Letter Sequence Request |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARNL-08-101, Proposed Changes to Technical Specifications Regarding Diesel Generator Endurance Test Surveillance2008-07-0909 July 2008 Proposed Changes to Technical Specifications Regarding Diesel Generator Endurance Test Surveillance Project stage: Request ML0823305172008-08-20020 August 2008 Email, Boska (NRC) to Prussman (Entergy), Acceptance Review for Indian Point 2 Amendment Project stage: Acceptance Review ML0824806212008-09-0505 September 2008 Request for Additional Information Regarding Amendment Application for Revision to Diesel Generator Surveillance Test Project stage: RAI NL-08-139, Reply to Request for Additional Information, Proposed Changes to Technical Specifications Regarding Diesel Generator Endurance Test Surveillance2008-09-29029 September 2008 Reply to Request for Additional Information, Proposed Changes to Technical Specifications Regarding Diesel Generator Endurance Test Surveillance Project stage: Response to RAI ML0827602872008-09-29029 September 2008 List of Procedures in Enclosure 1 Project stage: Other 05000286/LER-2008-004, Automatic Actuation of the Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps During Surveillance Testing Caused by Incorrect Test Jumper Connection Due to Personnel Error2008-09-29029 September 2008 Automatic Actuation of the Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps During Surveillance Testing Caused by Incorrect Test Jumper Connection Due to Personnel Error Project stage: Request NL-08-154, Supplement to Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Changes to Technical Specifications Regarding Diesel Generator Endurance Test Surveillance2008-10-0303 October 2008 Supplement to Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Changes to Technical Specifications Regarding Diesel Generator Endurance Test Surveillance Project stage: Supplement NL-08-157, Supplement to Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Changes to Technical Specifications Regarding Diesel Generator Endurance Test Surveillance2008-10-0808 October 2008 Supplement to Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Changes to Technical Specifications Regarding Diesel Generator Endurance Test Surveillance Project stage: Supplement ML0900803762009-01-0909 January 2009 Request for Additional Information Regarding Amendment Application for Revision to Diesel Generator Surveillance Test Project stage: RAI NL-09-010, Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Changes to Technical Specifications on Diesel Generator Endurance Test Surveillance2009-02-0606 February 2009 Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Changes to Technical Specifications on Diesel Generator Endurance Test Surveillance Project stage: Response to RAI ML0908400732009-04-22022 April 2009 Issuance of Amendment Emergency Diesel Generator Surveillance Test Project stage: Approval 2008-09-29
[Table View] |
text
Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 1Buchanan, N.Y. 10511-0249 ILLL.Iy Tel (914) 734-6700 J. E. Pollock Site Vice President September 29, 2008 Indian Point Unit No. 3 Docket No. 50-286 NL-08-135 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Mail Stop O-P1-17 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001
Subject:
Licensee Event Report # 2008-004-00, "Automatic Actuation of the Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps During Surveillance Testing Caused by Incorrect Test Jumper Connection Due to Personnel Error"
Dear Sir or Madam:
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc. (ENO) hereby provides Licensee Event Report (LER) 2008-004-00. The attached LER identifies an event where there was an automatic actuation of both motor driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps, a system listed in 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(B), which is reportable under 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A).
This condition was recorded in the Entergy Corrective Action Program as Condition Report CR-IP3-2008-01863.
There are no new commitments identified in this letter.. Should you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Mr. Robert Walpole, Manager, Licensing at (914) 734-6710.
Sincerely, J. E. Pollock Site Vice President Indian Point Energy Center cc:
Mr. Samuel J Collins, Regional Administrator, NRC Region I NRC Resident Inspector's Office, Indian Point 3 Mr. Paul Eddy, New York State Public Service Commission INPO Record Center a'
Abstract
On August 4, 2008, during performance of the monthly Reactor Protection Logic Channel Functional Test 3-PT-Ml3BI, Instrumentation & Control (I&C) technicians were testing Low-Low Steam Generator Water Level (SGWL) which required installation of jumper wires on terminal board logic contacts when a jumper became dislodged.
When the I&C technicians completed installation of the second jumper they reinstalled the jumper that became dislodged and continued installation of the remaining jumpers.
At this time Control Room Operators notified the technicians of an automatic start of the motor driven 31 and 33 Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps (AFWPs).
The I&C technicians stopped the test, removed the jumpers, performed troubleshooting and testing and satisfactorily completed the test.
The cause of the event was the AFWP Auto start actuation logic was satisfied when a relay was energized as a result of installation of a jumper on an incorrect terminal of the Low-Low SGWL logic circuit.
The incorrect jumper connection was due to personnel error as a result of ineffective use of Human Performance (HP) tools because standards and expectations have not been adequately reinforced in I&C technicians.
Corrective actions included coaching I&C personnel on use of HP tools, discussion with I&C Supervision of the event, lessons learned, and management expectations for procedure use and adherence and use of proper clips.
A Maintenance Stand-down was developed and conducted on details of the root cause events in 2008 to include their causes, HP traps, and HP tools used ineffectively.
HP Simulator High Intensity training will be performed.
A needs analysis will be performed for the frequency of Human Performance refresher training.
The event had no effect on public health and safety.
(if more space is required, use additional copies of (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)
Event Analysis
The event is reportable under 10CFR50.73(a) (2) (iv) (A).
The licensee shall report any event or condition that resulted in the manual or automatic actuation of any system listed in 10CFR50.73(a) (2) (iv) (B).
Systems to which the requirements of 10CFR50.73(a) (2) (iv) (A) apply for this event include the AFWS.
'This event meets the reporting criteria because the AFWS was actuated in accordance with design as a result of satisfying the requirements for initiation from the actuation circuitry for the 31 and 33 AFWPs.
As a result of the event, there were no safety systems that were not capable of performing their safety function.
In accordance with reporting guidance in NUREG-1022, an additional random single failure need not be assumed in that system during the condition.
Therefore, there was no safety system functional failure of the AFWS reportable under 10 CFR 50.73 (a) (2) (v)
Past Similar Events A review was performed of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) for the past three years for any events reporting Engineered Safety Feature actuation due to inadvertent actuation during testing.
LER-2005-003 reported an inadvertent actuation of the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW)
Pumps on May 16, 2005, during Reactor Protection Logic Channel Functional Testing (3-PT-Ml3BI).
The cause of the event reported in LER-2005-003 was human error due to inadequate work practices were the technician performing the test failed to adhere to the procedure and allowed himself to be distracted and failed to disarm the actuation circuit as required by procedure.
The event reported in LER-2005-003 has a similar cause to this event as both were caused by human performance issues.
The corrective actions for LER-2005-003 included counseling I&C personnel on management expectations on procedure adherence and use of human performance tools, high intensity training on use of human performance tools.
These corrective actions were not sufficiently effective in preventing a reoccurrence of a similar event by I&C personnel being reported in this LER because training on the lessons learned were not continually reinforced.
Safety Significance
This event had no effect on the health and safety of the public.
There were no actual safety consequences for the event because there were no accidents or transients requiring the AFWPs and Operators were aware of the possibility of an inadvertent AFW pump start during testing and have indications alerting them to AFW pump start.
The operators had adequate time to terminate AFWP operation and limit the addition of AFW into the SGs. Operators during this event recognized the AFW pump start and took appropriate actions in accordance with plant procedures to limit the effects of the inadvertent AFW actuation.
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000003/LER-2008-001, Attempted Introduction of Contraband Into the Plant Protected Area Due to Personnel Error | Attempted Introduction of Contraband Into the Plant Protected Area Due to Personnel Error | | | 05000247/LER-2008-001, Regarding Manual Reactor Trip Due to Decreasing Steam Generator Levels Caused by Loss of Feedwater Flow as a Result of Feedwater Pump Speed Control Malfunction | Regarding Manual Reactor Trip Due to Decreasing Steam Generator Levels Caused by Loss of Feedwater Flow as a Result of Feedwater Pump Speed Control Malfunction | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Submit an LER 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000286/LER-2008-001, Regarding Technical Specification Prohibited Condition Due to Exceeding the Allowed Completion Time for an Inoperable Safety Injection Pump Caused by a Failed Motor Supply Breaker | Regarding Technical Specification Prohibited Condition Due to Exceeding the Allowed Completion Time for an Inoperable Safety Injection Pump Caused by a Failed Motor Supply Breaker | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Submit an LER 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000247/LER-2008-002, Re. Technical Specification Prohibited Condition Due to Exceeding the Allowed Completion Time for an Inoperable Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Automatic Actuation Logic & Actuation Relay Caused | Re. Technical Specification Prohibited Condition Due to Exceeding the Allowed Completion Time for an Inoperable Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Automatic Actuation Logic & Actuation Relay Caused | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Submit an LER 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000286/LER-2008-002, Regarding Loss of Single Train 31 Pressurizer Backup Heater Bank Required to Function to Shutdown and Maintain the Reactor in a Safe Condition Remote from Control Room | Regarding Loss of Single Train 31 Pressurizer Backup Heater Bank Required to Function to Shutdown and Maintain the Reactor in a Safe Condition Remote from Control Room | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Submit an LER 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vi) | | 05000247/LER-2008-003, Re Manual Reactor Trip Due to Decreasing Steam Generator Levels Caused by a Main Turbine Runback Due to a Failed Runback Circuit Bistable with a Control Switch Mis-Positioned to Armed | Re Manual Reactor Trip Due to Decreasing Steam Generator Levels Caused by a Main Turbine Runback Due to a Failed Runback Circuit Bistable with a Control Switch Mis-Positioned to Armed | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Submit an LER 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | | 05000286/LER-2008-003, Regarding Automatic Actuation of Emergency Diesel Generator 33 During Surveillance Testing Caused by Inadvertent Actuation of the Undervoltage Sensing Circuit on 488 Volt AC Safeguards Bus 5A | Regarding Automatic Actuation of Emergency Diesel Generator 33 During Surveillance Testing Caused by Inadvertent Actuation of the Undervoltage Sensing Circuit on 488 Volt AC Safeguards Bus 5A | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Submit an LER 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation | | 05000286/LER-2008-004, Automatic Actuation of the Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps During Surveillance Testing Caused by Incorrect Test Jumper Connection Due to Personnel Error | Automatic Actuation of the Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps During Surveillance Testing Caused by Incorrect Test Jumper Connection Due to Personnel Error | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Submit an LER 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000286/LER-2008-005, Regarding Technical Specification Prohibited Condition Due to Exceeding the Allowed Completion Time for an Out of Position Valve Caused by Personnel Error | Regarding Technical Specification Prohibited Condition Due to Exceeding the Allowed Completion Time for an Out of Position Valve Caused by Personnel Error | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Submit an LER 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000286/LER-2008-006, Automatic Actuation of an Emergency Diesel Generator and Two Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps During Surveillance Testing Due to Inadvertent De-Energization of the Normal Supply Breaker to 480 Volt Safeguards Bus 6A | Automatic Actuation of an Emergency Diesel Generator and Two Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps During Surveillance Testing Due to Inadvertent De-Energization of the Normal Supply Breaker to 480 Volt Safeguards Bus 6A | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(1), Submit an LER 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function |
|