Similar Documents at Fermi |
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML16313A5162016-10-27027 October 2016 Comment (51) of Kenneth A. Westlake, on Behalf of United States Environmental Protection Agency, on Final Plant-Specific Supplement 56 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Fermi 2 Nuc ML16021A4362016-01-21021 January 2016 Comment (46) of Robert E. Wicke on Fermi, Unit 2 License Extension for 20 Years Operating ML16011A0132016-01-0606 January 2016 Comment (20) of Michael J Keegan Opposing License Renewal of Fermi 2 ML16011A0322016-01-0606 January 2016 Comment (39) of Ron Lankford on Fermi 2 License Renewal Application ML16011A0272016-01-0606 January 2016 Comment (34) of Anonymous Individual Opposing DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement to Extend for 20 Years ML16011A0342016-01-0606 January 2016 Comment (41) of Jeanne Micka on Fermi 2 License Extension Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML16011A0142016-01-0505 January 2016 Comment (21) of Kevin Kamps Opposing Fermi 2 License Renewal ML16011A0152016-01-0505 January 2016 Comment (22) of Michael J Keegan Opposing Fermi 2 License Renewal Application Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML16011A0112016-01-0404 January 2016 Comment (18) of Mark Muhich Regarding License Renewal for Fermi 2 ML16011A0122016-01-0404 January 2016 Comment (19) of Susan Michetti Opposing Fermi 2 License Renewal Extension ML16011A0092016-01-0404 January 2016 Comment (15) of Valincia Darby Regarding License Renewal of the DTE Energy Fermi 2 Power Plant Located in Frenchtown Township, Monroe County, Michigan ML16011A0362016-01-0404 January 2016 Comment (16) of Kathryn Barnes Opposing License Renewal of Fermi 2 ML16011A0102016-01-0404 January 2016 Comment (17) of Jessie Collins Opposing Fermi 2 License Renewal Application Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML16011A0082016-01-0101 January 2016 Comment (14) of Art Myatt Opposing the Construction of Fermi 3 and the Relicensing of Fermi 2 for the 2025-2045 Timeframe ML16007A0052015-12-31031 December 2015 Comment (9) of Sandra M. Pierce on Behalf of the Monroe Center for Healthy Aging Supporting DTE Energy'S Request for License Renewal of Fermi, Unit 2 ML16011A0292015-12-28028 December 2015 Comment (36) of Barbara Loe on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML16011A0302015-12-28028 December 2015 Comment (37) of David Schonberger on Behalf of Alliance to Halt Fermi 3 on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML16007A0092015-12-28028 December 2015 Comment (13) of Jessie P. Collins on Behalf of Citizens Resistance at Fermi Two (Craft) Opposing NRC Recommendation to Extend the Fermi, Unit 2, Reactor License for an Additional 20 Years ML16011A0282015-12-27027 December 2015 Comment (35) of Pam Barker on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML16011A0212015-12-20020 December 2015 Comment (28) of Gerald Lee Opposing DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Extension for 20 Years ML16011A0252015-12-20020 December 2015 Comment (32) of Mary Ann Baier on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML16011A0192015-12-20020 December 2015 Comment (26) of Martina Barnard on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML16011A0262015-12-20020 December 2015 Comment (33) of Anonymous Individual on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML16011A0242015-12-20020 December 2015 Comment (31) of Anonymous Individual Opposing DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Extension for 20 Years ML16011A0202015-12-20020 December 2015 Comment (27) of Sarah Flum Opposing DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML16011A0232015-12-20020 December 2015 Comment (30) of Michael Hormel Opposing DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Extension for 20 Years ML16011A0222015-12-20020 December 2015 Comment (29) of Sue Riopelle Opposing DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement Extension for 20 Years ML16011A0182015-12-20020 December 2015 Comment (25) of Timothy Schacht on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML16011A0162015-12-20020 December 2015 Comment (23) of Ralph Tuscher on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML16011A0172015-12-20020 December 2015 Comment (24) of Gerald Vande Velde on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement ML16004A1452015-12-19019 December 2015 Comment (8) of Carolyn Doherty Opposing the Extension of Fermi, Unit 2 to 20 Years ML15356A3682015-12-15015 December 2015 Comment (7) of Vito A. Kaminskas on Behalf of DTE Energy Company on Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants Supplement 56 Regarding Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML16029A0742015-12-0707 December 2015 Comment (48) of Scott Hicks on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Fermi 2 and Request for Concurrence Under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act ML16011A0332015-12-0202 December 2015 Comment (40) of Richard G. Micka on Fermi 2 License Extension Draff EIS ML16011A0352015-12-0202 December 2015 Comment (42) of Kathleen Russeau on Behalf of Community Foundation of Monroe County Supporting the Fermi 2 License Extension Renewal Effort ML15343A4202015-12-0202 December 2015 Comment (3) of Martha Gruelle on DTE Electric Company; Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant; Issuance of Draft Environmental Impact Statement NRC-15-0100, Comment (10) of Craig A. Haugen on Behalf of Jefferson Schools Supporting DTE Electric Company'S Application for a 20-Year Extension of Fermi 22015-11-30030 November 2015 Comment (10) of Craig A. Haugen on Behalf of Jefferson Schools Supporting DTE Electric Company'S Application for a 20-Year Extension of Fermi 2 ML15356A3712015-11-30030 November 2015 Comment (6) of Jim Mcdevitt on Behalf of Frenchtown Charter Township on Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants Supplement 56 Regarding Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant ML15343A0142015-11-30030 November 2015 Comment (4) of Floreine Mentel Supporting DTE Electric Company'S Application for a 20-Year Extension of the Operating License for Enrico, Fermi, Unit 2 ML15345A4392015-11-30030 November 2015 Comment (5) of Jerome D. Sobczak on Behalf of DTE Energy Shareholders United on DTE Electric Company'S Application for a 20-Year Extension of the Operating License for Enrico Fermi Unit 2 ML16007A0062015-11-30030 November 2015 Comment (10) of Craig A. Haugen on Behalf of Jefferson Schools Supporting DTE Electric Company'S Application for a 20-Year Extension of Fermi 2 ML16020A3372015-11-24024 November 2015 Comment (44) of J. Henry Lievens on Behalf of Monroe County, Mi, Board of Commissioners for DTE Electric Company'S Application for 20 Year Extension of Operating License for Enrico Fermi, Unit 2 ML16011A0312015-11-18018 November 2015 Comment (38) of Michelle S. Dugan on Behalf of the Monroe County Chamber of Commerce Supporting the Fermi 2 License Renewal Application ML15329A3032015-11-0606 November 2015 Comment (1) of Stephen J. Mcnew on Behalf of the Monroe County Intermediate School District, Supporting the DTE Energy Fermi 2 License Renewal Application ML14252A1392014-08-29029 August 2014 Comment (12) of Jessie Pauline Collins Opposing Enrico Fermi Unit 2 License Extension Application ML14252A1772014-08-29029 August 2014 Comment(00023) of Robert Simpson on DTE Electric Co., Fermi 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML14252A1862014-08-29029 August 2014 Comment (00026) of Mark Farris on DTE Electric Co., Fermi, Unit 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML14252A1782014-08-29029 August 2014 Comment (24) of David Schonberger Opposing 20-year Extension of the Operating License for Enrico Fermi Unit 2 ML14252A1762014-08-29029 August 2014 Comment (00022) of Carol Izant on DTE Electric Co., Fermi, Unit 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML14252A1382014-08-29029 August 2014 Comment (11) of Michael J. Keegan on Behalf of Don'T Waste Michigan on Fermi 2 Docket Id NRC-2014-0109 License Renewal Application 2016-10-27
[Table view] |
Text
~United States Department of the Interior.~~FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE East Lansing Field Office (ES) gLi 2651 Coolidge Road, Suite 101 'IN REPLY REFER TO: East Lansing, Michigan 43823-6316 vL ER 15-0627 December 7, 2015 " David J. Wrona, Chief' ..... ,, ..United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission...i
,.,, i-., Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch..............
..."::;".. ... ..Division of License Renewal -i .....Office of New Reactor Regulation i']':: Washington, D.C. 20555-0001
".........
Re: Submittal of'Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Fermi 2 and request for concurrence under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act.
Dear Mr. Wrona:
- We are responding to your October 28, 2015 letter and Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the proposed license renewal for the Fermi 2 power plant. Fermi 2 is a single-unit, nuclear-powered, steam-electric generating facility that began commercial operation in July 1985 and has a current license that expires in March 2025. Renewing the license will allow Fermi 2 to operate until March 2045. The Fermi site is located on approximately 1,260 acres along the western shore of Lake Erie, Frenchtown Township, Monroe County, Michigan and is owned and operated by Detroit Edison (DTE).Fermi 1 is non-operational and will be decommissioned; Fermi 3 has been proposed.You have requested our comments on the Draft SF1S and concurrence pursuant section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ES A) in regards to your determination of the effects of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission' s (NR.C) relicensing of Fer-mi 2. You have submitted the SEIS in fulfillment of your obligation to prepare a biological assessment of the proposed action on federally-listed species that may be within the project area and are submitting a copy for our review.Of the nine federally listed-species which may occur within the project area, you have determined "no effect" on four species, based on habitat. They are the Kamer blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis);
Northern riffleshell (Epioblasma torulosa rangiana);
Snuffbox mussel (Epioblasm triquetra);
and Rayed bean (T/illosa fabalis).
We agree with-this determination, although our concurrence on your determination of no effect is not required.You have determined that license renewal of Fermi 2 may affect but is not likely to adversely affect the remaining five species; Red knot (Calidris cariutus);
Piping plover (Charadrius melodus);
Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis);
Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis);
and Eastern fringed prairie orchid (Platanthera leucophaea).
We concur with your deternination for the following reasons: s' No new construction or other ground-disturbing activities, changes in operations,, or changes in existing land use conditions in natural areas are anticipated because of license renewal.SUNSI Review Complete S Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 S Add= E'. (e_.a /U
- Continued maintenance and repair activities will be limited to previously disturbed areas of the Fermi site.As such, any effects of the, action are insignificant and/or discountable.
In~regards to the Draft SEIS, this office has no further comments.This precludes the need to for further action on the proposed Fermni 2 license renewal as required by the ESA. However, if the project is modified or new information about the project becomes available that* indicates listed or proposed species may be present and/or affected, consultation with the Service should be reinitiated.
We further advise that should any species occurring in the project area become federally-listed or proposed, the licensee should reevaluate its responsibilities pursuant ESA. Since tbreatened and endangered species data is continually updated, we suggest the licensee annually request an updated federal-list of the species occurring in the project area.Questions regarding our resource protection recommendations should be directed to Mr. Burr Fisher at 517/351-8286 or burr_fisher@fws.gov.
Sincerely,' Scott Hicks , Field Supervisor
~United States Department of the Interior.~~FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE East Lansing Field Office (ES) gLi 2651 Coolidge Road, Suite 101 'IN REPLY REFER TO: East Lansing, Michigan 43823-6316 vL ER 15-0627 December 7, 2015 " David J. Wrona, Chief' ..... ,, ..United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission...i
,.,, i-., Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch..............
..."::;".. ... ..Division of License Renewal -i .....Office of New Reactor Regulation i']':: Washington, D.C. 20555-0001
".........
Re: Submittal of'Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Fermi 2 and request for concurrence under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act.
Dear Mr. Wrona:
- We are responding to your October 28, 2015 letter and Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the proposed license renewal for the Fermi 2 power plant. Fermi 2 is a single-unit, nuclear-powered, steam-electric generating facility that began commercial operation in July 1985 and has a current license that expires in March 2025. Renewing the license will allow Fermi 2 to operate until March 2045. The Fermi site is located on approximately 1,260 acres along the western shore of Lake Erie, Frenchtown Township, Monroe County, Michigan and is owned and operated by Detroit Edison (DTE).Fermi 1 is non-operational and will be decommissioned; Fermi 3 has been proposed.You have requested our comments on the Draft SF1S and concurrence pursuant section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ES A) in regards to your determination of the effects of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission' s (NR.C) relicensing of Fer-mi 2. You have submitted the SEIS in fulfillment of your obligation to prepare a biological assessment of the proposed action on federally-listed species that may be within the project area and are submitting a copy for our review.Of the nine federally listed-species which may occur within the project area, you have determined "no effect" on four species, based on habitat. They are the Kamer blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis);
Northern riffleshell (Epioblasma torulosa rangiana);
Snuffbox mussel (Epioblasm triquetra);
and Rayed bean (T/illosa fabalis).
We agree with-this determination, although our concurrence on your determination of no effect is not required.You have determined that license renewal of Fermi 2 may affect but is not likely to adversely affect the remaining five species; Red knot (Calidris cariutus);
Piping plover (Charadrius melodus);
Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis);
Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis);
and Eastern fringed prairie orchid (Platanthera leucophaea).
We concur with your deternination for the following reasons: s' No new construction or other ground-disturbing activities, changes in operations,, or changes in existing land use conditions in natural areas are anticipated because of license renewal.SUNSI Review Complete S Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 S Add= E'. (e_.a /U
- Continued maintenance and repair activities will be limited to previously disturbed areas of the Fermi site.As such, any effects of the, action are insignificant and/or discountable.
In~regards to the Draft SEIS, this office has no further comments.This precludes the need to for further action on the proposed Fermni 2 license renewal as required by the ESA. However, if the project is modified or new information about the project becomes available that* indicates listed or proposed species may be present and/or affected, consultation with the Service should be reinitiated.
We further advise that should any species occurring in the project area become federally-listed or proposed, the licensee should reevaluate its responsibilities pursuant ESA. Since tbreatened and endangered species data is continually updated, we suggest the licensee annually request an updated federal-list of the species occurring in the project area.Questions regarding our resource protection recommendations should be directed to Mr. Burr Fisher at 517/351-8286 or burr_fisher@fws.gov.
Sincerely,' Scott Hicks , Field Supervisor