ML041050068

Annual Report for the University of Texas at Austin

ML041050068
Person / Time
Site:	University of Texas at Austin
Issue date:	03/29/2004
From:	Kelly S University of Texas at Austin
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML041050068 (62)

Text

¶Department of Mechanical Engineering t/S THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN p '

Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory -Austin, Texas 78758 512-232-5370

• FAX 512-471-4589 - httpllwww.me.utexas.edul/-netlnet.html March 29, 2004 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington D. C. 20555

Subject:

Annual Report for The University of Texas at Austin, Docket 50-602

Dear Sir:

Enclosed is the 2003 Annual Report for the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory at The University of Texas at Austin. This report could not be submitted electronically due to the NRC web site failures. This report is being submitted in accordance with Section 6.6 of the Technical Specifications.

Please contact me at 512-232-5373 if you have any questions.

Sint~

Sean e

NETL Associate Director

Enclosure:

2003 Annual Report cc: A. Adams, NPRD Project Manager CF#3-20 LZO

The University of Texas at Austin Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 2003 Annual Report NRC Docket 50-602 DOE Contract No. DE-AC07-ER03919

The University of Texas at Austin Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 2003 Annual Report NRC Docket 50-602 DOE Contract No. DE-AC07-ER03919

2003 NETL Annual Report ii

I Z 2003 NETL Annual Report Tables of Contents ii Executive Summary iii Forvard iv 1.0 Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory 1-1 1.1 Introduction 1-1 Purpose of the Report Availability of the Facility Operating Regulations NETL History 1.2 NETL Building 1-4 J.J. Pickle Research Campus NETL Building Description Laboratories, Equipment 1.3 UT-TRIGA Alark II Research Reactor 1-7 Reactor Description Experiment Facilities Beam Port Facilities 1.4 Nuclear Engineering Academic Program 1-12 1.5 NETL Divisions 1-13 Operations and Maintenance Laboratory Operations Health Physics 2.0 Annual Progress Report 2-1 2.1 Faculty, Staff, and Students 2-1 2.2 Education and Training Activities 2-8 2.3 Research and Development Projects 2-9 2.4 Publications, Reports, and Papers 2-14 3.0 Facility Operating Summaries 3-1 3.1 Operating Experience 3-1 3.2 Reactor Shutdowns 3-1 3.3 Utilization 3-4 3.4 Maintenance 3-4 3.5 Facility Changes 3-4 3.6 Laboratory Inspections 3-7 3.7 Radiation Exposures 3-9 3.8 Radiation Surveys 3-15 3.9 Radioactive Effluents, Radioactive Waste 3-18

I Z 2003 NETL Annual Report EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

The Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory (NETL) facility continues to support the academic and research missions of The University of Texas but has begun to provide these support functions to other institutions. The NETL and NRE programs received an Innovations in Nuclear Infrastructure and Education (INIE) grant from the DOE in June of 2002. The INIE Southwest Consortium is a partnership between the University of Texas, Texas A&M University, the University of New Mexico and the Sandia National Laboratories. The funds from this program have permitted significant upgrades of the experimental facilities and research programs. The environmental research and analysis services performed by the NETL during this past year supported the Sandia National Laboratories, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, the Canadian government, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the University of Illinois, Texas A&M University and the State of Texas.

iv

. Z 2003 NETL Annual Report FORWARD The mission of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory at The University of Texas at Austin is to:

• Educate the next generation of leaders in nuclear science and engineering.

• Conduct leading research at the forefront of the international nuclear community.

• Apply nuclear technology for solving multidisciplinary problems.

• Provide service to the citizens of Texas, the U.S., and the international community.

This objective is achieved by carrying out a well-balanced program of education, research, and service. The NETL research reactor supports hands-on education in reactor physics and nuclear science. In addition, students in non-nuclear fields such as physics, chemistry, and biology use the reactor in laboratory course work.

It may also be used in education programs for nuclear powver plant personnel, secondary schools students and teachers, and the general public.

The NETL research reactor benefits a wide range of on-campus and off-campus users, including academic, medical, industrial, and government organizations. The principal services offered by our reactor involve material irradiation, trace element detection, material analysis, and radiographic analysis of objects and processes.

Such services establish beneficial links to off-campus users, expose faculty and students to multidisiplinary research and commercial applications of nuclear science, and earn revenues to help support Nuclear Engineering activities.

Sheldon Landsberger Director Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory v

Chapter 1

2003 NETL Annual Report 1.0 NUCLEAR ENGINEERING TEACHING LABORATORY 1.1 Introduction Purpose of the Report The Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory (NETL) at The University of Texas at Austin prepares an annual report of program activities. Information in this report provides an introduction to the education, research, and service programs of the NETL. A TRIGA nuclear reactor is the major experimental facility at the Laboratory. The reactor operates at power levels up to 1100 kilowatts or with pulse reactivity insertions up to 2.2% Ak/k.

I I

1

5

'.1 I



Figure 1-1 NETL - Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory The annual reports also satisfy requirements of the University Fuel Assistance Program, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [contract number DE-AC07-ER03919, Amendment A015; C85-110742 Task Order 2, Mod. 1], and the licensing agency, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) [docket number 50-602]. This annual report covers the period from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2003.

1-1

2003 NETL Annual Report Availability of the Facility The NETL facility serves a multipurpose role. The use of NETL by faculty, staff, and students in the College of Engineering is the Laboratory's primary function.

In addition, the development and application of nuclear methods are done to assist researchers from other universities, industry, and government. NETL provides services to industry, government and other laboratories for the testing and evaluation of materials. Public education through tours and demonstrations is also a routine function of the laboratory operation.

Operating Regulations Licensing of activities at NETL involve both Federal and State agencies. The nuclear reactor is subject to the terms and specifications of Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

License R-129, a class 104c research reactor license.

Another NRC license, SNM-180, for special nuclear material, provides for the use of a subcritical assembly with neutron sources.

Both licenses are responsibilities of the NETL. For general use of radioisotopes the university maintains a broad license with the State of Texas, L00485. Functions of the broad license are the responsibility of the University Office of Environmental Health and Safety.

NETL History Development of the nuclear engineering program was an effort of both physics and engineering faculty during the late 1950's and early 1960's. The program became part of the Mechanical Engineering Department where it remains to this day.

The program installed, operated, and dismantled a TRIGA nuclear reactor at a site on the main campus in the engineering building, Taylor Hall. Initial criticality for the first UT reactor was August 1963 with the final operation in April 1988. Power at startup was 10 kilowatts (1963) with one power upgrade to 250 kilowatts (1968). The total burnup during a 25 year period from 1963 to 1988 was 26.1 megawatt-days.

Pulse capability of the reactor was 1.4% Ak/k with a total of 476 pulses during the operating history. Dismantling and decommissioning of the facility were completed in December 1992.

Planning for a new facility, which led to the shutdown of the campus facility, began in October 1983, with constriction commencing in December 1986 and continuing until May 1989.

The final license was issued in January 1992, and initial criticality occurred on March 12, 1992.

1-2

2003 NETL Annual Report The new facility, including support laboratories, administrative offices, and the reactor is the central location for all NETL activities.

Land use in the area of the NETL site began as an industrial site during the 1940's.

Following the 1950's, lease agreements between the University and the Federal government led to the creation of the Balcones Research Center. In the 1990's, the University became owner of the site, and in 1994 the site name was changed to the J.J. Pickle Research Campus to honor retired U.S. Congressman James "Jake" Pickle.

1-3

2003 NETL Annual Report 1.2 NETL Building J.J. Pickle Research Campus The J.J. Pickle Research Campus (PRC) is a multidiscipline research campus with a site area of 1.87 square kilometers. Areas of the site consist of two approximately equal east and vest tracts of land. An area of about 9000 square meters on the east tract is the location of the NETL building.

Sixteen separate research units and at least five other academic research programs, including the NETL facility, have research efforts with locations at the research campus. Adjacent to the NETL site is the Center for Research in Water Resources and Bureau of Economic Geology, wvhich are examples of the diverse research activities on the campus. A Commons Building provides cafeteria service, recreation areas, meeting rooms, and conference facilities. Access to the NETL site is shown in Figure 1-2.

IFiI I

LI NE.T.L.

II I

l -SITE H

CENTER FOR RESEARCH IN WATER RESOURCES

_JCENTER FOR ELECTRO-MAGNETICS CENTER FOR ENERGY STUDIES

'0 U

Figure 1-2 NETL Site - J.J. Pickle Research Campus 1-4

2003 NETL Annual Report NETL Building Description The NETL building is a 1950 sq meter (21,000 sq fit), facility with laboratory and office spaces. Building areas consist of two primary laboratories of 330 sq m (3600 sq ft) and 80 sq m (900 sq ft), eight support laboratories (217 sq m, 2340 sq fit), and six supplemental areas (130 sq m, 1430 sq ft). Conference and office space is allocated to 12 rooms totaling 244 sq m (2570 sq ft). One of the primary laboratories contains the TRIGA reactor pool, biological shield structure, and the neutron beam experiment areas. A second primary laboratory consists of 1.3 meter (4.25 ft) thick walls for use as a general purpose radiation experiment facility. Other areas of the building include support shops, instrument laboratories, measurement laboratories, and material handling laboratories.

Laboratories, Equipment The NETL facility makes available several types of radiation facilities and an array of radiation detection equipment. In addition to the reactor, facilities include a subcritical assembly, a gamma irradiator, various radioisotope sources, and several radiation producing machines.

The gamma irradiator is a multicurie cobalt-60 source with a design activity of 10,000 curies. The gamma irradiator is in permanent storage and is not currently available for use.

Radioisotopes are available in millicurie quantities for calibration of radiation detection equipment.

Neutron sources of plutonium-beryllium and californium-252 are available. A subcritical assembly of 20% enriched uranium in a polyethylene moderated cylinder provides an experimental device for laboratory demonstrations of neutron multiplication and neutron flux measurements.

Laboratories provide locations to setup radiation experiments, test instrumentation, prepare materials for irradiation, process radioactive samples and experiment with radiochemical reactions.

1-5

I 2003 NETL Annual Report 1.3 UT-TRIGA MARK II Research Reactor The TRIGA Mark II nuclear reactor at the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory of The University of Texas at Austin is an above-ground, fixed-core research reactor. The nuclear core, containing uranium fuel, is located at the bottom of an 8.2 meter deep water-filled tank surrounded by a concrete shield structure. The highly purified water in the tank serves as the reactor coolant, neutron moderator, and a transparent radiation shield. Visual and physical access to the core is possible at all times. The TRIGA Mark II reactor is a versatile and inherently safe research reactor conceived and developed by General Atomics to meet the requirements of education and research. The UT-TRIGA research reactor provides sufficient power and neutron flux for comprehensive and productive work in many fields including physics, chemistry, engineering, medicine, and metallurgy. The word TRIGA stands for Training. Research, Isotope production, General Atomics.

COIIROL ROD DRIVE R[ACTOR BJRDCC X

i ~CETRLt C

\\

E

.CTRL

• l ALUIINVA TANK EXPERIMENT F NEIJ1RTJC TRNS3FERN C

2OR COR CRIC^

1 01 CHFAPRER OTART Figure 1-3 Re r T ad BioFLECa tSORh

' C 0 NT BVI P

._f LO^R LIN E.

Figure 1-3, Reactor Tank and Biological Shield 1-6

2003 NETL Annual Report Reactor Description Reactor Operation. The UT-TRIGA research reactor can operate continuously at nominal powers up to 1 MW, or in the pulsing mode where typical peak powers of 1500 MW can be achieved for durations of about 10 msec. The UT-TRIGA with its new digital control system provides a unique facility for performing reactor physics experiments as well as reactor operator training. The pulsing operation is particularly useful in the study of reactor kinetics and control.

Neutrons produced in the reactor core can be used in a wide variety of research applications including nuclear reaction studies, neutron scattering experiments, and nuclear analytical and irradiation services.

Special neutron facilities include a rotary specimen rack, which is located in the reactor graphite reflector, a pneumatically operated "rabbit" transfer system, which penetrates the reactor core, and a central thimble, which allows samples to be inserted into the peak flux region of the core. Cylindrical voids in the concrete shield structure, called neutron beam ports, allow neutrons to stream out away from the core. Experiments may be done inside the beam ports or outside the concrete shield in the neutron beams.

Nuclear Core. The reactor core is an assembly of about 100 fuel elements surrounded by an annular graphite neutron reflector. Each element consists of a fuel region capped at top and bottom with a graphite section, all contained within a thin-walled stainless steel tube. The fuel region is a metallic alloy of low-enriched uranium evenly distributed in zirconium hydride (UZrH). The physical properties of the TRIGA fuel provide an inherently safe operation. Rapid power transients to high powers are automatically suppressed without using mechanical control; the reactor quickly returns to normal power levels. Pulse operation, which is a normal mode of operation, is a practical demonstration of this inherent safety feature.

Reactor Reflector. The aluminum-canned graphite neutron reflector surrounding the reactor was flooded in 2000 by the NETL staff to correct pressurization problems. The reflector should be expected replaced next year (2004).

1-7

I 2003 NETL Annual Report Reactor Control. The instrumentation for the UT-TRIGA research reactor is contained in a compact microprocessor-driven control system. This advanced system provides for flexible and efficient operation with precise power and flux control. It also allows permanent retention of all pertinent data. The power level of the UT-TRIGA is controlled by four control rods. Three of these rods, one regulating and two shim, are sealed stainless steel tubes containing powdered boron carbide followed by UZrH. As these rods are withdrawn, boron (a neutron absorber) leaves the core and UZrH (fuel) enters the core, increasing power. The fourth control rod, the transient rod, is a solid cylinder of borated graphite followed by air, clad in aluminum, and operated by pneumatic pressure to permit pulse operation. The sudden ejection of the transient rod produces an immediate burst of power.

_i W F

Figure 1-4 TRIGA Reactor Detail 1-8

2003 NETL Annual Report Experiment Facilities The experimental and irradiation facilities of the TRIGA Mark II reactor arc extensive and versatile. Experimental tubes can easily be installed in the core region to provide facilities for high-level irradiations or small in-core experiments. Areas outside the core and reflector are available for large experiment equipment or facilities.

The reactor is equipped with a central thimble for access to the point of maximum flux in the core. The central thimble consists of an aluminum tube that fits through the center hole of the top and bottom grid plates. Experiments with the central thimble include irradiation of small samples and the exposure of materials to a collimated beam of neutrons or gamma rays.

A rotary multiple-position specimen rack located in a well in the top of the graphite reflector provides for batch production of radioisotopes and for the activation and irradiation of multiple samples. When rotated, all forty positions in the rack are exposed to neutron fluxes of the same intensity. Samples are loaded from the top of the reactor through a tube into the rotary rack using a specimen lifting device. A rack design feature provides pneumatic pressure for insertion and removal of samples from the sample rack positions.

A pneumatic transfer system permits applications with short-lived radioisotopes. The in-core tenminus of the system is normally located in the outer ring of fuel element positions, a region of high neutron flux. The sample capsule (rabbit) is conveyed to a sender-receiver station via pressure differences in the tubing system. An optional transfer box pennits the sample to be sent and received from one to three different sender-receiver stations.

Special cadmium-lined facilities have been constructed that utilize an internal area of the core created by removing three fuel elements.

Beam Port Facilities Five neutron beam ports penetrate the concrete biological shield and reactor water tank at core level. These beam ports were designed with different characteristics to accommodate a wide variety of experiments. Specimens may be placed inside a beam port or outside the beam port in a neutron beam from the beam port. When a beam port is not in use, special shielding reduces the radiation levels outside the concrete biological shield to safe values. This shielding consists of an inner shield plug, outer shield plug, lead-filled shutter, and circular steel cover plate.

1-9

I 2003 NETL Annual Report Beam Port (BP) #1 is connected to BP #5, end to end, to form a through beam port. The through beam port penetrates the graphite reflector tangential to the reactor core, as seen in Figure 1-6. This configuration allows introduction of specimens adjacent to the reactor core to gain access to a high neutron flux, allows access from either side of the concrete biological shield, and can provide beams of thermal neutrons with relatively low fast-neutron and gamma-ray contamination.

Beam Port #2 is a tangential beam port, terminating at the outer edge of the reflector.

However, a void in the graphite reflector extends the effective source of neutrons into the reflector to provide a thermal neutron beam with minimum fast-neutron and gamma-ray backgrounds. Beam Port #2 is out of commission due to Reflector flooding.

Beam Port #3 is a radial beam port. The beam port pierces the graphite reflector and terminates at the inner edge of the reflector. This beam port permits access to a position adjacent to the reactor core, and can provide a neutron beam with relatively high fast-ncutron and gamma-ray fluxes. Beam Port #3 contains the Texas Cold Neutron Source Facility.

Beam Port #4 is a radial beam port which also terminates at the outer edge of the reflector. A void in the graphite reflector extends the effective source of neutrons to the reactor core. This configuration is useful for neutron-beam experiments which require neutron energies higher than thermal energies. Beam Port #4 is out of commission due to Reflector flooding.

A neutron beam coming from a beam port may be modified by using collimators, moderators and neutron filters. Collimators are used to limit beam size and beam divergence.

Moderators are used to change the energy of neutron beams (e.g., cold moderator). Filters allow neutrons in selected energy intervals to pass through while attenuating neutrons with other energies.

1-10

2003 NETL Annual Report Table 1-1 Physical Dimensions of Standard Beam Ports Beam Port BP# 1, BP#2, BP#4 At Core:

At Exit:

BP #3, BP#5 At Core:

At Exit:

Port Diameter 6 in.

8 in.

6 in.

8 in.

10 in.

16 in.

15.24 cm 20.32 cm 15.24 cm 20.32 cm 25.40 cm 40.64 cm B P #3 IIP #4 Bip #s 11l' #1 Figure 1-5 Beam Ports 1-11

2003 NETL Annual Report 1.4 Nuclear Engineering Academic Program The Nuclear Engineering Program (NE) at The University of Texas at Austin is located within the Mechanical Engineering Department. The Program's undergraduate degree is the Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering, Nuclear Engineering Option. It is best described as a major in Mechanical Engineering with a minor in Nuclear Engineering. As such, all Mechanical Engineering degree requirements must be met.

The Program's graduate degrees are completely autonomous; they are Master of Science in Engineering (Concentration in Nuclear Engineering) and Doctor of Philosophy (Concentration in Nuclear Engineering). Course requirements for these degrees and the qualifying examination for the Ph.D. are separate and distinct from other areas of Mechanical Engineering. A Dissertation Proposal and Defense of Dissertation are also required for the Ph.D. degree and are acted on by a NE dissertation committee.

Of the five undergraduate Nuclear Engineering courses and the dozen graduate Nuclear Engineering courses, five courses make extensive use of the reactor facility. Table 1-3 lists the courses that use the reactor and its experiment facilities.

Table 1-3 Nuclear Engineering Courses Undergraduate ME 361F Instrumentation and Methods ME 361 G Reactor Operations and Control ME 177K Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Concepts Graduate ME 388R.3 Kinetics and Dynamics of Nuclear Systems ME 389R.1 Nuclear Engineering Laboratory ME 389R.2 Nuclear Analytical Measurement Techniques ME 397M Radioactive Waste Management ME 337D Radiation and Radiation Protection In addition to these formal classes the NETL often provides short, one day short courses or tours for Texas agencies, high schools and the Boy Scouts of America. The NETL has participated in the IAEA Fellowship programs for over five years. Several Fellows and Visiting Scientists spend 3-6 months at the NETL per year.

1-12

2003 NETL Annual Report 1.5 NETL Divisionis The Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory operates as a unit of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas. Figure 1-8 shows the responsibility line organization of the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory. The staff includes the Health Physics and Reactor Operations to support the Experimenter and Users groups and to insure compliance with all licensed activities.

The Operation and Maintenance Division (OMD) is responsible for the safe and effective operations of the TRIGA nuclear reactor. Activities of OMD include neutron and gamma irradiation service, operator/engineering training courses, and teaching reactor short courses.

Director l

Laboratory Manager L

Health Physicist and Research Support I

l7 Technicians I

. j Faculty and Facility Users Associate I

Director Administrative and Clerical Staff Reactor Supervisor lEronics Technician Reactor Operators Figure 1-6 NETL Staff Organization Reactor Operations and Maintenance The role of these individuals is the routine maintenance and safe operation of the TRIGA Mark II Research Reactor. With the assistance of the NETL licensed operators, Health Physicists 1-13

2003 NETL Annual Report and Electronics Technician this division performs most of the work necessary to meet the Technical Specifications of the reactor license. Personnel implement modifications to reactor systems and furnish design assistance for new experiment systems. The reactor operators may operate standard reactor experiment facilities.

Services provided to other divisions at the laboratory include assistance in the areas of initial experiment design, fabrication, and setup. Maintenance, repair support, and inventory control of computer, electronic, and mechanical equipment is also provided. Building systems maintenance is also coordinated by the OMD. Other activities include scheduling and coordination of facility tours.

Laboratorv and Research Activities The principal objectives of the Laboratory research staff involve support of the research and educational missions of the university at large. Elemental measurements using instrumental neutron activation analysis provide nuclear analytical support for individual projects ranging from student project support for classes to measurements for faculty research projects. Project support is in the areas of engineering, chemistry, physics, geology, biology, zoology, and other areas. Research project support includes elemental measurements for routine environmental and innovative research projects. In the area of education, the division, with available state-of-the-art equipment, helps stimulate the interest of students to consider studies in the areas of science and engineering. Education in the irradiation and measurement of radioactivity is presented to college, high school and other student groups in class demonstrations or on a one-on-one basis.

The neutron activation analysis technique is made available to different state agencies to assist with quality control of sample measurements. Analysis of samples for the presence of various elements and measurements of environmental effects assists detection of toxic elements.

Radiation measurement systems available include several high purity germanium detectors with relative efficiencies ranging from 20 to 40%. The detectors are coupled to several Canberra and ORTEC PC-based systems. Two of the detectors are equipped with an automatic sample changer for full-time (i.e., 24 hrs a day) utilization of the counting equipment. One detector operates in a Compton Gamma Ray Suppression System that provides improved low background measurements. A PC based acquisition and analysis system supports the analysis of Compton Suppression spectra and short half-life nuclear reaction.

1-14

2003 NETL Annual Report The group also manages the use of the five beam ports. Experiments at the beam ports may be permanent systems which function for periods in excess of one or two years or temporary systems. Temporary systems function once or for a few months, and generally require removal and replacement as part of the setup and shutdown process. The reactor bay contains floor space for each of the beam ports. Available beam paths range from 6 meters (20 ft) to 12 meters (40 fit).

The objectives of the research function are to apply nuclear methods at the forefront of modem technology and to investigate fundamental issues related to nuclear physics and condensed matter. Another mission of the division is to obtain new, funded research programs to promote the capabilities of the neutron beam projects division for academic, government and industrial organizations and/or groups.

The Laboratory Manager is responsible for coordinating all phases of a project, beginning with the proposal and design, proceeding to the fabrication and testing, and concluding with the operation, evaluation and dismantlement.

Projects available at NETL are the Texas Cold Neutron Source, Neutron Depth Profiling, Neutron Guide and Focusing System, Prompt Gamma Activation Analysis Neutron Radiography and Texas Intense Positron Source.

The Laboratory Management group is also responsible for radiation safety and protection of personnel at the NETL as well as the protection of the general public. The laws mandated by Federal and State government agencies are enforced at the facility through various measures. Health physics procedures have been developed that are facility-specific to ensure that all operations comply with the regulations. Periodic monitoring for radiation and contamination assures that the use of the reactor and radioactive nuclides is conducted safely with no hazard to personnel outside of the facility. Personnel exposures are always maintained ALARA ("as low as is reasonably achievable"). This practice is consistent with the mission of the NETL.

Collateral duties of the Health Physics group include the inventory and monitoring of hazardous materials, and environmental health.

The Laboratory and Health Physics group consists of one full time Health Physicist/Nuclear Laboratory Manager with part-time student support. The Health Physicist is functionally responsible to the Management of the NETL and the Department Chairman, but maintains a reporting relationship to the University Radiation Safety Office. This arrangement allows the Health Physicist to operate independent of NETL operations constraints to insure that safety is not compromised. One or more part-time Undergraduate Research Assistant (URA) 1-15

2003 NETL Annual Report may assist as Health Physics Technicians. The URA reports to the Health Physicist and assists with technical tasks including periodic surveys, equipment maintenance, equipment calibration, and record keeping.

The Laboratory Safety Group provides radiation monitoring, personnel exposure monitoring, and educational activities. Personnel for whom permanent dosimeters are required must attend an eight hour course given by the Health Physicist. This course covers basic radiation principles including general safety practices, and facility-specific procedures and rules.

Each trainee is given a guided tour of the facility to familiarize him with emergency equipment and to reinforce safety/emergency procedures. The group supports University educational activities through assistance to student experimenters in their projects by demonstration of the proper radiation work techniques and controls. The Health Physics group participates in emergency planning between NETL and the City of Austin to provide basic response requirements and conducts off-site radiation safety training to emergency response personnel such as the Hazardous Materials Division of the Fire Department, and Emergency Medical Services crews.

1-16

Chapter 2

2003 NETL Annual Report

-1.

2.0 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 2.1 Faculty, Staff, and Students Organization. The University administrative structure overseeing the NETL program is presented in Figure 2-1. A description follows, including titles and names of personnel, of the administration and committees that set policy important to NETL.

Radiation Safety Committee President University of Texas at Austin Executive Vice President and Provost

,i Dean College of Engineering L

Nuclear Reactor Committee Chairman Department of Mechanical Engineering Director Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Figure 2 University Administrative Structure over NETL Administration. The University of Texas at Austin is one campus of 15 campuses of the University of Texas System. As the flagship campus, UT Austin consists of 16 separate colleges and schools. The College of Engineering consists of six engineering departments with separate degree programs. NETL is one of several education and research functions within the college.

2-1

2003 NETL Annual Report Table 2-1 and Table 2-2 list The University of Texas System Board of Regents which is the governing organization and the pertinent administrative officials of The University of Texas at Austin.

Table 2-1 The University of Texas System Board of Regents for 2003 Chairman Vice Chairman Vice Chairman Vice Chairman Executive Secretary UT System Chancellor C. Miller W. Hunt R.C. Clements C. T. Krier F. A. Frederick M. G. Yudof Table 2-2 The University of Texas at Austin Administration President Larry R. Faulkner Executive Vice President and Provost ad interim Dean of College of Engineering Chairman of Department of Mechanical Engineering Sheldon Ekland-Olson Benjamin Streetman Joseph J. Beaman 2-2

2003 NETL Annual Report Radiation Safety Committee.

The Radiation Safety Committee convenes to review radiological safety practices at the University during each academic term.

The committee composition is shown in Table 2-3. Committee general responsibilities are review of activities of University research programs that utilize radiation source materials.

Table 2-3 2003 Radiation Safety Committee Chair Member Member Member Member Member Ex officio member Ex officio member J.M. Sanchez G. Hoffmann S.A. Monti J. Robertus B.G. Sanders D. J. O'Kelly S.Pennington E. Janssen Nuclear Reactor Committee. The Nuclear Reactor Committee convenes to review the activities related to facility operation during each quarter of the calendar year. The committee composition is shown in Table 2-4. Committee general responsibilities are review of reactor operation and associated activities.

Table 2-4 Nuclear Reactor Committee Chairman Member Member Member Member Member Ex officio member Ex officio member Ex officio member Ex officio member Ex officio member K. Ball S. Biegalski R.T. Johns H. M. Liljestrand S. Landsberger S. Pennington J. Beaman R. J. Charbeneau D. J. O'Kelly M. Krause D. S. O'Kelly 2-3

2003 NETL Annual Report Table 2-5 NETL Personnel NETL Facility Staff Director Associate Director Reactor Supervisor Laboratory and Safety Manager Research Associate (Positron)

Research Associate (NAA/Rad Effects)

Electronics Technician/Reactor Operator Reactor Operator Health Physics Technician Administrative Associate S.Landsberger D. S. O'Kelly M.G. Krause D. J O'Kelly B. Hurst S. Aghara L. Welch J. Hedlund D. Tillman J.L. Wiley NRE Faculty S. Biegalski D.E. Klein S. Landsberger 2-4

2003 NETL Annual Report Funding. NETL funding is provided by state appropriations, research grants, and service activities. Research funding supplements the base budget provided by the State and is obtained mostly through the process of competitive project proposals.

Funds from service activities supplement the base funds to allow the facility to provide quality data acquisition and analysis capabilities.

Both sources of supplemental funds, research projects and service activities, contribute to the education and research environment for students.

Innovations in Nuclear Infrastructure and Education (INIE). The NETL received a significant grant in 2002 in a partnership with Texas A&M University, The University of Newv Mexico and Sandia National Laboratories. This five-year grant will enable the facilities to acquire advanced experimental equipment and provide shared resources within the so-called Southwest Consortium.

2-5

2003 NETL Annual Report NETL/NRE Research 2003

1. Developed time-integrated proliferation resistance methodology for nuclear fuiel cycles (DOE)

2. Determine the effects of internal country monitoring on the illicit trafficking of nuclear materials through the newly independent states (namely Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, and Georgia) (LANL)

3. Development of stochastic network models to study nuclear smuggling routes in Russia for the U.S. DOE Second Line of Defense (SLD) project (managed through DOE/NN-50/Office of Security Affairs)

4. Performed two month training program for Moroccan Reactor Operators as part of the DOE Sister Laboratory International Program (LLNL/CNESTEN)

5. Radiation shielding testing of advanced tungsten composite materials to reduce environmental hazards of lead shielding (Ecomass Technologies)

6. Radiation shielding tests and modeling of composite gloves for handling transuranic materials (LANL)

7.

Tensile strength degradation of composite shielding gloves from high alpha and neutron doses (LANL)

8. Trace impurities and iodine background levels in groundwater (Illinois Geological Survey)

9. Neutron Activation Analysis (NAA) of travertine and anthracite from Civil War-era ships for nautical archaeology.

10. NAA of plant materials and soils to determine Arsenics and Antimony pollution levels on U.S/Mexico border (UT Pan Am)

11. Germanium compounds irradiated to produce Arsenic products for tumor therapy for the UT Medical Branch at Dallas

12. Heavy-metal particulate pollution levels over Russian smelters (NOAA)

13. Particulate atmospheric pollution levels over Finland (U of Alaska/NOAA)

14. Prompt gamma activation analysis of carbon composite flywheels (NASA/UT)

15. Radiation damage modeling of integrated chip packaging materials (Texas A&M/Texas Instruments) 2-6

2003 NETL Annual Report

16. Prompt gamma activation analysis of hydrogen in electrochemical batteries

17. NAA of Archaeological Artifacts (UT Middle Eastern Studies)

Other projects and descriptions are given below:

South Texas Projects, "Hydrodynamic Analysis For Circulating Water System For The South Texas Project Units I And 2 (Cda)", Steven Biegalski, Kenneth Ball, Sheldon Landsberger,

$45,304, New, (6/1/2003-5/31/2004).

The Circulating Water System (CWS) at South Texas Plant (STP) has experienced problems of frequent valve disc flutter. The 96" butterfly valve flutter caused valve and pump failures at various times. The Objective of this work is to establish a hydraulic model for the CWS system so that following items can be resolved.

Veridian Corporation, "Multiple Isotope Contribution Analysis (MICA) Software Tool",

$19,077, New, Steven Biegalski (2/l/2003-1/31/2004).

This work encompasses the design, development, and testing of the Multiple Isotope Contribution Analysis (MICA) software tool. MICA is a new software concept that involves the deconvolution of a sample signal, possibly containing multiple isotopic signatures, into the signal contributions from single isotopes. Detector-specific "shape-files" stored for each possible isotope will be used in the deconvolution. The shape-files will be generated using actual radioisotope sources counted using the specific detector, or they will be created using modeling techniques like the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) code. The geometry and materials of the detector must be known to produce good shape files. Because only 5 different isotopes are detected in xenon samples, the matrix deconvolution solution will be a reasonable goal.

Sandia National Laboraotory, "NuGET Experiment Validation", Sheldon Landsberger, Steven Biegalski, and William Charlton,

$40,000, New, (6/1/2003-9/30/2003).

Experimental data quantifying the absolute yields for prompt y-rays was gathered for six foil samples: aluminum, tungsten, tantalum, Cu/Ag alloy, stainless steel, and Hastelloy. Foils of each material with a thickness of 0.05-mm were used. The foils were irradiated in beam port #3 (BP#3) at the University of Texas Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory. BP#3 houses a prompt y-ray activation analysis (PGAA) system consisting of a guided neutron beam, sample positioning system, beam monitor, and high-purity germanium detector (HPGe). The HPGe was used to collect prompt y-ray spectra from each of the three foils. Analysis of these spectra resulted in the identification and quantification of over twenty different prompt y-ray lines for each element. The system was then modeled in MCNP and the experimental results were compared to the modeled results.

2-7

2003 NETL Annual Report Sandia National Laboratory, "Computational Support for Safe Operations of SNL's Nuclear Reactors", Steven Biegalski and Sheldon Landsberger Sheldon Landsberger, $50,000, New, (6/1/2003-5/31/2004).

The Sandia Pulsed Reactor (SPR) exhibits unique fuel temperature feedback characteristics. The time duration of pulse is approximately 1000 times faster than a TRIGA reactor. In addition, the SPR pulse creates asymmetric energy deposition due to the fast energy deposition rate and unusual fuel geometry, an asymmetric temperature profile develops in the fuel. Heat transfer analysis indicates this profile does not "flatten" for as much as 10 seconds after a large pulse.

This project uses a hybrid Monte Carlo and discrete ordinates approach to model the SPR pulse and the negative fuel temperature coefficient of reactivity.

Los Alamos National Laboratory, "Development of a Prototype Design for an Automated System Able to do Required Chemistry and Preparation of a Sample Suitable for Analysis", with Sheldon Landsberger, S222,486, New, (06/01/2003-09/30/2004).

This contract combines two projects. The first project is the prototype design for an automated actinide analysis system. The second project involves counting room support.

In the event of a nuclear event on US soil, the national laboratories will collect samples of the debris and analyze that debris to try to understand the composition of the fuel in the device as well as the technological development that the device represents. UT is developing an automated system to obtain analytical results in the field in a timely manner.

The counting room support aspect of this contract is aimed to provide efficiency calibrations for a large number of the LANL Ge detectors. The current LANL method of establishing efficiency calibrations for HPGe detectors involves a number of separate steps to arrive at a point-wise table of efficiencies for each combination of detector, sample height, and sample type. With a large number of detectors, sample heights, and sample types, this task is difficult and time consuming.

Often it is difficult or impossible to calibrate the number of combinations that is needed.

Efficiency calibrations are calculated with computer models to provide a database of all possible counting geometries on all the detectors.

2-8

2003 NETL Annual Report 2.2 Education and Training Activities Tours and special projects are available to promote public awareness of nuclear energy issues. Tours of the NETL facility are routine activities of NETL staff and students. A typical tour is a general presentation for high school and civic organizations. Other tours given special consideration are demonstrations for interest groups such as physics, chemistry and science groups.

A total of 2956 visitors were given access to the facility during the reporting period. The total includes tour groups, official visitors, and facility maintenance personnel. Tours for 25 groups with an average 20 persons/group were taken through the facility during the reporting period. This is a significant increase in the number of tours for education.

The NETL typically hosts three international visitors on JAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Fellowships a year.

In 2003, two Reactor Operator trainees from Morocco worked at the Lab to prepare for the construction and eventual criticality of a new TRIGA facility near Rabat, Morocco.

2-9

2003 NETL Annual Report 2.3 Research Acitivities Beam Port 2 Area Co-58 Positron Concentrator A project under development with the UT Physics Department utilizes this controlled area to produce a beam of neutrons from a large area Cobalt-58 source. The project is still under development but may produce an intense beam with relatively low specific activity for materials studies.

The BP2 Neutron Beam is filtered with a sapphire crystal to provide a highly thenmal neutron beam with a low fast neutron component. This beam may be developed in the future following replacement of the reactor reflector.

Texas Cold Neutron Source The Texas Cold Neutron Source (TCNS) is located in one of the radial beam ports (BP

1. 3) and consists of a cold source system and a neutron guide system. The facility was originally constructed using Texas Advance Research Program funding but later improvements were funded by the Department of Energy or using internal NETL sources.

The cold source system includes a cooled moderator, a heat pipe, a cryogenic refrigerator, a vacuum jacket, and connecting lines. Eighty milliliters of mesitylene moderator is maintained by the cold source system at -36 K in a chamber within the reactor graphite reflector.

Mesitylene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, was selected for the cold moderator because it has been shown to be an effective and safe cold moderator. The moderator chamber for the mesitylene is a 7.5 cm diameter right-circular cylinder 2.0 cm thick.

The neon heat pipe (properly called thermosyphon) is a 3-m long aluminum tube which is used for cooling the moderator chamber.

The heat pipe contains neon as the working fluid that evaporates at the moderator chamber and condenses at the cold head.

Cold neutrons coming from the moderator chamber are transported by a 2-in-long neutron guide inside the beam port and a 4-m-long neutron guide (two 2-m sections) outside the beam port. Both the internal neutron guide and the external neutron guide are curved with a radius of curvature equal to 300 m. To block line-of-sight radiation streaming in the guides, the cross-sectional area of the guides is separated into three channels by 1-mm-thick vertical walls. All reflecting surfaces are coated with Ni-58.

The TCNS system provides a low background subthermal neutron beam for neutron reaction and scattering research. Installation and testing of the external curved neutron guides, the shielding structure, neutron focusing and a Prompt Gamma Activation Analysis facility are 2-10

2003 NETL Annual Report completed. The only other operating reactor cold neutron source in the United States is at the National Institute of Standards and Technology and uses liquid hydrogen. At least four major centers for cold neutron research exist in Europe, with another two in Japan.

The TCNS was upgraded this past year with a larger cryorefrigerator, cold head and instrumentation system.

The larger refrigerator (22 watts from 4 watts) should cool the thermosyphon system faster and produce a more rapid cooldown and better thernal control at higher reactor powers. The automatic control system (shown below) will provide alamls and automatic shutdowns if normal parameters are exceeded.

-~~;

.=-___

au__ E' I I42?63isl File Optbns Hlp Tietrrocouvle 1 (A)

=

I 2938*

I 120 7heimmooiple 2 NK 29 710 Owlnr Ki 1

E9iIIIII 1111151

'0-Cold Head j

K II 93ll Heat Pipe o f

293 4 20-tleLine psigJ 2 9 3.3-l

.025 00 09:25:01 0815.00 M. 25 01 Mesitylene (psSi 77W.~.,

e MI L

S le.010 I G 1 lorll0 CG. 1 (torly

[FJZ1 t

+

3 G.

2 (ler

_109 200009

,4e*009-

_100 0-I>

2e+009 -

Gae Ie Gale2 2 l

Cbsed Cleed 0 a-1 0

1 08.25 00 092X 01 0D 25&00 09.25 01 G}

3 l

rapi.

Logging Open Opn _!

C51earl Log ngTo..

\\10SO40322.t

_1.

Figure 2-2 TCNS Control and Instrumentation Console Prompt Gamma Activation Analysis Facility The UT-PGAA facility utilizes the focused cold-neutron beam from the Texas Cold Neutron Source.

The PGAA sample is located at the focal point of the converging guide focusing system. The use of a guided focused cold-neutron beam provides a higher capture 2-11

2003 NETL Annual Report reaction rate and a lower background at the sample-detector area as compared to other facilities using filtered thermal neutron beams.

The UT-PGAA facility has been designed taking into account the advantage of the low background.

The following criteria have been used during the design: a) The structure and shielding materials for the UT-PGAA facility were chosen to minimize the background contribution for elements to be detected in the samples to be studied. b) The sample handling system was designed to be versatile to permit the study of a wide range of samples with quick and reproducible sample positioning with a minimum of material close to the samples. The shielding was improved to reduce the hydrogen capture gamma ray background A 25% efficient gamma-ray detector in a configuration with an offset-port dewar wvas purchased to be used at the UT-PGAA facility. The detector was selected in order to incorporate a Compton suppression system at a later date. A gamma-spectrum analysis system with 16,000 channels is used for data acquisition and processing.

The applications of the UT-PGAA will include: i) determination of B and Gd concentration in biological samples which are used for Neutron Capture Therapy studies, ii) determination of H and B impurity levels in metals, alloys, and semiconductor, iii) multielemental analysis of geological, archeological, and environmental samples for determination of major components such as Al, S, K, Ca, Ti, and Fe, and minor or trace elements such as H, B, V, Mn, Co, Cd, Nd, Sm, and Gd, and iv) multielemental analysis of biological samples for the major and minor elements H, C, N, Na, P, S, Cl, and K, and trace elements like B and Cd.

1.E+01 1.E+00 i

0 0

I)

C',

0 C.

I 1

FI 1 CN E.02

.E.03

.E.04 0

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 Energy [keV]

Figure 2-3 PGAA Spectra of Carbon Composite Flywheel 2-12

2003 NETL Annual Report Neutron Radiographv Facility The Neutron Radiography Facility at Beam Port 5 had not been significantly modified in the past 5 years.

This changed in 2003 as Dr. Stephan Biegalski began to use the existing radiography camera, upgraded the image capture boards and PC image analysis software and purchased'a much improved neutron imaging system from NOVA Scientific based on Micro-Channel Plate technology. The system is still under initial testing but expected resolutions are on the order of 50 microns.

Figure 2-4 MCP Neutron Imaging Detector (NOVA Scientific)

Texas Intense Positron Source A reactor-based slow positron beam facility is being fabricated at the Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory (NETL). The facility (Texas Intense Positron Source) will be one of a few reactor-based slow positron beams in the world when completed. The Texas Intense Positron Source consists of a copper source, a source transport system, a combined positron moderator/remoderator assembly, a positron beam line and a sample chamber.

High energy positrons from the source will be slowed down to a few eV by a tungsten foil moderator that also acts as a remoderator to reduce the beam size to enable beam transport to a target for experimentation.

The beam will be electrostatically guided and will deliver about 108 positrons/sec in the energy range of 0 - 50 keV.

Reactor-based positron beams utilizing a copper source have been implemented at Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands. There are several differences between TIPS and these reactor based positron beams. The source/moderator array of the Delft positron beam is located inside one of the neutron beam ports of their reactor and the positron beam is transported out of the reactor and then remoderated before it enters into an experimental chamber.

2-13

2003 NETL Annual Report Based on general experience on reactor based positron sources, we have decided that the moderator/remoderator assembly and the positron beam optics should be entirely outside the reactor biological shield. A source transport system will be placed in a 4 meter aluminum system for low activation that will be inserted into one of the neutron beam ports of the NETL 1-MW TRIGA Mark II research reactor. The transport system will be used to move the source to the irradiation location and out of the biological shield. The source will be moved away from the neutron beam line to an ultra high vacuum (at around 10-10 torr) chamber, where the moderator assembly is located. The transporter, load-lock transfer sytem and ultra high vacuum systems will be separated by gate valves.

The copper source of TIPS will be irradiated across from the core in the graphite reflector, in the middle section of the through port (BPI-BP5). The isotope 6 4Cu formed by neutron capture in 6 3Cu (69 % in natural copper) has a half life of 12.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br />, and the branching ratio for b + emission is 19 %. Our current source design consists of copper electroplated thinly onto a carbon backing. This source minimizes the unnecessary activation products because the positrons produced are relatively near the surface of the copper and may be ejected for moderation and beam focus.

Preliminary designs and construction of the source transport system are completed. The source transport system will use carbon fiber cord to move a sample carriage out near the reactor and back with minimal activation of transport components.

The positron source may be transferred with remote tools into the system Load-Lock device.

Cu-64 Load Locking System (top view)

Radlolsotopc Prep. Chamber LcdLokTanipo~rter Source Chamber Figure 2-5 TIPS Load-Lock Source Transfer System 2-14

2003 NETL Annual Report The Load-Lock will maintain the primary source chamber at ultra-high vacuum while permitting source transfer at atmospheric pressures.

The design and construction of the copper source, moderator assembly, and the positron beam optics are completed and testing of these components are currently in progress. The high-intensity low-energy positron beam of TIPS will be applied to defect characterization of metals, semiconductors, and polymers. The first planned experimental use will be to evaluate new low density, high k insulators for the semiconductor industry and industrial coatings.

TIPS Positron Annihilation Spectrometer (PAS)

Figure 2-6 TIPS Positron Detection System 2-15

2003 NETL Annual Report Other Proiects at the NETI, Neutrino Mass Experiment The UT Physics Department has obtained an NSF grant to investigate the theoretical mass of the neutrino. The neutrino is classically considered to be a massless particle but some theories dispute this and leave the potential for a mass (although very small). The NETL has a large shielded room that is being refurbished to house this five-year experiment.

Radiochemistry Laboratorv The Department of Energy provided initial funding to equip and develop a graduate-level radiochemistry laboratory to encourage students to enter this field and replace retiring radio chemists in the DOE laboratories.

Dr. Sheldon Landsberger and Dr. Donna O'Kelly have prepared several laboratories and several students are now working on projects directly sponsored by Los Alamos National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories. The laboratory consist of state-of-the-art Alpha Spectroscopy Systems, Liquid Scintillation Counting System and several High Resolution Gamma Counting Systems.

Figure 2-7, Room 3.106 Radiochemistry Laboratory 2-16

2003 NETL Annual Report 2.4 Publications, Reports, and Papers Reports, publications, and presentations on research done at NETL are produced each year by NETL personnel. The following list documents research done by NETL faculty, staff, and students during the reporting period.

Dr.Sheldon Landsberger:

Chapter in Books.

1. Landsberger, S. "Recent Developments in Neutron Activation Analysis: 1997-2002", in "Radioanalytical Methods in Interdisciplinary Research" American Chemical Society Symposium Series 868, ed. Laue and Nash, 2003.

Articles in Journals

1.

Landsberger, S. and C. Mann, "Determination and Correlation of 137Cs and unsupported 210Pb activities in soil", J. Radioanal. Nuc. Chem.. (2003).

2.

Dodoo-Amoo, D., S. Landsberger, J. M. Macdonald and J. M. Castro, "Development of Composite Materials for Non-Leaded Gloves Use in Radiological Hand Protection" Journal of Health Physics 84, 737-746 (2003).

3.

Yli-Tuomi, T., L. Venditte, P. K. Hopke, S Basunia, S. Landsberger, Y. Viisanen and J.

Paatero "Composition of the Finnish Arctic Aerosol: Collection and Analysis in Historic Air Filters", Atmos. Environ. 37 2355-2364 (2003).

4.

Yli-Tuomi T., P. K. Hopke, P. Paatero, M.S. Basunia, S. Landsberger, Y. Viisancn and J.

Paatero, "Atmospheric aerosol over Finnish Artic: Source Analysis by Multilinear Engine and the Potential Source Contribution Function", Atmos. Environ., 37 4381-4392 (2003).

5.

Basunia, M. S., S. Landsberger, Yli-Tuomi, P.K. Hopke, P. Wishinski, J. Paatero and Y.

Viisanen "Ambient Silver Concentration Anomaly in the Finnish Arctic Lowver Atmosphere", Environ. Sci. Technol., 37Z 5537-5544 (2003).

Conference Proceedings

1. Landsberger, S., E. Strassberg and K. Schmidt, "Animation of Nuclear and Radiochemistry Processes", paper #1341, pages 1-13, American Association of Engineering Education, 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, TN.

2. Landsberger, S., D. J. O'Kelly and L. Katz, "Development of a PhD Radiochemistry Program at the University of Texas at Austin" paper # 1342, pages 1-7 American Association of Engineering Education, 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, TN.

2-17

2003 NETL Annual Report

3.

Landsberger, S., "An Undergraduate Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Option within the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Undergraduate Radiation Physics Option within the Department of Physics", Trans. ANS, 883-884 (2003).

4. Biegalski, S. R., T. C. Green, G. A. Sayre, W. C. Charlton, S. Landsberger "Flux Weighted Efficiency Calculations at The University of Texas at Austin PGAA Facility" Trans. ANS, 89_(2003)

5. Landsberger, S., K. Jackman and S. R. Biegalski "Radiochemistry Training in Counting Statistics using Excel Files" Trans. ANS 89, 792-793 (2003)

6. Landsberger, S. D. J. O'Kelly, G. Robinson and Y. Ben-Shahar "Determination of Lowv-Level Manganese Concentrations in Honeybee Brains and its Influence in Food Gathering" Trans. ANS, 89 709-710 (2003)

7. Landsberger, S., D. J. O'Kelly and S. Panno "Determination of Bromine, Chlorine, and Iodine in Environmental Aqueous Samples by Epithermal Neutron Activation Analysis and Compton Suppression" Trans. ANS 89 735-736(2003)

8. Landsberger, S. and E. Strassberg, "A Web-Based Graduate Course in Nuclear and Radiochemistry" Trans. ANS, 89 889-890 (2003)

Oral Presentations

1. MacPherson, G. L, J. C. Johnson, S. Landsberger, M. C. Ketterer and L. Gato, "Nonradiaoctive Cesium and Rubidium as Analogs for CS-137 Behavior in Soil at the Konza Prarie LTER Site, North Eastern Kansa, USA, Annual Meeting Geological Society of America, November 2-5, Seattle, Washington., 2003 Dr. Stephan Bicalski:

PUBLICATIONS - PEER REVIEWED JOURNALS

0. Doron and S. R. Biegalski "Positron Research Review," submitted for publication in the Journal of Radioanalytical and Nucelar Chemistry, 2004.

S. R. Biegalski and P. Hopke, "Total Potential Source Contribution Function Analysis of Trace Elements Found in Aerosol Samples Collected near Lake Huron," submitted to Envil o1onnienltal Science and Technology, 2003.

K. M. F. Biegalski, S. Biegalski, "Deconvolution of Three-Dimensional Beta-Gamma Coincidence Spectra from Xenon Sampling and Measurement Units Using Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction,"

accepted for publication in the Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Clheiistry, 2004.

2-18

2003 NETL Annual Report S. Biegalski, T. Vilarel, "Coorelations Between Atmospheric Aerosol Trace Element Concentrations and Red Tide at Port Aransas, TX On the Gulf of Mexico," accepted for publication in the Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear C'hemnistry, 2004.

S. Landsberger, S. Biegalski "Use of Coincident and Non-Coincident Gamma Rays in Compton Suppression Neutron Activation Analysis," accepted for publication in the Journal f Ra(lioanalytical and Nuclear Chenoisty, 2004.

PUBLICATIONS - PEER REVIEWED CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS S. R. Biegalski, T. C. Green, G. A. Sayre, W. C. Charlton, S. Landsberger, "Flux Weighted Efficiency Calculations at The University of Texas at Austin PGAA Facility, " Transactions of The American Nuclear Society, Vol. 89., 2003.

S. R. Biegalski, M. A. Griffin, and D. A. Haas, "Upgrade of The University of Texas Thermal Imaging Facility," Transactions of The American Nuclear Society, Vol. 89, 2003.

S. R. Biegalski, D. S. O' Kelly, " Adaptations to Classroom Learning for Incorporation of Distance Learning," Transactions of The American Nuclear Society, Vol. 89, 2003.

S. Landsberger, K. Jackman and S. R. Biegalski "Radiochemistry Training in Counting Statistics using Excel Files" Transactions of The American Nuclear Society, Vol. 89., 792-793 (2003)

Kendra M. F. Biegalski, S. R. Biegalski, "Deconvolution of Three-Dimensional Beta-Gamma Coincidence Spectra from Xenon Sampling and Measurement Units," Proceedings for the 25"' Seismic Research Symposium, 2003.

Biegalski, S.; Penn, D., "Calibration methods for environmental radioxenon measurements with beta -

gamma coincidence spectroscopy," Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Vol. 87, 497, 2002.

TALKS S. R. Biegalski, T. C. Green, G. A. Sayre, W. C. Charlton, S. Landsberger, "Flux Weighted Efficiency Calculations at The University of Texas at Austin PGAA Facility, " American Nuclear Society Winter Conference, New Orleans, LA, November 2003.

S. R. Biegalski, M. A. Griffin, and D. A. Haas, "Upgrade of The University of Texas Thermal Imaging Facility," American Nuclear Society Winter Conference, New Orleans, LA, November 2003.

S. R. Biegalski, D. S. O' Kelly, " Adaptations to Classroom Learning for Incorporation of Distance Learning," American Nuclear Society Winter Conference, New Orleans, LA, November 2003.

S. Biegalski, Sean O'Kelly, "Innovations for the University of Texas Reactor Laboratory Class to Accommodate Remote Learning, " ASEE Conference, Nashville, TN, 2003.

2-19

2003 NETL Annual Report K. M. F. Biegalski, S. Biegalski, "Deconvolution of Three-Dimensional Beta-Gamma Coincidence Spectra from Xenon Sampling and Measurement Units Using Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction,"

MARC VI Conference, Kona, III, 2003.

S. Biegalski, T. Vilarel, "Coorelations Between Atmospheric Aerosol Trace Element Concentrations and Red Tide at Port Aransas, TX On the Gulf of Mexico," MARC VI Conference, Kona, HI, 2003.

S. Landsberger, S. Biegalski "Use of Coincident and Non-Coincident Gamma Rays in Compton Suppression Neutron Activation Analysis," MARC VI Conference, Kona, HI, 2003.

Biegalski, S.; Penn, D., "Calibration methods for environmental radioxenon measurements with beta -

gamma coincidence spectroscopy," American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting 2002, Washington, D.C.

Other NETI, Staff and Student Publications, Presentations M. Gregson and W.S. Charlton, "Analysis of Radiation Detection Systems for Detecting the Illicit Trafficking of Nuclear Materials," accepted for publication to the Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry (2003).

S.K. Aghara, R.J. Fink, W.S. Charlton, B. Bhuva, M.R. Samadi, J.A. Ochoa, and J.R. Porter, "Degradation of Commercially Available DAC ICs in Mixed Degradation of Commercially Available DAC ICs in Mixed-Radiation Environment," presented at the 2003 IEEE Nuclear Space Radiation Effects Conference (NSREC), Monterey, CA, July 21-25, 2003.

W.S. Charlton, D.G. Ford, C. Gariazzo, and M. Whitaker, "Development of a Proliferation Resistance Analysis Methodology for Assessing Safeguards Effects in Fuel Cycles," presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Institute for Nuclear Materials Management, Phoenix, Arizona, July 14-18, 2003.

S.K. Aghara, W.S. Charlton, R. Fink, J.A. Ochoa, and J. Porter, "Fast Neutron Damage to Digital-to-Analog Converters in a Mixed Radiation Environment," Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 88, p.

63-65 (2003).

D.J. Dorsey, W.S. Charlton, and R. Hebner, "Experimental Measurements of Fiber Volume in Carbon Composites Using PGAA," Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 88, p. 664-665 (2003).

D.J. Dorsey and W.S. Charlton, "Experiments to Measure the Variations in the Neutron Flux Delivered by the Texas Cold Neutron Source," Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 88, p. 666-668 (2003).

M. Gregson and W.S. Charlton, "Analysis of Radiation Detection Systems for Detecting the Illicit Trafficking of Nuclear Materials," presented at the 6th International Conference on the Methods and Applications of Radioanalytical Chemistry (MARC VI), Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, April 7-11, 2003.

S. O'Kelly, M. Spellman, "Focusing on the Research Reactor as an Educational Resource ",

Trans. Vol. 89, Winter ANS Meeting, New Orleans, LA, Nov 16-20,2003.

2-20

2003 NETL Annual Report F. J. Davis, D.S. O'Kelly, "The Needfor a Nuclear Undergraduate Collaboration for Eduication Sharing, " Trans. Vol. 89, Winter ANS Meeting, New Orleans, LA, Nov 16-20, 2003.

Session Organizer, Innovations in Nuclear Infrastructure and Education Program Reviews, ANS 2004 Meeting, New Orleans, LA W. Charlton, DS O'Kelly, "Accelerator Driven Subcritical System Experiment Plan at Texas A&M University and Tile University of Texas" ISU Workshop on Accelerator Driven Subcritical Experiments, Idaho State University, August 21-22, 2003.

M.G. Krause, D.S. O'Kelly, "Design considerations for NETL Replacement Reflector; " 2003 Meeting of the Organization of Test, Research and Training Reactors, August 2003.

D.S. O'Kelly, "University of Texas at Austin INIE Progress Review: Year 1, - 2003 Meeting of the Organization of Test, Research and Training Reactors, August 2003.

S. Beigalski, S. O'Kelly, "Innovations for the University, of Texas Reactor Laboratory Class."

Proc. ASEE, Nashville, TN 2003.

D. S. O'Kelly, "The Innovations in Nuclear Infrastructure and Education Programn: Time Future of Nuclear Edulcation, " Proc. ASEE, Nashville, TN 2003.

D.S. O'Kelly, "The Southvwest Reactor and Research Consortiummi: A 21J' Centullm Collaboration. " Tran. Amer. Nuc. Soc. 2003.

2-21

Chapter 3

2003 NETL Annual Report 3.0 FACILITY OPERATING SUMMARIES 3.1 Operating Experience The UT-TRIGA reactor operated for 116 days in 2003. The reactor produced a total energy output of 400 MW-hrs during this period. The burnup per year in the eleven years of operation is shown in Figure 3-1.

Several experiments required 50% power or less so the burnup is less then what it would have been if the reactor were operating at fuill power.

I--

35.00 30.00 co 20.00

¢ 15.00 5 00

= 10.00

. - -nv 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 Year of Operation 7

Figure 3-1 History of Reactor Operations 3.2 Reactor Shutdowns The reactor safety system classifies protective action trips as one of three types, a limiting safety system (LSSS) trip, a limiting condition for operation (LCO) trip or a trip of the SCRAM manual switch. In the event the switch is used for a normal reactor shutdown, the operation is not considered a protective action shutdown. The following definitions in Table 3-1 classify the types of protective actions recorded.

3-1

2003 NETL Annual Report Table 3-1 Protective Action Definitions Protective Action Description Safety System Setting LSSS Condition for Operation LCO - (analog detection)

Setpoint corresponds to detection of limiting safety system setting.

Examples:

fuel temperature percent power Hardware action detects inoperable conditions within a safety channel or the instrument control and safety system.

Examples:

pool water level detector high voltage external circuit trips Software action detects inoperable conditions within a program function of the instrument control and safety system.

Examples:

watchdog timers program database errors Operator emergency shutdown Condition for Operation LCO - (digital detection)

Manual Switch (protective action)

Manual Switch (intentional operation)

Operator routine shutdown There were 13 safety system protective unscheduled shutdowns in 2003. Two of these were thermocouple spurious trips on Fuel Temperature Channel 1. Four scrams were caused by operator error while operating too close to a high power scram setpoint and four others were attributed to over insertion of reactivity during square wave mode (generally, considered operator errors). Two other scrams were a result of instrumentation fluctuations at high power. These scrams will be corrected by increasing the licensed high power limits in the near future.

3-2

• r 2003 NETL Annual Report SCRAM Log for 2003 SCRAM Fuel Temp 1 4/14/2003 @1kW - Spurrious spike in TC.

11/3/2003 @950kW - Spurrious spike in TC.

SCRAM %PWRI (NPP) 3/31/2003 Operator Error - watching NM instead of NP and NPP during rise in power.

8/25/2003 Operator Error @ 100% Power 8/29/2003 SCRAM during Square Wave - over-insertion of reactivity.

9/5/2003 SCRAM during Square Wave - over-insertion of reactivity.

SCRAM %PWR2 (NP) 3/13/2003 Operator Error - Rods not banked at 950kW 8/29/2003 SCRAM during Square Wave -- over-insertion of reactivity.

9/5/2003 SCRAM during Square Wave -- over-insertion of reactivity.

10/20/2003 Operator Error - Rods not banked at 950kW SCRAM NM% or HV 8/13/2003 Fluctuations in power @ 950kW 10/31/2003 Fluctuations in power @ 1MW SCRAM NP 1000 HV 8/29/2003 SCRAM during Square Wave - over-insertion of reactivity.

3.3 Utilization There were a significant number of sample irradiated and hours of operation during the reporting period compared to the previous 10 years of NETL operations. Four operators received new licenses during the year. The NETL staff continues to perform activation and analysis services as a public service and in support of the overall UT mission. Neutron activation analysis accounted for much of the reactor utilization time with teaching labs and beam port research projects making up the remainder. The Prompt Gamma Analysis System was in use for much of the year for student projects and a project with Sandia National Laboratory.

3.4 Routine Scheduled Maintenance All surveillances and scheduled maintenance were completed during the reporting year.

All results met or exceeded the limits of the Technical Specifications.

3-3

2003 NETL Annual Report 3.5 Facility Changes and Corrective Maintenance There were no significant facility changes or corrective maintenance during this reporting period at the NETL. All minor changes were reviewed by an SRO for application under 50.59.

3.6 Laboratory Inspections Inspections of laboratory operations are conducted by university and licensing agency personnel. Two committees, a Radiation Safety Committee and a Nuclear Reactor Committee, review operations of the NETL facility. The Nuclear Reactor Committee convened at the times listed in Table 3-6.

Table 3-6 Committee Meetings Nuclear Reactor Committee First Quarter January 29, 2003 Second Quarter April 17, 2003 Third Quarter September 17, 2003 Fourth Quarter No meeting Inspections by licensing agencies include federal license activities by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Nuclear Reactor Regulation Branch (NRR), and state license activities by the Texas Department of Health (TDH) Bureau of Radiation Control (BRC). NRC and TDH inspections were held at the times presented in Table 3-7.

Table 3-7 Dates of License Inspections License Dates R-129 February 2003 SNM-180 None L00485(48)

None 3-4

2003 NETL Annual Report Routine inspections by the Office of Environmental Health and Safety (OEHS) for compliance with university safety rules and procedures are conducted at varying intervals throughout the year. In response to safety concerns at other sites on the main campus, several additional OEHS inspections have been made. Inspections cover fire, chemical, and radiological hazards. No significant safety problems were found at NETL, which reflects favorably oln the positive safety culture for all hazard classes at the NETL. Safety concerns included such items as storage of combustibles, compressed gases, and fire extinguisher access.

3-5

2003 NETL Annual Report 3.7 Radiation Exposures A radiation protection program for the NETL facility provides monitoring for personnel radiation exposure, surveys of radiation areas and contamination areas, and measurements of radioactive effluents. Radiation exposures for personnel, building work areas and areas of the NETL site are shown in the following tables. Site area measurements include exterior points adjacent to the building and exterior points away from the building.

Table 3-8 summarizes NETL personnel dose exposure data for the calendar year. Figure 3-3 locates the building internal and external dosimetry sites. Dots locate fixed monitoring points within the building. Numbers identify the immediate site area radiation measurement points exterior to the building. These measurements do not indicate any measurable dose from work within the NETL building. Table 3-9 and Table 3-10 summarize doses recorded in facility work areas and the site areas.

Table 3-11 contains a list of the basic requirements and frequencies of measurements.

Additional measurement data is available from the State of Texas Department of Health.

The state agency records environmental radiological exposures at five sites in the vicinity of the research reactor site. Samples are also taken for analysis of soil, vegetation, and sanitary waste effluents.

3-6

2003 NETL Annual Report Table 3-8 Annual Summary of Personnel Radiation Doses Received Within the NETL Facility for 2003 Personnel Group Average Annual Dose (mrem)(1 )(6)

Greatest Individual Dose (mrem)(1 )(6)

Total Person mrem per Group (1)(6)

Whole Body DDE(2)

Lens of Eye LDE(3)

Extremities Whole Body Lens of Eye Extremities SDE(4)

DDE(2)

LDE(3)

SDE(4)

Whole Body DDE(2)

Lens of Eye LDE(3)

Extremities SDE(4)

Facility Operating 1.81 1.85 21.36 58 58 1195 165 168 1944 and Research Personnel Students 0.11 0.13 0.11 6

6 5

7 8

7 Visitors Film Badges/TLDMMMMMMMMM Visitors PD's (5) 0 NMA N/A 0

N/A N/A 0

N/A (1) 'M" indicates that each of the beta-gamma or neutron dosimeters during the reporting period was less than the vendor's minimum measurable quantity of 10 mrem for x and gamma rays and thermal neutrons, 40 mrem for energetic betas, and 20 mrem for fast neutrons. N/A" indicates that there was no extremity monitoring conducted or required for the group (2), (3), (4) Deep, Eye, and Shallow Dose Equivalents (DDE, LDE, and SDE respectively). DDE applies to external whole-body exposure and is the dose equivalent at a tissue depth of 1 cm (1000 mg/cm2). LDE applies to the external exposure of the eye lens and is taken as the dose equivalent at a tissue depth of 0.3 cm (300mg/cm2). SDE applies to skin or extremity exposure, and is the dose equivalent at a tissue depth of 0.007 cm (7mg/cm2) averaged over an area of 1 cm.

(5) PD's are pocket Ion chambers issued to persons who enter radioactive materials / restricted areas for periods of short duration, i.e., a few hours or days.

(6) Exposures were obtained from Daily Dosimeter Log sheets for DDE, and vendor dosimeter reports for LDE and SDE. LDE and SDE values do not consider September exposure due to postal x-raying during shipment during anthrax scare.

3-7

2003 NETL Annual Report ACCESS ROAD I

PARKING 1

3 0

2 6

4 S

S NETL 5

PARK I NG 1 Sidewalk, NETL facility front entrance 2 Reactor bay exterior wall, east 3 Reactor bay exterior wall, west 4 NETL power transformer 5 NETL service door 6 NETL roof stack Indicates location of dosimetry within the building SERV ICE DRIVE Figure 3-3 Environmental TLD Locations 3-8

2003 NETL Annual Report Table 3-9 Total Dose Equivalent Recorded on Area Dosimeters Located Within the NETL Facility 2003 Location in Reactor Facilitv Monitor ID Total Dose (mrem) n Shallow (1,2) b,c,x

(

4)

Deep (3)

Reactor Bay, North Wall 00277 142 137 135 Reactor Bay, East Wall 00278 203 204 196 Reactor Bay, West Wall 00279 35367 35357 35086 Water Treatment Room 00280 22322 22496 21508 Shield Area, Room 1.102 00281 1

1 M

Sample Processing, Room 3.102 00173 7

8 8

Gamma Spectroscopy Lab, 3.112 00174 M

M M

Radiation Experiment Lab, 3.106 00175 12 12 12 Reception Area, 2.102 00176 M

M M

Office, Room 3.104 00222 3

4 4

(1) The total recorded dose equivalent values reported in mrem do not include natural background contribution and reflect the summation of the results of 12 monthly beta, x-and gamma ray or neutron dosimeters for each location. A total dose equivalent of "M" indicates that each of the dosimeters during the period was below the vendor's minimum measureable quantity of 10 mrem for x and gamma rays, 40 mrem for energetic betas, 20 mrem for fast neutrons, and 10 mrem for thermal neutron. 'N1A' Indicates that there was no neutron monitor at that location.

(2) These dose equivalent values do not represent radiation exposure through an exterior wall directly into an unrestricted area.

(3) Deep indicates Deep Dose Equivalent. which applies to external whole-body exposure and is the dose equivalent at a tissue depth of 1 cm.

(4) Shallow Indicates Shallow Dose Equivalent, and applies to external exposure of the skin or an extremity, and is taken as the dose equivalent at a tissue depth of 0.007 cm averaged over an area of I square cm.

3-9

Is 2003 NETL Annual Report Table 3-10 Total Dose Equivalent Recorded on TLD Environmental Monitors Around the NETL Reactor Facility 2003 Monitor l.D Reactor Facility Location Total Recorded Dose Equivalent (1) (mrem) 00156 Sidewalk, NETL Front Entrance M

0157 NETL Power transformer M

00158 NETL Roof stack M

0159 Reactor bay exterior wall, East M

00160 Reactor bay exterior wall, West 160**

00161 NETL Service Door M

(1) The total recorded dose equivalent values reported in mrem do not include natural background contribution and reflect the summation of the results of 12 monthly beta, x-and gamma ray or neutron dosimeters for each location. A total dose equivalent of "M" indicates that each of the dosimeters during the period was below the vendor's minimum measureable quantity of 10 mrem for x and gamma rays, 40 mrem for energetic betas, 20 mrem for fast neutrons, and 10 mrem for thermal neutron.

(2) X or gamma ray exposure. May be followed by an 'H' for energies greater than 250 keV effective or L' for energies less than 100 keV effective.

• • TLD measurement was in contact with outer wall. Readings were reviewed with NRC headquarters (A. Adams). Location was not considered high occupancy and unlikely to result in doses to general public of greater than 100 mrem/yr. Readings were caused by temporary storage of neutron sources in reactor bay.

3-10

2003 NETL Annual Report Table 3-11 Radiation Protection Program Requirements and Frequencies Frequency Radiation Protection Requirement Weekly Gamma survey of all Restricted Areas.

Swipe survey of all Restricted Areas.

Swipe survey of Radioactive Materials Areas.

Response check of the continuous air monitor.

Response checks of the area radiation monitors.

Neutron survey of the reactor bay (during reactor operation).

Monthly Gamma, neutron and swipe surveys of exterior walls and roof.

Exchange personnel dosimeters and interior area monitoring dosimeters.

Review dosimetry reports.

Response check emergency locker portable radiation measuring equipment.

Review Radiation Work Permits.

Response check of the argon monitor.

Response check hand and foot monitor.

Conduct background checks of low background alpha/beta counting system.

Collect and analyze TRIGA primary water.

As Required Process and record solid wastes and liquid effluent discharges.

Prepare and record radioactive material shipments.

Survey and record incoming radioactive materials.

Perform and record special radiation surveys.

Issue radiation work permits and provide health physics coverage for maintenance operations.

Conduct orientations and training.

Quarterly Exchange TLD environmental monitors.

Gamma and swipe surveys of all non restricted areas.

Swipe survey of building exterior areas.

Calibrate area monitors in neutron generator room.

Perform Chi-square test, and determine HV plateaus and detection efficiencies on the low background alpha/beta counting system.

Semi-Annual Inventory emergency locker.

Calibrate portable radiation monitoring instruments.

Calibrate continuous air monitor, argon monitor, and area radiation monitors.

Calibrate personnel pocket dosimeters.

Leak test and inventory sealed sources.

Annual Conduct ALARA Committee meeting.

Conduct personnel refresher training.

Calibrate emergency locker portable radiation detection equipment 3-11

2003 NETL Annual Report 3.8 Radiation Surveys Radiation surveys of NETL work areas are shown in Table 3-12. Surveys wvith portable instruments and measurements of radioactive contamination are routine. Supplemental measurements are also made any time unusual conditions occur. Values in the table represent the result of routine measurements. Environmental monitoring at sample sites exterior to the building are generally done at random times or as a case by case evaluation.

Table 3-12 Annual Summary of Radiation and Contamination Levels Within the NETL Reactor Facility 2003 I.

Accessible Location Area Radiation Levels (mrem/hr)

Contamination Levels (dpm/1 1 sq cm)

Avg.(1)

Max. (1)

Avg.

Max.

TRIGA Reactor Bay:

Reactor Bay North

<0.1 25 MDA MDA Reactor Bay South 0.15 15 (3)

MDA MDA Reactor Bay East

<0.1 6

MDA MDA Reactor Bay West 3.5 20 MDA MDA Reactor Pool Deck (3rd Floor)

<0.1 15 MDA MDA NETL Facility:

NAA Sample Processing (Rm 3.102)

<0.1 6

MDA MDA NAA Sample Counting (Rm 3.112)

<0.1 0.13 MDA MDA Health Physics Laboratory

<0.1 0.9 MDA MDA NAA Laboratory (Rm 3.106)

<0.1 0.4 MDA MDA (1)Measurements made with Victoreen 450B and/or Bicron Microrem portables survey meters in areas readily accessible to personnel.

(2)MDA for the G-5000 low level alpha-beta radiation counting system Is 2.49 dpm/1 OOcm2 beta, and

.58 dpmJlOOcm2 alpha. Calculation of MDA based on NCRP Report #58.

(3)Water Treatment room at ton exchanger.

3-12

2003 NETL Annual Report 3.9 Radioactive Effluents, Radioactive Waste Radioactive effluents are releases to the air and to the sanitary sewer system. The most significant effluent is an airborne radionuclide, argon-41. T'wo other airborne radionuclides, nitrogen-16 and oxygen-19, decay rapidly and do not contribute to effluent releases. Argon-41, with a half-life of 109 minutes is the only airborne radionuclide emitted by the facility. A summary of the argon-41 releases are shown in Table 3-13. Total quantity of Ar-41 released in 2003 was 41.8% of the T.S. allowance.

This is based on a conservative dilution factor.

Evaluation of the radioactive gaseous effluent by the COMPLY code indicates the NETL is in compliance with dose limits to the public with a calculated effective dose equivalent of 8.1 mrem/yr at the conservative receptor point.

Table 3-13 Monthly Summary of Argon-41 Effluent Releases 2001 (1)

Date of Discharge (Month, 2001)

Total Quantity of Ar-41 Average Concentration of Ar Tech Spec. Percentage of Released (microcuries) 41 at Point of Release Ar-41 Released January 8.199E+05 4.909E-07 24.54%

February 5.558E+05 3.328E-07 16.64%

March 6.591 E+05 3.945E-07 19.73%

pril 6.622E+05 3.964E-07 19.82%

May 2.886E+05 1.728E-07 8.64%

June 2.130E+06 1.275E-06 63.75%

July 8.250E+05 4.939E-07 24.70%

August 2.605E+06 1.560E-06 77.98%

September 2.665E+06 1.596E-06 79.78%

October 2.21 OE+06 1.323E-06 66.16%

November 1.576E+06 9.435E-07 47.17%

December 1.770E+06 1.060E-06 52.98%/

ANNUAL VALUE 1.677E+07 8.365E-07 41.82%

(1) Point of release is the roof exhaust stack. Concentration includes dilution factor of 0.2 for mixing with main exhaust.

(2) Technical Specification limit for continuous release Is 2.OOE-6 microcuriestcubic cm.

3-13

2003 NETL Annual Report Large liquid releases to the sanitary sewer are done from waste hold tip tanks at irregular intervals. To date, no releases have been made. The liquid radioactive waste tanks allow for segregation of liquids for decay of the activity.

Liquids may also be processed on-site to concentrate the radionuclides into other forms prior to disposal.

Small quanities of liquid scintillation cocktail or dilute concentrations may be disposed directly to the sanitary sewer if below the limits of 10 CFR 20. Liquid disposals are infrequent. There wvere no solid waste transfers off the NETL R-129 License in 2003.

Table 3-14 Monthly Summary of Solid Waste Transfers for Disposal and Liquid Effluent Releases to the Sanitary Sewer From the NETL Facility 2003 l

I Date of Disposal /

Release Volume Total Activity Total Activity Released (millicurics)

Discharge (Month,)

(cubis meters)

(millicuries) anuay 1__

NONENoReleases FJnuary 0

NONE No Releases Februaryr0 NONE NO Releases March 0

NONE No Releases April 0

NONE No Releases May 0

NONE No Releases June 0

NONE No Releases July 0

NONE No Releases August 0

NONE No Releases September 0

NONE No Releases October 0

NONE No Releases November 0

NONE No Releases December 0

NONE No Releases l

3-14

2003 NETL Annual Report 3-15