NRC 2009-0110, Response to Request for Additional Information, License Amendment Request 247, Spent Fuel Pool Storage Criticality Control
| ML093270080 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 11/20/2009 |
| From: | Meyer L Point Beach |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NRC 2009-0110 | |
| Download: ML093270080 (35) | |
Text
November 20,2009 NEXTera TM ENERGY@
POINT BEACH 7
NRC 2009-01 10 10 CFR 50.90 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2 Dockets 50-266 and 50-301 Renewed License Nos. DPR-24 and DPR-27 Response to Request for Additional lnformation License Amendment Request 247 Spent Fuel Pool Storage Criticality Control References (I)
FPL Energy Point Beach Letter to NRC, License Amendment Request Number 247, Spent Fuel Pool Storage Criticality Control, dated July 24,2008 (ML082240685)
(2)
FPL Energy Point Beach Letter to NRC, Supplement to License Amendment Request Number 247, Spent Fuel Pool Storage Criticality Control, dated September 19,2008 (ML082630114)
(3)
NRC letter to NextEra Energy Point Beach, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2 - Request for Additional lnformation from Reactor Systems Branch Related to License Amendment Request No. 247 Spent Fuel Pool Storage Criticality Control - Round 3, dated October 22, 2009 (M L092930502)
NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (NextEra), (formerly known as FPL Energy Point Beach, LLC),
submitted a proposed license amendment request for Commission review and approval pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90 for Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP), Units 1 and 2 (Reference I). The proposed amendment revises the licensing basis to reflect a revision to the spent fuel pool (SFP) criticality analysis methodology. The revised criticality analysis for the SFP storage racks credits burnup, integral fuel burnable absorber (IFBA), Plutonium-241 decay, and soluble boron, where applicable. NextEra provided a supplemental response (Reference 2) containing additional quantitative information to support the fidelity of key methodology aspects described in Reference (1 ). of this letter provides the NextEra response to the request for additional information in accordance with Reference (3). Enclosure 2 contains an Addendum to WCAP-16541-P, Revision 2, which contains an analysis that restores the full 0.5% Ak analytical margin for the proposed storage configurations, incorporating any identified non-conservatisms. The changes to the proposed Technical Specifications, as a result of the burnup offsets, are contained in.
This letter contains no new commitments and no revisions to existing commitments.
NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, 6610 Nuclear Road, Two Rivers, WI 54241
Document Control Desk Page 2 The information contained in this letter does not alter the no significant hazards consideration contained in Reference (I) and continues to satisfy the criteria of 10 CFR 51 -22 for categorical exclusion from the requirements of an environmental assessment.
In accordance with 10 CFR 50.91, a copy of this letter is being provided to the designated Wisconsin Official.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing and enclosed information is true and correct.
Executed on November 20,2009.
Very truly yours, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC Enclosures cc:
Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, USNRC Resident Inspector, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, USNRC PSCW
ENCLOSURE I NEXTERA ENERGY POINT BEACH, LLC POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS I AND 2 LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST 247 SPENT FUEL POOL STORAGE CRITICALITY CONTROL RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The following information is provided by NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (NextEra) in response to the NRC staff's request for additional information (RAI) dated October 22,2009, to support continued review of Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP) License Amendment Request 247.
Question I:
Based on the information submitted by the licensee to date, the staff finds that the licensee's analysis does not provide reasonable assurance that Point Beach fuel storage will comply with the regulatory limit of kerf less than I.
0 under unborated conditions. Currently, there is not a generically approved methodology for performing an SFP criticality analysis. Therefore, licensees must submit a plant-specific SFP criticality analysis that includes technically-supported margins. lssues identified during staff review to date have reduced the reserved analytical margin, an order of magnitude from 0.5% Ak to 0.049% Ak. The analysis currently shows a maximum keff of 0.99951. The analytical margin is normally reserved to address potential uncertainties that are unaccounted for. The reserved analytical margin of 0.049% Ak essentially requires that there are no other uncertainties that must be accounted for, and that the remaining portions of the analysis are without issues. The staff finds that this is not the case for the Point Beach analysis.
For example, the proper use of the constant specific power and operating history assumption alone requires an additional allowance of 0.2% Ak margin, according to NUREG-6665, "Review and Prioritization of Technical lssues Related to Burnup Credit for L WR Fuel." With the reserved analytical margin at 0.049% Ak, the analysis is unable to accommodate this additional uncertainty, The analysis no longer provides reasonable assurance that keff will be less than 1.0.
With available margin being so small, issues that may be otherwise resolved by engineering judgment become more important to consider and quantify. Consequently, an issue that was relatively insignificant in the past can now be significant enough to cause regulatory limits to be exceeded, lssues such as the effect of not accounting for fission products and actinides in the criticality code validation, become important to quantify when any additional error greater than or equal to 0.00049 in Ak results in non-compliance. An analysis that retains the full 0.5 percent Ak analytical margin intact may allow the staff to accept engineering judgment to disposition certain issues.
"In summary, the staff finds that the current Point Beach analysis does not provide the staff with reasonable assurance that Point Beach fuel storage will comply with the regulatory limit of keff Page 1 of 2
less than 1.0 under unborated conditions. For the staff to continue its review, the licensee should consider resubmitting an analysis that restores the full 0.5% Ak analytical margin for the proposed storage configurations, incorporating any identified non-conservatisms. Alternatively, the licensee may attempt to regain the analytical margin by identifying and quantifying the conservatisms in their analysis. However, this approach usually results in a more lengthy review with additional RA1s to substantiate the identified conservatisms. "
NextEra Response Burnup offsets to restore the full administrative margin have been calculated. The burnup offsets result in increased burnup requirements for the three proposed storage configurations.
The details on how the burnups were calculated and results are contained in Enclosure 2. The changes to the proposed technical specifications, as a result of the burnup offsets, are contained in Enclosure 3.
Page 2 of 2
ENCLOSURE 2 NEXTERA ENERGY POINT BEACH, LLC POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS I AND 2 LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST 247 SPENT FUEL POOL STORAGE CRITICALITY CONTROL ADDENDUM TO WCAP-16541 REVISION 2 POINT BEACH UNITS I AND 2 SPENT FUEL POOL CRITICALITY SAFETY ANALYSIS 26 pages follow
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP Revision 2, Addendum 1 Point Beach Units 1 and 2 Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Safety Analysis - Addendum A. J. Blanco*
J. B. Clarity*
November 2009 Reviewer: T. C. Bishop*
Approved: E. J. Mercier*, Manager U.S. BWR Reload Analysis and Criticality Safety
- Electronically approved records are authenticated in the electronic document management system.
Westinghouse Electric Company LLC P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, PA 15230-0355 O 2009 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP.16541.NP. Revision 2. Addendum 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................ 1 Methodology...................................................................................................................................
3 2.1 Backcground....................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Burnup Offset Generation............................................................................................. 3 2.3 Burnup Offset Impact on Biases and Uncertainties..................................................... 3 Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Burnup Limits.................................................................................................................
5 3.1.1 "All-Cell" Configuration.................................................................................
5 3.1.2 "1-out-of-4 5.0 wlo Fresh. No IFBA" Configuration........................................
5 3.1.3 "1-out-of-4 4.0 wlo Fresh. With IFBA" Configuration..................................... 6 Results......................................................................................................................................... 11 4.1 Burnup vs Enrichment Curves 11 References..................................................................................................................................... 19
Westinghouse Non-Prourietarv Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP. Revision 2. Addendum 1 This page intentionally left blank.
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP.16541.NP. Revision 2. Addendum 1 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 WCAP.16541.NP.
Revision 2. Section 4.0 Tables....................................................................
2 Table 1-2 WCAP.16541.NP.
Revision 2. Section 4.0 Figures 2
Table 2-1 Total Credited Administrative Margin..................................................................................... 4 Table 3-1 WCAP.16541.NP, Revision 2 Data Source Tables.................................................................
7 Table 3-2 "All-Cell" Configuration Burnup Offsets (MWdIMTU) and Associated Increase in Administrative Margin (Ak).............................................................................................
8 Table 3-3 "l-out-of-4 5.0 w/o Fresh. No IFBA" Configuration Burnup Offsets (MWdIMTU) and Associated Increase in Administrative Margin (Ak) 9 Table 3-4 "1-out-of-4 4.0 wlo Fresh. With IFBA" Configuration Burnup Offsets (MWdIMTU) and Associated Increase in Administrative Margin (Ak) 10 Table 4-1 WCAP.16541.NP.
Revision 2. Section 4.0 Tables..................................................................
12 Table 4-2 WCAP.16541.NP, Revision 2. Section 4.0 Figures................................................................
12 Table 4-3 Fuel Assembly Burnup versus Initial Enrichment for the "All-Cell" Storage Configuration..................................................................................................................
13 Table 4-4 Fuel Assembly Burnup versus Initial Enrichment for the "1-out-of-4 5.0 w/o Fresh. No I
IFBA" Storage Configuration 14 Table 4-5 Fuel Assembly Burnup versus Initial Enrichment for the "l-out-of-4 4.0 w/o Fresh. With IFBA" Storage Configuration........................................................................................ 15
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 This page intentionally left blank.
Westinehouse Non-Proorietarv Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 4-1 Fuel Assembly Burnup versus Initial Enrichment for the "All-Cell" Storage Configuration................................................................................................................. 16 Figure 4-2 Fuel Assembly Burnup versus Initial Enrichment for the "1-out-of-4 5.0 w/o Fresh, No IFBA" Storage Configuration......................................................................................
17 Figure 4-3 Fuel Assembly Burnup versus Initial Enrichment for the "1-out-of-44.0 w/o Fresh, With IFBA" Storage Configuration........................................................................................ 18
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This addendum documents revisions to the burnup vs. initial enrichment limit curves found in WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2 (Reference 2) to incoi-porate burnup offsets. The report contains the methodology followed in generating the burnup offsets, burnup vs. initial enrichment limit curves, and bu~rnup vs. initial enrichment polynomials for each configuration found in WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2. The new burnup vs. initial enrichment limits restore the 0.005 Ak of administrative margin to satisfy the request for additional information in Reference 1.
Tables 1-1 and 1-2 summarize which tables and figures in Section 4.0 of the original issuance of WCAP-16541-NP have been updated.
Westinghouse Non-Pro~rietarv Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP. Revision 2, Addendum 1 Table 1-1 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Section 4.0 Tables Table 1-2 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Section 4.0 Figures Addendum Table 4-3 4-4 4-5 N/A N/A WCAP Table 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 4-5 Updated Yes Yes Yes NO NO Addendum Figure N/A N/A WCAP Figure 4-1 4-2 Updated NO NO 1 1
N/A 4-6 N/A 4-7 Yes 4-1 4-8 4-9 4-10 Yes Yes NO 4-2 4-3 N/ A
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 2.0 Methodology
2.1 Background
WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, contains 0.005 Ak of administrative lnargin reserved from both the borated and unborated keff regulatoly requirements of 0.95 and 1.0 respectively. A portion of the reserved administrative margin was used in response to requests for additional information (References 3, 5, and 7). Table 2-1 lists the total credited administrative margin.
2.2 Burnup Offset Generation Bu~nup offsets are generated for each configuration, enrichment, and decay time combination to restore the administrative margin to a minimum of 0.005 Alc.
The lnaximurn allowable fresh fuel enrichment for each configuration remains unaffected because administrative lnargin was credited only for situations related to depleted fuel.
The burnup offsets given in Section 3.0 are created by quadratically fitting kff vs. burnup for each emichment/decay time combination for each configuration. The keE values as a function of burnup, emichment, and decay time come from Tables 3-7, 3-11, and 3-13 of WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2. The fitted equation coupling bR and burnup is then used to determine the bumup offset needed to restore a minimuln of 0.005 Alc admhistrative margin.
0 2.3 Burnup Offset Impact on Biases and Uncertainties The burnup offsets do not impact the biases and uncertainties documented in WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2.
The majority of uncertainty calculations were performed using fresh fuel and therefore are not impacted by the burnup offset. The sum of biases and uncertainties used in the WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2 analysis is bounding (Reference 6, Question 2). The analysis in WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2 incorporates limiting biases and uncertainties from fresh and depleted conditions, to maximize the sum of biases and uncertainties.
The temperature bias calculation was performed using depleted fuel. The temperature bias was taken as the maximum value calculated based on a variety of enrichment and bumup combinations for each configuration and therefore the most limiting value was included in each configuration (Reference 4, Question 3). The temperature bias is thus not affected by the bumup offset.
The burnup uncertainty in WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2 is 5% of the burnup limit lnultiplied by the change in reactivity per change in burnup. In response to Question 1, documented in Reference 4, the burnup uncertainty was recalculated as described in Reference 8. The reactivity difference between the two methods was credited against the available administrative margin. To regain the full 0.005 Ak of administrative margin, the reactivity credit talcen from the administrative margin is being translated into a burnup offset. This b m u p offset does not impact the biases and uncertainties, as discussed above.
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 Table 2-1 Total Credited Administrative Margin "All-Cell" ccl-out-of-4,5.0 w/o Fresh, No IFBA" ccl-out-of-4,4.0 w/o Fresh, With IFBA" Credited Administrative Margin (Ak) 0.00131 0.0045 1 0.00421
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 3.0 Analysis 3.1 Burnup Limits The three configurations analyzed in WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2 are an "All-Cell" configuration and two "1-out-of-4" configurations. The "All-Cell" configuration stores assemblies that have similar reactivity, where a "l-out-of-4" configuration stores one high reactivity assembly for eveiy three low reactivity assemblies. The first of the two "l-out-of-4" configurations is the "l-out-of-4 5.0 w/o Fresh, No IFBA" configuration. This configuration assumes the high reactivity assembly is a 5.0 w/o fi-esh assembly without IFBA. The second of the two "l-out-of-4" configurations is the "l-out-of-4 4.0 w/o Fresh, With IFBA" configuration.
This configuration assumes the high reactivity assembly is a 4.0 w/o fi-esh assembly with no IFBA or a greater than 4.0 w/o fresh assembly containing IFBA.
For each of these configurations WCAP-16541 -NP, Revision 2 reports &K values for several bmup and decay time combinations for initial enrichments of 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 wlo. The 1~~ vs. burnup and burnup limit tables froin WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2 are presented in Table 3-1.
The fonnulation of the fitting coefficients and burnup offsets is given below for each configuration.
3.1.1 "All-Cell" Configuration Quadratic fits of the data fi-om Table 3-7 of WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2 were used to develop fitting
(
coefficients as discussed in Section 2.2. The fitting coefficients were used in conjunction with the original bumup limits to detennine the nominal multiplication factor of the required burnup for each enrichmentldecay time. The burnup offset was then detennined so that the AlkR between the new burnup limit and original burnup limit was greater than that shown in Table 2-1. The resulting set of burnup offsets and associated inargin reclaimed are shown in Table 3-2.
The minimum administrative margin gain for the "All-Cell" configuration, shown in Table 3-2, is 0.00138 Ak.
From Table 2-1, the additional inargin needed to return the administrative margin to 0.005 Ak is 0.00131 Ak.
The burnup offsets shown in Table 3-2 will return all initial eruichmentldecay time combinations in the "All-Cell" configuration to greater than 0.005 Ale administrative margin. Table 4-3 and Figure 4-1 present the updated burnup limits for the "All-Cell" configuration.
3.1.2 "1-out-of-4 5.0 w/o Fresh, No IFBA" Configuration The same method used to detennine the bumup offsets for the "All-Cell" storage configuration was used for the "l-out-of-4 5.0 w/o Fresh, No IFBA" configuration. The resulting set of burnup offsets and associated margin reclaimed are shown in Table 3-3.
The minimurn administrative margin gain for the "1-out-of-4 5.0 w/o Fresh, No IFBA" configuration, shown in Table 3-3, is 0.00453 Ale. From Table 2-1, the additional margin needed to return the administrative inargin to 0.005 Ale is 0.00451 Ale. The burnup offsets shown in Table 3-3 will retun all initial enrichmentldecay time combinations in the "l-out-of-4 5.0 w/o Fresh, No IFBA" configuration to greater than 0.005 Ak administrative margin. Table 4-4 and Figure 4-2 present the updated burnup liinits for the "l-out-of-4 5.0 wlo Fresh, No IFBA" I
configuration.
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 3.1.3 "1-out-of-4 4.0 wlo Fresh, With IFBA" Configuration The same method used to determine the burnup offsets for the "All-Cell" storage configuration was used for the "1-out-of-4 4.0 wlo Fresh, With IFBA" configuration. The resulting set of burnup offsets and associated margin reclaimed are shown in Table 3-4.
The minimuin administrative margin gain for the "1-out-of-4 4.0 wlo Fresh, With IFBA" configuration, shown in Table 3-4, is 0.00424 Alc. From Table 2-1, the additional margin needed to return the administrative margin to 0.005 Alc is 0.00421 Alc. The burnup offsets shown in Table 3-4 will return all initial enrichmentldecay time combinations in the "1-out-of-4 4.0 wlo Fresh, With IFBA" configuration to greater than 0.005 hk administrative margin. Table 4-5 and Figure 4-3 present the updated burnup limits for the "1-out-of-4 4.0 wlo Fresh, With LFBA" configuration.
Westinghouse Non-Pro~rietarv Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 Table 3-1 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2 Data Source Tables
' Note that the "All-Cell" configuration was analyzed based on the assumption of having no fuel pins in guide tubes. The requirements outlined in Section 4.1.I.I remain in place.
7 of 19 Burnup Limit Tables 4-1 4-2 4-3 Configuration
"~11-cell"'
"1-out-of-4,5.0 wlo Fresh, No IFBA" "1-out-of-4,4.0 wlo Fresh, With IFBA" keE vs. Burnup Tables 3-7 3-11 3-13
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 Table 3-2 "All-Cell" Configuration Burnup Offsets (MWdMTU) and Associated Increase in Administrative Margin (Ak) 20 yr decay Offset 150 200 200 15 yr decay Enrich.
3.0 4.0 5.0 Margin 0.00157 0.00165 0.00139 Offset 150 200 250 10 yr decay Margin 0.00152 0.00160 0.00166 Offset 150 200 250 5 yr decay Margin 0.00144 0.00157 0.00159 Offset 150 200 250 0 yr decay Margin 0.00138 0.00152 0.00152 Offset 200 200 250 Margin 0.00168 0.00141 0.00143
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 Table 3-3 c'1-out-of-4 5.0 w/o Fresh, No IFBA" Configuration Burnup Offsets (MWdIMTU) and Associated Increase in Administrative Margin (Ak)
Enrich.
3.O 4.0 5.0 10 yr decay Offset 1600 1800 2000 0 yr decay Margin 0.00464 0.00457 0.00457 15 yr decay 5 yr decay Offset 2000 2150 2300 Offset 1500 1700 1900 Offset 1800 1950 2100 20 yr decay Margin 0.00464 0.00461 0.00461 Margin 0.00465 0.00454 0.00453 Margin 0.00473 0.00469 0.00462 Offset 1450 1650 1800 Margin 0.00462 0.00465 0.00453
Westin~house Non-Pro~rietarv Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 Table 3-4 "1-out-of-4 4.0 w/o Fresh, With IFBA" Configuration Burnup Offsets (MWdIMTU) and Associated Increase in Administrative Margin (Ak) 20 yr decay Enrich.
3.0 4.0 5.0 Offset 1000 1150 1300 15 yr decay Margin 0.00434 0.00435 0.00430 Offset 1000 1100 1350 10 yr decay Margin 0.00445 0.00424 0.00432 Offset 1100 1200 1400 Margin 0.00446 0.00430 0.00436 0 yr decay 5 yr decay Offset 1300 1450 1550 Offset 1150 1250 1450 Margin 0.00435 0.00433 0.00434 Margin 0.00430 0.00430 0.00429
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 4.0 Results 4.1 Burnup vs. Enrichment Curves This addendwn to WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2 contains tables and figures which supersede the original issuance of WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2. Section 1.0 gives a listing of all tables (Table 1-1) and figures (Table 1-2) from Section 4.0 of the original issuance of WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2 and indicates whether the table or figure is superseded by this addendum and the identifier (i.e. Table 4-2) of the new table or figure which supersedes that in WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2. Tables 1-1 and 1-2 have been repeated here as Tables 4-1 and 4-2.
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 Table 4-1 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Section 4.0 Tables Table 4-2 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Section 4.0 Figures Addendum Table 4-3 4-4 4-5 N/ A N/A WCAP Table 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 4-5 Updated Yes Yes Yes No NO Addendum Figure N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4-1 4-2 4-3 N/A WCAP Figure 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 4-5 4-6 4-7 4-8 4-9 4-10 Updated NO NO NO NO NO NO Yes Yes Yes NO
Westinghouse Non-Pro~rietarv Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 Table 4-3 Fuel Assembly Burnup versus Initial Enrichment for the "All-Cell" Storage Configuration Note that the assembly btunups as a function of initial enrichment for each decay period are described by the following polynomials:
Initial Enrichment
( ~ 1 0 2 3 S ~ )
2.13 3.O 4.0 5.0 Assembly Burnup (0 yr decay) 71.56e3 -
1166.69e2 +
15059.19e - 27474.43 Assembly Burnup (5 yr decay)
-ll.14e3 -
287.32e2 +
11630.42e - 23361.60 Assembly Burnup (10 yr decay)
=
-16.28e3 -
308.68e2 +
11655.01e - 23267.42 Assembly Btunup (15 yr decay)
=
-85.22e3 +
436.68e2 +
8884.52e - 20081.62 Assembly B m u p (20 yr decay)
=
-1 13.81e3 +
669.67e2 +
8161.13e -
19321.65 Decay time is defined as the number of years since the fuel assembly was last critical 13 of 19 Limiting Burnup (MWdMTU) 15 yr decay2 0
8201 16989 24605 10 yr decay2 0
8480 17372 25256 0 yr decayz 0
9135 18675 27599 20 yr decay2 0
8116 16754 24000 5 Yr decay2 0
8643 17850 26215
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 Table 4-4 Fuel Assembly Burnup versus Initial Enrichment for the "1-out-of-4 5.0 wlo Fresh, No IFBA" Storage Configuration Note that the assembly bumups as a function of initial enrichment for each decay period are described by the following polynomials:
Initial Eni-ichrnent
( ~ 1 0 2 3 5 ~ )
1.33 3.O 4.0 5.0 Assembly Bumup (0 yr decay)
=
428.92e3 -
5757.04e2 +
36677.22e - 39606.18 Assembly Bumup (5 yr decay)
=
354.71e3 -
4760.55e2 +
31941.49e - 34895.75 Assembly Bcunup (10 yr decay)
=
346.35e3 -
4566.17e2 +
30296.34e - 33031.86 Asselnbly Bumup (15 yr decay)
=
321.26e3 - 4212.08e2 +
28522.05e - 31239.39 Assembly Bumup (20 yr decay)
=
326.36e3 -
4138.3 1e2 +
27551.88e - 30091.55 I
Decay time is defined as the number of years since the fuel assembly was last critical Lirniting Bu-nup (MWd/MTU) 20 yr decay3 0
24131 34790 45005 0 Yr decay3 0
30193 4244 1 53469 10 yr decay3 0
26113 37261 47589 5 Yr decay3 0
27661 39403 50137 15 yr decay3 0
25092 36016 46226
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 Table 4-5 Fuel Assembly Burnup versus Initial Enrichment for the "1-out-of-4 4.0 w/o Fresh, With IFBA" Storage Configuration Note that the assembly burnups as a function of initial enrichment for each decay period are described by the following polynomials:
Initial Emichnent (W/O 2 3 5 ~ )
1.60 3.0 4.0 5.0 Assembly Burnup (0 yr decay)
=
212.05e3 -
3290.58e2 +
26798.27e - 35321.90 Assembly Bumup (5 yr decay)
=
461.10e3 -
5538.19e2 +
32070.67e - 39023.97 Assembly Burnup (10 yr decay)
=
290.71e3 -
3744.49e2 +
25822.24e - 32920.44 Assembly Burnup (15 yr decay)
=
316.33e3 -
3898.92e2 +
25546.37e - 32188.62 Assembly Burnup (20 yr decay)
=
286.15e3 -
3716.74e2 +
25117.81e - 31845.90 Decay time is defined as the number of years since the fuel assembly was last critical 15 of 19 Limiting Burnup (MWcUMTU) 20 yr decay4 0
17783 27471 36593 15 yr decay4 0
17901 27859 37611 10 yr decay4 0
18695 29062 38917 0 Yr decay4 0
21183 32793 42911 5 Yr decay4 0
19794 30158 40512
Westin~thouse Non-Prourietarv Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 Figure
Westinghouse Non-Pro~rietarv Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP. Revision 2, Addendum 1 0 yr decay 5 yr decay 10 yr decay 15 yr decay 2 0 yr decay Figure 4-2 Fuel Assembly Burnup versus Initial Enrichment for the "1-out-of-4 5.0 wlo Fresh, No IFBA" Storage Configuration
Westinghouse Non-Pro~rietarv Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.C Initial '"u Enrichment (nominal wlo) 0 yr decay 5 yr decay 10 yr decay 15 yr decay 20 yr decay Figure 4-3 Fuel Assembly Burnup versus Initial Enrichment for the "1-out-of-4 4.0 w/o Fresh, With IFBA" Storage Configuration I
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP-16541-NP, Revision 2, Addendum 1
/
5.0 References
- 1. Poole, J.C. (NRC), "Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Additional Information from Reactor Systmes [sic] Branch Related to License Amendment Request No.
247 Spent Fuel Pool Storage Criticality Control - Round 3 (TAC NOS. MD9321 AND MD9322)", ML092930502, October 22,2009.
- 2. Anness, M.G., et al, "Point Beach Units 1 and 2 Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Safety Analysis",
WCAP-16541-NP, Rev. 2, June 2008.
- 3. Cushing, J. (NRC), "Acceptance Review for License Amendment Request Number 247 Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Control-Supplemental Information Required (TAC NOS.
MD9321 AND MD9322)", ML082530171, September 10,2008.
- 4. Meyer, L., "Supplement to License Amendment Request Number 247 Spent Fuel Pool Storage Criticality Control" ML082630114, September 19,2008
- 5. Poole, J.C. (NRC), "Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Additional Information from Reactor Systems Branch Related to License Amendment Request No. 247 Spent Fuel Pool Storage Criticality Control (TAC NOS. MD9321 AND MD9322),
ML090900617, April 22,2009 i
- 6. Meyer, L., "Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request 247 Spent Fuel Pool Storage Criticality Control", ML091420436, May 22,2009.
- 7. Poole, J.C. (NRC), "Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Additional Information from Reactor Systems Branch Related to License Amendment Request No. 247 Spent Fuel Pool Storage Criticality Control - Round 2 (TAC NOS. MD9321 AND MD9322)", ML091770550, July 09,2009.
- 8. Kopp, L. (NRC), "Guidance on the Regulatory Requirements for Criticality Analysis of Fuel Storage at Light-Water Reactor Power Plants", August 19, 1998.
ENCLOSURE 3 NEXTERA ENERGY POINT BEACH, LLC POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST 247 SPENT FUEL POOL STORAGE CRITICALITY CONTROL PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES 3 pages follow
Spent Fuel Pool Storage 3.7.1 2 30,000
] 0 yr decay 5 yr decay 0
2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Nominal Initial U-235 Enrichment (wlo) 10 yr decay 15 yr decay 20 yr decay 0 yr decay =
71.56e3 - 1166.69e2 + 15059.19e - 27474.43 5 yr decay = -11.14e3 - 287.32e2 + 11630.42e - 23361.60 10 yr decay= -16.28e3 - 308.68e2 + 11655.01e - 23267.42 15 yr decay= -85.22e3 + 436.68e2 + 8884.52e - 20081.62 20 yr decay= -113.81e3 + 669.67e2 + 8161.13e - 19321.65 Figure 3.7.12-1 i
1 Fuel Assembly Burnup Requirement of "All-Cell" Storage Configuration Point Beach Unit 1 - Amendment No.
Unit 2 - Amendment No.
Design Features 4.0 4.0 DESIGN FEATURES 0 yr decay 5 yr decay 10 yr decay 15 yr decay 20 yr decay 1.O 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Nominal Initial U-235 Enrichment (wlo) 0 y r decay = 428.92e3 - 5757.04e2 + 36677.22e - 39606.18 5 y r decay = 354.71e3 - 4760.55e2 + 31941.49e - 34895.75 10 y r decay= 346.35e3 - 4566.17e2 + 30296.34e - 33031.86 15 y r decay= 321.26e3 - 4212.08e2 + 28522.05e - 31239.39 20 y r decay= 326.36e3 - 4138.31e2 + 27551.88e - 30091.55
/
I Figure 4.3.1-6 Spent Fuel Assembly Burnup Requirements for I-Out-of-4 for 5.0 wlo with no IFBA Point Beach Unit 1 - Amendment No.
Unit 2 - Amendment No.
(014 $uaw3!Ju3 s~z-n Ie!j!ul leu!uroN O'S S'P O' P S'E O' E 9'1 0'2 YC S3tlfllV3A N9IS3a O'P Aeoap JA Aeoap JA Aeoap JA 0
000'1; OOO'OC 000'91 n f 2
000'02 I i!
Q m
3 0 -
0OOGSZ 2 B 5 C -