ML022810408
| ML022810408 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saxton File:GPU Nuclear icon.png |
| Issue date: | 09/18/2002 |
| From: | Brosey B GPU Nuclear Corp |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| -nr 6900-02-008, Rev 1 | |
| Download: ML022810408 (26) | |
Text
CALCULATION COVER SHEET CdPU NUCLEAR KOVISIOfl riumer
Subject:
Calculation No. Revision Number 6900-02-008 SNEC Facility DCGL Values for Volumetric Contamination DESCRIPTION OF REVISION A
Signature cJ -:
'V Date Originator B. Brosey/ ,. * ., --
- I : ( 7..
"Reviewer J.P. Donnachie!f11 4 JA Additional Reviewer Additional Reviewer Additional Reviewer I\* ,\ o".
-o.z_
Management Approval Cover Page 1A
NUCLEAR Calculation Sheet Calculation No. Rev. No. Sheet No.
Subject 6900-02-008 1 of "
SNEC Facility DCGL Values for Volumetric Contamination Originator Date Reviewed by Date Barry H. Brosey *.< September 16, 2002 Pat Donnachie V
PROBLEM STATEMENT U 1.0 Levels The purpose of this calculation is to determine SNEC Facility Derived Concentration Guideline (DCGLs) for volumetric contamination and their associated Area Factors (AF). These calculated DCGL offers a values are determined using the dose modeling computer code RESRAD, version 6.1. The code analysis.
probabilistic calculation option which was used as a step to develop input to a deterministic the upper 1 meter of surface These values were developed using a surface model that applies to materials at the site.
This calculation supercedes revision 0 of the previous calculation with the same number.
2.0
SUMMARY
OF RESULTS 2.1 Table 1 presents a summary of the DCGL values.
Table 1 - SNEC Site DCGLw Values for Surface Materials NINEC Unper 1 Meter of Soil - DCGL's Ufilts in piKIg for.
Radionuclide Peak Dose per pCq met (in yearsm Y TEDE 4 mrely D Am-241 9.70E-01 mrem'yr Qt = 0-2.c Arv-241 DW 1.93E-02 rnrenlyr @t= 1062 +/-2 __________
0-14 9.30E-01 nfenvyr at= 0 26.8 C-14 DW 8.87E-03 nrernmyr @t= 1.504 +/-0.003 __________ _________
Co-60 7.13E+00 frweff 6T @~t 0 3.6_____
5.62E-11 rnrenyr @t= 114.8 +/-0.2 7.1___E_1___
Co-60DW Cs-I 37 3.74E+00 rmrer'y~r @t= 0 6.6______
Cs-1370DW 2.32E-17 mremfyr @t= 1189 +/-2 _____________ _____l_ T Eu-i 52 2.46E+00 rrreffyw at = 0 ___ 0.1___
Eu-152 DW 2.18E-155 mreneyr @t= 1037 +/-2 ____.________
K-3 3.87E-02 rrreryr @ t= 0 645 H-3 DW 1.43E-02 rnrem/yr @ t = 0.913 +/-+0.002 2_____9 Ni-63 3.34E-02 nre0yr @t= 0 747 Ni-6DW 2.07E-08 myremly @t= 661 +/-1 Pu-238 828E-01 rrrem'* (Mt= 0 3.0.1 Pu-238 DW 1.70E-01 rnremyr @ t = 200.4 +/- 0.4 ______________
Pu-239 3.63E+00 nrelyr Ot= 642 +/-1 6.8 Pu-239 DW 2.83E+00 rnremnyr @ t = 556 +/-1 A__';z___As Pu-241 2.89E-02 mrern(yr Qt= 54.9 +/-:0.1 - 866 8.33E-04 nrernh/y @t= 950 +/-2 0__3 8__
Pu-241 DVW ___4__
Sr-90 2.05E+01 nrem¶yr @at = 0 _2 ,___
1-2_____
Sr-90 DW 5.03E-01 mremi/yr @ t = 36.49 +/-0.07 1 NOTE: Specific Acivity Unit (SAL) forCs &Eu Is &70E+13 piig&-135=04 puqIg Ixecuway.
CŽPU NUCLEAR Calculation Sheet Rev. No. Sheet No.
Subject Calculation No.
SNEC Facility DCGL Values for Volumetric Contamination 6900,02\008 1 2 of 2</
Date 02 Reviewed by Date Originator Barry H. Brosey . September 16,2002 Pat Donnachi t 2.2 Attachment 1-1 presents a summary of the Area Fact developed for the above listed DCGL values.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 SNEC Site Characterization Report, GPU Nuclear, 1996.
from Haley &
3.2 "Summary for RESRAD Parameter Inputs (Revision 1), Dated October 18, 2001, Aldrich, Incorporated of 150 Mineral Spring Drive, Dover, New Jersey (Underground Engineering
& Environmental Solutions), 07801-1635 to J. Patrick Donnachie of GPU Nuclear.
of Radioactive 3.3 ANL/EAIS-8, "Data Collection handbook to Support Modeling the Impacts Material in Soil", Environmental Assessment and Information Sciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, US DOE, April 1993.
from the 3.4 Argonne National Laboratory Report, "KI Study of Site Soils and Construction Debris SNEC Decommissioning Project", February 2002.
Site 3.5 URS Corporation, "Sub-Surface DCGLs for the Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation Calculation Package", 756 East Winchester Street, Suite 400, Salt Lake City, UT 84107.
3.6 Microsoft Excel 97, Microsoft Corporation Inc., SR-2, 1985-1997.
4.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND BASIC DATA plant 4.1 While Cs-137 is the predominant radionuclide present at the SNEC Facility produced during operation, other radionuclides of lower concentration have been detected. This calculation determines applicable guideline levels (DCGL) for the eleven (11) radionuclides shown in the following Table.
TABLE 2 - Radionuclides Present at the SNEC Facility Am-241 I C-14 I Co-60 I Cs-137 Eu-152 j H-3 Ni-63 Pu-238 Pu-239 Pu-241 Sr-90 NOTE: Table 2 radionuclides have been positively detected in samples from the SNEC Facility as reported in the SNEC "Site Characterization Report"(Reference 3.1) 4.2 Input for the RESRAD dose modeling computer code requires numerous groundwater hydrology and geological parameters. Many of these parameters have been determined by Haley & Aldrich, Inc., (Reference 3.2). The summary report from Haley & Aldrich includes the latest groundwater hydrology and geological information for the SNEC site. This information has been used as input to the RESRAD code. The Haley & Aldrich summary report is Attachment 2-1 of this calculation.
4.3 Argonne National Laboratories (ANL) was contracted by GPU Nuclear to determine distribution coefficients (Kd) for soils and construction debris from the SNEC Facility site. Kd values are the ratio of the mass of the solute species absorbed or precipitated on the solids per unit of dry mass of the soil, S, to the solute concentration in the liquids, C (Reference 3.3). The values ANL has provided were for a group of sample types including construction debris and flyash as well as soils and bedrock from the site. The analysis results of the ANL study of SNEC site materials is shown in Attachment 3-1.
NUCLEAR Calculation Sheet Icalculation No. Rev. No. Sbeet No.
Subject SNEC Facility DCGL Values for Volumetric Contamination 6900-02-008 3 of _.
Date Reviewed by Date Originator Barry H. Brosey s;: ) September 17,2002 Pat Donnachie 4.4 For purposes of this calculation only one set of K1 values were input into the RESRAD computer by ANL code. The K1 values selected were the lowest values determined for all data provided regardless of the sample from (Reference 3.4). for each element type (or representative element),
to allow GPU which they came. The reason for the selection of the lowest reported Kd value was any surface site Nuclear to calculate DCGLs for each radionuclide that could then be used for a GPU location. Subsurface volumetric DCGL values were developed separately through contractor and are reported in Reference 3.5.
of soil layer.
4.5 This calculation models SNEC site surface materials located within the upper 1 meter cover. A basic 10,000 The model was assumed to be a 1 meter thick contaminated zone without input square meter contaminated area is assumed for the base site surface model. Basic RESRAD parameters are included in Attachment 4-1 through 4-3.
case model the 4.6 Area factors are developed from the surface modeling parameters. In the base (1) using the contaminated fraction of plant, meat and milk products is assumed to be equal to one for area sizes resident farmer scenario. Default values of-1 are substituted for these three variables size the less than 10,000 square meters. The three default parameters (-1) appropriately and smaller contaminated fractions of plants, meat and milk obtained from the site when smaller area sizes are input into the REARAD computer code.
probabilistic 4.7 The most sensitive RESRAD input parameters have been determined using the basis, analysis feature of the RESRAD computer code. These parameters are listed on a per nuclide 6
in the accompanying data book titled, "Upper 1 Meter Surface Material DCGLs" (Attachment the computer file 1). In addition, all RESRAD reports and the computer files are included on storage CD provided with the data book.
and 5-2.
4.8 The logic flow for the RESRAD input parameters is included in Attachment 5-1 IK values were 4.9 Kd values were included in the RESRAD probabilistic analysis. H-3 and C-14 included in the probabilistic analysis. However, since ANL determined that the most likely values range for these Kds were-near 1 in either case, a limiting range for these Kds was assigned. This are was postulated to be 0 to 0.5 for H and 0 to 5 for ' C. The results of the deterministic analysis 3 4 conservatively bounded by the use of these Kd value ranges.
As discussed 4.10 Area Factor development was performed using the deterministic RESRAD option.
Meat &
previously, a default value of-1 was substituted for the contamination fractions for Plant, 2 Milk food. This was done so that RESRAD could scale smaller contaminated areas (10,000 n ,
2 2 2,500 m2, 400 m 2, 100 in , 25 in and I m ).
2 a drinking water 4.11 In addition to computer runs for Area Factors and the 25 mrem/y dose limit, option from RESRAD run was also performed for each radionuclide using only the drinking water for each drinking the pathways options listing. However, a probabilistic analysis was performed sensitive water analysis prior to running the deterministic analysis in order to determine the were inserted into the parameters. Once the sensitive parameters were developed, these values deterministic cases for each radionuclide.
4.12 Correlated values for each probabilistic run are shown in the following graphic file.
X VJ NUCLEAR Calculation Sheet Calculation No. Rev.No. Sheet No.
Subject SNEC IFacility DCGL Values for Volumetric Contamination 6900-02-008 1 4 of VZ Date Reviewed by Date Originatorr Barry HI. Broseyr-) .- September 16,2002
')-<' Pat Donnachie
~ ~ V a~f& RC~ ~ Bank ConfeIatwrw
--*; DENSAU 9Ol4l1+/-,'-- U-EPSZ L Vui 1 EPUZ-,
.ble' I - ,TPt z.. 4DENS(Z*"1. . -Toffective Porosiy of Unrisflated zone 1 Vt-.MSUOtI M_ PAM
$EPSZX "I9 V04
ý-~Variable 2, TPI.M11J
-Total Pmajiof Urnatwrated zorne1 C-ýPeul'foum uncetamnty analysis 0 Supplfess unceftainly analysis Whs sesson I 4.13 The individual computer file names provided in the included CD are listed below for Am-241. All other radionuclide files have the same format:
2
- NEW AM241.RAD =25 mirem/y TEDE, 10,000 m area dose
- NEW AM241 DW.RAD =4 mrem/y drinking water, 10,000 n? area dose
- NEW AM241B.RAD = 25 mrem/y TEDE, 400 in? area dose
- NEW AM241C.RAD =25 mreni/y TEDE, 100 in2 area dose 2
- NEW AM241D.RAD = 25 mrem/y TEDE, 25 mnarea dose 2
- NEW AM241E.RAD = 25 mrem/y TEDE, I mnarea dose 4.14 The complete probabilistic output files for all radionuclides are contained in the included CD computer disk.
4.15 The complete deterministic output files for all radionuclides are contained in the included CD computer disk.
CŽOU NUCLEAR Calculation Sheet calculation No. Rev. No. Sheet No.
Subject SNEC Facility DCGL Values for Volumetric ContaminationI6900-02-008 1 5 of 2" Date Reviewed by Date Originator - - ..
Barry H. Brosey- l."*3 September 16, 2002 Pat Donnachie/e1.
5.0 CALCULATIONS 6.1 5.1 All calculations are performed using an Excel spreadsheet or are internal to the RESRAD computer code. A "Read Only" CD ROM is provided with this calculation containing all RESRAD computer generated input & output files (see Attachment 6-1).
6.0 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS 6.1 Attachment 1-1, Summary Table of RESRAD Area Factor output results.
6.2 Attachment 2- to 2-13, Haley & Aldrich communication (Reference 3.2).
6.3 Attachments 3-1, Summary Table of ANL provided Kd values (Reference 3.3).
6.4 Attachment 4-1 and 4-3, RESRAD input values for probabilistic & deterministic analysis.
6.5 Attachment 5-1 and 5-2, Logic chart for developing the dose modeling DCGL values.
6.6 Attachment 6-1, addendum entitled "Upper 1 Meter Surface Material DCGLs", in a loose leaf binder that includes the RESRAD computer files on a CD.
REVISION I E . .!Ir-, FAC lLI Ill I- *C-lIIr"I IMri'll lll l r I. lS Table 5-15 Area Factors (AF) For Open Land Areas Based on 25 mremly TEDE and Upper I Meter Volumetric Surface Modeling File Names => NEW XXXXX.RAD* NEW XXXXXA.RAD NEW XXXXXB.RAD NEW XXXXXC.RAD NEW XXXXXD.RAD NEW XXXXXE.RAD AREA =* 10000 m 2
2500 m2 400 m 2
100 m, 2S m' I m, AF AF EMCDCGL Implied AF Radionuclides Base DCGL AF Implied EMCDCGL AF EMCDCGL Implied AF EMCDCGL Implied EMCDCGL Implied Am-241 25.7 1.0 47.7 1.9 110.1 4.3 321.7 12.5 699.1 27.2 3005 116.9 C-14 26.8 1.0 151.1 5.6 984.8 36.7 2.69E+03 100.2 7206 268.9 1.79E+05 6682.8 Co-60 3.5 1.0 4.4 1.3 4.9 1.4 5.4 1.6 7.0 2.0 43.4 12.4 Cs-137 6.6 1.0 14.9 2.3 19.9 3.0 23.8 3.6 31.1 4.7 189.3 28.7 Eu-152 10.1 1.0 10.5 1.0 11.1 1.1 12.1 1.2 15.5 1.5 94.3 9.3 H-3 645 1.0 1.47E+03 2.3 3.23E+03 5.0 7.87E+03 12.2 1.78E+04 27.6 3.55E+05 550.2 Ni-63 747 1.0 3.66E+03 4.9 1.29E+04 17.2 5.14E+04 68.8 2.05E+05 275 5.07E+06 6789.8 "M" 408.2 13.6 694.4 23.1 1.08E+04 358.8 Pu-238 30.1 1.0 57.7 1.9 142.9 4.7 mT 6.8 1.0 11.9 1.7 26.9 4.0 56.4 8.3 114.8 16.9 1374 202.1 Pu-239 866 1.0 1607 1.9 3713 4.3 1.09E+04 12.6 2.39E+04 27.6 1.02E+05 118.1 Pu-241 1.2 1.0 3.6 3.0 9.8 8.1 38.5 32.1 146.7 122.3 2826 2355 Sr-90
- Where "XXXXX" Is the radlonuclide computer file name, as an example "Am241".
NOTE 1: Base case DCGLs (in pCi/g) are for 10,000 square meter surface model only.
5-1 (surface materials only).
NOTE 2: The above set of DCGL values are used only to determine the Area Factors (AF) that will then be applied to the values listed InTable fractions for plant food, meat and milk must be re-set to their default NOTE 3: When AF values are calculated In the RESRAD computer code, the settings for contaminated condition (41) In order to allow the computer code to scale the food supply for the size of the areas appropriately.
Co o
5-73
(-.)
7 4- ----
UNDERGROUND ENGINEERING &
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS Haley & Aldrich, Inc.
150 Mineral Spring Drive Dover, NJ 07801-1635 Tel: 973.361.3600 Fax: 973.361.3800 HUY 18 October 2001 www.HaleyAldrich.com File No. 74683-000 GPU Nuclear, Inc.
Route 441 South Post Office Box 480 Middletown, PA 17057-0480 Attention: Mr. J. Patrick Donnachie
Subject:
Summary for RESRAD Parameters Inputs (Revision 1) wm co M 20 CDo -n in<
Dear Mr. Donnachie:
As we discussed, the attached document presents the summary for an updated version of RESRAD (Revision 1) containing revised inputs which were identified in our 12 September r
2001 report.
Cn The primary reason for the revisions is that recent supplemental field investigations provided site-specific information. These recent reports which were a follow-up to these field
<OFFICES investigations are noted in Section I of the attachment while the recommended inputs for E*Boston RESRAD are incorporated into Section II.
5_ Massachusetts g Cleveland Figure 1, which accompanied our 12 September 2001 is also attached and replaces Figure 1 o Ohio that was included with the initial RESRAD parameter inputs.
SDayton Ohio Figure 1 provides a generalized sketch of subsurface conditions. In the center column, 0 Denver subsurface materials are identified (labeled geologic), while hydrogeologic and RESRAD
.' 0 Colorado considerations are presented in the left and right columns respectively. Regarding specific o)0 Detroit inputs to RESRAD, in some instances revisions were made to total porosity, effective S* ichigan porosity, field capacity, hydraulic gradient, hydraulic conductivity and other related 0)0 Hartford parameters.
a Connecticut OQ Eo LosAngeles In Figure 1, under the geologic heading, three subsurface materials are noted: Fill (A),
- Califonhia Boulder layer (overburden) unit B and the Siltstone bedrock (C). The interface between the 6 Manchester base of the boulder layer and the bedrock (B/C) is also characterized in our 12 September c:) New Hamvshire 2001 report.
CD; Portland Based on our 12 September 2001 report we recommended the following considerations for ochester RESRAD. The Fill (A) unit is unsaturated throughout most of the hydrologic year and New York contains the contaminated zone. The Boulder layer (overburden) unit (B) a feature associated with the rivers depositional processes, is saturated, however, due to its low an Diego cailifornia
,Tucson rizona
]Vashington ATTACHMENT 2 - I istrict of Cotluina
GPU Nuclear, Inc.
18 October 2001 Page 2 permeability serves as a hydraulic barrier to flow between the Fill and the underlying Siltstone bedrock. Regarding the saturated interface (B/C) between the Boulder layer (B) and the underlying saturated Siltstone bedrock (C) we recommend using inputs for the bedrock, since the aquifer testing results for hydraulic conductivity for both units are similar (the same order of magnitude). The saturated thickness of the bedrock is much thicker than the interface layer.
If you have any questions regarding Revision 1, please contact us.
Sincerely yours, HALEY & ALDRICH, INC.
z 60 wm Charles R. Butts, P.G.
Enclosures c: Mr. Art Paynter Mr. Barry Brosey 0
I- G \documents\74\74683\74683rnO7.doc
'30 C) 0 0
='0
.-0 Cz0 C0)
=o CP t2O 0
PO CD N,
AT-ACHMENT 2. - 2.
The preceding cover letter dated October 18, 2001 provides a brief introduction and overview to this attachment (referred to as Revision 1). This revision contains some new inputs to RESRAD for the SNEC facility, based on the results of supplemental subsurface information from recent site investigations. Revisions have been made in some cases to total porosity, effective porosity, field capacity, hydraulic gradient and hydraulic conductivity and other related parameters.
RESRAD Input Parameters:
R013 Cover depth (in)
R013 Density of cover material (g/cm3)
R013 Cover depth erosion rate (m/yr)
R013 Density of contaminated zone (g/cm3)
R013 Contaminated zone erosion rate (m/yr)
R013 Contaminated zone total porosity R013 Contaminated zone effective porosity R013 Contaminated zone hydraulic conductivity (m/yr)
- z R013 Contaminated zone b parameter 0 0 R013 Average annual wind speed (m/sec)
R013 Hum idity in air (g/m3)
Q 4R013 Evapotranspiration coefficient R013 Precipitation (m/yr) c) R013 Irrigation (m/yr)
R013 Irrigation mode C* R013 Runoff coefficient 2)
R013 Watershed area for nearby stream or pond (mn R014 Density of saturated zone (g/cm3) q R014 Saturated zone total porosity R014 Saturated zone effective porosity o R014 Saturated zone hydraulic conductivity (m/yr)
R014 Saturated zone hydraulic gradient R014 Saturated zone b parameter R014 Water table drop rate (m/yr)
P" R014 Well pump intake depth (m below water table)
SU R014 Model: nondispersion (ND) or Mass-balance (MB) 00 0 R014 Well pumping rate (m3/yr) 0W 0-=
=r R015 Number of unsaturated zone strata R015 Unsaturated zone 1, thickness (in)
SCO, R015 Unsaturated zone 1, soil density (g/cm3 )
SR015 Unsaturated zone 1, total porosity "6 R015 Unsaturated zone 1, effective porosity R015 Unsaturated zone 1, soil-specific b parameter CD
<. R015 Unsaturated zone 1, hydraulic conductivity (m/yr)
N Contaminated Zone Thickness (m)
U Field Capacity f*
- ATTACHMENT 2
2, c(-
to Section I - Background Information and Objectives for Site Investigations Several investigations concerning subsurface conditions at the site have been undertaken since 1981. The following section provides a brief summary of the scope, objectives and results for these investigations that formed the basis for the initial RESRAD inputs. However, three additional Haley & Aldrich investigations (one geotechnical and two hydrogeologic reports dated May 1999, March 2001 and August 2001 respectively) provide additional site-specific information which is the basis for this revision (Revision 1). Revisions that were noted in the Haley & Aldrich 12 September 2001 report have been incorporated into Section II.
Groundwater Technology's, Inc. investigation (1981) provided the basic hydrogeologic framework for the site, serving as a guide for future groundwater monitoring. Monitoring well installations have occurred, since the initial investigation in 1981, in a staged approach, first by GEO Engineering (1992, and 1994) and by Haley & Aldrich (1998). Depending on the purpose for monitoring, wells were installed at several locations typically adjacent to site structures of interest. Monitoring wells were installed in both soil and bedrock.
wCn ro The Preliminary Hydrological Investigation, Saxton Nuclear Station, Saxton, Pennsylvania.
0 0 1981 by GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC. reviewed information obtained from the
_ *Pennsylvania State Geologist and the United States Geological Survey (Water Resource
,* Branch). In conjunction with geologic reconnaissance, this provided the initial geologic 0 interpretation for the Saxton site. Test borings located near the containment vessel (CV) and
. the radioactive waste disposal facility (RWDF) were installed to characterize the soils and r bedrock and the groundwater in each media.
"Resultsof investigation lead to following conclusions:
0 The result of this investigation identified three distinct subsurface materials: fill, a boulder layer with silty clay matrix and bedrock (occurring in this order from ground 0 surface when present).
0 Field permeability tests were conducted in boreholes and soil laboratory mechanical a analysis was performed on construction fill materials. Based on the field permeability testing, the highest permeability is at the boulder layer/bedrock interface.
g
- The boulder layer.appears to act as a barrier to the flow of groundwater between the
~ construction fill and the bedrock.
"M 0=Preliminary groundwater level observations in test borings indicate a hydraulic gradient 0 _of 10 to 15 feet of a distance of 600-800 feet from the site to the river.
W0 The combination of hydraulic gradient, bedrock permeability, and bedrock structure 0 0
=- (bedding and fracture patterns) indicates that the groundwater has a potential to flow from "thesite to the river.
The main objective of the Phase I Report of Findings-Groundwater Investigation Saxton Nuclear Experimental Station, Saxton, Pennsylvania, 1992 GEO Engineering was the installation of 8 monitoring wells at locations near the CV and RWDF. The wells were XD screened (and sanded) across the top bedrock and boulder layer contact. This was an area identified in the 1981 investigation as an area of relatively higher permeability compared to its immediate surroundings. Other pertinent information follows:
- A relative elevation survey of each well using an arbitrary datum of 100.00 feet at GEO-1 was completed. Water level information from these eight wells was used to produce 0* computer-generated contour maps of the groundwater surface. The resultant direction of 2
ATTACHMENTZ-jL2 10/18/01
groundwater flow (groundwater flowing perpendicular from locations with higher contour to those with lower elevations) is in a westerly direction towards the Raystown Branch of Juniata River.
"* For the purpose of monitoring radionuclide contamination in groundwater, several wells were installed hydraulically downgradient of the CV and several other upgradient of this structure.
"* The investigation confirmed the orientation of potential groundwater pathways in the bedrock (fractures and bedding)
"* A recommendation was proposed for the installation of two groundwater monitoring wells in bedrock adjacent to the CV.
In 1994, two gas-actuated monitoring wells devices were installed into the bedrock near the CV as reported in GEO Engineering's, Summary of Field Work, 1994. These two devices were installed into the bedrock to a depth similar to the base of the CV. The devices were installed west and northwest of the CV, at approximately 25 degree angles, to facilitate the interception of groundwater flowing in the bedrock.
z During this field activity a 50-foot observation well (GEO-9) was installed in bedrock making 0r0 it possible to obtain water level elevation data from the bedrock unit. As part of this field activity, monitoring wells GEO-1 to GEO-8 were retrofitted with gas actuated samplers.
In The Report of Field Work by Haley & Aldrich (1998) two additional gas actuated groundwater monitoring devices were installed adjacent to the RWDF (to the depth of the
< sump) to investigate the potential presence of tritium in groundwater. Also, GEO-10 was installed at the bedrock /soil interface to supplement the existing monitoring wells. It was V) situated downgradient of GEO-5 to evaluate trace amounts of tritiurih detected in the groundwater at GEO-5.
Section II - Summary of Descriptions and Justifications for Individual Parameters C0
\o R013 Cover depth (m) - Physical Parameter w Based on information provided by GPU Nuclear, cover will not be placed over the area for which the modeling applies, and therefore, the cover depth was input as 0.0 meters.
0 P R013 Density of cover material (g/cmn) - Physical Parameter a) Since the above-described parameter (cover depth) is input as 0.0, density of the cover 0 C_ material is not applicable and therefore not input into the RESRAD model.
0 0 :3 R013 Cover depth erosion rate (m/yr) - Physical Parameter Since the above-described parameter (cover depth) is input as 0.0, density of the cover to C~CD material is not applicable and therefore not input into the RESRAD model.
R013 Density of contaminated zone (g/cm 3) - Physical Parameter Based on information provided by GPU Nuclear regarding locations and depths of sampling CD points with radionuclide concentrations above background, the contaminated zone is located
- between approximately 0 and 1.0 meters, as shown on Figure 1. Based on subsurface investigations as described in Section I, the geologic stratigraphy at this depth is described as mixed soils, sandy or silty clay to well graded sand and gravel with rock fragments. Based
,. on the May 1982 Department of Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC)
DM-7.1 Manual, dry weight density for this type of material is in the range of 80 to 120 lb./ft3 (or 1.28 to 1.92 g/cm3). The range for dry weight as opposed to wet, or submerged ATTACHMENT 2 -, _ 10/18/01
weight, was used as the depth of soil contamination is unsaturated. The value input into the RESRAD model was 1.60 g/cm 3, the average of the above-stated range.
R013 Contaminated zone erosion rate (m/yr) - Physical Parameter Based on the Data Collection Handbook to Support Modeling Impacts of Radioactive Material in Soil (C. Yu, C. Loureiro, J. J. Cheng, L.G. Jones, Y.Y Wang, Y.P Chia, and E. Faillace, Environmental Assessment Division Argonne National Laboratory - www.ead.anl.gov) and assuming future use scenario as row-crop agriculture with an approximate 2% slope, the range of 9x10 5 to 6x10 4 to m/yr was used. The value input into the RESRAD model was 4
3.45x10 im/yr, the average of the above-stated range.
R013 Contaminated zone total porosity - Physical Parameter Based on subsurface investigations as described in Section I, the geologic stratigraphy of the contaminated zone is described as mixed soils, sandy or silty clay to well graded sand and gravel with rock fragments. Referencing Maidment, Handbook of Hydrology (pp. 5.14),
1993, these soil types correspond to total porosity ranges of between 0.35 and 0.56. Total oporosity cn is defined as the part of the soil volume that is void space. The recommended value
- z input into the RESRAD model is 0.46, the average of the above-stated range.
D 0
- n -n, R013 Contaminated zone effective porosity - Physical Parameter The effective porosity range for the site was based on the soil types. Referencing Maidment, Handbook of Hydrology (pp. 5.14), 1993 expressed the effective porosity range of 0.28 to rG) 0.54 based on the soil types found at the site. Effective porosity is defined as the percentage of inter-connected void space, and is applied to characterize soil. The recommended value input into the RESRAD model is 0.41, the average of the above-stated range. This value is not used by RESRAD 6.0.
R013 Contaminated zone hydraulic conductivity (m/yr) - Physical Parameter Hydraulic conductivity values are based on the results of field tests, soil characterization, empirical relationships, published values and the experience of our expert consultant. Packer 0 tests (rock pressure tests) were performed during the 1981 Preliminary Hydrogeologic Investigation in order to estimate the range in values for hydraulic conductivity of the bedrock
- 3 below the site. The packer test involves pumping water under pressure into selected sections R of an open borehole isolated using pneumatic packers. Packer tests indicated hydraulic 0
P"* conductivity of the bedrock to range between lxl03 cmr/s to negligible flow.
o oIn addition to packer testing for the 1981 report, sieve analyses were conducted on samples of 0" the silty sand fill and ash fill. Initial estimates of hydraulic conductivity suggested a high of
=lxl0 6 cm/s for the fill.
C Based on recent analyses for the purpose of the RESRAD modeling, data from the grain size CD distributions of the fill collected from the 1981 investigation were entered into several
- empirical relationships in order to refine the estimates of hydraulic conductivity. These P empirical relationships relate median effective grain diameter (typically, the grain diameter which represents the 10% finer by weight on a grain size distribution) as well as other
'< properties including sorting and porosity to hydraulic conductivity. The empirical relationships used have been shown to correspond well with field measured hydraulic conductivity (Vukovic, Milan and Soro, Andjelko, Determination of Hydraulic Conductivity of Porous Media from Grain-Size Composition, 1992).
i*
- 4 SATTACHMENT 2 - 10/18/01
The following presents one of the empirical equations as taken from Vukovic, Milan and Soro, Andjelko, Determination of Hydraulic Conductivity of Porous Media from Grain-Size Composition, 1992:
Slichter:
Kv *. C' *n
- Where: K = hydraulic conductivity (cm/sec) 2 g = acceleration due to gravity: 980 cm/sec 2 v = kinematic viscosity of water [at 20 deg C]: 1. 125x10 2
Cs = constant: 1.0x10 n = porosity dio = effective grain diameter relationships using Hydraulic conductivity values for the fill generated through the empirical O Mgrain size data were somewhat higher than the estimates initially suggested in the 1981 0cn 0 Preliminary Hydrogeologic Investigation report. Specifically, the original report suggested
-TI 6 5
' hydraulic conductivity values ranging from lxO1 to 1x10 to cm/s (0.315 to 3.15 mlyr).
t , However, recent evaluations of grain size data (soil samples S-1, S-2 from the 1981 CD Ground/Water Technology investigation and TB-1, similar to TB-3 from the Haley&Aldrich
.geotechnical investigation 1999) suggest hydraulic conductivity values ranging from 1xlO' to
< 8x10 2 cm/s (3.62 x 10' to 2.54 x 104 to m/yr), which is the range used in the RESRAD modeling. The recommended value input into the RESRAD model is 32.3 m/yr (1 x 10' cm/sec), the geometric mean of the above-stated range.
<o In addition to methods described above, hydraulic conductivity was qualitatively assessed given the experience of our expert consultant and based on their visual observation during o installation of the soil borings and soil sample characterization. The values given above also 0 correspond with published values for silts, sandy silts, and clayey sands (Applied Hydrogeology, Fetter, C.W., 1988).
-- R013 Contaminated zone b parameter - Physical Parameter o-= As described in the Data Collection Handbook to Support Modeling Impacts of Radioactive 0
._ Material in Soil (C. Yu, C. Loureiro, J.-J. Cheng, L.G. Jones, Y.Y Wang, Y.P Chia, and E.
0 2 Faillace, Environmental Assessment Division Argonne National Laboratory S0www.ead.anl.gov) the soil-specific exponential b parameter is an empirical and dimensionless
? M parameter that is used to evaluate the saturation ratio (or the volumetric water saturation) of "P the soil. Published data based on laboratory testing indicate a range of the exponential b 00 parameter is between 4.05 and 7.12. The RESRAD input for this parameter was based on the values corresponding from sand to loam in Table 13.1 of the Data Collection Handbook. The C) recommended value input into the RESRAD model is 5.6, the average of the above-stated 0
9 range.
R013 Average annual wind speed (m/sec) - Physical Parameter The input value for this parameter were based on data provided from the National Climatic Data Center (1999 Annual Summary Local Climatological Data for Pittsburgh, "ZZ Pennsylvania). The RESRAD input reflects the minimum monthly mean wind speed (3.13 m/sec or 7.0 mph) and maximum monthly mean wind speed (4.83 m/sec or 10.8 mph) over a 5
A-F77ACH-MEN7 10/18/01
42 year span. The value input into the RESRAD model is the annual mean wind speed based on 42 years of data of 4.07 rn/sec (9.1 mph).
R013 Humidity in air (g/m3) - Physical Parameter The default value of 8.0 g/m 3 was used in the RESRAD model.
R013 Evapotranspiration coefficient - Physical Parameter The value range for this input parameter was based primarily on guidance in the Data Collection Handbook to Support Modeling Impacts of Radioactive Material in Soil, and was estimated through an iterative solution with other parameter values including precipitation, irrigation and runoff coefficient. The range was based on a runoff coefficient (Cr) range of 0.3 to 0.4; a precipitation range (Pr) of 0.688 to 1.327 m/yr; and an irrigation value (aR) of 0.2 (refer to individual parameter justifications, as described below). Using these values, an evapotranspiration rate (ETr) was estimated (this value is not used implicitly in RESRAD, but is an intermediate step in calculating the evapotranspiration coefficient). Based on the Evaporation Atlas of the United States (NOAA, 1982), evaporation is estimated to be CO approximately half of the total (annual) precipitation for the Saxton, PA area. Given this, the z evapotranspiration coefficient was estimated as follows:
'<0
_ ETr 1 e (l-C)*Pr +IRr G0 Calculated Range of C = 0.50 to 0.67 m/yr
&n The value input into the RESRAD model was 0.59, the average of the above-stated range.
o R013 Precipitation (m/yr) - Physical Parameter The input values for this parameter were based on data provided from the National Weather Service (1999 Annual Summary Local Climatological Data for Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania).
0"x *The RESRAD input range reflects the 30 year minimum (0.688 m/yr or 27.09 inches/yr) and maximum (1.327 rn/yr or 52.24 inches/yr) annual precipitation amounts. The value input into the RESRAD model was 0.936 m/yr (36.85 inches/yr), which is the 30 year annual precipitation average.
0
.V 0 R013 Irrigation (m/yr) - Physical Parameter 0 *Based on the agricultural use scenario, the default value for irrigation (0.2 m/yr) was input a) 0- into the RESRAD model.
" . R013 Irrigation mode - Physical Parameter Sto It was assumed that the irrigation would be distributed overhead.
C)
The input values for this parameter were based on data provided from two sources: U.S.
- 0 Geological Survey Hydrologic Investigation Atlas HA-710 - Average Annual Runoff in the
- United States, 1951-1980; and Table 10.1 of the Data Collection Handbook to Support
,7- Modeling Impacts of Radioactive Material in Soil. The RESRAD input range represents coefficient values corresponding to an agricultural environment comprised of flat to rolling land (slopes of 0.3 to 6.1 m/mi). The corresponding range for runoff coefficient is 0.3 to 0.4. The value input into the RESRAD model was 0.35, the average of the above-stated range.
6 A---,ACHMIEN-- 1 -2)-*- o10/18101
R013 Watershed area for nearby stream or pond (m2) - Physical Parameter Based on the topographic quadrangles for Saxton, PA and Hopewell, PA, the watershed area surrounding the facility was estimated as the total area of land bounded by the Juniata River and surrounding topographic high areas. The value input in the RESRAD model was 5x10 6 i 2
R014 Density of saturated zone (g/cm3) - Physical Parameter Based on information provided by GPU Nuclear regarding water levels in the vicinity of the site, the saturated zone begins at between 0.7 and 2.3 meters below ground surface. Based on subsurface investigations as described in Section I, the geologic stratigraphy at this depth and below, is described as mixed soils and bedrock. Based on the May 1982 Department of Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) DM-7.1 Manual, density for this type of material is in the range of 80 to 120 lb./ft3 (or 1.28 to 1.92 g/cm 3). The range for wet weight was used as this pertains to saturated soil/rock. The value input into the RESRAD model was 1.60 g/cm 3, the average of the above-stated range.
S*-R014 Saturated zone total porosity - Physical Parameter 0m Based on subsurface investigations as described in Section I, the geologic stratigraphy of the D msaturated zone is described as mixed soils and bedrock. As denoted in Figure 1, units B, BIC r .and C are considered saturated and only units B/C and C subject to any appreciable flow of groundwater. Further, based on the thicker saturated thickness of unit C in relationship to G)
,_unit B/C and other pertinent information we recommended combining the interface and bedrock units (B/C and C) and using values for the siltstone bedrock for the RESRAD inputs.
Referencing Domenico and Schwartz, Physical and Chemical Hydr6geology (1990, p. 29) the i ~siltstone bedrock's total porosity ranges between 0.31 and 0.41. Total porosity in bedrock is o related to fracture porosity, which for this rock type, provides the majority of the void space.
B The recommended value input into the RESRAD model is 0.36, the average of the above stated range.
0 C R014 Saturated zone effective porosity - Physical Parameter The effective porosity range is based on bedrock. Referencing Domenico and Schwartz, Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology (1990, p.29) expressed the effective porosity range of 0.005 to 0.05 based on shale bedrock. The recommended value input into the RESRAD
.)
- model is 0.028, the average of the above-stated range.
W 0 "R014 Saturated zone hydraulic conductivity (m/yr) - Physical Parameter FD 0, The hydraulic conductivity for the bedrock based on testing of bedrock wells OW-3R, OW
- -C 4R, OW-5R and OW-7R is'67.91 m/yr, the geometric mean of these four test results, (value 6 reported in Haley & Aldrich's August 2001 report) in the saturated zone. The recommended
,8 value input into the RESRAD model is 67.91 m/yr.
X R014 Saturated zone hydraulic gradient - Physical Parameter
"- "The hydraulic gradient in the bedrock based on water level information recorded on January 11, 2001 ranges between 0.02 and 0.03 (gradient between the tunnel and the river and the site Z..- to the discharge tunnel respectively). A review of water level information on June 13, 2001 indicated a decrease in the hydraulic gradient from the tunnel to the river (0.013) while the value from the site to the tunnel remained the same as that calculated for the January water ACHM 9 ý10/18/01 7 ----
level information. The recommended value input into the RESRAD model is 0.02, the average of the lower value of the tunnel to the river and the value of the site to the tunnel.
R014 Saturated zone b parameter - Physical Parameter Refer to the discussion of the zone b parameter for the contaminated zone, presented above.
The recommended value input in the RESRAD model is 5.6.
R014 Water table drop rate (m/yr) - Physical Parameter Annual variation of the groundwater elevation at the SNEC facility is approximately 0.5 meters in the fill deposits and approximately 1.6 meters in the bedrock unit. This information is based on water level measurements collected over the period March 1999 to April 2001 by GPU Nuclear personnel. Although seasonal variation is up to approximately 1.6 meters, and possibly could be higher, a decline in long term groundwater elevations is expected to be significantly less, if any, since water table conditions are moderated by the strong hydrogeologic influence of the Juniata River, including existing river elevation controls. In addition, there is no unusually high consumptive use of groundwater locally. Based on this, a value of 0 m was input into the RESRAD model.
C r R014 Well pump intake depth (m below water table) - Physical Parameter C m Based on recommended well pump intake depths (Driscoll, Fletcher, Groundwater and Wells, Second Edition, 1986) and the subsurface conditions as described in Section I, the range for 5 *the well pump intake depth was input as 10 to 50 meters below the water to table. Actual pump vary based on the actual depth of the well, in addition actual well yield G) intake depths may
< and usage requirements. The value input into the RESRAD model was 30 m, the average of C~ the above-stated range.
R014 Model: nondispersion (ND) or Mass-balance (MB) - Physical Parameter C Guidelines from Appendix C - Rev 0 of the NMSS Decommissioning SRP indicate that the nondispersion approach should be acceptable when the area of contamination is known to be a
0 larger than the assumed capture area of a hypothetical well. The guidance provides well, however the calculation calculation to estimate the capture area of a hypothetical assumes a flat water table, which, based on subsurface investigations decried in Section 1, is not the case at the SNEC facility. The gradient based on data from monitoring wells collected as part of the 18 November 1992 report entitled Phase I Report of Findings gradient, Groundwater Investigation, ranges from 0.02 to 0.04. Given static hydraulic
. *hydraulic conductivity, and saturated thickness of the geologic strata, potential capture zone 0 C of a hypothetical well can be estimated as follows:
0O)0
=r " *Downgradientflow boundary (null point):
C. CO K~* = X, 2163 i - 2;r
- 67.91 *50 *0.02) X, 0.67m C, X" =% ;~
- C) *Transverse boundary (width of capture):
CDQ* Yt 4.2 lm Y' =Y *b'i) (67.91,50.0.02)
Yt=28
-o* .*
8 a _A _ 10/18/01 A J 77AHMN.
Where, Q = averagepumping rate of RESRAD input range (m3/yr)
K = averagehydraulic conductivity of RESRAD input range (m/yr) b = saturatedthickness of the aquifer (m) i average hydraulicgradientof RESRAD input range (m/m)
"* Equation taken from Wellhead Protection Strategies, US Geological Society, 1991.
"* Since the transverse boundary is equivalent to a linear distance (width of capture zone), to extrapolate to a total capture area, the transverse boundary is multiplied times pi.
A, = Y, *;r AC = 13.23m'n Based on information provided by GPU Nuclear, the area of contamination ranges from 182.4 to 1,161 in 2 . Based on the above equations, an estimate of capture zone for a hypothetical well at the SNEC facility is approximately 13.23 in 2 . Based on this, the area of the contamination is greater than the capture area of a hypothetical well, and therefore the
- znon-dispersion mode was applied for the RESRAD modeling.
R014 Well pumping rate (m3/yr) - Physical Parameter Based on data collected in the American Water Works Association Research Foundation's Residential End Use Study, 1998, the typical usage volume for a single domestic well varies G) r from approximately 207.3 m 3/yr to 365 m 3/yr. The value input into the RESRAD model was I< 286.2 m3/yr, the average of the above-stated range.
R015 Number of unsaturated zone strata - Physical Parameter
< As noted earlier, the contaminated zone is present to 1.0 m below ground surface for the o modeled area (Figure 1). The saturated zone begins at approximately 1.5 m below ground surface, and given the seasonal variation of the water table, the unsaturated zone exists (and Z3 o=" varies) from 1 to 1.5 m below ground surface. During a period of one to two months in the 00 spring water levels may be higher than throughout most of the hydrologic year resulting in a I period of transient saturation. Therefore, 1 was input for the number of unsaturated zone strata.
0 R015 Unsaturated zone 1, thickness (m) - Physical Parameter
.' _ As noted above, the unsaturated zone exists (and varies) from 1 to 1.5 m below ground 0° surface. Therefore, the unsaturated zone thickness ranges from 0 to 0.5 m (see Figure 1).
0 The value input into the RESRAD model was 0.25 m, the average of the above-stated range.
R015 Unsaturated zone 1, soil density (g/crn3) - Physical Parameter
- Based on subsurface investigations as described in Section I, the geologic stratigraphy at this CD depth is described as mixed soils, sandy or silty clay to well graded sand and gravel with rock
'8 fragments. Based on the May 1982 Department of Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) DM-7.1 Manual, dry weight density for this type of material is in the
-Z range of 80 to 120 lb./ftO (or 1.28 to 1.92 g/cm 3). The range for dry weight as opposed to wet, or submerged weight, was used as the depth of soil contamination is unsaturated. The
- value input into the RESRAD model was 1.60 g/cm 3 , the average of the above-stated range.
R015 Unsaturated zone 1, total porosity - Physical Parameter The total porosity range for the site in the unsaturated zone is based in three soil types (fill materials). Specifically, soil samples S-1 and S-2 from the 1981 Ground/Water Technology a 9 10/18/01
investigation and TB-1, similar to TB-3 from the Haley & Aldrich geotechnical investigation 1999 were selected. Referencing Maidment, Handbook of Hydrology (pp. 5.14), 1993, the on-site soil types correspond to a range in total porosity between 0.35 and 0.56. Total porosity is defined as the part of the soil volume that is void space. The recommended value input into the RESRAD model is 0.46, the average of the above-stated range.
R015 Unsaturated zone 1, effective porosity - Physical Parameter The effective porosity range for the site was based on the soil types. Referencing Maidment, Handbook of Hydrology (pp. 5.14), 1993, the range of 0.28 to 0.54 for effective porosity is the recommended as the appropriate parameter input based on the soil types found at the site.
The recommended value input into the RESRAD model is 0.41, the average of the above stated range.
R015 Unsaturated zone 1, soil-specific b parameter - Physical Parameter Refer to the discussion of the zone b parameter for the contaminated zone, presented above.
The recommended value input into the RESRAD model is 5.6.
P3 Qf z
R015 Unsaturated zone 1, hydraulic conductivity (m/yr) - Physical Parameter WM Refer to the discussion of hydraulic conductivity for the contaminated zone, presented above. o n As the geologic profile does not change significantly with regard to hydraulic conductivity, . 0.
the input range for the contaminated zone hydraulic conductivity was used again as the range for the unsaturated zone hydraulic conductivity. The recommended value input into the RESRAD model is 32.3 in/yr (1 x 10-4cm/sec), the geometric mean of three site soil types.
"* Contaminated Zone Thickness (in) - Physical Parameter Based on information provided by GPU Nuclear and for the specific application of the 0 E
RESRAD modeling, the contaminated zone is considered to be the upper 1 meter throughout the modeled area (Figure 1). The value input into the RESRAD model was therefore I meter. 0
"* Field Capacity - Physical Parameter (All Zones)
Based on information provided by GPU Nuclear and RESRAD developers at Argonne 0 National Laboratory, field capacity, a value included in the RESRAD 6.0 code, refers .- 0 to specific retention as it applies to unsaturated soil. Based on published values for ?T field capacity for soil materials classified as similar to on-site soil (Brady, The Nature .
& Property of Soils, 1974) field capacity ranges from 0.079 to 0.192. The =
recommended value input into the RESRAD model is 0.136, the average of the 0 minimum and maximum estimated values. CD Endnote: C Anthony Bonasera originally compiled the list of RESRAD input parameters and references supporting the values.
The equationspresented in the text were hand checked by Daniel G. Eunch of Haley & Aldrich, Inc in March 2001. The June 2001 updated version includes revisions to the evapotranspirationand model parameterequations due to changes in the inputparameters. The 12 June 2001 version includes edits to the evapotranspiration, precipitationvalues (increasedprecipitationdecimal places,field capacity, hydraulic conductivity, effective Inc checked the porosity and model parameter equations. Nancy van Dyke & Charlie Butts of Haley & Aldrich, June 2001 equation revisions. As you requested, Haley & Aldrich, Inc. created afile of citationsfor this document, thisfile is being maintained and updatedfor GPU'sfuture reference.
G.'documents\74\74683\74683mO6 doc 10 r~xA .1Z.......10/18/01 E~F
SKETCH OF UNDERGROUND MATERIALS HYDROGEOLOGIC GEOLOGIC RESRAD UNSATURATED 'CONTAMINATED (TRANSIENT SATURATION)
UNSATURATED GH GROUNDWA E LEVEL (TRANSIENT O17 METERS 1.0 METER SATURATION) II BELOW G.S.
(*)
SATURATED BUT
(*11 OVERBURDEN PRACTICALLY
-I LOW GROUNDWATER LEVEL )(BOULDER LAYER WIT IMPERMEABLE III 2.3 METERS SI OVERBURDEN N LT & CLAY IN -ODSPACE)
(BOULDER LAYER)
J FLOW __
BELOW G.S.
IT- RF. AC
."'-INTERFACE -7 /
y/ Z/
SATURATED FLOW III HAEY SAXTON NUCLEAR EXPERIMENTAL FACILITY SAXTON, PENNSYLVANIA lO S-f B,\ 1 z0 /* /A' '*Is oia 'a FIGURE 1
- 'z t;-2hi,10 %ý // 4r V AO* - Z0N/ 'ON
'900-Z0"0069 UZu ] oC
'foqoeu "d!
uoqrelnOle0 :
'uo~qeu~tueiuo0 oiJletnloA joj sonlgic~A"9 ,1Pe.I 03NS REVISION I
-~ , ^_____
'Z00-'00 06 "ONuoen 'du: unlo n AAesojNS JO A9N 900-ZO-0069 *ON uoieflnotBO o!ieu!Weluoo oujawnIoA j0j senlhBA -100 AlIIpej 03NS SNEC SAMPLES ASSAYED FOR Kd VALUES AT ANL Sample I s Sample 3 Sample4 Bar" a Sample6 Sample? Sampoe S River (composite) Sediment South of Warehouse CV Area, Near Location Sample SSGS SE Surp by Old Access Road CV Ares Swtchyaerd CV Ares CV Area CVArea Malortal TyPe Seditment Construction Debris FlyAsh &Cinders Back-FlI Materials Fll Soil Clay Material Weathered Bedrock Bedrock (mtshe'd)
Reference Grid No & Sonk Above Bddge &Off Tip AZ-129, 14 W by 1V AZ-129.15- Nby 12 Coordinates Of Island AV-133 AJ-131,21'N by2 W N BA.129.I-N BA-129.lNby 2W AZ-12.,13. N to 1'E Depth lGrW9ad,11! l) '0.1"BelowSedimei Surface -787' El -8111 -795! -10 8 -80912 -80 -800 LowestVllue HlgtestVakie Elemerts y/// AVERAGE to a %
SIGMA S/aas**s H -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 1 0 00% H C_-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 1 0 00% C HI 10000 10000 4000 10000 10000 10000 1300 1600 1300 10000 7100 4082 575% NI Er Nb600 80 500 500 500 500 600 500 80 600 460 157 342% Zr Nb Te 8.1 64 54 8.6 1.4 1.6 1.3 1.3 1.3 54 16 23 1441% To U 37 16 5200 17 34 106 5200 226 16 5200 1355 2375 175 3% u Pu 600 160 600 400 400 400 600 400 160 600 445 152 341% Pu Cet Eu 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 0 00% CeoEu Co 1000 1000 200 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 200 1000 900 283 314% co Co 2340 2433 2131 14149 13618 2884 9746 28341 2131 28341 9453 9205 97.4% Cs F* 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 0 00% Fe AM Cm 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 0 00% Arn,Cm Sr 60 25 476 28 11 24 114 60 11 476 100 155 1557% Sr Sb 1100 163 5200 2070 1100 1800 5000 1900 163 u200 2291 1838 802% sto 46000 1.60E+05 68000 81000 31000 98000 9700 26000 9700 160000 63713 48553 762% Pt Plb ATTACHMENT 3 - 1
C RESRAD INPUT FOR SNEC SURFACE MODEL Basic SNEC Ranqe of Values Assigned Menu Class PARAMETERS RESRAD Input Mln. Max. Distribution Default Distribution C14 P Thickness of Soil Evasion Layer of C-1 4 In Soil (m) 0.3 0.2 0.6 Trianaular D-5 0-34 P
P Bloaccumulation Factors, Fresh Water Food Transfer Factors
-Default Values __
Default Values Varies Varies J Varies Varies I:: Lognormal Lognormal NIA P Contaminated Zone Effective Porosity Not Used 0.28 0.64 NIA ROI I P Area of Contaminated Zone (mA2) 10000 N/A N/A N/A RO11 NRC Basic Radiation Dose Limit (mrem/y) (NRC) 25 N/A NIA N/A ROll P Length Parallel to Aquifer Flow (m) 112.8 NIA N/A NIA ROll P Thickness of Contaminated Zone I (m) 1 N/A N/A N/A ROll P Time Since Placement of Materials (yr) 0 N/A N/A N/A ROll P Times for Calculations (yr) I N/A N/A NIA ROil P Times for Calculations (yr) 3 N/A N/A NIA ROi l P Times for Calculations (yr) 10 N/A N/A N/A ROl0 P Times for Calculations (yr) 35 N/A N/A NIA ROil P Times for Calculations (yr) 160 N/A N/A N/A Roll P Times for Calculations (yr) 300 N/A N/A N/A ROil P Times for Calculations (yr) 1000 N/A N/A N/A ROll P Times for Calculations (yr) 10000 N/A N/A N/A R013 P Average Annual Wind Speed (m/sec) 4.07 3.13 4.83 Uniform Bounded Lognomral-N (1.4 - 13)
R013 P Contaminated Zone Field Capacity 0.136 0.079 0.192 Uniform None Assigned R013 P Contaminated Zone b Parameter 6.6 4.05 7.12 Uniform Bounded Lognormal-N (0 5 - 30)
R013 P, B Contaminated Zone Erosion Rate (mlyr) 0.000345 0.00009 0.0008 Loguniform Continuous Logarithmic (5E 0.2)
RO13 P Contaminated Zone Hydraulic Conductivity (m/yr) 32.3 0.362 25400 Loguniform Bounded LognormaI-N (0 004 - 9250)
R013 P Contaminated Zone Total Porosity 0.46 0.36 0.56 Uniform Truncated Normal, (0.157 - 0 693)
R013 P Cover Depth (m) 0 N/A N/A N/A RO13 P, B Cover Depth Erosion Rate (m/yr) Not Used N/A N/A N/A R013 P Density of Contaminated Zone (glcc) 1.6 1.28 1.92 Uniform Truncated Normal (0.809 - 2.23)
R013 P Density of Cover Material (glcc) Not Used NIA NIA N/A R013 P Evapotranspiration Coefficient (m/yr) 0.69 0.6 0.67 Uniform Uniform (0.5 -0.75)
R013 P Humidity In Air (g/mA3) 8 2.68E+00 2.03E+01 Truncated LognormaI-N P
R013 Irrigation (m/yr) 0.2 - - None Assigned R013 B Irrigation Mode (Overhead) Overhead N/A N/A N/A R013 B Precipitation (m/y) 0.936 0.688 1.327 Uniform None Assigned R013 P Runoff Coefficient 0.35 0.3 0.4 Uniform Uniform (0.1 - 0 8)
R013 P Watershed Area for Nearby Stream or Pond (mA2) 6.OOE+06 - - None Assigned None Assigned R014 P Density of Saturated Zone (g/cc) 1.6 1.28 1.92 Uniform Truncated Normal (0 809 - 2.23)
R014 P Model: Non-dispersion (ND) or Mass-Balance (MB) Non-Disperslon N/A N/A N/A R014 P Saturated Zone b Parameter Not Used N/A N/A MA R014 P Saturated Zone Effective Porosity 0.028 0.006 0.05 Loguniform Truncated Normal (0.075 - 0.635)
P 67.91 15.59 909.53 Uniform Bounded LognormaI-N (0 004 - 9250)
R014 P
Saturated Zone Hydraulic ConductMty (m/yr) 0.02 0.013 0.03 Uniform Bounded Lognormat-N (0.00007 -0.5) 9:ý R014 Saturated Zone Hydraulic Gradient R014 P Saturated Zone Total Porosity 0.36 0.31 0.41 Uniform Truncated Normal, (0.157 - 0.693)
R014 P Water Table Drop Rate (m/yr) 0 - - None Assigned None Assigned R014 BP Well Pump Intake Depth (m) 30 10 60 Uniform Triangular (6 -30)
R014 P Well Pumping Rate (mA3Iyr) 286.2 207.3 366 Uniform None Assigned R014 Saturated Zone Field Capacity 0.136 0.079 0.192 Uniform None Assigned P
RO15 Density of Unsaturated Zone I (g/cc) 1.6 1.28 1.92 Uniform Truncated Normal (0 809 - 2.23)
P R015 Effective Porosity of Unsaturated Zone 1 0.41 0.28 0.64 Uniform Truncated Normal (0.075 - 0.635)
P R015 Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Zone I (m/yr) 32.3 0.362 25400 Loguniform Bounded Lognormal-N (0.004 - 9250)
P R015 Number, of Unsaturated Zone Strata I NIA N/A N/A I N/A P
R015 T;l..**
I.II]*,RIcoI
.41 IIn4,,.ha,*,ele U/I JI OI3UICitVJU 7,.,a
%,Il t Ins' 1 .Li n -9r
£.....
n ().r unltuo-- IoUnl IU )Y.'lJ % . I,
-~lUIIQ'* - Iw,*f 8/9/2002 SNEC INPUT 5-13-02 ATTACHMENT----4
C /
R015 P Total porosity of Unsaturated Zone 1 0.48 0.36 0.56 Uniform Truncated Normal, (0.157 -0 693)
R015 P Unsaturated Zone 1 b Parameter 5.6 4.06 7.12 Uniform Bounded Lognormal-N (0.5 - 30)
R015 P Unsaturated Zone Field Capacity 0.136 0.079 0.192 Uniform None Assigned R017 P External Gamma Shielding Factor 0.7 4A00E.02 I Bounded Lognormal-N R017 P, B Indoor Dust Filtration Factor 0.4 0.15 0.95 Uniform RO17 B Indoor Time Fraction .. . .. 0.66 0 1 Continuos Linear RO17 M,P Inhalation Rate (mA3/yr) 8400 4380 13100 Triangular RO17 P. B Mass Loading for Inhalation (g/mA3) 0.0001 0 0.0001 Continuos Linear RO17 B Fraction of Time Spent Outdoors,,, 0.12.... - . None Assigned RO18 B, P Contariiinated Friction of Aquatic Food. . , 0 1 Triangular ROIS B. P Contaminated Fraction of Drinking Water I - - None Assigned R018 B, P Contaminated Fraction of Household Water Not Used N/A N/A N/A R018 B. P Contaminated Fraction of Irrigation Water 1 - - None Assigned RO18 B, P Contaminated Fraction of Livestock Water 1 - - None Assigned R018 , P Contaminated Fraction of Meat -.. .... ... . - - None Assigned RO18 3, P Contaminated Prfctidtb f Mulk -,. . -- - None Assigned RO18 B. P Contaminated Fraction of Plant Food ... - -.. None Assigned RO18 M.B Drinking Water intake (Liyr) 478.6 90.4 1860 Truncated Lognormal-N RO18 M,B Fish Consumption (kglyr) 20.6 , - - None Assigned RO18 M.a Fruit, Vegetable, and Grain Consumption (kglyr) 111.8. 135 318 Triangular RO1 M,9 Leafy Vegetable Consumption (kgfyr) - 21.4 - - None Assigned RO18 M,B Meat and Poultry Consumption (kglyr) - . 67 -- - None Assigned RO18 M, B Milk Consumption 233 60 200 Triangular Rol1 M, 9 Other Seafood Consumption (kg/yr) 0.9 - - None Assigned RO18 M,a Soil Ingestion Rate (g/yr) -- , 18.3 - 0 35.6 Triangular RO19 M,a Livestock Water Intake for Milk 60 * - - None Assigned RO19 M. a Depth of Roots (m) 0.9 0.3 1 Uniformr R019 M,B Depth of Soll Mixing Layer (m) 0.15 0 0.6 Triangular ROI9 Mm, Weathering Removal Constant of all Vegetation 20 6.1 84 Triangular RO19B M,B Wet Crop Yield for Fodder (kg/mA2) 1.1 - - None Assigned RO19B M.B Wet Crop Yield for Leafy (kg/mA2) 1.5 - - None Assigned RO119 M,a Wet Crop Yield for Non-Leafy (kglmA2) 0.7 0.397 7.72 Truncated Lognormal-N RO19B M,B Wet Follar Inception Fraction of Leafy Vegetables 0.26 0.06 0.95 Triangular STOR B A
Storaae Times for Livestock Fodder. I. ý I 1.0I-. . - - None Assigned A A I 0ý Nl SNEC INPUT 5-13-02 ATTACHMENT- %4 8/9/2002
C -
n1Jmrrgnuf Inn fnmcnn? fr AmreIm M-.M
& 1riu
- I. .---.-
U.1ua, 11snt04 AAH Mit. AMt MnY Y - .
rjigmhggion Y-9n
- I.
R16 P 1. Contaminated Zone (OMA3/g) '.00 TTIoT
-;- 100 ý6000 -RESRArI Defaitt R16 P 2. Unsaturated Zone (cmA3lg) 00' .~ - ..- 1000 .. -- 6000, . -ESRAD Default, R16 P 3. Saturated Zone (CM'A3/g) - 1000 , 1000 -6 000 RESRADD aMutt_________________
MDistribution Coefficient for Carbon ANL Value GPU Min. GP Mar. Distributo Type___________
R16 P 1. Contaminated Zone (cmA3/g) '----7-1` 7777 77-,-,-: "S76 ~- WT7-7 U ifoi7 T _________________
R16 P 2. Unsaturated Zone (cmA3lg) . -1~. 0- - . 5.. . Uniform __________________
R16 P 3. Saturated Zone (ciii3/g) -- 1 -0 ,.- 6 Uniform -_________________
Distribution Coefficient for Cesium Value Used ANL Min. ANL Max. Distribution Type _______________
R16 P 1. Contaminated Zone (CMA3/g) -' -. 2131,-.,-,, -,2131. 77 72-9341,77 7 - REM~Ad Deftult., -- ______________
R16 P 2. Unsaturated Zone (cmA3/g) 2131--------2131 .28341,- -; REBRAD Default -__________________
R16 P 3. Saturated Zone (cm,3Ig) 2131 2131 .28341 -RESRAD Default __________________
Distribution Coefficient for Cobalt Value Used ANL Min. ANL Mar. Distribution Type _______________
R16 P 1. Contaminated Zone (cmA3/g) 20 - --- ,-20' 6- - 7100AE i Daiuft -- _______________
R16 P 2. Unsaturated Zone (cmA3/g) .. 200 ý.- 200 , - 1000- - RESRAD Default - __________________
R16 P 3. Saturated Zone (CMA31g) 200--, - 200 1000. RESRAD Default _________________
Distribution Coefficient for Europium Value Used ANL Min. ANL Mar. DitrbuionType R16 P 1. Contaminated Zone (CMA3/g) -100 100 TýW LOW T-- ',lt~t~eiit RI6 P 2. Unsaturated Zone (cmA 3Ig) . 1000 . 1000 -' -- -6000- -RESRAD Meultt, R16 P 3. Saturated Zofie (6MA3Ig) - .--. 1000 1000 --- 6000 RESRAD Default Distribution Coefficient for Hydrogen ANL Value (GPU) GPU Min. GPU Mar. Distribution Type R16 P 1. Contaminated (cM A3/g)
-Zone - ;.-- 1 (0.28) - ~ -0"' 0._______. Uniform..
R16 P 2. Unsaturated Zone (crfA3/g) -1 (0.25) - , 0, O.c06 Uniform R16 P 3. Saturated Zone (cmA3/g) -1 (0.25) -01" 0.6 Uniform __________________
Distribution Coefficient for Iron Value Used GPU Min. GPU` Mar. Distribution Type R16 P 1. Contamin~ated Zone (cm;A3/g) ... 10000 7. 10000.7 - - 60000 -- 77777-WERAD Default R16 P 2. Unsaturated Zone (cmA3lg) -- 10000 . 1.-10000 A60000 ,~-, . RESRAD Default R16. P 3. Saturated Zone (cmA3/g) -10000 10000, 5-0000. , RESRAD Default Distribution Coefficient for Lead Value Used ANL Min. ANL Mar. Distribution Type R16 P 1. Contaminated Zone (cmA 3/g) 9700 - 9700-7 77705357 Rfl5RAO Vbefauit R16 P 2. Unsaturated Zone (CMA 31g) 9700 9700 , - 160000,1-.-, . RESRAD Default R16 P 3. Saturated Zone (CMA 3/g) . 9700 , 9700 - 1600001, RESRAD Default Distribution Coefficient for Nickei Value Used ANL Min. ANL Mar. Distribution Type R16 P 1. Contaminated Zone -cA/)-1306.-, 00 - ,RS Maw-> ADefUM D
R16 P 2. Unsaturated Zone (cmA3/g) 1300,,. -, 1300. 10000 - RESRAD Default R16 P 3. Saturated Zone (CMA 31g) 1300 - - 1300 - 10000 ,RESRAD Default VIIMNDistributionCoefficient for Plutonium Value Used AM'L Min ANL Mar. Distribution Type R16 P 1. Contaminated Zone (cmA31g) T 18 0O T ' ~io':;
160 ~ 60o- RMSAedbefault.
R1 2. Unsaturated Zone (cmA3Ig) 160 -A60 .- ,60 Boo, RESRAD Default R16 P 3. Saturated Zone (CMA 31g) 1S0 ISO16 -,600. RESRAD Default Distribution Coefficient for Strontium Value Used ANL Min. ANL Mar. Distribution Type R16 P 1. Contaminated Zone (CMA 3/g)-' '- 11 ,-)," -0~~TiT,s If: 475,,,'w> - RE6ItA0~IftaIH R16 P 2. Unsaturated Zone (CMA 3lg) .. I11.- 11 .- 475 - - REBRAD Default.
R16 P 3. Saturated Zone (cmA3Ig) - 11 -- 11 *- 475 RESRAD Default 21DistributionCoefficient for Uranium Value Used ANL Min. ANL Mar. Distribution Type R16 P 1. Contaminated Zone (cmA3/g) 1777 is. .6TTT;7 k~ 0 -- lElAbeilitht- __________________
R16 l' 2. Unsaturated Zone (CMA3/g) 16 . is-8 - 6 200 RESRAD Default RI6 P 3. Saturated Zone (CMA3/g) 1s. . 16, 5 200 RESRAD Default __________________
NOTE: ANL Kd values may be 'greater than" values. The ANL Mn. value Is the lowest reported value for this element and the ANL Max. value Is the highest reported value.0 NOTE: items In RED type face are SNEC Input values.
NOTE: Items with 13LUE background are D& 0 default values, while Items with a background are RESRAD default values. Unlisted parameters are RESRAD defaults.
8/9/2002 SNEC INPUT 5-13-02 SNEC INPU5.13-02ATTACHMENTi-..--
QAJ Figure 6-1 (Resident Farmer Scenario)
Dose Modelina Logqic Chart Identify input parameters for which the absolute value of the sensitivity coefficient Is ;;0.25 from 6 tables.
Create RESRAD Input file with distribution from H&A, D&D and RESRAD defaults.
Begin to run RESRAD-base case in probabilistic mode Create correlations with only sensitive between input parameters Execute RESRAD in Probabilistic Mode Import LHSBIN.DAT table into Excel and identify means, 25% and 75%
values for sensitive Is PRCC r2 N no parameter distributions.
correlation higher than PCC for firs
,6 tables?
ATTACHMENT S- - /
lawZC Dose Modeling Logic Chart (cont.)
Edit RESRAD input file to in dude 25% value as base deterministic input for each sensitive parameter that is negatively correlated (--0.25).
Edit RESRAD file to include 75% value as base deterministic value input for each sensitive parameter that is positively correlated (>0.25).
Replace base deterministic value for sensitive parameters with statistical mean value for those parameters for which mean is not bounded by 0.25
& 0.75 values.
s0 ccoefficient
^result Ž0.25 i~n PRCCorPCC~./
I value.
Replace base deterministic KD with lowest Argonne value.
ATTACHMENT. *" -