Text

Kld TR-533, Final Report, Rev. 1, Development of Evacuation Time Estimates
	ML12363A113
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	12/21/2012
From:	; KLD Engineering, PC
To:	; Florida Power & Light Co, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	L-2012-449 KLD TR-533, Rev. 1
	Download: ML12363A113 (491)
	v • d • e

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Development of Evacuation Time Estimates Work performedfor FloridaPower & Light, by:

KLD Engineering, P.C.

43 Corporate Drive Hauppauge, NY 11788 mailto:kweinisch@kldcompanies.com December 2012 Final Report, Rev. 1 KLD TR - 533

Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Overview of the ETE Process ...................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 The St. Lucie Nuclear Pow er Plant Location .............................................................................. 1-3 1.3 Prelim inary Activities ................................................................................................................. 1-5 1.4 Com parison w ith Prior ETE Study .............................................................................................. 1-9 2 STUDY ESTIM ATES AND ASSUM PTIONS ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Data Estim ates ........................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Study M ethodological Assum ptions .......................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Study Assum ptions ..................................................................................................................... 2-5 3 DEM AND ESTIM ATION ....................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Perm anent Residents ................................................................................................................. 3-2 3.2 Shadow Population .................................................................................................................... 3-7 3.3 Transient Population ................................................................................................................ 3-10 3.3.1 Seasonal Transient Population ......................................................................................... 3-11 3.4 Em ployees ................................................................................................................................ 3-15 3.5 M edical Facilities ...................................................................................................................... 3-19 3.6 Total Dem and in Addition to Perm anent Population .............................................................. 3-19 3.7 Special Event ............................................................................................................................ 3-19 3.8 Sum m ary of Dem and ............................................................................................................... 3-22 4 ESTIM ATION OF HIGHW AY CAPACITY ................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 Capacity Estim ations on Approaches to Intersections .............................................................. 4-2 4.2 Capacity Estim ation along Sections of Highw ay ....................................................................... 4-4 4.3 Application to the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Study Area .................................................... 4-6 4.3.1 Tw o-Lane Roads ................................................................................................................. 4-6 4.3.2 M ulti-Lane Highway ........................................................................................................... 4-6 4.3.3 Freeways ............................................................................................................................ 4-7 4.3.4 Intersections ...................................................................................................................... 4-8 4.4 Sim ulation and Capacity Estim ation .......................................................................................... 4-8 5 ESTIM ATION OF TRIP GENERATION TIM E.......................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.2 Fundam ental Considerations ..................................................................................................... 5-3 5.3 Estim ated Tim e Distributions of Activities Preceding Event 5 ................................................... 5-6 5.4 Calculation of Trip Generation Tim e Distribution .................................................................... 5-11 5.4.1 Statistical Outliers ........................................................................................................... 5-12 5.4.2 Staged Evacuation Trip Generation ................................................................................. 5-15 5.4.3 Trip Generation for W aterways and Recreational Areas ................................................. 5-16 6 DEM AND ESTIM ATION FOR EVACUATION SCENARIOS ..................................................................... 6-1 7 GENERAL POPULATION EVACUATION TIM E ESTIM ATES (ETE) .......................................................... 7-1 7.1 Voluntary Evacuation and Shadow Evacuation ......................................................................... 7-1 7.2 Staged Evacuation ...................................................................................................................... 7-1 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant i KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

7.3 Patterns of Traffic Congestion during Evacuation ..................................................................... 7-2 7.4 Evacuation Rates ........................................................................................................................ 7-4 7.5 Evacuation Tim e Estim ate (ETE) Results .................................................................................... 7-5 7.6 Staged Evacuation Results ......................................................................................................... 7-6 7.7 Guidance on Using ETE Tables ................................................................................................... 7-7 8 TRANSIT-DEPENDENT AND SPECIAL FACILITY EVACUATION TIME ESTIMATES ............................ 8-1 8.1 Transit Dependent People Dem and Estim ate ............................................................................ 8-2 8.2 School Population -Transit Dem and ......................................................................................... 8-4 8.3 M edical Facility Dem and ............................................................................................................ 8-4 8.4 Evacuation Tim e Estim ates for Transit Dependent People ....................................................... 8-5 8.5 Special Needs Population ................................................................... ...................................... 8-10 8.6 Correctional Facilities ............................................................................................................... 8-11 9 TRAFFIC M ANAGEM ENT STRATEGY ................................................................................................... 9-1 10 EVACUATION ROUTES .................................................................................................................. 10-i 11 SURVEILLANCE OF EVACUATION OPERATIONS ....................................................................... 11-1 A. GLOSSARY OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TERM S .............................................................................. A-1 B. DYNAM IC TRAFFIC ASSIGNM ENT AND DISTRIBUTION M ODEL .................................................... B-1 C. DYNEV TRAFFIC SIM ULATION M ODEL ........................................................................................... C-1 C.1 M ethodology .............................................................................................................................. C-5 C.1.1 The Fundam ental Diagram ............................................................................................ C-5 C.1.2 The Sim ulation M odel .................................................................................................... C-S C.1.3 Lane Assignm ent ............................................................................................................. C-13 C.2 Im plem entation ....................................................................................................................... C-13 C.2.1 Com putational Procedure ................................................................................................ C-13 C.2.2 Interfacing w ith Dynam ic Traffic Assignm ent (DTRAD) ................................................... C-16 D. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STUDY PROCEDURE .......................................................................... D-1 E. SPECIAL FACILITY DATA ...................................................................................................................... E-1 F. TELEPHONE SURVEY ........................................................................................................................... F-1 F.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... F-1 F.2 Survey Instrum ent and Sam pling Plan ....................................................................................... F-2 F.3 Survey Results ............................................................................................................................ F-3 F.3.1 Household Dem ographic Results ........................................................................................... F-3 F.3.2 Evacuation Response ............................................................................................................ F-8 F.3.3 Tim e Distribution Results ................................................................................................ F-10 F.4 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. F-12 G. TRAFFIC M ANAGEM ENT PLAN .......................................................................................................... G-1 G.1 Traffic Control Points ................................................................................................................ G-1 G.2 Access Control Points ................................................................................................................ G-1 H EVACUATION REGIONS ..................................................................................................................... H-1 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ii KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

J. REPRESENTATIVE INPUTS TO AND OUTPUTS FROM THE DYNEV II SYSTEM ..................................... J-1 K. EVACUATION ROADW AY NETW ORK .............................................................................................. K-1 L. A rea BO U N DA RIES ............................................................................................................................. L-1 M. EVACUATION SENSITIVITY STUDIES ......................................................................................... M -1 M.1 Effect of Changes in Trip Generation Times ....................................................................... M-1 M.2 Effect of Changes in the Number of People in the Shadow Region Who Relocate ................. M-2 M .3 Effect of Changes in EPZ Resident Population ......................................................................... M -3 N . ETE CRITERIA CH ECKLIST ................................................................................................................... N-1 Note: Appendix Iintentionally skipped St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant iii KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

List of Figures Figure 1-1. St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Location .................................................................................. 1-4 Figure 1-2. St. Lucie Link-Node Analysis Netw ork ..................................................................................... 1-7 Figure 2-1. Voluntary Evacuation M ethodology ....................................................................................... 2-4 Figure 3-1. St. Lucie Nuclear Pow er Plant EPZ . ........................................................................................ 3-3 Figure 3-2. Permanent Resident Population by Sector ............................................................................. 3-5 Figure 3-3. Permanent Resident Vehicles by Sector ................................................................................. 3-6 Figure 3-5. Shadow Vehicles by Sector ..................................................................................................... 3-9 Figure 3-6. Transient Population by Sector ............................................................................................. 3-13 Figure 3-7. Transient Vehicles by Sector ................................................................................................. 3-14 Figure 3-8. Em ployee Population by Sector ............................................................................................ 3-17 Figure 3-9. Em ployee Vehicles by Sector ................................................................................................ 3-18 Figure 4-1. Fundam ental Diagram s ............................................................................................................ 4-9 Figure 5-1. Events and Activities Preceding the Evacuation Trip .............................................................. 5-5 Figure 5-2. Evacuation M obilization Activities ........................................................................................ 5-10 Figure 5-3. Comparison of Data Distribution and Normal Distribution ....................................................... 5-13 Figure 5-4. Comparison of Trip Generation Distributions ....................................................................... 5-17 Figure 5-5. Comparison of Staged and Un-staged Trip Generation Distributions in the 2 to 5 Mile Region

................................................................................................................................................................. 5 -1 9 Figure 6-1. St. Lucie EPZ A reas .................................................................................................................. 6-4 Figure 7-1. Voluntary Evacuation Methodology ..................................................................................... 7-15 Figure 7-2. St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Shadow Region ..................................................................... 7-16 Figure 7-3. Congestion Patterns at 1 Hour after the Advisory to Evacuate ............................................ 7-17 Figure 7-4. Congestion Patterns at 3 Hours after the Advisory to Evacuate ....................... 7-18 Figure 7-5. Congestion Patterns at 5 Hours after the Advisory to Evacuate .......................................... 7-19 Figure 7-6. Congestion Patterns at 6 Hours after the Advisory to Evacuate .......................................... 7-20 Figure 7-7. Congestion Patterns at 7 Hours after the Advisory to Evacuate .......................................... 7-21 Figure 7-8. Congestion Patterns at 7 Hours, 45 Minutes after the Advisory to Evacuate ...................... 7-22 Figure 7-9. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 1 for Region R03 ...................................................... 7-23 Figure 7-10. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 2 for Region R03 .................................................... 7-23 Figure 7-11. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 3 for Region R03 .................................................... 7-24 Figure 7-12. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 4 for Region R03 .................................................... 7-24 Figure 7-13. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 5 for Region R03 .................................................... 7-25 Figure 7-14. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 6 for Region R03 .................................. 7-25 Figure 7-15. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 7 for Region R03 .................................................... 7-26 Figure 7-16. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 8 for Region R03 .................................................... 7-26 Figure 7-17. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 9 for Region R03 .................................................... 7-27 Figure 7-18. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 10 for Region R03 .................................................. 7-27 Figure 7-19. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 11 for Region R03 .................................................. 7-28 Figure 7-20. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 12 for Region R03 .................................................. 7-28 Figure 8-1. Chronology of Transit Evacuation Operations ...................................................................... 8-12 Figure 8-2. Transit-Dependent Bus Routes ............................................................................................. 8-13 Figure 10-1. General Population Reception Centers .............................................................................. 10-2 Figure 10-2. School Reception Centers ................................................................................................... 10-3 Figure 10-3. Evacuation Route M ap ....................................................................................................... 10-4 Figure B-i. Flow Diagram of Simulation-DTRAD Interface .................................................................... B-5 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant iv KILD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure C-1. Representative Analysis Network ........................................................................................... C-4 Figure C-2. Fundam ental Diagram s ........................................................................................................... C-6 Figure C-3. A UNIT Problem Configuration w ith t1 > 0 .............................................................................. C-7 Figure C-4. Flow of Sim ulation Processing (See Glossary: Table C-3) ............................................... C-15 Figure D-1. Flow Diagram of Activities ..................................................................................................... D-5 Figure E-1. Overview of Schools within the St. Lucie EPZ ................................................................... E-13 Figure E-2. Schools within Areas 2 & 4 of the EPZ .............................................................................. E-14 Figure E-3. Schools within Area 3 of the EPZ ....................................................................................... E-15 Figure E-4. Schools within the Shadow Region and Areas 5, 6, & 7 of the EPZ ...................................... E-16 Figure E-5. M edical Facilities w ithin the EPZ ....................................................................................... E-17 Figure E-6. *Beaches, Parks, Campgrounds, and Other Recreational Facilities within the EPZ ............... E-18 Figure E-7. Com m uter Colleges, M arinas, and GolfCourses within the EPZ .......................................... E-19 Figure E-8. Lodging Facilities w ithin the EPZ ........................................................................................... E-20 Figure E-9. Correctional Facilities within the EPZ ................................................................................... E-21 Figure F-1. Household Size in the EPZ ....................................................................................................... F-4 Figure F-2. Household Vehicle Availability ................................................................................................ F-4 Figure F-3. Vehicle Availability - I to 5 Person Households ...................................................................... F-5 Figure F-4. Vehicle Availability - 6 to 9+ Person Households .................................................................... F-5 Figure F-5. Household Ridesharing Preference ......................................................................................... F-6 Figure F-6. Com m uters in Households in the EPZ ..................................................................................... F-7 Figure F-7. M odes of Travel in the EPZ ..................................................................................................... F-8 Figure F-8. Num ber of Vehicles Used for Evacuation ............................................................................... F-9 Figure F-9. Households Evacuating w ith Pets ........................................................................................... F-9 Figure F-l0. Tim e Required to Prepare to Leave W ork/School .......................................................... F-11 Figure F-11. W ork to Hom e Travel Tim e .............................................................................................. F-11 Figure F-12. Tim e to Prepare Hom e for Evacuation ................................................................................ F-12 Figure G-1. Traffic Control Points within the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant EPZ .................................... G-2 Figure H-1. Region R01 ............................................................................................................................. H-3 Figure H-2. Region R02 ............................................................................................................................. H-4 Figure H-3. Region R03 ............................................................................................................................. H-5 Figure H-4. Region R04 ............................................................................................................................. H-6 Figure H-5. Region RO5 ............................................................................................................................. H-7 Figure H-6. Region R06 ............................................................................................................................. H-8 Figure H-7. Region R07 .............................................................................................................................. H-9 Figure H-8. Region R08 ........................................................................................................................... H-iO Figure H-9. Region R09 ........................................................................................................................... H-11 Figure H-iO. Region RIO ......................................................................................................................... H-12 Figure H-11. Region R11 ........................................................................................................................ H-13 Figure H-12. Region R12 .......................................................................................................................... H-14 Figure J-1. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 1) .............. J-8 Figure J-2. ETE and Trip Generation: Sum m er, M idweek, M idday, Rain (Scenario 2) ............................... J-8 Figure J-3. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 3) ....... J-9 Figure J-4. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4) .......................... J-9 Figure J-5. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 5)

................................................................................................................................................................. J-1 0 Figure J-6. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 6) .............. J-10 Figure J-7. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter,' Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7) ........................... J-11 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant v KLD En2ineerin2.I P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure J-8. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 8) ....... J-11 Figure J-9. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 9) ............................ J-12 Figure J-10. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 10)

................................................................................................................................................................. J-1 2 Figure J-11. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather, Special Event (Scenario 1 1 ) ............................................................................................................................................................ J-1 3 Figure J-12. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather, Roadway Impact (S ce n a rio 12 ) ......................................................... :.................................................................................. J-1 3 Figure K-1. Link-Node Analysis Netw ork ................................................................................................... K-2 Figure K-2. Link-Node Analysis Netw ork - Grid 1 ..................................................................................... K-3 Figure K-3. Link-Node Analysis Netw ork - Grid 2 ..................................................................................... K-4 Figure K-4. Link-Node Analysis Network- Grid 3 ................................................................................ K-5 Figure K-5. Link-Node Analysis Netw ork- Grid 4 ..................................................................................... K-6 Figure K-6. Link-Node Analysis Netw ork - Grid 5 ..................................................................................... K-7 Figure K-7. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 6 ................................................................................ K-8 Figure K-8. Link-Node Analysis Netw ork - Grid 7 ..................................................................................... K-9 Figure K-9. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 8 .............................................................................. K-10 Figure K-10. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 9 ............................................................................ K-11 Figure K-11. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 10 .......................................................................... K-12 Figure K-12. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 11 .......................................................................... K-13 Figure K-13. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 12 .......................................................................... K-14 Figure K-14. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 13 .......................................................................... K-15 Figure K-15. Link-Node Analysis Network-Grid 14 .......................................................................... K-16 Figure K-16. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 15 ......................................................................... K-17 Figure K-17. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 16 .......................................................................... K-18 Figure K-18. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 17 ......................................................................... K-19 Figure K-19. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 18 ............................................................................... K-20 Figure K-20. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 19 ............................................................................... K-21 Figure K-21. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 20 ............................................................................... K-22 Figure K-22. Link-Node Analysis Network- Grid 21 ............................................................................... K-23 Figure K-23. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 22 ............................................................................... K-24 Figure K-24. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 23 ............................................................................... K-25 Figure K-25. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 24 ............................................................................... K-26 Figure K-26. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 25 ............................................................................... K-27 Figure K-27. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 26 ............................................................................... K-28 Figure K-28. Link-Node Analysis Network- Grid 27 ............................................................................... K-29 Figure K-29. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 28 ............................................................................... K-30 Figure K-30. Link-Node Analysis Network- Grid 29 ............................................................................... K-31 Figure K-31. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 30 .............................................................................. K-32 Figure K-32. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 31 ............................................................................... K-33 Figure K-33. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 32 ............................................................................... K-34 Figure K-34. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 33 ............................................................................... K-35 Figure K-35. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 34 ............................................................................... K-36 Figure K-36. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 35 ............................................................................... K-37 Figure K-37. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 36 ............................................................................... K-38 Figure K-38. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 37 ............................................................................... K-39 Figure K-39. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 38 ............................................................................... K-40 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant vi KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K-40. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 39 ......................... ..................................................... K-41 Figure K-41. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 40 ............................................................................... K-42 Figure K-42. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 41 ............................................................................... K-43 Figure K-43. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 42 ............................................................................... K-44 Figure K-44. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 43 ............................................................................... K-45 Figure K-45. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 44 ............................................................................... K-46 Figure K-46. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 45 ............................................................................... K-47 Figure K-47. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 46 ............................................................................... K-48 Figure K-48. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 47 ............................................................................... K-49 Figure K-49. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 48 ............................................................................... K-50 Figure K-SO. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 49 ............................................................................... K-51 Figure K-51. Link-Node Analysis Network- Grid 50 ............................................................................... K-52 Figure K-52. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 51 ............................................................................... K-53 Figure K-53. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 52 ............................................................................... K-54 Figure K-54. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 53 ............................................................................... K-55 Figure K-55. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 54 .............................................................................. K-56 Figure K-56. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 55 ............................................................................... K-57 Figure K-57. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 56 ............................................................................... K-58 Figure K-58. Link-Node Analysis Network- Grid 57 ............................................................................... K-59 Figure K-59. Link-Node Analysis Network- Grid 58 ............................................................................... K-60 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant vii vii KLD Engineering, P.C.

KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

List of Tables Table 1-1. Stakeholder Interaction ........................................................................................................... 1-1 Table 1-2. Highw ay Characteristics ........................................................................................................... 1-5 Table 1-3. ETE Study Com parisons .......................................................................................................... 1-10 Table 2-1. Evacuation Scenario Definitions ............................................................................................... 2-3 Table 2-2. Model Adjustment for Adverse Weather ................................................................................. 2-8 Table 3-1. EPZ Perm anent Resident Population ....................................................................................... 3-4 Table 3-2. Permanent Resident Population and Vehicles by PAZ ............................................................. 3-4 Table 3-3. Shadow Population and Vehicles by Sector ...................................................................... ...... 3-7 Table 3-4. Summary of Transients and Transient Vehicles ................................................................. 3-12 Table 3-5. Summary of Non-EPZ Resident Employees and Employee Vehicles ...................................... 3-15 Table 3-6. St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant EPZ External Traffic ................................................................ 3-21 Table 3-7. Sum m ary of Population Dem and ........................................................................................... 3-23 Table 3-8. Sum m ary of Vehicle Dem and ................................................................................................. 3-24 Table 5-1. Event Sequence for Evacuation Activities ................................................................................ 5-3 Table 5-2. Tim e Distribution for Notifying the Public ............................................................................... 5-6 Table 5-3. Time Distribution for Employees to Prepare to Leave Work ................................................... 5-7 Table 5-4. Time Distribution for Commuters to Travel Home .................................................................. 5-8 Table 5-5. Time Distribution for Population to Prepare to Evacuate ....................................................... 5-9 Table 5-6. M apping Distributions to Events ............................................................................................ 5-11 Table 5-7. Description of the Distributions ............................................................................................. 5-11 Table 5-8. Trip Generation Histograms for the EPZ Population for Un-staged Evacuation .................... 5-18 Table 5-9. Trip Generation Histograms for the EPZ Population for Staged Evacuation ......................... 5-20 Table 6-1. Description of Evacuation Regions........................................................................................... 6-3 Table 6-2. Evacuation Scenario Definitions ............................................................................................... 6-5 Table 6-3. Percent of Population Groups Evacuating for Various Scenarios ............................................ 6-6 Table 6-4. Vehicle Estim ates by Scenario .................................................................................................. 6-7 Table 7-1. Time to Clear the Indicated Area of 90 Percent of the Affected Population ......................... 7-10 Table 7-2. Time to Clear the Indicated Area of 100 Percent of the Affected Population ....................... 7-11 Table 7-3. Time to Clear 90 Percent of the 2-Mile Radius within the Indicated Region ......................... 7-12 Table 7-4. Time to Clear 100 Percent of the 2-Mile Radius within the Indicated Region ....................... 7-13 Table 7-5. Description of Evacuation Regions ......................................................................................... 7-14 Table8-1. Transit-Dependent Population Estimates .............................................................................. 8-14 Table 8-2. School Population Dem and Estim ates ................................................................................... 8-15 Table 8-3. School Reception Centers ...................................................................................................... 8-18 Table 8-4. Special Facility Transit Dem and ............................................................................................. 8-20 Table 8-5. Summary of Transportation Resources .................................................................................. 8-21 Table 8-6. Bus Route Descriptions ........................................................................................................ 8-22 Table 8-7. School Evacuation Time Estimates - Good Weather .............................................................. 8-27 Table 8-8. School Evacuation Time Estimates - Rain ............................................................................... 8-30 Table 8-9. Summary of Transit-Dependent Bus Routes .......................................................................... 8-33 Table 8-10. Transit-Dependent Evacuation Time Estimates - Good Weather ........................................ 8-34 Table 8-11. Transit-Dependent Evacuation Time Estimates - Rain ........................................................ 8-35 Table 8-12. Medical Facility Evacuation Time Estimates - Good Weather ............................................. 8-36 Table 8-13. Medical Facility Evacuation Time Estimates - Rain .............................................................. 8-38 Table 8-14. Homebound Special Needs Population Evacuation Time Estimates .................................... 8-40 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant viii KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table A-1. Glossary of Traffic Engineering Terms ................................................................................ A-1 Table C-i. Selected Measures of Effectiveness Output by DYNEV II ........................................................ C-2 Table C-2. Input Requirem ents for the DYNEV II M odel ........................................................................... C-3 Tab le C-3 . G lossary .................................................................................................................................... C-8 Table E-1. Schools w ithin the EPZ ............................................................................................................. E-2 Table E-2. M edical Facilities w ithin the EPZ .............................................................................................. E-6 Table E-3. Beaches, Parks, Campgrounds, and Other Recreational Facilities within the EPZ ................... E-7 Table E-4. Commuter Colleges, Marinas, and Golf Courses within the EPZ .............................................. E-8 Table E-5. Lodging Facilities w ithin the EPZ ....................................................................................... E-10 Table E-6. Correctional Facilities w ithin the EPZ ................................................................................. E-12 Table F-i. St. Lucie Telephone Survey Sam pling Plan ............................................................................... F-2 Table H-i. Percent of Protective Action Area Population Evacuating for Each Region ........................... H-2 Table J-i. Characteristics of the Ten Highest Volume Signalized Intersections ................... J-2 Table J-2. Sam ple Sim ulation M odel Input ............................................................................................... J-4 Table J-3. Selected Model Outputs for the Evacuation of the Entire EPZ (Region R03) ........................... J-5 Table J-4. Average Speed (mph) and Travel Time (min) for Major Evacuation Routes (Region R03, Sce n a rio 1 ) ................................................................................................................................................. J-6 Table J-5. Simulation Model Outputs at Network Exit Links for Region R03, Scenario I ......................... J-7 Table K-i. Evacuation Roadway Network Characteristics ...................................................................... K-61 Table K-2. Nodes in the Link-Node Analysis Network which are Controlled .................................... K-163 Table M-i. Evacuation Time Estimates for Trip Generation Sensitivity Study .................................... M-1 Table M-2. Evacuation Time Estimates for Shadow Sensitivity Study .................................................... M-2 Table M -3. ETE Variation w ith Population Change ................................................................................ M -4 Table N-1. ETE Review Criteria Checklist ............................................................................................. N-1 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ix KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

This report describes the analyses undertaken and the results obtained by a study to develop Evacuation Time Estimates (ETE) for the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant (St. Lucie) located in St.

Lucie County, Florida. ETE are part of the required planning basis and provide Florida Power &

Light and State and local governments with site-specific information needed for Protective Action decision-making.

In the performance of this effort, guidance is provided by documents published by Federal Governmental agencies. Most important of these are:

" Criteria for Development of Evacuation Time Estimate Studies, NUREG/CR-7002, November 2011.

" Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, November 1980.

Development of Evacuation Time Estimates for Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG/CR-6863, January 2005.

10CFR50, Appendix E - "Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities" Overview of Proiect Activities This project began in late January, 2012 and extended over a period of 9 months. The major activities performed are briefly described in chronological sequence:

Attended "kick-off" meetings with Florida Power & Light emergency planning personnel and emergency management personnel representing state and county governments.

Accessed U.S. Census Bureau data files for the year 2010. Studied Geographical Information Systems (GIS) maps of the area in the vicinity of the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant, then conducted a detailed field survey of the highway network.

Synthesized this information to create an analysis network representing the highway system topology and capacities within the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ), plus a Shadow Region covering the region between the EPZ boundary and 15 miles radially from the plant.

Designed and sponsored a telephone survey of residents within the EPZ to gather focused data needed for this ETE study that were not contained within the census database. The survey instrument was reviewed and modified by the licensee and offsite response organization (ORO) personnel prior to the survey.

A data needs matrix was provided to the OROs at the kickoff meeting. Available data was provided for transient attractions and special facilities in each county. Telephone calls to specific facilities supplemented the data provided.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

The traffic demand and trip-generation rates of evacuating vehicles were estimated from the gathered data. The trip generation rates reflected the estimated mobilization time (i.e., the time required by evacuees to prepare for the evacuation trip) computed using the results of the telephone survey of EPZ residents.

Following federal guidelines, the EPZ is subdivided into 8 areas. These areas are then grouped within circular areas or "keyhole" configurations (circles plus radial sectors) that define a total of 12 Evacuation Regions (numbered R01 through R12).

The time-varying external circumstances are represented as Evacuation Scenarios, each described in terms of the following factors: (1) Season (Summer, Winter); (2) Day of Week (Midweek, Weekend); (3) Time of Day (Midday, Evening); and (4) Weather (Good, Rain). One special event scenario involving the NY Mets Spring Training was considered.

One roadway impact scenario was considered wherein a single lane was closed on Interstate 95 southbound for the duration of the evacuation.

Staged evacuation was considered for those regions wherein the 2 mile radius and sectors downwind to 5 miles were evacuated.

As per NUREG/CR-7002, the Planning Basis for the calculation of ETE is:

" A rapidly escalating accident at the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant that quickly assumes the status of General Emergency such that the Advisory to Evacuate is virtually coincident with the siren alert, and no early protective actions have been implemented.

" While an unlikely accident scenario, this planning basis will yield ETE, measured as the elapsed time from the Advisory to Evacuate until the stated percentage of the population exits the impacted Region, that represent "upper bound" estimates. This conservative Planning Basis is applicable for all initiating events.

" If the emergency occurs while schools are in session, the ETE study assumes that the children will be evacuated by bus directly to reception centers or host schools located outside the EPZ. Parents, relatives, and neighbors are advised to not pick up their children at school prior to the arrival of the buses dispatched for that purpose. The ETE for schoolchildren are calculated separately.

Evacuees who do not have access to a private vehicle will either ride-share with relatives, friends or neighbors, or be evacuated by buses provided as specified in the county evacuation plans. Those in special facilities will likewise be evacuated with public transit, as needed: bus, van, or ambulance, as required. Separate ETE are calculated for the transit-dependent evacuees, for homebound special needs population, and for those evacuated from special facilities.

Computation of ETE A total of 144 ETE were computed for the evacuation of the general public. Each ETE quantifies the aggregate evacuation time estimated for the population within one of the 12 Evacuation Regions to evacuate from that Region, under the circumstances defined for one of the 12 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Evacuation Scenarios (12 x 12 = 144). Separate ETE are calculated for transit-dependent evacuees, including schoolchildren for applicable scenarios.

Except for Region R03, which is the evacuation of the entire EPZ, only a portion of the people within the EPZ would be advised to evacuate. That is, the Advisory to Evacuate applies only to those people occupying the specified impacted region. It is assumed that 100 percent of the people within the impacted region will evacuate in response to this Advisory. The people occupying the remainder of the EPZ outside the impacted region may be advised to take shelter.

The computation of ETE assumes that 20% of the population within the EPZ but outside the impacted region, will elect to "voluntarily" evacuate. In addition, 20% of the population in the Shadow Region will also elect to evacuate. These voluntary evacuees could impede those who are evacuating from within the impacted region. The impedance that could be caused by voluntary evacuees is considered in the computation of ETE for the impacted region.

Staged evacuation is considered wherein those people within the 2-mile radius evacuate immediately, while those beyond 2 miles, but within the EPZ, shelter-in-place. Once 90% of the 2-mile radius is evacuated, those people beyond 2 miles begin to evacuate. As per federal guidance, 20% of people beyond 2 miles will evacuate (non-compliance) even though they are advised to shelter-in-place.

The computational procedure is outlined as follows:

" A link-node representation of the highway network is coded. Each link represents a unidirectional length of highway; each node usually represents an intersection or merge point. The capacity of each link is estimated based on the field survey observations and on established traffic engineering procedures.

" The evacuation trips are generated at locations called "zonal centroids" located within the EPZ and Shadow Region. The trip generation rates vary over time reflecting the mobilization process, and from one location (centroid) to another depending on population density and on whether a centroid is within, or outside, the impacted area.

The evacuation model computes the routing patterns for evacuating vehicles that are compliant with federal guidelines (outbound relative to the location of the plant), then simulate the traffic flow movements over space and time. This simulation process estimates the rate that traffic flow exits the impacted region.

The ETE statistics provide the elapsed times for 90 percent and 100 percent, respectively, of the population within the impacted region, to evacuate from within the impacted region. These statistics are presented in tabular and graphical formats. The 90th percentile ETE have been identified as the values that should be considered when making protective action decisions because the 100th percentile ETE are typically prolonged by those relatively few people who take longer to mobilize. This is referred to as the "evacuation tail" in Section 4.0 of NUREG/CR-7002.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Traffic Management This study references the existing comprehensive traffic management plans provided by St.

Lucie and Martin Counties. As discussed in Section 9 and in Appendix G, no changes to these existing plans are identified as a result of this study.

Selected Results A compilation of selected information is presented on the following pages in the form of figures and tables extracted from the body of the report; these are described below.

Figure 6-1 displays a map of the St. Lucie EPZ showing the layout of the 8 areas that comprise, in aggregate, the EPZ.

Table 3-1 presents the estimates of permanent resident population in each area based on the 2010 Census data.

Table 6-1 defines each of the 12 Evacuation Regions in terms of their respective groups of areas.

Table 6-2 lists the Evacuation Scenarios.

Tables 7-1 and 7-2 are compilations of ETE. These data are the times needed to clear the indicated regions of 90 and 100 percent of the population occupying these regions, respectively. These computed ETE include consideration of mobilization time and of estimated voluntary evacuations from other regions within the EPZ and from the Shadow Region.

Tables 7-3 and 7-4 present ETE for the 2-mile region for un-staged and staged evacuations for the 90th and 100th percentiles, respectively.

Table 8-7 presents ETE for the schoolchildren in good weather.

Table 8-10 presents ETE for the transit-dependent population in good weather.

Figure H-8 presents an example of an Evacuation Region (Region R08) to be evacuated under the circumstances defined in Table 6-1. Maps of all regions are provided in Appendix H.

Conclusions

General population ETE were computed for 144 unique cases - a combination of 12 unique Evacuation Regions and 12 unique Evacuation Scenarios. Table 7-1 and Table 7-2 document these ETE for the 90th and 100th percentiles. These ETE range from 3:40 (hr:min) to 6:00 at the 90th percentile.

Inspection of Table 7-1 and Table 7-2 indicates that the ETE for the 100th percentile are significantly longer than those for the 90th percentile. This is the result of the congestion within the EPZ. When the system becomes congested, traffic exits the EPZ at rates somewhat below capacity until some evacuation routes have cleared. As more routes clear, the aggregate rate of egress slows since many vehicles have already left the EPZ.

Towards the end of the process, relatively few evacuation routes service the remaining demand. See Figures 7-9 through 7-20.

Inspection of Table 7-3 and Table 7-4 indicates that a staged evacuation provides no St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

benefits to evacuees from within the 2 mile radius and unnecessarily delays the evacuation of those beyond 2 miles (compare Regions R02, R04 and R05 with Regions RIO through R12, respectively, in Tables 7-1 and 7-2). See Section 7.6 for additional discussion.

Comparison of Scenarios 6 (winter, midweek, good weather) and 11 (winter, midweek, good weather) in Table 7-2 indicates that the special event only has a significant impact on Regions RO0 and R05 due to the high transient population on Hutchinson Island. See Section 7.5 for additional discussion.

Comparison of Scenarios 1 and 12 in Table 7-1 indicates that the roadway closure - one lane southbound on 1-95 from the interchange with SW St. Lucie West Blvd (Exit 121) to the interchange with State Highway 714/Martin Highway (Exit 110) - does not have a significant impact (ETE increase by at most 20 minutes) on 90th percentile ETE. The roadway closure does, however, have a significant impact on the 1 0 0 th percentile ETE with increases of up to 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months . See Section 7.5 for additional discussion.

Fort Pierce and Port St. Lucie are the two most congested areas during an evacuation.

US 1 and Interstate-95 experience heavy congestion throughout the evacuation. 1-95 northbound experiences pronounced congestion for the duration of the evacuation due to a lane drop from 3 lanes to 2 lanes north of the interchange with SR 70. All congestion within the EPZ clears by 7 hours8.101852e-5 days 0.00194 hours 1.157407e-5 weeks 2.6635e-6 months and 30 minutes after the Advisory to Evacuate during good weather. See Section 7.3 and Figures 7-3 through 7-8.

Separate ETE were computed for schools, medical facilities, transit-dependent persons, and homebound special needs persons. The average one-wave ETE for schools, medical facilities and special needs persons are less than the general population ETE at the 9 0 th percentile. The one-wave ETE for transit-dependent persons are longer than general population ETE at the 90th percentile. See Section 8.

Table 8-5 indicates that there are sufficient buses and wheelchair buses available to evacuate the ambulatory and wheelchair bound transit-dependent population within the EPZ in a single wave; however, there are not enough ambulances to evacuate all of the bedridden population in a single wave. Discussions with Martin and St. Lucie County emergency management personnel indicate mutual aid agreements exist with the state and neighboring counties to provide enough ambulances to fill the deficiency of ambulance resources and evacuate the bedridden population in a single wave. See Sections 8.4.

The general population ETE at the 90th percentile is insensitive to reductions in the base trip generation time of 7 hours8.101852e-5 days 0.00194 hours 1.157407e-5 weeks 2.6635e-6 months due to the pronounced traffic congestion within'the EPZ.

See Table M-1.

" The general population ETE is relatively insensitive to a reduction in voluntary evacuating vehicles in the Shadow Region. The ETE is sensitive to an increase in voluntary evacuating vehicles in the Shadow Region (tripling the shadow evacuation percentage increases 90th percentile ETE by 40 minutes). See Table M-2.

A population increase of 3% or greater results in ETE changes which meet the criteria for updating ETE between decennial Censuses. See Section M.3.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 6-1. St. Lucie EPZ Areas St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate - Rev. 1

Table 3-1. EPZ Permanent Resident Population Area 2000 Pouato 200Ppu I n.

1 3324 3,676 2 11,707 13,199 3 37,589 37,713 4 20,733 38,391 5 53,537 72,494 6 17,158 22,505 7 19,268 21,995 8 7,347 7,736 TOTALPZ io6621iGrt J70 217,709 EPZ Population Growth: 27.57%

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

Table 6-1. Description of Evacuation Regions Area Region Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 71 8 R01 2-Mile Region R02 5-Mile Region MR " R4 R03 Full EPZ 0 "1 MIN M Evacuate 2-Mile Region and Downwind to 5 Miles Area Region Wind Direction Towards: 1 2 3 14 15 6 7 8 N/A N, NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE, SE Refer to Region R01 R04 SSE, S, SSW I I ý"

N/A SW, WSW, W Refer to Region R02 R05 WNW, NW, NNW I I I TM Evacuate 5-Mile Region and Downwind to the EPZ Boundary Area Region Wind Direction Towards: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 R06 N N/A NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE Refer to Region R02 N/A SE, SSE2 Refer to Region R04 R07 S, SSW R08 s N/A W Refer to Region R03 R09 WNW, NW, NNW 4x Ml-_A-l Staged Evacuation Mile Radius Evacuates, then Evacuate Downwind to 5 Miles Area Region Wind Direction Towards: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 RIO 5-Mile Radius 1 "

N/A N, NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE, SE Refer to Region R01 R 11 SSE, S, SSW I M I I M, !

ruj/AVI A v*vIvv, AI %A/I D 4- D

- Dinx II/t-I ,,.,*VVw VV*)VVp VV I1qýlI %J ý_AIUI I*..

- i -- I I RI7 %AI/\AI N\AI KJK\A/

Area(s) Shelter-in-Place 1 Although Area 7 is not within 5 miles of the plant, it is evacuated for regions involving the 5:mile radius and for regions wherein the 2-mile radius is evacuated and downwind to the south-southeast through the west to 5 miles.

2 Site specific protective action recommendations indicate that only Areas 1, 6, 7, & 8 evacuate for regions wherein the 5-mile radius is evacuated and downwind to the southeast and south-southeast to the EPZ boundary.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 6-2. Evacuation Scenario Definitions 1 Summer Midweek Midday Good None 2 Summer Midweek Midday Rain None 3 Summer Weekend Midday Good None 4 Summer Weekend Midday Rain None 5Summer Midweek, Evening Good None Summer Weekend 6 Winter Midweek Midday Good None 7 Winter Midweek Midday Rain None 8 Winter Weekend Midday Good None 9 Winter Weekend Midday Rain None 10 Winter Midweek, Evening Good None

___________ Weekend _______

NY Mets Spring Winter Midweek Midday Good Training 11 Training Single Lane 12 Summer Midweek Midday Good Closure on 1-95 Southbound 3 Winter assumes that school is in session (also applies to spring and autumn). Summer assumes that school is not in session.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 7-1. Time to Clear the Indicated Area of 90 Percent of the Affected Population Summer Summer SummeatWin We terter Winter Winter Summer Midweek Weekend Mdek Midweek Weekend Mdek Midweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Midday Midday nirwe2-iek M___

Evening Reioi-ilwRgineadkP Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Region Good Rain Good Rain Good Good Rai Good Rain Good Seil Rawy Rgo Weather Weather Weather Weather Wahreter Event Impact Entire 2-Mile Region, S-Mile Region, and EPZ RO " 4:40i 5:05, 4':50 5:20 :40 5:

505.- :35L4I 0- 5:25;. 6*00 :40 :40 4::4R R02 3:40 3:55 3:45 4:10 3:35 3:45 4:05 3:55 4:10 3:45 3:55 3:40 R02 13 515 5:50 4:55 5:25 4:45.5:30.6..........4.4...5::40 i> 6. 5:35.. R0.

2-Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R04 3:40 3:55 j_3:45 4:05 3:40 3:45 4:05 4:00 4:15 3:50 4:00 3:40 R04 ROl "o3-45 6Ky 4 eo054[ [ :0ea 4J 3;45Pou

_________ ________ 5-Mile Region and Keyhole to EPZ Boundary ____ ____ ____

R06 4:15 4:40 4:10 4:25 3:50 4:35 4:55 4:15 4:40 4:00 4:40 4:20 R06 R07 4:0:20. 4:10 4:4. 4:05 4:30- ,5.:00 :15. :.35k 4:10 - 4.:30.,

RO8 4:55 5:20 4:35 4:55 4:20 5:00 5:30 4:35 5:05 4 25 5:05 5:15 R08 R09 ý4:50; 5:10 4:20 4§Aw4ý40 4J1O ,0 :0 ~ 42 4;45 4-.4: 505 ý5ý:00- A09 Staged Evacuation Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R1O 4:10 4:25 4:35 4:50 4:35 4:10 4:30 4:40 4:55 4:35 4:15 4:10 R10 R11, 3:5 4:15 4:3. 4:25 4:35 4:105 4:25 415 4:3 3:55 R1214:5 R12 3:55 4:'15 4:10- 4:25 4:15 4:05 14:25 14:25 4:45 4:15 4:30 3:55 R12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-b ES-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

Table 7-2. Time to Clear the Indicated Area of 100 Percent of the Affected Population Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Winter Summer Midweek Weekend Midweek Midweek Weekend Midweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Midday Midday . Evening Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Region Good Rain Good Rain Good Good Rain Good Rain Good Special Roadway Region Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Event Impact Entire 2-Mile Region, 5-Mile Region, and EPZ R~l 7: 05 0"5, LO 00 90 7:00 7:05 '7:0- ' :0'>:0 - 700:5705 - RO Rol____ 7:5R101730' 81 7____

____ 7__00__ 7:1 ____

R02 7:05 7:05 7:05 7: 05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7310 7:05 7:05 7:05 R02 R0 7:25 73 ý- 7:10 ,710 7.:10 '7: 55 8!25 R03,

_______ ______ ________ 2-Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles _________________________

R04 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:7:05 :05 75 7:05 7:30 7 05 7:05 7.05 R04 ROe 7:05 gnn'7:057 7yhol [ 7' 7:05b'05 [uROa 5-Mile Region and Keyhole to EPZ Boundary R06 7:10 7:15 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:20 7:10 7:30 7:10 7:10 7:10 R06 Rog 7:10, 7:10" ~7:10S '7:10 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:10 .7:30 7:10 7:10 7:10 R08 ROBS" 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:0 7:10 7:10 7:10 ROB RO9 11; j .:10 7:50' 4 -7:10 tJ s-7:10-w4 ThiD-'

7- j - '7:15 .7:10' {>'730 ' 7:10 J - 7:30 , '. 7:10 [ RO9 Staged Evacuation Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R10 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:30 7:05 7:05 7:05 RiO Rl - 7:0S. :_7:05._ 7:05 7** '7-'05 7105' - 7:Q05. 7:05 7: 5 -. 7:30 7:05;m' 705 7:05 .. ' ___P____

R12 7:0 5 7.05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:30 7:05 7:05 7:05 R12 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 7-3. Time to Clear 90 Percent of the 2-Mile Radius within the Indicated Region Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Summer Summer Midweek Midweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Midweek Weekend Weekend Weekend Midweek

-Weekend Weekend Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Evening Midday Region Good Rain Good Rain Good Good Rain Good Rain Good Special Roadway Region Weather Weather I Weather Weather R Weather Weather Event Impact Un-staged Evacuation Mile Radius, 2-Mile Region and Keyhole to S-Miles 2-Mile 2:10 2:20 2:20 2:25 2:00 2:15 2-Mile Radius Radius 2:15 2:15 2:25 2:25 2:30 2:10 Radius Radius R02 2:15 2:15 2:25 2:25 230 2:10 2:10 2:20 220 2:25 2 00 2:15 R02 22:25 2:30 2:10 2:10 20 20 : :000R04 :15 RO 2:15 2:15 2:25 2:25 2:30 2:10 2:10 2:20 2:20 2:25 2:00 2:15 R05 Staged Evacuation Mile Region and Keyhole to 5-Miles R _ 2:15 ' 2:15. 225 2:25 2:30 2:10 2:10 ; -52:20 2:20 2:00 2:15 R R11 - 2:15 2:15 2:25 2:2 5 2:30 -2:10 2:10 2:20 2:20 2:25_ 2:00 2.1___ 1 R11

,R12- :215 -. >2:15-. -2:25 2:25 2:30 1O T'-h2:20'

-- 2:20 ______ 2:00 _ 2 :1115_

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 7-4. Time to Clear 100 Percent of the 2-Mile Radius within the Indicated Region Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Summer Summer Midweek Weekend Weekend Midweek Weekend Weekend Weekend Midweek Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Evening Midday Region Good Rain Good Rain Good Good Rain Good Rain Good Special Roadway Region Weather Weather Weather Weather _ _ Weather Weather Event Impact Un-staged Evacuation Mile Radius, 2-Mile Region and Keyhole to 5-Miles 2-Mile 2-Mile Radius Radius 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 Radius * ..... .. . .. .Radius

77. 00 70 7:001- 7:00 :00*0 70 7Q00,1`.ý- 7:0007-.-. :00 7:00>0 RO-1 R02 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 R02 RO 7: 00 7:000 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 RO5 Staged Evacuation Mile Region and Keyhole to 5-Miles Ri 70, 7:0 :0' 7:0 00 ~ -.00 <7:00 7:00 7~ 7.:00 _ 7:00 7:00 ~7:00 i Rll 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7(00 7:00 7:00 7:00 Rl R7 700.. :00 . . 7-:Q0

. . .. 7:00 L.

. 7.. 7:00 7:W.00. - -. 00 ... 7:00 1 . .. .

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 8-7. School Evacuation Time Estimates - Good Weather Environmental Studies Center 30 10 322.2 89 ,2:10 5.4 9 2:20 Felix A. Williams Elementary 30 10 14 33.3 3 i0:45 4.1 7 0:55 Jensen Beach Community Church 30 10 .43.8 86 2:10 4.1 7 2:

220 Jensen Beach Elementary School 30 10 282.2 77 !2:00 4.1 7 2:10 New Creations Academy 30 10 352.2 98 2:20 4.1 7 2:30 Trinity United Methodist School 30 10 71 155 4.1t2.2 7 Allapattah Flats K-8 30 10 000.0 0 0:40: 6.3 10 0:50 Anglewood Center 30 10 54 3.9 84 2:05: 6.8 1-1 2:20 Bayshore Elementary 30 10 24 8.6 17 1:00 12.7 20 1:20 Bethany School 30 10 653.7 106 2:30 6.7 11 ,2:45 Bible Baptist School 30 10 44 13.9 20 1:00 5.0 8 1:10 Chester A Moore Elementary 30 10 83.6 114 6.7 t2:35 11 2:50 Christ Family Fellowship Christian Academy 30 10 3.6 67 1:50 5.0 8 2:00 Dale Cassens Education Complex 30 10 5.6 3.5 97 2:20 6.7 11 2:35 Dan McCarty Middle School 30 10 . 3.5 95 2:15 6.7 11 2:30 Delaware Avenue School 30 10 5. 16.6 19 1:00 6.7 11 1:15 Fairlawn Elementary 30 10 4.1 17.8 14 0:55 6.7 11 1:10 Faith Baptist School 30 10 60 4.9 74 i 1:55 5.0 8 *2:05 First Liberty Baptist Academy 30 10 3.0 21.8 98 0:50 5.0 8 1:00 Floresta Elementary 30 10 512.4 28 1:10 10.8 17 1:30 Forest Grove Middle School 30 10 . 13.8 26 1:10 5.0 8 1:205 Fort Pierce Westwood High School 30 10 6.5 3.8 90 2:10 6.8 11 2:25 Francis K Sweet Elementary 30 10 .8 13.0 37 1:20 6.7 11 2:35 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Ft Pierce Magnet School ot the Arts 3i 1U b.b 3.7 1U7 2:30 b.7 11 Z:45 Garden City Early Learning Academy Elementary 30 10 7.3 3.6 121 2:45'** 6.7 11 3:00 Indian Hills School 30 10 5.6 3.7 92 2:15 6.7 11 2:30 John Carroll Catholic High School 30 10 5.0 31.8 10 0:50 6.7 11 1:05 Lakewood Park Elementary 30 10 0.0 0.0 0 0:40 14.6 22 1:05 Lawnwood Elementary 30 10 4.7 15.2 19 1:00, 6.7 11 1:15 Lincoln Park Academy 30 10 7.0 3.6 116 2:40 6.7 11 2:55 Manatee K-8 School 30 10 1.2 22.6 4 0:45 10.8 17 1:05 Mariposa Elementary 30 10 14.0 4.3 194 3:55 5.0 8 4:05 Morningside Academy - Lower 30 10 14.4 6.3 138 3:00 6.8 11 3:15, Morningside Academy - Upper 30 10 14.6 5.9 147 3:1 6.8 11 3:25",

Morningside Elementary 30 10 14.5 7.7 114 235: 6.8 11 2:50 NAU Charter 30 10 0.0 0.0 0 0:40 19.1 29 1:10 Northport K-8 School 30 10 3.4 15.8 13 0:55 10.8 17 1:15 Oak Hammock K-8 School 30 10 1.7 33.6 4 0:45',:,: 12.7 20 1:05' Pace Center for Girls 30 10 3.9 17.8 14 0:55, 6.7 11 1:10,.

Palm Pointe 30 10 0.0 0.0 0 0:40ýý! 14.7 23 1:05 Palm Vista Christian School 30 10 4.7 42.7 7 0:50 6.7 11 i:05 Parkway Elementary 30 10 4.8 18.4 16 '1:00 5.0 8 1:10 Port St Lucie High School 30 10 12.4 8.3 90 2:10ý 5.0 8 2:20 Renaissance Charter School of St. Lucie 30 10 1.7 16.1 7 0:50 10.8 17 1:10 Rivers Edge Elementary 30 10 4.5 3.5 76 2:00 5.0 8 2:10 -

Samuel S Gaines Academy K8 30 10 2.9 10.3 17 1:00 6.7 11 1:15 Savanna Ridge Elementary 30 10 7.9 7.4 64 1:45 5.0 8 1:55 Seventh Day Adventist School 30 10 3.9 13.6 18 1:00 5.0 8 1:10 Southern Oaks Middle School 30 10 3.9 18.6 13 0:55 5.0 8 1:05 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-1S KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Soutnport MIaide NcflOoi iU lU .14.b UU L4. 0.1 ii St Anastasia Elementary School 30 10 4.9 42.7 7 6.7 11 10 7.7 4.0 116 6.7 11 St Andrews Episcopal School 30 87 6.7 11 St Lucie Elementary 30 10 5.3 3.7 St Lucie West Centennial High School 30 10 1.3 19.2 5 12.7 20 St. Lucie West K-8 30 10 1.5 25.4 4 12.7 20 Treasure Coast High School 30 10 2.4 32.3 5 15.1 23 Village Green Environmental Studies School 30 10 13.0 3.8 203 5.0 8 Weatherbee Elementary 30 10 6.3 9.0 43 5.0 8 West Gate K-8 School 30 10 4.4 15.1 18 5.0 8 White City Elementary 30 10 4.7 15.2 19 5.0 8 Windmill Point Elementary 30 10 1.9 32.3 4 15.1 23 Woodlands Montessori School 30 10 6.3 18.0 21 5.0 R 4 z'147'_________

7 a St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 8-10. Transit-Dependent Evacuation Time Estimates - Good Weather 1-5 180 35.2 9.2 23U 31.51 4, 5 'U 149 TCC 1 6-10 200 35.2 9.8 215 30 31.5 47 5 10 149 30 11-15 220 35.2 10.51 201 30 31.5 47 5 10 149 30 1-9 180 11.2 3.5 190 30 27.3 41 5 10 77 30 10-18 200 11.2 3.7 183 301 27.3 41 5 10 77 j 30 TCC 2 19-27 220 11.2 3.9 173 301 27.3 41 5 10 77 30 9.:5u.ý 28-36 240 11.2 4.1 163 30 7.1 27.3 41 5 10 77 30 ~10:06--

1-6 180 14.6 4.6 190 30 6:*40/ 31.5 47 5 10 85 30 I 19:4:t-TCC 3 _____ 4 4 -I- -4 4 + 4 + +

6-12 200 14.6 5.0 175 30 64'5 31.5 47 5 10 85 30 I 19:45:'ý`

1-11 180 15.2 8.6 106 30 5:20 42.1 63 5 10 106 30 8:55 TCC 5 11-22 200 15.2 9.7 94 30 5 42.1 63 5 10 106 30 '9:00 1-11 180 21.9 10.0 132 30 5:45 36.9 55 5 10 116 30 9.20 TCC 6 11-23 200 21.9 11.0 119 30 5: 36.9 55 5 10 116 30 9:30 PSL Trolley 1-7 180 14.1 6.6 128 30 5:40 40.7 61 5 10 100 30 9:05 Area 1 1&2 180 12.1 10.2 71 30 4:45 27.4 41 5 10 91 30 1-7 180 8.7 12.3 42 30 4:15 47.3 71 5 10 97 30 7:50 Area 7 8-14 200 8.7 17.4 30 30 4:20 47.3 71 5 10 96 30 Area 8 1-5 180 12.0 14.2 51 30 4:25 49.6 74 5 10 108 30 8:10

'M% Minlr ETEJJ. 47i35k Maximum ETE;____

fr%~ Aveiage,' 605 Average ETE.-Z930l.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H-8. Region R08 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ES-18 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1 INTRODUCTION This report describes the analyses undertaken and the results obtained by a study to develop Evacuation Time Estimates (ETE) for the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant, located in St. Lucie County, Florida. ETE provide State and local governments with site-specific information needed for Protective Action decision-making.

In the performance of this effort, guidance is provided by documents published by Federal Governmental agencies. Most important of these are:

Criteria for Development of Evacuation Time Estimate Studies, NUREG/CR-7002, November 2011.

Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG 0654/FEMA REP 1, Rev. 1, November 1980.

Analysis of Techniques for Estimating Evacuation Times for Emergency Planning Zones, NUREG/CR 1745, November 1980.

Development of Evacuation Time Estimates for Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG/CR-6863, January 2005.

The work effort reported herein was supported and guided by local stakeholders who contributed suggestions, critiques, and the local knowledge base required. Table 1-1 presents a summary of stakeholders and interactions.

Table 1-1. Stakeholder Interaction Stakholdr :atur ofStakholdr Iteratio Meeting to define data requirements and set up contacts with local government agencies. Review Florida Power and Light and approval of telephone survey instrument and of key project assumptions.

Meeting to define data requirements and set up St. Lucie County Division of Emergency contacts with local government agencies. Obtain Management (DEM) and Martin County local emergency plans, special facility data, and Emergency Management Agency (EMA) transient data. Review and approval of telephone survey instrument and of key project assumptions.

The State of Florida Radiological Emergency Preparedness Annex. Review and approval of Florida Division of Emergency Management telephone survey instrument and of key project assumptions.

Local and State Police Agencies Obtain existing traffic management plans St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 1-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1.1 Overview of the ETE Process The following outline presents a brief description of the work effort in chronological sequence:

1. Information Gathering:

a. Defined the scope of work in discussions with representatives from Florida Power and Light.

b. Attended a project kickoff meeting with emergency planners from St. Lucie County DEM, and Martin County EMA to identify issues to be addressed and resources available.

c. Conducted a detailed field survey of the highway system and of area traffic conditions within the EPZ and Shadow Region.

d. Obtained demographic data from the 2010 census, St. Lucie DEM and Martin County EMA.

e. Conducted a random sample telephone survey of EPZ residents.

f. Conducted a data collection effort to identify and describe schools, special facilities, transportation providers, and other important information.

2. Estimated distributions of Trip Generation times representing the time required by various population groups (permanent residents, employees, and transients) to prepare (mobilize) for the evacuation trip. These estimates are primarily based upon the random sample telephone survey.

3. Defined Evacuation Scenarios. These scenarios reflect the variation in demand, in trip generation distribution and in highway capacities, associated with different seasons, day of week, time of day and weather conditions.

4. Reviewed the existing traffic management plans to be implemented by local and state police in the event of an incident at the plant. Traffic control is applied at specified Traffic Control Points (TCP) located within the EPZ.

5. Used existing Areas to define Evacuation Regions. The EPZ is partitioned into 8 Areas along jurisdictional and geographic boundaries. "Regions" are groups of contiguous Areas for which ETE are calculated. The configurations of these Regions reflect wind direction and the radial extent of the impacted area. Each Region, other than those that approximate circular areas, approximates a "key-hole section" within the EPZ as recommended by NUREG/CR-7002.

6. Estimated demand for transit services for persons at special facilities and for transit-dependent persons at home.

7. Prepared the input streams for the DYNEV II system.

a. Estimated the evacuation traffic demand, based on the available information derived from Census data, and from data provided by local and state agencies, St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 1-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Florida Power & Light and from the telephone survey.

b. Applied the procedures specified in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 1 )

to the data acquired during the field survey, to estimate the capacity of all highway segments comprising the evacuation routes.

c. Developed the link-node representation of the evacuation network, which is used as the basis for the computer analysis that calculates the ETE.

d. Calculated the evacuating traffic demand for each Region and for each Scenario.

e. Specified selected candidate destinations for each "origin" (location of each "source" where evacuation trips are generated over the mobilization time) to support evacuation travel consistent with outbound movement relative to the location of the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant.

8. Executed the DYNEV II model to determine optimal evacuation routing and compute ETE for all residents, transients and employees ("general population") with access to private vehicles. Generated a complete set of ETE for all specified Regions and Scenarios.

9. Documented ETE in formats in accordance with NUREG/CR-7002.

10. Calculated the ETE for all transit activities including those for special facilities (schools, medical facilities, etc.), for the transit-dependent population and for homebound special needs population.

1.2 The St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Location The St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant (St. Lucie) is located along the shores of the Atlantic Ocean in Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie County, Florida. The site is approximately 40 miles north-northwest of West Palm Beach, FL. The EPZ consists of parts of St. Lucie and Martin Counties. Figure 1-1 displays the area surrounding St. Lucie. This map identifies the communities in the area and the major roads.

Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010), Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 2010.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 1-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 1-1. St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Location St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 1-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1.3 Preliminary Activities These activities are described below.

Field Surveys of the Highway Network KLD personnel drove the entire highway system within the EPZ and the Shadow Region which consists of the area between the EPZ boundary and 15 miles radially from the plant. The characteristics of each section of highway were recorded. These characteristics are shown in Table 1-2:

Table 1-2. Highway Characteristics

" Number of lanes a Posted speed

Lane width a Actual free speed

" Shoulder type & width a Abutting land use

" Interchange geometries a Control devices

Lane channelization & queuing 0 Intersection configuration (including capacity (including turn bays/lanes) roundabouts where applicable)

Geometrics: curves, grades (>4%) 0 Traffic signal type

" Unusual characteristics: Narrow bridges, sharp curves, poor pavement, flood warning signs, inadequate delineations, toll booths, etc.

Video and audio recording equipment were used to capture a permanent record of the highway infrastructure. No attempt was made to meticulously measure such attributes as lane width and shoulder width; estimates of these measures based on visual observation and recorded images were considered appropriate for the purpose of estimating the capacity of highway sections. For example, Exhibit 15-7 in the HCM indicates that a reduction in lane width from 12 feet (the "base" value) to 10 feet can reduce free flow speed (FFS) by 1.1 mph - not a material difference - for two-lane highways. Exhibit 15-30 in the HCM shows little sensitivity for the estimates of Service Volumes at Level of Service (LOS) E (near capacity), with respect to FFS, for two-lane highways.

The data from the audio and video recordings were used to create detailed geographical information systems (GIS) shapefiles and databases of the roadway characteristics and of the traffic control devices observed during the road survey; this information was referenced while preparing the input stream for the DYNEV II System.

As documented on page 15-5 of the HCM 2010, the capacity of a two-lane highway is 1700 passenger cars per hour in one direction. For freeway sections, a value of 2250 vehicles per hour per lane is assigned, as per Exhibit 11-17 of the HCM 2010. The road survey has identified several segments which are characterized by adverse geometrics on two-lane highways which are reflected in reduced values for both capacity and speed. These estimates are consistent with the service volumes for LOS E presented in HCM Exhibit 15-30. These links may be St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 1-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

identified by reviewing Appendix K. Link capacity is an input to DYNEV II which computes the ETE. Further discussion of roadway capacity is provided in Section 4 of this report.

Traffic signals are either pre-timed (signal timings are fixed over time and do not change with the traffic volume on competing approaches), or are actuated (signal timings vary over time based on the changing traffic volumes on competing approaches). Actuated signals require detectors to provide the traffic data used by the signal controller to adjust the signal timings.

These detectors are typically magnetic loops in the roadway, or video cameras mounted on the signal masts and pointed toward the intersection approaches. If detectors were observed on the approaches to a signalized intersection during the road survey, detailed signal timings were not collected as the timings vary with traffic volume. TCPs at locations which have control devices are represented as actuated signals in the DYNEV II system.

If no detectors were observed, the signal control at the intersection was considered pre-timed, and detailed signal timings were gathered for several signal cycles. These signal timings were input to the DYNEV II system used to compute ETE, as per NUREG/CR-7002 guidance.

Figure 1-2 presents the link-node analysis network that was constructed to model the evacuation roadway network in the EPZ and Shadow Region. The directional arrows on the links and the node numbers have been removed from Figure 1-2 to clarify the figure. The detailed figures provided in Appendix K depict the analysis network with directional arrows shown and node numbers provided. The observations made during the field survey were used to calibrate the analysis network.

Telephone Survey A telephone survey was undertaken to gather information needed for the evacuation study.

Appendix F presents the survey instrument, the procedures used and tabulations of data compiled from the survey returns.

These data were utilized to develop estimates of vehicle occupancy to estimate the number of evacuating vehicles during an evacuation and to estimate elements of the mobilization process.

This database was also referenced to estimate the number of transit-dependent residents.

Computing the Evacuation Time Estimates The overall study procedure is outlined in Appendix D. Demographic data were obtained from several sources, as detailed later in this report. These data were analyzed and converted into vehicle demand data. The vehicle demand was loaded onto appropriate "source" links of the analysis network using GIS mapping software. The DYNEV II system was then used to compute ETE for all Regions and Scenarios.

Analytical Tools The DYNEV II System that was employed for this study is comprised of several integrated computer models. One of these is the DYNEV (DYnamic Network EVacuation) macroscopic simulation model, a new version of the IDYNEV model that was developed by KLD under contract with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 1-6 KLD Engineering. P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 1-2. St. Lucie Link-Node Analysis Network St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 1-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

DYNEV II consists of four sub-models:

" A macroscopic traffic simulation model (for details, see Appendix C).

A Trip Distribution (TD), model that assigns a set of candidate destination (D) nodes for each "origin" (0) located within the analysis network, where evacuation trips are "generated" over time. This establishes a set of O-D tables.

A Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA), model which assigns trips to paths of travel (routes) which satisfy the O-D tables, over time. The TD and DTA models are integrated to form the DTRAD (Dynamic Traffic Assignment and Distribution) model, as described in Appendix B.

A Myopic Traffic Diversion model which diverts traffic to avoid intense, local congestion, if possible.

Another software product developed by KLD, named UNITES (UNIfied Transportation Engineering System) was used to expedite data entry and to automate the production of output tables.

The dynamics of traffic flow over the network are graphically animated using the software product, EVAN (EVacuation ANimator), developed by KLD. EVAN is GIS based, and displays statistics such as LOS, vehicles discharged, average speed, and percent of vehicles evacuated, output by the DYNEV II System. The use of a GIS framework enables the user to zoom in on areas of congestion and query road name, town name and other geographical information.

The procedure for applying the DYNEV II System within the framework of developing ETE is outlined in Appendix D. Appendix A is a glossary of terms.

For the reader interested in an evaluation of the original model, I-DYNEV, the following references are suggested:

" NUREG/CR-4873 - Benchmark Study of the I-DYNEV Evacuation Time Estimate Computer Code

" NUREG/CR-4874 - The Sensitivity of Evacuation Time Estimates to Changes in Input Parameters for the I-DYNEV Computer Code The evacuation analysis procedures are based upon the need to:

Route traffic along paths of travel that will expedite their travel from their respective points of origin to points outside the EPZ.

Restrict movement toward the plant to the extent practicable, and disperse traffic demand so as to avoid focusing demand on a limited number of highways.

Move traffic in directions that are generally outbound, relative to the location of the St.

Lucie Nuclear Power Plant.

DYNEV II provides a detailed description of traffic operations on the evacuation network. This description enables the analyst to identify bottlenecks and to develop countermeasures that are designed to represent the behavioral responses of evacuees. The effects of these countermeasures may then be tested with the model.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 1-8 KLD Engineering. P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1.4 Comparison with Prior ETE Study Table 1-3 presents a comparison of the present ETE study with the 2003 study. The major factors contributing to the differences between the ETE values obtained in this study and those of the previous study can be summarized as follows:

A substantial increase in permanent resident population (27.3% over 10 years).

0 Vehicle occupancy and Trip-generation rates are based on the results of a telephone survey of EPZ residents. This study uses a trip generation time of 7 hours8.101852e-5 days 0.00194 hours 1.157407e-5 weeks 2.6635e-6 months to load vehicles onto evacuation routes, versus 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months in the previous study. Compressing the loading into a shorter timeframe can overwhelm evacuation routes, cause significant traffic congestion and prolong ETE.

Lower vehicle occupancy which results in more evacuating vehicles and prolongs ETE.

2010 HCM used - baseline capacity estimates have continuously increased from one version to the next of the HCM. The previous study used the 1985 HCM. Higher capacity estimates result in lower ETE.

0 Significant reduction in the number of seasonal residents. This may be due to seasonal homes becoming year-round residences, or due to differences in methodology for computing seasonal population.

Voluntary and shadow evacuations are considered.

0 The highway representation is far more detailed providing more routing choices for evacuees, which could reduce ETE.

a Dynamic evacuation modeling used which adjusts routing to avoid traffic congestion to the extent feasible (similar to a modern GPS) and could reduce in ETE.

Roadway improvements to accommodate the significant increase in population.

Those factors identified above which could reduce ETE outweigh those that prolong ETE and the result is a decrease in ETE of more than an hour in this study relative to the previous ETE study.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 1-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 1-3. ETE Study Comparisons T~pi Pivos T StdCurn T Std ArcGIS Software using 2010 US Resident Population 2000 US Census Data; Census blocks; area ratio method Basis Population = 171,061 used.

Population = 217,709 Vehicle occupancy based on 2000 US Census 2.07 persons/household, 1.19 Resident Population data. 2.51 persons/household, 1.13 evacuating vehicles/household Vehicle Occupancy vehicles/household yielding: 2.22 yielding: 1.74 persons/vehicle.

persons/vehicle.

Employee estimates based on data provided by both St. Lucie and Martin Counties, along Employee estimates based on with information from the previous study, 2010 Census data, supplemented internet yellow pages, internet searches, the with data provided by the plant.

Employee Harris Information Source, data from the 1.07 employees per vehicle Population local Chamber of Commerce offices, and the based on telephone survey AAA Vacation TourBook. 1.0 employee per results.

vehicle was used for all major employers.

Employees = 18,059 Employees are grouped with transient population.

Estimates based upon U.S.

Census data and the results of the telephone survey. A total of 4,075 people who do not have access to a vehicle, requiring 136 Transit-Dependent Census data used to determine percent of buses to evacuate. An additional Population housing units that are without a vehicle. 253 homebound special needs persons need special transportation to evacuate (191 require a bus, 52 require a wheelchair-accessible vehicle, and 10 require an ambulance).

Transient facility lists based on data provided Transient estimates based upon by both St. Lucie and Martin Counties, along information provided about with information from the previous study, transient attractions in EPZ, internet yellow pages, internet searches, the supplemented by observations Harris Information Source, data from the of the facilities during the road Transient local Chamber of Commerce offices, and the survey and from aerial Population AAA Vacation TourBook. Seasonal residents photography. Seasonal were estimated from 2000 US Census Bureau Residents computed using 2010 block data. Census data.

Transients = 14,813 Transients = 14,291 Seasonal Residents = 29,989 Seasonal Residents = 4,211 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 1-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

T-ic PI Special facility population based on information provided by each Special facility population based data provide county within the EPZ.

by both St Lucie and Martin Counties, as well Medical Facilities:

as information from the previous study, Current census = 1,950 Special Facilities internet yellow pages, internet searches, US Buses Required = 40 Population Medicare web page, and data from the State's health and human services agencies. Wheelchair Bus Required = 51 Special Facility Population = 4,829 Ambulances Required = 244 Correctional Facility:

Current Census = 114 Shelters-In-Place School based data provide by both St Lucie and Martin Counties, as well as information School population based on from the previous study, internet yellow pages, internet searches, US Medicare web infomaion pve each School Population page, and data from the State's health and county within the EPZ.

human services agencies. School enrollment = 65,464 School enrollment =52,053 Buses required = 874 Voluntary 20 percent of the population evacuation from within the EPZ, but not within within EPZ in areas Not considered the Evacuation Region (see outside region to be Figure 2-1) evacuated 20% of people outside of the EPZ Shadow Evacuation Not considered within the Shadow Region (see Figure 7-2)

Network Size Not Specified 1,816 links; 1,330 nodes Field surveys conducted in Evacuation Routes described on EPZ maps, January 2012. Roads and Roadway Geometric GIS maps of the EPZ, and a comprehensive intersections were video Data field survey of the EPZ. archived.

Road capacities based on 2010 HCM.

School Evacuation Direct evacuation to designated School Direct evacuation to designated Reception Centers School Reception Center.

50 percent of transit-dependent Ridesharing Not considered persons will evacuate with a neighbor or friend.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 1-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

- oic Prvou9 StdCurn T Std Based on residential telephone survey of specific pre-trip mobilization activities:

Trip Generation curves based upon Residents with commuters discussions with local emergency returning leave between 30 and preparedness officials. Permanent residents 420 minutes.

Trip Generation for evacuate between 30 and 120 minutes after the advisory to evacuate. Residents without commuters Evacuation returning leave between 15 and Employees and transients leave between 30 390 minutes.

and 60 minutes.

Employees and transients leave between 15 and 120 minutes.

All times measured from the Advisory to Evacuate.

Normal or Rain. The capacity anfr f din kin Fair and Adverse Weather. The capacity and th enet w are ed by 10%

Weather free flow speed of all links in the network are weather.

reduced by 20% for adverse in the event of rain.

DYNEV II System -Version Modeling NETVAC 4.0.11.0 NY Mets Spring Training Special Events None considered Special Event Population = 2,766 additional transients 12 Regions (central sector wind 9 Schemes and 8 Scenarios producing 72 direction and each adjacent Evacuation Cases sector technique used) and 12 unique cases. Scenarios producing 144 unique cases.

ETE reported for 9 0 th and 1 00 th ETE reported for 10 0 th percentile for all erente populan.Reuts Evacuation Time percentile population. Results Estimates Reporting Scemes. presented by Region and Scenario. Scenario.

Winter Daytime, Winter Weekday, Midday, Fair Weather: 9:17 Good Weather: 7:30 Evacuation Time Adverse Weather: 10:31 Rain: 8:10 Estimates for the entire EPZ, 1 0 0 th percentile Summer Daytime, Summer Weekday, Midday, Fair Weather: 8:40 Good Weather: 7:25 Adverse Weather: 9:45 Rain: 8:10 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 1-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

2 STUDY ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS This section presents the estimates and assumptions utilized in the development of the evacuation time estimates.

2.1 Data Estimates

1. Population estimates are based upon Census 2010 data.

2. Estimates of employees who reside outside the EPZ and commute to work within the EPZ are based upon data obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau, Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics1 .

3. Population estimates at special facilities are based on available data from county emergency management agencies and from phone calls to specific facilities.

4. Roadway capacity estimates are based on field surveys and the application of the Highway Capacity Manual 2010.

5. Population mobilization times are based on a statistical analysis of data acquired from a random sample telephone survey of EPZ residents (see Section 5 and Appendix F).

6. The relationship between resident population and evacuating vehicles is developed from the telephone survey. Average values of 2.07 persons per household and 1.19 evacuating vehicles per household are used. The relationship between persons and vehicles for transients and employees is as follows:

a. Employees: 1.07 employees per vehicle (telephone survey results) for all major employers.

b. Parks, campgrounds and beaches: Vehicle occupancy based on data gathered from surveys of facilities. Ranges from 1 to 6 persons per vehicle. Average household size (2.07 persons per vehicle) was used for those facilities which did not provide data.

c. Marinas, lodging facilities, and golf courses: Vehicle occupancy based on data gathered from surveys of facilities. Ranges from 1 to 6 persons per vehicle.

d. Special Event: Assumed transients attending the NY Mets Spring Training travel as families/households in a single vehicle, and used the average household size of 2.07 persons to estimate the number of vehicles.

l http://lehdmap.did.census.gov/

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 2-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

2.2 Study Methodological Assumptions

1. ETE are presented for the evacuation of the 90th and 100th percentiles of population for each Region and for each Scenario. The percentile ETE is defined as the elapsed time from the Advisory to Evacuate issued to a specific Region of the EPZ, to the time that Region is clear of the indicated percentile of evacuees. A Region is defined as a group of areas that is issued an Advisory to Evacuate. A scenario is a combination of circumstances, including time of day, day of week, season, and weather conditions.

2. The ETE are computed and presented in tabular format and graphically, in a format compliant with NUREG/CR-7002.

3. Evacuation movements (paths of travel) are generally outbound relative to the plant to the extent permitted by the highway network. All major evacuation routes are used in the analysis.

4. Regions are defined by the underlying "keyhole" or circular configurations as specified in Section 1.4 of NUREG/CR-7002. These Regions, as defined, display irregular boundaries reflecting the geography of the areas included within these underlying configurations.

5. As indicated in Figure 2-2 of NUREG/CR-7002, 100% of people within the impacted "keyhole" evacuate. 20% of those people within the EPZ, not within the impacted keyhole, will voluntarily evacuate. 20% of those people within the Shadow Region will voluntarily evacuate. See Figure 2-1 for a graphical representation of these evacuation percentages. Sensitivity studies explore the effect on ETE of increasing the percentage of voluntary evacuees in the Shadow Region (see Appendix M).

6. A total of 12 "Scenarios" representing different temporal variations (season, time of day, day of week) and weather conditions are considered. These Scenarios are outlined in Table 2-1.

7. Scenario 12 considers the closure of a single lane southbound on Interstate 95 southbound from the interchange with SW St. Lucie West Blvd (Exit 121) to the interchange with State Highway 714/Martin Highway (Exit 110).

8. The models of the I-DYNEV System were recognized as state of the art by the Atomic Safety & Licensing Board (ASLB) in past hearings. (Sources: Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Hearings on Seabrook and Shoreham; Urbanik 2). The models have continuously been refined and extended since those hearings and were independently validated by a consultant retained by the NRC. The new DYNEV II model incorporates the latest technology in traffic simulation and in dynamic traffic assignment. The DYNEV II System is used to compute ETE in this study.

2 Urbanik, T., et. al. Benchmark Study of the I-DYNEV Evacuation Time Estimate Computer Code. NUREG/CR-4873, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June, 1988.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 2-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 2-1. Evacuation Scenario Definitions 1 Summer Midweek Midday Good None 2 Summer Midweek Midday Rain None 3 Summer Weekend Midday Good None 4 Summer Weekend Midday Rain None 5 Summer Midweek, Evening Good None Summer Weekend 6 Winter Midweek Midday Good None 7 Winter Midweek Midday Rain None 8 Winter Weekend Midday Good None 9 Winter Weekend Midday Rain None 10 Winter Midweek, Weekend Evening Good None Winter Midweek Midday Good NY Mets Spring 11 Training Single Lane 12 Summer Midweek Midday Good Closure on 1-95 Southbound KLD Engineering, P.C.

St.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Lucie Nuclear Plant Power Plant 2-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

I -Mle Region Jl ego Kyl 15 Miles D w 15 Miles SKeyhole: 2-Mile Region & 5 Miles Downwind Keyhole: 5-Mile Region & 10 Miles Downwind Staged Evacuation: 2-Mile Region & 5 Miles Downwind I* Plant Location E Region to be Evacuated: 100% Evacuation ] 20% Shadow Evacuation M Shelter, then Evacuate I Figure 2-1. Voluntary Evacuation Methodology St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 2-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

2.3 Study Assumptions

1. The Planning Basis Assumption for the calculation of ETE is a rapidly escalating accident that requires evacuation, and includes the following:

a. Advisory to Evacuate is announced coincident with the siren notification.

b. Mobilization of the general population will commence within 15 minutes after siren notification.

c. ETE are measured relative to the Advisory to Evacuate.

2. It is assumed that everyone within the group of Areas forming a Region that is issued an Advisory to Evacuate will, in fact, respond and evacuate in general accord with the planned routes.

3. 38 percent of the households in the EPZ have at least 1 commuter; 51 percent of those households with commuters will await the return of a commuter before beginning their evacuation trip, based on the telephone survey results. Therefore 19 percent (38% x 51% = 19%) of EPZ households will await the return of a commuter, prior to beginning their evacuation trip.

4. The ETE will also include consideration of "through" (External-External) trips during the time that such traffic is permitted to enter the evacuated Region. "Normal" traffic flow is assumed to be present within the EPZ at the start of the emergency.

5. Critical Access Control Points (ACP) will be staffed within approximately 20 minutes following the siren notifications, to divert traffic attempting to enter the EPZ. The remaining ACPs will be established within 60 minutes after the Advisory to Evacuate.

Earlier activation of ACP locations could delay returning commuters. It is assumed that no through traffic will enter the EPZ after this 60 minute time period.

6. Traffic Control Points (TCP) within the EPZ will be staffed over time, beginning at the Advisory to Evacuate. Their number and location will depend on the Region to be evacuated and resources available. The objectives of these TCP are:

a. Facilitate the movements of all (mostly evacuating) vehicles at the location.

b. Discourage inadvertent vehicle movements towards the plant.

c. Provide assurance and guidance to any traveler who is unsure of the appropriate actions or routing.

d. Act as local surveillance and communications center.

e. Provide information to the emergency operations center (EOC) as needed, based on direct observation or on information provided by travelers.

In calculating ETE, it is assumed that evacuees will drive safely, travel in directions identified in the plan, and obey all control devices and traffic guides.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 2-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

7. Buses will be used to transport those without access to private vehicles:

a. If schools are in session, transport (buses) will evacuate students directly to the designated school reception centers.

b. It is assumed parents will pick up children at preschools and day care centers prior to evacuation.

c. According to the counties' emergency plans, medical facilities shelter-in-place and then evacuate later if needed. Buses, wheelchair buses and ambulances will evacuate patients at medical facilities and at any senior facilities within the EPZ if an evacuation of these facilities is necessary. Transportation is only provided for the hospitals within the EPZ. All other medical facilities have their own emergency plans and transportation resources.

d. Transit-dependent general population will be evacuated to reception centers.

e. Schoolchildren, if school is in session, are given priority in assigning transit vehicles.

f. Bus mobilization time is considered in ETE calculations.

g. Analysis of the number of required round-trips ("waves") of evacuating transit vehicles is presented.

h. Transport of transit-dependent evacuees from reception centers to congregate care centers is not considered in this study.

8. Provisions are made for evacuating the transit-dependent portion of the general population to reception centers by bus, based on the assumption that some of these people will ride-share with family, neighbors, and friends, thus reducing the demand for buses. We assume that the percentage of people who rideshare is 50 percent. This assumption is based upon reported experience for other emergencies 3 , and on guidance in Section 2.2 of NUREG/CR-7002.

9. One type of adverse weather scenario is considered. Rain may occur for either winter or summer scenarios. It is assumed that the rain begins earlier or at about the same time the evacuation advisory is issued. No weather-related reduction in the number of transients who may be present in the EPZ is assumed.

Adverse weather scenarios affect roadway capacity and the free flow highway speeds.

The factor applied for the ETE study is based on recent research on the effects of weather on roadway operations 4 ; the factor is shown in Table 2-2.

10. School buses used to transport students are assumed to transport 65 students per bus for elementary schools and 45 students per bus for middle and high schools, based on discussions with county offices of emergency management. Transit buses used to 3 Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Toronto, THE MISSISSAUGA EVACUATION FINAL REPORT, June 1981. The report indicates that 6,600 people of a transit-dependent population of 8,600 people shared rides with other residents; a ride share rate of 76% (Page 5-10).

4 Agarwal, M. et. al. Impacts of Weather on Urban Freeway Traffic Flow Characteristics and Facility Capacity.

Proceedings of the 2005 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, August, 2005. The results of this paper are included as Exhibit 10-15 in the HCM 2010.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 2-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

transport the transit-dependent general population are assumed to transport 30 people per bus.

Table 2-2. Model Adjustment for Adverse Weather Highway~

FreFo i Rceario Cpct* 90for Sed Mo, ian Time Efect loulto

Adverse weather capacity and speed values are given as a percentage of good Iweather conditions. Roads are assumed to be passable.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 2-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

3 DEMAND ESTIMATION The estimates of demand, expressed in terms of people and vehicles, constitute a critical element in developing an evacuation plan. These estimates consist of three components:

1. An estimate of population within the EPZ, stratified into groups (resident, employee, transient).

2. An estimate, for each population group, of mean occupancy per evacuating vehicle. This estimate is used to determine the number of evacuating vehicles.

3. An estimate of potential double-counting of vehicles.

Appendix E presents much of the source material for the population estimates. Our primary source of population data, the 2010 Census, however, is not adequate for directly estimating some transient groups.

Throughout the year, vacationers and tourists enter the EPZ. These non-residents may dwell within the EPZ for a short period (e.g. a few days or one or two weeks), or may enter and leave within one day. Estimates of the size of these population components must be obtained, so that the associated number of evacuating vehicles can be ascertained.

The potential for double-counting people and vehicles must be addressed. For example:

A resident who works and shops within the EPZ could be counted as a resident, again as an employee and once again as a shopper.

A visitor who stays at a hotel and spends time at a park, then goes shopping could be counted three times.

Furthermore, the number of vehicles at a location depends on time of day. For example, motel parking lots may be full at dawn and empty at noon. Similarly, parking lots at area parks, which are full at noon, may be almost empty at dawn. Estimating counts of vehicles by simply adding up the capacities of different types of parking facilities will tend to overestimate the number of transients and can lead to ETE that are too conservative.

Analysis of the population characteristics of the St. Lucie EPZ indicates the need to identify three distinct groups:

Permanent residents - people who are year round residents of the EPZ.

Transients - people who reside outside of the EPZ who enter the area for a specific purpose (shopping, recreation) and then leave the area.

" Employees - people who reside outside of the EPZ and commute to businesses within the EPZ on a daily basis.

Estimates of the population and number of evacuating vehicles for each of the population groups are presented for each Area and by polar coordinate representation (population rose).

The St. Lucie EPZ is subdivided into 8 Areas. The EPZ is shown in Figure 3-1.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

3.1 Permanent Residents The primary source for estimating permanent population is the latest U.S. Census data. The average household size (2.07 persons/household - See Figure F-i) and the number of evacuating vehicles per household (1.19 vehicles/household - See Figure F-8) were adapted from the telephone survey results.

Population estimates are based upon Census 2010 data. The estimates are created by cutting the census block polygons by the Area and EPZ boundaries. A ratio of the original area of each census block and the updated area (after cutting) is multiplied by the total block population to estimate what the population is within the EPZ. This methodology assumes that the population is evenly distributed across a census block. Table 3-1 provides the permanent resident population within the EPZ, by Area based on this methodology.

The year 2010 permanent resident population is divided by the average household size and then multiplied by the average number of evacuating vehicles per household in order to estimate number of vehicles. Permanent resident population and vehicle estimates are presented in Table 3-2. Figure 3-2 and Figure 3-3 present the permanent resident population and permanent resident vehicle estimates by sector and distance from the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant. This "rose" was constructed using GIS software.

It can be argued that this estimate of permanent residents overstates, somewhat, the number of evacuating vehicles, especially during the summer. It is certainly reasonable to assert that some portion of the population would be on vacation during the summer and would travel elsewhere. A rough estimate of this reduction can be obtained as follows:

Assume 50 percent of all households vacation for a two-week period over the summer.

Assume these vacations, in aggregate, are uniformly dispersed over 10 weeks, i.e. 10 percent of the population is on vacationduring each two-week interval.

Assume half of these vacationers leave the area.

On this basis, the permanent resident population would be reduced by 5 percent in the summer and by a lesser amount in the off-season. Given the uncertainty in this estimate, we elected to apply no reductions in permanent resident population for the summer scenarios to account for residents who may be out of the area.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 3-1. St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant EPZ St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 3-1. EPZ Permanent Resident Population 1 3324 3,676 2 11,707 13,199 3 37,589 37,713 4 20,733 38,391 5 53,537 72,494 6 17,158 22,505 7 19,268 21,995 8 7,347 7,736 TOTAL ý170,663: -217,7O9X<

EPZ Population Growth: 27.57%

Table 3-2. Permanent Resident Population and Vehicles by PAZ Are 201 Poplaio 201 Reidn Vehicle 1 3,676 2,112 2 13,199 7,584 3 37,713 21,675 4 38,391 22,004 5 72,494 41,658 6 22,505 12,938 7 21,995 12,648 8 7,736 4,445 TOTAL. 217709. ............ . .. .

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

N NNW NNE F 5--1 4,057 - 0 10-WNW ENE 12,77 I W E 0

27,77 LiI ESE 4S1 u9 i

%912 L-o--1 wssw SW 2.242 Z Boundary SSW 0 S 10,502 N 18,23 Resident Population Miles Subtotal by Ring Cumulative Total 0-1 159 159 1-2_ 298 457 2-3_ 366 823 3-4 7,904 8,727 W E 4-5 18,106 26,833 5-6_ 24,319 51,152 6-7 31,879 83,031 7- 8 42,141 125,172 8-9 44,182 169,354 9- 10 36,254 205,608 10 - EPZ 12,101 217,709 Inset -

Total: 217,709 0 - 2 Miles S Figure 3-2. Permanent Resident Population by Sector St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

N NNW NNE F -307-0 .0 WNW ENE 7,280 w-0--1 141 I

W E 0

15,96 01 WSW 633 \,79 ESE w-o-]

SR 1.288 EPZ Boundary 0

SSW S 6,038 N Resident Vehicles Miles Subtotal by Ring Cumulative Total 0-1 91 91 1-2 171 262 2-3 209 471 3-4 4,548 5,019 W E 4-5 10,400 15,419 5-6 13,973 29,392 6-7 18,262 47,654 7- 8 24,226 71,880 8-9 25,397 97,277 9- 10 20,833 118,110 10 - EPZ 6,954 125,064 Inset Total: 125,064 0 - 2 Miles S Figure 3-3. Permanent Resident Vehicles by Sector KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Nuclear Power Plant 3-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

3.2 Shadow Population A portion of the population living outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles radially from the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant (in the Shadow Region) may elect to evacuate without having been instructed to do so. Based upon NUREG/CR-7002 guidance, it is assumed that 20 percent of the permanent resident population, based on U.S. Census Bureau data, in this Shadow Region will elect to evacuate.

Shadow population characteristics (household size, evacuating vehicles per household, mobilization time) are assumed to be the same as that for the EPZ permanent resident population.

Table 3-3, Figure 3-4, and Figure 3-5 present estimates of the shadow population and vehicles, by sector.

Martin County Jail, St. Lucie County Jail, and Parkway Health and Rehabilitation Center are located within the Shadow Region. These facilities have permanent residents that are included in the Census but these facilities would not evacuate as they are not within the EPZ. As such, these residents are included in the Shadow Region population, but no evacuating vehicles are considered for those residents. The resident vehicles in the south and northwest sectors displayed in Table 3-3 and Figure 3-5 have been adjusted accordingly.

Table 3-3. Shadow Population and Vehicles by Sector SSW 13,244 7,605 SW 18,408 17,729 WSW 20,275 4,505 W 3,596 2,066 WNW 2,351 1,354 NW 7,109 3,251 NNW 5,382 3,097 fi -7 U -,

SSE 8,482 4,878 S 43,648 24,547 SSW 797 458 SW 12,443 7,147 WMartin- County Sdt3~k TTL 35735 -76,637, 3-7 3-7 KLD Engineering, P.c.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

N NNW NNE 55,382 WNW ENE 0

w E 00W wsw ESE SE SSW -4 - SSE EPZ Boundary to 11 Miles 14,04 F-8,482 F43,6 4 8 Shadow Population Miles Subtotal by Ring Cumulative Total EPZ - 11 32,802 32,802 11 - 12 35,519 68,321 12- 13 33,651 101,972 13- 14 17,589 119,561 14- 15 16,174 135,735 Total: 135,735 Figure 3-4. Shadow Population by Sector St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

N NNW W-- NNE 3,097 WNW ENE w E wsw ESE SE

-3 EPZ Boundary to 11 Miles F8,0631 4,878 Shadow Vehicles Miles Subtotal by Ring Cumulative Total EPZ- 11 18,856 18,856 11 - 12 20,224 39,080 12-13 18,138 57,218 13 - 14 10,123 67,341 14 - 15 9,296 76,637 Total: 76,637 Figure 3-5. Shadow Vehicles by Sector St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

3.3 Transient Population Transient population groups are defined as those people (who are not permanent residents, nor commuting employees) who enter the EPZ for a specific purpose (shopping, recreation).

transients may spend less than one day or stay overnight at camping facilities, hotels and motels. The St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant EPZ has a number of areas and facilities that attract transients, including:

" Lodging Facilities

Beaches

Parks

Campgrounds

An Environmental Learning Center

" An Aquarium

A Commuter College

Marinas

Golf Courses Surveys of lodging facilities within the EPZ were conducted to determine the number of rooms, percentage of occupied rooms at peak times, and the number of people and vehicles per room for each facility. These data were used to estimate the number of transients and evacuating vehicles at each of these facilities. A total of 8,293 transients in 2,830 vehicles are assigned to lodging facilities in the EPZ.

Supplemented with data provided by St Lucie County, surveys of the parks, beaches and other recreational areas within the EPZ were conducted to determine the number of transients visiting each of those places on a typical day. The average household size (2.07 persons per household) was used to determine the number of vehicles, assuming one vehicle per household. A total of 1,789 transients and 920 vehicles have been assigned to parks, beaches and recreational areas within the EPZ.

Data provided by St. Lucie County along with surveys of campgrounds within the EPZ were used to determine the number of campsites, peak occupancy, and the number of vehicles and people per campsite for each facility. These data were used to estimate the number of evacuating vehicles for transients at each of these facilities. Recreational vehicles (RVs) are treated as 2 vehicles due to their larger size and more sluggish operating characteristics. A total of 762 transients and 770 vehicles are assigned to campgrounds in the EPZ.

The Oxbow Eco Center is located in the EPZ. Based on aerial imagery, it is estimated that this facility could accommodate 22 vehicles and a bus of students. It is estimated that half of these visitors are local residents. Using a bus capacity of 50 students on average and the average household size of 2.07 persons per household, it was determined that a total of 73 transients and 13 transient vehicles (bus counted as two vehicles) could be at this facility during peak times.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

The St. Lucie County Aquarium is located in the EPZ. Based on aerial imagery, it is estimated that this facility could accommodate 25 vehicles. It is estimated that half of these visitors are local residents. Using the average household size of 2.07 persons per household, it was determined that a total of 26 transients and 13 transient vehicles could be at this facility during peak times.

Indian River State College has 3 campuses located within the EPZ. The college has no on campus housing. All students drive to the facility. According to data provided by the college, 90% of the total students that attend school at these campuses (17,528 students) live within 10 miles from the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant. The remaining 10% (1,753 students) commute from outside the EPZ. The average occupancy rate for employees obtained from the telephone survey (1.07 employees per vehicle - See Figure F-7) was used to compute the number of commuting student vehicles from outside the EPZ. A total of 1,753 transient students and 1,638 vehicles were assigned to this facility.

Data was provided by St. Lucie County on average daily attendance, and peak season of the marinas in the EPZ. These data were used to estimate the number of transients and evacuating vehicles at each of these facilities. The average household size was used to determine the number of vehicles if data was not provided. A total of 899 transients and 435 vehicles are assigned to marinas in the EPZ.

There are several golf courses within the EPZ. Surveys of golf courses were conducted to determine the number of golfers and vehicles at each facility on a typical peak day, and the number of golfers that travel from outside the area. A total of 696 transients and 319 vehicles are assigned to golf courses within the EPZ. Three facilities are both yacht and country clubs.

The people and vehicles at those facilities have been included with the golf totals above.

Appendix E summarizes the transient data that was estimated for the EPZ. Table E-3 and Table E-4 present the number of transients visiting recreational areas, while Table E-5 presents the number of transients at lodging facilities within the EPZ.

Table 3-4 presents transient population and transient vehicle estimates by Area. Figure 3-6 and Figure 3-7 present these data by sector and distance from the plant.

3.3.1 Seasonal Transient Population The St. Lucie EPZ has a secondary category of transient population which is seasonal residents.

These people will enter the area during the winter months and may stay considerably longer (several weeks or the entire season) than the average transient staying at a lodging facility. The seasonal population use other lodging facilities such as condos, beach houses and rentals that otherwise would not be captured with the year-round typical lodging population.

The methodology behind calculating the seasonal population involves using 2010 Census Block data. Each Census Block includes information regarding the number of vacant and occupied households, Using the Census data, an average vacant household percentage of 12% was calculated for the entire St. Lucie EPZ.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

It is assumed that seasonal residents will be renting homes near the Atlantic Ocean shoreline.

Using only those Census blocks that are on Hutchinson Island within the EPZ, the number of seasonal homes was calculated by determining the percentage of vacant households and subtracting out the average vacant household percentages (12%) within the EPZ. An average household size of 2.07 persons per household is used to determine the seasonal transient population, and 1.19 evacuating vehicles per seasonal household is used to determine the number of seasonal transient vehicles. These numbers are adapted from the telephone survey results (see Appendix F).

Based on this analysis, it is estimated that there is an additional seasonal population of 4,211 transients and 2,425 transient vehicles within the St. Lucie EPZ. These numbers are included with the transient population in Table 3-4 as well as in Figure 3-6 and Figure 3-7.

Table 3-4. Summary of Transients and Transient Vehicles 1 1,061 483 1,076 617 2,137 1,100 2 785 368 0 0 785 368 3 5,816 4,143 37 21 5,853 4,164 4 311 127 0 0 311 127 5 886 449 0 0 886 449 6 632 415 0 0 632 415 7 17 8 0 0 17 8 8 4,783 945 3,098 1,787 7,881 2,732 TQTA?~.W4,29 -: 938!ý 4,2i11 2425. 1,O- ,6 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Rev. 1 Evacuation Time Estimate

N NNW NNE 1

3,286 F-0

_0 WNW 2,290 II F19-6 0 WSW Tr-nsi-1n 0

0 SSW S 7,666 N Transients Miles Subtotal by Ring Cumulative Total 0-1 261 261 1-2 62 323 2-3 28 351 3-4 S31 882 W E 4-5 1,288 2,170 5-6 5,856 8,026 6-7 2,066 10,092 7-8 1,055 11,147 8-9 4,335 15,482 9 - 10 1,263 16,745 10 - EPZ 1,757 18,502 Inset Total: 18,502 0 - 2 Miles S Figure 3-6. Transient Population by Sector St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

N NNW _ NNE 06 - -1

-- S6-0 WNW '.

'111263 W

73 0 0 0 29 WSW 0 E1671 SW T n713

- 0 SSW F 82-- S 2,609 N Transient Vehicles Miles Subtotal by Ring Cumulative Total 0-1 150 150 1-2 35 185 2-3 14 199 3-4 266 465 W E 4-5 645 1,110 5-6 1,675 2,785 6- 7 1,114 3,899 7-8 562 4,461 8- 9 2,987 7,448 9-10 673 8,121 10 - EPZ 1,242 9,363 Inset Total: 9,363 0 - 2 Miles S Figure 3-7. Transient Vehicles by Sector KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear St. Lucie Power Plant Nuclear Power Plant 3-14 KILD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

3.4 Employees Employees who work within the EPZ fall into two categories:

Those who live and work in the EPZ

" Those who live outside of the EPZ and commute to jobs within the EPZ.

Those of the first category are already counted as part of the permanent resident population. To avoid double counting, we focus only on those employees commuting from outside the EPZ who will evacuate along with the permanent resident population.

Data obtained from the US Census Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics from the OnTheMap Census analysis tool1 were used to estimate the number of employees commuting into the EPZ. The 2010 Workplace Area Characteristic data was also obtained from this website and was used to determine the number of employees by Census Block within the St. Lucie EPZ.

Since not all employees are working at facilities within the EPZ at one time, a maximum shift reduction was applied. The Work Area Profile Report, also output by the OnTheMap Application, breaks down jobs within the EPZ by industry sector. Assuming maximum shift employment occurs Monday through Friday between 9 AM and 5 PM, the following jobs take place outside the typical 9-5 work day:

Manufacturing - 2.3% of jobs; takes place in shifts over 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months

" Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation - 2.1% of jobs; takes place in evenings and on weekends

Accommodations and Food Services - 10.0% of jobs; peaks in the evenings The maximum shift in the EPZ is about 85.6% (100% - 2.3% - 2.1% - 10.0% = 85.6%). This value was applied to the total employment in 2010 to represent the maximum number of employees present in the EPZ at any one time. The Inflow/Outflow Report for the St. Lucie EPZ was then used to calculate the percent of employees that work within the EPZ but live outside. This value, 53.7%, was applied to the maximum shift employee values to compute the number of people commuting into the EPZ to work at peak times.

In Table 3-5, the Employees (Max Shift) are multiplied by the percent non-EPZ factor to determine the number of employees who are not residents of the EPZ. A vehicle occupancy of 1.07 employees per vehicle obtained from the telephone survey (See Figure F-7) was used to determine the number of evacuating employee vehicles for all major employers.

Plant employment data and percent non-EPZ was provided and supplemented for the Census point in Area 8.

Table 3-5 presents non-EPZ Resident employee and vehicle estimates by Area. Figure 3-8 and Figure 3-9 present these data by sector.

Table 3-5. Summary of Non-EPZ Resident Employees and Employee Vehicles 1 http://onthemap.ces.census.gov/

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1 60 51 27 25 2 739 634 340 318 3 16,888 14,453 7,764 7,252 4 5,215 4,462 2,397 2,240 5 4,953 4,240 2,276 2,124 6 5,290 4,529 2,434 2,276 7 5,046 4,323 2,324 2,169 8 1,435 1,228 497 465

_____;J757__ , 1,O9~

I39o~~ '16;869;-

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

N NNW

[-165 w- NNE

- -' 0 I ,

-- 0 0 -

WNW 1,951

' 42 W

73 F591-WSW 0 939 '

43

-0 SSW S F401I N Employees Miles Subtotal by Ring Cumulative Total 0-1 254 254 1-2 0 254 2-3 24 278 3-4 238 516 W 4-5 608 1,124 5-6 2,904 4,028 6-7 1,225 5,253 7-8 2,364 7,617 8-9 5,049 12,666 9-10 4,617 17,283 10 - EPZ 776 18,059 Inset -

Total: 18,059 0- 2 Miles S Figure 3-8. Employee Population by Sector St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

N NNW NNE F153 F 0 "7 o0

r. 0 -

WNW ENE 1,824 LIZ 39 W E L5521 68

-E

' ES WSW 0 8-76-]%

S 40 Boundary

-0 SSW S F374] N Employee Vehicles Miles Subtotal by Ring Cumulative Total 0-1 238 238 1-2 0 238 2-3 22 260 3-4 222 482 W 4-5 569 1,051 5- 6 2,716 3,767 6-7 1,145 4,912 7-8 2,208 7,120 8-9 4,715 11,835 9-10 4,311 16,146 10 - EPZ 723 16,869 Inset Total: 16,869 0 - 2 Miles S Figure 3-9. Employee Vehicles by Sector St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-18 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

3.5 Medical Facilities Data were provided by the counties for each of the medical facilities within the EPZ. Table E-2 in Appendix E summarizes the data gathered. According to the counties' emergency plans, medical facilities within the EPZ first shelter-in-place and then evacuate later if needed. Section 8 details the evacuation of medical facilities and their patients if an evacuation is deemed necessary. The number and type of evacuating vehicles that need to be provided depend on the patients' state of health. It is estimated that buses can transport up to 30 people for St. Lucie County and 18 people for Martin County; wheelchair buses up to 15 people; and ambulances, up to 2 people.

3.6 Total Demand in Addition to Permanent Population Vehicles will be traveling through the .EPZ (external-external trips) at the time of an accident.

After the Advisory to Evacuate is announced, these through-travelers will also evacuate. These through vehicles are assumed to travel on the major routes traversing the EPZ - the Florida Turnpike, 1-95, and US 1. Based on discussion with the county emergency management agencies and local police, traffic will continue to enter the EPZ during the first 60 minutes following the Advisory to Evacuate, prior to the establishment of access control.

Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) data was obtained from Federal Highway Administration to estimate the number of vehicles per hour on the aforementioned routes. The AADT was multiplied by the K-Factor, which is the proportion of the AADT on a roadway segment or link during the design hour, resulting in the design hour volume (DHV). The design hour is usually the 30th highest hourly traffic volume of the year, measured in vehicles per hour (vph). The DHV is then multiplied by the D-Factor, which is the proportion of the DHV occurring in the peak direction of travel (also known as the directional split). The resulting values are the directional design hourly volumes (DDHV), and are presented in Table 3-6, for each of the routes considered. The DDHV is then multiplied by 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months (access control points - ACP - will be activated at 60 minutes after the advisory to evacuate) to estimate the total number of external vehicles loaded on the analysis network. As indicated, there are 13,652 vehicles entering the EPZ as external-external trips prior to the activation of the ACP and the diversion of this traffic.

This number is reduced by 60% for evening scenarios (Scenarios 5 and 10) as discussed in Section 6.

3.7 Special Event Several special events were discussed during a meeting with FPL and St. Lucie and Martin County emergency management personnel. The events that were considered include:

4 th of July fireworks show - mostly local residents; tourists for this event are already counted as transients

Stuart Sailfish Regatta Boat Races - maximum population of 3,000

New York Mets Spring Training - maximum population of 4,000 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

New York Mets Spring Training at the Digital Domain Stadium is considered as the special event (Scenario 11) for the ETE study due to the fact that it draws the greatest number of tourists into the EPZ. Data were obtained from St. Lucie County emergency management personnel. Spring training for the professional team occurs from February through early April. The St. Lucie Mets (minor league affiliate of the NY Mets) have games at the stadium from April through September. March is the peak month for spring training for the NY Mets. Spring training events occur all week long during the day. St. Lucie County Department of Emergency Management indicated there are a maximum of 4,000 people and 3,000 vehicles at the stadium. It is assumed 20% of these people are local residents and were subtracted out to avoid double counting. It was assumed that transients staying at lodging facilities in Areas 4 and 5 (434 people and 229 vehicles) are also included in this data. The remaining 2,766 people (2,171 vehicles) visiting the Digital Domain Stadium for NY Mets Spring Training come from outside the EPZ. These vehicles were incorporated at the parking lot for the stadium. No public transportation was considered for the special event. The special event vehicle trips were generated utilizing the same mobilization distributions for transients.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-20 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 3-6. St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant EPZ External Traffic Florida 8001 167 Turnpike Southbound 0.107 0.5 1,776 1,776

4. I. .4 33,200 ___________ 4. .4 . .4 Florida 8068 147 Turnpike Northbound 0.107 0.5 1,776 1,776 8000 1112 1-95 Southbound 1 0.091 0.5 2,776 2,776 8047 146 1-95 Northbound 0.091 0.5 2,776 2,776 8004 1116 US 1 Southbound 4 0.107 0.5 2,274 2,274 8231 1152 US 1 Northbound 0.107 0.5 2,274 2,274

'TOTAL'. , 6" 1Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington, D.C., 2011 2HCM 2010 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-21 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

3.8 Summary of Demand A summary of population and vehicle demand is provided in Table 3-7 and Table 3-8, respectively. This summary includes all population groups described in this section. Additional population groups - transit-dependent, special facility and school population - are described in greater detail in Section 8. A total of 352,906 people and 182,721 vehicles are considered in this study.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-22 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 3-7. Summary of Population Demand 1 3,676 69 1,061 27 0 1,076 0 0 0 5,909 2 13,199 247 785 340 50 0 1,241 0 0 15,862 3 37,713 706 5,816 7,764 533 37 28,174 0 0 78,990 4 38,391 719 311 2,397 413 0 10,664 0 0 52,781 5 72,494 1,356 886 2,276 115 0 13,713 0 0 90,840 6 22,505 421 632 2,434 730 0 4,473 0 0 31,195 7 21,995 412 17 2,324 223 0 3,351 0 0 28,322 8 7,736 145 4,783 497 0 3,098 0 0 0 16,259 Shadow 0 0 0. 0 0 0 3,8484 27,147 0 30,995 Total- 217,70 4,05~ .¶1,9 1,S:~ ,6~ 'Z 654 64,7 27,170 3296 2 Shadow Population has been reduced to 20%. Refer to Figure 2-1 for additional information.

3 Special Facilities include both medical facilities and correctional facilities.

4 According to St. Lucie County Division of Emergency Management, Allapattah Flats K-8 School, Lakewood Park Elementary, Palm Point, and NAU Charter will evacuate even though they are located in the Shadow Region.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-23 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 3-8. Summary of Vehicle Demand 1 2,112 4 483 25 0 617 0 0 U 3,241 2 7,584 16 368 318 7 0 38 0 0 8,331 3 21,675 48 4,143 7,252 180 21 414 0 0 33,733 4 22,004 48 127 2,240 37 0 390 0 0 24,846 5 41,658 90 449 2,124 10 0 518 0 0 44,849 6 12,938 28 415 2,276 138 0 128 0 0 15,923 7 12,648 28 8 2,169 54 0 138 0 0 15,045 8 4,445 10 945 465 0 1,787 0 0 0 7,652 Shadow 0 0 0 0 0 0 122' 15,327 13,652 29,101 Totl 2506 2'2 ~ 69A8 689 42 245. 1,74V- 1532 - 13,652 .18271 5 Buses represented as two passenger vehicles. Refer to Section 8 for additional information.

6 According to St. Lucie County Division of Emergency Management, Allapattah Flats K-8 School, Lakewood Park Elementary, Palm Point, and NAU Charter will evacuate even though they are located in the Shadow Region.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3-24 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

4 ESTIMATION OF HIGHWAY CAPACITY The ability of the road network to service vehicle demand is a major factor in determining how rapidly an evacuation can be completed. The capacity of a road is defined as the maximum hourly rate at which persons or vehicles can reasonably be expected to traverse a point or uniform section of a lane of roadway during a given time period under prevailing roadway, traffic and control conditions, as stated in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010).

In discussing capacity, different operating conditions have been assigned alphabetical designations, A through F, to reflect the range of traffic operational characteristics. These designations have been termed "Levels of Service" (LOS). For example, LOS A connotes free-flow and high-speed operating conditions; LOS F represents a forced flow condition. LOS E describes traffic operating at or near capacity.

Another concept, closely associated with capacity, is "Service Volume" (SV). Service volume is defined as "The maximum hourly rate at which vehicles, bicycles or persons reasonably can be expected to traverse a point or uniform section of a roadway during an hour under specific assumed conditions while maintaining a designated level of service." This definition is similar to that for capacity. The major distinction is that values of SV vary from one LOS to another, while capacity is the service volume at the upper bound of LOS E, only.

This distinction is illustrated in Exhibit 11-17 of the HCM 2010. As indicated there, the SV varies with Free Flow Speed (FFS), and LOS. The SV is calculated by the DYNEV II simulation model, based on the specified link attributes, FFS, capacity, control device and traffic demand.

Other factors also influence capacity. These include, but are not limited to:

Lane width

Shoulder width

Pavement condition

Horizontal and vertical alignment (curvature and grade)

Percent truck traffic

Control device (and timing, if it is a signal) 0 Weather conditions (rain, snow, fog, wind speed, ice)

These factors are considered during the road survey and in the capacity estimation process; some factors have greater influence on capacity than others. For example, lane and shoulder width have only a limited influence on Base Free Flow Speed (BFFS 1) according to Exhibit 15-7 of the HCM. Consequently, lane and shoulder widths at the narrowest points were observed during the road survey and these observations were recorded, but no detailed measurements of lane or shoulder width were taken. Horizontal and vertical alignment can influence both FFS and capacity. The estimated FFS were measured using the survey vehicle's speedometer and observing local traffic, under free flow conditions. Capacity is estimated from the procedures of A very rough estimate of BFFS might be taken as the posted speed limit plus 10 mph (HCM 2010 Page 15-15)

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 4-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

the 2010 HCM. For example, HCM Exhibit 7-1(b) shows the sensitivity of Service Volume at the upper bound of LOS D to grade (capacity is the Service Volume at the upper bound of LOS E).

As discussed in Section 2.3, it is necessary to adjust capacity figures to represent the prevailing conditions during inclement weather. Based on limited empirical data, weather conditions such as rain reduce the values of free speed and of highway capacity by approximately 10 percent. Over the last decade new studies have been made on the effects of rain on traffic capacity. These studies indicate a range of effects between 5 and 20 percent depending on wind speed and precipitation rates. As indicated in Section 2.3, we employ a reduction in free speed and in highway capacity of 10 percent for rain.

Since congestion arising from evacuation may be significant, estimates of roadway capacity must be determined with great care. Because of its importance, a brief discussion of the major factors that influence highway capacity is presented in this section.

Rural highways generally consist of: (1) one or more uniform sections with limited access (driveways, parking areas) characterized by "uninterrupted" flow; and (2) approaches to at-grade intersections where flow can be "interrupted" by a control device or by turning or crossing traffic at the intersection. Due to these differences, separate estimates of capacity must be made for each section. Often, the approach to the intersection is widened by the addition of one or more lanes (turn pockets or turn bays), to compensate for the lower capacity of the approach due to the factors there that can interrupt the flow of traffic. These additional lanes are recorded during the field survey and later entered as input to the DYNEV II system.

4.1 Capacity Estimations on Approaches to Intersections At-grade intersections are apt to become the first bottleneck locations under local heavy traffic volume conditions. This characteristic reflects the need to allocate access time to the respective competing traffic streams by exerting some form of control. During evacuation, control at critical intersections will often be provided by traffic control personnel assigned for that purpose, whose directions may supersede traffic control devices. The existing traffic management plans documented in the county emergency plans are extensive and were adopted without change.

The per-lane capacity of an approach to a signalized intersection can be expressed (simplistically) in the following form:

Qcap,rn Qca~m \h3600))iX (G C_

(J -L (3600) h X P-where:

QcOam Capacity of a single lane of traffic on an approach, which executes movement, m, upon entering the intersection; vehicles per hour (vph)

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 4-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

hm Mean queue discharge headway of vehicles on this lane that are executing movement, m; seconds per vehicle G Mean duration of GREEN time servicing vehicles that are executing movement, m, for each signal cycle; seconds L = Mean "lost time" for each signal phase servicing movement, m; seconds C = Duration of each signal cycle; seconds Pm = Proportion of GREEN time allocated for vehicles executing movement, m, from this lane. This value is specified as part of the control treatment.

m The movement executed by vehicles after they enter the intersection: through, left-turn, right-turn, and diagonal.

The turn-movement-specific mean discharge headway hm, depends in a complex way upon many factors: roadway geometrics, turn percentages, the extent of conflicting traffic streams, the control treatment, and others. A primary factor is the value of "saturation queue discharge headway", hsat, which applies to through vehicles that are not impeded by other conflicting traffic streams. This value, itself, depends upon many factors including motorist behavior.

Formally, we can write, hm = fm(hsat, F1, F2 ,...)

where:

hsat = Saturation discharge headway for through vehicles; seconds per vehicle F1,F2 = The various known factors influencing hm fU() = Complex function relating hm to the known (or estimated) values of hsat, F1 , F2 ,

The estimation of hm for specified values of hsat, F1 , F2 , ... is undertaken within the DYNEV II simulation model by a mathematical model 2. The resulting values for hm always satisfy the condition:

hm >- hsat That is, the turn-movement-specific discharge headways are always greater than, or equal to 2Lieberman, E., "Determining Lateral Deployment of Traffic on an Approach to an Intersection", McShane, W. &

Lieberman, E., "Service Rates of Mixed Traffic on the far Left Lane of an Approach". Both papers appear in Transportation Research Record 772, 1980. Lieberman, E., Xin, W., "Macroscopic Traffic Modeling For Large-Scale Evacuation Planning", presented at the TRB 2012 Annual Meeting, January 22-26, 2012 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 4-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

the saturation discharge headway for through vehicles. These headways (or its inverse equivalent, "saturation flow rate"), may be determined by observation or using the procedures of the HCM 2010.

The above discussion is necessarily brief given the scope of this ETE report and the complexity of the subject of intersection capacity. In fact, Chapters 18, 19 and 20 in the HCM 2010 address this topic. The factors, F1, F2,..., influencing saturation flow rate are identified in equation (18-5) of the HCM 2010.

The traffic signals within the EPZ and Shadow Region are modeled using representative phasing plans and phase durations obtained as part of the field data collection. Traffic responsive signal installations allow the proportion of green time allocated (Pm) for each approach to each intersection to be determined by the expected traffic volumes on each approach during evacuation circumstances. The amount of green time (G) allocated is subject to maximum and minimum phase duration constraints; 2 seconds of yellow time are indicated for each signal phase and 1 second of all-red time is assigned between signal phases, typically. If a signal is pre-timed, the yellow and all-red times observed during the road survey are used. A lost time (L) of 2.0 seconds is used for each signal phase in the analysis.

4.2 Capacity Estimation along Sections of Highway The capacity of highway sections -- as distinct from approaches to intersections -- is a function of roadway geometrics, traffic composition (e.g. percent heavy trucks and buses in the traffic stream) and, of course, motorist behavior. There is a fundamental relationship which relates service volume (i.e. the number of vehicles serviced within a uniform highway section in a given time period) to traffic density. The top curve in Figure 4-1 illustrates this relationship.

As indicated, there are two flow regimes: (1) Free Flow (left side of curve); and (2) Forced Flow (right side). In the Free Flow regime, the traffic demand is fully serviced; the service volume increases as demand volume and density increase, until the service volume attains its maximum value, which is the capacity of the highway section. As traffic demand and the resulting highway density increase beyond this "critical" value, the rate at which traffic can be serviced (i.e. the service volume) can actually decline below capacity ("capacity drop"). Therefore, in order to realistically represent traffic performance during congested conditions (i.e. when demand exceeds capacity), it is necessary to estimate the service volume, VF, under congested conditions.

The value of VF can be expressed as:

VF = R x Capacity where:

R = Reduction factor which is less than unity St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 4-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

We have employed a value of R=0.90. The advisability of such a capacity reduction factor is based upon empirical studies that identified a fall-off in the service flow rate when congestion occurs at "bottlenecks" or "choke points" on a freeway system. Zhang and Levinson 3 describe a research program that collected data from a computer-based surveillance system (loop detectors) installed on the Interstate Highway System, at 27 active bottlenecks in the twin cities metro area in Minnesota over a 7-week period. When flow breakdown occurs, queues are formed which discharge at lower flow rates than the maximum capacity prior to observed breakdown. These queue discharge flow (QDF) rates vary from one location to the next and also vary by day of week and time of day based upon local circumstances. The cited reference presents a mean QDF of 2,016 passenger cars per hour per lane (pcphpl). This figure compares with the nominal capacity estimate of 2,250 pcphpl estimated for the ETE and indicated in Appendix K for freeway links. The ratio of these two numbers is 0.896 which translates into a capacity reduction factor of 0.90.

Since the principal objective of evacuation time estimate analyses is to develop a "realistic" estimate of evacuation times, use of the representative value for this capacity reduction factor (R=0.90) is justified. This factor is applied only when flow breaks down, as determined by the simulation model.

Rural roads, like freeways, are classified as "uninterrupted flow" facilities. (This is in contrast with urban street systems which have closely spaced signalized intersections and are classified as "interrupted flow" facilities.) As such, traffic flow along rural roads is subject to the same effects as freeways in the event traffic demand exceeds the nominal capacity, resulting in queuing and lower QDF rates. As a practical matter, rural roads rarely break down at locations away from intersections. Any breakdowns on rural roads are generally experienced at intersections where other model logic applies, or at lane drops which reduce capacity there.

Therefore, the application of a factor of 0.90 is appropriate on rural roads, but rarely, if ever, activated.

The estimated value of capacity is based primarily upon the type of facility and on roadway geometrics. Sections of roadway with adverse geometrics are characterized by lower free-flow speeds and lane capacity. Exhibit 15-30 in the Highway Capacity Manual was referenced to estimate saturation flow rates. The impact of narrow lanes and shoulders on free-flow speed and on capacity is not material, particularly when flow is predominantly in one direction as is the case during an evacuation.

The procedure used here was to estimate "section" capacity, VE, based on observations made traveling over each section of the evacuation network, based on the posted speed limits and travel behavior of other motorists and by reference to the 2010 HCM. The DYNEV II simulation model determines for each highway section, represented as a network link, whether its capacity would be limited by the "section-specific" service volume, VE, or by the intersection-specific capacity. For each link, the model selects the lower value of capacity.

3 Lei Zhang and David Levinson, "Some Properties of Flows at Freeway Bottlenecks," Transportation Research Record 1883, 2004.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 4-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

4.3 Application to the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Study Area As part of the development of the link-node analysis network for the study area, an estimate of roadway capacity is required. The source material for the capacity estimates presented herein is contained in:

2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)

Transportation Research Board National Research Council Washington, D.C.

The highway system in the study area consists primarily of three categories of roads and, of course, intersections:

Two-Lane roads: Local, State

Multi-Lane Highways (at-grade)

Freeways Each of these classifications will be discussed.

4.3.1 Two-Lane Roads Ref: HCM Chapter 15 Two lane roads comprise the majority of highways within the EPZ. The per-lane capacity of a two-lane highway is estimated at 1700 passenger cars per hour (pc/h). This estimate is essentially independent of the directional distribution of traffic volume except that, for extended distances, the two-way capacity will not exceed 3200 pc/h. The HCM procedures then estimate Level of Service (LOS) and Average Travel Speed. The DYNEV II simulation model accepts the specified value of capacity as input and computes average speed based on the time-varying demand: capacity relations.

Based on the field survey and on expected traffic operations associated with evacuation scenarios:

Most sections of two-lane roads within the EPZ are classified as "Class I", with "level terrain"; some are "rolling terrain".

" "Class II" highways are mostly those within urban and suburban centers.

4.3.2 Multi-Lane Highway Ref: HCM Chapter 14 Exhibit 14-2 of the HCM 2010 presents a set of curves that indicate a per-lane capacity ranging from approximately 1900 to 2200 pc/h, for free-speeds of 45 to 60 mph, respectively. Based on observation, the multi-lane highways outside of urban areas within the EPZ service traffic with free-speeds in this range. The actual time-varying speeds computed by the simulation model reflect the demand: capacity relationship and the impact of control at intersections. A St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 4-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

conservative estimate of per-lane capacity of 1900 pc/h is adopted for this study for multi-lane highways outside of urban areas, as shown in Appendix K.

4.3.3 Freeways Ref: HCM Chapters 10, 11, 12, 13 Chapter 10 of the HCM 2010 describes a procedure for integrating the results obtained in Chapters 11, 12 and 13, which compute capacity and LOS for freeway components. Chapter 10 also presents a discussion of simulation models. The DYNEV II simulation model automatically performs this integration process.

Chapter 11 of the HCM 2010 presents procedures for estimating capacity and LOS for "Basic Freeway Segments". Exhibit 11-17 of the HCM 2010 presents capacity vs. free speed estimates, which are provided below.

Free Speed (mph): 55 60 65 70+

Per-Lane Capacity (pc/h): 2250 2300 2350 2400 The inputs to the simulation model are highway geometrics, free-speeds and capacity based on field observations. The simulation logic calculates actual time-varying speeds based on demand:

capacity relationships. A conservative estimate of per-lane capacity of 2250 pc/h is adopted for this study for freeways, as shown in Appendix K.

Chapter 12 of the HCM 2010 presents procedures for estimating capacity, speed, density and LOS for freeway weaving sections. The simulation model contains logic that relates speed to demand volume: capacity ratio. The value of capacity obtained from the computational procedures detailed in Chapter 12 depends on the "Type" and geometrics of the weaving segment and on the "Volume Ratio" (ratio of weaving volume to total volume).

Chapter 13 of the HCM 2010 presents procedures for estimating capacities of ramps and of "merge" areas. There are three significant factors to the determination of capacity of a ramp-freeway junction: The capacity of the freeway immediately downstream of an on-ramp or immediately upstream of an off-ramp; the capacity of the ramp roadway; and the maximum flow rate entering the ramp influence area. In most cases, the freeway capacity is the controlling factor. Values of this merge area capacity are presented in Exhibit 13-8 of the HCM 2010, and depend on the number of freeway lanes and on the freeway free speed. Ramp capacity is presented in Exhibit 13-10 and is a function of the ramp free flow speed. The DYNEV II simulation model logic simulates the merging operations of the ramp and freeway traffic in accord with the procedures in Chapter 13 of the HCM 2010. If congestion results from an excess of demand relative to capacity, then the model allocates service appropriately to the two entering traffic streams and produces LOS F conditions (The HCM does not address LOS F explicitly).

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 4-7 KLD Eneineerin2.I P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

4.3.4 Intersections Ref: HCM Chapters 18, 19, 20, 21 Procedures for estimating capacity and LOS for approaches to intersections are presented in Chapter 18 (signalized intersections), Chapters 19, 20 (un-signalized intersections) and Chapter 21 (roundabouts). The complexity of these computations is indicated by the aggregate length of these chapters. The DYNEV II simulation logic is likewise complex.

The simulation model explicitly models intersections: Stop/yield controlled intersections (both 2-way and all-way) and traffic signal controlled intersections. Where intersections are controlled by fixed time controllers, traffic signal timings are set to reflect average (non-evacuation) traffic conditions. Actuated traffic signal settings respond to the time-varying demands of evacuation traffic to adjust the relative capacities of the competing intersection approaches.

The model is also capable of modeling the presence of manned traffic control. At specific locations where it is advisable or where existing plans call for overriding existing traffic control to implement manned control, the model will use actuated signal timings that reflect the presence of traffic guides. At locations where a special traffic control strategy (continuous left-turns, contra-flow lanes) is used, the strategy is modeled explicitly. Where applicable, the location and type of traffic control for nodes in the evacuation network are noted in Appendix K. The characteristics of the ten highest volume signalized intersections are detailed in Appendix J.

4.4 Simulation and Capacity Estimation Chapter 6 of the HCM is entitled, "HCM and Alternative Analysis Tools." The chapter discusses the use of alternative tools such as simulation modeling to evaluate the operational performance of highway networks. Among the reasons cited in Chapter 6 to consider using simulation as an alternative analysis tool is:

"The system under study involves a group of different facilities or travel modes. with mutual interactions invoking several procedural chapters of the HCM. Alternative tools are able to analyze these facilities as a single system."

This statement succinctly describes the analyses required to determine traffic operations across an area encompassing an EPZ operating under evacuation conditions. The model utilized for this study, DYNEV II, is further described in Appendix C. It is essential to recognize that simulation models do not replicate the methodology and procedures of the HCM - they replace these procedures by describing the complex interactions of traffic flow and computing Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) detailing the operational performance of traffic over time and by location. The DYNEV II simulation model includes some HCM 2010 procedures only for the purpose of estimating capacity.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 4-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

All simulation models must be calibrated properly with field observations that quantify the performance parameters applicable to the analysis network. Two of the most important of these are: (1) Free flow speed (FFS); and (2) saturation headway, hsat. The first of these is estimated by direct observation during the road survey; the second is estimated using the concepts of the HCM 2010, as described earlier. These parameters are listed in Appendix K, for each network link.

Volume, vph Qmax-RQmax-Density, vpm riow;negimes Speed, mph:F: hD Free Forced:!

Vf R vc p Density, vpm kf k opt kj Figure 4-1. Fundamental Diagrams St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 4-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

5 ESTIMATION OF TRIP GENERATION TIME Federal Government guidelines (see NUREG CR-7002) specify that the planner estimate the distributions of elapsed times associated with mobilization activities undertaken by the public to prepare for the evacuation trip. The elapsed time associated with each activity is represented as a statistical distribution reflecting differences between members of the public.

The quantification of these activity-based distributions relies largely on the results of the telephone survey. We define the sum of these distributions of elapsed times as the Trip Generation Time Distribution.

5.1 Background In general, an accident at a nuclear power plant is characterized by the following Emergency Classification Levels (see Appendix 1 of NUREG 0654 for details):

1. Unusual Event

2. Alert

3. Site Area Emergency

4. General Emergency At each level, the Federal guidelines specify a set of Actions to be undertaken by the Licensee, and by State and Local offsite authorities. As a Planning Basis, we will adopt a conservative posture, in accordance with Section 1.2 of NUREG/CR-7002, that a rapidly escalating accident will be considered in calculating the Trip Generation Time. We will assume:

1. The Advisory to Evacuate will be announced coincident with the siren notification.

2. Mobilization of the general population will commence within 15 minutes after the siren notification.

3. ETE are measured relative to the Advisory to Evacuate.

We emphasize that the adoption of this planning basis is not a representation that these events will occur within the indicated time frame. Rather, these assumptions are necessary in order to:

1. Establish a temporal framework for estimating the Trip Generation distribution in the format recommended in Section 2.13 of NUREG/CR-6863.

2. Identify temporal points of reference that uniquely define "Clear Time" and ETE.

It is likely that a longer time will elapse between the various classes of an emergency.

For example, suppose one hour elapses from the siren alert to the Advisory to Evacuate. In this case, it is reasonable to expect some degree of spontaneous evacuation by the public during.

this one-hour period. As a result, the population within the EPZ will be lower when the Advisory to Evacuate is announced, than at the time of the siren alert. In addition, many will engage in preparation activities to evacuate, in anticipation that an Advisory will be broadcast.

Thus, the time needed to complete the mobilization activities and the number of people remaining to evacuate the EPZ after the Advisory to Evacuate, will both be somewhat less than St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

the estimates presented in this report. Consequently, the ETE presented in this report are higher than the actual evacuation time, if this hypothetical situation were to take place.

The notification process consists of two events:

1. Transmitting information using the alert notification systems available within the EPZ (e.g. sirens, tone alerts, EAS broadcasts, loud speakers).

2. Receiving and correctly interpreting the information that is transmitted.

The population within the EPZ is dispersed over an area of approximately 180 square miles and is engaged in a wide variety of activities. It must be anticipated that some time will elapse between the transmission and receipt of the information advising the public of an accident.

The amount of elapsed time will vary from one individual to the next depending on where that person is, what that person is doing, and related factors. Furthermore, some persons who will be directly involved with the evacuation process may be outside the EPZ at the time the emergency is declared. These people may be commuters, shoppers and other travelers who reside within the EPZ and who will return to join the other household members upon receiving notification of an emergency.

As indicated in Section 2.13 of NUREG/CR-6863, the estimated elapsed times for the receipt of notification can be expressed as a distribution reflecting the different notification times for different people within, and outside, the EPZ. By using time distributions, it is also possible to distinguish between different population groups and different day-of-week and time-of-day scenarios, so that accurate ETE may be computed.

For example, people at home or at work within the EPZ will be notified by siren, and/or tone alert and/or radio (if available). Those well outside the EPZ will be notified by telephone, radio, TV and word-of-mouth, with potentially longer time lags. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of the EPZ population will differ with time of day - families will be united in the evenings, but dispersed during the day. In this respect, weekends will differ from weekdays.

As indicated in Section 4.1 of NUREG/CR-7002, the information required to compute trip generation times is typically obtained from a telephone survey of EPZ residents. Such a survey was conducted in support of this ETE study. Appendix F presents the survey sampling plan, survey instrument, and raw survey results. The remaining discussion will focus on the application of the trip generation data obtained from the telephone survey to the development of the ETE documented in this report.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

5.2 Fundamental Considerations The environment leading up to the time that people begin their evacuation trips consists of a sequence of events and activities. Each event (other than the first) occurs at an instant in time and is the outcome of an activity.

Activities are undertaken over a period of time. Activities may be in "series" (i.e. to undertake an activity implies the completion of all preceding events) or may be in parallel (two or more activities may take place over the same period of time). Activities conducted in series are functionally dependent on the completion of prior activities; activities conducted in parallel are functionally independent of one another. The relevant events associated with the public's preparation for evacuation are:

Event Number Event Description 1 Notification 2 Awareness of Situation 3 Depart Work 4 Arrive Home 5 Depart on Evacuation Trip Associated with each sequence of events are one or more activities, as outlined below:

Table 5-1. Event Sequence for Evacuation Activities

- -- Av . t o 1 -*2 Receive Notification 1 2 -- 3 Prepare to Leave Work 2 2,3 -- 4 Travel Home 3 2,4 -- 5 Prepare to Leave to Evacuate 4 These relationships are shown graphically in Figure 5-1.

An Event is a 'state' that exists at a point in time (e.g., depart work, arrive home)

An Activity is a 'process' that takes place over some elapsed time (e.g., prepare to leave work, travel home)

As such, a completed Activity changes the 'state' of an individual (e.g. the activity, 'travel home' changes the state from 'depart work' to 'arrive home'). Therefore, an Activity can be described as an 'Event Sequence'; the elapsed times to perform an event sequence vary from one person to the next and are described as statistical distributions on the following pages.

An employee who lives outside the EPZ will follow sequence (c) of Figure 5-1. A household within the EPZ that has one or more commuters at work, and will await their return before St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

beginning the evacuation trip will follow the first sequence of Figure 5-1(a). A household within the EPZ that has no commuters at work, or that will not await the return of any commuters, will follow the second sequence of Figure 5-1(a), regardless of day of week or time of day.

Households with no commuters on weekends or in the evening/night-time, will follow the applicable sequence in Figure 5-1(b). Transients will always follow one of the sequences of Figure 5-1(b). Some transients away from their residence could elect to evacuate immediately without returning to the residence, as indicated in the second sequence.

It is seen from Figure 5-1, that the Trip Generation time (i.e. the total elapsed time from Event 1 to Event 5) depends on the scenario and will vary from one household to the next.

Furthermore, Event 5 depends, in a complicated way, on the time distributions of all activities preceding that event. That is, to estimate the time distribution of Event 5, we must obtain estimates of the time distributions of all preceding events. For this study, we adopt the conservative posture that all activities will occur in sequence.

In some cases, assuming certain events occur strictly sequential (for instance, commuter returning home before beginning preparation to leave) can result in rather conservative (that is, longer) estimates of mobilization times. It is reasonable to expect that at least some parts of these events will overlap for many households, but that assumption is not made in this study.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1 2 3 4 5 Residents Households wait for Commuters1 Households without 1 2 5 Commuters and Residents households who do not wait for Commuters (a) Accident!cbcUSr dunihg midweek, at midday;,year round Residents, 1 2 4 5 Transients Return to residence, away from then evacuate Residence Residents, 1 2 5 Residents at home; Transients at transients evacuate directly Residence (b)"Acident occurs, during weekend!,or duHrin the evening2 1 2 3,5 (C) Employees~wh0 ive outside the EPZ ACTIVITIES EVENTS 1 j, 2 Receive Notification 1. Notification 2 -0 3 Prepare to Leave Work 2. Aware of situation 2, 3 , 4 Travel Home 3. Depart work 2, 4 _0. 5 Prepare to Leave to Evacuate 4. Arrive home

5. Depart on evacuation trip Activities Consume Time 1 Applies for evening and weekends also if commuters are at work.

2 Applies throughout the year for transients.

Figure 5-1. Events and Activities Preceding the Evacuation Trip St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

5.3 Estimated Time Distributions of Activities Preceding Event 5 The time distribution of an event is obtained by "summing" the time distributions of all prior contributing activities. (This "summing" process is quite different than an algebraic sum since it is performed on distributions - not scalar numbers).

Time Distribution No. 1. Notification Process: Activity 1 -> 2 In accordance with the 2012 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Manual, 100% of the population is notified within 45 minutes. It is assumed (based on the presence of sirens within the EPZ) that 87 percent of those within the EPZ will be aware of the accident within 30 minutes with the remainder notified within the following 15 minutes. The notification distribution is given below:

Table 5-2. Time Distribution for Notifying the Public Elase Tim Pecn of 0 0%

5 7%

10 13%

15 27%

20 47%

25 66%

30 87%

35 92%

40 97%

45 100%

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Distribution No. 2. Prepare to Leave Work: Activity 2 --> 3 It is reasonable to expect that the vast majority of business enterprises within the EPZ will elect to shut down following notification and most employees would leave work quickly. Commuters, who work outside the EPZ could, in all probability, also leave quickly. since facilities outside the EPZ would remain open and other personnel would remain. Personnel or farmers responsible for equipment/livestock would require additional time to secure their facility. The distribution of Activity 2 -> 3 shown in Table 5-3 reflects data obtained by the telephone survey for employees working inside or outside of the EPZ who returns home prior to evacuating. This distribution is plotted in Figure 5-2.

Table 5-3. Time Distribution for Employees to Prepare to Leave Work 0 0% 35 92.8%

5 45.4% 40 93.2%

10 67.1% 45 95.2%

15 81.5% 50 95.6%

20 85.5% 55 95.6%

25 86.3% 60 99.6%

30 92.8% 75 100.0%

NOTE: The survey data was normalized to distribute the "Don't know" response. That is, the sample was reduced in size to include only those households who responded to this question. The underlying assumption is that the distribution of this activity for the "Don't know" responders, if the event takes place, would be the same as those responders who provided estimates.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-7 KLD Engineering. P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

Distribution No. 3, Travel Home: Activity 3 --> 4 These data are provided directly by those households which responded to the telephone survey. This distribution is plotted in Figure 5-2 and listed in Table 5-4.

Table 5-4. Time Distribution for Commuters to Travel Home 0 0 45 91.6%

5 10.1% 50 91.9%

10 31.9% 55 91.9%

15 47.3% 60 95.6%

20. 61.1% 75 96.3%

25 65.8% 90 97.3%

30 84.2% 105 98.0%

35 86.2% 120 100.0%

40 89.3%

NOTE: The survey data was normalized to distribute the "Don't know" response St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Distribution No. 4, Prepare to Leave Home: Activity 2, 4 -> 5 These data are provided directly by those households which responded to the telephone survey. This distribution is plotted in Figure 5-2 and listed in Table 5-5.

Table 5-5. Time Distribution for Population to Prepare to Evacuate

- - . 7 J~(JaiU~;I:Ll.

Cumlaiv Cumulativei 0 0% 180 92.0%

15 7.1% 195 93.6%

30 36.0% 210 93.6%

45 39.7% 225 93.6%

60 58.5% 240 95.9%

75 69.3% 255 96.6%

90 71.3% 270 96.6%

105 72.2% 285 96.6%

120 81.4% 300 98.2%

135 88.3% 330 98.2%

150 88.3% 360 100.0%

165 88.3%

NOTE: The survey data was normalized to distribute the "Don't know" response St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Mobilization Activities 100%

._2 4, 80%

4--

0 20

.E-60%

C" 4-*

-Notification

-a E -Prepare to Leave Work 0

4, 40% - Travel Home 4-CL

-Prepare Home 0.

0 20%

0%

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 Elapsed Time from Start of Mobilization Activity (min)

Figure 5-2. Evacuation Mobilization Activities St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

5.4 Calculation of Trip Generation Time Distribution The time distributions for each of the mobilization activities presented herein must be combined to form the appropriate Trip Generation Distributions. As discussed above, this study assumes that the stated events take place in sequence such that all preceding events must be completed before the current event can occur. For example, if a household awaits the return of a commuter, the work-to-home trip (Activity 3 -> 4) must precede Activity 4 --> 5.

To calculate the time distribution of an event that is dependent on two sequential activities, it is necessary to "sum" the distributions associated with these prior activities. The distribution summing algorithm is applied repeatedly as shown to form the required distribution. As an outcome of this procedure, new time distributions are formed; we assign "letter" designations to these intermediate distributions to describe the procedure. Table 5-6 presents the summing procedure to arrive at each designated distribution.

Table 5-6. Mapping Distributions to Events Distrbummiong" A t T DistributionOba EventD Distributions I and 2 Distribution A Event 3 Distributions A and 3 Distribution B Event 4 Distributions B and 4 Distribution C Event 5 Distributions 1 and 4 Distribution D Event 5 Table 5-7 presents a description of each of the final trip generation distributions achieved after the summing process is completed.

Table 5-7. Description of the Distributions Dstrbto Descriptio Time distribution of commuters departing place of work (Event 3). Also applies A to employees who work within the EPZ who live outside, and to Transients within the EPZ.

B Time distribution of commuters arriving home (Event 4).

C Time distribution of residents with commuters who return home, leaving home to begin the evacuation trip (Event 5).

Time distribution of residents without commuters returning home, leaving home D to begin the evacuation trip (Event 5).

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

5.4.1 Statistical Outliers As already mentioned, some portion of the survey respondents answer "don't know" to some questions or choose to not respond to a question. The mobilization activity distributions are based upon actual responses. But, it is the nature of surveys that a few numeric responses are inconsistent with the overall pattern of results. An example would be a case in which for 500 responses, almost all of them estimate less than two hours for a given answer, but 3 say "four hours" and 4 say "six or more hours".

These "outliers" must be considered: are they valid responses, or so atypical that they should be dropped from the sample?

In assessing outliers, there are three alternates to consider:

1) Some responses with very long times may be valid, but reflect the reality that the respondent really needs to be classified in a different population subgroup, based upon special needs;

2) Other responses may be unrealistic (6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months to return home from commuting distance, or 2 days to prepare the home for departure);

3) Some high values are representative and plausible, and one must not cut them as part of the consideration of outliers.

The issue of course is how to make the decision that a given response or set of responses are to be considered "outliers" for the component mobilization activities, using a method that objectively quantifies the process.

There is considerable statistical literature on the identification and treatment of outliers singly or in groups, much of which assumes the data is normally distributed and some of which uses non-parametric methods to avoid that assumption. The literature cites that limited work has been done directly on outliers in sample survey responses.

In establishing the overall mobilization time/trip generation distributions, the following principles are used:

1) It is recognized that the overall trip generation distributions are conservative estimates, because they assume a household will do the mobilization activities sequentially, with no overlap of activities;

2) The individual mobilization activities (prepare to leave work, travel home, prepare home) are reviewed for outliers, and then the overall trip generation distributions are created (see Figure 5-1, Table 5-6, Table 5-7);

3) Outliers can be eliminated either because the response reflects a special population (e.g.

special needs, transit dependent) or lack of realism, because the purpose is to estimate trip generation patterns for personal vehicles; St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

4) To eliminate outliers, a) the mean and standard deviation of the specific activity are estimated from the responses, b) the median of the same data is estimated, with its position relative to the mean noted, c) the histogram of the data is inspected, and d) all values greater than 3.5 standard deviations are flagged for attention, taking special note of whether there are gaps (categories with zero entries) in the histogram display.

In general, only flagged values more than 4 standard deviations from the mean are allowed to be considered outliers, with gaps in the histogram expected..

When flagged values are classified as outliers and dropped, steps "a" to "d" are repeated.

5) As a practical matter, even with outliers eliminated by the above, the resultant histogram, viewed as a cumulative distribution, is not a normal distribution. A typical situation that results is shown below in Figure 5-3.

100.0%

90.0%

g80.0%

70.0%

S60.0% /f (U

50.0%

. 40.0%

" 30.0%

E u 20.0%

10.0%

0.0%

Uý U I lý L' (N (N m uq U Um

I1- U *L U W3 Q O U -

U Center of Interval (minutes)

- Cumulative Data Cumulative Normal C

Figure 5-3. Comparison of Data Distribution and Normal Distribution St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

6) In particular, the cumulative distribution differs from the normal distribution in two key aspects, both very important in loading a network to estimate evacuation times:

Most of the real data is to the left of the "normal" curve above, indicating that the network loads faster for the first 80-85% of the vehicles, potentially causing more (and earlier) congestion than otherwise modeled; The last 10-15% of the real data "tails off" slower than the comparable "normal" curve, indicating that there is significant traffic still loading at later times.

Because these two features are important to preserve, it is the histogram of the data that is used to describe the mobilization activities, not a "normal" curve fit to the data. One could consider other distributions, but using the shape of the actual data curve is unambiguous and preserves these important features;

7) With the mobilization activities each modeled according to Steps 1-6, including preserving the features cited in Step 6, the overall (or total) mobilization times are constructed.

This is done by using the data sets and distributions under different scenarios (e.g. commuter returning, no commuter returning). In general, these are additive, using weighting based upon the probability distributions of each element; Figure 5-4 presents the combined trip generation distributions designated A, C, and D. These distributions are presented on the same time scale.

(As discussed earlier, the use of strictly additive activities is a conservative approach, because it makes all activities sequential - preparation for departure follows the return of the commuter. In practice, it is reasonable that some of these activities are done in parallel, at least to some extent -

for instance, preparation to depart begins by a household member at home while the commuter is still on the road.)

The mobilization distributions that result are used in their tabular/graphical form as direct inputs to later computations that lead to the ETE.

The DYNEV II simulation model is designed to accept varying rates of vehicle trip generation for each origin centroid, expressed in the form of histograms. These histograms, which represent Distributions A, C, and D, properly displaced with respect to one another, are tabulated in Table 5-8 (Distribution B, Arrive Home, omitted for clarity).

The final time period (15) is 600 minutes long. This time period is added to allow the analysis network to clear, in the event congestion persists beyond the trip generation period. Note that there are no trips generated during this final time period.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

5.4.2 Staged Evacuation Trip Generation As defined in NUREG/CR-7002, staged evacuation consists of the following:

1. Population within the 2 mile radius is advised to evacuate immediately

2. Population in regions extending from 2 to 5 miles downwind are advised to shelter in-place while the 2 mile radius is cleared

3. As vehicles evacuate the 2 mile radius, sheltered people from 2 to 5 miles downwind continue preparation for evacuation

4. The population sheltering in the 2 to 5 mile region are advised to begin evacuating when approximately 90% of those originally within the 2 mile radius evacuate across the 2 mile radius

5. Non-compliance with the shelter recommendation is the same as the shadow evacuation percentage of 20%

Assumptions

1. The EPZ population beyond 5 miles will react as does the population in the 2 to 5 mile region; that is they will first shelter, then evacuate after the 90th percentile ETE for the 2 mile radius

2. The population in the shadow region beyond the EPZ boundary, extending to approximately 15 miles radially from the plant, will react as they do for all non-staged evacuation scenarios. That is 20% of these households will elect to evacuate with no shelter delay.

3. The transient population will not be expected to stage their evacuation because of the limited sheltering options available to people who may be at parks, on a beach, or at other venues. Also, notifying the.transient population of a staged evacuation would prove difficult.

4. Employees will also be assumed to evacuate without first sheltering.

Procedure

1. Trip generation for population groups in the 2 mile radius will be as computed based upon the results of the telephone survey and analysis.

2. Trip generation for the population subject to staged evacuation will be formulated as follows:

a. Identify the 90th percentile evacuation time for the two mile radius. This value, Tscen , obtained from simulation results is scenario-specific. It will become the time at which the region being sheltered will be told to evacuate for each scenario.

b. The resultant trip generation curves for staging are then formed as follows:

i. The non-shelter trip generation curve is followed until a maximum of 20%

of the total trips are generated (to account for shelter non-compliance).

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

ii. No additional trips are generated until time Tscen*

iii. Following time Tscen*, the balance of trips are generated:

1. by stepping up and then following the non-shelter trip generation curve (if Tscen is < max trip generation time) or

2. by stepping up to 100% (if Tscen* is > max trip generation time)

c. Note: This procedure implies that there may be different staged trip generation distributions for different scenarios. NUREG/CR-7002 uses the statement "approximately 9 0 th percentile" as the time to end staging and begin evacuating.

The value of Tscen is 2:00 for weekday scenarios and 2:30 for weekend and evening scenarios.

3. Staged trip generation distributions are created for the following population groups:

a. Residents with returning commuters

b. Residents without returning commuters Figure 5-5 presents the staged trip generation distributions for both residents with and without returning commuters; the 90th percentile two-mile evacuation time is 120 minutes for good weather weekday scenarios and 150 minutes for good weather weekend and evening scenarios. At the 90th percentile evacuation time, 20% of the population (who normally would have completed their mobilization activities for an un-staged evacuation) advised to shelter has nevertheless departed the area. These people do not comply with the shelter advisory. Also included on the plot are the trip generation distributions for these groups as applied to the regions advised to evacuate immediately.

Since the 9 0 th percentile evacuation time occurs before the end of the trip generation time, after the sheltered region is advised to evacuate, the shelter trip generation distribution rises to meet the balance of the non-staged trip generation distribution. Following time Tscen*, the balance of staged evacuation trips that are ready to depart are released within 15 minutes. After Tscen*+15, the remainder of evacuation trips are generated in accordance with the un-staged trip generation distribution.

Figure 5-5 and Table 5-9 provides the trip generation histograms for staged evacuation.

5.4.3 Trip Generation for Waterways and Recreational Areas Section 3 of the Florida State Radiological Emergency Preparedness Annex indicates that upon

notification of Site Area Emergency, the U.S. Coast Guard will broadcast instructions over marine radio for vessels to clear all waters within 10 miles of the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant.

Vessels and crews will be positioned at day beacons 240 and 181 to close the India River/Intra-Coastal Waterway.

Section 2.3 indicates this study assumes a rapidly escalating general emergency. As indicated in Table 5-2, this study assumes 100% notification in 45 minutes. Table 5-9 indicates that all transients will have mobilized within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months . It is assumed that this 2 hour2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months timeframe is sufficient time for boaters, campers and other transients to return totheir vehicles and begin their evacuation trip.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Trip Generation Distributions Employees/Transients - Residents with Commuters - Residents with no Commuters 100 0.

80 I-60 0

4J 40 CL 0

0.

0 4-.

20 0

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time from Evacuation Advisory (min)

Figure 5-4. Comparison of Trip Generation Distributions St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 5-8. Trip Generation Histograms for the EPZ Population for Un-staged Evacuation Peren [

ofpl.ToI'taElTips-tGenera~ted~ With'in Indic~tate T(aime Perio da Reidnt wit Reiet aihu Tim Durato Emlye Trniet Comuer Commter Peio (Mn (Dsrbto A) (Dsrbto A) (Dsrbto C) (Daaisrbto a D) 1 15 8% 8% 0% 0%

2 15 37% 37% 0% 5%

3 15 36% 36% 2% 15%

4 15 12% 12% 6% 17%

5 15 3% 3% 11% 12%

6 15 3% 3% 12% 13%

7 30 1% 1% 23% 10%

8 30 0% 0% 14% 12%

9 30 0% 0% 12% 5%

10 30 0% 0% 6% 3%

11 60 0% 0% 7% 4%

12 60 0% 0% 3% 2%

13 60 0% 0% 3% 2%

14 30 0% 0% 1% 0%

15 600 0% 0% 0% 0%

NOTE:

Shadow vehicles are loaded onto the analysis network (Figure 1-2) using Distribution C.

Special event vehicles are loaded using Distribution A.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-18 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Staged and Un-staged Evacuation Trip Generation

-Employees / Transients - Residents with Commuters

-Residents with no Commuters -Staged Residents with Commuters (Weekday)

-= Staged Residents with no Commuters (Weekday) -Staged Residents with Commuters (Weekend/Evening)

-Staged Residents with no Commuters (Weekend/Evening) 100 a.

I-C 0

4- 80 m

w C

C 60 C

C 0

4- 40 (U

0.

0 0.

.4-0 4-C 20 0)

U 0) 0.

0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 Elapsed Time from Evacuation Advisory (min)

Figure 5-5. Comparison of Staged and Un-staged Trip Generation Distributions in the 2 to 5 Mile Region St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 5-9. Trip Generation Histograms for the EPZ Population for Staged Evacuation Pecn Toa P. Trp Geeae Wihi IniaedTm Perod Resident wit SP11.

Residents' Witou 4IP1~n4 Reiet S[JI-~it w ~ '[

Reidnt IJI.UitAhout W

Comtr Comtr Comtr omtr 1 15 0% 0% 0% 0%

2 15 0% 1% 0% 1%

3 15 0% 3% 0% 3%

4 15 2% 3% 2% 3%

5 15 2% 3% 2% 3%

6 15 2% 2% 2% 2%

7 30 5% 2% 5% 2%

8 30 57% 70% 3% 3%

9 30 12% 5% 66% 72%

10 30 6% 3% 6% 3%

11 60 7% 4% 7% 4%

12 60 3% 2% 3% 2%

13 60 3% 2% 3% 2%

14 30 1% 0% 1% 0%

15 600 0% 0% 0% 0%

Trip Generation for Employees and Transients (see Table 5-8) is the same for Un-staged and Staged Evacuation.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5-20 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

6 DEMAND ESTIMATION FOR EVACUATION SCENARIOS An evacuation "case" defines a combination of Evacuation Region and Evacuation Scenario.

The definitions of "Region" and "Scenario" are as follows:

Region A grouping of contiguous evacuating areas that forms either a "keyhole" sector-based area, or a circular area within the EPZ, that must be evacuated in response to a radiological emergency.

Scenario A combination of circumstances, including time of day, day of week, season, and weather conditions. Scenarios define the number of people in each of the affected population groups and their respective mobilization time distributions.

A total of 12 Regions were defined which encompass all the groupings of areas considered.

These Regions are defined in Table 6-1. The area configurations are identified in Figure 6-1.

Each keyhole sector-based area consists of a central circle centered at the power plant, and three adjoining sectors, each with a central angle of 22.5 degrees, as per NUREG/CR-7002 guidance. The central sector coincides with the wind direction. These sectors extend to 5 miles from the plant (Regions R04 and R05) or to the EPZ boundary (Regions R06 through R09).

Regions R01, R02 and R03 represent evacuations of circular areas with radii of 2, 5 and 10 miles, respectively. Regions RIO through R12 are identical to Regions R02, R04 and R05, respectively; however, those Areas between 2 miles and 5 miles are staged until 90% of the 2-mile radius has evacuated.

A total of 12 Scenarios were evaluated for all Regions. Thus, there are a total of 12x12=144 evacuation cases. Table 6-2 is a description of all Scenarios.

Each combination of region and scenario implies a specific population to be evacuated. Table 6-3 presents the percentage of each population group estimated to evacuate for each scenario.

Table 6-4 presents the vehicle counts for each scenario for an evacuation of Region R03 - the entire EPZ.

The vehicle estimates presented in Section 3 are peak values. These peak values are adjusted depending on the scenario and region being considered, using scenario and region specific percentages, such that the average population is considered for each evacuation case. The scenario percentages are presented in Table 6-3, while the regional percentages are provided in Table H-1. The. percentages presented in Table 6-3 were determined as follows:

The number of residents with commuters during the week (when workforce is at its peak) is equal to the product of 38% (the number of households with at least one commuter) and 51%

(the number of households with a commuter that would await the return of the commuter prior to evacuating). See assumption 3 in Section 2.3. It is estimated for weekend and evening scenarios that 10% of households with returning commuters will have a commuter at work during those times.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 6-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Employment is assumed to be at its peak (100%) during the winter, midweek, midday scenarios.

Employment is reduced slightly (96%) for summer, midweek, midday scenarios. This is based on the estimation that 50% of the employees commuting into the EPZ will be on vacation for a week during the approximate 12 weeks of summer. It is further estimated that those taking vacation will be uniformly dispersed throughout the summer with approximately 4% of employees vacationing each week. It is further estimated that only 10% of the employees are working in the evenings and during the weekends.

Transient activity is estimated to be at its peak during winter weekends and less (75%) during the week. As shown in Appendix E, there are many lodging facilities and campgrounds offering overnight accommodations in the EPZ; thus, transient activity is estimated to be relatively high during evening hours - 65% for winter and 50% for summer. Transient activity is estimated to be 75% and 55% on summer weekends and weekdays, respectively. Seasonal residents are transients and have the same scenario percentages.

As noted in the shadow footnote to Table 6-3, the shadow percentages are computed using a base of 20% (see assumption 5 in Section 2.2); to include the employees within the shadow region who may choose to evacuate, the voluntary evacuation is multiplied by a scenario-specific proportion of employees to permanent residents in the shadow region. For example, using the values provided in Table 6-4 for Scenario 1, the shadow percentage is computed as follows:

20%x 1+ 16,194 23%

2% +24,233 + 100,831)

One special event - NY Mets Spring Training - was considered as Scenario 11. Thus, the special event traffic is 100% evacuated for Scenario 11, and 0% for all other scenarios. Transient activity is also assumed to peak during this scenario.

It is estimated that summer school enrollment is approximately 10% of enrollment during the regular school year for summer, midweek, midday scenarios. School is not in session during weekends and evenings, thus no buses for school children are needed under those circumstances. As discussed in Section 7, schools are in session during the winter season, midweek, midday and 100% of buses will be needed under those circumstances. The school bus percentages were also applied to all vehicles evacuating from Indian River State College. Transit buses for the transit-dependent population are set to 100% for all scenarios as it is assumed that the transit-dependent population is present in the EPZ for all scenarios.

External traffic is estimated to be reduced by 60% during evening scenarios and is 100% for all other scenarios.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 6-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 6-1. Description of Evacuation Regions Area Region Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 71 8 RO 2-Mile Region X R02 5-Mile Region ** aV_

R03 Ful EPZ x X.

Evacuate 2-Mile Region and Downwind to 5 Miles Area Region Wind Direction Towards: 1 2 3 14 15 6 7 8 N/A N, NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE, SE Refer to Region R01 R04 SSE, S, SSW I I Tx N/A SW, WSW, W Refer to Region R02 R05 WNW, NW, NNW II Evacuate 5-Mile Region and Downwind to the EPZ Boundary Area Region Wind Direction Towards: 1 2 3 46 7 8 R06 N___________

N/A NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE Refer to Region R02 N/A SE, SSE2 Refer to Region R04 R07 S, SSW atý' x R08 WWS iX MWOt-ý N/A W Refer to Region R03 R09 WNW,NW, NNW l ll Staged Evacuation Mile Radius Evacuates, then Evacuate Downwind to 5 Miles Area Region Wind Direction Towards: 1 2 1 3 4 5 1 6 8 RIO 5-Mile Radius x __

N/A N, NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE, SE Refer to Region R01 Rlu SSE, S, SSW N/A SW, WSW, W Refer to Region RIO 1-

\AIKIIAI KIlAI KIKlIlAI Area(s) Shelter-in-Place 1 Although Area 7 is not within 5 miles of the plant, it is evacuated for regions involving the 5-mile radius and for regions wherein the 2-mile radius is evacuated and downwind to the south-southeast through the west to 5 miles.

2 Site specific protective action recommendations indicate that only Areas 1, 6, 7, & 8 evacuate for regions wherein the 5-mile radius is evacuated and downwind to the southeast and south-southeast to the EPZ boundary.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 6-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 6-1. St. Lucie EPZ Areas St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 6-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 6-2. Evacuation Scenario Definitions 1 Summer Midweek Midday Good None 2 Summer Midweek Midday Rain None 3 Summer Weekend Midday Good None 4 Summer Weekend Midday Rain None 5 Summer Midweek, Evening Good None Summer Weekend 6 Winter Midweek Midday Good None 7 Winter Midweek Midday Rain None 8 Winter Weekend Midday Good None 9 Winter Weekend Midday Rain None 10 Winter Midweek, Evening Good None

_________ ~Weekend_______

11 Winter Midweek Midday Good NY Mets Spring Training Single Lane 12 Summer Midweek Midday Good Closure on 1-95 Southbound Winter assumes that school is in session (also applies to spring and autumn). Summer assumes that school is not in session.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 6-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 6-3. Percent of Population Groups Evacuating for Various Scenarios Hoseod Househols Wit Wihu Exera 1 19% 81% 96% 55% 23% 0% 10% 10% 100% 100%

2 19% 81% 96% 55% 23% 0% 10% 10% 100% 100%

3 2% 98% 10% 75% 20% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%

4 2% 98% 10% 75% 20% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%

5 2% 98% 10% 50% 20% 0% 0% 0% 100% 40%

6 19% 81% 100% 75% 23% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100%

7 19% 81% 100% 75% 23% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100%

8 2% 98% 10% 100% 20% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%

9 2% 98% 10% 100% 20% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%

10 2% 98% 10% 65% 20% 0% 0% 0% 100% 40%

11 19% 81% 100% 100% 23% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

12 19% 81% 96% 55% 23% 0% 10% 10% 100% 100%

Resident Households with Commuters ....... Households of EPZ residents who await the return of commuters prior to beginning the evacuation trip.

Resident Households with No Commuters.. Households of EPZ residents who do not have commuters or will not await the return of commuters prior to beginning the evacuation trip.

Employees ................................................. EPZ employees who live outside the EPZ Transients .................................................. People who are in the EPZ at the time of an accident for recreational or other (non-employment) purposes.

Shadow ..................................................... Residents and employees in the shadow region (outside of the EPZ) who will spontaneously decide to relocate during the evacuation.

The basis for the values shown is a 20% relocation of shadow residents along with a proportional percentage of shadow employees.

Special Events ............................................ Additional vehicles in the EPZ due to the identified special event.

School and Transit Buses ............................ Vehicle-equivalents present on the road during evacuation servicing schools and transit-dependent people (1 bus is equivalent to 2 passenger vehicles).

External Through Traffic ............................. Traffic on interstates/freeways and major arterial roads at the start of the evacuation. This traffic is stopped by access control 60 minutes after the evacuation begins.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 6-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 6-4. Vehicle Estimates by Scenario 1 24,233 100,831 16,194 4,249 17,312 164 175 272 13,652 177,082 2 24,233 100,831 16,194 4,249 17,312 164 175 272 13,652 177,082 3 2,423 122,641 1,687 5,794 15,534 - - 272 13,652 162,003 4 2,423 122,641 1,687 5,794 15,534 272 13,652 162,003 5 2,423 122,641 1,687 3,863 15,534 - - 272 5,461 151,881 6 24,233 100,831 16,869 5,794 17,395 1,638 1,748 272 13,652 182,432 7 24,233 100,831 16,869 5,794 17,395 1,638 1,748 272 13,652 182,432 8 2,423 122,641 1,687 7,725 15,534 - - 272 13,652 163,934 9 2,423 122,641 1,687 7,725 15,534 272 13,652 163,934 10 2,423 122,641 1,687 5,021 15,534 - - - 272 5,461 153,039 11 24,233 100,831 16,869 7,725 17,395 2,171 1,638 1,748 272 13,652 186,534 12 24,233 100,831 16,194 4,249 17,312 - 164 175 272 13,652 177,082 Note: Vehicle estimates are for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03)

Note: The 1,638 commuting students for Indian River State College were subtracted from the transient population and treated separately as the scenario percentages for this population group are comparable to schools.

KLO Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 6-7 6-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

7 GENERAL POPULATION EVACUATION TIME ESTIMATES (ETE)

This section presents the ETE results of the computer analyses using the DYNEV II System described in Appendices B, C and D. These results cover 12 regions within the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant EPZ and the 12 Evacuation Scenarios discussed in Section 6.

The ETE for all Evacuation Cases are presented in Table 7-1 and Table 7-2. These tables present the estimated times to clear the indicated population percentages from the Evacuation Regions for all Evacuation Scenarios. The ETE of the 2-mile region in both staged and un-staged regions are presented in Table 7-3 and Table 7-4. Table 7-5 defines the Evacuation Regions considered.

The tabulated values of ETE are obtained from the DYNEV II System outputs which are generated at 5-minute intervals.

7.1 Voluntary Evacuation and Shadow Evacuation "Voluntary evacuees" are people within the EPZ in areas for which an Advisory to Evacuate has not been issued, yet who elect to evacuate. "Shadow evacuation" is the voluntary outward movement of some people from the Shadow Region (outside the EPZ) for whom no protective action recommendation has been issued. Both voluntary and shadow evacuations are assumed to take place over the same time frame as the evacuation from within the impacted Evacuation Region.

The ETE for the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant EPZ addresses the issue of voluntary evacuees in the manner shown in Figure 7-1. Within the EPZ, 20 percent of people located in areas outside of the evacuation region who are not advised to evacuate, are assumed to elect to evacuate.

Similarly, it is assumed that 20 percent of those people in the Shadow Region will choose to leave the area.

Figure 7-2 presents the area identified as the Shadow Region. This region extends radially from the plant to cover a region between the EPZ boundary and approximately 15 miles. The population and number of evacuating vehicles in the Shadow Region were estimated using the same methodology that was used for permanent residents within the EPZ (see Section 3.1). As discussed in Section 3.2, it is estimated that a total of 135,735 people reside in the Shadow Region; 20 percent of them would evacuate. See Table 6-4 for the number of evacuating vehicles from the Shadow Region.

Traffic generated within this Shadow Region, traveling away from the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant location, has the potential for impeding evacuating vehicles from within the Evacuation Region. All ETE calculations include this shadow traffic movement.

7.2 Staged Evacuation As defined in NUREG/CR-7002, staged evacuation consists of the following:

1. Residents within the 2 mile radius are advised to evacuate immediately.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

2. Residents evacuating from 2 to 5 miles downwind are advised to shelter in-place while the two mile radius is cleared.

3. As vehicles evacuate the 2 mile radius, people from 2 to 5 miles downwind continue preparation for evacuation while they shelter.

4. The population sheltering in the 2 to 5 mile region is advised to evacuate when approximately 90% of the 2 mile radius evacuating traffic crosses the 2 mile radius.

5. Non-compliance with the shelter recommendation is the same as the shadow evacuation percentage of 20%.

See Section 5.4.2 for additional information on staged evacuation.

7.3 Patterns of Traffic Congestion during Evacuation Figure 7-3 through Figure 7-8 illustrate the patterns of traffic congestion that arise for the case when the entire EPZ (Region R03) is advised to evacuate during the winter, midweek, midday period under good weather conditions (Scenario 6).

Traffic congestion, as the term is used here, is defined as Level of Service (LOS) F. LOS F is defined as follows (HCM 2010, page 5-5):

The HCM uses LOS F to define operations that have either broken down (i.e., demand exceeds capacity) or have exceeded a specified service measure value, or combination of service measure values,, that most users would consider unsatisfactory. However, particularly for planning applications where different alternatives may be compared, analysts may be interested in knowing just how bad the LOS F condition is. Several measures are available to describe individually, or in combination, the severity of a LOS F condition:

9 Demand-to-capacityratios describe the extent to which capacity is exceeded during the analysis period (e.g., by 1%, 15%, etc.);

- Duration of LOS F describes how long the condition persists (e.g., 15 min, 1 h, 3 h); and

Spatial extent measures describe the areas affected by LOS F conditions. These include measures such as the back of queue, and the identification of the specific intersection approaches or system elements experiencing LOS F conditions.

All highway "links" which experience LOS F are delineated in these figures by a thick red line; all others are lightly indicated. Congestion develops rapidly around concentrations of population and at traffic bottlenecks. Figure 7-3 displays the widespread traffic congestion within the study area at 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months after the Advisory to Evacuate (ATE). State Route (SR) 1A on the northern and southern ends of Hutchinson Island are heavily congested as the transient population and plant employees merge with evacuees from the mainland. Note that the northern bridge in Area 8 leaving Hutchinson Island (NE Causeway Blvd) is not congested. This is because traffic is metered by the slow moving traffic circle on Hutchinson Island at the intersection with SR IA.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

Traffic congestion on SR 1A southbound propagates upstream to the 2-mile radius, but does not backup into the 2-mile radius.

All of the evacuation routes in the major population centers within the EPZ (Fort Pierce, Port St Lucie, Jensen Beach, Indian River Estates) are heavily congested. There is congestion in competing directions (north-south and east-west) at most intersections, resulting in little to no benefit from traffic control. US 1 is heavily congested throughout most of the EPZ. All of the ramps to 1-95 and to the Florida Turnpike are congested. The main thoroughfares on 1-95 and the turnpike are operating below capacity (LOS E) as the ramps are currently bottlenecks and are metering the flow of traffic.

At 3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months after the ATE, Figure 7-4 displays peak traffic congestion within the study area. US 1 is congested throughout the entire EPZ and Shadow Region. The ramps to 1-95 and the turnpike are operating at LOS F. .1-95 southbound, south of the plant, is operating at LOS E or better, except for a small area of congestion (LOS F) just outside of the Shadow Region. 1-95 northbound, however, is operating at LOS F from the plant north. This is primarily due to the bottleneck caused by the lane drop from 3 lanes to 2 lanes north of the interchange with SR 70.

Congestion is dissipating on Hutchinson Island. Port St Lucie and Fort Pierce are heavily congested with all evacuation routes operating at LOS F. Note the Florida Turnpike is not congested. This is due to the diversion of external traffic using access control at 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months after the ATE, and the limited number of access ramps (there are only 4 in the whole study area) to the turnpike. Also note that there is still no congestion in the 2-mile radius.

Figure 7-5 shows the congestion patterns at 5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months after the ATE. Congestion has significantly dissipated over the last 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months . Congestion on the northern and southern portions of Hutchinson Island is clear. The only remaining congestion on Hutchinson Island is caused by the slow moving traffic circle at the intersection of SR 1A and NE Causeway Blvd and the large population evacuating from Nettles Island. Congestion along US 1 has cleared throughout most of the EPZ, with some congestion remaining northbound through Fort Pierce and southbound through Stuart. 1-95 northbound is heavily congested from SW St Lucie W Blvd to the end of the analysis network at the St Lucie/Indian River county line. 1-95 southbound is still only congested just outside of the Shadow Region near the interchange with SW High Meadows Ave. Many of the roads in Port St Lucie have cleared; those roads (SE Floresta Dr, Crosstown Pkwy, SW St Lucie W Blvd) which provide access to 1-95 and to the Florida Turnpike are still congested. Fort Pierce is still heavily congested, especially northbound along SR 615 and SR 713 and westbound along SR 68, SR 70 and SR 614.

At 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months after the ATE, Figure 7-6 shows that much of the congestion in the study area has dissipated. The last of the traffic congestion on Hutchinson Island clears 5 minutes earlier. Port St Lucie is essentially clear with the exception of the two ramps to the turnpike along SR 716 and SE Becker Rd. Congestion on 1-95 southbound persists outside of the Shadow Region near the interchange with SW High Meadows Ave. Pronounced congestion persists along 1-95 northbound, however, congestion is easing as queues extend to just south of Midway Rd (County Rd 712) 3 miles north of SW St Lucie W Blvd where queues extended to an hour earlier.

Fort Pierce is still heavily congested, however, traffic is also dissipating here. Queuing in the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

area extended 3 miles south of SR 68 an hour earlier; all congestion is now north of SR 68.

Figure 7-7 shows the last of the traffic congestion in the EPZ northbound along 1-95 north of SR 70, northbound along SR 713 and westbound along Angle Rd. Traffic congestion in all other areas of the EPZ is clear. 1-95 southbound cleared 30 minutes earlier at 6:30 (hr:min) after the ATE. Port St Lucie cleared 15 minutes earlier at 6:45. There is still significant congestion (US 1 northbound, SR 614 westbound, SR 713 northbound and SR 615 northbound) in the Shadow Region north of the EPZ, which is slowing the departure of evacuees from Fort Pierce.

Figure 7-8 shows the last of the traffic congestion in the study area - northbound along 1-95 and SR 713, and westbound along SR 614 and County Road 608 (West). The last congestion in the EPZ was northbound along 1-95 which cleared at 7:30 after the ATE. The remaining congestion in the Shadow Region clears at 8:25 after the ATE.

7.4 Evacuation Rates Evacuation is a continuous process, as implied by Figure 7-9 through Figure 7-20. These figures indicate the rate at which traffic flows out of the indicated areas for the case of an evacuation of the full EPZ (Region R03) under the indicated conditions. One figure is presented for each scenario considered.

As indicated in Figure 7-14 (Scenario 6), there is typically a long "tail" to these distributions.

Vehicles begin to evacuate an area slowly at first, as people respond to the ATE at different rates. Then traffic demand builds rapidly (slopes of curves increase). When the system becomes congested, traffic exits the EPZ at rates somewhat below capacity until some evacuation routes have cleared. As more routes clear, the aggregate rate of egress slows since many vehicles have already left the EPZ. Towards the end of the process, relatively few evacuation routes service the remaining demand.

The rate of egress for entire EPZ, however, remains relatively constant throughout the course of the evacuation. This is due to the limited number of evacuation routes out of Fort Pierce to the north, and the fact that the area remains fully saturated for almost the entirety of the evacuation, as discussed in Section 7.3.

Conversely, the rate of egress for the 2-mile and 5-mile regions have a long "tail" as congestion in these regions begins to dissipate hours earlier than in the entire EPZ, as depicted in Figure 7-5. This decline in aggregate flow rate, towards the end of the process, is characterized by these curves flattening and gradually becoming horizontal.

Ideally, it would be desirable to fully saturate all evacuation routes equally so that all will service traffic near capacity levels and all will clear at the same time. For this ideal situation, all curves would retain the same slope until the end - thus minimizing evacuation time. In reality, this ideal is generally unattainable reflecting the spatial variation in population density, mobilization rates and in highway capacity over the EPZ.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-4 KLD Engineering. P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

7.5 Evacuation Time Estimate (ETE) Results Table 7-1 and Table 7-2 present the ETE values for all 12 Evacuation Regions and all 14 Evacuation Scenarios. Table 7-3 and Table 7-4 present the ETE values for the 2-mile radius for both staged and un-staged keyhole regions downwind to 5 miles' They are organized as follows:

-be C ETE represents the elapsed time required for 90 percent of the 7-1 population within a Region, to evacuate from that Region. All Scenarios are considered, as well as Staged Evacuation scenarios.

ETE represents the elapsed time required for 100 percent of the 7-2 population within a Region, to evacuate from that Region. All Scenarios are considered, as well as Staged Evacuation scenarios.

ETE represents the elapsed time required for 90 percent of the 7-3 population within the 2-mile Radius, to evacuate from that Region with both Concurrent and Staged Evacuations.

ETE represents the elapsed time required for 100 percent of the 7-4 population within the 2-mile Radius, to evacuate from that Region with both Concurrent and Staged Evacuations.

The animation snapshots described above reflect the ETE statistics for the concurrent (un-staged) evacuation scenarios and regions, which are displayed in Figure 7-3 through Figure 7-8.

The unique nature of the EPZ - Hutchinson Island is separated from the rest of the EPZ with only three bridges connecting to the mainland - and the prevalence of traffic congestion in Areas 3, 4 and 5 which are beyond the 5-mile region is reflected in the ETE statistics:

" The 9 0 th percentile ETE for the 2-mile region (R01) is actually an hour and fifteen minutes longer than the 90th percentile ETE for the 5-mile region (R02), on average. This anomaly is explained by the limited capacity of the three bridges connecting Hutchinson Island to the mainland. These bridges meter the flow of traffic off the island, causing pronounced traffic congestion and significantly delays on the island. The 5-mile region has many more evacuating vehicles; however, the ETE is less because there are many more evacuation routes available to these evacuees.

The 90th percentile ETE for Region R01 is even longer than the 90th percentile ETE for the entire EPZ (R03) for winter weekend scenarios. As discussed in Section 6, transient activity peaks on winter weekends. There are many transients and seasonal residents on Hutchinson Island. The increased transient population exacerbates the congestion on the island further prolonging ETE. Again, Region R03, despite having many more evacuees achieves 90th percentile evacuation faster because there are many more evacuation routes available.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-5 KLD Engineering.I P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

The 100'h percentile ETE for all regions extending to 5 miles or less is equal to the trip generation time. This fact implies that the congestion within these areas dissipates prior to the end of mobilization time, as is displayed in Figure 7-7. Scenario 9 is an exception due to the high transient population during winter weekends and the reduced roadway capacity due to rain.

" The 1 0 0 th percentile ETE for those regions (R03 and R09)' wherein Area 3 (Fort Pierce) and Area 4 evacuate extends beyond trip generation time due to the persistence of traffic congestion in Fort Pierce for seven and a half hours (and longer for rain), as shown in Figure 7-8.

Comparisonof Scenarios 6 and 13 in Table 7-1 indicates that the Special Event - NY Mets Spring Training - only has a significant impact (30 minutes or more) for Regions R01 and RO5. Both of these regions are quite distant from the special event. This increase in ETE, however, is not due to the special event, but to the increased transient population on Hutchinson Island due to the special event. As discussed in Section 6, it is assumed that transient population peaks during the special event. As shown in Table 6-3, the transient percentage is 100% for Scenario 13 versus 75% for Scenario 6. The extra 25% of transients causes the increases in ETE for Regions R01 and R05.

Comparison of Scenarios 1 and 12 in Table 7-1 indicates that the roadway closure - one lane southbound on 1-95 from the interchange with SW St. Lucie West Blvd (Exit 121) to the interchange with State Highway 714/Martin Highway (Exit 110) - does not significantly impact the 90th percentile ETE. The ETE increases by at most 20 minutes at the 90th percentile. At the 100th percentile, the ETE for the entire EPZ increases by 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months - a significant change. Many evacuees from Area 5, the southern portion of Area 4, and the Shadow Region to the west of Areas 4 and 5 rely on 1-95 southbound to evacuate the area. The closure of a single lane significantly reduces the capacity of the roadway, prolonging traffic congestion and ETE. The roadway closure was selected on southbound 1-95 because the simulation results indicated a higher volume of evacuating traffic on southbound 1-95 than on northbound 1-95.

The results of the roadway impact scenario indicate that events such as adverse weather or traffic accidents which close a lane on 1-95, could impact ETE. State and local police could consider traffic management tactics such as using the shoulder of the roadway as a travel lane or re-routing of traffic along other evacuation routes to avoid overwhelming 1-95 southbound.

All efforts should be made to remove any blockage on 1-95 during evacuation.

7.6 Staged Evacuation Results Table 7-3 and Table 7-4 present a comparison of the ETE compiled for the concurrent (un-staged) and staged evacuation studies. Note that Regions RIO through R12 are the same geographic areas as Regions R02, R04 and R05, respectively.

To determine whether the staged evacuation strategy is worthy of consideration, one must show that the ETE for the 2-mile radius can be reduced without significantly affecting the region between 2 miles and 5 miles. In all cases, as shown in these tables, the ETE for the 2 mile radius St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

is unchanged when a staged evacuation is implemented. The reason for this is that the congestion within the 5-mile region does not extend upstream to the extent that it penetrates to within 2 miles of the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant as discussed in Section 7.3 and shown in Figure 7-3 through Figure 7-8. Consequently, the impedance, due to this congestion within the 5-mile region, to evacuees from within the 2-mile radius is not sufficient to materially influence the 90th percentile ETE for the 2-mile radius. Therefore, staging the evacuation to sharply reduce congestion within the 5-mile region, provides no benefits to evacuees from within the 2 mile radius.

The' 2-mile radius was used for this analysis rather than the 2-mile region (Areas 1 and 8). As shown in Figure 7-2, Areas 1 and 8 extend from the plant to the EPZ boundary. Traffic congestion on the three bridges leaving Hutchinson Island prolongs the ETE for the 2-mile region. However, all of these bridges are more than 5 miles from the plant. The objective of staged evacuation is to evacuate those people within 2 miles of the plant as expeditiously as possible. The use of the 2-mile radius rather than the 2-mile region is necessary to accurately gauge the impact of staged evacuation.

While failing to provide assistance to evacuees from within 2 miles of the plant, staging produces a negative impact on the ETE for those evacuating from within the 5-mile region. A comparison of ETE between Regions R02 and RIO, R04 and R11, and R05 and R12, reveals that staging retards the 90'h percentile evacuation time for those in the 2 to 5-mile region by up to 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months (see Table 7-1). This extending of ETEis due to the delay in beginning the evacuation trip, experienced by those who shelter, plus the effect of the trip-generation "spike" (significant volume of traffic beginning the evacuation trip at the same time - see Figure 5-5) that follows their eventual ATE, in creating congestion within the EPZ area beyond 2 miles.

In summary, the staged evacuation option provides no benefits to evacuees within 2 miles from the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant and adversely impacts many evacuees located beyond 2 miles from the plant. Staged evacuation is not a beneficial protective action strategy for this site.

7.7 Guidance on Using ETE Tables The user first determines the percentile of population for which the ETE is sought (The NRC guidance calls for the 9 0 th percentile). The applicable value of ETE within the chosen Table may then be identified using the following procedure:

1. Identify the applicable Scenario:

Season

" Summer

" Winter (also Autumn and Spring)

" Day of Week

" Midweek

" Weekend

" Time of Day

" Midday

" Evening St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

" Weather Condition

" Good Weather

" Rain

" Special Event

" NY Mets Spring Training

" Road Closure (A lane on 1-95 SB is closed)

Evacuation Staging

" No, Staged Evacuation is not considered

" Yes, Staged Evacuation is considered While these Scenarios are designed, in aggregate, to represent conditions throughout the year, some further clarification is warranted:

The conditions of a summer evening (either midweek or weekend) and rain are not explicitly identified in the Tables. For these conditions, Scenarios (2) and (4) apply.

0 The conditions of a winter evening (either midweek or weekend) and rain are not explicitly identified in the Tables. For these conditions, Scenarios (7) and (9) for rain apply.

The seasons are defined as follows:

" Summer assumes that public schools are not in session.

" Winter (includes Spring and Autumn) considers that public schools are in session.

Time of Day: Midday implies the time over which most commuters are at work or are travellingto/from work.

2. With the desired percentile ETE and Scenario identified, now identify the Evacuation Region:

Determine the projected azimuth direction of the plume (coincident with the wind direction). This direction is expressed in terms of compass orientation: towards N, NNE, NE, ...

Determine the distance that the Evacuation Region will extend from the nuclear power plant. The applicable distances and their associated candidate Regions are given below:

2 Miles (Region R01)

To 5 Miles (Region R02, R04 and R05)

To EPZ Boundary (Regions R03, R06 through R09)

Enter Table 7-5 and identify the applicable group of candidate Regions based on the distance that the selected Region extends from the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant.

Select the Evacuation Region identifier in that row, based on the azimuth direction of the plume, from the first column of the Table.

3. Determine the ETE Table based on the percentile selected. Then, for the Scenario identified in Step 1 and the Region identified in Step 2, proceed as follows:

The columns of Table 7-1 are labeled with the Scenario numbers. Identify the proper column in the selected Table using the Scenario number defined in Step 1.

Identify the row in this table that provides ETE values for the Region identified in Step 2.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

The unique data cell defined by the column and row so determined contains the desired value of ETE expressed in Hours:Minutes.

Example It is desired to identify the ETE for the following conditions:

Sunday, August 1 0 th at 4:00 AM.

It is raining.

Wind direction is toward the southwest (SW).

Wind speed is such that the distance to be evacuated is judged to be a 5-mile radius and downwind to 10 miles (to EPZ boundary).

The desired ETE is that value needed to evacuate 90 percent of the population from within the impacted Region.

A staged evacuation is not desired.

Table 7-1 is applicable because the 90th percentile ETE is desired. Proceed as follows:

1. Identify the Scenario as summer, weekend, evening and raining. Entering Table 7-1, it is seen that there is no match for these descriptors. However, the clarification given above assigns this combination of circumstances to Scenario 4.

2. Enter Table 7-5 and locate the Region described as "Evacuate 5-Mile Radius and Downwind to the EPZ Boundary" for wind direction toward the SW and read Region R08 in the first column of that row.

3. Enter Table 7-1 to locate the data cell containing the value of ETE for Scenario 4 and Region R09. This data cell is in column (4) and in the row for Region R09; it contains the ETE value of 4:40.

KLD Engineering, P.c.

St. Lucie Nuclear St. Lucie Power Plant Nuclear Power Plant 7-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 7-1. Time to Clear the Indicated Area of 90 Percent of the Affected Population Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Winter Summer Midweek Weekend Midweek Wend Midweek Weekend Midweek WendMidweek Midweek Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Region Good Rain Good Rain Good Good Rain Good Rain Good Special Roadway Region Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Event Impact Entire 2-Mile Region, S-Mile Region, and EPZ R01" 4:0 5:05 ý-"45O.

5:20: ' 4:20- 5:05-- - 5:35 1i. 5 -. 6:00- - ". 0 " 4 " O

--- --- _ _ 5:256-b 406 4:401-" RO101ý.

R02 3:40 3:55 3:45 4:10 3:35 3:45 4:05 3:55 4:10 3:45 3:55 3:40 R02 R03: 515, ;550 Wý435~ 4:45

ý,52- 5:30 6:00,~ 5-00. - 5.5c 4:45 '54- :35. R0 2-Mile Region and Keyhole to S Miles R04 3:40 3:55 3:45 4:05 3:40 3:45 4:05 4:00 4:15 3:50 4:00 3:40 R04 R3 34S.' .,,4:b5w. Z3:55 - "'4:10- 3:-1,507 . 4-:04-0' 4:20a j A:0Lj4:40>' 400 j"430ý

~ J 3:45' RO S-Mile Region and Keyhole to EPZ Boundary R06 4:15 4:40 4:10 4:25 3:50 4:35 4:55 4:15 4:40 4:00 4:40 4:20 R06 R'07- :20 4:40 4:10 4:40

-4:40 4:05 44:300 :3 - 5:0 : 5 4:35 4:10 ',- 4:25 R07 ROB 4:55 5:20 4:35 4:55 4:20 5:00 5:30 4:35 5:05 4:25 5:05 5:15 RO8 Rg -4:50 ' si7ý :0 Ti?6 :050 :30 -4:25 4:5,:5~C 41 500 R9' Staged Evacuation Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles RIO 4:10 4:25 4:35 4:50 4:35 4:10 4:30 4:40 4:55 4:35 4:15 4:10 RIO R11I 4:10 4,15"'> 4:35- 4,-45 4.--'4:35. -:-4.10-.i 4:20 i4-:-' 4:50 4:40 4:15 *-_4:10- Rii?

R12 3:55 4:15 4:10 4:25 4:15 4:05 4:25 4:25 4:45 4:15 4:30 3:55 R12 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-10 KLD Engineering. P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 7-2. Time to Clear the Indicated Area of 100 Percent of the Affected Population Summer Summer SummeatWin We terter Winter Winter Summer Midweek Weekend Mdek Midweek Weekend MdekMidweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Midday Midday Enirwe2-iek Evening ReinM5MliRgownePZek___

Midday Midday Evening

____ Midday Midday Region Good Rain Good Rain Good Good Rain Good Rain Good Special Roadway Region Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Event Impact Entire 2-Mile Region, S-Mile Region, and EPZ

~

RO1 7:05 7:05.~~i700 J0 7:00-7 i:0~ 7:05 T 70 -:30 1 7ý00ý '7:05, r7:05 Rl R02 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:30 7:05 7:05 7:05 R02

~R3' 7:25'..:', ý.8:10 -.ý7,0 -_7.;35: -7:10 _ a7:40 8:10ý- 7`10i iR03 7:10' 7:55 825 2-Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R04 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 _____,.R04 OS 7:0 :5j:5 O ~ ,.~70M 7:05 7:05 ;'705 7:30 7 705 0 7:5 J 7:5R S-Mile Region and Keyhole to EPZ Boundary R06 7:10 7:15 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:20 7:10 7:30 7:10 7:10 7:10 R06 R107 ,71_ 1 7: 10- 710 7:0 710-:0 7:1071:0~ 71~ :10< i 9 ,

RO8 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:10 7:30 7:10 7:10 7:10 ROB

-- -R-09*.j 7:i0. ,- .7:50 :.7 - 71007 -- 5 8 ,j 7:0 17:10 7 ;Z':7.,30

- .7:30. :7:10 R09 Staged Evacuation Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles RIO 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:30 7:05 7:05 7:05 RIO

-. R_--" 7:05.0 7:05 7:05 : -7:05 :705-0-505 7:30 3:7:050 7:05- 7:05 7*55. 7:05 R ,

R12 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:30 7:05 7:05 7:05 R12 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 7-3. Time to Clear 90 Percent of the 2-Mile Radius within the Indicated Region Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Summer Summer Midweek Midweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Weekend Midweek Weekend Weekend Weekend Weekend Midweek Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Evening Midday Region Good Good Good Good Good Good Special Roadway Region Rain Weather Rain Weather Weather Rain Rain Weather Weather Weather Event Impact Un-staged Evacuation Mile Radius, 2-Mile Region and Keyhole to 5-Miles 2-Mile 2-Mile Radius Radius 2:15 2:15 2:25 2:25 2:30 2:10 2:10 2:20 2:20 2:25 2:00 2:15 Radius Radius RO1.. 2:15 2:15 _ 2:25 -2:25 -2.30 210 . -:, -2 2 2:20-ýi 2510_ 2:25 *-'22:00 '2 .R R02 2:15 2:15 2:25 2:25 2:30 2:10 2:10 2:20 2:20 2:25 2:00 2:15 R02 R0 2,:15 .2:15 2:5 2:25 .2:.-30 _ 2:10 2:10. 22 25k-i,:2 -20 2:5RO -

ROS 2:15 2:15 2:25 2:25 2:30 2:10 2:10 2:20 2:20 2:25 2:00 2:15 ROS Staged Evacuation Mile Region and Keyhole to S-Miles RIOl 2:15 2:15 2:2 2:25 2 2:10 2:10 2:20 2:20C 2:25 2:00 2:15- RIO R11 2.15 2:15 2:2

5 23 2:10 2:10 2:20 2: 20 2:25 2:00) 2:15 RI1

- R2 j 2:15, ,:5 Z! ~ 2:2 ___Z_25 2; .,2;1 10 0 '20 2:5, 200C, 215 1 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 7-4. Time to Clear 100 Percent of the 2-Mile Radius within the Indicated Region Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Summer Summer Midweek Weekend Midweek Weekend Midweek Weekend Midweek Weekend Weekend Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Evening Midday Region Good Rain Good Rain Good Good Rain Good Rain Good Special Roadway Region Weather Weather _ Weather Weather I Weather R Weather Event Impact']

Un-staged Evacuation Mile Radius, 2-Mile Region and Keyhole to 5-Miles 2-Mile 2-Mile Radius 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 Radius Radius Radius R02 7.00 7:00 7.00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 R02

R64 70__70I:~~70 7:00 7:00~ 7:00 ~7:00 ~7;00 - 7ý00 700:700' R04 ROB 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7.00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7.00 7:00 7:00 7:00 ROS Staged Evacuation Mile Region and Keyhole to S-Miles RiO 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00

-:0. 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 x700 RiO R11 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7:00 7.00 R11 R112 700'.70 7.00 00-.

7700 >700 -7:0 7:00 7:00k 7-00 7;00 - 7;00 R127 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 7-5. Description of Evacuation Regions Area Region Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 R01 2-Mile Region x R5 R02 5-Mile RegionWRetRgoR RO3 WN WNFull EPZN 5-Mile RegionRegion and Downwind Evacuate t to Miles Area Region Wind Direction Towards: 1 2 3 14 15 6 7 8 N/A N, NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE, SE R04 SSE, S,SSW I @ý"rc~ x m Refer to Region R01 N/A SW, WSW, W Refer to Region R02 ROS WNW, NW, NNW * @ I ! I I t Evacuate S-Mile Region and Downwind to the EPZ Boundary Area Region Wind Direction Towards: 1 2 1I3 1 4 5 6 7 8 N/A NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE Refer to Region R02 R7s, N/A R08 SSWx*

SE, SSE 2 sw, WSW

Refer to Region R04 N/A W Refer to Region ROB R09 WNW, NW, NNW X * *

I@*

1*,ýýý7ý4'.-ý Staged Evacuation Mile Radius Evacuates, then Evacuate Downwind to 5 Miles

.Area Region Wind Direction Towards: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I8 R 10 "5-Mile Radius X **

Y

1ýx N/A N, NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE, SE Refer to Region R01 R* ~SSE, S,SSW x1 I I I @t N/A SW, WSW, W Refer to Region R10 R12 WNW, NW, NNW .* I I I

.*h*0" Areas) Shelter-in- '

Ara( **r.=.___:

e 7W-0,1 q i ýv, t r- ace 1 Although Area 7 is not within 5 miles of the plant, it is evacuated for regions involving the 5-mile radius and for regions wherein the 2-mile radius is evacuated and downwind to the south southeast through the west to-5 miles.

2 Site specific protective action recommendations indicate that only Areas 1, 6, 7, & 8 evacuate for regions wherein the 5-mile radius is evacuated and downwind to the southeast and south southeast to the EPZ boundary.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

SMeRegion I15 Miles\

2-Mile Region I I K / R wind1Me L5 Miles 15Miles SKeyhole: 2-Mire Region & 5 Miles Downwind]

FKeyhole: 5-Mile Region & 10 Miles Downwind Staged Evacuation: 2-Mile Region & 5 Miles Downwind I J I I L I* Plant Location M Region to be Evacuated: 100% Evacuation E]20%Shadow Evacuation M Shelter, then Evacuate I Figure 7-1. Voluntary Evacuation Methodology St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 7-2. St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Shadow Region St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 7-3. Congestion Patterns at 1 Hour after the Advisory to Evacuate St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 7-4. Congestion Patterns at 3 Hours after the Advisory to Evacuate St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-18 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 7-5. Congestion Patterns at 5 Hours after the Advisory to Evacuate St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 7-6. Congestion Patterns at 6 Hours after the Advisory to Evacuate St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-20 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 7-7. Congestion Patterns at 7 Hours after the Advisory to Evacuate St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-21 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 7-8. Congestion Patterns at 7 Hours, 45 Minutes after the Advisory to Evacuate St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-22 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Evacuation Time Estimates Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 1)

- 2-Mile Region - 5-Mile Region = Entire EPZ 0 90%

100%

250 t 200

- 150

'A o 2~- 100

> 50 0 7 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 7-9. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 1 for Region R03 Evacuation Time Estimates Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2)

- 2-Mile Region - 5-Mile Region -==Entire EPZ 0 90% 0 100%

250 to 200 S150 LU

,A 0

-2. 100 50 0

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 7-10. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 2 for Region R03 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-23 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Evacuation Time Estimates Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 3)

Mile Region - 5-Mile Region -= Entire EPZ 0 90% -

100%

250 200 S150

- 100

> oo 00 50 2,

60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 7-11. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 3 for Region R03 Evacuation Time Estimates Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4)

Mile Region Mile Region -= Entire EPZ 0 90% 0 100%

250

, 200 150

> 50 0

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 7-12. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 4 for Region R03 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-24 KILD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Evacuation Time Estimates Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 5)

- 2-Mile Region Mile Region - Entire EPZ 0 90% 0 100%

250 200 150 LU 100 LU 0) 50 50 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 7-13. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 5 for Region R03 Evacuation Time Estimates Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 6)

- 2-Mile Region - 5-Mile Region -Entire EPZ 0 90% 0 100%

250 200 0 r150 T 100

> 50 0

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 7-14. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 6 for Region R03 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-25 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Evacuation Time Estimates Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7)

- 2-Mile Region - 5-Mile Region -==*EntireEPZ 0 90% 0 100%

250 200 1 50

-pb LJ0

> 50 0

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 7-15. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 7 for Region R03 Evacuation Time Estimates Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 8)

- 2-Mile Region - 5-Mile Region -=Entire EPZ 0 90% 0 100%

250 200 150 w

_TC 100

> 50 0 ------

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 7-16. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 8 for Region R03 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-26 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Evacuation Time Estimates Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 9)

- 2-Mile Region - 5-Mile Region - Entire EPZ 0 90% 0 100%

250 200 150 U r 100 0J 50 0

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 7-17. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 9 for Region R03 Evacuation Time Estimates Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 10)

- 2-Mile Region - 5-Mile Region -Entire EPZ 0 90% 0 100%

250 200 150 LU, 50

> 50*

0 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 7-18. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 10 for Region R03 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-27 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Evacuation Time Estimates Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good, Special Event (Scenario 11)

Mile Region - 5-Mile Region -Entire EPZ 0 90% 0 100%

250 ba 200 d C

OU 150

.T 100

> 50 50 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 7-19. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 11 for Region R03 Evacuation Time Estimates Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good, Roadway Impact (Scenario 12)

Mile Region Mile Region -Entire EPZ 0 90% 0 100%

250

. 200 .

3 150

.T C0 100 '

> 50 0

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 7-20. Evacuation Time Estimates - Scenario 12 for Region R03 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7-28 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

8 TRANSIT-DEPENDENT AND SPECIAL FACILITY EVACUATION TIME ESTIMATES This section details the analyses applied and the results obtained in the form of evacuation time estimates for transit vehicles. The demand for transit service reflects the needs of three population groups: (1) residents with no vehicles available; (2) residents of special facilities such as schools, medical facilities, and correctional facilities; and (3) homebound special needs population.

These transit vehicles mix with the general evacuation traffic that is comprised mostly of "passenger cars" (pc's). The presence of each transit vehicle in the evacuating traffic stream is represented within the modeling paradigm described in Appendix D as equivalent to two pc's.

This equivalence factor represents the longer size and more sluggish operating characteristics of a transit vehicle, relative to those of a pc.

Transit vehicles must be mobilized in preparation for their respective evacuation missions.

Specifically:

Bus drivers must be alerted

They must travel to the bus depot

They must be briefed there and assigned to a route or facility These activities consume time. Based on discussion with the offsite agencies, it is estimated that school bus mobilization time will average approximately 30 minutes extending from the Advisory to Evacuate, to the time when buses first arrive at the facility to be evacuated.

During this mobilization period, other mobilization activities are taking place. One of these is the action taken by parents, neighbors, relatives and friends to pick up children from school prior to the arrival of buses, so that they may join their families. Virtually all studies of evacuations have concluded that this "bonding" process of uniting families is universally prevalent during emergencies and should be anticipated in the planning process. The current public information disseminated to residents of the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant EPZ indicates that schoolchildren may be evacuated to school reception centers prior to the evacuation of the general public, and parents should pick schoolchildren up at school reception centers. As discussed in Section 2, this study assumes a fast breaking general emergency. Therefore, children are evacuated to school reception centers. Picking up children at school could add to traffic congestion at the schools, delaying the departure of the buses evacuating schoolchildren, which may have to return in a subsequent "wave" to the EPZ to evacuate the transit-dependent population. This report provides estimates of buses under the assumption that no children will be picked up by their parents (in accordance with NUREG/CR-7002), to present an upper bound estimate of buses required. It is assumed that children at preschools and day-care centers are picked up by parents or guardians and that the time to perform this activity is included in the trip generation times discussed in Section 5.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-1 KLD Engineering. P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

The procedure for computing transit-dependent ETE is to:

Estimate demand for transit service

Estimate time to perform all transit functions

Estimate route travel times to the EPZ boundary and to the school reception centers 8.1 Transit Dependent People Demand Estimate The telephone survey (see Appendix F) results were used to estimate the portion of the population requiring transit service:

Those persons in households that do not have a vehicle available.

Those persons in households that do have vehicle(s) that would not be available at the time the evacuation is advised.

In the latter group, the vehicle(s) may be used by a commuter(s) who does not return (or is not expected to return) home to evacuate the household.

Table 8-1 presents estimates of transit-dependent people. Note:

Estimates of persons requiring transit vehicles include schoolchildren. For those evacuation scenarios where children are at school when an evacuation is ordered, separate transportation is provided for the schoolchildren. The actual need for transit vehicles by residents is thereby less than the given estimates. However, estimates of transit vehicles are not reduced when schools are in session.

It is reasonable and appropriate to consider that many transit-dependent persons will evacuate by ride-sharing with neighbors, friends or family. For example, nearly 80 percent of those who evacuated from Mississauga, Ontario who did not use their own cars, shared a ride with neighbors or friends. Other documents report that approximately 70 percent of transit dependent persons were evacuated via ride sharing. We will adopt a conservative estimate that 50 percent of transit dependent persons will ride share, in accordance with NUREG/CR-7002.

The estimated number of bus trips needed to service transit-dependent persons is based on an estimate of average bus occupancy of 30 persons at the conclusion of the bus run. Transit vehicle seating capacities typically equal or exceed 60 children on average (roughly equivalent to 40 adults). If transit vehicle evacuees are two thirds adults and one third children, then the number of "adult seats" taken by 30 persons is 20 + (2/3 xlO) = 27. On this basis, the average

-load factor anticipated is (27/40) x 100 = 68 percent. Thus, if the actual demand for service exceeds the estimates of Table 8-1 by 50 percent, the demand for service can still be accommodated by the available bus seating capacity.

[20+ (Gx10)] 40 x 1.5= 1.00 Table 8-1 indicates that transportation must be provided for 4,075 people. Therefore, a total of 136 bus runs are required to transport this population to reception centers.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

To illustrate this estimation procedure, we calculate the number of persons, P, requiring public transit or ride-share, and the number of buses, B, required for the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant EPZ:

n P = No. of HH x If(% HH with i vehicles) x [(Average HH Size) - i]} X AiC' i=0

Where, A = Percent of households with commuters C = Percent of households who will not await the return of a commuter P = 104,178 x [0.0161 x 1.13 + 0.4507 x (1.66 - 1) x 0.38 x 0.49 + 0.4185 x (2.32 - 2) x (0.38 x 0.49)2] 104,178 x 0.078 = 8,149 B = (0.5 x P) + 30 = 136 These calculations are explained as follows:

All members (1.13 avg.) of households (HH) with no vehicles (1.61%) will evacuate by public transit or ride-share. The term 104,178 (number of households) x 0.0161 x 1.13, accounts for these people.

The members of HH with 1 vehicle away (45.07%), who are at home, equal (1.66-1).

The number of HH where the commuter will not return home is equal to (104,178 x 0.66 x 0.4507 x 0.38 x 0.49), as 38% of EPZ households have a commuter, 49% of which would not return home in the event of an emergency. The number of persons who will evacuate by public transit or ride-share is equal to the product of these two terms.

The members of HH with 2 vehicles that are away (41.85%), who are at home, equal (2.32 - 2). The number of HH where neither commuter will return home is equal to 104,178 x 0.4185 x 0.32 x (0.38 x 0.49)2. The number of persons who will evacuate by public transit or ride-share is equal to the product of these two terms (the last term is squared to represent the probability that neither commuter will return).

Households with 3 or more vehicles are assumed to have no need for transit vehicles.

The total number of persons requiring public transit is the sum of such people in HH with no vehicles, or with 1 or 2 vehicles that are away from home.

The estimate of transit-dependent population in Table 8-1 far exceeds the number of registered transit-dependent persons in the EPZ as provided by the counties (discussed below in Section 8.5). This is consistent with the findings of NUREG/CR-6953, Volume 2, in that a large majority of the transit-dependent population within the EPZs of U.S. nuclear plants does not register with their local emergency response agency.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

8.2 School Population - Transit Demand Table 8-2 presents the school population and transportation requirements for the direct evacuation of all schools within the EPZ for the 2011-2012 school year. This information was provided by the county emergency management agencies. The column in Table 8-2 entitled "Buses Required" specifies the number of buses required for each school under the following set of assumptions and estimates:

No students will be picked up by their parents prior to the arrival of the buses.

While many high school students commute to school using private automobiles (as discussed in Section 2.4 of NUREG/CR-7002), the estimate of buses required for school evacuation do not consider the use of these private vehicles.

Bus capacity, expressed in students per bus, is set to 65 for primary schools and 45 for middle and high schools.

Those staff members who do not accompany the students will evacuate in their private vehicles.

No allowance is made for student absenteeism, typically 3 percent daily.

It is recommended that the counties in the EPZ introduce procedures whereby the schools are contacted prior to the dispatch of buses from the depot, to ascertain the current estimate of students to be evacuated. In this way, the number of buses dispatched to the schools will reflect the actual number needed. The need for buses would be reduced by any high school students who have evacuated using private automobiles (if permitted by school authorities).

Those buses originally allocated to evacuate schoolchildren that are not needed due to children being picked up by their parents, can be gainfully assigned to service other facilities or those persons who do not have access to private vehicles or to ride-sharing.

Table 8-3 presents a list of the school reception centers for each school in the EPZ. Students will be transported to these centers where they will be subsequently retrieved by their respective families.

8.3 Medical Facility Demand Table 8-4 presents the census of medical facilities in the EPZ. 1,950 people have been identified as living in, or being treated in, these facilities. The capacity and current census for each facility were provided by the county emergency management agencies. This data includes the number of ambulatory, wheelchair-bound and bedridden patients at each facility.

The transportation requirements for the medical facility population are also presented in Table 8-4. The number of ambulance runs is determined by assuming that 2 patients can be accommodated per ambulance trip; the number of wheelchair bus runs assumes 15 wheelchairs per trip and the number of bus runs estimated assumes 30 ambulatory patients per trip. According to the counties' emergency plans, medical facilities within the EPZ shelter in place first, and then evacuate if needed. All medical facilities, with the exception of hospitals, have their own emergency plans and transportation resources.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

8.4 Evacuation Time Estimates for Transit Dependent People EPZ bus resources are assigned to evacuating schoolchildren (if school is in session at the time of the ATE) as the first priority in the event of an emergency. In the event that the allocation of buses dispatched from the depots to the various facilities and to the bus routes is somewhat "inefficient", or if there is a shortfall of available drivers, then there may be a need for some buses to return to the EPZ from the reception center after completing their first evacuation trip, to complete a "second wave" of providing transport service to evacuees. For this reason, the ETE for the transit-dependent population will be calculated for both a one wave transit evacuation and for two waves. Of course, if the impacted Evacuation Region is other than R03 (the entire EPZ), then there will likely be ample transit resources relative to demand in the impacted Region and this discussion of a second wave would likely not apply.

When school evacuation needs are satisfied, subsequent assignments of buses to service the transit-dependent should be sensitive to their mobilization time. Clearly, the buses should be dispatched after people have completed their mobilization activities and are in a position to board the buses when they arrive at the pick-up points.

Evacuation Time Estimates for transit trips were developed using both good weather and adverse weather conditions. Figure 8-1 presents the chronology of events relevant to transit operations. The elapsed time for each activity will now be discussed with reference to Figure 8-1.

Activity: Mobilize Drivers (A->B->C)

Mobilization is the elapsed time from the ATE until the time the buses arrive at the facilityto be evacuated. Based on discussions with the county emergency management agencies, for a rapidly escalating radiological emergency with no observable indication before the fact, drivers would require 30 minutes to be contacted, to travel to the depot, be briefed, and to travel to the transit-dependent facilities. Mobilization time is slightly longer in adverse weather - 40 minutes when raining.

Activity: Board Passengers (C->D)

Based on discussions with offsite agencies, a loading time of 10 minutes (15 minutes for rain) for school buses is used.

For multiple stops along a pick-up route (transit-dependent bus routes) estimation of travel time must allow for the delay associated with stopping and starting at each pick-up point. The time, t, required for a bus to decelerate at a rate, "a", expressed in ft/sec/sec, from a speed, "v", expressed in ft/sec, to a stop, is t = v/a. Assuming the same acceleration rate and final speed following the stop yields a total time, T, to service boarding passengers:

T = t + B + t = B + 2t = B +

a Where B = Dwell time to service passengers. The total distance, "s" in feet, travelled during the deceleration and acceleration activities is: s = v2/a. If the bus had not stopped to service passengers, but had continued to travel at speed, v, then its travel time over the distance, s, St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

would be: s/v = v/a. Then the total delay (i.e. pickup time, P) to service passengers is:

P=T- -= B-+--

a a Assigning reasonable estimates:

B = 50 seconds: a generous value for a single passenger, carrying personal items, to board per stop S v = 25 mph = 37 ft/sec

a = 4 ft/sec/sec, a moderate average rate Then, P = 1 minute per stop. Allowing 30 minutes pick-up time per bus run implies 30 stops per run, for good weather. It is assumed that bus acceleration and speed will be less in rain; total loading time is 40 minutes per bus in rain.

Activity: Travel to EPZ Boundary (D-)E)

School Evacuation Transportation resources available were provided by the county emergency management agencies and are summarized in Table 8-5. Also included in the table are the number of buses needed to evacuate schools, medical facilities, transit-dependent population, homebound special needs (discussed below in Section 8.5) and correctional facilities (discussed below in Section 8.6). These numbers indicate there are sufficient resources available to evacuate the wheelchair bound population in a single wave. Discussions with Martin and St. Lucie County emergency management personnel indicate mutual aid agreements exist with the state and neighboring counties to provide enough ambulances to fill the deficiency of ambulance resources and evacuate the bedridden population in a single wave.

The buses servicing the schools are ready to begin their evacuation trips at 40 minutes after the advisory to evacuate - 30 minutes mobilization time plus 10 minutes loading time - in good weather. The UNITES software discussed in Section 1.3 was used to define bus routes along the most likely path from a school being evacuated to the EPZ boundary, traveling toward the appropriate school reception center. This is done in UNITES by interactively selecting the series of nodes from the school to the EPZ boundary. Each bus route is given an identification number and is written to the DYNEV II input stream. DYNEV computes the route length and outputs the average speed for each 5 minute interval, for each bus route. The specified bus routes are documented in Table 8-6 (refer to the maps of the link-node analysis network in Appendix K for node locations). Data provided by DYNEV during the appropriate timeframe depending on the mobilization and loading times (i.e., 40 minutes after the advisory to evacuate for good weather) were used to compute the average speed for each route, as follows:

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Average Speed (-)

Z;nt=i length of link i (mi) X 60 min.

Xhr.1 Y Delay on link i (min.) +

{= length of link i (mi.) 60 min..

current speed on linki (-.) 1 hr.

The average speed computed (using this methodology) for the buses servicing each of the schools in the EPZ is shown in Table 8-7 and Table 8-8 for school evacuation, and in Table 8-10 and Table 8711 for the transit vehicles evacuating transit-dependent persons, which are discussed later. The travel time to the EPZ boundary was computed for each bus using the computed average speed and the distance to the EPZ boundary along the most likely route out of the EPZ. The travel time from the EPZ boundary to the reception center was computed assuming an average speed of 40 mph and 35 mph for good weather and rain, respectively.

Speeds were reduced in Table 8-7 and Table 8-8 and in Table 8-10 and Table 8-11 to 55 mph (50 mph for rain - 10% decrease) for those calculated bus speeds which exceed 55 mph, as the school bus speed limit for state routes in Florida is 55 mph.

Table 8-7 (good weather) and Table 8-8 (rain) present the following evacuation time estimates (rounded up to the nearest 5 minutes) for schools in the EPZ: (1) The elapsed time from the Advisory to Evacuate until the bus exits the EPZ; and (2) The elapsed time until the bus reaches the school reception center. The evacuation time out of the EPZ can be computed as the sum of times associated with Activities A--'B-->C, C-'D, and D--E (For example: 30 min. + 10 + 7 = 0:50 for Environmental Studies Center, with good weather). The average ETE for evacuation of schools is significantly less than the 9 0 th percentile ETE for evacuation of the general population in the entire EPZ (Region R03) under winter, midweek, midday, good weather (Scenario 6) conditions. The evacuation time to the school reception center is determined by adding the time associated with Activity E--)F (discussed below), to this EPZ evacuation time.

Evacuation of Transit-DependentPopulation The buses dispatched from the depots to service the transit-dependent evacuees will be scheduled so that they arrive at their respective routes after their passengers have completed their mobilization. As shown in Figure 5-4 (Residents with no Commuters), approximately 90 percent of the evacuees will have completed their mobilization when the buses will begin their routes, approximately 180 minutes after the Advisory to Evacuate. Due to the high transit-dependent populations several groups of buses have been assigned to some of these routes.

The start of service for subsequent groups of buses is separated by 20 minute headways, as shown in Table 8-10 and Table 8-11. The use of bus headways ensures that those people who take longer to mobilize will be picked up. Mobilization time is 10 minutes longer in rain to account for slower travel speeds and reduced roadway capacity.

Those buses servicing the transit-dependent evacuees will first travel along their pick-up routes, then proceed out of the EPZ. The existing transit routes within the EPZ - Treasure Coast St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Connection (TCC) and the Port St. Lucie Trolley (PSL Trolley) - were used. Those people who are transit-dependent will be familiar with these routes and will use them in the event of an emergency evacuation. However, none of these existing routes traverses Areas 1, 7, or 8. One bus route was designed for each of these Areas as part of this study; these routes are described in Table 8-9. It is assumed that residents will walk to and congregate at pre-designated stops along the existing routes or walk along major evacuation routes to flag down a bus, and that they can arrive at the stops or routes within the 180 minute bus mobilization time (good weather).

As previously discussed, a pickup time of 30 minutes (good weather) is estimated for 30 individual stops to pick up passengers, with an average of one minute of delay associated with each stop. Longer pickup times of 40 minutes are used for rain.

The travel distance along the respective pick~up routes within the EPZ is estimated using the UNITES software. Bus travel times within the EPZ are computed using average speeds computed by DYNEV, using the aforementioned methodology that was used for school evacuation.

Table 8-10 and Table 8-11 present the transit-dependent population evacuation time estimates for each bus route calculated using the above procedures for good weather and rain, respectively.

For example, the ETE for Treasure Coast Connection Bus Route 1, servicing Areas 2 and 6, is computed as 180 + 230 + 30 = 7:20 for good weather. Here, 230 minutes is the time to travel 35.2 miles at 9.2 mph, the average speed output by the model for this route starting at 180 minutes. The ETE for a second wave (discussed below) is presented in the event there is a shortfall of available buses or bus drivers, as previously discussed.

Activity: Travel to Reception Centers (E->F)

The distances from the EPZ boundary to the reception centers are measured using GIS software along the most likely route from the EPZ exit point to the reception center. The general population and school reception centers are mapped in Figure 10-1. For a one-wave evacuation, this travel time outside the EPZ does not contribute to the ETE. For a two-wave evacuation, the ETE for buses must be considered separately, since it could exceed the ETE for the general population. Assumed bus speeds of 40 mph and 30 mph for good weather and rain, respectively, will be applied for this activity for buses servicing schools and the transit-dependent population.

Activity: Passengers Leave Bus (F--G)

A bus can empty within 5 minutes. The driver takes a 10 minute break.

Activity: Bus Returns to Route for Second Wave Evacuation (G-)C)

The buses assigned to return to the EPZ to perform a "second wave" evacuation of transit-dependent evacuees will be those that have already evacuated transit-dependent people who mobilized more quickly. The first wave of transit-dependent people depart the bus, and the bus then returns to the EPZ, travels to its route and proceeds to pick up more transit-St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-8 KLD Engineering. P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

dependent evacuees along the route. The travel time back to the EPZ is equal to the travel time to the reception center.

The second-wave ETE for the TCC Route 1 is computed as follows for goodweather:

Bus arrives at reception center at 8:07 in good weather (7:20 to exit EPZ + 47 minute travel time to reception center).

Bus discharges passengers (5 minutes) and driver takes a 10-minute rest: 15 minutes.

Bus returns to EPZ and completes second route: 47 minutes (equal to travel time to reception center) + 49 minutes (35.2 miles @ 42.9 mph) + 53 (35.2 miles @ 40 mph)

= 149 minutes

Bus completes pick-ups along route: 30 minutes.

Bus exits EPZ at time 7:20 + 0:47 + 0:15 + 2:29 + 0:30 = 11:25 (rounded to nearest 5 minutes) after the Advisory to Evacuate.

The ETE for the completion of the second wave for all transit-dependent bus routes are provided in Table 8-10 and Table 8-11. The average ETE for a one and two-wave evacuation of the transit-dependent population is longer than the 90'h percentile ETE for evacuation of the general population in the entire EPZ (Region R03) under winter, midweek, midday, good weather (Scenario 6) conditions. These higher ETE could be considered when make protective action decisions.

The relocation of transit-dependent evacuees from the reception centers to congregate care centers, if the counties decide to do so, is not considered in this study.

Evacuation of Medical Facilities According to the counties' emergency plans, medical facilities within the EPZ shelter-in-place and then evacuate later if needed. The computation of the evacuation time estimates of medical facilities is presented in the event an evacuation of these facilities is necessary. The evacuation of these facilities is similar to school evacuation except:

Buses are assigned on the basis of 30 patients for St. Lucie County and 18 patients for Martin County to allow for staff to accompany the patients. Wheelchair buses can accommodate 15 patients, and ambulances can accommodate 2 patients.

Loading times of 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 5 minutes per patient are estimated (based on discussion with the county emergency management agencies) for ambulatory patients, wheelchair bound patients, and bedridden patients, respectively.

Table 8-4 indicates that 40 bus runs, 51 wheelchair bus runs and 244 ambulance runs are needed to service all of the special facilities in the EPZ. Most of these facilities have their own emergency plans and transportation resources. Only the hospitals within the EPZ, Lawnwood Regional Medical Center, New Horizons of the Treasure Coast, Port St. Lucie Hospital, and St.

Lucie Medical Center, are provided transportation assistance from the counties. Table 8-4 indicates that 9 buses, 7 wheelchair buses, and 169 ambulances are required to evacuate these hospitals. According to Table 8-5, the counties can collectively provide 1,047 buses, 59 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

wheelchair accessible buses, and 63 ambulances. Thus, there are sufficient resources to evacuate the ambulatory and wheelchair bound persons from the special facilities in a single wave. Discussions with Martin and St. Lucie County emergency management personnel indicate mutual aid agreements exist with the state and neighboring counties to provide enough ambulances to fill the deficiency of ambulance resources and evacuate the bedridden population in a single wave.

It is estimated that mobilization time for medical facilities averages 90 minutes. Specially trained medical support staff (working their regular shift) will be on site to assist in the evacuation of patients. Additional staff (if needed) could be mobilized over this same 90 minute timeframe.

Table 8-12 and Table 8-13 summarize the ETE for medical facilities within the EPZ for good weather and rain. Average speeds output by the model for Scenario 6 (Scenario 7 for rain)

Region 3, capped at 55 mph (50 mph for rain), are used to compute travel time to EPZ boundary. The travel time to the EPZ boundary is computed by dividing the distance to the EPZ boundary by the average travel speed. The ETE is the sum of the mobilization time, total passenger loading time, and travel time out of the EPZ. Concurrent loading on multiple buses, wheelchair buses, and ambulances at capacity is assumed such that the maximum loading times for buses, wheelchair buses and ambulances are 30 (18 for Martin County), 75 and 10 minutes, respectively. All ETE are rounded up to the nearest 5 minutes. For example, the calculation of ETE for the Alzheimer's Community Care Association with 19 ambulatory residents during good weather is:

ETE: 90 + 18 x 1 + 12 = 120 min. or 2:00 It is assumed that the medical facility population within the EPZ is directly evacuated to appropriate host medical facilities. Relocation of this population to permanent facilities and/or passing through the reception center before arriving at the host facility are not considered in this analysis.

8.5 Special Needs Population The county emergency management agencies have a combined registration for transit-dependent and homebound special needs persons. Based on data provided by the counties, there are an estimated 26 homebound special needs people within the Martin County portion of the EPZ, and 227 people within the St. Lucie County portion of the EPZ who require transportation assistance to evacuate. These 253 people are comprised of 191 ambulatory persons, 52 wheelchair-bound persons and 10 bedridden persons.

ETE for Homebound Special Needs Persons Table 8-14 summarizes the ETE for homebound special needs people. The table is categorized by type of vehicle required and then broken down by weather condition. The table takes into consideration the deployment of multiple vehicles to reduce the number of stops per vehicle.

It is conservatively assumed that ambulatory and wheelchair bound special needs households are spaced 3 miles apart and bedridden households are spaced 5 miles apart. Bus speeds St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

approximate 20 mph between households and ambulance speeds approximate 30 mph in good weather (10% slower in rain). Mobilization times of 90 minutes were used (100 minutes for rain). The last HH is assumed to be 5 miles from the EPZ boundary, and the network-wide average speed, capped at 40 mph (35 mph for rain), after the last pickup is used to compute travel time. ETE is computed by summing mobilization time, loading time at first household, travel to subsequent households, loading time at subsequent households, and travel time to EPZ boundary. All ETE are rounded to the nearest 5 minutes.

For example, assuming no more than one special needs person per HH implies that 191 ambulatory households need to be serviced. While only 7 buses are needed from a capacity perspective, if 20 buses are deployed to service these special needs HH, then each would require about 10 stops. The following outlines the ETE calculations:

1. Assume 20 buses are deployed, each with about 10 stops, to service a total of 191 HH.

2. The ETE is calculated as follows:

a. Buses arrive at the first pickup location: 90 minutes

b. Load HH members at first pickup: 1 minutes

c. Travel to subsequent pickup locations: 9 @ 9 minutes = 81 minutes

d. Load HH members at subsequent pickup locations: 9 @ 1 minutes = 9 minutes

e. Travel to EPZ boundary: 28 minutes (5 miles @ 10.8 mph).

ETE: 90 + 1 + 81 + 9 + 28 = 3:30 rounded to the nearest 5 minutes The average ETE of all the homebound special needs population within the EPZ is less than the 90th percentile ETE for evacuation of the general population in the entire EPZ (Region R03) under winter, midweek, midday, good weather (Scenario 6) conditions.

8.6 Correctional Facilities As detailed in Table E-6, there is one correctional facility within the EPZ - the St. Lucie Juvenile Detention Center. The total inmate population at this facility is 114 people. According to St.

Lucie County Division of Emergency Management, the inmates at this facility would shelter in place if an evacuation were ordered. Thus, ETE are not computed for this facility.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

(Subsequent Wave) a I>

o-> E I Eo E>

I

/ Time Event A Advisory to Evacuate B Bus Dispatched from Depot C Bus Arrives at Facility/Pick-up Route D Bus Departs for Reception Center E Bus Exits Region F Bus Arrives at Reception Center/Host Facility G Bus Available for "Second Wave" Evacuation Service Activity A--B Driver Mobilization B->C Travel to Facility or to Pick-up Route C-> D Passengers Board the Bus D-->E Bus Travels Towards Region Boundary E-->F Bus Travels Towards Reception Center Outside the EPZ F->G Passengers Leave Bus; Driver Takes a Break Figure 8-1. Chronology of Transit Evacuation Operations St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 8-2. Transit-Dependent Bus Routes St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 8-1. Transit-Dependent Population Estimates 215,645 1.13 1.66 2.32 104,178 1.61% 45.07% 41.85% 38% 49% 8,149 50% 4,075 1.89%

I

'The population at medical facilities listed in Table 8-4 and at the correctional facility discussed in Section 8.6 are included in Census data. The population at these facilities was subtracted out from the total EPZ population (Table 3-1) in order to avoid double counting of transit dependent population as these facilities are treated separately (217,709 - 1,950 - 114 = 215,645).

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 8-2. School Population Demand Estimates I.. I 1.I~~artIJhin-ImCountv Suchools ~ :

7 Environmental Studies Center 200 5 7 Felix A. Williams Elementary 627 10 7 Jensen Beach Community Church 2 95 3 7 Jensen Beach Elementary School 567 9 7 Jensen Beach High School 1,650 37 7 New Creations Academy 131 3 7 Trinity United Methodist School 81 2 2 Savanna Ridge Elementary 678 11 2 Weatherbee Elementary 563 9 3 Anglewood Center 22 1 3 Bethany School 28 1 3 Chester A Moore Elementary 700 11 3 Dale Cassens Education Complex 309 7 3 Dan McCarty Middle School 777 18 Daniel M Foundation Positive 3 20 0 3 Expectations Academy 3 Delaware Avenue School 75 2 3 Fairlawn Elementary 617 10 3 Fort Pierce Westwood High School 1,251 28 3 Francis K Sweet Elementary 601 10 3 Ft Pierce Magnet School of the Arts 340 6 Garden City Early Learning Academy 372 6 3 Elementary 3 Indian Hills School 50 2 2 Martin County emergency management personnel indicated Jensen Beach Community Church preschool would need transportation assistance during an emergency. Children at all other preschools and daycares will be picked up by parents prior to evacuating.

3 According to St. Lucie County emergency management personnel, these schools have their own evacuation plans in place wherein parents pick up their children from the school during an evacuation. Buses are not provided for these schools.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

A Bus Runs 4

3 Indian River State College i

Indian River State College Police 17,528 0 3 Academy 2 3 John Carroll Catholic High School 410 10 3 Lawnwood Elementary 634 10 3 Lincoln Park Academy 1,810 41 3 Pace Center for Girls 45 1 3 Palm Vista Christian School 43 1 3 Samuel S Gaines Academy K8 1,219 19 3 St Anastasia Elementary School 507 8 3 St Andrews Episcopal School 155 3 3 St Lucie Elementary 661 11 4 Bible Baptist School 60 1 Christ Family Fellowship Christian 66 1 4 Academy 4 Faith Baptist School 170 4 4 First Liberty Baptist Academy 455 11 4 Forest Grove Middle School 734 17 4 Ft Pierce Central High School 2,280 51 3

4 Golden Rule Academy 81 0 3

4 New Life Christian Academy 70 0 4 Northport K-8 School 1,293 20 4 Park Centre Academy 3 29 0 4 Parkway Elementary 596 10 Renaissance Charter School of St. 1,339 21 4 Lucie 4 Rivers Edge Elementary 770 12 4 Seventh Day Adventist School 44 1 4 Southern Oaks Middle School 617 14 4 Sun Grove Montessori School 3 125 0 4 West Gate K-8 School 1,309 21 4 White City Elementary 527 9 4 Woodlands Montessori School 99 2 5

5 Barry University 30 0 4 Indian River State College and Police Academy are commuter colleges and all students drive themselves. No buses are required for these schools.

Barry University is a commuter college and all students drive themselves. No buses are required for this school.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

BusRuns Area School Name Enrollment R'quired 5 Bayshore Elementary 857 14 5 Floresta Elementary 639 10 5 Indian River State College 2 See Above See Above 5 Manatee K-8 School 1,510 24 5 Morningside Academy - Lower 328 6 5 Morningside Academy - Upper 150 4 5 Morningside Elementary 639 10 5 Oak Hammock K-8 School 1,429 22 5 Southeastern Military Academy 3 24 0 5 Southport Middle School 924 21 5 St Lucie West Centennial High School 2,489 56 5 St. Lucie West K-8 1,303 21 5 Treasure Coast High School 2,524 57 5 Windmill Point Elementary 867 14 3

6 Calvary Academy 1,284 0 6 Mariposa Elementary 788 13 6 Port St Lucie High School 1,931 43 Village Green Environmental Studies 6 School S.R. Allapattah Flats K-86 1,086 17 6

S.R. Lakewood Park Elementary 671 11 6

S.R. Palm Pointe 1,413 22 S.R. NAU Charter 6 678 11

'.TOTAL:ý 65A6~- 7 6 These schools are located in the Shadow Region. St. Lucie County emergency management personnel indicated these schools would evacuate in the event of an emergency at the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 8-3. School Reception Centers Environmental Studies Center Felix A. Williams Elementary Jensen Beach Community Church Jensen Beach Elementary School Martin County High School Jensen Beach High School New Creations Academy Trinity United Methodist School Allapattah Flats K-8 Anglewood Center Barry University Bayshore Elementary Bethany School Bible Baptist School Chester A Moore Elementary Christ Family Fellowship Christian Academy Dale Cassens Education Complex Dan McCarty Middle School Delaware Avenue School Fairlawn Elementary Faith Baptist School First Liberty Baptist Academy Floresta Elementary St. Lucie County Fairgrounds Forest Grove Middle School Fort Pierce Westwood High School Francis K Sweet Elementary Ft Pierce Central High School Ft Pierce Magnet School of the Arts Garden City Early Learning Academy Elementary Indian Hills School Indian River State College Indian River State College Indian River State College Police Academy John Carroll Catholic High School Lakewood Park Elementary Lawnwood Elementary St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-18 KLD Engineering. P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

sb hIt'ý' ,S IIcp lnIe t r Lincoln Park Academy Manatee K-8 School Mariposa Elementary Morningside Academy - Lower Morningside Academy - Upper Morningside Elementary NAU Charter Northport K-8 School Oak Hammock K-8 School Pace Center for Girls Palm Pointe Palm Vista Christian School Parkway Elementary Port St Lucie High School Renaissance Charter School of St. Lucie Rivers Edge Elementary Samuel S Gaines Academy K8 St. Lucie County Fairgrounds Savanna Ridge Elementary Seventh Day Adventist School Southern Oaks Middle School Southport Middle School St Anastasia Elementary School St Andrews Episcopal School St Lucie Elementary St Lucie West,Centennial High School St. Lucie West K-8 Treasure Coast High School Village Green Environmental Studies School Weatherbee Elementary West Gate K-8 School White City Elementary Windmill Point Elementary Woodlands Montessori School St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

7 Table 8-4. Special Facility Transit Demand S Alzheimer's Community Care Association j4 5 1 5 j1 7 According to the counties' emergency plans, medical facilities shelter-in-place and then evacuate later if needed. All medical facilities, with the exception of hospitals, have their own emergency plans and transportation resources.

8 These facilities are hospitals and would require transportation assistance from the county.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-20 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 8-5. Summary of Transportation Resources Trnprtto Whechi Resource B~~~use uss Amuane Reore Aviabe I

Martin County 112 I 54 I 29 St. Lucie County 915 0 29 Community Transit 20 5 5 9 Discussions with Martin and St. Lucie County emergency management personnel indicate mutual aid agreements exist with the state and neighboring counties to provide enough ambulances to fill the deficiency of ambulance resources and evacuate the bedridden population in a single wave.

10 According to the county emergency plans, medical facilities shelter-in-place and then evacuate if needed. All medical facilities, with the exception of hospitals, have their own emergency plans and transportation resources. The county provides transportation for the hospitals within the EPZ and therefore only the transportation needs for hospitals are show in the table.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-21 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 8-6. Bus Route Descriptions

.Bus~~~~~~~~~~. Rot oe..iir~ iokl!Sato P 222, 998, 1000, 1003, 407, 462, 221, 1006, 388, 1008, 220, 1010, 836, 1012, 219, 850, 216, 852, 854, 856, 1153, 859, 1155, 217, 896, 894, 1310, 7 TCC 1 1313, 1314, 218, 892, 1329, 890, 207, 885, 887, 917, 299, 298, 1127, 215, 883, 881, 594, 232, 863, 609, 294, 233 8 TCC 2 1041, 1039, 1036, 593, 1054, 1059, 1057, 1035, 592, 1061, 591, 285, 286, 599 915, 913, 296, 297, 910, 909, 295, 907, 1047, 905, 9 CC 3 204, 903, 901, 203, 109, 118, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 10 TCC 5 249, 252, 254, 775, 255, 256, 257, 258 11 TCC 6 219, 340, 339, 338, 367, 334, 1014, 333, 811, 1016, 341, 829, 342 12 TD Area 1 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 868, 866, 274, 275, 727, 728, 726, 276, 232, 863, 609, 294, 233 473, 490, 488, 487, 1231, 471, 1195, 1196, 1200, 13 TD Area 7 470, 1225, 1071, 1073, 222, 996, 993, 991, 988, 989, 223, 224

14.

D Area8 266, 54 277, 1168, 870, 869, 278, 279, 280, 871, 281, 546 AbbieJean Russell Care Center 15 1028, 1027, 213, 592, 1029, 1032, 288, 1330 Lauren Point Health 16 Lawnwood Regional Medical 295, 1027, 213, 592, 1029, 1032, 288, 1330 Center 17 Alzheimer's Community Care Ascain991, 988, 989, 223, 224 Association 18 Residence at Stuart 1173, 1172, 1171, 223, 224 Brighton Gardens Palm Garden Treatment Center 19 St. Lucie Medical Center

________________ 388, 1006, 221, 462, 407, 1003, 1000, 998, 222, iffany Hall 996, 993, 991, 988, 989, 223, 224 Village Green Environmental Studies School St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-22 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

~

Bus ~ Rot I oe'Taesd fo ot tr oEO Descrptio I 456, 1283, 220, 1008, 388, 1006, 221, 462, 407, 20 Emerald Health 1003,1000,998,222,996,993,991,988,989,223, 224 463, 455, 456, 1283, 220, 1008, 388, 1006, 221, 21 Port St. Lucie Hospital 462,407, 1003, 1000,998,222, 996,993,991,988, 989,223,224 894, 1310, 1313, 1314, 218, 892, 1329, 890, 207, 22 Broadmoor Assisted Living 885, 887, 917, 299, 298, 1127, 215, 883, 881, 594, 232,863,609,294,233 23 Lake Forest Park28,13 303, 1024, 205, 295, 1027, 213, 592, 1029, 1032, 288,1330 24 Emeritus at Jensen Beach 507,281,546 Harbor Place 1007, 458, 459, 462, 407, 1003, 1000, 998, 222, 25 _______________

Paradise Care Center 996,993,991,988,989,223,224 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 309, 26 Nature's Edge 1020, 311, 1022, 303, 1024, 205, 295, 1027, 213, 592,1029,1032,288,1330 766, 811, 1016, 341, 829, 342, 1018, 812, 92, 1378, 35,36,37,38,39,40,50,41,42,43,44,45 28 New Horizons of the Treasure 309, 1020, 311, 1022, 303, 1024, 205, 295, 1027, Coast 213,592,1029,1032,288,1330 1321, 855, 858, 875, 310, 732, 309, 1020, 311, 29 Pore 1022, 303, 1024, 205, 295, 1027, 213, 592, 1029, Care 1032,288,1330 Anglewood Center 30 286,599,287,264 Fort Pierce Westwood High School 32 Bethany School 305,306, 19 1,891161,206,205,1046,204,903,901,203, 0

109,112,899,202 Bible Baptist School 33 Forest Grove Middle School 309, 733, 316, 798, 308, 100, 102 Ft Pierce Central High School 455, 456, 1283, 220, 1010, 836, 1012, 219, 850, 34 Port St Lucie High School 216, 852, 854, 856, 1153, 859, 1155, 217, 731, 310, 732,309,733,316,798,308,100,102 35 Chester A Moore Elementary 205,1046,204,903,901,203,109,112,899,202 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-23 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Bus Rout Noe*rvre .rmRueSattd&

Francis K Sweet Elementary Garden City Early Learning Academy Elementary Lincoln Park Academy Dale Cassens Education Complex Dan McCarty Middle School 1050, 206, 205, 1046, 204, 903, 901, 203, 109, 112, 36 Ft Pierce Magnet School of the 899, 202 Arts St Lucie Elementary 37 Indian Hills School 1161, 206, 205, 1046, 204, 903, 901, 203, 109, 112, 899, 202 Christ Family Fellowship Christian 38 Academy 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 309, 733, 316, 798, 308, 100, 102 Woodlands Montessori School Rivers Edge Elementary 39 324, 325, 309, 733, 316, 798, 308, 100, 102 Southern Oaks Middle School 375, 376, 377, 326, 327, 328, 316, 798, 308, 100, 40 Parkway Elementary 102 41 West Gate K-8 School 795, 10 796, 0 797, 786, 785, 784, 783, 782, 798, 308, 100, 102 Renaissance Charter School of St.

4233,8110634,8934 333,811,1016,341,829,342 Lucie 43 Bayshore Elementary 1266, 336, 343, 823, 344 St Lucie West Centennial High 44 School 343, 823, 344 St. Lucie West K-8 45 Manatee K-8 School 825, 821, 817, 344 46 Oak Hammock K-8 School 349, 348, 1332, 347, 773, 344 Treasure Coast High School 47 644, 643, 642, 257, 258 Windmill Point Elementary St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-24 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Bu Ru Noes.~ dTri i.r4~Ie from*u Roue Star gEPZ to¶I De critin Number Bondr Delaware Avenue School John Carroll Catholic High School 908, 907, 1047, 905, 204, 903, 901, 203, 109, 112, 48 Palm Vista Christian School 899,202 St Anastasia Elementary School 49 Environmental Studies Center 504, 505, 506, 507, 281, 546 473, 490, 488, 487, 1231, 471, 1195, 1196, 1200, 50 New Creations Academy 470, 1225, 1071, 1073, 222, 996, 993, 991, 988, 989, 223, 224 Jensen Beach Elementary School 1193, 1212, 1219, 499, 500, 1089, 516, 501, 502, Trinity United Methodist School 503, 223, 224 52 Felix A. Williams Elementary 988, 989, 223, 224 53 First Liberty Baptist Academy 316, 798, 308, 100, 102 54 Floresta Elementary 338, 367, 334, 1014, 333, 811, 1016, 341, 829, 342 55 Northport K-8 School 334, 1014, 333, 811, 1016, 341, 829, 342.

56 Seventh Day Adventist School 313, 308, 100, 102 57 Jensen Beach High School 1001, 1000, 998, 222, 996, 993, 991, 988, 989, 223, 24 224 Morningside Academy - Lower Morningside Academy - Upper 393, 1282, 246, 247, 248, 249, 252, 251, 250, 253, 58 Morningside Elementary 183, 180, 156, 157, 158, 1374, 159, 160, 186 Southport Middle School Faith Baptist School 59 310, 732, 309, 733, 316, 798, 308, 100, 102 White City Elementary Fairlawn Elementary 60 Lawnwood Elementary 1046, 204, 903, 901, 203, 109, 112, 899, 202 Pace Center for Girls 61 Samuel S Gaines Academy K8 50, 40, 39, 38 854,856,1153,859, 1155,217,731,310,732,309, 6262 Savanna Ridge Elementary 733,316,798,308,100,102 Rev. 1 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-25 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

BuRot Decito Noes Trvre rmRueSatt P NumberI Boudar 63 St Andrews Episcopal School 922,306,1161,206,205,1046,204,903,901,203, 109,112,899,202 1291, 451, 730, 217, 731, 310, 732, 309, 733, 316, 64 Weatherbee Elementary 798,308,100,102 65 PSL Trolley Route 390, 389, 25 5,27 386, 5 387, 247, 248, 249, 252, 254, 775, 255,256,257,258 66 471, 1195,1196,1200,470,1225,1071, 1073, 222, Jensen Beach Community Church99,9391,8,99,2,24 996,993,991,988,989,223,224 1285, 1284, 1102, 459, 221, 1006, 388, 1008, 220, 1010, 836, 1012, 219, 850, 216, 852, 854, 856, 1153, 859, 1155, 217, 731, 310, 732, 309, 733, 316, 798,308,100,102 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-26 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 8-7. School Evacuation Time Estimates - Good Weather Felix A. Williams Elementary 30 10 1.4 1 33.3 3 0:45 74.1 7 0:55 i i Jensen Beach Community Church 30 10 5.4 5 I 3.8 I 86 j 2:10 ]I 4.1 1 7 1 2:20 Jensen Beach Elementary School 30 10 2.8 2.2 77 2:00 4.1 7 2:10 Jensen Beach High School 30 10 2.6 21.6 8 0:50 4.1 7 1:00 New Creations Academy 30 10 3.5 2.2 98 2:20 4.1 7 2:30 Trinity United Methodist School 30 10 2.6 2.2 71 1:55 4.1 7 2:05 Allapattah Flats K-8 30 10 0.0 0.0 0 0:40, 6.3 10 0:50 Anglewood Center 30 10 5.4 3.9 84 2:05 6.8 11 2:20 Bayshore Elementary 30 10 2.4 8.6 17 1:00 12.7 20 1:20 Bethany School 30 10 6.5 3.7 106 2:30 6.7 11 2:45 Bible Baptist School 30 10 4.4 13.9 20 1:00 5.0 8 1:10 Chester A Moore Elementary 30 10 6.8 3.6 114 2:35. 6.7 11 2:50 Christ Family Fellowship Christian Academy 30 10 4.0 3.6 67 1:50 5.0 8 2:00 Dale Cassens Education Complex 30 10 5.6 3.5 97 2:20 6.7 11 2:35 Dan McCarty Middle School 30 10 5.5 3.5 95 2:15 6.7 11 2:30 Delaware Avenue School 30 10 5.0 16.6 19 1:00 6.7 11 1:15 Fairlawn Elementary 30 10 4.1 17.8 14 0:55 6.7 11 1:10 Faith Baptist School 30 10 6.0 4.9 74 1:55 5.0 8 2:05 First Liberty Baptist Academy 30 10 3.0 21.8 9 0:50 5.0 8 1:00 Floresta Elementary 30 10 5.7 12.4 28 1:10 10.8 17 1:30 Forest Grove Middle School 30 10 5.9 13.8 26 1:10 5.0 8 1:20 Fort Pierce Westwood High School 30 10 5.6 3.8 90 2:10 6.8 11 2:25 Francis KSweet Elementary 30 10 7.8 13.0 37 1:20 6.7 11 1:35 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-27 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Ft Pierce Central High School 30 10 4.7 13.7 21 1:05 508 1:15 Ft Pierce Magnet School of the Arts 30 10 6.6 3.7 107 2:30 6.7 11 2:45 Garden City Early Learning Academy Elementary 30 10 7.3 3.6 121 2:45 6.7 11 3:00 Indian Hills School 30 10 5.6 3.7 92 2:15 6.7 11 2:30 John Carroll Catholic High School 30 10 5.0 31.8 10 0:50 6.7 11 1:05 Lakewood Park Elementary 30 10 0.0 0.0 0 0:40 14.6 22 1:05 Lawnwood Elementary 30 10 4.7 15.2 19 1:00 6.7 11 1:15 Lincoln Park Academy 30 10 7.0 3.6 116 2:40 6.7 11 2:55 Manatee K-8 School 30 10 1.2 22.6 4 0:45 10.8 17 1:05 Mariposa Elementary 30 10 14.0 4.3 194 3:55 5.0 8 4:05 Morningside Academy - Lower 30 10 14.4 6.3 138 3:00 6.8 11 3:15 Morningside Academy - Upper 30 10 14.6 5.9 147 3:10 6.8 11 3',25 Morningside Elementary 30 10 14.5 7.7 114 2:35 6.8 11 2:,50 NAU Charter 30 10 0.0 0.0 0 0:40 19.1 29 1:10 Northport K-8 School 30 10 3.4 15.8 13 .0:55 10.8 17 1:15 Oak Hammock K-8 School 30 10 1.7 33.6 4 0:45 12.7 20 1:05 Pace Center for Girls 30 10 3.9 17.8 14 0:55 6.7 11 1:10 Palm Pointe 30 10 0.0 0.0 0 0:40 14.7 23 1:05 Palm Vista Christian School 30 10 4.7 42.7 7 0:50 6.7 11 1:05 Parkway Elementary 30 10 4.8 18.4 16 1:00 5.0 8 1:10 Port St Lucie High School 30 10 12.4 8.3 90 2:10 5.0 8 2:20 Renaissance Charter School of St. Lucie 30 10 1.7 16.1 7 0:50 10.8 17 1:10 Rivers Edge Elementary 30 10 4.5 3.5 76 2:00 5.0 8 2:10 Samuel S Gaines Academy K8 30 10 2.9 10.3 17 1:00 6.7 11 1:15 Savanna Ridge Elementary 30 10 7.9 7.4 64 1:45 5.0 8 1:55 Seventh Day Adventist School 30 10 3.9 13.6 18 1:00 5.0 8 1:10 Southern Oaks Middle School 30 10 3.9 18.6 13 0:55 5.0 8 1:05 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-28 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St Andrews Episcopal School 30 10 7.7 4.0 116 2:40 6.7 11 2:55 St Lucie Elementary 30 10 5.3 3.7 87 2:10 6.7 11 2:2.5 St Lucie West Centennial High School 30 10 1.3 19.2 5 0:45 12.7 20 1:05 St. Lucie West K-8 30 10 1.5 25.4 4 0:45 12.7 20 1:05 Treasure Coast High School 30 10 2.4 32.3 5 0:45 15.1 23 1:10 Village Green Environmental Studies School 30 10 13.0 3.8 203 4:05 5.0 8 '4:15 Weatherbee Elementary 30 10 6.3 9.0 43 1:25 5.0 8 1:35 West Gate K-8 School 30 10 4.4 15.1 18 1:00 5.0 8 1:10 White City Elementary 30 10 4.7 15.2 19 1:00 5.0 8 i:10 Windmill Point Elementary 30 10 1.9 32.3 4 0:45 15.1 23 1:10 Woodlands Montessori School 30 10 6.3 18.0 21 1:05 5.0 8 1:15

. * .. .n.... si . e .- 4:0.

.15J, St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-29 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 8-8. School Evacuation Time Estimates - Rain Felix A. Williams Elementary 40 15 1.4 19.5 5 1:00 4.1 8 1:10 Jensen Beach Community Church 40 15 5.4 3.3 100 2:35 4.1 8 2:45 Jensen Beach Elementary School 40 15 2.8 1.8 91 2:30 4.1 8 2:40 Jensen Beach High School 40 15 2.6 19.6 8 1:05 4.1 8 1:15 New Creations Academy 40 15 3.5 1.8 115 2:50 4.1 8 3:00 Trinity United Methodist School 40 15 2.6 1.8 85 2:20 4.1 8 2:30 Allapattah Flats K-8 40 15 0.0 0.0 0 0:55 6.3 11 1:10 Anglewood Center 40 15 5.4 3.3 99 2:35 6.8 12 2:50 Bayshore Elementary 40 15 2.4 5.4 27 1:25 12.7 22 1:50 Bethany School 40 15 6.5 2.8 139 3:15 6.7 12 3:30 Bible Baptist School 40 15 4.4 12.4 22 1:20 5.0 9 1:30, Chester A Moore Elementary 40 15 6.8 3.1 134 3:10 6.7 12 3:25 Christ Family Fellowship Christian Academy 40 15 4.0 2.7 91 2:30 5.0 9 2:40 Dale Cassens Education Complex 40 15 5.6 2.8 120 2:55 6.7 12 3:10 Dan McCarty Middle School 40 15 5.5 2.8 118 2:55 6.7 12 3:10 Delaware Avenue School 40 15 5.0 1.3 228 4:45 6.7 12 5:00 Fairlawn Elementary 40 15 4.1 6.6 38 1:35 6.7 12 1:50 Faith Baptist School 40 15 6.0 4.4 84 2:20 5.0 9 2:30 First Liberty Baptist Academy 40 15 3.0 7.6 24 1:20 5.0 9 1:30 Floresta Elementary 40 15 5.7 6.3 55 1:50 1 10.8 19 2:10 Forest Grove Middle School 40 15 5.9 12.4 29 1:25 5.0 9 1:35 Fort Pierce Westwood High School 40 15 5.6 3.2 105 2:40 6.8 12 2:55 Francis KSweet Elementary 40 15 7.8 3.9 120 2:55 6.7 12 3:10 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-30 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Ft Pierce Central High School 4U 15 4./ 1Z.A Z3 5.U 1 Ft Pierce Magnet School of the Arts 40 15 6.6 2.9 137 :159? 6.7 12 Garden City Early Learning Academy Elementary 40 15 7.3 3.1 143 3 :20%. 6.7 12 Indian Hills School 40 15 5.6 2.7 124 I3:00'-, 6.7 12 John Carroll Catholic High School 40 15 5.0 16.5 19 .:15i 6.7 12 40 15 0.0 0.0 0 j 0 :557P- 14.6 26 Lakewood Park Elementary Lawnwood Elementary 40 15 4.7 6.1 48 1:45. 6.7 12 4 4 + 72771 4 4--

Lincoln Park Academy 40 15 7.0 3.1 138 3:15 6.7 12 3:30 Manatee K-8 School 40 15 1.2 3.8 19 1:15:2 10.8 19 1:35:,,

Mariposa Elementary 40 15 14.0 4.0 211 4:30z 5.0 9 4:40 Morningside Academy - Lower 40 15 14.4 4.3 200 4:15 . 6.8 12 4:30 Morningside Academy - Upper 40 15 14.6 4.3 203 4:20 : 6.8 12 4:35:

Morningside Elementary 40 15 14.5 5.9 147 3:25 - 6.8 12 3:40 NAU Charter 40 15 0.0 0.0 0 0:'55 19.1 33 1:30 Northport K-8 School 40 15 3.4 6.6 31 1:30 10.8 19 1:50:

Oak Hammock K-8 School 40 15 1.7 7.7 14 1:10:io : 12.7 22 1:35 Pace Center for Girls 40 15 3.9 6.6 36 1:35 6.7 12 1:50 Palm Pointe 40 15 0.0 0.0 0 0ý55 14.7 26 1:25 Palm Vista Christian School 40 15 4.7 24.0 12 1:10 6.7 12 1:25 Parkway Elementary 40 15 4.8 16.0 18 1:15 5.0 9 i1:25' Port St Lucie High School 40 15 12.4 3.8 198 4:15:1: 5.0 9 4:25:`

Renaissance Charter School of St. Lucie 40 15 1.7 12.6 8 '1:05 - 10.8 19 1:25 Rivers Edge Elementary 40 15 4.5 2.5 105 2:40D 5.0 9 2:50, Samuel S Gaines Academy K8 40 15 2.9 6.7 26 1:25- 6.7 12 1:40 Savanna Ridge Elementary 40 15 7.9 3.6 133 3:10 i 5.0 9 3:20 Seventh Day Adventist School 40 15 3.9 9.5 25 1:20 5,0 9 1:30 Southern Oaks Middle School 40 15 3.9 16.0 15 1:10 5.0 9 1:20 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-31 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Village Green Environmental Studies School KLD Engineering,Rev.P.C.1 St. Lucie St. Nuclear Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Power Plant 8-32 KILD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Evacuation Time Estimate Estimate Rev. 1

Table 8-9. Summary of Transit-Dependent Bus Routes N. ofLngh TCC 1 15 Treasure Coast Connection Bus Route 1 - Services Areas 2 and 6 35.2 TCC 2 36 Treasure Coast Connection Bus Route 2 - Services Areas 3 and 4 11.2 TCC 3 12 Treasure Coast Connection Bus Route 3 - Services Area 3 14.6 TCC 5 22 Treasure Coast Connection Bus Route 5 - Services Area 5 15.2 TCC 6 23 Treasure Coast Connection Bus Route 6 - Services Area 5 21.9 PSL Trolley Route 7 Port St. Lucie Trolley Route - Services Area 6 14.1 Area 1 2 SH AlA northbound from the plant - right onto US 1 northbound to EPZ 12.1 Boundary Area 7 14 CR 708 northbound from SH AIA in Sewall's Point - left onto CR 707A - left onto US 1 southbound to EPZ Boundary Area 8 5 SH AlA southbound from the plant toward Stuart to EPZ Boundary 12.0 Total: 136; Rev. 1 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-33 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Evacuation Time Estimate Time Estimate Rev. I

Table 8-10. Transit-Dependent Evacuation Time Estimates - Good Weather TCC 1 6-10 200 35.2 1 9.8 215 30 7:25 31.5 47 5 10 149 30 11:30

+ I +/- 1- 1- t 11-15 220 35.2 I 10.5 201 30 7:35 31.5 47 5 10 149 30 11:35 1-9 180 11.2 3.5 190 30 6:45 27.3 41 5 10 77 30 9:25 10-18 200 11.2 3.7 183 30 6:55 27.3 41 5 10 77 30 9:40 TCC 2 19-27 220 11.2 3.9 173 30 7:05 27.3 41 5 10 77 30 9:50 28-36 240 11.2 4.1 163 30 7:15 27.3 41 5 10 77 30 10:00 1-6 180 14.6 4.6 190 30 6:40 31.5 47 5 10 85 30 9:40 6-12 200 14.6 5.0 175 30 6:45: 31.5 47 5 10 85 30 9:45 TCC 5 1-11 180 15.2 8.6 106 30 5:20 42.1 63 5 10 106 30 8:55 11-22 200 15.2 9.7 94 30 5:25 42.1 63 5 10 106 30 9:00 TCC 6 1-11 180 21.9 10.0 132 30 5:45 36.9 55 5 10 ___

116 30 9:20 11-23 200 21.9 11.0 119 30 5:50 36.9 55 5 10 116 30 9:30 PSL Trolley 1-7 180 14.1 6.6 128 30 5:40 40.7 61 5 10 100 30 9:05 Area 1 1& 2 180 12.1 10.2 71 30 4:45 27.4 41 5 10 91 30 7:40 Area 7 1-7 180 8.7 12.3 42 30 4:15 47.3 71 5 10 97 30 7:50 8-14 200 8.7 17.4 30 30 4:20 47.3 71 5 10 96 30 7:55 Area 8 1-5 180 12.0 14.2 51 30 4:25 49.6 74 5 10 108 30 8:10

_ *:*LM."* --f*`ciri * %**

_ irn'E.*i~i*:*:=

7 TE* i:!735: :.Maximum ETE:. > :i,3

..... ___________ __..._____........ e EE; ~6v05 . Average ETE:

9 03O..

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-34 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 8-11. Transit-Dependent Evacuation Time Estimates - Rain St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-35 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 8-12. Medical Facility Evacuation Time Estimates - Good Weather Travel Loading Time to Rate Total Dist. To EPZ Mobilization (min per Loading EPZ Bdry Boundary ETE Medical Facility Patient (min) person) People Time (min) (mi.) (min) . (hr:min)

Community Care Wheelchair bound1 90 5 15 75 1 1.6 12 3:00 Association Bedridden 90 5 11 10 1.6 13 1:55 Emeritus at Ambulatory 90 1 72 18 1.9 5 ;1:55 Wheelchair bound 90 5 54 75 1.9 4 '250-Jensen Beach Bedridden 90 5 40 10 1.9 6 1 50 Residenlce at R nAmbulatory 90 1 5 5 0.9 1 1:40 Stuart Wheelchair bound 90 5 4 20 0.9 1 1:55 14 Bedridden 90 5 3 10 0.9 1 1 45 Ambulatory 90 1 34 30 5.2 184 505 Broadmoor Wheelchair bound 90 5 14 70 5.2 160 5:20 Bedridden 90 5 2 10 5.2 193 4: 55 AbbieJean Ambulatory 90 1 6 6 2.1 74 2 50 RussellCare Wheelchair bound 90 5 58 75 2.1 44 .3 30 Center ***:,..:,,:?:

Ambulatory 90 1 6 6 4.2 130 3 50 Lake Forest Park Wheelchair bound 90 5 33 75 4.2 87 <., 4:15 Bedridden 90 5 25 10 4.2 130 3 50 Lauren Point Ambulatory 90 1 14 14 2.1 72 3 00 Health Wheelchair bound 90 5 81 75 2.1 43 3330 Lawnwood Ambulatory 90 1 10 10 2.6 77 3 00 Regional Medical Wheelchair bound 90 5 50 75 2.6 53 3:40 Center Bedridden 90 5 250 10 2.6 77 3 00 Natures Edge Ambulatory 90 1 26 26 10.0 137 4:15 NaturesEdg Wheelchair bound 90 5 1 5 10.0 159 4:15 New Horizons of the Treasure Ambulatory 90 1 90 30 9.6 157 4 40 Coast St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-36 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Travel Loading Time to Rate Total Dist. To EPZ Mobilization (min per Loading EPZ Bdry Boundary ETE Medical Facility Patient (min) person) People Time (min) (mi) (min) (hr:min).,

Nursing & Wheelchair bound 90 5 75 75 9.4 112 4:40 Restorative Care Bedridden 90 5 10 10 9.4 163 4:25--.,

The Palms at St Ambulatory 90 1 40 30 14.6 119 4:007:

Lucie West Wheelchair bound .90 5 22 75 14.6 136 5:05 Brighton Ambulatory 90 1 103 30 6.1 102 :345 Gardens Wheelchair bound 90 5 12 60 6.1 80 3:50 Emerald Health Wheelchair bound 90 5 107 75 7.0 84 -:4:10 Harbor Place Ambulatory 90 1 104 30 5.1 85 3:25 Palm Garden Ambulatory 90 1 48 30 6.0 101 3:45f.

Treatment Wheelchair bound 90 5 35 75 6.0 71 .. .:00 Center Bedridden 90 5 26 10 6.0 127 3:50 Paradise Care Ambulatory 90 1 41 30 4.6 79 3:20 Center Wheelchair bound 90 5 3 15 4.6 75 3:00Ž§ Port St. Lucie Ambulatory 90 1 70 30 7.2 110 3: 150 -

Hospital _.__________,____-_

Ambulatory 90 1 44 30 6.1 102 g§3:45,.

Ste Wheelchair bound 90 5 44 75 6.1 72 4:00 Center.. . .

Bedridden 90 5 88 10 6.1 129 3:50 Ambulatory 90 1 52 30 6.2 104 3:45 Tiffany Hall Wheelchair bound 90 5 39 75 6.2 73 4:00*,

Bedridden 90 5 29 10 6.2 125 3:45 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-37 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 8-13. Medical Facility Evacuation Time Estimates - Rain Emeritus at Jensen Beach i i i i + + i.

Bedridden 100 5 40 10 1.9 6 2:00 Ambulatory 100 1 5 5 0.9 1 1 1:50 Residence at Stuart Wheelchair bound 100 5 4 20 0.9 2 2:05 Bedridden 100 5 3 10 0.9 1 *1:55 100 1 34 30 5.2 205 5:35 Broadmoor Ambulatory Wheelchair bound 100 5 14 70 5.2 189 6"00 Assisted Living Bedridden 100 5 2 10 5.2 210 :"0 AbbieJean Russell Ambulatory 100 1 6 6 2.1 59 2:45 :

Care Center Wheelchair bound 100 5 58 75 2.1 64 4:00 Ambulatory 100 1 6 6 4.2 131 4:00 Lake Forest Park Wheelchair bound 100 5 33 75 4.2 108 :4:45 Bedridden 100 5 25 10 4.2 131 77L 4:05 Lauren Point Ambulatory 100 1 14 14 2.1 59 1:55 Health Wheelchair bound 100 5 81 75 2.1 65 4:00 Lawnwood Ambulatory 100 1 10 10 2.6 78 3:10 Regional Medical Wheelchair bound 100 5 50 75 2.6 71 L4:10 Center Bedridden 100 5 250 10 2.6 78 3:10 Ambulatory 100 1 26 26 10.0 169 *4"55 Nature's Edge Wheelchair bound 100 5 1 5 10.0 180 4:45 New Horizons of the Treasure Coast Ambulatory 100 1 90 30 9.6 185 5:15 Port St Lucie Ambulatory 100 1 35 30 9.4 165 4:55 Nursing & Wheelchair bound 100 5 75 75 9.4 135 S: 10/

Restorative Care Bedridden 100 5 10 10 9.4 184 4:55 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-38 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Travel Loading time to Rate Total Dist. To EPZ Mobilization (min per Loading EPZ Bdry Boundary ETE Medical Facility Patient (min) person) People Time (min) (mi) (min) (hr:min)

The Palms at St Ambulatory 100 1 40 30 14.6 151 4:45 I

Lucie West Wheelchair bound 100 5 22 75 14.6 165 :40 Ambulatory 100 1 103 30 6.1 137 ,4:30 Brighton Gardens Wheelchair. bound 100 5 12 60 6.1 115 ... 4i35.

Emerald Health Wheelchair bound 100 5 107 75 7.0 129 5:05 Harbor Place Ambulatory 100 1 104 30 5.1 83 . 3:35 Ambulatory 100 1 48 30 6.0 136 Palm Garden Treatment Center Wheelchair bound 100 5 35 75 6.0 103 4.40`4 Bedridden 100 5 26 10 6.0 138 ý'4:10-Paradise Care Ambulatory 100 1 41 30 4.6 75 3:25 Center Wheelchair bound 100 5 3 15 4.6 80 .3:15.

Port St. Lucie Ambulatory 100 1 70 30 7.2 154 4:45i Hospital Ambulatory 100 1 44 30 6.1 138 4:30 Wheelchair bound 100 5 44 75 6.1 104 4:40 Center Bedridden 100 5 88 10 6.1 140 4: 10 Ambulatory 100 1 52 30 6.2 140 4:30 Tiffany Hall Wheelchair bound 100 5 39 75 6.2 106 -,4:45.

Bedridden 100 5 29 10 6.2 144 4 15 S - , . * - ,' -. " - Avera A e EIE:" ý",4:00 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-39 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 8-14. Homebound Special Needs Population Evacuation Time Estimates p

¶ý'4 P5j St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8-40 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

9 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STRATEGY This section discusses the suggested traffic control and management strategy that is designed to expedite the movement of evacuating traffic. The resources required to implement this strategy include:

" Personnel with the capabilities of performing the planned control functions of traffic guides (preferably, not necessarily, law enforcement officers).

Traffic Control Devices to assist these personnel in the performance of their tasks. These devices should comply with the guidance of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) of the U.S.D.O.T. All state and most county transportation agencies have access to the MUTCD, which is available on-line: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov which provides access to the official PDF version.

A plan that defines all locations, provides necessary details and is documented in a format that is readily understood by those assigned to perform traffic control.

The functions to be performed in the field are:

1. Facilitate evacuating traffic movements that safely expedite travel out of the EPZ.

2. Discourage traffic movements that move evacuating vehicles in a direction which takes them significantly closer to the power plant, or which interferes with the efficient flow of other evacuees.

The terms "facilitate" and "discourage" rather than "enforce" and "prohibit" are used to

-indicate the need for flexibility in performing the traffic control function. There are always legitimate reasons for a driver to prefer a direction other than that indicated. For example:

A driver may be traveling home from work or from another location, to join other family members prior to evacuating.

An evacuating driver may be travelling to pick up a relative, or other evacuees.

" The driver may be an emergency worker en route to perform an important activity.

The implementation of a plan must also be flexible enough for the application of sound judgment by the traffic guide.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 9-1 KLD Engineering. P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

The traffic management plan is the outcome of the following process:

1. The existing TCPs and ACPs identified by the offsite agencies in their existing emergency plans serve as the basis of the traffic management plan, as per NUREG/CR-7002.

2. Computer analysis of the evacuation traffic flow environment (see Figure 7-3 though Figure 7-8).

This analysis identifies the best routing and those critical intersections that experience pronounced congestion. Any critical intersections that would benefit from traffic or access control which are not already identified in the existing offsite plans are suggested as additional TCPs and ACPs.

3. The existing TCPs and ACPs, and how they were applied in this study, are discussed in Appendix G.

4. Prioritization of TCPs and ACPs.

Application of traffic and access control at some TCPs and ACPs will have a more pronounced influence on expediting traffic movements than at other TCPs and ACPs. For example, TCPs controlling traffic originating from areas in close proximity to the power plant could have a more beneficial effect on minimizing potential exposure to radioactivity than those TCPs located far from the power plant. These priorities should be assigned by state/county emergency management representatives and by law enforcement personnel.

The ETE simulations discussed in Section 7.3 indicate that the evacuation routes are oversaturated and experience pronounced traffic congestion during evacuation due to the limited capacity of the roadways and the large volume of evacuating traffic. Interstate-95 and US Highway 1 are the most heavily used evacuation routes. The ramps to the interstate and turnpike are significant bottlenecks. The traffic signals along the state and county routes are also significant bottlenecks. Nearly all of the traffic signals in the EPZ are actuated traffic signals and will adjust their timing to changing traffic patterns. Traffic control at signalized intersections will not have a pronounced impact on the evacuation process as most of the intersections have significant volume on the east-west approaches as well as the north-south approaches (see Figure 7-4 for several examples - intersection of State Routes 716 and 615; intersection of State Routes 713 and 607A; intersection of State Routes 611 and 770; etc.).

Thus, no additional TCPs or ACPs are deemed necessary as a result of this study.

The use of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) technologies (if available) can reduce manpower and equipment needs, while still facilitating the evacuation process. Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) can be placed within the EPZ to provide information to travelers regarding traffic conditions, route selection, and reception center information. DMS can also be placed outside of the EPZ to warn motorists to avoid using routes that may conflict with the flow of evacuees away from the power plant. Highway Advisory Radio (HAR) can be used to broadcast information to evacuees en route through their vehicle stereo systems. Automated Traveler Information Systems (ATIS) can also be used to provide evacuees with information.

Internet websites can provide traffic and evacuation route information before the evacuee begins their trip, while on board navigation systems (GPS units), cell phones, and pagers can be used to provide information en route. These are only several examples of how ITS technologies St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 9-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

can benefit the evacuation process. Consideration should be given that ITS technologies be used to facilitate the evacuation process, and any additional signage placed should consider evacuation needs.

The ETE analysis treated all controlled intersections that are existing TCP locations in the offsite agency plans as being controlled by actuated signals.

Chapters 2N and 5G, and Part 6 of the 2009 MUTCD are particularly relevant and should be reviewed during emergency response training.

The ETE calculations reflect the assumption that all "external-external" trips are interdicted and diverted after 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months has elapsed from the ATE.

All transit vehicles and other responders entering the EPZ to support the evacuation are assumed to be unhindered by personnel manning ACPs and TCPs.

Study Assumptions 5 and 6 in Section 2.3 discuss ACP and TCP staffing schedules and operations.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 9-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

10 EVACUATION ROUTES Evacuation routes are comprised of two distinct components:

Routing from an area being evacuated to the boundary of the Evacuation Region and thence out of the EPZ.

Routing of transit-dependent evacuees from the EPZ boundary to reception centers.

Evacuees will select routes within the EPZ in such a way as to minimize their exposure to risk.

This expectation is met by the DYNEV II model routing traffic away from the location of the plant, to the extent practicable. The DTRAD model satisfies this behavior by routing traffic so as to balance traffic demand relative to the available highway capacity to the extent possible.

See Appendices B through D for further discussion.

The routing of transit-dependent evacuees from the EPZ boundary to reception centers is designed to minimize the amount of travel outside the EPZ, from the points where these routes cross the EPZ boundary.

According to current public information issued to EPZ residents, evacuees living north of St.

Lucie West Boulevard/Prima Vista Boulevard will be directed to reception centers in Indian River County and possibly Brevard County. Evacuees living south of St. Lucie West Boulevard/

Prima Vista Boulevard and in Martin County will be directed to reception centers in Palm Beach County. The State of Florida Radiological Emergency Management Plan lists the reception centers. Figure 10-1 presents a map showing the primary general reception centers for evacuees. School reception centers are mapped in Figure 10-2. The major evacuation routes for the EPZ are presented in Figure 10-3.

It is assumed that all school evacuees will be taken to the appropriate school reception center and will be subsequently picked up by parents or guardians. Transit-dependent evacuees are transported to the nearest reception center for each county. This study does not consider the transport of evacuees from reception centers to congregate care centers, if the counties do make the decision to relocate evacuees.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 10-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

IX" General Population Reception Centers

,3, fl l1 Legend

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant

Reception Center IJ Area

, 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings L Shadow Region Figure 10-1. General Population Reception Centers St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 10-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 10-2. School Reception Centers St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 10-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 10-3. Evacuation Route Map St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 10-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

11 SURVEILLANCE OF EVACUATION OPERATIONS There is a need for surveillance of traffic operations during the evacuation. There is also a need to clear any blockage of roadways arising from accidents or vehicle disablement. Surveillance can take several forms.

1. Traffic control personnel, located at Traffic Control and Access Control points, provide fixed-point surveillance.

2. Ground patrols may be undertaken along well-defined paths to ensure coverage of those highways that serve as major evacuation routes.

3. Aerial surveillance of evacuation operations may also be conducted using helicopter or fixed-wing aircraft, if available.

4. Cellular phone calls (if cellular coverage exists) from motorists may also provide direct field reports of road blockages.

These concurrent surveillance procedures are designed to provide coverage of the entire EPZ as well as the area around its periphery. It is the responsibility of the counties to support an emergency response system that can receive messages from the field and be in a position to respond to any reported problems in a timely manner. This coverage should quickly identify, and expedite the response to any blockage caused by a disabled vehicle.

Tow Vehicles In a low-speed traffic environment, any vehicle disablement is likely to arise due to a low-speed collision, mechanical failure or the exhaustion of its fuel supply. In any case, the disabled vehicle can be pushed onto the shoulder, thereby restoring traffic flow. Past experience in other emergencies indicates that evacuees who are leaving an area often perform activities such as pushing a disabled vehicle to the side of the road without prompting.

While the need for tow vehicles is expected to be low under the circumstances described above, it is still prudent to be prepared for such a need. Consideration should be given that tow trucks with a supply of gasoline be deployed at strategic locations within, or just outside, the EPZ. These locations should be selected so that:

They permit access to key, heavily loaded, evacuation routes.

Responding tow trucks would most likely travel counter-flow relative to evacuating traffic.

Consideration should also be given that the state and county emergency management agencies encourage gas stations to remain open during the evacuation.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 11-1 KLD Eneineerine. I P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX A Glossary of Traffic Engineering Terms

A. GLOSSARY OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TERMS Table A-1. Glossary of Traffic Engineering Terms Ter Deiito Analysis Network A graphical representation of the geometric topology of a physical roadway system, which is comprised of directional links and nodes.

Link A network link represents a specific, one-directional section of.

roadway. A link has both physical (length, number of lanes, topology, etc.) and operational (turn movement percentages, service rate, free-flow speed) characteristics.

Measures of Effectiveness Statistics describing traffic operations on a roadway network.

Node A network node generally represents an intersection of network links. A node has control characteristics, i.e., the allocation of service time to each approach link.

Origin A location attached to a network link, within the EPZ or Shadow Region, where trips are generated at a specified rate in vehicles per hour (vph). These trips enter the roadway system to travel to their respective destinations.

Prevailing Roadway and Relates to the physical features of the roadway, the nature (e.g.,

Traffic Conditions composition) of traffic on the roadway and the ambient conditions (weather, visibility, pavement conditions, etc.).

Service Rate Maximum rate at which vehicles, executing a specific turn maneuver, can be discharged from a section of roadway at the prevailing conditions, expressed in vehicles per second (vps) or vehicles per hour (vph).

Service Volume Maximum number of vehicles which can pass over a section of roadway in one direction during a specified time period with operating conditions at a specified Level of Service (The Service Volume at the upper bound of Level of Service, E, equals Capacity).

Service Volume is usually expressed as vehicles per hour (vph).

Signal Cycle Length The total elapsed time to display all signal indications, in sequence.

The cycle length is expressed in seconds.

Signal Interval A single combination of signal indications. The interval duration is expressed in seconds. A signal phase is comprised of a sequence of signal intervals, usually green, yellow, red.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant A-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Ter eeiito Signal Phase A set of signal indications (and intervals) which services a particular combination of traffic movements on selected approaches to the intersection. The phase duration is expressed in seconds.

Traffic (Trip) Assignment A process of assigning traffic to paths of travel in such a way as to satisfy all trip objectives (i.e., the desire of each vehicle to travel from a specified origin in the network to a specified destination) and to optimize some stated objective or combination of objectives. In general, the objective is stated in terms of minimizing a generalized "cost". For example, "cost" may be expressed in terms of travel time.

Traffic Density The number of vehicles that occupy one lane of a roadway section of specified length at a point in time, expressed as vehicles per mile (vpm).

Traffic (Trip) Distribution A process for determining the destinations of all traffic generated at the origins. The result often takes the form of a Trip Table, which is a matrix of origin-destination traffic volumes.

Traffic Simulation A computer model designed to replicate the real-world operation of vehicles on a roadway network, so as to provide statistics describing traffic performance. These statistics are called Measures of Effectiveness.

Traffic Volume The number of vehicles that pass over a section of roadway in one direction, expressed in vehicles per hour (vph). Where applicable, traffic volume may be stratified by turn movement.

Travel Mode Distinguishes between private auto, bus, rail, pedestrian and air travel modes.

Trip Table or Origin- A rectangular matrix or table, whose entries contain the number Destination Matrix of trips generated at each specified origin, during a specified time period, that are attracted to (and travel toward) each of its specified destinations. These values are expressed in vehicles per hour (vph) or in vehicles.

Turning Capacity The capacity associated with that component of the traffic stream which executes a specified turn maneuver from an approach at an intersection.

KLD Engineering, P.C.

St.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Nuclear Power Plant A-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX B DT RAD: Dynamic Traffic Assignment and Distribution Model

B. DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT AND DISTRIBUTION MODEL This section describes the integrated dynamic trip assignment and distribution model named DTRAD (Dynamic Traffic Assignment and Distribution) that is expressly designed for use in analyzing evacuation scenarios. DTRAD employs logit-based path-choice principles and is one of the models of the DYNEVII System. The DTRAD module implements path-based Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) so that time dependent Origin-Destination (OD) trips are "assigned" to routes over the network based on prevailing traffic conditions.

To apply the DYNEV II System, the analyst must specify the highway network, link capacity information, the time-varying volume of traffic generated at all origin centroids and, optionally, a set of accessible candidate destination nodes on the periphery of the EPZ for selected origins.

DTRAD calculates the optimal dynamic trip distribution (i.e., trip destinations) and the optimal dynamic trip assignment (i.e., trip routing) of the traffic generated at each origin node traveling to its set of candidate destination nodes, so as to minimize evacuee travel "cost".

Overview of Integrated Distribution and Assignment Model The underlying premise is that the selection of destinations and routes is intrinsically coupled in an evacuation scenario. That is, people in vehicles seek to travel out of an area of potential risk as rapidly as possible by selecting the "best" routes. The model is designed to identify these "best" routes in a manner that realistically distributes vehicles from origins to destinations and routes them over the highway network, in a consistent and optimal manner, reflecting evacuee behavior.

For each origin, a set of "candidate destination nodes" is selected by the software logic and by the analyst to reflect the desire by evacuees to travel away from the power plant and to access major highways. The specific destination nodes within this set that are selected by travelers and the selection of the connecting paths of travel, are both determined by DTRAD. This determination is made by a logit-based path choice model in DTRAD, so as to minimize the trip "cost", as discussed later.

The traffic loading on the network and the consequent operational traffic environment of the network (density, speed, throughput on each link) vary over time as the evacuation takes place.

The DTRAD model, which is interfaced with the DYNEV simulation model, executes a succession of "sessions" wherein it computes the optimal, routing and selection of destination nodes for the conditions that exist at that time.

Interfacing the DYNEV Simulation Model with DTRAD The DYNEV II system reflects NRC guidance that evacuees will seek to travel in a general direction away from the location of the hazardous event. An algorithm was developed to support the DTRAD model in dynamically varying the Trip Table (O-D matrix) over time from one DTRAD session to the next. Another algorithm executes a "mapping" from the specified "geometric" network (link-node analysis network) that represents the physical highway system, to a "path" network that represents the vehicle [turn] movements. DTRAD computations are performed on the "path" network: DYNEV simulation model, on the "geometric" network.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant B-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

DTRAD Description DTRAD is the DTA module for the DYNEV II System.

When the road network under study is large, multiple routing options are usually available between trip origins and destinations. The problem of loading traffic demands and propagating them over the network links is called Network Loading and is addressed by DYNEVII using macroscopic traffic simulation modeling. Traffic assignment deals with computing the distribution of the traffic over the road network for given O-D demands and is a model of the route choice of the drivers. Travel demand changes significantly over time, and the road network may have time dependent characteristics, e.g., time-varying signal timing or reduced road capacity because of lane closure, or traffic congestion. To consider these time dependencies, DTA procedures are required.

The DTRAD DTA module represents the dynamic route choice behavior of drivers, using the specification of dynamic origin-destination matrices as flow input. Drivers choose their routes through the network based on the travel cost they experience (as determined by the simulation model). This allows traffic to be distributed over the network according to the time-dependent conditions. The modeling principles of D-TRAD include:

" It is assumed that drivers not only select the best route (i.e., lowest cost path) but some also select less attractive routes. The algorithm implemented by DTRAD archives several "efficient" routes for each O-D pair from which the drivers choose.

The choice of one route out of a set of possible routes is an outcome of "discrete choice modeling". Given a set of routes and their generalized costs, the percentages of drivers that choose each route is computed. The most prevalent model for discrete choice modeling is the logit model. DTRAD uses a variant of Path-Size-Logit model (PSL). PSL overcomes the drawback of the traditional multinomial logit model by incorporating an additional deterministic path size correction term to address path overlapping in the random utility expression.

" DTRAD executes the TA algorithm on an abstract network representation called "the path network" which is built from the actual physical link-node analysis network. This execution continues until a stable situation is reached: the volumes and travel times on the edges of the path network do not change significantly from one iteration to the next. The criteria for this convergence are defined by the user.

Travel "cost" plays a crucial role in route choice. In DTRAD, path cost is a linear summation of the generalized cost of each link that comprises the path. The generalized cost for a link, a, is expressed as Ca = ata + YS where c. is the generalized cost for link a, and a,,f, and yare cost coefficients for link travel time, distance, and supplemental cost, respectively. Distance and supplemental costs are defined as invariant properties of the network model, while travel time is a dynamic property dictated by prevailing traffic conditions. The DYNEV simulation model St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant B-2 KLD Engineering. P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

computes travel times on all edges in the network and DTRAD uses that information to constantly update the costs of paths. The route choice decision model in the next simulation iteration uses these updated values to adjust the route choice behavior. This way, traffic demands are dynamically re-assigned based on timedependent conditions.

The interaction between the DTRAD traffic assignment and DYNEV II simulation models is depicted in Figure B-1. Each round of interaction is called a Traffic Assignment Session (TA session). A TA session is composed of multiple iterations, marked as loop B in the figure.

The supplemental cost is based on the "survival distribution" (a variation of the exponential distribution).The Inverse Survival Function is a "cost" term in DTRAD to represent the potential risk of travel toward the plant:

Sa= - 03In (p), 0< p*l; 13>0 d,

Pdo dn= Distance of node, n, from the plant do=Distance from the plant where there is zero risk 13= Scaling factor The value of do = 15 miles, the outer distance of the shadow region. Note that the supplemental cost, sa, of link, a, is (high, low), if its downstream node, n, is (near, far from) the power plant.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant B-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Network Equilibrium In 1952, John Wardrop wrote:

Under equilibrium conditions traffic arrangesitself in congested networks in such a way that no individual trip-maker can reduce his path costs by switching routes.

The above statement describes the "User Equilibrium" definition, also called the "Selfish Driver Equilibrium". It is a hypothesis that represents a [hopeful] condition that evolves over time as drivers search out alternative routes to identify those routes that minimize their respective "costs". It has been found that this "equilibrium" objective to minimize costs is largely realized by most drivers who routinely take the same trip over the same network at the same time (i.e.,

commuters). Effectively, such drivers "learn" which routes are best for them over time. Thus, the traffic environment "settles down" to a near-equilibrium state.

Clearly, since an emergency evacuation is a sudden, unique event, it does not constitute a long-term learning experience which can achieve an equilibrium state. Consequently, DTRAD was not designed as an equilibrium solution, but to represent drivers in a new and unfamiliar situation, who respond in a flexible manner to real-time information (either broadcast or observed) in such a way as to minimize their respective costs of travel.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant B-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Start of next DTRAD Session 0

Set To = Clock time.

Archive System State at TO I

Define latest Link Turn Percentages

-F Execute Simulation Model from B time, T0 to T1 (burn time)

Provide DTRAD with link MOE at time, T1 Execute DTRAD iteration; Get new Turn Percentages Retrieve System State at To Apply new Link Turn Percents DTRAD iteration converges?

No Yes Next iteration Simulate from T0 to T2 (DTA session duration)

Set Clock to T2 BA Figure B-1. Flow Diagram of Simulation-DTRAD Interface St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant B-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX C DYNEV Traffic Simulation Model

C. DYNEV TRAFFIC SIMULATION MODEL The DYNEV traffic simulation model is a macroscopic model that describes the operations of traffic flow in terms of aggregate variables: vehicles, flow rate, mean speed, volume, density, queue length, on each link, for each turn movement, during each Time Interval (simulation time step). The model generates trips from "sources" and from Entry Links and introduces them onto the analysis network at rates specified by the analyst based on the mobilization time distributions. The model simulates the movements of all vehicles on all network links over time until the network is empty. At intervals, the model outputs Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) such as those listed in Table C-1.

Model Features Include:

Explicit consideration is taken of the variation in density over the time step; an iterative procedure is employed to calculate an average density over the simulation time step for the purpose of computing a mean speed for moving vehicles.

Multiple turn movements can be serviced on one link; a separate algorithm is used to estimate the number of (fractional) lanes assigned to the vehicles performing each turn movement, based, in part, on the turn percentages provided by the DTRAD model.

At any point in time, traffic flow on a link is subdivided into two classifications: queued and moving vehicles. The number of vehicles in each classification is computed. Vehicle spillback, stratified by turn movement for each network link, is explicitly considered and quantified. The propagation of stopping waves from link to link is computed within each time step of the simulation. There is no "vertical stacking" of queues on a link.

" Any link can accommodate "source flow" from zones via side streets and parking facilities that are not explicitly represented. This flow represents the evacuating trips that are generated at the source.

The relation between the number of vehicles occupying the link and its storage capacity is monitored every time step for every link and for every turn movement. If the available storage capacity on a link isexceeded by the demand for service, then the simulator applies a "metering" rate to the entering traffic from both the upstream feeders and source node to ensure that the available storage capacity is not exceeded.

A "path network" that represents the specified traffic movements from each network link is constructed by the model; this path network is utilized by the DTRAD model.

A two-way interface with DTRAD: (1) provides link travel times; (2) receives data that translates into link turn percentages.

Provides MOE to animation software, EVAN

Calculates ETE statistics St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant C-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

All traffic simulation models are data-intensive. Table C-2 outlines the necessary input data elements.

To provide an efficient framework for defining these specifications, the physical highway environment is represented as a network. The unidirectional links of the network represent roadway sections: rural, multi-lane, urban streets or freeways. The nodes of the network generally represent intersections or points along a section where a geometric property changes (e.g. a lane drop, change in grade or free flow speed).

Figure C-1 is an example of a small network representation. The freeway is defined by the sequence of links, (20,21), (21,22), and (22,23). Links (8001, 19) and (3, 8011) are Entry and Exit links, respectively. An arterial extends from node 3 to node 19 and is partially subsumed within a grid network. Note that links (21,22) and (17,19) are grade-separated.

Table C-1. Selected Measures of Effectiveness Output by DYNEV II Mesr Unt IIAplesT Vehicles Discharged Vehicles Link, Network, Exit Link Speed Miles/Hours (mph) Link, Network Density Vehicles/Mile/Lane Link Level of Service LOS Link Content Vehicles Network Travel Time Vehicle-hours Network Evacuated Vehicles Vehicles Network, Exit Link Trip Travel Time Vehicle-minutes/trip Network Capacity Utilization Percent Exit Link Attraction Percent of total evacuating vehicles Exit Link Max Queue Vehicles Node, Approach Time of Max Queue Hours:minutes Node, Approach Route Statistics Length (mi); Mean Speed (mph); Travel Route Time (min)

Mean Travel Time Minutes Evacuation Trips; Network St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant C-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table C-2. Input Requirements for the DYNEV II Model HIGHWAY NETWORK

Links defined by upstream and downstream node numbers

Link lengths

Number of lanes (up to 9) and channelization

Turn bays (1 to 3 lanes)

Destination (exit) nodes

Network topology defined in terms of downstream nodes for each receiving link

Node Coordinates (X,Y)

Nuclear Power Plant Coordinates (X,Y)

GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES.

On all entry links and source nodes (origins), by Time Period TRAFFIC CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS

" Traffic signals: link-specific, turn movement specific

Signal control treated as fixed time or actuated

Location of traffic control points (these are represented as actuated signals)

" Stop and Yield signs

Right-turn-on-red (RTOR)

Route diversion specifications

Turn restrictions

" Lane control (e.g. lane closure, movement-specific)

DRIVER'S AND OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS

Driver's (vehicle-specific) response mechanisms: free-flow speed, discharge headway

Bus route designation.

DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT

Candidate destination nodes for each origin (optional)

" Duration of DTA sessions

Duration of simulation "burn time"

Desired number of destination nodes per origin INCIDENTS

Identify and Schedule of closed lanes

Identify and Schedule of closed links St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant C-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

Entry, Exit Nodes are numbered 8xxx Figure C-1. Representative Analysis Network St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant C-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

C.1 Methodology C.1.1 The Fundamental Diagram It is necessary to define the fundamental diagram describing flow-density and speed-density relationships. Rather than "settling for" a triangular representation, a more realistic representation that includes a "capacity drop", (I-R)Qmax, at the critical density when flow conditions enter the forced flow regime, is developed and calibrated for each link. This representation, shown in Figure C-2, asserts a constant free speed up to a density, kf, and then a linear reduction in speed in the range, kf _<k <_ kc = 45 vpm, the density at capacity. In the flow-density plane, a quadratic relationship is prescribed in the range, kc < k *5 k, = 95 vpm which roughly represents the "stop-and-go" condition of severe congestion. The value of flow rate, Q,, corresponding to k,, is approximated at 0.7 RQmax. A linear relationship between k, and kj completes the diagram shown in Figure C-2. Table C-3 is a glossary of terms.

The fundamental diagram is applied to moving traffic on every link. The specified calibration values for each link are: (1) Free speed, vf ; (2) Capacity, Qmax ; (3) Critical density, k, =

45 vpm; (4) Capacity Drop Factor, R = 0.9 ; (5) Jam density, kj. Then, vc - Q`ax k, = -

(Vf-Vc) k~c R~mxj, V. Setting k = k- kc, then Q = RQmax -r Qax for 0*5k<ks=50. Itcanbe Qmax 8333 shown that Q = (0.98 - 0.0056 k) RQmax for k, - k < kj, where ks = 50 and k = 1 7 5 .

C.1.2 The Simulation Model The simulation model solves a sequence of "unit problems". Each unit problem computes the movement of traffic on a link, for each specified turn movement, over a specified time interval (TI) which serves as the simulation time step for all links. Figure C-3 is a representation of the unit problem in the time-distance plane. Table C-3 is a glossary of terms that are referenced in the following description of the unit problem procedure.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant C-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Volume, vph Capacity Drop Qmax-------

R Qmax-------

-- Qs Density, vpm VIow!Keglmes Speed, mph:

Free Forced:

- - I

I Vf R vc * ,

-* Density, vpm kf ks Figure C-2. Fundamental Diagrams St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant C-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Distance I Qb OQ OM OE Qe O Down L

Mb Me Up

-* Time El E2 TI Figure C-3. A UNIT Problem Configuration with tj > 0 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant C-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table C-3. Glossary The maximum number of vehicles, of a particular movement, that can discharge Cap from a link within a time interval.

The number of vehicles, of a particular movement, that enter the link over the time interval. The portion, ETI, can reach the stop-bar within the TI.

The green time: cycle time ratio that services the vehicles of a particular turn movement on a link.

h The mean queue discharge headway, seconds.

k Density in vehicles per lane per mile.

The average density of moving vehicles of a particular movement over a TI, on a link.

L The length of the link in feet.

The queue length in feet of a particular movement, at the [beginning, end] of a Lb , e time interval.

The number of lanes, expressed as a floating point number, allocated to service a particular movement on a link.

Lv The mean effective length of a queued vehicle including the vehicle spacing, feet.

M Metering factor (Multiplier): 1.

The number of moving vehicles on the link, of a particular movement, that are Mb , Me moving at the [beginning, end] of the time interval. These vehicles are assumed to be of equal spacing, over the length of link upstream of the queue.

The total number of vehicles of a particular movement that are discharged from a 0 link over a time interval.

The components of the vehicles of a particular movement that are discharged from a link within a time interval: vehicles that were Queued at the beginning of the TI; vehicles that were Moving within the link at the beginning of the TI; vehicles that Entered the link during the TI.

link that The percentage, expressed as a fraction, of the total flow on the executes a particular turn movement, x.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant C-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

The number of queued vehicles on the link, of a particular turn movement, at the Qb, Qe [beginning, end] of the time interval.

The maximum flow rate that can be serviced by a link for a particular movement Qmax in the absence of a control device. It is specified by the analyst as an estimate of link capacity, based upon a field survey, with reference to the HCM.

R The factor that is applied to the capacity of a link to represent the "capacity drop" when the flow condition moves into the forced flow regime. The lower capacity at that point is equal to RQmax.

RCap The remaining capacity available to service vehicles of a particular movement after that queue has been completely serviced, within a time interval, expressed as vehicles.

S" Service rate for movement x, vehicles per hour (vph).

tj Vehicles of a particular turn movement that enter a link over the first tj seconds of a time interval, can reach the stop-bar (in the absence of a queue down-stream) within the same time interval.

TI The time interval, in seconds, which is used as the simulation time step.

v The mean speed of travel, in feet per second (fps) or miles per hour (mph), of moving vehicles on the link.

VQ The mean speed of the last vehicle in a queue that discharges from the link within the TI. This speed differs from the mean speed of moving vehicles, v.

W The width of the intersection in feet. This is the difference between the link length which extends from stop-bar to stop-bar and the block length.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant C-9 KLD Engineering. P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

The formulation and the associated logic presented below are designed to solve the unit problem for each sweep over the network (discussed below), for each turn movement serviced on each link that comprises the evacuation network, and for each TI over the duration of the evacuation.

Given= Qb, Mb, L, TI, Eo, LN, G/C , h, Lv, RO, LCE,M Compute = O,Qe, Me Define O=OQ-OM+OE ; E=E 1 +E 2

1. For the first sweep, s = 1, of this TI, get initial estimates of mean density, ko , the R - factor, Ro and entering traffic, Eo , using the values computed for the final sweep of the prior TI.

For each subsequent sweep, s > 1, calculate E = Ei Pi Oi + S where Pi, Oi are the relevant turn percentages from feeder link, i, and its total outflow (possibly metered) over this TI; S is the total source flow (possibly metered) during the current TI.

Set iteration counter, n = 0, k ko , and E = Eo .

2. Calculate v (k) such that k _ 130 using the analytical representations of the fundamental diagram.

Qmax(TI)

Calculate Cap = 3600 3600 (G/c) LN, in vehicles, this value may be reduced due to metering SetR= l.0ifG/C< 1 orifk<k,; Set R=0.9onlyifG/C= land k>kc Calculate queue length, Lb Qbv LL

3. Calculate t = TI--L If tj K 0, sett = E= OE 0 ; Else, E,= E v TI

4. Then E 2 =E-E 1 ; t 2 =TI-tl

5. If Qb >Cap, then OQ = Cap,OM = OE 0 If tj > 0,then Qe = Qb + Mb + E1 - Cap Else Qe = Qb - Cap End if Calculate Qe and Me using Algorithm A (below)

6. Else (Qb < Cap)

OQ = Qb, RCap = Cap- OQ

7. If Mb < RCap,then St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant C-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

8. If t 1 > 0OM Mb,OOE= min RCap -Mb, C T )

Q'e = El - OE If Qe > 0,then Calculate Qe, Me with Algorithm A Else Qe 0, Me = E2 End if Else (t, = 0)

OM= (v(Tl)-Lb

\L-Lb Mb and OE = 0 M

Me = Mb-O +E; Qe =0 End if

9. Else (Mb > RCap)

OE =0 If tj > 0, then OM = RCap, Qe = Mb - 0M + El Calculate Qe and Me using Algorithm A

10. Else (t 1 = 0)

Md [(v(Ti)-Lb K\ L-----b ) MI Mb If Md > RCap, then OM =RCap qe= Md - OM Apply Algorithm A to calculate Qe and Me Else OM = Md 0

Me =Mb - M + E and Qe= 0 End if End if End if End if

11. Calculate a new estimate of average density, kn = 4 [kb + 2 km + ke],

4 where kb = density at the beginning of the TI ke = density at the end of the TI km = density at the mid-point of the TI All values of density apply only to the moving vehicles.

if Ikn - kn- 1I > G and.n < N where N = max number of iterations, and E is a convergence criterion, then St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant C-ll KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

12. set n = n + 1 , and return to step 2 to perform iteration, n, using k = kn*

End if Computation of unit problem is now complete. Check for excessive inflow causing spillback.

13. If Qe + Me > (L--)LN then The number of excess vehicles that cause spillback is: SB = Qe + Me

- (L-W).LN L,

where W is the width of the upstream intersection. To prevent spillback, meter the outflow from the feeder approaches and from the source flow, S, during this TI by the amount, SB. That is, set SB M = 1 - > 0, where M is the metering factor (over all movements).

(E + S) -

This metering factor is assigned appropriately to all feeder links and to the source flow, to be applied during the next network sweep, discussed later.

Algorithm A This analysis addresses the flow environment over a TI during which moving vehicles can join a standing or discharging queue. For the case Qb VQ Y'e shown, Qb < Cap, with t 1 > 0 and a queue of Qe length, Qe, formed by that portion of Mb and E that reaches the stop-bar within the TI, but could Mb v v U

not discharge due to inadequate capacity. That is, Qb + Mb + E1 > Cap. This queue Q, = Qb + Mb + El - Cap can be extended to Qe by traffic entering the approach during the current length, TI, traveling at speed, v, and reaching the rear of the t4l t3 queue within the TI. A portion of the entering t3 TI vehicles, E 3 = E 1-*, will likely join the queue. This analysis calculates t 3 ,Qe and Me for the input values of L,TI, v, E, t, Lv LN, Qe .

When t, > 0 and Qb -<Cap: LvL Define: Le = Q'e LN - . From the sketch, L3 = v(TI - tl - t 3 ) = L - (Qe + E 3 ) Lv LN Substituting E3 = ý- E yields: - vt 3 + t_' E Lv = L - v(TI - t,) - Le . Recognizing that TI TI LN the first two terms on the right hand side cancel, solve for t 3 to obtain:

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant C-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

L'~.

t3 E L such that 0

t 3 < TI - t1 F LL If the denominator, v - E L- - 0, set t 3 = TI - t 1 .

I TI LN t 3 _t__+t3 Then, Qe=Qe+E T-I M =E 1 TI The complete Algorithm A considers all flow scenarios; space limitation precludes its inclusion, here.

C.1.3 Lane Assignment The "unit problem" is solved for each turn movement on each link. Therefore it is necessary to calculate a value, LNx, of allocated lanes for each movement, x. If in fact all lanes are specified by, say, arrows painted on the pavement, either as full lanes or as lanes within a turn bay, then the problem is fully defined. If however there remain un-channelized lanes on a link, then an analysis is undertaken to subdivide the number of these physical lanes into turn movement specific virtual lanes, LNx.

C.2 Implementation C.2.1 Computational Procedure The computational procedure for this model is shown in the form of a flow diagram as Figure C-4. As discussed earlier, the simulation model processes traffic flow for each link independently over TI that the analyst specifies; it is usually 60 seconds or longer. The first step is to execute an algorithm to define the sequence in which the network links are processed so that as many links as possible are processed after their feeder links are processed, within the same network sweep. Since a general network will have many closed loops, it is not possible to guarantee that every link processed will have all of its feeder links processed earlier.

The processing then continues as a succession of time steps of duration, TI, until the simulation is completed. Within each time step, the processing performs a series of "sweeps" over all network links; this is necessary to ensure that the traffic flow is synchronous over the entire network. Specifically, the sweep ensures continuity of flow among all the network links; in the context of this model, this means that the values of E, M, and S are all defined for each link such that they represent the synchronous movement of traffic from each link to all of its outbound links. These sweeps also serve to compute the metering rates that control spillback.

Within each sweep, processing solves the "unit problem" for each turn movement on each link.

With the turn movement percentages for each link provided by the DTRAD model, an algorithm St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant C-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

allocates the number of lanes to each movement serviced on each link. The timing at a signal, if any, applied at the downstream end of the link, is expressed as a G/C ratio, the signal timing needed to define this ratio is an input requirement for the model. The model also has the capability of representing, with macroscopic fidelity, the actions of actuated signals responding to the time-varying competing demands on the approaches to the intersection.

The solution of the unit problem yields the values of the number of vehicles, 0, that discharge from the link over the time interval and the number of vehicles that remain on the link at the end of the time interval as stratified by queued and moving vehicles: Qe and Me. The procedure considers each movement separately (multi-piping). After all network links are processed for a given network sweep, the updated consistent values of entering flows, E; metering rates, M; and source flows, S are defined so as to satisfy the "no spillback" condition.

The procedure then performs the unit problem solutions for all network links during the following sweep.

Experience has shown that the system converges (i.e. the values of E, M and S "settle down" for all network links) in just two sweeps if the network is entirely under-saturated or in four sweeps in the presence of extensive congestion with link spillback. (The initial sweep over each link uses the final values of E and M, of the prior TI). At the completion of the final sweep for a TI, the procedure computes and stores all measures of effectiveness for each link and turn movement for output purposes. It then prepares for the following time interval by defining the values of Qb and Mb for the start of the next TI as being those values of Qe and Me at the end of the prior TI. In this manner, the simulation model processes the traffic flow over time until the end of the run. Note that there is no space-discretization other than the specification of network links.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant C-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure C-4. Flow of Simulation Processing (See Glossary: Table C-3)

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant c-is C-1S KLD Engineering, P.C.

KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

C.2.2 Interfacing with Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTRAD)

The DYNEV II system reflects NRC guidance that evacuees will seek to travel in a general direction away from the location of the hazardous event. Thus, an algorithm was developed to identify an appropriate set of destination nodes for each origin based on its location and on the expected direction of travel. This algorithm also supports the DTRAD model in dynamically varying the Trip Table (O-D matrix) over time from one DTRAD session to the next.

Figure B-1 depicts the interaction of the simulation model with the DTRAD model in the DYNEV II system. As indicated, DYNEV II performs a succession of DTRAD "sessions"; each such session computes the turn link percentages for each link that remain constant for the session duration,

[T 0 , T2], specified by the analyst. The end product is the assignment of traffic volumes from each origin to paths connecting it with its destinations in such a way as to minimize the network-wide cost function. The output of the DTRAD model is a set of updated link turn percentages which represent this assignment of traffic.

As indicated in Figure B-i, the simulation model supports the DTRAD session by providing it with operational link MOE that are needed by the path choice model and included in the DTRAD cost function. These MOE represent the operational state of the network at a time, "T1 - T2 , which lies within the session duration, [T"O, T2] . This "burn time", T1 -To, is selected by the analyst. For. each DTRAD iteration, the simulation model computes the change in network operations over this burn time using the latest set of link turn percentages computed by the DTRAD model. Upon convergence of the DTRAD iterative procedure, the simulation model accepts the latest turn percentages provided by the DTA model, returns to the origin time, To , and executes until it arrives at the end of the DTRAD session duration at time, T 2 . At this time the next DTA session is launched and the whole process repeats until the end of the DYNEV II run.

Additional details are presented in Appendix B.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant C-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX D Detailed Description of Study Procedure

D. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STUDY PROCEDURE This appendix describes the activities that were performed to compute Evacuation Time Estimates. The individual steps of this effort are represented as a flow diagram in Figure D-1.

Each numbered step in the description that follows corresponds to the numbered element in the flow diagram.

Step1 The first activity was to obtain EPZ boundary information and create a GIS base map. The base map extends beyond the Shadow Region which extends approximately 15 miles (radially) from the power plant location. The base map incorporates the local roadway topology, a suitable topographic background and the EPZ boundary.

Step 2 2010 Census block information was obtained in GIS format. This information was used to estimate the resident population within the EPZ and Shadow Region and to define the spatial distribution and demographic characteristics of the population within the study area. Employee data were estimated using the U.S. Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics interactive website1 , and from data provided by FPL. Transient data were obtained from county emergency management agencies and from phone calls to transient attractions.

Parking lot capacity for some transient attractions was estimated using aerial imagery.

Information concerning schools, medical and other types of special facilities within the EPZ was obtained from county sources, augmented by telephone contacts with the identified facilities.

Step 3 A kickoff meeting was conducted with major stakeholders (county emergency managers, on-site and off-site utility emergency managers, and local law enforcement agencies). The purpose of the kickoff meeting was to present an overview of the work effort, identify key agency personnel, and indicate the data requirements for the study. Specific requests for information were presented to county emergency managers. Unique features of the study area were discussed to identify the local concerns that should be addressed by the ETE study.

Step4 Next, a physical survey of the roadway system in the study area was conducted to determine the geometric properties of the highway sections, the channelization of lanes on each section of roadway, whether there are any turn restrictions or special treatment of traffic at intersections, the type and functioning of traffic control devices, gathering signal timings for pre-timed traffic signals, and to make the necessary observations needed to estimate realistic values of roadway capacity.

'http://lehdmap.did.census.gov/

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant D-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Step_ 5 A telephone survey of households within the EPZ was conducted to identify household dynamics, trip generation characteristics, and evacuation-related demographic information of the EPZ population. This information was used to determine important study factors including the average number of evacuating vehicles used by each household, and the time required to perform pre-evacuation mobilization activities.

Step 6 A computerized representation of the physical roadway system, called a link-node analysis network, was developed using the UNITES software developed by KLD. Once the geometry of the network was completed, the networkwas calibrated using the information gathered during the road survey (Step 4). Estimates of highway capacity for each link and other link-specific characteristics were introduced to the network description. Traffic signal timings were input accordingly. The link-node analysis network was imported into a GIS map. 2010 Census data were overlaid in the map, and origin centroids where trips would be generated during the evacuation process were assigned to appropriate links.

Step Z The EPZ is subdivided into 8 Areas. Based on wind direction and speed, Regions (groupings of Areas) that may be advised to evacuate, were developed.

The need for evacuation can occur over a range of time-of-day, day-of-week, seasonal and weather-related conditions. Scenarios were developed to capture the variation in evacuation demand, highway capacity and mobilization time, for different time of day, day of the week, time of year, and weather conditions.

Step 8 The input stream for the DYNEV II model, which integrates the dynamic traffic assignment and distribution model, DTRAD, with the evacuation simulation model, was created for a prototype evacuation case - the evacuation of the entire EPZ for a representative scenario.

Step9 After creating this input stream, the DYNEV II System was executed on the prototype evacuation case to compute evacuating traffic routing patterns consistent with the appropriate NRC guidelines. DYNEV II contains an extensive suite of data diagnostics which check the completeness and consistency of the input data specified. The analyst reviews all warning and error messages produced by the model and then corrects the database to create an input stream that properly executes to completion.

The model assigns destinations to all origin centroids consistent with a (general) radial evacuation of the EPZ and Shadow Region. The analyst may optionally supplement and/or replace these model-assigned destinations, based on professional judgment, after studying the topology of the analysis highway network. The model produces link and network-wide measures of effectiveness as well as estimates of evacuation time.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant D-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Step 10 The results generated by the prototype evacuation case are critically examined. The examination includes observing the animated graphics (using the EVAN software which operates on data produced by DYNEV II) and reviewing the statistics output by the model. This is a labor-intensive activity, requiring the direct participation of skilled engineers who possess the necessary practical experience to interpret the results and to determine the causes of any problems reflected in the results.

Essentially, the approach is to identify those bottlenecks in the network that represent locations where congested conditions are pronounced and to identify the cause of this congestion. This cause can take many forms, either as excess demand due to high rates of trip generation, improper routing, a shortfall of capacity, or as a quantitative flaw in the way the physical system was represented in the input stream. This examination leads to one of two conclusions:

The results are satisfactory; or

" The input stream must be modified accordingly.

This decision requires, of course, the application of the user's judgment and experience based upon the results obtained in previous applications of the model and a comparison of the results of the latest prototype evacuation case iteration with the previous ones. If the results are satisfactory in the opinion of the user, then the process continues with Step 13. Otherwise, proceed to Step 11.

Step 11 There are many "treatments" available to the user in resolving apparent problems. These treatments range from decisions to reroute the traffic by assigning additional evacuation destinations for one or more sources, imposing turn restrictions where they can produce significant improvements in capacity, changing the control treatment at critical intersections so as to provide improved service for one or more movements, or in prescribing specific treatments for channelizing the flow so as to expedite the movement of traffic along major roadway systems. Such "treatments" take the form of modifications to the original prototype evacuation case input stream. All treatments are designed to improve the representation of evacuation behavior.

Step 12 As noted above, the changes to the input stream must be implemented to reflect the modifications undertaken in Step 11. At the completion of this activity, the process returns to Step 9 where the DYNEV II System is again executed.

Step 13 Evacuation of transit-dependent evacuees and special facilities are included in the evacuation analysis. Fixed routing for transit buses and for school buses, ambulances, and other transit vehicles are introduced into the final prototype evacuation case data set. DYNEV II generates route-specific speeds over time for use in the estimation of evacuation times for the transit St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant D-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

dependent and special facility population groups.

Step 14 The prototype evacuation case was used as the basis for generating all region and scenario-specific evacuation cases to be simulated. This process was automated through the UNITES user interface. For each specific case, the population to be evacuated, the trip generation distributions, the highway capacity and speeds, and other factors are adjusted to produce a customized case-specific data set.

Step 15 All evacuation cases are executed using the DYNEV II System to compute ETE. Once results were available, quality control procedures were used to assure the results were consistent, dynamic routing was reasonable, and traffic congestion/bottlenecks were addressed properly.

Step 16 Once vehicular evacuation results are accepted, average travel speeds for transit and special facility routes were used to compute evacuation time estimates for transit-dependent permanent residents, schools, hospitals, and other special facilities.

Step 17 The simulation results are analyzed, tabulated and graphed. The results were then documented, as required by NUREG/CR-7002.

Step 18 Following the completion of documentation activities, the ETE criteria checklist (see Appendix N) was completed. An appropriate report reference is provided for each criterion provided in the checklist.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant D-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Step 1 Create GIS Base Map 1

= Step 2 Gather Census Block and Demographic Data for Study Area Il Step 3 Kickoff Meeting with Stakeholders Step 4 Field Survey of Roadways within Study Area 1, Step 5 Conduct Telephone Survey and Develop Trip Generation Characteristics Il Step 6 Establish Transit and Special Facility Evacuation Create and Calibrate Link-Node A Networka Routes and Update DYNEV II Database Step 14 Step 7 Generate DYNEV 11Input Streams for All Evacuation Cases Develop Evacuation Regions te S Step 8 Step 15 Execute DYNEV 1ito Compute ETE for All Create and Debug DYNEV II Input Stream Evacuation Cases Step 16

_ _ _ Step 9 Use DYNEV II Average Speed Output to Compute ETE for Transit and Special Facility Routes I-Execute DYNEV II for Prototype Evacuation Case TStep 17 Documentation IStep 18 Complete ETE Criteria Checklist Figure D-1. Flow Diagram of Activities St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant D-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX E Special Facility Data

E. SPECIAL FACILITY DATA The following tables list population information, as of June 2012, for special facilities, transient attractions, and major employers that are located within the St. Lucie EPZ. Special facilities are defined as schools, preschools, hospitals and other medical care facilities, and correctional facilities. Transient population data is included in the tables for recreational facilities (beaches, parks, campgrounds, marinas, golf courses), commuter colleges and lodging facilities. Each table is grouped by county. The location of the facility is defined by its straight-line distance (miles) and direction (magnetic bearing) from the center point of the plant. Maps of each school, preschool, medical facility, recreational facility, commuter college, lodging facility, and correctional facility are also provided.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table E-1. Schools within the EPZ 7 7.6 S Environmental Studies Center 2900 NE Indian River Dr Jensen Beach 772-219-1887 200 16 7 8.6 S Felix A. Williams Elementary 401 NE Baker Rd Stuart 772-219-1640 627 82 Jensen Beach Community 3900 Northeast Skyline 7 6.7 S Church 1 Drive Jensen Beach (772) 334-0815 95 12 7 7.8 S Jensen Beach Elementary School 2525 NE Savannah Rd Jensen Beach 772-219-1555 567 97 7 7.6 S Jensen Beach High School 2875 NE Goldenrod Ave Jensen Beach 772-232-3500 1,650 154 7 7.3 S New Creations Academy 2000 NE Jensen Beach Blvd Jensen Beach 772-334-9891 131 15 7 8.1 S Trinity United Methodist School 2221 NE Savannah Rd Jensen Beach 772-334-3404 81 11 Mortin Coun'ty Subtotals: 3,351ý' 387-2 4.5 W Savanna Ridge Elementary 6801 Lennard Rd Port St. Lucie 772-460-3050 678 72 2 4.9 WNW Weatherbee Elementary 800 E Weatherbee Rd Ft. Pierce 772-468-5300 563 70 3 11.3 NW Anglewood Center 1809 Panther Ln Ft. Pierce 772-468-5215 22 -

3 6.8 NW Bethany School 3015 Oleander Ave Ft. Pierce _ _28_ _

3 10.1 NW Chester A Moore Elementary 827 N 29th St Ft. Pierce 772-468-5315 700 72 3 7.9 NW Dale Cassens Education Complex 1905 S 11th St Ft. Pierce 772-468-5190 309 63 3 8.0 NW Dan McCarty Middle School 1201 Mississippi Ave Ft. Pierce 772-468-5700 777 104 Daniel M Foundation Positive 3 7.9 NW Expectations Academy 2 827 Sunrise Blvd Ft. Pierce - 20 3 9.3 NW Delaware Avenue School 2909 Delaware Ave Ft. Pierce 772-468-5220 75 3 8.8 NW Fairlawn Elementary 3203 Rhode Island Ave Ft. Pierce 772-468-5345 617 62 I This facility is a pre-school. Based on information provided by Martin County Emergency Management Agency, transportation assistance is needed to evacuate this facility. Children at all other pre-schools will be picked up by parents.

2 According to St. Lucie County emergency management personnel, these schools have their own evacuation plans in place wherein parents pick up their children from the school during an evacuation. Buses are not provided for these schools.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Fort Pierce Westwood High 3 11.0 NW School 1801 Panther Ln Ft. Pierce 1,251 135 3 9.9 NW Francis KSweet Elementary 1400 Avenue Q Ft. Pierce 772-468-5330 601 63 Ft Pierce Magnet School of the 3 8.5 NW Arts 1200 Delaware Ave Ft. Pierce - 340 44 Garden City Early Learning 3 10.2 NW Academy Elementary 2202 Ave Q Ft. Pierce 772-468-5277 372 53 3 7.8 NW Indian Hills School 1901 S 11th St Ft. Pierce 772-468-5270 50 3 8.6 NW Indian River State College 3209 Virginia Ave Ft. Pierce Indian River State College Police 17,528 762 3 10.0 WNW Academy 5900 Tedder Rd Ft. Pierce 3 9.7 NW John Carroll Catholic High School 3402 Delaware Ave Ft. Pierce 772-464-5200 410 42 3 8.3 NW Lawnwood Elementary 1900 23rd St Ft. Pierce 772-468-5740 634 75 3 9.6 NW Lincoln Park Academy 1806 Avenue I Ft. Pierce 772-468-5474 1,810 149 3 8.8 NW Pace Center for Girls 3651 Virginia Ave Ft. Pierce 772-595-8880 45 3 9.3 NW Palm Vista Christian School 700 S 33rd St Ft. Pierce 772-464-1591 43 3 9.8 WNW Samuel S Gaines Academy K8 2250 S Jenkins Rd Ft. Pierce 772-462-8888 1,219 151 3 9.6 NW St Anastasia Elementary School 401 33rd St Ft. Pierce 772-461-2232 507 80 3 8.1 NW St Andrews Episcopal School 210 S Indian River Dr Ft. Pierce 772-461-5009 155 36 3 7.8 NW St Lucie Elementary 2020 S 13th St Ft. Pierce 772-468-5213 661 82 4 6.9 WNW Bible Baptist School 4401 S 25th St Ft. Pierce 772-461-6630 60 Christ Family Fellowship 4 6.7 W Christian Academy 6501 NW St. James Dr Ft. Pierce - 66 4 6.3 WNW Faith Baptist School 3607 Oleander Ave Ft. Pierce 772-461-3607 170 32 4 7.3 WNW First Liberty Baptist Academy 3660 W Midway Rd Ft. Pierce - 455 26 4 7.6 WNW Forest Grove Middle School 3201 S 25th St Ft. Pierce 772-468-5885 734 92 4 7.2 WNW Ft Pierce Central High School 4101 S 25th St Ft. Pierce 772-468-5888 2,280 189 2

4 8.2 WNW Golden Rule Academy 3891 Edwards Rd Ft. Pierce 81 7 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

4 5.2 WNW New Life Christian Academy2 5300 Melville Rd Ft. Pierce 70 4 6.8 WSW Northport K-8 School 250 NW Floresta Dr Port St. Lucie 772-340-4700 1,293 143 2

4 7.0 WNW Park Centre Academy 3453 Sunrise Blvd Ft. Pierce - 29 4 4 7.6 W Parkway Elementary 7000 NW Selvitz Rd Ft. Pierce 772-340-4800 596 75 Renaissance Charter School of 4 8.2 WSW St. Lucie 300 NW Cashmere Blvd Port St. Lucie - 1,339 4 6.5 W Rivers Edge Elementary 5600 NE St James Dr Port St. Lucie 772-785-5600 770 82 4 8.8 WNW Seventh Day Adventist School 3201 Memory Ln Ft. Pierce 772-465-8386 44 4 6.8 W Southern Oaks Middle School 5500 NE St James Dr Port St. Lucie 772-785-5640 617 101 4 5.4 W Sun Grove Montessori School 5610 Oleander Ave Ft. Pierce - 125 4 8.1 W West Gate K-8 School 1050 SW Cashmere Blvd Port St. Lucie 772-807-7600 1,309 143 4 5.7 WNW White City Elementary 905 W 2nd St Ft. Pierce 772-468-5840 527 58 4 6.4 W Woodlands Montessori School 651 NE Hammock Creek Tr Port St. Lucie 772-340-1160 99 5 7.8 SW Barry University 337 SE Port St Lucie Blvd Port St. Lucie 30 3 5 8.3 WSW Bayshore Elementary 1661 SW Bayshore Blvd Port St. Lucie 772-340-4720 857 86 5 6.1 SW Floresta Elementary 1501 SE Floresta Dr Port St. Lucie 772-340-4755 639 67 Included Included 5 6.8 WSW Indian River State College 200 SW Prima Vista Blvd Port St. Lucie - Above. Above.

5 9.8 WSW Manatee K-8 School 1450 SW Heatherwood Blvd Port St. Lucie 772-340-4745 1,510 154 5 6.1 SSW Morningside Academy - Lower 2180 SE Morningside Blvd Port St. Lucie 772-335-3231 328 35 5 6.4 SSW Morningside Academy - Upper 1631 SE Greendon Ave Port St. Lucie 772-335-2096 150 14 5 6.0 SSW Morningside Elementary 2300 SE Gowin Dr Port St. Lucie 772-337-6730 639 66 5 9.8 WSW Oak Hammock K-8 School 1251 SW California Blvd Port St. Lucie 772-344-4490 -1,429 156 5 8.1 WSW Southeastern Military Academy 2 602 SW Biltmore St Port St. Lucie - 24 5 6.4 SSW Southport Middle School 2420 SE Morningside Blvd Port St. Lucie - 924 103 St Lucie West Centennial High 5 9.0 WSW School 1485 SW Cashmere Blvd Port St. Lucie 772-785-6660 2,489 212 5 8.9 WSW St. Lucie West K-8 1501 SW Cashmere Blvd Port St. Lucie 772-785-6630 1,303 133 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

5 10.2 SW Treasure Coast High School 1000 SW Darwin Blvd Port St. Lucie 772-807-4300 2,524 188 5 10.5 SW Windmill Point Elementary 700 SW Darwin Blvd Port St. Lucie 772-336-6950 867 93 2

6 4.1 SSW Calvary Academy 2250 SE Walton Rd Port St. Lucie - 1,284 6 5.6 SSW Mariposa Elementary 2620 SE Mariposa Ave Port St. Lucie 772-337-5960 788 87 6 3.7 SW Port St Lucie High School 1201 S.E. Jaguar Lane Port St. Lucie 772-337-6770 1,931 174 Village Green Environmental 6 4.8 SSW Studies School 1700 SE Lennard Rd Port St. Lucie 772-337-6750 470 53 S.R. 12.4 W Allapattah Flats K-83 12051 NW Copper Creek Dr Port St. Lucie 772-468-5050 1,086 117 S.R. 15.4 NNW Lakewood Park Elementary 3 7800 Indrio Rd FortPierce 772-468-5830 671 77 3

S.R. 12.6 ESE Palm Pointe 10680 SW Academic Way Port St. Lucie 772-345-3245 1,413 148 S.R. 12.3 SE NAU Charter3 4402 SW Yamada Drive Port St. Lucie 772-237-8600 678 50 St. Lucie County Subtotals: 62,113 5,083 TOTAL:~ 65,464, 5, 470 3 These schools would evacuate even though they are outside the EPZ (in the Shadow Region - S.R.) according to St. Lucie County Division of Emergency Management.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table E-2. Medical Facilities within the EPZ 7 8.1 S I Care Association Alzheimer's Community Highway 2200 Northwest Federal Stuart 45 45 19 15 11 7 8.8 SSE Emeritus at Jensen Beach 1700 Northeast Indian River Dr Jensen Beach 166 166 72 54 40 7 9.3 S Residence at Stuart 1048 Northwest Fork Rd Stuart 12 12 5 4 3 Martin County Subtotals: 223 223 96 73 54 2 5.9 NW Broadmoor Assisted Living 200 Dixieland Dr Ft. Pierce 52 50 34 14 2 AbbieJean Russell Care 3 9.2 NW Center 700 South 29th St Ft. Pierce 79 64 6 58 0 3 7.8 NW Lake Forest Park 2909 South 25th St Ft. Pierce 74 64 6 33 25 3 9.2 NW Lauren Point Health 703 South 29th St Ft. Pierce 107 95 14 81 0 Lawnwood Regional 3 8.4 NW Medical Center 1700 S 23rd St Ft. Pierce 365 310 10 50 250 4 6.7 W Nature's Edge 699 NW Airoso Blvd Port St. Lucie 33 27 26 1 0 New Horizons of the 4 7.9 WNW Treasure Coast 4500 Midway Rd Ft. Pierce 90 90 90 0 0 Port St Lucie Nursing &

4 5.1 W Restorative Care 7300 Oleander Ave Port St. Lucie 180 120 35 75 10 4 8.2 WSW The Palms at St Lucie West 501 NW Cashmere Blvd Port St. Lucie 66 62 40 22 0 5 5.3 SW Brighton Gardens 1699 SE Lyngate Dr Port St. Lucie 130 115 103 12 0 6 4.7 SW Emerald Health 1655 SE Walton Rd Port St. Lucie 120 107 0 107 0 6 5.4 SSW Harbor Place 3710 SE Jennings Rd Port St. Lucie 104 104 104 0 0 Palm Garden Treatment 6 5.2 SW Center 1751 SE Hillmoor Dr Port St. Lucie 120 109 48 35 26 6 5.8 SSW Paradise Care Center 2277 SE Lennard Dr Port St. Lucie 50 44 41 3 0 6 3.8 SSW Port St. Lucie Hospital 2550 SE Walton Rd Port St. Lucie 75 70 70 0 0 6 5.1 SW St. Lucie Medical Center 1800 SE Tiffany Ave Port St. Lucie 286 176 44 44 88 6 5.2 SSW Tiffany Hall 1800 SE Hillmoor Dr Port St. Lucie 120 120 52 39 29 St. Lucie County Subtotals: 2,051 1,727 723 574 430

,, :. : , .. . . TOTAL .2,274 1,950 8i9*84.647,: 4e4'!

Rev. 1 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-6 KLID Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Evacuation Time Estimate Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table E-3. Beaches, Parks, Campgrounds, and Other Recreational Facilities within the EPZ 1 6.4 NNW Blue Heron Beach 2101 Blue Heron Blvd Ft. Pierce 772-462-2110 65 32 1 7.6 NNW Kimberly Bergali's Beach 1400 S Ocean Dr Ft. Pierce 772-460-2200 75 36 1 8.1 NNW South Beach Boardwalk Park 800 S Ocean Dr Ft. Pierce 772-460-2200 83 40 1 8.6 NNW South Causeway Island Park Seaway Dr Ft. Pierce - 424 205 2 4.8 NW Savannas Park & Campground 1400 E. Midway Rd Ft. Pierce 772-464-7855 222 74 3 9.8 NNW Fort Pierce KOA 1821 North US Highway 1 Ft. Pierce 772-812-7200 60 66 3 10.0 Ft Pierce Inlet State Recreation NNW Area 905 Shorewinds Dr Ft. Pierce 772-468-3985 115 56 3 7.8 NW Lawnwood Regional Park 1302 Virginia Ave Ft. Pierce 772-462-1521 325 157 3 8.8 NNW Museum Pointe Park 414 Seaway Dr Ft. Pierce 772-462-1521 76 73 3 9.1 NNW Pepper Park Riverside 3375 N SR Highway AlA Ft. Pierce 772-462-1521 47 23 3 8.8 NNW St Lucie County Aquarium 420 Seaway Dr Ft. Pierce 772-462-3474 26 13 3 10.4 Treasure Coast RV Parks &

WNW Campgrounds 2250 Crossroads Pkwy Port St. Lucie 772-468-2099 330 495 4 5.4 WNW Easy Livin' RV Park 4611 South US Highway 1 Ft. Pierce 772-461-0800 40 20 4 8.4 WNW George Lestrange Preserve 4911 Ralls Rd Ft. Pierce 772-462-2526 11 6 4 6.7 W Oxbow Eco Center 5400 NE St James Dr Port St. Lucie 772-785-5833 73 13 5 8.0 WSW Swan Park 700 SW Carmelite St Port St. Lucie 772-878-2277 67 33 5 6.9 SW Tom Hooper Park 2340 SE Rivergate Pkwy Port St. Lucie 772-878-2277 34 17 6.7 Veterans Memorial Park 2200 SE Veterans 5 SW Rivergate Memorial Pkwy Port St. Lucie 772-335-1433 53 41 5.6 3703 Southeast Jennings 6 SSW Port St. Lucie RV Resort Rd Port St. Lucie 772-337-3340 110 115 6 3.9 SSW Sandhill Crane Park 2355 SE Scenic Park Dr Port St. Lucie 772-878-2277 277 134 8 4.0 SSE Dollman Park Riverside 9101 5 Ocean Dr Jensen Beach 772-462-2110 41 20 8 2.2 SSE Herman's Bay Beach 7880 S Ocean Dr Jensen Beach 772-462-1521 26 13 8 5.6 SSE Waveland Beach 10350 S Ocean Dr Jensen Beach 772-462-1521 70 34 St. Lucie County Subtotals: 2,650. 1,716:

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table E-4. Commuter Colleges, Marinas, and Golf Courses within the EPZ 1 8.7 NNW Harbour Isle Marina 305 Seaway Drive Ft. Pierce 772-461-9049 126 61 6.7 Private Course for 1

NNW Ocean Village Golf Course 2400 S. Ocean Dr Ft. Pierce 772-467-0102 Residents Only 2 5.3 WNW Gator Trace Golf Course 4302 Gator Trace Dr Ft. Pierce 772-464-7442 105 34 3 8.7 NNW Fort Pierce Inlet Marina 1010 Seaway Dr Ft. Pierce 772-464-8451 126 61 3 8.4 NW Ft Pierce City Marina 1 Avenue A Ft. Pierce 772-464-1245 163 79 Harbortown Marina-Fort 3 9.6 NNW Pierce 1936 Harbortown Dr Ft. Pierce 772-466-7300 163 79 3 7.7 NW Indian Hills Golf Course 1600 S 3rd St Ft. Pierce 772-465-8110 60 29 3 8.6 NW Indian River State College 3209 Virginia Ave Ft. Pierce - 1,753 1,638 3 9.8 Little Jim's Marina and Fishing NNW Bridge 601 N Beach Causeway Ft. Pierce 772-468-2503 3 1 3 8.7 NNW Pelican Yacht Club 1120 Seaway Drive Ft. Pierce 772-464-1734 126 61 3 8.9 South Bridge Marina &

NNW Storage 125 Fishermans Wharf Ft. Pierce 772-465-6321 126 61 3 9.5 NNW Taylor Creek Marina 1600 North 2nd St Ft. Pierce 772-465-2663 52 25 4 7.5 W St. James Golf Course 5613 NW Saint James Dr Port St. Lucie 772-336-4653 123 60 Private Course for 4 8.9 W The Cascades at St Lucie West NW Peacock Blvd Port St. Lucie 772-224-1634 Residents Only 5 7.7 SSW Ballantrae Golf and Yacht Club 3325 SE Ballantrae Blvd Port St. Lucie 772-398-0888 60 29 5 9.3 SSW Floridian Yacht and Golf Club 14020 NW Gilson Rd Port St. Lucie 772-781-1000 18 13 Harbour Ridge Yacht &

5 8.9 SSW Country Club 12600 Harbour Ridge Blvd Palm City 772-336-3000 60 29 PGA Country Club and Golf WSW Course 951 SW Country Club Rd Port St. Lucie 772-340-1911 60 29 5 5.6 WSW River Park Marina 500 E Prima Vista Blvd Port St. Lucie 772-462-1522 14 7 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

5 6.8 SSW Saints Golf Course 2601 SE Morningside Blvd Port St. Lucie 772-398-2901 60 29 5 8.1 SSW Sandpiper Golf Course 4500 SE Pine Valley St Port St. Lucie 772-398-5007 30 14 The Tesoro Club- The Palmer 5 9.7 SSW Golf Course 2000 SE Via Tesoro Port St. Lucie 772-345-4010 60 29 6 3.5 SW Savanna Club Golf Course 3492 Crabapple Dr Port St. Lucie 772-879-1316 60 24 Private Course for 6 4.4 WSW Spanish Lakes 1 Golf Course 1 Silver Oak Dr Port St. Lucie 772-878-3416 Residents Only St. Lucie County Subtotdls-TOTAL:

3,348 [ 2,392 4..-328..;..

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table E-5. Lodging Facilities within the EPZ Ft. Pierce Inlet Beach Kesort 1 7.9 NNW (Beachwood Motel) 110 S Ocean Dr Ft Pierce 772-465-3157 92 27 1 6.9 NNW Ocean Village Vacation Rentals 2400 S Ocean Dr Ft. Pierce 772-489-6100 158 63 1 8.7 NNW Royal Inn Beach 222 Hernando St Ft. Pierce 772-672-8888 38 19 2 4.8 WSW Best Western Port St. Lucie 7900 S US Highway 1 Port St. Lucie 772-878-7600 176 98 2 6.3 NW Days Inn 3224 S US Highway 1 Ft Pierce 772-465-7000 190 95 2 6.2 NW Econo Lodge 3236 S US Highway 1 Ft Pierce 772-461-2323 78 60 2 5.0 WNW Garden State Motel 5220 S US Highway 1 Ft Pierce 772-461-7031 14 7 3 10.1 WNW America's Best Value Inn 6651 Darter Ct Ft. Pierce 772-466-4066 112 56 3 9.9 WNW Best Western PLUS 6485 Metal Dr Ft. Pierce 772-409-1740 60 29 3 10.0 WNW Comfort Suites 6505 Metal Dr Ft. Pierce 772-409-1420 108 45 3 8.8 NNW Dockside Inn & Resort 1160 Seaway Dr Ft. Pierce - 84 34 3 9.9 WNW Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott 6502 Metal Dr Ft. Pierce 772-462-2900 194 108 3 9.9 NNW German American Motel 2510 Tamarind Dr Ft. Pierce 772-465-9684 56 56 3 10.0 WNW Hampton Inn & Suites 1985 Reynolds Dr Ft. Pierce 772-828-4100 226 81 3 10.3 WNW Holiday Inn Express 7151 Okeechobee Rd Ft. Pierce 772-464-5000 150 94 3 10.4 WNW La Quinta Inn & Suites 2655 Crossroads Pkwy Ft. Pierce 772-828-4199 235 87 3 10.1 WNW Motel 6 2500 Peters Rd Ft. Pierce 772-461-9937 226 119 3 10.1 WNW Quality Inn 2831 Reynolds Dr Ft. Pierce 772-460-9855 108 72 3 7.0 NW Roadway Inn 2601 S US Highway 1 Ft. Pierce 772-464-8850 108 108 3 10.3 WNW Roadway Inn 7050 Okeechobee Rd Ft. Pierce 772-465-8600 222 111 3 8.8 NNW Sandhurst Hotel & Suites 1230 Seaway Dr Ft. Pierce 772-595-0711 154 70 3 9.9.. NNW Sandy Toes Beach Rentals 2507 N Ocean Dr Ft. Pierce 772-882-4325 6 3 3 10.3 WNW Sleep Inn 2715 Crossroads Pkwy Ft. Pierce 772-595-6080 110 67 3 7.4 NW Sunset Inn 1802 S US Highway 1 Ft. Pierce 772-293-9233 38 18 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

3 8.0 NW Super 8 Motel 612 S US Highway 1 Ft. Pierce 772-466-8488 68 68 4 5.8 WNW Farrell's Motel 3625 S US Highway 1 Ft Pierce 772-464-1019 39 15 4 5.9 NW Travel Inn 3425 S US Highway 1 Ft Pierce 772-460-2333 25 13 5 8.3 SSW Club Med Sandpiper 3500 SE Morningside Blvd Port St. Lucie 772-398-5100 370 179 6 5.5 SSW Holiday Inn Port St. Lucie 10120 S US Highway 1 Port St. Lucie 772-337-2200 185 142 7 7.2 S Inn at Tilton Place 3350 NE Indian River Dr Jensen Beach 772-934 6436 17 8 Courtyard by Marriott, 8 6.4 SSE Hutchinson Island 10978 S Ocean Dr Jensen Beach 772-2294000 220 110 8 4.7 SSE Island Beach Resort 9800 S Ocean Dr Jensen Beach 772-229-3006 180 60 8 6.0 SSE Vistana's Beach Club 10740 S Ocean Dr Jensen Beach 772-229-9200 4,246 708 St. Lucie County Subtotals: 8,293 2,830 TOTAL:. 8,293;' 2,30 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table E-6. Correctional Facilities within the EPZ Disac Die Curre-

. ST LUI CONY - L.

4 6.5 WNW7St Lucie Juvenile Detention Center 1301 Bell Ave Ft. Pierce 772-468-3929 114 St. LucaeCounty:Subtotal: 114 rr~~, , ~ ii 1/2 iTAL: l, 1 4 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure E-1. Overview of Schools within the St. Lucie EPZ St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure E-2. Schools within Areas 2 & 4 of the EPZ St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure E-3. Schools within Area 3 of the EPZ St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure E-4. Schools within the Shadow Region and Areas 5, 6, & 7 of the EPZ St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Medical Facilities within the A St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant EPZ Map No. Facility Name * -

1 AbbleJean Russell Care Center 2 Alzheimers Community Care Association 3 Brighton Gardens 4 Broadmoor Assited Living 5 Emerald Health 6 Emeritus atJensen Beach 7 Harbor Place Lake Forest Park 9Lauren Point Health 10 Lawnwood Regional Medical Center 1 Nature's Edge 12 New Horizons ofthe Treasure Coast 13 PaIm Garden Treatment Center 14 Paradise Care Center 15 Port St Lucie Nursing & Restorative Care 16 Port St. Lucie Hospital 17 Residence at Stuart SR St. Lucie Medical Center 19 The Palms at St Lucie West 20 TiffanyHall

, '7s,~X Legend St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Medical

, 1* 2,5, 10, 15 Mile Rings"t Area

.5 MilerRing 2,5, LDE15 LeeShadow Region Coight: sRI ,

Figure E-5. Medical Facilities within the EPZ Rev. 1 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation'Time Estimate EvacuationTime Estimate Rev. 1

Figure E-6. Beaches, Parks, Campgrounds, and Other Recreational Facilities within the EPZ St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-18 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Commuter Colleges, Marinas, and Golf Courses within the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant EPZ Map No. Facility Name*

1 Ballantrae Golf and Yacht Club 2 Floridian Yacht and GolfClub 3 Fort Pierce Inlet Marina 4 Ft Pierce City Marina 5 Gator Trace Golf Course Harbortown Marina-Fort Pierce 7 Harbour Isle Marina 8Harbour Ridge Yacht & CountryClub 9 Indian Hills Golf Course 0 Indian RiverState College 1 Little Jim's Marina and Fishing Bridge 12 Ocean Village Golf Course 13 Pelican Yacht Club 14 PGACountryClub and GoifCourse 15 River ParkMarina 16 Saints GolfCourse 17 Sandpiper GolfCourse 1B Savanna Club GolfCourse 19 South Bridge Marina & Storage 20 SpanishLakes 1 Golf Course 21 St.JamnesGofCourse kM rIn.

T F112rC, he 'asc. e s at St Luc 24 1 The Tesoro Club- The P Legend

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant College Marina

'~Golf 2 2,5, 10, 15 Mile Rings Area aQ Shadow Region CJ. RIa tsrigh,:

Figure E-7. Commuter Colleges, Marinas, and Golf Courses within the EPZ St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure E-8. Lodging Facilities within the EPZ St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-20 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Correctional Facilities within the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant EPZ

__/_A&__- 5 fl Correctional

,y 2,5, 10, IS Mile Rings Area 0t Shadow Region Corigrtrss, -- ~'pD-t

[ OH Figure E-9. Correctional Facilities within the EPZ St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant E-21 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX F Telephone Survey

F. TELEPHONE SURVEY F.1 Introduction The development of evacuation time estimates for the St. Lucie EPZ requires the identification of travel patterns, car ownership and household size of the population within the EPZ.

Demographic information can be obtained from Census data. The use of this data has several limitations when applied to emergency planning. First, the Census data do not encompass the range of information needed to identify the time required for preliminary activities (mobilization) that must be undertaken prior to evacuating the area. Secondly, Census data do not contain attitudinal responses needed from the population of the EPZ and consequently may not accurately represent the anticipated behavioral characteristics of the evacuating populace.

These concerns are addressed by conducting a telephone survey of a representative sample of the EPZ population. The survey is designed to elicit information from the public concerning family demographics and estimates of response times to well defined events. The design of the survey includes a limited number of questions of the form "What would you do if ...?" and other questions regarding activities with which the respondent is familiar ("How long does it take you to ...?")

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 19

F.2 Survey Instrument and Sampling Plan Attachment A presents the final survey instrument used in this study. A draft of the instrument was submitted to stakeholders for comment. Comments were received and the survey instrument was modified accordingly, prior to conducting the survey.

Following the completion of the instrument, a sampling plan was developed. A sample size of approximately 500 completed survey forms yields results with a sampling error of +/-4.4% at the 95% confidence level. The sample must be drawn from the EPZ population. Consequently, a list of zip codes in the EPZ was developed using GIS software. This list is shown in Table F-i. Along with each zip code, an estimate of the population and number of households in each area was determined by overlaying Census data and the EPZ boundary, again using GIS software. The proportional number of desired completed survey interviews for each area was identified, as shown in Table F-i. Note that the average household size computed in Table F-1 was an estimate for sampling purposes and was not used in the ETE study.

The completed survey adhered to the sampling plan.

Table F-1. St. Lucie Telephone Survey Sampling Plan 34945 260 104 34946 58 35 34947 11,888 4,690 21 34949 3,938 4,261 19 34950 15,617 7,204 32 34952 38,289 20,972 95 34953 18,652 7,236 32 34957 22,310 18,221 81 34981 4,283 1,833 8 34982 24,548 11,561 51 34983 38,432 15,779 70 34984 13,774 5,737 25 34986 16,077 8,114 36 34990 963 713 3 34994 4,449 2,648 12 34996 4,081 3,399 15 Total 217,6191 112,507 500 Average Household Size: 1.93 Total Sample Required: 500 1 The total EPZ population of 217,619 shown in Table F-1 differs slightly (0.04% lower) from the total shown in Table 3-1. The telephone survey sampling plan was developed early in the project based on GIS digitization of the EPZ boundary from a paper map. Later in the project, the EPZ boundary was refined, which resulted in some population differences along the EPZ boundary.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 10

F.3 Survey Results The results of the survey fall into two categories. First, the household demographics of the area can be identified. Demographic information includes such factors as household size, automobile ownership, and automobile availability. The distributions of the time to perform certain pre-evacuation activities are the second category of survey results. These data are processed to develop the trip generation distributions used in the evacuation modeling effort, as discussed in Section 5.

A review of the survey instrument reveals that several questions have a "don't know" (DK) or "refused" entry for a response. It is accepted practice in conducting surveys of this type to accept the answers of a respondent who offers a DK response for a few questions or who refuses to answer a few questions. To address the issue of occasional DK/refused responses from a large sample, the practice is to assume that the distribution of these responses is the same as the underlying distribution of the positive responses. in effect, the DK/refused responses are ignored and the distributions are based upon the positive data that is acquired.

F.3.1 Household Demographic Results Household Size Figure F-1 presents the distribution of household size within the EPZ. The average household contains 2.07 people. The estimated household size (1.93 persons) used to determine the survey sample (Table F-i) was drawn from Census data, 6.7% less than the survey result. This difference is greater than the aforementioned 4.4% sampling error.

As discussed in Section 3.3.1, there is a significant seasonal population on Hutchinson Island (zip codes 34949, 34957 and 34996). The seasonal homes in these zip codes are counted by the Census as households with no population. Thus, the number of households for these zip codes in Table F-1 is overstated. The vacant households in zip codes 34949, 34957 and 34996 were removed using GIS, resulting in 2,171, 12,930 and 2,083 households within each zip code, respectively. There are a total of 103,810 households in the EPZ when eliminating those vacant households. The average household size using Census data after eliminating vacant households is 2.10 (217,619 - 103,810), which is in good agreement (1.4% difference) with the 2.07 people per household based on the survey results. The good agreement between these estimates is an indication of the reliability of the telephone survey results.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 10

St. Lucie Household Size 60%

50%

"* 40%

,-c 0

30%

o6 20%

10%

0%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10+

Household Size Figure F-1. Household Size in the EPZ Automobile Ownership The average number of automobiles available per household in the EPZ is 1.66. It should be noted that approximately 1.6 percent of households do not have access to an automobile. The distribution of automobile ownership is presented in Figure F-2. Figure F-3 and Figure F-4 present the automobile availability by household size. Note that nearly all households that do not have access to a car are single person households. As expected, nearly all households of 2 or more people have access to at least one vehicle.

St. Lucie Vehicle Availability 50%

40%

0 20%

10%

0%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9+

Number of Vehicles Figure F-2. Household Vehicle Availability St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 10

Distribution of Vehicles by HH Size 1-5 Person Households M1 Person 2 People 0 3 People *4 People a 5 People 100%

80%

0 60% M x 40%

S20%

0% j 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9+

Vehicles Figure F-3. Vehicle Availability - 1 to 5 Person Households Distribution of Vehicles by HH Size 6-9+ Person Households u6People U 7People 038People *9+People 100%

80%

0 (U 60%

01O 40%

0 20%

1 6 7 8 9 1 0%

1 2 3 4 5 Vehicles 6 7 8 9 10 Figure F-4. Vehicle Availability - 6 to 9+ Person Households St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 10

Ridesharing 100% of the households surveyed who do not own a vehicle responded that they would share a ride with a neighbor, relative, or friend if a car was not available to them when advised to evacuate in the event of an emergency. Note, however, that only those households with no access to a vehicle - 8 total out of the sample size of 500 - answered this question. Thus, the results are not statistically significant. As such, the NRC recommendation of 50% ridesharing is used throughout this study. Figure F-5 presents this response.

St. Lucie Rideshare with Neighbor/Friend 100%

80%

0 w 60%

UA 0

=40%

0 20%

0%

Yes

.v_ No Figure F-5. Household Ridesharing Preference St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1)

Commuters Figure F-6 presents the distribution of the number of commuters in each household.

Commuters are defined as household members who travel to work or college on a daily basis.

The data shows an average of 0.62 commuters in each household in the EPZ, and 38% of households have at least one commuter.

St. Lucie Commuters 70%

60%

S50%

40%

M 30%

0 R 20%

10%

0%

0 1 2 3 4+

Number of Commuters Figure F-6. Commuters in Households in the EPZ St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 10

Commuter Travel Modes Figure F-7 presents the mode of travel that commuters use on a daily basis. The vast majority of commuters use their private automobiles to travel to work. The data shows an average of 1.07 employees per vehicle, assuming 2 people per vehicle - on average - for carpools.

Figure F-7. Modes of Travel in the EPZ F.3.2 Evacuation Response Several questions were asked to gauge the population's response to an emergency. These are now discussed:

"How many of the vehicles would your household use during an evacuation?"The response is shown in Figure F-8. On average, evacuating households would use 1.19 vehicles.

"Would your family await the return of otherfamily members priorto evacuating the area?"

Of the survey participants who responded, 51 percent said they would await the return of other family members before evacuating and 49 percent indicated that they would not await the return of other family members.

"Ifyou had a household pet, would you take your pet with you if you were asked to evacuate the area?" Based on the responses to the survey, 65 percent of households have a family pet.

Of the households with pets, 95 percent of them indicated that they would take their pets with them, as shown in Figure F-9.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 10

Vehicles Used for Evacuation 100%

80%

60%

c-OJ 40%

0 M

0 20%

0% 4-3 0 1 .2 3 4 Number of Vehicles Figure F-8. Number of Vehicles Used for Evacuation Households Evacuating with Pets 100%

80%

060%

x 40%

0 20%

0%

Yes No Figure F-9. Households Evacuating with Pets St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 10

"Emergency officials advise you to take shelter at home in a nuclear emergency. Would you?"

This question is designed to elicit information regarding compliance with instructions to shelter in place. The results indicate that 60 percent of households who are advised to shelter in place would do so; the remaining 40 percent would choose to evacuate the area. Note the baseline ETE study assumes 20 percent of households will not comply with the shelter advisory, as per Section 2.5.2 of NUREG/CR-7002. Thus, the data obtained through the survey is significantly higher than the federal guidance recommendation. A sensitivity study was conducted to estimate the impact of shadow evacuation (non-compliance of shelter advisory) on ETE - see Table M-2 in Appendix M.

"Emergency officials advise you to take shelter at home now in a nuclear emergency and possibly evacuate later while people in other areas of greater risk are advised to evacuate now. Would you?" This question is designed to elicit information specifically related to the possibility of a staged evacuation. That is, asking a population to shelter in place now and then to evacuate after a specified period of time. Results indicate that 65 percent of households would follow instructions and delay the start of evacuation until so advised, while the balance of 35 percent would choose to begin evacuating immediately.

F.3.3 Time Distribution Results The survey asked several questions about the amount of time it takes to perform certain pre-evacuation activities. These activities involve actions taken by residents during the course of their day-to-day lives. Thus, the answers fall within the realm of the responder's experience.

The mobilization distributions provided below are the result of having applied the analysis described in Section 5.4.1 on the component activities of the mobilization.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 10

"How long does it take the commuter to complete preparationfor leaving work?" Figure F-10 presents the cumulative distribution; in all cases, the activity is completed by 75 minutes.

Approximately 82 percent can leave within 15 minutes.

Time to Prepare to Leave Work 100%

80%

60%

E

' 40%

20%

0%

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Preparation Time (min)

Figure F-10. Time Required to Prepare to Leave Work/School "How long would it take the commuter to travel home?" Figure F-11 presents the work to home travel time for the EPZ. About 92 percent of commuters can arrive home within 45 minutes of leaving work; all within 120 minutes.

Work to Home Travel 100%

80%

60%

E 0

L 40%

20%

0%

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Travel Time (min)

Figure F-11. Work to Home Travel Time St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 10

"How long would it take the family to pack clothing, secure the house, and load the car?"

Figure F-12 presents the time required to prepare for leaving on an evacuation trip. In many ways this activity mimics a family's preparation for a short holiday or weekend away from home. Hence, the responses represent the experience of the responder in performing similar activities.

The distribution shown in Figure F-12 has a long "tail." About 92 percent of households can be ready to leave home within 180 minutes; the remaining households require up to an additional three hours.

Time to Prepare to Leave Home 100%

80%

0

= 60%

0

= 40%

0 20%

0%

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 Preparation Time (min)

Figure F-12. Time to Prepare Home for Evacuation F.4 Conclusions The telephone survey provides valuable, relevant data associated with the EPZ population, which have been used to quantify demographics specific to the EPZ, and "mobilization time" which can influence evacuation time estimates.

KLD Engineering, p.c.

St. Lucie Nuclear St. Lucie Power Plant Nuclear Power Plant F-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 10

ATTACHMENT A Telephone Survey Instrument St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 10

Telephone Survey Instrument Hello, my name is and I'm working in cooperation COL. 1 Unused with local emergency management agencies to identify local COL. 2 Unused behavior during emergency situations. This information will be COL. 3 Unused

.used for emergency planning and will be shared with local officials COL. 4 Unused to enhance emergency response plans in your area for all hazards; emergency planning for some hazards may require evacuation. COL. 5 Unused Your responses will greatly contribute to local emergency Sex COL. 8 preparedness. I will not ask for your name and the survey shall take 1 Male no more than 10 minutes to complete.

2 Female INTERVIEWER: ASK TO SPEAK TO THE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD OR THE SPOUSE OF THE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD.

(Terminate call if not a residence.)

DO NOT ASK:

1A. Record area code. To Be Determined COL. 9-11 lB. Record exchange number. To Be Determined COL. 12-14

2. What is your home zip code? COL. 15-19 3A. In total, how many running cars, or other running COL. 20 SKIP TO vehicles are usually available to the household? 1 ONE Q. 4 (DO NOT READ ANSWERS) 2 TWO Q. 4 3 THREE Q.4 4 FOUR Q. 4 5 FIVE Q. 4 6 SIX Q. 4 7 SEVEN Q.4 8 EIGHT Q. 4 9 NINE OR MORE Q. 4 0 ZERO (NONE) Q. 3B X DON'T KNOW/REFUSED Q. 3B 3B. In an emergency, could you get a ride out of the COL. 21 area with a neighbor or friend for a non- 1 YES hurricane related event? 2 NO X DON'T KNOW/REFUSED

4. How many people usually live in this household? COL. 22 COL. 23 (DO NOT READ ANSWERS) 1 ONE 0 TEN 2 TWO 1 ELEVEN 3 THREE 2 TWELVE 4 FOUR 3 THIRTEEN 5 FIVE 4 FOURTEEN 6 SIX 5 FIFTEEN St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-14 KILD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

7 SEVEN 6 SIXTEEN 8 EIGHT 7 SEVENTEEN 9 NINE 8 EIGHTEEN 9 NINETEEN OR MORE X DON'T KNOW/REFUSED

5. How many adults in the household commute to a COL. 24 SKIP TO job, or to college on a daily basis? 0 ZERO Q. 9 1 ONE Q. 6 2 TWO Q.6 3 THREE Q.6 4 FOUR OR MORE Q. 6 5 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED Q. 9 INTERVIEWER: For each person identified in Question 5, ask Questions 6, 7, and 8.

6. Thinking about commuter #1, how does that person usually travel to work or college? (REPEAT QUESTION FOR EACH COMMUTER)

Commuter #1 Commuter #2 Commuter #3 Commuter #4 COL. 25 COL. 26 COL. 27 COL. 28 Rail 1 1 1 1 Bus 2 2 2 2 Walk/Bicycle 3 3 3 3 Drive Alone 4 4 4 4 Carpool-2 or more people 5 5 5 5 Don't know/Refused 6 6 6 6

7. How much time on average, would it take Commuter #1 to travel home from work or college? (REPEAT QUESTION FOR EACH COMMUTER) (DO NOT READ ANSWERS)

COMMUTER4#1 COMMUTER #2 COL. 29 COL. 30 COL. 31 COL. 32 1 5 MINUTES OR LESS 1 46-50 MINUTES 1 5 MINUTES OR LESS 1 46-50 MINUTES 2 6-10 MINUTES 2 51-55 MINUTES 2 6-10 MINUTES 2 51-55 MINUTES 3 11-15 MINUTES 3 56- 1 HOUR 3 11-15 MINUTES 3 56- 1 HOUR OVER 1 HOUR, BUT OVER 1 HOUR, BUT, 4 16-20 MINUTES 4 LESS THAN 1 HOUR 15 4 16-20 MINUTES 4 LESS THAN 1 HOUR MINUTES 15 MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 16 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 16 5 21-25 MINUTES 5 MINUTES AND I HOUR 5 21-25 MINUTES 5 MINUTES AND 1 30 MINUTES HOUR 30 MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 31 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 31 6 26-30 MINUTES 6 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 6 26-30 MINUTES 6 MINUTES AND 1 45 MINUTES HOUR 45 MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 46 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 46 7 31-35 MINUTES 7 MINUTES AND 2 7 31-35 MINUTES 7 MINUTES AND 2 HOURS HOURS "OVER 2 HOURS OVER 2 HOURS 8 36-40 MINUTES 8 8 36-40 MINUTES 8 (SEC 2 _HUR (SPECIFY _ ) (SPECIFY_)

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-1S KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

9 41-45 MINUTES 9 9 41-45 MINUTES 9 0 0 DON'T KNOW DON'T KNOW

/REFUSED

/REFUSED COMMUTER #3 COMMUTER #4 COL. 33 COL. 34 COL. 35 COL. 36 1 5 MINUTES OR LESS 1 46-50 MINUTES 1 5 MINUTES OR LESS 1 46-50 MINUTES 2 6-10 MINUTES 2 51-55 MINUTES 2 6-10 MINUTES 2 51-55 MINUTES 3 11-15 MINUTES 3 56 -1 HOUR 3 11-15 MINUTES 3 56- 1 HOUR OVER 1 HOUR, BUT OVER 1 HOUR, BUT 4 16-20 MINUTES 4 LESS THAN 1 HOUR 15 4 16-20 MINUTES 4 LESS THAN 1 HOUR MINUTES 15 MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 16 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 16 5 21-25 MINUTES 5 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 5 21-25 MINUTES 5 MINUTES AND 1 30 MINUTES HOUR 30 MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 31 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 31 6 26-30 MINUTES 6 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 6 26-30 MINUTES 6 MINUTES AND 1 45 MINUTES HOUR 45 MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 46 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 46 7 31-35 MINUTES 7 MINUTES AND 2 7 31-35 MINUTES 7 MINUTES AND 2 HOURS HOURS OVER 2 HOURS OVER 2 HOURS 8 36-40 MINUTES 8 36-40 MINUTES (SPECIFY ___ (SPECIFY __ .)

9 41-45 MINUTES 9 9 41-45 MINUTES 9 0 0 DON'T KNOW DON'T KNOW

/REFUSED /REFUSED

8. Approximately how much time does it take Commuter #1 to complete preparation for leaving work or college prior to starting the trip home? (REPEAT QUESTION FOR EACH COMMUTER) (DO NOT READ ANSWERS)

COMMUTER #1 COMMUTER #2 COL. 37 COL. 38 COL. 39 COL. 40 1 5MINUTESORLESS 1 46-50 MINUTES 1 5 MINUTES OR LESS 1 46-50 MINUTES 2 6-10 MINUTES 2 51-55 MINUTES 2 6-10 MINUTES 2 51-55 MINUTES 3 11-15 MINUTES 3 56 - 1 HOUR 3 11-15 MINUTES 3 56 - 1 HOUR OVER 1 HOUR, BUT OVER 1 HOUR, BUT 4 16-20 MINUTES 4 LESS THAN 1 HOUR 15 4 16-20 MINUTES 4 LESSTHAN 1 HOUR MINUTES 15 MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 16 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 16 5 21-25 MINUTES 5 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 5 21-25 MINUTES 5 MINUTES AND I 30 MINUTES HOUR 30 MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 31 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 31 6 26-30 MINUTES 6 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 6 26-30 MINUTES 6 MINUTES AND 1 45 MINUTES HOUR 45 MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 46 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 46 7 31-35 MINUTES 7 MINUTES AND 2 7 31-35 MINUTES 7 MINUTES AND 2 HOURS HOURS St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

OVER 2 HOURS OVER 2 HOURS 8 36-40 MINUTES (SPECIFY __ .) 8 36-40 MINUTES (SPECIFY __ .)

9 41-45 MINUTES 9 9 41-45 MINUTES 9*

0 0 X DON'T KNOW /REFUSED X DON'T KNOW /REFUSED COMMUTER #3 COMMUTER #4 COL. 41 COL. 42 COL. 43 COL. 44 1 5 MINUTES OR LESS 1 46-50 MINUTES 1 5 MINUTES OR LESS 1 46-50 MINUTES 2 6-10 MINUTES 2 51-55 MINUTES 2 6-10 MINUTES 2 51-55 MINUTES 3 11-15 MINUTES 3 56 -1 HOUR 3 11-15 MINUTES 3 56- 1 HOUR OVER 1 HOUR, BUT OVER 1 HOUR, BUT LESS 4 16-20 MINUTES 4 LESS THAN 1 HOUR 15 4 16-20 MINUTES THAN 1 HOUR 15 MINUTES MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 16 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 16 5 21-25 MINUTES 5 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 5 21-25 MINUTES 5 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 30 30 MINUTES MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 31 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 31 6 26-30 MINUTES 6 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 6 26-30 MINUTES 6 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 45 45 MINUTES MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 46 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 46 7 31-35 MINUTES 7 MINUTES AND 2 7 31-35 MINUTES MINUTES AND 2 HOURS HOURS OVER 2 HOURS OVER 2 HOURS (SPECIFY 8 36-40 MINUTES 8 36-40 MINUTES 8 (SPECIFY __ .) DON'TKNOW/REFU__SE) 9 41-45 MINUTES 9 9 41-45 MINUTES 9 0 0 DON'T KNOW /REFUSED X DON'T KNOW /REFUSED x

9. If you were advised by local authorities to evacuate, for a non-hurricane related event, how much time would it take the household to pack clothing, medications, secure the house, load the car, and complete preparations prior to evacuating the area? (DO NOT READ ANSWERS)

COL. 45 COL. 46 1 LESS THAN 15 MINUTES 1 3 HOURS TO 3 HOURS 15 MINUTES 2 15-30 MINUTES 2 3 HOURS 16 MINUTES TO 3 HOURS 30 MINUTES 3 31-45 MINUTES 3 3 HOURS 31 MINUTES TO 3 HOURS 45 MINUTES 4 46 MINUTES- 1 HOUR 4 3 HOURS 46 MINUTES TO 4 HOURS 5 1 HOUR TO 1 HOUR 15 MINUTES 5 4 HOURS TO 4 HOURS 15 MINUTES 6 1 HOUR 16 MINUTES TO 1 HOUR 30 MINUTES 6 4 HOURS 16 MINUTES TO 4 HOURS 30 MINUTES 7 1 HOUR 31 MINUTES TO 1 HOUR 45 MINUTES 7 4 HOURS 31 MINUTES TO 4 HOURS 45 MINUTES 8 1 HOUR 46 MINUTES TO 2 HOURS 8 4 HOURS 46 MINUTES TO 5 HOURS 9 2 HOURS TO 2 HOURS 15 MINUTES 9 5 HOURS TO 5 HOURS 30 MINUTES 0 2 HOURS 16 MINUTES TO 2 HOURS 30 MINUTES 0 5 HOURS 31 MINUTES TO 6 HOURS x 2 HOURS 31 MINUTES TO 2 HOURS 45 MINUTES x OVER 6 HOURS (SPECIFY__ )

Y 2 HOURS 46 MINUTES TO 3 HOURS COL. 47 1 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

10. Please choose one of the following (READ COL. 50 ANSWERS): 1 A If you were at home and were asked to evacuate, 2 B A. I would await the return of household commuters to evacuate together.

B. I would evacuate independently and meet X DON'T KNOW/REFUSED other household members later.

11. How many vehicles would your household use during an evacuation? (DO NOT READ ANSWERS)

COL. 51 1 ONE 2 TWO 3 THREE 4 FOUR 5 FIVE 6 SIX 7 SEVEN 8 EIGHT 9 NINE OR MORE 0 ZERO (NONE)

X DON'T KNOW/REFUSED

12. If you have a household pet, would you take your pet with you if you were asked to evacuate the area?

(READ ANSWERS)

COL. 54 1 DON'T HAVE A PET 2 YES 3 NO X DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 13A. Emergency officials advise you to take shelter at home in a COL. 52 nuclear emergency. Would you: (READ ANSWERS) 1 A A. SHELTER; or 2 B B. EVACUATE X DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 13B. Emergency officials advise you to take shelter at home now in a COL. 53 nuclear emergency and possibly evacuate later while people in 1 A areas of greater risk are advised to evacuate now. Would you: 2 B (READ ANSWERS)

X DON'T KNOW/REFUSED A. SHELTER; or B. EVACUATE St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-18 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Thank you very much.

(TELEPHONE NUMBER CALLED)

IF REQUESTED:

For additional information, contact your County Emergency Management Agency during normal business hours.

County EMA Phone St. Lucie County 772-462-8100 Martin County 772-287-1652 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant F-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX G Traffic Management Plan

G. TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN NUREG/CR-7002 indicates that the existing TCPs and ACPs identified by the offsite agencies should be used in the evacuation simulation modeling. The traffic and access control plans for the EPZ were provided by each county. These plans were reviewed and the TCPs and ACPs were modeled accordingly.

G.1 Traffic Control Points As discussed in Section 9, traffic control points at intersections (which are controlled) are modeled as actuated signals. If an intersection has a pre-timed signal, stop, or yield control, and the intersection is identified as a traffic control point, the control type was changed to an actuated signal in the DYNEV Ii system. Table K-2 provides the control type and node number for those nodes which are controlled. If the existing control was changed due to the point being a Traffic Control Point, the control type is indicated as "TCP" in Table K-2.

As discussed in Section 9, there is significant traffic congestion in competing directions (east-west and north-south) at intersections within the population centers of the EPZ and Shadow Region. Assigning police officers to perform traffic control at these intersections will have no benefit due to the heavy congestion along competing approaches. The main thoroughfare on Interstate 95 is operating at LOS F for most of the evacuation, as shown in Figures 7-3 through 7-8. Positioning police officers at ramps to facilitate access to the interstate would have minimal benefit as the main thoroughfare is already heavily congested.

Figure G-1 maps the TCPs identified in the state and local emergency plans. These TCPS are concentrated along US Highway 1 and on the westbound routes which provide access to the turnpike and to the interstate. These TCPs would be manned during evacuation by traffic guides who would direct evacuees in the proper direction and facilitate the flow of traffic through the intersections.

G.2 Access Control Points Based on discussions with the offsite agencies, ACPs will be established within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months of the advisory to evacuate to discourage through travelers from using major through routes which traverse the EPZ. As discussed in Section 3.6, external traffic was only considered on three routes which traverse the EPZ - Interstate 95, the Florida Turnpike, and US 1- in this analysis.

The generation of these external trips ceased at 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months after the advisory to evacuate in the simulation.

As discussed in Section 9, no additional TCPs or ACPs are deemed necessary as a result of this study.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant G-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure G-1. Traffic Control Points within the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant EPZ St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant G-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX H Evacuation Regions

H EVACUATION REGIONS This appendix presents the evacuation percentages for each Evacuation Region (Table H-i) and maps of all Evacuation Regions. The percentages presented in Table H-1 are based on the methodology discussed in assumption 5 of Section 2.2 and shown in Figure 2-1.

Note the baseline ETE study assumes 20 percent of households will not comply with the shelter advisory, as per Section 2.5.2 of NUREG/CR-7002.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant H-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table H-1. Percent of Protective Action Area Population Evacuating for Each Region Area Region Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 71 8 R01 2-Mile Region 0#X 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%%

R02 5-Mile Region l

20% 20% 20% 10% 0 R03 Full EPZ 0 00 1O i00, % ~ 0 0 Evacuate 2-Mile Region and Downwind to 5 Miles Wind Direction Area Region Towards: 1 1 2 3 4 15 6 17 8 N, NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE, Refer to Region R01 N/A SE R04 SSE, S, SSW 20% 20% 1 20% 1 206% 110%fk - I N/A SW, WSW, W Refer to Region R02 ROS WNW, NW, NNW 104W 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% 1 Evacuate 5-Mile Region and Downwind to the EPZ Boundary Wind Direction Area Region Towards: 1 2 3 14 5 16 7 8 R06 N __ _ - j 20% 120% 1 0 N/A NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE Refer to Region R02 N/A SE, SSE 2 Refer to Region R04 R07 s, SSW 10 20% o i 20% i0(' lOO1o -MiiORD ROB SW, WSW 0 20%

_001 N/A W Refer to Region R03 R09 WNW, NW, NNW lt100` 0%ý 2o0% * *0 Staged Evacuation Mile Radius Evacuates, then Evacuate Downwind to 5 Miles Wind Direction Area Region Towards:. 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 R10 5-Mile Radius - - 20% 20% 20% . 10%1 N, NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE, Refer to Region R01 N/A SE R1 SSE, S, SSW 20%1 20 20 20 % 1 20% r1-Q% rQ'l 0*

N/A SW, WSW, W Refer to Region R10 20% ] 20%

Area(s) Shelter-in-Place 1Although Area 7 is not within 5 miles of the plant, it is evacuated for regions involving the 5-mile radius and for regions wherein the 2-mile radius is evacuated and downwind to the south southeast through the west to 5 miles.

2 Site specific protective action recommendations indicate that only Areas 1, 6, 7, & 8 evacuate for regions wherein the 5-mile radius is evacuated and downwind to the southeast and south southeast to the EPZ boundary.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant H-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H-1. Region R01 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant H-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H-2. Region R02 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant H-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Miles Figure H-3. Region R03 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant H-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H-4. Region R04 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant H-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H-5. Region R05 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant H-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H-6. Region R06 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant H-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H-7. Region R07 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant H-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H-8. Region R08 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant H-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

ý miles I I I Figure H-9. Region R09 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant H-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Miles II Figure H-1O. Region RIO St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant H-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Miles Figure H-11. Region R11 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant H-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MIIe~

Figure H-12. Region R1Z KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant H-14 H-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX J Representative Inputs to and Outputs from the DYNEV II System

J. REPRESENTATIVE INPUTS TO AND OUTPUTS FROM THE DYNEV II SYSTEM This appendix presents data input to and output from the DYNEV II System. Table J-1 provides the volume and queues for the ten highest volume signalized intersections in the study area.

Refer to Table K-2 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each intersection.

Table J-2 provides source (vehicle loading) and destination information for several roadway segments (links) in the analysis network. Refer to Table K-1 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each link.

Table J-3 provides network-wide statistics (average travel time, average speed and number of vehicles) for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) for each scenario. As expected, Scenarios 2 and 7, which are rain scenarios, exhibit the slowest average speed and longest average travel times. Scenario 11 (special event) has a slower average speed than the comparable Scenario 6 due to the additional transients present for the special event. Scenario 12 (roadway closure) has a slower average speed than the comparable Scenario 1 due to the reduced capacity on 1-95 southbound.

Table J-4 provides statistics (average speed and travel time) for the major evacuation routes - I-95, US 1, and the Florida Turnpike - for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) under Scenario 1 conditions. As discussed in Section 7.3 and shown in Figures 7-3 through 7-8, 1-95 and US 1 are congested for most of the evacuation. As such, the average speeds are comparably slower (and travel times longer) than the Florida Turnpike which is underutilized due to the limited number of access ramps within the study area. US 1 and 1-95 NB are the last two routes to clear and they have the slowest average speeds throughout the evacuation.

Table J-5 provides the number of vehicles discharged and the cumulative percent of total vehicles discharged for each link exiting the analysis network, for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) under Scenario 1 conditions. Refer to Table K-1 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each link. Link 95 (1-95 northbound), Link 188 (I-95 southbound), Link 341 (US 1 southbound), and Link 352 (US 1 northbound) service 61% of the evacuating vehicles.

Figure J-1 through Figure J-12 plot the trip generation time versus the ETE for each of the 12 Scenarios considered. The distance between the trip generation and ETE curves is the travel time. Plots of trip generation versus ETE are indicative of the level of traffic congestion during evacuation. For low population density sites, the curves are close together, indicating short travel times and minimal traffic congestion. For higher population density sites, the curves are farther apart indicating longer travel times and the presence of traffic congestion. As seen in Figure J-1 through Figure J-12, the curves are spatially separated as a result of the traffic congestion in the EPZ, which was discussed in detail in Section 7.3.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant J-I KLD Engineering.I P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table J-1. Characteristics of the Ten Highest Volume Signalized Intersections S SMax.

932 22,081 521 US 1 and SE Indian 933 3,595 0 230St Actuated 1096 3,969 117 TOTAL 29,645 570 25,329 1,168 231 2,351 0 US land SE Cove Rd Actuated 1

567 1,937 32 TOTAL 29,617 -

538 21,203 381 229 4,076 0 228 US 1 and CR 714 Actuated 241 0 0 522 4,125 71 TOTAL 29,404 -

558 24,273 1,241 1 2,424 0 570 US 1 and Salerno Rd Actuated 972 57 0 571 1,897 77 TOTAL 28,651 -

1 26,106 1,124 1152 2,347 0 US 1 and Lillian Ct Actuated 231 1139 0 0 TOTAL 28,453 -

933 23,887 626 558 US 1 and Pomeroy Actuated 570 3,500 0 St 557 132 0 TOTAL 27,519 -

230 23,880 692 US 1 and SE Fischer 558 3,582 0 St3 Acuated St 1099 0 0 TOTAL 27,462 -

225 20,058 400 930 4,215 0 US 1 and SR 76 Actuated 226 947 2,854 28 TOTAL 27,127 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant J-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

'S. Max.

Aproc Toal 'Tr Inerecio S (P Voum - u 249 15,487 1903 SR 716, Bayshore 359 6,566 2104 252 Blvd and Florida Actuated Turnpike On Ramp 254 [ 3,954 1 99 TOTAL 26,007 230 3,898 0 US 1 and SE Actuated 229 22,056 412 Luckhardt St 1095 29 0 TOTAL 25,983 -

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant J-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table J-2. Sample Simulation Model Input

- 6 - . .9 .

6. 6 - - - .6 2 39 S 8140 3,800 8004 3,800 447 118 NW 8001 4,500 8879 1,700 8375 1,700 657 285 NW 8879 1,700 8000 4,500 8569 1,700 832 23 S 8231 5,700 8140 3,800 1027 23 W 8000 4,500 1137 18 SW 8068 4,500 8047 6,750 1475 369 SW 8020 1,700 8676 1,700 8195 3,800 1712 190 SW 8134 1,700 8622 1,700 8047 6,750 509 352 SW 8068 4,500 8020 1,700 8375 1,700 1219 127 NW 8879 1,700 8000 4,500 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant J-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table J-3. Selected Model Outputs for the Evacuation of the Entire EPZ (Region R03)

-r - - - - -- - -1 1-Network-Wide Average 5.5 6.5 4.8 5.8 4.8 5.7 6.7 4.9 5.8 4.7 5.9 5.9 Travel Time (Min/Veh-Mi)

Network-Wide Average 10.9 9.3 12.5 10.4 12.6 10.5 9.0 12.2 10.3 12.8 10.3 10.3 Speed (mph)

Total Vehicles 191,667 191,873 174,650 174,805 160,089 197,695 197,743 177,206 177,085 161,423 202,466 192,775 Exiting Network St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant J-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table J-4. Average Speed (mph) and Travel Time (min) for Major Evacuation Routes (Region R03, Scenario 1)

US 1 Northbound 32.1 18.1 106.3 6.3 304.3 4.0 478.1 5.0 385.4 US 1 Southbound 32.1 11.0 174.3 4.4 435.7 4.1 464.7 10.5 183.8 Florida Turnpike Northbound 28.7 71.4 24.1 72.3 23.8 72.4 23.8 72.4 23.8 Florida Turnpike Southbound 28.7 67.4 25.5 71.7 24.0 72.1 23.9 72.2 23.8 1-95 Northbound 38.3 42.7 53.7 22.5 102.2 17.4 131.6 15.0 152.9 1-95 Southbound 38.2 55.6 41.3 38.5 59.6 36.0 63.7 US 1 Northbound321 66 294 81 267 1. 162 457 21 US 1 Southbound 32.1 23.1 83.2 37.1 51.8 36.9 52.1 45.7 42.1 Florida Turnpike Northbound 28.7 72.4 23.8 67.6 25.4 72.3 23.8 72.4 23.8 Florida Turnpike Southbound 28.7 72.3 23.8 68.2 25.2 72.2 23.9 72.3 23.8 1-95 Northbound 38.3 10.9 210.8 16.1 142.6 24.0 95.5 60.9 37.7 1-95 Southbound 38.2 36.8 62.3 36.8 62.3 70.3 32.6 71.0 32.3 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant J-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table J-5. Simulation Model Outputs at Network Exit Links for Region R03, Scenario I Cumulative Vehicles Discharged by the Indicated Time Cumulative Percent of Vehicles Discharged by the Indicated Time 283 814 1,563 2,615 3,685 4,693 5,330 5,617 5 3%

1%/ 1% 2% 2% 3% 1 3% 3%

30 328 672 1,197 1,807 2,518 3,208 3,524 3,528 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%

4,036 8,356 12,638 16,861 21,113 25,411 29,678 33,923 16% 14% 14% 14% 14% 15% 16% 18%

10,108 16,032 21,984 28,349 34,206 36,915 36,944 188 4,166 17% 17% 18% 19% 19% 20% 20% 19%

7,084 9,979 12,608 15,018 17,075 17,652 17,659 190 3,161 13% 12% 11% 11% 10% 10% 10% 9%

4,987 6,238 7,366 8,553 9,193 9,272 9,273 229 2,743 11% 8% 7% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5%

3,309 5,127 7,143 9,129 9,880 10,031 10,033 267 1,375 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 5% 5%

286 527 1,930 3,508 4,939 6,156 7,291 7,941 7,953 2% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%

7,995 12,644 17,288 22,034 25,638 26,095 26,107 341 3,281 13% 14% 14% 15% 15% 15% 14% 14%

5,140 7,171 9,690 12,217 14,689 16,953 18,736 352 2,249 9% 9% 8% 8% 8% 9% 9% 10%

391 377 985 1,286 1,499 1,791 2,140 2,587 3,053 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2%

761 800 3,309 4,920 6,009 6,520 6,744 6,865 6,868 3% 6% 6% 5% 4% 4% 4% 4%

811 361 656 952 1,233 1,394 1,442 1,457 1,457 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%

883 26 56 65 67 68 68 68 68 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

889 112 376 683 772 800 804 807 807

.0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0%

292 630 1,220 1,682 1,857 1,890 1,914 1,914 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%

955 640 2,102 3,414 4,530

____ 5,511 6,445 6,918 6,932 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%

29 212 326 370 393 406 417 417 1514 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant J-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 1)

-Trip Generation -ETE 100%

80%

60%

0 0 40%

20%

0% 480 360 420 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J-1. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 1)

ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2)

-Trip Generation mETE 100%

_T U 80%

E

'M 60%

5 40%

C 20%

0%

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J-2. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2)

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant J-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 3)

-Trip Generation - ETE 100%

80%

60%

0

" 40%

20%

0%

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J-3. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 3)

ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4)

-Trip Generation -ETE 100%

A) 80%

o 60%

0 I--

" 40%

U 20%

0%

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J-4. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4)

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant J-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 5)

- Trip Generation - ETE 100%

.2 80%

60%

0 t 40%

20%

0%

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J-5. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 5)

ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 6)

- Trip Generation - ETE 100%

-4 80%

0J 0%

"6U 4o%

60%

20% ' '

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J-6. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 6)

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant J-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7)

-Trip Generation = ETE 100%

80%

i 60%

0 0 40%

20%

0%

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J-7. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7)

ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 8)

- Trip Generation m ETE 100%

U 80%

2 60%

0 40%

C U 20%

a) 0%

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J-8. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 8)

KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant J-11 i-li KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 9)

- Trip Generation m ETE 100%

4)

-' 80%

60%

0 t 40%

20%

0%

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J-9. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 9)

ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 10)

-Trip Generation -ETE 100%

_J

80%

o 60%

0 40%

U 20%

0%

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J-10. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 10)

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant J-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good, Special Event (Scenario 11)

-Trip Generation mETE 100%

-* 80%

60%

0

40%

4-20%

0%,,, ,

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J-11. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather, Special Event (Scenario 11)

ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good, Roadway Impact (Scenario 12)

-Trip Generation mETE 100%

(U

-o 80%

60%

0 I-

" 40%

20%

0%

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J-12. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather, Roadway Impact (Scenario 12)

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant J-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX K Evacuation Roadway Network

K. EVACUATION ROADWAY NETWORK As discussed in Section 1.3, a link-node analysis network was constructed to model the roadway network within the study area. Figure K-1 provides an overview of the link-node analysis network. The figure has been divided up into 58 more detailed figures (Figure K-2 through Figure K-41) which show each of the links and nodes in the network.

The analysis network was calibrated using the observations made during the field survey conducted in January 2012. Table K-1 lists the characteristics of each roadway section modeled in the ETE analysis. Each link is identified by its road name and the upstream and downstream node numbers. The geographic location of each link can be observed by referencing the grid' map number provided in Table K-1. The roadway type identified in Table K-1 is generally based on the following criteria:

" Freeway: limited access highway, 2 or more lanes in each direction, high free flow speeds

" Freeway Ramp: ramp on to or off of a limited access highway

Major arterial: 3 or more lanes in each direction

" Minor arterial: 2 or more lanes in each direction

" Collector: single lane in each direction

Local roadways: single lane in each direction, local roads with low free flow speeds The term, "No. of Lanes" in Table K-1 identifies the number of lanes that extend throughout the length of the link. Many links have additional lanes on the immediate approach to an intersection (turn pockets); these have been recorded and entered into the input stream for the DYNEV II System.

As discussed in Section 1.3, lane width and shoulder width were not physically measured during the road survey. Rather, estimates of these measures were based on visual observations and recorded images.

Table K-2 identifies each node in the network that is controlled and the type of control (stop sign, yield sign, pre-timed signal, actuated signal, traffic control point) at that node.

Uncontrolled nodes are not included in Table K-2. The location of each node can be observed by referencing the grid map number provided.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K-1. Link-Node Analysis Network St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K-2. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 1 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie j Shadow Region o Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-1ý. Link , Water 0 Area L_-- Index Grid Figure K-3. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 2 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

~tic am 65T-l~iles St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures St. Lucie j Shadow Region o Node 2.5, 10, 15 Mile Rings Link

Water Grid 3 0 Area *_- Index Grid o 0.5 1 Figure K-4. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 3 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

140 d

4 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures Grid 4 0 0.5 1

==Miles ~ o Figure K-5. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 4 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

-, Grid 5 S

0.5 1 Miles Figure K-6. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 5 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

I __ - i-St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures A St. Lucie L Shadow Region o Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

'* ° Grid 6

-*I Link Water W

0 0.5 0 Area E Index Grid 1

Miles -e el Figure K-7. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 6 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Legend

St. Lucie Shadow Region o Node 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-I*' Link Water C Area Index Grid Figure K-8. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 7 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

Legend St. Lucie L7j Shadow Region e Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-0., Link <t> Water Area = Index Grid Figure K-9. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 8 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures St. Lucie L Shadow Region e Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-0*, Link Wý>

water 0 Area =_] Index Grid n 0.25 0.s Figure K-10. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 9 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-1I KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

i St. Lucie [§ Shadow Region o Node 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-*. Link ,3 Water c5 Area --.] Index Grid Figure K-11. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 10 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

'*" Grid 11 0 0.25 0.5 Miles Figure K-12. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 11 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1167 72 726 1166 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie U-Shadow Region

-I.-

o Node Link *

' 2, S, 10, 15 Mile Rings Water 0 0.25 0 5Mles Grd1 2 Area -- Index Grid Figure K-13. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 12 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

',er __

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures St. Lucie L Shadow Region o Node ' 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings Grid 13

-lý. Link $ Water

ý? Area l Index Grid o 0.25 0.

Figure K-14. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 13 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

~lediae~

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie L Shadow Region o Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings Grid 14

-1,. Link :i Water 0 Area [.] Index Grid Mies Figure K-15. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 14 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

~readi1

/

7

/

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures St. Lucie Lj Shadow Region o Node -2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

)-° Grid 15

-ý-, Link ;2> Water I] Area = Index Grid 0 0.25 0.

Figure K-16. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 15 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Legend St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie ] Shadow Region o Node ' 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-1*- Link *$ Water 0-% Grid 16 a o5 s CJ Area [7. Index Grid Figure K-17. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 16 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-18 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

I, I

I St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie 3 Shadow Region o Node " 2, 5. 10. 15 Mile Rings Grid 17 Link Water W

I Area [j Index Grid 0 0.25 0.s Figure K-18. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 17 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

18(S Legend St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie j Shadow Region o Node 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings "*)-"Grid 18

-I., Link $ Water 0 Area [ Index Grid S 0.25 .s M Ins Figure K-19. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 18 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-20 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

X 1 i/ !/7/yi /' i//'l/ II [ C-

// ,,,, '/</ -/~//'ivo /- 80 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie L Shadow Region o Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings Grid 19

-No, Link j Water 9 Area 7 Index Grid 0 0.25 0.

Miles Figure K-20. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 19 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-21 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1132 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie L/2 Shadow Region o Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-I-, Link ., Water Grid 20 IV Area L. Index Grid 0 0.25 0.5 Figure K-21. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 20 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-22 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Legend St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie [ Shadow Region o Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-Do* Link 3 Water Grid 21 0 Area L Index Grid 0 0.25 0.5 Mies Figure K-22. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 21 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-23 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

/:

/

.__.,Ar~ea.2 .... - --

/

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation IlLegend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

r St. Lucie L Shadow Region o Node ' 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings 0-*Grid 22

-0. Link Water W,

1 o 0.25 0.5 Area - Index Grid Figure K-23. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 22 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-24 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie Shadow Region o Node 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-1, Link Water W3 Grid 23 0 0.25 0.s 0j Area E-1 Index Grid miles Figure K-24. Link-Node Analysis Network- Grid 23 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-25 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1301

/

I I.

K.

.1 (ii (053 1303 Grid 2'4' St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures Grid 24 0.25 0.5 Figure K-25. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 24 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-26 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

N 11 Otatic cean 9i0 Uid B2 0 I

I:

/

-Rieer St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie K Shadow Region o Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-Pý. Link , Water 0Grid 25

x. xllie 0 Area [- Index Grid Figure K-26. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 25 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-27 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

"/,,//, /' ,

7/7' 7'

/ . / */7, / / ,</

-/7 77<j St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures Grid 26 0 0.5 1 Miles Figure K-27. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 26 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-28 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie Shadow Region S

o Node - 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-0*, Link 53 Water Grd27 0 0.25 0.

0 Area [.. Index Grid Miles Figure K-28. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 27 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-29 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie L Shadow Region o Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mite Rings

-0* Link Water W

0 0.25 0,5 05 Area Index Grid Mie k ,*c* *,o Figure K-29. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 28 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-30 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie / Shadow Region o Node " 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings Grid 29

-0. Link *5 Water 0 0.25 0.5 0! Area [ Index Grid Miles Figure K-30. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 29 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-31 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Legend St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

" St. Lucie j Shadow Region o Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

"* ° Grid 30

-0* Link 3 Water 0 Area E:Iindex Grid 0 0.25 05 Mies Figure K-31. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 30 KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-32 K-32 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Rev. 1 Evacuation Time Estimate

Legend

St. Lucie [ Shbdow Region o Node ' 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-1,, Link

Water iJ Area [ Index Grid Figure K-32. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 31 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-33 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures Grid 32 0 0.25 0.5 Figure K-33. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 32 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-34 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie 1, Shadow Region o Node - 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings Grid 33

-I'- Link 5 Water 0 0.25 05 Area [i Index Grid Miles Figure K-34. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 33 K-35 KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-35 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

" St. Lucie / Shadow Region o Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-*. Link , Water Grid 34 a 0.25 0.5 0 Area [7.l Index Grid Figure K-35. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 34 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-36 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

/

N.

- T5 Legend St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

'i St. Lucie L/ Shadow Region o Node ' 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-m. Link .$ Water s Grid 35

o. tMle 0 Area iII] Index Grid Figure K-36. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 35 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-37 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

.,'i

-');

7/.,

....',/ // I "I/ -,/7

. /, .'.//7

/7, .,,;-;.:,

7:

f// /xt

, /',, /7/7, 7;;

" /.-77 ;f'77'<:

777,.; /;- .;

7,.'

4' %.2*.-i

'.7'~>

/

T.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

)+/- St. Lucie Shadow Region G Node 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings Grid 36

-I. Link Water Area [_1 Index Grid 0 0.25 0.5 Miles Figure K-37. Link-Node Analysis Network- Grid 36 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-38 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K-38. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 37 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-39 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures St. Lucie [7§ Shadow Region o Node ' 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings Grid 38

-li* Link .5 Water 0 0.25 0.5 0 Area [_2 Index Grid MHes Figure K-39. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 38 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-40 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

- ,//j//,,7~7 //

/7

/ / /

/ '7 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation ILegend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie [ Shadow Region o Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-1i. Link , Water 0"Grid 39 0 0.25 05Mie 0 Area [ _7Index Grid Figure K-40. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 39 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-41 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1272 Grid 40 678 Legend

St. Lucie L Shadow Region e Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-lp, Link 3 Water 0 Area [. Index Grid Figure K-41. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 40 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-42 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Area 5

St. Lucie : Shadow Region o Node ' 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-I.- Link . Water (0 Area l Index Grid Figure K-42. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 41 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-43 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

V//

Legend

St. Lucie ] Shadow Region o Node ' 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-l. Link

Water C Area j Index Grid Figure K-43. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 42 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-44 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

7/., 7/,-

Legend St. Lucie L Shadow Region o Node ' 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-0ý, Link 3 Water 0 Area l--i Index Grid Figure K-44. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 43 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-45 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Area 7 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures Grid 44 0 0.25 0.5 Figure K-45. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 44 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-46 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures Grid 45 0 0.25 0.5 IMiles Figure K-46. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 45 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-47 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Legend St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie Shadow Region o Node 2, 5. i0, 15 Mile Rings "-* Grid 46

, Link Sf Water CL Area Index Grid I-- 0 0.25 0.5 Mires Figure K-47. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 46 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-48 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

</77 f//.// - // ,* . o n*BA'tn,,.

Legend St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie shadow Region Si o Node " 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings Grid 47

-1ý, Link Water W

ý? Area [lIndex Grid 0 0.25 0.i Mie Figure K-48. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 47 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-49 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

/

/"

.7 ON)p~

LX,-ýA831' -

Legend St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie Shadow Region 0 Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings Link ,$ Water Grid 48 0 Area ._ Index Grid 0.5s mil" Figure K-49. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 48 KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-50 K-50 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Rev. 1 Evacuation Time Estimate

20 21 49 Legend St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie Ei'Shadow Region o Node - 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-1, Link f Water Grid 49 0 Area [2 Index Grid 0 0.5 t Miles Figure K-50. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 49 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-51 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

-/ f//,/;//?,x*;-.i' //

Legend St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie i Shadow Region o Node _ 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings Grid 50

-I., Link Water W$

0 0.25 0 Area ( Index Grid 0.5 Mile Figure K-51. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 50 KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-52 K-52 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures C4 Grid 51 0 0.25 0.5 Figure K-52. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 51 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-53 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures St. Lucie Shadow Region a Node "-' 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings Grid 52

-I.- Link *5 Water c3 Area l Index Grid 0 0.25 0.5 Miles Figure K-53. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 52 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-54 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie 3 Shadow Region

-I.,

o Node Link 5

2, 5,10, 15 Mile Rings Water +- Grid 53 C) Area .- ] Index Grid 0 0.25 0.5 Miles Figure K-54. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 53 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-55 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

I-,-1// X~

./7 /,7 ./ %/,*'7K7 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures St. Lucie Shadow Region S

o Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-I.- Link Water W

-' Grid 54 o 0.25 05~ie 0 Area [T-:.. Index Grid Figure K-55. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 54 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-56 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie SShadow Region o Node ' 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings Grid 55

-I' Link Water W$

0.25 S M.5 Area I--3 ndlx Grid miles Figure K-56. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 55 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-S7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie U Shadow Region o Node

2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-I.- Link *$ Water

) Area [__ Index Grid Figure K-57. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 56 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-58 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures St. Lucie r Shadow Region o Node ' 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings Grid 57

-p., Link Water W3 0 0.25 0.5 C* Area -Y] Index Grid Miles Figure K-58. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 57 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-59 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

4 cea9n"l St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Evacuation Legend Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures

St. Lucie f Shadow Region o Node ' 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings

-ile Link , Water Grid 58 Area Index Grid 0 0.5 1 Miles Figure K-59. Link-Node Analysis Network - Grid 58 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-60 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table K-1. Evacuation Roadway Network Characteristics MAJOR 1 1 231 US 1 ARTERIAL 340 3 12 4 1750 40 57 2 1 566 SE COVE RD COLLECTOR 5574 1 12 0 1750 45 57 MAJOR 3 1 570 US 1 ARTERIAL 2647 3 12 4 1750 40 57 4 2 878 CR 614 COLLECTOR 3169 1 12 4 1700 50 4 5 2 879 CR 603 COLLECTOR 6437 1 12 4 1700 40 4 MINOR 6 3 4 SR 714 ARTERIAL 235 2 12 4 1900 45 49 FREEWAY 7 3 9 SR 714 OFF RAMP TO 1-95 RAMP 442 1 12 0 1698 45 49 MINOR 8 3 22 SR 714 ARTERIAL 972 2 12 4 1900 50 49 MINOR 9 4 3 SR 714 ARTERIAL 235 2 12 4 1900 45 49 FREEWAY 10 4 9 SR 714 OFF RAMP TO 1-95 RAMP 309 1 12 0 1698 45 49 MINOR 11 4 13 SR 714 ARTERIAL 1724 2 12 4 1900 45 49 FREEWAY 12 9 18 1-95 ON RAMP FROM SH 714 RAMP 1970 1 15 3 1698 55 49 FREEWAY 13 11 12 SR 714 ON RAMP FROM 1-95 RAMP 384 1 12 4 1698 45 49 FREEWAY 14 11 13 SR 714 ON RAMP FROM 1-95 RAMP 281 1 12 4 1698 45 49 MINOR 15 12 13 SR 714 ARTERIAL 250 2 12 4 1900 45 49 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-61 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

FREEWAY 16 12 19 1-95 OFF RAMP RAMP 354 1 12 4 1698 45 49 MINOR 17 12 21 SR 714 ARTERIAL 1815 2 12 4 1900 45 49 MINOR 18 13 4 SR 714 ARTERIAL 1724 2 12 4 1900 45 49 MINOR 19 13 12 SR 714 ARTERIAL 250 2 12 4 1900 45 49 FREEWAY 20 13 19 1-95 OFF RAMP RAMP 254 1 12 4 1698 45 49 FREEWAY 21 17 4 SR 714 ON RAMP FROM 1-95 RAMP 1552 1 12 3 1698 45. 49 22 17 18 1-95 FREEWAY 3429 3 12 4 2250 70 49 23 17 142 1-95 FREEWAY 4005 3 12 4 2250 75 49 FREEWAY 24 18 11 1-95 OFF RAMP RAMP 1416 1 12 4 1698 45 49 25 18 17 1-95 FREEWAY 3429 3 12 4 2250 70 49 26 18 25 1-95 FREEWAY 4040 3 12 4 2250 70 49 FREEWAY 27 19 17 1-95 ON RAMP FROM SR 714 RAMP 1966 1 12 4 1698 45 49 28 20 21 SR 714 COLLECTOR 1003 1 12 4 1698 55 49 MINOR 29 21 12 SR 714 ARTERIAL 1815 2 12 4 1900 45 49 30 21 20 SR 714 COLLECTOR 1003 1 12 4 1698 55 49 MINOR 31 22 3 SR 714 ARTERIAL 972 2 12 4 1900 50 49 MINOR 32 22 23 SR 714 ARTERIAL 999 2 12 4 1900 50 49 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-62 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 33 23 22 I SR714 ARTERIAL 999 2 12 4 1900 50 49 34 23 24 SR 714 COLLECTOR 2616 1 12 4 1698 55 49 35 24 23 SR 714 COLLECTOR 2616 1 12 4 1700 55 49 36 24 673 SR 714 COLLECTOR 8146 1 12 4 1700 60 49 37 25 18 1-95 FREEWAY 4040 3 12 4 2250 70 49 38 25 26 1-95 FREEWAY 7701 3 12 4 2250 70 38 39 26 25 1-95 FREEWAY 7701 3 12 4 2250 70 38 40 26 51 1-95 FREEWAY 2521 3 12 4 2250 70 38 41 27 28 1-95 FREEWAY 8672 3 12 4 2250 70 36 42 27 52 1-95 FREEWAY 2889 3 12 4 2250 70 38 FREEWAY 43 27 58 1-95 OFF RAMP TO BECKER RD RAMP 1282 1 12 4 1700 45 38 44 28 27 1-95 FREEWAY 8600 3 12 4 2250 70 36 45 28 29 1-95 FREEWAY 9634 3 12 5 2250 70 36 46 29 28 1-95 FREEWAY 9643 3 12 5 2250 70 36 47 29 30 1-95 FREEWAY 2732 3 12 5 2250 70 29 48 30 29 1-95 FREEWAY 2732 3 12 5 2250 70 29 49 30 31 1-95 FREEWAY 6863 3 12 4 2250 70 29 50 31 30 1-95 FREEWAY 6887 3 12 4 2250 70 29 51 31 32 1-95 FREEWAY 2274 4 12 4 2250 70 29 52 32 33 1-95 FREEWAY 2274 3 12 4 2250 70 27 1-95 OFF RAMP TO FREEWAY 53 32 79 CROSSTOWN PKWY RAMP 843 1 12 3 1698 45 29 54 32 83 1-95 FREEWAY 525 4 12 4 2250 70 29 55 33 32 1-95 FREEWAY 2274 3 12 4 2250 70 27 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-63 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

56 33 34 1-95 FREEWAY 3515 4 12 4 2250 70 27 1-95 OFF RAMP TO FREEWAY 57 33 81 CROSSTOWN PKWY RAMP 815 1 12 4 1698 45 27 58 34 33 1-95 FREEWAY 3507 4 12 4 2250 70 27 59 34 35 1-95 FREEWAY 3505 3 12 4 2250 70 27 1-95 OFF RAMP TO ST LUCIE FREEWAY 60 34 91 BLVD RAMP 1906 1 12 4 1750 50 27 61 35 36 1-95 FREEWAY 13976 3 12 4 2250 70 19 62 35 96 1-95 FREEWAY 2056 3 12 4 2250 70 27 63 36 35 1-95 FREEWAY 13976 3 12 4 2250 70 19 64 36 37 1-95 FREEWAY 5580 3 12 4 2250 70 19 65 37 36 1-95 FREEWAY 5585 3 12 4 2250 70 19 66 37 38 1-95 FREEWAY 3630 3 12 4 2250 70 17 67 38 37 1-95 FREEWAY 3630 3 12 4 2250 70 17 68 38 39 1-95 FREEWAY 8098 3 12 4 2250 70 17 FREEWAY 69 38 106 1-95 OFF RAMP TO CR 712 RAMP 1913 1 12 4 1698 45 17 70 39 38 1-95 FREEWAY 8121 3 12 4 2250 70 17 71 39 40 1-95 FREEWAY 3812 3 12 4 2250 70 17 72 40 39 1-95 FREEWAY 3794 3 12 4 2250 70 17 73 40 50 1-95 -FREEWAY 1926 3 12 4 2250 70 11 74 41 42 1-95 FREEWAY 5015 3 15 4 2250 70 11 75 41 50 1-95 FREEWAY 3126 3 12 4 2250 70 11 FREEWAY 76 41 112 1-95 OFF RAMP RAMP 4 1698 45 10 77 42 41 1-95 FREEWAY 5015 3 15 4 2250 70 11 78 42 43 1-95 FREEWAY 3805 2 15 4 2250 70 10 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-64 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

79 43 42 1-95 FREEWAY 3805 2 15 4 2250 70 10 80 43 44 1-95 FREEWAY 2985 2 12 4 2250 70 8 81 44 43 1-95 FREEWAY 2985 2 12 4 2250 70 8 82 44 45 1-95 FREEWAY 2245 2 12 4 2250 70 8 FREEWAY 83 44 131 1-95 OFF RAMP TO SR 68 RAMP 1025 1 12 4 1698 45 8 84 45 44 1-95 FREEWAY 2233 2 12 4 2250 70 8 85 45 46 1-95 FREEWAY 8273 2 12 4 2250 70 8 86 46 45 1-95 FREEWAY 8273 2 12 4 2250 70 8 87 46 47 1-95 FREEWAY 5346 2 12 4 2250 70 8 88 47 46 1-95 FREEWAY 5366 2 12 4 2250 70 8 89 47 48 1-95 FREEWAY 15705 2 12 4 2250 70 4 90 48 47 1-95 FREEWAY 15705 2 12 4 2250 70 4 91 48 49 1-95 FREEWAY 2375 2 12 4 2250 70 4 FREEWAY 92 48 138 1-95 OFF RAMP RAMP 725 1 12 4 1698 45 4 93 49 48 1-95 FREEWAY 2375 2 12 4 2250 70 4 FREEWAY 94 49 141 1-95 OFF RAMP RAMP 910 1 12 4 1700 45 4 95 49 1112 1-95 FREEWAY 13268 2 12 4 2250 70 4 96 50 40 1-95 FREEWAY 1926 3 12 4 2250 70 11 97 50 41 1-95 FREEWAY 3126 3 12 4 2250 70 11 98 51 26 1-95 FREEWAY 2521 3 12 4 2250 70 *38 99 51 52 1-95 FREEWAY 866 3 12 4 2250 70 38 100 52 27 1-95 FREEWAY 2889 3 12 4 2250 70 38 101 52 51 1-95 FREEWAY 866 3 12 4 2250 70 38 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-65 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

FREEWAY 102 I 52 53 I 1-95 OFF RAMP TO BECKER RD RAMP 418 1 12 4 1698 45 38 FREEWAY 103 53 55 1-95 OFF RAMP TO BECKER RD RAMP 676 2 12 4 1750 45 38 1-95 ON RAMP FROM BECKER FREEWAY 104 54 52 RD RAMP 423 1 12 4 1698 45 38 MAJOR 105 55 56 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 690 3 12 4 1750 40 38 FREEWAY 106 55 62 BECKER RD OFF RAMP RAMP 199 2 12 4 1900 45 38 MAJOR 107 56 55 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 690 2 12 4 1750 40 38 FREEWAY 108 56 63 BECKER RD OFF RAMP RAMP 183 2 12 4 1900 40 38 1-95 ON RAMP FROM BECKER FREEWAY 109 57 27 RD RAMP 1276 1 12 4 1698 45 38 FREEWAY 110 58 56 1-95 OFF RAMP TO BECKER RD RAMP 609 2 12 4 1750 45 38 MAJOR 111 59 64 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 2267 3 12 4 1900 40 38 MAJOR 112 60 61 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 1007 3 12 1 1900 45 38 MAJOR 113 61 55 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 281 3 12 4 1750 40 38 FREEWAY 114 61 62 1-95 ON RAMP RAMP 386 1 12 4 1350 30 38 1-95 ON RAMP FROM BECKER FREEWAY 115 62 57 RD RAMP 405 2 12 4 1900 50 38 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-66 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1-95 ON RAMP FROM BECKER FREEWAY 116 1 63 54 1 RD RAMP 508 2 12 4 1900 45 38 MAJOR 117 64 56 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 219 3 12 4 1750 40 38 FREEWAY 118 64 63 1-95 ON RAMP RAMP 301 1 12 4 1348 30 38 FREEWAY 119 65 70 SR 716 OFF RAMP RAMP 452 2 12 4 1900 50 29 MAJOR 120 65 74 SR 716 ARTERIAL 1881 2 12 4 1750 50 29 MAJOR 121 67 65 SR 716 ARTERIAL 230 3 12 4 1750 50 29 FREEWAY 122 67 70 SR 716 OFF RAMP RAMP 590 1 12 4 1698 45 29 FREEWAY 123 70 72 1-95 ON RAMP RAMP 465 2 12 4 1900 50 29 FREEWAY 124 72 29 1-95 ON RAMP RAMP 896 1 12 4 1700 45 29 MAJOR 125 73 74 SR 716 ARTERIAL 992 3 12 4 1750 40 29 MAJOR 126 74 65 SR 716 ARTERIAL 1881 2 12 4 1750 50 29 FREEWAY 127 74 927 1-95 ON RAMP FROM SR 716 RAMP 775 3 12 4 1900 45 29 MAJOR 128 75 67 SR 716 ARTERIAL 1884 4 12 4 1900 50 29 MAJOR 78 CROSSTOWN PKWY ARTERIAL 690 3 12 4 1750 40 29 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-67 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

CROSSTOWN PKWY OFF FREEWAY 1301 77 80 RAMP TO 1-95 RAMP 371 2 12 4 1905 45 29 MAJOR 131 78 77 CROSSTOWN PKWY ARTERIAL 690 3 12 4 1750 40 29 CROSSTOWN PKWY OFF FREEWAY 132 78 82 RAMP TO 1-95 RAMP 538 2 12 4 1905 50 27 CROSSTOWN PKWY ON RAMP FREEWAY 133 79 78 FORM 1-95 RAMP 426 2 12 4 1750 45 29 1-95 ON RAMP FROM FREEWAY 134 80 32 CROSSTOWN PKWY RAMP 633 1 12 4 1698 45 29 CROSSTOWN PKWY ON RAMP FREEWAY 135 81 77 FORM 1-95 RAMP 575 2 12 4 1750 45 27 1-95 ON RAMP FROM FREEWAY 136 82 33 CROSSTOWN PKWY RAMP 593 1 12 4 1698 45 27 137 83 31 1-95 FREEWAY 1749 3 12 4 2250 70 29 MAJOR 138 84 77 CROSSTOWN PKWY ARTERIAL 2000 3 12 4 1750 50 29 MAJOR 139 85 78 CROSSTOWN PKWY ARTERIAL 1603 3 12 3 1750 50 29 FREEWAY 140 86 34 1-95 ON RAMP RAMP 2365 1 12 4 1698 45 27 141 86 87 ST. LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 676 1 12 4 1700 40 27 142 87 91 ST. LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 1565 1 12 4 1750 40 27 1-95 ON RAMP FROM ST. FREEWAY 143 87 97 LUCIE BLVD RAMP 1829 1 12 4 1348 30 27 144 91 87 ST. LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 1566 1 12 4 1700 40 27 FREEWAY 145 91 1378 1-95 ON RAMP RAMP 255 1 12 4 1700 45 27 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-68 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

146 92 91 ST. LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 228 1 12 4 1750 40 27 FREEWAY 147 92 1378 1-95 ON RAMP RAMP 377 1 12 4 1700 50 27 148 96 34 1-95 FREEWAY 1449 3 12 4 2250 70 27 1-95 ON RAMP FROM ST. FREEWAY 149 97 96 LUCIE BLVD RAMP 1051 1 12 4 1700 45 27 MINOR 150 100 102 CR 712 ARTERIAL 2414 2 12 4 1900 50 17 FREEWAY 151 100 104 CR 712 OFF RAMP TO 1-95 RAMP 543 1 12 4 1348 30 17 MINOR 152 102 617 CR 712 ARTERIAL 11302 1 12 4 1698 55 16 FREEWAY 153 104 38 1-95 ON RAMP FROM CR 712 RAMP 1341 1 12 4 1698 45 17 FREEWAY 154 106 102 CR 712 ON RAMP FROM 1-95 RAMP 674 1 12 4 1700 40 17 MINOR 155 109 112 SR 70 ARTERIAL 2235 2 12 4 1900 50 11 FREEWAY 156 109 118 1-95 ON RAMP RAMP 788 1 12 4 1348 30 11 MINOR 157 112 899 SIR70 ARTERIAL 726 2 12 4 1750 60 10 FREEWAY 158 118 41 1-95 ON RAMP RAMP 999 1 12 4 1698 45 11 MAJOR 159 121 124 SIR68 ARTERIAL 719 2 12 4 1900 45 8 FREEWAY 160 121 129 1-95 ON RAMP FROM SIR 68 RAMP 824 1 12 4 1698 45 8 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-69 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 161 I 124 125 1 SR 68 ARTERIAL 1614 2 12 4 1900 45 8 FREEWAY 162 124 129 1-95 ON RAMP FROM SR 68 RAMP 552 1 12 4 1700 45 8 MINOR 163 125 124 SR 68 ARTERIAL 1614 1 12 4 1700 45 8 MINOR 164 125 210 SR 68 ARTERIAL 590 2 12 4 1750 45 8 FREEWAY 165 129 44 1-95 ON RAMP FROM SR 68 RAMP 1470 1 12 4 1698 45 8 FREEWAY 166 131 125 1-95 OFF RAMP TO SR 68 RAMP 917 1 12 4 1348 30 8 MINOR 167 134 137 CR 614 ARTERIAL 937 2 12 4 1900 40 4 FREEWAY 168 134 139 CR 614 OFF RAMP RAMP 244 1 12 4 1698 45 4 MINOR 169 135 134 CR 614 ARTERIAL 384 2 12 4 1900 40 4 FREEWAY 170 135 139 CR 614 OFF RAMP RAMP 511 1 12 4 1698 45 4 MINOR 171 136 137 CR 614 ARTERIAL 194 1 12 4 1700 40 4 FREEWAY 172 136 140 CR 614 OFF RAMP RAMP 325 1 12 4 1350 30 4 MINOR 173 137 134 CR 614 ARTERIAL 937 1 12 4 1700 40 4 FREEWAY 174 137 140 CR 614 OFF RAMP RAMP 187 1 12 4 1700 45 4 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-70 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

FREEWAY 175 1 138 134 1 CR614ON RAMP RAMP 297 1 12 4 1700 45 4 FREEWAY 176 139 49 1-95 ON RAMP RAMP 1391 1 12 4 1700 45 4 FREEWAY 177 140 48 1-95 ON RAMP RAMP 1223 1 12 4 1698 45 4 FREEWAY 178 141 137 CR 614 ON RAMP RAMP 181 1 12 4 1700 45 4 179 142 17 1-95 FREEWAY 3996 3 12 4 2250 75 49 180 142 143 1-95 FREEWAY 11142 3 12 4 2250 75 49 181 143 142 1-95 FREEWAY 11142 3 12 4 2250 75 49 182 143 144 1-95 FREEWAY 5468 3 12 4 2250 75 52 183 144 143 1-95 FREEWAY 5459 3 12 4 2250 75 52 184 144 145 1-95 FREEWAY 15418 3 12 4 2250 75 52 185 145 144 1-95 FREEWAY 15418 3 12 4 2250 75 52 186 145 146 1-95 FREEWAY 5260 3 12 4 2250 75 53 187 146 145 1-95 FREEWAY 5264 3 12 4 2250 75 53 188 146 1371 1-95 FREEWAY 602 3 12 4 2250 75 53 189 147 148 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 9680 2 12 4 2250 70 53 190 148 147 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 9680 2 12 4 2250 70 53 191 148 149 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 6833 2 12 4 2250 70 53 192 149 148 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 6833 2 12 4 2250 70 53 193 149 150 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 1556 2 12 4 2250 70 51 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE OFF FREEWAY 194 149 168 RAMP RAMP 1091 12 4 1698 45 51 195 150 151 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 13479 2 12 4 2250 75 50 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-71 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

FREEWAY 196 I 150 169 RAM P RAMP 578 1 12 4 1350 30 51 197 150 171 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 546 2 12 4 2250 70 51 198 151 150 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 13479 2 12 4 2250 75 50 199 151 176 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 7849 2 12 10 2250 75 42 200 152 153 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 9327 2 12 4 2250 70 40 201 152 177 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 4156 2 12 4 2250 70 42 202 153 152 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 9327 2 12 4 2250 70 40 203 153 154 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 5583 2 12 4 2250 70 30 204 154 153 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 5576 2 12 4 2250 70 30 205 154 155 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 3657 2 12 10 2250 75 30 206 155 154 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 3657 2 12 10 2250 75 30 207 155 182 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 810 2 12 10 2250 75 30 208 156 157 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 6529 2 12 10 2250 75 30 209 156 182 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 936 2 12 10 2250 75 30 210 157 156 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 6529 2 12 10 2250 75 30 211 157 158 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 6352 2 12 10 2250 75 28 212 158 157 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 6430 2 12 10 2250 75 28 213 158 1374 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 2948 2 12 10 2250 75 28 214 159 160 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 7995 2 12 10 2250 75 20 215 159 1374 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 8833 2 12 10 2250 75 20 216 160 159 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 7984 2 12 10 2250 75 20 217 160 186 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 16327 2 12 10 2250 75 17 218 161 162 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 2929 2 12 10 2250 70 10 219 161 186 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 1866 2 12 10 2250 70 10 220 162 161 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 2936 2 12 10 2250 70 10 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-72 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

221 162 163 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 7711 2 12 10 2250 70 10 222 163 162 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 7711 2 12 10 2250 70 10 223 163 164 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 6427 2 12 4 2250 70 8 224 164 163 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 6428 2 12 4 2250 70 8 225 164 165 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 6966 2 12 4 2250 70 7 226 165 164 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 6948 2 12 4 2250 70 7 227 165 166 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 6116 2 12 4 2250 70 7 228 166 165 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 6116 2 12 4 2250 70 7 229 166 167 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 4983 2 12 4 2250 70 4 230 167 166 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 4966 2 12 4 2250 70 4 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 231 168 150 RAMP RAMP 1106 1 12 4 1348 30 51 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 232 168 928 RAMP RAMP 226 1 12 4 1125 25 51 MAJOR 233 168 929 MARTIN HWY ARTERIAL 224 2 12 4 1905 25 51 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE OFF FREEWAY 234 169 170 RAMP RAMP 535 1 12 4 1350 35 51 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 235 169 171 RAMP RAMP 512 1 12 4 1348 35 51 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 236 170 169 RAMP RAMP 612 1 12 4 1350 30 51 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE OFF FREEWAY 237 170 928 RAMP RAMP 854 1 12 4 1698 40 51 238 171 149 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 1010 2 12 4 2250 70 51 MAJOR 239 172 929 MARTIN HWY ARTERIAL 618 2 12 4 1905 70 51 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-73 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

240 1 172 980 1 SIR 714 COLLECTOR 3284 1 12 4 1750 55 51 241 173 174 BECKER RD COLLECTOR 1336 1 12 4 1750 55 42 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 242 173 983 RAMP RAMP 181 1 12 4 1700 40 42 MINOR 243 173 984 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 165 2 12 4 1900 30 42 MINOR 244 174 173 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 1336 2 12 4 1750 55 42 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 245 174 175 RAMP RAMP 1281 1 12 4 1700 45 42 FREEWAY 246 175 174 BECKER RD ON RAMP RAMP 1274 1 12 4 1750 45 42 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 247 175 177 RAMP RAMP 1505 1 12 4 1698 45 42 FREEWAY 248 176 175 BECKER RD ON RAMP RAMP 814 1 12 4 1700 45 42 249 176 177 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 1584 2 12 4 2250 70 42 250 177 152 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 4156 2 12 4 2250 70 42 251 177 178 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 3572 2 12 4 2250 70 42 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE OFF FREEWAY 252 177 179 RAMP RAMP 1716 1 12 4 1698 45 42 253 178 151 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 5860 2 12 10 2250 75 42 FREEWAY 254 179 173 BECKER RD ON RAMP RAMP 535 2 12 4 1750 45 42 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 255 180 156 RAMP RAMP 1206 1 12 4 1700 45 30 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 1 256 180 185 RAMP RAMP 994 1 12 4 1698 45 30 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-74 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

FLORIDA'S TURNKPIKE ON FREEWAY 257 I 181 182 I RAMP RAMP 698 1 12 4 1700 45 30 258 182 155 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 810 2 12 10 2250 75 30 259 182 156 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 936 2 12 10 2250 75 30 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 260 183 180 RAMP RAMP 520 2 12 4 1900 30 30 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 261 185 181 RAMP RAMP 646 1 12 4 1350 30 30 262 186 160 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 16328 2 12 10 2250 75 17 263 186 161 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 1866 2 12 10 2250 70 10 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 264 187 192 RAMP RAMP 194 1 12 4 1350 30 10 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 265 192 193 RAMP RAMP 476 1 12 3 1348 30 10 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 266 193 161 RAMP RAMP 857 1 12 3 1700 45 10 MINOR 267 196 195 SR 70 ARTERIAL 6037 2 12 4 1905 60 16 MINOR 268 197 196 SR 70 ARTERIAL 4334 2 12 4 1905 60 16 MINOR 269 198 197 SR 70 ARTERIAL 4295 2 12 4 1905 60 16 MINOR 270 199 198 SR 70 ARTERIAL 3771 2 12 4 1905 60 16 MINOR 271 200 199 SR 70 ARTERIAL 3077 2 12 4 1905 60 16 MINOR 272 201 200 5R 70 ARTERIAL 11586 2 12 4 1905 60 7 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-75 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 273 1 202 187 RAMP RAMP 1014 2 12 4 1905 30 10 MINOR 274 202 201 SR 70 ARTERIAL 5255 2 12 4 1900 55 10 MINOR 275 202 898 SR 713 ARTERIAL 2111 1 12 4 1698 50 10 MAJOR 276 203 109 SR 70 ARTERIAL 922 3 12 4 1900 50 11 277 203 211 CR 611 COLLECTOR 10766 1 12 4 1750 55 11 MAJOR 278 204 903 SR 70 ARTERIAL 1100 3 12 4 1750 50 11 MINOR 279 205 295 SR 615 ARTERIAL 4258 2 12 3 1750 45 11 MAJOR 280 205 1046 SR 70 ARTERIAL 3219 3 12 4 1750 50 11 MAJOR 281 206 205 SR 70 ARTERIAL 4296 3 12 1 1750 45 14 282 206 1050 S 13TH ST COLLECTOR 2438 1 12 0 1750 30 14 MAJOR 283 207 885 US 1 ARTERIAL 2646 2 12 3 1750 40 14 MAJOR 284 207 890 US 1 ARTERIAL 1523 2 12 4 1750 50 14 MAJOR 285 207 1043 SR 70 ARTERIAL 1286 3 12 1 1900 50 14 MINOR 286 209 208 5R 68 ARTERIAL 10132 1 12 4 1698 50 7 MINOR 287 210 125 SR 68 ARTERIAL 590 2 12 4 1900 30 8 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-76 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

IVIINUK 288 1. 210 263 1 SR 713 ARTERIAL 4052 1 12 3 1698 50 8 MINOR 289 210 1373 SR 68 ARTERIAL 867 1 12 4 1700 50 8 MAJOR 290 211 121 SR 68 ARTERIAL 2446 2 12 3 1905 45 9 291 212 591 CR 607A COLLECTOR 2103 1 12 0 1700 55 9 MAJOR 292 212 924 SR 68 ARTERIAL 2550 2 12 4 1750 45 9 MAJOR 293 213 212 SR 68 ARTERIAL 2717 2 12 4 1750 45 9 MINOR 294 213 592 SR 615 ARTERIAL 1985 2 12 3 1750 45 9 MINOR 295 213 1131 SR 68 ARTERIAL 2730 2 12 4 1750 50 12 296 214 593 N 13TH ST COLLECTOR 1971 1 12 1 1750 30 12 MINOR 297 214 1131 SR 68 ARTERIAL 1345 2 12 4 1750 50 12 MINOR 298 214 1146 SR 68 ARTERIAL 1384 1 12 4 1750 30 12 MAJOR 299 215 883 US 1 ARTERIAL 497 2 12 4 1750 40 12 MAJOR 300 215 1127 US 1 ARTERIAL 1068 2 12 4 1750 40 12 MINOR 301 215 1143 SR 68 ARTERIAL 303 1 12 4 1750 50 12 MAJOR 302 216 850 US 1 ARTERIAL 600 3 12 4 1750 45 23 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-77 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MAJOR 303 I 216 852 I us1 ARTERIAL 819 3 12 4 1750 45 23 MINOR 304 217 731 CR 712 ARTERIAL 663 2 12 0 1905 45 21 MAJOR 305 217 896 US 1 ARTERIAL 2642 2 12 4 1750 40 21 MAJOR 306 217 1155 US 1 ARTERIAL 3731 3 12 4 1750 45 21 MAJOR 307 218 892 US 1 ARTERIAL 601 2 12 4 1750 40 14 MAJOR 308 218 1314 US I ARTERIAL 687 2 12 4 1750 40 14 MINOR 309 219 340 E PRIMA VISTA BLVD ARTERIAL 2252 2 12 3 1900 45 31 MAJOR 310 219 850 US I ARTERIAL 2939 3 12 4 1750 45 23 MAJOR 311 219 1012 US 1 ARTERIAL 2003 3 12 4 1750 50 31 MINOR 312 220 383 VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY ARTERIAL 823 2 12 4 1900 40 32 MAJOR 313 220 1008 us i ARTERIAL 1316 3 12 4 1750 40 32 MAJOR 314 220 1010 us I ARTERIAL 3042 3 12 4 1750 40 32 MAJOR 315 221 462 US1 ARTERIAL 2622 4 12 4 1750 40 34 MAJOR 316 221 1006 USi ARTERIAL 2964 3 12 4 1750 45 34 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-78 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MAJOR 317 221 1067 1SR 716 ARTERIAL 1815 3 12 1 1750 55 34 MAJOR 318 222 996 US 1 ARTERIAL 1874 3 12 0 1750 45 41 MAJOR 319 222 998 US 1 ARTERIAL 837 4 12 4 1750 40 41 MAJOR 320 223 224 US 1 ARTERIAL 5492 3 12 4 1900 50 46 321 223 503 NW WRIGHT BLVD COLLECTOR 1177 1 12 4 1750 40 46 MAJOR 322 223 989 US 1 ARTERIAL 884 3 12 4 1750 40 46 MAJOR 323 224 223 US 1 ARTERIAL 5492 3 12 4 1750 50 46 MAJOR 324 224 950 US 1 ARTERIAL 666 3 12 4 1750 40 46 MAJOR 325 225 226 US 1 ARTERIAL 1437 3 12 4 1750 40 46 MAJOR 326 225 949 US 1 ARTERIAL 1577 3 12 4 1750 40 46 MAJOR 327 226 225 US 1 ARTERIAL 1433 3 12 4 1750 40 46 MAJOR 328 226 930 US 1 ARTERIAL 1088 3 12 0 1750 40 46 MINOR 329 226 1094 SR 76 ARTERIAL 1083 2 12 1 1900 45 46 MAJOR 330 227 538 US 1 ARTERIAL 1523 3 12 0 1750 45 54 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-79 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MAJUK 331 1 227 930 us 1 ARTERIAL 3211 3 12 0 1750 45 46 MAJOR 332 228 229 US 1 ARTERIAL 1258 3 12 0 1750 45 54 MINOR 333 228 241 CR-714 ARTERIAL 1301 2 12 4 1900 45 54 MAJOR 334 228 538 US 1 ARTERIAL 1358 3 12 0 1750 45 54 MAJOR 335 229 228 US 1 ARTERIAL 1258 3 12 0 1750 45 54 MAJOR 336 229 932 US 1 ARTERIAL 2652 3 12 4 1750 45 54 MAJOR 337 230 932 US I ARTERIAL 1504 3 12 4 1750 45 55 MAJOR 338 230 933 US 1 ARTERIAL 1519 3 12 4 1750 50 55 MINOR 339 230 935 SE INDIAN ST ARTERIAL 2574 2 12 4 1750 45 54 MAJOR 340 231 1 us1 ARTERIAL 340 3 12 4 1750 40 57 MAJOR 341 231 1152 US 1 ARTERIAL 289 3 12 4 1900 40 57 MAJOR 342 232 594 US 1 ARTERIAL 1042 2 12 4 1750 40 12 MAJOR 343 232 863 US 1 ARTERIAL 756 2 12 4 1750 40 12 34 294MUSAJORTER31AJ OR 1905 34 233ý 294 us 1 ARTERIAL 232 124 10 5012 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-80 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MAJUK 345 233 595 I US 1 ARTERIAL 1140 3 12 4 1900 50 12 MAJOR 346 234 235 US I ARTERIAL 8716 2 12 4 1750 60 5 MAJOR 347 234 291 US I ARTERIAL 5470 2 12 4 1750 60 6 MAJOR 348 235 234 US 1 ARTERIAL 8710 2 12 4 1750 60 5 MAJOR 349 235 236 US 1 ARTERIAL 11087 2 12 4 1750 60 5 350 235 880 CR 614 COLLECTOR 7124 1 12 4 1700 50 5 MAJOR 351 236 235 US 1 ARTERIAL 11083 2 12 4 1750 60 5 MAJOR 352 236 1116 US 1 ARTERIAL 4103 2 12 4 1900 60 2 MINOR 353 237 242 SR 714 ARTERIAL 2730 2 12 4 1900 50 54 MINOR 354 237 562 CR-714 ARTERIAL 1979 2 12 4 1750 45 54 MAJOR 355 237 978 SR 76 ARTERIAL 2002 3 12 3 1900 50 54 MINOR 356 238 239 SR 76 ARTERIAL 4663 2 12 4 1750 50 54 MINOR 357 239 240 SR76 ARTERIAL 8314 2 12 4 1750 55 56 MINOR 358 240 531 SR76 ARTERIAL 3138 2 12 4 1750 55 56 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-81 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 359 I241 228 1 CR-714 ARTERIAL 1301 2 12 4 1750 45 54 360 241 229 SE GRUMMAN BLVD COLLECTOR 1879 1 12 4 1750 50 54 MINOR 361 241 562 CR 714 ARTERIAL 2241 2 12 4 1750 45 54 MINOR 362 242 449 SR 714 ARTERIAL 1284 2 12 4 1900 50 54 MINOR

.363 243 432 SR 714 ARTERIAL 2801 2 12 2 1750 50 51 364 243 1370 MAPP RD COLLECTOR 3684 1 12 0 1700 40 54 MINOR 365 244 245 SR 714 ARTERIAL 1818 2 12 4 1750 50 51 366 244 441 SW HIGH MEADOWS AVE COLLECTOR 2586 1 12 0 1698 55 51 MINOR 367 245 172 SR 714 ARTERIAL 3365 2 12 4 1750 50 51 MAJOR 368 246 247 SR 716 ARTERIAL 948 3 12 1 1750 55 33 MAJOR 369 247 248 SR 716 ARTERIAL 4587 3 12 1 1750 55 33 MAJOR 370 248 249 SR 716 ARTERIAL 3247 3 12 1 1750 45 33 371 248 382 SW FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 2199 1 12 0 1575 35 33 MAJOR 372 249 252 SR 716 ARTERIAL 4482 3 12 1 1750 45 33 FREEWAY 373 2S0 253 SR 716 OFF RAMP RAMP 559 1 12 4 1348 30 30 FREEWAY 374 251 250 SR 716 ON RAMP RAMP 1142 1 12 1350 30 30 KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-82 K-82 KLD EngineerinR, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

FREEWAY 375 1 252 251 BAYSHORE BLVD RAMP -530 2 12 4 1900 30 30 MAJOR 376 252 254 SR 716 ARTERIAL 2214 3 12 4 1750 45 30 MINOR 377 252 359 BAYSHORE BLVD ARTERIAL 2341 2 12 4 1750 55 30 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 378 253 183 RAMP RAMP 461 2 12 4 1900 30 30 MAJOR 379 254 252 SR 716 ARTERIAL 2214 2 12 4 1750 45 30 MAJOR 380 254 775 SR 716 ARTERIAL 2058 3 12 4 1750 45 30 MAJOR 381 255 256 SR 716 ARTERIAL 2262 3 12 4 1750 45 30 MAJOR 382 256 257 SR 716 ARTERIAL 2013 3 12 4 1750 45 30 MAJOR 383 257 258 SR 716 ARTERIAL 4618 3 12 4 1750 45 30 MINOR 384 257 642 SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVD ARTERIAL 1650 2 12 0 1900 55 37 MAJOR 385 258 259 SR 716 ARTERIAL 3779 3 12 4 1750 45 29 MAJOR 386 259 1083 SR 716 ARTERIAL 960 3 12 4 1750 45 29 MINOR 387 260 261 CR 614 ARTERIAL 5453 1 12 .4 1700 5 5 388 260 880 CR 614 COLLECTOR 6647 1 12 4 1700 50 5 389 260 1113 TURNPIKE FEEDER RD COLLECTOR 1321 1 12 4 1700 50 5 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-83 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 390 261 2 CR 614 ARTERIAL 5216 1 12 4 1750 50 5 391 261 1375 CR 607 COLLECTOR 6417 1 12 4 1700 40 5 MINOR 392 262 210 SR 713 ARTERIAL 6606 1 12 4 1750 55 10 MINOR 393 263 264 SR 713 ARTERIAL 3869 1 12 3 1750 55 8 MINOR 394 264 265 SR 713 ARTERIAL 5449 1 12 6 1750 55 5 MINOR 395 265 260 SR 713 ARTERIAL 13407 1 12 4 1750 50 5 396 *265 289 CR 608 COLLECTOR 15772 1 12 4 1750 50 5 397 266 267 SR AlA COLLECTOR 4170 1 12 4 1698 50 25 398 266 277 SR AlA COLLECTOR 10181 1 12 4 1698 50 25 399 267 268 SR AlA COLLECTOR 12952 1 12 4 1698 55 25 400 268 269 SR AlA COLLECTOR 10911 1 12 4 1698 55 15 401 269 270 SR AlA COLLECTOR 5812 1 12 4 1698 55 15 402 270 271 SR AlA COLLECTOR 6524 1 12 4 1698 55 13 403 271 272 SR AlA COLLECTOR 6472 1 12 4 1698 45 13 404 272 273 SR AlA COLLECTOR 2469 1 12 4 1698 55 13 405 273 868 SR AlA COLLECTOR 1102 1 12 4 1698 55- .13 406 274 275 SR AlA COLLECTOR 1511 1 12 4 1698 55 13 407 275 727 SR AIA COLLECTOR 669 1 12 4 1575 35 12 MINOR 408 276 232 SR AlA ARTERIAL 708 2 12 4 1750 35 12 409 277 1168 SR AlA COLLECTOR 14567 1 12 4 1700 45 35 410 278 279 OCEAN BLVD COLLECTOR 14606 1 12 4 1698 50 45 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-84 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

411 279 280 OCEAN BLVD COLLECTOR 3714 1 12 4 1750 45 48 412 280 871 SR AlA COLLECTOR 6556 1 12 4 1698 50 47 MINOR 413 281 546 SR AlA ARTERIAL 4083 2 12 4 1750 45 47 414 283 938 SR AlA COLLECTOR 3467 1 12 3 1700 40 46 415. 283 959 SE PALM BEACH RD COLLECTOR 2656 1 12 3 1750 35 46 MINOR 416 284 1147 SR AlA ARTERIAL 1389 2 12 3 1750 45 47 417 285 286 CR 607A COLLECTOR 3141 1 12 0 1750 55 9 418 286 288 AVE Q COLLECTOR 8046 1 12 4 1750 40 9 419 286 599 CR 607A COLLECTOR 1696 1 12 0 1698 55 9 420 287 264 CR 607A COLLECTOR 4327 1 12 0 1750 55 8 421 288 286 AVE Q COLLECTOR 8045 1 12 4 1750 40 9 MINOR 422 288 1330 SR 615 ARTERIAL 1187 2 12 3 1750 45 9 423 289 265 CR 608 COLLECTOR 15772 1 13 0 1750 50 5 MINOR 424 289 290 SR 615 ARTERIAL 3539 2 12 8 1905 55 5 425 289 291 CR 608 COLLECTOR 3066 1 12 4 1750 50 6 MAJOR 426 290 234 SR 615 ARTERIAL 2742 2 12 8 1750 55 5 MAJOR 427 291 234 US 1 ARTERIAL 5470 2 12 4 1750 60 6 428 291 289 CR 608 COLLECTOR 3063 1 12 4 1750 50 6 MAJOR 429 291 595 US 1 ARTERIAL 4482 2 12 4 1900 50 6 430 292 293 N 13TH ST COLLECTOR 687 1 12 4 1698 40 12 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-85 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

431 292 294 AVE 0 COLLECTOR 2314 1 12 4 1348 30 12 432 293 723 AVE COLLECTOR 752 1 12 4 1698 40 12 MAJOR 433 294 233 US 1 ARTERIAL 2862 2 12 4 1750 50 12 MAJOR 434 294 609 US 1 ARTERIAL 687 2 12 4. 1905 45 12 MINOR 435 295 907 CR 770 ARTERIAL 3432 2 12 4 1750 55 11 MINOR 436 295 909 CR 770 ARTERIAL 410 2 12 4 1905 40 11 MINOR 437 295 1027 SR 615 ARTERIAL 2447 2 12 3 1750 40 9 438 296 214 S 13TH ST COLLECTOR 1355 1 12 1 1750 30 12 MINOR 439 296 297 CR 770 ARTERIAL 1323 2 12 4 1750 45 12 440 296 913 CR 770 COLLECTOR 1377 1 12 1 1750 35 12 MINOR 441 297 296 CR 770 ARTERIAL 1323 2 12 1 1750 55 12 MINOR 442 297 910 CR 770 ARTERIAL 2039 2 12 4 1750 45 12 LOCAL 443 297 912 S 17TH ST ROADWAY 575 1 12 0 1700 30 12 MAJOR 444 298 299 US I ARTERIAL 1364 2 12 4 1750 40 12 445 298 915 CR 770 COLLECTOR 978 1 12 4 1750 45 12 MAJOR 446 298 1127 US 1 ARTERIAL 275 2 12 4 1750 40 12 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-86 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MAJOR 447 1 299 298 1 US 1 ARTERIAL 1364 2 12 4 1750 40 12 MAJOR 448 299 917 US 1 ARTERIAL 177 2 12 4 1900 50 14 449 300 203 CR 611 COLLECTOR 3850 1 12 0 1750 55 11 450 301 1066 CR 611 COLLECTOR 705 1 12 4 1698 50 11 451 302 303 CR 611 COLLECTOR 1400 1 12 4 1750 50 11 452 302 1327 CR 611 COLLECTOR 2206 1 12 4 1750 50 11 MINOR 453 303 1024 SR 615 ARTERIAL 2644 2 12 3 1750 45 11 MINOR 454 303 1048 CR 611 ARTERIAL 2246 2 12 1 1750 40 14 MINOR 455 304 218 CR 611 ARTERIAL 2496 2 12 4 1750 40 14 456 304 305 OLEANDER BLVD COLLECTOR 1315 1 12 1 1348 30 14 MINOR 457 304 1048 CR 611 ARTERIAL 2973 2 12 4 1750 40 14 458 305 306 OLEANDER BLVD COLLECTOR 4087 1 12 1 1750 40 14 459 306 921 OLEANDER BLVD COLLECTOR 226 1 12 1 1348 30 14 MAJOR 460 306 1161 SR 70 ARTERIAL 891 2 12 1 1750 50 14 461 307 919 SUNRISE BLVD COLLECTOR 1795 1 14 6 1750 45 14 MINOR 462 308 100 CR 712 ARTERIAL 4333 2 12 4 1905 55 17 463 308 1348 GLADES CUT OFF RD COLLECTOR 8432 1 12 0 1698 40 17 MINOR 464 309 733 CR 712 ARTERIAL 698 2 12 2 .1905 55 18 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-87 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 465 I 309 1020 I SR 615 ARTERIAL 5860 2 12 4 1750 55 18 466 310 732 CR 712 COLLECTOR 4602 1 12 0 1350 45 21 467 310 1322 OLEANDER AVE COLLECTOR 2521 1 12 1 1575 35 21 MINOR 468 311 1022 SR 615 ARTERIAL 3507 2 12 3 1750 55 18 469 312 304 OLEANDER AVE COLLECTOR 5292 1 12 1 1750 40 14 LOCAL 470 312 1324 BELL AVE ROADWAY 3083 1 12 4 1750 30 21 471 313 308 GLADES CUT OFF RD COLLECTOR 11978 1 12 0 1750 50 18 472 313 314 SELVITZ RD COLLECTOR 1282 1 12 0 1698 40 18 473 314 315 SELVITZ RD COLLECTOR 1478 1 12 0 1698 40 11 474 315 301 SELVITZ RD COLLECTOR 999 1 12 0 1750 40 11 475 316 313 SELVITZ RD COLLECTOR 8499 1 12 0 1698 40 18 476 316 798 CR 712 COLLECTOR 6952 1 12 0 1750 45 18 MINOR 477 317 318 CR 615 ARTERIAL 1694 2 12 3 1900 50 20 478 317 330 NW BAYSHORE RD COLLECTOR 1434 1 12 4 1698 45 20 MINOR 479 317 371 CR 615 ARTERIAL 2654 2 12 1 1750 45 28 MINOR 480 318 319 CR 615 ARTERIAL 1883 2 12 3 1900 50 20 MINOR 481 319 320 CR 615 ARTERIAL 2722 2 12 3 1900 50 20 MINOR 482 320 321 CR 615 ARTERIAL 1874 2 12 3 1900 50 20 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-88 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 483 321 322 I CR 615 ARTERIAL 1481 2 12 3 1750 50 20 MINOR 484 322 323 CR 615 ARTERIAL 1604 2 12 3 1750 50 20 MINOR 485 323 324 CR 615 ARTERIAL 1853 2 12 3 1900 50 20 LOCAL 486 323 326 PEACHTREE BLVD ROADWAY 2693 1 12 0 1750 35 20 MINOR 487 324 325 CR 615 ARTERIAL 1696 2 12 3 1900 50 20 MINOR 488 325 309 CR 615 ARTERIAL 2806 2 12 3 1750 50 18 LOCAL 489 326 323 PEACHTREE BLVD ROADWAY 2693 1 12 0 1750 35 20 490 326 327 SELVITZ RD COLLECTOR 1101 1 12 0 1698 45 20 491 327 328 SELVITZ RD COLLECTOR 1678 1 12 0 1698 45 18 492 328 316 SELVITZ RD COLLECTOR 1194 1 12 0 1750 45 18 MINOR 493 329 334 CR 615 ARTERIAL 1716 2 12 4 1750 45 31 494 330 331 NW BAYSHORE RD COLLECTOR 3344 1 12 4 1698 45 20 495 331 332 BAYSHORE BLVD COLLECTOR 1946 1 14 0 1698 45 20 496 331 374 SELVITZ RD COLLECTOR 2277 1 12 0 1698 40 20 497 332 370 BAYSHORE BLVD COLLECTOR 1801 1 14 0 1698 45 20 MAJOR 498 333 811 ST. LUCIE BLVD ARTERIAL 2427 3 12 1 1750 28 MINOR 499 333 1014 NW PRIMA VISTA BLVD ARTERIAL 5913 2 12 4 1750 45 28 KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-89 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 500 333 1263 BAYSHORE BLVD ARTERIAL 1307 2 12 4 1900 55 28 MINOR 501 334 1014 NW PRIMA VISTA BLVD ARTERIAL 1179 2 12 4 1750 45 28 MINOR 502 334 1262 SE AIROSO BLVD ARTERIAL 1448 2 12 1 1750 45 28 MINOR 503 335 336 BAYSHORE BLVD ARTERIAL 4312 2 12 4 1750 55 28 MINOR 504 335 1263 BAYSHORE BLVD ARTERIAL 2180 2 12 4 1900 55 28 MINOR 505 336 335 BAYSHORE BLVD ARTERIAL 4312 2 12 4 1900 55 28 506 336 343 CROSSTOWN PKWY COLLECTOR 2444 3 12 3 1750 55 28 MINOR 507 336 359 BAYSHORE BLVD ARTERIAL 6761 2 12 4 1750 55 30 MINOR 508 337 353 SW AIROSO BLVD ARTERIAL 1143 2 12 1 1900 50 31 509 337 1266 CROSSTOWN PKWY COLLECTOR 3086 3 12 3 1750 55 28 MINOR 510 338 367 SE PRIMA VISTA BLVD ARTERIAL 1559 2 12 4 1900 45 31 511 338 1268 SE FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 953 1 12 4 1698 45 31 MINOR 512 339 338 E PRIMA VISTA BLVD ARTERIAL 2072 2 12 3 1750 50 31 MINOR 513 340 339 E PRIMA VISTA BLVD ARTERIAL 2902 2 14 3 1750 45 31 MINOR 514 341 829 ST LUCIE BLVD ARTERIAL 3107 2 12 0 1750 55 27 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-90 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 515 342 1018 ST LUCIE BLVD ARTERIAL 1044 2 12 0 1750 55 27 516 343 823 CROSSTOWN PKWY COLLECTOR 2766 3 12 3 1750 55 30 517 344 85 CROSSTOWN PKWY COLLECTOR 3972 3 12 3 1900 50 29 518 344 773 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 1938 1 12 4 1750 40 29 519 345 346 SW WEST VIRGINIA DR COLLECTOR 3896 1 12 3 1698 45 31 520 345 355 SE FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 1857 1 12 0 1698 45 31 521 346 361 SW WEST VIRGINIA DR COLLECTOR 1220 3 12 3 1750 50 31 522 347 773 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 2239 1 12 0 1750 40 29 523 347 1332 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 1655 1 12 4 1700 40 29 524 348 349 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 2150 1 12 0 1750 40 30 525 348 1332 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 1137 1 12 0 1698 40 29 526 349 348 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 2150 1 12 0 1698 40 30 527 349 350 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 3442 1 12 0 1698 40 30 528 349 352 SAVONA BLVD COLLECTOR 2804 1 12 0 1698 40 30 529 350 349 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 3446 1 12 0 1750 40 30 530 350 774 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 599 1 12 0 1750 40 30 531 351 254 SW CAMEO BLVD COLLECTOR 4713 1 12 0 1750 30 30 532 352 349 SAVONA BLVD COLLECTOR 2805 1 12 4 1750 40 30 533 352 1353 SAVONA BLVD COLLECTOR 449 1 12 0 1350 30 30 MINOR 534 353 358 SW AIROSO BLVD ARTERIAL 3102 2 12 1 1750 50 33 MINOR 535 354 249 SW AIROSO BLVD ARTERIAL 2743 2 12 1 1750 55 33 536 355 356 SE FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 3401 1 12 0 1750 45 33 537 356 SE FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 3465 1 12 0 1750 55 33 KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-9 1 K-91 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

MINOR 538 358 354 1 SW AIROSO BLVD ARTERIAL 2309 1 2 12 1 1900 55 33 539 358 359 SE THORNHILL DR COLLECTOR 4953 1 12 0 1750 55 30 MINOR 540 359 252 BAYSHORE BLVD ARTERIAL 2341 2 12 4 1750 55 30 MINOR 541 359 336 BAYSHORE BLVD ARTERIAL 6761 2 12 4 1750 55 30 542 360 356 SE THORNHILL DR COLLECTOR 3112 1 12 0 1750 55 33 543 360 358 SE THORNHILL DR COLLECTOR 2648 1 12 0 1750 55 33 544 360 361 SE SANDIA DR COLLECTOR 3074 1 12 0 1750 35 33 545 361 337 CROSSTOWN PKWY COLLECTOR 2567 3 12 4 1750 50 31 MINOR 546 362 337 SW AIROSO BLVD ARTERIAL 4116 2 12 1 1750 45 31 547 363 362 SE LAKEHURST DR COLLECTOR 1480 1 12 0 1750 55 31 548 363 364 SE SANDIA DR COLLECTOR 2224 1 12 0 1575 35 31 549 363 365 SE SANDIA DR COLLECTOR 1403 1 12 0 1575 35 31 550 364 367 SE SANDIA DR COLLECTOR 1306 1 12 0 1575 35 31 551 365 361 SE SANDIA DR COLLECTOR 2838 1 12 0 1750 35 31 552 366 335 SW LAKEHURST DR COLLECTOR 4125 1 12 0 1700 45 28 553 366 362 SW LAKEHURST DR COLLECTOR 2775 1 12 0 1750 55 28 MINOR 554 367 334 SE PRIMA VISTA BLVD ARTERIAL 1637 2 12 4 1750 45 31 555 368 369 NW FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 1582 1 12 4 1700 45 28 556 368 371 NW FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 3729 1 12 4 1750 45 28 557 369 370 NW FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 2007 1 12 4 1698 45 28 MINOR 558 370 333 BAYSHORE BLVD ARTERIAL 3595 2 14 0 1750 45 28 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-92 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

M INOU 559 I 371 329 I CR 615 ARTERIAL 1268 2 12 4 1900 45 31 560 372 371 NE FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 1475 1 12 4 1750 45 31 561 372 373 NE FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 1856 1 12 4 1698 55 31 562 373 338 NE FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 1146 1 12 4 1750 40 31 563 374 375 SELVITZ RD COLLECTOR 2704 1 12 0 1698 40 20 564 375 376 SELVITZ RD COLLECTOR 1891 1 12 0 1698 40 20 565 376 377 SELVITZ RD COLLECTOR 1902 1 12 0 1750 40 20 566 377 326 SELVITZ RD COLLECTOR 2418 1 12 4 1750 40 20 567 378 379 SW OAKRIDGE DR COLLECTOR 2238 1 12 0 1698 40 33 568 378 381 SW OAKRIDGE DR COLLECTOR 2011 1 12 0 1750 40 33 569 379 380 BAYSHORE BLVD COLLECTOR 1219 1 12 0 1698 40 30 570 380 1343 BAYSHORE BLVD COLLECTOR 2196 1 12 0 1698 40 30 571 381 382 SW FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 939 1 12 0 1575 35 33 572 381 413 SOUTHBEND BLVD COLLECTOR 1675 1 12 0 1700 40 33 573 382 248 SW FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 2205 1 12 0 1750 35 33 574 382 381 SW FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 939 1 12 0 1750 35 33 MINOR 575 383 220 VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY ARTERIAL 823 2 12 4 1750 40 32 MINOR 576 383 384 VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY ARTERIAL 1265 2 12 4 1900 55 32 MINOR 577 384 385 VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY ARTERIAL 1467 2 12 4 1900 55 34 MINOR 578 385 389 VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY ARTERIAL 1163 2 12 4 1750 55 34 MINOR 579 386 387 VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY ARTERIAL 3547 2 12 2 1750 45 33 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-93 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

M IN U 580 387 247 VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY ARTERIAL 1605 2 12 2 1750 45 33 MAJOR 581 388 1006 US 1 ARTERIAL 3515 3 12 4 1750 45 34 MAJOR 582 388 1008 US 1 ARTERIAL 3180 3 12 4 1750 40 34 MINOR 583 389 386 VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY ARTERIAL 2095 2 12 2 1900 50 33 LOCAL 584 390 388 SE LYNGATE DR ROADWAY 795 2 12 6 1750 40 34 585 390 389 SE LYNGATE DR COLLECTOR 2422 1 12 6 1750 40 34 586 390 391 SE MORNINGSIDE BLVD COLLECTOR 1733 1 12 6 1698 40 34 587 391 392 SE MORNINGSIDE BLVD COLLECTOR 2216 1 12 6 1698 40 34 588 392 393 SE MORNINGSIDE BLVD COLLECTOR 1613 1 12 6 1750 40 34 589 393 1067 SR 716 COLLECTOR 1036 3 12 1 1750 55 34 MAJOR 590 393 1282 SR 716 ARTERIAL 3399 3 12 1 1750 55 34 591 394 247 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 2505 2 12 4 1750 45 33 592 395 394 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 1577 1 12 4 1698 45 33 593 396 395 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 2127 1 12 4 1698 45 33 594 397 1081 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 1425 1 12 4 1350 30 34 595 398 397 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 1688 1 12 4 1350 30 41 596 399 398 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 161 1 12 4 675 15 41 597 400 399 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 125 1 12 4 675 15 41 598 400 402 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 1418 1 12 4 1575 35 41 599 401 400 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 153 1 12 4 675 15 41 600 402 403 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 831 1 12 4 1575 35 34 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-94 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

601 403 1078 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 953 1 12 4 1575 35 34 602 404 405 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 1684 1 12 4 1575 35 34 603 405 1077 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 139 1 12 4 675 15 34 604 406 407 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 782 2 12 4 1750 35 34 MAJOR 605 407 462 US 1 ARTERIAL 2302 4 12 4 1750 40 34 MAJOR 606 407 1003 US 1 ARTERIAL 1456 4 12 4 1750 40 34 607 408 409 SE MORNINGSIDE BLVD COLLECTOR 1061 1 12 6 1698 40 34 608 409 410 SE MORNINGSIDE BLVD COLLECTOR 1205 1 12 6 1698 40 34 609 410 411 SE MORNINGSIDE BLVD COLLECTOR 986 1 12 6 1698 40 34 610 411 412 SE MORNINGSIDE BLVD COLLECTOR 692 1 12 6 1698 40 34 611 412 393 SE MORNINGSIDE BLVD COLLECTOR 905 1 12 6 1750 40 34 612 413 414 SOUTHBEND BLVD COLLECTOR 2494 1 12 0 1700 40 33 613 414 415 SOUTHBEND BLVD COLLECTOR 1483 1 12 0 1700 40 40 614 415 416 SOUTHBEND BLVD COLLECTOR 4552 1 12 0 1700 40 40 615 416 417 SOUTHBEND BLVD COLLECTOR 1043 1 12 0 1700 40 40 616 417 418 SOUTHBEND BLVD COLLECTOR 1525 1 12 0 1700 40 40 617 418 419 SOUTHBEND BLVD COLLECTOR 6551 1 12 0 1700 40 40 618 419 420 SOUTHBEND BLVD COLLECTOR 2138 1 12 0 1700 50 42 619 420 421 SOUTHBEND BLVD COLLECTOR 533 1 12 0 1750 50 42 MINOR 620 421 174 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 751 2 12 4 1750 55 42 621 422 1105 BECKER RD COLLECTOR 3556 1 12 4 1700 55 42 622 423 422 BECKER RD COLLECTOR 4235 1 12 4 1698 55 43 623 424 423 BECKER RD COLLECTOR 2216 1 12 4 1698 55 43 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-95 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

624 424 425 SW MURPHY RD COLLECTOR 1023 1 12 0 1698 40 43 625 425 426 SW MURPHY RD COLLECTOR 1945 1 12 0 1350 35 43 626 426 427 SW MURPHY RD COLLECTOR 1382 1 12 4 1698 40 43 627 427 428 SW MURPHY RD COLLECTOR 3476 1 12 0 1575 35 43 628 428 429 SW MURPHY RD COLLECTOR 1091 1 12 0 1575 35 43 629 429 430 SW MURPHY RD COLLECTOR 985 1 12 0 1575 35 43 630 430 987 SW HIGH MEADOWS AVE COLLECTOR 264 1 12 0 900 20 43 631 431 432 SW MATHESON AVE COLLECTOR 5187 1 12 0 1750 55 51 LOCAL 632 431 433 MAPP RD ROADWAY 975 1 11 0 1575 35 43 633 431 986 SW MURPHY RD COLLECTOR 5300 1 12 0 1575 35 43 MINOR 634 432 843 SR 714 ARTERIAL 1562 2 12 4 1750 50 51 LOCAL 635 433 431 MAPP RD ROADWAY 975 1 11 0 1750 35 43 LOCAL 636 433 434 MAPP RD ROADWAY 802 1 11 0 1350 35 43 LOCAL 637 434 435 MAPP RD ROADWAY 1717 1 11 0 1350 35 51 LOCAL 638 435 436 MAPP RD ROADWAY 538 1 11 0 1350 35 51 LOCAL 639 436 437 MAPP RD ROADWAY 676 1 11 0 1350 35 51 LOCAL 640 437 438 MAPP RD ROADWAY 747 1 11 0 1350 35 51 LOCAL 641 438 243 MAPP RD ROADWAY 1891 1 11 0 1750 35 54 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-96 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

642 439 445 MARTIN HWY COLLECTOR 5353 1 12 0 1750 40 51 643 440 172 MARTIN HWY COLLECTOR 1370 1 12 0 1750 45 51 644 440 442 SW HIGH MEADOWS AVE COLLECTOR 3903 1 12 0 1698 45 51 645 441 440 SW HIGH MEADOWS AVE COLLECTOR 1642 1 12 0 1750 55 51 646 442 448 SW HIGH MEADOWS AVE COLLECTOR 1793 1 12 4 1698 45 51 647 443 444 SW HIGH MEADOWS AVE COLLECTOR 1620 1 12 4 1698 45 53 FREEWAY 648 444 146 1-95 ON RAMP RAMP 837 1 12 4 1698 55 53 649 445 440 MARTIN HWY COLLECTOR 3476 1 12 0 1750 40 51 650 445 446 SW BERRY AVE COLLECTOR 4142 1 12 0 1698 55 51 651 446 447 SW GOLDEN BEAR WAY COLLECTOR 2289 1 12 0 1698 40 51 652 447 448 SW GOLDEN BEAR WAY COLLECTOR 444 1 12 0 1698 40 53 653 448 443 SW HIGH MEADOWS AVE COLLECTOR 8632 1 12 4 1698 45 53 MINOR 654 449 243 SR 714 ARTERIAL 1564 2 12 3 1750 40 54 LOCAL 655 449 450 SW CORNELL AVE ROADWAY 3707 1 12 0 1125 25 54 LOCAL 656 450 1370 SW 35TH ST ROADWAY 1619 1 12 4 1350 30 54 657 451 730 CR 712 COLLECTOR 1660 1 12 0 1700 45 21 658 452 1291 CR 712 COLLECTOR 2295 1 12 0 1700 45 21 LOCAL 659 452 1307 W WEATHERBEE RD ROADWAY 3611 1 12 4 1750 30 21 660 453 452 CR 712 COLLECTOR 3700 1 12 0 1700 40 22 661 453 495 CR 707 COLLECTOR 6570 1 12 0 1698 40 22 662 454 463 SE WALTON RD COLLECTOR 4239 1 12 4 1698 50 35 663 454 477 CR 707 COLLECTOR 14558 1 11 0 1698 40 35 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-97 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 664 455 456 SE WALTON RD ARTERIAL 4049 2 12 4 1750 55 32 MINOR 665 455 457 SE LENNARD RD ARTERIAL 1939 2 12 2 1750 55 32 MINOR 666 456 1283 SE WALTON RD ARTERIAL 1563 2 12 4 1750 55 32 MINOR 667 457 455 SE LENNARD RD ARTERIAL 1939 2 12 2 1750 55 32 668 457 461 SE TIFFANY AVE COLLECTOR 2110 1 12 4 1698 55 34 MINOR 669 457 1069 SE LENNARD RD ARTERIAL 3547 2 12 4 1750 50 34 MINOR 670 458 459 SE LENNARD RD ARTERIAL 1919 2 12 0 1750 45 34 MINOR 671 459 221 CANE SLOUGH RD ARTERIAL 1246 2 12 4 1750 40 34 MINOR 672 459 462 SE LENNARD RD ARTERIAL 2306 2 12 4 1750 55 34 MINOR 673 460 388 SE TIFFANY AVE ARTERIAL 1744 2 12 4 1750 55 34 MINOR 674 461 460 SE TIFFANY AVE ARTERIAL 1572 2 12 4 1900 55 34 MAJOR 675 462 221 US 1 ARTERIAL 2621 4 12 4 1750 40 34 MAJOR 676 462 407 US 1 ARTERIAL 2302 4 12 4 1750 40 34 677 463 455 SE WALTON RD COLLECTOR 5762 1 12 4 1750 50 32 678 463 464 SE GREEN RIVER PKWY COLLECTOR 3935 1 12 1 1698 45 35 679 464 474 SE GREEN RIVER PKWY COLLECTOR 1677 1 12 1 1698 45 35 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-98 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

680 465 466 SE GREEN RIVER PKWY COLLECTOR 2131 1 12 4 1698 45 35 681 466 467 SE GREEN RIVER PKWY COLLECTOR 3314 1 12 4 1698 45 35 682 467 468 SE GREEN RIVER PKWY COLLECTOR 3563 1 12 4 1698 45 35 683 468 469 SE GREEN RIVER PKWY COLLECTOR 2398 1 12 4 1698 45 44 684 469 470 SE GREEN RIVER PKWY COLLECTOR 1878 1 12 4 1750 45 44 685 470 1187 SE GREEN RIVER PKWY COLLECTOR 2461 1 12 4 1700 40 44 MINOR 686 470 1225 NW JENSEN BEACH BLVD ARTERIAL 1487 2 12 1 1750 50 44 687 471 1194 NE SAVANNAH RD COLLECTOR 2932 1 12 4 1698 55 44 MINOR 688 471 1195 NE JENSEN BEACH BLVD ARTERIAL 1005 2 12 4 1750 55 44 689 473 490 NE JENSEN BEACH BLVD COLLECTOR 677 1 12 4 1350 30 45 690 473 1229 CR 707 COLLECTOR 601 1 12 4 1700 40 45 691 474 465 SE GREEN RIVER PKWY COLLECTOR 1860 1 12 4 1698 45 35 692 475 458 SE MELALEUCA BLVD COLLECTOR 937 1 12 0 1750 40 34 693 476 474 SE MELALEUCA BLVD COLLECTOR 2764 1 12 0 1698 40 35 694 476 1287 SE MELALEUCA BLVD COLLECTOR 1667 1 12 0 1698 40 35 695 477 478 NE COUNTY LINE RD COLLECTOR 1072 1 12 4 1698 45 35 696 477 1234 CR 707 COLLECTOR 884 1 11 0 1698 40 35 697 478 479 COUNTY LINE RD COLLECTOR 1049 1 12 4 1350 30 35 698 479 480 NE 9TH AVE COLLECTOR 1083 1 12 4 1700 45 35 699 480 481 NE SAVANNAH RD COLLECTOR 802 1 12 4 1700 45 35 700 481 482 NE SAVANNAH RD COLLECTOR 629 1 12 4 1350 30 35 701 482 471 NE SAVANNAH RD COLLECTOR 5068 1 12 4 1750 55 44 702 483 473 CR 707 COLLECTOR 2595 1 12 4 1750 40 45 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-99 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LUOLAL 703 484 483 CR 707 ROADWAY 140 1 12 4 900 20 45 704 484 491 NE CAUSEWAY BLVD COLLECTOR 460 1 12 4 1698 40 45 LOCAL 705 485 484 CR 707 ROADWAY 164 1 12 4 900 20 45 LOCAL 706 486 485 JENSEN BEACH CAUSEWAY ROADWAY 149 1 12 4 900 20 45 MINOR 707 487 1231 NE JENSEN BEACH BLVD ARTERIAL 601 2 12 4 1750 55 45 708 488 487 NE JENSEN BEACH BLVD COLLECTOR 95 1 12 4 900 20 45 709 490 473 NE JENSEN BEACH BLVD COLLECTOR 677 1 12 4 1750 30 45 710 490 488 NE JENSEN BEACH BLVD COLLECTOR 91 1 12 4 900 20 45 711 491 488 NE CAUSEWAY BLVD COLLECTOR 2194 1 12 4 1698 45 45 712 492 493 CR 707 COLLECTOR 9943 1 12 0 1698 40 24 713 492 494 CR 707 COLLECTOR 7067 1 12 0 1698 40 24 714 493 454 CR 707 COLLECTOR 7653 1 12 0 1698 40 35 715 494 453 CR 707 COLLECTOR 8273 1 12 0 1698 40 22 716 495 496 CR 707 COLLECTOR 10572 1 12 0 1698 40 14 717 496 590 CR 707 COLLECTOR 4667 1 12 0 1698 40 14 718 497 215 SR68 COLLECTOR 1005 1 12 4 1750 40 12 719 497 724 CR 707 COLLECTOR 370 1 10 0 1350 30 12 720 498 486 CAUSEWAY BLVD COLLECTOR 5922 1 12 4 1698 45 45 721 499 500 NE SAVANNAH RD COLLECTOR 1820 1 12 4 1698 55 44 722 500 1089 NE SAVANNAH RD COLLECTOR 2071 1 12 4 1698 55 44 723 501 502 NE BAKER RD COLLECTOR 1884 1 12 4 1750 55 46 724 502 503 N DIXIE HWY COLLECTOR 1700 1 12 4 1750 55 46 KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-100 K-1O00 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 725 503 223 NW WRIGHT BLVD ARTERIAL 1177 2 12 4 1750 40 46 726 503 517 N DIXIE HWY COLLECTOR 2204 1 12 4 1698 55 46 727 504 505 CR 707 COLLECTOR 2701 1 12 4 1698 40 45 728 505 506 CR 707 COLLECTOR 1995 1 12 0 1698 40 45 729 505 508 NE DIXIE HWY COLLECTOR 870 1 12 4 1698 55 45 730 506 507 CR 707 COLLECTOR 2123 1 12 0 1698 40 45 731 507 281 CR 707 COLLECTOR 8170 1 12 4 1750 40 47 732 508 509 NE DIXIE HWY COLLECTOR 483 1 12 4 1700 45 45 733 509 510 NE DIXIE HWY COLLECTOR 1820 1 12 4 1698 55 45 734 510 511 NE DIXIE HWY COLLECTOR 899 1 12 4 1700 40 45 735 511 512 NE DIXIE HWY COLLECTOR 2523 1 12 4 1698 55 45 736 512 513 NE DIXIE HWY COLLECTOR 1028 1 12 4 1700 40 44 737 513 514 NE DIXIE HWY COLLECTOR 1310 1 12 4 1700 40 46 738 514 1170 NE DIXIE HWY COLLECTOR 1866 1 12 4 1698 55 46 739 515 516 NE DIXIE HWY COLLECTOR 483 1 12 4 1750 55 46 740 516 501 NE SAVANNAH RD COLLECTOR 587 1 12 4 1698 55 46 741 S17 519 N DIXIE HWY COLLECTOR 2086 1 12 4 1698 55 46 742 18 952 SR 1A COLLECTOR 1388 1 12 4 1700 55 46 743 519 S18 1SRA COLLECTOR 1598 1 12 4 1700 55 46 744 520 946 SR 1A COLLECTOR 941 1 12 4 1750 55 46 MINOR 74 521 522 SR 1A ARTERIAL 586 2 12 4 1750 55 54 MINOR 746 522 228 CR 714 ARTERIAL 1198 2 12 4 1750 55 54 MINOR 747 522 962 SR 1A ARTERIAL 2644 2 12 3 1750 45 54 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-101 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

748 523 520 SE 5TH ST COLLECTOR 438 1 12 4 1350 30 46 MINOR 749 523 945 SR76 ARTERIAL 689 2 12 4 1750 55 46 750 524 521 SE CHRISTIE WAY COLLECTOR 459 1 12 4 1750 55 54 751 524 522 SE PALM BEACH RD COLLECTOR 816 1 12 4 1750 55 54 MINOR 752 525 526 CR 714 ARTERIAL 2087 2 12 3 1900 50 47 753 525 527 CR 714 COLLECTOR 2747 1 12 4 1750 50 47 MINOR 754 526 522 CR 714 ARTERIAL 3464 2 12 3 1750 50 54 MINOR 755 527 525 CR 714 ARTERIAL 2747 2 12 3 1900 50 47 MINOR 756 527 937 SR AlA ARTERIAL 949 2 12 3 1750 45 47 MINOR 757 528 582 SR 1A ARTERIAL 957 2 12 4 1900 45 55 MINOR 758 528 1096 SE INDIAN ST ARTERIAL 611 2 12 4 1900 30 55 759 529 966 SR 1A COLLECTOR 3704 1 12 3 1700 40 55 LOCAL 760 530 567 TRAFFIC CIRCLE ROADWAY 127 1 12 4 900 20 57 MINOR 761 531 1140 SR76 ARTERIAL 1154 2 12 4 1900 55 56 762 532 537 SE CENTRAL PKWY COLLECTOR 1221 1 12 4 1698 55 54 763 533 532 SE CENTRAL PKWY COLLECTOR 1117 1 12 4 1698 55 54 764 534 533 SE CENTRAL PKWY COLLECTOR 654 1 12 4 1698 55 54 765 534 535 SE CENTRAL PKWY COLLECTOR 945 1 12 4 1698 55 54 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-102 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

766 1 535 536 1 SE CENTRAL PKWY COLLECTOR 700 1 12 4 1698 55 54 767 536 538 SE CENTRAL PKWY COLLECTOR 818 1 12 4 1750 55 54 768 537 237 SR 76 COLLECTOR 1357 3 12 1 1750 45 54 MAJOR 769 538 227 US 1 ARTERIAL 1523 3 12 0 1900 45 54 MAJOR 770 538 228 US 1 ARTERIAL 1355 3 12 0 1750 45 54 771 539 540 ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 1675 1 10 2 1698 40 47 772 540 541 ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 1119 1 10 2 1698 40 47 773 541 542 ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 2212 1 10 2 1698 40 47 774 542 543 ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 1913 1 10 2 1698 40 55 775 543 544 ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 1132 1 10 2 1125 40 55 776 544 545 ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 3371 1 12 4 1700 40 55 777 545 572 SE ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 930 1 12 4 1698 55 55 778 545 581 SE INDIAN ST COLLECTOR 1582 1 12 0 1700 40 55 779 546 539 ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 1471 1 10 2 1698 30 47 MINOR 780 546 874 SR AlA ARTERIAL 440 2 12 3 1900 45 47 781 547 281 CR 707 COLLECTOR 8417 1 10 1 1750 40 47 782 548 547 CR 707 COLLECTOR 2540 1 10 1 1698 40 58 783 549 550 SE SAILFISH POINT BLVD COLLECTOR 1836 1 12 4 1698 55 58 784 550 551 SE SAILFISH POINT BLVD COLLECTOR 4286 1 12 4 1698 55 48 785 551 552 MACARTHUR BLVD COLLECTOR 5243 1 12 4 1698 55 48 786 552 553 MACARTHUR BLVD COLLECTOR 1554 1 12 4 1698 55 48 787 553 280 MACARTHUR BLVD COLLECTOR 3251 1 12 4 1750 45 48 788 554 239 POMEROY ST COLLECTOR 4044 1 12 4 1750 55 56 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-103 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 789 554 555 SE WILLOUGHBY BLVD ROADWAY 3131 2 12 1 0 1900 50 54 790 554 557 POMEROY ST COLLECTOR 2932 1 12 4 1698 55 55 791 554 563 SE WILLOUGHBY BLVD COLLECTOR 3151 1 12 4 1700 50 56 MINOR 792 555 556 SE WILLOUGHBY BLVD ARTERIAL 2238 2 12 0 1750 50 54 MINOR 793 556 238 SE INDIAN ST ARTERIAL 2370 2 12 4 1750 45 54 794 557 558 POMEROY ST COLLECTOR 2137 1 12 4 1750 55 55 MAJOR 795 558 570 US I ARTERIAL 6034 3 12 4 1750 40 57 MAJOR 796 558 933 US 1 ARTERIAL 3151 3 12 4 1750 50 55 MINOR 797 559 560 SE WILLOUGHBY BLVD ARTERIAL 954 2 12 0 1900 50 54 MINOR 798 560 561 SE WILLOUGHBY BLVD ARTERIAL 1900 2 12 0 1750 50 54 MINOR 799 561 556 SE WILLOUGHBY BLVD ARTERIAL 1871 2 12 0 1750 50 54 MINOR 800 562 237 CR-714 ARTERIAL 1979 2 12 4 1750 45 54 MINOR 801 562 241 CR 714 ARTERIAL 2241 2 12 4 1900 45 54 MINOR 802 562 559 SE WILLOUGHBY BLVD ARTERIAL 1376 2 12 0 1900 50 54 803 563 564 SE WILLOUGHBY BLVD COLLECTOR 2377 1 12 4 1750 50 57 804 564 240 SALERNO RD COLLECTOR 8616 1 12 4 1750 45 56 805 564 565 SE WILLOUGHBY BLVD COLLECTOR 1526 1 12 2 1700 45 57 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-104 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

806 1 564 973 1 SALERNO RD COLLECTOR 2584 1 12 4 1700 so 57 807 565 566 SE WILLOUGHBY BLVD COLLECTOR 1232 1 12 2 1750 45 57 808 566 934 SE COVE RD COLLECTOR 5833 1 12 0 1750 50 56 809 567 1 5E COVE RD COLLECTOR 5786 1 12 4 1750 45 57 LOCAL 810 567 568 TRAFFIC CIRCLE ROADWAY 169 1 12 3 900 20 57 811 568 569 SR 1A COLLECTOR 1824 1 12 3 1700 55 58 MAJOR 812 570 1 US i ARTERIAL 2645 3 12 4 1750 40 57 MAJOR 813 570 558 US 1 ARTERIAL 6034 3 12 4 1750 40 57 814 571 570 SALERNO RD COLLECTOR 4981 1 12 1 1750 35 57 815 571 584 SR 1A COLLECTOR 1673 1 12 4 1698 55 57 816 572 573 SE ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 1842 1 12 4 1698 55 55 LOCAL 817 572 580 SE CLAYTON ROADWAY 1779 1 12 4 1350 30 55 818 573 574 SE ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 1529 1 12 4 1698 55 55 819 574 575 SE ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 2181 1 12 4 1700 55 55 820 574 579 SE JEFFERSON ST COLLECTOR 4229 1 12 4 1350 30 55 821 575 576 SE ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 2391 1 12 4 1698 55 55 822 576 577 SE ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 1625 1 12 4 1700 55 55 823 577 965 SE ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 1408 1 12 4 1350 30 55 824 579 583 SE JEFFERSON ST COLLECTOR 1461 1 12 4 1750 30 55 LOCAL 825 580 579 SE EVERGREEN AVE ROADWAY 2161 1 12 13S0 30 55 LOCAL 826 580 581 SE EVERGREEN AVE ROADWAY 894 1 12 4 1350 30 55 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-1o5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 827 I 580 582 I SE CLAYTON ROADWAY 2124 1 12 4 1350 30 55 MINOR 828 581 528 SE INDIAN ST ARTERIAL 2472 2 12 0 1750 35 55 MINOR 829 582 583 SR 1A ARTERIAL 2205 2 12 4 1750 45 55 830 583 529 SR 1A COLLECTOR 2278 1 12 3 1700 40 55 831 584 530 SR 1A COLLECTOR 1113 1 12 4 1698 55 57 832 585 1157 SE ANCHOR AVE COLLECTOR 926 1 12 4 1575 35 57 833 586 585 SE HORSESHOE POINT RD COLLECTOR 6065 1 12 4 1700 55 58 834 587 586 SE HORSESHOE POINT RD COLLECTOR 1639 1 12 4 1698 55 58 LOCAL 835 588 530 TRAFFIC CIRCLE ROADWAY 189 1 12 4 900 20 57 836 589 588 SE COVE RD COLLECTOR 6263 1 12 4 1698 55 58 837 590 861 CR 707 COLLECTOR 2434 1 12 0 1575 35 12 838 591 212 CR 607A COLLECTOR 2103 1 12 0 1750 55 9 839 591 285 CR 607A COLLECTOR 3325 1 12 0 1698 40 9 MINOR 840 592 1029 SR 615 ARTERIAL 2004 2 12 3 1750 45 9 LOCAL 841 592 1035 AVE D ROADWAY 2676 1 12 4 1750 35 12 LOCAL 842 592 1061 AVE D ROADWAY 1359 1 12 4 1750 30 9 843 593 292 N 13TH ST COLLECTOR 4010 1 12 4 1698 40 12 LOCAL 844 593 1036 AVE D ROADWAY 880 1 12 4 1575 35 12 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-106 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 845 1 593 1054 I AVE D ROADWAY 583 1 12 8 1750 40 12 MAJOR 846 594 232 US 1 ARTERIAL 1042 2 12 4 1750 40 12 MAJOR 847 594 881 US 1 ARTERIAL 616 2 12 4 1750 40 12 LOCAL 848 594 1041 AVE D ROADWAY 526 1 12 0 1750 35 12 MAJOR 849 595 233 US 1 ARTERIAL 1140 2 12 4 1750 50 12 MAJOR 850 595 291 US 1 ARTERIAL 4482 2 12 4 1750 50 6 851 595 1130 JUANITA AVE COLLECTOR 1413 1 12 0 1700 40 12 852 596 597 JUANITA AVE COLLECTOR 5278 1 12 0 1698 40 9 MINOR 853 596 1331 SR 615 ARTERIAL 1321 2 12 8 1750 45 9 854 597 596 JUANITA AVE COLLECTOR 5278 1 12 0 1750 40 9 855 597 598 JUANITA AVE COLLECTOR 3944 1 12 0 1698 40 9 856 598 597 JUANITA AVE COLLECTOR 3943 1 12 0 1700 40 9 857 598 599 N 53RD ST COLLECTOR 1522 1 12 0 1698 40 9 858 599 287 CR 607A COLLECTOR 2389 1 12 0 1698 55 9 859 599 598 N 53RD ST COLLECTOR 1523 1 12 0 1700 40 9 860 600 1137 SR AlA COLLECTOR 10074 1 12 4 1750 55 6 861 601 600 SR AlA COLLECTOR 5220 1 12 4 1700 55 6 862 602 601 SR AlA COLLECTOR 7079 1 12 4 1700 55 6 863 602 603 SR AlA COLLECTOR 5284 1 12 4 1700 55 6 864 603 602 SR AlA COLLECTOR 5282 1 12 4 1700 55 6 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-107 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

865 603 604 SR AlA COLLECTOR 1455 1 12 4 1700 50 6 866 60 603 SR AIA COLLECTOR 1456 1 12 4 1750 50 6 867 604 605 SR AlA COLLECTOR 2306 1 12 4 1698 55 6 868 605 606 SR AIA COLLECTOR 2358 1 12 4 1698 50 6 869 606 607 SR AIA COLLECTOR 2874 1 12 4 1698 50 6 870 607 865 SR AlA COLLECTOR 2976 1 12 4 1698 55 12 871 608 233 SR AlA COLLECTOR 683 3 12 4 1750 40 12 872 608 611 CR 605 COLLECTOR 5480 1 12 4 1698 55 6 MAJOR 873 609 294 US 1 ARTERIAL 687 2 12 4 1905 45 12 874 609 610 CR 605 COLLECTOR 1360 1 12 0 1698 55 12 MAJOR 875 609 863 US 1 ARTERIAL 1616 2 12 4 1750 45 12 876 610 608 CR 605 COLLECTOR 1977 1 12 4 1750 55 12 877 611 291 CR 608 COLLECTOR 1043 1 12 4 1750 30 6 878 611 612 CR 605 COLLECTOR 5478 1 12 4 1698 55 6 879 612 613 CR 605 COLLECTOR 8784 1 12 4 1698 55 6 880 613 235 INDRIO RD COLLECTOR 949 1 12 4 1750 30 5 881 613 614 CR 605 COLLECTOR 4031 1 12 4 1698 55 5 882 614 615 CR 605 COLLECTOR 3576 1 12 4 1698 55 5 883 615 616 CR 605 COLLECTOR 5936 1 12 4 1698 55 2 884 617 618 CR 712 COLLECTOR 8035 1 12 4 1698 55 16 885 618 197 CR 609A COLLECTOR 2074 1 12 4 1698 55 16

.886 618 619 CR 712 COLLECTOR 3743 1 12 4 1698 55 16 887 619 196 CR 712 COLLECTOR 655 1 12 4 1698 45 16 888 620 621 GLADES CUT OFF RD COLLECTOR 19758 1 12 2 1698 40 26 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-108 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

889 621 622 RANGE LINE RD COLLECTOR 8195 1 12 4 1698 40 26 890 621 1134 GLADES CUT OFF RD COLLECTOR 6323 1 12 2 1700 40 26 891 623 84 CROSSTOWN PKWY COLLECTOR 2310 3 12 4 1750 55 29 MINOR 892 624 623 CROSSTOWN PKWY ARTERIAL 2184 2 12 4 1900 55 26 MINOR 893 625 624 SW VILLAGE PKWY ARTERIAL 2312 2 12 4 1900 45 26 MINOR 894 626 628 SW VILLAGE PKWY ARTERIAL 278 2 12 4 1900 25 26 MINOR 895 626 629 SW VILLAGE PKWY ARTERIAL 1420 2 12 1 1900 40 26 MINOR 896 627 626 SW VILLAGE PKWY ARTERIAL 236 2 12 4 1900 25 26 MINOR 897 628 625 SW VILLAGE PKWY ARTERIAL 281 2 12 4 1900 25 26 MINOR 898 629 630 SW VILLAGE PKWY ARTERIAL 1604 2 12 1 1900 40 26 MINOR 899 630 631 SW VILLAGE PKWY ARTERIAL 2299 2 12 1 1750 40 29 MINOR 900 631 632 SW VILLAGE PKWY ARTERIAL 1217 2 12 1 1750 40 29 MINOR 901 632 637 SW VILLAGE PKWY ARTERIAL 1156 2 12 1 1750 40 29 MINOR 902 633 627 WESTCLIFF LN ARTERIAL 2760 2 12 4 1900 55 26 MINOR _

903 634 633 SW COMMUNITY BLVD ARTERIAL 1894 1900 26 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-109 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 904 I 634 1357 I SW COMMUNITY BLVD ARTERIAL 1025 2 12 4 1900 40 26 MINOR 905 635 1364 SW COMMUNITY BLVD ARTERIAL 139 2 12 4 1900 25 26 MINOR 906 636 75 SR 716 ARTERIAL 2013 2 12 4 1750 55 26 MINOR 907 637 75 SW VILLAGE PKWY ARTERIAL 1015 2 12 1 1750 40 29 MINOR 908 638 639 SW COMMUNITY BLVD ARTERIAL 119 2 12 4 1900 25 26 MINOR 909 639 634 SW COMMUNITY BLVD ARTERIAL 152 2 12 4 1900 25 26 910 641 258 SAVONA BLVD COLLECTOR 1452 1 12 0 1750 50 30 911 641 648 SAVONA BLVD COLLECTOR 7980 1 12 4 1700 50 36 MINOR 912 642 257 SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVD ARTERIAL 1650 2 12 0 1750 55 37 MINOR 913 642 643 SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVD ARTERIAL 1424 2 12 0 1750 40 37 MINOR 914 643 642 SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVD ARTERIAL 1425 2 12 0 1900 55 37 915 643 644 SW DARWIN BLVD COLLECTOR 1698 1 12 0 1700 50 37 MINOR 916 643 1243 SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVD ARTERIAL 1195 2 12 0 1750 55 37 917 644 643 SW DARWIN BLVD COLLECTOR 1697 1 12 0 1750 40 37 918 644 645 SW DARWIN BLVD COLLECTOR 741 1 12 0 1698 50 37 919 645 646 SW DARWIN BLVD COLLECTOR 1568 1 12 0 1698 55 37 920 646 647 SW DARWIN BLVD COLLECTOR 1670 1 12 0 1750 55 37 921 647 6S6 SW DARWIN BLVD COLLECTOR 3943 1 12 0 1698 55 37 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-110 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

922 647 704 SW TULIP BLVD COLLECTOR 2062 1 12 0 1700 40 37 923 648 641 SAVONA BLVD COLLECTOR 7980 1 12 0 1698 50 36 924 648 649 SAVONA BLVD COLLECTOR 5346 1 12 0 1698 50 37 925 649 "659 SAVONA BLVD COLLECTOR 775 1 12 0 1698 50 39 926 650 649 SW PAAR DR COLLECTOR 2314 1 12 0 1700 45 39 927 651 650 SW PAAR DR COLLECTOR 2203 1 12 0 1700 45 38 928 652 651 SW PAAR DR COLLECTOR 1047 1 12 4 1700 45 38 929 652 1248 SW ROSSER BLVD COLLECTOR 4754 1 12 4 1700 55 36 930 653 649 SW PAAR DR COLLECTOR 4012 1 12 0 1700 45 37 931 653 1111 SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 5385 1 12 0 1700 50 39 932 654 653 SW PAAR DR COLLECTOR 1523 1 12 0 1750 50 37 933 654 655 SW PAAR DR COLLECTOR 3967 1 12 0 1700 55 37 934 655 831 SW DARWIN BLVD COLLECTOR 4292 1 12 0 1698 55 39 935 656 655 SW DARWIN BLVD COLLECTOR 2228 1 12 0 1700 55 37 936 657 835 BECKER RD COLLECTOR 4952 1 12 1 1750 50 42 937 657 1106 BECKER RD COLLECTOR 3011 1 12 1 1700 50 39 MINOR 938 658 660 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 3809 2 12 1 1750 50 39 939 658 1141 SW CITRUS BLVD COLLECTOR 1117 2 12 4 1900 55 39 940 659 660 SAVONA BLVD COLLECTOR 4049 1 12 0 1750 50 39 MINOR 941 660 981 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 2716 2 12 1 1750 50 39 942 661 662 SW CITRUS BLVD COLLECTOR 2296 1 12 4 1698 55 39 943 662 663 SW CITRUS BLVD COLLECTOR 1986 1 12 4 1698 55 39 944 663 664 SW CITRUS BLVD COLLECTOR 2591 1 12 4 1698 55 39 945 664 665 SW CITRUS BLVD COLLECTOR 3857 1 12 4 1698 55 39 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-Ill KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

946 1 665 666 1 SW CITRUS BLVD COLLECTOR 1 4103 1 12 4 1698 55 so 9467 666 6667 SW CITRUS BLVD COLLECTOR 24038 1 12 4 1698 55 so 947 666 667 SW CITRUS BLVD COLLECTOR 2028 1 12 4 1698 55 50 948 667 668 SW CITRUS BLVD COLLECTOR 2068 1 12 4 1698 55 50 949 668 669 SW CITRUS BLVD COLLECTOR 2551 1 12 4 1698 55 50 950 669 670 SW CITRUS BLVD COLLECTOR 1978 1 12 1 4 1698 55 1 50 951 670 6712 S CIRU BLVD COLLECTOR 5348 1 12 4 1750 55 50 952 671 672 CR 726 COLLECTOR 9296 1 12 4 1698 55 50 954 671 980 SR 714 COLLECTOR 2628 1 12 4 1750 55 50 955 672 676 CR 726 COLLECTOR 7933 1 1 12 4 1698 55 52 956 673 24 SR 714 COLLECTOR 8146 1 12 4 1698 60 1 49 957 673 671 SIR 714 COLLECTOR 9298 1 12 4 1750 50 50 MINOR 958 674 1241 SW ROSSER BLVD ARTERIAL 1254 2 12 0 1750 55 36 959 674 1248 SW ROSSER BLVD COLLECTOR 6822 1 12 0 1698 55 36 960 675 677 SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 2225 1 12 0 1698 50 37 961 677 653 SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 1812 1 12 0 1750 50 37 LOCAL 962 678 679 VIA TESORO ROADWAY 1954 1 12 0 1350 30 40 LOCAL 963 679 680 VIA TESORO ROADWAY 2079 1 12 0 1350 30 1 40 LOCAL 964 680 681 VIA TESORO ROADWAY 1694 1 12 0 1350 30 42 LOCAL 965 681 682 VIA TESORO ROADWAY 1408 1 12 0 1350 30 42 LOCAL 966 682 .692 VIA TESORO ROADWAY 11137 1 12 0 1750 30 42 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-112 KILD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 967 683 684 HARBOUR RIDGE BLVD ROADWAY 1510 1 12 0 1350 30 40 LOCAL 968 684 685 HARBOUR RIDGE BLVD ROADWAY 2518 1 12 0 1350 30 40 LOCAL 969 685 686 HARBOUR RIDGE BLVD ROADWAY 460 2 12 0 1900 30 41 LOCAL 970 686 687 HARBOUR RIDGE BLVD ROADWAY 1929 1 12 0 1350 30 41 LOCAL 971 687 688 HARBOUR RIDGE BLVD ROADWAY 2496 1 12 0 1350 30 43 972 688 691 NW GILSON RD COLLECTOR 2684 1 12 0 1350 30 43 LOCAL 973 689 690 HARBOUR RIDGE BLVD ROADWAY 1823 1 12 0 1350 30 41 LOCAL 974 690 686 HARBOUR RIDGE BLVD ROADWAY 1033 1 12 0 1350 30 41 975 691 424 NW GILSON RD COLLECTOR 1405 1 12 4 1350 30 43 MINOR 976 692 421 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 1059 2 12 4 1750 55 42 MINOR 977 693 257 SW TULIP BLVD ARTERIAL 2187 2 12 0 1750 40 30 978 694 693 SW TULIP BLVD COLLECTOR 3539 1 12 0 1700 40 37 979 695 694 SW TULIP BLVD COLLECTOR 2300 1 12 0 1700 40 37 980 696 695 SW TULIP BLVD COLLECTOR 1098 1 12 0 1700 40 37 981 696 697 SW TULIP BLVD COLLECTOR 1659 1 12 0 1700 40 37 982 697 698 SW TULIP BLVD COLLECTOR 1134 1 12 0 1700 40 37 983 698 647 SW TULIP BLVD COLLECTOR 1274 1 12 0 1750 40 37 984 699 697 SW PAAR DR COLLECTOR 1648 1 12 0 1700 40 37 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-113 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

985 700 699 SW PAAR DR COLLECTOR 1228 I 12 0 1700 50 37 986 700 701 SW PAAR DR COLLECTOR 1635 1 12 0 1700 50 40 987 701 702 SW PAAR DR COLLECTOR 1599 1 12 0 1700 50 40 988 702 703 SW PAAR DR COLLECTOR 2657 1 12 0 1700 50 40 989 703 655 SW PAAR DR COLLECTOR 2096 1 12 0 1700 50 37 990 704 705 SW TULIP BLVD COLLECTOR 2637 1 12 0 1700 40 37 991 705 675 SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 2096 1 12 0 1698 50 37 LOCAL 992 706 707 SW STUART W BLVD ROADWAY 11484 1 12 0 1700 30 38 LOCAL 993 707 708 SW STUART W BLVD ROADWAY 1289 1 12 0 1700 30 49 LOCAL 994 708 709 SW STUART W BLVD ROADWAY 1279 1 12 0 1700 30 49 LOCAL 995 709 710 SW STUART W BLVD ROADWAY 1392 1 12 0 1700 30 49 LOCAL 996 710 22 SW STUART W BLVD ROADWAY 868 1 12 0 1700 30 49 LOCAL 997 711 717 SW CRANE CREEK AVE ROADWAY 933 1 12 0 1350 30 51 LOCAL 998 712 713 SW CRANE CREEK AVE ROADWAY 1421 1 12 0 1350 30 51 LOCAL 999 713 722 SW CRANE CREEK AVE ROADWAY 1260 1 12 0 1350 30 51 LOCAL 1000 714 715 SW ST ANDREWS DR ROADWAY 1765 1 12 0 1350 30 43 LOCAL 1001 715 716 SW ST ANDREWS DR ROADWAY 1122 1 12 0 1350 30 51 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-114 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 1002 716 717 SW ST ANDREWS DR ROADWAY 1176 1 12 0 1350 30 51 LOCAL 1003 717 712 SW CRANE CREEK AVE ROADWAY 706 1 12 0 1350 30 51 LOCAL 1004 718 719 SW SANDHILL RD ROADWAY 1365 1 12 0 1350 30 51 LOCAL 1005 719 720 SW SANDHILL RD ROADWAY 1545 1 12 0 1350 30 50 LOCAL 1006 720 979 SW SANDHILL RD ROADWAY 897 1 12 0 1350 30 51 LOCAL 1007 721 722 SW SANDHILL RD ROADWAY 1511 1 12 0 1350 30 51 LOCAL 1008 722 245 SW CRANE CREEK AVE ROADWAY 898 1 12 0 1350 30 51 1009 723 1345 AVE Q COLLECTOR 532 1 12 4 1350 30 12 1010 724 725 CR 707 COLLECTOR 150 1 10 0 900 20 12 1011 725 276 CR 707 COLLECTOR 2247 1 12 0 1750 40 12 MINOR 1012 726 276 SR AlA ARTERIAL 5188 2 12 4 1750 45 12 1013 727 728 SR A1A COLLECTOR 128 1 12 4 900 20 12 1014 728 726 SR AlA COLLECTOR 613 1 12 4 1700 45 12 1015 729 307 OLEANDER BLVD COLLECTOR 204 1 12 1 1348 30 14 MINOR 1016 730 217 CR 712 ARTERIAL 659 2 12 0 1750 45 21 1017 731 310 CR 712 COLLECTOR 1991 1 12 0 1750 45 21 MINOR 1018 732 309 CR 712 ARTERIAL 640 2 12 2 1750 55 18 1019 733 316 CR 712 COLLECTOR 4547 1 12 0 1750 50 18 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-115 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 1020 734 377 ST JAMES BLVD. ROADWAY 1972 1 12 1 4 1750 30 20 LOCAL 1021 735 736 RESERVE BLVD ROADWAY 124 1 12 4 900 20 27 1022 736 86 RESERVE BLVD COLLECTOR 1518 1 12 4 1348 30 27 LOCAL 1023 738 735 RESERVE BLVD ROADWAY 160 1 12 4 900 20 27 1024 739 738 RESERVE BLVD COLLECTOR 1265 1 12 4 1348 30 27 1025 741 742 RESERVE BLVD COLLECTOR 1804 1 12 4 1348 30 26 1026 742 620 RESERVE BLVD COLLECTOR 2147 1 12 4 1348 30 16 LOCAL 1027 743 744 PLANTATION LAKES DR ROADWAY 943 1 12 4 1350 30 26 LOCAL 1028 744 745 PLANTATION LAKES DR ROADWAY 1163 1 12 4 1350 30 27 LOCAL 1029 745 739 PLANTATION LAKES DR ROADWAY 1079 1 12 4 1350 30 27 LOCAL 1030 746 747 LEGEND DR ROADWAY 2201 1 12 4 900 20 16 LOCAL 1031 747 742 LEGEND DR ROADWAY 777 1 12 4 900 20 26 1032 748 741 CLUB HOUSE DR COLLECTOR 1612 1 12 4 1350 30 27 LOCAL 1033 749 741 PLANTATION LAKES DR ROADWAY 1805 1 12 4 1350 30 26 LOCAL 1034 750 743 PLANTATION LAKES DR ROADWAY 2026 1 12 4 1125 25 26 1035 751 1164 NW PEACOCK BLVD COLLECTOR 1254 2 12 0 1750 30 27 1036 752 751 NW PEACOCK BLVD COLLECTOR 625 2 12 0 1750 40 27 1037 753 752 NW PEACOCK BLVD COLLECTOR 4323 1 12 0 1700 40 27 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-116 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LUCAL 1038 754 753 INW PEACOCK BLVD ROADWAY 1351 1 12 0 1700 40 19 LOCAL 1039 755 756 NW CALIFORNIA BLVD ROADWAY 117 2 12 0 1900 25 19 LOCAL 1040 755 767 NW CALIFORNIA BLVD ROADWAY 1060 1 12 0 1700 40 19 LOCAL 1041 756 754 NW PEACOCK BLVD ROADWAY 150 2 12 0 1900 25 19 LOCAL 1042 757 758 NW PEACOCK BLVD ROADWAY 794 1 12 0 1350 30 20 LOCAL 1043 757 807 NW PEACOCK BLVD ROADWAY 1449 1 12 0 1350 30 19 LOCAL 1044 758 757 NW PEACOCK BLVD ROADWAY 794 1 12 0 1350 30 20 LOCAL 1045 758 1372 NW PEACOCK BLVD ROADWAY 1570 1 12 0 1350 30 20 LOCAL 1046 760 761 NW PEACOCK BLVD. ROADWAY 188 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1047 760 799 OLD INLET DR COLLECTOR 666 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1048 761 762 CASHMERE BLVD COLLECTOR 2917 1 12 0 1700 40 20 1049 762 763 CASHMERE BLVD COLLECTOR 1208 1 12 0 1700 40 20 1050 763 764 CASHMERE BLVD COLLECTOR 1088 1 12 0 1700 40 28 1051 764 765 CASHMERE BLVD COLLECTOR 531 1 12 0 1700 40 28 MINOR 1052 765 766 CASHMERE BLVD ARTERIAL 1598 2 12 0 1900 40 28 MINOR 1053 766 811 CASHMERE BLVD ARTERIAL 1642 2 12 0 1750 40 28 1054 767 768 NW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 2927 1 12 0 1700 40 27 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-117 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1055 768 769 NW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 1230 1 12 0 1700 40 27 1056 769 751 NW UNIVERSITY DR COLLECTOR 3033 1 12 4 1750 40 27 1057 769 770 NW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 1677 1 12 0 1700 40 27 1058 770 771 NW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 123 1 12 0 1350 30 27 1059 771 342 NW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 1732 1 12 0 1750 40 27 1060 772 774 SW DEL RIO BLVD COLLECTOR 3105 1 12 0 1750 30 30 1061 772 1240 SW DEL RIO BLVD COLLECTOR 1534 1 12 0 1750 30 30 1062 773 344 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 1938 1 12 0 1750 40 29 1063 773 347 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 2239 1 12 4 1700 40 29 1064 773 1240 SW DEL RIO BLVD COLLECTOR 5293 1 12 0 1750 30 29 1065 774 351 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 1890 1 12 0 1698 40 30 1066 774 775 SW DEL RIO BLVD COLLECTOR 4688 1 12 0 1750 30 30 MAJOR 1067 775 254 SR 716 ARTERIAL 2058 3 12 4 1750 45 30 MAJOR 1068 775 255 SR 716 ARTERIAL 416 3 12 4 1900 45 30 LOCAL 1069 776 777 SW SAVAGE BLVD ROADWAY 1038 1 12 0 1700 30 29 LOCAL 1070 777 778 SW SAVAGE BLVD ROADWAY 1995 1 12 0 1700 30 29 LOCAL 1071 778 779 SW SAVAGE BLVD ROADWAY 2310 1 12 0 1700 30 29 LOCAL 1072 779 780 SW SAVAGE BLVD ROADWAY 1494 1 12 0 1700 30 29 LOCAL 1073 780 781 SW SAVAGE BLVD ROADWAY 1920 1 12 0 1700 3029 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-118 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 1074 1 781 830 1 SW SAVAGE BLVD ROADWAY 1674 1 12 0 1750 30 29 MINOR 1075 782 798 EAST TORINO PKWY ARTERIAL 369 2 12 4 1750 45 18 1076 783 782 EAST TORINO PKWY COLLECTOR 2674 1 12 4 1700 45 17 1077 784 783 EAST TORINO PKWY COLLECTOR 1604 1 12 0 1700 45 20 1078 785 784 EAST TORINO PKWY COLLECTOR 1559 1 12 0 1700 40 20 1079 786 785 EAST TORINO PKWY COLLECTOR 1361 1 12 0 1700 40 20 1080 787 784 N TORINO PKWY COLLECTOR 782 1 12 0 1700 40 20 1081 788 787 N TORINO PKWY COLLECTOR 3205 1 12 0 1700 40 19 1082 789 788 N TORINO PKWY COLLECTOR 1291 1 12 0 1700 30 19 1083 790 789 W TORINO PKWY COLLECTOR 952 1 12 0 1700 30 19 1084 791 790 W TORINO PKWY COLLECTOR 2269 1 12 0 1700 40 19 1085 792 791 W TORINO PKWY COLLECTOR 2640 1 12 0 1700 40 19 1086 793 792 W TORINO PKWY COLLECTOR 3404 1 12 0 1700 40 19 1087 794 795 EAST TORINO PKWY COLLECTOR 2263 1 12 0 1700 40 20 1088 795 796 EAST TORINO PKWY COLLECTOR 1792 1 12 0 1700 40 20 1089 796 797 EAST TORINO PKWY COLLECTOR 1706 1 12 0 1700 40 20 1090 797 786 EAST TORINO PKWY COLLECTOR 1372 1 12 0 1700 40 20 MINOR 1091 798 308 CR 712 ARTERIAL 1480 2 12 4 1750 50 17 LOCAL 1092 799 800 SHOREVIEW DR ROADWAY 670 1 12 0 1350 30 20 LOCAL 1093 800 801 SHOREVIEW DR ROADWAY 843 1 12 0 1350 30 20 LOCAL 1094 801 802 SHOREVIEW DR ROADWAY 643 1 12 0 1700 30 20 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-119 .KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 1095 802 803 SHOREVIEW DR ROADWAY 582 1 12 0 1350 30 20 LOCAL 1096 803 804 BLUE LAKE DR ROADWAY 1218 1 12 0 1350 30 28 LOCAL 1097 804 805 BLUE LAKE DR ROADWAY 1422 1 12 0 1350 30 28 LOCAL 1098 805 806 NW BETHANY DR ROADWAY 1368 1 12 0 1350 30 28 LOCAL 1099 806 341 NW BETHANY DR ROADWAY 1440 1 12 0 1750 30 28 1100 807 756 NW PEACOCK BLVD COLLECTOR 1582 1 12 0 1700 40 19 LOCAL 1101 807 757 NW PEACOCK BLVD ROADWAY 1442 1 12 0 1350 30 19 LOCAL 1102 807 808 NE SUN TERRACE CIR ROADWAY 1523 1 12 0 1350 30 19 LOCAL 1103 808 809 NE SUN TERRACE CIR ROADWAY 993 1 12 0 1350 30 19 LOCAL 1104 809 810 NE SUN TERRACE CIR ROADWAY 1420 1 12 0 1350 30 27 LOCAL 1105 810 805 NE SUN TERRACE CIR ROADWAY 2167 1 12 0 1350 30 27 MINOR 1106 811 1016 ST LUCIE BLVD ARTERIAL 1660 2 12 0 1750 40 28 MINOR 1107 812 92 ST LUCIE BLVD ARTERIAL 1303 2 12 0 1900 55 27 1108 813 814 NE VOLUCIA DR COLLECTOR 1864 1 12 0 1700 0 19 1109 814 815 NE VOLUCIA DR COLLECTOR 1593 12 0 1700 4 19 1110 815 816 NE VOLUCIA DR COLLECTOR 2012 1 12 0 1700 40 19 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-120 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1111 816 785 W BLANTON BLVD COLLECTOR 2942 1 12 0 1700 40 19 1112 816 789 W BLANTON BLVD COLLECTOR 2678 1 12 0 1700 30 19 1113 817 344 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 632 1 12 0 1750 35 27 1114 818 819 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 1723 1 12 0 1575 35 27 1115 818 821 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 1373 1 12 0 1750 35 27 1116 819 342 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 1431 1 12 0 1750 35 27 1117 820 1250 SWCASHMERE BLVD COLLECTOR 1456 1 12 0 1750 40 28 1118 821 817 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 1823 1 12 0 1575 35 27 1119 822 820 SW CASHMERE BLVD COLLECTOR 2450 1 12 0 1750 40 28 1120 822 1258 SW CASHMERE BLVD COLLECTOR 2013 1 12 0 1750 30 28 1121 823 344 CROSSTOWN PKWY COLLECTOR 5382 3 12 3 1750 55 29 1122 823 1240 CASHMERE BLVD COLLECTOR 2094 1 12 4 1750 40 30 1123 824 821 SW HEATHERWOOD BLVD COLLECTOR 1102 1 12 0 1750 35 27 LOCAL 1124 825 821 SW HEATHERWOOD BLVD ROADWAY 2070 1 12 0 1750 35 27 LOCAL 1125 826 825 SW HEATHERWOOD BLVD ROADWAY 1120 1 12 4 1750 40 27 LOCAL 1126 826 1261 SW HEATHERWOOD BLVD ROADWAY 1283 1 12 0 1750 40 28 1127 827 829 SW COUNTRY CLUB DR COLLECTOR 1859 1 12 0 1750 30 27 1128 828 827 SW COUNTRY CLUB DR COLLECTOR 1420 1 12 0 1350 30 27 MINOR 1129 829 342 ST LUCIE BLVD ARTERIAL 1663 2 12 0 1750 55 27 MAJOR 1130 830 73 SR 716 ARTERIAL 2174 3 12 4 1750 45 29 1131 831 657 SW DARWIN BLVD COLLECTOR 2282 1 12 0 1750 50 39 1132 832 831 SW KESTOR DR COLLECTOR 2130 1 12 0 1350 30 39 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-121 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1133 833 832 SW KESTOR DR COLLECTOR 1507 1 12 0 1350 30 42 1134 833 834 SW KESTOR DR COLLECTOR 1536 1 12 0 1350 30 42 1135 834 835 SW KESTOR DR COLLECTOR 2220 1 12 0 1750 30 42 1136 835 657 BECKER RD COLLECTOR 4952 1 12 1 1750 40 42 MINOR 1137 835 984 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 1856 2 12 1 1900 40 42 MAJOR 1138 836 1010 usI ARTERIAL 2483 3 12 4 1750 45 31 MAJOR 1139 836 1012 US 1 ARTERIAL 4275 3 12 4 1750 50 31 1140 837 836 SAVANNA CLUB BLVD COLLECTOR 1704 2 12 4 1750 30 31 1141 838 837 SAVANNA CLUB BLVD COLLECTOR 2007 1 12 4 1350 30 32 1142 839 838 SAVANNA CLUB BLVD COLLECTOR 1595 1 12 4 1350 30 32 1143 840 839 SAVANNA CLUB BLVD COLLECTOR 1171 1 12 4 1350 30 32 LOCAL 1144 841 840 BROMELIAD CR ROADWAY 1333 1 12 4 1350 30 32 LOCAL 1145 842 840 BROMELIAD CR ROADWAY 2183 1 12 4 1350 30 32 MINOR 1146 843 1367 SR 714 ARTERIAL 2225 2 12 4 1750 50 51 1147 844 843 SW MONARCH CLUB DR COLLECTOR 996 1 12 0 1750 30 51 1148 845 846 SW MONARCH CLUB DR COLLECTOR 787 1 12 0 1350 30 51 1149 846 844 SW MONARCH CLUB DR COLLECTOR 1029 1 12 0 1350 30 51 5 847 846 SW FOXPOINT TRAIL COLLECTOR 969 1 12 4 1350 30 51 LOCAL 1151 848 439 MAPP RD ROADWAY 5173 1 12 0 1750 30 51 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-122 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1152 1 849 219 E PRIMA VISTA BLVD ARTERIAL 1884 2 12 4 1750 40 31 MAJOR 1153 850 216 US 1 ARTERIAL 600 3 12 4 1900 45 23 MAJOR 1154 850 219 US 1 ARTERIAL 2939 3 12 4 1750 45 23 1155 851 850 NE RIOMAR DR COLLECTOR 748 1 12 4 1750 35 23 1156 851 876 NE RIOMAR DR COLLECTOR 2064 1 12 4 1350 30 23 MAJOR 1157 852 216 US I ARTERIAL 818 3 12 4 1900 45 23 MAJOR 1158 852 854 US 1 ARTERIAL 2670 3 12 4 1750 45 23 LOCAL 1159 853 852 BRAZILIAN CIR ROADWAY 580 1 12 4 1750 30 23 MAJOR 1160 854 852 US 1 ARTERIAL 2670 3 12 4 1750 45 23 MAJOR 1161 854 856 US 1 ARTERIAL 2982 3 12 4 1750 45 23 1162 855 854 KITTERMAN RD COLLECTOR 2648 1 10 0 1750 35 23 LOCAL 1163 855 858 OLEANDER AVE ROADWAY 6136 1 12 4 1575 35 23 MAJOR 1164 856 854 US 1 ARTERIAL 2982 3 12 4 1750 45 23 MAJOR 1165 856 1153 US 1 ARTERIAL 1764 3 12 4 1750 45 23 LOCAL 1166 857 856 EASY ST ROADWAY 3021 1 12 0 1575 35 23 1167 858 859 ULRICH RD COLLECTOR 2515 1 12 0 1750 30 23 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-123 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LULAL 11681 858 875 OLEANDER AVE ROADWAY 3846 1 12 4 1575 35 21 MAJOR 1169 859 1153 US 1 ARTERIAL 1417 3 12 4 1750 45 23 MAJOR 1170 859 1155 US 1 ARTERIAL 747 3 12 4 1750 45 23 1171 860 497 CR 707 COLLECTOR 1518 1 10 0 1750 35 12 1172 861 860 CR 707 COLLECTOR 94 1 12 0 1125 25 12 LOCAL 1173 862 497 ORANGE AVE ROADWAY 450 1 12 0 1750 30 12 MAJOR 1174 863 232 US 1 ARTERIAL 756 2 12 4 1750 40 12 MAJOR 1175 863 609 US 1 ARTERIAL 1615 2 12 4 1905 45 12 LOCAL 1176 864 863 AVE H ROADWAY 753 1 12 0 1750 35 12 MINOR 1177 865 608 SR AlA ARTERIAL 730 2 12 4 1750 40 12 1178 866 274 SR AlA COLLECTOR 589 1 12 4 1698 55 13 LOCAL 1179 867 866 BINNEY DR ROADWAY 601 1 12 4 1750 30 13 1180 868 866 SR AIA COLLECTOR 305 1 12 4 1750 35 13 LOCAL 1181 869 278 SR AIA ROADWAY 76 1 12 4 900 20 45, 1182 869 498 CAUSEWAY BLVD COLLECTOR 3935 1 12 4 1698 45 45 LOCAL 1183 870 869 SR AlA ROADWAY 63 1 12 4 900 20 45 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-124 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

MINUR 1184 1 871 281 1 SR A1A ARTERIAL 413 2 12 4 1750 40 47 1185 872 873 ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 447 1 12 4 1700 40 47 1186 873 546 ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 500 1 12 4 1750 40 47 1187 873 874 ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 258 1 12 4 1700 40 47 MINOR 1188 874 284 SR AIA ARTERIAL 1218 2 12 3 1750 45 47 1189 875 310 OLEANDER AVE COLLECTOR 703 1 12 1 1750 35 21 1190 876 340 NE RIOMAR DR COLLECTOR 328 1 12 4 1575 35 31 1191 877 339 SE NANRANJA AVE COLLECTOR 362 1 12 4 1750 30 31 1192 878 135 CR 614 COLLECTOR 2350 1 12 4 1700 45 4 1193 879 2 CR 603 COLLECTOR 6437 1 12 4 1750 40 4 1194 880 235 CR 614 COLLECTOR 7123 1 12 4 1750 50 5 1195 880 260 CR 614 COLLECTOR 6646 1 12 4 1750 50 5 MAJOR 1196 881 594 US 1 ARTERIAL 618 2 12 4 1750 35 12 MAJOR 1197 881 883 US 1 ARTERIAL 883 2 12 4 1750 40 12 LOCAL 1198 882 881 A E BACKUS AVE ROADWAY 569 1 12 4 1750 30 12 LOCAL 1199 882 1042 S 7TH ST ROADWAY 388 1 12 4 1350 30 12 LOCAL 1200 882 1376 S 7TH ST ROADWAY 776 1 12 4 1750 30 12 MAJOR 1201 883 215 US 1 ARTERIAL 497 2 12 4 1750 40 12 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-125 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MAJOR 1202 1883 881 us 1 ARTERIAL 883 2 12 4 1750 40 12 LOCAL 1203 883 1145 AVE A ROADWAY 870 2 12 4 1750 30 12 1204 884 883 AVE A COLLECTOR 339 2 12 4 1750 30 12 MAJOR 1205 885 207 US 1 ARTERIAL 2645 2 12 3 1750 40 14 MAJOR 1206 885 887 US 1 ARTERIAL 936 2 12 4 1750 50 14 1207 886 885 OHIO AVE COLLECTOR 684 1 12 4 1750 35 14 MAJOR 1208 887 885 US 1 ARTERIAL 936 2 12 4 1750 50 14 MAJOR 1209 887 917 US 1 ARTERIAL 1446 2 12 4 1900 50 14 1210 888 887 PARKWAY DR COLLECTOR 380 1 12 4 1750 35 14 LOCAL 1211 889 207 PARKING LOT ROADWAY 266 3 12 4 1750 30 14 MAJOR 1212 890 207 US 1 ARTERIAL 1523 2 12 4 1750 50 14 MAJOR 1213 890 1329 US 1 ARTERIAL 1098 2 12 4 1750 40 14 1214 891 890 GARDENIA AVE COLLECTOR 1572 1 12 4 1750 30 14 MAJOR 1215 892 218 US 1 ARTERIAL 601 2 12 4 1750 40 14 MAJOR 1216 892 1329 US I ARTERIAL 2051 2 12 4 1750 40 14 LOCAL 1217 893 892 EMIL AVE ROADWAY 889 1 12 4 1750 30 14 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-126 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MAJOR 1218 1 894 896 US1 ARTERIAL 5661 2 12 4 1750 40 21 MAJOR 1219 894 1310 US I ARTERIAL 2427 2 12 4 1750 40 21 1220 895 894 FARMERS MARKET RD COLLECTOR 741 1 12 4 1750 30 21 MAJOR 1221 896 217 US 1 ARTERIAL 2638 3 12 4 1750 40 21 MAJOR 1222 896 894 US 1 ARTERIAL 5660 2 12 4 1750 40 21 LOCAL 1223 897 896 W WEATHERBEE RD ROADWAY 987 2 12 4 1750 30 21 MINOR 1224 898 202 SR 713 ARTERIAL 2111 2 12 4 1750 50 10 1225 898 262 SR 713 COLLECTOR 3956 1 12 4 1698 55 10 MINOR 1226 899 202 SR70 ARTERIAL 1758 2 12 4 1900 60 10 1227 900 899 CROSSROADS PKWY COLLECTOR 974 1 12 4 1750 40 10 MAJOR 1228 901 203 SR70 ARTERIAL 2826 3 12 1750 50 11 1229 902 901 MCNEIL RD COLLECTOR 2841 1 12 4 1750 40 11 MAJOR 1230 903 901 SR70 ARTERIAL 1584 3 12 4 1750 50 11 LOCAL 1231 904 903 MALL ROADWAY 605 1 12 4 1750 30 11 MINOR 1232 905 204 CR 770 ARTERIAL 612 2 12 4 1750 55 11 1233 906 905 HARTMAN RD COLLECTOR 1015 1 12 4 1750 30 11 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-127 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 1234 907 1047 CR 770 ARTERIAL 894 2 12 4 1900 55 11 1235 908 907 S 33RD ST COLLECTOR 3013 1 12 4 1750 30 11 MINOR 1236 909 295 CR 770 ARTERIAL 410 2 12 4 1750 40 11 MINOR 1237 909 910 CR 770 ARTERIAL 1242 2 12 1 1750 40 14 MINOR 1238 910 297 CR 770 ARTERIAL 2039 2 12 1 1750 40 12 MINOR 1239 910 909 CR 770 ARTERIAL 1242 2 12 4 1900 45 14 1240 911 910 GEORGIA AVE COLLECTOR 365 1 12 4 1750 30 14 LOCAL 1241 912 297 S 17TH ST ROADWAY 575 1 12 0 1750 30 12 LOCAL 1242 912 1131 S 17TH ST ROADWAY 759 1 12 0 1750 30 12 1243 913 296 CR 770 COLLECTOR 1377 1 12 4 1750 45 12 1244 913 915 CR 770 COLLECTOR 1312 1 12 1 1750 35 12 LOCAL ,

1245 913 1146 S 10TH ST ROADWAY 1357 1 12 4 1750 30 12 LOCAL 1246 914 913 S 10TH ST ROADWAY 567 1 12 4 1750 30 12 1247 915 298 CR 770 COLLECTOR 978 1 12 1 1750 35 12 1248 915 913 CR 770 COLLECTOR 1312 1 12 4 1750 45 12 LOCAL 1249 915 1142 S 7TH ST ROADWAY 1370 1 12 4 1750 30 12 LOCAL 1250 916 915 S 7TH ST ROADWAY 509 1 12 4 1750 30 12 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-128 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MAJOR 1251 1 917 299 1US i ARTERIAL 177 2 12 4 1750 50 14 MAJOR 1252 917 887 US 1 ARTERIAL 1446 2 12 4 1750 50 14 1253 918 299 SUNRISE BLVD COLLECTOR 206 1 12 4 1750 30 14 1254 918 917 SUNRISE BLVD COLLECTOR 136 1 12 4 1350 30 14 1255 919 918 SUNRISE BLVD COLLECTOR 1121 1 14 6 1700 45 14 1256 920 919 PARKWAY DR COLLECTOR 333 1 12 4 1750 30 14 1257 921 729 OLEANDER BLVD COLLECTOR 2250 1 12 1 1348 30 14 MAJOR 1258 922 306 SR 70 ARTERIAL 184 3 12 1 1750 50 14 LOCAL 1259 923 452 PALM DR ROADWAY 1303 1 12 0 1575 35 21 MAJOR 1260 924 211 SR 68 ARTERIAL 5356 2 12 3 1750 45 9 1261 925 924 HARTMAN RD COLLECTOR 1313 1 12 4 1750 30 9 1262 926 212 S 33RD ST COLLECTOR 1245 1 12 0 1750 30 9 FREEWAY 1263 927 30 1-95 ON RAMP FROM SR 716 RAMP 1212 1 12 4 1700 45 29 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE OFF FREEWAY 1264 928 168 RAMP RAMP 224 1 12 4 1698 25 51 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 1265 928 170 RAMP RAMP 855 1 12 4 1350 35 51 MAJOR 1266 929 168 MARTIN HWY ARTERIAL 223 1 12 4 1700 25 51 MAJOR 1267 929 172 MARTIN HWY ARTERIAL 618 1 12 4 1750 70 51 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-129 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MAJOR 1268 930 226 US 1 ARTERIAL 1088 3 12 0 1750 40 46 MAJOR 1269 930 227 US 1 ARTERIAL 3209 3 12 0 1900 45 46 MINOR 1270 931 528 SR 1A ARTERIAL 1577 2 12 3 1750 45 55 MAJOR 1271 932 229 US 1 ARTERIAL 2656 3 12 4 1750 45 54 MAJOR 1272 932 230 US 1 ARTERIAL 1507 3 12 4 1750 45 55 MAJOR 1273 933 230 US I ARTERIAL 1518 3 12 4 1750 50 55 MAJOR 1274 933 558 US I ARTERIAL 3151 3 12 4 1750 50 55 1275 934 531 SE COVE RD COLLECTOR 5418 1 12 2 1750 50 56 MINOR 1276 935 556 SE INDIAN ST ARTERIAL 1899 2 12 4 1750 45 54 LOCAL 1277 936 935 ASTER LANE ROADWAY 956 2 12 0 1750 30 54 MINOR 1278 937 283 SR AlA ARTERIAL 3025 2 12 3 1750 45 46 1279 938 939 SR AlA COLLECTOR 1749 1 12 3 1700 30 46 MINOR 1280 939 940 SR AlA ARTERIAL 98 2 12 4 1900 30 46 1281 940 941 SRA1A COLLECTOR 124 1 12 4 1700 30 46 1282 941 942 5R 76 COLLECTOR 79 1 12 4 1350 30 46 1283 941 1150 5R 76 COLLECTOR 58 1 12 4 1350 30 46 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-130 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LUCAL 1284 I942 944 1SR 76 ROADWAY 246 1 12 4 1350 30 46 LOCAL 1285 943 949 SW OCEAN BLVD ROADWAY 856 2 12 4 1750 30 46 MINOR 1286 944 523 SR 76 ARTERIAL 338 2 12 4 1900 30 46 LOCAL 1287 945 946 W 7TH ST ROADWAY 1091 1 12 4 1750 30 46 MINOR 1288 945 947 SR 76 ARTERIAL 494 2 12 4 1750 55 46 LOCAL 1289 946 945 W 7TH ST ROADWAY 1091 1 12 4 1750 30 46 1290 946 955 SR 1A COLLECTOR 1566 1 12 1 1750 55 46 MINOR 1291 947 226 SR 76 ARTERIAL 533 2 12 4 1750 55 46 LOCAL 1292 948 930 SE JOHNSON AVE ROADWAY 1017 2 12 0 1750 30 46 LOCAL 1293 948 947 SE KINDRED ST ROADWAY 938 1 12 4 1750 30 46 MAJOR 1294 949 225 US 1 ARTERIAL 1578 3 12 4 1750 40 46 MAJOR 1295 949 950 US 1 ARTERIAL 591- 3 12 4 1750 40 46 MAJOR 1296 950 224 US 1 ARTERIAL 666 3 12 4 1900 40 46 MAJOR 1297 950 949 US 1 ARTERIAL 591 3 12 4 1750 40 46 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-131 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 1298 950 951 SW 2ND AVE ROADWAY 580 I 12 4 1350 30 46 MINOR 1299 951 954 SR 1A ARTERIAL 110 2 12 4 1900 30 46 MINOR 1300 952 951 SR 1A ARTERIAL 108 2 12 4 1900 30 46 MINOR 1301 953 952 SR 1A ARTERIAL 131 2 12 4 1900 30 46 1302 954 1150 SR 1A COLLECTOR 876 1 12 4 1350 30 46 1303 955 957 SR 1A COLLECTOR 3688 1 12 1 1700 40 46 LOCAL 1304 956 955 E FLORIDA ST ROADWAY 786 1 12 4 1750 30 46 MINOR 1305 957 521 SR 1A ARTERIAL 453 2 12 1 1750 40 54 1306 958 283 SE PALM BEACH RD COLLECTOR 253 1 12 4 1750 30 46 1307 959 524 SE PALM BEACH RD COLLECTOR 2458 1 12 3 1575 35 46 LOCAL 1308 960 959 E 10TH ST- ROADWAY 1491 1 12 4 1750 30 46 LOCAL 1309 961 959 E 10TH ST ROADWAY 1389 1 12 4 1750 30 46 MINOR 1310 962 931 SR 1A ARTERIAL 2570 2 12 3 1750 45 55 LOCAL 1311 963 962 SE AIRPORT RD ROADWAY 972 1 12 4 1750 30 55 LOCAL 1312 964 931 SE AVIATION WAY ROADWAY 1089 1 12 4 1750 30 55 1313 965 966 SE ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 286 1 12 4 1700 45 55 1314 966 967 SR 1A COLLECTOR 506 1 12 3 1700 40 55 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-132 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1315 967 968 SR 1A COLLECTOR 1256 1 12 3 1750 35 57 1316 968 571 SR 1A COLLECTOR 590 1 12 3 1750 35 57 LOCAL 1317 969 968 SEAWARD ST ROADWAY 522 1 12 4 1750 30 57 LOCAL 1318 970 968 SEAWARD ST ROADWAY 466 1 12 4 1750 30 57 1319 972 570 SALERNO RD COLLECTOR 3036 1 12 4 1750 40 57 1320 973 564 SALERNO RD COLLECTOR 2584 1 12 4 1750 50 57 1321 973 974 SALERNO RD COLLECTOR 177 1 12 4 1350 30 57 1322 974 975 SALERNO RD COLLECTOR 176 1 12 4 1350 30 57 1323 975 972 SALERNO RD COLLECTOR 165 1 12 4 1350 30 57 1324 976 974 SALERNO RD COLLECTOR 160 1 12 4 1350 30 57 1325 977 975 SALERNO RD COLLECTOR 173 1 12 4 1350 30 57 MINOR 1326 978 238 SR 76 ARTERIAL 4615 2 12 3 1750 50 54 LOCAL 1327 979 721 SW SANDHILL RD ROADWAY 863 1 12 0 1350 30 51 1328 980 172 SR 714 COLLECTOR 3285 1 12 4 1750 55 51 1329 980 671 SR 714 COLLECTOR 2628 1 12 4 1750 50 50 MINOR 1330 981 60 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 1175 2 12 1 1900 50 38 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ON FREEWAY 1331 983 178 RAMP RAMP 1235 1 12 4 1700 70 42 MINOR 1332 984 173 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 165 2 12 4 1750 40 42 MINOR 1 1333 984 835 1BECKER RD ARTERIAL 1856 2 12 1 1750 50 42 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-133 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

FREE" 1334 984 983 I RAMP RAMP 285 1 12 4 1350 30 42 LOCAL 1335 986 430 SW MURPHY RD ROADWAY 281 1 12 0 900 20 43 1336 987 244 SW HIGH MEADOWS AVE COLLECTOR 5047. 1 12 0 1750 55 51 MAJOR 1337 988 989 Us 1 ARTERIAL 1589 3 12 4 1750 40 46 MAJOR 1338 988 991 US 1 ARTERIAL 2557 3 12 0 1750 45 44 MAJOR 1339 989 223 US 1 ARTERIAL 884 3 12 4 1750 40 46 MAJOR 1340 989 988 US 1 ARTERIAL 1589 3 12 4 1750 40 46 LOCAL 1341 990 989 NW RIVER SHORES ST ROADWAY 1127 1 12 4 1750 30 46 MAJOR 1342 991 988 US 1 ARTERIAL 2557 3 12 0 1750 45 44 MAJOR 1343 991 993 US 1 ARTERIAL 3083 3 12 0 1750 45 44 LOCAL 1344 992 991 NW WINDEMERE DR ROADWAY 1271 1 12 4 1750 30 44 MAJOR 1345 993 991 US 1 ARTERIAL 3083 3 12 0 1750 45 44 MAJOR 1346 993 996 US 1 ARTERIAL 1571 3 12 0 1750 45 41 LOCAL 1347 994 993 NW BRITT RD ROADWAY 876 3 12 4 1750 30 44 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-134 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LUCAL 1348 995 993 I NW BRITT RD ROADWAY 1111 1 12 4 1750 30 41 MAJOR 1349 996 222 US I ARTERIAL 1874 4 12 0 1750 45 41 MAJOR 1350 996 993 US 1 ARTERIAL 1571 3 12 0 1750 45 41 LOCAL 1351 997 996 MALL ENTRANCE ROADWAY 716 2 12 4 1750 30 41 MAJOR 1352 998 222 US 1 ARTERIAL 836 3 12 4 1750 40 41 MAJOR 1353 998 1000 us 1 ARTERIAL 1584 4 12 4 1750 40 41 LOCAL 1354 999 998 SUNSET BLVD ROADWAY 1287 2 12 4 1750 30 41 MAJOR 1355 1000 998 US I ARTERIAL 1584 4 12 4 1750 40 41 MAJOR 1356 1000 1003 US 1 ARTERIAL 1756 4 12 4 1750 40 41 LOCAL 1357 1001 1000 NW GOLDENROD RD ROADWAY 1134 2 12 4 1750 30 41 LOCAL 1358 1002 1000 NW GOLDENROD RD ROADWAY 942 2 12 4 1750 30 41 MAJOR 1359 1003 407 US 1 ARTERIAL 1456 4 12 4 1750 40 34 MAJOR 1360 1003 1000 us 1 ARTERIAL 1756 4 12 4 1750 40 41 LOCAL 1361 1004 1003 FENNEL AVE ROADWAY 775 2 12 4 1350 30 41 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-135 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 1362 1005 1003 NW EUGENIA ST ROADWAY 652 2 12 4 1750 30 41 MAJOR 1363 1006 221 US 1 ARTERIAL 2965 3 12 4 1750 45 34 MAJOR 1364 1006 388 US 1 ARTERIAL 3515 3 12 4 1750 45 34 MINOR 1365 1007 458 SE LENNARD RD ARTERIAL 747 2 12 4 1750 50 34 1366 1007 1006 SE JENNINGS RD COLLECTOR 2540 2 12 4 1750 30 34 MAJOR 1367 1008 220 US 1 ARTERIAL 1316 3 12 4 1750 40 32 MAJOR 1368 1008 388 US I ARTERIAL .3179 3 12 4 1750 40 34 1369 1009 1008 CIVIC CENTER ENTRANCE COLLECTOR 631 1 12 4 1750 30 32 LOCAL 1370 1009 1283 UNNAMED RD ROADWAY 1320 2 12 4 1750 30 32 MAJOR 1371 1010 220 US 1 ARTERIAL 3043 3 12 4 1750 40 32 MAJOR 1372 1010 836 US 1 ARTERIAL 2483 3 12 4 1750 45 31 1373 1011 1010 SE VILLAGE GREEN DR COLLECTOR 3123 2 12 4 1750 30 32 MAJOR 1374 1012 219 US 1 ARTERIAL 2003 3 12 4 1750 50 31 MAJOR 1375 1012 836 US I ARTERIAL 4275 3 12 4 1750 50 31 1376 1013 1012 SPANISH LAKES RD COLLECTOR 653 1 12 4 1750 30 31 MINOR 1377 1014 333 NW PRIMA VJSTA BLVD ARTERIAL 5913 2 12 4 1750 45 28 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-136 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 1378 1014 334 NW PRIMA VISTA BLVD ARTERIAL 1179 2 12 4 1750 40 28 1379 1015 1014 NW IRVING ST COLLECTOR 1090 1 12 4 1750 30 28 MINOR 1380 1016 341 ST LUCIE BLVD ARTERIAL 759 2 12 0 1750 40 28 1381 1017 1016 KINGS ISLE BLVD COLLECTOR 939 1 12 0 1750 30 28 MINOR 1382 1018 812 ST LUCIE BLVD ARTERIAL 1131 2 12 0 1750 55 27 1383 1019 1018 1 LAKE CHARLES BLVD COLLECTOR 1056 1 12 0 1750 30 27 MINOR 1384 1020 311 SR 615 ARTERIAL 2383 2 12 4 1750 55 18 1385 1021 1020 COBRA PRIDE WAY COLLECTOR 1065 1 12 4 1750 30 18 MINOR 1386 1022 303 SR 615 ARTERIAL 1728 2 12 3 1750 45 11 1387 1023 1022 BULLDOG DRIVE COLLECTOR 923 1 12 4 1750 30 11 MINOR 1388 1024 205 SR 615 ARTERIAL 2541 2 12 3 1750 45 11 1389 1025 1024 CORTEZ BLVD COLLECTOR 1625 1 12 4 1750 30 14 1390 1026 1024 CORTEZ BLVD COLLECTOR 1441 1 12 4 1750 30 11 MINOR 1391 1027 213 SR 615 ARTERIAL 1338 2 12 3 1750 40 9 1392 1028 1027 DELWARE AVE COLLECTOR 1292 1 12 4 1750 30 9 MINOR 1393 1029 1032 SR 615 ARTERIAL 1283 2 12 3 1750 45 9 1394 1030 1029 AVE I COLLECTOR 1292 1 12 4 1750 30 12 1395 1031 1029 AVE I COLLECTOR 1735 1 12 4 1750 30 9 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-137 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 1396 1032 288 SR 615 ARTERIAL 1285 2 12 3 1750 45 9 1397 1033 1032 AVE M COLLECTOR 1268 1 12 4 1750 30 12 1398 1034 1032 AVE M COLLECTOR 1473 1 12 4 1750 30 9 LOCAL 1399 1035 592 AVE D ROADWAY 2676 1 12 8 1750 25 12 LOCAL 1400 1035 1057 AVE D ROADWAY 549 1 12 4 1575 35 12 LOCAL 1401 1036 593 AVE D ROADWAY 880 1 12 0 1750 35 12 LOCAL 1402 1036 1039 AVE D ROADWAY 712 1 12 4 1575 35 12 LOCAL 1403 1037 1035 17TH ST ROADWAY 503 1 12 0 1750 30 12 LOCAL 1404 1038 1036 10TH ST ROADWAY 583 1 12 0 1350 30 12 LOCAL 1405 1039 1036 AVE D ROADWAY 712 1 12 0 1575 35 12 LOCAL 1406 1039 1041 AVE D ROADWAY 1165 1 12 4 1750 35 12 LOCAL 1407 1040 1039 DUNDASCT ROADWAY 965 1 12 0 1350 30 12 LOCAL 1408 1041 594 AVE D ROADWAY 526 1 12 0 1750 35 12 LOCAL 1409 1041 1039 AVE D ROADWAY 1165 1 12 0 1575 35 12 LOCAL 1410 1042 1041 S 7TH ST ROADWAY 427 1 12 0 1750 30 12 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-138 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MAJOR 1411 1043 922 SR 70 ARTERIAL 503 3 12 1 1900 50 14 MAJOR 1412 1046 204 SR 70 ARTERIAL 2503 3 12 4 1750 50 11 LOCAL 1413 1046 1047 35TH ST ROADWAY 1481 1 12 4 1350 30 11 MINOR 1414 1047 905 CR 770 ARTERIAL 2300 2 12 4 1750 55 11 MINOR 1415 1048 303 CR 611 ARTERIAL 2246 2 12 4 1750 40 14 MINOR 1416 1048 304 CR 611 ARTERIAL 2974 2 12 1 1750 45 14 1417 1049 1048 SUNRISE BLVD COLLECTOR 3012 1 12 4 1750 30 14 1418 1049 1161 SUNRISE BLVD COLLECTOR 2906 1 12 4 1750 30 14 1419 1050 206 S 13TH ST COLLECTOR 2438 1 12 0 1750 30 14 1420 1050 1052 S 13TH ST COLLECTOR 2755 1 12 0 1750 30 14 1421 1051 1050 NEBRASKA AVE COLLECTOR 837 1 12 4 1750 30 14 1422 1052 296 S 13TH ST COLLECTOR 1353 1 12 0 1750 40 12 LOCAL 1423 1053 1052 GEORGIA AVE ROADWAY 982 1 12 4 1750 30 14 LOCAL 1424 1054 593 AVE D ROADWAY 583 1 12 4 1750 35 12 LOCAL 1425 1054 1059 AVE D ROADWAY 173 1 12 4 1125 25 12 LOCAL 1426 1057 1035 AVE D ROADWAY 548 1 12 8 1750 30 12 LOCAL 1427 1057 1377 AVE D ROADWAY 167 1 12 4 1125 25 12 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-139 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 1428 1059 1057 AVE D ROADWAY 188 1 12 4 1125 25 12 LOCAL 1429 1060 1059 15TH ST ROADWAY 538 1 12 4 1350 30 12 LOCAL 1430 1061 591 AVE D ROADWAY 2294 1 12 4 1350 30 9 LOCAL 1431 1062 1061 29TH ST ROADWAY 612 1 12 4 1750 30 9 LOCAL 1432 1063 1061 29TH ST ROADWAY 601 1 12 4 1750 30 9 1433 1064 1046 35TH ST COLLECTOR 3867 1 12 4 1750 40 11 1434 1065 1064 KIRBY LOOP RD COLLECTOR 2655 1 12 4 1700 30 11 1435 1065 1066 ROGERS RD COLLECTOR 2632 1 12 4 1700 40 11 1436 1066 300 CR 611 COLLECTOR 4637 1 12 4 1698 50 11 MAJOR 1437 1067 221 SR 716 ARTERIAL 1815 3 12 1 1750 40 34 MAJOR 1438 1067 393 SR 716 ARTERIAL 1036 3 12 1 1750 55 34 LOCAL 1439 1068 1067 GOWIN DR ROADWAY 750 1 12 4 1750 30 34 MINOR 1440 1069 1007 SE LENNARD RD ARTERIAL 1853 2 12 4 1900 55 34 LOCAL 1441 1070 1069 HILLMOOR DR ROADWAY 577 1 12 4 1750 30 34 MINOR 1442 1071 1073 NW JENSEN BEACH BLVD ARTERIAL 1654 2 12 1 1750 50 44 LOCAL 1443 1072 1071 ROYAL OAK DR ROADWAY 1053 1 12 4 1350 30 44 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-140 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 1444 1073 222 NW JENSEN BEACH BLVD ARTERIAL 1664 2 12 1 1750 50 41 LOCAL 1445 1074 1073 GOLDENROD RD ROADWAY 711 1 12 4 1750 30 44 LOCAL 1446 1075 1073 GOLDENROD RD ROADWAY 619 1 12 4 1750 30 44 1447 1076 406 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 412 1 12 4 1575 35 34 1448 1077 1076 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 82 1 12 4 675 15 34 1449 1078 1080 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 81 1 12 4 900 20 34 1450 1079 404 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 678 1 12 4 1700 35 34 1451 1080 1079 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD COLLECTOR 72 1 12 4 900 20 34 LOCAL 1452 1081 1082 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD ROADWAY 96 1 12 4 675 15 33 LOCAL 1453 1082 396 SE WESTMORELAND BLVD ROADWAY 71 1 12 4 675 15 33 1454 1082 408 SE MORNINGSIDE BLVD COLLECTOR 1091 1 12 6 1698 40 33 MAJOR 1455 1083 830 SR 716 ARTERIAL 2165 3 12 4 1750 45 29 LOCAL 1456 1084 1083 IMPORT DR ROADWAY 771 1 12 0 1750 30 29 LOCAL 1457 1085 284 DRIVEWAY ROADWAY .505 1 12 0 1750 25 47 LOCAL 1458 1086 937 SE MARTIN AVE ROADWAY 1421 1 12 4 1750 30 47 LOCAL 1459 1087 950 SW 2ND AVE ROADWAY 299 1 12 0 1750 30 46 LOCAL 1460 1088 1185 NW BAKER RD ROADWAY 77 1 12 2 900 20 44 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-141 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1461 1089 516 NE SAVANNAH RD COLLECTOR 788 1 12 4 1750 55 46 LOCAL 1462 1089 1091 NW BAKER RD ROADWAY 1039 1 12 2 1700 40 44 LOCAL 1463 1090 1092 NW BAKER RD ROADWAY 1570 1 12 2 1750 40 44 LOCAL 1464 1090 1186 SE GREEN RIVER PKWY ROADWAY 70 1 12 4 1750 40 44 LOCAL 1465 1091 1088 NW BAKER RD ROADWAY 1492 1 12 2 1700 40 44 LOCAL 1466 1092 988 NW BAKER RD ROADWAY 1765 1 12 2 1750 40 44 LOCAL 1467 1093 1092 DRIVEWAY ROADWAY 343 1 12 4 1750 30 44 1468 1094 537 SR 76 COLLECTOR 3248 3 12 1 1900 45 54 LOCAL 1469 1095 932 SE LUCKHARDTST ROADWAY 950 2 12 0 1750 30 54 MINOR 1470 1096 230 SE INDIAN ST ARTERIAL 1362 2 12 4 1750 40 55 LOCAL 1471 1097 571 SE SALERNO RD ROADWAY 324 1 12 4 1750 30 57 LOCAL 1472 1098 934 SE ATLANTIC RIDGE DR ROADWAY 747 1 12 0 1750 40 56 LOCAL 1473 1099 933 SE FISCHER ST ROADWAY 546 3 12 2 1750 30 55 LOCAL 1474 1100 455 SE LENNARD RD ROADWAY 866 1 12 4 1750 45 32 LOCAL 1475 1101 457 SE TIFFANY AVE ROADWAY 1914 1 12 4 1750 45 34 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-142 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LULAL 1476 1102 459 SE MARIPOSA AVE ROADWAY 2630 1 12 4 1750 30 34 1477 1103 445 SW BERRY AVE COLLECTOR 921 1 12 0 1750 40 51 1478 1104 431 MAPP RD COLLECTOR 3498 1 12 0 1750 45 43 MINOR 1479 1105 692 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 739 2 12 4 1750 55 42 MINOR 1480 1106 658 BECKER RD ARTERIAL 2071 2 12 1 1750 50 39 LOCAL 1481 1107 980 SW 42ND AVE ROADWAY 891 1 12 0 1750 35 50 LOCAL 1482 1108 381 SW OAKLYN ST ROADWAY 623 1 12 0 1750 40 33 LOCAL 1483 1109 256 SW DALTON AVE ROADWAY 1109 1 12 0 1750 30 30 1484 1110 644 SW DARWIN BLVD COLLECTOR 373 1 12 0 1700 40 37 1485 1110 1243 SW DARWIN BLVD COLLECTOR 1065 1 12 0 1750 40 37 MAJOR 1486 1111 658 SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVD ARTERIAL 875 3 12 0 1750 50 39 1487 1112 49 1-95 FREEWAY 13268 2 12 4 2250 70 4 1488 1113 1117 TURNPIKE FEEDER RD COLLECTOR 2840 1 12 4 1750 50 5 1489 1114 1115 TURNPIKE FEEDER RD COLLECTOR 1806 1 12 4 1700 50 5 1490 1115 236 TURNPIKE FEEDER RD COLLECTOR 2047 1 12 4 1750 50 2 MAJOR 1491 1116 236 US 1 ARTERIAL 4114 2 12 4 1750 60 2 1492 1117 1114 TURNPIKE FEEDER RD COLLECTOR 6520 1 12 4 1700 50 5 LOCAL 1493 1118 1117 WINTER GARDEN PARKWAY ROADWAY 724 1 12 4 1750 30 5 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-143 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LUCAL 1494 1 1119 1 603 1 ATLANTIC BEACH BLVD ROADWAY 1332 1 12 0 1750 50 6 LOCAL 1495 1120 84 COMMERCE CENTRE DR ROADWAY 429 1 12 0 1750 30 27 LOCAL 1496 1121 73 DRIVEWAY ROADWAY 1369 1 12 1 1750 30 29 LOCAL 1497 1122 637 SW MEETING ST ROADWAY 402 1 12 0 1750 30 29 LOCAL 1498 1123 632 SW ASHLYN WAY ROADWAY 277 2 12 0 1750 30 29 1499 1124 639 WESTCLIFF LN COLLECTOR 576 1 12 4 1700 30 26 1500 1125 638 SYCAMORE TREE WAY COLLECTOR 234 1 12 0 1700 30 26 LOCAL 1501 1126 631 SW ACADEMIC WAY ROADWAY 1347 1 12 0 1750 40 26 1502 1126 1359 SWACADEMICWAY COLLECTOR 1269 1 12 0 1700 40 26 MAJOR 1503 1127 215 US 1 ARTERIAL 1068 2 12 4 1750 40 12 MAJOR 1504 1127 298 US 1 ARTERIAL 275 2 12 4 1750 40 12 LOCAL 1505 1128 1127 CITRUS AVE ROADWAY 482 2 12 0 1750 40 12 1506 1129 288 AVE Q COLLECTOR 1313 1 12 4 1750 40 12 1507 1130 596 JUANITA AVE COLLECTOR 3320 1 12 0 1750 40 12 MINOR 1508 1131 213 SR 68 ARTERIAL 2730 2 12 4 1750 50 12 MINOR 1509 1131 214 SR 68 ARTERIAL 1345 2 12 4 1750 50 12 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-144 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 1510 1131 1037 17TH ST ROADWAY 1526 1 12 4 1350 30 12 LOCAL 1511 1132 322 ST JAMES BLVD ROADWAY 560 1 12 0 1750 40 20 LOCAL 1512 1133 343 SW CAMEO BLVD ROADWAY 858 2 12 0 1750 40 30 1513 1135 981 BECKER RD COLLECTOR 1053 1 12 1 1750 40 38 1514 1137 1136 SR AlA COLLECTOR 1350 1 12 4 1700 55 3 LOCAL 1515 1138 1137 DRIVEWAY ROADWAY 739 1 12 0 1750 30 3 LOCAL 1516 1139 231 LILLIAN CT ROADWAY 261 1 12 0 1750 30 57 1517 1141 661 SW CITRUS BLVD COLLECTOR 558 1 12 4 1698 55 39 1518 1142 1143 SR 68 COLLECTOR 658 1 12 4 1750 50 12 LOCAL 1519 1142 1145 5 7TH ST ROADWAY 144 1 12 4 1750 30 12 1520 1142 1146 SR 68. COLLECTOR 1345 1 12 4 1750 50 12 1521 1143 215 SR 68 COLLECTOR 303 1 12 4 1750 50 12 1522 1143 1142 SR 68 COLLECTOR 658 1 12 4 1750 50 12 1523 1144 1143 5 5TH ST COLLECTOR 689 1 12 4 1750 30 12 LOCAL 1524 1145 1142 5 7TH ST ROADWAY 144 2 .12 4 1750 30 12 LOCAL 1525 1145 1376 S 7TH ST ROADWAY 183 1 12 4 1350 30 12 1526 1146 214 SR 68 COLLECTOR 1385 1 12 4 1750 50 12 1527 1146 1142 SR 68 COLLECTOR. 1345 1 12 4 1750 50 12 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-145 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 1528 1147 527 SR AIA I ARTERIAL 1231 2 12 3 1750 45 47 LOCAL 1529 1148 1147 DRIVEWAY ROADWAY 553 1 12 4 1750 25 47 LOCAL 1530 1149 938 SE GEORGIA AVE ROADWAY 1360 1 12 0 1700 30 46 1531 1150 942 SR 76 COLLECTOR 64 1 12 4 1350 30 46 LOCAL 1532 1150 943 SW OCEAN AVE ROADWAY 472 1 12 4 1700 40 46 LOCAL 1533 1151 225 SW PALM CITY ROAD ROADWAY 170 1 12 4 1750 30 46 MAJOR 1534 1152 231 US 1 ARTERIAL 2.88 3 12 4 1750 45 57 MAJOR 1535 1153 856 US 1 ARTERIAL 1764 3 12 4 1750 45 23 MAJOR 1536 1153 859 US 1 ARTERIAL 1417 3 12 4 1750 45 23 LOCAL 1537 1154 1153 SUNSHINE BLVD ROADWAY 1206 1 12 4 1750 30 23 MAJOR 1538 1155 217 US I ARTERIAL 3729 3 12 4 1750 45 21 MAJOR 1539 1155 859 US 1 ARTERIAL 746 3 12 4 1750 45 23 LOCAL 1540 1156 1155 TROPICAL ISLE WAY ROADWAY 1288 1 12 4 1750 30 23 1541 1157 584 SE ANCHOR AVE COLLECTOR 162 1 12 4 1698 55 57 1542 1158 1157 SR 1A COLLECTOR 416 1 12 4 1750 30 57 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-146 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LUCAL 1543 1 1159 1 254 1 SW CAMEO BLVD ROADWAY 1334 1 12 4 1750 30. 30 LOCAL 1544 1160 387 DRIVEWAY ROADWAY 695 1 12 4 1750 20 33 MAJOR 1545 1161 206 SR 70 ARTERIAL 851 2 12 1 1750 50 14 1546 1162 812 NW PEACOCK BLVD COLLECTOR 1011 2 12 0 1750 30 27 LOCAL 1547 1163 1162 DRIVEWAY ROADWAY 574 1 12 4 1750 20 27 1548 1164 1162 NW PEACOCK BLVD COLLECTOR 1429 2 12 0 1750 30 27 1549 1165 1164 DRIVEWAY COLLECTOR 962 1 12 4 1750 20 27 1550 1166 1167 DRIVEWAY COLLECTOR 151 1 12 4 1350 30 12 1551 1167 727 TRAFFIC CIRCLE COLLECTOR 75 1 12 4 900 20 12 1552 1168 870 SR AlA COLLECTOR 12462 1 12 4 1700 45 35 1553 1169 1168 NETTLES BLVD COLLECTOR 3532 1 12 4 1575 35 35 1554 1170 515 NE DIXIE HWY COLLECTOR 2146 1 12 4 1698 55 46 LOCAL 1555 1171 223 COCONUT POINT LN ROADWAY 174 2 12 4 1750 40 46 LOCAL 1556 1172 1171 COCONUT POINT LN ROADWAY 348 1 12 4 1700 40 46 LOCAL 1557 1173 1172 COCONUT POINT LN ROADWAY 2669 1 12 4 1700 40 46 LOCAL 1558 1174 1173 COCONUT POINT LN ROADWAY 975 1 12 4 1700 40 43 LOCAL 1559 1175 1174 PINE LAKE DR ROADWAY 639 1 12 4 1700 40 43 LOCAL 1S60 1176 1175 PINE LAKE DR ROADWAY 1246 1 12 4 1700 40 43 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-147 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 1561 1177 1176 PINE LAKE DR ROADWAY 910 1 12 4 1700 40 43 LOCAL 1562 1177 1181 PINE LAKE DR ROADWAY 2675 1 12 4 1700 40 41 LOCAL 1563 1178 988 NW 14TH ST ROADWAY 459 1 12 4 1750 40 44 LOCAL 1564 1179 1178 PALM LAKE DR ROADWAY 1439 1 12 4 1700 40 44 LOCAL 1565 1180 1178 PALM LAKE DR ROADWAY 969 1 12 4 1700 40 46 LOCAL 1566 1181 1177 PINE LAKE DR ROADWAY 2669 1 12 4 1700 40 41 LOCAL 1567 1181 1182 PINE LAKE DR ROADWAY 2014 1 12 4 1700 40 41 LOCAL 1568 1182 995 NW BRITT RD ROADWAY 1570 1 12 4 1700 40 41 LOCAL 1569 1182 1181 PINE LAKE DR ROADWAY 2014 1 12 4 1700 40 41 LOCAL 1570 1183 1182 NW BRITT RD ROADWAY 2926 1 12 4 1700 40 41 LOCAL 1571 1184 1183 EVERLADES BLVD ROADWAY 2832 1 12 4 1700 40 41 LOCAL 1572 1185 1090 NW BAKER RD ROADWAY 82 1 12 2 900 20 44 LOCAL 1573 1186 502 SE GREEN RIVER PKWY ROADWAY 995 1 12 4 1750 40 46 1574 1187 1188 SE GREEN RIVER PKWY COLLECTOR 523 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1S7S 1188 1185 SE GREEN RIVER PKWY COLLECTOR 5426 1 12 4 1700 40 44 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-148 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1576 1189 1091 CARDINAL AVE COLLECTOR 1695 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1577 1190 1189 MARANTA TERRADO COLLECTOR 2306 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1578 1191 499 COY SENDA COLLECTOR 840 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1579 1192 1191 COY SENDA COLLECTOR 818 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1580 1193 1212 NE SAVANNAH RD COLLECTOR 478 1 12 4 1698 55 44 1581 1194 1213 NE SAVANNAH RD COLLECTOR 983 1 12 4 1750 55 44 MINOR 1582 1195 1196 NE JENSEN BEACH BLVD ARTERIAL 441 2 12 4 1750 55 44 MINOR 1583 1196 1200 NE JENSEN BEACH BLVD ARTERIAL 2185 2 12 4 1750 55 44 1584 1197 1194 TOWN TERRACE COLLECTOR 527 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1585 1198 1197 TOWN TERRACE COLLECTOR 796 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1586 1199 1198 TOWN TERRACE COLLECTOR 951 1 12 4 1700 40 44 MINOR 1587 1200 470 NE JENSEN BEACH BLVD ARTERIAL 1919 2 12 4 1750 55 44 1588 1201 1200 PINECREST LAKES BLVD COLLECTOR 964 1 12 4 1750 40 44 1589 1202 1201 PINECREST LAKES BLVD COLLECTOR 1238 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1590 1203 1202 PINECREST LAKES BLVD COLLECTOR 1687 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1591 1203 1204 PINECREST LAKES BLVD COLLECTOR 1053 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1592 1204 1205 PINECREST LAKES BLVD COLLECTOR 431 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1593 1205 1206 PINECREST LAKES BLVD COLLECTOR 855 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1594 1206 1207 PINECREST LAKES BLVD COLLECTOR 862 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1595 1207 1208 PINECREST LAKES BLVD COLLECTOR 632 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1596 1208 1209 PINECREST LAKES BLVD COLLECTOR 576 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1597 1209 1193 PINECREST LAKES BLVD COLLECTOR 467 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1598 1210 1195 LAKE AVE COLLECTOR 1670 1 12 4 1700 40 44 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-149 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1599 1211 1196 HOLLY CREEK DR COLLECTOR 355 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1600 1212 1219 NE SAVANNAH RD COLLECTOR 187 1 12 4 1698 55 44 1601 1213 1193 NE SAVANNAH RD COLLECTOR 771 1 12 4 1698 55 44 1602 1214 1218 PINELAKE VILLAGE BLVD COLLECTOR 970 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1603 1215 1214 PINELAKE VILLAGE BLVD COLLECTOR 1215 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1604 1216 1213 NE 24TH ST COLLECTOR 1001 1 12 4 1750 40 44 1605 1217 .1216 NE 24TH ST COLLECTOR 1348 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1606 1218 1212 PINELAKE VILLAGE BLVD COLLECTOR 102 1 12 4 1700 40 44 1607 1219 499 NE SAVANNAH RD COLLECTOR 812 1 12 4 1698 55 44 LOCAL 1608 1220 1004 FENNEL AVE ROADWAY 1550 1 12 4 1350 30 34 LOCAL 1609 1221 1220 GOLDEN OAK TRAIL ROADWAY 1009 1 12 4 1350 30 34 LOCAL 1610 1222 1072 ROYAL OAK DR ROADWAY 920 1 12 4 1350 30 44 LOCAL 1611 1223 1222 ROYAL OAK DR ROADWAY 1426 1 12 4 1350 30 44 LOCAL 1612 1224 1222 MOSSY OAK WAY ROADWAY 1775 1 12 4 1350 30 44 MINOR 1613 1225 1071 NW JENSEN BEACH BLVD ARTERIAL 1537 2 12 1 1750 50 44 LOCAL 1614 1226 1225 NW WINDEMERE DR ROADWAY 1385 1 12 4 1350 30 44 LOCAL 1615 1227 1226 NW WINDEMERE DR ROADWAY 1814 1 12 4 1350 30 44 LOCAL 1616 1228 1227 NW WINDEMERE DR ROADWAY 1617 1 12 4 1350 30 44 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-150 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1617 1229 473 CR 707 COLLECTOR 602 1 12 4 1750 40 45 1618 1229 1230 CR 707 COLLECTOR 854 1 12 4 1700 40 45 1619 1230 504 CR 707 COLLECTOR 516 1 12 4 1698 40 45 1620 1230 1229 CR 707 COLLECTOR 854 1 12 4 1700 40 45 MINOR 1621 1231 471 NE JENSEN BEACH BLVD ARTERIAL 2358 2 12 4 1750 55 44 LOCAL 1622 1232 1231 SKYLINE DR ROADWAY 936 1 12 4 1350 30 45 LOCAL 1623 1233 1232 SKYLINE DR ROADWAY 2240 1 12 4 1350 30 44 1624 1234 485 CR 707 COLLECTOR 3872 1 11 0 1698 40 44 LOCAL 1625 1235 1234 SKYLINE DR ROADWAY 840 1 12 4 1350 30 35 LOCAL 1626 1236 1235 SKYLINE DR ROADWAY 1474 1 12 4 1350 30 35 LOCAL 1627 1237 1236 SKYLINE DR ROADWAY 1204 1 12 4 1350 30 35 1628 1238 248 SE FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 2998 1 12 0 1750 55 33 LOCAL 1629 1239 256 SW DALTON AVE ROADWAY 1024 1 12 4 1750 30 30 1630 1240 772 SW DEL RIO BLVD COLLECTOR 1535 1 12 0 1350 30 30 1631 1240 773 SW DEL RIO BLVD COLLECTOR 5293 1 12 0 1750 40 29 1632 1240 823 CASHMERE BLVD COLLECTOR 2094 1 12 4 1750 40 30 MINOR 1633 1241 1242 SW ROSSER BLVD ARTERIAL 0 1750 5529 MINOR 1634 1242 259 SW ROSSER BLVD ARTERIAL 1344 2 12 0 1750 55 29 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-151 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1635 1243 705 SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVD COLLECTOR 1642 1 12 0 1700 55 37 1636 1244 1241 NERVIA AVE COLLECTOR 2833 1 12 4 1750 30 29 1637 1245 1242 ALEDO LN COLLECTOR 881 1 12 4 1750 30 29 1638 1246 1241 NERVIA AVE COLLECTOR 1492 1 12 4 1750 30 29 1639 1247 1242 ALEDO LN COLLECTOR 1789 1 12 4 1750 30 29 1640 1248 652 SW ROSSER BLVD COLLECTOR 4754 1 12 0 1698 55 36 1641 1248 674 SW ROSSER BLVD COLLECTOR 6822 1 12 4 1700 55 36 LOCAL 1642 1249 825 SW VILLAGE DR ROADWAY 594 1 12 4 1750 40 27 1643 1250 823 SW CASHMERE BLVD COLLECTOR 1100 1 12 0 1750 40 28 1644 1251 1250 SWVILLAGEDR COLLECTOR 606 1 12 4 1750 40 28 1645 1252 1250 SW VILLAGE DR COLLECTOR 509 1 12 4 1750 40 28 1646 1253 1349 LAKE FORREST WAY COLLECTOR 288 1 12 4 1350 30 28 1647 1254 1253 LAKE FORREST WAY COLLECTOR 1686 1 12 4 1700 40 28 1648 1254 1255 LAKE FORREST WAY COLLECTOR 2086 1 12 4 1700 40 28 1649 1255 1254 LAKE FORREST WAY COLLECTOR 2089 1 12 4 1700 40 28 1650 1255 1256 LAKE FORREST WAY COLLECTOR 847 1 12 4 1700 40 28 1651 1256 1258 SW CRYSTAL RIVER BLVD COLLECTOR 561 1 12 4 1700 40 28 1652 1257 1256 LAKE FORREST WAY COLLECTOR 1167 1 12 4 1700 40 28 1653 1258 811 SW CASHMERE BLVD COLLECTOR 2013 1 12 0 1750 30 28 LOCAL 1654 1259 828 MOCKINGBIRD DR ROADWAY 1614 1 12 4 1350 30 27 1655 1260 828 SW COUNTRY CLUB DR COLLECTOR 1444 1 12 0 1350 30 28 1656 1260 1261 SW COUNTRY CLUB DR COLLECTOR 1378 1 12 0 1350 30 28 LOCAL 1657 1261 820 SW HEATHERWOOD BLVD ROADWAY 1145 1 12 0 1750 40 28 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-152 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MINOR 1658 1262 362 SE AIROSO BLVD ARTERIAL 2009 2 12 1 1750 45 31 MINOR 1659 1263 333 BAYSHORE BLVD ARTERIAL 1308 2 12 4 1750 55 28 MINOR 1660 1263 335 BAYSHORE BLVD ARTERIAL 2185 2 12 4 1900 55 28 1661 1264 1263 LUCEO DR COLLECTOR 3323 1 12 4 1700 40 28 1662 1264 1265 LUCEO DR COLLECTOR 2435 1 12 4 1700 40 28 1663 1265 1262 LUCEO DR COLLECTOR 1268 1 12 4 1700 40 28 1664 1266 336 CROSSTOWN PKWY COLLECTOR 2770 .3 12 3 1750 55 28 1665 1267 1266 BROADVIEW ST COLLECTOR 3401 1 12 4 1700 40 28 1666 1268 1269 SE FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 1562 1 12 4 1698 45 31 1667 1269 1270 SE FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 1702 1 12 1698 45 31 1668 1270 1271 SE FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 1888 1 12 4 1698 45 31 1669 1271 345 SE FLORESTA DR COLLECTOR 995 1 12 4 1698 45 31 LOCAL 1670 1272 1273 SE PINE VALLEY ST ROADWAY 1062 1 12 4 1350 30 40 LOCAL 1671 1273 1274 SE PINE VALLEY ST ROADWAY 1229 1 12 4 1350 30 41 LOCAL 1672 1274 1275 SE PINE VALLEY ST ROADWAY 1990 1 12 4 1350 30 41 LOCAL 1673 1275 401 SE PINE VALLEY ST ROADWAY 1085 1 12 4 1350 30 41 LOCAL 1674 1276 1280 SE MORNINGSIDE BLVD ROADWAY 835 1 12 4 1350 30 33 LOCAL 1675 1277 1276 SE MORNINGSIDE BLVD ROADWAY 738 1 12 4. 1350 30 33 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-153 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LULAL 1676 1278 1277 SE MORNINGSIDE BLVD ROADWAY 970 1 12 4 1350 30 33 LOCAL 1677 1279 1278 SE MORNINGSIDE BLVD ROADWAY 3896 1 12 4 1350 30 40 LOCAL 1678 1280 1081 SE MORNINGSIDE BLVD ROADWAY 76 1 12 4 675 15 33 LOCAL 1679 1281 1077 SE BAKERSFIELD ST ROADWAY 3281 1 12 4 1350 30 41 MAJOR 1680 1282 246 SR 716 ARTERIAL 2330 3 12 1 1750 55 33 MINOR 1681 1283 220 SE WALTON RD ARTERIAL 827 2 12 4 1750 40 32 LOCAL 1682 1284 1102 SE MARIPOSA AVE ROADWAY 1113 1 12 4 1350 30 34 LOCAL 1683 1285 1284 SE MARIPOSA AVE ROADWAY 1996 1 12 4 1350 30 34 1684 1286 475 SE MELALEUCA BLVD COLLECTOR 1609 1 12 0 1698 40 34 1685 1287 1286 SE MELALEUCA BLVD COLLECTOR 2207 1 12 0 1698 40 34 LOCAL 1686 1288 841 BROMELIAD CR ROADWAY 1801 1 12 4 1350 30 32 LOCAL 1687 1289 842 BROMELIAD CR ROADWAY 827 1 12 4 1350 30 32 LOCAL 1688 1290 1289 BROMELIAD CR ROADWAY 1660 1 12 4 1350 30 32 1689 1291 451 CR 712 COLLECTOR 2322 1 12 0 1700 45 21 LOCAL 1690 1292 1291 PALMETTO DR ROADWAY 281 1 12 0 1575 35 21 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-154 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 1691 1 1293 1 1306 1PALMETTO DR ROADWAY 1924 1 12 0 1575 35 21 LOCAL 1692 1294 857 EASY ST ROADWAY 1282 1 12 0 1575 35 23 LOCAL 1693 1295 1293 HOWARD ST ROADWAY 1805 1 12 0 1575 35 21 LOCAL 1694 1295 1305 PALM DR ROADWAY 2044 1 12 0 1575 35 21 LOCAL 1695 1296 1294 EASY ST ROADWAY 1775 1 12 0 1575 35 23 LOCAL 1696 1297 1293 PALMETTO DR ROADWAY 1778 1 12 0 1575 35 23 LOCAL 1697 1297 1300 PALMETTO DR ROADWAY 1656 1 12 0 1575 35 23 LOCAL 1698 1298 1295 PALM DR ROADWAY .1748 1 12 0 1575 35 23 LOCAL 1699 1298 1297 SAVANNAH ST ROADWAY 1745 1 12 0 1575 35 23 LOCAL 1700 1298 1299 PALM DR ROADWAY 1626 1 12 0 1575 35 23 LOCAL 1701 1299 1296 PALM DR ROADWAY 1511 1 12 0 1575 35 23 LOCAL 1702 1299 1300 BARTOW ST ROADWAY 1716 1 12 0 1575 35 23 LOCAL 1703 1300 1294 PALMETTO DR ROADWAY 1482 1 12 0 1575 35 23 LOCAL 1704 1301 1298 SAVANNAH ST ROADWAY 2193 1 12 0 1575 35 24 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-155 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 1705 1 1302 1 1299 I BARTOWST ROADWAY 3493 1 12 0 1575 35 24 LOCAL 1706 1303 1296 EASY ST ROADWAY 3464 1 12 0 1575 35 24 LOCAL 1707 1304 1305 BRADLEY ST ROADWAY 859 1 12 0 1575 35 22 LOCAL 1708 1305 923 PALM DR ROADWAY 1932 1 12 0 1575 35 21 LOCAL 1709 1305 1306 BRADLEY ST ROADWAY 1897 1 12 0 1575 35 21 LOCAL 1710 1306 1292 PALMETTO DR ROADWAY 1716 1 12 0 1575 35 21 LOCAL 1711 1307 896 W WEATHERBEE RD ROADWAY 2492 2 12 4 1750 30 21 LOCAL 1712 1308 1288 BROMELIAD CR ROADWAY 2028 1 12 4 1350 30 32 LOCAL 1713 1309 849 TILTON RD ROADWAY 5505 1 12 4 1350 30 23 MAJ OR 1714 1310 894 US 1 ARTERIAL 2427 2 12 4 1750 40 21 MAJOR 1715 1310 1313 US 1 ARTERIAL 1016 2 12 4 1750 40 14 LOCAL 1716 1311 218 PLEASURE AVE ROADWAY 2430 1 12 4 1750 30 14 LOCAL 1717 1312 1310 HIGH POINT BLVD ROADWAY 1599 1 12 4 1700 40 14 MAJOR 1718 13137 1310 US 1 ARTERIAL 1016 2 12 4 1750 40 14 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-156 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

MAJOR 1719 1 1313 1 1314 1 US I ARTERIAL 834 2 12 4 1750 40 14 MAJOR 1720 1314 218 US I ARTERIAL 685 2 12 4 1750 40 14 MAJOR 1721 1314 1313 US 1 ARTERIAL 834 2 12 4 1750 40 14 LOCAL 1722 1315 1314 PLANTATION BLVD ROADWAY 1515 1 12 4 1350 30 14 LOCAL 1723 1316 1313 LAKEFRONT BLVD ROADWAY 1086 1 12 4 1350 30 14 LOCAL 1724 1317 319 NORTH MACEDO BLVD ROADWAY 2239 1 12 4 1350 30 20 LOCAL 1725 1317 374 NORTH MACEDO BLVD ROADWAY 3068 1 12 4 1350 30 20 LOCAL 1726 1318 851 BEACH AVE W ROADWAY 733 1 12 4 1575 35 23 LOCAL 1727 1319 1318 BEACH AVE W ROADWAY 1257 1 12 4 1575 35 23 LOCAL 1728 1319 1320 OLEANDER AVE ROADWAY 847 1 12 4 1575 35 23 LOCAL 1729 1320 1321 OLEANDER AVE ROADWAY 801 1 12 4 1575 35 23 LOCAL 1730 1321 855 OLEANDER AVE ROADWAY 2575 1 12 4 1575 35 23 LOCAL 1731 1322 897 W WEATHERBEE RD ROADWAY 1683 1 12 4 1350 30 21 1732 1322 1323 OLEANDER AVE COLLECTOR 1421 1 12 1 1575 35 21 1733 1323 312 OLEANDER AVE COLLECTOR 3977 1 12 1 1575 35 21 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-157 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 1734 1 1324 311 1 BELL AVE ROADWAY 2080 1* 12 4 1750 30 21

-LOCAL 1735 1324 1048 SUNRISE BLVD ROADWAY 5291 1 12 4 1750 30 14 LOCAL 1736 1325 1324 SUNRISE BLVD ROADWAY 2691 1 12 4 1350 30 21 LOCAL 1737 1326 1323 TUMBLIN KLING RD ROADWAY 1325 1 12 4 1350 30 21 1738 1327 301 CR 611 COLLECTOR 2088 1 12 4 1750 50 11 1739 1328 899 CROSSROADS PARKWAY COLLECTOR 2174 1 12 4 1750 30 10 MAJOR 1740 1329 890 US 1 ARTERIAL 1098 2 12 4 1750 40 14 MAJOR 1741 1329 892 US 1 ARTERIAL 2051 2 12 4 1750 40 14 MINOR 1742 1330 596 SR 615 ARTERIAL 1499 2 12 3 1750 45 9 MINOR 1743 1331 289 SR 615 ARTERIAL 2659 2 12 8 1750 45 5 1744 1332 347 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 1677 1 12 0 1698 40 29 1745 1332 348 SW CALIFORNIA BLVD COLLECTOR 1137 1 12 4 1700 40 29 LOCAL 1746 1333 562 ALHAMBRA ST ROADWAY 1082 1 12 4 1750 30 54 LOCAL 1747 1334 1335 JOHNSTON RD ROADWAY 6035 1 12 0 1700 45 5 LOCAL 1748 1335 264 ANGLE RD ROADWAY 6743 1 12 0 1750 45 8 LOCAL 1749 1336 1335 ANGLE RD ROADWAY 3799 1 12 0 1700 45 8 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-158 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

LOCAL 1750 1337 266 PLANT ACCESS RD ROADWAY 1319 2 12 4 1700 30 25 LOCAL 1751 1338 1230 HIBISCUS DR ROADWAY 700 1 10 0 1350 30 45 LOCAL 1752 1339 476 SE BERKSHIRE BLVD ROADWAY 2239 1 12 0 1700 40 35 LOCAL 1753 1340 476 SE BERKSHIRE BLVD ROADWAY 1831 1 12 0 1700 40 35 1754 1341 456 SE VILLAGE GREEN DR COLLECTOR 1745 2 12 4 1750 30 32 1755 1341 1011 SE VILLAGE GREEN DR COLLECTOR 799 2 12 0 1900 30 32 LOCAL 1756 1342 1341 CAMINO DE ENTRADA ROADWAY 491 1 12 0 1700 40 32 1757 1343 251 BAYSHORE BLVD COLLECTOR 258 1 12 0 1700 40 30 1758 1344 1343 SW GLENWOOD DR COLLECTOR 1846 1 12 0 1700 40 30 1759 1345 1346 AVE Q COLLECTOR 184 1 12 4 900 20 12 1760 1346 1347 AVEQ COLLECTOR 150 1 12 4 900 20 12 1761 1347 1129 AVE 0 COLLECTOR 1226 1 12 4 1700 40 12 1762 1348 620 GLADES CUT OFF RD COLLECTOR 12649 1 12 0 1698 40 19 1763 1349 1350 LAKE FORREST WAY COLLECTOR 87 1 12 4 900 20 28 1764 1350 1351 LAKE FORREST WAY COLLECTOR 71 1 12 4 900 20 28 1765 1351 820 LAKE FORREST WAY COLLECTOR 637 1 12 4 1750 40 28 1766 1352 773 SW DEL RIO BLVD COLLECTOR 4959 1 12 0 1750 40 29 1767 1353 1354 SAVONA BLVD COLLECTOR 147 1 12 0 900 20 30 1768 1354 1355 SAVONA BLVD COLLECTOR 149 1 12 0 900 20 30 1769 1355 258 SAVONA BLVD COLLECTOR 2271 1 12 0 1750 40 30 LOCAL 1770 1356 1354 SW ABINGDON AVE ROADWAY 2140 1 12 0. 1350 30 29 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-159 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

IVINIUK 1771 1357 1360 SW COMMUNITY BLVD ARTERIAL 164 2 12 4 1900 25 26 MINOR 1772 1358 635 SW COMMUNITY BLVD ARTERIAL 1077 2 12 4 1900 55 26 MINOR 1773 1359 1358 SW COMMUNITY BLVD ARTERIAL 1954 2 12 4 1900 55 26 MINOR 1774 1360 1361 SW COMMUNITY BLVD ARTERIAL 129 2 12 4 1900 25 26 MINOR 1775 1361 1359 SW COMMUNITY BLVD ARTERIAL 1881 2 12 4 1900 55 26 LOCAL 1776 1362 1360 SW AVENTINO DR ROADWAY 368 1 12 0 1350 30 26 1777 1363 1358 SW TRADITION LAKES BLVD COLLECTOR 7 2 12 0 1900 35 26 MINOR 1778 1364 636 SW COMMUNITY BLVD ARTERIAL 354 2 12 4 1900 25 26 MINOR 1779 1365 1364 TRADITION PKWY ARTERIAL 1320 2 12 4 1900 40 26 LOCAL 1780 1366 1358 SW MEETING ST ROADWAY 733 1 12 0 1700 35 26 MINOR 1781 1367 244 SR 714 ARTERIAL 1448 2 12 4 .1750 50 51 1782 1368 1367 SW WATERFALL BLVD COLLECTOR 1075 2 12 0 1750 40 51 LOCAL 1783 1369 561 SE RUHNKE ST ROADWAY 806 1 12 0 1750 40 54 1784 1370 439 MAPP RD COLLECTOR 307 1 12 0 1750 40 54 1785 1371 146 1-95 FREEWAY 602 3 12 4 2250 75 53 LOCAL 1786 1372 760 NW PEACOCK BLVD ROADWAY 183 1 12 0 1350 30 20 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-160 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1787 1373 209 1SIR68 COLLECTOR 12824 1 12 4 1700 50 8 1788 1374 158 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 2948 2 12 10 2250 75 28 1789 1374 159 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 8833 2 12 10 2250 75 20 LOCAL 1790 1376 882 S 7TH ST ROADWAY 776 1 12 4 1350 30 12 LOCAL 1791 1376 1145 S 7TH ST ROADWAY 182 2 12 4 1750 30 12 LOCAL 1792 1377 1054 AVE D ROADWAY 173 1 12 4 1125 25 12 FREEWAY 1793 1378 35 1-95 ON RAMP RAMP 1738 1 12 4 1700 45 27 1794 8000 1112 1-95 FREEWAY 1829 2 12 4 2250 70 1 1795 8001 167 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 5135 2 12 4 2250 70 4 MAJOR 1796 8004 1116 US 1 ARTERIAL 635 2 12 4 1900 60 2 1797 8047 1371 1-95 FREEWAY 1228 3 12 4 2250 75 53 1798 8068 147 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 1692 2 12 4 2250 70 53 Exit Link 879 8879 CR 603 COLLECTOR 1467 1 12 4 1700 40 4 Exit Link 616 8005 CR 605 COLLECTOR 1662 1 12 4 1700 55 2 Exit Link 1375 8375 CR 607 COLLECTOR 1466 1 12 4 1700 40 5 Exit Link 676 8676 CR 726 COLLECTOR 939 1 12 4 1700 55 52 Exit Link 147 8068 FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 1692 1 2 12 4 2250 70 53 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-161 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Exit Link 167 8001 -FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE FREEWAY 5135 2 12 4 2250 70 4 Exit Link 1134 8134 GLADES CUT OFF RD COLLECTOR 6310 1 12 4 1700 40 26 Exit Link 1112 8000 1-95 FREEWAY 1829 2 12 4 2250 70 1 Exit Link 1371 8047 1-95 FREEWAY 1228 3 12 4 2250 75 53 Exit Link 622 8622 RANGE LINE RD COLLECTOR 1892 1 12 4 1700 40 26 Exit Link 569 8569 SR 1A COLLECTOR 547 1 12 3 1700 55 58 Exit Link 208 8003 SR 68 COLLECTOR 2590 1 12 4 1700 50 7 Exit MINOR Link 195 8195 SR 70 ARTERIAL 3137 2 12 4 1900 60 16 Exit Link 20 8020 SR 714 COLLECTOR 1473 1 12 4 1700 55 49 Exit MINOR Link 1140 8140 SR 76 ARTERIAL 731 2 12 4 1900 30 56 Exit Link 1136 8136 SR AlA COLLECTOR 1305 1 12 4 1700 30 3 Exit MAJOR Link 1116 8004 US 1 ARTERIAL 635 2 12 4 1900 60 2 Exit MAJOR Link 1152 8231 US 1 ARTERIAL 372 3 12 4 1900 40 57 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-162 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table K-2. Nodes in the Link-Node Analysis Network which are Controlled 1 914165 1 1018676 1 Actuated 57 2 840529 1159105 Actuated 4 4 855376 1028441 Stop 49 9 855271 1028732 Yield 49 12 853402 1028410 Yield 49 13 853652 1028414 Stop 49 22 856582 1028433 Stop 49 55 851351 1045868 Actuated 38 56 850661 1045853 Actuated 38 62 851328 1046066 Yield 38 65 843046 1065684 TCP-Actuated 29 70 843258 1065294 Yield 29 73 845918 1065688 Actuated 29 74 844926 1065726 TCP-Actuated 29 75 840932 1065710 Actuated 29 77 844935 1076574 Actuated 29 78 845623 1076525 Actuated 29 84 842935 1076575 Actuated 29 91 847249 1082770 Actuated 27 100 848983 1105738 TCP- Uncontrolled 17 102 846569 1105690 TCP- Uncontrolled 17 104 848636 1106085 Yield 17 112 853481 1120473 Yield 10 124 853258 1132343 Yield 8 125 851645 1132277 Yield 8 129 853336 1132846 Yield 8 134 834626 1159215 Stop 4 137 833690 1159204 Stop 4 139 834595 1159457 Yield 4 140 833758 1159031 Yield 4 172 883553 1028437 Actuated 51 173 872393 1045842 Actuated 42 174 873718 1046015 Actuated 42 196 823220 1106248 TCP-Actuated 16 197 827269 1107727 Stop 16 202 851162 1119583 Actuated 10 203 856458 1121525 Actuated 11 204 861151 1124350 TCP-Actuated 11 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-163 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

2051 8668721 1124341 1 Actuated 11 206 871168 1124369 Actuated 14 207 874882 1124306 TCP-Actuated 14 210 851055 1132255 TCP - Actuated 8 211 856422 1132291 TCP-Actuated 9 212 864327 1132395 TCP-Actuated 9 213 867044 1132383 Actuated 9 214 871117 1132269 Actuated 12 215 874807 1132218 Actuated, 12 217 874886 1105773 TCP-Actuated 21 218 874834 1119035 TCP-Actuated 14 219 876601 1088497 TCP-Actuated 31 220 882167 1078088 TCP - Actuated 32 221 887277 1068375 TCP-Actuated 34 222 892458 1059177 TCP-Actuated 41 223 896369 1048303 TCP-Actuated 46 225 897836 1040126 Actuated 46 226 899032 1039353 Actuated 46 228 904297 1034584 Actuated 54 229 905161 1033669 Actuated 54 230 907447 1030212 Actuated 55 231 914376 1018409 Actuated 57 232 874368 1135187 Actuated 12 233 872182 1140639 TCP-Actuated 12 234 868374 1151033 TCP-Actuated 6 235 864967 1159035 TCP-Actuated 5 236 860697 1169250 Actuated 2 237 899065 1033665 Actuated 54 238 901202 1027416 Actuated 54 239 901763 1022885 Actuated 56 240 899377 1014965 Actuated 56 243 893782 1032447 Actuated 54 244 885747 1032486 Actuated 51 245 884328 1031686 Actuated 51 246 878698 1068342 TCP - Uncontrolled 33 247 877768 1068520 Actuated 33 248 873191 1068668 TCP-Actuated 33 249 869953 1068911 TCP-Actuated 33 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-164 K-164 KLD Engineering, P.C.

KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

4- ***y *44 251 865631 1068800 1 Stop 30 252 865498 1069303 TCP-Actuated 30 254 863503 1068344 TCP-Actuated 30 256 859984 1065496 Actuated 30 257 859254 1063620 TCP-Actuated 30 258 854861 1065044 TCP - Actuated 30 259 851214 1065851 TCP-Actuated 29 260 851197 1159029 Actuated 5 264 851040 1140174 TCP-Actuated 8 265 851100 1145623 TCP-Actuated 5 272 885722 1140413 TCP- Uncontrolled 13 273 883463 1139554 TCP - Uncontrolled 13 276 875076 1135206 TCP- Actuated 12 278 916753 1062909 TCP - Uncontrolled 45 280 922234 1046955 Actuated 48 281 916049 1043742 Actuated 47 283 904409 1041691 Pretimed 46 284 910972 1041202 Actuated 47 286 858971 1138989 Actuated 9 288 867017 1138940 Actuated 9 289 866872 1145603 TCP-Actuated 5 291 869925 1145788 Actuated 6 294 873458 1138106 Stop 12 295 866985 1128598 Actuated 11 296 871154 1130915 Actuated 12 297 869831 1130949 Actuated 12 298 874820 1130875 TCP-Actuated 12 299 874842 1129511 Actuated 14 300 856459 1117675 Stop 11 301 861798 1117815 TCP - Actuated 11 303 867120 1119162 Actuated 11 304 872338 1119041 Actuated 14 306 872910 1124359 Actuated 14 308 853316 1105766 TCP-Actuated 17 309 866993 1105685 TCP-Actuated 18 310 872233 1105831 TCP-Actuated 21 311 867122 1113927 Actuated 18 316 861748 1105736 TCP-Actuated 18 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-165 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

x. ý ii Y II Control -T ' '

Grid Map Node Coordinate. Coo rdinatel (ft) (ft) iType Number 319 8667351 1093790 1 Stop 20 322 864790 1099283 Actuated 20 323 864682 1100747 Actuated 20 326 862277 1101958 Actuated 20 333 860234 1085149 TCP- Actuated 28 334 867326 1085175 TCP- Actuated 31 335 860464 1081675 Stop 28 336 861546 1077501 TCP - Actuated 28 337 867400 1077603 Actuated 31 338 870390 1085762 TCP- Actuated 31 339 871846 1087236 TCP- Actuated 31 340 874406 1088375 TCP-Actuated 31 341 855415 1084729 TCP-Actuated 28 342 850921 1083131 TCP- Actuated 27 343 859344 1076440 TCP-Actuated 30 344 851197 1076442 TCP- Actuated 29 349 855812 1070643 TCP- Actuated 30 351 861342 1072532 Stop 30 356 874309 1074965 TCP- Actuated 33 358 868836 1073674 TCP-Actuated 33 359 864440 1071391 TCP-Actuated 30 361 869967 1077632 Actuated 31 362 867363 1081718 Actuated 31 367 868939 1085205 Stop 31 370 860195 1088745 Stop 28 371 867382 1088112 TCP-Actuated 31

.374 861545 1093481 Stop 20 377 861945 1099586 Actuated 20 381 871910 1065956 TCP - Actuated 33 387 877519 1070076 Actuated 33 388 884264 1074111 TCP-Actuated 34 389 881179 1074099 Actuated 34 393 884426 1068389 TCP - Actuated .34 401 883190 1062447 Yield 41 405 888377 1063693 Yield 34 407 889666 1064070 TCP-Actuated 34 421 874413 1046299 TCP- Actuated 42 430 885548 1037738 Yield 43 K-166 K-166 KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

x Y i Control Grid Map Node Coordinate. Coordinate' I ý,ýI (ft) (ft) :Type Nurn Iber 431 891116 1 1037699 1 Actuated 43 432 890981 1032514 Actuated 51 440 884923 1028456 Actuated 51 445 888399 1028461 Actuated 51 446 888321 1024320 Stop 51 447 886303 1023241 Stop 53 448 885914 1023026 Stop 53 452 881083 1108321 Stop 21 453 884783 1108377 TCP - Uncontrolled 22 454 898521 1078448 TCP- Uncontrolled 35 455 888520. 1078378 Actuated 32 456 884472 1078413 Actuated 32 457 888453 1076440 Actuated 34 458 888470 1070293 Actuated 34 459 888523 1068375 Actuated 34 462 888526 1066069 TCP - Actuated 34 470 898798 1059032 Actuated 44 471 904345 1058851 Actuated 44 473 908025 1058571 Actuated 45 474 896810 1073805 Stop 35 476 894482 1072340 Stop 35 483 906939 1061012 TCP - Uncontrolled 45 484 907070 1060983 TCP - Uncontrolled 45 485 906995 1061149 TCP- Uncontrolled 45 486 907116 1061078 TCP- Uncontrolled 45 488 907293 1058467 Yield 45 490 907366 1058418 Yield 45 497 875751 1132557 Actuated 12 499 904300 1052731 Stop 44 502 898560 1049647 Actuated 46 503 897546 1048282 Actuated 46 516 900895 1050102 Actuated 46 520 899519 1041065 Stop 46 521 904059 1036206 Actuated 54 522 904452 1035772 Actuated 54 527 908381 1041581 Actuated 47 528 909263 1030982 Actuated 55 530 919460 1021149 Yield 57 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-167 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

531 8987641 1011908 1 Actuated 56 537 898970 1035023 Stop 54 538 903333 1035541 Actuated 54 544 916051 1033990 Stop 55 546 912576 1041618 Actuated 47 556 903374 1028364 Actuated 54 558 909798 1026177 Actuated 55 561 902235 1029830 Actuated 54 562 901043 1033736 Actuated 54 564 907279 1018400 Actuated 57 566 909105 1016337 Actuated 57 570 912766 1020924 Actuated 57 571 917323 1022934 Actuated 57 579 912731 1029211 Stop 55 580 911846 1031183 Stop 55 581 911510 1032012 Stop 55 582 909920 1030287 Stop 55 583 911387 1028640 Actuated 55 584 918579 1021829 Stop 57 585 918232 1022859 Stop 57 588 919649 1021133 Yield 57 591 863408 1134287 Stop 9 592 867061 1134368 Actuated 9 593 871064 1134240 Actuated 12 594 874345 1134145 Actuated 12 596 866982 1141625 Actuated 9 598 857761 1141636 Stop 9 599 857719 1140114 Stop 9 603 883452 1146210 Actuated 6 608 872865 1140641 Actuated 12 619 823490 1105686 TCP-Uncontrolled 16 620 838494 1090775 Stop 16 624 838622 1075709 Stop 26 627 838482 1073196 Yield 26 631 841233 1068898 Actuated 29 632 841294 1067685 Actuated 29 635 838728 1065822 Yield 26 637 841348 1066589 Actuated 29 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-168 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

638 836438 1071305 Yield 26 639 836443 1071186 Yield 26 643 858655 1060647 Actuated 37 644 860035 1059702 Stop 37 647 863288 1058140 Actuated 37 649 856266 1050664 Stop 37 653 860029 1052055 Actuated 37 655 865480 1052470 Stop 37 657 865420 1045896 Actuated 39 658 860339 1045847 Actuated 39 660 856530 1045896 Actuated 39 671 877641 1028499 Actuated 50 686 881956 1052215 Stop 41 688 884677 1049703 Stop 43 692 875369 1046755 Actuated 42 697 865548 1058938 Stop 37 705 858680 1057810 Stop 37 708 854653 1031008 Stop 49 710 856487 1029296 Stop 49 717 882707 1035255 Stop 51 722 883567 1032171 Stop 51 723 870364 1138966 Yield 12 724 875722 1132926 Yield 12 727 880379 1137859 Yield 12 729 872903 1126839 Yield 14 738 843297 1082901 Yield 27 739 842628 1083909 Stop 27 741 841274 1087997 Stop 27 742 839866 1089124 Stop 26 751 848611 1086487 Actuated 27 756 851561 1091634 Yield 19 769 851614 1086382 Stop 27 770 851550 1084706 Yield 27 773 851236 1074504 TCP-Actuated 29 774 859646 1071700 TCP - Actuated 30 775 861645 1067460 TCP - Actuated 30 784 855386 1101389 Stop 20 785 855687 1099896 Stop 20 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-169 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

789 850523 1100430 Stop 19 798 854796 1105758 TCP- Actuated 18 799 856391 1091500 Stop 20 803 855167 1090065 Stop 20 804 855187 1088898 Stop 28 805 855053 1087483 Stop 28 806 855028 1086116 Stop 28 811 857807 1085131 TCP- Actuated 28 812 848779 1082798 TCP- Actuated 27 816 852872 1099234 Stop 19 820 856595 1079062 TCP- Actuated 28 821 851054 1078857 TCP- Actuated 27 823 856579 1076506 TCP - Actuated 30 825 853114 1078653 Actuated 27 828 854113 1081116 Stop 27 829 852475 1083724 TCP- Actuated 27 830 848090 1065776 TCP- Actuated 29 831 865392 1048179 Stop 39 835 870372 1045857 Actuated 42 836 879596 1082979 TCP- Actuated 31 840 885757 1083289 Stop 32 843 889420 1032544 Actuated 51 846 888936 1034470 Stop 51 849 877588 1089878 Stop 23 850 875245 1091104 TCP- Actuated 23 852 874948 1092465 TCP- Actuated 23 854 874983 1095134 TCP-Actuated 23 856 874977 1098117 TCP- Actuated 23 859 874912 1101297 TCP- Actuated 23 861 876071 1130985 Yield 12 863 874126 1135903 Actuated 12 866 882335 1138890 TCP- Actuated 13 869 916686 1062929 TCP - Uncontrolled 45 870 916723 1062975 TCP - Uncontrolled 45 874 912155 1041491 Yield 47 881 874377 1133530 Actuated 12 883 874667 1132695 Actuated 12 885 874869 1126952 Actuated 14 K-170 KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-170 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

x y Control Grid Map Node Coordinate' Coordinate' i (ft) (ft) Type Number 887 8748501 1127888 1 Actuated 14 890 874874 1122784 Actuated 14 892 874827 1119636 Actuated 14 894 874983 1114074 Actuated 21 896 874981 1108413 TCP- Actuated 21 899 852798 1120227 Actuated 10 901 859034 1122701 Actuated 11 903. 860297 1123657 Actuated 11 905 861654 1124699 Actuated 11 907 864322 1126434 Actuated 11 910 868240 1129673 Actuated 14 913 872531 1130922 Actuated 12 915 873842 1130879 Actuated 12 917 874836 1129334 Stop 14 919 874032 1128460 Actuated 14 924 861779 1132322 TCP- Actuated 9 927 844312 1066199 Yield 29 930 899993 1038844 Actuated 46 931 908186 1032134 Actuated 55 932 906746 1031543 Actuated 55 933 908209 1028898 Actuated 55 934 903782 1013951 Actuated 56 935 905110 1029134 Actuated 54 937 907434 1041630 Actuated 47 938 900943 1041728 Stop 46 939 899194 1041724 Stop 46 941 899050 1041730 Stop 46 942 899048 1041651 Stop 46 943 898535 1041690 Stop 46 945 899066 1040379 Actuated 46 946 900157 1040373 Actuated 46 947 899060 1039885 Actuated 46 949 897678 1041693 Actuated 46 950 897671 1042284 Actuated 46 951 898251 1042293 Yield 46 952 898251 1042401 Yield 46 955 901204 1039208 Actuated 46 959 904319 1039037 Actuated 46 KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-171 K-171 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

962 9063341 1033915 1 Actuated 54 965 915701 1024355 Yield 55 966 915419 1024311 Yield 55 968 916834 1023265 Actuated 57 973 909638 1019454 Yield 57 974 909803 1019391 Stop 57 975 909955 1019480 Stop 57 979 881630 1032615 Stop 51 980 880269 1028461 Actuated 50 981 853814 1045914 Actuated 38 983 872459 1045679 Yield 42 986 885816 1037719 Yield 43 988 895519 1050625 TCP-Actuated 44 989 896077 1049137 Actuated 46 991 894672 1053037 Actuated 44 993 893636 1055940 Actuated 41 996 893095 1057414 Actuated 41 998 892039 1059901 Actuated 41 1000 891264 1061283 Actuated 41 1003 890386 1062804 Actuated 41 1006 885893 1070996 TCP - Actuated 34 1008 882778 1076922 Actuated 32 1010 880734 1080772 TCP - Actuated 31 1012 877558 1086737 TCP-Actuated 31 1014 866147 1085202 TCP-Actuated 28 1016 856167 1084872 Actuated 28 1018 849894 1082943 TCP-Actuated 27 1020 867074 1111544 Actuated 18 1022 867127 1117434 Actuated 11 1024 867036 1121805 TCP-Actuated 11 1027 867036 1131045 Actuated 9 1029 867077 1136372 Actuated 9 1032 867063 1137655 Actuated 9 1035 869736 1134307 Actuated 12 1036 871943 1134197 Stop 12 1039 872654 1134164 Stop 12 1041 873819 1134166 Actuated 12 1046 863654 1124404 Actuated 11 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-172 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

x Y-Control Grid Map Node Coordinate' Coordinate' (ft) (ft) jType Nurnlber, 1047 863617 1 1125884 1 Stop 11 1048 869365 1119095 TCP-Actuated 14 1050 871186 1126807 Actuated 14 1052 871172 1129562 Actuated 14 1054 870484 1134298 Yield 12 1057 870285 1134314 Yield 12 1059 870409 1134445 Yield 12 1061 865702 1134379 Actuated 9 1066 861094 1117850 Stop 11 1067 885462 1068375 Actuated 34 1069 888422 1072894 Actuated 34 1071 895775 1059083 Actuated 44 1073 894122 1059144 Actuated 44 1077 888506 1063652 Yield 34 1078 886021 1063939 Yield 34 1081 880601 1064204 Yield 33 1083 850255 1065892 TCP-Actuated 29 1088 898966 1050614 Yield 44 1091 900458 1050640 Stop 44 1092 897286 1050664 Actuated 44 1102 891153 1068381 Stop 34 1117 853322 1162318 Actuated 5 1127 874805 1131150 Actuated 12 1129 868330 1138967 Stop 12 1131 869772 1132281 Actuated 12 1137 875415 1172635 Actuated 3 1142 873846 1132249 Actuated 12 1143 874504 1132234 Actuated 12 1145 873851 1132393 Actuated 12 1146 872501 1132279 Actuated 12 1147 909603 1041437 Actuated .47 1150 899007 1041694 Stop 46 1153 874960 1099881 TCP-Actuated 23 1155 874945 1102043 TCP-Actuated 23 1157 918545 1021987 Actuated 57 1161 872019 1124384 Actuated 14 1162 848784 1083810 Actuated 27 1164 848774 1085244 Actuated 27 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-173 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

x y Control Grid Map Node Coordinate' Coordinate' I (ft) (ft) IType Number 1167 880376 1137776 Yield S 12 1168 911835 1074438 Stop 35 1174 892708 1048114 Stop 43 1182 891154 1055057 Stop 41 1185 898919 1050668 Yield 44 1193 904343 1054164 Stop 44 1194 904321 1055919 Stop 44 1195 903352 1059008 Stop 44 1196 902911 1059008 Stop 44 1200 900726 1059030 Actuated 44 1212 904337 1053686 Yield 44 1213 904363 1054936 Actuated 44 1218 904408 1053625 Yield 44 1220 891126 1064685 Stop 34 1222 894899 1060736 Stop 44 1225 897311 1059025 Stop 44 1230 908863 1057385 Stop 45 1231 906653 1058392 Actuated 45 1234 905550 1064727 Stop 35 1240 856528 1074413 Actuated 30 1241 851183 1063302 Actuated 29 1242 851149 1064506 Actuated 29 1243 858674 1059452 Actuated 37 1250 856568 1077606 Actuated 28 1256 858252 1083056 Stop 28 1258 857720 1083081 Stop 28 1261 855455 1079085 Stop 28 1262 867304 1083727 Stop 28 1263 860297 1083843 Stop 28 1266 864314 1077611 Stop 28 1280 880529 1064209 Yield 33 1283 882909 1078452 Actuated 32 1286 890920 1070817 Stop 34 1291 879220 1106980 Stop 21 1293 879250 1103074 Stop 21 1294 879279 1098159 Stop 23 1295 881055 1103044 Stop 21 1296 881055 1098159 Stop 23 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-174 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

x Y Control Grid Map Node Coordinate' Coordinate' (ft) (ft) IType Number.,

1298 881055 1 1101296 1 Stop 23 1299 881055 1099670 Stop 23 1300 879339 1099640 Stop 23 1305 881144 1105086 Stop 21 1306 879250 1104998 Stop 21 1310 874932 1116500 Stop 14 1313 874898 1117515 Stop 14 1314 874865 1118349 Stop 14 1323 872335 1109771 Stop 21 1324 869203 1113911 Stop 21 1335 844299 1140319 Stop 8 1341 884380 1080132 Stop 32 1343 865826 1068612 Stop 30 1345 869834 1139005 Yield 12 1349 857346 1079067 Stop 28 1353 855499 1067433 Yield 30 1354 855401 1067350 Yield 30 1357 837351 1070475 Yield 26 1358 838741 1066899 Stop 26 1359 838619 1068824 Stop 26 1360 837342 1070316 Yield 26 1364 838637 1065716 Yield 26 1367 887195 1032522 Actuated 51 1370 893762 1028763 Stop 54 1372 856446 1092244 Yield 20 1

Coordinates are in the North American Datum of 1983 Florida East State Plane Zone St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant K-175 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX I Area Boundaries

L. AREA BOUNDARIES Area 1 County: St. Lucie Defined as the area within the following boundary: North of the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant on Hutchinson Island. South of Seaway Drive. West of the Atlantic Ocean. East of the Indian River.

Area 2 County: St. Lucie Defined as the area within the following boundary: North of Dyer Road. South of.

Savannah Road. West of the Indian River. East of US 1.

Area 3 County: St. Lucie Defined as the area within the following boundary: North of Edwards Road, Savannah Road, and Seaway Drive. South of the Belcher Canal. North of the North Beach Causeway. West of the Atlantic Ocean and US 1. East of Kings Highway and 1-95.

Area 4 County: St. Lucie Defined as the area within the following boundary: North of St. Lucie Boulevard West and Prima Vista Boulevard. South of Edwards Road. West of US 1.

East of California Boulevard, 1-95, and the Florida Turnpike.

Area 5 County: St. Lucie Defined as the area within the following boundary: North of Becker Road and the St. Lucie/Martin County Line. South of Prima Vista and St. Lucie Boulevard West.

West of US 1 and the St. Lucie/Martin County Line. East of the Florida Turnpike, I-95, California Boulevard, Savona Boulevard, Savage Boulevard, Darwin Boulevard and Paar Drive.

Area 6 County: St. Lucie Defined as the area within the following boundary: North of the St. Lucie/Martin County Line. South Of Dyer Road. West of the Indian River. East of US 1.

Area 7 County: Martin Defined as the area within the following boundary: North of the St. Lucie Inlet, All of Sewalls Point, and the St. Lucie River. South of the St. Lucie/Martin County Line.

West of the Indian River. East of the St. Lucie/Martin County Line.

Area 8 County: St Lucie Defined as the area within the following boundary: North of the St. Lucie Inlet.

South of the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant on Hutchinson Island. West of the Atlantic Ocean. East of the Indian River St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant L-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX M Evacuation Sensitivity Studies

M. EVACUATION SENSITIVITY STUDIES This appendix presents the results of a series of sensitivity analyses. These analyses are designed to identify the sensitivity of the ETE to changes in some base evacuation conditions.

M.1 Effect of Changes in Trip Generation Times A sensitivity study was performed to determine whether changes in the estimated trip generation time have an effect on the ETE for the entire EPZ. Specifically, if the tail of the mobilization distribution were truncated (i.e., if those who responded most slowly to the Advisory to Evacuate, could be persuaded to respond much more rapidly), how would the ETE be affected? The case considered was Scenario 6, Region 3; a winter, midweek, midday, good weather evacuation of the entire EPZ. Table M-1 presents the results of this study.

Table M-1. Evacuation Time Estimates for Trip Generation Sensitivity Study 3 Hours 5:20 7:30 5 Hours 5:25 7:30 7 Hours (Base) 5:30 7:30 As discussed in Section 7.3, traffic congestion persists within the EPZ for seven and a half hours.

As such, the ETE for the 100th percentile are not affected by the trip generation time, but by the time needed to clear the congestion within the EPZ. The 9 0 th percentile ETE are also not sensitive to truncating the tail of the mobilization time distribution, as ETE only decrease by 10 minutes when reducing the trip generation by 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months .

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant M-1 KLD Engineering. P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

M.2 Effect of Changes in the Number of People in the Shadow Region Who Relocate A sensitivity study was conducted to determine the effect on ETE of changes in the percentage of people who decide to relocate from the Shadow Region. The case considered was Scenario 6, Region 3; a winter, midweek, midday, good weather evacuation for the entire EPZ. The movement of people in the Shadow Region has the potential to impede vehicles evacuating from an Evacuation Region within the EPZ. Refer to Sections 3.2 and 7.1 for additional information on population within the Shadow Region.

Table M-2 presents the evacuation time estimates for each of the cases considered. The results show that the ETE is sensitive to shadow evacuation. Eliminating shadow evacuation (0%) reduces the 90th percentile ETE by 15 minutes and the 100th by 5 minutes. Tripling the shadow percentage increases the ETE by 40 minutes and 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months , 10 minutes for the 9 0 th and 1 0 0 th percentiles, respectively - significant increases.

Note, the telephone survey results presented in Appendix F indicate that 40% of households would elect to evacuate if advised to shelter, which is twice the base assumption of 20% non-compliance suggested in NUREG/CR-7002. Doubling the shadow evacuation percentage increases the ETE by 20 minutes and 25 minutes for the 9 0 th and 1 0 0 th percentiles, respectively.

Table M-2. Evacuation Time Estimates for Shadow Sensitivity Study

.vclo~m Evcatn - Esimt fo aEnir

E-0 0 5:15 7:25 20 (Base) 17,395 5:30 7:30 40 34,790 5:50 7:55 60 52,185 6:10 8:40 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant M-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

M.3 Effect of Changes in EPZ Resident Population A sensitivity study was conducted to determine the effect on ETE of changes in the resident population within the study area (EPZ plus Shadow Region). As population in the study area changes over time, the time required to evacuate the public may increase, decrease, or remain the same. Since the ETE is related to the demand to capacity ratio present within the study area, changes in population will cause the demand side of the equation to change. The sensitivity study was conducted using the following planning assumptions:

1. The population within the study area was increased by varying amounts up to 10%.

Changes in population were applied to permanent residents only (as per federal guidance), in both the EPZ and in the Shadow Region.

2. The transportation infrastructure remained fixed; the presence of new roads or highway capacity improvements were not considered.

3. The study was performed for the 2-Mile Region (R01), the 5-Mile Region (R02) and the entire EPZ (R03).

4. The scenario which yielded the highest ETE values was selected as the case to be considered in this sensitivity study (Scenario 7).

Table M-3 presents the results of the sensitivity study.Section IV of Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, and NUREG/CR-7002, Section 5.4, require licensees to provide an updated ETE analysis to the NRC when a population increase within the EPZ causes ETE values (for the 2-Mile Region, 5-Mile Region or entire EPZ) to increase by 25 percent or 30 minutes, whichever is less. Note that all of the base ETE values are greater than 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months ; 25 percent of the base ETE is always greater than 30 minutes. Therefore, 30 minutes is the lesser and is the criterion for updating.

Those percent population changes which result in ETE changes greater than 30 minutes are highlighted in red below - a 3% increase or more in the EPZ population. FPL will have to estimate the EPZ population on an annual basis. If the EPZ population increases by 3% or more, an updated ETE analysis will be needed.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant M-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

Table M-3. ETE Variation with Population Change

. oua IS ionces Population Increase Region Base 3% 4% 5% 7% 10%

2-MILE 5:35 5:40 5:40 5:40 5:45 5:50 5-MILE 4:05 4:05 4:15__ 4:15 4:20 4:20 FULL EPZ 6:00 6:10 6:15 6:15 6:25 6:30 Population Increase Region Base 3% 4% 5% 7% 10%

2-MILE 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:10 7:10 7:20 5-MILE 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:10 7:10 7:20 FULL EPZ 8:10 8:40 8:40 8:40 8:40 8:55 Rev. 1 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant M-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX N ETE Criteria Checklist

N. ETE CRITERIA CHECKLIST Table N-1. ETE Review Criteria Checklist 1.0 Introduction

a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area Yes Section 1 should be described.

b. A map should be included that identifies primary features Yes Figures 1-1, 3-1 of the site, including major roadways, significant topographical features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ.

c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be Yes Table 1-3 provided and includes similar information as identified in Table 1-1, "ETE Comparison," of NUREG/CR-7002.

1.1 Approach

a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained Yes Section 1.3 during the field survey of the roadway network should be provided.

b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, Yes Sections 2.1, 3, 8 large employers, and special events should be identified.

c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control Yes Sections 1.3, 2.2, 9; Appendix G plans in the analysis.

d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be Yes Section 1.3, Table 1-3, Appendix B, identified by name and version. Appendix C St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Crieri Crtro SReie Adrese Coment

e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be Yes Section 3 - avoid double counting described.

Section 5, Appendix F - 4.4% sampling error at 95% confidence interval for telephone survey 1.2 Assumptions

a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption Yes Section 2.3 - Assumption 1 that the evacuation should be ordered promptly and no Section 5.1 early protective actions have been implemented.

b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Yes Sections 2.2, 2.3 Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and include the basis to support their use.

1.3 Scenario Development

a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, Yes Tables 2-1, 6-2 should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason should be provided for use of other scenarios.

1.3.1 Staged Evacuation

a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in Yes Sections 5.4.2, 7.2 development of a staged evacuation.

1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas

a. A map of EPZ with emergency response planning areas Yes Figure 6-1 (ERPAs) should be included.

b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs Yes Tables 6-1, 7-5, H-1 considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction in each sector.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NR Crtei Revie Crtro drseo mns

c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Yes Tables 6-1, 7-6, and H-1 Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations.

2.0 Demand Estimation

a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four Yes Permanent residents, employees, population groups, including permanent residents of the transients - Section 3, Appendix E EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools. Special facilities, schools - Section 8, Appendix E 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. The US Census should be the source of the population Yes Section 3.1 values, or another credible source should be provided.

b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for Yes 2010 used as the base year for analysis growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE.

c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, Yes Figure 3-2 "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for permanent residents.

2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles

a. The persons per vehicle value should be between I and 2 Yes 1.74 persons per vehicle based on or justification should be provided for other values, telephone survey results - see Table 1-3 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

gnT Ahalsi r

b. Major employers should be listed. Yes Alternate method used. The NRC has reviewed this methodology. See Section 3.4 2.1.2 Transient Population

a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations Yes Sections 3.3, 3.4, Appendix E should be included, and peak and average attendance for these facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided.

b. The average population during the season should be used, Yes Tables 3-4, 3-5 and Appendix E itemize the itemized and totaled for each scenario. transient population and employee estimates. These estimates are multiplied by the scenario specific percentages provided in Table 6-3 to estimate average transient population by scenario. See page 6-1.

c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at Yes Sections 3.3, 3.4 facilities should be estimated.

d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided. Yes Sections 3.3, 3.4 Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why values vary should be provided.

e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 Yes Figure 3 transients of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution Figure 3 employees for the transient population.

2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents

a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit Yes Section 8.1, Table 8-1 dependent residents should be discussed.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

R Reie CrtraCrtro Addrsse Coment

b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group Yes Section 8.1, Tables 8-5, 8-9 should be quantified.

c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent Yes Sections 8.1, 8.4 residents should be used in the analysis.

d. The methodology used to determine the number of Yes Section 8.5 people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data.

e. Capacities should be provided for all types of Yes Section 2.3 - Assumption 10 transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% Sections 3.5, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3 should be used or justification should be provided for higher values.

f. An estimate of this population should be provided and Yes Page 8 last paragraph information should be provided that the existing Table 8-1 -transit dependents registration programs were used in developing the estimate. Section 8.5 - special needs

g. A summary table of the total number of buses, Yes Sections 8.3, 8.4- page 8-6 ambulances, or other transport needed to support Table 8-5 evacuation should be provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis 2.3 Special Facility Residents

a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, Yes Appendix E, Tables E-1 through E-5, E location, and average population should be provided, list facilities, type, location, and population Special facility staff should be included in the total special facility population.

b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility Yes Sections 8.2, 8.3, 8.6 data was obtained.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals Yes Section 8.3, Table 8-4 should be provided.

d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles Yes Section 8.3 needed to support the evacuation of the facility should be Tables 8-4, 8-5 provided.

e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g., Yes Section 8.4, 8.6 medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate.

2.4 Schools

a. A list of schools including name, location, student Yes Table 8-2 population, and transportation resources required to Section 8.2 support the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided.

b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle Yes Table 8-2, Section 8.2 schools should be based on 100% of the school capacity.

c. The estimate of high school students who will use their Yes Section 8.2 personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis for the values used should be discussed.

Rev. 2 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I

NRC~~ Reie CrtraCieinAdesdCm et

d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessary. Yes There are sufficient resources to evacuate schools in a single wave. However, Section 8.4 and Figure 8-1 discuss the potential for a multiple wave evacuation 2.5.1 Special Events

a. A complete list of special events should be provided and Yes Section 3.7 includes information on the population, estimated duration, and season of the event.

b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient Yes Section 3.7 population should be analyzed in the ETE.

c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event Yes Section 3.7 should be estimated.

2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation

a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for Yes Section 2.2 - Assumption 5 areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles Figures 2-1, 7-1 from the NPP.

Section 3.2

b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 Yes Section 3.2, Figure 3-4, Table 3-3 to 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector.

c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway Yes Section 5 -Table 5-8 network should be consistent with the trip generation time generated for the permanent resident population.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

R Reie Crtei Crtro Addese Coment 2.5.3 Background and Pass Through Traffic

a. The volume of background traffic and pass through traffic Yes Sections 3.6, 6 is based on the average daytime traffic. Values may be Table 3-6, 6-3, 6-4 reduced for nighttime scenarios.

b. Pass through traffic is assumed to have stopped entering Yes Only 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months needed based on discussion the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification. with offsite agencies.

Section 2.3 - Assumption 5, Section 3.6, Table 6 External Through Traffic footnote, Appendix G 2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation

a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the Yes total populations and total vehicles used in analysis for Tables 3-7, 3-8, 6-4 permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and pass-through demand used in each scenario.

3.0 Roadway Capacity

a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be Yes Section 4 discussed.

3.1 Roadway Characteristics

a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been Yes Section 1.3 conducted.

b. Information should be provided describing the extent of Yes Section 1.3 the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the analysis.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Seve Crtei Crteio Adrsse Comet

c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway Yes Appendix K, Table K-1 Characteristics," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided.

d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should Yes Section 4 be provided.

e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node Yes Appendix K, Figures K-1 through K-59 numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be present the entire link-node analysis provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway network at a scale suitable to identify all Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR- links and nodes 7002.

3.2 Capacity Analysis

a. the approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for Yes Section 4 the transportation network should be described in detail and identifies factors that should be expressly used in the modeling.

b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information Yes Section 1.3, Section 4 should be used in the ETE calculation.

3.3 Intersection Control

a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the Yes Appendix K, Table K-2 total number of intersections modeled that are unsignalized, signalized, or manned by response personnel.

b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections Yes Table J-1 within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle length, and turn lane queue capacity.

c. Discussion should be provided on how signal cycle time is Yes Section 4.1, Appendix C used in the calculations.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

SReie Crtei Crtro Addrsse Comment 3.4 Adverse Weather

a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and Yes Table 2-1, Section 2.3 - Assumption 9 the effects of adverse weather on mobilization time Mobilization time - Table 2-2 should be considered.

b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Yes Table 2 based on HCM 2010. The Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 factors provided in Table 3-1 of should be used or a basis should be provided for other NUREG/CR-7002 are from HCM 2000.

values.

c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on No Not applicable streets and driveways, when applicable.

4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time

a. The process used to develop trip generation times should Yes Section 5 be identified.

b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the Yes Appendix F survey, area of survey, number of participants, and statistical relevance should be provided.

c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be Yes Appendix F summarized.

d. The trip generation time for each population group should Yes Section 5, Appendix F be developed from site specific information.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NR Revie Crtei Crtro dresdCm et 4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their Yes Section 5 discusses trip generation for homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. households with and without returning Trip generation time includes the assumption that a commuters. Table 6-3 presents the percentage of residents will need to return home prior to percentage of households with returning evacuating. commuters and the percentage of households either without returning commuters or with no commuters.

Appendix F presents the percent households who will await the return of commuters. Section 2.3, Assumption 3

b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method Yes Section 5.4.3 used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in campgrounds.

c. The trip generation time accounts for transients Yes Section 5, Figure 5-1 potentially returning to hotels prior to evacuating.

d. Effect of public transportation resources used during Yes Section 3.7 special events where a large number of transients should be expected should be considered.

e. The trip generation time for the transient population Yes Section 5, Table 5-8 should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network with the general public.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

N eiwCiei rtro Addesse Coment in ET nayi 4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents a, If available, existing plans and bus routes should be used Yes Section 8.4 - pages 8-7, 8-8. Existing in the ETE analysis. If new plans should be developed with transit routes were used for some areas.

the ETE, they have been agreed upon by the responsible Basic bus routes were developed for the authorities. ETE analysis for those areas that do not have existing transit service. See Figure 8-2, Table 8-9.

State and county emergency management agencies reviewed and approved the ETE study including these prescribed routes.

b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating Yes Sections 8.4, 8.5 ambulatory and non-ambulatory residents.

c. The number, location, and availability of buses, and other Yes Section 8.4, Table 8-5 resources needed to support the demand estimation should be provided.

d, Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief Yes Section 8.4, Figure 8-1 drivers, and initiate the bus route should be provided.

e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit Yes Section 8.4, page 8-8 dependent residents to prepare and travel-to a bus pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to the pickup point.

f. The number of bus stops and time needed to load Yes Section 8.4 passengers should be discussed.

g. A map of bus routes should be included. Yes Figure 8-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-12 N-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

SReie Crtei Crtro Addrsse Comment

h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons Yes Section 8.5 includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents,.loading time, and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided.

i. Information should be provided to supports analysis of Yes Sections 8.4, 8.5 return trips, if necessary. Figure 8-1 Tables 8-10, 8-11 4.1.3 Special Facilities

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times Yes Section 8-4, Tables 8-7, 8-8, 8-12, 8-13 should be provided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and Yes Section 8.4 outbound speeds.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bounds individuals Yes Section 8.4, Tables 8-4, 8-12, 8-13 should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents should be discussed.

d. Time for loading of residents should be provided Yes Section 8.4

e. Information should be provided that indicates whether Yes Section 8.4, Table 8-5 the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional trips should be needed.

f. If return trips should be needed, the destination of Yes Section 8.4 vehicles should be provided.

g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility Yes Section 8.4 residents are expected to pass through the reception center prior to being evacuated to their final destination.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

R Reie Crtei Crteio Addresse Comet

h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the Yes Section 8.4 time elements for the return trips.

4.1.4 Schools

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization time Yes Section 8.4 should be provided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and Yes School bus routes are presented in Table outbound speeds. 8-6.

School bus speeds are presented in Tables 8-7, 8-8 Section 8.4 discusses inbound and outbound speeds

c. Time for loading of students should be provided. Yes Tables 8-7, 8-8. Discussion in Section 8.4

d. Information should be provided that indicates whether Yes Section 8.4 - page 8-6 the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional trips are needed.

e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses Yes Return trips are not needed. Sufficient should be provided, resources to evacuate in single wave.

f. If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion Yes Table 8-3. Students are evacuated to should be provided on whether students are expected to school reception centers where they will pass through the reception center prior to being be picked up by parents or guardians.

evacuated to their final destination.

Rev. 1 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis

g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the Yes Return trips are not needed. Tables 8-7 time elements for the return trips. and 8-8 provide time needed to arrive at school reception centers, which could be used to compute a second wave evacuation if necessary 4.2 ETE Modeling

a. General information about the model should be provided Yes DYNEV II (Ver. 4.0.11.0) System. Section and demonstrates its use in ETE studies. 1.3, Table 1-3, Appendix B, Appendix C

b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE No Not applicable as a traffic simulation calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate model was used.

the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as appropriate.

4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model Input

a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative Yes Appendices B and C describe the set of model inputs should be provided. simulation model assumptions and algorithms Table J model inputs

b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key Yes Appendix A performance measures and parameters used in the Tables C-i, C-2 analysis.

4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output

a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation Yes Appendix B model used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE should be provided.

Rev. 1 St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Time Estimate Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

R Reie Crtei Citro Adrese Comments

b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided Yes 1. Table J-5.

to support review: 2. Table J-3.

1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit 3. Table J-1.

node. 4. Table J-3.

2. Network wide average travel time. 5. Figures J-1 through J-12 (one plot

3. Longest queue length for the 10 intersections with the for each scenario considered).

highest traffic volume. 6. Table J-4. Network wide average

4. Total vehicles exiting the network. speed also provided in Table J-3.

5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ.

6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ.

c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various Yes Figures 7-3 through 7-8 times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service (LOS) "E" and LOS "F" conditions, if they occur.

4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public

a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and Yes Tables 7-1, 7-2 100% of the total permanent resident and transient population St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NR Reie Crtei Crtro Adrse Comments

-~i -T Analysis --

b. The ETE tor 100% ot the general public should include all Yes Section 5.4 - truncating survey data to members of the general public. Any reductions or eliminate statistical outliers truncated data should be explained. Table 7 100th percentile ETE for general population

c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs Yes Tables 7-3, 7-4 similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole,"

of NUREG/CR-7002.

d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of Yes Section 8.4, 8.5 special facilities, transit dependent, and school Tables 8-7, 8-8, 8-10 through 8-13 populations.

5.0 Other Considerations 5.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans

a. Information that responsible authorities have approved Yes Section 9, Appendix G the traffic control plan used in the analysis should be provided.

b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic Yes Appendix G control plan that affect the ETE should be provided.

5.2 Enhancements in Evacuation Time

a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation Yes Sections 7, 8, 9, and 11 time should be provided. Appendices G and M

b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of Yes Results of the ETE study were formally enhancements to local authorities should be provided, presented to local authorities at the final project meeting. Recommended enhancements were discussed.

St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NR Reie Crtei Crtro Adrse Comments 5.3 State and Local Review

a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction Yes Table 1-1 with these agencies should be discussed.

b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues Yes After review with the offsite agencies, all that may affect the ETE. issues have been resolved.

5.4 Reviews and Updates

a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required Yes TAppendix M, Section M.3 to be performed and submitted to the NRC. _

5.5 Reception Centers and Congregate Care Center

a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers Yes Figure 10-1 should be provided.

b. If return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate Yes Section 8.4 discusses a multi-wave return times for buses should be provided, evacuation procedure. Figure 8-1

c. It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers Yes Section 2.3 - Assumption 7h are left at the reception center and are taken by separate Section 10 buses to the congregate care center.

Technical Reviewer Date Supervisory Review Date St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant N-18 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

L-2012-449, Kld TR-533, Final Report, Rev. 1, Development of Evacuation Time Estimates

Text

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

L-2012-449, Kld TR-533, Final Report, Rev. 1, Development of Evacuation Time Estimates

Text

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search