Letter Sequence Acceptance Review |
---|
TAC:MC2023, 3.3.9 and 3.3.10 - Delete Flux Monitors Specific Overlap Requirement SRS (Approved, Closed) |
|
MONTHYEARML0427102392004-10-18018 October 2004 Ctr, RAI, TS Change Request (TSCR-029) to Adopt Four NRC-Approved Generic Changes to Improved Technical Specifications Project stage: RAI NG-04-0037, Response to Staffs Request for Additional Information (RAI) Re Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR-029) to Adopt Four Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Approved Generic Chances to Improved Technical Specifications2004-11-22022 November 2004 Response to Staffs Request for Additional Information (RAI) Re Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR-029) to Adopt Four Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Approved Generic Chances to Improved Technical Specifications Project stage: Request ML0511106922005-05-12012 May 2005 License Amendment, Issuance of Amendment to Revise the Technical Specifications by Adopting TSTF Nos. 273, 284, and 299 Project stage: Approval ML0513301812005-05-12012 May 2005 Technical Specifications, Issuance of Amendment to Revise the Technical Specifications by Adopting TSTF Nos. 273, 284, and 299 Project stage: Approval ML0513804822005-06-14014 June 2005 NRC Staff Denial of Licensee Request to Adopt Technical Specification Traveler (TSTF) 264 Project stage: Other ML0517404312005-06-24024 June 2005 (TS) - Correction to Amendment No. 258 Dated May 12, 2005 Project stage: Acceptance Review ML0517300052005-06-24024 June 2005 Correction to Amendment No. 258 Dated May 12, 2005 Project stage: Other 2005-05-12
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:Technical Specifications
MONTHYEARML21067A6422021-05-13013 May 2021 Cyber Security License Amendment Approval ML19310C2042020-01-0202 January 2020 Issuance of Amendment No. 309 to Align Technical Specifications Staffing and Administrative Requirements NG-18-0041, Correction of Error in Final Technical Specification Page 1.1-3 for License Amendment Request (TSCR-168), Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-542, Reactor Pressure Vessel Water Inventory Control2018-03-28028 March 2018 Correction of Error in Final Technical Specification Page 1.1-3 for License Amendment Request (TSCR-168), Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-542, Reactor Pressure Vessel Water Inventory Control NG-17-0233, Submittal of License Amendment Request (TSCR-178) Application to Reduce the Required Number of Operable Suppression Chamber-to-Drywell Vacuum Breakers2017-12-15015 December 2017 Submittal of License Amendment Request (TSCR-178) Application to Reduce the Required Number of Operable Suppression Chamber-to-Drywell Vacuum Breakers ML15310A0822015-12-22022 December 2015 Issuance of Amendment to Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF)-501, Relocate Stored Fuel Oil and Lube Oil Volume Values to Licensee Control ML15169A2612015-08-18018 August 2015 Issuance of Amendment Concerning Extension of Cyber Security Plan Milestone 8 Completion Date ML15014A2002015-02-10010 February 2015 Issuance of Amendment to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force - 523 Generic Letter 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation (Tac No. MF4358) NG-14-0143, License Amendment Request (TSCR-146): Application to Revise Tech Specs to Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler-523,Generic Letter 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Proces2014-06-23023 June 2014 License Amendment Request (TSCR-146): Application to Revise Tech Specs to Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler-523,Generic Letter 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process NG-13-0297, License Amendment Request (TSCR-145): Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Battery Terminal and Charger Voltage and Amperage Section Affected: 3.8.42013-08-29029 August 2013 License Amendment Request (TSCR-145): Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Battery Terminal and Charger Voltage and Amperage Section Affected: 3.8.4 NG-12-0434, Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR-141): License Amendment Request for Change to Renewed Operating License Condition C.122012-11-13013 November 2012 Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR-141): License Amendment Request for Change to Renewed Operating License Condition C.12 NG-12-0256, Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI Regarding License Amendment Request (TSCR-135): Application for One-Time Technical Specification Change Regarding Core Spray Operability During Shutdown2012-06-27027 June 2012 Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI Regarding License Amendment Request (TSCR-135): Application for One-Time Technical Specification Change Regarding Core Spray Operability During Shutdown ML12107A1532012-04-13013 April 2012 NRR E-mail Capture - ME8251 - Duane Arnold - Preparations for Potential Bravo Diesel Generator LCO Extension TS 3.8.1 NG-12-0028, License Amendment Request (TSCR-132): Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Battery Terminal and Charger Voltage and Amperage Section Affected: 3.8.42012-03-22022 March 2012 License Amendment Request (TSCR-132): Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Battery Terminal and Charger Voltage and Amperage Section Affected: 3.8.4 ML1207402022012-03-21021 March 2012 Correction to Amendment No. 280 Regarding Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler (TSTF-425) to Relocate Specific Surveillance Frequencies to a Licensee-Controlled Program NG-12-0054, Supplement to an Application to Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler TSTF-425, Revision 3, to Relocate Specific Surveillance Frequencies to a Licensee Controlled Program2012-02-0303 February 2012 Supplement to an Application to Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler TSTF-425, Revision 3, to Relocate Specific Surveillance Frequencies to a Licensee Controlled Program NG-11-0371, License Amendment Request (TSCR-129): Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Alternative Testing of Safety/Relief Valves Sections Affected: 3.4.3, 3.5.1, and 3.6.1.52011-09-29029 September 2011 License Amendment Request (TSCR-129): Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Alternative Testing of Safety/Relief Valves Sections Affected: 3.4.3, 3.5.1, and 3.6.1.5 NG-11-0299, Response to Request for Additional Information Related to an Amendment to Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler TSTF-425, Revision 3, to Relocate Specific Surveillance Frequencies to a Licensee Controlled Program2011-08-15015 August 2011 Response to Request for Additional Information Related to an Amendment to Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler TSTF-425, Revision 3, to Relocate Specific Surveillance Frequencies to a Licensee Controlled Program NG-11-0037, License Amendment Request (TSCR-120): Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justification for Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program (TSTF-425, Rev. 3)2011-02-23023 February 2011 License Amendment Request (TSCR-120): Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justification for Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program (TSTF-425, Rev. 3) ML0530503092010-12-16016 December 2010 Current Facility Operating License DPR-49, Tech Specs, Revised 03/17/2018 ML1029305242010-12-16016 December 2010 Issuance of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-49 for Duane Arnold Energy NG-09-0119, Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J and Associated Changes to Technical Specifications for Main Steamline Isolation Valve Local Leakage Rate Testing (TSCR-096) Affected Technical Specification...2009-03-0404 March 2009 Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J and Associated Changes to Technical Specifications for Main Steamline Isolation Valve Local Leakage Rate Testing (TSCR-096) Affected Technical Specification... ML0822601352008-09-0909 September 2008 Technical Specifications, Issuance of Amendment Regarding License Amendment Request to Remove the Emergency Diesel Generator Surveillance Requirement for Preplanned Preventive Maintenance and Testing ML0817805562008-06-24024 June 2008 Tech Spec Pages for Amendment 269 Adoption of Changes to TSTF-448, Revision 3, Control Room Habitability. NG-08-0312, Updated Technical Specification and Bases Pages Related to Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR-092): Consolidated Line Item Improvement; Adoption of Changes to Standard Specifications . .2008-05-0808 May 2008 Updated Technical Specification and Bases Pages Related to Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR-092): Consolidated Line Item Improvement; Adoption of Changes to Standard Specifications . . ML0808103592008-03-20020 March 2008 Technical Specifications, Amendment to Improve the Ranked Position Withdrawal Sequence Control Rod Insertion Process NG-07-0571, Application for Technical Specification Improvement to Adopt TSTF-476, Revision 1, Improved Banked Position Withdrawal Sequence (BPWS) Control Rod Insertion Process (NEDO-33091).2007-09-14014 September 2007 Application for Technical Specification Improvement to Adopt TSTF-476, Revision 1, Improved Banked Position Withdrawal Sequence (BPWS) Control Rod Insertion Process (NEDO-33091). NG-07-0493, Tscr: Consolidated Line Item Improvement, Adoption of Changes to STS Under TSTF-448, Revision 3 Regarding Control Room Envelopes Habitability2007-06-29029 June 2007 Tscr: Consolidated Line Item Improvement, Adoption of Changes to STS Under TSTF-448, Revision 3 Regarding Control Room Envelopes Habitability ML0717901682007-06-28028 June 2007 Tech Spec Pages for Amendment 265 Regarding Technical Specification Change Related to the Revised Rule for Combustible Gas Control ML0703804842007-02-0505 February 2007 Technical Specification, System Leakage and Hydrostatic Testing Operation ML0635405782006-12-14014 December 2006 Tech Spec Pages for Amendment 263 Regarding Inoperability of Snubbers ML0632500392006-11-15015 November 2006 Technical Specifications, Revises TS Table 3.3.6.1-1, Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation, to Eliminate the Main Steamline Radiation Monitor Trip Function NG-06-0472, Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR-083): Adoption of TSTF-478, Rev. 0, 'Bwr Technical Specification Changes That Implement the Revised Rule for Combustible Gas Control, Affected Tech Specs: Section 3.6.3.1 and 3.6.3.22006-07-17017 July 2006 Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR-083): Adoption of TSTF-478, Rev. 0, 'Bwr Technical Specification Changes That Implement the Revised Rule for Combustible Gas Control, Affected Tech Specs: Section 3.6.3.1 and 3.6.3.2 NG-06-0250, Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR-078): Adoption of TSTF-484, Rev. 0, Use of TS 3.10.1 for Scram Time Testing Activities, Affected Technical Specifications: Section 3.10.12006-03-0101 March 2006 Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR-078): Adoption of TSTF-484, Rev. 0, Use of TS 3.10.1 for Scram Time Testing Activities, Affected Technical Specifications: Section 3.10.1 ML0627102722006-01-27027 January 2006 Technical Specifications, Transfer of License to FPL Energy Duane Arnold, LLC ML0603201602006-01-27027 January 2006 Appendix B - Additional Conditions Operating License No. DPR-49 ML0517404312005-06-24024 June 2005 (TS) - Correction to Amendment No. 258 Dated May 12, 2005 ML0517503432005-06-23023 June 2005 Technical Specifications, Revised Action for Scram Discharge Volume Vent and Drain Values ML0513301812005-05-12012 May 2005 Technical Specifications, Issuance of Amendment to Revise the Technical Specifications by Adopting TSTF Nos. 273, 284, and 299 ML0503401522005-01-31031 January 2005 Technical Specifications, Deletion Requirements for Submittal of Occupational Radiation and Monthly Operating Reports ML0501200762005-01-10010 January 2005 TS Pages for Amendment 255 Regarding Technical Specifications Adopt TSTF-359, Increased Flexibility in Mode Restraints NG-04-0689, Application for Technical Specification Improvement to Revise the Required Action within TS 3.1.8 Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) Vent and Drain Valves, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process2004-10-29029 October 2004 Application for Technical Specification Improvement to Revise the Required Action within TS 3.1.8 Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) Vent and Drain Valves, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process ML0324004962003-08-25025 August 2003 Technical Specification Page, Updating Reactor Coolant System Pressure and Temperature Limit Curves (TS Figure 3.4.9-1) and Extends Applicability to 32 Effective full-power Years ML0314100482003-05-16016 May 2003 License Amendment 251, License Page 4a, Pertaining to Reactor Building Crane and single-failure Proof NG-03-0304, Revision of Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR-059A): Update to Reactor Coolant System Pressure and Temperature Limit Curves.2003-05-0202 May 2003 Revision of Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR-059A): Update to Reactor Coolant System Pressure and Temperature Limit Curves. NG-03-0332, 2002 Annual Radioactive Materials Release Report2003-04-30030 April 2003 2002 Annual Radioactive Materials Release Report ML0308505872003-03-21021 March 2003 TS Page for Amendment No. 249 ML0229501072002-10-28028 October 2002 Correction to Issuance of Amendment No. 248, TAC MB4269 ML0227703442002-10-0202 October 2002 Tech Spec for Amendment No. 248, Organization 5.2 for Duane Arnold ML0227703312002-10-0101 October 2002 Technical Specifications, Extends On-line Battery Replacement Time ML0210800482002-05-30030 May 2002 License Amendment No. 246, Issuance of Amendment Missed Surveillance, Consolidated Line Item Improvement 2021-05-13
[Table view] |
Text
Frequency 1.4 1.4 Frequency (continued)
EXAMPLES The following examples illustrate the various ways that Frequencies are specified. In these examples, the Applicability of the LCO (LCO not shown) is MODES 1, 2, and 3.
EXAMPLE 1,4-1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY Perform CHANNEL CHECK. 12 hours0.5 days <br />0.0714 weeks <br />0.0164 months <br /> Example 1.4-1 contains the type of SR most often encountered in the Technical Specifications (TS). The Frequency specifies an interval (12 hours0.5 days <br />0.0714 weeks <br />0.0164 months <br />) during which the associated Surveillance must be performed at least one time.
Performance of the Surveillance initiates the subsequent interval. Although the Frequency is stated as 12 hours0.5 days <br />0.0714 weeks <br />0.0164 months <br />, an extension of the time interval to 1.25 times the interval specified in the Frequency is allowed by SR 3.0.2 for operational flexibility. The measurement of this interval continues at all times, even when the SR is not required to be met per SR 3.0.1 (such as when the equipment is inoperable, a variable is outside specified limits, or the unit is outside the Applicability of the LCO). If the interval specified by SR 3.0.2 is exceeded while the unit is in a MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability of the LCO, and the performance of the Surveillance is not otherwise modified (refer to Examples 1.4-3 and 1.4-4), then SR 3.0.3 becomes applicable.
If the interval as specified by SR 3.0.2 is exceeded while the unit is not in a MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability of the LCO for which performance of the SR is required, the Surveillance must be performed within the Frequency requirements of SR 3.0.2 prior to entry into the MODE or other specified condition. Failure to do so would result in a violation of SR 3.0.4.
(continued)
DAEC 1.4-3 Amendment Sb. 258
Frequency 1.4 1.4 Frequency EXAMPLES EXAMPLE 1.4-2 (continued)
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY Verify flow is within limits. Once within 12 hours0.5 days <br />0.0714 weeks <br />0.0164 months <br /> after 2 25%
RTP AND 24 hours1 days <br />0.143 weeks <br />0.0329 months <br /> thereafter Example 1.4-2 has two Frequencies. The first is a one time performance Frequency, and the second is of the type shown in Example 1.4-1. The logical connector "AND" indicates that both Frequency requirements must be met. Each time reactor power is increased from a power level < 25% RTP to 2 25% RTP, the Surveillance must be performed within 12 hours0.5 days <br />0.0714 weeks <br />0.0164 months <br />.
The use of "once" indicates a single performance will satisfy the specified Frequency (assuming no other Frequencies are connected by "AIND"). This type of Frequency does not qualify for the extension allowed by SR 3.0.2.
"Thereafter" indicates future performances must be established per SR 3.0.2. but only after a specified condition is first met (i.e., the "once" performance in this example). If reactor power decreases to < 25% RTP, the measurement of both intervals stops. New intervals start upon reactor power reaching 25% RTP.
(continued)
DAEC 1.4-4 Amendment Nb. 258
Frequency 1.4 1.4 Frequency EXAMPLES EXAMPLE 1,4-4 (continued)
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY
NOTE--------------------
Only required to be met in MODE 1.
Verify leakage rates are within limits. 24 hours1 days <br />0.143 weeks <br />0.0329 months <br /> Example 1.4-4 specifies that the requirements of this Surveillance do not have to bermet until the unit is in MODE 1. The interval measurement for the Frequency of this Surveillance continues at all times, as described in Example 1.4-1. However, the Note constitutes an "otherwise stated" exception to the Applicability of this Surveillance. Therefore, if the Surveillance were not performed within the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> interval (plus the extension allowed by SR 3.0.2), but the unit was not in MODE 1, there would be no failure of the SR nor failure to meet the LCO. Therefore, no violation of SR 3.0.4 occurs when changing MODES, even with the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Frequency exceeded, provided the MODE change was not made into MODE 1. Prior to entering MODE 1 (assuming again that the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Frequency were not met), SR 3.0.4 would require satisfying the SR.
(continued)
DAEC 1.4-6 Amendment nb. 258
Frequency 1.4 1.4 Frequency EXAMPLES EXAMPLE 1.4-5 (continued)
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY
NOTE--------------------
Only required to be met in MODE 1.
Perform complete cycle of the valve 7 days The interval continues, whether or not the unit operation is in MODE 1, 2 or 3 (the assumed Applicability of the associated LCO) between performances.
As the Note modifies the required performance of the Surveillance, the Note is construed to be part of the "specified Frequency." Should the 7 day interval be exceeded while operation is not in MODE 1, this Note allows entry into and operation in MODES 2 and 3 to perform the Surveillance. The Surveillance is still considered to be performed within the "specified Frequency" if completed prior to entering MODE 1. Therefore, if the Surveillance were not performed within the 7 day (plus the extension allowed by SR 3.0.2) interval, but operation was not in MODE 1, it would not constitute a failure of the SR or failure to meet the LCO. Also, no violation of SR 3.0.4 occurs when changing MODES, even with the 7 day Frequency not met, provided operation does not result in entry into MODE 1.
Once the unit reaches MODE 1, the requirement for the Surveillance to be performed within its specified Frequency applies and would require that the Surveillance had been performed. If the Surveillance were not performed prior to entering MODE 1, there would then be a failure to perform a Surveillance within the specified Frequency, and the provisions of SR 3.0.3 would apply.
(continued)
DAEC 1.4-7 Amendment Nb. 258
Frequency 1.4 1.4 Frequency EXAMPLES EXAMPLE 1,4-6 (continued)
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY
NOTE--------------------
Not required to be in MODE 3.
Verify parameter is within limits. 24 hours1 days <br />0.143 weeks <br />0.0329 months <br /> Example 1.4-6 specifies that the requirements of this Surveillance do not have to be met while the unit is in MODE 3 (the assumed Applicability of the associated LCO is MODES 1.
2, and 3). The interval measurement for the Frequency of this Surveillance continues at all times, as described in Example 1.4-1. However, the Note constitutes an "otherwise stated" exception to the Applicability of this Surveillance.
Therefore, if the Surveillance were not performed within the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> interval (plus the extension allowed by SR 3.0.2), and the unit was in MODE 3, there would be no failure of the-SR nor failure to meet the LCO. Therefore, no violation of SR 3.0.4 occurs when changing MODES to enter MODE 3. even with the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Frequency exceeded, provided the MODE change does not result in entry into MODE 2. Prior to entering MODE 2 (assuming again that the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Frequency were not met), SR 3.0.4 would require satisfying the SR.
DAEC 1.4-8 Amendment Nb. 258
Programs and Manuals 5.5 5.5 Programs and Manuals 5.5.1 Offsite Dose Assessment Manual (ODAM) (continued) markings in the margin of the affected pages, clearly indicating the area of the page that was changed, and shall indicate the date (i.e., month and year) the change was implemented.
5.5.2 Primary Coolant Sources Outside Containment This program provides controls to minimize leakage from those portions of systems outside containment that could contain highly radioactive fluids during a serious transient or accident to levels as low as practicable. The systems include Core Spray, HighWPressure Coolant Injection, Residual Heat Removal, Reactor Core Isolation Cooling, Reactor Water Cleanup (only to second isolation valve). Post Accident Sampling (until such time as a modification eliminates PASS as a potential leakage path),
Containment Atmospheric Monitoring, Control Rod Drive (scram discharge volume only) and Liquid Radwaste (only Reactor Building Floor and Equipment Drain sump pumps, piping, and tanks up to and including collector tanks). The program shall include the following:
- a. Preventive maintenance and periodic visual inspection requirements; ahd
- b. System leak test requirements for each system at least once per 24 months.
The provisions of SR 3.0.2 are applicable.
5.5.3 [Deleted]
(continued)
DAEC 5.0-8 Amendment lb. 258
Programs and Manuals 5.5 5.5 Programs and Manuals 5.5.12 Primary Containment Leakage Rate TestinQ Program (continued) by the following exception to NEI 94-01, Rev. 0, "Industry Guideline for Implementing Performance-Based Option of 10 CFR 50, Appendix 3":
The first Type A test after the September 1993 Type A test shall be performed no later than September 2008.
The peak calculated containment internal pressure for the design basis loss of coolant accident, P.. is 45.7 psig.
The maximum allowable primary containment leakage rate, La, at P,,
shall be 2.0X of primary containment air weight per day.
Leakage Rate acceptance criteria are:
- a. Primary Containment leakage rate acceptance criterion is
< 1.0 L,. During the first startup following testing in accordance with this program, the leakage rate acceptance criteria are:
- 0.60 L,for the Type B and Type C tests; and,
- 0.75 L,for the Type A tests; and
- b. The air lock testing acceptance criterion is overall air lock leakage rate < 0.05 La when tested at Ž P,.
The provisions of SR 3.0.3 are applicable to the Primary Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program.
DAEC 5.0-18 Amendment Eb. 258