05000318/LER-2005-002, Regarding Personnel Air Lock Containment Penetration Closure Requirements Violation
| ML051290061 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs |
| Issue date: | 05/04/2005 |
| From: | Holm D Constellation Energy Group |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| LER 05-002-00 | |
| Download: ML051290061 (6) | |
| Event date: | |
|---|---|
| Report date: | |
| Reporting criterion: | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications |
| 3182005002R00 - NRC Website | |
text
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Constellation Generation Group, LLC 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway Lusby. Maryland 20657 Constellation Energy Group May 4, 2005 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 ATTENTION:
SUBJECT:
Document Control Desk Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit No. 2; Docket No. 50-318; License No. DPR 69 Licensee Event Report 2005-002 Personnel Air Lock Containment Penetration Closure Requirements Violation The attached report is being sent to you as required by 10 CFR 50.73.
Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. L. S. Larragoite at (410) 495-4922.
Very truly yours, David A. Holm Plant General Manager DAH/ALS/bjd
Attachment:
As stated cc:
R. V. Guzman, NRC S. J. Collins, NRC Resident Inspector, NRC R. 1. McLean, DNR J§/W/
NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 06/30/2007 (6-2004)
, the NRC may digits/characters for each block)
Inot orsponsor, and a person is not required to respond to. the
- 3. PAGE Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Powver Plant, Unit 2 05000 318 1 OF 005
- 4. TITLE Personnel Air Lock Containment Penetration Closure Requirements Violation
- 5. EVENT DATE
- 6. LER NUMBER
- 7. REPORT DATE
- 8. OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED SEUNILRVFACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR NSEUENTAL REV MONTH DAY YEAR 05000 I
FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 03 06 2005 2005 - 002 -
00 05 04 2005 05000
- 9. OPERATING MODE
- 11. THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR§: (Checkallf that apply) o 20.2201(b)
El 20.2203(a)(3)(i)
El 50.73(a)(2)(i)(C)
El 50.73(a)(2)(vii) 6 El 20.2201(d) a 20.2203(a)(3)(ii)
El 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A)
El 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)
El 20.2203(a)(1)
El 20.2203(a)(4) 0 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B)
El 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)
El 20.2203(a)(2)(i)
El 50.36(c)(1)(i)(A)
El 50.73(a)(2)(iii)
[E 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)
- 10. POWER LEVEL El 20.2203(a)(2)(ii)
El 50.36(c)(1)(ii)(A) 0 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A)
El 50.73(a)(2)(x)
El 20.2203(a)(2)(iii)
El 50.36(c)(2)
El 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A)
El 73.71(a)(4) 03 20.2203(a)(2)(iv)
El 50.46(a)(3)(ii)
El 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B)
El 73.71 (a)(5) 000 0 20.2203(a)(2)(v)
El 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A)
El 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C)
El OTHER El 20.2203(a)(2)(vi) 0 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B)
D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D)
Specify In Abstract below I
or In (If more space is required, use additional copies of (If more space is required, use additional copies of (If more space Is required, use additional copies of (If more space Is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A)
Contributing causes to that event were inadequate work packages and inadequate communications, both of which were the result of human performance errors.
The previous similar event involved the same underlying concern regarding containment penetration closure controls. However, prior corrective actions established did not prevent recurrence because the corrective actions were established to address a different root cause.
Specifically, the previous similar event was the result of inadequate preparation of maintenance work packages and inadequate communications during performance of maintenance activities.
Therefore, prior corrective actions included changes to the procedures controlling preparation of maintenance work packages and improvements regarding communications during performance of maintenance activities.