ML20134J215
| ML20134J215 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/30/1996 |
| From: | Dockery J NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI) |
| To: | Evans C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20134B508 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-96-485 NUDOCS 9702120051 | |
| Download: ML20134J215 (1) | |
Text
_ _._ _.._ -. - _ _ _ _ _ -. _ _ __.. _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _.
i l
From:
JamesDockery/0[
(EVA A).s, R g To:
CFE j
Date:
5/30/96 2:28pm
Subject:
OI Case 2-95-008
'i
- Carolyn, Attached are two communiques I sent you and then failed i
to follow up on.
(Frankly, I completely forgot about them until j
recently when I started to try and write an ROI!)
j Notwithstanding the DOL W&H finding that " discrimination...was a i
factor in the actions which comprise his complaint,"
I doubt that the alleger has articulated a prima facie case in either his complaint letter or his OI testimony because there doesn't seem i
to be any identifiable " adverse employment consequence" that he suffered.
I'm even more confident that he has failed to establish any realistic causal nexus betwwen his " protected activity" (which the licensee concedes, by tca way) and the perceived
~
discriminatory treatment by s (largely unidentified) management
" conspiracy."
Mostly, I think he's right that some people did not want him to work in the plant; but it's because he has an i
abrasive and overly rigid personality.
There's no indication that anyone at all cared about any " protected activity" he may have engaged in.
Any thoughts on the matter?
Am I completely off target in your reading of the documents?
- Thanks, Jim D.
9702120051 970210 PDR FOIA BINDER 96-485 PDR
_.