IR 05000518/1978013

IE Inspec Repts 50-518/78-13, 50-519/78-13, 50-520/78-13 & 50-521/78-13 on 781010-11 During Which No Items of Noncompliance Were Noted.Major Areas Inspected Incl:Constr Activities & Independent Inspec

ML20062E510
Person / Time
Site:	Hartsville
Issue date:	11/02/1978
From:	Burdette T, Herdt A, Rausch J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20062E498	List: IR 05000518/1978013 ML20062E497
References
50-518-78-13, 50-520-78-13, 50-521-78-13, NUDOCS 7812080052
Download: ML20062E510 (3)

Text

_

># "ICog UNITED STATES

• '

/ o,

^

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[ 3 4 o REGloN 11 5 '-*-

$ 101 MARIETTA STREET. , o 8 ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30303

\..v...,/

.

Report Nos.: 50-518/78-13, 50-519/78-13, 50-520/78-13 and 50-521/78-13

.

Docket Nos.: 50-518, 50-519, 50-520 and 50-521 License Nos.: CPPR-150, CPPR-151, CPPR-152 and CPPR-153 Category: A2, A2, A2 and A2 Licensee: Tennessee Valley Authority 830 Power Building

,,

Chattanooga, Tennessee 37401 Facility Name: Hartsville Nuclear Plants A and B Inspection at: Hartsville, Tennessee Inspection Conducted: October 10-11, 1978 Inspectors: T. E. Burdette J. K. Rausch IN -[d.;c%IN '//4, ' N

'

Reviewed by:

A. R. Herdt, Chief d Date Projects Section Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch Inspection Summary t. s Inspection on October 10-11, 1978 (Report Nos.: 50-518/73-13, 50-519/78-13, 50-520/78-13 and 50-521/78-13)

Areas Inspected: Construction activities, independent inspection, and turnover of principal inspector responsibilities. The inspection involved

'

twenty (20) inspector-hours at the construction site by two hTC inspector _

Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

l l _ 781208COSL

_

. . .

I

.

-

.

'

RII Rpt. Nos. 50-518/78-13, 50-519/78-13, 50-520/78-13 and 50-521/78-13 I-1 DETAILS I Prepared by: /Y <r. b. I /// M T. E. Burdette, Principal Inspector ' Date Projects Section Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch

& Va L )b # #b#

J. K. Rausch, Pri.fcipal Inspector Date Projects Section Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch

., Dates of Inspection: October 10-11, 1978

~~

Reviewed by: bP ([ ' c /t) //[A[7$

A. R. Herdt, Chief,f Date Projects Section Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch Persons Contacted Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)

• R. T. Hathcote, Project Manager

• G. A. Gonsalves, Supervisor, Site QA Unit

• R. Brown, Construction Engineer, Plant A

• T. Quinn, Construction Engineer, Plant B

• L. H. Jackson, Assistant Construction Engineer, Plant A

• H. S. Sheppard, Assistant Construction Engineer, Plant B-u *R. L. Teasley, Jr. , Construction Superintendent , Plant A kl. A. Wilson, Construction Superintendent

• C. E. Sparks, Warehouse Supervisor

• R. E. Young, Assistant Construction Engineer, Plant B

• D. J. Couser, Mechanical QC Supervisor, Plant A

• Teriy Tyler, ENDES Licensing Engineer

• Denotes those present at the exit intervie . Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings The licensee actions on previous inspection findings were not reviewed

.

during this inspectio a

.

.

<

RII Rpt. Nos. 50-518/78-13, 50-519/78-13, 50-520/78-13 and 50-521/78-13 I-2 Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompliance, or deviation One unresolved item disclosed during the inspection is discussed in paragraph . Independent Inspection Effort The inspectors examined construction activities of Plants A and B to observe work in progress and to inspect the general state of cleanliness and housekeeping. The inspectors observed work activities

^

in the batch plant and concrete laboratory. Preparations were being (. , made for a base mat concrete pour in Unit I of Plant B.

.

The inspectors also examined activities in the receiving warehous The inspectors noted a problem in warehouse receiving practices in the area of segregation of rejected and nonconforming items. Caged areas were available for use in segregating rejected material but the areas were not being utilized in all cases. Areas were not marked to reflect the inspection status of material and warehouse personnel appeared unaware of procedure requirements. In reviewing applicable procedures on segregating of nonconforming material, procedures were not clear as to proper warehouse segregation practice TVA personnel indicated that an unissued procedure CEP 14.01 might clarify requirements in the warehouse receiving area. The area of warehouse receiving practices was identified to the licensee as Unresolved Item 518/519/520/521/78-13-0 ,s No items of noncompliancs or deviations were identifie (; _ Principal Inspector Turnover The inspectors met with TVA management and informed them that the Principal Inspector responsibilities for the Hartsville Nuclear Plants A and B were being transferred to T. E. Burdette of Region I . Exit Interview The inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on October 11, 197 The inspectors summarized the scope and findings of the inspectio The unresolved item described in paragraph 4 was discussed in detail .

__ e