ML051930239

Written Examination Review Worksheet, ES-401-9 (Folder 3)

ML051930239
Person / Time
Site:	FitzPatrick
Issue date:	04/14/2005
From:	Suzanne Dennis Operations Branch I
To:	Conte R Operations Branch I
Conte R
References
50-333/05-301, ES-401, ES-401-9 50-333/05-301
Download: ML051930239 (5)

Text

Explanation

4. Job Content Flaws I 5. Other 1 6. I 7.

TIF Explanation Inlv S

E d- both not needed. To get to safety limit you must exceed op. Limit Removed Both and the MCPR Operating

- ~ ~~~

E Changed to fundamental. Typo in explanation. Should be 10312 not 10012.

S S

I s 1 S

S E Stem does not provide enough information to assume that an EOP-2 entry would not occur. Therefore answer B could be correct.. The answei must be based on procedural guidance for the given conditions.

Barry Steve, I used EOP-2 and walked through the procedure and it lec me to EP-2 (copy of high-lighted procedure attached) Weak distractom will replace immediate with required procedurally driven in question S Borderline SRO ONLY - based on correct answer Interface with TS How is this ALARA? - provides commuication to staff to minimize

- dose U -

Barry seems too basic, not SRO only level question process for preparingR WP vs. requirement for RWP -

Replaced S

S S

S E Is there enough stem focus to assure that an emergency doesnt exist, thereby making B also correct?

stem edited for focus

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# OK :?lk (FW Stem lCuesl T/F Focus I Dist. Link I

Cred. IPartial Job- IMinutia #I [Back- Q= ISRO u/E/S units ward WA Only Explanation

4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:

The question is not linked to the job requirements (Le., the question has a valid WA but, as written, is not operational in content).

The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (Le., it is not required to be known from memory)

The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).

The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.

5. Check questions that are samDled for conformance with the approved WA and those that are designated SRO-only (WA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).

6. Based on the reviewers judgment, is the question as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?

7. At a minimum, explain any U ratings (e.q., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).

NUREG-1021. Revision 9 NOTES:

Exam discussed wit, 1 licensee on April I 1 and 12,2005. Out of 33 comments, 17 were resolved with no changes required. Unsats and Enhancements (3 noted below) will be resolved during validation week of April 18, 2005.

Total Unsat= 7 , SRO Unsat = 1, Total Enhancements = 8, Total SRO Enhancements = 5 All comments were resolved and reviewed as noted during the validation week. All replacement questions were found to be sat per the ES 401-9 guidance and were revalidated by the licensee.