IR 05000491/1981002
| ML20010B894 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cherokee  |
| Issue date: | 07/20/1981 |
| From: | Conlon T, Harris J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20010B889 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-491-81-02, 50-491-81-2, 50-492-81-02, 50-492-81-2, 50-493-81-02, 50-493-81-2, NUDOCS 8108180444 | |
| Download: ML20010B894 (3) | |
Text
e s
e"fiuq
,
~k UNITED STATES 8%
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
$
REGION ll
"e$g
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 4,t
,o ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
.....
JUL 271981 Report Nos. 50-491/81-02, 50-492/81-02, 50-493, 81-02 Licensee: Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Facility Name: Cherokee Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-491, 50-492, 50-493 License Nos. CPPR-167, CPPR-168, CPPR-169 Inspection at Cherokee site near Gaffney, South Carolina Inspector:
W r
720~ Il J. R. Harris Date Signed Approved
_
w
~7 al2 d - F/
T. E. Conlon, Section Chief Date Signed Engineering Inspection Branch Engineering and Technical Inspection Division SUMMARY Inspection on July 7-10, 1981 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 31 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of nuclear service water dam, construction status and storage controls.
Results Of the 3 areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8108180444 810818 PDR ADOCK 05000491
PD..
....
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- K. Patterson, Resident Cashier (Acting Project Manager)
- K Schmidt, QA Engineer
- W. L'ndsay, Geotechnical Engineer D. Mas n, Supervising Technician, Civil
- D. Whipp, Construction Technician T. Murray, Mechanical Inspector, QC L. Camp, QA Technician D.- Hensley, QA Technician D. Bullins, QC Inspector, Civil
- S. Teague, Employment Supervisor
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 10, 1981 with-those persons indicated in paragraph I above.
3.
. Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items-were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Independent Inspection The inspector examined storage controls and completed concrete work in the power block.
Cherokee site is in an extended construction delay status.
Ongoing nuclear safety related work consists of receiving inspection, storage, and preventative maintenance for nuclear safety related materials and completion of the Nuclear Service Water (NSW) dam. Work ~ remaining to be completed on the NSW dam is placement of slope protection and installation of dam instrumentation. Instrumentation will. not be initiated until resump-tion of construction activities.
Storage and maintenance controls examined by the NRC inspector were on the-following equipment:
a.
Miscellaneous Liquid Waste Concentrators M-059 and M-060
_
_
.
o...
I
b.
Control Element Drive Mechanism Motor Generators M-109, M-110 and M-111 c.
Main Fire Pump Motors E001, E002, E003 and E004 d.
Gas Decay Tanks M-031, M-032 and M-033 e.
Boric Acid Makeup Water Pump M-034 f.
Gas Accumulator Tank M-030 No violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Lakes, Dams and Canals - Observation of Work and Work Activities, Units -1,2, and 3 The inspector examined completed work and ongoing placement of slope protec-tion consisting of crusher run bedding material and rip rap. Acceptance criteria examined by the inspector appear in the following documents:
a.
Specification CKS 114.00-00-001, General Grading Work b.
Procedure M-1, Inspection of Compacted Earth Fills c.
Drawing Numbers CK-0025-01, CK-0025-02 and CK-0026-04 Observations showed that completed work, material and rip rap were placed in accordance with acceptance _ criteria.
No viola +'sns~ or deviations were identified.
I 7.
Lakes, Dams ard Canals, Review of Quality Records,' Units 1,2, and 3
'
The. inspector examined quality records for the select fill, impervious core, and slope protection materials in the embankment. The dam is completed E
except for completion of placement of slope protection material and instal-lation of instrumentation. Acceptance criteria examined by the inspector
!
appears in the documents listed in paragraph 6.
i Records examined included, daily inspection records, test data and associ-
ated nonconformance reports on the embankment fill' and impervious core
,'
placed between February and May 1981.
No violations or deviations were identified.
,