IR 05000335/1986027
| ML20210E064 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 01/26/1987 |
| From: | Bibb H, Crlenjak R, Wilson B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210E031 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-335-86-27, 50-389-86-26, NUDOCS 8702100221 | |
| Download: ML20210E064 (5) | |
Text
(Q
'
Y(,
,
J;>
'
p C:f ro
' UNITED STATES
+
-
^
',
' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
<
y
"
'
,
,
REGION 11,'
y j
101 MARIETTA STREET,N.W.
<
ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323
'+9.....,o
<
'
.
,
Report Nos.: 50-335/86-27 and 50-389/86-26
~
Licensee:
Florld'a Power and' Light Company 9250 West Flagler Street Miami, FL 33102 Docket Nos.: 50-335 and 50-389 License Nos.: DPR-67 and NPF-16 Facility Name: St. Lucie 1 and 2 Inspection Conducted: December 16 - January 12, 1987 Inspectors:
/
b
&
2/AS7 R?'V. Cr'Isnjak, Senior Resident Inspector Date Signed ff Fs)
2.1 # 87 H. E. Bibb, Resi ent Inspector Date Signed Approved b
/ ALM -
J2[o aND
%
B.4lilson, Section Chief Date Signed Division of Reactor Projects
>
SUMMARY Scope:
This inspection involved on-site activities in the areas of Technical Specification compliance, operator performance, overall plant operations, quality assurance practices, station and corporate management practices, corrective and preventive maintenance activities, site security procedures, radiation control activities, surveillance activities, and refuel activities.
Results: Of the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
!
l
.
8702100221 870126 ADOCK 0500033S PDR PDR O
'
.
%
--
.
,
.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Licensee Employees' Contacted
- K. Harris, St. Lucie Vice President
- D. A. Sager, Plant Manager J. H. Barrow, Operations Superintendent T.lb Dillard, Maintenance Superintendent L. W. Pearce Operations Suoervisor
- R. W. Frechette, Chemistry Supervisor C. F. Leppla, I&C Supervisor P. L. Fincher, Training Supervisor C. A. Pell, Technical Staff Supervisor
- E. J. Wunderlich, Reactor Engineering Supervisor H. F. Buchanan, Health Physics Supervisor G. Longhouser, Security Supervisor
- J. Barrow, Fire Prevention Coordinator
- J. Scarola, Asst. Plant Superintendent - Electrical
- C. Wilson, Asst. Plant Superintendent - Mechanical
- N. G. Roos, Quality Control Supervisor Other - licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen, engineers, technicians, operators, mechanics, security force members. and office personnel.
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview
.
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 14, 1987, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided
,
to or reviewed by the inspectors during this inspection.
'
3.
Plant Tours (Units 1 and 2)
'
.The inspectors conducted plant tours periodically during the inspection
'
i interval to verify that monitoring equipment was recording as required, equipment was properly tagged, operations personnel were aware of plant
]
conditions, and plant housekeeping efforts were adequate.
The inspectors i
also determined ~ that appropriate radiation controls were properly i
established, critical clean areas were being controlled in accordance with
-
procedures, excess equipment or material was stored proper 13 and combustible
materials and debris were disposed of expeditiously.
During tours, the
'
.
inspectors looked for the existence of unusual fluid leaks, piping
'
vibrations, pipe hanger and seismic restraint settings, various valve and L
.
b-I
&
t y*
---w.en--m+-
e-..e,,--we,---
e.
--we.
y-,e
--n.
- %
-e.-
--m a-
.-.s ve-.r
--*--m
r-,< -,-w
,
mew.. w
- - -
c-,.
--e.,--
,e,-..
bx-,*---,----r-..<e,--,--.
.,
.et
,
e
-
.
breaker positions, equipment caution and danger tags, component positions, adequacy of fire fighting equipment, and instrument calibration dates. Some tours were conducted on backshifts.
The inspectors routinely conducted partial walkdowns of Emergency Core Cooling (ECCS) systems.
Valve, breaker / switch lineups and equipment conditions were randomly verified both locally and in the control room.
During the inspection period the inspectors conducted a complete walkdown in the accessible areas of the Unit 1 and Unit 2 component cooling water and diesel generator systems to verify that the lineups were in accordance with licensee requirements for operability and equipment material conditions were satisfactory.
Additionally, flowpath verifications were performed on the following systems:
Unit 1 and Unit 2 intake cooling water and chemical and volume control.
4.
Plant Operations Review (Units 1 and 2)
The inspectors, periodically during the inspection interval, reviewed shift logs and operations records, including data sheets, instrument traces, and records of equipment malfunctions.
This review included control room logs and auxiliary logs, operating orders, standing orders, jumper logs and equipment tagout records.
The inspectors routinely observed operator alertness and demeanor during plant tours.
During routine operations, operator performance and response actions were observed and evaluated. The inspectors conducted random off-hours inspections during the reporting interval to assure that operations and security remained at an acceptable level.
Shift turnovers were observed to verify that they were conducted in accordance with approved licensee procedures.
The inspectors performed an in-depth review of the following safety-related tagouts (clearances).
Unit 1 1-1-10 1A Boric Acid Pump - Preventative Maintenance (PM)
1-1-14 HVS-5A - PM 1-1-17 B Boric Acid Holdup Tank Pump - Replace Seal 1-1-20 1A Spent Fuel Pool Cooling Pump - PM Unit 2 2-1-08 2B Boric Acid Pump - Adjust 2-1-10 2B Intake Cooling Water Lube Water - Install Valve 2-1-18 Boric Acid Pump - Replace Impeller 5.
Technical Specification Compliance (Units 1 and 2)
During this reporting interval, the inspectors verified compliance with limiting conditions for operations (LCOs) and results of selected surveillance tests.
These verifications were accomplished by direct observation of monitoring instrumentation, valve positions, switch
.
positions, and review of completed logs and records.
The licensee's compliance with LC0 action statements was reviewed on selected occurrences as they happened.
6.
Maintenance Observation Station maintenance activities of selected safety-related systems and components were observed / reviewed to ascertain that they were conducted in accordance with requirements.
The following items were considered during this review; LCOs were met, activities were accomplished using approved procedures, functional tests and/or calibrations were performed prior to returning components or systems to service; quality control records were maintained; activities were accomplished by qualified personnel; parts and materials used were properly certified; and radiological controls were implemented as required. Work requests were reviewed to determine status of outstanding jobs and to assure the priority was assigned to safety-related equipment.
The inspectors observed portions of the following maintenance activities.
Unit 2 62-307 2B Intake Cooling Water (ICW) Pump - Adjust Packing 62-331 2B ICW Pump Check Valve - Repair Seat Leakage 2689 V-2636 - Rebuild Valve 7.
Review Of Nonroutine Events Reported By The Licensee (Units 1 and 2)
Licensee Event Reports (LERs) were reviewed for potential generic impact, to detect trends, and to determine whether corrective actions appeared appropriate.
Events which were reported immediately were also reviewed as they occurred to determine that technical specifications were being met and that the public health and safety were of upmost consideration.
Both units continued to operate at full power throughout the reporting period.
As of January 12 Unit 1 and Unit 2 have operated continuously for 113 and 118 days, respectively.
During the current dual cycles Unit 1 and Unit 2 have cumulative capacity factors of 96 and 99 percent, respectively.
8.
Physical Protection (Units 1 and 2)
(
The inspectors verified by observation and interviews during the reporting interval that measures taken to assure the physical protection of the
,
facility met current requirements.
Areas inspected included the
'
organization of the security force, the establishment and maintenance of gates, doors and isolation zones in the proper conditions, that access control and badging was proper, and procedures were followed.
!
!
l
.
-
.
_-
. _ -...
_ _.
'
.
9.
Surveillance Observations During the inspection period, the inspectors verified plant operation in compliance with selected technical specifications (TS) requirements.
Typical of these were confirmation of compliance with the TS for reactor coolant chemistry, refueling water tank, containment pressure, control room ventilation and AC and DC electrical sources. The inspectors verified that testing was performed in accordance with adequate procedures, test instrumentation was calibrated, limiting conditions for operations were met, removal ani restoration of the affected components were accomplished, test results met requirements and were reviewed by personnel other than the individual directing the test, and that any deficiencies identified during the testing were properly reviewed and resolved by appropriate management personnel. The inspectors observed portions of the following surveillances:
1-0700051 Auxiliary Feedwater Actuation System Monthly Functional Test 1-1400051 Reactor Protection System Monthly Functional Test 10. Refueling Activities During this inspection period, the inspectors began preparations for the upcoming Unit 1 refueling outage by reviewing the refueling technical specifications and surveillance procedures.
Copies of the refueling activities working schedule, milestone graph and critical path graph were obtained by the inspector.
The licensee appears well prepared for the outage.
In general, this is a routine refueling outage, with routine refueling maintenance scheduled. The licensee plans to install a new system for automatic control of the steam generator water level below 15 percent power.
The new system is designed to provide more precise and error-free control which was difficult under manual control conditions.
l
-
-
--.
._
_.
__