IR 05000267/1976013
| ML20010B818 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Saint Vrain  |
| Issue date: | 12/29/1976 |
| From: | Johnson E, Madsen G, Westerman T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20010B798 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-81-95 50-267-76-13, NUDOCS 8108180154 | |
| Download: ML20010B818 (32) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:... _ .... -. ,.. . _..,p- , ,,,.7 , ... ,_ , ,._, _.
. . .. ... u-L- .,;.*__. G. _ 'e - - U.~'sA s- '&Q -s n 4 '"' -"~ "* "*".~** ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '
... .. - .. . . . P. S. .Tli:Ai; 11GI. LNID::Y t/iY':l SClO': Ort ICE Or I!:5r.:.CIIO:; 10.1 T::1Or01: ::T i.:~C1 L:: l't
IL Inr.pection..teport ::o. 50.:67/ 7f-13 lue::rt : o. 50-2f,1 1.ict r.:;ce s Pubile Service Ccrpany of Color-do Lice.:e !:0. DPR-34 Facility: Tort St. Vrain !!ocicar Generatin. Station Category B heation: Plat teville, Colorado Typt of Licensee: Prnier Ecactor (!!TCR 3 30, :*.12-CCA) Type of Inspection: Routine, Announced Dates of Inspection: 1:ovether 15-17, !:overber 29 - Decerber 3 and Decenber 7-6, 1976 Dates of Previous.Innpection: October 4-7, 10-14, and 28-20, 1976 11, [',' %
! (i l ! ~-.. I Inspecto : l__ _ "I ' @ k / J I / 17. I l T.F.liestjrnan,EcactorInspector ~Date s t-h, Y , leco:::panyinp, e' Inspectors:
- [,.,.3,
, $. j1 r *, 's / 1:1 Johnso Reactor Inspector / Date '\\ / (, <' lA / / lf Q j (. _\\ f - GT L.1:adsen, Chief, Kcactor Operitiens and Date Nuc1 cat fupport brancl- ,
. sviewed By: /u. b*' 9 " ! // '//76 _. _ C. L..'::.dsen, Chici, Reactor Operations and Date Nuc1 car Support Branch ] I
-
- h I
8108180154 810514 PDR FOIA LIVEDALE81-95 PDR
-.. _. . -- . p.,m-rr yrn~'".m:~""'"a*,x: R" w*~H"':~" ~Y.[- ?"' {.$ QMK K KM s u - s.. s. J. *
- ~;.Ri
- ' n w ---- " - w s- . -*L"~... - - - " Na}e <s- - s , . , o , - . . i , i a
4 - f
-
-2-a ]
i
.et'?:'ArsY OF FINDINGS <.
i '. Enforcerent Action .
A.
Vie:ations
i Uonc j B.
Infractions
Contrary to Criterica V of..ppendix S to 10 CFR 50, Sectior. E.5(c) of the lic.cnsec's approved QA plan, and Internal 1.'ork Procedure I;.T-2, a
] Centro 11ed Work Procedure was not issu;.d for the replacccent of ] clectrical system breakers initiated under ric1d Change rotice 3335(/.). (I ETAILS, Section 4.b(1)) , l l C.
Deficicneies ! i a None ) Licensee Action on Previously Identified Fnforcerent I t cr:s , Previous itecs of nonecepliance associated with the following inspection
l reports ucre inspected for co.pletion of corrective cction.
j Inspection Report 50-267/75-04 l 50-267/75-07 " " { $0-267/76-09 " " ' The status of these ite=s of nonco:rpliance is as dir. cussed in the ! k Detcils, paragrcph 7, of this report.
! } } Desicn Ch:nges l
Nonc i
Other Sirnifier.at Tindings t A.
Current Unresolved Itces t . 1.
7613-01 Shift Turncver Instructions
i
The Kovember 17, 1976 issuatice of Amendenent 16 to the Facility ] Technical Specification incorporates Regulatory Guide 1.33 ' requircrents for shift turnover instructions. Plant instructions have not yet been developed. (DETAILS, paragraph 9.c) + ',
(continued)
i } I _. _ _ _ - - - . _ -., __ ,_ . _., _ - , .. .,... _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _,,
,
tr. :.- , y -., n.-. --- p e.-.... y..... _ _,.-..,,.y.,.,... __,_ ,, _ _ w _e w. - -.. .L..-.u. w.
t - 2 v.
w. 4 a.... m -. a A
858 Do 1s) v , , . . 3_ !. 7i .. ' I C.' '...'. ! 1 I r... > f: n: J *. I..'. I va 'I t ?.. r.. :. : r.. !00 ' . f. t ecx4 er ir.:., t s : ed t w-1..s nut .ic ;- rairicin.-d of critical rec tor e;. era: 1o.
1,e t. e. u 7; ',c E a-d I; c. 21 a c r..; e ou t : e t , terr rature.
(l'r.U.%.'., pa ra; ra!.b Ts.h ' 4)) 3.
76.3-b:! Tallure te I n c l i.. _ 1. !-- f t i.
Cer...t d enn in For.villante t Pr.
2. ire a S< veral r. :rveillanc e ;'racs <?urer. re" at:c.! during it.s, ec tion 76-09 vere n9t. d to lack tl.e a;ipropr i.. ( l iini t i r a, condition for . operat lea (l.CO) ulthin tl.e i.ndy of the procedere. This could rt r.ul t 11. the vi.'lat ina of au 100 durf ur. tl e perforrance of a t.u rvei ll ai.cc t est. (D! Tall s, pa rar-aph 9.e)
' 613-O '. Penetratien Tr G in tle Confine tet Euildine, / Tua,e::et r.it ion seals in the confiner.ent building had been bresched to perrit t he t outin,. of t enporary p' nir.y.. (DETAILS, pari:gr.iph 3.c (1)) L.
Staten of Previously Identified Unre.olved Ite s The fo'Iv.-:Ing previously unresolved itens were revie. cd Ct. ring this inspect.on: 750'-3 Bac!.up !barInn !?at er Syst en 751-1 Itecords Procedure 7607-4 Seismic and Envirecrental cualitication 7.07-5 ASLO Solenoid Valves 7603.3 til Calibratien Criteria 7(.G9-4 Adminis trative Control of ::ondestructive Ex:mination (!.'J E) 7609-5 contractor Derir.n Verification 7b01-4 Systen 91 I!vd.aulic ?;C4-1 Calibration ',f Test Equipcent Previous', unresolved 2 crs 7509-3, 7f 09-5 and 7603-1 are considcred resolved. (UTTAIIS, paragraph 8) 1.ntrance and Exit Mee.t i n e n-- - -. An entrance recting was held with P.r. Svart on 1:over.ber 15, 29 and Decer.ber 7, 1976.
I'x i t interviews were held vf t:r. Brey on Decer.ber 3, 1976 and ':r. Swa t t on Decenbcr 8, li !!r. Swart was contacied by telephene er. Decenb?r 19, 1976.
(continued) , l
N 'r n x.:=- u=ra ar.,1m - --. _ - - - -.
- .-
, A.
(creral
- I b e. 1.rpose of the in:spection was st.ited to t,e to revis' til.:nt operstions; fire protectior/ prevention; 8t g c 2 corr.:tive :.e t ina ;
review of sa fety lic.it r., lir.it inr. raf et y :.y st set t ar.,.ind licitinp. co: ditions for operat ion; the Pawroer.23,1976 r.iral t ir.cou s openin;. of sts a:-/ water durp v.21ves; previces 1:ers of noncorpliance; previous unre. olved itets; and other previour.ly identified inspection f ollo,,p its: s.
B.
Itces of 1:ance-n11pec n The ite:2 of nonco pliar.cc identified in the su N ry certion of this report war. revicued.
C.
_toresolved Iters The unresolved iter.s identified in the sur. ary section of this repart were reviewed.
~ (continued)
, -.. -- m
T)* ~ '
% ~,,j u ' ., - . i ! ! ?, I i ', 1.
. r :.. e :..-.t.'..* . t.m'. . .. . pa.d : S...iss ( or *.'. o f Ce !.. r.,.. 3. I'. (..d.: Tr.:it;is.: Co:,r.!i::.it r . l'. !!. II.. r s :.':.**. :. !sirt ct or O.ni;t y. * i r.7 n. e ' . (:. 1:. T ra c,, bu;'er ;i:'.or %nt 0; c r.n '.c a.. P.i .I. L. Sal s ;.iotel. z, Q.i ! : _. i t t e r r'. Fw.ir t, Superinte: .t ':a c l e la i rt <!ns t ion l'. Tri t h !. '...p e r in t < : t " sint e: :nce ' !!. I!il'. yard, St:perviner Tc'-!.nical Sc rv icee '. t erric. Et:.ineer Tec!.:lic al Services D. Tre:et, It:3 'neer lec hnical Services 11. 1odners, Op ' it ion ; St:pervir.ar . T.c h r id e, !:e>. dent 1.ngineer S. !"c C ibe. Ps r. id en t Engineer C.
Sistert, (M Engir.a r 11. l'ev i e, 0.1 En;;inee ' L. Brey, Superintendent - Oper tions O. Lewi:., a int ( nanc( !!. !!it:6f nu, Ecactor O.)erator 1.. Sir.glet en, Shif t St.pervisor 1.. Evans, Aux ilia ry T'!uip: ent 0;s rat or D. 1:oed Shift Supervisor J. VanJyke, Act ing Sepe.viser of Cperatiens J. Leesy, !!ane Of fice E? cetrical 1.ngineering reneral Ate..ic J. Wan. c, Si t e Proj ec t ':anager J. Bc.ers, Eni'.incering J. loeps, QA Engineer D. Pettycord, Manager of QA 2.
Fire Prevention / Protection a.
gjectf3 The objective of this inspection ef fort ras to verify that the licensee had developed, f raple: ented and is -11ntc.ining an ef fcetive fire prevention / protection propram throu,.hout the facility.
h.
Arcas Revicted-The inspector reviewed the licensee's adninistrative, quality i assurance and : rergency procedures to verify that : (centinued)
- O ap, c@
o pJ o-6- . (1) c ri. c., t r.:1 p recc.:ia v:,ch is h J. 'i ne ri iu i r. r e n t, ier
e,cr.tica-ren.canel afpros -1 ao ! cent rol e; all c s t ri.. t en, r o.11 f ic.it ;e i. an! rtinte.r .n.. act is it ic: u t h !i: t i:e c l a.: t 1.ou: i.ir y or vatinu tbc p. r i.
. i enir i t-of v!!;!. i;ui: rent hav.
'ae. n t'm ele;ie:! a:e a p.r t e; t ;.c ptint ait,I: i.t ra t ivo ; t e.n s !ures. (21 . ark centrcl proceduse. receite spe ial tr 'erirat ion for activiti.. invalvin;t veldj u:!, cpen flar<, er tb use of other ignitica sourcen and that they tal.e co; n i r.n:ce of nearby fl.-- - able ra t e rial, c = ble t rays, or critical process equir :r-t.
(3) Kerb control procedures for construction, rodification, or raiattnance activitics require a firewatch, uith capability f or cc.c.onication with the cont rol room, if an activity identificd in '2' above is to be ptrforncd in the proxicity of fla :-able er.terial, cable trays, or vital proccas er,uiprent.
(I.)
Quality As a rance proc dures have been established which t equire periedic audit cf 1.*ork Fequests for const ruction, codification, and rnintenacce activities.
(5) Quality as.surance surveillance is period!cally perforred duri g constrectica, raodification, and rainten.'oce activities to assare proper operatiens persor.ncl authorizat ion, and conferr.ance vith established controls (especially i;;nition source control provisions and firewatch adequacy).
(6) If any cable pene. rat ica seals have been in,talled, replaced, or codified, a qu..lity assurance verification was perforced to enefirn that t b: seal caterial was not falt abic.
(7) Adrinistrative controls have been feposed that require review of all replacenent cable penetration seals to assure flar:able riaterials are not used.
(8) E=ctrency fire fighting procedures have been prepared for cpecific vital arcac such as the control room and the cable spreading reos, and that fire drills are required on an established frequency.
The inspector also perforcied th-following: (9) A review of the results and corrective action for the licensec's cost recent fire inspection.
(c ont inued)
. N
. < . -i-(10) A detailed in..pccrit.ti<t ti.e font rol rr.<.:,.".xiliary l el ec t r ical s c e,.. I.".0 Y. r.wi t d.,;.ir re c a r! '.0 ': of t!.e rc.ic tor 1..tildit.;. Thir f r.,p ci t i.e:. w.a r t e-.> r.: (a) h fi re alat. -: for tiet.c arra; (b) W ca:t in, uf e l.:nn e-quig.r < nt aca!Iable , ! (c) 1he ac t e.it i:in cont rc,ls availr b!c.
(11) A review of the resultu r.f recently c ondects d fire dri t!.. (12) A re viest of the rr vcnt ivo raf atenanc< prr;;ran in use to r.afntain fire fighting eqi;ip ent.
c.
Findin;s (1) The following ad=inistrative procedures were reviewed to deternine if the above iters were ades"ately addressed: ADP-12 ":Nintenance and repair procedures" Specifies that naintenar.cc and todificatien procedurer require that i<.placceent raterial be procured per ILT-1, establish c the adr.inistrative approvals needed to perforn raintenance or rodification activitics.
r ADM-27 ".'?cintenanec/Ecpair/ Modi fication/ Testing Request ed or Perforred by Oatside perser nel, Contractors or Agencies" Specifies the administrative apprevals necessary for such activities, requires special precautions . ', to avoid da.agc to critical equipment, to maintain control over conbustibles and specifits use of , . AD"-29 procedures for wcIding or cutting operations.
ADl:-29 " Control of Ignition Sources Durine l'aintenance" Specifies procedures and precautit ns to be observed l for welding or cutting operations 23cluding approvals, use of fire watch, etc.
, ADM-30 " Control of co=bustibles" Defines corbustible naterial and specifies require-rents for handling this natorial in the plant.
(continued) { i i i . ! t . - , - '
. s.,Q Q:}
. ,. _s_ l '.".'- 1 "Interd0pirt ut.il L'oi : " r e., ' u t. f or t he o Oc1l;t-F c l.i t ed !rerere.ent " > lr'ntr.;
- '. rial r J. S e rv i c e r."
S; c. if ier *:re top rq cri.1 0 (:;allity) itt: . I '.i p-2 " Int < r d e;*. r t t.en ta l *.lo r proe rJur.. t er W.li fica t ion.. to Pla;.t Ty t e:-s, Er,ui; .at or Stri.etures" F;. c ifies centrolled er,e (.f cc-bu.st ahics ned in.tir at es m er. tut ion.; te et t.ure th it fir e r.tep:; are not violated.
(2) The inspecter reviewed the Quality Assur..nce Snrveillance rer.ultr. for the r.ost recent inspection of the fire preventien area. This consisted of 0AEP 1801, Attachrent 6.1, " Fire P revent ;on" per fo .ed on A u r,u'.t 17, 1976. This r.urveillance cov ered the r;ajor aspects of the fire prevention pregraf: with the except ion of a review of the preventive uninten:.nce pro,1 rah fot fire preventien/ protectica equipnent. A licensee representative indicated ti.at the preventative maintenance program i:, covered un<'er a 5.eparate rurveillance procedure at which time the raintenanec of fire equipment rculd be reviewed.
(3) The inspector reviewad the licensee's fireffphtinp. +.raianig progran. Thir c onr.ists of a nitie hour initial course for all ceployees with a two hour annual refresher courne. An advanced firefighting course is provided for all shif t
- .crsennel and the rtandby assistance personnel. In addition, plant f arid iarizatica was conducted for the 1ccal fire departnent during the past year. The licensee set ^iles six fire drills ann nlly and the inspector reviewed t e its of drills cen:!ucted !!ay 19, August 24 and Septenber 16, 1976.
The inspectcr had no questions in this area.
(4) 1hc inspector reviewed a pertion of the licensce's preventative taintenance progran for fire protection equirnent. This consisted of: Sutveillance Test 5.4.2-A "Centrol Peon Smoke 0: tactor Tunctirnal" - annual test of response of the snake dete: tors trounted in control room pancis.
L'eckly Fire liazard Inspection - a veckly vall-though of the plant by operations personnel to deternine if any fire hazards are present.
. (continued)
agg h.Q o
C g
e~ ' . l , o ll . . '. - 1 . i: +
' , !:'} 4.
,T.
'
- 1
'! l . - c- ... t.
l . .. 1, - . -
v- ., .. . - .. . .- lr.
' t . I.d-Le ,.: .
t 8:: , . ' 'e'.' 1: 't !, e.:1 (' !s:. '. . . 1.
"*
,.
' r . t :. s.'i' .t!. .. ' !!- ; i
P: F-3 ' 3;.a :
- i... c i s'.
-. r - .:N; . '.. ~
. . t i:.i t. u;: ,.tlo.
ri tf ;. t.
'- - /L rc 5.
. "i i.. ::: pr. * a r 6'e t s r - ' - t i. i '. ti . ;: 't
- . ce 7.a ; i t :... rt. c c::c c ',2 *.r in
.), n re, - t t '. o *> e
pri-t e.! ie tl e t in: a] 1re - t i. - f en. .... t i e r.
' Code.. a ! 1. 3. ' ::n f*:r t u r e:.? ie.r.:. c: t!. t : e.
(5) Tiie inr ne: t, r e>nnir.n' t !.. fire prot. t i: - " ;.re eent i c rw 3.t. r c s f o.- ti e contr.: recr. a.r: c.r e e:. c: rie rec: ' it. cear rec'.
- 1. ros
.4 orevi& 2 consi>t ) a n c !.er/. < of: g c, (a) rentro) E ar - - t Tsta cr r.c.rv nir 1:rea: r.
.fcl . 'n e b eich ' e .
e::tr.::: e lialen sy. ster. with raacal in!t it : ion f e4:tt t, CO3 c:-::In. u!shes s llV/sC sure,c and vent syste. centrol Froke detectort r.annted in centrol recr ; a::els ' !*.is t t r I'yralar.' ir. dica ters f or r eactor building,, U TJ tei t ri.;3.ir root. alarn pa::cIr.
Annunc i e.t or:; f o r i t,.. Gea 1 ij icat e re, en key valves in tlic fire 1.cse ri:.er s":st er Annunci.it ers for deluce syst en actuat ica (b) Auxi1ialy Elcet ric. Reer - Tseo Scott Air Pacis rear one ent.'. int e Italon sy:;ter: with ::anual initiatien contrcl at dect (cout inued)
' , " "," * * i, '" p- - " ; - -,- M k " ' 'r) . ~ c.
-- ' 9,. ' . . . r.
. -
- .
' '* - j' ! . Q}O. ' <, '! . . - '-
- ,
g ', g- ~n
. v ., ..- ,,C)[ 'r'l' , , .. i 's t - - ,?- g.
- .
. . Y ' i .
- .A...xM..'.L
'-. d.
i 9.
1; q [' '._..l, d d O u d*S=4J e* h u " *^ , ~ ~ - -.,,, _ ~ !/ i . -10- . CO2 c::t inguinhers Wo crergency air breathin; t :nifols. one by ca.:h entrar.ce !!oce station near door (c) 480 V Suitchgear Roon - Two Scott Air Pecks nen: entrance Ercrgency ah breathing canifold riear door !!alen system with carual initiation fcuture cutside entr ate CO2 extinguishers Dry churical extinguisher Sneke detectors and locc1 indicating panel ct door with nar.rer alarm in control roo: Hese station near door CARD 0X station outside door with sof ficient scope to reach any interior point of the roen.
The inspcetor h.?d no questions in this area.
(6) A tour of tht-reactor building van conducted to examine the fire protection /preventicn equipment inr.talled. Each Ictel !n the reactor building is equipped with several hose s.ations (one in each corner) and approximately six CO or dry chemical extinguisters. The inspector noted
onE hose reel that was not hung properly anc four here nozzles that were not stored in the fully shut position.
Thcsc iters were brought to the cttention of the licensee.
The inspector had no further cuestions in this area.
(7) The inspector examined six.recently cotpleted nodifications (L'A75E 3290, L'A75E 31590, CN 302..CN 414, CN 327 and CN 453) to detcrcine that they ir.cluded appropriate controls to ensure that fire stops disturbed during the r:odification were restored ord ti.at new pcnctrations cade were provided with protection. To discrep. acies were noted in thi's area.
The inepector had no further questions in this are *. r ~ m~ e-- q ' ., i'
.. -,. , .. _, _ _ ,, _, _ , ' -{ ,j.J ; A,a, p- , o . ,J
.. - c
O
y.
-".; ~*9 , '- . Ns..'o m '.ui.m n a ci,au, ,, .
- . , .. w.u..........., _, . , ,, . ., w.s.; s.,< %.U.
a.a. s :.ua.L::. u . . p;.L.: M. a ~ u t ' , . f I . -11-3.
1;evitv t;t Plant On (- ra t i e n *. l l a.
Objyc t i s e l l The objective of thir. inspection ef fert was to ascertain ul < ther ) or niet facility log book:. are in conforr nce with licensee a adni.iictrative procedures, wh:th_r licentee personnel cendi:c: i plant patrols con,istent with epi.,lity assurance progran or l Tect.nical Epecif'ce.tf on rcc,uirerent s and uhether shif t and l control roon z.anning is in co; pli.ince with 10 CIR 50 or 'rechnical ' 5;:ec2 ficat ion requircrentr.. b.
Areas Pmoued I
With! i the scope of this inspectien effort the fol'c,uing creas , ! vere reviewed.
(1) Log tooks and operating records including: !
(a) Shift sui.ervir.or and control roon logs for the peried j 1;ov. :-be r 16-26, 19 76.
l (o) Operating Orders book entries frco Septerber 16, 1976.
'
(c) Jurper log (ADM-22 Torr: l's).
. i ! (d) Plent Troubic 1:eports icsued since Septer.ber 16, 1976.
j (2) Drep-in inspections of the control roo= throu;;hout the i ! period of the insp(cricn to deternint that canning require-I raer.ts are cet and that opera.tions are being conducted in a forca) ranner.
, I l (3) A tour of accessib]c areas te include the following: (a) Seltered nonitoring instrunentation recording as tequired.
(b) Plant housekeeping conditions.
(c) Existence of fluid Icaks.
(a) Exister.cc of excer.sive piping vibrations.
(c) Radiation cot.trols properly established.
(f) ripe hanger /ccismic restralht settings and oil Icvels.
< _......, ,
_-. - --- .- , - .- P i I . ' . . -12-(g) Selected valve pasitions or equipn n. start , positlers.
(h) p.quipnent lockout tag internation.
(4) Discussiona with control roo * operator: pertaining to the reasons for *tghted annunciators.
. (5) Verification that plant tours are being conducted by plant supervisory personnel as required by the Quality Assurance Prograa.
c.
Firdints (1) During a tour of the facility, the inspector noted that two pipe ponctration seals fran the 1.Iquid Nitrogen bottic arca (outside the confinc=ent building) to the interior of the confincrant had been breached by what appeared to be tenporary J iacs. In one case, the penetration seal boot had bcen cut to allow a run of copper tubing into the confinement. In the other~ case a pcactration seal had been recovec entirely to allow a hosc into the cor.finement. The ~ it.spector noted that the confinemen; was under a negative pressure, at the tire of this tour, and air fluw through these breached penetrations was into che cenfinenent.
Technical Specificatioit 4.5 requires in part that: "The plant shall not be operated at power... unless: (a) Ecactor Building Integrity is raintained as follows:...." Although the tpecification specifically addresses only truck doors or personnel access doors, the intent is to preclude a ground level release pcint for radioactivity for any postulated occurrence.
During this segment of the inspection, the plant was shutdewn. The inspector indicated that this item weuld renain unresolved until :. f uture inspection when the piant was at power.
(2) In his review of current operating orders, the inspector ' r.0ted that an audit had recently been conducted of the orders. Ibny of the orders contained in the book had been notcJ by the auditor to be outasted or needed within the operating procedures. The inspector exprest.cd his conecrn that the optrating orders be kept up to date.
(3) The inspector reviewed a*1 Plant Trouble Reports (p1R) , issued since Septecher 16, 1976 for the following systc=s: i 11, 12, 21, 22, 25, 31, 42, 45, 61, 63, 92 and 93. The (continued) , , - -., . _ . , -.,.- - - - - _.. - - - - - . -. - -,. _ -
-
- Es
. . - ! 't - in:.ne t t$r ver ifie.1 tira t t i.e t trere no re"ce.111ence iter, th't u.re i.ot reported au requires' by ti.s: Te chnical T.; eeific: t f ua:, nr.J to deternine t h.st the lir itine, cor.ditions for oper1r ion t.cre sa tir.' cd for the It c ns id.ent i fied en t'.e PYP.. The f.:r. pet tor selec ted 2!. PT1 rcprirt s for derniled revieu vith t'ac plant technical servirr. rteff to sctisfy the ::bove requir: ents.
I:n iters of reatorpliance were notec in this revicu.
One PIR (9-173 dated Septcrber 16, 1976) descrf. bed the fa.ilure of a rod drive relay which enuccd one of the control rod drive.= to occasie.:cIly insert when the rod ot.uate switch vis set to wi t hd raa.
1he cat:sc cnd correcti.e 4.ction indir.ated on the T!n sens a 1cose ::creu on the relay which led to sin le phnsing in the rod; tightening the screw apparently correctad this nalfuncticn.
The inspecter dir. cussed this ice with th2 license; renresentative who evaluated the ralfunction ::n-1 ceternined that a sarpling of siciiler relays in the re d control systcr.tas not investigated to deternine if a sicilcr ec1 function could occur. The inspector expressed his concern that the investigstfun of an occurrence thould include a revicu of sitilar corpenents in order to detcrnina if a single isolated failure hcd occurred or if t eric problems were indicated.
, i l (4) The innpector noted in his review of the licensee's station lop,that tines verc not indicated for tany of the entries.
The inrpector expressed his concern that thic hampers the trcncricsson of a precise history cf plant operatons from shiit to shift. A licensee representative indicated that a change to tha ndninistrative procedure governing the raintenance of con trol roen logs had been prepared ans was te be issued socn. This new precedure vill be reviewed duriag a future inspection tc. deterrine if this concern has been satisfied.
4.
f.tage 2 Operation (>40% power Level) The inspector verified the status of tha retaining cpen ccrrective ection iters outlired in the Details Section 3 of Inspection Report 50-267/76-11.
. (continued)
> a;>, %o
p)
. - U.- a.
Tiar. - ' n t ic.' w11 r.e r io.i (1) Three ko0r Cc: cles Cs51e Cocaenir** Follo.ing the derating r.tudy, the l2censee eeasured ce t ral J e..cs for tis five cabler. Phase dera'.ed crpacity e>:cceded t he-cables calculated w arity. The results of these recsurerents are as follo s: Cable No.
Tvg Darated A ps 1*ea,ured Load 3280 4/0 N;G 152.0 142 331B 4 M.'c 53.2
3460 4 M:G 53.2
3540 4/0 m:G 152.0 150 3600 4/0 E:C 152.0 148 This item is considered resolved.
The inspector found aat Change I:otice CN 321, which reset the breater relays associated with cables 3766 and 3535, has been corpleted (PORC 178/11-17-76).
, The licensee revised, by reno dated 1:overber 5, 1976, his previous r.;ero of October 21, 1976. The reno clarified that only the power cables previously found to be jur.pers in the 430 volt now corply with the licensee's June 10, 1976 letter to the I RC.
The licenr.ce's previous :ovenber 5, 1976 neto had inplied that all power cabics in the 480 volt room ccrplied with the June 10, 1976 Irtter.
1E:IV now considers the cocooning of the cables in the 480 volt room and Aur.iliary Electric Equipnent Room to be corplete.
b.
Licensee's June _ 10, 1976 Letter /Over-Current Protection for !nncontorr.ing Cables This Ictter was previously identified incorrect:y in Inspection Report 50-267/76-11 to be dated April 10, 1976.
(1) Dreaker Changes The six breakers under FCN 3385(A) were verified by the inspector to have been tested. This includes the breakers associated with cabics 5925, 6152, 6079, 6038, 5S10 and 5430.
(continued)
. . i i . -15-Iturin:; review of t he breal.or rhenne. (t rur. 4 Cables) identifiu! 1r. the June 10,197f Jet ter, the breal er act.ociated eith cable no. (01' um. f ound t o have been d o.itted.
- 1be licensee infor ed the inr.r ector that the I
starter circuit c 40ciated uith this cubic is protected ' on each phane by a T-50 c1 css overload with a trip nettin; In the rar.ge of 24.3 neps t o 27.1 arps.
The protec*iun for this cable is considered to be adequate. The inspector did find, ho.ever, that the chantx-out of the Croup 4 cabic breal.ers by a Ucrk Ecquest is contrary to the licensce's Internal Uork Procedure IUt'-2.
IUP-2, ' Section 4.4, specifien with regard to Cantrolle. Work Procedures " CUTs are required for all Snicty clated CS's installed by PSC personnel, and will be prepared as directed by the responsible supervisor in accordance with plant procedures." 1he failure to follou Irecedure is . coatrary to Criteriun V of Appendix C to 10 CFR 50 and ' the lict r.see's approved QA Plan, Final Safe ty Analysis Section P. 5(c). The in:,pector did find that the licensee has initiated correctt-action in that n Quality Assurance beficiency Report (QA' J-232) has been issued.
(2) _ Cable Study Based on further evaluation of P.iser 104, the licersee has < concluded that the acceptance of Ricer 100 vith an 897 . current loading it acceptabic based on the fact that the ' heat tencrated by a tray is proportional to the uquare of the current and the 100% current loading alloved by IPCEA on a continuous basis. An S9% current load equates to a 79.1% value for heat nencration. This tray is also within the design 40% fill criteria. This iten is considered resolved.
Interie Alternate Coolinn I'ethod (IACI) c.
I (1) _ Technical Specifications (TI) , ! Proposed Technical Specifications are currently under review by the Nuc1 car Ecactor Ecculation (KRR).
(2) Proc _edures Following further review, it has been deternined that ' depressurization cust be initiated within two hours. This finding was subnitted in Licensee Event Report UE 50-267/ 76-07 and was further analyred in the licensce's November 16, 1976 letter to the URR.
Subsequently, the following procedures were verified by the inspector to have been revised to include the two hour depressurization requirement: (continued) . . . _ _ _ _ - ._ _ .
. s e mQ '%' } , <~ q
-16-S0?
- .8 Interin Alter: ate f voling.: thed (!:ev. 5)
50P Saf e Shutdown wit h 1:ic,bly De :raded cor di t iens (Fev. 3) Ir.crrency Precedure 6 pnt eta.ect 1.oun of Ac tive Cere Ceolinn (Kev. II.)
ScP Safe Shutdos.n eith Firbly Der.r.,ded t mJitions also included reviaicw to the dcpressuriza:irn rate f ron 150 pcunds/ hour to 150 cubic feet /ntrute, and a res"egucncing of events to assure that depresnurization accurs in the proper seque::ces.
Revision to SOP 48 vas also rade to assure t'.at a r.axicum depressurization rate was achieved.
d.
Fire pr.*ection/Detectiop (1) 1:alon Systen (a) Installation The inspector verified the installation of the three zone sarpling stations (CN 453/tlA 239-45/FT 3378).
The inspector also verificd that a three channel portable halen analyrcr h.is been fabricated and in ready for plant use.
The installation of the Stage 2 halon systen is considered cor.plete by IE:1V.
(b) Testing The inspector verified that the eajor Icakane paths had been closed of f (!!A 3290). A functional test "Ft. !!c Brid e" . was conducted to identify significant Icakage paths.
The rodification to asr.ure positive rating betecen the darper shaft and actuating orn has provided adequate air balance in the Auxiliary Electric Equipnent noon for purging.
The inspector verified that three fans have been provided for nining to prevent stratification of the halon.
A draft of the final test report, as forwarded in a !!ovenhor 11, 1976 Ictter to the 1uc1 car Ecactor Regulation, concludes the following: (continued)
.
- >v o
.t-li- . "1.
- h.
Fer St. Vr..:n Halon 13F.! Iire Protection i Sy..t er : r t all rg eircrents c.f PFC*L ib i c n S.,tc~ he.;n F n i f i t : * i.:. L '.e t.; ec i fi ci L':C F'...t t r r nd i fi; a t i c:., npplic dlt,ectices ef th' . T."A. t a :d i r.!, c.' t >c cpp!! car 2 e rer,uire rent.
f ort h in /.t t a hrent :o. 3 cf PSC 3 e t :. e r r.cr l'-73024, dated Deettber 15. 1975.... "2.
A concrat raticn ef H,lon ;;reat er th in Y: by volune in air ccn be raintained for up to 4 hourc in any ror.n of the three-room ccet rol ccrp?c::. A 3r: concentrat ion of 11alen in air is greate r t!.an the einit un concentration lesel needed to entir.guich an electrical cable type fire.
'n c test results, sho-ti:at a holding peried ei 3-1/2.
- hours was achicted in the 480'J I:oon.
It is believed that, by similar p!anned imprevt ents to ninirize roor leakage, a L-bour holdir; period should be conservatively attaircd and considered as a repeatable design value for the three roans.
"3.
"ac1:anical nixing chould be provided for the rears by the use of one er nore portahic fans, pending the installation of perranent fans."
The inspector concurs in the test conclusions with the exception of the statenent that the Halen 1301 Tire Prctection Systet neets all requirenents of the PSC llalon Systen Design Specification. The holding tire and the variation of concentration within an individual roen were outside the PSC Specificatien liti-tations. The licensec stated that the final report uculd be corrected.
The licensee test results are being reviewed by ::RR, Technical Review. Any further action by 1E:IV is dependent on that review.
(2) Air Breathing Systen (a) Installation The inspectos verified completion of the Change Kotices (CN's) at.i U>rk Authorizations (i.'A's) involved in t he installation of the Air Ercathirt. System.
- his includ(d the folluring:
CN 327(B) UA 194-45, 195-45, 196-45, 197-45, 226-45 1 C 405 UA 191-45 (continued)
. - . ' ) ' . - 1 f.- . 10:iV cm:ula rs t::e inst all.itien of the. it b re.i t hin;; e,> te cc~plete.
(b)Jgt A Fur.etional Ter.t ha s not i.cen c. :.p t et e.l.
I (3) !! cit Ven!!!atien an.! Ai r Cendi t leair c, Systso (llVAC) . (a) Installation i The inr.;'cetor verified the ec:victice of the following Fleid Ch.tage ::oticcs (FC::'ai) ant Uork Authori atloas l (t?A's) associated with the !!VAC systen, s FCN $5a 1A 3166 FCN 579 tlA 300?. FCN 5Fd UA 3220
FCN 359 WA 3065 FCN 5'e3 t!A 3063 FCN 593 1A 3C52 FC:; 595 WA 3159 FCN 600 I?A 3198 f' FCN SS7 IJA 3148 FC'. 606 !!A 3160 FCX 608 WA 3165 f FCN 613 !!A 3133 i FCN 618 !!A 3203 FCN 3378 -- j FCN 62f.
1;A 3213 FCN 042 -- FCN 3500 tlA 3294 ' FCN 645 WA 3289 FCN 656 WA 3357 ' FC:: 657 UA 3358 FCN 3500A UA 3294 ICN 659 WA 3374 FCN 603A -- FCN 61SA -- FCN 387A -- FC:; 5BBA -- FCN 657A UA 3358 ' ICN 3500P, -- FCN 661 -- FCN 3378A . FCN 595A VA 3157 l IE:IV considers the ins.tallation of the llVAC Systeci
Podifiention co plete.
(continued) . . - ,.-
. . Q
- d2
,]< -e .t9_ (4) rer.,m f c.e ion Tvr.t.
'!a rt (a) he f ir.pec t et ve rlIled co: ?!s t ic > of t? - l o ! ! e., !r :, 01.au: e ::n t iren (tr,'s) an.! :.ir l-t ot ho r!:e it i on *, (UJ ';.) : C; 317.i t A 2C.5-M !?A "'1/.-P 3 1A 241 '.D C:: 4% G 7 1:4 \\;A 2 '.2-0 3 IE:lv com.it'a rs ti.e ir. stall.it ton of the com unica:ict hyr.t s.: r.odi fleat icn co-p]et c.
(b) Tunctinn11 Testira The insperter vt.rified functional testing of the system on !;cvenber 15, 1976.
(5) T-37 /.-bient Air Tor,erature in the Thret Pour. Control Coral e :, To!)cvin? a Prclenred Sheivwn rif t be ITAC hsten (POPC 169) Tollowinp, completion of T-37, the data co. pared to serie the contractors heat nodel and the no:*e1 ins focni to be conservative. The f olletting is a st=ary of the .,airu: equilibrien terper.itures in the thra;: room ec,icx.
Calculat_ed FS.\\R 1.iei t . Control Room 111 120 Auxiliary E1cetric Equipment Room 113 120 4POV Eoon (full heat load) 158 140 450V Roon (Eccrgency Diesel Operation) 111 140 'lhis review indicates that the trancforrier loads in the 480V be transferred to the Ercrgency Dicact in order to roon riust pieclude c>:eeedinn 1400r. SOP 75-03 and T.ncrgency Procedure I.1 have been revised accordinply to provide for transfer of transforrer loads to the Enercency Dicsels in the event of the loss of the llVAC Sycten in the 480V rocci.
(cu rinued) .
D 9e D o n v
- -:n-(6) P 1 :.n t P r e c c.h:r e...k w.- ia t.' s i t.!. S t a c..e.. Pr e e.it i e:- i .. - The in.;pector verifi.d tiu status of tl i: n ica:. - f r.rce plete St? !.5-fC Co: * ro! !:. -.. .\\t... i l i. ; Elvetric Tquipment and I.NV swi t c h. a r I:cc: !4 31."i Fi re F:,t i: ru f :.h i'i:t Syr.t. r.
"a l i lic." ee's.,etion. vith r e:.p ec t to thit precedure ir.el ta ti:e f.31 : evi n g.
Inc.truction fo: the c :e of t h rennt e three zene . s.:nplinn statlans I::ve been included in the procedurc.
Signs end bot tk Irt-clin;; have b0en prnvided to a;>ure that in the event of a nansol release of halon to the cent rol roce and at:::111ary clectric equip ent room such a release would be Initiated sinultaneeunty.
An Operator's Order has been issued (12/17/76) ' to provide control of air breathing naska and hoses, t alon det. ctors, at4d portoble f ans fer halon nixing.
Laboratory equipment has been obtained it deter =ining air breathing systen quality.
All plant prc cdures associated with Stare 2 operation are considered corplete.
5.
Review of Safety tirits (St.). Linitinn T.,fety Svsten Settines (I SSS) nnd Lititin-j Conditions for Ontrations (110) a.
Inspection Sco g ' The insaector verified that reactor operations are in confortance with Technical Specification (TS) SL's, LSSS's and LCO's by audit of the following TS sections, procedure requirerents, alarm indications ani! plant datat (1) 3.1 Reactor Core Safety 1.init Reviewed period of !!ovenber 23, 1976 (Alarn Data Print Test, Power to flow Eccorder, Control Channel Average Log Poser Recorder, and Ecactor Scran).
(2) 3.2 Eenctor vessel Pressure Safety 1. i r.i t Safety Valve lift paints have not been exceeded.
i (cont inued) l
~ s , . . _ ;, 3 (j) 3. 3 L*.::.-
- o r.a f et ;.,9, tt u. &O t lic.; h...ve been re ac bed dee to at t t.:1 i.,:.d ! t it.:-
. (4) LCa 4. ]. :' 0:$. r.'bl e C. n: ro ! ! i.!... I ' O 1.' vel.l y 1:i.w t i v! t y l e s t Sp. 5.1.1 '..'-:'
- aithly ed rtri.Le S ** 5.1.1. t-M Sts.i t u;. Ch.*rh OTO.* 117 (5)
--i Us 4_.__1_.1..rod Seoe. re s:. 1.r0 ,
SOP J 2-01. Tr.ble ), Sequence of 1:ithdr.acal satisiles this 1.C0 ((-) LCC 4.1.4 Pa rt I :ll e Jr-- - serted !:o.h. LCO SOP 12-01 and 12-02 saticfy this LCO.
(7) -- 0 4.1.5 1:eletivity Chan*e with T.rnerature, LCO. - - 1.0
- ot specifically verified by procedure.
l (8) 1CO 4.1.6 ite:.crve Shutdown Snt en.1.C0__
1.0 - l'rene.ure 1;opper Alare., provide indic.atlon.
Surveillance Tests c.rc perior.wd en this :.ystem.
(9) 1.00 4.1.7 Cor d nlet Orifice Valves. 1.C0 , !;ot s;iecifically "crified by precedure. Plaut corpu:cr has touttue to corrute, also there nay be tires when plaat corputer is not available.
(10) LCO 4.1.8 Reactivity Status, ICO SOP 12-02 satisfies this LCO.
, (11) 1.C0 4.1. 9 Core Perion Tenperature Risc. 1.00
SO 12-04 requires verification by cenputer routine only . durin;; < <;ualization of orifice flew. ::ot specified by i procedure for periodic verification. Actions in event pl.m t cerputer is not available are r.ot crecitied.
(12) LCO 4.2.f.
Tire Uater Purps, lCO, _
SI: 5.2.10 W ratisfies this LCO.
Licensee indicatcd thac notation of the TS fuel storage linit in tt;e Stat ion Lo;. is to be censidered.
(continued) . h
.e= _ _,
. C.$3 Q .- O ..
- *
(13) 1.n'.*. 7. ') Cltae - ..; < e lad f ; a t i on i n pr..' r i d.,' b-.in.,lar* en the (10c r.It up of
1 r ; e, t.' r n.>t e.! t a ;t 1i t?. 16.7 lbn/!.eur. T: - i nen. ra' 1r..he es..asi.'t ed f ir. cis- "t :>r a t trn be. t r. - li ern.tre t MI. be er -M e t o s'..er: ine e.r;.! i ace sti r5 t hi I.CO.
- .2.11 l ec, I -
..r f t 1. v e l, 1.ct. % :v.erattere. 1.r0 (14) 100 Pecorded in OTO' III durir; ri.e fran 2'.' io ,0* pmcer.
rea. tor u su in this W record of Inte, rat ed t ir..1:at - conditien 1.as been raintain.d.
1.C0 nmi t'..ppear applicshic any t ire reactor lo critical an.' not.just bc '. ween 2' to 30:: peuer i." the average outlet te perature is bettnen 7250T.sud 120N F.
(15) LCO 4.2.15 Prl:V cool in L'ner S ;st en 1 er + r.i t u r e., f.00 this Adequate records are raintained to deternine that LCO is being,cc plied with; ho-ev.r, present proce.!ut es do this !.C0 is provide for pcriodic deterrination that not being coeplied with.
(16) 1.C0 4. 3. 3 S t e a, 'Ja t o r Pe r a Tan'. Teventory. 1.C0 Ir.dication is provided by red light alarn only en 105 board.
(17) 1.C0 4.3.5 Storarc Pont's Saec connent as LCO 4.2.15.
(18) 1.CO 4.6.1(c) Auxiliary riectric Systen. LCO (Fuel Stora"e) are connent as I.C0 4.2.15.
b.
Findings, Duc to chort perivl of actual operations, this inspection .(1) concentrated prirarily on deterrining that ade<1uate procedural requircr'ents have been established.
(2) The inspector's only corr.cnt with regard to safety 11 nits was that for a short tern poster to flow incident, the alarci date printout is the only plent rccord th,t providcs the capability for short terr 2 resolution, i.e., 1/10 of a second.
(rontinued) j . A a - .m > - w e w.
m umew= og w.e em==neumm S -
@c p@
O O O . v y (3) 1.10 '.. l. *,. l.. l. 7 '.l.'*,
'.8., .. '. . /. 3.L.
. . '.. (. 1 (, ) :. r a toi l.
t i. '. - ' '.. ; * ! l.* I 3.- ? i' ' . ..
- i l.e l l' a
'. f*artto -
- it.
!. at .
- .
1 *.. e '
- *
- :'; '- v.w !.
l.. re v i t J' *ie**
- l'
I ;'s rI t , . ss r f fi. !b ef i. :er c
I- ..e r \\ ' . . (4) I.Cd '...'. i ; i i..: - - . ..'t.
i.. .**: " -r* . . . "li t af ....ra..!11
rer:orr '. il 1:.s:
.- ota tl reaitri ope r.:. f. 3 . t: m r e.. r. tic:
. t.
pi a ti.re b. t reva 7;' < !..J 1;'.' . e r: :r r.
-. ! '. a
t' i. Im i :.- i: c >.n : rf -;1,";, b.
i+<:: ! .:i ' 6.
.S i r u l.: 0: c...c.
Co m... _c f.r. t..e.:t...' :.. t. t :*r.. *. c k t-... - -. -~ . -. .a . .. The s i r i.it.n tous, o; a!- ei ' t..r /u t er dt. ? val w. en *.c e " e r M IW/6, one in tach 1.cp,tr' r v i...' tei *. t h e. lie rr * e.
ite 1-iti tinr. v one va, (.:e to-it ; rc;>er DC ! i.:, line-in i d.: the norr.1 la char:a r and bat t ery terre rcrave d f re-ti.
- ! l'.'
h u s, t. iti:~ t clorir; t!x DC tie 'rea:er betweer. EC hu; I ar c 2.
he i l j,C uu s i n t h i s c on f i;.;u ra t i e n wa s l e f t:,- supplied bj t::c..; f.< en.ary ID PC charr.er.
Open ; tar tir, t;.e PC li.he oil p rp for th-in turbine, the r] N bu:. voltage drep;ied to M volts.
Cer ieater t l r, the F1 in!.tre ent b u r. (AC) soltere also cr';. ped to % e cr!.nc.n value. This resulta in a siruitaneous trip of the corr (s endina lou cet paint reisture nonitcrr. (one in carh loop and on of tbo hl:h set point roisture recitors). Due to an earlier failure cf cre l u.: set reint toir.ture renitors, both of the le.e roisture r.anitor trip Ispies were in a 1 of 2 trip confinuration. He sir. Itar ecur . tripe that edeurret? resulted in sivultanecus ortnir; of cv ster / tater du.:p valve in each Icop.
The lets of instrure r.t bu'. 61 (An voltage precluded the epeaint of the steachtater dur > in c..ch lecp that did not open durit:r the ir.cident. Control poteer for the:e ato valve.s is supplied fro instru=ent bus 51.
Darirn a cubsecuent test (T-62), tehich.-eas uitnessed by t! c 1:tz pc etor, riruitaneous roi!.ture reniter trips ci.ilar to t5c revorbe r 23,19,o event secte initi tei.
Instrurent Lus power was no ral dut ing; these i ttsts.
The test results were er folletes:
Run Stc_an G_ene_ra t or Te_c_d _Wa t e. r Valve =- --Stean Vater Ecns..'._a.l w a-
-
All 4 closed.
/11 4 crened.
3 of 4 clor.ed.
/.11 4 opened.
All I, closed.
3 of 4 opened.
'Ibc results of this test confirn that siruitanceus trips real.! caus: 1er.s of f eeJvater (secondary forced circulation) a id epeni:q. cif edl 4 steca/ tater durp valves. S.nultaneous sipnals cut of the.. ;Id state (centinued) . M.
_ , _ g - 6MM
r
i ' !
- SGA
'[h , . q , I l ! ,
,- . . -24- . TPS logie into che relay lor.ic of the stean/ water dunp and loop shutdown circuitry nay proluce inconsistent s: sten operation due to the intercut relay related actu:: ting respense charactorie. tics.
. The licensee has insttilled a te_perary fix which provides for a tico delay in the steam / cater der:p :nd Icop shut. lown Iber 1 circuitry. The proposed fix vas discussol by the licensee uith URR Projects and Technical Ecvicu by conference calls during the veek of Nove bcr 29 - Decccher 3, 1976. The IC:1V inspector was present during these discussiens. Subsec.uently, a site visit ';as also nad' by URR, Technical Review, on December 6 and 7,1976.
It has been cencluded by the MpC (Kan/1T.) that the present temporary fix is acceptabic and does preclude sicultaneous stcan/ water dunps cI both loop.. Simultaneous signals will p.oduce a prefercace ( ducp of loop 2 due to the time delay in loop 1.
A permanent fix I is to be cade during a future plant shutdown. This will include a nanual switch in the l'pS systen. The switch cust be actuated by the operater in the event a low trip point noisture nonitor chaanni is cade inoperative. The switch inserts the 1/2 vice 2/3 trip logic. In addition, consideration is being given to changing the ! low coisture conitor trip circuitry to transmission logic (i.e., l loss of power not produce a trip). A final test is to be perforced l folleving the perranent ilx which is to essitulate the conditions ! of Novenber 23, 1976.
The consequences of the accident were reviewed with the licensee since there was (1) a period of tine, approximately 30 seconds,
- at dung valves were open in both loops sicultaneously with I
s-condary coolant at 2,4v0 psig/C700F; (2) two circulatcr trips; I and (3) a feeduater flew loss for approxinately 32-13 ninutes. The licenscc has indicated that the nearest primary systen temperature 31 nit reached was 7500T on the inlet of the circulators (8003F lusign Licitation).
The licensee concluded that no design prassure linitations were reached in the techanical portion of the stena/ water dump piping and tank sinec no relief valves were lif ted durinn thc period of tice th,t one durp valve was open in eac'a loop. The systen description of the stean weter dump systen ir.ditates a system. design of 15 f ull durps per loop.
The.14-day rernrt of the occurrence was received by 1E:IV on , Decerher 13, 1976. The licensee has been requested by telephone en l !. Dec ember 16, 1976 to supplcnent this rcport with a more detailed ' narrative of the seo.nence of events that occurred and an analysis of the consequences to denenstrate that an ursafe plant condition did not exist.
i l l l ' . , l I - --, . m.. , -. _. - -- -.... .,, . - - -
x s e o 8N T o
. . >- "ibc Jic.n.e* is to revim phia* proc.dere; to verity in a!) casen t h:. t c.t t.". go.e r..t n: f es duc t or fle..: tntablisr'. d prior to r ::.ta r tin; a c irculate r in a.i t.: t io:.. stere ciret.lator inlet t o - se:..Li. e :ay s:r..d UJ0p.
II.:o, plant prortdures are to be . revie.e ! to detern u that ir. the evot feentater I:ow is loct (t Mre ep..m or ac t ions are rea r.cr.ry to preclude the c : rculator inact tonperaturca f rom e.':ccedir ;, F003r) t!::> operator is r.cde aware of tiet actien-he rur.t . t 1:: to preclude cirr clatcr dararc.
During the fur et ion:.1 t estinn.: bat follored the inctallation of the t erpore.ry f n, a ler,1 : chip ralfunct ioned in the : oisturr' rrri.tr circuitry. Tcnch centit; cf the f ailed Ic 'e chip did not repeat the nalfenct icn.
1!:e lic. n,ce is to revice the cdequacy of . the a:i:,tinr. bc.nch t earin:; proce 'ures.
The inspector indicatcd that thic area uculd ' e subject to further inspection.
The licen n e has also indicatsd that the necessity te c. tablish nuninistrative contrc?. for r.r.intaining records cf plant oper-ational type cycler. is to be retiewed.
Tho li.itatica of 15 stes=/watcr dur"pu per loop was identified by the ir.nec r as ein er.arple of a lich ?d operational cycle.
7.
Previous It ens of ::cncoroliance . The inspector veri fied by record review, observatien and discussion uith licensee personnel (au cppropriate) the followinr, arce.s relating to tl.c followep on all Itcrs of r.carnrpliance.
Ecceipt on-site M si,cntnt of responsibility for review and corrective action E Tineliness of response.
Reviou ac prescribed by Technical Specificaticns.
Corrective actions.
The folle. int, iters of noncor.pliar.cc ucre ret '.cwed : a.
Inspection Report 50-267/75-01 (1) Infraerfon !!unber E knend.cnt 16 to the racility Technical Specifications now requires that the ::t clear racili*y Safety Co.r.ittee only tview proposed testr. and experirer.ts which involve en unreviewed safety quertien as defined in 10 cyp 50.,9.
This ite.a is considered close. . __ _ __.
- . i.
i ! A I-i
' . , .
26-
f b.
3nspection Kenogt_50-26',,*i5 07 f.
(1) It.fraclio,n A.2.c j
- ctal tray covers have been installed with exception of the 12-foot area along tiie J uall in the Auxiliary
, j Electric T.quipr.ent Roon. This deviation from FSAR j cor.eiteents is to be bandits as a 10 CPR 50.59 change j to the TSAR.
a
This itea rcnnins open pending fina? review of the { 10 CFR 50.59 docunantation.
l '. i (2) Infraction B i j The inspector will perforn a selected audit of drawing {- resisior. st a subsco,uent inspection.
, i i This iten rc=ains open.
I l (3) ,A Audit 1402/ Engineering, McView of Conn 1cted Acceptance Q ] Testing (Liecnsee Identified) x l Engineering Proceduro ENC-1 cas issued effective October 18,
1976 (Issue A) as specified i:i QA Audit 1402.
, This iten is censidered closed.
(4) QADR 173/ Control tork Prceedure for Chance Not.cc 59 i e j This item remains open pending the closcaut of QADR 173.
c.
_Insnection Rei, ort 50-267/76-09
f (1) Infraction A.I.a i The inspector verified that the licensee haa revicued out- ] standing "N" purchase orders for status of inspection.
The results of this inspection was docurented by QAlp
j No. 294 i.10/18/76).
'
This item is considered closed.
f (2) Inf raction A.1.b . l
j The inspcetor reviewed GA's audit of their architecture i q cugineering firm on September 29 and 30,1976. The inspecter was inforned that reaudit it scheduled for I_ July 1977.
$ ' ' This item is considered closed.
l c . -... -. -. - - -- .- .-.-.. - -... .... . -. -. - -. - -
h a,~} N,)e _}
. . -??- . l ' (3) Infraction A.2 The licenaec'r. Noverter 3,1976 Ict r er cot.itr. to the conplet tor of corrective cc tj or. Ly Janeiry 15, 1977 l with tegard to estab11:.tr.ent c. f r( c o rd s r, ' cs-found I calibration conditions.
l This iten rcrains ope:.. (4) Infrcction B The inspector verified. that a r.ero datod Octcber 6,1976 vas issued to all storekeeper chich specifies the steps to be taken to assure proper storage cor.dttions for qualit. related itets.
This ite.m is considc-ed closed.
(5) Infraction c A response uith respect to the PSC con.mitrents to provide a plar.t training program is to be forearded to IE:IV by , Jan.uary 1977.
This itcs rensins open.
(6) Infraction _D Change Notice (CN) 471 was in preparation to provide proper documentetion of the are suppressers. The deley in issuing CN 471 was stated to be due to the delay in researching all the plant systers tl.at are suppressors had been insta11cd in.
This itcs rermins open.
(7) Infraction E The inspector verified that Technical Services Procedure I8 was issued (PORC 175) to outline the form i revicu of nodifications by Technical Services.
The inspector also verified that ADM-27 (Rev. 3) requires Technical Services sign-off on each Uork Authori:ation prior to returning a systcc to an operable status. Thic resolves the issue of contractor initiated design changes which necessitate procedure revision.
(continued)
_ _ _ _ _. a-o % o n o rs , . ~.8-Durinr. the revicu of licenue initiat< d desig: c ha nr.e s, the inspectcr fot.nd Ll.at Irternal Ucrk Procedure IU0-2 does require Technical Farvices revieu of all Change ::otices (C.N's) for precedure revisica. W rc was, however, no foraa! sign-of f la t he CN review process to assure that thir. revicu u cc:p let. 3 prior to returning the affected sc:,ter te operable status. 71 e licensec stated that the Control Uork Procedure form would be chan ;ed accorJingly.
The licensei has ccmritted to the revicw of facility ch occurents by April 1, 1977 to identif y all requirca proceJure revisions as the result of past design changes. The inspector inforr.ed the licensec that the revision of the associatcJ precedures is censidered to require tinely action following the cct-pletion of the review in process.
This itcn rcrains open.
(8) Infractionj[ It is the licensee's posit ion at this tire that the review by Operator personnel of procedure revisions uill provide for tinely review of design changes. This area uill be the subject of a routine IE:IV audit of training.
This iten is considered closed.
d.
Nuclear racility Safety Corrittee ( FSC) Review The inspector verified the KrSC review of the items of noncon-pliance identified during inspections 50-267/76-07 and 76-08 (eceting f41, Septetber 14, 1976). The inspector also verified that during neeting #42 (October 26, 1976), the itecs of noncompliance identified during inspection 50-267/76-09 were revicued.
8.
Previously Identified Unresolved Iters a.
7501-3 Backup Ecarinn t'ater System Nuclear Ecactor Regulation is reviewing the circulator operating history.
This iten rc=ains unresolved.
(continued)
__ , e J . -29-i.. 7 51.>- i Pr. cord ; Prcet era . Aa tr.;.lerwi.t in;.nrocedare for records is r.:st !cip..ted by .lu.very 1, 1977.
Tidn it:n renins unreso:ved.
c.
7607 *. Sei:..i r a nd 1:n. f re n c.c.t al Du.'.i i f f er.t ic a rinal action re. sinn f r.cc,r.,,J e t c. This itet s : rain, t.aresols ed, d.
7007-5 ASCO Tolea<id 'Jalves - - - - - Change ::otice (C:;) 451 seas 3 sst.ed Septebcr 27,197(. to provida ferr.a1 documentrtion of the ASCO valve rodificatices. The C?; is pendinn l'ugineerin;; Dcpartt.ent approval. QA I;cficiency lie po r t 154 rerains open.
' This, iter. rerains unresolved, c.
7609-4 Adr nist rative Cont rol of ::on '. <t ru-t ive Tn.ninat ion (?:DI:) i The licensee stated that the develo;: ent af adnini..trative controls for I;DT in to be incleded in the final inspection , pre,'.ran cs described in the licensec's apprcved QA Plan.
This iten rer.ains unresolved, f.
7609-5 Contractor I'esirn Verification The inspector found that Contractor l'rocedurc AP-4,1' reparation of Tield Change Notices, Issea C, has been revised to include (ctailed steps for independent design verificatien.
i This iten in cenr.idered resolved.
c.
7601-4 Systen 91 I!vdraulic QADR 207 renains outstanding. Sanplinc, procedures have not been established.
This iten remains unresolved, h.
7609-01 Calibration of Test T r u i pren_t This iten was addressed as an item of nonco:plicnre during inspection 50-267/76-09 and will no lonrcr he carried as an unrcselved item.
(continued)
.. - - ,
%~) 3 - . .- a-30-. 1.
1609-3 ?;1 Calibr.it ion Crit eri:. Darin; inspectien 7t'-09 it v.h na: ed t L.it .ut s 11 u.c e t e:.ts
5. '. 1.1. 5 r --ri c u d 5. 4.1. t. /- c-a a ! 1.w ' a 10.. di:ference between indicateJ ::1 pcrer an ce.purcJ plant p.v.cer fran a calori-et r!c bc fere a roadjest ent t an rer.u i r e.'. D trin;- this in pection, t he itu. pee t,r no t e.' t l.at th linear p n:cr ranoe d ::nael precedure 5.4.1.1.'. r-d had a.
ch,nr.ed to specify a readjun: ent is requi red t:bcnecer a di f:cresce 1:5 noted bett.cen the indica t e.! and conpu t ed pmter.
Procedurc 5.4.1.1.5 c-c: s;as nat changed. 1;ie in p..c t e r d ir.cus. sed this stith a license rc presentat ive who f edicated that this channel (locarithric posur) provided only 1 rate of pe..er incre.ise trip siynal and L. the nature of ti.c 1.r.arithr.ic present.ation an accuracy of + 107. power is all tha6 is achievable for the _ indicatica. The inspector con urred with this.
This item is resolved.
9.
_Itens Identified Durir Previous Innpcetion for rollerup a.
PTR Fur at (In.spection Pe. ort 50-267/7.3-07) The licensee has no further plans to codify I'TR fornat.
This iten is considered closed, b.
A1:51 4 5. 2. 6 Inspec tion Proc.r.m (Inspection report 50-20,7 / 76-C 9) Progran develop ent is to be co pleted by Decarber 1976.
c.
Shift Turr.over Instri.ctionn (inspection Ecport 50-267/76-Op The !;ovember 17, 1976 Isr.uance of Arendment 16 to the racility Technical Specifications incorporates Regulatory Guide 1.33 require: cats for shift turr.over instructions. The licensee is cogni: ant of the requircrents and action is being taken to provide ap;iropriate instructions. Thir. item is now considered to be an unresolved ite:. d.
PSC Q\\ Aedit of Ceneral At onic (Inspect ion Peport 50-267/76-09) Quality At.surance Audit 1701 was conducted October 13-13, 1976.
This iten is considered closed.
(continued)
s o p-
0
9 .s.
. S_i. r.u. !.: .
- . n.-
i.s. t.!'_r. _._. r... ( . -.. . - - c.
. 7_1_. v_ _t_f.r_a ....._:_. ". _.N. 7 /_7./ - 0 5 ) - ., - fr.
., a c...i t 2.- i f '. v t: ci!.e
- . if ti t c c.i l
.
- . :.
i11a: t t..t, .! i. n:: -.... a t.,
- ,re
'.e '. : r ; i. : J.11:c * < i r.
Ih ; ri.
- ..
- .e t j e r c. f -
pr. t . :re r r, ' - t r, ired i enJit i- .t<* - isfi.
.x ;vriar-1:. t i.
est.
- ':.. t
. not 1.
o: t !.. i ter : i . r.pecifis ci: f ra r.' the.,irer. icite - L i:.-i t i: Cun0 ', for Op rr.t ic: (LCO) t o ( n u r.: t '.a t TS rt <;ci ri r.cn t :. arc *:.t i n ' '.. s.! :: ::n c mineerc d r.: f e.
. i r d :. ,;:,t c i t. t..l i n c':t o f '..: v: c c.
i t e.- .. n i.-l i r r t s'd c. t "' . . i t ;,es I::. r..*sern.
ti nt tire .% ?- Duri c, this ii. ;w t ion t!.s.e r.t.r. ci l i x c.- t ea ts.. r e r e v i et. ed acair end no chan;;< w:. n3tr d.
T h irr.pucter noted that the lice:uec'= On,1iry /sse.rance Prcr.ran sectiin E.5.19.15 ce r.its to /J.51 Ste;*t!ard.';if. 7 - 1972. Sec t ien 6. 2. 5 o f t r:is :.t.c.d a rd r. t a t e s i t' ;'a r t. " Test procedures chall centair... l i:.i t in;- ce n:.'it i ons. .' Thi'. it en vn meu.: sed eit' t he licer. uc .. - . ni indiented to hu e s ci.o l':e.. ^
-- ' ' ' . .. e
h .' ' tb A _d . ! i , 3 ra _ 1 i u sV Ai . - = - - -+, ,,yg e.c -=
- NT N S
~ i / / e ' -- I
- . .. ... ,, ..,, ,
- .r 4. - - - - m --,~ m, m, _ _ _ _ ,, _ , , , m _ . m._,,.2 .i. 4 -._ _z.. . - _.... - ... _. _ _ - - . _ _. n -.,. _ _ _ _ ,,. _ _, m_.-,. - . .. . . .. ; -.., -...., -. z 5-;:.y-..
, - e.. .r m s. w. -- ~~ . ., . < . - f'. ... a ,. . . - < , . .- , - .. , .. . '. . ... - . ., - . . <. . ,./- W - it .... . . A . .n l ' s q - . -
f.
, . gu--- l
- -
i , --- -- i .- ; < l l / . < I - . %.; w s - -. .t.
- . .. , . . . . , . . - . ,. - , ,, ; ,
- ,;.s . . .%s . , ,s a.s w.
f ' s c I _7 m_3
- .
. , g-s- - ... _ _. -. i . t: l , < ' .'
4 i , l I _
- "s*
. ! i ) . _,n
! ' Jg ~ L~ ~ s^ ) - l / .\\ . ...- } G .. _ ~ O - \\ . -.. . - :.- -- - - - . . ,. = : ' ,,
-
% ..., , s, - ' ,, - . , - t , , . .
2- . ... a ' - . ,
. , y' s,
- D.
f
- n-w~'
~ - .* . -. I tf3 -'
rx , 1 - 'y ' - e-x -- .t ) ) ./ / ' { i
> . .t ') } .
f-Qi kg - ~s a .,,- n: . . . . . --, .. - . - . .- i . .a..... , . ..c.
., - . r.. - , . . ., ..,,-. .... - z.
. .. .. - i.
., a . .,- . .. .. - . . >.. . - . <> t. t,c . w ~- - .. , . .,, ~. .> ,t ,. . .:. . '...;., ,t- ..c; ..,, . , . ... . . .. . -....., _ , ~s. , ,.. . . - ., - , .- .. r _- - ..... .. . .<
- g. *.-
,;. .. .i - _- .. -.... -. - .s .e . . J . <. ....,....... a. '. v. .i;s., u. - - . - . uo __ . . . _..,s ao .s ... , - - -.;., ,2 .b .. _ . , v.
. ., ..y. m.. . G.-- . ...., < .-. , s.
.' . ~, ~, t.
..
. , . _. - - .i , p - -.4 . .,, .' ! J.
. .
- .t.
', < A . , .
- <. * < <
.. ,
- 'l l Flj F28 {'7 5 r - C3
4 7.2 y I _,, . .:= ',. ,, i _ _, _ _-.. g,; .37
. .
l Eg '~ a ,',,,.r.-- ' ' ..
.u ti,;
- . ' .. '.. . - . s
t.- "y , . .- -, -; , , . - !: = G l.8 - ' . . . . . '. i.
. - .. '- LEm ' _.
. , ,,,
. ,...... c. < _... ; 9 .c.
r.Y.:.;-.w. u. >, , ,o r .. .m - . ' - -. . . i . ,,l,6 ...i . .. y m+;
==r a
. '- - 2l;:,.. ' W ~ u..-. - " .... , . . c.. ., . _m-1,1' W -40.$ U....-.,n..c.. m.. . w..s... :, . i..___- --- i.1,um . - __- . . .. ... 1: ' - A fr.; -.' ti.. ] . . '... q..- ... .
- .....
< . -:., t -.; % %. .... q;,2_L. ;,..... ; .%..-- 4 la,* :,. E. ' 1 - i4 . ' . -q.- . m ..n,.t'
{.'U.- ;<.. s.,., :
- -g ;'. '; },'
- - - - 7, 'n.,4*g... r ' ~ ,...., r.,. A.:/.a,...M... ;,,.-c :".S '
p.
- ... s.. ; ;;,.,
- .. ;%..
a..
-. - ,.. ~y.., p-.
. .., .. . #. 7.. 1,,>*. o, . .- ..,,s ..,-4. m.., -:.... wse.
s, s..- , . I I(*,"'n,]"*, ^.".','I})d, ...... . .r.
.c M..) $'.,*nr 12 - c O-2 - w'%rg. ] - - W3CROCOPY RESOLUTCN TEST t'HAAT '- ... %.w b D I (Q. 2/ * E ., <, ,.,, s,. m i. }}