CY-12-064, Kces 2012-700, Rev. 0, Decommissioning Study of the Connecticut Yankee Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation.

Kces 2012-700, Rev. 0, Decommissioning Study of the Connecticut Yankee Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation.

ML12363A145
Person / Time
Site:	Haddam Neck  File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png
Issue date:	12/17/2012
From:	Knight Cost Engineering Services
To:	Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
References
CY-12-064 KCES 2012-700, Rev 0
Download: ML12363A145 (25)

Text

CY-12-064 ENCLOSURE 1 DECOMMISSIONING STUDY OF THE CONNECTICUT YANKEE INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION December 2012

Decommissioning Study of the Connecticut Yankee Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Prepared for Connecticut Yankee Atomic, Power

....~~~~~~ ....

. ... ~~~.

, oma n..............................................

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC December, 2012

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-700, Rev. 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

........................................................................................... 3 2.0

SUMMARY

................................................................................... 4 3.0 DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATING METHODOLOGIES................7 4.0 ASSUMPTIONS .................................................................................. 8 5.0 SCHEDULES ............................................................................... 10 6.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ............................................................ 12 6.1 UTILITY STAFF ....................................................................................... 12 6.2 DECOMMISSIONING GENERAL CONTRACTOR ........................................... 12 6.3 SECURITY ............................................................................................... 13

7.0 REFERENCES

............................................................................. 14 APPENDIX A .................................................................................... 15 Page 2 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-700, Rev. 0

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to identif, the costs associated with the decommissioning of the Connecticut Yankee (CY) Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI). This estimate includes only the structures, systems and land within the NRC licensed area. The CY ISFSI is located about three quarters of a mile from the former reactor site, tucked in a slight valley between natural ridgelines. The NAC-MPC fuel storage and transport canister system chosen by CY is licensed by the NRC for both storage and transportation.

There are 43 dry storage casks on the 100 by 200-foot, three-foot-thick concrete pad at the CY ISFSI. Forty of the casks contain the 1019 spent fuel assemblies and three casks store sections of the reactor vessel internals that are classified as Greater Than Class C (GTCC) waste. Each vertical concrete cask has a three and a half-inch steel liner surrounded by 21 inches of reinforced concrete. The entire dry storage process -- procuring materials, fabricating the fuel containers, constructing the storage facility, took approximately three years to complete.

Page 3 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-700, Rev. 0 2.0

SUMMARY

Decommissioning is the safe removal of a facility or site from service and the reduction of radioactivity to a level that permits either the release of the property for unrestricted use and NRC license termination; or a restricted release of the property and NRC license termination.

This estimate includes all costs incurred to release the property for unrestricted use.

On June 17, 2011, the NRC published a final rule amending its regulations to improve decommissioning planning. The rule will become effective on December 17, 2012 and requires compliance by March 31, 2013. This rule will require licensees to report additional details in their decommissioning cost estimate. To assist in the implementation of the new rule, the NRC issued NUREG-1757, "Consolidated Decommissioning Guidance, Financial Assurance, Recordkeeping and Timeliness."

NUREG-1757 does not apply to licensees under 10CFR Part 50 nor does it elimninate the need to follow Regulatory Guide 1.202 or NUREG-1713. It does provide additional information to support the development of the cost estimate. This cost estimate was prepared in accordance with the guidelines provided in RG 1.202 and NUREG-1713. In addition, it does take into account the guidelines identified in NUREG-1757.

NUTREG-1757 specifies that a contingency of 25% is to be included in the estimate. This estimate takes exception to this contingency level for two reasons. First, the estimate is conservative in that the entire storage pad, concrete overpacks and overpack liners are assumed to be disposed of as potentially contaminated. Second, the CY site has recently been successfully decommissioned. Many of the key personnel involved in that project remain at the CY ISFSI.

The lessons learned from that project will be incorporated in the CY ISFSI decommissioning.

For this reason it is felt that a 10% contingency is adequate to cover unknown and unplanned occurrences.

The total cost including contingency is $19.4 million, $17.7 million for radiological removal and

$1.8 million for non-radiological removal. Table 2-1 provides a summary of costs. Cost details are provided in Appendix A TABLE 2-1

SUMMARY

OF COSTS Non-Radiological radiological Total Cost Removal $ Removal $

Grand Total Building $19,432,609 $17,681,565 $1,751,044 Tax on General Contractor $718,275 $653,552 $64,723 General Contractor with contingency $11,311,421 $10,292,165 $1,019,255 Page 4 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-700, Rev. 0 Site Costs with contingency $7,402,913 $6,735,848 $667,066 General Contractor $10,283,110 $9,356,514 $926,596 Site Costs $6,729,921 $6,123,498 $606,423 CY ISFSI $17,013,031 S15,48(0,011 $1,533,01.9 PERIOD DEPENDENT COSTS $11,132,644 $10,129,497 $1,003,146 1.1 CY Site Costs S6,729,921 $6,123,498 $606,423 1.1.1 Project Management $2,172,341 1.1.2 Security Staff $1,549,507 1.1.3 Fees $650,000 $591,429 $58,571 1.1.4 Insurance $758,073 $689,764 $68,309 1.1.5 Legal $200,000 $181,978 $18,022 1.1.6 Property Taxes $1,400,000 $1,273,848 $1.26,152 1.2 General Contractor $4,402,723 $4,006,000 $396,723 1.2.1 Decommissioning General Contractor $2,170,358 1.2.2 Waste Packaging and Loading Crew $973,899 1.2.3 Equipment & Materials $1,258,466 ACTIVITIES $5,880,387 $5,350,514 $529,873 1.3 Project Engineering $20,139 $18,325 $1,815 1.3.1 Procedure Development and Review - Offsite $10,070 Preparation of QA and Safety Documents - Offsite 1.3.2 (in parallel with 1.2.1) $10,070 Site Mobilization and General Employee Training 1.4 (GET) $115,459 $105,055 $10,404 1.4.1 Site Mobilization $30,128 1.4.2 General Employee Training $76,622 1.4.3 Site Specific Training $8,709 1.5 Site Preparation - Performed by Staff $16,223 $14,761 $1,462 1.5.1 Initial Site Survey 1.5.2 Setup work areas 1.5.3 Decontamination Readiness Review 1.6 Disconnect all utilities to work areas. $8,112. $7,381 $731 1.6.1 Electrical $4,056 1.6.2 Ventilation $2,028 1.6.3 Piping $2,028 1.7 Removal inside security fence S5,295,913 $5,153,594 $142,319 1.7.1 Remove EFF $5,124 $5,124 1.7.2 Remove VCCs $3,324,922 $3,324,922 $0 1.7.2.1 Exterior Concrete $1,647,758 $0 $0 1.7.2.2 Steel liner $1,677J165 1.7.3 Remove Concrete Pad $1,828,671 $1,828,671 Remove Security Fence, Indust. Fence, Light Towers, 1.7.4 Intrusion Sys. and Access Rd $122,185 $122,185 1.7.5 Remove walkway $15,010 $15,010 1.8 Removal outside fences $361,313 $361,313 Page 5 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-700, Rev. 0 1.8.1 Diesel Generator $5,391 $5,391 1.8.2 ISFSI Support Building $94,127 $94,127 1.8.3 SAS Building $46,962 $46,962 1.8.4 Septic System $23,298 $23,298 1.8.5 Pumphouse $15,568 $15,568 1.8.6 Power to SAS $6,019 $6,019 1.8.7 Conduit and wire - SAS to pad $88,249 $88,249 1.8.8 Remove road inside licensed area $61,119 $61,119 1.8.9 Remove vehicle barriers $20,581 $20,581 1.9 Final Site Survey Structure gone - By DGC Staff $25,000 $22,747 $2,253 1.9.1 Prepare Final Status Survey Plan 1.9.2 Soil Sampling 1.9.3 Direct Survey 1.9.4 Sampling Analysis 1.9.5 Prepare Final Status Survey Report 1.10 Orise Site Release Confirmation 1.11 Outside areas $6,740 $6,740 1.11.1 Backfill, grade and seed $6,740 $6,740 1.12 Demolition Crew Demobilization $21,419 $19,489 $1,930 1.13 Final Project Report - Offsite $10,070 $9,162 $907 Page 6 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-700, Rev. 0 3.0 DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATING APPROACH Two types of costs were determined in this estimate: activity costs and level of effort costs. The activity costs were developed utilizing a unit cost factor approach. Site material quantities for concrete, steel and equipment where developed from site specific drawings. Productivity factors were applied to these quantities to determine activity durations. Labor crews were developed and applied to the material quantities to determine labor costs and person-hours. The activity durations were used to develop a project schedule.

The level of effort costs such as equipment rental and the General Contractor (GC) staff were developed based on the project schedule duration. A rental equipment file was developed for the construction effort. The GC staff is assumed to be on-site for the duration of the project. The Oversight staff cost is another level of effort cost that is included in the cost estimate.

Bulk removal of the storage pad and concrete storage casks is assumed to be performed using an excavator with a hydraulic hammer attachment. The steel liner will be segmented utilizing torch cutters. All of this waste will be trucked off-site for processing. This leads to a large disposal volume; however, at a lower rate for bulk processing than for direct burial. In addition, there will be far less characterization and iterative decontamination. Clean structures will be demolished using mechanical means and disposed of at a local landfill.

In addition to the removal labor there is a dedicated waste packaging crew included in this estimate. This crew will consolidate, package and prepare containers for transportation. The waste packaging is estimated to remain on site for the duration of the project. This crew consists of 2 laborers; 1 Health Physics Technician; 1 Equipment Operator and 1 Foreman..

Page 7 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-700, Rev. 0 4.0 ASSUMPTIONS Following is a list of assumptions developed by KCES in completing this study. These assumptions are based on the most current decommissioning methodologies and site-specific considerations.

1. Component quantities were developed from actual plant listings.

2. Concrete volumes were developed from plant drawings.

3. The oversight staff is assumed to be the similar size and configuration as it is currently.

4. The oversight staff positions and costs were supplied by the Company and represent July, 201.2 salary and benefit data.

5. Subcontractor base labor rates and fringe benefits were taken directly from the 2012 R. S. Means Heavy Construction Cost Data and adjusted to Connecticut based on the City Cost Indexes for Hartford, CT.

6. Activity labor costs do not include any allowance for delays between activities, nor is there any cost allowance for craft labor retained on-site while waiting for work to become available.

7. All skilled laborers will be supplied locally and hired by the Decommissioning General Contractor (DGC).

8. The cost for Utility personnel assisting the DGC to develop decommissioning activity specifications is included in the Utility Staff costs.

9. The separate DGC staff salaries, including overhead and profit, were determined by KCES.

10. Transportation costs are based on actual mileage from CY to Memphis, TN processing facility utilized in the estimate.

11. The ISFSI Concrete Pad, VCC exterior concrete and VCC liner steel are assumed to be Class A waste. This waste will be disposed of at the Studsvik processing facility in Tennessee. A disposal rate of $0.13 per pound has been used in this estimate and is based on information provided by Studsvik.

12. The following buildings are disposed of as Clean waste in local landfill. A disposal rate of $91.80 per ton has been used in this estimate and is based on information provided in the 2012 R. S. Means Building Construction Cost Data.

Remove Security Fence, Indust. Fence, Light Towers, Intrusion Sys. and Access Rd Walkway Page 8 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-700, Rev. 0 Electrical Equipment Enclosure Diesel Generator ISFSI Support Building Security Alarm Station Septic System Pumphouse Power to SAS Conduit and wire - SAS to pad Road inside licensed area Vehicle barriers

13. All costs used in these calculations were current on July, 2012.

14. The costs of all required safety analyses and safety measures for the protection of the general public, the environment, and decommissioning workers are included in the cost estimates.

15. It is assumed that all MPCs containing both spent fuel and GTCC will have been removed from site prior to the start of decommissioning.

16. Property taxes are included in the estimate at the current cost of $1,400,000 per year.

17. Fees are included in the estimate at the current cost of $650,000 per year.

18. Insurance costs are included in the estimate at the current cost of $758,073 per year.

19. Legal costs are included in the estimate at the current cost of $200,000 per year.

20. The decommissioning will be performed under the current regulations.

21. Removal of the pad and concrete overpacks will be performed in Tyvek coveralls.

Productivity rates have been adjusted to account for this.

22. No subsurface material is assumed to require remediation regarding radionuclides. This assumption is justified because: 1) the ISFSI area was confirmed to be clean of radiological contaminants prior to the construction of the ISFSI; 2) the ISFSI area will be maintained clean of loose radiological contaminants during the storage period; 3) the irradiated fuel and GTCC waste are stored in sealed canisters; 4) nuclear activation of the VCCs, VCCs liners, and ISFSI pad are anticipated; the activation products will remain fixed during the storage period; and 5) if contamination of subsurface material occurs during decommissioning activities, the contamination is expected to remain below the decommissioning criteria of 25 millirem per year Total Effective Dose Equivalent.

Page 9 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-700, Rev. 0 5.0 SCHEDULE A scenario-specific schedule has been developed for estimate.

Activity durations were determined based on the unit cost factor approach. Plant material inventory quantities were developed from site specific material. Unit rates for cost, man hours and schedule hours were applied to the material quantities. From this calculation the removal or decontamination cost, total man hours and total schedule hours were determined for an activity.

The schedule hours are then entered into the schedule to determine project duration. Two work crews are assumed for the concrete pad and concrete overpacks. All other work was assumed to be performed by one crew. Work outside of the security fence will be performed in parallel with the work inside the fence. The total project duration is 11.93 months.

Figure 5-1 provides the detailed decommissioning schedule.

Page 10 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-700, Rev. 0 Figure 5-1 Project Schedule IU Task Name Curatione Start Finih . .. J St1Cr/a .. Mar

... 23 Quander 1 ] 3rd ader .. . ........ t. mmrter e. tat Quarter

. *..*.. .. Ia Jan .ma a* L

.......  :::  :: :Sep __i::: 0, .::.. :: Jon

. Project Enginst ring 0 days That11214 5 days Thu V'2,114 Wed1/91141 3 Procedure Development and Revniew.- Olilte findI12;J14

'-4" Preprration of QA and Safety Documentss. Otfsl/e 5 days Thu 119114 Toe f/2ft114 S"Site Mobilization and General Employee Training (GET) 3 days Thu 1/91i4 trIo/

MWed 1113114 1120114 ii

..6" Site Mob/izatlon 5 days

.7 . Ganeral Employee Tealning Toe1114il4 Iday Tuo 1121114

.. 8 Sit Specn i Trnining 4 days Toe1/21/14 Man 1117114 q

. Site Preparation - Performed by Staff Wed 1122114 2 days tht 1123/14 10 InitialSite Survey Wed 1122/14 1 day Fri 1124,11. Fri 1124/14

.15 " Setup work areas 1,hu1121114 I day 12 CeDecontamination Reedless Revise Man 1127114 MVnd 11271141

-- "I Di/scaneed. all atiiti/ee 10 workf areas. 2 days Trio1/29114 Wed 1124114, Too 1128/I4 I day Tue M1/814

.14 Electrical Toe 1128/14 0.5 days Ved 1r99/14

..15 Veiveiation Wed 1129114.

0.5 dayS Wed 1/29114 Wad 11291141 17 Removal inside fences 190,02 days. Thu 1130114 Thu "0123114 II

..1" Remrove EEE 0.04 days. Thu 1130/14 Thu 1130/14 1.32.28 days 1.. Remove VCCs 33.74 days Thu 1130/14 Tue 810114 L) 20 ' Eterior Concrete Ta 1V30114 Wed 3/19014 98.74 days 21 Steel liner Wed 3110114 TureW1014 37.44 days Toe 815/14 Thu 9/25/11i4 22 I Re*ove Centroef Pod p

• 3.44 days Thu0012514 Wad 10/22/14 23 1 Remo ne and Towers 01.58days 2*41  : Remove wantiway

• 0.70 days TWo10123/14 Wed 101*2/14 Removal outiede fences Fri 4/18/14 56.35 days. Thu 1130114, "20 Diesel Generator 1i. days! Tru 1130114 ý Fri Vi31114 27 1 ISFSI UppolrtBuilding 6.00 days Fd V/31/14' Mwl 2110114 "2 SAS Building 9.29 days, Fri 2121/14 Mon 2V10114

.. 20 Septic Sysnem 5.65 days Fd 2/21114 Mon3/3/14

.1......

3.00 days Men 313(14. Thu 3/*/4

.3 " Powr I SAS 1.48 days Thu 3/d14 Mon3115114

.32 Conduit and wise - SAS to pod 21.65 days Mon 3/10/14 TUo4/.114

.33" R~rove oad inside licensed area 3.23 days Min 41141141

.Remove vehicle baniers A. 01days Mon 4114114 t Fri 4118114

. ' Final Site Survey Sructaure gone - By OGC Staff 23 daye Thu 10123114 Tua If/25114 30 Prepare Fisal Status Sarvey Plan 5 days IOU10123114 ffha 101301141 37 Sell Sarmypling 5 days Thu 10/30114 Tha 11/014

.4 Tte 11118114i 30-' SSmpling Analysis 0 days Too 11111114

..40 raPPpare Final Stafus S*rney Repoat 5 days Tlo 11118114 TOO 11V25114 5 days 41 0 05. Sils Reletao Confirmlidon Tl. 11/25114 Tua 11125114 42 Outside areas 13.70days Too 111251/4 Fri 13112114 44 43 Brorirfll,0onde, andiseed Demoititon Crew lhnemcbllizatioe 13.70 days 2 days Tl. 1112V/14 Fti 12(12114 Fd IV/21141 Ton 13/10/t14 Tue 12./0/14 4

4' FinalProjectReporo.Offsite t days

.d

...... y..- Tua 12(16/144 Page 11 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-700, Rev. 0 6.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT There are three components to project management during decommissioning, Oversight Staff (staff), Decommissioning General Contractor Staff (DGC) and Security. The person levels for each are identified below.

6.1 OVERSIGHT STAFF The staff size is currently at a level of 18 and is assumed to be maintained at this level and at a similar configuration during the decommissioning. In addition, one final status survey resource will be added and one licensing person will be added to assist in the decommissioning. The staff will provide DGC oversight as well as maintain license compliance. Table 7-1 provides a summary of this staff.

TABLE 6-1 OVERSIGHT STAFF Staff Number President 1 Cask Relicensing Project Manager 1 Workers Concerns Manager 1 Business Manager I ISFSI Manager 2 ISFSI QA Manager I Director Government Relations 1 General Counsel I Business Administrator I Treasurer I Accountant I Benefits Manager I IT Services I ISFSI Operations Specialist 2 Program Manager 1 ISFSI Administrator I Licensing Engineer I Security Manager 1 20 6.2 DECOMMISSIONING GENERAL CONTRACTOR The DGC will be responsible for all of the physical work. The staff will oversee the work crews.,

schedule work and supply HP support. The DGC will be responsible for finishing the project on time and on budget. Table 7-2 provides a summary of the DGC staff.

Page 12 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-700, Rev. 0 TABLE 6-2 DGC STAFF 2012 Person Base Position Salary Level Project Superintendent $148,000 1.00 QA Auditor/Inspector $70,000 1.00 Health & Safety Supervisor $117,000 1.00 Packaging/Shipping Specialist $70,000 1.00 Cost Control Accountant $55,000 1.00 Scheduler II $60,000 1.00 Demolition Specialist $86,000 1.00 Industrial Safety $86,000 1.00 Engineering Supervisor $117,000 1.00 Project Supervisor $79,000 1.00 Decontamination Tech $55,000 2.00 Instrumentation Tech $55,000 1.00 Tool Crib Attendant $43,000 1.00

'14.00 6.3 SECURITY Once spent fuel has been removed from the site the security force will be significantly reduced.

This estimate assumes a force of 13 guards and one manager. This will allow a security person level of 5 guards during work time and two guards all other times. The guard force was assumed to consist of various levels of guards and the rate used has been adjusted accordingly.

Page 13 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-700, Rev. 0 7.0 References

1. R.S. Means, Inc, Building ConstructionCost Data, Kingston, Massachusetts, 2012.

2. Regulatory Guide 1.202, "Standard Format and Content of Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors"

3. NUREG-1 713, "Standard Review Plan for Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors"

4. NUREG- 1757, "Consolidated Decommissioning Guidance, Financial Assurance, Recordkeeping and Timeliness" Page 14 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-700, Rev. 0 APPENDIX A Page 15 of 15

e'Jioi.

'ete'fa Nto ttn

.a -YL ý fo A 10 55 11SF54 CYa.. Y5.4

.a ~

AO.tMS s~t., I~ta nt.

Ctki is Q.5 St c.a i

C5.

ti 611.1 stittetee s"MCM.5e

-'C

.uIN $iesta $Mt itt1tS Stat'eat treat ~iSantts.n Ifift $Sm,1 P " t.0t~12 SI'* tatatt lint, atuni a-t aa.cntnasno at titsm tanAIM uttati MIit Ma? Sit' Umaa 1121ie it MANl/ "itsl tSitl1 tai.tal 00laPt Mn~al.

teu aura, Ma-ate p~wsaffr Va-Ta

$4,WJta ta:si'r to4 ii Cttt.atea atIatn stifle -ON Pito~*t. a-at t~eaktta te sanro*.i.dateeaaawrnasaeeo VatATIM wnita.

Ft.

MINI; IMC Mxlam 2m.? 1.

enst.afrPeiae.nai 25ti7 iattl $ta-Ma ta I' Mill fli St Malee iTAM% win 22557 tat

- - ttt4ta* L5t $100 tam aannntitt.ant MIa.,, teas00M $1ii tmA-l I" tanac~ $0*,148 WSta a-ti MW trWM 1000n% sne IMMj ta-al 4.,*74 tat 20e Mirs so i a-- a-Si14taat -t ta-al itt

• 1147D art? trea tin tea tat itt UV&Oan.S..ataaet*at(OttIati Fit gist $attOs asli3 260ti t040% WPWi a-i tat"

~atoa- Sl-,i W-it annw tsr 1attst 2me, iM teat* titt treat% Mri I MANtii a LF5itatiatins a-W`nn 2tn.1 aa, i SAoanos a-W. atawt Sill it

t. INA ý 1-,a "tf. attss- u....s Ma.*t-ii W s ilnatl teOAr 1'"U" Naml..

teta tie, norflt it ati 05 t

-a- ti'as A $in ea sentI sntatt its tnt% tititi 13 tth~at ta1113 6010M. - "WACO Small- tman a-alt atattit tfteti ti. ScAnt Untie $MMi a-a thM.M -.tti $i-litt, Sta-f iii tita.eata... SIADDAt 612711t04 tinisa tSa.. sýiaa Se4W l- eta-a Uta-i, 25*.43, 1 t MAN

$31026 12 i ttatili*atita taitaitititait.5i ut7ia3-iFS isetTamt. oll saw a-eta-pa-at tes -132 -Git loomnt SMT7 tJWU~

stat-ta-- tittt t"?t tea- tasi tta-al teeetateaa*a.

totoeihf teuttat a tat, Mim lean. M '.tti Vt s-a-b- $11 S tOM 4UE ti'a b ttti Titi is,. tatat tat.. 1t7,.1a 120t tttaieti(n&tnatai it-a-- ttts tail tttat 01til4ttt it tat6~et1* a- iota iMA? tilt a-" i941 til at teat athi xtsttta ist ito ittitna*ttt.*tittea IN- "'lt"

.7at ia." 12" Mfta ton atastitta-

-Ut -a MIaN a- ins3.

10% at.. aili.

Ulmt a-0n MA tsar Atl a,9a-it sotaseti arat a-i"iAft aae 4 0St~i in Eeiettttfibt.iW.

to- -. as tts to- it ant aaats t~tA.an. eta test a-- san eta St a- tin a eta taiae tiata aa.an a- ta-a-t- lea ala attat i--ear.-- stat tate eti-akt.i-a tttt SPe

Cm25042.A V.700. 725206. ,kniftWuCoi, *'5 70*5 V-6-1. ,2 22.0 44,.5~.7 24 10 .,4 52. f 55 752,nd~lS- 7.4700 Wt.l 'Zoo 500 It=42 Yd20 15 V000 S,27tL2 . ., 7.0 710 40 W.

C42 R1571.7 72.04- S1 SO 6 1A27 22y 0

s. 21.2 7*070 7 05 1 1252 2770 2~0 2250 467a 74*22 10 72 15 75 10 75 5.2 .7.5 a So50 671N "I0

- 672 655 WON1 Smt a 12,260 5204*

72,4. 2 I 2*427 SI7M*

1 S074 525.64 I ON 24 SI PAW2 "ON 12.7IN $24.252

-'Sim 1$3M5 . 1. - "I ý

'all 0.27 27 ,6,7, SM to6 6.44 522 Us 015274W 7W. 21A 275 1 5212 17W.5438 la-a 2T." SO I 52520 6428.

7W7qn7 .t7.&,764wf7502 m527217 I5777 572)216 610 2555.4502oa25.,* mm Wr5*30 0575 v20 US 41Al a 570.57 SIM475 Aam*50 W5 SO 0764.45 W0 a4 55.sa5* 52127 57.5 0 0277 o

15 20024575717 64 NO 5 so S5016 W2 64 a4 W4 MIS 5112mg M m72 S7017 50050 5640 IO0 64.50 4 55079. I~a t1 104 n 4o 5755240, 5642750 10 521mm 572,57 0

715 .w. o72.7.52107.2 770.S s4 I.7 26."7 40 750 504.2 24 710 541 0 1 72 S 0 72 71 52A7205 $1*54 17722m sa 7.

"m15 MISS5 so5.0 100 OWD5II 75P25.5.SO 70 500 so5 WISP25o45t.SMml 5064 26#625647S602 6464 456750 55450 a,=

6410l .045.4520 50SIAM 747S.So0 S 44 76 Sss,.s2 7 2442124f t CAAdwk 7750.W.9hm O5a.70470 7 ad"s,.*25, 7h 7 Sala 270.5225 27W 552075 1404 576.52 2 No 20.007 WO, 75064 75 , 5241 54052. 27750M552Q220 TM--25.40.5.00,0 40002 ft .40. 521 .525 704la250.5527 "to0 $600 viSW124205250a07 501 9 520 7.4.41 .2005 A 7t. aam BM 4 5255.57

ý7S-72.52S5b0.4ý $74511 52012 17*07 17521 7257l 5.572 "Ls, 000 52I'm 57 64m.260 UM 44SIA 11.0*0 5010 MAI 5 50227IN 54425 524196 1.4.3 Su W.CftP.,,ft U."I st-

'4*4 07*..3 0s 0.. ~. 20.10.,. 0l.4 O,*.Io I 000. 01 tsooaO00m 0a50. 0400 7,1.0

• 00 0 00 00 010=0.00 Os 7. 01 OOO -050 004 VI..WA WOO000 (20 low0 P .70'0 0.21A 00.000 25.W0 0,0,. 7o.4 0242 *720 101 20 00 007C"(0 20 (1 0 0 *55 1 05.**oooso000 so0 W.00po~d.o I 0.00*00* Sam 05.0 SO00 wftftw ý -s,0ooso I P*W51.04 100 IQ 500 Sftftfodr I OrdaoM 500 0000 0110$.0C.rIsA-h I000'O010 0000 a No0m 0.1000t.Oo*0 I 1000505 00 00 WAG0010 5 1 0 2 I ft0055100 w0 $10"0 1so~..O010 I te, MOle5 1.I U13Z0.~0~0 20 '.0 10 I,, `S` $75021 SAM22 510.-0 $100 M00 10 500 IS$000000 05$1 SO 1012 00170 0700 P7a1 VM0S 10NO 10 Od*os05.

a 000 100 0 24 07.10 VMS0 Il s01006o-O.s It 00 120 40 u0 IAN0 1170 00W won 0 0 0110 10 0100502 5000510 ft 00 "1.-70 0 00 100007 $6.133,56 COMO1 A 7 10 1.S9 R0 0N 307 U4.'" 10 a04 WI.N0 MIN0 1.0 0l00.d0Ž001000S*

2 W,5100- 071000 400 101. 007* 0.7 00.w Nit00 Mm4 0001 150 w 04.0 200 ~ ~~~~~ 4'0 57 On%100 0 10 7. In5 o1110011 005000.00~01074000500O~ 1100.o055s15100oo00.~dos10 0*.

0400555 500.00 l'00t0 110015l20 WAS.4 04" 000 10 v00 A7l901 000 "am 0000 S00 $00 m0 2117 0 7111 1.401 01100 0 0 0 0 to0 0.700 00171000 a7 so $ SO $0 00704.10 SIX.=0.0 A 5NO 10 Sa50 lm1 005001 Mt,"'710 570400 0107.100r 00540 00102 000r 100701..wolc0 1152 F 04k00 I-0

o. 00..5 0 00 $1101"'0 5.010.700 A0507 000011. Ins17 0000am 21 74""F 00000500 011.0005. 0.1700100004001040.0551015000005057020005 10410w 1400 Onto0 000 007.05 0700 1000010 10-50 02 0100.0 10000.5I T.

5.0 On0 000 1000 am0 100 a00 0 6,.4-0 060.50m0 0001 00010 00n00. 00.1 01 S5071011 00105500 Iý12J -ý A 7001 100 -1075. 7101. '00 50777 01070 It Min 700175~~~~ s2 *0 S-&.. 0s1505

--. I000 00 100 0000 0a ,0n 0 40 0.05$1700 .00.15570 100% 7051"33 w0 all*5

.0

.1000 AM004Sa a 0*1 *.770..

$0110 51.50500 SO SIM., 5AM10001 V-104 100t= am00 100 05002000 o W-0510 00 713 55001.570*ON 00 0000.1404, .0 50 05K 00, 000,10010M07040.0501 705570511000000150 0101111100.5550050#70 500. Om55. 007002 70 050.5 .70 N00o007 00 002000*0 11*4055.40 0410 IWO, 10.00lI 1000A 001.00 00 711A 50..0051000500*0*.0 0022.

11 1000 I'm "I00.0100% 000.0 *00 " l;M 30 IS . 41 0u ANS 50100*

7151 co 11 m 0.VW% M0.1 5.00 000 W00 . 7009 704013 0 0.55*0000 1010 "A.0515 000 OW` a I'm 205 .05 '00 107 0000.s.0000 0 ~~ ~ 0a.7 ~ ~ ~

0% n1 0 15 70 515 0 .10 001"2005 00505.1 00001 OO0710400 70.5001. -A51001 0,5500 0 7 0.404.51 an.0 $00 SA0005 5=Goa0 000.0 5.0 0O0 10.10 0 000 1000 710 05.00,001.050. A 5 14 5.1 2 5.00 0710044 1M.. $Iwo

• 4551lt 504 5 10 , 0a 10? 5o.00 070 51*0.0 W-00 10550 0010.07, 100 00000 04 0~ - 07515 V00 00010 .000% 10071 10 -0 &VA".000 11071 0S.

~

5000. 700005 02Iwo072

~ 004,75 05001005 wo

$00 70005$

000 70.15 074000 00000 am.n0 0.

007S1*

C-6.4~ Ywi- lUStSD-..~t e.ssCagPnS Emktw

~~~ ~

8.54 M4tP5.5. ~ ~ 54 ~ ~

t1 "S.0. ~

od oe Ai5 ~ ~ oS Si

. 15 IM 0I.

0S a0 N~l % 4. " 3 .7 1 so? Sul" 1W Ut OS.4*aisa iS ft *000 Lb. uP M 4. s. S S V.: Isis Mw% 23,1 a 4M5 itNi i LU A dns-I Mf an BIG 55 PS an SOa m Sas Vv 6 inm aoil Si amn im Win4 UO misE ".121 177 Ill vvw fh Oa"S 555 II WA~Sif 0.00 -I" Am NOD a.0S) 35 A sail amWONsN SamiSam, O

$.in usm ma MAN

~IC 7tor ma Ins, so s

WOO iV=OS

-at i Slenustt rla..sasorn 05 31Pi Ph-S U M Dow In on urn na. am an *.s 4 55 ,5-li Pmt-SE~

0.*n on 0. *H'i ton

$0i,0 sam aa o0m~ata~l om EM to..,, stoo an tossS6=acn 21 05 55 CE S 155 s a I Sat C S-instý 67 a~a 1. u s* i S. ws i a t IM? MAN V al atiE SE 05% @5 54~~0 d pdd S i oSi.isil.55 SE sa0 OAs :w in5 I0N 1 0E- `4-VO d - 1 D urns o-S 5 E m~, i . oos.nili a I Itt Ia I's itt amss is aS PANaEw$i6019

- -ft ý 0.00tz ila, W-S'.a cot. 05 afl' a Es MPis Rn an a

,of Pablis iIMss it IN b$te5.. IMP. am t Inwn "7.i po.loS I n~

SIn cam% us ams in I'mnsis i M Mstt ~~iV.12 ins iss SOSia I'Ms 1,i 1, M MAot3n3 itee. 1* a iso, MCs as 1w - 1s as RE..

am am "m NO SOam Sam s S as 'IVS. W1110InP P Go 1,3 MOO~ at $4i0 IMiO AEEi-a. W--. P as -. 0E 205 a`,Y n o ~snseti isia~t 1s,04 w- XssWn .at. 40 11tw.. Ia~

waa.

tram~~MW 55 I'm* ISM,551tis Pah, iS1 POS ES 55 R

• AU MA5Ais M MtAN 5ssi s si,5 M0 WOO? 0. Ums" O iiIi iSS" 4201 isOsa, aMWs. 5 sn M* silw 13200 I.~ %tow mm ems w sA"..

-ass2 A*-

-- nRf 5w 0#

t 55 trasi

`IX Ci M lnosAs.NE~ ~l~o ali~sisttotissIsiS~iianuk*.lus-Vn

.e4oVeS.sndsts.diinsiS~~~

%iW

• 5~~

ru

4420000..

00000400..0 000.. 00 040 00

-~.

0~W Log

.4

-0000 I -.

0,4

~~

0.o*0L-0.0 00 45 040 C-0.00 000

-!00.

40 4g So0 No0.4000

• 0 0 001 5

QOO ak0.001*3 Z.,0000 045400 0254*0 r*00.4 AUSY"00 000000.04000020.00 0020in00 y045.000 bt*0000 Am.000 DA0.040 .000 CA"0 0l Ot .

o0 cm Taac peA 0 Uow KM00 0"0o SAO 440 0.0 0.0 .0 obo CA"0,0 04% 000 000 go0 IAo a4SO 4000 1600 0400 4000 220.4 *.It I00 0.00000 2A.o4J40oat 041 SoSo0 Um ISIS,O U. 0010010000k05000000M.0*0.040,04.0e*0w00 oe 4001, mo00 000 I.

A oo00oo 0.0 2.40 0u000200.

00n 5~0*04 040 002% 050 000 I'm 'Do 110010*.4 0800 8000 2~0 00c", o004 0 54000002 71124D #"0% "o0 .0 440 ow Alt, .Md M40 540,0 In0 WI 21000 21-0 02 0800 1040000, Cmo4o ,~o06ý o, row%

0000 m~ 5 SUN000 A.0 WIND 0000 U420 "A0000 000.0 0000*00.044tt 040 0o0 SAO WIN0 0Sam 000 WAS 0.5 0000,.0. 58o0..4o..R.O0040 0W.4 a4 000. 0 mm* MXGn =14.10 00000 00.000 0000.44015 0 On. 005004.0040040000aOOo.

t.04 S 00'000040100002 0 - 100 0 4 a l~~s~ ~ 1 oo*snn,,t SO 0 00n.40.0000.o0400000.10201 000 S5. PmuooorO.0u.Oor.,ftoo 10 0.,o 00 b*

0.00.4 0 0000.0.006400100000040 504 "0040 Soma LA0. SO 00

• t0 IOmW A4 0000 0I= ¶00 00 040 040 0.0 00 000 040 000 5Ulm4 so 00 00 o So So So 4.1T 00¢,040 0000 50040, 40a..blSd A 100 00 000 00 00 WM04 0000.000

• 4 Sam."000 000 .00. OAo0*00 8.4 6,-000.0 W-0o f - . PIP Ma S.40 040 o40 UN* .00

4020 So 0000W00050 Nma on 40 s

=0440 0010 0.00 1 0 . 050~25 6100300 040 040 "to0 0040 -00.0A

~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~

00.4 00.0.4001 004.0000400 ktt 002 02 0400400V 00 0040000.00.0.0 00.220 5044 MA 0

0000 8040 0000g.

IS 000 OM 050.00

""""0000 00l~O0002008 1o.05 stl404 000 0000100000 0010..04000 0000. IS 2i0 54.40 100.AW 121.41# 5I15,04 I7.M 0000040*00.0* 500,00 0*05 0 0400040*3.o0o. Soo; 08.a404004 0 004.0 0.4*00000 4.4.00.

0 002000*0400400 SAM0 0000o.. w0 0 00 04.4*04*00004 0000 V0000502o*30.0 050025000* 00AM 2100*00000 00004024*4*00* low0 21000.4 .0 000*000*

0 0in.40000. 0.04. mo00 vvf0.0040."

0 0040*000*0005004 0 0000000400000000 0*30000 0*00 0 00...... 60040 60100 0000000000.0441*4,0000o00000 00a000004.ao.dooo..O 0,4*0000.

1*00,00. 1400000.6 00040.0 000 00000000000n04 00.00 $V0I00 20.101 W00 04 800 '03 0000 0So 4 000M0 0 004 0

CY-12-064 ENCLOSURE 2 CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL ASSURANCE December 2012

CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL ASSURANCE NRC Licensee:

Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Haddam Neck Plant Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation NRC License No. DPR-61 (NRC Docket Nos. 50-213 and 72-39) 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, CT 06424-3099 Issued to: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Certification:

I hereby certify that Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company is the licensee for the Haddam Neck Plant Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (HNP ISFSI) and that I, the undersigned, am authorized to provide this Certification of Financial Assurance with respect to the radiological decommissioning of the HNP ISFSI.

During the operation of this ISFSI, spent nuclear fuel and Greater than Class C waste will be stored at the HNP ISFSI in storage casks licensed under 10 CFR 72. Pursuant to contracts with the Department of Energy the spent fuel and associated casks will ultimately be removed from the ISFSI location, and HNP will dispose of other radiological waste in accordance with NRC regulations, at which time the HNP ISFSI will be decommissioned in accordance with NRC regulations.

I further certify that financial assurance in an amount sufficient to fund HNP ISFSI radiological decommissioning at the time of such decommissioning has been provided, pursuant to 10 CFR 72.30, as described in the letter to which this Certification is attached. That radiological decommissioning funding assurance is premised on a site-specific decommissioning cost estimate and funding methodology described therein, in the amount of:

Haddam Neck Plant ISFSI $ 17.7 million (inclusive of contingency)

Carla M. Pizzella Connecticut Yan ee Atomiecwer Company Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer Phone (860) 267-6426 x304 Corporate Seal Date k1.A\ J-It J k&.

CY-12-064 ENCLOSURE 3 TOTAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE HNP ISFSI, INCLUDING COST ESTIMATE FOR MANAGING IRRADIATED FUEL AND GTCC WASTE December 2012

Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Irradiated Fuel & GTCC Waste Management and ISFSI Decom Estimate Represented In 2013 Dollars Data r ~i,,, .l Lu

- *ui Q qft4

$510,244 et.4..

0U,,* -.

$532,756

-. M

$547,244 $547,244 C,*..1 0-f* ,1

$493,244 Q -. fn4

$650,744 Q.,,-*~,

$511,256 Q 2

$1,201,487 Cum of 202

$0 Sm f22

$456,177 2013-2023

$5,985,574 Contngency $535,179 GE Morris $1,760,000 $1,760,000 $1,760,000 $1,760,000 $1,760,000 $1,760,000 $1,760,000 $1,760,000 $1,760,000 $0 $0 $15,840,000 Insurance $658,073 $558,073 $558,073 $558,073 $558,073 $558,073 $558,073 $558,073 $558,073 $0 $883,073 $6,005,730 Labor - Non-Manual $1,710,508 $1,726,800 $1,726,800 $1,726,800 $1,726,800 $1,726,800 $1,726,800 $1,726,800 $1,726,800 $0 $838,200 $16,363,108 Labor - Security $2,355,500 $2,355,500 $2,355,500 $2,355,500 $2,355,500 $2,355,500 $2,355,500 $2,355,500 $2,355,500 $0 $0 $21,199,500 Legal Services $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $500,000 $2,300,000 Materials & Supplies $105,000 $95,000 $95,000 $95,000 $95,000 $95,000 $2,745,000 $95,000 $95,000 $0 $5,000 $3,520,000 Miscellaneous $100,500 $100,500 $100,500 $100,500 $100,500 $100,500 $100,500 $100,500 $100,500 $0 $66,500 $971,000 Outside Services - A&G $537,000 $717,000 $827,250 $1,467,000 $1,467,000 $467,000 $467,000 $577,250 $467,000 $0 $356,000 $7,349,500 Outside Services - ISFSI OP's $547,000 $662,000 $752,000 $652,000 $652,000 $572,000 $572,000 $572,000 $572,000 $0 $78,000 $5,631,000 Outside Services - Legal $780,000 $80,000 $330,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $580,000 $330,000 $80,000 $0 $1,030,000 $3,450,000 Property Taxes $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $0 $400,000 $11,200,000 Regulatory Fees $690,000 $690,000 $690,000 $690,000 $690,000 $690,000 $690,000 $690,000 $690,000 $0 $345,000 $6,555,000 Utilities $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $0 $60,000 $600,000 Outside Services - RAD D&D of ISFSI $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,123,604 $0 $18,123,604 Outside Services - NON-RAD D&D of ISFSI $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,794,820 $0 $1,794,820 Sn so Sn Sn Sn $0 SO SO $2,150,000 $0 $0 $2,150,000 tJUIg *IVU* -- rm L*II*

Grand Total - $11,238,760 $10,715,117 $11,187,879 $11,492,117 $11,492,117 $10,358,117 $13,665,617 $10,736,379 $13,216,360 $19,918,424 $5,017,950 $129,038,831 Note 1: The cost of management of irradiated fuel and GTCC waste is calculated as follows:

$129,038,836 Grand Total from Above

($1,794,820) Non-Rad D&D ISFSI 318.123.604) Red D&D ISFSI

$109,120,412 Management of Irradiated Fuel and GTCC Waste Note 2: The cost of RAD and NON-RAD D&D of the ISFSI in 2013 dollars as provided in the column labeled "Sum of 2022" is derived by escalating the value of the cost estimates provided in Enclosure 1 by 2.5%.