BVY 06-042, Bvy 06-042 Attachment 2 - Vermont Yankee Power Station - Basis for Compliance with License Condition 3.M.4
| ML063170201 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vermont Yankee  |
| Issue date: | 10/23/2006 |
| From: | Hofmann S State of VT, Dept of Public Service |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Byrdsong A T | |
| References | |
| 50-271-LR, ASLBP 06-849-03-LR, BVY 06-042, RAS 12430 | |
| Download: ML063170201 (242) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:BVY 06-042 Attachment 2 Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Basis for Compliance with License Condition 3.M.4
Page 1 of 3 Bases for Compliance with License Condition 3.M.4
References:
- 1. ERSTI-04-VY1-1409-000, "Power Ascension Test Procedure for Extended Power Conditions 1593 to 1912 MWt (PATP)
- 2. Vermont Yankee Steam Dryer Monitoring Plan, Revision 3
Purpose:
The Vermont Yankee Steam Dryer Monitoring Plan, Reference 2, incorporates a revision to the Level 1 and Level 2 Limit Curves based on use of the existing Finite Element Model results using 1791 MWt data and a reduction of the limit factor based on the calculated increased in dryer stress intensity based on the 1872 MWt Strain Gage data. This document assesses compliance of Revision 3 to the Vermont Yankee Steam Dryer Monitoring Plan with Vermont Yankee (VY) License Condition 3.M.4. Discussion: On April 22, 2006 VY raised reactor power from 1792 MWt to 1832 MWt. This was followed on April 28, 2006 with power ascension to 1872 MWt. At the 1872 MWt power level, the upper and lower sets of strain gages on the 'A' main steam line provided indications at 143.5 Hz that exceeded the Level 2 Acceptance Criteria of the Steam Dryer Monitoring Plan (SDMP, Rev. 2). VY entered the event into the plant corrective action program and performed an engineering evaluation that concluded that continuous operation at the existing power level (1872 MWt) would not challenge steam dryer integrity. Entergy performed a review of the 1872 MWt data based on the results of the, ANSYS Finite Element Model (FEM) performed at 1791 MWt. This evaluation is contained in VYC-3001, Revision 2, Minor Calculation Change (MCC) 2. This evaluation shows that from 1791 MWt to 1872 MWt the stress on the steam dryer limiting component (gusset shoe) has increased from 2688 psi to 3599 psi. This new stress result from the Acoustic Circuit Model (ACM) method is combined.with the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Stress (599 psi) and results in a conservative reduction in the Level 1 limit factor from 3.53 to 2.64. Entergy also used the FEM results at 1791 MWt and the strain gage data at 1872 MWt to project the estimated total stress at full power (1912 MWt). The combined ACM and CFD stress at 1912 is estimated to be 4050 psi with 236 percent margin to the 13,600psi ASME limit. The use of the strain gage data from 1872 MWt in comparison with the 1791 MWt ACM/FEM results and generation of revised steam dryer limit curves has been assessed against the requirements of License Condition 3.M.4 which states:
"When operating above OLTP, the operating limits, required actions, and surveillances specified in the SDMP shall be met. The following key attributes of the SDMP shall not be made less restrictive without prior NRC approval:
Page 2 of 3 a.. During initial power ascension testing above OLTP, each test plateau increment shall be approximately 80 MWt,
- b. Level I performance criteria; and
- c. The methodology for establishing the stress spectra used for the Level 1 and.
Level 2 performance criteria. Changes to other aspects of the SDMP may be made in accordance with the guidance of NEI 99-04." As described above, License Condition 3.M.4 specifies those attributes of the approach to steam dryer monitoring that require NRC approval prior to being made less restrictive. As addressed below, VY concludes that the key attributes have NOT been made less restricted and, therefore, the proposed model and limit curve changes do NOT require prior NRC approval. The following changes have been incorporated into the VY approach to steam dryer monitoring:
- 1. An updated Level 1 Limit Curve representing a conservative reduction of the Level 1 Limit Factor from 3.53 to 2.64 based on the values obtained in the 1872 MWt FEM/Strain Gage evaluation. The methodology for calculating the proposed limit curve factors at 1872 MWt is unchanged from themethodology employed for calculating the limit curve factors at the 1791 MWt power ascension plateau.
- 2. The FEM/Strain Gage Evaluation is based on using the results of the FEM performed using inputs from the last ACM runs (at the power ascension plateau of 1791 MWt) and, after determining the sensitivity of the FEM for each key in-plant acoustic frequency, calculating the change in the FEM results for the given Strain Gage changes. No new methodologies are employed to calculate these results. This technique for calculating the governing component stress intensity at 1871 MWt continues to rely on the governing principal of linear stress analysis in that a structure will experience an. increase in stress intensity linearly with an increase in applied load.
This revision of the SDMP was evaluated against the criteria in License Condition 3.M.4 to determine if NRC approval is required as summarized below:
- a. This revision proposes no change in the test plateau increments from those specified in the criteria.
- b. The Level 1 performance criteria is defined as a limit curve for strain gage results that represents a stress on the dryer equal to the ASME Design Limit of 13.6 ksi minus the calculated total model and measurement uncertainty. The updated. limit curves still represent the ASME criteria minus the calculated uncertainty.
- c. The methodology for establishing stress spectra for the Level 1 and Level 2 criteria is not altered by this change.
Page 3 of.3 As required by License Condition 3.M the dryer component stress intensities are generated from the FEM. Post-processing of the FEM generates the relative contribution of the significant in-plant forcing function frequencies. The changes in main steam line strain gage
.readings at these frequencies are then input into the calculation to develop a new resultant stress. This revised, conservatively determined stress is then used to generate revised Level. 1 and Level 2 limit factors and maintains the same ACM/FEM linearity and employs the same uncertainty values.
The above changes were evaluated using the guidance provided in NEI 99-04.:
== Conclusion:==
- 1. Based on the analysis performed using VYNPS Strain Gage data taken at the 1872 MWt plateau and employing the use of the frequency sensitivities generated by the ANSYS FEM there is significant margin to the ASME fatigue limit and the final 40 MWt power ascension is not expected to result in challenge to the Level 1 Limit Curve.
- 2. The SDMP has not been made less restrictive by the changes, made to the generation of the Level 1 Limit Factor based on the FEM/Strain Gage evaluation.
Therefore, prior NRC approval is not required to implement these changes. Preparer: Craig Nichols "- . . Name Signature -at Reviewer: James Callaghan - . Name Sip4 r Date Approver: John Dreyfuss
I Entergy Nuclear Northeast Eniergy Nuclear OCperaionc, Inc. Vermonl Yankee. P.O. Box 0500 185 Old Ferry Road
.,ralleborc, V/T C5307-050C TOe 802 257 5271 Mr. William Sherman May 17,2006 Vermont Public Service Department Vermont State Nuclear Engineer 112 State Street Montpelier, Vermont 05602 Dear Mr. Sherman; This letter is in response to your letter of May 12, 2006 requesting additional information related to the Power Ascension Tests (PAT) in accordance. with the requirements of the Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") dated February 14, 2006 (Stipulation condition 1). Enclosed please find:
1. Actual Strain vs. Frequency curves, plotted with the limit curves, for the eight steam line locations ,for each step 'reported to NRC
- 2. Expanded (Detailed) Actual Strain vs. Frequency curves, plotted with the limit curves, for the eight steam line locations for each step reported to NRC
- 3. Accelerometer Results for Steam Lines inside the Drywell for each step reported to NRC
- 4. Moisture Carryover Results for each step reported to NRC If you should have any further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.
~rely; David K. McElwee Senior Liaison Engineer cc: Ted Sullivan - Site VP - w/o attachments David O'Brien - Commissioner VDPS - w/o antachmnents Docket No. 7195 Attiachmeni. 13-5 173 Pages
Reactor Building MSL A1 ,A2,A3 1 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers i.0E+00 1.0E-01 S N N 1.OE-02 C, 1.0E-03 1.0E-034"" Frequency, Hz Basline ACCGMSL. A_1_N-S
- ACCMSLA 1 N-S - 2.87A2 X Baseline ACC MSL A 1 N-S 1.CE+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 .,
- 1.CE-03 1 CE-04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSL A 2 Vert
/
AGCMSLA_2_Vert 2.87A2 X Baseline ACC MSL.A_2_Vert 1.OE+0C 1.0E-01 I N 1.0E-02 E C,
.0E-03 1.0E-04 Freouencv. Hz Basline ACCMSL A 3 E-W i ACCGMSLA_3_E-W 2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSL_A 3_E-W
\\Vysharedl\FroJects\DAC Data\BaselineData_1593_MWt\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B1 ,B2 2 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 1.CE-03 1.CE-04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSL-B 1.N-S
* -ACCMSL_B_1 N-S 2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSL B 1_N-S 1.0E-01I,-
I N
- 1. 02 tE-0 2
CD 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 * ........ Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSLB_2_E-W S ACCMSLB_2_E-W 2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSL B 2 E-W
\\Vyshared1\Projects\DAC Data\Baseline Data 1593_MWt\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B3,B4,B5, 3 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0E+00 1.OE-01 E In 1.OE-02 0 1.OE-03 - 1.OE-04 * -.. M. "*"* . . . Frequency, Hz
-ACCMSLB_3_N-S -- 2.87^2 X Baseline Acc MSL B 3 N-S Basline ACCMSL B 3 N-S 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 N
N In 1.0E-02 0 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 - Frequency, Hz S ACC_MSLB_4_Vert -2.87A2 X Baseline ACC MSL B 4 Vert Basline ACCMSLB_4_Vert 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 t 1.OE-02 I.oE-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz ACCMSLB_5_E-W 2.87A2 X Baseline ACCOMSLB_5_E-W BaslineACCMSL B 5 E-Wý
\\Vysharedl \Projects\DAC Data\Easeline Data_1593_MWt\DryerAC C\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B6,B7 4 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0E+00 ,. #* 1.OE-02 I - 1.GE 03 10E-04 Frequency, Hz ACCMSLB_6_N.-S 2.87"2 X Baseline ACCMSLB_6_N-S. Basline AcCMSLB_6_N-S 1.OE+O01, * - 1.OE-02 -- 1 GE-03 a% . , ; 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz
-ACCMSL B 7 E-W -2.87A2 X Baseline ACC MSL B 7 E-W Basline ACCMSL B 7 E-W \\VyshAred 1\FroIectS\DAC Data\EaselineData1.1593_MWt\D ryerACC\Dryer_Accel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B8,29,B10 5 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.0E--02 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSL B 8 N-S
-ACC_ MSLB_8_N-S -- 2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSL B_8_N-S 1.0E+O00**
N 1.0E-02 1.0E-03>- 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSL-B-9 Vert 2.87A2 X Baseline ACC MSLB 9_Vert __! ACC MSL B 9 Vert, 1.0E+00 1.0E:01 1 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 Freauencv. Hz 2.87^2 X Baseline ACC MSL_B_10_E-W Basline ACCMSL B 10 E-W! ACCMSLB_10_E-W
\\Vyshared 1\ProJects\DAC Data\EaselineData_1 593_MWt\DryerACC\Dryer.Accel.xls
Reactor Building MSL C1 ,C2,C3 6 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 N z N 1.0E-02 .0 1.OE-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz
-ACCMSLC_1_N-S -2.87^2 X Baseline ACCMSLC_1_N-S Basline ACCMSL C_1_N-SI I
1.0E+00* 1.OE-01 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz
-ACCMSL-C_2_Vert 2.87^2.X Baseline ACCGMSL C_2_Vert Basline ACCMSLC_2_Vert
*1.OE'-00 i.CE-Ol 1.0 E-04 Freauenc-,H ACC_MSLC_3_E-W 2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSLC_3_E-W BaslineACCMSL C_3_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Easeline Data I 593_MWt\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL D1,D2. D3 7 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0E+00 1.OE-01 N S N IA 1 ýOE-02 2 C, 1.0E-03 ** Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSLD0_1_N-S
- ACC_MSL D 1 N-S 2.87A2 X Baseline ACC MSL D 1 N-S 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 S.OE-04" Frequency, Hz
-AccMSL_D_2_Veitl - 2.87A2 X Baseline ACC_MSL_0_2_Veil Basline ACCMSLD02_Vert 1.0E+00 1.CE-01 I
1.0E-02 2 C, 1.0E-03 1.CE-04 Frequency, Hz ACCMSLD 3_E-W 2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSL D 3 E-W Basline ACCMSLD_3_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\BaselineData 1593_MWt\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL D4,D5' 8 of 8 Dryer Accelerormeters (. ) 1.0E400 1.0E-01 E 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz 2.87^2 X Baseline ACC MSLD04_N-S BaslineACCMSLD 4_N-S
-- ACCcMSLD_4_N-S 1.0Eý00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 1 GE 03 . ..-
. ~
-+/- r
.'*-1-requency, 1.0E-04 1 12: --
1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz SAccC MSL D 5_E-W 2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSLD05_E-W Basline ACCMSLD_5_E-W:
\\Vysharedl \Projects\DAC Data\BaselineData_1 593_MWt\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL A1,A2,A3 1 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers I .OE+O00 1.0E-01 C 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 I 1.0E-04W Frequency, Hz
-- ACCMSL A 1 N-S 2.8712 X Baseline ACCMSL A 1 N-S Basline ACCMSL A 1 N-SI 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 N
S N N 1.0 E-02 E C, 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz
-ACCMSLA_2_Vert -- 2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSLA_2_Vert Basline ACCMSLA_2_Vert 1.OE+00 1.QE-01 1.0E-02 E
1.OE-03 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz
- ACCMSL A 3 E-W - 2.87^2 X Baseline ACCMSL A 3 E-W Basline ACCMSLA_3_E-W
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1000---1633Mwt--Set 1\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B1,B2 2 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 , 1.0E-02 E 1.0E-03 1.oE-04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSL B _1N-S
-ACCMSLB_1_N-S -2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSL B 1 N-S 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 .. .... ... Frequency, Hz
- ACCMSL_B_2_E-W -- 2.87^2 X Baseline ACCMSLB_2_E-W Basline ACCMSLB_2_E-W;
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1000---1633Mwt--Set 1\DryerACC\Dryer.Accel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B3,B4,B5 3 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 E 1.0E-02 ND 1.0E-03 f . .... 1.OE-04 [ - - Frequency, Hz
-ACCMSL_B_3_N-S -2.87^2X Baseline ACCMSL 8 3 N-S Basline ACCMSL 8 3 N-S 1.OE+00 1.0E-01
¶C1.OE-02 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSL B 4 Verti i
- ACCMSL_B_4_Vert - 2.87^2 X Baseline ACCMSL_B_4_Vert 1.0E400 777>-j 0 - -- ~ ----- - h I
N 1.0E-02 C, 1.0E-04 IE 4 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSLB_5_E-W ACC MSL B 5 E-W -2.872 X Baseline ACC MSL B 5 E-W
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1000---16,-3Mwt--Set 1\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B6,B7 4 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.OE÷O0 1.OE-01 I 1.OE-02 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz
- 2.87A2X Baseline ACCMSLB_6_N-S Basline ACCMSL-B-6 N-S
-ACC_MSLB_6_N-S 1.OE÷O0 0
1.OE-01 N S N 'C 1.OE-02 S C, 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 J Frequency, Hz
-ACCMSL_B,7 E-W - 2.87^2 X Baseline ACCMSL B 7 E-W Basline ACCMSL B 7 E-W
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1000---1633Mwt--Set l\DryerACC\DOrer_Accel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B8,B9,B1O 5 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0E+00 1.0E-0 1.OE-02 1.0E-03 1 0E-04 Frequency, Hz
- ACCMSL B 8 N-S -2.87 2XBaseline ACCMSL B 8 N-S Basline ACCMSL B 8 N-S!
I.0E+00 7 1.0E-02 N I N C 1.0E-02 E 0 1.0E-03 1.0E-D4 Frequency, Hz CA ACCMSL B 9 Vert 2.87^2 X Baseline ACCMSLB_9_Vert Basline ACC-MSL B 9 Vert 1.0E+O0 1.CE-01 I, E 1.0E-02 1.CE 04 Freuency Hz ACCMSLB 10 E-W 2.8712 X Baseline ACC MSL B 10 E-W Basline ACC MSLB_10_E --W!
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 03 04 1000---1633Mwt--Set 1\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL c1,C2,C3 6 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0E+00 1 GE-Ol 1OE-02 1, 1.0 E-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSLC01 N-S
-ACCMSL C 1 N-S 2.87^2 X Baseline ACCOMSLC_1_N-S 1.0E+00 1.OE-01 'C4 1.0E-02 IE 1.0E-03 1.0&E04 J.................'
Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSLC02_VertI
-ACC_MSL_C_2_Velt *2.87^2 X Baseline ACCGMSLC_2_VerL 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 N
I N
'C 1.OE-02 E
C, 1.OE-03 1.0E-04 '... Frequency, Hz B i Basline ACCMSL C 3 E*-WI
-ACCMSLC 3_E-W -- 2.87^2X Baseline ACCGMSLC_3_E-W
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1000---1633Mwt--Set I\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL D1,D2. D3 7 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0E&00 1.OE-01 N S N
'C 1.0E-02 C,
1.0E-03 " * ,.,'** ***a*** 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz
-7_AccMSL_D_1_N-S -- 2.87'2 X Baseline ACCMSLD_1_N-.S Basline ACCMSL D 1IN-S 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.OE 04 X Baseline ACCMSL D_2_Vert Basline ACCMSLD02_Verti
-ACC MSL D_2_Vert -2.87A2 1.OE+00 ---- ----
,M. _ _ _ .
Lb 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz ACCMSLD03_E-W Basline ACCMSLD03_E-W ACC MSL D 3 E-W - 2.87i2 X Baseline
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1000 --- 1633Mwt--Set 1\DryerACC\Dryer Accel.xls
Reactor Building MSL D4,D5 8 of 8 Dryer' Accelerometers 1.0E+00w t.0E-01 S N 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSLD04_N-S
- ACC MSL D 4 N-S 2-87A2 X Baseline ACC MSL D 4 N-S 1.OE*00 1.0E-01 N
S N U, 1.0E-02 E 0 1.0E-03 1.02-04 ~- Frequency, Hz t Basline ACCMSLD 5_E-W
-ACCMSLD_5_E-W -2.87 2X Baseline ACCGMSLD05_E-W
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1000---1633Mwt--Set 1\D rye r_ACC\Dryer.Accel.xls
Reactor Building MSL A1 ,A2,A3 1 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 2 1.E -02 1.OE-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz Basline.ACCMSL A 1iN-S ACC-MSL A 1 N-S - 2.87^2 X Baseline ACC MSL A 1 N-S 1.0E+00
.10E-O1 N.
1.0E-02 E
.0E-03 1.0 E -04 J .. .. . . .. . . .... . . . .. .
Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSL A 2 Vert I
- ACCMSL A 2 Vert -2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSLA_2_Vert 1.0E+00 . 7-7;2:
20 D -460-~~ 60 -' 100 2 1.0E-01 I C SC.E-02 E 1.0E-03 1.CE-04 Frequency, Hz 2.87'2 X Baseline ACCMSL_A_3_E-W Basline ACCMSLA_3_E-W
- ACCMSL A 33E-W
\\Vyshared1\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1800---1671 Mwt--Set 1\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B1,B2 2 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.OE+O0 - 3 1.OE-02 1.0E-03,,* 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSLB_1_N-S ACCMSLB_1 N-S 2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSL B 1 N-S 1.0E+00 1.OE-01 Cm 1.OE-02 1,OE-03 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSLB_2_E-W
-ACCMSL_B_2_E-W - 2.87^2 X Baseline ACC MSL B 2 E-W
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1800---1671 Mwt--Set I \DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B3,B4,B5 3 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.OE+0-C,1 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSL B 3 N-S:
- ACcMSLB 3_N-S -- 2.87`2X Baseline ACCMSLB_3 N-S 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 S
N N 1.OE-02 E 0 1.0E-03 1.0E-04.. Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSLB_4_Vert
=ACC MSL B 4 Venrt- 2.87^2 X Baseline ACC MSL B 4 Vert S 1.GE-02 " -. . . .. . .. '
In E 0 1.0E-03
- - -- ~"-c~-~9~ "~j K-------------
~-,g$'-%,-'-3/4---&z -- At,, -A-
.00-04 -k.......... Vt. -- ~ -
i .0E-04 J '::" "'""*"*" ... .. . Frequency, . .Hz
-2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSLB_5_E-W Basline ACCMSLB_5_E-W
-ACC_MSLB_5_E-W
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1800---1671Mwt--Set 1\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B6,B7 ' 4 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers UU 1 .OE40O 0~ 1.ME-0a g 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz
*ACCMSLB_6_N-S -2.87^2 X Baseline ACCMSLB_6_N-S Basline ACCMSLB_6_N-S 1.OE*00 1.0E-01 S
N 1.OE-J2 E C, I.OE-03 1 C.E-04... Frequency, Hz
-ACCMSLB_7_E-W *2.87A2X Baseline ACCMSLB_7_E-W Basline ACCMSLB_7_E-W
\\Vysharcdl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1800--- 1671Mwt--Set 1\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B8,B9,B10 5 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0E00 *
- 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 E
1 0E-03*-:* 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCGMSL B 8 N-S S-_ACC_MSL_B_8_N-S -2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSLB_8_N-S 1.OE+00 *- - 1.0E-01
- S N* 1.OE-02 1.0E-03 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSL B 9 Vert!
AGOMSLB_9_Vet 2.87^2 X Baseline ACCMSL B 9 Vert 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 - -k S N 1.0E-02 N S C, 1.0E-03rP 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz ACCMSL B 10 E-W -- 2.87'2X Baseline ACCGMSLB_10_E-W Basline ACCMSLB_10_E-W,
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1800---1671 Mwt--Set 1\DryerACC\Dryer_Accel.xls
Reactor Building MSL C1 ,C2,C3 6 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.OE+00 1 .E-01
*~1.0E-02 1.OE-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSL-C_1_N-S
-ACC_MSL_C_1_N-S 2.87^2 X Baseline ACCMSL C 1 N-S 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 N
N 1.0E-02 C, 1.OE-03 1.0E-04 ....... ." 1"4Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSL C_2_Vert A*CcMSLC_2 Vert -- 2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSL C_2_Vert 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 I N 1.OE-02 E 1.0E-03 Frpnupmrv. H, Freýuencý Hz Basline ACCMSL C 3_E-W
-ACC_MSL_C_3_E-W - 2.87^22XBaseline ACCMSLC_3_E-W
\\Vyshared l\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1800---1671 Mwt--Set l\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL D1,D2. D3 7 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0F*00 1.0E-01 1.OE-02 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz rACC_MSLD_1_N-S -- 2.87^2X Baseline ACC MSL D 1 N-S Basline ACCMSLD01_N-S 1.0E+00 0 1-.E-01 N S N In 1.OE-02 2 C, 1.OE-03 -2 .. .. Frequency, Hz
- ACCMSL_D_2_Vert -2.87^2 X Baseline ACCMSLD02_Vert Basline ACCMSLD02_Vert 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 N
1.0E-02 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz 2.87A2X Baseline ACC MSL D 3 E-W Basline ACCMSLD03 E-Wr
-ACCMSL D 3 E-W --
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1800---1671 Mwt--Set i\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL D4,D5' 8 of 8 Dryer Accelerormeters (O 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 N 1.0E-02 S CD 1.0E-03 1 OE 04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSLD_4_N-S
*-ACCMSLD_4_N-S -- 2.87A2X Baseline ACC MSLD04_N-S i .OE+00 1.OE-01 S
N 1.0E-02 S C, 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 I . " Frequency, Hz
-*AGOMSLD_5_E-W -2.87"2 XBaseline ACC MSL D 5 E-W Basline ACCMSL_0_5_E-WI
\\Vysharedl\projicts\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1800---1671 Mwt--Set 1\DrverACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL A1 ,A2,A3 1 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 E 1.0E-02 3 1.0E.-03 1,0E--04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSLA_1_N-S i . ACCMSLA_1_N-S - 2.87^2 X Baseline ACCGMSL A_1_N-S I 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 N N 1.0E-02 S C, 1.0E-03 1.0E-04.. . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .... . . . . . ... . ..Frequency,
. . . . . Hz Basline ACCMSLA_2_Vert ACCMSLA_2_Vert -2.87A2 X Baseline, ACCMSL A 2 Vert 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 w 7
S 1.CE-02 S CD 1.CE-03 1.CE-04 Frecuencv, Hz ACC_MSL A 3 E-W 2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSLA_3_E-W Basline ACCMSLA_3_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04_01 1800---1752Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DrverACC\Dryer, Accel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B1,B2 2 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers (',J 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1,0E-02 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz 2.87^2 X Baseline ACCMSLB_1_N-S Basline ACCMSLB_1_N-S
-ACCMSL_B_I_N-S 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz ACC_MSL_B_2_E-W - 2.87"2X Baseline ACCMSLB_2_E-W Basline ACCMSLB_2_E-W.
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_01 1800---1752Mwt Set 2 Record S4et\DryerACC\D rye rAcceL I.xs
Reactor Building MSL B3,B4,B5 3 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 S N C 1.OE-02 C, 1.0E-03 1 OE-04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSLB_3_N-S
-ACC MSLB_3_N-S -2.87A2 X Baselne ACC MSL B 3 N-S 1.0E+00 ..
1.0E-01 1.oE.o 1.E0 SAP-1.0E-04 *Frequency, Hz I*ACCMSLB_4_Vert 2.87"2 X Baseline ACC MSL B 4 Vert Basline ACC MSLB4Vert B4Vr i ACML64Vr 1.0E+00 i.0E-01 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 Frecuencv. Hz Basline ACCGMSLB_5_E-W ACCMSLB_5_E-W 2.87A2 X Baseline ACCGMSL B_5_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_01 1800---1752Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B6,B7 4 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 A 1.OE-02 1.0E-03 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACCMSLB_6_N-S
-ACCMSLB_6_N-S 2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSLB_6_N-S 1.OE÷00 1.OE-01 1.0E-02 Cj 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz BaslineACCMSL B 7 E-W ACCMSL B 7 E-W 2.87A2 X Baseline ACC MSL B 7 E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_01 1800---1752Mwt Set 2 Record S et\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B8,B9,B1O 5 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.OE400 1.0E-01 1.OE-02 1.OE-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz Basline ACC MSLB_8_N-S
- ACC_MSL_B_8_N-S 2.87"2X.Baseline ACC MSL B 8 N-S 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 S1.0E-02 1.0E-O3 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz 2.87^2 X Baseline ACCMSL B 9_Vert Basline ACCMSLB_9 Verlt I
-ACC_MSL B 9 Vert 1.GE-GO N
1.0E02 1.GE 04 Freouencv. Hz ACC-MSLB-10E-W 2.87^2 X Baseline ACC_MSL_B_10 E-W Basline ACCMSLB_10_E-W.
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_01 1800---1752Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
'Reactor Building MSL Cl,2,C3 6 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 I
N N 1.0E-02 C, 1.OE-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz
- ACCMSLC_1_N-S - 2.87^2 X Baseline ACC MSL C 1 N-S Basline ACCMSL-C-1-N-S I .OE+O0
_60 120~ 0 1.0E-01 N 1.0E-02 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 ...... Frequency, Hz ACC_MSL-c_2_Vert 2.87^2 X Baseline ACCMSLC_2_Vert ,Basline ACCMSLC_2_Vert 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 1.OE-03 1.0E-04 Frenuc+/-nrv Hz Frenuencý Hz ACC_MSL_C_3_E-W 2.87^2 X Baseline ACCMSLC_3_E-W Basline ACC_MSL C 3_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_01 1800---1752Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerACC\Dryer.Accel.xls
Reactor Building MSL D1,D2,D3 7 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0Et00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 C,1 1.02-03 1 Mg 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz
- ACCMSL-D_1,N-S - 2.87 2 X Baseline ACCMSLD_1_N-S BaslineACCMSL D 1 N-S 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.OE-02 C .
1.0 2-03 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz
! ACCMSLD_2_Vert 2.87A2 X Baseline ACCMSLD02_Vert Basline ACCMSLD_2_Vert 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 E
1.OE-03 1.OE-04 .. Frequency. Hz ACCMSL D 3 E-W 2.87A2 X Baseline ACC MSL D 3 E-W Basline ACC_MSL D 3 E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_01 1800---1752Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerACC\Dryer_Accel.xls
Reactor Building MSL D4,D5 8 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 w 1.0E-02 E 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 . Frequency, Hz I, Basline AGO_MSLD_4_N-Sj
- ACCMSL D 4 N-S - 2.87A2 X Baseline ACC MSL D 4 N-S 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 E
1.0E-03 1.0E-04 - Frequency, Hz
ý2.87A2 X Baseline ACCGMSLD05_E-W Basline ACCGMSL_0_5_E-W
- ACCGMSLD_5_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_01 1800---1752Mvvt Set 2 Record Set\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL A1 ,A2,A3 1 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0E+00 1.OE-01 1.0E-03 1.0OE-04 Frequency, Hz
-- 4.24A2 X 1593 MWth Base ACCMSL A 1-N-SI
-: ACCGMSL A_1_N-S Basline ACCMSL_A _1 N-S
.oE+o00 1.E N 1.0E-02 C,
1.OE-03 1.0 E-04 .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . Hz
...Frequency, .. . . .. . . . . . . .. ...
-ACCMSLA 2 Vert 4.24A2 X 1593 MWth Base ACCGMSLA_2_Vert i Basline ACCMSLA 2 Vert 1.0Et00 i.0E-01 1J1.OE-02 0
1.0E-O3 1.0E-04 cy, Hz 4.24A2 X 1593 MWth Base ACCMSL_A_3_E-W ACCMSL_A_3_E-W Basline ACC MSL A 3 E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_06 1000---1792Mwt Set 1 Record Set\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL BI,B2' 2 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers (> 1.OE÷00 1.E0E-01 N S N 1.0E-02 S CD 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 ...... . Frequency, Hz S-ACCMSLB_1_N-S - 4.24`2 X 1593 MWth Base ACC_MSLB_1_N-S Basline ACCMSL B_1 N-S 1.0E+00 1.OE-01 1, 1.OE-02 E 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz 4.24A2 X 1593 MWth Base ACCMSLB_2_E-W ACCMSL_B_2_E-W Basline ACC MSLB_2_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_06 1000---1792MM Set 1 Record Set\DryerACC\DryerAccel .xls
Reactor Building MSL B3,B4,B5 3 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 N I N 1.0E-02 0 1.OE-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz
-- 4.24A2 X 1593 MWth Base ACCMSL B 3 N-S
-ý ACC MSLB_3_N-S Basline ACC MSL-B 3 N-S 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 E 1.OE-02 1.0E-03 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz ACCMSL B 4_Vert 4.24A2 X 1593 MWth Base ACCMSL B 4 Vert 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.OE-02 E
1.0 E-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz ACCMSL_B_5_E-W 4.24"2 X 1593 MWth Base ACC MSL B 5 E-W BaslineACC MSL_B 5_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 06 1000---1792Mwt Set 1 Record Set\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B6,B7 , 4 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers I ,OE+O0 1.0E-01 1.0E-02
* .OE-03 1.0OE-04 Frequency, Hz
-- 4.24A2 X 1593 MWth Base ACCMSLB_6_N-S-AGCCMSL_B_6-N-S Basline ACC MSL B_6_N-S 1.OE-00 1.0E-01 N
S N 1.0 E-02 1.0 E-03 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz 4.24 A2 X 1593 MWt h Base AGOMSL_ B_7_-W ACCGOMSL_B_7_E-W Basline ACC MSL B 7_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_06 1000---1792Mwt Set 1 Record Set\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Reactor Building MSL B8,B9,B1O 5 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.0E+00 1.OE-01 E 1 .OE-02 (D 1.OE-03 v - Frequency, Hz
--- ACCGMSLB_8_N-S -- 4.24A2 X 1593 MWth Base ACCMSLB_8_N-S i- Basline ACC MSL B_8_ N-S 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 N
1.OE-02 IC 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz 4.24A2 X 1593 MWth Base ACCMSLB_9 Vert 11
-ACC _MSLB_9_Vert Basline ACC MSLB 9 Vert 1.OE ÷00 j.OE-01 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 2v2
&44-~7[:A -
Frequeincv. Hz ACCMSL_ B_10_E-W 4.2412 X 1593 MWth Base ACCMSLB_10 E-W. Basline ACCMSLB10-E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_06 1000 --- 1792Mwt Set 1 Record Set\DryerACC\DryerAccel .xls
Reactor Building MSL C1,C2,C3 6 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers C, 1.0E+00
'0 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz
-- 4.24A2 X 1593 MWth Base ACCMSLC 1-N-S
-ACC MSL C 1 N-S Basline ACC MSL C_1_N-S 1.OE+00 1.OE-01
.~1.OE-02 1 .0E-03 1.0E-04 Frequency, Hz
-ACCMSL_C_2_Vert 4.24A2 X 1593 MWth Base ACCMSL C_2_Vert Basline ACC MSL C 2 Vert 1.0E*00 1.0E-01
- 1.OE-02 1.0E-03 1OCE-04 Frequency, Hz 4.24A2 X 1593 MWth Base ACCMSL_C_3_E-W ACCMSL_C_3_E-W Basline ACCMSL C_3_E-W
\\Vysharedl1\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006-04_06 1000---1792Mwt Set 1 Record Set\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
¥ Reactor Building MSL D1,D2,D3 7 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers
- 1. E+00 1OE-01 N
z N L6 1.OE-02 2 0 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz
-- 4.24A2 X 1593 MWth Base ACCMSL D1 N-S
-ACCMSLD iN-S BaslineACC MSL D 1 NS 1 0E+00 1OE-01 S
N 1 .OE-02 2 0 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 r--r--n Frequency, Hz 4.24A2 X 1593 MWth Base ACCMSLD_2_Vert
-ACCMSLD_2_Vert Basline ACC MSLKD 2 Vert 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 NI 1.OE-02 0.
1.OE'03 1.OE-04 Frequency, Hz ACCMSLD_3_E-W 4.24"2X1593MWthBaseACCMSLD03_E- W Basline ACCMSLD_3_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_06 1000---1792Mwt Set 1 Record Set\DryerACC\Dryer Accel.xls
Reactor Building MSL D4,D5' 8 of 8 Dryer Accelerometers 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 1.OE-04 .Frequency, Hz
- ACCMSL_D_4_N-S - 4.24A2 X 1593 MWth Base ACCMSLD_4_N-S Basline ACC MSL 0_4_N-S 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 . .. .. ...
Frequency, Hz 4.24A2 X 1593 MWth Base ACCMSLD_5_E-W
' ACCMSLD_5_E-W Basline ACC MSL-D-5E-W
\\Vysharedl.\ProjectS\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_06 1000---1792Mwt Set 1 Record Set\DryerACC\DryerAccel.xls
Dryer Accelerometer /YC-3001 Rev'2 Att C C.3.1 of C.3.8 PSD Data Baseline Factored MSL A1 ,A2,A3 Curves based on 1791 MWth Data 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 E
; 1.OE-05 1.0E-06 1.0E-07 Frequency, Hz 3.53A2.XBaselineACCMSL A 1 N-S Baseline ACCMSL A 1 N-S
-- ACCMSL A 1 N-S 1.6E-02 -g C "
- 1.0E-04 N M 1.0E-05 .
1.0E-06 1.OE-07 .. Frequency, Hz 3.53A2 X Baseline ACCMSLA_2_Vert Baseline ACCMSL A 2 Vert
. ACC_MSLA_2_Vert 1.E-02 1.E 03 iE
- 1. 05 1.0E-06__ -
1.OE-07 Freauencv. Hz 3.53A2 X Baseline ACCMSL A 3 E-W Baseline ACCMSLA_3_E-W ACCMSLA_3 E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100---1832Mwt Set 2 Record set\DryerACC\DryerAccel.RI .xls
Dryer Accelerometer IYC-3001 ReV 2 Att C C.3.2 of C.3.8 MSL B1,B2 PSD Data Baseline Factored Curves based on 1791 MWth Data 1.0E-01 . 1.OE-02 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 1.0E-05 1.0E-06 1.0E-07 Frequency, Hz Baseline ACCMSL B_ _N-S
- ACCMSL_B_1_N-S - 3.53A2 X Baseline ACCMSLB_1_N-S 1.0E-O2.
1.0E-O3 I I 1.0E-04 E 1.OE-06 1.0E-07 . .. . . .... Frequency, Hz
. ACCMSL_B_2_E-W. 3.53A2XBaselineACCMSLB 2 E-W BaselineACC_MSLB_2_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100---1832Mwt Set 2 Record set\DryerACC\Dryer.Acce_RI .xls
Dryer Accelerometer IYC-3001 Rev 2 Att C C.3.3 of C.3.8 PSD' Data Baseline Factored MSL B3,B4,B5 Curves based on 1791 MWth Data 1,0E-02 i-,*.i 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 i 1.OE-05 1.0E-06 1.OE-07 Frq.uencyKz Baseline ACC_MSLB_3_N-S
- ACC_MSLB_3_N-S - 3.53A2 X Baseline ACCMSLB 3_N-S 1.0E-02 1.OE-03 x 1.0E-04 1.OE 1.0E-06 1.0E,-07 Frequency, Hz Baseline ACC_MSL B 4 Vertl i ACCMSLB_4_Vert 3.53A2 X Baseline ACCMSL B 4_Vert 1.OE-02 1.OE-03 1.0E-04 E
1.0E-05 1.OE-06 1.OE-07 -- r '- ....... Frequency, Hz 3.53A2 X Baseline ACCMSLB_5_E-W Baseline ACCMSL B 5 E-W ACCMSLB_5_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100---1832Mwt Set 2 Record set\DryerACC\DryerAccelRi .xls
Dryer Accelerometer VYC-3001 Rev 2 Att C C.3.4 of C.3.8 PSD Data Baseline Factored MSL B6,B7 O Curves based on 1791 MWth Data 1.0E-02 S1.0E--05 1.0E-06 1.0E-07 Frequency, Hz Baseline ACCMSLB_6_N-S
*-ACC MSLB_6_N-S - 3.53A2 X Baseline ACCMSL B 6 N-S 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 -
- 1.0E-04 - S1.0E i 1.OE-06 1.OE-07 Frequency, Hz
-- "ACC-MSLB_7_E-W -- 3.53A2 X Baseline ACCMSL B_7 E-W Baseline ACCMSL B 7 E-W.
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100---1832Mvvt Set 2 Record set\DryerACC\DryerAccelR1 .xls
Dryer Accelerometer /YC-3001 Rev 2 Att C C.3.5 of C.3.8 PSD Data Baseline Factored MSL B8,B9,B1O Curves based on 1791 MWth Data 1.0E--02 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 E S1.0E-05 1.0E-06 1.0E-07 Frequency, Hz BaselineACC MSL B 8 N-S'
- ACCMSL B 8 N-S 3.53^2 X Baseline ACCMSL B 8 N-S 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 ......
1.0E-04 E S1.0E.-05 -F 1.0E-O6 1.0E-07 Frequency, Hz 3.53A2 X Baseline ACC MSL B 9 Vert Baseline ACCMSL B 9 Vert I ACC_MSL B 9 Vert - S1.0E-02 -. "* "*4 ..... ,..,.. _ 4*4 0 S1.02-05 ,.- 1.0E-07 Freguency, Hz iAGO _MSL _B 10 _E-W 3.53A2XBaselineA CCMSLB_10 E w - . Baseline AGOMSLB_10_2-W
\\Vysharedl\Frojects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1 100---1832Mw1 Set 2 Record set\DryerACC\DryerAccel_Ri .xls
Dryer Accelerometer V, (C-3001 Rev 2 Att' C C.3.6 of C.3.8 PSD Data Baseline Factored 'MSL C1,C2,C3 Curves based on 1791 MWth Data 1.OE-02
- 1.OE-03 S1.01E-05 1.OE-05 Frequency, Hz Baseline ACCMSL C-1-N-S i ACCMSLC_I_N-S -3.53^2 X Baseline ACCMSL C 1_N-S 1.OE-02
- 1. 0E-04
-*-'~
I,.1.E-05 1.OE-06 W -CS et*.32~slnACMLC2Vr 1.OE-07 Frequency, Hz C Baseline ACCMSL C 2 VertII I 1.O1E-02 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 0 .OE-05 1.OE-06 1.OE-07 Frecuencv. Hz 3.53A2 X Baseline ACCMSLC_3_E-W Baseline ACC MSLC_3 E-W ACCMSLC_3_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_ 22 1100---1832Mwvt Set 2 Record set\DryerACC\DryerAccel_R1 .xls
Dryer Accelerometer IYC-3001 Rev 2 Att C C.3.7 of C.3.8 PSD Data Baseline Factored MSL D1,D2. D3 Curves based on 1791 MWth Data 1.0E-02
$,:-xgg'
-z 0 1.OE-03 ~ ~iV~ .'z4A4*ft~-"~ ~ r~t,,3/4.. -
I IV, ý-- -- - ~
-ýMKI-11W. - -1 -'ý' ý
- - ~j~Wfi~'-" ~
r~% ~-~--~- - rcuc 4~t Ut 1.0E-04 ii ` 1.o0-05 1MM 1.0E-06 Mffi->r 1.0E-07 Frequency, Hz
-ACCMSLD_1_N-S -3.53A2 X Baseline ACCMSL D 1 N-S Baseline ACCMSLD 1 N-S 1.0E-02 1.0E-03
- 1.OE-04 E
1.0E-05 1.OE-06 1.0E-07 Frequency, Hz
- ACC MSL D 2 Vert -- 3.53A2 X Baseline ACC MSL D 2 Vert Baseline ACCMSL D 2 Vert 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 E
1.0E-05 1.0E-06 1.0E-07 Frequency, Hz ACC_MSLD 3 E-W 3.53A2 X Baseline ACCGMSLD_3_E-W Baseline ACC MSL D 3 E-Wi
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100---1832 Mwt Set 2 Record set\DryerACC\DryerAccelR .xlIs
Dryer Accelerometer IYC-3001 Rev 2 Att C C.3.8 of C.3.8 PSD Data Baseline Factored MSL D4,D5 Curves based on 1791 MWth Data 1.0E-0277 wvv 1.OE-03 - 1.OE-04 1* OE-05 1.0E&06 1.0E-07 Freauencv. Hz
- ACC_MSL D 4 N-S -3.53A2 X Baseline ACC MSL, D 4 N-S Baseline ACCMSL D_4_N-S I 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 1.0E-05 1.0E-06 1.0E-07 .
Frequency, Hz ACCMSL0D 5 E-W 3.53'2 X Baseline ACC MSL D 5 E-W Baseline ACC MSL D 5_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100.---1832Mvvt Set 2 Record set\DryerACC\DryerAccel_Ri .xis
Dryer Accelerometer MSL A1 ,A2,A3 1 of 8 PSD Data Baseline Factored Curves based on 1791 MWth Data 1.OE - 1.OE-03 z1.OE-04 1.0 E-05 1.0E-06 I OE-07 Frequency, Hz 1_N-S Baseline ACCMSLA_1_N-S
.- ACC_MSLA_1_N-S -3.53^2XBaselineACC_MSLA 1.OE-03 N2Q 1.CE 07 ACCK5LAVer Frequency, Hz 3.53^2 X Baseline ACCMSLA_2_Vert Baseline ACCMSLA_2_Vert IE -
I.0E-03 1.0E-04
'-V 1.0E-06 1.OE-07 Freauencv. Hz 3.53^2 X Baseline ACCMfSLA_3_E-W Baseline ACCMSLA_3_E-W ACCMSLA 3 E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerACC\Data 2006 04 28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set Dryer Accel_R1 .xls
Dryer Accelerometer MSL BI',B2 , 2 of 8 PSD Data Baseline Factored (.) Curves based on 1791 MWth Data 1.0E-0l - 7.; 1.0E-02 I.CE-03 1.0E-04 1.0E-05 ICE-06 1.0E-07 rItt4ucIJty, a'.
-- ACCMSL B 1 N-S - 3.532 X Baseline ACC MSL B 1 N-S Baseline AGC_MSLB_1_N-S 1.E-02 1.0E-03 1.CE-04 1.oE-o5 1 .0 E -0 7 .. . .... .. . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . .. Frequency,
. . . . . . Hz
-ACCMSLB_2 E-W 3.53A2XBaselineACCMSL B 2 E-W BaselineACC MSL B 2_E-W
\\Vysharedl\PTrojects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerACC\Data,2006_04-28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set Dryer Accel_Rl.xls
Dryer Accelerometer MSL B3,B4,B5 3 of 8 PSD Data Baseline Factored Curves based on 1791 MWth Data 1,0E'02 1.0E-03 1.OE-04 o 1.OE-05 1.0E-06 1.0E-07 Ffquency. Hz Baseline ACC MSL B 3 N-S
--- ACCMSLB_3_N-S -3.53A2 X Baseline ACC_MSLB_3_N-S 1.0E-02 0
1.0E-03 z 1.OE-04 E 1.0E-05 1.0E-06 1.0E-07 Frequency, Hz Baseline ACCMSL B 4 Vert!I
- ACCMSL_B_4_Vert - 3.53A2 X Baseline ACCMSL B_4_Vert 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 z 1.OE-04 01.E-05 1.OE-06 1.OE-07 . " .
Frequency, Hz 3.53A2 X Baseline ACCGMSLB_5_E-W Baseline ACCMSLB_5_E-W: ACCMSLB_5_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerACC\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set DryerAccel_R1.xls
Dryer Accelerometer. MSL B6,B7 4 of 8 PSD Data Baseline Factored Curves based on 1791 MWth Data 1.0E-02 1.OE-03 z 1.OE-04
%I, E
1.OE-05 1.OE-06 1.0E-07 " Frequency, Hz Baseline ACCMSLB_6_N-S
- ACCMSL_B_6_N-S 3.53^2 X Baseline ACC_MSLB 6_N-S 1.OE-02 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 E
1.0E-05 1.0E-06 1.OE-07 Frequency, Hz ACC_MSL_B_7_E-W 353^2 X Baseline ACC MSL B 7 E-W Baseline ACCMSL B_7_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set DryerAccel_R1.xls Set\DryerACC\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record
Dryer Accelerometer MSL B8,89,B10 5 of 8 PSD,Data Baseline Factored Curves based on 1791 MWth Data 1.OE-02 - ..- _ 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 N 1.0E-05 1.0E-06 1.OE-07 Frequency, Hz AOCCMSLB_83N-S .353A2X Baseline ACC MSL B 8 N-S Baseline ACCMSL. B 8 N-S! i 1.OE-02 1.0E-03
" 1.OE-04 E .1.E-05 1.CE-06 1-0E-07 r..-
Frequency, Hz 3.53A2 X Baseline ACC_MSLB_9_Vert Baseline ACC_MSLB 9_Vert ACC MSL B 9 Vert 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 . 1.0E-04 E 1.0E-05 1.0E-06 1.CE-07 Freouencv. Hz 3.53A2 X. Baseline ACC_MSLB_10 E-W ACCMSL_B_10_E-W Baseline ACCMSLB_ 10_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerACC\Data_2006 04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set Dryer Accel_Ri .xls
Dryer Accelerometer MSL C1,C2,C3 6 of 8 PSD Data Baseline Factored ( .*) Curves based on 1791 MWth Data 1.0E-0 2 1.0E-03
- 1.E-04 N
E5 S1.0E-05 1.0E-06 1.0E-07 Frequency, Hz
*-ACCMSLC_1_N-S 3.53'2 X Baseline ACC MSLC_1_N-S Baseline ACCMSLC 1_N-S1 1.0E-02 6-7
.0E--03 A Aý 0 E -0 .. - .. .. . ..
1.CE-05 1. 0 E . . . 1.E-0 7 Frequency, Hz Baseline ACC MSL C 2 Vert ACC MSL C_2_Vert 3.53 2 X Baseline ACC MSL -C 2 Vert 1.0E-02 1.CE-03 z1 .CE-04 iCOE-OS 1 .CE-06 1.0E-07 Freouencv. Hz 3.53A2 X Baseline ACCMSLC_3_E-W Baseline ACCGMSLC_3_E-W ACCMSLC_3_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 28 1000---1872MWt Set 2 Record Set\DryerACC\Data_2006_04_28 1000--.-1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set DryerAccelRl.xls
Dryer Accelerometer MSL D1,D2,D3 7 of 8 PSD Data Baseline Factored Curves based on 1791 MWth Data 1.0E-02 1.OE-03 z 1.OE-04 N 1.0E-05 1.0E-06 1.0E-07 Frequency, Hz X Baseline ACCMSL D_1_N-S Baseline ACC._MSLD_1_N-S. i,-ACC_MSLD_1_N-S -3.53A2 1.0E-02 " 1.0E-03 Z 1.OE-04 C-4* 1.CE-06 1.0E-07 Frequency, Hz 3.53^2 X Baseline ACCMSL D 2 Vert Baseline ACCMSLD_2_Vert, i ACCMSLD2_Vert 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 . ....... 1.0E-04 E A' i .0E-05 zL: 1.0E-06 1.CE-07 Frequency, Hz ACC_MSLD 3_E-W 3.53^2 X Baseline ACCMSLD_3_E-W Baseline ACCMSLD_3_E-Wi
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerACC\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set Dryer Accel_R1.xls
Dryer Accelerometer MSL D4,D5, 8 of 8 PSD Data Baseline Factored O Curves based on 1791 MWth Data 1.0E-02 w* Z-' 1.OE-03 iE 0
*-1.0E-04 i.CE-05 1.0E-06 1.OE-07 Frequency, Hz
-Baseline ACCMSL 0D4N-S1
-ACC_MSL_D_4_N-S -- 3.53A2 X Baseline ACCMSL D_4_N-S 1.OE-02 1.0E-03 1.OE-04 N
1.E-05 1.OE-06 1.0E-07 . . . . .. . . Frequency, Hz 3.53A2 X Baseline ACC-MSL D 5 E-W BaselineACCMSL D 5 E-W. ACCMSLD_5_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerACC\Data_2006 04 28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set Dryer Accel_R1 .xls
Dryer Accelerometer MSL A1 ,A2,A3 1 of 8 PSD Data Baseline Factored Curves based on 1912 MWth Data 1.OE-02 1.OE-03 S1.OE-04 S1.OE-05 0 .E0 1.OE-06 Frequency, Hz
-ACMSLA1_N-S 2.642 X Baseline ACCMSL A 1 N-S Baseline ACC_MSLA_1_N-S 1CE -02 0 20 40. 60 80 100 120 S1.OE-03 1.OE-04 NX 1 OE-05 1.OE-06 N-1.0E Frequency, Hz
-2Xe
! ACC-MSL A 2 Vert 2.64"12 X Baseline ACC MSL A 2 Vert Baseline ACCMSLA_2_Vert 1.OE-02 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05
.0E -06 1.0E Frequency, Hz 2.64\2 X Baseline ACCMSL A_3_E-W Baseline ACCMSLA_3_E-W
-ACCMSL_A_3_E-W -
\\Vysharedi\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 05 05 1000---1912Mwt Set 5\Drye rACC\Dsta_2006_05_05 1106---1912Mwt Set 5 Record Set DryerAccel.xls
-Dryer Accelerometer MSL B1,B2 '2 of 8 PSD Data Baseline Factored Curves based on 1912 MWth Data 1.OE-01 L _-_ 20'" 40. 60
- 8 1.oE-02 1,OE-03 S.OE-04 1.OE 1 OE-06 1.OE-07i Frequency, Hz Baseline ACC_MSLB_1_N-S 1 -ACCMSL B_1 N-S '-2.64A2 X Baseline ACC MSL B 1 N-S 1,.E-02 1.OE-03 1,0E-04 1.OE-05 1 .OE-06 1.OE-07 J- " Frequency, Hz Baseline ACCMSL B 2 E-W
'- ACC MSL B 2 E-W -2.64A2 X Baseline ACCGMSLB_2'E-W
\\Vyshared 1\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 05 05 1000---1912Mwt Set 5\DryerACC\Data_2006_05_05 1106---1912Mwt Set 5 Record Set DryerAccel.xls
Dryer Accelerometer MSL B3,B4,B5 3 of 8 PSD Data Baseline Factored Curves based on 1912 MWth Data 1.0E-02 20 40 60 8, 1.OE-03 1.0E-04 AA'r o 1.0E-06 1.0E-07 Baseline ACCMSL B-3 N-St I
- ACC_MSLB_3_N-S -- 2.64'2 X Baseline ACCMSLB_3_N-S 1.OE-02 0 40 60 80 100 120 1.OE-03 z1.OE-04 IJJ.N C I4 1.OE-05 1.OE-07 y ___'
Frequency, Hz 4_Vert 2.64"2 X Baseline ACC MSL B 4 Vert Baseline ACC_MSLB, 4_Vert
-ACCMSLB 1.OE-02 20 40 60 80 100 120 1.OE-03 z1.OE-04 A P N
C4 ,-1, 1.Eo*T C I i 1.OE-06 1.OE-07 Frequency, Hz
-2.64"2 XBaseline ACCMSLB_5_E-W BaselineACC MSL B 5 E-Wi ACCG_MSL_B_5 E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_05_05 1000---1912Mwt Set 5\Dryer_ACC\Data_2006_05_05 1106---t912Mwt Set 5 Record Set DryerAccel.xis
Dryer Accelerometer MSL B6,B7 4 of 8 PSD Data Baseline Factored Curves based on 1912 MWth Data 1.oE-02 I ' I ' I.DE-03 z1.QE-04 1 .OE-07 Frequency, Hz
- ACCMSL B 6 N-S - 2.6412 X Baseline ACC MSL B 6 N-S Baseline ACC MSL B 6 N-SS N
I N E 0 Frequency, Hz
-ACCMSLB_7_E-W -- 2.64^2 X Baseline ACCMSL_B_7_E-W Baseline ACCMSLB_7_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_05_05 1000---1912Mwt Set 5\DryerACC\Data_2006_05,05 1106---1912Mwt Set 5 Record Set DryerAccel.xls
Dryer Accelerometer MSL C1,C2,C3 6 of 8 PSD Data Baseline Factored Curves based on 1912 MWth Data 1.OE-02 . . '*, 00 2 140 160 180 260
~ 20 40ý 60 8 1.OE-03 z .0E-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 1.OE-07 Frequency, Hz Baseline ACCMSLC_1_N-S
-ACCMSL_C_1_N-S -2.64^2 X Baseline ACC MSLC_1_N-S 1.OE-02 40 60 80 1.0 120 1.OE-03 z1.OE-04 1.OE-05 - j &
1.OE-06 1.OE-07 Frequency, Hz Baseline ACCMSLC_2_Vert
-ACG MSL_C_2_Vert 2.W42 X Baseline ACC MSL C 2 Vert 1.0E-02 20 40 60 80 100 120.
1.OE-03 1.OE-04 *
'l.0E-05 1.OE- 06 1.0E-07 Freauency, Hz Baseline ACC MSL C 3 E-W
- ACCMSL C 3 E-W 2.64'2 X Baseline ACC_MSL C 3 E-W
\\Vyshared t\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_05_05 1000---1912Mwt Set 5\Dryer_ACC\Data_2006_05_05 1106---1£12Mwt Set 5 Record Set DryerAccel.xls
Dryer Accelerometer MSL D1;D2,D3 7 of 8 PSD Data Baseline Factored Curves based on 1912 MWth Data 1.OE-02 1.OE-03 z .OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 1.OE-07 J - Frequency, Hz Baseline ACC MSLD01_N-S,
- ACC-MSLDI1N-S -- 2.64A2 X Baseline ACCMSLD_1_N-S 1.OL-U ..
26 40 60 8o-0 1 o 120 146 160 180 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 E N 1.OE-07 Frequency, Hz ACGMSL D_2 Vert - 2.64^2 X Baseline ACC MSL D 2 Vert Baseline ACCMSL D 2 Vert 1.OE-02 1.0E -03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 I .0E-07 -2, ~ - Frequency, Hz Baseline ACC MSL D 3 E-WI
-ACC MSL D 3 E-W -2.6412 X Baseline ACcMSL D_3_E-W
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_05_05 1000---1912Mwt Set 5\DrYerACC\Data_2006_05_05 1106---1912Mwt Set 5 Record Set DryerAccel.xls
MSL D4,D5 8 of 8 Dryer Accelerometer PSD Data Baseline Factored
,Curves based on 1912 MWth Data 1.0E-02 140 160 180 200
- 80. 100 120 2 0.
. ... 40 - 60.
1.OE-03 1.E-7 r1.OE-04 1.OE--05 -- 1.OE-06 1.0E-07 JJ" Frequency, Hz Baseline ACC.MSLD_4_N-S
-- ACC-MSLD 4_N-S - 2.64^2 X Baseline ACCMSLD_4_N-S In 1.OE -07 _ . . . . ..... . . Frequency,
. . . . Hz. . .. . .. .. . . .. . .
-ACCMSL D 5 E-W - 2.64^2 X Baseline ACCMSL D 5 E-W Baseline ACCGMSL D 5 E-W]
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_05_05 1000---1 912Mwt Set 5\Dryer ACC\DatS_2006_05_05 1 106---1912MvA Set 5 Record Set Dryer_Accel.xls
Power Uprate I Moisture Carryover 0.200 0.160 0.140 0.120 0.100 0.080 -- 0.060 -- _______- 0.020 0.000 1/3/2006 1/23/2006 2/12/2006 3/4/2006 3/24/2006 4/13/2006 5/3/2006 5/23/2006 1
Average Moisture Carryover Trend 0.160 - 0.147% at 1912MWth 0.140 0.120 Q 0.100 0 0.080 0
- Moisture Carryover
,-t o 0.060 50 ....... 0.040 0.020 0.000 - _ 1550 .1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 19)50 Thermal Power (MWth)
Date Time of CPD Sample Time of Rx Sample Na-24 for CPD1 Na-24 for Rxj % Carryover Rx Power (MWth) 1/19/2006 2:25 2:10 4.22E-08 2.38E-04 0.0177 1592 1/23/2006 7:45 7:14 3.20E-08 2.20E-04 0.0145 1592 1/26/2006 2:00 1:55 3.05E-08 2.35E-04 0.0130 1592 1/29/2006 1:05 1:00 2.67E-08 2.1 9E-04 0.0122 1592 2/212006 1:32 1:25 3.76E-08 2.26E-04 0.0166 1592 2/5/2006 1:13 0:39 3.79E-08 2.28E-04 0.0166 1592 2/9/2006 0:45 0:35 5.08E-08 2.41E-04 0.0211 1592 .2/12/2006 1:05 0:45 4.65E-08 2.14E-04 0.0217 1592 2/16/2006 14:29 14:17 4.08E-08 2.23E-04 0.0183 1592 2/19/2006 2,20 2:15 2.94E-08 2.41E-04 0.0122 1592 2/23/2006 1:03 0:54 3.33E-08 2.19E-04 0.0152 "1592 2/26/2006 1:00 0:50 3,90E-08 2.27E-04 0.0172 1592
-3/2/2006 0:30 0:19 3.96E-08 2.13E-04 0.0186 1592 3/4/2006 10:50 10:50 *5.24E-08 2.22E-04 0.0236 1632 3/4/2006 18:15 18:08 7.34E-08 2.18E-04 0.0336 1673 3/4/2006 19:30 19:25 6.31E-08 2.22E-04 0.0284 1673 3/5/2006 8:13 8:15 7.94E-08 2.06E-04 0.0385 1673 3/5/2006 20:17 20:10 6.30E-08 2.23E-04 0.0283 1673 3/6/2006 1:40 1:30 __5.92E-08 2.24E-04 0.0264 1673 3/6/2006 12:03 11:52 5.91E-08 2.27E-04 0.0260 1673 3/7/2006 1:40 1:30 6.66E-08 -2.23E-04 0.0299 1673 3/8/2006 -140 -1:30 7.38E-08 2.22E-04 0.0332 1673 3/8/2006 13:30 13:20 4.62E-08 2.17E-04 0.0213 1673 3/9/2006 2:00 1:45 6.28E-08 2.17E-04 0.0289 1673 3/9/2006 8:30 8:40 6.62E-08 2,14E-04 0.0310 1673 3/10/2006 .12:54 12:44 5.84E-08 2.17E-04 0.0269 1673 3/11/2006 0:30 0:20 6.73E-08 2.16E-04 0.0312 1673 3/12/2006 1:45 1:46 7.12E-08 2.23E-04 0.0319 1673 3/12/2006 13:57 13:55 5.82E-08 2.25E-04. 0.0259 1673 3/13/2006 2:10 2:20 8.56E-08 2.22E-04 0.0386 1673 3113/2006 15:05 15:03 6.39E-08 2.19E-04 0.0292 1673 3/14/2006 0:35 0:55 6.99E-08 2.18E-04 0.0321 1673 3/14/2006 16:26 16:24 6.19E-08 2.24E-04 0.0276 1673 3/15/2006 0:45 0:40 7.25E-08 2.13E-04 .0.0340 1673 3/16/2006 0:30 0:30 7.74E-08 2.17E-04 0.0356 1673 3/17/2006 1:01 0:40 5.85E-08 2.23E-04 0.0263 1673
3/18/2006 0:45 0:35 5.OOE-08 2.43E-04 0.0206 1673 3/19/2006 0:50 0:41 4.48E-08 2.33E-04 0.0193 1673 3/20/2006 0:54 0:47 8.28E-08 2.24E-04 0.0370 1673 3/21/2006 0:40 0:20 7.26E-08 2.23E-04 0.0326 1673 3/22/2006 0:25 0:35 6.16E-08 2.29E-04 0.0269 1673 3/23/2006 1:00 0:35 5.75E-08 2.13E-04 0.0270 1673 3/25/2006 0:40 0:20 5.59E-08 2.27E-04 0.0246 1673 3/26/2006 0:57 0:48 4.40E-08 2.28E-04 0.0193 1673 3/27/2006 0:40 0:35 7.01E-08 2.31 E-04 0.0304 1673 3/28/2006 2:15 2:25 5.95E-08 2.38E-04 0.0250 1673 3/28/2006 9:55 9:45 8.01 E-08 2.33E-04 0.0344 1673 3/29/2006 0:40 0:25 6.92E-08 2.22E-04 0.0312 1673 3/29/2006 14:43 14:07 6.83E-08 2.28E-04 0.0300 1673 3/30/2006 0:37 0:25 6.36E-08 2.23E-04 0.0285 1673 3/31/2006 0:40 0:15 6.91 E-08 2.28E-04 0.0303 1673 4/1/2006 0:26 0:17 3.78E-08 2.39E-04 0.0158 1673 4/1/2006 10:55 10:55 8.43E-08 2.30E-04 0.0367 1712 4/1/2006 11:40 11.40 9.47E-08 2.38E-04 0.0399 1712 4/1/2006 18:35 18:30 1.10E-07 2.36E-04 0.0466 1753 4/2/2006 1:46 1:50 1.16E-07 2.33E-04 0.0497 1753 4/2/2006 10:00 10:00 1.22E-07 2.30E-04 0.0530 1753 4/3/2006 1:25 1:20 1.20E-07 2.36E-04 0.0508 1753 4/3/2006 1.1:10 10:57 1.06E-07 2.31 E-04 0.0461 1753 4/4/2006 0:40 0:20 1.10E-07 2.25E-04 0.0489 1753 4/4/2006 13:46 13:36 1.25E-07 2.37E-04 0.0527 1753
*4/5/2006 1:00 0:40 1.29E-07 2.11 E-04 0.0611 1753 4/5/2006 14:25 14:27 1.02E-07 2.23E-04 0.0459 1753 4/6/2006 0:30 0:20 1.1OE-07 2.19E-04 0.0502 1753 4/6/2006 .10:45 10:45 1133E-07 2.27E-04 0.0587 1793 4/6/2006 11:30 11:30 1.63E-07 2.18E-04 0.0746 1793 4/6/2006 15:30 15:30 1.23E-07 2.29E-04 0.0537 1793 4/7/2006 0:28 0:10 1.47E-07 2.14E-04 0.0687 1793 4/7/2006 11:00 11:00 1.50E-07 2.34E-04 0.0641 1793 4/8/2006 0:44 0:35: 1.48E-07 2.37E-04 0.0625 1793 4/8/2006 9:50 9:50 1.43E-07 2.51 E-04 0.0572 1793 4/9/2006 1:25 1:35 1.69E-07 2.38E-04 0.0712 1793 4/10J2006 1:02 1:10 1.54E-07 2.47E&04 0.0623 1793
. 4/11/2006 3:30 3:40 1.74E-07 2.46E-04 0.0707 1793 4/12/2006 1:00 0:30 1.66E-07 2.49E-04 0.0664 1793 4/13/2006 0:38 0:28 1.75E-07 2.44E-04 0.0717 1793 4/14/2006 4:20 4:15 1.76E-07 2.45E-04 0.0717 1793 4/15/2006 0:20 0:15 1.86E-07 2.45E-04 0.0759 1793 4/16/2006 0:45 0:36 1.66E-07 2.61E-04 0.0635 1793 4/17/2006 0:30 0:15 1.87E-07 2.43E-04 0.0770 1793 0:40 0:20 1.61 E-07 2.64E-04 0.0610 1793 4/18/2006 4/19/2006 0:55 0:50 1.69E-07 2.54E-04 0.0665 1793 4/20/2006 2:25 2:30 1,54E-07 2.57E-04 0.0601 1793 4/21/2006 1:40 1:55 1.71E-07 2.63E-04 0.0648 1793 4/22/2006 1:55 2:20 1.73E-07 2.60E-04 0.0668 1793 4/22/2006 11:18 11:18 2.12E-07 2.53E-04 0.0835 1832 4/22/2006 12:01 -12:01 - 2.31E-07 2.64E-04 0.0875 1832 4/23/2006 0:55 0:48 1.95E-07 2.64E-04 0.0740 1832 4/23/20-06 7:40 7:52 2.37E-07 2.54E-04 0.0933 1832 - 4/24/2006 0:51 0:45 2.27E-07 2.67E-04 0.0849 1832 4/24/2006 10:56 10:47 2.16E-07 2.61E-04 0.0826 1832 4/25/2006 1:10 0:50 2.16E-07 2.72E-04 0.0792 1832 4/25/2006 12:11 12:11 2.25E-O_7 2.65E-04 0.0848 1832 4/26/2006 2:10 1:55 -2.5-E-07 2.71E-04 0,0833 1832 4/26/2006 13:30 13:35 1.91E-07 -2.69E-04 0.0708 1832 4/27/2006 1:18 1:26 2.01E-07 2.52E-04 0.0800 1832 4/28/2006 1:35 1:30 2.40E-07 2.72E-04 0.0882 1832 4/28/2006 11:35 11:30 2.92E-07 2.68E-04 0.1087 1872 4/28/2006 12:37 12:30 2.62E-07 2.69E-04 0.0975 1872 4/29/2006 0:34 0:30 2.62E-07 2.62E-04 0.1000 1872 4/29/2006 1:30 -1:30 2.85E-07 2.68E-04 0.1063 1872 4/29/2006 10:50 10:30 2.92E-07 2.54E-04 0.1150 1872 4/30/2006 0:32 0:27 2.79E-07 2.64E-04 0.1054 1872 4/30/2006 12:45 12:25 2.81E-07 2.47E-04 0.1138 1872 51112006 0:35 0:29 2.91E-07 2.67E-04 0.1092 1872 511/2006 10:25 10:30 2.88E-07 2.60E-04 0.1108 1872 5/2/2006 0:36 0:53 2.78E-07 2.62E-04 0.1060 1872 5/3/2006 0:24 0:33 3.01E-07 2.74E-04 0.1098 1872 5/4/2006 0:15 0:10 2.47E-07 2.66E-04 0.0928 1872 5/5/2006 0:15 0:05 2.63E-07 2.64E-04 0.0995 1872
10:40 10:40 3.79E-07 2.59E-04 0.1465 1912 515/2006 5/5/2006 11:25 11:31 3.78E-07 2.57E-04 0.1473 1912
IRx Power jAvera e Moisture Carovery 1592 0.0.165 1632 0.0236 1673 0.0289 1712 0.0383 1753 0.0505 1793 0.0665 - 1832 0.0822 1872 0.106 1912 0.1469
Moisture Carryover 0.120 0.100 0.080 0.060 0.040 0.020 0.000 Sample Date and Time
EPU Moisture Carryover Analysis Results per OP 0631 ( Date Time Reactor Power MWt Moisture Carryover % Acceptance Criteria 2/24/06 0:00 0:39 1592 0.015 < 0,10 % 2/26/06 0:50 0:50 1592 0.017 < 0.10% 0:19 1592 0.019 <0.10% 3/2/060:19 3/4/06 10:50 10:50 1633 0.024 <0.10% 3/4/06 18:08 18:08 1671 0.034 <010% 3/4/06 19:25 19:25 1671 0.02.8 <0.10% 3/5/068:13 8:13 1660 0.038 <0.10% 3/5/06 20:10 20:10 1673 0.028 <0.10% 3/6/06 1:30 1:30 1671 0.026 <0.10% 3/6/06 12:03 12:03 1672 0.026 <0.10% 3/7/06 1:30 1:30 1672 0.030 <0.10% 3/8/06 1:30 1:30 1672 0.033 <0.10% 3/8/06 13:30 13:30 -1672 0.021 <0.10% 3/9/06 1:45 1:45 1672 0.029 <0.10% 3/9/06 8:40 8:40 1672 0.031 <0.10% 3/10/06 1:32 1:32 1672 0.032 <0.10% 3/10/06 1244 12:44 1672 0.027 <0.10% 3/11/06 0:20 0:20 1672 0.031 <0.10% 3/11/06 1325 13:25 1672 0.033 <0.10% 3/12/06 1:45 1:45 1672 0.032 <0.10% 3/12/06 1355 13:55 1672 0.026 <0.10% 3/13/06 2:10 2:10 1672 0.039 <0.10% 3/13/06 1503 15:03 ,1672 0.029 <0.10% 3/14/06 0:55 0:55 1672 0.032 <0.10% 3/14/06 1624 16:24 1672 0.028 <0.10% 3/15/06 3:45 3:45. 1672 0.034 <0.10% 3/16/06 0:30 0:30 1672 0.036 <0.10% 3/17/06 0:40 0:40 1672 0.026 <0;10% 0:35 1672 0.021 <0.10% 3/18/06 0:35 3/19/06 0:41 0:41 1672 0.019 <0.10% 3/20/06 0:47 0:47 1672 0.037 <0.10% 3/21/06 0:40 0:40 1672 0.033 <0.10% 3/22/06 0:35 0:35 1672 0.027 <0.10% 0:35 1672 0.027 <0.10% 3/23/06 0:35 0:32 1672 0.029 <0.10% 3/24/06 0:32 3/25/06 0:20 0:20 1672 0.025 <0.10% 3/26/06 0:30 0:30 1672 0.019 <0.10% 3/27/06 0:35 _035 1672 0.030 <0.10% 3/28/06 2:25 2:25 1672 0.025 <0.10% 3/28/06 9:45 9:45 1672 0.034 <0.10% 3/29/06.0:25 0:25 1672 0.031 <0.10% 3/30/06 0:37 0:37 1672 0.029 <0.10% 3/31/06 0:15 0:15 1672 0.030 <0.10% 0:17 1672 0.016 <0.10% 4/1/06 0:17 4/1/06 10:55 10:55 1712 0.037 <0.10% 4/1/06 11:40 11:40 1712 0.040 <0.10% 18:30 1750 0.047 <0.10% 4/1/06 18:30 19:40 1748 0.050 <0.10% 4/1/06 19:40
Date ITime I Reactor Power MWt I Moisture Carryover % I m = m Acceptance Criteria II
Change from last' 1.13 1.12 1.26 1.42 0.82 1.36
EPU Moisture Carryover Analysis Results per.OP 0631 Date Moisture Carryover % Acceptance Criteria 2/24/06 0:00 0.015 0.10 2/26/06 0:50 0.017 0.10 3/2/06 0:19 0.019 0.10 3/4/06 10:50 0,024 0.10 3/4/06 18:08 0.034 0.10 3/4/06 19:25 0.028 0.10 3/5/06 8:13 0.038 .0.10 3/5/06 20:10 0.028 0.10 3/6/06 1:30 0.026 0.10 3/6/06 12:03 0.026 0.10 3/7/06 1:30 0.030 0.10 3/8/06 1:30 0.033 0.10 3/8/06 13:30 0.021 0.10 3/9/06 1:45 0.029 0.10 3/9/06 8:40.. 0.031 0.10 3/10/06 1:32 0.032 0.10 3/10/06 1244 0.027 0.10 3/11/06 0:20 0.031 0.10 3/11/06 1325 0.033 0.10 3/12/06 1:45 ., 0.032 0.10 0.10 0.10 3/12/Q, 1355 0.026 0.039 3/13/2006 3/13/06 1503 0.029 0.10 3/14/06 0:55 0.032 0.10 3/14/06 1624 0.028 0.10 3/15/06 3:45 0.034 0.10 3/16/06 0:30 0.036 0.10 3/17/06 0:40 0.026 0.10 3/18/06 0:35 0.021 0.10 3/19/06 0:41 0.019 0.10 0.10 3/20/06 0:47 0.037 0.10 0.10 0.028 0.027 3/21/06 0:40 0.10 3/23/06 0:35 3/22/06 0:35 0.027 0.029 0.10 3/24/06 0:32 0.10 0.025 3/25/06 0:20 0.10 0.019 0.10 3/26/06 0:30 0.030 3/27/06 0:35 3/28/06 2:25 0.025 0.10 3/28/06 9:45 0.034 0.10 3/29/06 0:25 0.031 0.10 3/30/06 0:37 0.026 0.10 0.030 0.10 3/31/06 0:15 0.016 0.10 4/1/06 0:17 0.037 0.10 4/1/06 10:55 0.040 0.10 4/1/06 11:40 4/1/0618:30 0.047 0.10 4/1/06 19:40 0.051 0.10
4/2/06 1:50 0:050 0.10 (. 0.053 0.10 4/2/06 15:53 0.046 0.10 4/2/06 19:32 0.049 0.10 4/3/06 1:25 0.051 0.10 0.10 0.10 I
Reactor Building MSL A U 1 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.0E+00 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 N 3:J 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 1.OE-05 1.0E-06 50 100 150 200 250 0 Frequency, Hz AveMSLAUpper NoExcita AveMSL_AUpper-withExcita
- LCIAveMSL A_Upper LC2_AveMSLAUpper Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSL_AUpper
\\\Vyshared 1\Projects\DAC Data\BaselineData_1593_MWt\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL A L 2of8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.0E+00 1.OE-01 1.0E-02 E 1.OE-03
'A3 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_A_LowerNoExcita -AveMSLALower withExcita LC2_AveMSLALower -LC1_AveMSLALower Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSL_A_Lower
\\\Vysha red 1\Projects\DAC Data\BaselineData_1593_MWt\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL B U 3 of8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.OE-02 N
" 1.OE-03 E
1.0E-04 1.OE-05. 1.0E-06 50 100 150 200 250 0 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_BUpperNoExcita AveMSL_B_Upper with Excita LC2_Ave_M SL_B_ Upper -LClAveMSL-B.Upper Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSL_BUpper
\\Vyshared 1\Projects\DAC Data\BaselineData_1593_MWt\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL B L 4of8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+o0 1.0E-01 1.OE-02 MI 3: (It 1.0E-03 E 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 I.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_BLowerNoExcita -AveMSLBLowerwithExcita
-LC1_Ave_MSLB_Lower LC2_Ave-MSLBLower Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSLBLower
\\Vyshared 1\Projects\DAC Data\BaselineData_1593_MWt\DryerSG\SGSignal Limit Curve.xls
Reactor Building MSL C U 5of8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.E+00 I.E-01 1.E-02 N M 1.E-03 E 0) 1.E-04 1.E-05 I.E-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz.
-Ave_MSL_C Upper NoExcita AveMSL_C_Upper withExcita
-LC1_AveMSLCUpper
-LC2_AveMSL-_C Upper Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSL_C_Upper
\\Vyshared I \Projects\DAC Data\BaselineData_1593_MWt\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL C L 6of8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.0E÷00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 N (I) 1.0E-03 E I-. ii-1.OE-04 1.0E-O5 1.0E-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSLCLowerNoExcita - AveMSL_C_Lower withExcita LC2_AveMSL_C_Lower -LC1_AveMSLCLower Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSLCLower
\\Vyshared 1\Projects\DAC Data\BaselineData_1593_MWt\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL D U 7 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage ) 1.0E+00 1.OE-01 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 E 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.0E-06 100 150 200 250 0 50 Frequency, Hz AveMSLD Upper NoExcita AveMSL_D_Upper withExcita
-LC1_AveMSL-D Upper LC2_AveMSL_D_Upper Baseline 1593 MWth Ave_MSL_DUpper
\\Vysha red 1\Projects\DAC .Data\BaselineData_1593_MWt\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL D L 8of8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+O0 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 1.OE-03 E 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 50 100 150 200 250 0 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_D_LowerNoExcita - AveMSL D Lower withExcita LC2_AveMSL_D_Lower -LC1_AveMSLDLower Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSLDLower
\\Vyshared l\Projects\DAC Data\BaselineData_1593_MWt\DryerSG\SGSign.al_Limit Curve.xls
Reactor Building MSLAU 1 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 N
-I-1.0E-03 "E
1.0E-04 1.OE-05 1.0E-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_AUpper NoExcita AveMSL_A_Upper withExcita
-LC2_AveMSLAUpper
-LC1_AveMSL-A Upper Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSLAUpper
\\Vyshared l\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1000---1633Mwt--Set 1\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL A L 2 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.OE-02 N En 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 1.0E-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSLALowerNoExcita -AveMSLA_Lower withExcita LC2_AveMSL_A_Lower -'LC_ AveMSLALower Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSLALower
\\Vyshared l\projects\DAC Data\Data-2006_03_04 1000---1633Mwt--Set 1\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL B U 3of8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 * , 1.0E-03 E ar 1.OE-04 I.OE-05 1.OE-06 50 100 150 200 250 0 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_B Upper-NoExcita - Ave_MSL_BUpper withExcita
---- LCIAveMSL B Upper LC2_AveMSLBUpper Baseline 1593 MWth Ave_MSLB_Upper
\\Vyshared l\projects\DAG Data\Data_2006_03_04 1000---1633Mwt--Set 1\DryerSG\SGSignal_LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL B L 4of8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 C14 1.0E-03 E 1.0E-04 1.0E-05 1.OE-06 50 100 150 200 250 0 Frequency, Hz
- AveMSL_B_LowerwithExcita
-AveMSL_BLowerNoExcita
-LClAve_MSLBLower
-LC2_Ave_.MSLBLower Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSL_B_Lower
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1000---1633Mwt--Set 1\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSLC U 5of8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1E+00 1,E-01 1.E-02 N
"6 1.E-03 E
I .E-04 I.E-D5 1.E-06 0 50 100 - 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_CUpperNoExcita *-AveMSLCUpper withExcita LC2_AveMSLCUpper -LCAveMSL-C Upper Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSL_CUpper
\\Vyshared l\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1000---1633Mwt--Set 1\DryerSG\SG Signal LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL C L 6of8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.0E+O0 -A. 1.OE-610 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 4 N I C." 1.OE-03 E 0) 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 50 100 . 150 200 250 0 Frequency, Hz AveMSL CLowerNoExcita AveMSLCLowerwithExcita LC2_AveMSLC_Lower LC1_AveMSLCLower Baseline 1593 MWth Ave MSL_C-Lower
\\Vyshared l\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1000---1633Mwt--Set l\DryerSG\SGSignal_LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSLD U 7 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE-00 1.OE-01 1.0E-02
'1-S1.0E-03 E
1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 -I; 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_DUpperNoExcita -AveMSL_D,_Upper withExcita LC2_AveMSLDUpper - LCIAveMSL.D Upper Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSLDUpper
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1000---1633Mwt-.Set l\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL D L 8 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1 OE+00 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 I 1.0E-03 E 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 200 250 50 100 150 0 Frequency, Hz 0 AveMSL_D_LowerNoExcita Ave_MSL_D_LowerwithExcita LC2_AveMSLDLower -LOIAveMSLDLower Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSL_D_Lower
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1000---1633Mwt--Set 1\Dryer SG\SGSignal_LimitCurve.xls
MSLAU 1of 8 Reactor Building Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00 9-5 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 1.OE-03 E 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz Ave MSLA Upper No Excita AveMSLA Upper-withExcita LC2_Ave_MSL_AUpper - LC_Ave_MSL_A_Upper
.. Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSL AUpper
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1800-1671 M -Set 1\Dryer-SG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
MSLAL 2of8 Reactor Building Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00
'-N 1.OE-01 1.0E-02 N
,1-1.OE-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.0E-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSLALowerNoExcita AveMSLA_LowerwithExcita
-LC2_AveMSL_A_Lower - LClAve_MSL_A_Lower
--
- Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSL_A_Lower
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1800---1671 Mwt--Set 1\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xis
MSL B U 3of8 Reactor Building Dryer - Strain Gage
.1.0E+00 1.OE-01 1.0E-02 N
I c'4 1.0E-03 E ci) i.0E-04 I .0E-05 I OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_BUpper NoExcita AveMSL*_BUpper withExcita LC2_AveMSL B Upper - LCAve _MSLB .Upper Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSL_BUpper
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1800---1671Mwt--Set 1\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
MSL B L 4of8 Reactor Building Dryer - Strain Gage S1.OE+00 1 1.OE-01 I.OE N 1.0E-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_B_LowerNoExcita -Ave MSL B LowerwithExcita LC2_AveMSL B Lower -LCAveMSLBLower Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSLB Lower
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1800---1671 Mwt--Set 1\DryerSG\SG._SignaILUmit_Curve.xls
Reactor Building MSL C U 5 of 8 Dryer- Strain Gage 1.E+0-1.E-01 1.E-02 0N 1.E-03 E 1.E-04 1.E-05 1.E-06 0 50 100 150 .200 250 Frequency, Hz
-AveMSL_C Upper No Excita -AveMSL_C_Upper withExcita
-LC2_AveMSL_C_Upper -LCIAve_MSL C Upper
___- Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSL_CUpper
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1800---1671 Mwt--Set 1\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
MSL C L 6of8 Reactor Building Dryer - Strain Gage 1.0E+00 - 1.OE 1.0E-02 NE 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 1.0E-05 1.0E-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz Ave_MSL_C_LowerNoExcita -AveMSL_CLowerwithExcita LC2_AveMSLCLower -LC1 Ave_MSL C Lower Baseline 1593 MWth Ave MSLCLower
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1800---1671Mwt--Set 1\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
MSL D U 7of8 Reactor Building Dryer - Strain Gage 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 0"4 1.0E-03 E 1.OE-04 1.0E-05 1.0E-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz [:AveMSL_DUpper: No Excita - Ave_MSL_D_Upper withExcita LC2_Ave_MSLDUpper -LCAveMSL D Upper
--- Baseline 1593 MWth Ave_MSL_DUpper
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1800---1671 Mwt--Set 1\Dryer.SG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
MSL D L 8of8 Reactor Building Dryer - Strain Gage Q 1.OE+00 - 1.0E-01 1.OE-02 -U M 1.OE-03 E 1.0E-04 1.0E-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSLDLowerNoExcita AveMSLDLower withExcita LC2_AveMSLDLower LC1_AveMSLDLower
... Baseline 1593 MWth AveMSLDLower
\\Vysharedl\projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_03_04 1800---1671 Mwt--Set 1\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Ilk Reactor Building MSLAU I of 8 -4 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.01E+00 1.0E-01 1.0E N I CJ
- 0) 1.0E-03 a) 1.OE-04 1.0E-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_A_Upper NoExcita AveMSL_A_Upper.withExcita LC2_AveMSL AUpper LC1_AveMSLA Upper Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSL_A_Upper E:\SG SignalLimitCurve-l 712MWthSet 1.xls
Reactor Building MSL A L 2 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.0E+00 1.OE-01 1,0E-02 N N1 1.0E-03
.C 1.OE-04 I.OE-05 1.0E-06 4 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz
-AveMSL_A_LowerNoExcita - AveMSLALowerwithExcita LC2_Ave.MSL_A_Lower LC1_AveMSL_A_Lower Baseline 1671 MWth Ave_MSL_A_Lower E:\SG SignalLimitCurve_1712MWthSetl.xls
Reacior Building MSL B U 3 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.01E-02 N 1.OE-03 E 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz
-Ave_MSLBUpper No_Excita AveMSL_B_Upper withExcita
-LC2_AveMSLB_Upper
-LC1_AveMSL-BUpper Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSLBUpper E:\SGSignalLimitCurve_1712MWthSet1.xls
Reactor Building MSL B L 4 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.0E00 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 I .OE-03 E 1.0E-04 1.0E-05 1.0E-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_B_LowerNoExcita - AveMSL_B_LowerwithExcita LC2_Ave_MSL_BLower - LCIAveMSL_B_Lower Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSL_B Lower L E:\SG SignalLimit Curve_1 712MWthSetl .xls
Reactor Building MSL C U 5 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.E+00 7 1.E-01 1.E-02 1.E-03 E 1.E-04 1.E-05 1.E-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz Ave_MSL_CUpper-NoExcita Ave-MSL_C_Upper withExcita
-LC2_AveMSLCUpper -LClAveMSL-C Upper Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSLC Upper E:\SGSignalLimitCurve_1712MWthSet1.xls
Reactor Building MSL C L 6 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 - N
"* 1.0E-03 -
E 1.0E-04 - 1.0E 1.0E-06 -
.. 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSLCLowerNoExcita -AveMSLCLower-withExcita LC2_Ave_MSLCLower LC1_AveMSLCLower Baseline 1671 MWth Ave_ MSL C Lower E:\SGSignalLimit-Curve_1712MWthSetl .xls
Reactor Building MSL D U 7 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 - E
- 3 1 .0E-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 50 100 150 200 250 0
Frequency, Hz Hz NoExcita Frequency, -AveMSL_D_Upper withExcita
-AveMSL_DUpper
"-"-LC1_AveMSLD Upper
-LC2_AveMSL_D_Upper Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSL_DUpper E:\SGSignalLimitCurve_l 712MWthSetl.xls
Reactor Building MSL D L Dryer - Strain Gage 8 of 8 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 N. X E' 1.OE-03 1.0E-04 - 1.0E-05 - 1.0E-06 - 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz
-AveMSL D Lower No Excita - Ave MSL D Lower_withExcita LC2_AveMSLDLower .LC1 Ave MSL DLower Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSL D Lower E:\SGSignalLimitCurve_1712MWth_-Setl .xls
Reactor Building MSL A U 1 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 N cn 1.OE-03 g. 0 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1,OE-06 50 100 150 200 250 0 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_AUpper NoExcita AveMSL_A_Upper withExcita
-LCAveMSL A Upper
-LC2_AveMSLAUpper Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSL_A_Upper E:\SGSignalLimitCurve_1752MWthSet2.xls
Reactor Building MSL A L Dryer - Strain Gage 2 of 8, 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 1.OE-02 N N.j U) 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz
-AveMSL_A_LowerNoExcita AveMSL_A_Lower withExcita
-LC2_AveMSLALower -LCIAveMSL_ALower Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSL_ALower E:\SGSignalLimitCurve_1 752MWthSet2.xls
Reactor Building MSL B U 3 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.0E+00 I.OE-01 1.01E-02 N 11OE-03 E
-1.0E-04 1.OE-05 1.0E-06 50 100 150 200 250 0
Frequency, Hz AveMSLBUpper NoExcita AveMSLBUpper withExcita LC2_AveMSLBUpper -LClAveMSL-BUpper Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSL_BUpper E:\SGSignalLimitCurve_1752MWthSet2.xls
Reactor Building MSL B L 4'of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.0E+00 1.OE-01 10E-02 1.0E-03 E 1.0E-04 1.0E-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 .250 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_BLowerNo Excita -AveMSL__B_LowerwithExcita LC2_Ave_MSL_B_Lower _L01_Ave_MSL_B_-Low er Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSL_B_Lower E:\SGSignal LimitCurve_I 752MWthSet2.xls
Reactor Building MSL C U 5 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.E+00-,.. 1.E-01 1.E-02 N CV 1.E-03 E 1.E-04 1.E-05 1 .E-06 50 100 150 200 250 0 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_CUpper NoExcita AveMSLC Upper withExcita LC2-AveMSLCUpper -LCIAveMSL-C Upper Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSL_CUpper E:\SGSignalLimitCurve_1 752MWthSet2.xls
Reactor Building MSL D U 7 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 1 0E-03 E 1.0E-04 1.0E-05 1.OE-06 50 100 150 200 250 0 Frequency, Hz AveMSL._DUpper NoExcita -AveMSL_DUpper withExcita LC2_AveMSLD Upper -LC1_AveMSL-DUpper Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSL_D-Upper E:\SGQSignal_Limit Curve_1 752MWthSet2.xls
Reactor Building MSL D L 8 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.0E+O0 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 Ni I N rn 1.0E-03 C, 1.0E-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 + 100 150 200 250 0 50 Frequency, Hz
- AveMSLDLowerNoExcita -AveMSL_DLower-withExcita LC2_AveMSLDLower LClAveMSLDLower Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSL_DLower E:\SGSignalLimitCurve_1 752MWthSet2.xls
Reactor Building MSL A U 1 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 N 3: C14 1.0E-03 1.O1E 1.0E-05 - 1.0E-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz
.AveMSL_AUpper NoExcita AveMSL_A_Upper withExcita LC2_AveMSLAUpper LC1_AveMSL-A Upper
.. Baseline 1671 MWth Ave MSL A Upper
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_06 1000--- 1792Mwt Set 1 Record Set\Dryer SG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xIs
Reactor Building MSL A L 2 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 - 1'.0E-02 (A 1.OE-03 E 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz Ave_MSL_A_LowerNoExcita - AveMSLA_LowerwithExcita LC2_AveMSL_A_Lower - LC1_AveMSL_A_Lower Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSL_ALower
\\Vyshared l\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_06 1000---1792Mwt Set 1 Record Set\DryerSG\SGSignal_LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL B U 3 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00 - 1.OE-01 1.0E-02 N C14 1.OE-03 E 1.0E-04 1.OE-05 1.0E-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz Ave_MSL_BUpperNo._Excita AveMSL_B_Upper withExcita
-LC2_AveMSL_B_Upper
-LC1_AveMSL-BUpper Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSL B Upper
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_06 1000---1792Mwt Set 1 Record Set\Dryer.SG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL B L 4 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.0E-+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 N 1.0E-03 E 0. mi 1.0E-04 1.0E-05 1.0E-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz
-AveMSLBLowerNoExcita -AveMSL B Lowerwith_E ~xcita
-LC2_AveMSLB_Lower -"LCl_Ave_MSLBLower Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSLBLower
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_06 1000---1792Mwt Set 1 Record Set\Dryer SG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL C U 5 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage I.E+00 1.E-01 1.E-02 1.E-03 E 1 .E-04 1.E-05 1.E-06 0 50 100- 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSLCUpper NoExcita AveMSL_CUpper withExcita LC2_AveMSL_C Upper -LCIAveMSLC .Upper Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSLCUpper
\\Vyshared l\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_06 1000---1792Mwt Set 1 Record Set\Dryer SG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL C L 6 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.0E-02 CI E' 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 1.0E-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSLCLowerNoExcita AveMSL_C_LowerwithExcita LC2_AveMSLC_Lower LC1_Ave_MSL_C_Lower Baseline 1671*MWth Ave MSL_C_Lower
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_06 1000---1792Mwt Set 1 Record Set\DryerSG\SGSignalyLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL D U 7 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 N I N 1.OE-03 E 0) 1.0E-04 I.OE-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz
-AveMSL_D Upper NoExcita -AveMSL_D_Upper-w rithExcita LC2_AveMSLDUpper LC1_AveMSL-DUp~ )er
.... Baseline 1671 MWth Ave.MSL D Upper
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_06 1000---1792Mwt Set 1 Record Set\DryerSG\SGSignal LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL D L 8 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 1.OE-02 - N CV E 1.0E-03 1.OE-04 - 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz eAveMSL-DdLowerlNo\Excita 2AveMMSSLRer LowerSwithgExcita LC2_AveMSLDLower----!CAvMSDLoe
--- Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSLD Lower
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 06 1000 ---1792Mwt Set 1 Record Set\DryerSG\SGSignal_LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building 1832 MWth Set 2 Test Data with 1791 MWth Limit Curve I of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage MSL A U 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 1.OE-03 E V-M) 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_AUpper NoExcita .-- AveMSLAUpper-withExcita LC2,AveMSLAUpper LC1_-AveMSL-A Upper Baseline 1791 MWth Ave_MSL_AUpper
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100---1832Mwt Set 2 Record set\Dryer SG\SG Signal LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building 1832 MWth Set 2 Test Data with 1791 MWth Limit Curve 2 of 8. Dryer- Strain Gage MSL A L 1.OE+OO 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 - N IN i" 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_A_Lower No Excita -AveMSLALowerwithExcita
- LC2_AveMSLALower -LClAveMSLALower Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSLALower
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100---1832Mwt Set 2 Record set\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building 1832 MWth Set 2 Test Data with 1791 MWth Limit Curve 3 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage MSL B U 1.0E+00 - 1.OE-01 1.0E-02 N 1.0E-03 E I.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.0E-06 50 100 150 200 250 0 Frequency, Hz 0 AveMSL_BUpper NoExcita AveMSL_B_Upper withExcita
-LCIAve_MSLB_Upper LC2_AveMSLB_Upper Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSLBUpper
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100---1832Mwt Set 2 Record set\Dryer iSG\SG Signal LimitCurve.xis
Reactor Building 1832 MWth Set 2 Test Data with 1791 MWth Limit Curve 4 of 8 MSL B Dryer - Strain Gage L 1.OE÷00 - 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 N N 1.OE-03 E 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 50 100 150 200 250 0 Frequency, Hz
-AveMSLBLowerNoExcita -AveMSL_B_LowerwithExcita
-LC2_AveMSLBLower -LC1_AveMSLBLower Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSL_B_Lower Signal/LimitCurve~xls
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_ 22 1100---1832Mwt Set 2 Record set\DryerSG\SG
Reactor Building 1832 MWth Set 2 Test Data with 1791 MWth Limit Curve 5 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage MSL C U 1.E+00 1.E-01 I.E-02 N I N (j~ 1.E-03 a) I.E-04 1.E-05 1.E-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_CUpper-NoExcita -AveMSLCUpper withExcita LC2_AveMSLCUpper LC1_AveMSLC Upper Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSLC Upper
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100---1832Mwt Set 2 Record set\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building 1832 MWth Set 2 Test Data with 1791 MWth Limit Curve 6 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage MSL C L 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 1.0E-03 E 1.0E-04 1.OE-05 1.0E-06 50 100 150 200 250 0 Frequency, Hz
-AveMSLCLowerNoExcita -Ave_MSL_CLowerwithExcita LC2_AveMSL._C_Lower LClAveMSLCLower Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSLCLower
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100---1832Mwt Set 2 Record set\DryerSG\SG Signal LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building 1832 MWth Set 2 Test Data with 1791 MWth Limit Curve 7 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage MSL D U 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 A NJ MI C14 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 kj Frequency, Hz
-AveMSL DUpperNoExcita AveMSL_D Upper withExcita
- LC2_AveMSL_DUpper ~LCAveMSL-DUpper Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSLDUpper
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100---1832Mwt Set 2 Record set\Dryer SG\SG SignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building 1832 MWth Set 2 Test Data with 1791 MWth Limit Curve 8 of 8 Dryer - Strain Gage MSL D L 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.0 E-02 N M N En 1.0E-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.0E-06 100 150 200 250 0 50 Frequency, Hz
-AveMSLDLowerNoExcita -- AveMSLDLower withExcita
-LC2_Ave_MSLDLower *LC1_AveMSLDLower Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSLD Lower
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100---1832Mwt Set 2 Record set\Dryer SG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
9 1 of 6 MSL A U narrow band Reactor Building - 1912 MWth Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00 I.OE-01 1.OE-02
=
1.OE-03 0 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 130 .132 134 136 138 140 142 144 146 148 150 Frequency, Hz
-- AveMSL_A_Upper No Excita - Ave_MSL_A_Upper.withExcita
-- LC2_Ave_MSLAUpper LC 1Ave_MSL'AUpper
.-......Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSL_A_Upper
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1 912 MWt Evaluation\Att i b.2 1912 MWth Set 2\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL A L narrow band 2 of 6 Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth 1.OE+00 - 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 N x N'. 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.0E-06 - 130 132 134 136 138 140 142 148 144 146 150 Frequency, Hz
-AveMSL_A_Lower No Excita AveMSL_A_LowerwithExcita LC2_AveMSL_ALower -LClAve_M SL_A_Lower Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSLA_Lowier
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att lb.2 1912 MWth Set 2\SGSignal_LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL B U narrow band 3 of 6 Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 N x.I-1.0E-03 1.0E-04 1.0E-05 1.0E-06 130 140 150 Frequency, Hz
- AveMSLB_Upper No Excita Ave_MSL_B_Upper withExcita
-LC2_AveMSL.BUpper
-LCAveMgL-BUpper Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSLB Upper
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att 1b.2 1912 MWth Set 2\SGSignal_Limit_Curve.xls
MSL B L narrow band 4 of 6 Reactor Building Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth 1.OE+00 r To asseaS§the saceptabillty s ma: f requency shifts, the limit curve may be shifted 't the right or to the left less llaou.stc f' than or equal to 1Hz.,If the acoustic signal falls under the shiifted, limit curve, then the limit curve criteria can be disp'ositioned'as satis~fiied. I I.0E-01 1.OE-02 F _____________________________ N z C" 1.OE-03 1.OE-04
- 57. mo 1.0E-05 1.OE-06I I
130 140 150 Frequency, Hz AveMSLBLowerNoExcita AveMSLBLower-withExcita LC2_AveMSLBLower -L ClAveMSLBLower Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSL_B_Lower ........
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att lb.2 1912 MWth Set 2\SGSignal_LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building _ MSL D U narrow band 5 of 6 Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth I.0E+00 0 1.OE-01 1.OE-02. E 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 +- 130 132 134 136 138 140 142 144 146 148 150 Frequency, Hz
- AveMSLDUpper NoExcita AveMSL-D_Upper-with-Excita LC2_AveMSL D_Upper - LC1_AveMSLDUpper Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSL D_Upper
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att lb.2 1912 MWth Set 2\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL D L narrow band 6 of 6 Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth I.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.0E-02 N z C'.1 1.OE-03 0 1.OE-04 1.0E-05 10E-0641 130 132 134 136 138 140 142 144 146 148 150 Frequency, Hz AveMSLDLowerNoExcita - AveMSL_0_Lower with-Excita LC2_AveMSLDLower -- LC1_AveMSLDLower Baseline 1872 MWth Ave MSL_DLoweý
\\Vysharedl \public\Power Uprate\1 912 MWt Evaluation\Att 1b.2 1912 MWth Set 2\SGSignal_LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSLAL 1 of 1 Dryer - Strain. Gage 1.0E-02 1.OE N
" 1.OE-04 1.0E-05 1.OE 130 132 134 136 138 140 142 144 146 148 150 Frequency, Hz
-AveMSLALowerNoExcita AveMSL_A_LowerwithExcita
-LC2_Ave_MSL_A_Lower -LC1_AveMSLALower Baseline 1671 MWth AveMSLALower
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_06 1000---1792Mwt Set I Record Set\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building 1832 MWth Set 2 Test Data with 1791 MWth Limit Curve 1 of 4 Dryer - Strain Gage MSL A U 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 E V 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 4 130 132 134 136 138 140 142 144 146 148 150 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_AUpper NoExcita AveMSL_A_Upper withExcita
-LC1_AveMSL-A Upper
-LC2-AveMSLAUpper Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSL_A_Upper
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100---1832Mwt Set 2 Record set\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building 1832 MWth Set 2 Test Data with 1791 MWth Limit Curve 2 of 4 Dryer - Strain Gage MSLAL 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 N 1.01E-03 E 1.01E-04 1.0E-05 1.OE-06 130 132 134 136 138 140 142 144 146 148 150 Frequency, Hz 0 AveMSL_A_LowerNoExcita -AveMSL_A_LowerwithExcita LC2_AveMSLA_Lower -LC1_AveMSLALower Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSLALower
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100---1832Mwt Set 2 Record set\DryerSG\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building 1832 MWth Set 2 Test Data with 1791 MWth Limit Curve 3 of 4 MSL D U Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE-'00 1.OE-0l 1.OE-02 N 30 1.0E-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 TI-- 130 132 134 136 138 140 142 144 146 148 150 Frequency, Hz
- AveMSL_DUpper NoExcita -"AveMSL_D_Upper withExcita LC2_AveMSLDUpper -LC1_AveMSL-DUpper Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSLDUpper
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100---1832Mwt Set 2 Record set\Dryer SG\SG Signal-Limit_Curve.xls
Reactor Building 1832 MWth Set 2 Test Data with 1791 MWth Limit Curve 4 of 4 Dryer - Strain Gage MSL D L I.OE--00 1.OE-01 1I.OE-02 N C14 1.0E-03 E 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 -" 132 134 136 138 140 142 144 146 148 150 130 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_0_LowerNoExcita - AveMSLDLower_withExcita LC2_AveMSL_D_Lower LOIAveMSLID7Lower Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSLDLoWer
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 22 1100---1832Mwt Set 2 Record set\Dryer SG\SG Signal LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL A U narrow band 1 of 12 Dryer - Strain Gage 1872 MWth 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 E 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.0E-06 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_A Upper NoExcita AveMSL_A_Upper withExcita
-LC1_Ave_MSL'AUpper LC2_AveMSLAUpper Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSL_AUpper \\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_28 1000--1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerSG\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set SG_SignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL A L narrow band 2 of 12 Dryer - Strain Gage. 1872 MWth 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 E 1.0E-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.0E-06 -* 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_A_LowerNoExcita - AveMSLA_Lower_with_Excita LC2_AveMSL_A_Lower -LC1_Ave_MSL_A_Lower Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSL_ALower 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerSG\Data_2006_04_28 SG SignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL D U narrow band 3 of 12 Dryer - Strain Gage 1872 MWth 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 1.OE-03 E IV 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 -1 140 145 150 120 125 130 135 Frequency, Hz AveMSLD Upper NoExcita -AveMSL_D_Upper withExcita LC1_AveMSL-DUpper LC2_AveMSLDUpper Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSLD Upper 1000,---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerSG\Data_2006_04_28 SG_SignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL D L narrow band 4 of 12 Dryer - Strain Gage 1872 MWth 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 N x 1.0E-03 E 1.0E-04 1.0E-05 1.OE-06 -1 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 Frequency, Hz
- Ave_MSLDLowerNoExcita -AveMSLDLowerwithExcita
- LC2_AveMSL_D_Lower -LC1_AveMSL D Lower Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSLDLower
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 .04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerSG\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL A U 5 of 12 Dryer - Strain Gage 1872 MWth p, 1.OE+00 - 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 E 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz Ave-MSLAUpper NoExcita AveMSL_AUpper.withExcita LC2_AveMSLA-Upper -LCI_AveMSLAUpper Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSL_AUpper
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_28 1000--1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\Dryer._SG\Data_2006_04_28 1000--1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL A L 6 of 12 Dryer - Strain Gage 1872 MWth 9 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 N I N In 1.OE-03 a) 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_A_LowerNoExcita -Ave_MSLA_LowerwithExcita LC2_AveMSL_A_Lower -LCAveMSLALower Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSL_A_Lower
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_28 1000--1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\Dryer, SG\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL B U 7 of 12 Dryer - Strain Gage 1872 MWth 1.OE+O0 1.OE-01 I .OE-02 1.OE-03 E V) I.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_BUpper NoExcita Ave_MSL_B_Upper withExcita LC2_AveMSL BUpper -LC1_AveMSL-BUpper Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSL_B Upper
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\Dryer SG\Data_2006 04 28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL B L 8 of 12 Dryer - Strain Gage 1872 MWth 1.OE+O0 1.0E-01 1.OE-02 N x E' 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 1 OE-05 1.OE-06 50 100 150 200 250 0 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_B_LowerNoExcita AveMSLBLowerwithExcita
-LC1_AveMSLBLower
-LC2_AveMSL_B_Lower Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSLBLower
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\Dryer.SG\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set SGSignal_LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL C U 9 of 12 Dryer - Strain Gage 1872 MWth p 1.E+00 1.E-01 1.E-02 N
-" 1.E-03 E
0) 11E-04 1.E-05 1 .E-06 0 50 100-, 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSLC Upper No Excita AveMSL C_Upper with Excita LC2_AveMSLC_Upper - LC1_AveMSL C Upper Baseline 1791 MWth Ave MSL C Upper 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006 04 28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerSG\Data_2006_04_28 SG Signal LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL C L 10 of 12 Dryer - Strain Gage 1872 MWth T 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.OE-02 N 1.OE-03 E (D 1.0E-04 1.0E-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_C_LowerNoExcita AveMSL_C_LowerwithExcita LC2_AveMSLC"Lower LC1_AveMSLCLower Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSLCLower
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerSG\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set SG_Signal LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL D U 11 of 12 Dryer.- Strain Gage 1872 MWth 1.0E+O0 1.OE-01 1.0E-02 N E" 1.0E-03 I.0E-04 1.0E-05 1.0E-06 50 100 150 200 250 0 Frequency, Hz AveMSLD_Upper NoExcita AveMSLD Upper withExcita LCI.AveMSL--Upper LC2_Ave_MSL_D_Upper Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSLDUpper 1000---1872Mwt Set 2. Record Set
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerSG\Data_2006_04_28 SGSignal LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL D L 12 of 12 Dryer- Strain Gage 1872 MWth 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.,OE-02 N M 1 0E-03 E 1.OE-04 1.0E-05 1.OE-06 0 50 100 150 200 250 Frequency, Hz AveMSLDLowerNoExcita -AveMSL_DLowerwithExcita LC2_AveMSL_D_Lower ~LC1_Ave__MSLDLower Baseline 1791 MWth AveMSL-DLower 000.---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set
\\Vysharedl\Projects\DAC Data\Data_2006_04_28 1000---1872Mwt Set 2 Record Set\DryerSG\Data_2006_04_28 SG_SignalLimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL A U narrow band 1 of 6 Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth p 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 N C..' 1.OE-03 -- (I) 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06. 130 132 134 136 138 140 142 144. 146 148 150 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_A_Upper No Excita -AveMSLAUpper-withExcita LC2_AveMSLAUpper - LClAve_MSLAUpper Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSL A Uppeir* .
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att lb.1 1912 MWth Set 1\SGSignal_LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL A L narrow band 2 of 6 Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth
-~1.OE+O0 IQOE-Ol I .OE-02 14 r 1.0 E-03 1.OE-04 I.OE-05 I .OE-06 130 132 134 136 138 140 142 144 146 148 150 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_A_'LowerNoExcitE AveMSL_A_Lower withExcita LC2 AveMSL_A_Lower -LClAve_MSLA_Lower Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSIL-ALower
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att lb.1 1912 MWth Set 1\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
MSL B U narrow band 3 of 6 Reactor Building Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth 1,OE+00 1.0E-01 1.QE-02 N c4ý 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 -k-130 140 150 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_B_Upper No Excita Ave_MSLBUpper withExcita LC2_-AveMSLB Upper - LCAve_MSL_BUpper Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSLB_Upper
\\VysharedI\pubhc\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation'kAt 1b.1 1912 MWth Set I\SG SignW-Lmit Cuve.xls
4 of 6 MSL B L narrow band Reactor Building 1912 MWth Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00 To assess .the acceptability ofs 6malacoustic frequency shIftZ th ii uv a esifte Uto the: right or to the left less than or equal tol1Hz. Ifthe acoustic signal falls under th,'eshifted limnit curve, ,then'thelimI~it c+urve critei cab dispo6sitioned as satisid 1.0E-01 1.OE-02 - - V N
-" 1.OE-03 1.OE-04
-~ ~;-
1.OE-05 A
-1 fAl::.nR 1 OE-06 130 140 150 Frequency, Hz Ave_MSL_B_Lower No Excita -- Ave_M SL_B_LowerwithExcita
-- LC2_AveMSLB_Lower - LClAve_MSL_B_Lower Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSL_B_Lower
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att lb.1 1912 MWth Set 1\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
I Reactor Building MSL D U narrow band 5 of 6 Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth I 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 1.OE-02 N
-M-1.0E-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 I I 1.OE-06 130 132 134 136 138 140 142 144 146 148 150 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_D_UpperNoExcita Ave_M SL_DUpper withExcita LC2_AveMSLDUppe-r - LCAve_MSL_D_Upper Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSLD_Upper
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt EvaluationAtt lb.1 1912 MWth Set 1\SG Signal LimitCurve.xls
MSL D L narrow band 6 of 6 Reactor Building Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth 1.OE+00 03 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 N z ('.4 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 130 132 134 136 138 140 142 144 146 148 150 Frequency, Hz Ave_MSL_DLower NoExcita Ave_MSL_D_LowerwithExcita
*LC2,AveMSLDLower "LC1 Ave MSL D Lower Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSLD Lower
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1.912 MWt Evaluation\Att lb.1 1912 MWth Set I\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
MSL A U narrow band 1 of 14 Reactor Building - Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth 1.OE+00 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 E 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 1.0E-05 1.OE-06 130 132 134 136 138 140 142 144 146 148 150 Frequency, Hz
-AveMSL_A_Upper NoExcita Ave_MSL_A_Upper.withExcita LC2_Ave_MSLAUpper -LClAve_MSLAUpper Baseline 1872 MWth Ave MSL A Upper
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att la 1912 MWth Set 5\SG_Signal_LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL A L narrow band 2 of 14 Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth 1.0E+00 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 N C*4 1.OE-03 W 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 130 132 134 136 138 140 142 144 146 148 150 Frequency, Hz
-AveMSL_A_LowerNo Excita AveMSL_ALowerwithExcita LC2_AveMSL_A_Lower -LCAveMSL ALower Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSL_A_Lower
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att la 1912 MWth Set 5\SG Signal-LimitCurve.xIs
Reactor Building MSL B U narrow band 3 of 14 Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth 1.OE+QO -- J ------ -----... oassess the acceptability ofsmall acoustic frequency shifts, tlhe limit curve may be shifted to the right or to the left less T.. orqual rhan, to 1Hz. If:the acoustic signal falls under the shifted limit.curve then the limit curve:criteria can be dispositioned as satisfied.:.... 1,0E-01 1.OE-02 N
=
1.OE-03 Q) 1.0E-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 4-130 140 150 Frequency, Hz
- Ave_MSL_B_Upper NoExcita -Ave_MSLB _Upper-with Excita LC2_AveMSLLB_Upper - LC1_Ave_MSL_BUpper Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSL_B_Upper _
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att la 1912 MWth Set 5\SGSignalLimitCurve.xls
MSL B L narrow band 4 of 14 Reactor Building 1912 MWth Dryer - Strain Gage 1.OE+00 Q ao"i s aso athe fsmall a"i frequeny ite limitcure maybe shifted to theright or to the leftlesý shifted limit cure.thenthh etlimit urve criteria can be. than or equalto 1eHz. If the cacIustic signal falls under the dispositioned as satisfed. 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 .1. __________________________________________________________ N 4" 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 7 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 130 140 150 Frequency, Hz AveMSL_B_LowerNoExcita - Ave MSLBLower"withExcita LC2_AveMSLBLower LCAveMSLBLowr Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSL_B_Lower
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att la 1912 MWth Set 5\SGSignal_Limit_Curve.xls
Reactor Building MSL D U narrow band 5 of 14 Dryer- Strain Gage . 1912 MWth 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 1.OE-02
=N
(
- 0) 1.OE-03 w
1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.QE-06 130 132 134 136 138 140 142 . 144. 146 148 150 Frequency, Hz Ave_MSL_DUpperNo_Excita Ave_MSL_D_Upper-withExcita LC2_AveMSLD_Upper -LC1_Ave_MSL_DUpper
.Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSLD_Upper-
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att la 1912 MWth Set 5\SG_Signal_LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSL D L narrow band 6 of 14 Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth 1.OE+00 - 1.0E-01 1.OE-02 N
- *.OE-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05
-1.OE 130 132 134 136 -138 140 142 144 146 148 150 Frequency, Hz AveMSLDLowerNoExcita - AveMSL_D_Lower withExcita LC2 AveMSLDLower -LClAve_MSL_D_Lower Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSL_D_Lower
\\Vyshared l\public\Power Uprate\1l912 MWt Evaluation\Att 1a 1912 MVVth Set 5\SGSignal_LirnitCurve.xls
MSLAU 7 of 14 Reactor Building - Dryer -.Strain Gage 1912 MWth r, 1.OE+0O nc* shifts, !thel limit burvemay Ibeshifted to the right or to the left lets er.tl&e..shifted limit curVe, then:the.limit cure.criteria can: be 1.OE-01 1.OE-02
- 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 1.0E-05
.... .V - 11
*J~ . 7 0 . ..8 079"'. ..
1 00:11
...
- 13 1 150
'" "/
1 V'" 1 18 1 2 2 2 1.0E-06 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180, 190 200 210 2202024 5 Frequency, Hz
- AveMSL_A_Upper.No Excita - AveMSLA_Upper withExcita LC2_AveMSLAUpper - LC_Ave_MSLAUpper Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSLAUpper
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att la 1912 MWth Set 5\SGSignal_LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building MSLAL 8 of 14 Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth 1.OE+00 1.0E-01 1.OE-02 N I ('4 (0 1.OE-03 g 0 1.0E-04 1.OE-05 1.OE-06 I I I I r r , , , . . -- t t* A u iu 2u 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 Frequency, Hz
- AveMSL A LowerNoExcita AveMSL_A_LowerwithExcita
-LC 2_AveM SL_A_Lowe r C-v-S-ALwr- L Cl1_Ave_M Ave MSL A Lower___C SL_A_Lowe r --
Baseline 1872 MWth Ave MSLA Lower
\\Vysharedl~public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att 1la 1912 MWth Set 5\SG Signal Limit Curve.xls
9 of 14 MSL B U Reactor Building - 1912 MWth Dryer - Strain Gage
*-1.OE+00 -
may be shifted to the right Or to the left less small acoustic frequency shiftsb the limit curve criteria can be the limit curve oustic signal falls under the shifted limit curve, then 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 N
"i 1.OE-03EV 1.OE-04 1.QE 1,0E-06 250 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 Frequency, Hz AveMSL-B UpperNOExcita - AveMSL_B. Upper-with Excita
-LCl_Ave_MSLB Upper LC2_AveM SLBUpper Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSL_BUpper Set 5\SG Signal Limit Curve.xls
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att la 1912 MWth
MSL B L 10 of 14 Reactor Building Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth 1.OE+00 - 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 T l.OE-03 1.OE-04 -- I.0E-05 - 1.OE-06 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 Frequency, Hz
--- Ave_-MSL_B_LowerNoExcita -- Ave_MSL_BLowerwith_Excita LC2_AveMSL_B_Lower - LC_Ave_MSL_B_Lower Baseline 1872 MWth AveMSL_B_Lower
\\Vyshared l\public\Power Uprate\1 912 MWt Evaluation\Att 1a 1912 MWth Set 5\SGSignal_LimitCurve.xls
Reactor Building - MSL C U 11 of 14 Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth 1.OE+00 C'ý' 1.OE-01 1.OE-02 N
" 1.0E-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05 1.0E-06 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250
- Frequency, Hz
- AveMSL_C UpperNo Excita AveMSLC Upper withExcita LC2_AveMSLCUpper - LC1_AveMSLCUpper Baseline 1872 MWth Ave MSL C Upper
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att 1 a 1912 MWth Set 5\SGSignal_LimitCurve.xls
k Reactor Building MSL D L 14 of 14 Dryer - Strain Gage 1912 MWth 1.OE+00
ýhi.eto the rihht orj to the leftless mit ueve criteria can be 1.OE-01 1.0E-02 N
"I 0 1.OE-03 1.OE-04 1.OE-05
- .Il.! I' I 1 I I L '
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 1.OE-06 0 0 04 070-1 0 1 0 1 010 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9'0 100" 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 Frequency, Hz
-AveMSL_D_LowerNoExcita Ave_MSL_D_LowerwithExcita
-LC2_Ave MSL_D_Lower -LC_Ave_MSL_D_Lower Baseline 1872 MWth Ave MSL D Lowel
\\Vysharedl\public\Power Uprate\1912 MWt Evaluation\Att la 1912 MWth Set 5\SGSignal_LimitCurve.xls
112 STATE STREET FAX: (802) 828-2342 DRAWER 20 TTY (VT): 1-800-734-8390 MONTPELIER VT 05620-2601 e-mail: vtdps@psd.state~vt.us TEL: (802) 828-2811 Internet: http://www.state.vLus/psd STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE July 24, 2006 John Marshall, Esq. Nancy Malmquist, Esq. Robert Miller, Esq. Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC P.O. Box 99 St. Johnsbury, VT 05819-0099 Re: Docket 7195 - DPS Responses to Discovery - Final Production
Dear John,
Nancy and Bob: I enclose herewith the Department's final production in response to the discovery requests served by Entergy in this docket on July 14, 2006. Tltis production includes the privilege log to which I alluded in my letter to you of July 21, 2006. I also include under cover of this letter certain supplemental materials that are responsive to the following questions: Q.EN:DPS.6. Q.EN:DPS.8. Q.EN:DPS.9. Please note, Attachment 6-3 consists of an excerpt from a document that is 347 pages long. As you will see, Mr. Sherman represents in his answer that only the excerpt provided is responsive to the Company's discovery request. If, however, you would nonetheless like a copy of the document in its entirety, please let me know. Please Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. ly yours,
; ry u I. MAey, Esq.
ecial Counsel Enclosures cc: Attached Service List NRC 50-271-LR ASLBP 06-849-03-LR DPS-3 37 Pages
STATE OF VERMONT PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD Docket No.,7195 Petition of Vermont Department of Public Service for an investigation into the reliability of the steam dryer and resulting performance of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station under uprate conditions DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE'S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT YANKEE, LLC. AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.'S FIRST SET OF INFORMATION REQUESTS July 24, 2006
Docket No. 7195 Department of Public Seryice's Responses to Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC. And Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.'s First Set of Information Requests
- 6. Reference Mr. Sherman's Direct Testimony dated June 21, 2006, beginning at page 9, line 5. Please identify and produce all documents relied upon for the assertion that the "only basis for NRC acceptance of the steam dryers in power uprate conditions was the added instrumentation and the power ascension tests."
ANSWER: In my Direct Testimony dated June 21, 2006, I specifically rely onExhibits DPS-WKS-2 and -3 for the statement that NRC acceptance of the steam dryers in power uprate conditions was based on the added instrumentation and the power ascension tests. The following additional attached documents are responsive to the request: Attachment 6-1 NRC letter to Entergy (Dyer to Kansler), Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station - Extended Power Uprate Review Schedule and License Conditions, October 12, 2005 Attachment 6-2 NRC letter to Ertergy (Ennis to Kansler), Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station - Issuance ofAmendment Re; Extended Power Uprate, March 2! 2006 Attachment 6-3 Excerpt (p. 41-51), Safety Evaluation By The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Related to Amendment No. 229 to Facility OperatingLicense No. DPR-28 Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations,Inc. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-2 71. Person Responsible for Response: William K. Sherman, Department of Public Service Date: July 24, 2006
Docket No. 7195 Department of Public Service's Responses to Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC. And Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.'s First Set of Information Requests
- 8. Reference Mr. Sherman's Direct Testimony dated June 21, 2006, beginning at page 11, line 13. Please identify and produce all notes taken'by Mr. Sherman, or reports, memoranda or other documents drafted by Mr. Sherman, relating to Mr. Sherman's review of data Entergy provided to the NRC or relating to his participation in technical conference calls or his site visits during the Vermont Yankee Power Ascension Test.
OBJECTION (BY COUNSEL): The Department objects to this question to the extent that it seeks disclosure and production of attorney-client privileged information pursuant to V.R.E. 502(b)(1). A privilege log is attached to this supplemental response. Subject to this objection the Department responds as follows: The following are notes taken or reports, memoranda or other documents which I drafted, relating to my review of data Entergy provided to the NRC or relating to my participation in technical conference calls or site visits during the Vermont Yankee Power Ascension Test: Attachment 8-1 W. Sherman, handwritten notes from site, March 6, 2006 - May 5, 2006. Attachment 8-2 Email (Sherman to Ennis), Re: VY Power Ascension, March 31, 2006. Attachment 8-3 Email string, Steam dryer data methodology (McElwee to Sherman; Nichols to McElwee; McElwee to Nichols; Sherman to McElwee; Sherman to Ennis), May 1, 2006. Attachment 8-4 Email (Sherman to Ennis), Steam dryer question, May 1, 2006 Attachment 8-5 Handwritten notes by W. Sherman, Steam Dryer Meeting, 6-15-06 Attachment 8-6 Email (Sherman to McElwee), questions re: Rbettipresentation, June 19, 2006. Attachment 8-7 Email (Sherman to David O'Brien, Betsy Bishop; Sarah Hofmann), Entergy PowerAscension Test Recalculations, March 23, 2006. Attachment 8-8 Email (Sherman to William Sherman, David O'Brien, Betsy Bishop; Sarah Hofmnann), Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations, March 30, 2006. Attachment 8-9 Email (Sherman to William Sherman, David O'Brien, Betsy Bishop; Sarah Hofmnann), Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations, March 31, 2006.
Docket No. 7195 Department of Public Service's Responses to Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC. And Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.'s First Set of Information Requests Attachment 8-10 Email (Sherman to William Sherman, David O'Brien, Betsy Bishop; Sarah Hofinann), Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations, March 31, 2006. Attachment 8-11 Email (Sherman to William Sherman, David O'Brien, Betsy Bishop; Sarah Hofmann), Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations,Aprill, 2006. Attachment 8-12 Email (Sherman to William Sherman, David O'Brien, Betsy Bishop; Sarah Hofmann), Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations,April 2, 2006. Attachment 8-13 Email (Sherman to William Sherman, David O'Brien, Betsy Bishop, Sarah Hofmann, Richard Smith), Next VYpower step up tomorrow (Thursday) - to 115%, April 5, 2006. Attachment 8-14 Email (Sherman to William Sherman, David O'Brien, Betsy Bishop, Sarah Hofmann, Richard Smith), VY on hold at 112.5% power, April 6, 2006. Attachment 8-15 Email (Sherman to William Sherman, David O'Brien, Betsy Bishop, Sarah Hofmrann, Richard Smith), Update on Vermont Yankee on hold at 112.5% power, April 12, 2006. Attachment 8-16 Email (Sherman to William Sherman, David O'Brien, Betsy Bishop, Sarah Hofmann, Richard Smith), Update on Vermont Yankee now at 115% power, April 24, 2006. Attachment 8-17 Email (Sherman to William Sherman, David O'Brien, Betsy Bishop, Sarah Hofmnann, Richard Smith), Vermont Yankee still at 115% power, April 27, 2006. Attachment 8-18 Email (Sherman to William Sherman, David O'Brien, Betsy Bishop, Sarah Hofmann, Richard Smith), Vermont Yankee now at 117.5% power but on Hold again, April 28, 2006. Attachment 8-19 Email (Sherman to William Sherman, David O'Brien, Betsy Bishop, Sarah Hofmann, Richard Smith, Hans Mertens), Vermont Yankee now approved to go to 120%, May 4, 2006.
Docket No. 7195 Department of Public Service's Responses to Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC. Andl Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.'s First Set of Information Requests Attachment 8-20 Email (Sherman to William Sherman, David O'Brien, Betsy Bishop, Sarah Hofiann, Richard Smith), Vermont Yankee at 117 full upratepower- 120%, May 5, 2006. [REDACTED] Person Responsible for Response: William K. Sherman, Department of Public Service Date: July 24, 2006
Docket No. 7195 Department of Public Seryice's, Responses to Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC. And Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.'s First Set of Information Requests
- 9. Reference Mr. Sherman's Direct Testimony dated June 21, 2006, beginning at page 14, line 33. Please identify and produce all documents relied upon for assertion that the "original limit curves presented in the initial power ascension test plan (Exhibit DPS-WKS-4) carried the expectation, that steam line/steam dryer phenomena were sufficiently understood analytically and that the limit curves were conservative." By way of clarification, Entergy VY is here requesting documents that demonstrate that the initial power ascension test plan "carried the expectation" indicated.
ANSWER: Please see Attachments 6-3, 8-5 and 8-6, which are responsive to the request. In addition, the following document is responsive to the request: Attachment 9-1 Entergy News Release: Update:. Vermont Yankee Power Increase ProgramNow at FirstPlateau,March 8, 2006. Person Responsible for Response: William K. Sherman, Department of Public Service Date: July 24, 2006
Docket No. 7195 Department of Public Service's Supplemental Responses to Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC. And Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.'s First Set of Information Requests VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE By___________ William Sherman Subscribed and sworn before me this 2 4 th day of July, 2006. Notary Public, My commission expires February 10, 2007 As tob 10 s:- cc: Attached
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE DOCKET NO. 7195 PRIVILEGE LOG FOR DOCUMENTS THROUGH July 24, 2006 prepared by June E. Tierney, Esq. Page 1 of 1 No. Document Type Date Author/Sender Recipients Subject Privilege Discovery Asserted Question Memorandum 12/02/05 William Sherman Sarah Hofmann, Esq. Power Uprate Confidential Q.EN:DPS.8
*(DPS director, public Steam Dryer Attorney -
advocacy) Summary Client Comm.; VRE.
*__._502(b)(1) 2 Electronic Mail 05/05/06 William Sherman Sarah Hofmann, Esq.(DPS Entergy Power Confidential Q.EN:DPS.8 director, public advocacy); Uprate Step Up Attorney-David O'Brien (DPS Client Conmmissioner); Richard Conmm.;
Smith (DPS Deputy VRE Commissioner); Hans 502(b)(1) Mertens (DPS director, engineering); Betsy Bishop. (Chief Of Staff, Governor's Office) Sarah Hofhiann, Esq.(DPS Power Uprate, Confidential Q.EN:DPS.8 Memorandum 05/15/06 William Sherman director, public advocacy); Recommendation Attorney-David O'Brien (DPS St Client Commissioner) Comm.; Dryer VRE
- 502(b)(1)
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION FILE COpy WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 RECEIVED MAR O320 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 229 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-28 ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT YANKEE, LLC AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION DOCKET NO. 50-271 Proprietary information pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of FederalRegulations Section 2.390 has been redacted from this document. Redacted information is identified by blank space enclosed within double brackets. Docket No. 7195 Attachment 6-3 Page 1 of 12
susceptibility to adverse flow effects from EPU operation. The NRC's acceptance criteria are based on (1) draft GDC-1, insofar as it requires those systems and components which are essential to the prevention of accidents which could affect the public health and safety or to mitigation of their consequences be designed, fabricated, erected, tested, and inspected to quality standards commensurate with the importance of the safety functions to be performed; (2) draft GDC-2, insofar as it requires that those systems and components which are essential to the prevention of accidents which could affect the public health and safety or to mitigation of their consequences be designed to withstand the effects of earthquakes combined with the effects of normal or accident conditions; and (3) draft GDC-40 and 42, insofar as they require that protection be provided for ESFs against the dynamic effects and missiles that might result from plant'equipment failures, as well as the effects of a LOCA. Specific review criteria are contained in SRP Sections 3.9.1, 3.9.2, 3.9.3, and 3.9.5.
- 2.2.6.2 Technical Evaluation 2.2.6.2.1 Steam Dryer As indicated in Attachment 5 to Supplement 26 (March 31, 2005) of its EPU request, the licensee originally procured the steam dryer for VYNPS as a non-safety-related, non-Seismic I, non-ASME component. In response to damage experienced by steam dryers at other nuclear power plants under EPU conditions, Entergy modified the square-hood steam dryer at VYNPS to improve its capability to withstand potential adverse flow effects that could result from operation of the plant at EPU conditions. In Supplement 8 (July 2, 2004) of its EPU request, the licensee described the modifications to the VYNPS steam dryer as follows:
- outer vertical hood plates (61-inch high) on 90 and 270' sides replaced with 1-inch thick plate;
- 3 reinforcing gussets (55.5-inch high) welded to outer vertical hood plates and lower horizontal cover plates on 900 and 2700 sides;
" lower horizontal cover plates on 900 and 2700 sides replaced with 5/8-inch thick plate; " 15-inch section of upper horizontal: cover plates on 900 and 2700 sides at intersection of outer vertical hood plates replaced with 1-inch thick plate; " internal bracing brackets at outer vertical hood plates removed; and " dryer bank tie. bars replaced with new design.
During a technical audit at the GE office in San Jose, CA, from August 24 to 26, 2004, NRC staff members from the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) and Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) with technical assistance by contractors from the Argonne National Laboratory reviewed the VYNPS steam dryer analysis initially provided as part of the licensee's EPU request. As discussed in the audit report dated September 14, 2004, the NRC staff concluded that the licensee's analysis was inadequate to demonstrate that the steam dryer at the VYNPS will be capable of maintaining its structural integrity under EPU conditions. For example, the licensee's analysis of the steam dryer as then submitted in support of its EPU request (1) had not adequately identified and verified the excitation sources for FIV Docket No. 7195 Attachment 6-3 Page 2 of 12
mechanisms that resulted in significant degradation of similar steam dryers at other-BWR nuclear power plants operating at EPU conditions; (2) had 'not provided a technically justifiable load definition for the steam dryer for EPU conditions in light of several assumptions that had not been adequately justified; (3) had not justified the applied methodology as realistic. in light of assumptions to account for uncertainties that resulted in apparent significant overestimation of predicted steam dryer stresses; (4) might be non-conservative based on assumptions for reducing the stress experienced by steam dryer parts and the creation of new potential fatigue failure locations as a result of modifications to the VYNPS steam dryer; and (5) had not validated the extrapolation of pressure peaks from original. power.levels to EPU conditions for the steam dryer at VYNPS. In the audit'report, the NRC staff indicated that the licensee could submit a revised analysis of the steam dryer in support of its request to operate VYNPS at EPU
'conditions.
In Supplement 26 (March 31, 2005), Supplement 27 (April 5, 2005), and Supplement 29 (June 2, 2005) of its EPU request, Entergy provided a revised analysis of the capability of the modified VYNPS steam dryer to' maintain its structural integrity under EPU conditions, NRC staff members from NRR and RES have reviewed the revised VYNPS steam dryer analysis with technical assistance by contractors from the Argonne National Laboratory (including a consultant from the Pennsylvania State University), and McMaster University in Canada. On June 15 and 16, 2005, the NRC staff with its contractors conducted a technical audit of the revised analysis of the VYNPS steam dryer at toe GE office in Washington, DC. On July 27, 2005, the NRC staff provided a final RAI to Entergy on the revised analysis of the VYNPS steam dryer. On August 1 and 4, 2005, the lice hsee submitted a response to the RAI in Supplements 30 and 31 to its EPU request. On August 15 and 16, 2005, an NRC staff member and a contractor conducted an audit at the GE Scale Model Test (SMT) facility near San Jose, CA, to obtain information on the licensee's performance of tests to. validate the specific application of the acoustic circuit model (ACM) used by the licensee to determine the pressure loads on the VYNPS steam dryer during EPU operation. From August 22 to 25, 2005, the NRC staff with its contractors conducted a technical audit at the GE office in Washington, DC, of the revised analysis of the VYNPS steam dryer. In Supplement 33 (September 14, 2005) of its EPU request, the licensee provided revised RAI responses to address the NRC staff's findings from the August 22-25, 2005, audit. In Supplement 34 (September 18, 2005) of its EPU request, the licensee provided, among other information, several figures inadvertently omitted from Supplement 33. On December 5, 2005, the NRC staff conducted a follow-up audit to the June and August 2005 audits with licensee personnel at the Excel Corporation office in Rockville, MD, to verify appropriate finite element modeling of the connection of the gussets to the cover plate in the VYNPS steam dryer for the determination of stress at the connection under EPU conditions. As described in the applicable supplements to its EPU request, the licensee evaluated the pressure loads acting on the steam dryer during operation of VYNPS through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and acoustic circuit model (ACM) analyses. The licensee used the CFD .analysis of the VYNPS steam dryer to predict hydrodynamic pressure loads that would act on the steam dryer at low frequencies under .CLTP and EPU conditions. The licensee used the ACM analysis to calculate the acoustic pressure loads acting at high frequencies on the VYNPS steam dryer at CLTP based on pressure fluctuations in the MSLs measured by pressure sensors installed on the MSL venturi lines and strain gages installed on the MSLs. The licensee performed transient and static stress analyses using an ANSYS finite element model (FEM) of the VYNPS steam dryer. The licensee calculated the stresses on the VYNPS steam Docket No. 7195 Attachment 6-3 Page 3 of 12
-43 -
dryer resulting from the CFD and ACM analyses, and combined those stresses by the square-root-of-the-sum-of-squares (SRSS) methodology with applicable weld concentration factors. The licensee then compared the peak alternating stresses for specific steam dryer locations to the fatigue limits in the ASME Code and the primary plus secondary stresses to the applicable ASME Code Service Level limits. In its review of the VYNPS steam dryer analysis, the NRC staff evaluated the licensee's validation of its CFD and ACM analyses, and the uncertainty of those analyses and their inputs. The staff reviewed the licensee's fundamental frequency and damping assumptions for the VYNPS steam dryer. The staff evaluated the licensee's calculational methodology to convert the design pressure loads obtained from the CFD and ACM analyses to the stress at various locations on the steam dryer, the combination of the calculated CFD and ACM stresses, the stress limits used in evaluating steam dryer integrity, and the margins to those limits. The staff also reviewed the information provided by the licensee for monitoring the loads exerted on the steam dryer during plant operation and overall dryer performance. In its CFD analysis, the licensee conducted a, Large Eddy Simulation (LES) of the upper portion of the VYNPS reactor pressure vessel (including the steam dryer) and MSLs. The licensee determined pressure loads from low frequencies up into the acoustic range based on CFD analyses. Upon filtering the CFD analysis based on frequency, the licensee predicted stresses of low magnitude in the VYNPS steam dryer dye to hydrodynamic loads having a frequency. content of less than 30 Hz. In Attachment 5 to Supplement 33 of its EPU request, the licensee indicated that it used the full CFD predicted stress (and not the filtered CFD stress) in the evaluation of the combined stress and the limit curve factors. The licensee estimated the uncertainty of the CFD analysis as 15% based on a previous analysis of a small pipe flow model, and used measurements of low frequency pressure loads on steam dryers at four other nuclear power plants to support this uncertainty estimate. The NRC staff reviewed the CFD analysis (including the electronic data file) of the fluid dynamic loads on the VYNPS steam dryer. The NRC staff determined that significant uncertainty surrounds the CFD predictions, and that the magnitude of this uncertainty was highly underestimated by the licensee. For example, the licensee did not perform sensitivity studies of the CFD analysis applied to VYNPS to obtain an understanding of the significance of specific assumptions in the analysis. The comparison of the Vermont Yankee CFD results to the measured low frequency pressure loads at four other nuclear power plants does not establish the uncertainty value for the VYNPS CFD analysis, because CFD analyses were not performed for those other plants and all but one of those plants contained a steam dryer with an improved design to reduce hydrodynamic loads. The plant with a similar design steam dryer to VYNPS provided one pressure measurement that was in the skirt area with low flow conditions. Based on its review at that point, the staff determined that the uncertainty assumed by the licensee in its determination of the loads from the CFD analysis of the VYNPS steam dryer was significantly underestimated. To address this concern, and to confirm the licensee's predictions regarding the hydrodynamic and acoustic loads on the steam dryer, a license condition will be added to the VYNPS Facility Operating License as shown in SE Section 3.17.3. The license condition provides requirements for monitoring, evaluating, and taking prompt action in response to potential adverse flow effects as a result of operation at EPU conditions. The licensee applied two different methods in its effort to validate the ACM used to calculate the acoustic pressure loads at high frequencies on the VYNPS steam dryer. In one method, the licensee used air tests conducted at the GE SMT facility to compare pressure loads calculated Docket No. 7195 Attachment 6-3 Page 4 of 12
by the ACM from steam line data to pressure measurements from a scale model steam dryer. In the second method, the licensee compared pressure sensor,data collected from the. instrumented steam dryer at the Quad Cities Unit 2 nuclear power plant during its power ascension to pressure loads calculated by the version of the ACM selected for application to the VYNPS steam dryer. The NRC staff determined that a number of uncertainties exist regarding the use of the SMT facility to validate the specific application of the ACM for the VYNPS steam dryer (including the relatively low flow provided by the SMT facility and the substantial deviation of the ACM predictions to SMT measurements). As a result, the staff focused on the licensee's use of the pressure sensor data obtained from the Quad Cities ýUnit 2 instrumented steam dryer to validate the ACM for application to VYNPS. At VYNPS, the licensee applied a version of the ACM that was used by Ekelon to assess the pressure loads on the steam dryer at Quad Cities Unit 2 at a power level of 790 megawatts electric (MWe) during EPU restart in May 2005. At Quad Cities Unit 2, Exelon revised the 790 MWe version of the ACM based on additional pressure sensor data collected from its instrumented steam dryer at 930 MWe. For VYNPS, Entergy developed an uncertainty estimate for the "790 MWe-version" of the ACM based on a comparison of the pressure loads calculated by the ACM to the measured pressure at 27 locations on the Quad Cities Unit 2 steam dryer. From its evaluation, the licensee estimated the uncertainty of the ACM as 100% of the calculated steam dryer pressure load. The NRC staff reviewed the.licensee's estimation of the uncertainty of the version of the ACM used at VYNPS, and determined the 100% uncertainty value to be insufficient to provide reasonable assurance in the calculation of the pressure loads on the VYNPS steam dryer. For example, Figure EMEB-B-18-1-6 on page 16 in Attachment 1 to Supplement 33 of the licensee's EPU request indicates that the root mean square (RMS) of the pressure load calculated by the ACM, combined with the 100% uncertainty estimate, underpredicts the measured RMS pressure at many of the 27 pressure sensor locations on the Quad Cities Unit 2 steam dryer. Further, Figures EMEB-B-18-4-1 to 27 indicate that the power spectral density (PSD) from the ACM-calculated loads, combined with the 100% uncertainty estimate, underpredicts the PSD from the measured pressure data at Quad Cities Unit 2 over a wide frequency range for many of the 27 pressure sensors. As a result, the NRC staff considers the uncertainty assumed by the licensee for the version of the ACM applied at VYNPS to be significantly underestimated. To address this concern, and to confirm the licensee's predictions regarding the hydrodynamic and acoustic pressure loads on the steam dryer, a license condition will be added to the VYNPS Facility Operating License as shown in SE Section 3.17.3. The license condition provides requirements for monitoring, evaluating, and taking prompt action in response to potential adverse flow effects as a result of operation at EPU conditions. At VYNPS, the licensee currently uses data from the MSL venturi instrument lines and one strain gage on each MSL to provide input to the ACM. The long venturi instrument lines and the lack of an array of strain gages at each MSL measurement location at VYNPS can result in significant uncertainty (over 100%) in the pressure input to the ACM. The NRC staff questioned the reliability of the ACM in calculating steam dryer pressure loads based on the large uncertainty associated with the MSL input data. To address the concerns with the uncertainty of the current MSL data used as input to the ACM, the licensee stated in the cover letter for Supplement 33 of its EPU request that it would install 32 additional strain gages on the MSL piping during the fall 2005 refueling outage (RFO) and would enhance the data acquisition system prior to EPU operation to reduce the measurement uncertainty associated with the ACM input. During the August 22-25, 2005, audit, the licensee indicated that the 32 additional strain Docket No. 7195 Attachment 6-3 Page 5 of 12
-45 -
gages would be installed as a set of four strain gages in a quadrantarray at two locations on each MSL to provide 8 independent inputs to the VYNPS ACM. In Attachment 5 to Supplement 26 of its EPU request, the licensee described its structural analysis of the VYNPS steam dryer for CFD and ACM pressure loads at CLTP conditions. In Attachment 5 to Supplement 33 of its EPU request, the licensee discussed its updated structural analysis of the steam dryer that includes the ACM results for CLTP conditions from Supplement 26 combined with CFD pressure loads predicted for EPU conditions at VYNPS. The ACM analysis uses MSL instrumentation to project the measured pressure fluctuations as pressure loads on the steam dryer for the specific power level at which the plant is operating, and does not predict steam dryer loads for higher power levels. The ANSYS FEM for the VYNPS steam dryer analysis included the dryer support ring, dryer hoods,, end plates, cover plates, upper dryer banks, cross beams, bottom support plates, tie bars, and gussets. In early 2005, the licensee identified the need to revise the FEM to model more accurately the connection of the gussets to the lower cover plate. The FEM used to evaluate steam dryer stress'from CFD loads was updated at that time. The licensee performed hand calculations to verify that the stress at the gusset to cover plate connection from the ACM loads was significantly less than the applicable stress limit. As part of determining the EPU steam dryer load definition, the licensee will update the FEM model used in the ACM analysis to reflect the as-built connection of the gussets to the cover plate. The licensee evaluated the dynamic structural response of the steam dryer to applied pressure fluctuations from acoustic loading using a time history method with modal superposition. The licensee, performed a sensitivity assessment by varying the time interval between the pressure time steps by 10% (equivalent to peak broadening in the response spectrum analysis method). The licensee assigned an uncertainty to the stress amplitude of 20% due to load/response frequency uncertainty based on these shifted frequency analyses. However, the licensee did not include potential increased stress resulting from peak loading frequencies aligning with the dryer resonance frequencies in its analysis. For the fatigue stress evaluation, the licensee determined the peak stress for various locations on the VYNPS steam dryer by combining the stresses calculated from the CFD and ACM analyses by the SRSS method, and then multiplying the combined stress by applicable weld concentration and size factors. The licensee applied the acoustic and CFD uncertainties to calculate an uncertainty value for the limit curve factor used to monitor steam dryer performance. For the ASME load case assessments, the licensee increased the acoustic loading stress by a 130% uncertainty value and the CFD loading stress by a 16% uncertainty value, and combined these stresses by the SRSS method. The licensee then compared the results of these stress analyses to the applicable ASME allowable stress limits to demonstrate available structural margin in the VYNPS steam dryer. In Attachment 2 to Supplement 33, the licensee provided the results of its analysis of the dryer skirt indicating low acoustic loading stress for that region of the VYNPS steam dryer. Based on the ASME fatigue stress limit, the licensee calculated an allowable limit curve over the frequency spectra using the CFD analysis for low frequency loads and the ACM analysis for the high frequency loads with the current MSL data input, including the consideration of uncertainties. The NRC staff reviewed the method used by the licensee to calculate the stress at various locations on the VYNPS steam dryer based on the pressure loads predicted by the CFD and ACM analyses. As a result of the uncertainties associated with the CFD and ACM analyses and MSL input data, the NRC staff indicated during the audit on August 22-25, 2005, Docket No. 7195 Attachment 6-3 Page 6 of 12
that it was important to demonstrate that the structural integrity of the steam dryer would not be challenged if the actual loads on the steam dryer reached the limit curve. In Attachment 5 to Supplement 33 of its EPU request, the licensee provided its assessment of the limit curve relative to the fatigue stress limit to demonstrate that, if the limit curve is not exceeded, the structural integrity of the VYNPS steam dryer will be assured. In its assessment, the licensee calculated the most limiting stress location as the (( 1] with a stress of (( )) psi based on the CFD analysis at EPU conditions and a stress of (( )) psi based on the ACM analysis at CLTP conditions. As these stresses are associated with independent low and high frequency pressure loads, respectively, the combined peak stress for this location on the VYNPS steam dryer is calculated by the SRSS method to be (( )) psi. The licensee established a limit curve that would provide for an SRSS combination of CFD and ACM stress at the most limiting steam dryer location of 7393 psi. Therefore, the limit curve stress will provide considerable margin to the ASME fatigue limit stress of 13,600 psi. As discussed below, in accordance with the license condition discussed in SE Section 3.17.3, the licensee will provide its limit curve as part of the startup test procedure for VYNPS to the NRC staff prior to exceeding CLTP. In Attachment 6 to Supplement 33 of its EPU request, the licensee describes its updated Steam Dryer Monitoring Plan (SDMP) for monitoring and evaluating the performance of the VYNPS steam dryer during power ascension testing and operation above CLTP to full EPU conditions to verify acceptable steam dryer performance. The licensee defines unacceptable steam dryer performance as a condition that could challeng steam. dryer structural integrity and result in the generation of loose parts, cracks or tears in the dryer that-result in excessive moisture carryover. The licensee proposed a license condition for steam dryer monitoring to require operational surveillances as well a-s visual inspections of the steam dryer at specific scheduled RFOs following achievement of full uprate conditions as shown in SE Section 3.17.3. The .licensee stated that power ascension above CLTP would be conducted in 2.5% power steps and 5% power plateaus. The power ascension will include hold points at each 2.5% step and 5% plateau. The licensee stated that the maximum power increase would not exceed a nominal 5% power in a 24-hour period. The SDMP specifies that moisture carryover will be determined every 24 hours; MSL pressure data from strain gages will be obtained hourly when initially increasing power above a previously attained level and at least once every 2.5% power step above CLTP; and MSL pressure data from pressure transducers will be collected at least once every 2.5% power step above CLTP and within 1 hour after achieving every 2.5% power step above CLTP. The SDMP allows relaxed monitoring if the surveillance requirements are met at a power step, but requires a power reduction if a surveillance is not accomplished within the specified time intervals. In addition, the SDMP indicates that plant data which may be indicative of off-normal dryer performance will be monitored during power ascension (e.g., steam flow, feed flow, etc.). The SDMP establishes criteria for verifying acceptable steam dryer performance at VYNPS using moisture carryover and MSL pressure data. The performance criteria are specified as Level 2 based on maintaining less than (or equal to) 80% of the ASME allowable alternating stress at 101 cycles (i.e., 10,880 psi) and Level 1 based on maintaining the ASME allowable alternating stress at 1011 cycles (i.e., 13,600 psi). The Level 2 steam dryer performance criteria are (1) moisture carryover exceeds 0.1%; (2) moisture carryover exceeds 0.1% and increases by more than 50% over the average of the three previous measurements taken at greater than 1593 MWt; and (3) pressure data exceed the Level 2 spectra. If any of the Level 2 steam dryer performance criteria are exceeded, the SDMP specifies that (1) reactor power ascension be Docket No. 7195 Attachment 6-3 Page 7 of 12
promptly suspended until an engineering evaluation concludes that further power aýcension is justified; and (2) before resuming reactor power ascension, the steam dryer performance data shall be reviewed as part of an engineering evaluation to assess whether further power ascension can be made without exceeding the Level 1 criteria. The Level 1 steam dryer performance criteria are (1) moisture carryover exceeds 0.35%; and (2) pressure data exceed Level 1 spectra. If either of the Level 1 steam dryer performance criteria is exceeded, the SDMP specifies that the licensee will: (1). Promptly initiate a reactor power reduction and achieve a previously acceptable power level (i.e., reduce power to a previous step level) within 2 hours, unless an engineering evaluation concludes that continued power operation or power ascension is acceptable. (2) Within 24 hours, re-measure moisture carryover and perform an engineering evaluation of steam dryer structural integrity. If the results of the evaluation of dryer structural integrity do not support continued'plant operation, the reactor shall be placed in a hot shutdown condition within tt~e following 24 hours. Ifthe results of the engineering evaluation support continued power operation, implement steps (3) and (4) below. (3) If the results of the engineering evaluation support continued power operation, reduce further power ascension step and plateau levels to nominal increases of 1.25% and 2.5% of, CLTP, respe(tively, for any additional power ascension. (4) Within 30 days, use the transient pressure data to calculate the steam dryer-fatigue usage to demonstrate that continued power operation is acceptable. The SDMP also specifies that, if the steam dryer performance criteria are exceeded, the following actions will be taken depending on the criteria exceeded: (1) Either suspend reactor power ascension (Level 2 Acceptance Criteria) or reduce reactor power (Level 1 Acceptance Criteria), initiate a Condition Report, and evaluate the cause of any exceedance of the performance criteria. (2) Prior to increasing reactor thermal power to a level higher than any previously attained, the plant conditions relevant to steam dryer integrity and associated evaluation results shall be reviewed by the on-site safety review committee, and a recommendation shall be made to the General Manager, Plant Operations prior to increasing power for each 5% power plateau. (3) Strain gage pressure and moisture carryover data collected at each 5% power plateau will be made available to the NRC through its resident inspector. (4) Each initial increase in reactor thermal power to the next higher 5% power plateau above 100% CLTP must be authorized by the General Manager, Plant Operations. In addition, the SDMP states that other reactor operational parameters that may be influenced by steam dryer integrity (e.g., steam flow distribution between the individual steam lines) will be Docket No. 7195 Attachment 6-3 Page 8 of 12
monitored with the intent of detecting structural degradation of the steam dryer during plant operation (e.g., flow distribution between individual MSLs). Plant procedures will control the enhanced monitoring of selected plant parameters. The SDMP states that the results of visual inspections of the steam dryer conducted during the next three RFOs shall be reported to the NRC staff within 60 days following startup from the respective RFO. The SDMP also states that its results shall be submitted to the NRC staff in a report within 60 days following completion of all EPU power ascension testing. In addition, the final full EPU power performance criteria spectra (limit curve),will be submitted to the NRC staff within 120 days. As long-term actions, the SDMP states that the VYNPS steam dryer will be inspected during RFOs scheduled for fall 2005, spring 2007, fall 2008, and spring 2010, according to the recommendations of GE Services Information Letter (SIL) No. 644, Revision 1 (November 9, 2004). The SDMP also indicates that, following completion of EPU power ascension testing, moisture carryover measurements will continue to be made periodically, and other plant operational parameters that may be affected by steam dryer structural integrity will continue to be monitored, in accordance with GE SIL 644 and plant procedures. The SDMP notes that temporarily installed pressure monitoring sensors and strain gages may be removed from service following achievement of one operating cycle after issuance of the EPU license amendment and satisfaction of the license condition requirements for steam dryer inspections. .In Attachment 1 to Supplement 32 to its EPU request, the licensee modified its commitment to perform visual inspections of the steam dryer at VYNPS. In particular, the licensee describes its plan to perform a visual inspection during the fall 2005 RFO of the steam dryer modification, flaws left "as-is," and the repair made during the last RFO. The licensee indicates that this inspection plan satisfies recommendations A.1.c and A.l.d in GE SIL 644, Revision 1. The licensee also discusses its plan to conduct a visual inspection of all accessible, susceptible locations of the steam dryer during each of the three RFOs, beginning with RFO-26 (i.e., spring 2007) to satisfy recommendation B.2 in SIL 644, Revision 1. The licensee lists this steam dryer inspection plan as a regulatory commitment in Attachment 10 to Supplement 32. In the cover letter for Supplement 33 of its EPU request, the licensee states that several actions will be taken with respect to providing confidence in the capability of the steam dryer at VYNPS to maintain its structural integrity under EPU conditions. In Attachment 1 to Supplement 36, Entergy specified those planned actions as part of a proposed license condition. The proposed license condition is shown in SE Section 3.17.3. The actions include: (1) The licensee will install 32 additional strain gages on the main steam piping during the fall 2005 RFO and will enhance the data acquisition system prior to EPU operation in order to reduce the measurement uncertainty associated with the ACM. (2) In the event that acoustic signals are identified that challenge the limit curve during EPU power ascension, the licensee will evaluate dryer loads and re-establish the limit curve based on the new strain gage data, and will perform a frequency specific assessment of ACM uncertainty at the acoustic signal frequency. Docket No. 7195 Attachment 6-3 Page 9 of 12
(3) After reaching 120% of CLTP, the licensee will obtain measuremenfs from the MSL strain gages and establish the VYNPS dryer flow-induced vibration load fatigue margin, update the dryer stress report, and re-establish the SDMP limit curve with the updated ACM load definition and revised instrument uncertainty, which will be provided to the NRC staff. (4) During power ascension, if an engineering evaluation is required in accordance with the SDMP, the licensee will perform the structural analysis to address frequency uncertainties tip to +/-10% and assure that peak responses that fall within this uncertainty band are addressed. (5) The licensee will revise the SDMP to reflect long-term monitoring of plant parameters potentially indicative of a dryer failure; to reflect consistency of the VYNPS steam dryer inspection program with SIL 644, Revision 1; and to identify the NRR Project Manager for VYNPS as the point of contact for providing SDMP information during power ascension. (6) The licensee will submit the final EPU VYNPS steam dryer load definition to the NRC upon completion of the power ascension test program. (7) The licensee will submit the flow-induced vibration related portions of the EPU startup test procedure, including the methodology for updating the limit curve, prior to power ascension. In Attachment 6 to Supplement 33 of its EPU request, the licensee proposed a license condition for implementation of the VYNPS SDMP. The proposed license condition was subsequently superceded by Supplement 36 of the EPU request. The proposed license condition is shown in. SE .Section 3.17.3. of theNRC The staff has reviewed the information provided by the licensee in support of its analysis structural integrity of the VYNPS steam dryer under EPU conditions, and for monitoring steam dryer loads and performance during plant operation. Although significant uncertainty exists regarding the licensee's method for calculating specific stress values on the VYNPS steam dryer from its CFD and ACM analyses, the licensee's current MSL instrumentation suggests minimal excitation of the pressure frequency spectra in the MSLs at CLTP conditions. As a result, the staff finds that the licensee has demonstrated that the flow-induced stress imposed on the VYNPS steam dryer at CLTP conditions is within the,fatigue stress limits provided in the ASME Code. However, the available margin to those stress limits is not readily verifiable. Therefore, the NRC staff considers the licensee's planned actions specified in Supplement 33 of its EPU request, and included in the proposed license condition in Supplement 36, to be an important part of the licensee's effort to provide confidence that the structural integrity of the steam dryer will be maintained during EPU operation. For example, the staff considers the use of the more accurate MSL strain gages to be installed for monitoring pressure fluctuations in the MSLs to be necessary in light of the large uncertainty in the current MSL instrumentation that provides input to the ACM analysis. The staff considers the selection of the new MSL instrumentation in terms of its sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio to be important to its acceptability. The staff also considers it important to consider whether any acoustic sources might exist between the MSL strain gage locations. Further, the staff agrees with the importance of evaluating the peak frequencies within the +/-10% frequency range when Docket No. 7195 Attachment 6-3 Page 10 of 12
the licensee re-evaluates the steam dryer loads if MSL strain gage data exceed the limit curve, or following achievement of EPU conditions, as part of establishing a new limit curve. During the licensee's evaluation of the results of the inspection of the VYNPS steam dryer to be conducted in the fall of 2005, the predictions of low stress (including in the skirt region) need to be compared to actual operating experience with the VYNPS steam dryer. The staff also considers the requirements specified by the licensee in the proposed license condition to be appropriate for establishing and implementing the SDMP at VYNPS. In light of the large uncertainties in the CFD and ACM analyses and the fact that the ACM analysis has calculated the steam dryer pressure loads only at CLTP, the NRC staff determined that the licensee needs to closely monitor MSL strain gage data and other plant data as the reactor power is raised at VYNPS such that the ACM loads can be calculated at the increased power level to verify that the structural limits for the steam dryer are not reached. For example, the staff concluded that the new 32 MSL strain gages need to be monitored frequently during power ascension above CLTP for increasing pressure fluctuations in the steam lines. Hold points need to be established at 105%, 110%, and 115% of CLTP to collect plant data, conduct plant inspections and walkdowns, and evaluate the plant data for steam dryer performance. The time period for each hold point will need to be sufficient to complete all activities specified in the startup test procedure for the applicable hold point. Sufficient information and time will need to be provided to the NRC staff to determine whether any safety concerns exist prior to increasing power above each hold point. If any frequency peak from the MSL strain gage data exceeds the limit curve established by the licensee prior to operation above CLTP, the unit needs to be returned to a power level where the limit curve is not exceeded. The licensee would then resolve the uncertainties in the steam dryer analysis prior to further increases in reactor power. In the subsequent engineering evaluation, peak responses that fall within the
+/-10% frequency uncertainty band need to be considered as part of an adequate structural analysis. Further, the potential effect of the skirt in the steam dryer FEM on the stresses- in the steam dryer components needs to be addressed. In addition to evaluating the MSL strain gage data, reactor pressure vessel water level instrumentation or MSL piping accelerometers need to be monitored frequently to help identify any resonance frequencies not captured by the MSL strain gage data and ACM analysis. If resonance frequencies are identified as increasing significantly above nominal levels established at CLTP conditions, power ascension needs to be stopped until an evaluation of continued steam dryer integrity is performed to demonstrate that no safety concerns exist. Within a reasonable time period following issuance of the EPU license amendment, the uncertainties in the steam dryer analysis need to be resolved to avoid long-term fatigue concerns with the steam dryer. In response to an NRC letter dated October 12, 2005, Entergy submitted a proposed license condition in Attachment 1 to Supplement 36 of its EPU application that.addresses the NRC staff findings discussed above.
The proposed license condition is shown in SE Section 3.17.3. The NRC staff considers the development of an adequate EPU startup test procedure to be a significant action in confirming the safe operation of VYNPS during EPU conditions. The staff has determined that the EPU startup test procedure needs to include (a) the stress limit curve to be applied for evaluating steam dryer performance; (b) specific hold points and their duration during EPU power ascension; (c) activities to be accomplished during hold points; (d) plant parameters to be monitored; (e) inspections and walkdowns to be conducted for steam, FW, and condensate systems and components during the hold points; (f) methods to be used to trend plant parameters; (g) acceptance criteria for monitoring and trending plant parameters, and conducting the walkdowns and inspections; (h) actions to be taken if acceptance criteria Docket No. 7195 Attachment 6-3 Page 11 of 12
are not satisfied; and (i) verification of the completion of commitments and planned actions specified in the EPU application and all, supplements to the application in support of the EPU request prior to power increase above CLTP. While the licensee indicates that plant parameters will be monitored to provide information on steam dryer performance, the staff also, considers it important for additional steam dryer loading information to be obtained for qualitative evaluation from the reactor pressure vessel water level instrumentation or MSL piping accelerometers in light of the inadequacy of the ACM in calculating low frequency pressure loads on the steam dryer. While the SDMP indicates that other plant parameters (such as steam flow distribution between MSLs) will be monitored, the staff also considers it important for the frequency of such monitoring, acceptance criteria, and actions if those criteria are not satisfied, to be specified in the startup test procedure. In response to an NRC letter dated October 12, 2005, Entergy submitted a proposed license condition in Attachment 1 to Supplement 36 of its EPU application. The staff has determined that this proposed license condition addresses the NRC staff findings discussed above. The proposed license condition is shown in SE Section 3.17.3.'- Prior to power ascension above CLTP and during the power ascension, the NRC staff has determined that sufficient time needs to be available during the hold points to allow the licensee to present plant information on potential adverse flow effects on the steam dryer (and other plant equipment) to the NRC staff for a determination of whether any safety concerns exist with power ascension. In Attachment 2 to Supplement 36 of its EPU request, Entergy submitted a regulatory commitment that addresses the NRC staff.findings discussed above. As shown in SE Section 4.0 (Item No. 25), Entergy will provide information on plant data, evaluations, walkdowns, inspections, and procedures associated with the individual requirements of the license condition (pertaining to potential adverse flow effects) to the NRC staff prior to increasing power above 1593 MWt or each specified hold point, as applicable. If any safety concerns are identified during the NRC staff review of the provided information, Entergy will not increase power above 1593 MWt or the applicable hold point, and the specific requirements in the license condition will not be satisfied. The NRC staff considers that this commitment provides appropriate interaction between the licensee and the staff prior to and during power ascension above CLTP conditions. 2.2.6.2.2 Steam. Feedwater, and Condensate Systems and Components In Attachment 1 to Supplement 15 (September 23, 2004) of its EPU request, the licensee stated that the VYNPS piping steady state vibration program for EPU power ascension testing follows the guidance in Part 3 of the ASME OM-S/G-2000 standard (ASME OM-3). The program assesses the FIV levels of selected piping systems that are expected to experience increased flow during EPU conditions. The licensee stated that vibration data will be taken at approximately 2.5% power increments above CLTP and will be evaluated for acceptability. For example, the MS and FW piping located in the drywell which is inaccessible during plant operation will be monitored for vibration levels using direct mounted accelerometers with acceptance criteria based on guidance in ASME OM-3. The FW regulator valves and attached FW piping located downstream of the reactor feed pumps will be monitored with a hand-held vibration meter. If vibration levels for these components increase significantly, the licensee will further evaluate the affected components. Also in Attachment 1 to Supplement 15 of its EPU request, the licensee stated that it will employ visual monitoring during EPU power ascension testing to determine if significant Docket No. 7195 Attachment 6-3 Page 12 of 12
Sherman, William From: Sherman, William Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 3:55 PM To:
Subject:
O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations in I was asked to describe how Entergy is analyzing the acoustical noise identified at, the 5% power- increase order to proceed to the next 5% step up. I know this is complicated and I am happy to try to explain more if necessary! each Entergy has a series of limit curves based on acoustical sensor locations on its .four main steam lines. For location, these curves define the acoustical noise acceptability limit. The curves are created from complex calculations based on stress limits of the steam dryer, the known acoustical signature of the steam lines, benchmarked steam dryer performance from Quad Cities, and various safety margins. Using the new acoustical signature from the 105% readings and newer industry data, the curves were !recalculated for the next 5% step up. The new acoustical signature input has the effect of redistributing the will be more 'limiting steam dryer stress according to that newly expected acoustical signature. This means there
- "room" (i.e., a higher limit) for the frequency that was unexpectedly high at the 105%, and less room at certain other frequencies that proved not to be active at the I0% level.
with We derive some confidence that NRC specialists-. PHI consultants hired by NRC - will review and concur March the new analytical curves before the next step up. The earliest time for the next step up is this Sunday, 26. It seems possible to me that additional power step-ups may reveal more frequency surprises and cause.yet additional recalcuations and a redistribution of steam dryer stress vs. frequency.
-- Bill Bill Sherman State Nuclear Engineer Vermont Department of Public Service (802) 828-3349 Docket No. 7195 Attachment 8-7 Page 1 of 1 1
Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations Page I of 2 Sherman, William From: Sherman, William Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 8:42 AM To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah
Subject:
RE: Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations I wanted to give all an interim status' I participated on a technical call yesterday between Entergy and the NRC regarding the recalculations. In the hour and 1/2 conf call, NRC staff asked many questions about the recalculation material. At the end, they indicated they were satisfied-with Entergy's answers but that their technical consultants (PHD experts hired by NRC to assist in this area) would have additional questions. The next conference call is not scheduled yet. Best estimate for when Entergy would be allowed to increase power again: Earliest--- Saturday. Most likely - next Tuesday. I will keep you informed.
-- Bill
-From: Sherman, William Sent: Thu 3/23/2006 3:55 PM To: O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah
Subject:
Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations I was asked to describe how Eniergy is analyzing the acoustical noise identified at the 5% power-increase in order to proceed to the next 5% step up. I know this is complicated and I am happy to try to explain more if necessary! Entergy has a series of limit curves based on acoustical sensor, locations on its four main steam lines. For each location, these curves define the acoustical noise acceptability limit. The curves are created from complex calculations based on stress limits of the steam dryer, the known acoustical signature of the steam lines, benchmarked steam dryer performance from Quad Cities, and various safety margins. Using the new acoustical signature from the 105% readings and newer industry data, the curves were recalculated for the next 5% step up. The new acoustical signature input has the effect of redistributing the limiting steam dryer stress according to that newly expected acoustical signature. This means there will be more "room" (i.e., a higher limit) for the frequency that was unexpectedly high at the 105%, and less room at certain other frequencies that proved not to be active at the 105% level. We derive some confidence that NRC specialists - PHD consultants hired by NRC - will review and concur with.the new analytical curves before the next step up. The earliest time for the next step up is this Sunday, March 26. it seems possible to me that additional power step-ups may reveal more frequency surprises and cause yet additional recalcuations and a redistribution of steam dryer stress'vs. frequency, Docket No. 7195
-- Bill Attachment 8-8 Page 1 of 1
Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations Page 1 of2 Sherman, William From: Sherman, William Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 2:00 PM To: Sherman, WilJiamý O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah
Subject:
RE: Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations staff, and I participated in another conference call this morning between Entergy and the NRC staff. Again the specifically dealt particularly its consultants, asked many questions about Entergy's reanalysis. The questions Entergy has reduced the uncertainty for these with Entergy characterization of the uncertainties in its calculations. that is giving Entergy more "room" on the stress curves.. recalculations, and it is this uncertainty reduction next power step In the end, the NRC staff agreed that Entergy's calculations were sufficient to justify going to the (110%) in the power ascension test. and Entergy will increase power tomorrow (Saturday). I will get information by telephone during the day Saturday of this next step increase. If anything out of the ordinary occurs will go to the site on Monday to review the results during the test on Saturday, I will keep you informed. Call or email if questions - 828-3349.
-- Bill From: Sherman, William Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 8:42 AM To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah
Subject:
RE: Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations between Entergy and the NRC to give all an interim status. I participated on a technical call yesterday I wanted about the regarding the recalculations. In the hour and 1/2 conf call, NRC staff asked many questions they were satisfied with Entergy's answers but that their recalculation material. At the end, they indicated hired by. NRC to assist in this area) would have additional questions. technical consultants (PHD experts for when Entergy would be allowed to increase The next conference call is not scheduled yet. Best estimate power again: Earliest -- Saturday. Most likely - next Tuesday. I will keep you informed.
-- Bill From: Sherman, William Sent: Thu 3/23/2006 3:55 PM To: O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah
Subject:
Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations I was asked to describe how Entergy is analyzing the acoustical noise identified at the 5% power-increase'in order to proceed to the next 5% step up. I know this is complicated and I am happy to try to explain more if necessary! Entergy has a series of limit curves based on acoustical sensor locations on its four main steam lines. Docket No. 7195 Attachment 8-9 Pnce 1 nf2
- Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations Page.2 of 2 For each location, these curves define the acoustical noise acceptability limit.
The curves are created from complex calculations based on stress limits of the steam dryer, the known acoustical signature of the steam lines, ben chmarked steam dryer performance from Quad Cities, and various safety margins. Using the new acoustical signature from the 105% readings and newer industry data, the curves were recalculated for the next 5% step up. The new acoustical signature input has the effect of redistributing the limiting steam dryer stress according to that newly expected acoustical signature. This means there and will be more "'roomr" (i.e., a higher limit) for the frequency that was unexpectedly high at the 105%, less room at certain other frequencies that proved not to be. active at the 105% level. We derive some confidence that NRC specialists - P1D consultants hired by NRC - will review and concur with the new analytical curves before the next step up. The earliest time for the next step up is this Sunday, March 26. It seems possible to me that additional power step-ups may reveal more frequency surprises and cause yet additional. recalcuations and a redistribution of steam dryer stress vs. frequency.
-- Bill Bill Sherman State Nuclear Engineer Vermont ,Department of Public Service (802) 828-3349 Docket No. 7195 Attachment 8-9 Page 2 of 2 S/' ri
Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations Page I of 2 Sherman, William From: Sherman, William Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 2:21 PM Sarah To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann,
Subject:
RE: Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations because of other commitments, but will Quick amendment to this. I will delay going to the site until Tuesdayon. Bill maintain contact with Entergy and NRC to follow what's going From: Sherman, William Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 2:00 PM Sarah To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann,
Subject:
RE: Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations Entergy and the NRC staff. Again the staff, and I participated in another conference call~this morning between reanalysis., The questions specifically dealt particularly its consultants, asked many questions about Entergy's Entergy has reduced the uncertainty for these with Entergy characterization of the uncertainties in its calculations. Entergy more "room" on the stress curves. recalculations, and it is this uncertainty reduction that is giving sufficient to justify going to the next power step In the end, the NRC staff agreed that Entergy's calculatigns were (11.0%) in the power ascension test. by telephone during the day Saturday'and Entergy will increase power tomorrow (Saturday). I will get information increase. If anything out of the ordinary occurs step will go to the site on Monday to review the' results. of this hext during the test on Saturday, I will keep you informed. Call or email if questions - 828-3349.
-- Bill From: Sherman, William Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 8:42 AM Sarah To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann,
Subject:
RE: Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations call yesterday between Entergy and the NRC I wanted to give all an interim status. I participated on a technicalstaff asked many questions about the NRC regarding the recalculations. In the hour and 1/2 conf call, satisfied with Entergy's answers but that their recalculation material. At the end, they indicated they were in this area) would have additional questions. technical consultants (PHD experts hired by NRC to assist for when Entergy would be allowed to increase The next conference call is not scheduled yet. Best estimate Tuesday. power again: Earliest -- Saturday. Most likely - next I will keep you informed.
-- Bill From: Sherman, William PM Sent: Thu 3/23/2006 3:55 Docket No. 7195 To: O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah Attachment 8-10 Page I of 2
Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations Page 2 of 2 Subject; Entergy PowerAscension Test Recalculations I was asked to'describe how Entergy is analyzing the acoustical noise identified at the 5% power-increase in order to proceed to the next 5% step up. I know this is complicated and I am happy to try to explain more if necessary! Entergy has a series of limit curves based on acoustical sensor locations on its four main steam lines. For each location, these curves define the acoustical noise acceptability -limit. The curves are created from complex calculations based on. stress limits of the steam dryer, the known acoustical signature of the steam lines, benchmarked steam dryer performance from Quad Cities, and various safety margins. Using the new acoustical signature from the 105% readings and newer industry data, the curves were recalculated for the next 5% step up. The new acoustical signature input has the effect of redistributing the limiting steam dryer stress according to that newly expected acoustical signature. This means there will be more "room" (i.e., a higher limit) for the frequency that was unexpectedly high at the 105%, and less room at certain other frequencies that proved not to be active at the 105% level.. We derive some confidence that NRC specialists - PHD consultants hired by NRC - will reviewand concur with the new analytical curves before the next step up. The earliest time for the next step up is this Sunday, March 26. it seems possible to me that additional power step-ups may reveal more frequency surprises and cause yet additional recalcuations and a redistribution of steam dryer stress vs. frequency.
-- Bill Bill Sherman State Nuclear Engineer Vermont Department of Public Service (802) 828-3349 Docket No. 7195 Attachment 8-10 Page 2 of 2
Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations Page 1 of i Sherman, William From: Sherman, William' Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 2:27 PM To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah
Subject:
RE: Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations Just a note on Saturday afternoon ifyou are monitoring. out of the ordinary. They VY went up 2.5% in power this morning. The reports for this increase-showed nothing will go up another 2.5% starting in about half an hour. I'll keep you informed. -- Bill Docket No. 7195 Attachment 8-11 Page 1 of 1
Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations Page I of I Sherman, William From: Sherman, William Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 6:*28 AM To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah
Subject:
RE: Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations up - bringing power to 110% - is that all the Another quick update. Preliminary reports from the total 5% step plant, and the acoustical steam dryer data looks readings are clear. No noted vibration problems throughout the good. We will have a more complete picture o n Monday.
-- Bill From: Sherman, William Sent: Sat 4/1/2006 2:26 PM Sarah To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David;Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann,
Subject:
RE: Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations Just a note on Saturday afternoon if you are monitoring. nothing out of the ordinary. They VY went up 2.5% in power this morning. The reports for this increase-showed will go up another 2.5% starting in about half an hour. I'll keep you informed. -- Bill Docket No. 7195 Attachment 8-12 Page 1 of I
Page 1 of I Entergy Power Ascernsion Test Recalculations Sherman, William From: Sherman, William Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 2:24 PM To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah Cc: Smith, Richard
Subject:
Next VY power step up tomorrow. (Thursday) - to 115%
- to 115% power.
Based on NRC agreement, Entergy will take the next 5% power step up tomorrow (Thursday) and responding to I have participated on two lengthy calls with the NRC technical staff and Entergy, asking questions regarding the 110% data. I also reviewed the data at the site yesterday. and there were no surprises None of the acoustical data for the steam dryers approached the <new> limit curves, at this step. at one sensing The major area of discussion this time concerned 3 of 6 strain gage sensors not functioning eight strain-gage sensing locations on the four steam lines coming from the reactor.) NRC location. (There are was spurious. NRC also agreed that reviewed the readings from the 3 suspect strain gages and agreed the data provide the necessary data. the 3 remaining sensors at that location were sufficient to I will keep you informed of the results of this next step. -- Bill From: Sherman, William Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 6:28 AM To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah
Subject:
RE: Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations to 110% - is that all the Another quick update. Preliminary reports from the total 5% step up - bringing power problems throughout the plant, and the acoustical steam dryer data looks readings are clear. No noted vibration good. We will have a more complete picture on Monday.
-- Bill From: Sherman, William Sent: Sat 4/1/2006 2:26 PM To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah
Subject:
RE: Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations Just a note on Saturday afternoon if you are monitoring. of the ordinary. They VY went up 2.5% in power this morning. The reports for this increase showed nothing out will go up another 2.5% starting in about half an hour. I'll keep you informed. -- Bill Docket No. 7195 Attachment 8-13 Page 1 of 1
Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations Page 1 of I Sherman, William From: Sherman, William Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 2:43 PM To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah. Cc: Smith, Richard
Subject:
VY on hold at 112.5% power peak has exceeded VY is now on hold again in the power ascension at 112.5% power because another frequency the "action" Value on the new acceptablity curve. for at least a week to This is the same, type of result as occurred at 105%. It is expected VY will be on hold evaluate this new frequency peak. but the The "action" value is a value at which continued operation at the given power level is. acceptable, I agree there is no frequency peak must be evaluated and explained before further power increase is allowed. safety problem with remaining at 112.5% power during the evaluation. peak crossed the VY went up 2.5% percent power this morning in three steps. This frequency was at 137 hertz. (Hertz is a line on the third step. This new peak is at 142 hertz. The peak at 105% measure of frequency - 1 hz equals -1cycle/sec.) like this one were My overall assessment is that this acoustical peak was unexpected but that unexpected peaks until the new indicates that it must go on hold anticipated by power ascension testing program. The p~ogram peak is evaluated. Contact me ifquestions.
-- Bill From: Sherman, William Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 2:24 PM To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah Cc: Smith, Richard
Subject:
Next VY power step up tomorrow (Thursday) - to 115% to 115% power. Based on NRC agreement, Entergy will take the next 5% power step up tomorrow (Thursday) -- I have participated onthetwo 110% data.calls with the NRC technical staff and Entergy, asking and responding to lengthy questions regarding I also reviewed the data at the site yesterday. were no surprises None of the acoustical data for the steam dryers approached the <new> limit curves, and there at this step. at one sensing The major area of discussion this time concerned 3 of 6 strain gage sensors not functioning from the reactor.) NRC location. (There are eight strain-gage sensing locations on the four steam lines coming spurious. NRC also agreed that reviewed the readings from the -- suspect strain gages and agreed the data was data. the 3 remaining sensors at that location were sufficient to provide the necessary I will keep you informed of the results of this next step. -- Bill Docket No. 7195 Attachment 8-14 Page 1 of I
-i/1 -1/1) A
Eniergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations Page I Of1 Sherman, William From: Sherman, William Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:45 AM Sarah To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Cc: Smith, Richard
Subject:
Update on Vermont Yankee on hold at 112.5% power Just a quick note as an update. is again "recalculating" its limit curves to take into Vermont Yankee is still on hold at 112.5% power. Entergy than expected. This recalculation process is account the new frequencies that are creating higher stress levels estimate for the next power inc'rease is at the end of not expected to be complete until late next week. The best next week.
-- Bill Docket No. 7195 Attachment 8-15 Page 1 of i
Page 1 of 1 Entergy Power Ascension Test Recalculations Sherman, William~ From: Sherman, William Sent: Monday, April 24,.2006 6:20 AM To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah Cc: Smith, Richard
Subject:
Update on Vermont Yankee now at 115% power the 115% level. Initial reports to me over the On Saturday Vermont Yankee. increased power from 112.5% to peaks or other problems. This means they weekend are that they did not experience any unexpected frequency this week. will be ready to make the last 5% increase on Wednesday or.Thursday
-- Bill From: Sherman, William Sent: Wed 4/12/2006 11:45 AM Sarah To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop,. Betsy; Hofmann, Cc: Smith, Richard
Subject:
Update on Vermont Yankee on hold at 112.5% power Just a quick note as an update.
"recalculating", its limit curves tO take into Vermont Yankee is still on hold at 112.5% power. Entergy is again levels than expected. This recalculation process is account the new frequencies that are creating higher stress best estimate for the next power increase is at the end of not expected to be complete until late next week. The next week. -- Bill Docket AttachmentNo. 7195 8-16 Page I of 1 "7/i "1/gnn6*
Sherman, William From: Sherman, William Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 12:48 PM To: Sherman, William, O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah Cc: Smith, Richard
Subject:
RE: Vermont Yankee still at 115% power I've been at the nuclear plant these last two days. VY was supposed to got to 117.5% power today and 120% tomorrow. However, they have been delayed for a day by a steam flow problem. Steam flow is indicating slightly higher than actual flow. Entergy indication and will correct the has determined the reason (a needed density correction) instrumentation. This indication problem is not related to the steam dryer issue that we are following. My assessment New schedule is 117.5% tomorrow (Friday) and 120% on Sunday if no problems. Entergy may. again experience steam dryer issues at the 117.5% level that will is that cause further delay-
Original Message -----
F.Vom: Sherman, William Sent: Mon 4/24/2006 6:19 AM Tp: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah CT: Smith, Richard
Subject:
Update on Vermont Yankee now at 115% power Initial reports On Saturday Vermont Yankee increased power flrom 112.5% to the 115% level. to me over the weekend are that they did not \experience any unexpected frequency peaks or will be ready to make the last 5% increase on Wednesday other problems., This means they or Thursday. this week.
--- Bill From: Sherman, William Sent: Wed 4/12/2006 11:45 AM To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah Cc: Smith, Richard
Subject:
Update on Vermont Yankee on hold at 112.5% power Just a quick note as an update. Vermont Yankee is still on hold at 112.5% power. Entergy is again." recalculating" its limit curves to, take into account the new frequencies that are creating higher stress levels than expected. This recalculation process is not expected to be complete until late next week. The best estimate for the next power increase is at the end of next week.
-- Bill Docket No. 7195 Attachment 8-17 Page 1 of 1 1.
Sherman, William From: Sherman, William Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 1:10 PM To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah Cc, Smith, Richard
Subject:
..Vermont Yankee now at 117.5% power but on Hold again Entergy increased VY's power to 117.5% power this morning. However, again a measured frequency stress/strain response reached the twice-recalculated limit curve requiring a hold to evaluate the consequences. Therefore, 'the final power increase (which was scheduled for Sunday) is put off until the evaluation is complete. The previous two evaluations have taken appoxiriately two weeks to resolve. ----- Original Message -----
From: Sherman, William Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 12:48 PM To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, 'David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah Cc: Smith, Richard
Subject:
RE: Vermont Yankee still at 115% power Iive been at. the nucclear plant these last two days. VY was supposed to got to 117.5% p6wer today and 120% tomorrow. However, they have been delayed for a day by a steam flow i#dication problem. Steam flow is indicating slightly higher than actual flow. Entergy has determined the reason (a needed density correction) and will correct the ihstrumentation. This indication problem is'not related to the stearn dryer issue that we are following. New schedule is 117.5% tomorrow (Friday) and 120% on Sunday if no problems.. My assessment is that Entergy may again experience steam drVer issues at.the 117.5% level that will cause further delay.
.original Message-.----
From: Sherman, William Sent: Mon 4/24/2006 6:19 AM To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah Cc: Smith, Richard
Subject:
Update on Vermont Yankee now at 115% power On Saturday Vermont Yankee increased power from 112.5% to the 115% level. Initial reports to me over the weekend are that they did not experience any unexpected frequency peaks or other problems. This'means they will be ready to make the last 5% increase on Wednesday or Thursday this week. Bill From: Sherman, William Sent: Wed 4/12/2006 11:45 AM To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah Cc: Smith, Richard
Subject:
Update on Vermont Yankee on hold at 112.5% power Just a quick note as an. update. Vermont Yankee is still on hold at 112.5% power. Entergy is again "recalculating" its limit curves to take into account the new frequencies that are creating higher stress levels than expected. This recalculation process is not expected to be complete until late next week. The best estimate for the next power increase is at the end of next week.
-- Bill Docket No. 7195 Attachment 8-18 Page I of I
Sherman, William From: Sherman, William Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 2:36 PM To: Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah Cc: Smith, Richard; Mertens, Hans
Subject:
Vermont Yankee now approved to go to 120% the results and Vermont Yankee has done additional calculations and has provide methodology to NRC. NRC agrees that the calculations demonstrate safe operation with satisfactory of the final conservatism, and therefore agrees that Entergy can proceed with the increase 2.5% to 100%. Entergy will make this increase tomorrow (Friday) Docket No. 7195 Attachment 8-19 Page I of 1 I
Sherman, William From:
- Sherman, William Friday, May 05, 2006 2:44 PM Sent:
Sherman, William; O'Brien, David; Bishop, Betsy; Hofmann, Sarah To: Smith, Richard; Mertens, Hans Cc: Vermont Yankee at full uprate power - 120%
Subject:
at 10:20 am. This was done I observed Vermont Yankee increase to 120% power.today 120 MW of. additional Vermont Yankee is now producing approximately satisfactoril-y and are no plant vibration issues Preliminary inspections are that there power from uprate.. curves. issues with their final limit and no steam dryer acoustical Two issues remain. On Monday, Entergy will perform a condensate feed pump trip test. This test will verifY whether control systems function properly at the~uprated power level-. It is pos 5 ible the plant will automatically "sluOtdown Monday if the control do not function as. expected.
.. :D A iLlb
-- Bill Docket No. 7195 Attachment 8-20 Page 1 of I
C-C) UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 May 5, 2006 Mr. Marvin Moriarty, Regional Director. Northeast Regional Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035-9589
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR LIST OF PROTECTED SPECIES WITHIN THE AREA UNDER EVALUATION FOR THE VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION REVIEW
Dear Mr. Moriarty:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is reviewing an, application submitted by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) for the renewal of the operating license for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (VYNPS). VYNPS is located in the town of Vernon, Vermont, in Windham County on the west shore of the Connecticut River immediately upstream of the Vernon Hydroelectric Station. As part bf the review of the license renewal application (LRA), the NRC is preparing a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) under the provisions of Title 10 of the Code of FederalRegulations Part 51 (10 CFR Part 51), the NRC regu'lation that implements the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. The SEIS includes an analysis of pertinent environmental issues, including endangered or threatened species and impacts to fish and wildlife. This letter is being submitted under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1934, as amended. The proposed action would include the use and continued maintenance of existing plant facilities and transmission lines. VYNPS stated that no major refurbishment activities have been identified as necessary to support the continued operation of VYNPS beyond the end of the existing operating license term. VYNPS is situated on approximately 125 acres of land on the west shore of the Connecticut River 0.75 miles upstream of the Vernon Hydroelectric Station. This section of the river is known as Vernon Pool. The areas adjacent to the station are primarily farm and pasture lands. The area within a five mile radius is predominantly rural with the exception of a portion of the town of Brattleboro, Vermont, and the town of Hinsdale, New Hampshire. Between 75 percent and 80 percent of the area within five miles of the station is wooded. The remainder is occupied by farms and small industries. Enclosure 1 shows the layout of the general area near the VYNPS site and Enclosure 2 presents an overview of the site location. NRC 50-271-LR ASLBP 06-849-03-LR DPS-4 8 Pages
M. Moriarty -2.- The VYNPS utilizes a once-through cooling system and mechanical draft cooling towers to remove waste heat from the condensers. The three circulating water pumps are located in the enclosed intake structure at the river bank. Water from the main condensers is returned to the discharge structure where it is either discharged through an aerating structure to the river oris diverted to the cooling towers. Water circulated through the towers may be either discharged through the aerating structure to the river or recirculated in a closed loop path to the intake structure, or a combination of both, known as hybrid cycle mode. The discharge path is manually selected by the operator and is contingent upon seasonal variation in environmental parameters. The only transmission lines considered to be in scope for the review are located inside the 125 acre plant site. These transmission lines were constructed to connect VYNPS to the New England transmission grid. The transmission lines exiting the switchyards are part of the New England transmission grid that was constructed to supply purchased power to the State of Vermont. The New England transmission grid is not considered to be in scope of the license renewal review. To support the SEIS preparation process and to ensure comp!iance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, the NRC requests information on Federally listed, proposed, and candidate species and critical habitat that may be in the vicinity of the VYNPS site. In addition, please provide any information you consider appropriate under the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act. From May 23-25, 2006, the NRC staff plans tb conduct a site audit at the VYNPS. On June. 7, 2006, the NRC staff plans to hold two public NEPA scoping meetings at the Latchis Theatre, 50 Main Street, Brattleboro, Vermont 05301. The first session will convene at 1:30 p.m. and will continue until 4:30 p.m., as necessary. The second session will convene at 7:00 p.m., with a repeat of the overview portions of the meeting, and will continue until 10:00 p.m., as necessary. In addition to the environmental scoping meeting described above, the NRC will hold an informal open house at the Quality Inn & Suites, 1380 Putney Road, Brattleboro, Vermont 05301, on Tuesday, June 6, 2006, from 2:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m., as necessary. You and your staff are invited to attend both the site audit and the public meetings. Your office will receive a copy of the draft SEIS along with a request for comments. The anticipated publication date for the draft SEIS is December 2006.
- 14. Moriarty If you have any questions concerning the NRC staff review of this LRA, please contact Mr. Richard L. Emch Jr., Senior Environmental Project Manager at 301-415-1590 or RLEC.nrc.aov.
Sincerely, Rani Franovich, Branch Chief Environmental Branch B Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-271
Enclosures:
I. L-ayout of General Area near VYNPS Site
- 2. Overview of the Site Location cc w/encls.: See next page
F7. i
LiJ.n a . .1 U',h4. foiw L NEW~- ItNPIIRE C......Ld.JSl c I RK ' hty FV. i K 1
-- ll ---
- -~il'
', i A F- -, It F'-
MJA SSI CH-ALSErI'S Stat.~U %lp- "
- l.altf.,,'U 4 ~ ~ ~
ClC..Laztm ~ 9 II .t4:~-,t tu .wliu
-ie - - - - - - -ai~ -1. n.,
WONECTICUTL-
- ISLAND Enclosure 2
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station cc: Regional Administrator, Region I Mr. James M. DeVincentis U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Manager, Licensing 475 Allendale Road Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station King of Prussia, PA 19406-1415 P.O. Box 0500 185 Old Ferry Road Mr. David R. Lewis Brattleboro, VT 05302-0500 Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP 2300 N Street, N.W. Resident Inspector Washington, DC 20037-1128 Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. David O'Brien, Commissioner P.O. Box 176 Vermont Department of Public Service Vernon, VT 05354 112 State Street Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 Director, Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency Mr. James Volz, Chairman ATTN: James Muckerheide Public Service Board. 400 Worcester Rd. State of Vermont Framingham', MA 01702-5399 112 State Street Montpelier, VT 05620-2701 Mr. Jonathan M. Block, Esq. Main Street Operating Experience Coordinator P.O. Box 566 Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Putney, VT 05346-0566 320 Governor Hunt Road Vernon, VT 05354 Mr. John F. McCann Director, Licensing Mr. G. Dana Bisbee, Esq. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Deputy Attorney General 440 Hamilton Avenue 33 Capitol Street White Plains, NY 10601 Concord, NH. 03301-6937 Mr. Gary J. Taylor Chief, Safety Unit Chief Executive Officer Office of the Attorney General Entergy Operations One Ashburton Place, 19th Floor 1340 Echelon Parkway Boston, MA 02108 Jackson, MS 39213 Ms. Deborah B. Katz Mr. John T. Herron Box 83 Sr. VP and Chief Operating Officer Shelburne Falls, MA 01370 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 440 Hamilton Avenue Ms..Carla A. White, RRPT, CHP White Plains, NY 10601 Radiological Health Vermont Department of Health P.O. Box 70, Drawer #43 108 Cherry Street Burlington, VT 05402-0070
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station. , cc: Mr. Oscar Limpias* Mr. James P. Matteau Vice President, Engineering Executive Director Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Windham Regional Commission 440 Hamilton Avenue 139 Main Street, Suite 505 White Plains, NY 10601 Brattleboro, VT 05301 Mr. Christopher Schwartz Mr.*William K. Sherman Vice President, Operations Support Vermont Department of Public Service Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 112 State Street 440 Hamilton Avenue Drawer 20 White Plains, NY 10601 Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 Mr. Michael J. Colomb Mr. Michael D. Lyster Director of Oversight 5931 Barclay Lane Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Naples, FL $4!10-7306 440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains,NY 10601 Ms. Charlene-D. Faison Manager, Licensing Mr. Travis C..McCullough 440 Hamilton Avenue Assistant General.Counsel White Plains, NY 10601 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 440 Hamilton Avenue Mr. James Ross White Plains, NY 10601 Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 1 Street, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006-3708 Mr. Jay K. Thayer Site Vice President Mr. Peter Deyo Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Chairman, Vernon Select Board P.O. Box 0500 567 Governor Hunt Road 185 Old Ferry Road Vernon, VT 05354 Brattleboro, VT 05302-0500 Mr. Jerry Remillard Mr. James H. Sniezek Brattleboro Town Manager 5486 Nithsdale Drive 230 Main Street, Suite 208 Brattleboro, VT 05301 Salisbury, MD 21801 Mr. Steven A. Steidle Ms. Stacey M. Lousteau Treasury Department Chair, Brattleboro Select Board Entergy Services, Inc. '108 Meetinghouse Lane 639 Loyola Avenue Brattleboro, VT 05301-8985 New Orleans, LA 70113 Sen. Roderick M. Gander Mr. Raymond Shadis Senator, Windham District 43 Tyler Street New England Coalition Brattleboro, VT 05301 Post Office Box 98 Edgecomb, ME 04556
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station cc: Sen. Jeanette K. White Senator, Windham District 35A Old Depot Road Putney, VT 05346 Mr. Ed Anthes Vermont Nuclear Free by 2012 PO Box 6325 Brattleboro, VT 05302 Mr. John D. Smith Chairman Board of Selectmen PO Box 13 Hinsdale, NH 03451 Ms. Diana Sidebotham The New England Coalition PO Box 545 Brattleboro, VT 05302
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY, COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 May 5, 2006 Ms. Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Regional Office 2D One Blackburn Drive
-0 Gloucester, MA 09130-2298
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR LIST OF PROTECTED SPECIES AND ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT WITHIN THE AREA UNDER EVALUATION FOR THE VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION REVIEW
Dear Ms. Kurkul:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is reviewing an application submitted by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) for the renewal of the operating license for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (VYNPS). VYNPS is located in the town of Vernon, Vermont, in Windham County on the west share of the Connecticut River. As part of the review of the license renewal application (LRA), the NRC is preparing a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) under the provisions of Title 10 of the Code of FederalRegulations Part 51 (10 CFR Part 51), the NRC regulation that implements the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. The SEIS includes an analysis of pertinent environmental issues, including endangered or threatened species and impacts to marine resources and habitat. This letter is being submitted under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act-of 1934, as amended, and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The proposed action would include the use and continued maintenance of existing plant facilities and transmission lines. VYNPS stated that no major refurbishment activities have been identified as necessary to support the continued operation of VYNPS beyond the end of the existing operating license term. VYNPS is situated on approximately 125 acres of land on the west shore of the Connecticut River 0.75 miles upstream of the Vernon Hydroelectric Station. This section of the river is known as Vernon Pool. The areas adjacent to the station are primarily farm and pasture lands. The area within a five mile radius is predominantly rural with the exception of a portion of the town of Brattleboro, Vermont, and the town of Hinsdale, New Hampshire. Between 75 percent and 80 percent of the area within five miles of the station is wooded. The remainder is occupied by farms and small industries. Enclosure 1 shows the layout of the general area near the VYNPS site and Enclosure 2 presents an overview of the site location. NRC 50-271-LR ASLBP 0 6 -849-03-LR DPS-5 8 Pages
P. Kurkul The VYNPS utilizes a once-througlh cooling system'and mechanical draft cooling towers to remove waste heat from the condensers. The three circulating water pumps are located in the enclosed intake structure at the river bank. Water from the main condensers is returned to the discharge structure where it is either discharged through an aerating structure to the river or is diverted to the cooling towers. Water circulated through the towers may be either discharged through the aerating structure to the river or recirculated in a closed loop path to the intake structure, or a combination of both, known as hybrid cycle mode. The discharge path is manually selected by the operator and, is contingent upon seasonal variation in environmental parameters. The only transmission lines considered to be in scope for the review are located inside the 125 acre plant site. These transmission lines were constructed to connect VYNPS to the New England transmission grid. The transmission lines exiting the switchyards are part of the New England transmission grid that was constructed to supply purchased power to the State of Vermont. The New England transmission grid is not considered to be in scope of the license renewal review. To support the SEIS preparation process and to ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, the NRC requests information on Federally listed, proposed and candidate species, and critical habitat under toie jurisdiction of the National Marine Fisheries Service that may be in the vicinity of the VYNPS site. In addition, please provide any information you consider appropriate under the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act. Also in support of the SEIS preparation and to ensure compliance with Section 305 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the NRC requests a list of essential fish habitat that has been designated in the vicinity of the VYNPS site. From May 23-25, 2006, the NRC staff plans to conduct a site audit at the VYNPS. On June 7, 2006, the NRC staff plans to hold two public NEPA scoping meetings at the Latchis Theatre, 50 Main Street, Brattleboro, Vermont 05301. The first session will convene at 1:30 p.m. and will continue until 4:30 p.m., as necessary. The second session will convene at 7:00 p.m., with a repeat of the overview portions of the meeting, and will continue until 10:00 p.m., as necessary. In addition to the environmental scoping meeting described above, the NRC will hold an informal open house at the Quality Inn & Suites, 1380 Putney Road, Brattleboro, Vermont 05301, on Tuesday, June 6, 2006, from 2:00-8:00 p.m., as necessary. You and your staff are invited to attend both the site audit and the public meetings. Your office will receive a copy of the draft SEIS along with a request for comments. The anticipated publication date for the draft SEIS is December 2006.
P. Kurkul If you have any questions concerning the NRC staff review of this LRA, please contact Mr. Richard L. Emch Jr., Senior Environmental Project Manager at 301-415-1590 or RLE(cDnrc. av Sincerely, Rani Franovich, Branch Chief Environmental Branch B Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket .No. 50-271
Enclosures:
- 1. Layout of General Area near VYNPS Site,
- 2. Overview of the Site Location cc w/encls.: See next page
~E~iIONTNEV%' HA1kIIPSHIIRE
'4-W S; J.
40 " ,4 I ,
~za. rl 2~ P.rif kMv-119 1' MtASSI CHUIS ET3~'S
- coNNECT1CITR1101 -
* - IJSLAND Enclosure2
j Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station cc: Regional Administrator, Region I Mr. James M. DeVincentis U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Manager, Licensing 475 Allendale Road Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station King of Prussia, PA 19406-1415 P.O. Box 0500 185 Old Ferry Road Mr. David R. Lewis Brattleboro, VT 05302-0500 Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP 2300 N Street, N.W. Resident Inspector, Washington, DC 20037-1128 Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. David O'Brien, Commissioner P.O. Box 176 Vermont Department of Public Service Vernon, VT 05354 112 State Street Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 Director, Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency Mr. James Volz, Chairman ATTN: James Muckerheide Public Service Board 400 Worcester Rd. State of Vermont Framingham, MA 01702-5399 112 State Street Montpelier, VT 05620-2701 Mr. Jonathan M. Block, Esq. Main Street Operating Experience Coordinator P.O. Box 566 Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Putney, VT 05346-0566 320 Governor Hunt Road Vernon, VT 05354 Mr. John F. McCann Director, Licensing Mr. G. Dana Bisbee, Esq. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Deputy Attorney General 440 Hamilton Avenue 33 Capitol Street White Plains, NY 10601 Concord, NH 03301-6937 Mr. Gary J. Taylor Chief, Safety Unit Chief Executive Officer Office of the Attorney General Entergy Operations One Ashburton Place, 19th Floor 1340 Echelon Parkway Boston, MA 02108 Jackson, MS 39213 Ms. Deborah B. Katz Mr. John T. Herron Box 83 Sr. VP and Chief Operating Officer Shelburne Falls, MA 01370 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 440 Hamilton Avenue Ms. Carla A. White, RRPT, CHP White Plains, NY 10601 Radiological Health Vermont Department of Health P.O. Box 70, Drawer #43 108 Cherry Street Burlington, VT 05402-0070
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station i*('.,I cc: Mr. Oscar Limpias Mr. James*P. Matteau Executive Director Vice President, Engineering Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Windham Regional Commission 139 Main Street, Suite 505 440 Hamilton Avenue Brattleboro, VT 05301. White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. William K. Sherman Mr. Christopher Schwartz Vermont Department of Public Service Vice President, Operations Support 112 State Street Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Drawer 20 440 Hamilton Avenue Montpelier, VT 05620-26011 White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. Michael D. Lyster Mr. Michael J. Colomb 5931 Barclay Lane Director of Oversight Naples, FL 34110-7306 .Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 440 Hamilton Avenue Ms. Charlene D. Faison White Plains, NY 10601 Manager, Licensing 440 Hamilton Avenue Mr. Travis C. McCullough White Plains, NY 10601 Assistant General Counsel Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Mr. James Ross 440 Hamilton Avenue Nuclear Energy Institute White Plains, NY 10601 1.776 I Street, NW, Suite 400 Mr. Jay K. Thayer Washington, DC 20006-3708 Site Vice President Mr. Peter Deyo Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Chairman, Vernon Select Board Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station 567 Governor Hunt Road P.O. Box 0500 Vernon, VT 05354 185 Old Ferry Road Brattleboro, VT 05302-0500 Mr. Jerry Remillard Brattleboro Town Manager Mr. James H. Sniezek 230 Main Street, Suite 208 5486 Nithsdale Drive Brattleboro, VT 05301 Salisbury, MD 21801 Mr. Steven A. Steidle Ms. Stacey M. Lousteau Treasury Department Chair, Brattleboro Select Board 108 Meetinghouse Lane Entergy Services, Inc. Brattleboro, VT 05301-8985 639 Loyola Avenue New Orleans, LA 70113 Sen. Roderick M. Gander Senator, Windham District Mr. Raymond Shadis 43 Tyler Street New England Coalition Brattleboro, VT 05301 Post Office Box 98 Edgecomb, ME 04556
"I Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station cc:
Sen. Jeanette K. White Senator, Windham District 35A Old Depot Road Putney, VT 05346 Mr. Ed Anthes Vermont Nuclear Free by 2012 PO Box 6325 Brattleboro, VT 05302 Mr. John D. Smith Chairman Board of Selectmen PO Box 13 Hinsdale, NH 03451 Ms. Diana' Sidebotham The New England Coalition PO Box 545 Brattleboro, VT 05302
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 21, 2006 Mr. Marvin Moriarty, Regional Director Northeast Regional Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035-9589
SUBJECT:
AMENDED REQUEST FOR LIST OF PROTECTED SPECIES WITHIN THE AREA UNDER EVALUATION FOR THE VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION REVIEW
Dear Mr. Moriarty:
In a letter dated May 5, 2006, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comrmission (NRC) staff requested information on Federally listed, proposed, and candidate species and critical habitat that might be in the vicinity of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (VYNPS) site. In that letter the staff indicated that the only area considered to be in scope for the license renewal environmental review was the 125 acre plant site. The letter further stated that no transmission lines were considered to be in scope for the review. After obtaining additional information related to the construction of the transmission lines, the staff has reconsidered its initial position and come to the conclusion that two transmission lines exiting the VYNPS will be considered within the scope of the environmental review. The reconsidered transmission lines are the 115 Kv transmission lines from VYNPS to the Coolidge Substation in Vermont (51 miles) and from VYNPS to the Chestnut Hill Substation in New Hampshire (2 miles). To support the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) preparation process and to ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the NRC requests information on Federally listed, proposed, and candidate species and critical habitat that might be in the vicinity of the VYNPS site and the previously mentioned transmission lines. In addition, please provide any information you consider appropriate under the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act. CD, t o '- NRC 50-27[-LR C: C ASLBP 06-849-03-LR DPS-6 9 Pages
M. Moriarty VYNPS is situated on approximately 125 acres of land on the west shore of the Connecticut River 0.75. miles upstream of the Vernon Hydroelectric Station. This section of the river is known as Vernon Pool. Enclosure 1 shows the transmissionline from VYNPS to the Coolidge Substation in Vermont. Enclosure 2 shows the transmission line from VYNPS to the Chestnut Hill Substation in New Hampshire. Sincerely, Rani Franovich, Branch Chief Environmental Branch B Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-271
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/encls: See next page
I'll I Enclosure 1
NEW~ NIPTIJE4 HA S;TATE PA-'RK Scobie 345kV 11 k V Keene
}:Imp- ,.i::*] *:i 115kv m
N jjý Enclosure 2
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station cc: Regional Administrator, Region I Mr. James M. DeVincentis U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Manager, Licensing 475 Allendale Road Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station King of Prussia, PA 19406-1415 P.O. Box 0500 185 Old Ferry Road Mr. David R. Lewis Brattleboro, VT 05302-0500 Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP 2300 N Street, N.W. Resident Inspector
.Washington, DC 20037-1128 Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. David O'Brien, Commissioner P.O. Box 176 Vermont Department of Public Service Vernon, VT 05354 112 State Street Montpelie'r, VT 05620-2601 Director, MasSachusetts Emergency Management Agency Mr. James Volz, Chairman ATTN: James Muckerheide Public Service Board 400 Worcester Road State of Vermont Framingham, MA 01702-5399 112 State Street.
Montpelier, VT 05620-2701 Mr. Jonathan M. Block, Esq. Main Street Operating Experience Coordinator- P.O. Box 566 Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Putney, VT 05346-0566 320 Governor Hunt Road Vernon, VT 05354 Mr. John F. McCann Director, Licensing Mr. G. Dana Bisbee, Esq.. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Deputy Attorney General 440 Hamilton Avenue 33 Capitol Street White Plains, NY 10601 Concord, NH 03301-6937 Mr. Gary J. Taylor Chief, Safety Unit Chief Executive Officer Office of the Attorney General Entergy Operations One Ashburton Place, 19th Floor 1340 Echelon Parkway Boston, MA 02108 Jackson, MS 39213 Ms. Deborah B. Katz Mr. John T. Herron Box 83 Sr. VP and Chief Operating Officer Shelburne Falls, MA 01370 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 440 Hamilton Avenue Ms. Carla A. White, RRPT, CHP White Plains, NY 10601 Radiological Health Vermont Department of Health P.O. Box 70, Drawer #43 108 Cherry Street Burlington, VT 05402-0070
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (. cc: Mr. Oscar Limpias Mr. James P, Matteau Vice President, Engineering Executive Director Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Windham Regional .Commission
*440 Hamilton Avenue 139 Main Street, Suite 505 White Plains, NY 10601 Brattleboro, VT 05301 Mr. Christopher Schwartz Mr. William K. Sherman Vice President, Operations Support Vermont Department of Public Service Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 112 State Street Drawer 20 440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 Mr. Michael J. Colomb Mr. Michael D. Lyster Director.of Oversight. 5931 Barclay Lane Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Naples, FL 34110-7306 440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Ms. Charlene D. Faison Manager, Licensing Mr. Travis C. McCullough 440. Hamilton Avenue Assistant General, Counsel White Plains, NY 10601 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
440 Hamilton Avenue Mr. James Ross White Plains, NY 10601 Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, NW, Suite 400 Mr. Jay K. Thayer Washington, DC 20006-3708 Site Vice President Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Mr. Peter Deyo Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Chairman, Vernon Select Board P.O. Box 0500 567 Governor Hunt Road 185 Old Ferry Road Vernon, VT 05354 Brattleboro, VT 05302-0500 Mr. Jerry Remillard Mr. James H. Sniezek Brattleboro Town Manager
.5486 Nithsdale Drive 230 Main Street, Suite 208 Salisbury, MD 21801 Brattleboro, VT 05301 Ms. Stacey M. Lousteau Mr. Steven A. Steidle Treasury Department Chair, Brattleboro Select Board
.Entergy Services, Inc. 108 Meetinghouse Lane 639 Loyola Avenue Brattleboro, VT 05301-8985 New Orleans, LA 70113 Sen. Roderick M. Gander Mr. Raymond Shadis Senator,. Windham District New England Coalition 43 Tyler Street P.O. Box 98 Brattleboro, VT 05301 Edgecomb, ME 04556
Vermont Yankee"Nuclear Power Station cc: Sen. Jeanette K. White Karl Finnell Senator, Windham District 21 Dummerston Station 35A Old Depot Road E Dummerston ,VT 05346 Putney, VT 05346 TJ Poor, Mr. Ed Anthes Dept of Public Service Vermont Nuclear Free by 2012 State St, Drawer 20 P0 Box 6325 Montpelier, VT 05602 Brattleboro, VT 05302 Charles Jenks Mr. John D. Smith 103A Keets Road Chairman Board of Selectmen Deerfield, MA 01342 PO Box 13 Hinsdale, NH 03451 Anthony L.. Stevens 40 Lathrop Street Ms. Diana Sidebotham South Hadley, MA 01075 The New England Coalition PO Box 545 William Irwin Brattleboro, VT 05302 VT Dept of Health 108 Caerry Street Ch'ristina Laine Burlington, VT 05402 PO Box 3347 Stowe, VT 05672 Terri C. Smith 779 Brattleboro Road John Dougherty Hinsdale, NH 03451 120 Manning Hill Road Winchester, NH 03470 Carrol Ann Twetan 13 Revere Drive Steven Naeck Hinsdale NH 03451 291 Cobble Hill Road W. Swanzey, NH 03446 Jane Michand 129 Forrest Street, Apt. 2 Michael Carrier Brattleboro, VT 05301 230 Main Street Brattleboro, VT 05301 Salvador Hancola/Deborah Reger 149 Grist Mill Road Thomas Simon Corinth, VT 05039 2230 Higley Hill Road Wilmington, VT 05363 Martha Drala 1480 Union Village Janice Healy Norwich, VT 05055 1350 Main Street Springfield, MA 01103 Jon Blode 94 Main Street PO Box 566 Putney, VT 05346
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station cc: Cora Brooks Michael Flory P'O. Box 43 2031 B Ft Bridgeman Road Chelsea, VT 05038 Vernon, VT 05354 Bunder Mabkan Eesha Williams PO Box 960 111 Dutton Farm Road Manchester Ctr, VT 05255 Brattleboro, VT 05301 Joan C Shaw Dennis Girroir 49 Coltage Street 860 Lakeridge Drive Manchester Ctr, VT 05255 Guilford, VT 05301 Anne Elizabeth Howes Dan Jeffries. 52 South, Main 163 Carriage Hill Road Brattleboro, VT 05301 Brattleboro, VT 05301 Richard Denby Chris Nord PO Box 253 14 North Main Street Hinsdale NH 03451 Newton, NH 03858 Megg Rogers Emma Stamas 24 River Road Box 12 Hinsdale, NH 03452 Colrain, MA 01340 A.J. Madkour Clay Turnbull PO Box 960 1799 Simpson Brk Road Manshester Center Townshend, VT 05353 Vermont 05255 Bernard Buteau Julie Moore 1836 Petersham Road VT Agency of Natural Resources Athol, MA 01331 103 S. Main Street Center Bldg- 3 rd Fir Evan Mulholland Waterbury, VT 05671 1645 Eagle Peak Road
.Randolph, VT 05060 Ruth E Clark 955 Barney Hill Road Ms. Jeanne Walsh Guilford, VT 05301 Ref. Librarian, Brooks Memorial Library 224 Main Street Timothy M. Jones Brattleboro, VT 05301 MA Attorney General W Mass Division Ms. Debra Kern 1350 Main Street Director, Dickinson Memorial Library Springfield, MA 01103 115 Main Street Northfield, MA 01360
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station " cc: Ms. Mary Major. Lbrary.Director,-Hinsdale Public Library " - P.O. Box 6 Hinsdale, NH 03451 Ms. Adrienne Boudreau Library Director, Vernon Free Library 567 Governor Hunt Road Vernon, VT 05354 Mike Hamer Licensing Specialist, VYNPS P.O. Box 0500 185 Old Ferry Road Brattleboro, VT 05302-0500 Evan Mulholland 1645 Eagle Peak Road Randolph, VT 05060 William Irwin VT Dept of Health 108 Caerry Street Burlington, VT 05402 George Clain 86 Maple Crest Barre, VT 05641 Email: Sheila Hollis sshollis(cduanemorris.com Bill Pearson bill 129 ,surfaIobaI. net Robert English ren-alish(ftubpol. umass.edu Richie Davis rdavis(,recorder.com
For the Reply to Answers to Petition to Intervene 30-Jun-06 Calculation for the Heat Transfer a.cross the concrete containment Basis: Marks' Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers Eighth Edition, 1978, McGraw-Hill Transmission of Heat by Conduction and Convection, pp. 4-59 to 4-70 Assumptions:, inside containment Temp - steady state at 165 degrees F outside Temp, in reactor building - steady state at 100 degrees F Using Elevation 280- top of spherical section - data from LRA, Amendment 2, May 15, 2006 k/I steel plate thickness - 2.5 inches 2.5 sand gap - 2 inches 2 concrete thickness - varying, scaled from drawing - approx. 6 ft 72 steel thermal conductivity - k tO 26.2 btulhIftA21FIft 26.2 10.48 a - 0.002 concrete thermal conductivity - k 1.05 1.05 0. 014583 dry sand thermal conductivity - k 0.188 0.188 0.094 Calculation:
- C Intermediate ti 165 Temp inside containment*
t4 100 Temp inside reactor building A 0.008969 B 0.155142 Equation t3 163.5332 15.51418 1.155142 0.00889 156.2024 Temp at inside face of concrete. t2 1.388597 163.5332 164,9218 Temp at steel/sand interface Check 0.819619 0.819619 0.819619 satisfactory Check with equation page 5 AA 0.819619 t2 164.9218 t3 156.2024 NRC 50-271-LR ASLBP 06-849-03-LR DPS-7 3 Pages
A -6&-p . cC)--s
~ ~ VCLC~Qd\~' £BT.
(7 co~-1 14 3, 14ol I-C V-Q IxL- 4 ,I/ (~c; c/v
~Ni T~z -g~
OQ1L.8c8 g,-o/~Q 7ETh[&2~ 3 L~2 Th~ z~t. FJ'Q I~i~-' -
~
U CU Oý 2-6 rnz~-- S) CJ~A~cC 2~-{j~Q Q~~rno F'>
'T ckKl-W-q6 1~v7::z G
Th~t.j~( -'
/LA~i 3 'P L L TX~ic j~
(k z4L~1~ I
~y ~+/-kA)
-~ -Cs I o~ i-f d
K it vL}}