ML22314A075

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2B - Exam Administrative Items - Normal Release
ML22314A075
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/10/2022
From:
NRC/RGN-II
To:
Progress Energy Carolinas
References
Download: ML22314A075 (1)
v • d • e


Text

ML22314A075 Form 2.1-1 Examination Preparation Checklist Facility: ______Harris_____________________________ Date of Examination: ___Sept 2022_______

Developed by: Written: Facility NRC // Operating: Facility NRC Chief Target Task Description Examiners Date*

Initials

1. Examination administration date confirmed (A.1-5). For NRC-prepared examinations,

-240 arrangements are made for the facility licensee to submit reference materials (B.4, C.4.g and F).

-210 2. NRC examiners and facility licensee contact assigned (B.1 and C.1-3).

3. Facility licensee contact briefed on examination security and other requirements (D.4). As applicable, the facility licensee contact submits to the NRC any prescreened K/As for

-210 elimination from the written examination outline, with a description of the facility licensees prescreening process (ES-4.1 A.1.a and ES-4.1 B.2).

-210 4. Reference material due for NRC-prepared examinations (F). N/A

-210 5. Examination kick-off call held (C.4). The NRC sends the corporate notification letter (A.5).

6. Written examination outline developed by the NRC and sent to the facility licensee contact

-195 (must be on the examination security agreement) (B.2, ES-4.1 A.1.b and ES-4.1 A.2.a). N/A

7. Operating test outlines and checklists due: Forms 1.3-1, 2.3-1, 3.2-1, 3.2-2, 3.3-1, and 3.4-1, as

-150 applicable (B.6). Facility licensee provides a draft operating test administration schedule to the NRC (B.18).

8. Operating test outlines reviewed by the NRC and feedback provided to the facility licensee

-136 (ES-2.3).

9. NRC-prepared examinations approved by the NRC supervisor and forwarded for facility

-100 licensee review (ES-2.3). N/A

10. Proposed examinations (written, JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable) and outline forms;

-75 quality checklists and supporting documentation (including Forms 2.3-2 and 2.3-4 and any Form 2.3-1, 1.3-1, and 3.4-1 updates); and reference materials due.

-60 11. Preliminary waiver/excusal requests due (ES-2.2 E.1).

12. Written examination and operating test reviews completed (ES-2.3). The NRC supervisors

-50 authorization to proceed with the facility review granted (ES-2.3 D).

-50 13. Examination review results discussed between the NRC and the facility licensee (B.14).

-35 14. Examination preparatory week conducted by the NRC and the facility licensee (I).

-30 15. Preliminary license applications, including any waiver/excusal requests, due (ES-2-2 C.1).

16. Final license applications, including any waiver/excusal requests, due and Form 2.2-1

-14 prepared (ES-2.2 C and E).

-7 17. Written examinations and operating tests approved by the NRC supervisor (C.9)

18. Facility licensee management feedback on the examination requested by the NRC

-7 supervisor (C.10).

19. Final applications reviewed; 10% of applications audited to confirm qualifications/eligibility

-7 (ES-2.2 G); and examination approval letter (Letter 2.3-1) and waiver/excusal letters sent.

-7 20. Written examination administration guidelines reviewed with the facility licensee (D.14).

-7 21. Approved scenarios and job performance measures distributed to NRC examiners (D.12).

  • Target dates are based on facility licensee-prepared examinations and the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. These dates are for planning purposes and may be adjusted in coordination with the facility licensee.

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Jason Bundy / 9/9/2022 Jason Bundy / 9/9/2022 Thomas Stephen / 9/12/2022

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

- I

  • -. t .L
  • I ...

I

  • I I
  • I r

(Y)es I (N)o QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (continued)

I

. a b* c#

4 The events are valid with regard to physics and thennodynamics. y y Y I

5. The sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to observe and evaluate apphcant perfonnance. y y Y
6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time y Ii y Y

,- constraints. Cues are given. -

Ii 11

7. The simulator modeling is not altered.
  • -la...J -- **

y y Y '

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator y performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to y Y I ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4. y y Y

(

i

10. Scenarios (as grouped) allow each applicant to be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients, events, and evolutions specified on the version of Form 3.4-1 y y Y submitted with the scenario set
11. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible.

I y y Y i!

12. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. y y Y , 1, Actual Attributes by (Y)es / (N)o I,...

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES per Scenario (See ES-3.4) Scenario No. I 1 '2 I 3 a b* c# ..

Malfunctions after emergency operating procedure (EOP) I y y Y I 1.

entry (1-2) 3 '2 2

2. Abnormal events (2-4) I;;:: - ;' \ l.J: 1:'"::

i.=tlr""

- *, n 6 /5 I 6 V y Y j y y Y LI

."-2.]<;;:?

3. Major transients (1-2) 1 '2 I 2
  • a
4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 / 1 1 y y Y I
5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions

.,- 0 / 1

' 1 y

'1

(:::, 1 per scenario set: set is the entire set of scenarios y Y prepared for the scheduled exam) -:c I ,,

6. Preidentified critical tasks (:::. 2) - 2 I 2 I 2 y y Y Jl

,. Printed Name/Signature Date 1--; '2 I JamesRGre . I

a. Author "

. l

b. Facility Reviewer{') Scott Rua / ....-ci ..

9Uzozz.. '

Jason Bundy /,. -- -*~ - 9/9/2022

'.re C. NRC Reviewer (#) ifFl *-L\-,-, -- I I,':....---=

I -}---...: u i

- *I

  • NRG Chief Examiner Jason -..,,, Bundy 71 * - -- -

9/9/2022I Lr-,J

-::i -. ..... I* I ........ ::---.

7 "if *** - I- ..-

9/9/2022 I*

NRG Supervisor '""'t _ -,.,- Thomas 'J:- Stephen - ...*...-, ---- ,:-,

......'--:ir" .---....* _......., J -

  • -- 1.1...
...JI 1
r-
  • The facility licensee signature 1s not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
  1. An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column c. This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the operating test under review.

I L -

I ,._

ES-2.3, Page 11 of 19 I ..,

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Jason Bundy 9/9/2022 Jason Bundy 9/9/2022 Thomas Stephen 9/12/2022

Form 5.1-1 Postexamination Check Sheet Postexamination Check Sheet Facility: Harris Dates of Examination: September 19-22 and 27, 2022 Date Activity Description Complete

1. *Received postexamination package from facility licensee and 11/4/2022 verified complete. (ES-4.4)
2. *Reviewed and incorporated any necessary facility and applicant written examination comments. NRC grading of written examination 11/4/2022 completed. (ES-4.4)
3. *Reviewed and incorporated any necessary facility and applicant operating test comments. NRC grading of operating test completed. 11/4/2022 (ES-3.6)
4. *Completed NRC chief examiner review of operating test and written 11/4/2022 examination grading. (ES-3.6 and ES-4.4)
5. Completed licensing official review. 11/4/2022
6. Mailed licenses, preliminary results, and pass letters. 11/4/2022
7. Notified facility licensee of results. 11/4/2022
8. Issued the examination report (refer to Operator Licensing Manual 11/4/2022 Chapter (OLMC) 510, Operator Licensing Examination Reports).
9. Returned reference material after final resolution of any informal 11/4/2022 NRC staff reviews, hearing demands, or both.
10. Performed examination recordkeeping activities (refer to OLMC 520, Operator Licensing Examination Records and Documentation, and 11/4/2022 Management Directive 3.53, NRC Records and Document Management Program).
  • Activity may not be applicable for a retake examination. If this activity does not apply, place an N/A in the Date Complete column.

Jason Bundy From: Rua, Scott Matthew <Scott.Rua@duke-energy.com>

Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 8:50 AM To: Jason Bundy

Subject:

[External_Sender] Fwd: [EXTERNAL] Post exam comments Good morning Jason ,

Aside from what we provided for TS 3.0.3 clarification, the station has no additional post exam comments.

Respectfully, Scott Rua Regulated Exam Superintendent Get Outlook for iOS From: Gregitis, James R <James.Gregitis@dukeenergy.com>

Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 8:45:42 AM To: Rua, Scott Matthew <Scott.Rua@dukeenergy.com>

Subject:

FW: [EXTERNAL] Post exam comments From: Jason Bundy <Jason.Bundy@nrc.gov>

Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 8:44 AM To: Gregitis, James R <James.Gregitis@dukeenergy.com>

Subject:

[EXTERNAL] Post exam comments

      • CAUTION! EXTERNAL SENDER *** STOP. ASSESS. VERIFY!! Were you expecting this email? Are grammar and spelling correct? Does the content make sense? Can you verify the sender? If suspicious report it, then do not click links, open attachments or enter your ID or password.

Hi Jim, I wanted to touch base and see if the facility is planning any post exam comments.

Respectfully, Jason U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, R2 Senior Operations Engineer Jason.Bundy@nrc.gov 4049974557 1

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML22314A075&oldid=3519273"