ML042720454

Third Ten Year Inservice Inspection Interval Requests for Relief No. 04-ON-005

ML042720454
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee
Issue date:	09/20/2004
From:	Rosalyn Jones Duke Energy Corp
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML042720454 (72)

Text

P Duke RON A. JONES SPoivere Vice President A Duke Energy Company Oconee Nuclear Duke Power ONOZ VP / 7800 Rochester Highway Seneca, SC 29672 864 885 3158 864 885 3564 fax September 20, 2004 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

Duke Energy Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Docket Nos. 50-269 Third Ten Year Inservice Inspection Interval Requests for Relief No. 04-ON-005 Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii), attached is a Request for Relief from the requirement to examine 100% of the volume specified by the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1989 Edition with no Addenda (as modified by Code Case N-460).

Request for Relief 04-ON-005 is to allow Duke Energy to take credit for nine (9) limited ultrasonic examinations on welds associated with various systems and components described in the attached request.

During examination of the subject Unit 1 welds, the ultrasonic examination coverage did not meet the 90%

examination requirements of Code Case N-460. The obtainable volume coverage for each weld examination is indicated on the attached request. Achievement of greater examination coverage for these welds is impractical due to piping/valve geometry, interferences, and existing examination technology. Therefore, Duke Energy requests that the NRC grant relief as authorized under 10 CFR 50.55a(g) (6) (i).

4ocf/

www. dukepower. corn

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission September 20, 2004 Page 2 If there are any questions or further information is needed you may contact R. P. Todd at (864) 885-3418.

Very t ly yours, RA S te ce President Attachment xc w/att: Mr. William D. Travers Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth St., SWW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303 L. N. Olshan, Project Manager, Section 1 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 xc(w/o attch):

M. C. Shannon Senior NRC Resident Inspector Oconee Nuclear Station Mr. Henry Porter Division of Radioactive Waste Management Bureau of Land and Waste Management SC Dept. of Health & Environmental Control 2600 Bull St.

Columbia, SC 29201

Request for Relief 04-ON-005 Limited Examinations Associated With Various Systems and Components lEOC 21

Relief Request 04-ON-005 Page 1 of 8 Proposed Relief in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii)

Inservice Inspection Impracticality Duke Energy Corporation Oconee Nuclear Station - Unit 1 (EOC-21)

Third 10-Year Interval - Inservice Inspection Plan Interval Start Date= 7-15-1993 Interval End Date=1-1-2004 ASME Section XI Code - 1989 Edition with No Addenda

l. II. & III. IV. V. VI. VII.

Limited System / Code Requirement from Which Basis for Relief Alternate Justification Implementation Area/Weld Component for Which Relief is Requested: Examinations or for Granting Schedule I.D. Relief is Requested: 100% Exam Volume Coverage Testing Relief Number Area or Weld to be Exam Category Examined Item No.

Fig. No.

Limitation Percentage I-PZR- Reactor Coolant System Exam Category B-B See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph WP26-3 Pressurizer Sensing Item No. B03.1 10.011 "A" "I""J" "0" Sample Nozzle to Shell Fig. IWB-2500-7 Weld 32.08% Volume coverage (circumferential weld) Limited Scan of Examination Volume A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H I-PZR- Reactor Coolant System Exam Category B-B See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph.

WP26-7 Pressurizer Sensing Item No. B03.110.012 "A" "Ir "J" "0" Sample Nozzle to Shell Fig. IWB-2500-7 Weld 32.08% Volume coverage (circumferential weld) Limited Scan of Examination Volume A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H ILP-140-8A Low Pressure Injection Exam Category B-J See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph System Item No. B09.011.111 "B" "I" "K" - "0" Elbow to Valve ILP-I Fig. IWB-2500-8 (c)

Weld 85.07% Volume Coverage Limited Scan of Examination Volume C-D-E-F (100% examination coverage from one side and partial coverage from opposite side)

Relief Request 04-ON-005 Page 2 of 8

1. I. & 111. IV. V. VI. VII.

Limited System I Code Requirement from Which Basis for Relief Alternate Justification Implementation Area/Weld Component for Which Relief Is Requested: Examinations or for Granting Schedule I.D. Relief is Requested: 100% Exam Volume Coverage Testing Relief Number Area or Weld to be Exam Category Examined Item No.

Fig. No.

Limitation Percentage 1-51 A High Pressure Injection Exam Category C-F-I See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph 114AC System Item No. C05.021.029 ..

"CC 1.. "0" Pipe to Valve IHP-63 Fig. IWC-2500-7 (a)

Weld 55.55% Volume Coverage Limited Scan of Examination Volume C-D-E-F

__ (examination from one side)

IHP-187-114 High Pressure Injection Exam Category C-F-I See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph System Item No. C05.021.034 " D" "Ir" M" "0" Elbow to Valve IHP- Fig. IWC-2500-7 (a) 138 Weld 62.5% Volume Coverage Limited Scan of Examination Volume C-D-E-F (examination from one side) 1-51 A High Pressure Injection Exam Category C-F- I See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph 49BA System Item No. C05.021.050 ..Elr I GM" "0" Pipe to Valve IHP-132 Fig. IWC-2500-7 (a)

Weld 62.5% Volume Coverage Limited Scan of Examination Volume C-D-E-F (examination from one side) 1-5 IA High Pressure Injection Exam Category C-F-i See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph 23BB System Item No. C05.021.056 "F" if" "M" "0" Flange to Pipe Weld Fig. IWC-2500-7 (a) 62.5% Volume Coverage Limited Scan of Examination Volume C-D-E-F (examination from one side)

Relief Request 04-ON-005 Page 3 of 8

1. II. & 11X. IV. V. VI. VIl.

Limited System / Code Requirement from Which Basis for Relief Alternate Justification Implementation Area/Weld Component for Which Relief is Requested: Examinations or for Granting Schedule I.D. Relief is Requested: 100% Exam Volume Coverage Testing Relief Number Area or Weld to be Exam Category Examined Item No.

Fig. No.

Limitation Percentage IHP-187-116 High Pressure Injection Exam Category C-F-i See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph System Item No. C05.021.073 "G"9"Ir "M" "0" Tee to Elbow Weld Fig. IWC-2500-7 (a) 62.5% Volume Coverage Limited Scan of Examination Volume C-D-E-F (examination from one side)

IHP-194-4 High Pressure Injection Exam Category C-F-I See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph See Paragraph System Item No. C05.02 1.111 "HI "Ir "M" "0" Pipe to Valve IHP-27 Fig. IWC-2500-7 (a)

Weld 65.18% Volume Coverage Limited Scan of Examination Volume C-D-E-F (examination from one side)

See Attachment A for B03.110.011 and B03.110.012 area/weld locations.

See Attachment B for inspection data on all items listed in the above table for this Relief Request.

Note: Items in this relief request were inspected during one of the following months: August, September, October or November of 2003.

Relief Request 04-ON-005 Page 4 of 8 IV. Basis for Relief Paragraph A: (The Pressurizer sensing sample nozzle material is SA508 GR. B and the heater belt shell material is SA 212 GR. B. Welds 1-PZR-WP26-3 and 1-PZR-WP26-7 have a diameter of 5.75 inches and a wall thickness of 6.188 inches.)

During the ultrasonic examination of welds 1-PZR-WP26-3 and 1-PZR-WP26-7, 32.08% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained for each of the welds. The percentage of coverage reported represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The coverage from each scan was as follows: straight beam, 37.42%; 450 scan, 39.06%; 600 scan, 19.77%. Limitations caused by the nozzle configuration prevented scanning from both sides of the weld. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of these welds, the sampling nozzles would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of these welds.

Paragraph B: (The valve and elbow material is stainless steel. Weld 1LP-140-8A has a diameter of 12 inches and a wall thickness of 1.125 inches.)

During the ultrasonic examination of weld ILP-140-8A, 85.07% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The percentage of coverage reported represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The 45° circumferential scans, both clockwise and counter-clockwise covered 100% of the examination volume, the 600 axial scan from the elbow side covered 100% of the examination volume and the 600 axial scan from the valve side covered 40.3% of the examination volume. Scanning limitations caused by the valve configuration prevented full scanning from both sides of the weld. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.

Paragraph C: (The valve and pipe material is stainless steel. Weld 1-51A-01-1 14AC has a diameter of 2.5 inches and a wall thickness of .375 inches.)

During the ultrasonic examination of weld 1-51A-01-1 14AC, 55.55% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The percentage of coverage represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The 450 circumferential scans, both clockwise and counter-clockwise covered 61.1% of the examination volume and the 600 axial scan from the pipe side covered 100% of the examination volume. In addition, a 70° shear wave angle beam was used to interrogate the weld and base material on the valve side of the weld. Scanning limitations caused by the valve configuration prevented scanning from both sides of the weld. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.

Paragraph D: (The valve and elbow material is stainless steel. Weld IHP-187-114 has a diameter of 4 inches and a wall thickness of .531 inches.)

During the ultrasonic examination of weld IHP-187-114, 62.5% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The percentage of coverage represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The 450 circumferential scans, both clockwise and counter-clockwise covered 75% of the examination volume and the 600 axial scan from the elbow side covered 100% of the examination volume.

Scanning limitations caused by the valve configuration prevented scanning from both sides of the weld. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.

Relief Request 04-ON-005 Page 5 of 8 Paragraph E: (The valve and pipe material is stainless steel. Weld 1-5 1A-02-49BA has a diameter of 4 inches and a wall thickness of .531 inches.)

During the ultrasonic examination of weld 1-5 IA-02-49BA, 62.5% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The percentage of coverage represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The 450 circumferential scans, both clockwise and counter-clockwise covered 100% of the examination volume and the 600 axial scan from the pipe side covered 100% of the examination volume.

Scanning limitations caused by the valve configuration prevented scanning from both sides of the weld. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.

Paragraph F: (The flange and pipe material is stainless steel. Weld 1-5 IA-02-23BB has a diameter of 4 inches and a wall thickness of .531 inches.)

During the ultrasonic examination of weld 1-51A-02-23BB, 62.5% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The percentage of coverage represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The 450 circumferential scans, both clockwise and counter-clockwise covered 100% of the examination volume and the 600 axial scan from the pipe side covered 100% of the examination volume.

Scanning limitations caused by the flange configuration prevented scanning from both sides of the weld. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of this weld, the flange would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.

Paragraph G: (The tee and elbow material is stainless steel. Weld IHP-187-116 has a diameter of 4 inches and a wall thickness of .531 inches.)

During the ultrasonic examination of weld IHP- 187-116,62.5% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The percentage of coverage represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The 450 circumferential scans, both clockwise and counter-clockwise covered 100% of the examination volume and the 600 axial scan from the elbow side covered 100% of the examination volume.

Scanning limitations caused by the tee configuration prevented scanning from both sides of the weld. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of this weld, the tee would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.

Paragraph H: (The valve and pipe material is stainless steel. Weld 1HP-194-4 has a diameter of 4 inches and a wall thickness of .674 inches.)

During the ultrasonic examination of weld 1HP-194-4, 65.18% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The percentage of coverage represents the aggregate coverage from all scans performed on the weld and adjacent base material. The 450 circumferential scans, both clockwise and counter-clockwise covered 80.36% of the examination volume due to a sharp transition where the weld joins the valve body. The 600 axial scan from the pipe side covered 100% of the examination volume. Scanning limitations caused by the valve configuration prevented scanning from both sides of the weld. In order to scan all of the required surfaces for the inspection of this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. There were no recordable indications found during the inspection of this weld.

V. Alternate Examinations or Testing Paragraph I:

The scheduled 10-year code examination was performed on the referenced area/weld and it resulted in the noted limited coverage of the required ultrasonic volume. No additional examinations are planned for the area/weld during the current inspection interval.

Relief Request 04-ON-005 Page 6 of 8 VI. Justification for Granting Relief Paragraph J:

Ultrasonic examination of areas/welds for item number B03.1 10 were conducted using personnel, qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VII of the 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda. The ultrasonic procedures used complied with the requirements of ASME Section V, Article 4, 1989 Edition with no addenda.

Although 100% coverage of the examination volume could not be achieved, the amount of coverage obtained for this examination provides an acceptable level of quality and integrity. (See Paragraph L for additional justification.)

Paragraph K:

Ultrasonic examination of area/weld for item number B09.011 was conducted using personnel, equipment and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII Supplement 2 of the 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as administered by the PDI. Although 100% of the required scanning could not be achieved, the amount of coverage of the examination volume obtained for this weld provides an acceptable level of quality and integrity. In addition to the volumetric examination with limited coverage, Duke Energy performed a surface examination (code required) on the B09.011 item and achieved 100% coverage. The result of the surface examination was acceptable. (See Paragraph L for additional justification.)

Duke Energy Corporation does not claim credit for coverage of the far side of austenitic welds. The characteristics of austenitic weld metal attenuate and distort the sound beam when shear waves pass through the weld. Refracted longitudinal waves provide better penetration but cannot be used beyond the first sound path leg. Duke Energy Corporation uses a combination of shear waves and longitudinal wave to examine single sided austenitic welds when the nominal material thickness exceeds 0.5 inch. A 700 shear wave angle beam is used to interrogate the far side of the weld when the nominal material thickness is equal to or less than 0.5 inch.

The procedures, personnel and equipment have been qualified through the Performance Demonstration Initiative (PDI). However, although longitudinal wave search units and 700 shear wave search units were used in the qualification and cracks were detected through the weld metal, PDI does not provide a qualification for single sided examination of similar metal austenitic piping welds.

In addition to the B09.0l1 weld that relief is being requested for limited scanning, there were 7 additional B09.01 1 welds that surface and volumetric examinations were performed on. The examinations didn't identify any recordable indications and 100% coverage was obtained on each of the 7 welds. The 7 additional welds were from the same system as the B09.011 weld of this request.

Paragraph L:

Duke Energy will use Class 1, Examination Category B-P, pressure testing and VT-2 visual examination to compliment the limited scan examinations. The Code requires that a pressure test be performed after each refueling outage for Class 1. These tests require a VT-2 visual examination for evidence of leakage. This testing provides adequate assurance of pressure boundary integrity.

In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), there are other activities which provide a high level of confidence that, in the unlikely event that leakage did occur through these welds, it would be detected and isolated. Specifically, leakage from these welds would be detected by monitoring of the Reactor Coolant System (RCS), which is performed once each shift under procedure PT/1,2,3/A/0600/10, "RCS Leakage".

This RCS leakage monitoring is a requirement of Technical Specification 3.4.13, "Reactor Coolant System Leakage". Any leakage is also evaluated in accordance with this Technical Specification. The leakage could also be detected through several other methods. One is the RCS mass balance calculation. A second is the Reactor Building air particulate monitor. This monitor is sensitive to low leak rates; the iodine monitor, gaseous monitor and area monitor are capable of detecting any fission products in the coolant and will make these monitors sensitive to coolant leakage. A third is the level indicator in the Reactor Building normal sump. A fourth is a loss of level in the Letdown Storage Tank. Based on the results of the required volumetric, surface and VT-2 examinations performed during this outage, it's Duke's belief that this combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of component integrity.

Relief Request 04-ON-005 Page 7 of 8 Paragraph M:

Ultrasonic examination of areas/welds for the item numbers C05.021 were conducted using personnel, equipment and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII Supplement 2 of the 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as administered by the PDI. Although 100% coverage of the examination volume could not be achieved, the amount of coverage obtained for each of these welds provides an acceptable level of quality and integrity. In addition to the volumetric examinations with limited coverage, Duke Energy performed a surface examination (code required) on the each of the C05.021 items and achieved 100% coverage. The results from the surface examinations were acceptable. (See Paragraph N for additional justification.)

In addition to the C05.021 welds that relief is being requested for limited scanning, there were 12 additional C05.021 welds that surface and volumetric examinations were performed on. The examinations didn't identify any recordable indications and 100% coverage was obtained on each of the 12 welds. The 12 additional welds were from the same system as the C05.021 welds of this request.

Duke Energy Corporation does not claim credit for coverage of the far side of austenitic welds. The characteristics of austenitic weld metal attenuate and distort the sound beam when shear waves pass through the weld. Refracted longitudinal waves provide better penetration but cannot be used beyond the first path leg. Duke Energy Corporation uses a combination of shear waves and longitudinal waves to examine single sided austenitic welds when the nominal material thickness exceeds 0.5 inch. A 700 shear wave angle beam is used to interrogate the far side of the weld when the nominal material thickness is equal to or less than 0.5 inch.

Paragraph N:

Duke Energy will use Class 2, Examination Category C-H, pressure testing and VT-2 visual examination to compliment the limited examination coverage. The Code requires that a pressure test be performed once each period for Class 2 items. These tests require a VT-2 visual examination for evidence of leakage. This testing provides adequate assurance of pressure boundary integrity.

In addition to the above Code required examinations (surface and pressure test), there are other activities which provide a high level of confidence that, in the unlikely case that leakage did occur through these welds, it would be detected and isolated. One is that leakage from these welds would be detected by Operations personnel during their regular rounds (reference OP/M/UM 102/020A). The Nuclear Equipment Operator has been trained to look for any unusual conditions, such as leaks. In addition, the procedure addresses leaks as being an item to consider during rounds. The C05.021 items in this request are located in an area where operations personnel will be walking through as part of their rounds; therefore, any leak would be identified by visual observation.

Duke Energy has examined the welds/components referenced in this request to the maximum extent possible utilizing the latest in examination techniques and equipment. The welds/components identified in Section I of this request were rigorously inspected by volumetric NDE methods during construction and verified to be free from unacceptable fabrication defects. Based on the coverage and results of the required volumetric exams and surface exams this outage and the pressure testing (VT-2) exams, it is Duke's belief that this combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of component integrity.

VII. Implementation Schedule Paragraph 0 The scheduled third 10-year interval plan code examination was performed on the referenced areas/welds resulting in limited scan and volumetric coverage. No additional examinations are planned for the areas/welds during the current inspection interval. The same areas/welds may be examined again as part of the next (fourth) 10-year interval plan, depending on the applicable code year edition and addenda requirements adopted in the future.

Relief Request 04-ON-005 Page 8 of 8 VIII. Other Information The following individuals contributed to the development of this relief request:

James J. McArdle (NDE Level III Inspector) provided Sections II through V and part of Section VI.

B. W. Carney, Jr. (Oconee Engineering) provided part of Section VI.

Larry C. Keith (Oconee ISI Plan Manager) compiled the remaining sections.

Sponsored By: dqvVco dCg Date 6 eat q V

Approved By: _ I_ __ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ - _4

Attachment B Page I of 6 0 UT Vessel Examination

.SF ..... ....g.....

Site/Unit: Oconee / I Procedure: NDE-640 Outage No.: ONSIEOC21 Summary No.: BO3.110.011 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-03-206 Workscone: IlSI Work Order No.: 98403077 Page: I of I Code: Section Xi, 1989 Cat./ltem: B-D-/1B3.110.l1 Location: N/A Drawing No.: ISI OCNI-002

Description:

Pzr Nozzle to Shell System ID: 50 Component ID: B03.110.011 /1-PZR-WP26-3 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter 5.75 / 6.187 Limitations: YES Start Time: 1326 Finish Time: 1329 Examination Surface: Inside g Outside ; Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.2.3 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: . FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE32769 Surface Temp.: 80 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-03-286 Angle Used 0 45 45T 60 60T Scanning dB 29.6 Indication(s): Yes ] No R Scan Coverage: Upstream I Downstream i CW W CCWR]

Comments:

FC 03-20 Results: Accept i Reject r Info f_

Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: No Reviewed Previous Data: Yes

Attachiment B

.§X UT Vessel Examination Pageaof C aM.:rP*A.

. ^ - .O. a.

Site/Unit: Oconee / 1 Procedure: NDE-820 Outage No.: ONSIEOC21 Summary No.: B0: 3.110.011 Procedure Rev.: 1 Report No.: UT-03-200 Workscope: 'Si Work Order No.: 98403077 Page: 1 of 2 Code: Section Xl, 1989 CatIltem: B-D-1B3.110.11 Location: NIA Drawing No.: ISI OCNI-002

Description:

Pzr Nozzle to Shell System ID: 50 Component ID: B03.110.011 /1-PZR-WP26-3 Size/Length: NIA ThicknesslDiameter 3.75/ 6.187 Limitations: YES Start Time: 1310 Finish Time: 1326 Examination Surface: Inside Q Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.2.3 Wo Location: N IA Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE32769 Surface Temp.: 80 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-03-269, CAL-03-275 Angle Used 0 45 45T 60 60T Scanning dB 60 60 70.5 70.6 Indication(s): Yes f No i Scan Coverage: Upstream i Downstream i CW i CCW i Comments:

FC 03-31 Results: Accept i Reject C Info a_

Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: No 168.6% Reviewed Previous Data: Yes Examiner Level II Signature Date Reviewer Signature Date Mauldin, Larry E. 5, 912812003 Examiner Level Il-N . re Date Site Review Signature Date Potter, Michael E. /re 9/2812003 Other Level Signature Date ANII Revol Boaiature 3 , Date

I Attachment B Page 3 of GO 1~A Supplemental Report Report No.: UT-03-200 Page: 2 of 2

• dmmary No.: B03.110.011 ,

Examiner. Mauldin, Larry E-s&t o  : II Reviewer __ ____ Date: Jo4o71O x Examiner Potter, Michael E. L evel: 1l-N Site Review: - Date:

Other: ___ Level: ANII Review AJhug-RAGseJ&3te: /°0//V;ZS

.1 v Comments: ISI LIMITATION REPORT-SEE ATTACHED SHEET Sketch or Photo:

Attachment B Page f of 6 0 DUKE POWER COMPANY ONS1EOC21 ISI LIMTATION REPORT UT-03-200 Component/Weld ID: 1-PZR-WP26-3 Item No: B03-110.011 remarks:

l NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Due to Nozzle Configuration ELIMITED SCAN 1i 1 2 E1 Z 2 cw EcCw FROM L NA to L NA INCHES FROM WO 1.0" to Beyond ANGLE: Z 0 Z 45 3 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG E NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION E LIMITEDSCAN El 1 [E 2 El 1 E 2 [E cw E cl w FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: E 0 El 45 D1 60 other FROM DEG to DEG D NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION El LIMITED SCAN E 1 El 2 El 1 El 2 El cw E_cow FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to .

ANGLE: El 0 El 45 El 60 other FROM DEG to DEG El NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION ELIMITED SCAN l1 2 l2E2Eli 2 cw l ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attahed ANGLE: El 0 El 45 E]60 other FROM DEG to DEG Z yes El No PreparedBy: LarryMauldin Level: 11 Date: 09/28/2003 Sheet 2 -oof 2 Reviewed By: Date: uthorized llspector . ,A Date 2

ar-: /0/0)7/0 - J5<~~

4-.1 (I

IAttachment I1, lpage 5 of Co:

Determination of Percent Coverage for Enry- UT Examinations - Vessels Site/Unit: 0J4 ' I Procedure: Wb Y-O'D, W Outage No.:

Summary No.: t;p3 .A a dd id Procedure Rev.: . Report No.:

Workscope: _ _ _ WorkOrderNo.: 9'1'32o 1 7 of 0 deg Planar Scan 4E%  % Length X 3 7. 4 2  % volume of length 1 00 = 37. "2- %totalforOdeg 45 deg Scan 1 /00  % Length X 6/4Z. %volume of length / 100 = 7 %total for Scan 1 Scan 2 / D  % Length X D %volume of length 100 = _ _ %total for Scan 2 Scan 3 /ZO  % Length X /17.X g %volume of length /100 = Y z %total for Scan 3 Scan 4 /d V %Length X 4Z?. t b %volume of length/ 100 = Ma 8 %total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = 3. 06 %total for 45 deg Other deg /O Scan 1 / aI 6  % Length X .63 ./O %volume of length 1 00 = %total for Scan 1

-ir/&

Scan 2 /V  % Length X  % volume of length 100 = %total for Scan 2 Scan3 /P. %LengthX /n' %volumeoflengthl1oO= /3 %totalfor Sn3 Scan 4 /0&  % LengthX /5 %volumeoflength/100= 3 %totalforScAh. 4 Add totals and divide by# scans= %totalfor 4 0 deg Percent complete coverage Add totals for each angle and scan required and divide by # of angles to determine;

%Total for complete exam Note:

Supplemental coverage may be achieved by use of other angles / methods. When used, the coverage for volume not obtained with angles as noted above shall be calculated and added to the total to provide the percent total for the complete examination. D Site Field Supervisor: Dae:v

- I L9C 6 A/e5t-11 (3 ANS/NVG X r.'APL/VG IYOZZC6 Attachment B Page 6 of 6°O 45- f6Oo (,fo BE&AM CIIeOACW1 /

S6oZ fl 4AL:

ZA:

"A :

A X(- -

.1X X (-. i A S EASE M(AI6L LOYaSZAO-L-

[IIWLD CLOVC 12M-6

Attachment 13 ader-ASNSING I

/ -QMPL/I/ /eZc6 M Page 7 of 6 o

&) ()C, 2 k)t12 C/

R soy. //O. 0 ,,

/- PZc:W/).7 §

,M-z.~

.. + 44.1- + + _4.1)

_ -S._ 8_

.BLDG X.G HI-

n. (,+ x~n qz 5 +2.o75)

~71 6, .0 ./ i

LOO-6Ase --, 3E ANS/NG 7'/1 4L/MV .

Attachment I}

Page I of/ Ao LI°Co uu I*-,em W .d?. /10.0/f I: ..D. 0 umAPet- etZ6 3 A:.

Cb A e'ML: SA:Z &, /D - -A.

+EF fC7H H (Gns fG 6 X (S.) 4 4 5s) ' 73 r -~f30,-7 sos Pi 16- 3a 3.. ,IcI IZ.

+ J. ( I 8 +.I ) :.z s ,. ,v.

,r. 3 i -

D !18frAiLd-L CO VLagAn

OC6Ar

• 3 ENSIN / %QMPL//V1 /XV zce Attachment B Pageq of 60 x2-(eM 1' //o0o?

AspeI -14P46C .

2 /0, S-3~

)A-(e-:

0O CoVA~d6' 3jOSE- M=(A- !

.S_.o4 X 6.1MI" 18.S66 -_18.6 si. /X.

Wt~ b fhŽ-L:- _ _

10V

~ 40se71 2d0sa .8"t

(jNvs/NG / AQ

_-mPL/A/ /d Z'z6L Attachment B O6ZOAI** Page /o of go en

/ AS1ePt1i 61M I ..1). t+ /'PZle4/p6 A) B+/-d E C k L+GI+a d4 3I)A fe 5 03 2?A17 i4T7Sc~I 4- x(2,)4- ~ s +~~. ~

2 A /2.4 Y__7___

.S D

Attachment I]

Page /I of 60 i -~-MkbUT Vessel Examination Site/Unit: Oconee / 1 Procedure: NDE-640 Outage No.: ONSIEOC21 Summary No.: BO3.110.012 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: _ UT-03-207 Workscope: 'SI Work Order No.: 98403077 Page: 1 of I Code: Section Xi, 1989 Cat./ltem: B-D- /B3.110.12 Location: N/A Drawing No.: ISI OCN1-002

Description:

Pzr Nozzle to Shell System ID: 50 Component ID: B03.110.012 11-PZR-WP26-7 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter 5.75 66.187 Limitations: YES Start Time: 1329 Finish Time: 1331 Examination Surface: Inside a Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.2.3 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE32769 Surface Temp.: 80 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-03-286 Angle Used l 0 45 l45T 60 60T l Scanning dB 29.5 Indication(s): Yes ° No NJ Scan Coverage: Upstream i Downstream iJ CW i CCWPI Comments:

FC 03-20 Results: Accept R Reject C3 Info a Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: No Reviewed Previous Data: Yes Examiner Level II Mauldin, Larry E. 4, Aid Signatpre t Y ayz<

Date Reviewer 9/2812003 aA tA //

Signature Date Examiner Level Iu-N ture Date Site Review Signature Date Potter, Michael E. J 9/28/2003 Other Level Signature Date ANSiRqview 7 gnature Date

~>dR~r/&//SQ

Attachment B Page ;. of 60 UT Vessel Examination Site/Unit: Oconee / 1 Procedure: NDE-820 Outage No.: ONSIEOC21 Summary No.: s0: 3.110.012 Procedure Rev.: I Report No.: UT-03-201 Workscope: 'SI Work Order No.: 98403077 Page: 1 of. 2 Code: Section Xl, 1989 Cat/Item: B-D-/B3.110.12 Location: N/A Drawing No.: ISI OCNI-002

Description:

Pzr Nozzle to Shell System ID: 50 Component ID: B03.110.012 /1-PZR-WP26-7 Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter 5.75/6.187 Limitations: YES Start Time: 1316 Finish Time: 1331.

Examination Surface: Inside 5 Outside S Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.2.3 Wo Location: N IA Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE32769 Surface Temp.: 80 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-03-269, CAL-03-275 Angle Used 0 45 45T l 60 i 60T l Scanning dB 60 I 60 70.6 70.5 Indication(s): Yes ° No A Scan Coverage: Upstream R Downstream 0 CW RI CCW R Comments:

FC 03-31 Results: Accept i Reject a Info a Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: No / 68.6% Reviewed Previous Data: Yes Examiner Level II Signature Date Reviewer A ,/7 Signature Date Mauldin, Larry E. 9128/2003 t /l /

Examiner Level Il-N ry tX4re Date Site Review ) / Signature Date Potter, Michael E. / 9/28/2003 Other Level Signature Date ANII Review S ature Date L:!w g ri eer/av

I Attachment B1 Page 13_ofCo.

Supplemental Report ppjoke PU 1.4P.

-1) 7P* ye Report No.: UT-03-201 Paae: 2 of 2

.ummary No.: B03.110.012 a Examiner. Mauldin, Larry E. c 8l, II Reviewer. , 2 i~/K._ Date: JO/o 7/03 Examiner Potter, Michael E. 5* mvel: Il-N Site Review: Date:

Other. Level: ANII Review: ate: ________

V Comments: ISI LIMITATION REPORT-SEE ATTACHED SHEET Sketch or Photo:

Attachment B*

Page /'of of DUKE POWER COMPANY ONSlEOC21 ISI LIMITATION REPORT UT-03-200 Component/Weld ID: 1-PZR-WP26-7 Item No: B03-110.012 remarks:

l NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Due to Nozzle Configuration E LIMITED SCAN E 1 E2 Z 1 E 2 E cw E ccw FROM L NA to L NA INCHES FROM WO 1.0" to Beyond ANGLE: Z 0 Z 45 1 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG El NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION E LIMITED SCAN El 1 E2 2l 1 E2 E cw a ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: M 0 E1 45 El 60 other FROM DEG to DEG El NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION ElLIMITED SCAN El 1 El 2E 2Eli cw r1 ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: E0 E 45 E1 60 other FROM DEG to DEG El NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION E1 LIMITED SCAN El 1 El 2 Eli l2E 2 cw lc ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached ANGLE: ElO El 45 D 06 other FROM DEG to DEG Z yes El No Prepared By: Larry Mauldin/ZN _ Level: 11 Date: 09/28/2003 lSheet 2 of 2 Reviewed By: Date: Authorized Inspector: eg* Lt 1/31o3 0I Z2 L43 /o/,

LI v

i Attachment B Page i5 of .0 Determination of Percent Coverage for Mk &ter UT Examinations - Vessels Site/Unit: _ 011 1 / Procedure: MEW IjybE- S2o Outage No.: OV9,j,/6Z-1C2 Summary No.: o3 //0. 9.lx Procedure Rev.: A / Report No.: / - o3-zo.6 Workscope: / S I Work Order No.: 9f6o ?0o77 of /

o deg Planar Scan /  %) % Length X 9 7. 4"- %volume of length /100 = 3'7 4/D %total for O deg 45 deg Scan 1 MV  % Length X (/. 7 %volume of length /100 = 61.7 %total for Scan 1 Scan 2 /  % LengthX C)  % volume of length / 100 = 6  % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 /0I)  % Length X 417. ,2u'  % volume of length / 100 = _(7. ?- 8  % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 IZ)  % Length X 4?7. X 9/  % volume of length / 100 = 17. 2 9  % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by# scans = 39. Ot %total for 45 deg Other deg /

Scan 1 /0*D  % Length X  ;%ovolumeoflength/ 100= _ __ __% total for Scan 1 Scan 2 /  % Length X 9 %volumeoflength/100=- e  % total for Scan 2 Scan 3  % Length X /% volume of length /100=  % total for S n 3 Scan 4 /  % Length X  % volume of length / 100= /3  % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by# scans = /9I77 %total for 666 deg Percent complete coverage Add totals for each angle and scan required and divide by # of angles to determine; Total for complete exam Note:

Supplemental coverage may be achieved by use of other angles / methods. When used, the coverage for volume not obtained with angles as noted above shall be calculated and added to the total to provide the percent total for the complete examination. . / D :/1 Site Field Supervisor. _________/_____ate:_ -y j A

• raI~

Attachment B; OC2AI& 36S\N51/VG /

(* /

OQMP7L/G /YCJ ZZC6 Page 16 of 66 I1

'45" 6 -

Zv:

D)AY-a:

6,188 X4 (.- I.5) -2 6 z i Lt. (ti-aDe s

(20a Os C I LL A'Om)

E3 \JS4 M&A LOOVJW E] WtfLD SOVG Q.A6O[-;

C'

Attachment B LCOyr* C3 6ANSING Z OMPLNG #0 Z Ce Page /7 of 60 The'IM

• ot //0o~o/

Slxs Mt1-I-*4Lt. I ..D. *+ /.,. WP a -7

,S1 4 t/.L3 ZY: S G.1L + (S.1 4-4.5) + :Iz--(.5. + 4.1) S3, ,,.

N/,lh-2 o t l W LCtj i rO .

143 1V 4-'DE C-

.2. C X.' Lf 45 S..(

X + (. q+ .15)

,3 2.f/,1f- 6. 3 b./

31 I

iOgCQAt~t I E.NS/iP/G / C,c OczoAk~t*(~3 ,. ._

yc

1. 1)VzZ(e Attachment B' Page MS of 60 J45 0 CoI;XQia I/.D. * /-?. b2O G 7 zs:AL 4-)F- at-A(S. 1 4.5 ) - - .. 0rS3*3 V 3 so V .

WE+.LD 31i -I d2 q39, 3F a bt-I-0C I, X II LKz t ( I1, 3',9 &+.I<) :-.L. X A.-

Zo. <,3 i D E n VLN fL AfLdC A G&.

[M WtALA OMV-:R0 A

, Attachment I 06od5 - (SENS/6A' 4 gz -D Page/? of 60

30.3. //O. ot;7 CAM

0° CoVaeA C@e.

IO 0d~~uh 3> ose- .(=

AL',-

. _.t)AlX 6. 188 "= / 8. s6Y - 18.6 Jz. I#.

We (1 ee #en L '

1EO WA~ d 0-6V80d /tr9@v In _

C

OCO-AI&cr (IE.NS5/G / %AMPL/IeS i;

i0 ZZ(L6 Attachment B; Page s of( 6

/MsOc-Cff6 4 ace D2eem

• 11S&. (f)oldLi X 4-f ) 4~- .x +z Z.2 z.I x,2.83 -

A(I Y7.

I I

I

.1 I

I I

I D

Attachment B Pagelofr 60 UT Pipe Weld Examination Site/Unit: Oconee I I Procedure: NDE.600 Outage No.: ONS1EOC21 Summary No.: Bo9.011.111 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-03-265 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98403309 Page:, of 4 Code: Section Xi, 1989 Cat.item: B-J-/B9.11.111 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 1LP-140

Description:

Elbow to Valve (1LP-1)

System ID: 53A Component ID: B09.011.111 /lLP-140.8A Size/Length: 12.0 /SS Thickness/Diameter 1.125 Limitations: Yes Start Time: 0905 Finish Time: 0932 Examination Surface: Inside 2 Outside j Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.1.1.1 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE32769 Surface Temp.: 72 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-03.363, CAL-03-364, CAL-03-365 Angle Used a 45 45T 60 60RL l Scanning dB 43.0 38.5 54 Indication(s): Yes Ei No Q Scan Coverage: Upstream Ei Downstream i CW i CCW i Comments:

Results: Accept &5 Reject El Info El ___

Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: Ve. / 10%o /f.. Reviewed Previous Data: Yes Examiner Level ill Signature _ Date Reviewer / / Signature Date Zimmerman, David K. yvlz 10/14/2003 / (2,- II /// e°I Examiner Level Il-N _Signature A Date Site Review Signature Date Huhe, Troy / A 4 10114/2003 Other Level Signature Date ANII Reiew Signature Date

_ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _._ _ d i 7 // / -S>/

Attachment B Page aA of Go DIX Supplemental Report Pv4,00rty, Dke" Report No.: UT-03-265 Page: 2 of .4 Summary No.: B09.011.111 Examiner Zimmerman, David K. (t,, ,, $.. _ Level: II Reviewer Date:

Examiner Huhe, Troy / Level: Il-N Site Review: /)JO.A A gj a~ Date:

Other Level: ANII Review: Date: -0&zo3 C, W Comments: ISI PLOT / RESOLUTION SHEET INDICATION 1: GOEMTRICAL REFLECTOR DUE TO WELD ROOT CONFIGURATION. 70 SHEAR WAVE PRODUCED LESS THAN 50% DAC SIGNAL DID NOT HOLD UP TO SKEW. THIS CONFERS WITH PAST UT DATA.

Sketch or Photo:

0 JiVa. 1

Attachment B Page z3 of 6O Ultrasonic Indication Report Site/Unit: Oconee / 1 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS1 EOC21 Summary No.: B09.011.111 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-03.265 Workscope: is! Work Order No.: 98403309 Page: 3 of 4 Nvo Wn Search Unit Angle: 60 9 ( Piping Welds Wo Location: Weld Centerline 0 Ferritic Vessels > 2"T IL WIl W52 Lo Location:

9.1.1.1 C) Other MP Metal Path Wmax Distance From Wo To S.U. At Maximum Response RBR Remaining Back Reflection

-- --... DATI WI Distance From Wo At Of Max (Forward)

L Distance From Datum W2 Distance From Wo At Of Max (Forward) i Lo LI tLm Comments:

I05 "i- 1s -I 1 Scan Indication  % W Forward Backward L1 L L2 RBR Remarks No. Of Max Of Max Of Max Of Max Of Amp.

DAC W MP Wi MP W2 MP Max Max 2 1 70 1.55 1.96 Int 3600 Int.

Examiner Level ill Signature _ Date Reviewer Signature Date Zimmerman, David K. /, , 10/14/2003 A // 0 s&/S-0 3 Examiner Level Il-N ' Siatu Date Site Review Signature Date Huhe,Troy ' ( 1 10/14/2003 Other Level Signature Date ANIRevilew S DS Q 6 /dZ~,Z//

Attachment B

, ID-rkeX IY-11Mert Supplemental Report Page aoof (o Report No.: UT-03-265 Page: 4 of 4 Summary No.: B09.011.111 Examiner Zimmerman David K. go fi:g Level: II Reviewer (Imc no Date: 10-5-°!

Examiner Huhe, Troy - ,1_ Level: Il-N Site Review: Date:

Other kC,I Level: ANII Review: Date: _o_____

I/c Comments: ISI LIMITATION REPORT-SEE ATTACHED Sketch or Photo:

LC q_ L(0

/

/

/

l

Attachment B Page asof 6o DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Revision 1 Component/Weld ID: lLP-140-8A Item No: B09.011.111 remarks:

Ea NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Valve configuration: 100%

Z LIMITED SCAN 1 EF- 2 al 1 [ 2 Ea cw El ccw coverage obtained from FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO 1.5 to Beyond opposite scan.

ANGLE: El 0 0 45 Z 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG Ea NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION E LIMITED SCAN a 1 a 2 l 1 El 2 a cw [ ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: El 0 El 45 El 60 other FROM DEG to DEG E NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION El LIMITED SCAN E 1 El 2 a 1 E 2 El cw E ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: El 0 E 45 E0 60 other FROM DEG to DEG El NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION E LIMITED SCAN l1 E1 2 El 1 El 2 E cw [ ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached ANGLE: El 0 El 45 El 60 other FROM DEG to DEG 3 yes El No Prepared By: David Zimmerman - Level: Date: 10/14/03 l Sheet 1 of 1 Reviewed By: Date: Authorized Insp t r Date, YJ,5 gz / t ~/0-/So I/wf/M /0 K 6' v

!Attachnment 'B iPage atof Go P16&k 40ne .d Determination of Percent Coverage for II.....

UT Examinations - Pipe

.... I Site/Unit: t'Aw ' / Procedure: -

,1iD e- 6 Outage No.: ByNS16'ce Z/

Summary No.: 53o i

• u/. /1/ Procedure Rev.:

Report No.: A 1 -s5 -.- S-Workscope: 1$ I Work Order No.: Page: ,/ of /

45 deg Scan 1 /o  % LengthhX X/0- %volumeoflength/100= -/rtb  % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 /__ _  % Length X //0  % volume of length/ 100= g  % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 I_  % Length X  % volume of length / 00 =  % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 I _  % Length X  % volume of length / 00 =  % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans.= /Or %total for 45 deg Other deg - 6 0 (to be used for supplemental scans)

The data to be listed below Is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.

Scan 1 /  % Length X /  % volume of length /100 = /e-  % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 /00  % LengthX

• 9.23 %volumeoflength/100=  % total for Scan 2 Scan 3  % Length X  % volume of length / 100 =  % total for Scan 3 Scan 4  % Length X  % volume of length / 100 =  % total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 96.07 %Totalfo ompleteexam Site Field Supe orv i s o .

rA , Date: Z-/ 8 - 0Y 0 0 I I iSCt 1//6LA

Attachment B UT Base Mets. Lamination Page A7 ofGo 15' '.

Site/Unit: Oconee / I Procedure: NDE-640 Outage No.: ONSIEOC21 Summary No.: CO! 5.021.029 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-03-266-Workscope: 'SI Work Order No.: 98573336 Page: 1 of 2 Code: Section Xl, 1989 CatJltem: C-F-1/C5.21.29 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 1-51A-01(4)

Description:

Pipe to Valve (1HP-63)

System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.029/1-51 A-01-114AC Size/Length: N/A Thickness/Diameter: .3750/2.5" Limitations: None Start Time: 1035 Finish Time: 1039 Examination Surface: Inside a Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: 9.1.1.1 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27219 Surface Temp.: 84 *F Scanning dB: 59 Cal. Report No.: CAL.03-366 Yd.  % Amplitude Position One Position Max Position Two Loss .Remarks No. BackWaIl Full Screen Li Wi W2 MP LM WI W2 MP L2 WI W2 MP NRI Comments: FC 03.20 !W/b Results: Accept i] Reject Q Info z ____

Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: *Yce,14#O DI Pfro ?a?,rReviewed Previous Data: Yes Examiner Level II jj Swature Date Reviewer Signature Date Mauldin, Larry E. I, g C A er1Y'X 10/14/2003 _ _i_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __3 Examiner Level Il-N Signature Date Site Review Signature Date Steinbauer, Troy ~ 10/14/2003 Other Level -Signature Date ANII Review Signature Date

_ __ _ __ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ /8 /P 7'

Attachment B*

Page xsof rc D0m--lg 0rhAy',

Supplemental Report Report No.: UT-03-266 Page: 2 of 2 Summary No.: C05.021.029 Examiner Mauldin, Larry E. ,@tCj ,Z I /rj, 116. Level: II Reviewer Date: O. bOo 5

Examiner X Examiner Stelnbauer, Troy Level: 11-N Site Review: k4 I, Date:

Other -- Level: ANII Review Date: _______ec

- V - -- L Comments:

Ib -> A 3 ,

aI r oyl't Sketch or Photo:

Attachment B Page aqofCo UT Pipe Weld Examination "P.tine-ro, Site/Unit: Oconee / Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS1EOC21 1

Summary No.: CO!5.021.029 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-03-267 Workscope: 'SI Work Order No.: 98573336 Page: 1 of 2 Code: Section Xi, 1989 CatJItem: C-F-1/C5.21.29 Location: WA Drawing No.: 1-51A-01(4)

Description:

Pipe to Valve (lHP-63)

System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.029 /1-51A-01-114AC Size/Length: WA Thickness/Diameter .375"/2.5" Limitations: Yes Start Time: 1041 Finish Time: 1100 Examination Surface: Inside 5 Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND, Lo Location: 9.1.1.1 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27219 Surface Temp.: 84 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-03-367, CAL-03-368, CAL-03-369 AngleUsed 0 45 45T1 60l 38 l 70 l Scanning dB 41 44.8 44 Indication(s): Yes 5 No i Scan Coverage: Upstream i Downstream i CW i CCW i Comments:

Results: Accept iv Reject ° Info 5_

Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: Yes I 00% Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level II . _,,Pignature Date Review Signature Date Mauldin, Larry E. ZZ30,ra/Y-A 10/14/2003 go 0 o /

Examiner Level II.N Signature Date Site Review Y Signature Date StelnbauerD Troy Ae 10/14/2003 Other Level SISgff flE;w-- Date ANII Revjew 66¢ Slgnature N //03Date I

! AttachmentfB I Page 36 (f,,o -

Supplemental Report

.1Iinr~

ergy Report No.: UT-03-267 Page: 2 of 2

'.summary No.: C05.021.029 A Examiner Mauldin, Larry E ie',&/4gyvel: II Reviewer: Date: lo,.

Examiner. Level: Site Review _V 7@ Date:

Other. Level: ANII Review ._4y- Date: ______03 Comments: ISI Limitation Report - See attached sheet Sketch or Photo:

Attachment B' Page 3/ ofGo DUKE POWER COMPANY ONSlEOC21 ISI LIMITATION REPORT UT-03-267 Component/Weld ID: 1-51A-01-114AC Item No: C05.021.029 remarks:

El NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Due to Valve Configuration LIMITED SCAN ZLIMTEDCANl 1213 F1 [2 a cw F ccw 100% Coverage obtained from opposite

~ ~l El2Ecw~ccw side.

FROM L NA to L NA INCHES FROM WO .4" to Beyond ANGLE: Dl 0 E0 45 Z 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG El NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION El LIMITED SCAN l1 El 2 El 1 M2 El cw Elccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: El 0 0 45 El 60 other FROM DEG to DEG El NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION ELIMITED SCAN El1 El2 Eli 2El cw F ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: 0

°ED 45 El 60 other FROM DEG to . DEG El NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION El LIMITED SCAN El 1 El 2 E 1 E 2 0 cw El ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached ANGLE: 0 El 45 El/0 other FROM DEG to DEG 3 yes E No Prepared By: Larry Mauldin Level: 11 Date: 1o/14/2003 Sheet 2 of 2 Reviewed By:

)d-O<t-- Date:

lo O- 1O Authorized nfipctor, Z-og f Dat

)tldy>-Ipl0 4, v

!AttachmentBi]

Page 3 j 0 'of Determination of Percent Coverage for runners"W UT Examihations - Pipe Site/Unit: W/15 / / Procedure: /Ibc..-1 bD Outage No.: &S/LO6e. ,l Summary No.: o05-. 0>/. 7.29 Procedure Rev.: /S Report No.:

Workscope: _ _ _ _ _ Work Order No.: ?98'3 Sb i Page: of 45 deg Scan 1 / 10  % LengthX if. t  % volume of length /100 = 41.1  % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 /0 0o  % Length X 6/. /  % volume of length / 100 = 61. I  % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 _  % Length X  % volume of length /100 =  % total for Scan 3 Scan 4  % Length X _  % volume of length / 100 =  % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = L 6/.  % total for 45 deg Other deg - . 90 (to be used for supplemental scans)

The data to be listed below Is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.

Scan 1 /IdD  % Length X /,4D  % volume of length /100 = /Iti'  % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 c

/00  % Length X £9  % volume of length / 100 = __  % total for Scan 2 Scan 3  % Length X  % volume of length /1 00 =  % total for Scan 3 Scan 4  % Length X  % volume of length / 100 =  % total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; J '5- %Total for omplete exam Site Field Supervisor: -- Date: A-1 A- L;,y V () wJ (-

/Z>

9I z

Attachment B '

UT Base Meta.. amination Page 33of O

i. :A w.. 7..o.'

Site/Unit: ONS / 1 Procedure: NDE-640 Outage No.: ONS1EOC21 Summary No.: C05.021.034 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-03-087 Workscope: lSI Work Order No.: 98577219 Page: 1 of 2 Code: Section Xl, 1989 Code Cat.: C-F-1 Location: NIA Drawing No.: 1HP-187 .

Description:

Elbowto Valve (1HP-138j

.System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.034 11 HP-187-114 Size/Length: 4'/SS Thickness/Diameter: .531 Limitations: NONE Start Time: 0949 Finish Time: 0951 Examination Surface: Inside Q Outside J Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: Rule 1 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.: 101 OF Scanning dB: 58.5 Cal. Report No.: CAL-03-101 Ind.  % Amplitude Position One Position Max Position Two Loss Remarks No Back Wall Full Screen Li W1 W2 MP LM WI W2 MP L2 W1 W2 MP NRI REVlIEWl Comments: F/C 03-20 Results: Accept RI Reject El Info EJ INITIAL SECTION Xl EXAM Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: U&1OG 1 ;JtpReviewed Previous Data: No Examiner LevelL!... ignature Date Reviewer Signature Date Houser, Gayle E. 8/2012003 GaryJ Moss Level IIf Examiner Level II ig ature Date Site Review TF Signature Date Leeper, Winfred C. 8/20/2003 Other Level Sig atbre Date ANII Review N Signature Date UT Base Metal Lamination

!Attachment BI}l I'Page3 of 60 IODLVke Supplemnental Report 0:..>...n7pro,r, Report No.: UT-03-087

.. Page: 2 of 2 Summary No.: C05.021.034 Examiner: Houser, Gayle E. Level: IlIl Reviewer GaryJ M L- I Date:

Examiner Leeper, Winf red C. ,/w.Rl Iji, II Site Review Date:

Other Level: ANII Review. Date: -,

Comments:

Sketch or Photo: Z\UT1VDDEALXProfileUne2.jpg an lt 9tj

'fv in -l1 V * .) %

6c8I

Attachment B:

Page 35ofO C ADuke UT Pipe Weld Examination lomEnerag Site/Unit: ONS / 1 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS1EOC21 Summary No.: Co5.021.034 Procedure Rev.: 14 Report No.: UT-03-090 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98577219 Page: 1 of 3 Code: Section Xl, 1989 Code Cat.: C-F-1 Location: NWA Drawing No.: 1HP-187

Description:

Elbow to Valve (1HP-138)

System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.034/1 HP-1 87-114 Size/Length: 4"/SS Thickness/Dlameter_ .531 Limitations: YES Start Time: 0953 Finish Time: 1011 Examination Surface: Inside a Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: Rule I Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.: 101 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-03-102, CAL-03-103, CAL-03-104 Angle Used l 0 45 45T 60 60L l l Scanning dB 48.0 49.0 65.0 Indication(s): Yes 5 No 0 Scan Coverage: Upstream 5 Downstream i CW Pi CCWR Comments:

F/C 02-15, 02-16, 03-18, 03-21 Results: Accept. iJ Reject a Info E INITIAL SECTION XI EXAM Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: e Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level IlI l Date Reviewer A ,gnature Date Houser, Gayle E. 8/20/2003 GaryJ Moss Level II /(II6 8/l, Examiner Level SI Date Site Review Y l Signature Date Leeper, Winfred C. rp-,- 8/20/2003 I Other Level Ad Slature Date ANII Review - Signature pate UT Pipe Weld Examination

!Atta chment B ',

Supplemental Report i Page 36 of ° '

170Era.Y  ;.

Report No.: UT-03-090 Page: 2 of 3 Summary No.: C05.021.034 Examiner Houser, Gayl Reviewer: Gary J M pl > Date:

Examiner Leeper, Winf Site Review- Date:

Other ANII Review I °7( Date:

Comments:

SEE ATTACHED PROFILE SHEET

!Attachment 3 IPage R7o 60_

Limitation Record Site/Unit: ONS / 1 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONSlEOC21 Summary No.: C05.021.034 Procedure Rev.: 14 Report No.: UT-03-090 Workscope: 1SI Work Order No.: 98577219 Page: 3 of 3 Description of Limitation:

No Sc.4 AsX/1L Fgen VALUtr Y0° Sketch of Limitation: I

\/AWE' SZ I

Umitations removal requirements:

NWA Radiation field: N/A

AttachmentB!

lPage 35 of do Determination of Percent Coverage for Paoiwr-y. UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit: O/J4 / / Procedure: A1E-6O ) Outage No.: 0 U/roc 2/

Summary No.: _Cogs. VA /. oV9 Procedure Rev.: / S- Report No.: e

17. oS3-OR Workscope: /5/ Work Order No.: ftgs-7711 f Page: . { of 45 deg Scan 1 /DO  % Length X %volume of length /100 = 7 C  % total for Scan 1

75r Scan 2  !/of  % Length X  %'volume of length/ 100 = 7 f  % total for Scan 2 Scan 3  % Length X  % volume of length /100 =  % total for Scan 3 Scan 4  % Length X  % volume of length /1 00 =_ _  % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = 75  % total for 45 deg Other deg - lo (to be used for supplemental scans)

The data to be listed below Is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.

Scan 1 tag  % LengthX ] 2o %volumeoflength/100= /e4t %totalforScanl Scan2  % LengthX 2 %volumeoflength/100=. C %totalforScan2 Scan 3 -  % Length X %volume of length / 100 =  % total for Scan 3 Scan 4  % Length X  % volume of length /1 00 =  % total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; W S .b %Total fo omplete exam Site Field Supervisor 3 fZ- 1 0-. Date: ,..O/

-/

' I I CUD9 mM/0Y

Attachment B:

UT Base Metal Lamination Page 37of GO Ste/Uni: Oconee / I Procedure: NDE-640 Outage No.: ONS1 EOC21 Summary No.: Co5.021.050 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-03-238 Workscope: Is' Work Order No.: 98573350 Page: 1 of 2 Code: Section Xi, 1989 Cat/ltem: C-F-1/C5.21.50 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 1-SIA-02

Description:

Valve (1HP-132) to Pipe System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.050/151 1A-02-49BA Size/Length: 4" SS Thickness/Diameter 0.531" Limitations: Yes Pipe to Valve

. Start Time: 1035 Finish Time: 1040 Examination Surface: Inside a Outside 0 Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: Top of Pipe Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27219 Surface Temp.: 74 0F Scanning dB: 48 Cal. Report No.: CAL-03-322 Ind. O Amplitude Position One Position Max Position Two N. Loss- Remarks Back Wall Full Screen LI W1 W2 MP LM W1 W2 MP L2 W1 W2 MP NRI Comments: FC / 03-20 Results: Accept i Reject a Info a Initial Section XI Exam Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: YC s - 100% Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level illre 8 Date Reviewer A Signature Date Eaton, Jay A. 10/5/2003 y ti Qa / l/ /0-10 -o/ J Examiner Level Signature Date Sie Review Signature Date Other Level Signature Date ANII Revlev i eature Dat

Attachment B; Page q0of, 4 O' p'ajn-. Supplemental Report Report No.: UT-03.238 WcF-hoto~y.

Page: 2 of 2 Summary No.: C05.021.050 n I1 Examiner Eaton, Jay A. 1kltf-rev -

Level: IlIl Reviewer c480' By~-7 Date: / .- e 6.1 Examiner Level: Site Review Date:

Other Level: ANII Revlew Date: /0//3/

Comments:

Sketch or Photo: \\ngofs1JDDeal7UddeaLServer\Graphics\Common\ProfileUne2.Jpg VALU/Y

43. 0 4IO <L --

Attachment B:

Page q' of 6i A9lf^ke~ UT Pipe Weld Examination Site/Unit: Oconee / 1 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONSlEOC21 Summary No.: Co5.021.050 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-03-240 Workscope: iSI Work Order No.: 98573350 Page: 1 of 4 Code: Section Xl, 1989 Cat./ltem: C-F-11C5.21.50 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 1-51A-02

Description:

Valve (1HP-132) to Pipe System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.050 /1-51A-02-49BA Size/Length: 4" SS Thickness/Diameter 0.531" Limitations: Yes - See attached Limitation Report Start Time: 1040 Finish Time: 1100 Examination Surface: Inside a Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: Top of Pipe Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27219 Surface Temp.: 74 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-03-323, CAL-03-325, CAL-03-342 Angle Used l 01 45 l45T 60 60L l*

Scanning dB 55 50 60 Indication(s): Yes i No E Scan Coverage: Upstream a Downstream i CW i CCW i Comments:

Results: Accept i Reject °] Info Init ection XI Exam wss0 6b Percent Of Coverage Obtalned > 90%: o > Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level III / l gaure Date Reviewer o n]Signature Date Eaton, Jay A.

Examiner Level (A k r

' "Signature 1015/2003 Date Site Review J/ CAA Y

/q t2/(O Signature

/0-/0 -Oa Date Other Level Signature Date ANII Review ignature Date LI2 //i/

V c,

Attachment B.,

Page $q oE4 Ultrasonic Indication Report

£~p ko ____

Site/Unit: Oconee / 1 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONSl EOC21 Summary No.: C05.021.050 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-03-240 Workscope: [SI Work Order No.: 98573350 Page: 2 of 4 WO lWn2IX Search Unit Angle: 60°L Piping Welds CT.

Wo Location: CIL of Weld o Ferritic Vessels > 2*T Lo Location: Top of Pipe O Other MP Metal Path Wmax Distance From Wo To S.U. At Maximum Response RBR Remaining Back Reflection .. 4ts _E F- --- DATLTAI W1 Distance From Wo At Of Max (Forward)

L Distance From Datum W2 Distance From Wo At Of Max (Forward) T IT j LO Comments: .~ _

Scan Indication  % W Forward Backward Li L L2 RBR Remarks No. Of Max Of Max Of Max Of Max Of Amp.

DAC W MP W1 MP W2 MP Max Max 60'L 1 80 0.8 .97 N/A NtA N/A NWA 360 ON InLt N/A Examiner Level IlI

=___________=___ SIgnlre Date Reviewer ___-A~/ signature Date Eaton, Jay A. 10/5/2003 /9.

Examiner Level [ Signature Date Site Review . Signature Date Other Level Signature Date ANII Review I JiiAnture Date

( 6' V 6f

Attachment B.

Page 43 of 0a IaP~ike Supplemental Report Report No.: UT-03-240 Page: 3 of 4 Summary No.: C05.021.050 /)I -,

Examiner: Eaton,JayA.

Examiner.

Y Level:

Level:

IlIl Reviewer Site Review

-. A> M Date:

Date:

O Other. Level: ANII Review: Date: /d/ld/la3 U '

Comments: a

-- p _r ('o5 l te A

- cI"OA -c- *- -F:-v'A ZOLZf /g\

1141S, ~WAS tS£VZ-M ?uLrn k Sketch or Photo: \\ngofsl\IDDeai7\lddeaLServer\GrapI *ics\Common\ProfileUne2.jpg VALVC-J

.1 -

-4;-T"-- - Ik - - I ,^-:,

1 ...,-

!AttachmentB I

~Page 0 ..

d .1,6

&u ke W Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit: C<,I / Procedure: doe:- &OD Outage No.: _,_______60,__

SummaryNo.: COS, og/. °! Procedure Rev.: / is Report No.: t/ _o0 I -Zi/

Workscope: /e / Work Order No.: Ag 6- 73 3 S 0 Page: . / of /

45 decn Scan 1 170o  % Length X /o-g-'  % volume of length /100 = /or -% total for Scan 1 Scan 2 /  % LengthX ./oX

./ -

% volume of length 1100 = ,7D - %1total for Scan 2 Scan 3 I _ _ _  % Length X  % volume of length 1100 =  % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 _  % Length X  % volume of length 1100 =  % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = /OV  % total for 45 deg Other deg - _ (to be used for supplemental scans)

The data to be listed below Is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.

Scan 1 Z7  % Length X /{  % volume cof length 1100 = /&PO - % total for Scan I Scan2  % LengthX a %volumec of length /100 = 0> %total for Scan 2 Scan 3 -  % Length X _  % volume cof length I 100 =  % total for Scan 3 Scan 4  % Length X  % volume cof length /1 00 =  % total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totalsf r e ch scan required and divide by# of scans to determine;

% Total i complete exam Site Field Supervisor: l Z ?ni OHi __. W Date:

10

Attachment B Page qsofc ° UT Base Metal Lamination Site/Unit: Oconee / 1 Procedure: NDE-640 Outage No.: ONS1EOC21 Summary No.: CO5.021.056 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT.03.239 Workscope: 'St Work Order No.: 98573350 Page: 1 of 2 Code: Section Xl, 1989 Catiltem: C-F-11C5.21.56 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 1-51 A02

Description:

Flange to Pipe System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.056 /1-51-A02.23BB Size/Length: 4" SS Thickness/Diameter 0.531" Limitations: Yes - Pipe to Flange Start Time: 1005 Finish Time: 1010 Examination Surface: Inside a Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: North Side of Pipe Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27219 Surface Temp.: 74 OF Scanning dB: 48 Cal Report No.: CAL.03-322

% Amplitude Position One Position Max Position Two Id. Loss -Remarks No. BackWall Full Screen Li WI W2 MP LM WI W2 MP L2 WI W2 MP NRI Comments: FC /03.20 IJaUsItz&

Resufts: Accept i Reject a Info E SIK SZ we Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: I a -tNo--7S%- Reviewed Previous Data:

Attachment BA, Page q6 of 60 Supplemental Report Report No.: UT-03-239

. - - ra ,

Page: 2 of 2 Summary No.: C05.021.056 Examiner Eaton, Jay A. I Level: IlIl Reviewer A

Yt 1

v1 Date: /o-S-.5 N Examiner Level: Site Review Date:

Other Level: ANII Review. Date:

Comments:

Sketch or Photo: \\ngofsl\IDDeal7\lddeal_Server\Graphics\Common\ProfileUne2.Jpg fW49 v.

Attachment B Page 47 of GO UT Pipe Weld Examination Site/Unit: Oconee I 1 Procedure: NDE.600 Outage No.: ONS1 EOC21 Summary No.: CIo5.021.056 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-03-241 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98573350 Page: 1 of 2 Code: Section Xl, 1989 CatJltem: C-F-11C5.21.56 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 1-51A-02

Description:

Flange to Pipe System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.056 /1-51A-02-23BB Size/Length: 4" SS Thickness/Diameter 0.531 "

Limitations: Yes - See attached Limitation Report Start Time: 1012 Finish Time: 1028 Examination Surface: Inside Q Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: I 4orth Side of Pipe Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27219 Surface Temp.: 74 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-03.323, CAL-03-325, CAL-03-342 Angle Used 0 45 145T1 601 60L I I Scanning dB I 55 50 60 Indication(s): Yes El No 2 Scan Coverage: Upstream El Downstream i CW i CCW ED Comments: REWVEWED Inlffaf1rj 6--

Results: Accept E Reject a Info al Initial Section XI Exam Em Iv to. OS 92-Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: 5 t oReviewed Previous Data: No A IePt Z,1 y

IAttachmnkl 6-IAt^eof;c .it arjo.ke Limitation Record Site/Unit: Oconee / 1 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS1 EOC21 Summary No.: C05.021.056 Procedure Rev.: 15 Report No.: UT-03-241 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98573350 Page: 2 of 2 Description of Limitation:

Due to Flange configuration. Weld CIL + 0.5' and Beyond - 360° Sketch of Limitation:

Umitations removal requirements:

N/A Radiation field: N/A Examiner Level ill Sig atre Date Reviewer Signature Date Eatelo ^yA-.o/&-Iwl e 0I5 2003 )IfAA A M 01' /0-12-3 Examiner Level V SlglatureI Date Site Review r( Signature Date Other Level Signature Date ANII Review / Sigrpture I Date I)( /6/s/Q3, (I va

Attachnim-Wn. 1

." -:Psg.47o d' 1W,&uke. Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit: Add', I / Procedure: ,V A) C -6 0o Outage No.: cliJs/foc g/

Summary No.: Gos. oz/ .oaK Procedure Rev.: / S* Report No.: UT-!,- Ax Workscope: / ,/ Work Order No.: eg 7 3 3 ao: Page: Jof /

45 den Scan 1 At>< -% Length X / o0  % volume of length /100 = HoIC>.  % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 /0-7  % LengthX . /XOr  % volume of length / 100 = / o o % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 _  % Length X  % volume of length/ 100 =  % total for Scan 3 Scan 4  % Length X  % volume of length /1 00 =  % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by# scans = / 00  % total for 45 deg Other deg - 'Q (to be used for supplemental scans)

The data to be listed below Is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.

Scan 1 /0r0  % Length X /0-  % volume of length/ 100 = / -D  % total for Scan 1 Scan 2  % Length X D' %volumeoflength1100=-  % total for Scan 2 Scan 3  % Length X  % volume of length / 100 =  % total for Scan 3 Scan 4  % Length X  % volume of length / 100 =  % total for Scan 4 Percent comnlete coverage Add totals for each can required an4 divide by # of scans to determine;

__x___% Total fI omplete exam Site Field Supervisor: . C Date: ____-/_ -

'L ' t

Attachment B '

UT Base Metcs11. Lamination .PPages ofrO I I. .1 .- O ,., S,,

E' Site/Unit: ONS / 1 Procedure: NDE-640 Outage No.: ONS1 EOC21 Summary No.: Co5.021.073 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-03-088 Workscope: 'Si Work Order No.: 98577219 Page: 1 of 2 Code: Section Xi, 1989 Code Cat.: C-F-1 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 1HP-187

Description:

Tee to Elbow System ID: SIA Component ID: C05.021.073 /1 HP-1 87-116 Size/Length: 4* /SS Thickness/Diameter: .531 Limitations: NONE Start Time: 0947 Finish Time: 0949 Examination Surface: Inside E -Outside R Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: Rule 1 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: _ MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.: 101 OF Scanning dB: 58.5 Cal. Report No.: CAL-03-101 Ind.  % Amplitude Position One Position Max Position Two Loss %Remarks No. Ls BackWall Full Screen LI WI W2 MP LM WI W2 MP 12 WI W2 MP NRi Comments: FIC 03-20 Results: Accept 55 Reject C Info E INITIAL SECTION XI EXAM Percent Of Coverage Obtained> 90%: YES 100% Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level III Signature Date Reviewer Signature Date Houser, Gayle E. -- J 8/2012003 Gary J Moss Level IIll Q2 R -o 3 Examiner Level I S, ture Date Site Review Signature Date Leeper, Winfred C. 8/20/2003 Other Level Signati~re Date ANII Review Signature $tk Date UT Base Metal Lamination

AttachmnentB 1 r -ages / oU 40

&ppxe Supplemental Report 0rr Report No.: UT-03-088 Page: 2 of 2 Summary No.: C05.021.073 Examiner Houser, Gayle E. eve: IlIl Reviewer: GaryJMoss LevI I i&, Date: &.A.5o3 Examiner Leeper, Winfred CLevel: II Site Review Date:

Other Level: ANII Review Date:

Comments:

Sketch or Photo: Z7\UT\DDEAL\ProfileUne2.jpg

. \%'r m o M o 6,4 - rl 0 6.

1- -9 v-. r-. so

AttachmentiB.;,

.Page p of GO ML,Duke UT Pipe Weld Examination

[#Energy.

Site/Unit: ONS / 1 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS1EOC21 Summary No.: Co 5.021.073 Procedure Rev.: 14 Report No.: UT.03-089 Workscope: 'SI Work Order No.: 98577219 Page: 1 of 3 Code: Section Xl, 1989 Code Cat.: C-F-1 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 1HP-187

Description:

Tee to Elbow System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.073 /1HP-187-116 Size/Length: 4" /SS Thickness/Diameter 0531 Limitations: YES Start Time: 0952 Finish Time: 1007 Examination Surface: Inside jj Outside i Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location: Rule I Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.: 101 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-03-102, CAL-03-103, CAL-03-104 Angle Used 0 45 l 45T l 60 60L l l Scanning dB 48.0 49.0 65.0 Indication(s): Yes fl No Ri Scan Coverage: Upstream Pi Downstream i CW iR CCW R1 Comments: REVIEWED F/C 02-15, 02-16, 03-18, 03-21 a iISBCT Results: Accept iv Reject Ea Info °l 62- INITIAL SECTION XI EXAM Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: AVES4.9% ,, Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level ni Siature Date Reviewer Signature Date Houser, Gayle E. 812012003 Gary J Moss Level 11 /SX s Examiner Level II l)naire Date Site Review Signature Date Leeper, Winfred C. 8(20/2003 Other Level Signaur9 S Date ANIlIew _ Signature Date UT Pipe Weld Examination

AttachmentiB7 Isftake 1100rFA,7o Supplemental Report Page os1f GI Report No.: UT-03-089 Page: 2 of 3 Summary No.: C05.021.073 Examiner. Houser, Gayle E. Level: IlIl Reviewer: GaryJ Moss Lv II Date: ,i;25-°3 Examiner Leeper, Winfred C. LI Site Review, Date:

Other. Level: ANII Review ',>- Date: B y Comments:

SEE ATTACHED PROFILE SHEET

I lAttachmrent B 1

Pngeslof G0 Limitation Record

- Site/Unit: ONS / 1 Procedure: NIJE-600 Outage No.: ONSlEOC21 Summary No.: C05.021.073 Procedure Rev.: 14 Report No.: UJT-03-089 Workscope: ISI Work Order No.: 98577219 Page: 3 of 3 Description of Limitation:

No scan from surface 1 scan 1 due to the throat of the tee. Limited area is 0 + 12.63" to 0 + 1.5". This area was scanned with a 60 L - Wave from the surface 2 side to gain 100% coverage. See sketch below:

Sketch of Limitation:

I - 61 kOLtn -6 Limitations removal requirements:

N/A Radiation field: N/A Examiner Level Ill Houser, Gayle E. e A igPture

/CO Date Reviewer 8120/2003 GaryJ Moss Level II S ature 2}o3 Date Examiner Level ii Leeper, Winfred C.

Other Level

/

Si

\Sin Iur re Date Site Review 8120/2003 Date ANII Review

/ signature nignature Date Date Ayd; - I I,

Attachment B.

Page Y5of: Cb P11,&,ke 0 W . Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit: Ag C7 I / Procedure: /__b__-_ _ _ Outage No.: OS/6o C-i/

Summary No.: Co', oa/, O /' Procedure Rev.: Report No.: ro-o,-o0 Workscope: / 5__ I Work Order No.: 9gf67;?/ Page: j of /

45 deg Scan 1 4<n-  % Length X ,672

/  % volume of length / 100 = Ae -% total for Scan 1 Scan 2  % Length X  :. 1H4  % volume of length/ 100 = Ago- - % total for Scan 2 Scan 3  % Length X  % volume of length /100 =  % total for Scan 3 Scan 4  % Length X  % volume of length / 100 =  % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = /V  % total for 45 deg Other deg - 6e (to be used for supplemental scans)

The data to be listed below Isfor coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.

Scan 1 /0-cD  % Length X / De0 -% volume of length /1 00 = /Z-O  % total for Scan I Scan 2 otov  % Length X 0 ; %volumeoflength/100= a %total for Scan 2 Scan 3 - _  % Length X  % volume of length /100 =  % total for Scan 3 Scan 4  % Length X  % volume of length / 100 =  % total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 6 S/o%0,

,%-oq-f

/2  % Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor &%(}a X Date: 2-/ 9 -,I&

UITA

'm45J,

, Attachmenitd, UT Base Meta. Lamination :Page5 6 6O1 '

Sie/Unit: ONS _ 1 Procedure: NDE-640 Outage No.: ONSI EOC21 Summary No.: Co5.021.111 Procedure Rev.: 2 Report No.: UT-03-085 Workscope: 'SI Work Order No.: 98577854 Page: 1 of 1 Code: Section Xi, 1989 Code Cat.: C-F-1 Location: N/A Drawing No.: I HP- 194

Description:

Pipe to Valve (1HP-27)

System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.111 11HP-194-4 Size/Length: 4.0" ISS Thickness/Diameter .674 Limitations: NONE Start Time: 0912 Finish Time: 0916 Examination Surface: Inside ] Outside iJ Surface Condition: FLUSH Lo Location: RT #0 Wo Location: Centerilne of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27221 Surface Temp.: 90 OF Scanning dB: 50 Cal. Report No.: CAL-03-097

% Ampritude Position One Position Max Position Two In. Loss Remarks No. Back Wil Full Screen Li WI W2 MP LM WI W2 MP L2 WI W2 MP NRI Comments: F/C 03-20 Results: Accept g3 ReJect ° Info ] INITIAL SECTION Xi EXAM Percent Of Coverage Obtained> 90%: YES 100% Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level ii Signature Date Reviewer 9_ ignature g Date Weaver, Marion T. 8/2012003 2 GaryJMoss Level / / -J 5 Examiner Level Signature Date Site Review Signature Date Other Level Signature Date ANII Review Signature Pate UT Base Metal Lamination

AttachmentfBI

• Pagge 5cV6f Supplemental Report Report No.:

V0ner0gy. Lr_053-D'56 Page: -? of_-'

Summary No.:

J/e/

Examiner Examiner C-031 Level:

Level:

a,7 Reviewer Site Review 2AC-4*t5 SEAt2 Date: g4S Date:

'5 Other Level: ANII Review c Date: 97c9 Comments:

Sketch or Photo:

(S /)

• t (S2)

'. 1-1 Ii 1430,

,Ml' ' An tv

, AttachmentB .,

Page SW of :60 ADuke UT Pipe Weld Examination VSEnergy.

Site/Unit: ONS / 1 Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONSlEOC21 Summary No.: C05.021.111 Procedure Rev.: 14 Report No.: UT-03-086 Workscope: IS! Work Order No.: 98577854 Page: 1 of 3 Code: Section Xi, 1989 Code Cat.: C-F-1 Location: N/A Drawing No.: 1HP-194

Description:

Pipe to Valve (1HP-27)

System ID: 51A Component ID: C05.021.111 /1HP-194-4 Size/Length: 4.0N SS Thickness/Diameter. .674 Limitations: YES - 1 SIDED (VALVE) Start Time: 0924 Finish Time: 0932 Examination Surface: Inside E Outside i Surface Condition: FLUSH Lo Location: RT #0 Wo Location: Centerline of Weld Couplant: ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 01225 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE 27221 Surface Temp.: 90 OF Cal. Report No.: CAL-03-098, CAL-03-099, CAL-03-100 Angle Used 0 45 45T 60 38 l 60L l Scanning dB s,56 51 57 Indication(s): Yes FJ No i Scan Coverage: Upstream M Downstream Wl CW i CCW i Comments: miasma F/C 02-15, 02-16, 03-18, 03-21 HSBcr~ c Results: Accept Ea Reject 0 nJ OEB INITIAL SECTION XI EXAM Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:. No - 75 ° Reviewed Previous Data: No Examiner Level II Signature Date Reviewer Signature Date Weaver, Marion T. <7 11 8/20/2003 GaryJ Moss Level II ,0.. J As A Examiner Level Signature Date Site Review l Signature Date Other Level III 6 Signature Date ANII Review Signature 2 Date Eaton, Jay A. 8/20/2003 UT Pipe Weld Examination l

IAttachWe! l

'IPii,:e,59 t6 "I Limitation Record

- Site/Unit ONS / I Procedure: NDE-600 Outage No.: ONS1EOC21 Summary No.: C05.021.111 Procedure Rev.: 14 Report No.: UT-03-086 Workscope: IS1 Work Order No.: 98577854 Page: A of ,-4 Description of Limitation: C"={105 (efj74I The 38 shear scans 3 & 4 and the 60 shear scan 2 on surface 2 were limited due to valve configuration. A 60 L - Wave was scanned from surface 1. See the sketch and coverage calculations below:

Sketch of Limitation:

i. \5--

Il-Limitations removal requirements: O/A Radiation field: Offs Examiner Level Ii Signature Date Reviewer S ature Date Weaver, Marion T. sailG 812012003 GaryJ Moss Level S1_ .a5-o3 Examiner Level Signature Date Site Review D / Signature Date Other Level Signa e r Date ANII Review Signature Dale I 5A F Lg;,jC _--E_ (5g1 r C7

.laPt" Determination of Percent Coverage for r~oraw, UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit: njS 1 /I Procedure: IV71F- 6 6- Outage No.: AfUocV z

Summary No.: Co S-. od. /// Procedure Rev.: Report No.: I/-03 -CJ Workscope: / S( Work Order No.: 9S5 776-S Page: / of /

45 deg Scan 1  % Length X  % volume of length /100 =  % total for Scan 1 Scan 2  % Length X  % volume of length / 100 =  % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 _/Zro  % Length X &to b(C'  % volume of length 1100 = g'o . 3  % total for Scan 3 Scan 4  % Length X  : g3 L  % volume of length /100 = go. 3 4  % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = gO. 3 '  % total for 45 deg Other deg - h Z (to be used for supplemental scans)

The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.

Scan 1 /&a  % Length X /iYV  % volume of length / 100 = /o>  % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 */eV  % Length X  % volume of length / 1 00= X  % total for Scan 2 Scan 3  % Length X  % volume of length / 100 =  % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 -

% Length X  % volume of length/10 = ___% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine;

___5 __ %Totalf omplet exam I Site Field Supervisor > - ( Date: Ritz&- oag AxI I,,

A7t6tO