ML12340A545
| ML12340A545 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 12/05/2012 |
| From: | Entergy Nuclear Operations, Entergy Services, Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Morgan, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, NRC/OGC, Riverkeeper, State of NY, Office of the Attorney General |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| RAS 23842, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01 | |
| Download: ML12340A545 (46) | |
Text
DB1/ 71548218.6 1 HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET Proceeding Name: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Generating Units 2 and 3) Docket Nos.: 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No.: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Contention:
RK-TC-2 Hearing Date(s):
October 15-17, 2012 THE PARTIES' PROPOSED CORRECTIONS: Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1270 1-6 (Whereupon, the documents referred to as NRC Staff 3, Clearwater 4, Riverkeeper 9, New York 17 and Entergy 7 were marked for identification and received in evidence.) (Whereupon, the documents referred to as NRC Staff NRCR30001 , Clearwater CLER40001 , Riverkeeper RIVR90001, New York NYSR17001 and Entergy ENTR70001 were marked for identification and received in evidence.)
N/A 1293 22 affect inspect Jeffrey Horowitz 1294 2 position permission Robert Aleksick 1295 22 You just simply You don't just simply Robert Aleksick 1297 18 where is calculated for each operating period?
wear is calculated for each operating period. Robert Aleksick 1299 22 fact FAC Robert Aleksick 1304 11 alternate ultimate Robert Aleksick 1306 24 diverse differ Robert Aleksick 1313 17 There is a facility and a program. There is a ca pability in the program, Robert Aleksick 1338 11 log lots of Jeffrey Horowitz 1317 21 ani an Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1318 4 Surry was indicated Surry indicated Dr. Joram Hopenfeld DB1/ 71548218.6 2 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1318 15 operating up to nine facilities operating up to nine facilities Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1323 11 bought brought Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1323 17 project process Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1323 22 But they haven't. But they haven't.
Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1324 7 they you give they give Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1324 13 without -- without
-- Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1324 17 excess for x-ray Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1326 5 aspect respect Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1327 21 was would Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1328 7-8 [for clarification purposes, this sentence is referring to the data in
Figure 1A on slide 6 of Dr.
Hopenfeld's CHECWORKS presentation, as well as figure 1 in
RIV000111. Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1331 7 the number lost the loss Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1331 15 arcs curves Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1332 4 this not the this is not Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1332 5-6 control controlled Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1333 5 (indiscernible) eaten away Dr. Joram DB1/ 71548218.6 3 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker Hopenfeld1333 11 and which is the size of and which is the size of Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1337 6 to say to make Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1337 9 It was It was in Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1342 16 NEI-9510 NEI 95-10 Alan Cox 1342 17 four for Alan Cox 1348 18 GALL Rev 2 and Rev 3 GALL Rev 1 and Rev 2 Alan Cox 1348 25 GALL Rev 1 had referred to Rev 2. GALL Rev 1 had referred to Rev 2 of NSAC-202L. Alan Cox 1350 2 50.50 50.59 Alan Cox 1357 24 address may I add to Nelson Azevedo 1371 15 look to NAC-202L look to NSAC-202L Judge McDade 1382 18 NEI-9510 NEI 95-10 Alan Cox 1385 10 supply supplied Alan Cox 1400 16 due do Alan Cox 1406 24-25 recommendation NSAC-202L recommendations of NSAC-202L Alan Cox 1409 7 it appointed Indian Point Allen Hiser 1422 6 on iota one iotaDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1422 14 that thanDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1422 15 sight sizeDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1432 16 the fact on the fact onDr. Joram DB1/ 71548218.6 4 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker Hopenfeld 1432 20 tell me tell youDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1432 21 how my experience of it about my experience with itDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1433 7 That's what That's not whatDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1434 13 general in generalDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1435 4 from forDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1436 8 exploration explosion Joram Hopenfeld 1436 11 achieved fatiguedDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1436 16 one one Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1436 18 an in an Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1437 1 aspect. process. Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1437 6 you -- Once the corrosion -- are soluble, you dissolve -- the corrosion products --
are soluble, Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1437 13, 20 captivation cavitation Judge McDade 1438 22 well wall Robert Aleksick 1441 16 outside oxide Jeffrey Horowitz 1444 17 the path is it is past the Jeffrey Horowitz 1444 20 at metal graphically metallographically Jeffrey Horowitz 1441 20 brought showed Dr. Joram Hopenfeld DB1/ 71548218.6 5 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1443 14 coherent with adherent to Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1443 20 So you So when you Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1443 20 velocity. You have velocity, you Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1444 2 a proportion proportional Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1446 16 what the German said what the gentleman said Joram Hopenfeld 1446 23 or or Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1446 24 Stock equation Navier Stokes equations Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1447 9 of geometry and turbulence and geometry of turbulence Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1447 11 to do to consider Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1449 5 I have I would have Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1449 9 to do -- to do with sampling. Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1449 15 is -- is wrong. Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1449 23 is was Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1449 24 The small That small Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1485 13 Stress Stretch Ian Mew 1498 25 there then Dr. Joram Hopenfeld DB1/ 71548218.6 6 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1499 1 something some kind Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1499 3 happened, some happened to some Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1500 7-8 important is afte r all this experience to important. It is, after all this experience, to Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1501 6 compare come Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1501 11 on to Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1505 8 as a bay Pass 2 Ian Mew 1507 24-25 both units at approximately 3,700 both units and approximately 3,700 Robert Aleksick 1514 7 to isDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1514 8 is it isDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1514 11 large areas, small areas large eddies, small eddiesDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1515 17 it was there wasDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1516 5 considered considerableDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1516 5 thick thickDr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1516 11 suddenly would suddenlyDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1516 13 in inDr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1517 19 thing thinningDr. Joram Hopenfeld DB1/ 71548218.6 7 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1518 16 thinning evolves downstream of any orifice.
thinning evolves downstream of an orifice. Jeffrey Horowitz 1519 4 They did use CHECWORKS. They did not use CHECWORKS. Jeffrey Horowitz 1519 9 August. Re-did the drain line. We spoke about this August. Reheater drain line. We spoke about this Jeffrey Horowitz 1520 16 all wall Jeffrey Horowitz 1521 14 generated in the the Steam Generator Integrity Nelson Azevedo 1522 9-10 It's monitored Entergy steam generator integrity program. It's monitored by the Entergy steam generator integrity program.
Nelson Azevedo 1524 10-11 Because it's pressure of the same side.Because it is the same pressure on both sides. Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1524 12 gradient -active radioactiveDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1524 14 auxiliary acceleratedDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1524 17 auxiliary acceleratedDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1524 18 cracking is cracking there isDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1526 24 what knowDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1527 10 Exhibit 000005 at page 3.
Exhibit RIV000005 at page 2-3, 24-25.
Deborah Brancato 1529 16-17 it exactly running a computer code like a CHECWORKS a computer code running exactly like a CHECWORKS Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1530 17 reg rigDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1531 6 that's that's notDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1535 18 know know howDr. Joram Hopenfeld DB1/ 71548218.6 8 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1536 8 CAGE FrenchDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1536 10 constance constantsDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1536 13 constance constantsDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1537 22 factor. safety.Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1544 22 trying definingDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1545 18 in the offshore local for the localDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1549 19 is is thatDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1552 5 the control under controlledDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1555 18 flow rate wear rate Robert Aleksick 1556 14 a parent measurement an apparent measurement Robert Aleksick 1558 5 infrequency infrequently Robert Aleksick 1559 15 service surface Nelson Azevedo 1561 25 local local transientDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1562 8 is not - In is not uniform inDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1562 20 50 15Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1564 4 to the to why theDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1564 20 to give it to you to to give it to you toDr. Joram
Hopenfeld DB1/ 71548218.6 9 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1565 2 50mL drag 50mm diameterDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1565 4 25 mL 25 mm Joram Hopenfeld 1565 6 pittance pittingDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1566 7 pick up pick it upDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1570 1 0.59 0.059Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1570 2 was -- was to 0.26Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1571 17 reflects FAC reflects back Allen Hiser 1572 15 perpendicular to the lamination parallel to the lamination Nelson Azevedo 1576 9 That's not what That's whatDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1579 9 it it atDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1587 11 not controlled not mass transfer controlledDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1597 24 no soDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1597 23-24 The Regulation 1801 NUREG-1801 Joram Hopenfeld 1603 16 ca can Robert Aleksick 1629 14 I eye Robert Aleksick 1637 8 imply apply Robert Aleksick 1645 23 weld grounds weld beads Jeffrey Horowitz 1649 5, 6 KOMMSIE COMSY Jeffrey Horowitz 1649 10 When the found that out, and they found When we found that out, and we found Jeffrey Horowitz DB1/ 71548218.6 10 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1649 14-15 one code, one line of FORTRAN, that's all, and a code of this.
one code, one line of FORTRAN, that's all, and a code of this.
Jeffrey Horowitz 1652 11-12 is marrred are off Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1653 11 are wearing more than you think they should be, or are wearing more than you think they should be, or Jeffrey Horowitz 1655 15 thing thinning Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1659 3 by -- by a factor of two Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1659 8 of -- of 2.2 Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1660 19 easier not just easier just Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1663 11 confused -- confused the drafts Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1674 14, 25 goal GALL Matthew Yoder 1688 15 they accepted in their compliancethey are in complianceDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1690 2 regarding regardDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1694 8 AMP AMP, thisDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1694 10 numbers. others.Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1694 12 critical --.
critical thickness.Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1694 15 critical, critical thickness,Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1694 17 them were them that wereDr. Joram Hopenfeld DB1/ 71548218.6 11 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1694 18 were exceeded exceeded critical.Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1695 17 a leak a leak occursDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1695 19 stated we stated, when weDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1695 24 is, is,Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1701 2 prefer calling prefer calling itDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1710 10-11 in the site than safety Jeffrey Horowitz 1727 11 perspective prescriptive Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1729 13 to to Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1729 15 there there Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1729 20 indirectly indirect Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1730 4 Know what -- Know what Describe Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1730 9 mineralography metalography Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1730 11 -- to corrosion or erosion, to Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1730 12 and some and to some Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1731 1 a lot -- a lot of data, Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1731 24 get blowing up pipes get pipes blowing up Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld DB1/ 71548218.6 12 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1731 25 over -- over 60 years Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1734 23 thing thinning Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1735 2 they operate and after they operate the uprate and after the uprate Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1735 24 we have -- straight pipes, Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1735 25 looking at where - in area looking in area Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1736 8 anywhere anything Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1736 9 look -- and do -- forget look there and forget Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1736 12 say see that it is Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1736 13 from -- from this data, Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1738 5 kind of thing it - by this kind kind of thinning, this kind Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1738 20 better -- better correlation. Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1739 3 of about Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1740 14 thing thinning Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1740 15 there if there Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1740 15 It wasn't - if it was It wasn't scattered, or if it was Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1740 21 doesn't -- doesn't help, Dr. Joram DB1/ 71548218.6 13 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker Hopenfeld1740 22 would it would Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1741 15 I -- I would have done Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1742 4 rationing rationale Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1742 7 of it of it Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1742 12 looking of looking Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1742 21 know to know how to Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1755 15 There's no -- There's no difference - Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1756 6 It's how -- It's how the data is selected. Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1756 17 interested -- interested in, Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1757 8 no of no Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1757 9 I -- I believe Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1760 15 propagates a lot big number than you would think off propagates into a lot bigger number than you would think of off Jeffrey Horowitz 1764 3 in the for the Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1764 5 -- or - they were Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1764 18 the response -- if the response was to the direct testimony, Dr. Joram Hopenfeld DB1/ 71548218.6 14 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1778 4 and see and see Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1786 20 The list of witnesses omits "Dr.
Tina Ghosh," who should be
added. 1788 8-10 (Whereupon, the aforementioned document was marked for
identification as Riverkeeper's
Exhibit Number RIV000049.) (Whereupon, the aforementioned documents were marked for identification as Riverkeeper's
Exhibit Numbers RIV000132 and
RIV000133.)
n/a 1791-1792 24-25, 1-3 (Whereupon, the aforementioned document, having previously been marked for identification as Riverkeeper's Exhibit Number
RIV000049, was received de bene esse in evidence.) (Whereupon, the aforementioned documents, having previously been marked for identification as Riverkeeper's Exhibit Numbers
RIV000132 and RIV000133, were received de bene esse in evidence.)
n/a1801 20-21 their model assumes that the oxide layer is thickness and there is a result the corrosion rate is linear. their model assumes that the oxide layer has constant thickness and there is a as a result the corrosion rate is linear. Jeffrey Horowitz 1801 22-23 This is an assumption they check in that test data they show as well as
other data. It's a little slow This is an assumption that they check in that their test data they show this shows as well as in other data. It's also Jeffrey Horowitz 1811 13 the -- the text, Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1811 17 to we to what we Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1813 6 have -- have made a difference. Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1815 1 predicted versus that predicted versus measured Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1815 2 see see that Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1815 6 pleasant simple Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1816 17 of the - this is the correct -- of the exhibit is - this is the correct paper - Dr. Joram DB1/ 71548218.6 15 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker Hopenfeld1825 5 MR. YODER: Matthew Yoder, staff attorney MR. YODER: Matthew Yoder, staff. Matthew Yoder 1836 5 but that Ian Mew 1838 22 dissect detect Alan Cox 1843 5 apart. And that one apart, and the other oneDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1843 18 beg useDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1843 21 working workingDr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1844 12-13 results and nonlinear wear in piping component results in nonlinear wear in piping components Deborah Brancato 1844 14 He explained You explainedDeborah Brancato 1844 14 and he did and you didDeborah Brancato 1846 3 stray straightDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1846 6 echo alsoDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1846 8 it is -- it is chemical,Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1846 20 bear wearDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1847 19 if you only - it was if it only wasDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1847 22 of overDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1847 23 the -- the grid,Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1848 22 the -- the numbers,Dr. Joram DB1/ 71548218.6 16 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker Hopenfeld 1848 23 I -- I saw,Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1849 13-15 I believe that though there is still hate
for the CHECWORKS idea, FAC is simply a dissolution project.
I believe that because they hitched their wagon to the CHECWORKS idea they consider FAC simply as a dissolution
process. Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1849 24 think that think that thatDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1850 2-3 how you people mentioned this whole
thing how people discussed this whole thing Dr. Joram
Hopenfeld 1853 4-5 different processes, Entergy employeesdifference processes Entergy employs Deborah Brancato 1853 8 is the is, do theDeborah Brancato 1853 9 applies applyDeborah Brancato1854 1-2 The next question is to Dr. Turk, NRC staff's witnesses.
The next question is to Dr. Hiser , NRC staff's witness. Deborah Brancato 1854 6 fact FACDeborah Brancato 1858 3 memo amendmentDeborah Brancato 1877 14 I wear I boughtDr. Joram Hopenfeld 1880 11-12 You talked about a competitive program to check work. You talked about a competitive program to CHECWORKS. Brad Fagg 1882 12 EVF EDF Jeffrey Horowitz
DB1/ 71548218.6 17 HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET Proceeding Name: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Generating Units 2 and 3) Docket Nos.: 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No.: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Contention:
RK-TC-2 Hearing Date(s):
October 15-17, 2012 ENTERGY'S PROPOSED CORRECTION, TO WHICH RIVERKEEPER OBJECTS:
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1444 19 experiments assume that experiments show that Jeffrey Horowitz DB1/ 71548218.6 18 HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET Proceeding Name: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Generating Units 2 and 3) Docket Nos.:
50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No.: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Contention:
NYS-12C Hearing Date(s):
October 17-18, 2012 THE PARTIES' PROPOSED CORRECTIONS: Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1900 11 the evaluate to evaluate Grant Teagarden 1900 21 the cost implement of such the cost to implement such Grant Teagarden 1909 11 demonstrating that they are in fact severe accidents demonstrating that they are in fact severe accidents.
Kevin O'Kula 1909 12 but multiple system failures linked with the They have multiple system failures linked with the Kevin O'Kula 1914 23 infirement (phonetic) environment Grant Teagarden 1916 18 look at maybe one of the SAMA candidates can apply look at maybe one of the SAMA candidates, they can apply Kevin O'Kula 1919 21 intend tend François Lemay 1930 16 wait weight Grant Teagarden 1933 1-4 And one of ot her point that this figure doesn't show it. But within the 10 mile ring we actually have 10 additional rings for a final resolution in close to the plant.
And one other point. This figure doesn't show it, but within the 10 mile ring we actually have 10 additional rings for a finer resolution in close to the plant. Lori Potts 1939 5 DAC deck Nathan Bixler 1935 25 traveled travel Kevin O'Kula 1945 15 point NEI 05-01 point to NEI 05-01 François Lemay DB1/ 71548218.6 19 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1946 11 we describe a description of François Lemay 1946 12 to be site-specific, to be site-specific: François Lemay 1946 15 we discuss it discusses François Lemay 1960 20 per person on a year per person - year Grant Teagarden 1986 14 factor, or 15 factor of 15 Grant Teagarden 1993 24 correction reduction Judge McDade 1994 5 correction reduction Judge McDade 2004 14 AOECR OECR François Lemay 2004 14 we use for our is used for the François Lemay 2004 19 we look ISR looked François Lemay 2004 19 we found ISR found François Lemay 2005 3 they NUREG-1150 François Lemay 2007 24 to be published " to be published" Donald Harrison 2012 6 Chan. Chanin. François Lemay 2012 16 to assess assessing François Lemay 2012 18 it would ideal it would be ideal François Lemay 2013 17 pretending that performed pretending that we performed François Lemay 2014 22 wrote note Kevin O'Kula 2015 14 tie to a T citation trail tie to a T citation trail Kevin O'Kula 2019 12 types situation in types situated in Grant Teagarden 2035 19 discussion, as we understand it goes, there are --
discussion, as we understand it goes, that Kevin O'Kula 2035 20 The cost-benefit analyses are more the cost-benefit analyses are more Kevin O'Kula DB1/ 71548218.6 20 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2037 6 again by again for Kevin O'Kula 2043 18 Laurie Lori Lori Potts 2044 6 that's fortunate. that's unfortunate. Lori Potts 2044 17 preferred proffered Lori Potts 2051 12 chronic CHRONC Judge Wardwell 2054 20 we . . . we ISR . . . ISR François Lemay 2054 21 we ISR François Lemay 2057 5 seven seventh Kevin O'Kula 2057 13 Early EARLY Kevin O'Kula 2057 16 early EARLY Kevin O'Kula 2058 21 No Now Grant Teagarden 2068 2-3 written down and a review written down in a review Lori Potts 2073 25 OEC OECR François Lemay 2075 16 you the applicant François Lemay 2075 17 your its François Lemay 2090 7 Robert M. Aleksick
[delete]None (should not be on witness list for October 18) 2090 8 Nelson Azevedo
[delete]None (should not
be on witness list for October 18) 2090 9 Ian D. Mew
[delete]None (should not
be on witness list for October 18) 2090 10 Dr. Allen Hiser
[delete]None (should not
be on witness list for October 18)
DB1/ 71548218.6 21 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2090 11 Alan Cox [delete]None (should not be on witness list for October 18) 2090 12 Kathryn Sutton
[delete]None (should not
be on witness list for October 18) 2090 13 Dr. Joram Hopenfeld
[delete]None (should not
be on witness list for October 18) 2090 14 Jeffrey Horowitz Matthew Yoder[delete]None (should not be on witness list for October 18) 2090 15 The list of witnesses omits "Dr.
Tina Ghosh," who should be added. 2094 1 MR. BESSETTE MR. SIPOS John Sipos 2096 25 the morning before the morning after. Paul Bessette 2100 1 This line should be attributed to Donnie Harrison, not Joseph Jones Donnie Harrison 2107 22 and that François Lemay 2108 1 value values François Lemay 2108 18 cost at site-specific cost th at's site-specific François Lemay 2108 25 deficient fission François Lemay 2113 16 we scrutinized the input value to see if they're reasonable, "we scrutinized the input values to see if they're reasonable,"
François Lemay 2113 20 if designs have it assigns that François Lemay 2114 5 then it becomes you get then you get François Lemay 2115 15 have one-time have a one-time François Lemay DB1/ 71548218.6 22 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2118 11 11,000 1,100 Joseph Jones 2125 15 in the Plains in the White Plains area Kevin O'Kula 2126 9 surfaces would not be touched. surfaces, some would not be touched. Kevin O'Kula 2127 9 wouldn't be cleaned altogether the same way. But this wouldn't be cleaned altogether the same way, but that this Kevin O'Kula 2131 10 use used François Lemay 2133 13 PARTICIPANT DR. O'KULA Kevin O'Kula 2135 2-3 but just with what François Lemay 2137 15 we ISR François Lemay 2149 9 MACCS1 MACCS2 François Lemay 2153 3 Every Not every Kevin O'Kula 2153 6 meterological data site meteorological data from the site Kevin O'Kula 2154 19 take a count take into account Kevin O'Kula 2155 9 NUREG/CR-4148 NUREG/CR-5148 Kevin O'Kula 2163 23-24 potential re-cost beneficial potentially cost beneficial Tina Ghosh 2164 3 which what Tina Ghosh 2164 17 benefit for Indian Point. And you get over 100 benefit for Indian Point 2. And you get over 100 Tina Ghosh 2166 3 we're going to towards eliminating the we're going to towards eliminating the Tina Ghosh 2167 12 on the walls, now on the walls. Now Grant Teagarden 2172 16 Brad Brian Brian G. Harris 2173 18 illegal a legal John Sipos 2173 20 how to John Sipos DB1/ 71548218.6 23 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2176 7 use uses François Lemay 2177 7 one average, deposition one average deposition François Lemay 2177 23 but code but the MACCS2 code François Lemay 2178 13 accurately possible accurately as possible François Lemay 2178 22 and we have breaking and breaking François Lemay 2179 1 wrecking of tail light wrecking the tail light François Lemay 2180 1 accident, completely accident, it completely François Lemay 2180 9 look how looked at how François Lemay 2181 6-9 It is the time required for decontamination and in the way MACCS works. At the end of this average decontamination period, people are allowed back into their homes. It is the time required for decontamination.
A nd is the way MACCS works, at the end of this average decontamination period, people are allowed back into their homes. François Lemay 2181 11 contamination decontamination François Lemay 2181 12 in to François Lemay 2181 12-13 And I think we all agree and the NRC Staff and I And I think we all agree, Entergy and the NRC Staff and I François Lemay 2184 10 one ones François Lemay 2184 24 is are François Lemay 2184 24 early high EARLY HIGHFrançois Lemay 2184 25 early medium-late high EARLY MEDIUM - LATE HIGH François Lemay2187 11 CD CDNFRM Judge Wardwell 2192 15 works, doesn't works, it doesn't François Lemay 2194 9 early high EARLY HIGH François Lemay DB1/ 71548218.6 24 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2196 15-16 early high EARLY HIGH François Lemay 2196 18 early high EARLY HIGH François Lemay 2196 19 early medium EARLY MEDIUM François Lemay 2196 19 late high LATE HIGH François Lemay 2213 13 we ISR François Lemay 2218 18 Laurie Lori Lori Potts 2222 25 review reveal Tina Ghosh 2223 13 Any one SAMA is only to act on particular accident Any one SAMA is only able to act on particular accident Tina Ghosh 2224 4 their them are Tina Ghosh 2224 5 class cost Tina Ghosh 2224 8 particularly typically Tina Ghosh 2225 1 were we're Tina Ghosh 2229 5 Laurie Lori Lori Potts 2229 6-7 for ever SAMA for every SAMA Lori Potts 2231 9 95 95th Tina Ghosh 2231 19 as is Tina Ghosh 2232 3 could would Tina Ghosh 2232 21 boon cushion Tina Ghosh 2236 2 dominate dominant Tina Ghosh 2241 8 FERC Burke Grant Teagarden 2244 12 after the first sentence, decontamination cost after the first sentence, "The decontamination cost Kevin O'Kula 2242 14 FERC Burke Grant Teagarden DB1/ 71548218.6 25 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2244 17 average statistics. average statistics." Kevin O'Kula 2244 19 The methods to be employed "The methods to be employed Kevin O'Kula 2244 20 decontamination techniques. decontamination techniques." Kevin O'Kula 2253 15 aren't are Joseph Jones 2256 1 Terrell Tawil François Lemay 2256 22 that NUREG, the NRC that the NRC François Lemay 2259 12 we have very few. we have very little information. François Lemay 2259 22 Terrell Tawil François Lemay 2261 19 decon DECON Kevin O'Kula 2261 20 accessed with by Burke assessed by Burke Kevin O'Kula 2262 12 the late 70's early 80's. the late 70's to early 80's. Kevin O'Kula 2262 14 decon DECON Kevin O'Kula 2262 15 of that accountability code of that accountability code Kevin O'Kula 2263 13 Terrell Tawil François Lemay 2264 17 area areas François Lemay 2264 24 work works François Lemay 2265 3 it comes in in a it comes out in the François Lemay 2268 4 those histogram the histogram François Lemay 2268 8 tend tends François Lemay 2268 24 DEC TIMDEC François Lemay 2269 3 10 DEC TIMDEC Judge Wardwell 2269 9-10 to different to use different François Lemay 2272 19 these N/A values these input values Judge Wardwell DB1/ 71548218.6 26 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2276 6 DR. BIXLER DR. LEMAY François Lemay 2281 25 is are François Lemay 2282 1 get collective get a collective François Lemay 2285 22 dealt with with the NRC. dealt with with within the NRC. Tina Ghosh 2290 25 a lot more normally lognormally Tina Ghosh 2293 9 lot of normal lognormal Tina Ghosh 2293 18 ma may Tina Ghosh 2300 22 per acre basis per hectare basis Grant Teagarden 2309 21 made, the made in the François Lemay 2309 23 transit or things that are outside. transit of things that are outside the 50-mile radius. François Lemay 2310 11 dd add Nathan Bixler 2355 7 should have bee should have been Martha Stolley 2357 8 some outside surfaces some surfaces François Lemay 2357 19 having documented having a documented François Lemay 2360 10 sometime sometimes François Lemay 2360 11 sometime sometimes François Lemay 2361 1 sometime sometimes François Lemay 2361 2 sometime sometimes François Lemay 2361 3 in urban area in an urban area François Lemay 2361 8 value values François Lemay 2365 18 I asked "more normalized value" Dr. O'Kula referred to "more normalized value" Kathryn Liberatore2367 6 code in fact CONDO code Kevin O'Kula DB1/ 71548218.6 27 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2367 7 but so Kevin O'Kula 2369 3-7 These lines should be attributed to Martha Stolley, not Kevin O'Kula N/A 2372 20 supplied applied Kevin O'Kula 2372 22 identified on the parts identified for the two plants Kevin O'Kula 2372 23 of two public - two lightwater reactors of two public - two light water reactors Kevin O'Kula 2377 4 multiple floor in the building multiple floors in the buildings François Lemay
DB1/ 71548218.6 28 HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET Proceeding Name: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Generating Units 2 and 3) Docket Nos.: 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No.: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Contention:
NYS-16B Hearing Date(s):
October 22, 2012 THE PARTIES' PROPOSED CORRECTIONS: Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2391 14 SUSAN TAYLOR, ESQ. None (missing from attorney list for October 22) 2393 8 Robert Aleksick Raphael Kuyler [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 9 Nelson Azevedo Ronald J.
Tenpas [delete] None (should not be on witness list
for October 22) 2393 10 Jonathan M. Rund [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 12 Alan Cox [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 13 Dr. Allen Hiser [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 14 Donald Harrison [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 15 Dr. Joram Hopenfeld [delete] None (should not DB1/ 71548218.6 29 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker be on witness list for October 22) 2393 16 Jeffrey Horowitz [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 18 Dr. Francois J. Lemay [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 19 Ian D. Mew [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 23 Kathryn Sutton [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 25 Matthew Yoder [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2401 10 Document 900422 Document 9422 Judge McDade 2405 10 consumer commuter Judge McDade 2405 11 fraud flawed Judge McDade 2405 19 the variance material of consequence is there a material consequence Judge McDade 2407 25 You can't submit it? You can start with it? Judge McDade 2408 1 Can't submit it, yes. Can start with it, yes. Stephen Sheppard 2408 3 Dr. Tall [delete] Judge McDade 2410 10 put point Judge McDade 2412 6-7 undertake even though undert ake to not be counted even though Stephen Sheppard DB1/ 71548218.6 30 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2413 7 conceitedly concededly Judge McDade 2414 18 difference different Stephen Sheppard 2415 18 that [delete] Stephen Sheppard 2415 25 addressed addresses Stephen Sheppard 2416 14 addressed addresses Stephen Sheppard 2418 6 - 7 that was sent percent Joseph Jones 2418 7 in of considerable amount that in considerable amount and Joseph Jones 2418 12 conceive concede Judge McDade 2420 5 distinction distinct Judge McDade 2421 18-19 So the zero percent So there is zero percent Jerry Riggs 2430 8-9 the states provide at the county level the states provide this data at the county level Jerry Riggs 2430 17-18 which they all have 2000 and we have to convert which they all have, 2000, then we have to convert Jerry Riggs 2431 1 from the projection information using the projection information Jerry Riggs 2432 6 align a line Jerry Riggs 2432-2433 25-1 provided to try to make a smooth fit of line on top of those datapoints using math.
provided. To try to make a smooth fit of line on top of those data points we use math. Jerry Riggs 2442 1 we're taking the 2035 and we're taking the 2035 value and Jerry Riggs 2443 7 using the MACCS2 model are used in the MACCS2 model Stephen Sheppard 2445 17-18 based on the four small elements based on the four small elements Jerry Riggs 2447 2 And then in the final outcome And then with the final outcome Jerry Riggs 2449 11-15 But they underscore a slightly alternative version of exactly my concern. Although the growth rates But they underscore a slightly alternative version of exactly my concern, although the growth rates Stephen Sheppard DB1/ 71548218.6 31 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker themselves weren't the central focus of my evaluation and proposed revisions of the population estimates. themselves weren't the central focus of my evaluation and proposed revisions of the population estimates. 2449 25 estimates be estimates should be Stephen Sheppard 2452 12 If the actual growth of - If this change This change Stephen Sheppard 2453 14-15 higher rates higher birth rates Stephen Sheppard 2453 22-25 Really if you wanted to make sure of the 2010 census data, the proper approach, I understand that time doesn't always permit that. But the proper approach would be to redo the county level forecasts Really if you wanted to make use of the 2010 census data, the proper approach -- I understand that time doesn't always permit that -- but the proper approach would be to redo the county level forecasts Stephen Sheppard 2455 22 Oconee county Nathan Bixler 2455 25 Oconee a county Nathan Bixler 2456 1 Oconee county Nathan Bixler 2458 7 Oconee county Nathan Bixler 2459 24 up us Judge Wardwell 2461 1 us use Judge Wardwell 2462 7 Teagarten Teagarden Tina Ghosh 2464 15 weight weighting Jerry Riggs 2466 20 resident residence Joseph Jones 2472 6 them, so if you -- if I might refer to the discussion them. If I might refer to the discussion Stephen Sheppard 2474 24 commuting in will both be present within. commuting in, will both be present within the 50-mile zone.
Stephen Sheppard DB1/ 71548218.6 32 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2477 5 people who reside outside and people who reside outside of the zone and Stephen Sheppard 2482 24 such a such location such and such a location Stephen Sheppard 2497 14-16 The SAMA analysis doesn't know who is a commuter and who is a business traveler and who is a permanent resident if they're all permanent residents. The SAMA analysis doesn't know who is a commuter and who is a business traveler and who is a permanent resident. It treats them as if they're all permanent residents. Lori Potts 2509 12 MR. JONES JUDGE KENNEDY Judge Kennedy 2510 24 50 40 Tina Ghosh 2518 10 essentially potentially Grant Teagarden 2523 24 or the three county populations that were or the two other county populations that were Stephen Sheppard 2523 25 alleged to have -- that will peak alleged to peak, will peak. Stephen Sheppard 2531 12 researches researchers Stephen Sheppard
DB1/ 71548218.6 33 HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET Proceeding Name: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Generating Units 2 and 3) Docket Nos.: 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No.: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Contention:
NYS-17B Hearing Date(s):
October 22, 2012 THE PARTIES' PROPOSED CORRECTIONS: Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2550 6 vacant lot. vacant lot." Ronald Tenpas 2550 14 home." home. Ronald Tenpas 2556 19 as I understand as a disamenity as I understand a disamenity Stephen Sheppard 2559 17 clear clearer Stephen Sheppard 2559 24,25 the p-- (none) Stephen Sheppard 2563 12 and end an end Stephen Sheppard 2566 5 that is that is, Stephen Sheppard 2567 20,21 date s I can -- (none) Stephen Sheppard 2568 16 so if you're getting -- a a Stephen Sheppard 2568 25 institution. institution? Stephen Sheppard 2570 13 40 or something of observations 40 or something observations Stephen Sheppard 2571 11 that that that, that Stephen Sheppard 2573 8 done gone Judge Wardwell 2573 22 not indirectly not directly Stephen Sheppard 2575 10 transactions transaction Stephen Sheppard 2580 20,21 p-- (none) Stephen Sheppard DB1/ 71548218.6 34 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2581 9,10 so if it was p-- (none) Stephen Sheppard 2585 21 I estimate, my estimate My estimate Stephen Sheppard 2587 22 mistake in mistaken George Tolley 2589 20 exclaim explain George Tolley 2590 19 coefficient on distance coefficient of distance George Tolley 2592 20 reliability. You reliability. If you George Tolley 2592 22 that terms. those terms. George Tolley 2592 25 hedonic hedonics George Tolley 2593 10 planned property George Tolley 2593 11 p-- (none) George Tolley 2593 21 plus c, plus a plus c, that is, plus a George Tolley 2594 2 affect effect George Tolley 2596 12 to a statistician to statistics George Tolley 2598 4 and then Entergy William Reamer 2598 7 330 3-30 William Reamer 2599 10 multiple list multiple listing service George Tolley 2600 13 if were if we were Stephen Sheppard 2600 16,17 would increasing would be increasing Stephen Sheppard 2601 6 And even And Dr. Tolley even Stephen Sheppard 2601 14 measure it according as measure it according to St ephen Sheppard 2601 24 explore explores Stephen Sheppard 2608 1 margin of marginal George Tolley 2609 12 functional form. functional forms. George Tolley DB1/ 71548218.6 35 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2609 13 affect effect George Tolley 2610 1 very fraction, very tiny fraction, George Tolley 2610 5 Dr. Sheppard, Dr. Sheppard states, George Tolley 2610 7 that what it that is what it George Tolley 2613 18,19 p -- -- Stephen Sheppard 2613 21 be property values be on property values Stephen Sheppard 2621 6 range as those other hedonic estimates that impact range as other hedonic estimates of the impact Stephen Sheppard 2621 16 staff (sic) Applicant William Reamer 2623 11 staff (sic) Applicant William Reamer 2624 19 assume be assumed William Reamer 2624 21 -- now that for William Reamer 2627 1 of the impact of the impact of Stephen Sheppard 2629 16 repeat cells estimators repeat sales estimators George Tolley 2629 24 about 1.7, $1.07 billion, about 1.7, $1.07 billion, George Tolley 2631 23 power PILOT George Tolley 2633 1 amenity disamenity George Tolley 2635 25 if is, William Reamer 2641 3 about there may -- (none) Stephen Sheppard 2641 20 This is saying before This is, as I was saying before George Tolley 2641 23 Allison and Metz (ph) and people probably about 1980 Oates and people probably about 1970 George Tolley 2642 1 owners in the - where owners in the
- where George Tolley 2645 8 Press Prest Stephen Sheppard DB1/ 71548218.6 36 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2648 5 is this distance. is this distance. George Tolley 2648 7 includes this in his includes this in his George Tolley 2648 20 I find one I buy one George Tolley 2656 23 staff applicant William Reamer 2656 4 the action, no action the no action George Tolley 2656 23 staff applicant William Reamer 2658 18 Blomquist estimate of Blomquist estimate or George Tolley 2673 22 Energy Entergy Susan Taylor 2682 13 of measuring, of characterizing proximity of measuring, of characterizing, proximity Stephen Sheppard 2682 15 proposed or to be tested proposed, or to-be-tested, Stephen Sheppard 2683 13 Distsquaretilde T. distsquare ~ t. Stephen Sheppard 2684 17 does is do does, is do Stephen Sheppard 2689 8,9 ¶ [paragraph break] no break, keep lines together Stephen Sheppard 2689 13 treatment group. The treatment group. ¶ [paragraph break]
The Stephen Sheppard 2691 19 all together, altogether, Stephen Sheppard 2708 2 is 2011 107 his 2011 1.07 George Tolley 2708 7 Bomquist-based Blomquist-based Ronald Tenpas 2709 12 hat that William Reamer 2710 9 done it on done on George Tolley
DB1/ 71548218.6 37 HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET Proceeding Name: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Generating Units 2 and 3) Docket Nos.: 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No.: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Contention: CW-EC-3A Hearing Date(s):
October 23, 2012 THE PARTIES' PROPOSED CORRECTIONS: Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 2727 5 Robert M. Aleksick Nelson Azevedo[delete]None (should not be on witness list for October 23) 2727 6 Dr. Allen Hiser Dr. Nathan Bixler[delete]None (should not be on witness list for October 23) 2727 7 Dr. Kevin O'Kula
[delete]None (should not
be on witness list for October 23) 2727 8 Patricia Milligan Patricia Milligan None 2727 10 Alan Cox [delete]None (should not be on witness list for October 23) 2727 13 Donald Harrison
[delete]None (should not
be on witness list for October 23) 2727 17 Grant Teagarden
[delete]None (should not
be on witness list for October 23) 2727 18 Dr. Jeffrey Horowitz
[delete]None (should not
be on witness list for October 23)
DB1/ 71548218.6 38 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 2727 19 Ian D. Mew
[delete]None (should not be on witness list for October 23) 2727 20 Dr. Joram Hopenfeld
[delete]None (should not
be on witness list for October 23) 2727 21 Joseph Jones
[delete]None (should not
be on witness list for October 23) 2727 24 Dr. Francois J. Lemay
[delete]None (should not
be on witness list for October 23) 2727 25 Lori Potts
[delete]None (should not
be on witness list for October 23) 2727 N/A Add Michael Slobodien to the witness list None 2753 25 in the sites at the site Jeffrey Rikhoff 2736 8 page 4-55, 117, line 19 page 4-53, line 19 Judge McDade 2736 10 "Socioeconomic connotations" "Socioeconomic conditions" Judge McDade 2761 1 self-evacuated self-evacuate Patricia Milligan 2764 7 evacuation evacuate Patricia Milligan 2767 9 evaluated evacuated Patricia Milligan 2773 25 to at Jeffrey Rikhoff 2782 9 clarify clarifies Patricia Milligan 2782 18 for from Patricia Milligan 2790 21 which is I believe that the approach that's used now, which is, I believe, that the approach that's used now, Dr. Edelstein DB1/ 71548218.6 39 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 2791 10-11 that my colleagues here have, are prepared to discuss, we have issues that my colleagues here have and are prepared to discuss, we identified issues Dr. Edelstein 2792 4-5 Well yes. I mean I believe that Well, yes. I mean, I believe, that Dr. Edelstein 2792 7-8 Would certainly not __ missing something so obvious Would, certainly, not be missing something so obvious Dr. Edelstein 2792 21 is that correct, Dr. Edelson?
is that correct, Dr. Edelstein?
Judge McDade 2795 10 could leave the area and evacuate, but (-) could leave the area and evacuate.
B ut (-) Dr. Edelstein 2799 21-22 That decision apparently is , as far as I can understand it, would That decision apparently, as far as I can understand it, would Dr. Edelstein 2801 23 is the first step I would recommend is the first step, I would recommend Dr. Edelstein 2802 16-17 we realize that the ability of -
to mitigate impacts we realize that the ability to mitigate impacts Dr. Edelstein 2803 18 clemency from Governor Pataki__ inexecutive clemency from Governor Pataki, in Mr. Papa 2804 16 There's, a t that point, the survivalAt that point, the survival Mr. Papa 2804 21 only for prisoners but for also guardsonly for prisoners but for guards also Mr. Papa 2805 5 This is very old buildings, the These are very old buildings, the Mr. Papa 2805 10 Okay. Dr. Edelson Dr. Edelstein Judge McDade 2806 12 Just people would Just that people would Mr. Papa 2807 6 comes in terms of an environmentalcomes, in terms of an environmental Dr. Larsen 2807 8 in New Orleans, in which in New Orleans, which Dr. Larsen 2807 14 Essentially when Essentially, when Dr. Larsen 2808 1 The problem is is The problem is Dr. Larsen 2808 8-9 However, the problem is is that if you don't -- a lot of things However, the problem is that if you don't -- there are a lot of things Dr. Larsen 2810 6 that basically we hd that, basically, we had Dr. Larsen DB1/ 71548218.6 40 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 2810 20 and you know my responsibilityand you know, my responsibility Dr. Larsen 2812 12 big worries, just based big worries is just based Dr. Larsen 2815 24 kinds of situation have be set upkinds of situation have to be set up Dr. Larsen 2816 24 and spoke a training and spoken at training Mr. Mair 2819 6 What they found They found Mr. Mair 2820 22 work on worked on Mr. Mair 2821 11 so that making sure making sure Mr. Mair 2824 9 education them educate them Mr. Mair 2825 7 in this instant in this instance Mr. Mair 2832 23-24 So you would basically that the public transportation, as it is So basically, public transportation, as it
is Mr. Mair 2833 10 cars are commuting cars they are commuting Mr. Mair 2833 19-20 So of those work vehicles (-) model vehicles. Many So of those working vehicles (-) model vehicles, m any Mr. Mair 2836 11 they had did with they had done with Mr. Mair 2836 19 nothing's disastrous nothing disastrous Mr. Mair 2837 13-14 The answer is is that The answer is that Mr. Mair 2837 18-19 It think that I think that Mr. Mair 2837 24 civil defense type of, as civil defense type of building, as Mr. Mair 2838 16-17 to, as they say, to carry on to, as they say, carry on Mr. Mair 2848 20 We have people let's say who We have people, let's say, who Mr. Simms 2849 7 With medication The medication Mr. Simms 2850 17 certain of the residents certain residents Mr. Simms 2851 14 how many of any of the staff how many of the staff Mr. Simms 2853 1 system that is available system that are available Dr. Kanter DB1/ 71548218.6 41 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 2854 4 testimony demonstrated was that testimony demonstrated that Dr. Kanter 2855 11 that the -- that was stated by I think Entergy that was stated by, I think, Entergy Dr. Kanter 2857 2-3 that that means that there is not__
potential that means that there is not potential Dr. Kanter 2857 16-18 And what I said there was there was a disparate impact was implicit in And what I said there was that there is a disparate impact implicit in Mr. Filler 2858 5 accounting for how you would __ with account for how you would deal with Mr. Filler 2858 9 an accounting for how you're an account for how you're Mr. Filler 2862 11 disproportionate health benefitdisproportionate health burden Mr. Mair 2863 11 populations dependency population's dependency Mr. Mair 2872 18 can had Sherwin Turk 2902 6-8 what the deal is. And the census data itself, what we've got is what the deal is a nd the census data itself. W hat we've got is Jerry Riggs 2905 3-5 in t this is it's a subdivision of block -- of group quarters.
in t this is it's a subdivision of block group data.
Jerry Riggs
DB1/ 71548218.6 42 HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET Proceeding Name: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Generating Units 2 and 3) Docket Nos.: 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No.: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Contention:
NYS-37 Hearing Date(s):
October 24, 2012 THE PARTIES' PROPOSED CORRECTIONS: Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 2936 10 relative relevant Judge McDade2941 1 outs outputs David Schlissel 2946 2 access excess David Schlissel 2947 10 effected affected David Schlissel 2951 5 produce reduce David Schlissel 2952 19 new nuclear David Schlissel 2963 3 I think there are little over 21oo megawatts I think there are little over 2100 megawatts David Schlissel 2972 2 ultimates alternatives David Schlissel 2977 13 they and Andrew Stuyvenberg 2977 13 serve served Andrew Stuyvenberg 2978 2 So it's not necessarily as efficient as soley in terms So it's not necessarily as efficient soley
in terms Andrew Stuyvenberg 2993 17 placement replacement Andrew Stuyvenberg 2988 7 being been Andrew Stuyvenberg DB1/ 71548218.6 43 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 3000 3 the by Andrew Stuyvenberg 3010 2-3 been New York State's specific determination a New-York-State-specific determination Andrew Stuyvenberg 3014 8 Or either the no-action alternative For either the no-action alternative Judge Wardwell 3016 6 STUYVENBERG: SCHLISSEL: 3016 9 STUYVENBERG: SCHLISSEL: 3016 23-24 the references to the model the reference is to the model David Harrison 3017 18 would be replace the generation would be replace the generation David Harrison 3019 1 is has David Schlissel 3019 5 weight way David Schlissel 3019 23-24 the potential very expensive environmental regulations the potential of very expensive environmental regulations David Harrison 3020 14 under baseline conditions, under baseline conditions. David Harrison 3020 15 the baseline conditions The baseline conditions David Harrison 3020 19 the baseline conditions and then we re-ran it.
the baseline conditions. A nd then we re-ran it.
David Harrison 3025 9 editions additions David Harrison 3026 7 16.3 megawatt hours 16.3 million megawatt hours David Harrison 3026 9-11 that reflects these various market conditions and that we think in terms of the analysis that was made that that reflects these various market conditions. A nd we think, in terms of the analysis that was made, that David Harrison 3026 16-19 Well, we did look at what - we did the model generates changes in natural gas and coal, so the fossil fuel was a - in the model run that Well, we did look at that. We did.
The model generates changes in natural gas and coal. So the fossil fuel change was a mix in the model David Harrison DB1/ 71548218.6 44 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness we did, the difference was run that we did. T he difference was 3030 22-23 143 megawatt hours 143 million megawatt hours Eugene Meehan 3030 23 2 megawatt hours 2 million megawatt hours Eugene Meehan 3032 17 145 million megawatt hours 141 million megawatt hours Eugene Meehan 3032 24 160,000 160 million Eugene Meehan 3033 2 2,000 2 million Eugene Meehan 3039 4 this thing eliminating Andrew Stuyvenberg 3044 9-11 as a way to areas a way to determine are Andrew Stuyvenberg 3044 12 way -Andrew Stuyvenberg 3044 13 alternatives alternatives' Andrew Stuyvenberg 3046 22 820 8-20 Andrew Stuyvenberg 3047 25 825 8-25 Andrew Stuyvenberg 3049 17 if its Andrew Stuyvenberg 3050 7 there they Andrew Stuyvenberg 3057 25 These lines should be attributed to Judge Wardwell, not David Schlissel Judge Wardwell 3059 2 apologize apologies Andrew Stuyvenberg DB1/ 71548218.6 45 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 3082 3 this was just conceptual so you can see that the red this was just conceptual. S o you can see that the red David Harrison 3082 4 is negative in the change, so that is the effect of is negative in the change. S o that is the effect of David Harrison 3082 16-17 we were looking not at - at Indian Point not being available we were looking not at
- at Indian Point not being available David Harrison 3088 21 or the price elasticity of demand is the price elasticity of demand David Harrison 3095 8-10 And this actually - the reason that we needed the generation is then we used - and the modeling also generates estimates of And this actually. T he reason that we needed and the generation is then we used - and the modeling also generates - estimates of David Harrison 3096 24 consequence consequence of no action Andrew Stuyvenberg 3100 6-7 This - by linear you mean it doesn't have a particular different slope By linear you mean it doesn't have a particularly different slope David Harrison 3101 3 this increasing marginal cost of as you this increasing marginal cost of as you David Harrison 3104 16 to they Andrew Stuyvenberg 3104 20 we present represent Andrew Stuyvenberg 3109 20 These lines should be attributed to Andrew Stuyvenberg, not David Schlissel Andrew Stuyvenberg 3111 3 staff Entergy Eugene Meehan 3111 12-13 14 million 141 million Eugene Meehan 3116 19 sheet rock for the Cricket Valley SEQR for the Cricket Valley Eugene Meehan 3116 20 I described is described Eugene Meehan DB1/ 71548218.6 46 Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 3121 11 Yes, no, and what we were emphasizing the importance Yes, no. W hat we were emphasizing is the importance David Harrison 3125 17 energy efficiency renewables energy efficiency and renewables David Harrison 3128 4 16.3 megawatt hours 16.3 million megawatt hours David Harrison 3128 4-5 That Entergy, that Entergy goes, That energy, that energy goes, David Harrison 3132 20 it is Andrew Stuyvenberg 3135 13 would should Andrew Stuyvenberg 3135 15 that there Andrew Stuyvenberg 3136 16-19 These lines should be attributed to Beth Mizuno, not Andrew Stuyvenberg Beth Mizuno 3136 20-21 These lines should be attributed to Andrew Stuyvenberg, not Beth Mizuno Andrew Stuyvenberg 3136 22-24 These lines should be attributed to Beth Mizuno, not Andrew Stuyvenberg Beth Mizuno 3136 25 These lines should be attributed to Andrew Stuyvenberg, not Beth Mizuno Andrew Stuyvenberg 3141 24, 25 a loan alone David Schlissel 3155 2 disposition's dispositions Andrew Stuyvenberg