ML20134J215
| ML20134J215 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/30/1996 |
| From: | Dockery J NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI) |
| To: | Evans C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20134B508 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-96-485 NUDOCS 9702120051 | |
| Download: ML20134J215 (1) | |
Text
_ _._ _ . ._ - . - _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ __ .. _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _
i l From: JamesDockery/0[ .
To: CFE (EVA A).s , R g j Date: 5/30/96 2:28pm
Subject:
OI Case 2-95-008
'i Carolyn, Attached are two communiques I sent you and then failed i to follow up on. (Frankly, I completely forgot about them until j recently when I started to try and write an ROI!)
j Notwithstanding the DOL W&H finding that " discrimination...was a i factor in the actions which comprise his complaint," I doubt that the alleger has articulated a prima facie case in either his
! complaint letter or his OI testimony because there doesn't seem i
to be any identifiable " adverse employment consequence" that he
! suffered.
I'm even more confident that he has failed to establish any realistic causal nexus betwwen his " protected activity" (which the licensee concedes, by tca way) and the perceived
~
discriminatory treatment by s (largely unidentified) management
" conspiracy." Mostly, I think he's right that some people did ;
not want him to work in the plant; but it's because he has an i abrasive and overly rigid personality. There's no indication that anyone at all cared about any " protected activity" he may have engaged in.
Any thoughts on the matter? Am I completely off target in your reading of the documents? Thanks, Jim D. l 9702120051 970210 '
_.