05000335/FIN-2014007-02
From kanterella
Revision as of 07:58, 25 September 2017 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by Mark Hawes)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Finding | |
|---|---|
| Title | Failure to Follow Seismic Restraining Procedures on Ladders Located Near Safety-Related Equipment |
| Description | An NRC identified non-cited violation (NCV) of Technical Specification 6.8.1, Procedures and Programs, was identified which requires that written procedures be established, implemented, and maintained covering activities referenced in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, dated February 1978. The licensees failure to comply with procedures to seismically restrain ladders was a performance deficiency. Specifically, the licensees procedures for seismic restraint of ladders: MA-AA-100- 1008, Station Housekeeping and Material Control; QI-13-PSL, Housekeeping and Cleanliness Controls Methods St. Lucie Plant; ADM-04.02, Industrial Safety Program; and ADM-27.11, Scaffold Control, were not implemented as written with regard to ladders that were installed near safety-related equipment. The inspectors identified three examples of ladders not seismically restrained in accordance with the licensees procedures. Immediate corrective actions included completing a site-wide walkdown of the safety-related systems to identify and bring into procedural compliance any ladders that were not seismically restrained. This issue is documented in the licensees corrective action program as Action Request (AR) 1935979 and 1933112. The performance deficiency was determined to be more than minor because if left uncorrected the failure to comply with station procedures to ensure adequate restraining of seismically controlled ladders could lead to a more significant safety concern. Specifically, seismically unrestrained ladders could impact safety-related equipment during a design basis seismic event. Using Manual Chapter 0609.04, Significance Determination Process Initial Characterization of Findings Table 2 dated June 19, 2012, the finding was determined to affect the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone. The inspectors evaluated the risk of this finding using Manual Chapter 0609 Appendix A, Significance Determination Process for Findings At-Power, Exhibit 2- Mitigating Systems Screening questions. The inspectors determined that the finding was of very low safety significance because it did not represent an actual loss of safety function. The finding involved the cross-cutting area Problem Identification and Resolution, in the component of Resolution. Specifically licensee failed to take effective corrective actions to address issues in a timely manner commensurate with their safety significance (P3). |
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000335/2014007 Section 4OA2 |
| Date counted | Mar 31, 2014 (2014Q1) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71152 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | J Reyes N Staples R Taylor S Rose T Goulding T Vukovinsky |
| Violation of: | Technical Specification - Procedures Technical Specification |
| CCA | P.3, Resolution |
| INPO aspect | PI.3 |
| ' | |
Finding - Saint Lucie - IR 05000335/2014007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Saint Lucie) @ 2014Q1
Self-Identified List (Saint Lucie)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||