IR 05000280/2008301
| ML081440012 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 03/17/2008 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-II |
| To: | Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO) |
| References | |
| 50-280/08-301, 50-281/08-301 | |
| Download: ML081440012 (47) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS (Yellow Paper) ~/ Exam Preparation Checklist ES-201-1/' /,/ / / ~ Exam Outline Quality Checklist.( . . ES-201-2 V // I.:if)'" Exam Security Agreement(s) ES-201-3 $<:::"ez: 'Itt'\\ ~c: Y Administrative Topics Outline (Final).'f::;......cA.<. ov...\\t~c.~ ES-301-1/ Control Room Systems &Facility Walk-through Test Outline (Final) .~~c: e-.. \\o~c~~. :(.. ~c;L.\\. ~ ~~ ~~, -;.t;!~~: ******* * ES-301-2/ >>: Operating Test Quality Check Sheet *... * * * * * * *. * * ES-301-3 / f Simulator Scenario Quality Check Sheet ES-301-4/ r Transient and Event Checklist * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ES-301-5 / ~ Competencies Checklist ES-301-6/ yr."
Written Exam Quality Check Sheet ES-401-6/
- J ti-<<!
r.
Written Exam Review Worksheet ES-401-9 ~ 12.
Written Exam Grading Quality Checklist ES-403-1 / 13.
Post-Exam Check Sheet...................... ES-501-1 ~ r* Facility Submittal Letter 6g-o;U-9 ]) T..D 'I-//-{) B Stt ay ol t!J~a-cJ-l)1
ES-201, Rev. 9E Facility: Surry Examination Preparation Checklist Date of Examination: Form ES-201-1 3/17/08 Examinations Developed by: Target Date* Facility: Operating Test Task Description (Reference) NRC: Written Chief Examiner's Initials-180-120-120-120 [-90] {-75} {-70} {-45} 1.
Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) 2.
NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) 3.
Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) _ 4.
Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) [5. Reference material due (C. I.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)] 6.
Integrated examination outline(s) due.-i,cilliihi-orms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, -401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} 8.
Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) -:ff/FJE ! yt/FJE ~Z/FJE r ~?t/FJE /FJE a: je-/FJE lX /FJE rt/FJE-30-14 9.
Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C. 1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) 4/FJE II ~ 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES-202) fllFJE-14-14-7 -7 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.t) 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h) 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if>10) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) ( fi/FJE-7 -7 ( 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee ftlFJE (C.3.k) ? 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to i ~~/FJE NRC examiners (C.3.i) l)/'C j I
Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NR ES-201, Rev. 9 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 WRITTEN ONLY Facility: SURRY Date.of Examination: Initials Task Description f.Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
e.Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
d.Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
c.Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
b.Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
a.Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
c.Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
b.Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: (l)the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2)at least one task is new or significantly modified (3)no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations a.Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: (l)the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2)task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3)no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) (4)the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5)the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
b.Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit testes), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
c.To the extent possible, assess whether the outliners) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
b.Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
a.Using Form ES;.301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
d.Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
c.Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
a.Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.
W / T 4.
G E N E R A L 3.
S I M U L A T o R 2.
1.
W R I T T E N a. Author ......;:._----: b. Facility Reviewer (*) c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)........:I--...:.....:l~;;;....-._ __.;;~__:.~__..;;;...;;;.. d. NRC Supervisor'_JJ~td:42JI.d~:I:.~J-lJ:2AAIJ~~l, Item Note:# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence require ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: ~AA'\\ ('-~l/L S5'/~'\\"N Date of Examination: 3/t,flu>> Initials Item Task Description a b* C# 1.
a.
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.
(.) ll) (\\y W R b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with (,) lO ()) I Section 0.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
T Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
(I) (0 T c.
lU E d.
Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
(I) (\\) N OJ 2.
a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, /1 @? ~ S and major transients.
I M b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number U and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule @ <;t L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using 1'1 A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T from the applicants' audit testes), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative ~ R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
1'1 'it 3.
a.
Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria spedfied on Form ES-301-2: (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks @ W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form
/ (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form {(t T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit testes) (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
b.
Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form ~ fi (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified ,4t (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations ~ c.
Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix 1'1 @ rt-of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
4.
a.
Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered 11.) ~tZ) ¥- in the appropriate exam sections.
G b.
Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
1'16.) ~ ~l <;Z-E N c.
Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-spedfic priorities) are at least 2.5.
1'1li)(IiJ (ii I~ E d.
Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
1'/('1,'" (jiJ ~/ ~L R A e.
Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
~(z,) ~(eJ ~; L t'f(z.) ~(z) rr?, f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
- Author J,J print~z,~uret7A ,t;):r a.
ILll4-1'1 W* At1,4-,2{I#l",L .........-r b. Facility Reviewer (*) '~~V\\~ I-t (J..\\,wv ~~' .~)- /df..0--::--:-' UtJ5/D} c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) F~\\L:S~ 6~L~~~\\/J~Ad//~~ -':/,'?/ff9 d. NRC Supervisor Uh~~-r:WL"~ / f;f,<'.. / (,/ PJ,/tr/4L / Y"~ - r~~fl-n Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Colur4.n':-c"~i~i;xaminer concurrence required.
ES-201, Page 25 of 27 (11 W<<.ITTEN ~)cC>- 3etVvc.teJ iJ (2) K\\?,VlC'-'\\I at WR.nTf10 ~XAoAA
Form ES-201-3 Examination SeC:~_Jr_it....y_A ......g__r_e_e_m_e_n_t _ ES-201 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of Jh7~ ";/2-as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons whohave not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
.. 2.
Post-Examination To the be.st of my knOWI!3dJi; I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information conc.erning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of ~-lfJo9
- From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who 'Nere administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
Pf~iNTED r'-JAME 1. WILLI AI'1 fIJ. ;I14i2JrJ$'U.
2.
~e.£J"t lel 14. ~w.., lei 3'r~~ C. Hlt/4/?;s_ 4. ~oH-N ~/Dr-z 5. W,'II,qlfbt :S.1?a uc:ke/ 6.
{.)q{{:r (j.. rof'cI uu_ 7. L f /-l ~ Be:<. K=:e(L 8. fi"1M ~~ e.CA.... g!~:iS 12.
'~,.d \\< C\\lU.t'&cu 13.~\\oJ~ ~.. L.cJ..:,J' 14.
(~irL F*::aw1t'f 7lIZ "15.
1Zl~~ctr! FBt\\ow~", NOTES: ~ -=-- t:: I ( 'l~ I Lp~)'-( JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY <<..'0 SIGNATURE (1) {:1)tJ>Pt- ~.f'~ DATE SIGNAl"UI~E (2) DATE NOTE ES-201, Pa~Je 26 of 27
Form ES-201-3 ExaminationSec~_r_~~y_A~g~r_e_e_m_e_n_t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_ ES-201 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of olin...o,rrJ.j!,'tas of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility'rnanaqement or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
' 2.
Post-Examinatiol! To the best of my kno~l~dge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing exarninations administered during the week(s) of S/l7-ij}/1>. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
DATE PRINTED NAME ,JOBTITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGN;\\TURE* (2) e:i ' " ~~/r-v~t ~4'*O'j- ~V ~\\ -
._----------------------..
ES-201, Page 26 of 27
ES*201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES*201*3 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of :3J7-'fA as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of ;'.f*,; , . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide erformance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE
----------------------------
.-- ------------------- ----------------------------
ES-201, Page 26 of 27
ES-301 Facility: Surry Administrative Topics Outline Date of Examination: Form ES-301-1 March 2008 Examination Level: RO 0' SRO D Operating Test Number: 2008*301 Administrative Topic (see Note) Conduct of Operations Conduct of Operations G2.1.7 (3.7/4.4) Equipment Control G2.2.12 (3.0/3.4) Radiation Control G2.3.2 (2.5/2.9) Emergency Plan G2.4.43 (2.8/3.5) Type Code* N,R N,R M,R D,S Describe activity to be performed Title: Perform a Quadrant Power Tilt Ratio calculation (QPTR).
Description: Given plant conditions determine the QPTR in accordance with QPTR worksheet.
Title: Perform Measurement of Macrofouling Blockage of Component Cooling Heat Exchanger (CCHX) lCC-E-lA Surveillance (RO only) Description: Determine status of the CCHX given plant data and associated graphs from l-OSP-SW-002 to include completion of procedure acceptance criteria and follow-on tasks.
Title: Calculate radiation exposure when performing task in containment (varying fields and use of personnel) Description: Job to be performed in CTMT. Select number of personnel to perform the job in accordance with ALARA practices and determine the expected dose.
Title: Complete Report of Emergency to State and Local Governments (RO only).
Description: Complete report per EPIP-2.01, Notification of State and Local Governments (Met data and stability class determination required).
NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.
- Type Codes & Criteria:
(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank (3 for ROs; 4 for SROs & RO retakes) (N)ew or (M)odified from bank (1) (P)revious 2 exams (1; randomly selected)
ES-301 Facility: Surry Administrative Topics Outline Date of Examination: Form ES-301-1 March 2008 Examination Level: RO D SRo0 Operating Test Number: 2008-301 Administrative Topic (see Note) Conduct of Operations G2.I.5 (2.3/3.4) Conduct of Operations G2.I.7 (3.7/4.4) Equipment Control G2.2.12 (3.0/3.4) Radiation Control G2.3.2 (2.5/2.9) Emergency Plan G2.4.4I (2.3/4.1) Type Code* M,R N,R N,R M,R M,S Describe activity to be performed Title: Evaluate Overtime Eligiblity. (SRO only) Description: Given various Operator hours of work for previous week, determine which operator is eligible to perform overtime.
Title: Perform a Quadrant Power Tilt Ratio calculation (QPTR).
Description: Given plant conditions determine the QPTR in accordance with QPTR worksheet.
Title: Perform a review of a performance test to verify operability of associated components. (SRO only) Description: Review I-OPT-CS-006 (RWST Chemical Addition Tank and Containment Spray System MOV Stroke Test) for accuracy.
Title: Calculate radiation exposure when performing task in containment (varying fields and use of personnel) Description: Job to be performed in CTMT. Select number of personnel to perform the job in accordance with ALARA practices and determine the expected dose.
Title: Classify an event in accordance with EPIP-l.OI (SRO only).
Description: Facility JPM 88.05. Modified such that EPIP-l.Ol will be performed with requested approval of faulted EPIP-2.01 form.
NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.
- Type Codes & Criteria:
(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank (3 for ROs; 4 for SROs & RO retakes) (N)ew or (M)odified from bank (1) (P)revious 2 exams (1; randomly selected)
ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: -..:;;;;.S....;;;.;;.;UIT;;.;;;;..yol--- _ Exam Level: RO [{1 SRO-I D SRO-U D Date of Examination: Operating Test No.: March, 2008 2008-301 Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO; 7 for SRO-I; 2 or 3 for SRO-U) System I lPM Title Type Code* Safety Function a.
CVCS I Perform a blended flow make-up to the Unit 1 RWST in SIN I accordance with 1-0P-CS-004. KIA - 004A4.04 (3.2/3.6) b.
ESFAS I Transfer the SI System to Cold Leg Recirculation Mode SIL/A/ENID II (I-ES-l.3). KIA - 013A4.01 (4.5/4.8) c.
RHR I Initiate RHR alternate decay heat removal by forced feed SILID IV -P cooling with a charging pump. KIA - 005A2.03 (2.9/3.1) and APE25AA1.02 (3.8/3.9) d.
CS I Secure containment depressurization equipment. 026A2.08 SILIAIM V (3.2/3.7) e.
f.
g.
h.
NI I Remove a failure source range NI from service during a SILlAID reactor startup. 015A4.03 (3.8/3.9) CW I Respond to a low level transient. 075A2.02 (2.5/2.7) SID WGDS I Initiate the release of a waste gas decay tank. 071A4.26 SlAIN (3.1/3.9) PPC I Depressurize the RCS to minimize SGTR breakflow SID EPE038 EA1.04 (4.3/4.1) VII VIII IX III In-Plant Systems" (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U) i.
j.
k.
RC I Locally establish RCS and SG HIILO interface integrity.
EID APE068.AA1.21 (3.9/4.1) I APE067.AA2.16 (3.3/4.0) AFW I Establish make-up to the ECST in accordance with 2-ES-EILIAIRIN 3.1 Attachment 4. 061Al.04 (3.9/3.9) EDG I Manually start an emergency diesel generator at the local EIAIM panel. 064A4.01 (4.0/4.3) VIII IV - S VI @ All control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.
(A)Iternate path (C)ontrol room
- Type Codes Criteria for RO / SRO-I / SRO-U 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3
(D)irect from bank (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant (EN)gineered safety feature (L)ow-Power / Shutdown (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A) (P)revious 2 exams (R)CA (S)imulator S:,..9 / S:. 8/ S:. 4 2:..1/~1/~1 - / - / ~ 1 2:..1/~1/~1 2:..2 / ~ 2 / ~ 1 S:,..3/ S:. 3 / S:. 2 (randomly selected) 2:..1/~1/~
ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: --:.;:;.S...:;,;;.;UIT;;..;;;,.,yoJ-- _ Exam Level: RO D SRO-I [if SRO-U D Date of Examination: Operating Test No.: March, 2008 2008-301 Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO; 7 for SRO-I; 2 or 3 for SRO-U) System I JPM Title Type Code* Safety Function a.
CVCS I Perform a blended flow make-up to the Unit 1 RWST in SIN I accordance with 1-0P-CS-004. KIA - 004A4.04 (3.2/3.6) b.
ESFAS I Transfer the SI System to Cold Leg Recirculation Mode SIL/AIENID II (I-ES-l.3). KIA - 013A4.01 (4.5/4.8) c.
RHR I Initiate RHR alternate decay heat removal by forced feed SILID IV - P cooling with a charging pump. KIA - 005A2.03 (2.9/3.1) and APE25AA1.02 (3.8/3.9) d.
CS I Secure containment depressurization equipment. 026A2.08 SILIAIM V (3.2/3.7) e.
f.
g.
h.
NI I Remove a failure source range NI from service during a SILlAID reactor startup. 015A4.03 (3.8/3.9) CW I Respond to a low level transient. 075A2.02 (2.5/2.7) SID WGDS I Initiate the release of a waste gas decay tank. 071A4.26 SlAIN (3.1/3.9) VII VIII IX In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U) i.
j.
k.
RC I Locally establish RCS and SG HIILO interface integrity.
EID APE068.AA1.21 (3.9/4.1) I APE067.AA2.16 (3.3/4.0) AFW I Establish make-up to the ECST in accordance with 2-ES-EILIAIRIN 3.1 Attachment 4. 061Al.04 (3.9/3.9) EDG I Manually start an emergency diesel generator at the local E/AIM panel. 064A4.01 (4.0/4.3) VIII IV - S VI @ All control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.
- Type Codes (A)lternate path (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant Criteria for RO / SRO-I / SRO-U 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3 S:...9 / s 8 / s 4
>1/>1/>1
(EN)gineered safety feature (L)ow-Power / Shutdown (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A) (P)revious 2 exams (R)CA (S)imulator - / - t e. 1 ?-1/?.1/?..1 ?.-2 t e. 2 /?. 1 ~3/ s 3 / s 2 (randomly selected) ?.-1 /?. 1 /?.
ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: ~S-=u=rr...y _ Exam Level: RO D SRO-I D SRO-U 0 Date of Examination: Operating Test No.: March, 2008 2008-301 Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO; 7 for SRO-I; 2 or 3 for SRO-U) System 1JPM Title Type Code* Safety Function a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
ESFAS 1Transfer the SI System to Cold Leg Recirculation Mode (1-ES-1.3). KIA - 013A4.01 (4.5/4.8) RHR 1Initiate RHR alternate decay heat removal by forced feed cooling with a charging pump. KIA - 005A2.03 (2.9/3~1) and APE25AA1.02 (3.8/3.9) CS 1Secure containment depressurization equipment. 026A2.08 (3.2/3.7) S/L/AIEN/D S/L/D S/L/NM II IV -P V In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U) i.
j.
k.
RC 1Locally establish RCS and SG HIILO interface integrity.
E/D APE068.AA1.21 (3.9/4.1) 1APE067.AA2.16 (3.3/4.0) AFW 1Establish make-up to the ECST in accordance with 2-ES-E/L/NR/N 3.1 Attachment 4. 061A1.04 (3.9/3.9) VIII IV - S @ All control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.
- Type Codes (A)lternate path (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant (EN)gineered safety feature (L)ow-Power / Shutdown (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A)
(P)revious 2 exams (R)CA (S)imulator Criteria for RO / SRO-I / SRO-U 4-6/4-6/2-3 S:,..9 / S:. 8/ S:. 4 2:-,1/2:,1/2:,1 - / - /2:,1 2:-,1/2:,1/2:,1 2:-,2/2:, 2/2:, 1 S:,..3/ S:. 3 / S:. 2 (randomly selected) 2:-,1 /2:,1 /2:,
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: S v/l.IlY /'IJJF/l.. 5r,4'-IPA./ Date of Examination: '1/'7//)f Operating Test Number: 3"1 Initials 1. General Criteria a b* C# a.
The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with ~A{ @ ~~ sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
"z t b.
There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered tt1 EJ ~ during this examination.
c.
The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit testes). (see Section D.1.a.)
1'1 ~ y~< ! d.
Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within f11 e +it acceptable limits.
e.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent fVJ r:J f applicants at the designated license level.
~ 2. Walk-Through Criteria -- -- -- a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: e initial conditions /It initiating cues
references and tools, including associated procedures
reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee /
operationally important specific performance criteria that include: ]A - detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature - system response and other examiner cues - statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant - criteria for successful completion of the task - identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards - restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable b.
Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through r') outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance /'f.ov fL criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified '-- on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
3. Simulator Criteria -- -- -- The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with f'1 ~J fE Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
\\:, Printed Name I Signature Date a.
Author J,.,JILLJAItf w. ;4f"ltSI/ALL/~~
- I)s:jor b.
Facility Reviewer(*) ~.A-\\J\\~ \\\\ Wl'-~.V / JJ~f2-- 3k.kvu:r c.
NRC Chief Examiner (#) ~n---t.....~ 3 - E-"'-.x, t-! "-~\\-/ ~t!/.:t-3/rz-/Q~
- JII ~AW- -r.
I. E../ IV tJJltz/il d.
NRC Supervisor ,J,nAI A A.. tA \\ AIJJlFlJ. taar-- 1./1(. J i.
i The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed test~ ..., NOTE:
Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-301, Page 24 of 27
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: ~UAA" £wti2. 5;TA1'vN Date of Exam:3h1 /<Ir Scenario Numbers: a / orA I :1 Operating Test No.::5 0 I QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* C# 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out 1'1 @ ~t,- of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
(VI ~ ~ 3.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated @ . the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event t'1 the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew 1£ the expected operator actions (by shift position) . the event termination point (if applicable) 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario rt fj)) 1'f-without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
'- 5.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
M I(OJ ~, '-. 6.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain M @ ~ complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
If Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
fl1 ~ tt Cues are given.
111 V:'.., ~ 8.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
(J"J ( 9.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator /11 @ performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated
to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
1'1 V"" l~ nJ f All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.
~' 11.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 fV( 1:" r (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
.oJ 12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events 111 ~J y1 specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
~ 13.
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
~,raJ ~ I Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d) Actual Attributes -- -- -- 1.
Total malfunctions (5-8) f{/ ;j'/f{ 1'1 !r;J 1"£ 2.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)
- A/3/3 111 /iJ ~
3.
Abnormal events (2-4) if /'-I / '-I 1'1 Q /(j£ 4.
Major transients (1-2)
/~/3 1"1 -p 4Ii '7 /;). / ~ f7 6J 1/(/£ 5.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) ~ "lZ 6.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) I / / / l Ii fJ V4if
7.
Critical tasks (2-3)
/ 2.
/ z: M ~:} ~£ ¥f / I ES-301, Page 25 of 27
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Su(J./J..'f Aw~ S,P;;'\\\\Jov Date of Exam: 3/'1/err Scenario Numbers: 4 /S / Operating Test No.: ~~l QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* C# 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out .1\\1 (Ot> ¢ of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
1'1 ~ ~. ... ! 3.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated ~J the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event f11 1~ the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew --. . the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario A1 ~ without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
5.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
111 ~0 f~ 6.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain ~ I complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
/It ~~/ / 7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Il1 ~ Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
1t Cues are given.
8.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
.1\\1 ~j ~ 9.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator / performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated 111 ~ 4/ to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
fl7 vnJ ft All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.
11.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 111 inJ II/; (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
'- yt r****.... II 12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events fl1( 0';; 9r£ specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13.
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
1'1 (i'J Vjt '-- V Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- -- 1.
Total malfunctions (5-8) ._....Jt / f{ / /'1 Il)J ~[ I 2.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) ~ / d.. / IZ1 ~I /~ 3.
Abnormal events (2-4) If / ii/ '1 ~ I(){/ 4.
Major transients (1-2) Ol /3/ 1'1 7QJ 4;1 EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) ~ /:J.
fJ1 ~ ~/ 5.
/ ~v'£-- 17 r9?/ / 6.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) \\ / " / {/l 7.
Critical tasks (2-3) .~ / do. / 1'1 I~ 11% I ES-301, Page 25 of 27
ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Surry Power Station Date of Exam: 3/17/2008 Operating Test No.: A E Scenarios P V P E L N
2
4' T M I T
I T N C CREW CREW CREW CREW A I A T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION L M N Y T P S A B S A B S A B S A B U E R T
R T
R T
R T
M (*)
C P
C p
C p
C P R I U RO RX
1
1
[g] NOR
1
1
1 SRO-I D I/C 3,4,7,9 3,7,8
4
2 SRO-U MAJ 6,8,9 6,8
2
1 D TS
0
2 RO RX
1
1
[g] NOR
1
1
SRO-I D I/C 2,8 2,4,6
4
2 SRO-U MAJ 6,8,9 6,8
2
1 D TS
0
2 RO RX
5
1
0 D NOR
1
1
1 SRO-I D I/C 2,3,4,7,8,9 2,3,4,6,7,8
4
2 SRO-U MAJ 6,8,9 6,8
2
1 [g] TS 2,4 3,4,5
0
2 RO RX
1
0 D NOR
1
1 SRO-I D IIC
4
2 SRO-U MAJ
2
1 D TS
0
2 Instructions: 1) Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand column ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Surry Power Station Date of Exam: 3/17/2008 Operating Test No.: A E Scenarios P V P E L N
2
4 T M I T
I T N C CREW CREW POSITION CREW CREW A I A T POSITION POSITION POSITION L M N Y T P S A B S A B S A B S A B U E R T
R T
R T
R T
M (*)
C P
C P
C P
C P R I U RO RX
1
1
~ NOR
1
1
SRO-I D IIC 1,3,6 2,4,7
4
2 SRO-U MAJ 6,8 6,8,9
2
1 D TS
0
2 RO RX
1
1
~ NOR
1
1
SRO-I D IIC 5,7,9 3,5,6
4
2 SRO-U MAJ 6,8 6,8,9
2
1 D TS
0
2 RO RX
1
1
0 D NOR
1
1
SRO-I ~ IIC 1,3,5,6,7,9 3,5,6
4
2 SRO-U MAJ 6,8 6,8,9
2
1 D TS 1,3
0
2 RO RX
1
1
0 D NOR
3
1
1 SRO-I ~ IIC 1,3,6 2,3,4,5,6,7
4
2 SRO-U MAJ 6,8 6,8,9
2
1 D TS 2,3
0
2 Instructions: 1) Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.S.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand column ES-301, Rev. 9 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Surry Power Station Date of Examination: 3/17/2008 Operating Test No.: 301 APPLICANTS RO [Z] BOP [Z] RO D RO D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I [Z] SRO-I D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U [Z] Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO
2
4
2
4
2
4
2
4 Interpret/Diagnose
1
2
5
3
1
2
1
2 Events and Conditions Comply With and
2
1
4
7
2
1
2
1 Use Procedures (1) Operate Control
4
5
8
5
4
5 Boards (2) Communicate All All All All All All All All All All All All All All All All and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory
4
5
4
5 Ability (3) Comply With and
3
3
3
3 Use Tech. Specs. (3) Notes: (1)lncludes Technical Specification compliance for an RD.
(2)Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions: Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applican ES-301, Rev. 9 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Surry Power Station Date of Examination: 3/17/2008 Operating Test No.: 301 APPLICANTS RO ~ BOP ~ RO D RO D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I ~ SRO-I D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U ~ Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO
5
5 Interpret/Diagnose
2
3 Events and Conditions Comply With and
3
1 Use Procedures (1) Operate Control
6
Boards (2) Communicate All All All All All All All All All All All All All All All All and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory
1 Ability (3) Comply With and
2 Use Tech..Specs, (3) Notes: (1)lncludes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions: Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applican ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist FORM ES-401-6 Date of exam: y ler/tp8 Exam Level RO~RO ~ Initial Note
- The facility reviewer=sinitials/signature are not applicable for NRC-develope 3.
SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 8.
References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.
c# b* Date a Item Description Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO/ SRO-onlyquestion 22 /
21 /
32 /
distributio n(s) at right.
Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO exam Memory CIA are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KIAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO /
/
38 /
SRO question distributibution.
Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.
11.
The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.
Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examinatio no utline and is appropriate fo r the tier to which they are assigned; 9.
deviations are justified.
6.
7.
4.
The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office).
Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check 5.
the item that applies) and appears appropriate: _ the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed, or _ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started, or ~ examinations were developed independently, or _ the licensee certifies that there is no duplicatio n, 0 r _ other (explain) 2.
a. NRC KlAs are referenced for all questions.
b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.
10.
Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.
d. NRC Regional Supervisor c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) a. Author b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column Ac@;chief examiner concurrence require ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 I
7. Explanation Q# 1.
LOK (F/H) 2.
LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws Stem Icuesl T/F I c~ed'lpartial JOb-I Minutia I
- / IBack-Focus Dist.
Link units ward 5. Other Kl Q=A I SRO Only 6.
U/EiS Instructions [Refer to Section 0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.] 1.
Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
2.
Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).
3.
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
- The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
- The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
- The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
- One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
4.
Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
The question is not linked to the job requirements (Le., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in oo~~. /
The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (Le., it is not required to be known from memory).
- The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
- The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
5.
Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
6.
Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory? 7.
At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
Page 1 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 4. Job Content Raw s Q#
LOK (F/H)
LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Raw s Stem Partial Focus Job-Link Back-ward 5. Other 0= SRO KIA Only
U/EiS H 008.AK2.01
D Frank reviewed - D D D D D D D E Restructured stem and distractors Done
H
D D D D D D D D D D D S 011.EK3.12 Wrote new question.
2/21 Frank reviewed - Done
H
D D D D D D D D D D S 007.EK2.02 Fran k reviewed - Meets KA, no other comments
H
D D D D D D D D D S 022.AA2.03 2/21 Frank reviewed - Suggested adding actual component nomenclature which has failed.
Changed distracter B to include the actual component which failed.
F
D D D D D D D D D D S 026.AA1.07 Frank has reviewed sat
F
D D D D D D D D D S 027.AA1.01 Frank reviewed Focused stem and distractors Final Page 2 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 4. Job Content Raw s Q#
LOK (F/H)
3. Psychometric Raw s LOD (1-5) Stem Partial Focus Job-Link Back-ward 5. Other 0= SRO KIA Only
U/EIS
H
D D D D D D D D D S 029.EK3.10 Frank reviewed Focused question and added DA Final
H
D D D D D D D D D D D S 038.EK1.01 Frank has reviewed SAT
H
D D D D D D D D D S 040.AA1.24 Frank Reviewed Minor editorial remarks completed.
H
D D D D D D D D D D S 054.AK1.02 Frank reviewed.
Editorial remarks completed.
2/21 Frank thought this might be an overlap question. Searched through the 100 questions here and could not find a repeat question.
F
D D D D D D D D E 055.EA2.05 Frank reviewed.
2/21 Changed question wording "Station Batteries are NOT fully depleted" to IIStation Batteries have NOT reached the end of their design discharge ratlnq", Page 3 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
U/6'S 5. Other 0= SRO KIA Only Back-ward 4. Job Content Raw s Job-Link 2. 3. Psychometric Raw s LOD I---....--.....--......--..--~.....- ....--....--.....--+-~--,~......-I (1-5) Stem Partial Focus
LOK (F/H) Q#
F
D D D D D D D D D D D E 056.AA1.04 Frank reviewed Reorgan ized stem Focused distractors Final
H
D D D D D D D D D D D s 057.AA2.19 Frank reviewed.
2/21 Made minor editorial corrections based on Frank's input. Changed 2nd part of each distracter to "CC Flow to the HX remains the same" or "is lost",
F
D D D D D D D D E 062.AG2.1.32 Frank reviewed. OK 2/21 Minor editorial changes, Le. Clarified wording in stem of question.
F
D D D D D D D D D D D E 065.AK3.03 Frank reviewed Changed structure of question and distractors
F
D D D D D D D D D D E WE04.EG2.4.31 Frank reviewed.
Modified to change last two distractors from Rad Monitor alarms to sump alarms that are not entry criteria for ECA-1.2 OK 2/21 Changed distractors A& B to match the annunciator display and not the rad monitor numbers.
Now matches the question.
Page 4 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 4. Job Content Raw s Q#
LOK (F/H)
LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Raw s Stem Partial Focus Job-Link Back-ward 5. Other 0= SRO KIA Only
U/6'S
H
D D D D D D D D D E WE12.EK2.2 Frank reviewed Changed distractors Final
H
D D D D D D D D D D E WE05.EK3.2 Frank reviewed.
Changed wording such that FRV bypass valve is given to be closed and ask what it takes to open valve.
2/21 Minor editorial corrections.
H
D D D D D D D D D E 001.AK2.06 Frank reviewed Add plausibility to speed of distractors - 72 and 8 too big of gap Changed distractors and stem Final
F
D D D D D D D D D D D E 003.AG2.4.1 Frank reviewed.
Made changes so that question is now modified from INPO bank question. Original question response was to place rod control in manual. With 2 rods now being affected, a Rx trip is required.
2/21 Added Delta Flux alarm to stem to make distracter C more plausible.
H
D D D D D D D D D S 005.AA2.01 Frank reviewed Clarified stem Final Page 5 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 5. Other
S D SRO U/EIS Only D
2 3. Psychometric Raw s 4. Job Content Raw s Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Partial Job-Focus Link
F
D D D D D D D D 061.AA2.05 Frank reviewed. OK 2/21 Made minor changes to qualify that there are currently no fuel handling activities in progress.
F
D D D D D D D D D D E 068.AK3.09 Frank reviewed changed distractors corrected DA
F
D D D D D D D D D D D S 076.AK3.05 2/22 Frank reviewed OK
H
D D D D D D D D D D D S WE13.EK1.2 Frank reviewed Clarified distractors Final
F
D D D D D D D D D E WE16.EA2.2 2/22 Frank reviewed - modifications made OK
H
D D D D D D D D D D D S WE02.EG2.4.31 Frank revewed SAT Page 6 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 4. Job Content Raw s Q#
LOK (F/H)
LOD (1-S) 3. Psychometric Raw s Stem Partial Focus Job-Link Back-ward S. Other 0= SRO KIA Only
U/E/S
F
D D D D D D D D D D S 003.K6.14 Frank reviewed Done
F
D D D D D D D D s 004.A2.13 Frank reviewed Changed question and distractors Final
H
D D D D D D D D D D s OOS.K2.03 Frank reviewed Removed pumps from question Final
F
D D D D D D D D D E 006.A3.0S Frank reviewed Heatup of RWST not plausible Changed to motor overheating Done -.need procedure reference for information found in lesson plan
F
D D D D D D D D D D s 004.K6.13 Frank reviewed Added DA Changed question due to overlap Focused stem Final Page 7 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
U/EIS 5. Other 0= SRO KIA Only 4. Job Content Raw s 3. Psychorretric Raw s Stem Partial Focus
LOD t---....--.....- .....--.....--+----.--......--....--....--....---I (1-5)
LOK (F/H) Q#
H
D D D D D D D D D S 008.K1.02 Frank reviewed Final
H
D D D D D D D D D D S 010.K6.03 Frank reviewed Final
F
D D D D D D D D D D D S 012.G2.1.27 Frank reviewed Rewrite Wrote new question
H
D D D D D D D D D D D S 013.K2.01 Frank reviewed - Focused Stem Final
H
D D D D D D D D D D D S 003.K3.01 Frank reviewed - Added below ECP to the stem.
Check with plant on review. May not need this additional info if you can not be critical if still pulling CB C this low in the group.
F
D D D D D D D D D E 076.K1.12 Frank reviewed changed distractors changed stem Final Page 8 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 Q#
LOK (F/H)
LOD (1-5) 3. Psychorretric Raw s 8tem Focus 4. Job Content Raw s Back-ward 5. Other 0= 8RO KIA Only
U/6'8
H
D D D D D D D D D D D
078.K2.01 Frank reviewed - Minor editorial changes to stem and distractors Final
H
D D D D D D D D D D
103.G2.1.12 Rewrote question Frank reviewed SAT
F
D D D D D D D D D D
073.K1.01 Frank reviewed Changed distractors Final
H
D D D D D D D D D D D S 007.K4.01 Frank reviewed Minor editorial changes to stem and distractors Final
. H
D D D D D D D D D D
064A.4.06 Reviewed by frank Modified distractors Final Page 9 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 4. Job Content Raw s Q#
2 3. Psychorretric Raw s LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Partial Focus Job-Link Back-ward 5. Other 0= SRO KIA Only
U/E/S
H
D D D D D D D D D D E 008.A1.04 Frank reviewed Rewrote question Frank reviewed - editorial changes Final
H
D D D D D D E 059.A4.03 Frank reviewed Changed stem Final
H
D D D D D D D D D D D S 022.K1.01 Frank reviewed Final
F
D D D D D D D D D D E 026.A4.01 Frank reviewed Chan ged stem form at Final
F
D D D D D D D D D D D s 039.K5.01 Frank reviewed-question replaced Frank reviewed Final Page 10 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 5. Other 4. Job Content Raw s S
D SRO U/EIS Only D D Back-0= ward KIA D D o Job-Link
2 3. Psychometric Raw s Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Partial Focus
F
D D D 059.A4.08 Frank reviewed Corrected distractor Frank reviewed added symmetry to distractors Final
F
D D D D D D D D D D D E 061K4.01 Frank reviewed - rewrote question Changed to 2x2 format
H
D D D D D D D D D D E 062.A3.05 Frank reviewed Changed distractors to 2x2 Rearranged the distractors Final
H
D D D D D D D D D D S 063.A2.01
F
D D D D D D D D D D S 064.K3.03 Frank reviewed Final
H
D D D D D D D D D D s 004.K5.15 Frank reviewed - looks OK Page 11 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 4. Job Content Raw s Q#
LOK (F/H)
3. Psychometric Raw s LOD (1-5) Stem Partial Focus Job-Link Back-ward 5. Other 0= SRO KIA Only
U/E/S
F
D D D D D D D D D E 103.K3.02 Frank reviewed Rewrote question Changed distractors Final
H
D D D D D D D D D S 079.K4.01
F
D D D D D D D D D D D E 086.A4.05 Frank reviewed Changed distractors format Added type of operation
H
D D D D D D D D D D E 002.K6.02 Frank reviewed Changed Distractor format Final
F
D D D D D D D D D D S 029.A3.01 Frank reviewed Changed question Final Page 12 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 4. Job Content Raw s SRO U/5'S Only S
D 5. Other D Back-0= ward KIA D D Job-Link
2 3. Psychometric Raw s Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Partial Focus
F
D D D D D 035.K1.01 Frank reviewed Added DA Added reason to TDAFP Final
H
D D D D D D D D D D D E 045.A1.05 Frank reviewed Changed distractors and stem Final
F
D D D D D D D D D D S 071.K4.04 Frank reviewed Resampled KA due to no auto actions in LW System Changed format of stem Final
F
D D D D D D D D D D S 015.K5.10 Verify with the licensee that choices C & 0 could not be considered correct. Also, are the adjustments made always in the increase or decrease direction?
H.
D D D D D D D D D D D S 001.G2.1.27 Changed question due to overlap\\ Final Page 13 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 Q#
LOK (F/H)
LOD (1-5) 3. Psychorretric Raw s Stem Partial Focus 4. Job Content Raw s Job-Link 5. Other SRO Only
U/E/S
H
D D D D D D D D D D D S 011.A2.10 Frank reviewed Added DA Changed stem Final
H
D D D D D D D D D D D S G2.1.1 Replaced question due to overlap Changed Question and distractors Final
F
D D D D D D D D D D D E G2.1.14 Frank reviewed Changed distractors due to reference change Added reference Changed distractors and question Changed Distractor Final
H
D D D D D D D D S G2.1.7 Frank reviewed Added Annunciator designations Final
F
D D D D D D D D D D D E G2.2.22 Frank reviewed - This question was modified to change correct answer per his input.
Page 14 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
U/6'S 5. Other 0= SRO KIA Only Back-ward 4. Job Content Raw s Job-Link
3. Psyc horretric Raw s LOD.....-.....--....---......-.....--+--.....--.....--.....--+--.....---1 (1-5) Stem Partial Focus
LOK (F/H) Q#
F
D D D D D D D D D D E G2.2.13 Frank reviewed Changed question Focused Stem Final
H
D D D D D D D D D D D s G2.2.28 Frank reviewed - OK
F
D D D D D D D D D D D s G2.3.4
H
D D D D D D D D D D D s G2.3.2 Frank reviewed Modified stem Changed distractors - new answer Final
F
D D D D D D D D D D D s G2.4.49 Frank reviewed Changed distractors Final
F
D D D D D D D D D D s G2.4.11 Frank reviewed Changed distractor construction Replaced question due to overlap Page 15 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
U/6'S 5. Other 0= SRO KIA Only Back-ward 4. Job Content Raw s Job-Link 3. Psychometric Raw s Stem Partial Focus
LOD .....- ....--....--.....--....-.......j.....- .....--.....--.....--+---...--.... (1-5)
LOK (F/H) Q#
H
D D D D D D D D D D D E 007 EG2.4.4 Frank reviewed and updated editorial comments.
FINAL
H
D D D D D D D D D D S 008AA2.26 Frank reviewed - stems changed and reviewed by Frank Can Add procedure selection if necessary to make SRO only.
FINAL
H
D D D D D D D D D E 038EG2.4.6 W/ RCS SC <50F and decreasing - transition to ECA-3-1 would be required per E-3 step 18.
WOG Guidance quoted in basis for answer A supports this.
Changed stem to reverse trend of Subcooling and clarify procedure position and added to distractors FINAL
H
D. D D D D D D D D S 054AA2.04 Frank reviewed - Answer A has A &C SG having 30% wide range level and supplied from unit 2 AFW system. If the RNO is followed in step 2, 12% NR would be required before being allowed to exit the procedure.
Rewrote question Frank Reviewed FINAL
H
D D D D D D D D D S 055EG2.4.30 Frank - Q How does it meet the KA?? Rewrote question Frank reviewed - changed distractors and scope of stem FINAL Page 16 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
U/EIS 5. Other 0= SRO KIA Only Back-ward 4. Job Content Raw s Job-Link
3. Psychometric Raw s LOD.....-....--....--.....-.....~--+--.....--....-.....,-.--+--....---I (1-5) Stem Partial Focus
LOK (F/H) Q#
H
D D D D D D D D D D D S WE05EG2.4.6 Already have a question on FR-H.1 Rewrote question Frank reviewed FINAL
F
D D D D D D D D D D D S WE03EA2.1 Frank Reviewed - editorial changes FINAL
H
D D D D D D D D D E WE08EG2.4.20 Frank reviewed KA Match?? Question about procedure flow -through ES-1.3 and required transition.
Rewrote question Frank reviewed - changed construction of distractors Final
H
D D D D D D D D D D E 061AG2.2.25 Frank Reviewed - added Monitor designation in in distractors. Rearranged distractors to be consistent in construction.
Frank reviewed - reorganized the stem - added time to distractors FINAL
F
D D D D D D D D D D D S 069AA2.02 Frank Reviewed - editorial changes.
- 86 F
D D D D D D D D D S 013G2.1.23 FINAL Page 17 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
2 3. Psychorretric Raw s 4. Job Content Raw s 5. Other
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Partial Job-Back-0= SRO U/E/S Focus Link ward KIA Only
F
D D D D D D D D D D D S 039A2.03 FINAL
H
D D D D D D D D D E 062A2.03 Frank reviewed - Corrected time for symmetry. Removed one variable from distractor.
Frank reviewed second time - focused stem cleaned up distractors.
FINAL
F
D D D D D D D D D D D S 073GG2.1.10 FINAL
F
D D D D D D D D D E 078GG2.1.20 Frank reviewed - look to add reason. Rewrote question to include status of flow and strategy for C/D or maintenance in HSD FINAL
F
D D D D D D D D D D D S 034A2.01
F
D D D D D D D D D D s 002G2.4.20 Reviewed by Frank - focused stem changed wording in distractors FINAL
H
D D D D D D D D D u 086A2.04 Frank reviewed - KA mismatch - Rewriting question.
Frank reviewed - clarified stem and distracters FINAL Page 18 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 4. Job Content Raw s Q#
LOK (F/H)
LOD (1-5) 3. Psychometric Raw s Stem Partial Focus Job-Link Back-ward 5. Other 0= SRO KIA Only
U/EIS
H
D D D D D D D D D D u G2.1.11 Frank reviewed - RO Only Rewrote question Frank reviewed FINAL
H
D D D D D D D D D D D s G2.1.20 Frank reviewed - changed language and structure of distractors Frank reviewed second time - focused the stem FINAL Replace question - overlap with Q 99 Frank Reviewed Final
G2.2.6
F H
3 D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D s E G2.2.22 Frank reviewed - Change time requirement in distractors to not include 1 hr requirement.
Corrected stem to remove window dressing.
Frank reviewed a second time - focused stem and formatted distractors.
FINAL
G2.3.8
G2.4.1 F H
3 D FINAL D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D s s Page 19 of 20
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 4. Job Content Raw s Q#
LOK (F/H)
3. Psychometric Raw s LOD (1-5) Stem Partial Focus Job-Link Back-ward 5. Other 0= SRO KIA Only
U/8'S E+O.
F
D D D D D D D D D D D E G2.4.28 Frank reviewed. Changed wording in stem to be more specific.
Frank reviewed again - highlighted FIRST - may need to change from caps to bold/underline when outputted.
FINAL Page 20 of 20
ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 IFacility: Surry Date of Exam: 4/9/08 Exam Level: RO and SRO I Initials 1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading Printed Name/Signature a b c ~ N/A ~ t.
~ N/A ~/t t ~ N/A ~t-l-N/A ytz-( ~ N/A ~r c ~ N/A r Date ~),~ ~g P.Capehart / C.Kontz ~~ N/A Item Description d. NRC Supervisor (*) b. Facility Reviewer(*) c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) Frank Ehrhardt ~~/d-- ~/
- l Malcolm Widmann IVllI,hl Jif/JJ(L a. Grader 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2 % overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) 2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (*) "'--"""'" The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are require Post-Examination'Check Sheet tt' ~ CJ.f-* Facility: ~/'/ly' Date of Examination: Task Description Date Complete 1.
Facility written exam comments or graded exams received ~'/r;IJ~ and verified complete 2.
Facility written exam comments reviewed and incorporated 'f;7jIY and NRC grading completed, if necessary 3.
Operating tests graded by NRC examiners ~/'~~ 4.
NRC chief examiner review of operating test and written exam ~\\IL(8/~B grading completed 5.
Responsible supervisor review completed L-I/~a?/~ 6.
Management (licensing official) review completed Y-~-ZJ( 7.
License and denial letters mailed txr-;l~O 8 8.
Facility notified of results ,4..- Z
r:>l - ,'- t/ 0 9.
Examination report issued (refer to NRC MC 0612) 6.t~-~ - GJ 8 10.
Reference material returned after final resolution of any appeals
- VIA-ES-501 Post-Examination Check Sheet ES-501, Page 23 of 25 Form ES-501-1
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 April 11, 2008 Mr. Victor McCree Acting Regional Administrator United States Nuclear Regulatory Cornmlssion Region II Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth St., SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8931 Serial No.
SS&LITJN Docket Nos.
License Nos.
08-0217 RO 50-280 50-281 DPR-32 DPR-37 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 SUBMITTAL OF OPERATING EXAMINATION AND SUPPORTING REFERENCE MATERIALS NRC letter dated September 12, 2007, Reactor and Senior Reactor Operator Initial Examinations for Surry Power Station, requested transmittal of the Operating Exam and supporting references for the reactor and senior reactor operator initial examinations that were scheduled to be conducted during the weeks of March 17 and March 24, 2008.
The NRC Operating Exam was submitted to Frank Ehrhardt, the NRC Chief Examiner, electronically (via the NRC resident) on March 12, 2008 as previously agreed upon in earlier conversations. In accordance with that agreement, the associated quality assurance documents from NUREG 1021 Revision 9 and the material listed below was sent: Scenarios: Scenario #1 - ECA-3.3 (Designated Back-up Scenario) Scenario #2 - FR-H.1 Scenario #3 - FR-Z.1 Scenario #4 - ECA-3.1 Scenario #5 - EC,A-1.1 Administrative JPMS: G2.3.2 - Calculate Radiation Exposure (All) G2.1.7 - QPTR Calculation (All) G2.1.5 - Evaluate Overtime (SRO only) G2.2.12 - Review 1-0PT-CS-006 (SRO only) G2.4.41 - Classify an Event (SRO only) G2.4.43 - Transmit Report of Emergency to State and Local Governments (RO only) G2.2.12 - Performance of 1-0SP-SW-002 (RO only)
Serial No. 08-0217 Docket Nos. 50-280 50-281 Simulator JPMs: 005A2.03 - Alternate Decay Heat Removal (All) 013A4.01 - Transfer to Cold Leg Recirculation (All) 026A2.08 - Secure Containment Depressurization Equipment (All) 004A4.04 - Perform a Blended Flow Makeup to Unit1 RWST (RO and DSRO) 015A4.03 - SRNI Failure (RO and DSRO) 071A4.26 - Release a WGDT (RO and DSRO) 075A2.02 - Respond to a Low Level Transient (RO and DSRO) EPE038.EA1.04 - Depressurize RCS to Minimize SGTR Break Flow (RO only) In-Plant JPMs: 061A1.04 - Establish Makeup to the ECST (All) APE068.AA1.21 - Locally Establish RCS and SG HI-LO Interface Integrity (All) 064A4.01 - Manually Start an EDG at the Local Panel (RO and DSRO) If t re are any questions concerning this material, please contact Mr. Barry A.
arber at (757) 365-2725.
Commitments made by this letter: None
Serial No. 08-0217 Docket Nos. 50-280 50-281 cc: Mr. M. T. Widmann, Chief Operations Branch United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Suite 23 T85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8931 Mr. F. J. Ehrhardt Chief Examiner United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Suite 23 T85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8931 Document Control Desk United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station }}