ML13232A129

From kanterella
Revision as of 12:23, 4 July 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1, Pilgrim Station Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment J, Page J78 of J134 Through End
ML13232A129
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 06/17/2013
From: Maclay L
Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
2.13.056 PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev 1
Download: ML13232A129 (84)
v • d • e


Text

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J78 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 5Status: YE NEI U-IIISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 014Equipment ID No. 19-HO-179 Equip. Class, Other (0)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drainsLocation:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 23' Room, Area DrywellManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO NZ2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YOI NEý UO NIAZYOl NO] UL N/AZYOl NE] UOE N/AZIEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J79 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YE NF--] Ur--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 014Equipment ID No. 19-HO-179 Equip. Class2 Other (0)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NDI U-- N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NI-] UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Robust manual valve.YrI NEI uiD N/AO8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YM ND uD N/AD:]Y[-] NDI UD- N/A[YM Nn UD2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J80 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YE NF-I U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 014Equipment ID No. 19-HO-179 Equip. Class3 Other (0)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drainsOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ Nil U[Iadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is AWC-36Evaluated by: bAV ,62 A,1'YDate:-SEFF r-LBqu"::*': .14?31L3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J81 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YZ N[-- UL--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 014Equipment ID No. 19-HO-179 Equip. Class4 Other (0)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drainsPhotographs Note:Note:4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J82 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YE Nr-] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 014Equipment ID No. 19-HO-179 Equip. Classw Other (0)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drainsI4 UtLW.Note:5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J83 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 5Status: YO NF-- U-ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 015Equipment ID No. pool cavity gates Equip. Class, Other (0)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drainsLocation:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 117 Room, Area RefuelFloor Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Wide Gate, Dwq MIM1 12-2Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YI- NN2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y-I Nil U[-] N/ANYE] N] Ur-] N/A ]Y[-] N[-] UP-] N/AZI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J84 of J 134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YZ NEI UL-1Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 015Equipment ID No. pool cavity gates Equip. Class2 Other (0)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YOI NI UFI N/AN(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NO Ur-1potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Lamps well supported on rigid conduits.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YOI NO U[- N/A[YZ NEI UIU N/A--Y-- NEI UD- N/AEY[ NEI Ur2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J85 of J134ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YN! NFI- UI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 015Equipment ID No. pool cavity gates Equip. Class3 Other (0)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drainsOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI- UMIadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Gate inspected while removed for refueling.

It was hanging on the East wall of the SFP, North of thecattle chute opening.Area walk-by is A WC-38Evaluated by: -Date:A(,I J,ý"/ J.'-AI"EPF VA'%~sDate~: __ __ _3 _I3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J86 of J 134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YZ N--] U--iSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 015Equipment ID No. pool cavity gates Equip. Class4 Other (0)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drainsPhotographs 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J87 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YE NR UEDSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 015Equipment ID No. pool cavity gates Equip. Class5 Other (0)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drainsNote: Note:5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J88 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: YE NLI-- U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 016Equipment ID No. pool cavity gates Equip. Class, Other (0)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drainsLocation:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 117' Room, Area Refuel FloorManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Narrow Gate, Dwc MIM112-2Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[:I NO2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y[-] NE] U[-J N/AEYE] NEil uiJ N/AEYE-] NE-] uEr] N/AN1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J89 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YE NE] UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 016Equipment ID No. gool cavity gates Equip. Class2 Other (0)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drains5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[I NE] UE] N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEi UE]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Lamps well supported on rigid conduits9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[:] NEi UE] N/AMYO NE]I UE N/AE]YEI NE] UE] N/AEY[ NE] UEi2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J90 of J134ATRACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YZ NFI] U-ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 016Equipment ID No. pool cavity gates Equip. Class3 Other (0)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drainsOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Gate inspected while removed for refueling.

It was hanging on the east wall of the SFP on the southside of the cattle chute opening.Area walk-by is A WC-38.Eva~uated 10it De lSM-1fV. kALDate:DAM1 4-/Z~4,1V3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J91 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YO Nni- UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 016Equipment ID No. pool cavity -gates Equip. Class4 Other (0)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drainsPhotographs 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J92 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YZ Nr--] UI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 016Equipment ID No. pool cavity gates Equip. Classs Other (0)Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pool and cavity drainsNote: Note:5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J93 of J 134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: YZ N--I U-ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 083Equipment ID No. X55 Equip. Class, Transformers (04)Equipment Description Transformer to Y3/Y31Location:

Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SETManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Refer to response to question

  1. 5.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Y-I NZY; Nn U- N/A[DYZ Nn U-- N/AD-Y] Nn UD N/A-I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J94 of J 134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YE NFIl U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 083Equipment ID No. X55 Equip. Class Transformers (04)Equipment Description Transformer to Y3/Y315. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Yr] NE-] U-] N/AE(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Note: The transformer and its anchorage are different from what isshown in drawing E15A-8, Rev. EO. This is due to the replacement ofthe transformer per EC 0000016677, Rev. 0.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEl UL-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

The Unistrut supporting conduits X1200 and A 3025 above X55 has twoanchors with nuts that are not fully engaged.

The engagement isgreater than 75% in both cases, and this is judged to be adequate todevelop the full strength of the anchor. Therefore, this is not considered a potential seismic interaction.

See attached photo.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified.

See Drawing C-961 SHI,Rev. El.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE ND UL- N/AD]YE NI-- Ur-] N/AD-YE N[:] Uil N/A[-]YE N[-- Uil Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J95 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YN Nn- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 083Equipment ID No. X55 Equip. Class Transformers (04)Equipment Description Transformer to Y3/Y31Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments

.(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL 1-083 is on A WC-0 17.Follow up internal inspection performed on 4-29-13.

All internal fasteners in place and appear tight.No loose or missing items observed.

No adverse seismic interactions observed.

Evaluaed by-.: W wj D",40) 6t, ivW. s'Jeff Kalb &a (Date: 3bqmJiV II PNote: This follow-up internal inspection was performed during PNPS Refueling Outage 19. AnEntergy shared resource, David Grimes from Vermont Yankee, performed duties of one SWEteam member. Mr. Grimes SWE credentials were verified by review of Vermont Yankee'sPhase 1 submittal report VY-RPT-12-00019 Rev.0 (Asset Suite EC40647)

Pages 9 and H8.Mr. Grimes' current Entergy qualification as Seismic Walkdown Engineer was also verified viathe Entergy Plateau qualification system as part of the pre-job brief for this walkdown.

EN-DC-168 REV 0 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J96 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YZ NF-] UrSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 083Equipment ID No. X55 Equip. Class Transformers (04)Equipment Description Transformer to Y3/Y31Photographs Note: Equipment tagVAULW. t-JVCPICIII VICPVV U1 MJUIIJ111VIII Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J97 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YZ NEI UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 083Equipment ID No. X55 Equip. Class Transformers (04)Equipment Description Transformer to Y3/Y31Note: Nut on Unistrut that is not fully engaged.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J98 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 6Status: YE N-i Ur--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084Equipment ID No. X56 Equip. Class' Transformers (04)Equipment Description Transformer to Y4/Y41Location:

Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area CSRManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings, Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YZ NO2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YZ NI U[-I N/ARYZ N[D] U-l N/ADY] Nil U[-] N/A--IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J99 of J 134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 6Status: YZ NE] UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084Equipment ID No. X56 Equip. Class Transformers (04)Equipment Description Transformer to Y4/Y415. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NEI UE] N/AE7(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchor configuration matches drawings E15A3 E2, E15A-8 EO,E15A-7 and the SEWs package, detail 3/3. Two additional bolts werenoted for the connection of the panel to the channel.

The design incalculation C15.0.3059 specifies 3/16" fillet welds, which also exists atthe connection, therefore, the bolts are extra and the configuration isacceptable.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Unistrut supporting conduit was noted to be within an inch of the top ofthe cabinet.

This is acceptable based on minimal vertical displacement of the cabinet during a seismic event. Panel is also touching thecolumn! wall on the right side. This is acceptable, as the cabinet doesnot contain essential relays and is therefore not prone to chatter.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NE]I UM N/AE]YE NE] U[-E N/AE--YN NEI UE- N/AE]YM NEI UE]

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J100 of J134ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 6Status: YE Nnl UrISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084Equipment ID No. X56 Equip. Class Transformers (04)Equipment Description Transformer to Y4/Y41Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NI-] Ur-Iadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk-by is AWC-018.Follow-up internal visual inspection performed on 4/18/13.

Maintenance of the transformer was inprogress at the time of inspection (W0296640).

Four cables were intentionally de-terminated atthis time, refer to photo below.All fasteners were in place with no signs of any being loose.No loose or missing items were identified.

No potentially adverse seismic interactions were identified.

Q~ 1191Evaluatedi by: QSWUaILwDate: i J 3.JeW Kalb Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J101 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 6Status: YE NIIJ U[ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084Equipment ID No. X56 Equip. Class Transformers (04)Equipment Description Transformer to Y4/Y41Photographs Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J102 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 6Status: YM NFI- U[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084Equipment ID No. X56 Equip. Class Transformers (04)Equipment Description Transformer to Y4/Y41Note: Cabinet anchorage Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J103 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 6 of 6Status: YZ Nr--] Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084Equipment ID No. X56 Equip. Class Transformers (04)Equipment Description Transformer to Y4/Y41*or Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J104 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 5Status: YN ND- UD-1Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095Equipment ID No. EPA1 Equip. Class, Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyLocation:

Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SETManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YM Ni-I2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YE ND- U[-1 N/AD-1Y] N[D U[-I N/AD-YE Nn Ur N/AEDII Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J105 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YZ N-- UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095Equipment ID No. EPA I Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection Assembly5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ ND] ULi N/ADl(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See SEWS package for EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ ND-- UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Panel D-7 is mounted above EPA I with its cover latch facing the floor,and was examined for an interaction involving the cover comingunlatched over EPA 1 during a seismic event. The cover appears to beadequately latched and the panel securely

anchored, and does notpresent a seismic interaction concern.

See attached photo.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified.

See Drawing C-961 SHI,Rev. El.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?There is a short, rigid conduit running between EPA 1 and EPA2, aswell as a conduit running from EPA I that is in close proximity to EPA2.Both panels and the conduit are all anchored to the same wall, so thisis not judged to be a seismic interaction hazard. See SEWS packagefor EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94, for further confirmation.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ ND: UD-] N/AD--YE ND- uD- N/AD-YE ND-- uD- N/AD-YE Nr-- Ur-Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J106 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YE Nil U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095Equipment ID No. EPA 1 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyOther Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI- UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWELl-095 is on AWC-017.Follow-up internal visual inspection of panel performed on 12/12/12:

-All internal fasteners in place and appear tight-No adverse conditions observedA loose label for 194.502A-005-10 was found on top of EPA 1. This was reported to Operations and anESOMS request was initiated.

~.il ~ruEvaluated bvDate: i=/=/,*o-kLLjV r I jI t 02 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J107 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YN NE-I UII-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095Equipment ID No. EPA I Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyPhotographs Note: Equipment tagNote: Overall view of panel Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J108 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YZ NF-M Ur--]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 095Equipment ID No. EPA1 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyNote: Cabinet internals Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J109 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 5Status: YZ ND-- UDSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096Equipment ID No. EPA2 Equip. Class, Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyLocation:

Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SETManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YZ N[D2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YN ND U[i] N/Al]Y; ND Ur- N/AD--YM ND UD N/AD-1' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J 110 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YZ ND1 UD-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096Equipment ID No. EPA2 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection Assembly5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YO ND] U[i N/AD-I(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See SEWS package for EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ ND-] UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified.

See Drawing C-961 SHI,Rev. El.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?There is a short, rigid conduit running between EPA 1 and EPA2, aswell as a conduit running from EPA 1 that is in close proximity to EPA2.Conduit B081 is also in close proximity to EPA2, approx. 1.5" away.The panels and the conduits are all anchored to the same wall, so thisis not judged to be a seismic interaction hazard. See SEWS packagefor EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94, for further confirmation.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NDI UD- N/AD--Y[ NDI UD- N/AD-Y[ ND UD-- N/AD-YE ND UD Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J 11 of J1 34ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YE NEI ULISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096Equipment ID No. EPA2 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyOther Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[:] ULIadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments

.(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWEL 1-096 is on A WC-017.Follow-up internal inspection of panel performed on 12/12/12:

-All internal fasteners appear to be in place and tight.-Small debris found in bottom comer of cabinet and removed by electrician

((1) screw, (2) nuts andmetal shavings)

-No adverse conditions observedEvaluated by:2311 ~LJ/Date: t ,, 4_I2j1z1J?I " j Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J112 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YE NFIl ULISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096Equipment ID No. EPA2 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyPhotographs Note: Equipment tagNote: Overall view of equipment Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J113 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YZ NEI U[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 096Equipment ID No. EPA2 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyPhotographs Note: Cabinet internals Note: Cabinet internals on door Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J114 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 6Status: YZ Nr-] UL-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097Equipment ID No. EPA3 Equip. Class, Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyLocation:

Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SETManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ Nr-2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YZ NE] U[-] N/AF-YO NE] U[-- N/AYZ NEi Ui N/AD--I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J115 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 6Status: YE ND- U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097Equipment ID No. EPA3 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection Assembly5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ N[-] Ur-- N/Ar-D(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See SEWS package for EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE N[-] UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

A small fraction of the lower washers and anchor bolts come belowthe tab. The amount is insignificant, and the bolts are judged tosecurely anchor the panel to the wall, so this is not considered anadverse condition.

See attached photo.Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified.

See Drawing C-961 SH 1,Rev. El.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?There is a short, rigid conduit running between EPA3 and EPA4, aswell as a conduit running from EPA3 that is in close proximity to EPA4.Both panels and the conduit are all anchored to the same wall, so thisis not judged to be a seismic interaction hazard. See SEWS packagefor EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94, for further confirmation.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN ND U[D- N/AD:]YE ND-] uD-I N/AD-YZ NDI UD-1 N/AD--Y] NDI UDl Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J116 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 6Status: YE NFIl UFI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097Equipment ID No. EPA3 Equip. Class Instrumentation and-Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyOther Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[-I U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWELI-097 is on AWC-017.Follow-up internal inspection of panel performed on 1/9/13:-No loose or missing fasteners observed-No other adverse conditions observedEvaluated by: ),X4j .I IDate:bNTv .1 /)0)13T-C-Ff- ý,ýLB SU k&

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J117 of J134A'TACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 6Status: YE N I Ur-LSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097Equipment ID No. EPA3 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyPhotographs Note: Equipment tagNote: Overall view of panel Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J118 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 6Status: YN ND UFIuSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097Equipment ID No. EPA3 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyNote: Typical anchor bolt on bottom of panel.num. lyplucll allullut UUil U11 1UP Ui Pallut.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J119 of J134ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 6 of 6Status: YE ND-- Ur-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 097Equipment ID No. EPA3 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyNote: Cabinet intemalsNote: Cabinet intemals Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J120 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet I of 5Status: YE NF UDSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 098Equipment ID No. EPA4 Equip. Class, Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyLocation:

Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SETManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ NrI-2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?YZ NEI [--] N/AE]Y[ NR UDl N/AD-YZ N-- UI- N/ADI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J121 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YE Nn U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 098Equipment ID No. EPA4 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection Assembly5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YO NiD UrI N/AFD(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See SEWS package for EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UI--potentially adverse seismic conditions?

A small fraction of the lower washers and anchor bolts come belowthe tab. The amount is insignificant, and the bolts are judged tosecurely anchor the panel to the wall, so this is not considered anadverse condition.

See attached photo.Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified.

See Drawing C-961 SHI,Rev. El.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?There is a short, rigid conduit running between EPA3 and EPA4, aswell as a conduit running from EPA3 that is in close proximity to EPA4.Both panels and the conduit are all anchored to the same wall, so thisis not judged to be a seismic interaction hazard. See SEWS packagefor EPA 1-6, dated 8/4/94, for further confirmation.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ ND-- U[I N/AD-YE NEI U-- N/Ai-Y[ ND-] UD- N/ADY[ NDI U[--

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J122 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YZ NFIl UI--]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 098Equipment ID No. EPA4 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y] NEIl UFadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWELI-098 is on AWC-017.Follow-up internal inspection performed on 1/9/13:-Observed one missing screw on upper left comer of circuit board at back of panel. Circuit board hasvery low weight/mass and was adequately supported by the remaining 5 screws. Not a seismicinteraction hazard. Screw was replaced by ELAB mechanic that provided access to the panel.-No other loose or missing fasteners or adverse conditions observed.

Evaluated by: Dayj0,) )-rIDate:Sf r- r- kIii LKia LIA-t>W~AF k!*Lr~ Ar~ 1/10/13 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J123 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YZ NFI- UFiSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 098Equipment ID No. EPA4 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyPhotographs Note: Equipment tagNote: Overall view of panel showinganchorage Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J124 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YE ND-- UF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 098Equipment ID No. EPA4 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Eauibment Description RPS Elec Protection AssembilNote: Typical anchor bolt on bottom of panel.Note: Cabinet internals Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J125 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 5Status: YN ND-- UI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 099Equipment ID No. EPA5 Equip. Class, Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyLocation:

Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SETManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Due to location on the wall, only two of four anchors are visible,therefore, this component was not chosen for 50% anchorage verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Two of four anchors are visible.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

Two of four anchors are visible.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?Two of four anchors are visible.Y[-] NEYE ND- UD-1 N/AD-YE N[D] U[] N/ADýYE N[l lD-- N/AD-1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J126 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: Y[ NEI UF--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 099Equipment ID No. EPA5 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection Assembly5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Yrll N[-] UrI N/AN(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to response to question

  1. 1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM NEI UIpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified.

See Drawing C-961 SHI,Rev. El.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?There is a short, rigid conduit running between EPA5 and EPA6. Bothpanels are anchored to the same wall, so this is not judged to be aseismic interaction hazard. See SEWS package for EPA 1-6, dated8/4/94, for further confirmation.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Nil ur-] N/A[-IYE ND urEI N/ADYE NEI Ur1 N/A[-YE NDI U[I N/

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J127 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YE NF] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 099Equipment ID No. EPA5 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NEil UiFadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments

.(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWELl-099 is on AWC-017.Follow-up internal inspection performed on 4/2/13:-All fasteners in place and appear tight-No loose items observed in panel-No debris in bottom of panelEvaluated by: JA JJDate: t -- /

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J128 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YE Nr-] UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 099Equipment ID No. EPA5 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyPhotographs Note: Equipment tagNote: EPA5 is on the right Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J129 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YM NF] U-ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 099Equipment ID No. EPA5 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyPhotographs Note: Cabinet internals Note: Cabinet intemals on door Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J130 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 1 of 5Status: YZ ND I U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 100Equipment ID No. EPA6 Equip. Class, Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyLocation:

Bldg. RW Floor El. 23 Room, Area MG SETManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Due to location on the wall, only two of four anchors are visible,therefore, this component was not chosen for 50% anchorage verification.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Two of four anchors are visible.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

Two of four anchors are visible.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?There is a surface crack (<1/16')

near the bottom left anchor that isjudged to be insignificant.

Y- NEYO NEI] UI'- N/AD-YE NDI ULI N/ADYN ND-- U-- N/AD--' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J131 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 2 of 5Status: YZ NF- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 100Equipment ID No. EPA6 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection Assembly5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE] NEI Ui- N/AZ(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whichan anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Refer to response to question

  1. 1.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NE] UE]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Masonry wall 194.20 is seismically qualified.

See Drawing C-961 SHI,Rev. El.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?There is a short, rigid conduit running between EPA5 and EPA6. Bothpanels are anchored to the same wall, so this is not judged to be aseismic interaction hazard. See SEWS package for EPA 1-6, dated8/4/94, for further confirmation.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YM NE] UE] N/AD-YE NEI UE] N/AE]YN NEI U[] N/A[-]Y[ NEI UF--

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J132 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 3 of 5Status: YZ N[R UR]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 100Equipment ID No. EPA6 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[] U-Iadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWELl-100 is on AWC-017.Follow up internal inspection performed on 4/2/13:-All fasteners in place and appear tight-No potential adverse seismic interactions observed-One small screw and two small washers found in the bottom of the panel. They did not appear tohave fallen off, most likely left over from previous maintenance.

These items were removed byelectrical maintenance escort.Evaluated by: D6aVu)',n

,,L) LDate: L -j- aF VLRQk&t Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J133 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 4 of 5Status: YZ NEil Ui--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 100Equipment ID No. EPA6 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyPhotographs Note: Equipment tagNote: EPA6 is on the /eft.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment JPage J134 of J134ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORMSheet 5 of 5Status: YE NF U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 100Equipment ID No. EPA6 Equip. Class Instrumentation and Control Panels (20)Equipment Description RPS Elec Protection AssemblyPhotographs Note: Cabinet internals Note:

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K1 of K27Attachment KForm 9.7: Deferred Area Walk-By Checklists (AWCs)

~1Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K2 of K27ATrACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5Status: YZ NI Ui-]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 033Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 74' Room, Area, General Area NorthSWEL Components:

SWEL2-11, SWEL2-12Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofsignificant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Y[ NDI Ur-] N/AD1YO NEI U[:] N/AD-Y[ N[-] UD1 N/AD--I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

Thisselected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K3 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5Status: YO NR- UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 033Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 74' Room, Area General Area North4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE Ni[] U-- N/A--spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tilesand lighting)?

Fluorescent light fixture overhead east of HO-1 72 and 173 supportchains offset by conduit.

Conduit is well supported between the twochains. Load to conduit is small and acceptable.

Conduit R931 to 19-FS-4806 (FS is non-safety related per Q-list and Asset Suite) fuel poolgate leak detector.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage ofportable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, leadshielding)?

Numerous items located east of hoistway but all have wheels locked/chocked or adequate standoff distance from equipment YE NF- U-I N/ADYE ND] Ur- N/AFDYE NFI Ur- N/AD-Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K4 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5Status: YE NF] uF]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 033Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 74 Room, Area General Area North8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE] U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Radiation shielding above and west of HO- 173 appears well attachedand well labeled, acceptable.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Some minor cracking observed in joints of masonry wall at southwest comer of hoistwayapproximately 12'-14' up, on the east face of the wall. CR-PNP-2013-1204 initiated, but this wasdetermined by the SWE team to not represent an adverse seismic condition based on the location andlimited extent of cracking.

    • Note that this area is bounded by the Snubber Cage on the west side-did not do walk-by of snubbershop area because it is separated from the General Area by robust chain link cage. (see photo below)Evaluated by: Date: 2/27/12ter e _2_z_7/_1 Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K5 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5Status: Y9 NF Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 033Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 74 Room, Area General Area NorthSWEL Components:

SWEL2-11, SWEL2-12Photographs Note: Cracking, CR initiated, refer tocomments aboveNote: Overall view of area Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K6 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5Status: YE N-- Ui-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 033Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 74 Room, Area General Area NorthSWEL Components:

SWEL2-11.

SWEL2-12Note:Note: Fluorescent light chain offset byconduit, acceptable, see #4 above.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K7 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5Status: YZ NR U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 034Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 74' Room, Areal SFPHxSWEL Components:

SWEL2-03.

04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 13Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofsignificant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Y[ N[l UEiD N/AD--Y[ NDl U[-I N/A[:]YE NDI u[-] N/AD--' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

Thisselected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K8 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5Status: ND- UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 034Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 74' Room, Area SFPHx4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicspatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tilesand lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Fire protection line all socket welded and well supported.

1" copper drain water line on south wall well supported.

YE ND-] Ur-- N/A[-YZ NEI UD- N/AD-6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage ofportable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, leadshielding)?

YN NDI UD1 N/AD-Y[ NDJ UD N/ADl Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K9 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5Status: YZ NiL ULI--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 034Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 74 Room, Area SFPHx8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

-CR-PNP-2013-1195 initiated for loose nut on hanger P210A discharge.

Bolt is in place, nut is 75%engaged.

This condition was determined by SWE team to not represent an adverse seismicinteraction/concern.

-Jam nut on a pipe clamp below 19-HO-186 is approximately 50% engagement but tight, the clamp isnot connected to anything (see photo below)-Rolling portable stair near 19-HO-165 is free to roll but not near safety related equipment and has arelatively low weight!mass, therefore acceptable.

-Conduit R1072 pull fitting cover only one bolt hanging open. There are no wires in the conduit,therefore conduit is secure and acceptable with one bolt.-Panel A-10 has only one screw holding the cover on, but is acceptable (see photo below)-CR-PNP-2013-1201 initiated for rod hanger for 1" copper demin. line detached at clamp at top of rod,above! north of 19-HO- 166. The next support is approximately 3' downstream, 7' upstream.

Thiscondition was determined by SWE team to not represent an adverse seismic interaction/concern.

-CR-PNP-2013-1205 initiated for 1" copper instrument air line sagging approximately 6" near valve 31-HO-255 in overhead above mesh entry door to room. This condition was determined by SWE team tonot represent an adverse seismic interaction/concern.

(see photos below)Evaluated by: __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date: ,Zj-.DAIL, "

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K10 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5Status: YE NLi-- ULI---Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 034Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 74 Room, Area SFPHxSWEL Components:

SWEL2-03.

04. 05. 06. 07. 08. 13Photographs Note: uverall areaNote: CR initiated for clamp Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage Kll of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5Status: YE NRI- UD-7Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 034Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 74 Room, Area SFPHxSWEL Components:

SWEL2-03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 13Note: A-IC panel with one bolt holding coverNote: Airline sagging Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K12 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 3Status: YZ NF U[-IArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 035Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 23' Room, Area, Main Steam TunnelSWEL Components:

SWEL1-001.

002, 003, 004Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofsignificant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YZ ND U- N/ADY[ ND U[ N/A[D]YZ ND ulI N/ADI If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

Thisselected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K13 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 3Status: YZ NF ULIIArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 035Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area Main Steam Tunnel4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicspatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tilesand lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Fire protection line all socket welded and well supported.

1" copperdrain water line on south wall well supported.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage ofportable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, leadshielding)?

YN N[I UE] N/AE]YN NEI Ur- N/AD-YZ NDI U-- N/AD-YN NED U[-I N/AD-Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K14 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 3Status: YE N[-] URIIArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 035Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area Main Steam Tunnel8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI U[-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

-Multiple scaffolds in place for RF019 work: 13-117,13-121, 13-129,13-137, 13-156, all appropriately labeled and green tagged.-Insulation intentionally removed for FW check valve work- laid down on scaffold and on floor. It willbe reinstalled during RFO, therefore acceptable.

-No adverse conditions were found during the area walk-by, therefore no pictures are attached to thisform. Refer to SWEL 1-001, -002, -003, -004 for pictures of SWEL items, if needed.Evaluated by: NI & ) ) xL..4 Date: f 9S)(F V4L L bwyU -lq Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K15 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5Status: YZ NF Ur-IArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 036Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 23' Room, Area, DrywellSWEL Components:

SWEL2-009, 010, 014Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Refer to comments on sheet 32. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofsignificant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YE NE-] Ul-- N/AL]YE NE-] uE] N/Ar-YE NE] ur] N/AF-I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

Thisselected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K16 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5Status: YE N[j- UrArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 036Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area Drywell4. Does it aooear that the area is free of notentiallv adverse seismic YrI NFl urF- N/AFlspatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tilesand lighting)?

No ceiling in this area. Lights are well supported by rigid conduits.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?In general, all equipment in Drywell is qualified for seismic loading.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?Note that Drywell is inert during power operations.
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage ofportable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, leadshielding)?

Significant maintenance activities in progress at time of walkdown.

Drywell closeout procedure walkdown will ensure that all items areremoved or secured prior to start up.Y[ N-- U-- N/AD-YZ NDI ulD N/AD-Y[ NDI UDl N/AD-Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K17 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5Status: YE NEI- UF-]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 036Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area Drywell8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEi U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Time spent performing walk-by of south side of Drywell 23' was minimized due to very high dose ratesat the time.Evaluated by: Daytj S I(§3,9 LIIDate: I'2!3-h 37t --Va a L14-71Im.. '3113V___t ___ -

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K18 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5Status: YE NI- Ur--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 036Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area DrywellSWEL Components:

SWEL2-009, 010, 014Photographs Note: ScaoNote:

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K19 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5Status: Y[E NEI ULIArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 036Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 23 Room, Area DrywellSWEL Components:

SWEL2-009, 010, 014Note:

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K20 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 4Status: YE NnI U[-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 037Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 41 Room, Area, DrywellSWEL Components:

SWELl -023, 034Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

All equipment in this area is anchored to the structure by welds toDrywell liner plate or Bioshield wall plate.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofsignificant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?YZ N[-] ul- N/A[--YZ NEI UEI N/A[--Y[ NEI ui-- N/A[-I' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

Thisselected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K21 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4Status: YZ NI-- UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 037Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 41 Room, Area Drywell4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicspatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tilesand lighting)?

No ceiling in this area. Lights are well supported by rigid conduits.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?In general, all equipment in Drywell is qualified for seismic loading.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?Note that Drywell is inert during power operations.
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage ofportable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, leadshielding)?

Significant maintenance activities in progress at time of walkdown.

Drywell closeout inspection will ensure that all items are removed orsecured prior to start up.YN NEI U[:] N/AEZYN NEI UEZ N/AD--YE NDI U[- N/AD-YN NDI Ur- N/AD-I Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K22 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4Status: YE! N-- U-]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 037Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 41 Room, Area Drywell8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE Nni Ur-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Concrete shielding blocks were identified in the NIB Nozzle penetration of the Bioshield wall with no restraint steel in place.CR-PNP-2013-3008 was initiated for this condition.

It was determined that these blocks should have been removed per plant design changein previous outage. WO 349326 to remove blocks scheduled for 516/13prior to restart.

As of May 28th, this activity has been completed asconfirmed by site personnel.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: )L vý& / ) h Date: ,-I3tr-F- 6VA ký bMi 4V. Ji IEngineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K23 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4Status: YE NI1 U--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 037Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 41 Room, Area DrywellSWEL Components:

SWELl -023, 034Photouraohs Note: Concrete shielding blocksNote:

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K24 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4Status: YZ NEI U[-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 038Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 117 Room, Areal Refuel FloorSWEL Components:

SWEL2-015.

016Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. Thespace below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free ofsignificant degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverseseismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fillconditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Y[J NDI U-- N/AD-YE NDI UE N/ADYO NDI u[-] N/AD-' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

Thisselected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K25 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4Status: YE NI I U--Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 038Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 117 Room, Area Refuel Floor4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicspatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tilesand lighting)?

No ceiling in this area. Lights are well supported by rigid conduits.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?Fire Protection piping well supported and socket welded joints.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions that could cause a fire in the area?None observed.

Note that gates are underwater during plantoperations and refueling.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismicinteractions associated with housekeeping practices, storage ofportable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, leadshielding)?

Much equipment and material staged in the area due to ongoingrefueling activities.

The general area surrounding the SFP is classified as a 'safe location' per PNPS Seismic Interaction Hazard Procedure 1.17. 1.YE NEI U[-] N/ADYZ NDI U[-- N/ADYZ NDl U-- N/AD--YO ND U[ N/AD Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K26 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4Status: YZ NiF U-IIArea Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 038Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 117 Room, Area Refuel Floor8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI] U]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?The SFP inlet line siphon breakers were specifically viewed andphotographed as part of this walk-by.

They were found to be in placewith no obvious seismic interaction concerns.

Comments

.(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area included in this walkby was South, West and North sides of spent fuel pool (West of Rx Cavity).Evaluaed bY -oJ Date;,-S~f¶ Pf-~. _ __ _

Engineering Report No. PNPS-CS-12-00001, Rev. 1Attachment KPage K27 of K27ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4Status: YE NI] U-]Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC- 038Location:

Bldg. RB Floor El. 117 Room, Area Refuel FloorSWEL Components:

SWEL2-015.

016PhotoaraDhs INote:Note: NE Siphon BreakA

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13232A129&oldid=802000"