ML12340A545
| ML12340A545 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 12/05/2012 |
| From: | Entergy Nuclear Operations, Entergy Services, Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Morgan, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, NRC/OGC, Riverkeeper, State of NY, Office of the Attorney General |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| RAS 23842, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01 | |
| Download: ML12340A545 (46) | |
Text
HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET Proceeding Name: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Generating Units 2 and 3)
Docket Nos.: 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No.: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Contention: RK-TC-2 Hearing Date(s): October 15-17, 2012 THE PARTIES PROPOSED CORRECTIONS:
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1270 1-6 (Whereupon, the documents (Whereupon, the documents referred N/A referred to as NRC Staff 3, to as NRC Staff NRCR30001, Clearwater 4, Riverkeeper 9, New Clearwater CLER40001, Riverkeeper RIVR90001, New York York 17 and Entergy 7 were NYSR17001 and Entergy marked for identification and ENTR70001 were marked for received in evidence.) identification and received in evidence.)
1293 22 affect inspect Jeffrey Horowitz 1294 2 position permission Robert Aleksick 1295 22 You just simply You dont just simply Robert Aleksick 1297 18 where is calculated for each wear is calculated for each operating Robert Aleksick operating period? period.
1299 22 fact FAC Robert Aleksick 1304 11 alternate ultimate Robert Aleksick 1306 24 diverse differ Robert Aleksick 1313 17 There is a facility and a program. There is a capability in the program, Robert Aleksick 1338 11 log lots of Jeffrey Horowitz 1317 21 ani an Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1318 4 Surry was indicated Surry indicated Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1
DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1318 15 operating up to nine facilities operating up to nine facilities Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1323 11 bought brought Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1323 17 project process Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1323 22 But they haven't. But they havent. Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1324 7 they you give they give Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1324 13 without -- without -- Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1324 17 excess for x-ray Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1326 5 aspect respect Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1327 21 was would Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1328 7-8 [for clarification purposes, this Dr. Joram sentence is referring to the data in Hopenfeld Figure 1A on slide 6 of Dr.
Hopenfelds CHECWORKS presentation, as well as figure 1 in RIV000111.
1331 7 the number lost the loss Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1331 15 arcs curves Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1332 4 this not the this is not Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1332 5-6 control controlled Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1333 5 (indiscernible) eaten away Dr. Joram 2
DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker Hopenfeld 1333 11 and which is the size of and which is the size of Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1337 6 to say to make Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1337 9 It was It was in Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1342 16 NEI-9510 NEI 95-10 Alan Cox 1342 17 four for Alan Cox 1348 18 GALL Rev 2 and Rev 3 GALL Rev 1 and Rev 2 Alan Cox 1348 25 GALL Rev 1 had referred to Rev 2. GALL Rev 1 had referred to Rev 2 Alan Cox of NSAC-202L.
1350 2 50.50 50.59 Alan Cox 1357 24 address may I add to Nelson Azevedo 1371 15 look to NAC-202L look to NSAC-202L Judge McDade 1382 18 NEI-9510 NEI 95-10 Alan Cox 1385 10 supply supplied Alan Cox 1400 16 due do Alan Cox 1406 24-25 recommendation NSAC-202L recommendations of NSAC-202L Alan Cox 1409 7 it appointed Indian Point Allen Hiser 1422 6 on iota one iota Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1422 14 that than Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1422 15 sight size Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1432 16 the fact on the fact on Dr. Joram 3
DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker Hopenfeld 1432 20 tell me tell you Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1432 21 how my experience of it about my experience with it Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1433 7 Thats what Thats not what Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1434 13 general in general Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1435 4 from for Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1436 8 exploration explosion Joram Hopenfeld 1436 11 achieved fatigued Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1436 16 one one Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1436 18 an in an Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1437 1 aspect. process. Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1437 6 you -- Once the corrosion -- are you dissolve -- the corrosion products -- Dr. Joram soluble, are soluble, Hopenfeld 1437 13, 20 captivation cavitation Judge McDade 1438 22 well wall Robert Aleksick 1441 16 outside oxide Jeffrey Horowitz 1444 17 the path is it is past the Jeffrey Horowitz 1444 20 at metal graphically metallographically Jeffrey Horowitz 1441 20 brought showed Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 4
DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1443 14 coherent with adherent to Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1443 20 So you So when you Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1443 20 velocity. You have velocity, you Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1444 2 a proportion proportional Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1446 16 what the German said what the gentleman said Joram Hopenfeld 1446 23 or or Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1446 24 Stock equation Navier Stokes equations Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1447 9 of geometry and turbulence and geometry of turbulence Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1447 11 to do to consider Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1449 5 I have I would have Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1449 9 to do -- to do with sampling. Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1449 15 is -- is wrong. Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1449 23 is was Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1449 24 The small That small Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1485 13 Stress Stretch Ian Mew 1498 25 there then Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 5
DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1499 1 something some kind Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1499 3 happened, some happened to some Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1500 7-8 important is after all this experience important. It is, after all this Dr. Joram to experience, to Hopenfeld 1501 6 compare come Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1501 11 on to Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1505 8 as a bay Pass 2 Ian Mew 1507 24-25 both units at approximately 3,700 both units and approximately 3,700 Robert Aleksick 1514 7 to is Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1514 8 is it is Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1514 11 large areas, small areas large eddies, small eddies Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1515 17 it was there was Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1516 5 considered considerable Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1516 5 thick thick Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1516 11 suddenly would suddenly Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1516 13 in in Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1517 19 thing thinning Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 6
DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1518 16 thinning evolves downstream of thinning evolves downstream of an Jeffrey Horowitz any orifice. orifice.
1519 4 They did use CHECWORKS. They did not use CHECWORKS. Jeffrey Horowitz 1519 9 August. Re-did the drain line. We August. Reheater drain line. We Jeffrey Horowitz spoke about this spoke about this 1520 16 all wall Jeffrey Horowitz 1521 14 generated in the the Steam Generator Integrity Nelson Azevedo 1522 9-10 Its monitored Entergy steam Its monitored by the Entergy steam Nelson Azevedo generator integrity program. generator integrity program.
1524 10-11 Because its pressure of the same side. Because it is the same pressure on both Dr. Joram sides. Hopenfeld 1524 12 gradient -active radioactive Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1524 14 auxiliary accelerated Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1524 17 auxiliary accelerated Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1524 18 cracking is cracking there is Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1526 24 what know Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1527 10 Exhibit 000005 at page 3. Exhibit RIV000005 at page 2-3, 24-25. Deborah Brancato 1529 16-17 it exactly running a computer code like a computer code running exactly like a Dr. Joram a CHECWORKS CHECWORKS Hopenfeld 1530 17 reg rig Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1531 6 thats thats not Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1535 18 know know how Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 7
DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1536 8 CAGE French Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1536 10 constance constants Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1536 13 constance constants Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1537 22 factor. safety. Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1544 22 trying defining Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1545 18 in the offshore local for the local Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1549 19 is is that Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1552 5 the control under controlled Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1555 18 flow rate wear rate Robert Aleksick 1556 14 a parent measurement an apparent measurement Robert Aleksick 1558 5 infrequency infrequently Robert Aleksick 1559 15 service surface Nelson Azevedo 1561 25 local local transient Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1562 8 is not - In is not uniform in Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1562 20 50 15 Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1564 4 to the to why the Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1564 20 to give it to you to to give it to you to Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 8
DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1565 2 50mL drag 50mm diameter Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1565 4 25 mL 25 mm Joram Hopenfeld 1565 6 pittance pitting Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1566 7 pick up pick it up Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1570 1 0.59 0.059 Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1570 2 was -- was to 0.26 Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1571 17 reflects FAC reflects back Allen Hiser 1572 15 perpendicular to the lamination parallel to the lamination Nelson Azevedo 1576 9 Thats not what Thats what Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1579 9 it it at Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1587 11 not controlled not mass transfer controlled Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1597 24 no so Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1597 23-24 The Regulation 1801 NUREG-1801 Joram Hopenfeld 1603 16 ca can Robert Aleksick 1629 14 I eye Robert Aleksick 1637 8 imply apply Robert Aleksick 1645 23 weld grounds weld beads Jeffrey Horowitz 1649 5, 6 KOMMSIE COMSY Jeffrey Horowitz 1649 10 When the found that out, and they When we found that out, and we Jeffrey Horowitz found found 9
DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1649 14-15 one code, one line of FORTRAN, one code, one line of FORTRAN, Jeffrey Horowitz thats all, and a code of this. thats all, and a code of this.
1652 11-12 is marrred are off Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1653 11 are wearing more than you think are wearing more than you think Jeffrey Horowitz they should be, or they should be, or 1655 15 thing thinning Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1659 3 by -- by a factor of two Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1659 8 of -- of 2.2 Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1660 19 easier not just easier just Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1663 11 confused -- confused the drafts Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1674 14, 25 goal GALL Matthew Yoder 1688 15 they accepted in their compliance they are in compliance Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1690 2 regarding regard Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1694 8 AMP AMP, this Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1694 10 numbers. others. Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1694 12 critical --. critical thickness. Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1694 15 critical, critical thickness, Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1694 17 them were them that were Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 10 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1694 18 were exceeded exceeded critical. Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1695 17 a leak a leak occurs Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1695 19 stated we stated, when we Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1695 24 is, is, Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1701 2 prefer calling prefer calling it Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1710 10-11 in the site than safety Jeffrey Horowitz 1727 11 perspective prescriptive Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1729 13 to to Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1729 15 there there Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1729 20 indirectly indirect Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1730 4 Know what -- Know what Describe Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1730 9 mineralography metalography Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1730 11 -- to corrosion or erosion, to Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1730 12 and some and to some Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1731 1 a lot -- a lot of data, Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1731 24 get blowing up pipes get pipes blowing up Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 11 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1731 25 over -- over 60 years Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1734 23 thing thinning Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1735 2 they operate and after they operate the uprate and after the uprate Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1735 24 we have -- straight pipes, Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1735 25 looking at where - in area looking in area Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1736 8 anywhere anything Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1736 9 look -- and do -- forget look there and forget Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1736 12 say see that it is Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1736 13 from -- from this data, Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1738 5 kind of thing it - by this kind kind of thinning, this kind Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1738 20 better -- better correlation. Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1739 3 of about Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1740 14 thing thinning Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1740 15 there if there Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1740 15 It wasnt - if it was It wasnt scattered, or if it was Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1740 21 doesnt -- doesnt help, Dr. Joram 12 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker Hopenfeld 1740 22 would it would Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1741 15 I -- I would have done Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1742 4 rationing rationale Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1742 7 of it of it Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1742 12 looking of looking Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1742 21 know to know how to Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1755 15 Theres no -- Theres no difference - Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1756 6 Its how -- Its how the data is selected. Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1756 17 interested -- interested in, Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1757 8 no of no Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1757 9 I -- I believe Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1760 15 propagates a lot big number than propagates into a lot bigger number Jeffrey Horowitz you would think off than you would think of off 1764 3 in the for the Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1764 5 -- or - they were Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1764 18 the response -- if the response was to the direct Dr. Joram testimony, Hopenfeld 13 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1778 4 and see and see Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1786 20 The list of witnesses omits Dr.
Tina Ghosh, who should be added.
1788 8-10 (Whereupon, the aforementioned (Whereupon, the aforementioned n/a document was marked for documents were marked for identification as Riverkeepers identification as Riverkeeper's Exhibit Number RIV000049.) Exhibit Numbers RIV000132 and RIV000133.)
1791- 24-25, (Whereupon, the aforementioned (Whereupon, the aforementioned n/a 1792 1-3 document, having previously been documents, having previously been marked for identification as marked for identification as Riverkeeper's Exhibit Number Riverkeepers Exhibit Numbers RIV000049, was received de bene RIV000132 and RIV000133, were esse in evidence.) received de bene esse in evidence.)
1801 20-21 their model assumes that the oxide their model assumes that the oxide Jeffrey Horowitz layer is thickness and there is a layer has constant thickness and result the corrosion rate is linear. there is a as a result the corrosion rate is linear.
1801 22-23 This is an assumption they check in This is an assumption that they Jeffrey Horowitz that test data they show as well as check in that their test data they other data. Its a little slow show this shows as well as in other data. Its also 1811 13 the -- the text, Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1811 17 to we to what we Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1813 6 have -- have made a difference. Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1815 1 predicted versus that predicted versus measured Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1815 2 see see that Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1815 6 pleasant simple Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1816 17 of the - this is the correct -- of the exhibit is - this is the correct Dr. Joram paper -
14 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker Hopenfeld 1825 5 MR. YODER: Matthew Yoder, MR. YODER: Matthew Yoder, Matthew Yoder staff attorney staff.
1836 5 but that Ian Mew 1838 22 dissect detect Alan Cox 1843 5 apart. And that one apart, and the other one Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1843 18 beg use Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1843 21 working working Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1844 12-13 results and nonlinear wear in piping results in nonlinear wear in piping Deborah Brancato component components 1844 14 He explained You explained Deborah Brancato 1844 14 and he did and you did Deborah Brancato 1846 3 stray straight Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1846 6 echo also Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1846 8 it is -- it is chemical, Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1846 20 bear wear Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1847 19 if you only - it was if it only was Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1847 22 of over Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1847 23 the -- the grid, Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1848 22 the -- the numbers, Dr. Joram 15 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker Hopenfeld 1848 23 I -- I saw, Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1849 13-15 I believe that though there is still hate I believe that because they hitched their Dr. Joram for the CHECWORKS idea, FAC is wagon to the CHECWORKS idea they Hopenfeld simply a dissolution project. consider FAC simply as a dissolution process.
1849 24 think that think that that Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1850 2-3 how you people mentioned this whole how people discussed this whole thing Dr. Joram thing Hopenfeld 1853 4-5 different processes, Entergy employees difference processes Entergy employs Deborah Brancato 1853 8 is the is, do the Deborah Brancato 1853 9 applies apply Deborah Brancato 1854 1-2 The next question is to Dr. Turk, The next question is to Dr. Hiser, Deborah Brancato NRC staff's witnesses. NRC staff's witness.
1854 6 fact FAC Deborah Brancato 1858 3 memo amendment Deborah Brancato 1877 14 I wear I bought Dr. Joram Hopenfeld 1880 11-12 You talked about a competitive You talked about a competitive Brad Fagg program to check work. program to CHECWORKS.
1882 12 EVF EDF Jeffrey Horowitz 16 DB1/ 71548218.6
HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET Proceeding Name: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Generating Units 2 and 3)
Docket Nos.: 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No.: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Contention: RK-TC-2 Hearing Date(s): October 15-17, 2012 ENTERGYS PROPOSED CORRECTION, TO WHICH RIVERKEEPER OBJECTS:
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1444 19 experiments assume that experiments show that Jeffrey Horowitz 17 DB1/ 71548218.6
HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET Proceeding Name: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Generating Units 2 and 3)
Docket Nos.: 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No.: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Contention: NYS-12C Hearing Date(s): October 17-18, 2012 THE PARTIES PROPOSED CORRECTIONS:
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1900 11 the evaluate to evaluate Grant Teagarden 1900 21 the cost implement of such the cost to implement such Grant Teagarden 1909 11 demonstrating that they are in fact demonstrating that they are in fact Kevin OKula severe accidents severe accidents.
1909 12 but multiple system failures linked They have multiple system failures Kevin OKula with the linked with the 1914 23 infirement (phonetic) environment Grant Teagarden 1916 18 look at maybe one of the SAMA look at maybe one of the SAMA Kevin OKula candidates can apply candidates, they can apply 1919 21 intend tend François Lemay 1930 16 wait weight Grant Teagarden 1933 1-4 And one of other point that this And one other point. This figure Lori Potts figure doesnt show it. But within doesnt show it, but within the 10 the 10 mile ring we actually have mile ring we actually have 10 10 additional rings for a final additional rings for a finer resolution resolution in close to the plant. in close to the plant.
1939 5 DAC deck Nathan Bixler 1935 25 traveled travel Kevin OKula 1945 15 point NEI 05-01 point to NEI 05-01 François Lemay 18 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 1946 11 we describe a description of François Lemay 1946 12 to be site-specific, to be site-specific: François Lemay 1946 15 we discuss it discusses François Lemay 1960 20 per person on a year per person - year Grant Teagarden 1986 14 factor, or 15 factor of 15 Grant Teagarden 1993 24 correction reduction Judge McDade 1994 5 correction reduction Judge McDade 2004 14 AOECR OECR François Lemay 2004 14 we use for our is used for the François Lemay 2004 19 we look ISR looked François Lemay 2004 19 we found ISR found François Lemay 2005 3 they NUREG-1150 François Lemay 2007 24 to be published "to be published" Donald Harrison 2012 6 Chan. Chanin. François Lemay 2012 16 to assess assessing François Lemay 2012 18 it would ideal it would be ideal François Lemay 2013 17 pretending that performed pretending that we performed François Lemay 2014 22 wrote note Kevin OKula 2015 14 tie to a T citation trail tie to a T citation trail Kevin OKula 2019 12 types situation in types situated in Grant Teagarden 2035 19 discussion, as we understand it discussion, as we understand it goes, Kevin OKula goes, there are -- that 2035 20 The cost-benefit analyses are more the cost-benefit analyses are more Kevin OKula 19 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2037 6 again by again for Kevin OKula 2043 18 Laurie Lori Lori Potts 2044 6 thats fortunate. thats unfortunate. Lori Potts 2044 17 preferred proffered Lori Potts 2051 12 chronic CHRONC Judge Wardwell 2054 20 we . . . we ISR . . . ISR François Lemay 2054 21 we ISR François Lemay 2057 5 seven seventh Kevin OKula 2057 13 Early EARLY Kevin OKula 2057 16 early EARLY Kevin OKula 2058 21 No Now Grant Teagarden 2068 2-3 written down and a review written down in a review Lori Potts 2073 25 OEC OECR François Lemay 2075 16 you the applicant François Lemay 2075 17 your its François Lemay 2090 7 Robert M. Aleksick [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 18) 2090 8 Nelson Azevedo [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 18) 2090 9 Ian D. Mew [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 18) 2090 10 Dr. Allen Hiser [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 18) 20 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2090 11 Alan Cox [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 18) 2090 12 Kathryn Sutton [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 18) 2090 13 Dr. Joram Hopenfeld [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 18) 2090 14 Jeffrey Horowitz Matthew Yoder [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 18) 2090 15 The list of witnesses omits Dr.
Tina Ghosh, who should be added.
2094 1 MR. BESSETTE MR. SIPOS John Sipos 2096 25 the morning before the morning after. Paul Bessette 2100 1 This line should be attributed to Donnie Harrison Donnie Harrison, not Joseph Jones 2107 22 and that François Lemay 2108 1 value values François Lemay 2108 18 cost at site-specific cost thats site-specific François Lemay 2108 25 deficient fission François Lemay 2113 16 we scrutinized the input value to we scrutinized the input values to François Lemay see if theyre reasonable, see if theyre reasonable, 2113 20 if designs have it assigns that François Lemay 2114 5 then it becomes you get then you get François Lemay 2115 15 have one-time have a one-time François Lemay 21 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2118 11 11,000 1,100 Joseph Jones 2125 15 in the Plains in the White Plains area Kevin OKula 2126 9 surfaces would not be touched. surfaces, some would not be Kevin OKula touched.
2127 9 wouldnt be cleaned altogether the wouldnt be cleaned altogether the Kevin OKula same way. But this same way, but that this 2131 10 use used François Lemay 2133 13 PARTICIPANT DR. OKULA Kevin OKula 2135 2-3 but just with what François Lemay 2137 15 we ISR François Lemay 2149 9 MACCS1 MACCS2 François Lemay 2153 3 Every Not every Kevin OKula 2153 6 meterological data site meteorological data from the site Kevin OKula 2154 19 take a count take into account Kevin OKula 2155 9 NUREG/CR-4148 NUREG/CR-5148 Kevin OKula 2163 23-24 potential re-cost beneficial potentially cost beneficial Tina Ghosh 2164 3 which what Tina Ghosh 2164 17 benefit for Indian Point. And you benefit for Indian Point 2. And you Tina Ghosh get over 100 get over 100 2166 3 were going to towards eliminating were going to towards eliminating Tina Ghosh the the 2167 12 on the walls, now on the walls. Now Grant Teagarden 2172 16 Brad Brian Brian G. Harris 2173 18 illegal a legal John Sipos 2173 20 how to John Sipos 22 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2176 7 use uses François Lemay 2177 7 one average, deposition one average deposition François Lemay 2177 23 but code but the MACCS2 code François Lemay 2178 13 accurately possible accurately as possible François Lemay 2178 22 and we have breaking and breaking François Lemay 2179 1 wrecking of tail light wrecking the tail light François Lemay 2180 1 accident, completely accident, it completely François Lemay 2180 9 look how looked at how François Lemay 2181 6-9 It is the time required for It is the time required for François Lemay decontamination and in the way decontamination. And is the way MACCS works. At the end of this MACCS works, at the end of this average decontamination period, average decontamination period, people are allowed back into their people are allowed back into their homes. homes.
2181 11 contamination decontamination François Lemay 2181 12 in to François Lemay 2181 12-13 And I think we all agree and the And I think we all agree, Entergy François Lemay NRC Staff and I and the NRC Staff and I 2184 10 one ones François Lemay 2184 24 is are François Lemay 2184 24 early high EARLY HIGH François Lemay 2184 25 early mediumlate high EARLY MEDIUM LATE HIGH François Lemay 2187 11 CD CDNFRM Judge Wardwell 2192 15 works, doesnt works, it doesnt François Lemay 2194 9 early high EARLY HIGH François Lemay 23 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2196 15-16 early high EARLY HIGH François Lemay 2196 18 early high EARLY HIGH François Lemay 2196 19 early medium EARLY MEDIUM François Lemay 2196 19 late high LATE HIGH François Lemay 2213 13 we ISR François Lemay 2218 18 Laurie Lori Lori Potts 2222 25 review reveal Tina Ghosh 2223 13 Any one SAMA is only to act on Any one SAMA is only able to act Tina Ghosh particular accident on particular accident 2224 4 their them are Tina Ghosh 2224 5 class cost Tina Ghosh 2224 8 particularly typically Tina Ghosh 2225 1 were were Tina Ghosh 2229 5 Laurie Lori Lori Potts 2229 6-7 for ever SAMA for every SAMA Lori Potts 2231 9 95 95th Tina Ghosh 2231 19 as is Tina Ghosh 2232 3 could would Tina Ghosh 2232 21 boon cushion Tina Ghosh 2236 2 dominate dominant Tina Ghosh 2241 8 FERC Burke Grant Teagarden 2244 12 after the first sentence, after the first sentence, The Kevin OKula decontamination cost decontamination cost 2242 14 FERC Burke Grant Teagarden 24 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2244 17 average statistics. average statistics. Kevin OKula 2244 19 The methods to be employed The methods to be employed Kevin OKula 2244 20 decontamination techniques. decontamination techniques. Kevin OKula 2253 15 arent are Joseph Jones 2256 1 Terrell Tawil François Lemay 2256 22 that NUREG, the NRC that the NRC François Lemay 2259 12 we have very few. we have very little information. François Lemay 2259 22 Terrell Tawil François Lemay 2261 19 decon DECON Kevin OKula 2261 20 accessed with by Burke assessed by Burke Kevin OKula 2262 12 the late 70s early 80s. the late 70s to early 80s. Kevin OKula 2262 14 decon DECON Kevin OKula 2262 15 of that accountability code of that accountability code Kevin OKula 2263 13 Terrell Tawil François Lemay 2264 17 area areas François Lemay 2264 24 work works François Lemay 2265 3 it comes in in a it comes out in the François Lemay 2268 4 those histogram the histogram François Lemay 2268 8 tend tends François Lemay 2268 24 DEC TIMDEC François Lemay 2269 3 10 DEC TIMDEC Judge Wardwell 2269 9-10 to different to use different François Lemay 2272 19 these N/A values these input values Judge Wardwell 25 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2276 6 DR. BIXLER DR. LEMAY François Lemay 2281 25 is are François Lemay 2282 1 get collective get a collective François Lemay 2285 22 dealt with with the NRC. dealt with with within the NRC. Tina Ghosh 2290 25 a lot more normally lognormally Tina Ghosh 2293 9 lot of normal lognormal Tina Ghosh 2293 18 ma may Tina Ghosh 2300 22 per acre basis per hectare basis Grant Teagarden 2309 21 made, the made in the François Lemay 2309 23 transit or things that are outside. transit of things that are outside the François Lemay 50-mile radius.
2310 11 dd add Nathan Bixler 2355 7 should have bee should have been Martha Stolley 2357 8 some outside surfaces some surfaces François Lemay 2357 19 having documented having a documented François Lemay 2360 10 sometime sometimes François Lemay 2360 11 sometime sometimes François Lemay 2361 1 sometime sometimes François Lemay 2361 2 sometime sometimes François Lemay 2361 3 in urban area in an urban area François Lemay 2361 8 value values François Lemay 2365 18 I asked more normalized value Dr. OKula referred to more Kathryn Liberatore normalized value 2367 6 code in fact CONDO code Kevin OKula 26 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2367 7 but so Kevin OKula 2369 3-7 These lines should be attributed to N/A Martha Stolley, not Kevin OKula 2372 20 supplied applied Kevin OKula 2372 22 identified on the parts identified for the two plants Kevin OKula 2372 23 of two public - two lightwater of two public - two light water Kevin OKula reactors reactors 2377 4 multiple floor in the building multiple floors in the buildings François Lemay 27 DB1/ 71548218.6
HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET Proceeding Name: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Generating Units 2 and 3)
Docket Nos.: 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No.: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Contention: NYS-16B Hearing Date(s): October 22, 2012 THE PARTIES PROPOSED CORRECTIONS:
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2391 14 SUSAN TAYLOR, ESQ. None (missing from attorney list for October 22) 2393 8 Robert Aleksick Raphael [delete] None (should not Kuyler be on witness list for October 22) 2393 9 Nelson Azevedo Ronald J. [delete] None (should not Tenpas be on witness list for October 22) 2393 10 Jonathan M. Rund [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 12 Alan Cox [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 13 Dr. Allen Hiser [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 14 Donald Harrison [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 15 Dr. Joram Hopenfeld [delete] None (should not 28 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker be on witness list for October 22) 2393 16 Jeffrey Horowitz [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 18 Dr. Francois J. Lemay [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 19 Ian D. Mew [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 23 Kathryn Sutton [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2393 25 Matthew Yoder [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 22) 2401 10 Document 900422 Document 9422 Judge McDade 2405 10 consumer commuter Judge McDade 2405 11 fraud flawed Judge McDade 2405 19 the variance material of is there a material consequence Judge McDade consequence 2407 25 You cant submit it? You can start with it? Judge McDade 2408 1 Cant submit it, yes. Can start with it, yes. Stephen Sheppard 2408 3 Dr. Tall [delete] Judge McDade 2410 10 put point Judge McDade 2412 6-7 undertake even though undertake to not be counted even Stephen Sheppard though 29 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2413 7 conceitedly concededly Judge McDade 2414 18 difference different Stephen Sheppard 2415 18 that [delete] Stephen Sheppard 2415 25 addressed addresses Stephen Sheppard 2416 14 addressed addresses Stephen Sheppard 2418 6-7 that was sent percent Joseph Jones 2418 7 in of considerable amount that in considerable amount and Joseph Jones 2418 12 conceive concede Judge McDade 2420 5 distinction distinct Judge McDade 2421 18-19 So the zero percent So there is zero percent Jerry Riggs 2430 8-9 the states provide at the county the states provide this data at the Jerry Riggs level county level 2430 17-18 which they all have 2000 and we which they all have, 2000, then we Jerry Riggs have to convert have to convert 2431 1 from the projection information using the projection information Jerry Riggs 2432 6 align a line Jerry Riggs 2432- 25-1 provided to try to make a smooth fit provided. To try to make a smooth Jerry Riggs 2433 of line on top of those datapoints fit of line on top of those data points using math. we use math.
2442 1 were taking the 2035 and were taking the 2035 value and Jerry Riggs 2443 7 using the MACCS2 model are used in the MACCS2 model Stephen Sheppard 2445 17-18 based on the four small elements based on the four small elements Jerry Riggs 2447 2 And then in the final outcome And then with the final outcome Jerry Riggs 2449 11-15 But they underscore a slightly But they underscore a slightly Stephen Sheppard alternative version of exactly my alternative version of exactly my concern. Although the growth rates concern, although the growth rates 30 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker themselves werent the central themselves werent the central focus focus of my evaluation and of my evaluation and proposed proposed revisions of the revisions of the population population estimates. estimates.
2449 25 estimates be estimates should be Stephen Sheppard 2452 12 If the actual growth of - If this This change Stephen Sheppard change 2453 14-15 higher rates higher birth rates Stephen Sheppard 2453 22-25 Really if you wanted to make sure Really if you wanted to make use of Stephen Sheppard of the 2010 census data, the proper the 2010 census data, the proper approach, I understand that time approach -- I understand that time doesn't always permit that. But the doesn't always permit that -- but the proper approach would be to redo proper approach would be to redo the county level forecasts the county level forecasts 2455 22 Oconee county Nathan Bixler 2455 25 Oconee a county Nathan Bixler 2456 1 Oconee county Nathan Bixler 2458 7 Oconee county Nathan Bixler 2459 24 up us Judge Wardwell 2461 1 us use Judge Wardwell 2462 7 Teagarten Teagarden Tina Ghosh 2464 15 weight weighting Jerry Riggs 2466 20 resident residence Joseph Jones 2472 6 them, so if you -- if I might refer to them. If I might refer to the Stephen Sheppard the discussion discussion 2474 24 commuting in will both be present commuting in, will both be present Stephen Sheppard within. within the 50-mile zone.
31 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2477 5 people who reside outside and people who reside outside of the Stephen Sheppard zone and 2482 24 such a such location such and such a location Stephen Sheppard 2497 14-16 The SAMA analysis doesnt know The SAMA analysis doesnt know Lori Potts who is a commuter and who is a who is a commuter and who is a business traveler and who is a business traveler and who is a permanent resident if theyre all permanent resident. It treats them as permanent residents. if theyre all permanent residents.
2509 12 MR. JONES JUDGE KENNEDY Judge Kennedy 2510 24 50 40 Tina Ghosh 2518 10 essentially potentially Grant Teagarden 2523 24 or the three county populations that or the two other county populations Stephen Sheppard were that were 2523 25 alleged to have -- that will peak alleged to peak, will peak. Stephen Sheppard 2531 12 researches researchers Stephen Sheppard 32 DB1/ 71548218.6
HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET Proceeding Name: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Generating Units 2 and 3)
Docket Nos.: 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No.: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Contention: NYS-17B Hearing Date(s): October 22, 2012 THE PARTIES PROPOSED CORRECTIONS:
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2550 6 vacant lot. vacant lot. Ronald Tenpas 2550 14 home. home. Ronald Tenpas 2556 19 as I understand as a disamenity as I understand a disamenity Stephen Sheppard 2559 17 clear clearer Stephen Sheppard 2559 24,25 the p-- (none) Stephen Sheppard 2563 12 and end an end Stephen Sheppard 2566 5 that is that is, Stephen Sheppard 2567 20,21 date s I can -- (none) Stephen Sheppard 2568 16 so if youre getting -- a a Stephen Sheppard 2568 25 institution. institution? Stephen Sheppard 2570 13 40 or something of observations 40 or something observations Stephen Sheppard 2571 11 that that that, that Stephen Sheppard 2573 8 done gone Judge Wardwell 2573 22 not indirectly not directly Stephen Sheppard 2575 10 transactions transaction Stephen Sheppard 2580 20,21 p-- (none) Stephen Sheppard 33 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2581 9,10 so if it was p-- (none) Stephen Sheppard 2585 21 I estimate, my estimate My estimate Stephen Sheppard 2587 22 mistake in mistaken George Tolley 2589 20 exclaim explain George Tolley 2590 19 coefficient on distance coefficient of distance George Tolley 2592 20 reliability. You reliability. If you George Tolley 2592 22 that terms. those terms. George Tolley 2592 25 hedonic hedonics George Tolley 2593 10 planned property George Tolley 2593 11 p-- (none) George Tolley 2593 21 plus c, plus a plus c, that is, plus a George Tolley 2594 2 affect effect George Tolley 2596 12 to a statistician to statistics George Tolley 2598 4 and then Entergy William Reamer 2598 7 330 3-30 William Reamer 2599 10 multiple list multiple listing service George Tolley 2600 13 if were if we were Stephen Sheppard 2600 16,17 would increasing would be increasing Stephen Sheppard 2601 6 And even And Dr. Tolley even Stephen Sheppard 2601 14 measure it according as measure it according to Stephen Sheppard 2601 24 explore explores Stephen Sheppard 2608 1 margin of marginal George Tolley 2609 12 functional form. functional forms. George Tolley 34 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2609 13 affect effect George Tolley 2610 1 very fraction, very tiny fraction, George Tolley 2610 5 Dr. Sheppard, Dr. Sheppard states, George Tolley 2610 7 that what it that is what it George Tolley 2613 18,19 p -- -- Stephen Sheppard 2613 21 be property values be on property values Stephen Sheppard 2621 6 range as those other hedonic range as other hedonic estimates of Stephen Sheppard estimates that impact the impact 2621 16 staff (sic) Applicant William Reamer 2623 11 staff (sic) Applicant William Reamer 2624 19 assume be assumed William Reamer 2624 21 -- now that for William Reamer 2627 1 of the impact of the impact of Stephen Sheppard 2629 16 repeat cells estimators repeat sales estimators George Tolley 2629 24 about 1.7, $1.07 billion, about 1.7, $1.07 billion, George Tolley 2631 23 power PILOT George Tolley 2633 1 amenity disamenity George Tolley 2635 25 if is, William Reamer 2641 3 about there may -- (none) Stephen Sheppard 2641 20 This is saying before This is, as I was saying before George Tolley 2641 23 Allison and Metz (ph) and people Oates and people probably about George Tolley probably about 1980 1970 2642 1 owners in the - where owners in the - where George Tolley 2645 8 Press Prest Stephen Sheppard 35 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 2648 5 is this distance. is this distance. George Tolley 2648 7 includes this in his includes this in his George Tolley 2648 20 I find one I buy one George Tolley 2656 23 staff applicant William Reamer 2656 4 the action, no action the no action George Tolley 2656 23 staff applicant William Reamer 2658 18 Blomquist estimate of Blomquist estimate or George Tolley 2673 22 Energy Entergy Susan Taylor 2682 13 of measuring, of characterizing of measuring, of characterizing, Stephen Sheppard proximity proximity 2682 15 proposed or to be tested proposed, or to-be-tested, Stephen Sheppard 2683 13 Distsquaretilde T. distsquare ~ t. Stephen Sheppard 2684 17 does is do does, is do Stephen Sheppard 2689 8,9 ¶ [paragraph break] no break, keep lines together Stephen Sheppard 2689 13 treatment group. The treatment group. ¶ [paragraph break] Stephen Sheppard The 2691 19 all together, altogether, Stephen Sheppard 2708 2 is 2011 107 his 2011 1.07 George Tolley 2708 7 Bomquist-based Blomquist-based Ronald Tenpas 2709 12 hat that William Reamer 2710 9 done it on done on George Tolley 36 DB1/ 71548218.6
HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET Proceeding Name: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Generating Units 2 and 3)
Docket Nos.: 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No.: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Contention: CW-EC-3A Hearing Date(s): October 23, 2012 THE PARTIES PROPOSED CORRECTIONS:
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 2727 5 Robert M. Aleksick Nelson Azevedo [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 23) 2727 6 Dr. Allen Hiser Dr. Nathan Bixler [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 23) 2727 7 Dr. Kevin O'Kula [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 23) 2727 8 Patricia Milligan Patricia Milligan None 2727 10 Alan Cox [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 23) 2727 13 Donald Harrison [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 23) 2727 17 Grant Teagarden [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 23) 2727 18 Dr. Jeffrey Horowitz [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 23) 37 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 2727 19 Ian D. Mew [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 23) 2727 20 Dr. Joram Hopenfeld [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 23) 2727 21 Joseph Jones [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 23) 2727 24 Dr. Francois J. Lemay [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 23) 2727 25 Lori Potts [delete] None (should not be on witness list for October 23) 2727 N/A Add Michael Slobodien to the witness None list 2753 25 in the sites at the site Jeffrey Rikhoff 2736 8 page 4-55, 117, line 19 page 4-53, line 19 Judge McDade 2736 10 Socioeconomic connotations Socioeconomic conditions Judge McDade 2761 1 self-evacuated self-evacuate Patricia Milligan 2764 7 evacuation evacuate Patricia Milligan 2767 9 evaluated evacuated Patricia Milligan 2773 25 to at Jeffrey Rikhoff 2782 9 clarify clarifies Patricia Milligan 2782 18 for from Patricia Milligan 2790 21 which is I believe that the approach which is, I believe, that the approach Dr. Edelstein thats used now, thats used now, 38 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 2791 10-11 that my colleagues here have, are that my colleagues here have and are Dr. Edelstein prepared to discuss, we have issues prepared to discuss, we identified issues 2792 4-5 Well yes. I mean I believe that Well, yes. I mean, I believe, that Dr. Edelstein 2792 7-8 Would certainly not __ missing Would, certainly, not be missing Dr. Edelstein something so obvious something so obvious 2792 21 is that correct, Dr. Edelson? is that correct, Dr. Edelstein? Judge McDade 2795 10 could leave the area and evacuate, but could leave the area and evacuate. But Dr. Edelstein
() ()
2799 21-22 That decision apparently is, as far as I That decision apparently, as far as I can Dr. Edelstein can understand it, would understand it, would 2801 23 is the first step I would recommend is the first step, I would recommend Dr. Edelstein 2802 16-17 we realize that the ability of - to we realize that the ability to mitigate Dr. Edelstein mitigate impacts impacts 2803 18 clemency from Governor Pataki__ in executive clemency from Governor Mr. Papa Pataki, in 2804 16 Theres, at that point, the survival At that point, the survival Mr. Papa 2804 21 only for prisoners but for also guards only for prisoners but for guards also Mr. Papa 2805 5 This is very old buildings, the These are very old buildings, the Mr. Papa 2805 10 Okay. Dr. Edelson Dr. Edelstein Judge McDade 2806 12 Just people would Just that people would Mr. Papa 2807 6 comes in terms of an environmental comes, in terms of an environmental Dr. Larsen 2807 8 in New Orleans, in which in New Orleans, which Dr. Larsen 2807 14 Essentially when Essentially, when Dr. Larsen 2808 1 The problem is is The problem is Dr. Larsen 2808 8-9 However, the problem is is that if you However, the problem is that if you Dr. Larsen dont -- a lot of things dont -- there are a lot of things 2810 6 that basically we hd that, basically, we had Dr. Larsen 39 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 2810 20 and you know my responsibility and you know, my responsibility Dr. Larsen 2812 12 big worries, just based big worries is just based Dr. Larsen 2815 24 kinds of situation have be set up kinds of situation have to be set up Dr. Larsen 2816 24 and spoke a training and spoken at training Mr. Mair 2819 6 What they found They found Mr. Mair 2820 22 work on worked on Mr. Mair 2821 11 so that making sure making sure Mr. Mair 2824 9 education them educate them Mr. Mair 2825 7 in this instant in this instance Mr. Mair 2832 23-24 So you would basically that the public So basically, public transportation, as it Mr. Mair transportation, as it is is 2833 10 cars are commuting cars they are commuting Mr. Mair 2833 19-20 So of those work vehicles () model So of those working vehicles () Mr. Mair vehicles. Many model vehicles, many 2836 11 they had did with they had done with Mr. Mair 2836 19 nothings disastrous nothing disastrous Mr. Mair 2837 13-14 The answer is is that The answer is that Mr. Mair 2837 18-19 It think that I think that Mr. Mair 2837 24 civil defense type of, as civil defense type of building, as Mr. Mair 2838 16-17 to, as they say, to carry on to, as they say, carry on Mr. Mair 2848 20 We have people lets say who We have people, lets say, who Mr. Simms 2849 7 With medication The medication Mr. Simms 2850 17 certain of the residents certain residents Mr. Simms 2851 14 how many of any of the staff how many of the staff Mr. Simms 2853 1 system that is available system that are available Dr. Kanter 40 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 2854 4 testimony demonstrated was that testimony demonstrated that Dr. Kanter 2855 11 that the -- that was stated by I think that was stated by, I think, Entergy Dr. Kanter Entergy 2857 2-3 that that means that there is not__ that means that there is not potential Dr. Kanter potential 2857 16-18 And what I said there was there was a And what I said there was that there is a Mr. Filler disparate impact was implicit in disparate impact implicit in 2858 5 accounting for how you would __ with account for how you would deal with Mr. Filler 2858 9 an accounting for how youre an account for how youre Mr. Filler 2862 11 disproportionate health benefit disproportionate health burden Mr. Mair 2863 11 populations dependency populations dependency Mr. Mair 2872 18 can had Sherwin Turk 2902 6-8 what the deal is. And the census what the deal is and the census data Jerry Riggs data itself, what weve got is itself. What weve got is 2905 3-5 in t this is its a subdivision of in t this is its a subdivision of block Jerry Riggs block -- of group quarters. group data.
41 DB1/ 71548218.6
HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET Proceeding Name: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Generating Units 2 and 3)
Docket Nos.: 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No.: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Contention: NYS-37 Hearing Date(s): October 24, 2012 THE PARTIES PROPOSED CORRECTIONS:
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 2936 10 relative relevant Judge McDade 2941 1 outs outputs David Schlissel 2946 2 access excess David Schlissel 2947 10 effected affected David Schlissel 2951 5 produce reduce David Schlissel 2952 19 new nuclear David Schlissel 2963 3 I think there are little over 21oo I think there are little over 2100 David Schlissel megawatts megawatts 2972 2 ultimates alternatives David Schlissel 2977 13 they and Andrew Stuyvenberg 2977 13 serve served Andrew Stuyvenberg 2978 2 So it's not necessarily as efficient as So its not necessarily as efficient soley Andrew soley in terms in terms Stuyvenberg 2993 17 placement replacement Andrew Stuyvenberg 2988 7 being been Andrew Stuyvenberg 42 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 3000 3 the by Andrew Stuyvenberg 3010 2-3 been New York State's specific a New-York-State-specific Andrew determination determination Stuyvenberg 3014 8 Or either the no-action alternative For either the no-action alternative Judge Wardwell 3016 6 STUYVENBERG: SCHLISSEL:
3016 9 STUYVENBERG: SCHLISSEL:
3016 23-24 the references to the model the reference is to the model David Harrison 3017 18 would be replace the generation would be replace the generation David Harrison 3019 1 is has David Schlissel 3019 5 weight way David Schlissel 3019 23-24 the potential very expensive the potential of very expensive David Harrison environmental regulations environmental regulations 3020 14 under baseline conditions, under baseline conditions. David Harrison 3020 15 the baseline conditions The baseline conditions David Harrison 3020 19 the baseline conditions and then we the baseline conditions. And then David Harrison re-ran it. we re-ran it.
3025 9 editions additions David Harrison 3026 7 16.3 megawatt hours 16.3 million megawatt hours David Harrison 3026 9-11 that reflects these various market that reflects these various market David Harrison conditions and that we think in conditions. And we think, in terms terms of the analysis that was made of the analysis that was made, that that 3026 16-19 Well, we did look at what - we did Well, we did look at that. We did. David Harrison the model generates changes in The model generates changes in natural gas and coal, so the fossil natural gas and coal. So the fossil fuel was a - in the model run that fuel change was a mix in the model 43 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness we did, the difference was run that we did. The difference was 3030 22-23 143 megawatt hours 143 million megawatt hours Eugene Meehan 3030 23 2 megawatt hours 2 million megawatt hours Eugene Meehan 3032 17 145 million megawatt hours 141 million megawatt hours Eugene Meehan 3032 24 160,000 160 million Eugene Meehan 3033 2 2,000 2 million Eugene Meehan 3039 4 this thing eliminating Andrew Stuyvenberg 3044 9-11 as a way to are as a way to determine are Andrew Stuyvenberg 3044 12 way - Andrew Stuyvenberg 3044 13 alternatives alternatives Andrew Stuyvenberg 3046 22 820 8-20 Andrew Stuyvenberg 3047 25 825 8-25 Andrew Stuyvenberg 3049 17 if its Andrew Stuyvenberg 3050 7 there they Andrew Stuyvenberg 3057 25 These lines should be attributed to Judge Wardwell Judge Wardwell, not David Schlissel 3059 2 apologize apologies Andrew Stuyvenberg 44 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 3082 3 this was just conceptual so you can this was just conceptual. So you can David Harrison see that the red see that the red 3082 4 is negative in the change, so that is is negative in the change. So that is David Harrison the effect of the effect of 3082 16-17 we were looking not at - at Indian we were looking not at - at Indian David Harrison Point not being available Point not being available 3088 21 or the price elasticity of demand is the price elasticity of demand David Harrison 3095 8-10 And this actually - the reason that And this actually. The reason that David Harrison we needed the generation is then we needed and the generation is then we used - and the modeling also we used - and the modeling also generates estimates of generates - estimates of 3096 24 consequence consequence of no action Andrew Stuyvenberg 3100 6-7 This - by linear you mean it doesnt By linear you mean it doesnt have a David Harrison have a particular different slope particularly different slope 3101 3 this increasing marginal cost of as this increasing marginal cost of as David Harrison you you 3104 16 to they Andrew Stuyvenberg 3104 20 we present represent Andrew Stuyvenberg 3109 20 These lines should be attributed to Andrew Andrew Stuyvenberg, not David Stuyvenberg Schlissel 3111 3 staff Entergy Eugene Meehan 3111 12-13 14 million 141 million Eugene Meehan 3116 19 sheet rock for the Cricket Valley SEQR for the Cricket Valley Eugene Meehan 3116 20 I described is described Eugene Meehan 45 DB1/ 71548218.6
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness 3121 11 Yes, no, and what we were Yes, no. What we were David Harrison emphasizing the importance emphasizing is the importance 3125 17 energy efficiency renewables energy efficiency and renewables David Harrison 3128 4 16.3 megawatt hours 16.3 million megawatt hours David Harrison 3128 4-5 That Entergy, that Entergy goes, That energy, that energy goes, David Harrison 3132 20 it is Andrew Stuyvenberg 3135 13 would should Andrew Stuyvenberg 3135 15 that there Andrew Stuyvenberg 3136 16-19 These lines should be attributed to Beth Mizuno Beth Mizuno, not Andrew Stuyvenberg 3136 20-21 These lines should be attributed to Andrew Andrew Stuyvenberg, not Beth Stuyvenberg Mizuno 3136 22-24 These lines should be attributed to Beth Mizuno Beth Mizuno, not Andrew Stuyvenberg 3136 25 These lines should be attributed to Andrew Andrew Stuyvenberg, not Beth Stuyvenberg Mizuno 3141 24, 25 a loan alone David Schlissel 3155 2 disposition's dispositions Andrew Stuyvenberg 46 DB1/ 71548218.6