ML050950495

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Aug/Sept 2004-301 Exam 50-261/2004-301 Final Written Outlines
ML050950495
Person / Time
Site: Robinson Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/26/2004
From:
Division of Nuclear Materials Safety II
To:
References
50-261/04-301
Download: ML050950495 (13)


See also: IR 05000261/2004301

Text

Final Submittal

ROBINSON AUG/SEPT 2004

EXAM NO. 05000261/2004-301

AUG. 27 - SEPT. 3, 2004

FINAL SAMPLE PLANS / OUTLINES

ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2

Final

Facility: HB Robinson Date of Exam: 8/27/2004

RO K/A Category Points I I

Tier Group K K K K K K 7 A A A G Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 *

1. 1 0 0 4 7 16 1 18

Emergency

& 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 9

Abnormal

Plant Tier 2 2 6 8 8 2 28

Evolutions Totals

2. 1 3 4 4 1 1 1 5 3 0 4 2 28

Plant 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 10

Systems Tier 4 4 4 2 2 2 6 5 2 5 2 38

Totals

3. Generic Knowledge and 1 2 3 4 9

Abilities Categories 2 3 2 2

Note: 1. Ensure that at least two topics from every K/A category are sampled within each tier of

the RO outline (i.e., the "Tier Totals" in each K/A category shall not be less than two).

Refer to Section D.1.c for additional guidance regarding SRO sampling.

2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified

in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/- 1 from that

specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points

and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points.

3. Select topics from many systems and evolutions; avoid selecting more than two K/A

topics from a given system or evolution unless they relate to plant-specific priorities.

4. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline.

5. The shaded areas are not applicable to the category/tier.

6.* The generic (G) K/As in Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the K/A

Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. The SRO

K/As must also be linked to 10 CFR 55.43 or an SRO-level learning objective.

7. On the following pages, enter the K/A numbers, a brief description of each topic, the

topics' importance ratings (IR) for the applicable license level, and the point totals for

each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table

above; summarize all the SRO-only knowledge and non-A2 ability categories in the

columns labeled "K"and "A". Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.

8. For Tier 3, enter the K/A numbers, descriptions, importance ratings, and point totals on

Form ES-401-3.

9. Refer to ES-401, Attachment 2, for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate

K/A statements.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 1

ES-401 HB Robinson Form ES-401-2

NRC Written Examination Outline

Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier I Group 1

EIAPE #/ Name Safety Function IG K1 K2 K3 A1 IA21 NumberT K/A Topic(s) Imp. 1Q#1

0 Ability to determine or interpret the following as they apply 40 76

009 / Small Break LOCA X EA2.04 to a small break LOCA: PZR level

Emergency Procedures / Plan Ability to perform without

027 / Pressurizer Pressure Control System Malfunction X 24.49 reference to procedures those actions that require 40 77

3 immediate operation of system components and controls.

ATWS 11 EA2 09 Ability to determine or interpret the following as they apply 45

029 i ATWS / 1 to a ATWS: Occurrence of a main turbine/reactor trip

Emergency Procedures / Plan Ability to verify system

X 2,450 alarm setpoints and operate controls identified in the 33 79

056 / Loss of Off-site Power / 6 alarm response manual.

Ability to determine and interpret the following as they

X AA2.02 apply to the Loss of Nuclear Service Water: The cause of 3.6 80

062 / Loss of Nuclear Svc. Water / 4

possible CCW loss

E04 / LOCA Outside Containment / 3 2A2.128 Conduct of Operations: Knowledge of the purpose and 33 81

nX 1 function of major system components and controls.

E05 / Inadequate Heat Transfer - Loss of Secondary X 2 1.27 Conduct of Operations: Knowledge of system purpose 29 82

Heat Sink / 4 and or function.

X 2.1.20 Conduct of operations: Ability to execute procedure steps. 4.3 39

007 / Reactor Trip - Stabilization - Recovery/ 1

Ability to determine and interpret the following as they

X AA2.23 apply to the Pressuizer Vapor Space Accident: Criteria 3.6 40

008 / Pressurizer Vapor Space Accident /3

for throttling high-pressure injection after a small LOCA

009 1 Small Break LOCA / 3 009 Smll rea LOC / XA1.17 EA.17 Ability

to to operate

a small break LOCA: PRT the following as they apply

and monitor 34 41

Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as

X EK3.03 the apply to the Large Break LOCA: Starting auxiliary feed 4.1 42

oil / Large Break LOCA / 3 pumps and flow, ED/G, and service water pumps

Ability to operate and / or monitor the following as they

XAM .22 apply to the Reactor Coolant Pump Malfunctions (Loss of 4.0 43

015 / 17 / RCP Malfunctions / 4 RC Flow): RCP seal failure/malfunction

Ability to operate and / or monitor the following as they

025 / Loss of RHR System/4 x AAI.20 apply to the Loss of Residual Heat Removal System: HPI 2.6

pump control switch, indicators, ammeter running lights,

and flow meter

Ability to determine and interpret the following as they

026 / Loss of Component Cooling Water / 8 X AA2.02 apply to the Loss of Component Cooling Water: The 2.9 45

cause of possible CCW loss I I

NUREG Draft Revision 9

ES-401 HB Robinson Form ES-401-2

NRC Written Examination Outline

Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions- Tier 1 Group 1

  1. /

I/PEName Safety Function GKA1 A2 Number K/A Topic(s) Imp. Q#

Ability to determine and interpret the following as they

7 /Pressurizer X AA2.10 apply to the Pressurizer Pressure Control Malfunctions: 3.3 46

heater energizedldeenergized condition

029/ ARNS/ 1X X E1.0

EAl to a ATWS:

Ability to operate androd

Manual controlthe following as they apply

monitor 4.0 47

029 / ATWS / 1

038/Steam Gen. Tube Rupture / 3

038 3Stam en. ubeRupure X EA.19

EAl.19 to a SGTR:

Ability MFWand

to operate System

monitor the indicator

status following as they apply 3.4 48

Ability to operate and / or monitor the following as they

040 / Steam Line Rupture - Excessive Heat Transfer /4 X AA1.13 apply to the Steam Line Rupture: Steam line isolation 4.2 49

valve indications

Ability to determine and interpret the following as they

054/ Loss of Main Feedwater / 4 X AA2.08 apply to the Loss of Main Feedwater (MFW): Steam flow- 2.9 50

feed trend recorder

056/ Loss of Oft-site Power/S6 AA2.56 Ability to determine and interpret the following as they 3B 51

A 5

06Looff-tPw/ apply to the Loss of Offsite Power: RCS T-ave

Ability to determine and interpret the following as they

0571 Loss of Vital AC Inst. Bus / 6 X AA2.17 apply to the Loss of Vital AC Instrument Bus: System and 3.1 52

component status, using local or remote controls

Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as

058 / Loss of DC Power / 6 X AK3.02 they apply to the Loss of DC Power: Actions contained in 4.0 53

EOP for loss of do power

Ability to operate and / or monitor the following as they

the to 2.9

X A .07 apply to the Loss of Nuclear Service by rates

Water: Flow

Nclear Svc. Water /4 the components and systems that are serviced

CCWS; interactions among the components

Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as

effects

Knowingfrom 2.9 55

065 / Loss of Instrument Air / S AK3.03 they apply

on plant to the Loss

operation of isolating certain Air:

of Instrument equipment

instrument air

Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as

they apply to the (Loss of Secondary Heat Sink) RO or

E05 I Inadequate Heat Transfer - Loss of Secondary X EK3.4 SRO function as a within the control room team as56

Heat Sink / 4 appropriate to the assigned position, in such a way that

procedures are adhered to and the limitations in the

facilities license and amendments are not violated.

KA Category Point Totals: 5 0 0 4 7 9 Group Point Total: 25

NUREG-4 -), Draft Revision 9 )

I ES-401 HB Robinson Form ES-401-2 I

NRC Written Examination Outline

Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 Group 2

I

EIAPE # / Name Safety Function IG I K1 IK2 I K3 I Al I A2 Number K/A Topic(s) Imp. Q#

2.46 Emergency Procedures / Plan Knowledge symptom based 40 83

036 /Fuel Handling Accident / 8 -X 2.46 EOP mitigation strategies.

Ability to determine and interpret the following as they

E EA2 apply to the (Degraded Core Cooling) Facility conditions 42 84

E06 rinad Core Cooling 4 Eand selection of appropriate procedures during abnormal

and emergency operations.

Emergency Procedures / Plan Knowledge of EOP

E03 I Post-LOCA Cooldown/Depressurization. 4 x 24 16 implementation hierarchy and coordination with other 40 85

support procedures

Ability to determine and interpret the following as they

El44! Loss of CTMT Integrity / 5 X EA21 apply to the (High Containment Pressure) Facility 38 86

conditions and selection of appropriate procedures during

abnormal and emergency operations.

Ability to determine and interpret the following as they

apply to the (High Containment Radiation) Facility 2.9 73

E16 I High Containment Radiation 9 Econditions and selection of appropriate procedures during

abnormal and emergency operations.

Knowledge of the interrelations between the Continuous

001 / Continuous Rod Withdrawal /1 X AK2.01 Rod Withdrawal and the following: Rod bank step 2.9 57

counters

Knowledge of the operational implications of the following

003 / Dropped Control Rod / 1 x AK1.21 concepts as they apply to Dropped Control Rod: Delta 2.7 58

flux (Al)

Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as

005 / Inoperable/Stuck Control Rod / 1 x AK3.02 they apply to the Inoperable / Stuck Control Rod: Rod 3.6 59

insertion limits

024/ Emergency Boration I I x AA2.04 Ability to determine and interpret the following as they 3.4 60

apply to the Emergency Boration: Availability of BWST

Conduct of Operations: Ability to perform specific system

028 / Pressurizer Level Malfunction / 2 x 2.1.23 and integrated plant procedures during all modes of plant 3.9 61

operation.

Ability to operate and / or monitor the following as they

X AA1.02 apply to the Control Room Evacuation: AFW emergency 4.3 62

068 / Control Room Evac. / 8

pump

iI!!M

Knowledge of the operational implications or the following

concepts as they apply to the (SI Termination) Normal,

x EK1.2 abnormal and emergency operating procedures 3.4 63

E02 / Rediagnosis & SI Termination / 3

associated with (SI Termination).

I ................ )......~

NUREGSý, Draft Revision 9

ES-401 HB Robinson Form ES-401-2

NRC Written Examination Outline

Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 Group 2

E/ # / Narne Safety Function G K1K3A1 A2 Number K/A Topic(s) Imp. Q#

Knowledge of the interrelations between the (Degraded

Core Cooling) and the following: Components, and

E06 / Inad. Core Cooling /4 x EK21 functions of control and safety systems, including 3.6 64

instrumentation, signals, interlocks, failure modes, and

automatic and manual features.

Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as

they apply to the (Steam Generator Overpressure)

Facility operating characteristics during transient

E13 / Steam Generator Over-pressure /4 X EK3.1 conditions, including coolant chemistry and the effects of 2.9 65

temperature, pressure, and reactivity changes and

operating limitations and reasons for these operating

characteristics.

K/A Category Point Total: 2 2 2 1 14

NUREG-' Draft Revision 9 5

ES-401 HB Robinson Form ES-401-2

NRC Written Examination Outline

Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 2 Group 1

G KI K2 K3 I K4 I K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 Number K/A Topics Imp. Q# I

FSystem #/Name

Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following

malfunctions or operations on the ECCS: and (b) based

X A2 12 on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control. 48 86

006 Emergency Core Cooling

or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or

operations: Conditions requiring actuation of ECCS

Emergency Procedures ! Plan Knowledge of

x 2.431 annunciators alarms and indications, and use of the 3.4 89

012 Reactor Protection

response instructions.

Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following

malfunctions or operations on the CCS: and (b) based

on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control.

022 Containment Cooling

l A2 03

A2 03 or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or 10 90

operations: Fan motor thermal overload/high-speed

operation

Emergency Procedures/Plan: Ability to verify system

2 450 alarm setpoints and operate controls identified in the 33 91

010 Pressurizer Pressure Control X

alarm response manual.

Knowledge of the effect that a loss or malfunction of the

K3.03 RCPS will have on the following: Feedwater and 2.8 1

003 Reactor Coolant Pump emergency feedwater

manually operate and/or monitor in the control 2.6 2

3Reator Coolant Pump

0 A407 room: to

Ability RCP seal bypass

K Knowledge of bus power supplies to the following: 33 3

004 Chemical and Volume Charging Pumps

Control X

Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following

malfunctions or operations on the RHRS, and (b) based

X A2.04 on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, 2.9 4

005 Residual Heat Removal or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or

operations: RHR valve malfunction

Knowledge of the physical connections and/or cause-

K1.01 effect relationships between the RHRS and the following 3.2 5

005 Residual Heat Removal X

systems: CCWS

Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters

006 Emergency Core Cooling Al 6 (to prevent exceeding design limits) associated with 3.6 6

operating the ECCS controls including: Subcooling

margin

007 Pressurizer Relief/Quenich X A4.1 0 Ability to manually operate and/or

room: Recognition of leaking PORV/code in the control

monitor safety 3.6 7

Tan

Tank __________________________

K2.02 Knowledge of bus power supplies to the following: cOW 3.0 8

008 Component Cooling Water 1W X pump, including emergency backup

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

NUREG , Draft Revision 9

ES-401 HB Robinson Form ES-401-2

NRC Written Examination Outline

Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 2 Group 1

system #/Name IIK14

K5 K6 I A I A-2 I A3 A4u -Number KIA Topics Imp Q#

Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following

malfunctions or operations on the CCWS, and (b) based

008 Component Cooling Water X A2.03 on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, 3.0 9

or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or

operations: HigMow CCW temperature

Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters

010 Pressurizer Pressure Control XAl.04 (to prevent exceeding design limits) associated with

operating the PZR PCS controls including: Effects of 36 10

temperature change during solid operation

31 11

012 Reactor Protection x K3.02 I Knowledge

RPS will have of the effect

on the following: T/Gor malfunction of the

that a loss

013 Engineered Safety Features xKnowledge of the effect that a loss or malfunction of the

K3,03 ESFAS will have on the following: Containment 4.3 12

Actuation X

Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters

022 Containment Cooling X A1 04 (to prevent exceeding design limits) associated with 32 13

operating the CCS controls including: Cooling water flow

Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters

026 Containment Spray X Al.011 (to prevent exceeding design limits) associated with 3.9 14

operating the CSS controls including: Containment

pressure

Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters

039 Main and Reheat Steam X A1.06 (to preventtheexceeding design limits) associated with 3.0 15

operating MRSS controls including: Main steam

pressure

Knowledge of the physical connections and/or cause-

039 Main and Reheat Steam X K1.09 effect relationships between the MRSS and the following 2.7 16

systems: RMS

Knowledge of the physical connections and/or cause-

056 Condensate X K1.03 effect relationships between the Condensate System 2.6 17

and the following systems: MFW

059 ain eedwter 3.04 Knowledge

MFW will have on effect

of the that a loss

the following: RCSor malfunction of the 3.6 16

Knowledge of the effect of a loss or malfunction of the

061 Auxildary/Emergency X K6.02 following will have on the AFW components: Pumps 2.6 19

FeedwaterI I [

Knowledge of ac distribution system design feature(s)

062 AC Electrical Distribution x K4.02 and/or interlock(s) which provide for the following: Circuit 2.5 20

breaker automatic trips

03DC ElcrclDistribution X201 dc loads29 29 1

21

063 DCElectrical Dist n K.01 Knowledge of bus power supplies to the following: Major

NUREG-' -'1, Draft Revision 9 7

ES-401 HB Robinson Form ES-401-2

NRC Written Examination Outline

Tier 2 Group 1

Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions -

iSystem * KA Topics

Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following

malfunctions or operations on the ED/G system; and (b)

06 based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, 2.6 22

Emergency Diesel Generator X A2.13 control, or mitigate the consequences of those

malfunctions or operations: Consequences of opening

auxiliary feeder bus (ED/G sub supply)

Knowledge of the operational implications as they apply

073 Process Radiation Monitoring X K5.02 to concepts as they apply to the PRM system: Radiation 2.5 23

intensity changes with source distance

073 Process Radiation Monitoring x A4,02 Ability to manually operate and/or monitor in the control 37 24

room Radiation monitoring system control panel

Conduct of Operations: Ability to recognize indications

076 Service Water X 2.1.33 for system operating parameters which are entry-level 3.4 25

conditions for technical specifications.

078 Instrument Air X K202 Knowledge of bus power supplies to the following 3.3 26

Emergency air compressor

078 Instrument Air X A4.01 room: to

Ability manually

Pressure operate and/or monitor in the control

gauges 3.1 27

103 Containment X 2.1.2 Conduct of Operations: Knowledge of operator 3.0 28

responsibilities during all modes of plant operation.

K/A Category Point Totals: 4 4 1 1 1 5 5 0 4 Group Point Tal 32

NUREG- 4 'I1, Draft Revision 9 8

ES-401 HB Robinson Form ES-401-2

NRC Written Examination Outline

Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 2 Group 2

System #/Name G KI 1K2 K3 K4 K5 I K6 I Al 172 A3 A4 Number I KATopics Imp. Q#

Equipment Control Knowledge of bases in technical

029 Containment Purge X 2 2 25 specifications for limiting conditions for operations and 37 92

safety limits.

Conduct of Operations: Ability to perform specific

034 Fuel Handling Equipment X 21 23 system and integrated plant procedures during all 4.0 93

modes of plant operation

Knowledge of the operational Implications of the

002 Reactor Coolant K5 following concepts as they apply to the RCS:

Relationship of pressure and temperature for water 37 29

saturation and subcooling conditions

Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters

X A1.04 (to exceeding

preventthe design limits) associated with 3.5 30

014 Rod position nIndication operating RPIS controls, including: Axial and radial

power distribution

015 Nuclear Instrumentation X A4.03 Ability to manually operate and/or monitor in the control 3.8 31

Ability to monitor automatic operation of the NNIS,

016 Non-nuclear Instirumentation X A3.01 including: Automatic selection of NNIS inputs to control 2.9 32

systems I

Knowledge of design feature(s) and/or interlock(s)

029 Containment Purge K4.03 which provide for the following: Automatic purge 3.2 33

isolation

Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following

malfunctions or operations on the Fuel Handling

034 Fuel Handling Equipment 2.01 System ; and (b) based on those predictions, use 3.6 34

procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the

consequences of those malfunctions or operations:

Dropped fuel element

Knowledge of the physical connections and/or cause-

035 Steam Generator K1.01 effect relationships between the S/GS and the following 4.2 35

systems: MFW/AFW systems

Knowledge of the effect of a loss or malfunction on the

041 Steam Dump/Turbine Bypass X K6.03 following will have on the SDS: Controller and 2.7 36

Control positioners, including ICS, S/G, CRDS

monitor automatic operation of the MT/G

045 Main Turbine Generator 0G A3.0

A3F05 system,toincluding:

Ability Electrohydraulic control 2.6 37

NUREG-S,, Draft Revision 9

ES-401 HB Robinson Form ES-401-2

NRC Written Examination Outline

Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 2 Group 2

System #/Name K1

K K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 Number K/A Topics Imp. Q#

Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following

malfunctions or operations on the Fire Protection

086 Fire Protection X A2.01 System; and (b) based on those predictions, use 2,9 3

procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the

consequences of those malfunctions or operations:

Manual shutdown of the FPS

KJA Category Point Totals: 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 Group Point Total: 12

NUREG-1n'01, Draft Revision 9 10

ES-401 Generic Knowledge and Abilities Outline ('ier3) Form ES-401-3]

Facility: HB Robinson Date of Exam: 8/27/2004

RO SRO-Only

Category K/A # Topic

IR Q# IR Q#

2.1.11 Knowledge of less than one hour technical 38 94

specification action statements for systems.

2.1.3 Knowledge of shift turnover practices. 34 95

Conduct of 2.1.28 Knowledge of the purpose and function of major 3.2 66

Operations system components and controls.

2.1.1 Knowledge of conduct of operations 3.7 67

1 requirements.

Subtotal 2 2

Knowledge of the process for making changes in

2.2.6 procedures as described in the safety analysis 33 96

report.

2.212 Knowledge of surveillance procedures 3.4 97

Knowledge of bases in technical specifications

2.225 for limiting conditions for operations and safety 37 98

2. limits

Equipment Control 2.2.14 Knowledge of the process for making 2.9 68

configuration changes.

2.2.13 Knowledge of tagging and clearance 3.6 69

procedures.

2.2.28 Knowledge of new and spent fuel movement 2.6 70

procedures.

Subtotal 3 3

2.3.9 Knowledge of the process for performing a 34 99

containment purge.

3. 2.3.2 Knowledge of facility ALARA program. 2.5 71

Radiation Control 2.3.1 Knowledge of 10 CFR: 20 and related facility 2.6 72

radiation control requirements

Subtotal 2 1

2.4.16 Knowledge of EOP implementation hierarchy 4.0 100

and coordination with other support procedures

2.4.37 Knowledge of the lines of authority during an 35 87

emergency.

Knowledge of facility protection requirements

4. 2.4.26 including fire brigade and portable fire fighting 2.9 74

Emergency equipment usage.

Procedures / Plan Ability to recognize abnormal indications for

2.4.4 system operating parameters which are entry- 4.0 75

level conditions for emergency and abnormal

I operating procedures.

Subtotal 3 1

Tier 3 Point Total 9 8

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 11

ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4

Tier / Randomly Reason for Rejection

Group Selected K/A

2/1 007 A2.03 Double Jeopardy with question #8. Replaced with 008 A2.03

1/2 E10 G2.4. 30 It isn't possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question related to the

subject K/A. Replaced with E03 G2.4.31

It isn't possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question related to the

1/2 051 G2.1.27 subject K/A. Topic was randomly generated as part of random search for

replacement of El0 Generic

search for

1/2 E06 G2.1 .14 3 items in one topic, this item was generated as part of a random

replacement of El0 Generic.

with Generic

2/2 034 A2.02 Replaced due to double jeopardy with 034 A2.01. Replaced

2A1.23

to the

1/1 007 G2.2.22 It isn't possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question related

subject K/A. Replaced with 007 G2.1.20

Does not apply and could not prepare a psychometrically sound question

related to the topic. Replaced with 027 AA2.10

to the

2/1 061 G2.1.14 It isn't possible to prepare a psychometrically sound question related

subject K/A. Replaced with 010 G2.4.50

2/1 006 A2.05 psychometrically sound question related to the

It isn't possible to prepare a 006

subject K/A. Replaced with A2.12

1/2 E03 G2.4.31 KA rejected and replaced with E03 G2.4.16 as directed by Chief Examiner

!/2___ E 4 8/17/2004

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 12