ENS 47949
From kanterella
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ENS Event | |
|---|---|
21:30 May 22, 2012 | |
| Title | Unanalyzed Condition Identified During a Fire Protection Review |
| Event Description | During a review of non-compliances with Appendix R that are being resolved as part of the NFPA 805, Risk Informed Fire Protection Transition, it was identified that a non-compliant operator manual action to manually backwash the cooling water strainers was identified in several fire areas, but the need to manually backwash the strainers may be required in other fire areas not previously identified. For Fire Areas 25, 30, 31, 38, 66, 109, and 117 power to the cooling water strainer central control panel could be affected which could require the need to perform a manual backwash of the strainers. Manual backwash of the cooling water strainers has not been established as an alternate compensatory measure for Fire Area 25, 30, 31, 38, 66, 109 and 117.
Manual operator actions that are required to recover functionality of a system that is credited to achieve and maintain hot safe shutdown for a fire in a III.G.1 or III.G.2 fire area are indicative of a missing fire barrier. The lack of established alternate compensatory measures is being reported as an unanalyzed condition as defined by 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii). Compensatory measures have been established by verifying fire detection in the affected areas is functional with an hourly fire watch established in accordance with site procedures. The licensee will notify the NRC Resident Inspector.
An eight hour report per 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) was reported on May 22, 2012 for a non-Compliant manual operator action to backwash the cooling water strainers in several fire areas not previously identified. Subsequent analysis determined that the process of removing sufficient decay heat to achieve and maintain cold shutdown does allow the use of repair actions. Since Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP) can be in the process of removing sufficient decay heat to reach cold shutdown conditions in much less than 15 hours1.736111e-4 days <br />0.00417 hours <br />2.480159e-5 weeks <br />5.7075e-6 months <br /> there is significant margin to show this action is acceptable as a cold shutdown action and is in compliance with the requirements of Appendix R,Section III.G. Therefore, the action is not a non-compliant operator manual action and EN 47949 is retracted. The NRC Resident Inspector has been informed." R3DO (Kozak) notified. |
| Where | |
|---|---|
Prairie Island  Minnesota (NRC Region 3) | |
| Reporting | |
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | |
| Time - Person (Reporting Time:+0.98 h0.0408 days <br />0.00583 weeks <br />0.00134 months <br />) | |
| Opened: | John Kempkes 22:29 May 22, 2012 |
| NRC Officer: | Dong Park |
| Last Updated: | Jul 19, 2012 |
| 47949 - NRC Website
Loading map... {"minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"mappingservice":"leaflet","width":"350px","height":"250px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":6,"defzoom":14,"layers":["OpenStreetMap"],"image layers":[],"overlays":[],"resizable":false,"fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":true,"cluster":false,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clustermaxradius":80,"clusterspiderfy":true,"geojson":"","clicktarget":"","imageLayers":[],"locations":[{"text":"\u003Cb\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\"mw-parser-output\"\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Ca class=\"mw-selflink selflink\"\u003EENS 47949\u003C/a\u003E - \u003Ca href=\"/Prairie_Island\" title=\"Prairie Island\"\u003EPrairie Island\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003C/div\u003E\u003C/b\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\"mw-parser-output\"\u003E\u003Cp\u003EUnanalyzed Condition Identified During a Fire Protection Review\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003C/div\u003E","title":"ENS 47949 - Prairie Island\n","link":"","lat":44.62379722222222,"lon":-92.64153611111111,"icon":"/w/images/6/6c/Xcel_Energy_icon.png"}],"imageoverlays":null} | |
Unit 1 | |
|---|---|
| Reactor critical | Critical |
| Scram | No |
| Before | Power Operation (100 %) |
| After | Power Operation (100 %) |
Unit 2 | |
|---|---|
| Reactor critical | Not Critical |
| Scram | No |
| Before | Hot Shutdown (0 %) |
| After | Hot Shutdown (0 %) |
WEEKMONTHYEARENS 526382017-03-20T21:39:00020 March 2017 21:39:00
[Table view]10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Historical Event Related to Past Operability ENS 518772016-04-21T20:50:00021 April 2016 20:50:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Missing Fire Barriers ENS 516422016-01-08T01:00:0008 January 2016 01:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition - Appendix R Credited Procedures Not in Place ENS 516162015-12-21T22:25:00021 December 2015 22:25:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Due to Non-Compliant Fire Protection Manual Operator Actions ENS 514982015-10-26T12:03:00026 October 2015 12:03:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Associated with a High Energy Line Break ENS 509942015-04-19T22:45:00019 April 2015 22:45:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Due to Non Compliance with 10 Cfr 50 App R ENS 508012015-02-10T08:50:00010 February 2015 08:50:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Voids Identified That Result in an Unanalyzed Condition ENS 505312014-10-13T19:25:00013 October 2014 19:25:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Due to a Missing Fire Barrier ENS 505232014-10-10T22:17:00010 October 2014 22:17:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Missing Fire Barrier ENS 504752014-09-19T18:53:00019 September 2014 18:53:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Due to Missing Fire Barriers ENS 503622014-08-08T15:26:0008 August 2014 15:26:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Due to Lack of Appropriate Fuse Protection ENS 496852013-12-31T15:33:00031 December 2013 15:33:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Due to Removal of Multiple Steam Generator Lateral Support Shims and Bumpers ENS 493612013-09-19T17:20:00019 September 2013 17:20:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition No Documented Plan in Place to Receive Additional Fuel Oil During Maximum Probable Flood Condition ENS 491282013-06-17T21:15:00017 June 2013 21:15:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Potential Unanalyzed Condition - Carbon Dioxide Fire Suppression System Does Not Meet Design Requirements ENS 479492012-05-22T21:30:00022 May 2012 21:30:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Identified During a Fire Protection Review ENS 475222011-12-09T17:59:0009 December 2011 17:59:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition- Degraded Fire Barrier Between Fire Areas ENS 466992011-03-25T15:53:00025 March 2011 15:53:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Potential Unanalyzed Condition Due to Power Level Greater than Limit ENS 465082010-10-23T00:49:00023 October 2010 00:49:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition - Battery Chargers May Lockup During a Design Basis Event ENS 463182010-10-07T18:52:0007 October 2010 18:52:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Degraded Fire Barrier ENS 462612010-09-16T18:43:00016 September 2010 18:43:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition - Degraded Fire Barrier Identified ENS 458552010-04-19T03:25:00019 April 2010 03:25:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Lco 3.0.3 Entry and Loss of Safety Function Due to Loss of Turbine Building High Energy Line Break Compensatory Measure ENS 455672009-12-14T18:00:00014 December 2009 18:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Related to Certain Fire Conditions ENS 449312009-03-23T22:00:00023 March 2009 22:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition for Postulated Missile Hazard That Could Disable Both Trains of Component Cooling ENS 447732009-01-14T17:30:00014 January 2009 17:30:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Manual Actions for Fire Not in Compliance ENS 443792008-07-31T18:45:00031 July 2008 18:45:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Postulated High-Energy Line Break That Could Disable Both Trains of Component Cooling ENS 435922007-08-24T16:30:00024 August 2007 16:30:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Fire Barrier Separation Criteria Not Met for Afwp Rooms ENS 434042007-06-04T21:00:0004 June 2007 21:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Due to Identified Non Compliant Fire Protection Manual Operator Actions ENS 430102006-11-25T01:45:00025 November 2006 01:45:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition ENS 413772005-02-06T02:46:0006 February 2005 02:46:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 4160 Volt Relaying and Metering Single Failure Vulnerability 2017-03-20T21:39:00 | |
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ENS_47949&oldid=423755"