded expected act ons with exact crnteria anc iiornenc a i d e

- system response and other exam ne1 cues

- Statements descriomg mporlant ooservat1ons to De made oy tne appl.cant

- crilerla lor sLccesslL complet on 01 the taw

- dent tication 01 cr tica steps an0 their assoc ated performance slanaards

- restr.ctions on tne seqLence 01 steps ifapp icablc 0 EnsLre Inat any changes from Ihe previoLsly approea syslems ana aamlnistrat've waln.tnrough o J .nes (Forms ES-301.1 ana 2 ) have not ca,sed tne tesl to Deviate lrom any 01 tne acceptance cr terla [e g., tern a str OLtiOn, bank Jse. repetit on from Ihe as1 2 hRC examlnal on51 Specit ea on those forms and Form ES-201-2

3. Simulator Criteria Tne associated s mL.alor operat ng lesls (scenario sets) nave been reviewen n accordance w In Form ES-301-4and a copy 15anacned Date
a. Author 7lmb
b. Facility Reviewerr)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Supervisor NOTE ' The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developedtests.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: 1 Date of ~%XI! Scenario Numbers: I / 21 3 Operating Test No.:

QUALITATIVE AlTRlBUTES 1 I

,lnitiz

- the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 b

=acility:

Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the '"at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-piant (BOP)" positions: instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (IC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormai conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be Significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

Whenever practical. both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that requtre verifiable actions that Provide lnsiaht to the aoolicanYs competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 wlitv. /-b&U u 6 Y Date of E xamination: 4IUlI-7 ODeratina Test No:

I Instructions:

Circle the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author: 7 NRC Reviewer: 7

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: & (6 CkMK Date of Exam: q / q /m 7 Exam Level: RO 0 SR I

Initial Item Description

1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the tacmj.
2. a. NRC WAS are referenced for all questions.
b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.
3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 I
4. The sampling process was random and systematic (if more than 4 RO and 2 SRO questions are repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult with NRR OL program office,)

5 Odeslion duplicatfon from the m n s e screen ngaua I exam was conlrollea as inacatea oe,ow (cnecfi tne ilem Inat app esl and appears appropr are

- the aJa I exam was systematically ana ranaorniy aeve ope0 or

-the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

-the examinations were developed independently; or exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if ihe randomly Printed Name I Sionatiire

a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer r)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

cl. NRC Regional Supervisor hole ' Tne facility reviewer's in tla sisignatLro are nor app cab e lor hRC-aevelopedexam narlons 4 lnaepenaenl NRC reviewer n.tial items .n Colbmn c , m e 1 examiner concurrence reqdrea

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Date of Exam: Exam Level: ROISRO

,I I I Initials Printed NamelSignature Date

/k&? z

a. Grader
b. Facility Reviewerr)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

h y o R. ~jc;dk~

l q t I

7  ;-.

/0/1r)o7

d. NRC Supervisor (*) A

(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

i