ML17363A076
Text
Development of EAL Threshold values from NEE-323-CALC-005 Calculated values are provided in Calc-005 as shown below.
Table 3 - Recommended RA1, RS1, and RG1 EA!. Threshofds (Modes 1, z 3}1 R-elease. Point RAl RSI RG1 l,lCi/<<
pci/cc p.Ci/cc TUd>1ne 8Uilding 15 8!:-0*2:
l.56Hll 1.SBE+oo Reactor 8Uilding 1.22f -'0.2:
1.22E-01 1.22E+oo Offg.s.st.Id:
4..39:ffO!
4.39E+02 4..:i19E+o3 URPSF 1.S.lf-<Oi!
1.51Hll 1511E..OO
Release Point RA!
IRSl RGI Ltei/CiC ud/cc u-oi/a:
rurbine B ding 1..30!*01:
1.30H ll l..31(l)E+oo Reactor Building 1.01(-'02 1.01H 1 1.tQlE+oo Off gas.stad:
,4.52.E-!01 4.52E+02 4..52.E+o3 I.LRPSF 1..25f-02 1.25E-01 1.25f+oo*
- Per Design Input 5.8 the resu ts in EAL threshold values exceed the range of the monitor.
The following table of threshold values was developed for use in the DAEC EAL scheme by averaging the separate Mode 1-3 and Mode 4-5 thresholds from Calc-005, and then rounding the average values for ease of EAL evaluator use, as well as to provide a step-wise progression through the emergency classification. Resulting values are shown in the Alert, SAE, and GE columns below:
~
Monitor GE SAE Alert NOUE Reactor Buildin& ventilation rad monitor (Kaman 3/4, 5/ 6, 7 / 8) 1.0E+oo uci/ cc 1.0 E-01 uci/ cc l.OE-02 uci/ cc l.OE-03 uci/cc Turbine Buildin& ventilation rad monitor (Kaman 1/2) l.OEi-00 uci/cc 1.0 E-01 uci/ cc 1.0E-02 uci/ cc 1.0E-03 uci/cc
~
Off&as Stack rad monitor (Kaman 9/10) 4.5E+0 3 uci/ cc 4.5E~2 uci/ cc 4.SE+ol uci/ cc 2.0E-01 uci/ cc I!)
LLRPSF rad monitor (Kaman 12) 1.0 E-01 uci/ cc 1.0E-02 uci/ cc 1.0E-03 uci/cc
CALC NO.
NEE-323-CALC-005
.. ENERCON CALCULATION COVER SHEET REV.
00 Excelfence-Every project. Every day.
PAGE NO.
1 of 34 Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI Client:
Duane Arnold Energy Center
Title:
99-01 Rev. 06 Project Identifier:
NEE-323 Item Cover Sheet Items Yes No 1
Does this calculation contain any open assumptions, including preliminary D
[gJ information, that require confirmation? (If YES, identify the assumptions.)
2 Does this calculation serve as an "Alternate Calculation"? (If YES, identify the design D
[gJ verified calculation.)
Design Verified Calculation No. --
3 Does this calculation supersede an existing Calculation? (If YES, identify the design D
[gJ verified calculation.)
Superseded Calculation No. --
Scope of Revision:
Initial Issue Revision Impact on Results:
Initial Issue Study Calculation D Final Calculation [8J Safety-Related D Non-Safety-Related [8J (Print Name and Sign)
Originator: Ryan Skaggs Date:
12/14/17 Design Verifier1 (Reviewer if NSR): Jay Bhatt Date:
12/14/17 Approver: Zachary Rose Date:
12/14/17 Note 1: For non-safety-related calculation, design verification can be substituted by review.
I ENERCON CALCULATION CALC NO.
NEE-323-CALC-005 I
Excellence-Every project. £very dGy.
REVISION STATUS SHEET REV.
00 CALCULATION REVISION STATUS REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION 00 12/1 4/17 Initial Issue PAGE REVISION STATUS PAGE NO.
REVISION PAGE NO.
REVISION All 00 APPENDIX/ATTACHMENT REVISION STATUS APPENDIX NO.
NO. OF REVISION ATTACHMENT NO. OF REVISION PAGES NO.
NO.
PAGES NO.
A 8
00 1
4 00 Page 2 of 34
I ENERCON Exuflenu-Every proj~r. Every day.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section
1.0 Purpose and Scope
2.0 Summary of Results and Conclusions 3.0 References 4.0 Assumptions 5.0 Design Inputs 6.0 Methodology 7.0 Calculation 8.0 Computer Software 9.0 Impact Assessment List of Appendices Appendix A - Dose Spreadsheet Output List of Attachments - Calculation Preparation Checklist Page 3 of 34 CALC NO.
NEE-323-CALC-005 REV.
00 Page No.
4 4
6 7
8 13 19 33 34
- of Pages 8
- of Pages 4
ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every day.
1.0 Purpose and Scope
Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
REV.
NEE-323-CALC-005 00 The DAEC site is implementing new requirements of Revision 6 to the Document NEI 99-01, "Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors." One of the changes included in Revision 6 to NEI 99-01 is a new basis for the Emergency Action Level (EAL) RA1. The requirements for RS1 and RG1 did not change from NEI 99-01 Rev. 05 with the implementation of NEI 99-01, Rev. 06.
The following table is extracted from Section 6 of Revision 6 to NEI 99-01:
ALERT SITE AREA EMER-GENERAL EMER-GENCY GENCY AA 1 Release of gaseous AS1 Release of gaseous AG1 Release of gase-or liquid radioactivity re-radioactivity resulting in ous radioactivity result-suiting in offsite dose offsite dose greater than ing in offsite dose greater than 10 mrem 100 mrem TEOE or 500 greater than 1,000 mrem TEOE or 50 mrem thy-mrem thyroid COE.
TEOE or 5,000 mrem roid COE.
Op. Modes: All thyroid COE.
Op. Modes: All Op. Modes: All AA1, AS1, AG1 compares to DAEC terminology RA1, RS1, RG1, respectively. This calculation determines the effluent radiation monitor readings that correspond to the RA 1, RS1, and RG1 thresholds.
2.0 Summary of Results and Conclusions The results below show the RA 1 EAL release concentration thresholds and associated dose rates for each release point for a decay time of five hours and 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />. The highlighted dose indicates which threshold was met at the release concentration.
Table 1 - RA 1 EAL Release Concentration Thresholds (Decay= 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> (Mode 1, 2, 3))
Release Point Release Concentration CEDE EDE
µCi/cc mrem mrem Turbine Building 1.58E-02 2.38 0.39 Reactor Building 1.22E-02 2.37**
0.39 Offgas Stack 4.39E+Ol 1.96 8.05*
Low-Level Radwaste Processing and 1.51E-02 2.37 0.39 Storage Facility (LLRPSF)
- Calculation of this value was demonstrated in Section 7.3
10.00 41.1 2.76 49.7 Table 2 - RA 1 EAL Release Concentration Thresholds (Decay = 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> (Mode 4, 5))
Release Point Release Concentration CEDE EDE TEDE COE Thyroid
µCi/cc mrem mrem mrem mrem Turbine Building 1.30E-02 2.59 0.07 2.67 49.7 Reactor Building 1.0lE-02 2.60 0.07 2.68 49.9 Offgas Stack 4.52E+Ol 2.61 1.41 4.02 50.0 LLRPSF 1.25E-02 2.60 0.07 2.67 49.8 Page 4 of 34
ENERCON Exctlfence-Every project. Every day.
Resultant EAL thresholds:
Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
REV.
NEE-323-CALC-005 00 The tables below show the release concentration threshold for RA 1, RS1, and RG1 based on the results above for both a decay time of five hours and a decay time of 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />.
From Section 1.0:
RS1 thresholds are 10 times larger than those for RA 1 RG1 thresholds are 100 times larger than those for RA1 Table 3 - Recommended RA 1, RS1, and RG1 EAL Thresholds (Modes 1, 2, 3)
Release Point RAl RS1 RGl
µCi/cc
µCi/cc
µCi/cc Turbine Building l.58E-02 l.58E-01 1.58E+OO Reactor Bu ilding l.22E-02 l.22E-01 l.22E+OO Offgas Stack 4.39E+Ol 4.39E+02 4.39E+03 LLRPSF l.Sl E-02 l.SlE-01 l.SlE+OO*
Table 4 - Recommended RA 1, RS1, and RG 1 EAL Thresholds (Modes 4, 5)
Release Point RAl RS1 RGl
µCi/cc
µCi/cc
µCi/cc Turbine Building 1.30E-02 l.30E-01 l.30E+OO Reactor Building l.OlE-02 1.0l E-01 l.OlE+OO Offgas Stack 4.52E+Ol 4.52E+02 4.52E+03 LLRPSF l.25E-02 l.25E-01 l.25E+OO*
- Per Design Input 5.8 the results in EAL threshold values exceed the range of the monitor.
Page 5 of 34
ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every day.
3.0 References Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
REV.
NEE-323-CALC-005 00 3.1 NEI 99-01, Revision 6, "Development of Emergency Action Levels for Non-Passive Reactors", Nuclear Energy Institute, November 2012.
3.2 NUREG-1940, RASCAL 4: Description of Models and Methods, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, 2012.
3.3 NUREG-1940 Supplement 1, RASCAL 4.3: Description of Models and Methods, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, 2015.
3.4 NUREG-1228, Source Term Estimation During Incident Response to Severe Nuclear Power Plant Accidents, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Division of Operational Assessment, 1988.
3.5 NUREG-1465, Accident Source Terms for Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, 1995.
3.8 DAEC Offsite Dose Assessment Manual (ODAM).
3.9 Plant Chemistry Procedure PCP 8.3, Alarm Setpoints and Background Determination for KAMAN Normal Range Monitors.
3.10 DAEC Nuclear Station HRN-HRH Radiation Monitor Operation, Maintenance and Troubleshooting Manual, ©2000, by Engineering Solutions, 310 Luchana Drive, Litchfield Park, Arizona.
3.11 DAEC Emergency Plan, Section 'I', Rev. 27.
3.12 Federal Guidance Report No. 11, Limiting Values of Radionuclide Intake and Air Concentration and Dose Conversion Factors for Inhalation, Submersion and Ingestion Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, 1999.
3.13 Federal Guidance Report No. 12, External Exposure to Radionuclides in Air, Water, and Soil, 1993.
3.14 Table of
- Nuclides, http://atom.kaeri.re.kr:8080/tonlindex.html.
retrieved 10110/17.
Page 6 of 34
LI ENERCON Excellence-Every projecr. £very day.
4.0 Assumptions Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 The following are assumptions about the receptor:
CALC NO.
REV.
NEE-323-CALC-005 00 No credit is taken for radiation shielding provided by structures.
No decay in-transit is assumed during the time elapsed between the release point and the receptor.
Both of the above assumptions are acceptable because they will result in a higher dose to the receptor and conservatively lower thresholds.
Page 7 of 34
ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every doy.
5.0 Design Inputs 5.1 Core Inventory Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
REV.
NEE-323-CALC-005 00 The assumed isotopic mixture in Table 5 is taken from Table 1-1 of NUREG-1940.
The core inventory (curies per megawatts thermal) in the table is based on calculations made by the NRC staff in December 2003 using the SAS2H control module of SCALE (Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation),
Version 4.4a.
Table 5 - Isotopic Mixture NUCLIDE CORE INVENT*ORY !NUCLIDE CORE INVENTORY NUCLIDE CORE INVENTORY (Ci/MWt.)
(Ci/MWt)
(Ci/MWt)
Ba-139 4.74E+04 La-141 4.33E+04 Te-127 2.36E+03 Ba-140 4.76E+04 La-142 4.21E+04 Te-127m 3.97E+02 Ce-141 4.39E+04 Mo-99 5.30E+04 Te-129 8.26E+03 Ce-143 4.00E+04 Nb-95 4.50E+04 Te-129m 1.68E+03 Ce-144" 3.54E+04 Nd-147 1.75E+04 Te-131m 5.41E+03 Cm-242 1.12E+03 Np-239 5.69E+05 Te-132 3.81E+04 Cs-134 4.70E+03 Pr-143 3.96E+04 Xe-131m 3.65E+02 Cs-136 1.49E+03 Pu-241 4.26E+03 Xe-133 5.43E+04 Cs-137 3.25E+03 Rb-86 5.29E+01 Xe-133m 1.72E+03 1-131 2.67E+04 Rh-105 2.81E+04 Xe-135 1.42E+04 1-132 3.88E+04 Ru-103 4.34E+04 Xe-135m 1.15E+04 1-133 5.42E+04 Ru-105 3.06E+04 Xe-138 4.56E+04 1-134 5.98E+04 Ru-1os*
1.55E+04 Y-90 2.45E+03 1-135 5.18E+04 Sb-127 2.39E+03 Y-91 3.17E+04 Kr-83m 3.05E+03 Sb-129 8.68E+03 Y-92 3.26E+04 Kr-85 2.78E+02 Sr-89 2.41E+04 Y-93 2.52E+04 Kr-85m 6.17E+03 Sr-90 2.39E+03 Zr-95 4.44E+04 Kr-87 1.23E+04 Sr-91 3.01E+04 Zr-97*
4.23E+04
- Kr-88 1.70E+04 Sr-92 3.24E+04 La-140 4.91E+04 Tc-99m 4.37E+04 Page 8 of 34
ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every day.
5.2 Release Fraction Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
REV.
NEE-323-CALC-005 00 Table 6 displays release fractions as a function of time taken from Table 1-4 which references Table 3-12 of NUREG-1465.
Table 6 - Release Fraction NUCLIDE GROUP BWR CORE INVENTORY RELEASE FRACTION Cladding Failure Core Melt Phase Postvessel (Gap Release (In-Vessel Phase)
Melt-Through Phase Phase)
(1.5-hour duration)
(Ex-Vessel Phase)
(0.5-hour duration)
(3.0-hour duration)
Noble gases (Kr, Xe) 0.05 0.95 0
Halogens (I, Br) 0.05 0.25 0.30 Alkali metals (Cs, Rb) 0.05 0.20 0.35 Tellurium group (Te, Sb, Se) 0 0.05 0.. 25 Barium, strontium (Ba, Sr) 0 0.02 0.1 Noble metals (Ru, Rh, Pd, Mo, 0
0.0025 0.0025 Tc, Co)
Cerium group (Ce, Pu, Np}
0 0.0005 0.005 Lanthanides (La, Zr, Nd, Eu, Nb, 0
0.0002 0.005 Pm, Pr, Sm, Y, Cm, Am)
Reference:
Table 3-12 from NUREG-146S.
5.3 Gaseous Dispersion Factors The dispersion factors are taken from the ODAM Section 3.
Offgas Stack Building Vents 5.4 Isotopic half-lives Table 7 - Dispersion Factors Dose due to Plume/Submersion ODAM Sections 3.5.2.1 and 3.9 2.8E-7 sec/m3 4.3E-6 sec/m3 Organ Dose Due to Particulates and Iodine ODAM Section 3.8 3.1 E-7 sec/m3 3.9E-6 sec/m3 Isotopic half-lives are taken from NUREG-1940, Supplement 1. For those isotopes missing from that list, denoted by*, half-lives were obtained from the following website which is maintained by the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute:
h ftp :Ila tom. kaeri. re. kr: 8080ltonlindex. html Page 9 of 34
CALC N EE-323-CALC-005 ENERCON Revised Gaseous Radiological NO.
Excellence-Every project. Every day.
EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 REV.
00 Table 8 contains the half-lives and calculated;\\ (lambda) values.
Table 8 - Half-lives and Decay Constants T 1/2 T 1/2 Decay Isotope T 1/2 Lambda units Hours hrs*1 Ba-139 0.0574 days 1.38E+OO 5.03E-01 Ba-140 12.7 days 3.05E+02 2.27E-03 Ce-141 32.5 days 7.80E+02 8.89E-04 Ce-143 1.38 days 3.31E+Ol 2.09E-02 Ce-144 284 days 6.82E+03 1.02E-04 Cm-242 163 days 3.91E+03 1.77E-04 Cs-134 753 days 1.81E+04 3.84E-05 Cs-136 13.1 days 3.14E+02 2.20E-03 Cs-137 11000 days 2.64E+05 2.63E-06 1-131 8.04 days 1.93E+02 3.59E-03 1-132 0.0958 days 2.30E+OO 3.0lE-01 1-133 0.867 days 2.08E+Ol 3.33E-02 1-134 0.0365 days 8.76E-01 7.91E-01 1-135 0.275 days 6.60E+OO 1.05E-01 Kr-83m*
1.83 hours9.606481e-4 days <br />0.0231 hours <br />1.372354e-4 weeks <br />3.15815e-5 months <br /> 1.83E+OO 3.79E-01 Kr-85 3910 days 9.38E+04 7.39E-06 Kr-85m 0.187 days 4.49E+OO 1.54E-01 Kr-87 0.053 days 1.27E+OO 5.45E-01 Kr-88 0.118 days 2.83E+OO 2.45E-01 La-140 1.68 days 4.03E+Ol 1.72E-02 La-141 0.164 days 3.94E+OO 1.76E-01 La-142 0.0642 days 1.54E+OO 4.50E-01 Mo-99 2.75 days 6.60E+Ol 1.05E-02 Nb-95 35.2 days 8.45E+02 8.20E-04 Nd-147 11 days 2.64E+02 2.63E-03 Np-239 2.36 days 5.66E+Ol 1.22E-02 Pr-143 13.6 days 3.26E+02 2.12E-03 Pu-241 5260 days 1.26E+05 5.49E-06 Rb-86 18.7 days 4.49E+02 1.54E-03 Rh-105 1.47 days 3.53E+Ol 1.96E-02 Ru-103 39.3 days 9.43E+02 7.35E-04 Ru-105 0.185 days 4.44E+OO 1.56E-01 Ru-106 368 days 8.83E+03 7.85E-05 Sb-127 3.85 days 9.24E+Ol 7.SOE-03 Sb-129*
4.4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> 4.40E+OO 1.58E-01 Sr-89 50.5 days 1.21E+03 5.72E-04 Sr-90 10600 days 2.54E+05 2.72E-06 Sr-91 0.396 days 9.SOE+OO 7.29E-02 Sr-92 0.113 days 2.71E+OO 2.56E-01 Tc-99m 0.251 days 6.02E+OO 1.15E-01 Te-127 0.39 days 9.36E+OO 7.41E-02 Te-127m 109 days 2.62E+03 2.65E-04 Te-129 0.0483 days 1.16E+OO 5.98E-01 Te-129m 33.6 days 8.06E+02 8.60E-04 Page 10 of 34
l&
i CALC N EE-323-CALC-005 ENERCON Revised Gaseous Radiological NO.
EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 Excellence-Every project. Every day.
REV.
00 T 1/2 T 1/2 Decay Isotope T 1/2 Lambda units Hours hrs*1 Te-131m 1.25 days 3.00E+Ol 2.31E-02 Te-132 3.26 days 7.82E+Ol 8.86E-03 Xe-131m*
11.934 days 2.86E+02 2.42E-03 Xe-133 5.25 days 1.26E+02 5.50E-03 Xe-133m*
2.19 days 5.26E+Ol 1.32E-02 Xe-135 0.379 days 9.lOE+OO 7.62E-02 Xe-135m*
15.29 minutes 2.55E-01 2.72E+OO Xe-138*
14.08 minutes 2.35E-01 2.95E+OO Y-90 2.67 days 6.41E+Ol 1.08E-02 Y-91 58.5 days 1.40E+03 4.94E-04 Y-92 0.148 days 3.55E+OO 1.95E-01 Y-93 0.421 days 1.0lE+Ol 6.86E-02 Zr-95 64 days 1.54E+03 4.Sl E-04 Zr-97 0.704 days 1.69E+Ol 4.lOE-02 5.5 Reduction Factor for Sprays NUREG-1940 Table 1-11 states that when sprays are used for longer than 1. 75 hours8.680556e-4 days <br />0.0208 hours <br />1.240079e-4 weeks <br />2.85375e-5 months <br /> (but less than 2.25 hours2.893519e-4 days <br />0.00694 hours <br />4.133598e-5 weeks <br />9.5125e-6 months <br />), the following factor is applied to reduce all of the particulate and iodine species.
RFs =Exp(-0.64t)
Where t = the amount of times sprays are in service.
Note: This reduction factor does not apply to the noble gases.
For this calculation, sprays are used for a total of 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> as described in Section 6.1.
The reduction factor is:
RFs = e(-o.54*2> = 0.278 5.6 Standby Gas Treatment Filters NUREG-1940 allows a reduction factor of 0.01 for filters like the standby gas treatment (SBGT) system. This factor is only applied to releases from the Offgas Stack.
RFF = 0.01 5.7 Secondary Containment NUREG-1228 provides a reduction factor for natural removal through settling and plate-out in the secondary containment. For a 0.5 hour5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> holdup period, that reduction factor is 0.4. This factor is applied to the building vent releases but not the release from the Offgas Stack.
RFsc = 0.4 Page 11 of 34
ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every day.
Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 5.8 Monitor Range and Exhaust Flow Rates CALC NO.
REV.
NEE-323-CALC-005 00 Table 9 is developed from the DAEC Emergency Plan Section "I",
ODAM Figure 3-1, and Procedure PCP 8.3.
Table 9 - Monitor Range and Exhaust Flow Rates Monitor Monitor Release Release Point Common Equipment ID Range Flow Name
µCi/cc CFM Turbine Building KAMAN RE-5945 / RE-lE-7 to 72,000 1/2 5946 1E+5 KAMAN RE-7645, RE-3/4 7644 Reactor Building KAMAN RE-7647, RE-lE-7 to 93,000 5/6 7646 1E+5 KAMAN RE-7649, RE-7/8 7648 Offgas Stack KAMAN RE-4176, RE-lE-7 to 10,000 9/10 4175 1E+5 LLRPSF KAMAN 12 RE-8801 lE-7 to 75,000 3E-1 5.9 Breathing Rate From NUREG-1940 and FGR11, the breathing rate is 3.33E-4 m3/second.
5.10 Exposure-to-Dose Conversion Factors for Inhalation The "Exposure-to-Dose Conversion Factors for Inhalation" by radionuclide provided in FGR11 Table 2.1 allow the determination of the committed dose equivalent to the thyroid and the effective dose equivalent per unit per unit intake, and are shown in Table 11.
5.11 Dose Coefficients for Air Submersion The dose coefficients in Sv/Bq*s*m-3 from being submersed in air for each radionuclide to an effective dose are taken from Table 111.1 of FGR12, and are shown in Table 11.
Page 12 of 34
. ENERCON
&cellenc~-Ev~ry projecr. Every day.
6.0 Methodology Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
REV.
N EE-323-CALC-005 00 This calculation will equate a radioactive material release rate as measured at the gaseous effluent radiation monitors with the dose received to a member of the public at an offsite location.
The relationship is highly influenced by the mixture of radioisotopes in the effluent and the dispersion of gases after they have left the facility. Primary guidance is provided by NUREG-1940 and NUREG-1228.
6.1 Scenario The following generalized timeline is used to determine the phenomenon that can affect the mixture of radioisotopes in effluent. This scenario is realistic, but bounds an event that could occur in a shorter total time frame:
T= 0 hr. Major recirculating system line break occurs. Reactor is shut down.
T= 1 hr. Core is uncovered.
T= 1 hr. Sprays are initiated.
T = 2 hrs. Core is covered.
T= 4.5 hrs. A catastrophic event causes damage to the drywell and the sec-ondary containment.
o The gaseous mixture from the Drywell spreads into the Reactor Build-ing, Turbine Building, and LLRPSF.
o Mean average holdup time of the gas in these buildings is 0.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />.
Scenario timing will affect the mixture of radioisotopes and is summarized here:
The core is uncovered for 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.
Core/Drywell Sprays are running for a total of 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.
Primary Containment integrity is maintained for 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.
Source holdup time in secondary containment is 0.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />.
Source decay time from shutdown to the release point is 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />.
When the reactor is in mode 4 or 5, the total decay time is 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />.
Other Factors:
The flow rates from the effluent exhaust points are listed in Design Input 5.8.
The gaseous effluent radiation monitors are equally efficient for the monitor-ing of noble gases, particulates, and iodines.
All releases from the Offgas Stack are filtered by the Standby Gas Treatment system.
Removal of particulates and iodines by natural process during holdup in sec-ondary containment are credited for releases from the building vents only.
6.2 Receptor The receptor is an adult located at the ODAM-described location of minimal dispersion who is exposed to the radioactive release for one hour. Due to this relatively short duration, the only exposure pathways are inhalation and submersion.
Assumptions related to the receptor are found in Section 4.0.
Page 13 of 34
ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every day.
6.3 General Approach Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
REV.
NEE-323-CALC-005 00 With a given mixture of radionuclides, the dose received by an individual offsite is a function of the gross activity present in the gaseous mixture.
The resultant dose received by an offsite receptor is dependent not only on the gross radioactivity levels of the effluent but also upon the isotopic mixture present in the gas. This calculation predicts the relative contribution of each radionuclide to the gross radiation monitored by the effluent monitor.
With the fractionation of the mixture of radionuclides understood, a given gross output reading (µCi/cm3) from an effluent radiation monitor can be scaled to determine the concentration of each isotope present in the effluent.
The calculation then uses default dispersion factors described in the Offsite Dose Assessment Manual to determine the resultant concentration of radionuclides to which an individual offsite would be exposed.
Dose conversion factors provided in Federal Guidance Report 11 (FGR 11) and 12 (FGR 12) are used to determine the dose (mrem) to an individual offsite due to their exposure to the gaseous mixture of radionuclides.
With the given radionuclide mixture and dispersion factors understood, an iterative process can be used to relate the effluent monitor reading to a target offsite dose.
Two types of radiation dose are calculated: 1) TEDE and 2) COE Thyroid.
COE or Committed Dose Equivalent is the radiation dose to a specific organ due to an uptake of radioactive material. In this case, the uptake is limited to inhalation of radioactive material in the plume.
TEDE or Total Effective Dose Equivalent is the summation of the Effective Dose Equivalent (EDE) and the Committed Dose Equivalent (CEDE).
EDE is the dose due to an individual being directly exposed (by submersion) to the radiation present in the gaseous release (shine).
CEDE is the sum of the COE for each organ of the body with weighting factors applied for each organ. In this calculation, only contributions from the inhalation pathway are considered.
An iterative process is used to determine the gross radiation monitored by the effluent monitors that correspond to the threshold doses.
6.4 Source Term This calculation will not analyze for the total activity released from the core. It will only analyze for the ratios of the isotopic species that are released from the core.
Various phenomena will act to change the composition of the isotopic mixture in the time between reactor shutdown and release from the facility. In summary the removal phenomena addressed here include:
Page 14 of 34
ENERCON Excellenc~-Every project. £very day.
Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
REV.
N EE-323-CALC-005 00 RF1 = Fraction of the activity released from the inventory of damaged fuel described in Section 6.5.
RFs = Fraction of the activity remaining after reduction by containment spray from Section 5.5.
RFR = Fraction of activity remaining after 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> or 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> of radioactive decay described in Section 6.6.
RFF = Fraction of the activity remaining after filter by SBGT filters from Section 5.6.
RFsc = Fraction of activity remaining after natural removal processes in secondary containment from Section 5.7.
Combining these factors provides a single fraction to derive a depleted source:
RFrotal = RF1
- RFs *RFR
- RFsc 6.5 Fuel Damage Release Fractions Table 6 contains release fractions for three time periods representing the total amount of time the core has been assumed to be uncovered. They are: 0 to 0.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />, 0.5 to 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, and 2 to 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />. For this calculation, the core is assumed to be uncovered for one hour.
A spreadsheet is used to scale the release fraction between the 0.5 hour5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> point and the 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> point.
The Reduction Factor, RF1, due to the release fraction is 100% of the release expected in the first 0.5 hour5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> PLUS 1/3 of the amount released as expected in the period between 0.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> and 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.
Example for Alkali Metals: 0.05 * (
0 5 hr)+ 0.2 * (
0 5 hr) = 0.1167 0.5 hr 1.5 hr Table 10- Release Fractions by Time Step (Hours)
Group Time (h) by step 0.5 1.5 Cumu lative Alka li Metals 0.050 0.2000 0.1167 Barium Group 0.000 0.0200 0.0067 Cerium Group 0.000 0.0005 0.0002 Halogen 0.050 0.2500 0.1333 Lanthanides 0.000 0.0002 0.0001 Noble Gas 0.050 0.9500 0.3667 Noble Metals 0.000 0.0025 0.0008 Tellurium group 0.000 0.0500 0.0167 Page 15 of 34
ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every day.
6.6 Radioactive Decay Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
REV.
NEE-323-CALC-005 00 The total amount of time the radioactive source is allowed to decay before being exhausted as an effluent is 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> or 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> depending on the reactor mode per Section 6.1.
The generalized equation for radioactive decay is:
A= Aoe(-M)
Where:
A = decayed activity Ao = initial activity A = isotopic decay constant t = elapsed time and A= ln2 / t%
With an end goal of a total reduction factor RFTota1, a radiation decay factor RFR is derived from the general equation above:
RFR = e(-M) 6.7 Effective Dose Equivalent - Noble Gas Submersion Submersion dose from noble gases is calculated with guidance provided in FGR12.
The concentration of an isotope i present in the plume at the receptor is calculated:
Xir=
Xiv* v * (~)
With the isotopic concentration at the receptor known, the dose (mrem) at the receptor is calculated:
Dose = Li(xir
- hEsoJ Where i=
(i) =
concentration of radionuclide i present at the receptor (Ci/m3)
Note: Ci/m3 = µCi/cc volume of gas released (m3) concentration of radionuclide i released from the stack or building vent.
(Ci/m3) each isotope present in the gaseous release dispersion factor for that release point (sec/m3) factor converting the gas concentration to effective dose equivalent.
( mre~cm 3
)
µCi sec Page 16 of 34
. ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every day.
Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
REV.
N EE-323-CALC-005 00 As described in Section 7.3, a spreadsheet is used to determine the EDE dose contribution for each isotope in the mixture.
6.8 Committed Dose Equivalent: Thyroid Organ dose from airborne particulates and iodines is calculated with guidance provided in FGR11.
The concentration of an isotope i present in the plume at the receptor is calculated:
X jr=
Xiv
- v * (~)
With the isotopic concentration at the receptor known, the dose (mrem) at the receptor can be calculated:
Dose = :L(Xir
- B
- t
- hrsoa Where i=
(~) =
B=
hrsoi=
t=
concentration of radionuclide i present at the receptor (Ci/m3)
Note: Ci/m3 = µCi/ cm3 volume of gas released (m3) concentration of radionuclide i released from the stack or building vent.
(Ci/m3) each isotope present in the gaseous release dispersion factor for that release point (sec/m3) breathing Rate (cm3/sec) factor converting the gas concentration to effective dose equivalent.
(mrem/µCi) time the dose is to be integrated (sec)
As described in Section 7.4, a spreadsheet is used to determine the thyroid COE dose contribution for each isotope in the mixture.
6.9 Committed Effective Dose Equivalent Committed Effective Dose Equivalent from airborne particulates and iodines is calculated with guidance provided in FGR11.
The concentration XirOf an isotope i present in the plume at the receptor is calculated:
Xir=
Xiv* v* (~)
With the isotopic concentration at the receptor known, the dose (mrem) at the receptor can be calculated:
Dose = Li(Xir
- B
- t
- hEsoi)
Where Page 17 of 34
ENERCON Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
NEE-323-CALC-005 Excellence-fvery project. Every doy.
REV.
00 i =
(~) =
B=
hEsoi=
t =
concentration of radionuclide i present at the receptor (Ci/m3)
Note: Ci/m3 = µCi/ cm3 volume of gas released (m3) concentration of radionuclide i released from the stack or building vent.
(Ci/m3) each isotope present in the gaseous release dispersion factor for that release point (sec/m3) breathing Rate (cm3/sec) factor converting the gas concentration to effective dose equivalent.
(mrem/µCi) time the dose is to be integrated (sec)
As described in Section 7.4, a spreadsheet is used to determine the CEDE dose contribution for each isotope in the mixture.
Page 18 of 34
ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every day.
Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
REV.
N EE-323-CALC-005 00 7.0 Calculation 1
All calculations were completed using Microsoft Excel.
Sample calculations are shown in the subsections that follow.
- 7. 1 Dose Factors FGR11 and FGR 12 display dose factors in the SI units of Sv/Bq and Sv m 3/ Bq sec, respectively. Traditional units of mrem/µCi and mrem cm3/µC i sec are desired.
FGR11:
1 Sv lE+OS mrem 1
~
G 3.70E+09 mrem
= -----+----
2.7E-ll G
l.OOE+6
µCi The conversion factor from Sv/Bq to mrem/µCi is 3.70E+09.
FGR 12:
Sv m*
lE+OS mrem 1
~
1E+06 ml G
~
sec Sv 2.7E-ll G
m*
1E+06
µCi
µCi 3.70E+l5 mrem cm3
µCi sec The conversion factor from Sv m 3/Bq sec to mrem cm3/µCi sec is 3.70E+15.
The thyroid, CEDE, and submersion dose factors in the traditional units for each isotope are calculated in the table below. Column C, D, and H are dose factors from Sections 5.10 and 5.11 and Columns E and I are the conversion factors from above.
Column F, G, and J are the hTsoi, hEsoi, and hEsoi factors as described in Sections 6.8,
6.9, and 6.7, respectively. Line 6 of Table 11 illustrates the formulas for Ba-139.
Table 11-Isotopic Dose Factors FGRll FGRll Units Thyroid CEDE FGR 12:
Units Submersion Thyroid CEDE Isotope Sv Sv Conversion mrem mrem Sv m3 Conversion mrem cc Bq Bq Factor
µCi
µCi Bq sec Factor
µCi sec Ba-139 2.40£-12 4.64£-11 3.70£+09
=E6*C6
=E6*D6 2.17£-15 3.70£+15
=/6*H6 Ba-139 2.40E-12 4.64E-ll 3.70E+09 8.88E-03 l.72E-01 2.17E-15 3.7E+l5 8.03E+OO Ba-140 2.56E-10 l.OlE-09 3.70E+09 9.47E-01 3.74E+OO 8.58E-15 3.7E+15 3.17E+Ol Ce-141 4.61E-ll 2.42E-09 3.70E+09 l.71E-01 8.95E+OO 3.43E-15 3.7E+15 l.27E+Ol Ce-143 l.21E-ll 9.16E-10 3.70E+09 4.48E-02 3.39E+OO l.29E-14 3.7E+l5 4.77E+Ol Ce-144 l.88E-09 l.OlE-07 3.70E+09 6.96E+OO 3.74E+02 8.53E-16 3.7E+l5 3.16E+OO Cm-242 9.41E-10 4.67E-06 3.70E+09 3.48E+OO l.73E+04 5.69E-18 3.7E+15 2.llE-02 Cs-134 l.llE-08 l.25E-08 3.70E+09 4.llE+Ol 4.63E+Ol 7.57E-14 3.7E+15 2.80E+02 Cs-136 1.73E-09 l.98E-09 3.70E+09 6.40E+OO 7.33E+OO l.06E-13 3.7E+15 3.92E+02 Cs-137 7.93E-09 8.63E-09 3.70E+09 2.93E+Ol 3.19E+Ol 7.74E-18 3.7E+l5 2.86E-02 1-131 2.92E-07 8.89E-09 3.70E+09 l.08E+03 3.29E+Ol l.82E-14 3.7E+15 6.73E+Ol 1-132 l.74E-09 l.03E-10 3.70E+09 6.44E+OO 3.81E-01 l.12E-13 3.7E+15 4.14E+02 1-133 4.86E-08 1.58E-09 3.70E+09 l.80E+02 5.85E+OO 2.94E-14 3.7E+l5 1.09E+02 Page 19 of 34
CALC N EE-323-CALC-005
.. ENERCON Revised Gaseous Radiological NO.
Excellence-Every pro/ecr. Every day.
EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 REV.
00 FGRll FGRll Thyroid Thyroid CEDE Units CEDE FGR 12:
Units Submersion Isotope Sv Sv Conversion mrem mrem Sv m3 Conversion mrem cc Bq Bq Fact or
µCi
µCi Bq sec Factor
µCi sec 1-134 2.88E-10 3.SSE-11 3.70E+09 1.07E+OO l.31E-01 1.3E-13 3.7E+l5 4.81E+02 1-135 8.46E-09 3.32E-10 3.70E+09 3.13E+Ol 1.23E+OO 7.98E-14 3.7E+15 2.95E+02 Kr-83m 1.SE-18 3.7E+15 5.SSE-03 Kr-85 1.19E-16 3.7E+l5 4.40E-01 Kr-8Sm 7.48E-15 3.7E+15 2.77E+Ol Kr-87 4.12E-14 3.7E+l5 1.52E+02 Kr-88 1.02E-13 3.7E+l5 3.77E+02 La-140 1.22E-10 1.31E-09 3.70E+09 4.SlE-01 4.85E+OO 1.17E-13 3.7E+l5 4.33E+02 La-141 9.40E-12 1.57E-10 3.70E+09 3.48E-02 S.81E-01 2.39E-15 3.7E+l5 8.84E+OO La-142 8.74E-12 6.84E-11 3.70E+09 3.23E-02 2.53E-01 1.44E-13 3.7E+l5 S.33E+02 Mo-99 1.17E-10 1.07E-09 3.70E+09 4.33E-01 3.96E+OO 7.28E-15 3.7E+l5 2.69E+Ol Nb-95 3.58E-10 1.57E-09 3.70E+09 1.32E+OO 5.81E+OO 3.74E-14 3.7E+l5 1.38E+02 Nd-147 1.94E-11 1.85E-09 3.70E+09 7.18E-02 6.85E+OO 6.19E-15 3.7E+15 2.29E+Ol Np-239 7.62E-12 6.78E-10 3.70E+09 2.82E-02 2.SlE+OO 7.69E-15 3.7E+15 2.85E+Ol Pr-143 1.68E-18 2.19E-09 3.70E+09 6.22E-09 8.lOE+OO 2.lE-17 3.7E+l5 7.77E-02 Pu-241 1.24E-11 2.23E-06 3.70E+09 4.59E-02 8.25E+03 7.25E-20 3.7E+15 2.68E-04 Rb-86 1.33E-09 1.79E-09 3.70E+09 4.92E+OO 6.62E+OO 4.81E-15 3.7E+15 1.78E+Ol Rh-105 2.57E-11 2.58E-10 3.70E+09 9.SlE-02 9.SSE-01 3.72E-15 3.7E+15 1.38E+Ol Ru-103 5.97E-10 2.42E-09 3.70E+09 2.21E+OO 8.95E+OO 2.25E-14 3.7E+l5 8.33E+Ol Ru-105 1.SOE-11 1.23E-10 3.70E+09 5.SSE-02 4.SSE-01 3.81E-14 3.7E+l5 1.41E+02 Ru-106 1.37E-08 l.29E-07 3.70E+09 5.07E+Ol 4.77E+02 0
3.7E+l5 O.OOE+OO Sb-127 1.SOE-10 1.63E-09 3.70E+09 5.SSE-01 6.03E+OO 3.33E-14 3.7E+l5 1.23E+02 Sb-129 2.07E-11 1.74E-10 3.70E+09 7.66E-02 6.44E-01 7.14E-14 3.7E+15 2.64E+02 Sr-89 4.16E-10 1.12E-08 3.70E+09 1.54E+OO 4.14E+Ol 7.73E-17 3.7E+l5 2.86E-01 Sr-90 2.64E-09 3.SlE-07 3.70E+09 9.77E+OO 1.30E+03 7.53E-18 3.7E+l5 2.79E-02 Sr-91 4.08E-11 4.49E-10 3.70E+09 1.SlE-01 1.66E+OO 3.45E-14 3.7E+l5 1.28E+02 Sr-92 2.19E-11 2.18E-10 3.70E+09 8.lOE-02 8.07E-01 6.79E-14 3.7E+l5 2.51E+02 Tc-99m S.OlE-11 8.80E-12 3.70E+09 1.85E-01 3.26E-02 S.89E-15 3.7E+l5 2.18E+Ol Te-127 6.46E-12 8.60E-11 3.70E+09 2.39E-02 3.18E-01 2.42E-16 3.7E+l5 8.95E-01 Te-127m 2.39E-10 5.81E-09 3.70E+09 8.84E-01 2.lSE+Ol 1.47E-16 3.7E+l5 S.44E-01 Te-129 1.63E-12 2.42E-11 3.70E+09 6.03E-03 8.95E-02 2.75E-15 3.7E+15 1.02E+Ol Te-129m 3.95E-10 6.47E-09 3.70E+09 1.46E+OO 2.39E+Ol 1.SSE-15 3.7E+15 5.74E+OO Te-131m 3.61E-08 1.73E-09 3.70E+09 1.34E+02 6.40E+OO 7.0lE-14 3.7E+l5 2.59E+02 Te-132 6.28E-08 2.SSE-09 3.70E+09 2.32E+02 9.44E+OO 1.03E-14 3.7E+l5 3.81E+Ol Xe-131m 3.89E-16 3.7E+l5 1.44E+OO Xe-133 1.56E-15 3.7E+15 5.77E+OO Xe-133m 1.37E-15 3.7E+l5 5.07E+OO Xe-135 1.19E-14 3.7E+15 4.40E+Ol Xe-135m 2.04E-14 3.7E+l5 7.SSE+Ol Xe-138 5.77E-14 3.7E+15 2.13E+02 Y-90 9.52E-12 2.28E-09 3.70E+09 3.52E-02 8.44E+OO 1.9E-16 3.7E+l5 7.03E-01 Y-91 1.lOE-10 l.32E-08 3.70E+09 4.07E-01 4.88E+Ol 2.6E-16 3.7E+15 9.62E-01 Y-92 3.69E-12 2.llE-10 3.70E+09 1.37E-02 7.81E-01 1.3E-14 3.7E+l5 4.81E+Ol Y-93 5.06E-12 5.82E-10 3.70E+09 1.87E-02 2.lSE+OO 4.8E-15 3.7E+l5 1.78E+Ol Zr-95 1.44E-09 6.39E-09 3.70E+09 5.33E+OO 2.36E+Ol 3.6E-14 3.7E+l5 1.33E+02 Zr-97 9.56E-11 1.17E-09 3.70E+09 3.54E-01 4.33E+OO 9.02E-15 3.7E+15 3.34E+Ol Page 20 of 34
ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every day.
7.2 Source Term Revised Gaseous Radiological EA Ls per NE I 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
REV.
NEE-323-CALC-005 00 A spreadsheet is used to determine the total reduction factor RFrota1 for each isotope present in the source term as described in Section 6.4. The activity per megawatt thermal from Section 5.1 is multiplied by RFrota1 to find the source term for each isotope. The spreadsheet for the Offgas Stack release is presented in Table 13.
The relative activity released from damaged fuel (RF1) was determined in Section 6.5.
Table 12 - 2 Hours Reduction Factor (RF,)
Cumulative 2 Hour Alkali Metals 0.1167 Barium Group 0.0067 Cerium Group 0.0002 Halogen 0.1333 Lanthanides 0.0001 Noble Gas 0.3667 Noble Metals 0.0008 Tellurium group 0.0167 A Spray Reduction factor of 0.278 for primary containment sprays (RFs) was derived in Section 5.5.
Determination of the Radiation Decay fractions (RFR) was demonstrated in Section 6.6. In the spreadsheets below, the source decay time is 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />.
Page 21 of 34
LI ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every doy.
7.2.1 Offgas Stack Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
REV.
NEE-323-CALC-005 00 For the Offgas Stack release, credit is taken for filtering (RFF) by the Standby Gas Treatment system but not for the natural removal processes that occur in secondary containment (RFsc).
Table 13-Isotopic Depletion and Release for Offgas Stack RF1 RFs RFsc RFF RFR RFrotal g
Re lease
+ 0.25 hr SBGT Decay Tota l Release Form Isotope Sprays Secondary MWTh Fraction Reduction Con-Filter Fraction Depletion Ci/MWTh tainment Barium Group Ba-139 4.74E+04 0.0067 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.0808 1.50E-06 7.lOE-02 Barium Group Ba-140 4.76E+04 0.0067 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9887 1.83E-05 8.72E-01 Cerium Group Ce-141 4.39E+04 0.0002 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9956 4.61E-07 2.03E-02 Cerium Group Ce-143 4.00E+04 0.0002 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9006 4.17E-07 1.67E-02 Cerium Group Ce-144 3.54E+04 0.0002 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9995 4.63E-07 l.64E-02 Lanthanides Cm-242 1.12E+03 0.0001 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9991 1.85E-07 2.07E-04 Alkali Metals Cs-134 4.70E+03 0.1167 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9998 3.24E-04 1.52E+OO Alkali Metals Cs-136 1.49E+03 0.1167 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9890 3.21E-04 4.78E-01 Alkali Metals Cs-137 3.25E+03 0.1167 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 1.0000 3.24E-04 1.05E+OO Halogen 1-131 2.67E+04 0.1333 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9822 3.64E-04 9.72E+OO Halogen 1-132 3.88E+04 0.1333 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.2215 8.21E-05 3.19E+OO Halogen 1-133 5.42E+04 0.1333 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.8466 3.14E-04 1.70E+Ol Halogen 1-134 5.98E+04 0.1333 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.0191 7.09E-06 4.24E-Ol Halogen 1-135 5.18E+04 0.1333 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.5915 2.19E-04 1.14E+Ol Noble Gas Kr-83m 3.05E+03 0.367 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.1505 5.52E-02 1.68E+02 Noble Gas Kr-85 2.78E+02 0.367 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0000 3.67E-01 1.02E+02 Noble Gas Kr-85m 6.17E+03 0.367 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.4620 l.69E-Ol l.05E+03 Noble Gas Kr-87 l.23E+04 0.367 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0656 2.40E-02 2.96E+02 Noble Gas Kr-88 1.70E+04 0.367 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.2941 1.08E-01 1.83E+03 Lanthanides La-140 4.91E+04 0.0001 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9176 l.70E-07 8.35E-03 La nthanides La-141 4.33E+04 0.0001 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.4146 7.68E-08 3.33E-03 La nth an ides La-142 4.21E+04 0.0001 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.1055 1.96E-08 8.23E-04 Noble Metals Mo-99 5.30E+04 0.0008 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9488 2.20E-06 1.17E-01 Lanthanides Nb-95 4.50E+04 0.0001 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9959 1.85E-07 8.31E-03 Lanthanides Nd-147 1.75E+04 0.0001 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9870 1.83E-07 3.20E-03 Cerium Group Np-239 5.69E+05 0.0002 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9406 4.36E-07 2.48E-01 La nth an ides Pr-143 3.96E+04 0.0001 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9894 1.83E-07 7.26E-03 Cerium Group Pu-241 4.26E+03 0.0002 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 1.0000 4.63E-07 l.97E-03 Alkali Metals Rb-86 5.29E+Ol 0.1167 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9923 3.22E-04 1.70E-02 Noble Metals Rh-105 2.81E+04 0.0008 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9064 2.lOE-06 5.90E-02 Noble Metals Ru-103 4.34E+04 0.0008 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9963 2.31E-06 l.OOE-01 Noble Metals Ru-105 3.06E+04 0.0008 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.4581 1.06E-06 3.25E-02 Noble Metals Ru-106 1.55E+04 0.0008 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9996 2.32E-06 3.59E-02 Tellurium group Sb-127 2.39E+03 0.0167 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9632 4.46E-05 1.07E-01 Tellurium group Sb-129 8.68E+03 0.0167 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.4549 2.llE-05 1.83E-01 Barium Group Sr-89 2.41E+04 0.0067 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 0.9971 1.85E-OS 4.45E-01 Barium Group Sr-90 2.39E+03 0.0067 0.2780 1.0000 0.01 1.0000 1.85E-05 4.43E-02 Page 22 of 34
ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every day.
Form Isotope Barium Group Sr-91 Barium Group Sr-92 Noble Metals Tc-99m Tellurium group Te-127 Tellurium group Te-127m Tellurium group Te-129 Tellurium group Te-129m Tellurium group Te-131m Tellurium group Te-132 Noble Gas Xe-131m Noble Gas Xe-133 Noble Gas Xe-133m Noble Gas Xe-135 Noble Gas Xe-135m Noble Gas Xe-138 Lanthanides Y-90 Lanthanides Y-91 Lanthanides Y-92 Lanthanides Y-93 Lanthanides Zr-95 La nth an ides Zr-97 Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 RF1 RFs RFsc g
Release
+ 0.25 hr Sprays Secondary MWTh Fraction Reduction Con-tainment 3.01E+04 0.0067 0.2780 1.0000 3.24E+04 0.0067 0.2780 1.0000 4.37E+04 0.0008 0.2780 1.0000 2.36E+03 0.0167 0.2780 1.0000 3.97E+02 0.0167 0.2780 1.0000 8.26E+03 0.0167 0.2780 1.0000 l.68E+03 0.0167 0.2780 1.0000 5.41E+03 0.0167 0.2780 1.0000 3.81E+04 0.0167 0.2780 1.0000 3.65E+02 0.367 1.0 1.0 5.43E+04 0.367 1.0 1.0 l.72E+03 0.367 1.0 1.0 l.42E+04 0.367 1.0 1.0 l.15E+04 0.367 1.0 1.0 4.56E+04 0.367 1.0 1.0 2.45E+03 0.0001 0.2780 1.0000 3.17E+04 0.0001 0.2780 1.0000 3.26E+04 0.0001 0.2780 1.0000 2.52E+04 0.0001 0.2780 1.0000 4.44E+04 0.0001 0.2780 1.0000 4.23E+04 0.0001 0.2780 1.0000 Page 23 of 34 CALC NO.
REV.
RFF 5BGT Filter 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 NEE-323-CALC-005 00 RFR RFrotal Decay Total Release Fraction Depletion Ci/MWTh 0.6944 l.29E-05 3.87E-01 0.2786 5.16E-06 l.67E-01 0.5625 l.30E-06 5.70E-02 0.6905 3.20E-05 7.55E-02 0.9987 4.63E-05 l.84E-02 0.0503 2.33E-06 l.93E-02 0.9957 4.61E-05 7.75E-02 0.8909 4.13E-05 2.23E-01 0.9567 4.43E-05 l.69E+OO 0.9880 3.62E-01 l.32E+02 0.9729 3.57E-01 l.94E+04 0.9362 3.43E-01 5.90E+02 0.6832 2.SOE-01 3.56E+03 0.0000 4.55E-07 5.23E-03 0.0000 l.41E-07 6.45E-03 0.9474 l.76E-07 4.30E-04 0.9975 l.85E-07 5.86E-03 0.3769 6.99E-08 2.28E-03 0.7096 l.32E-07 3.31E-03 0.9977 l.85E-07 8.21E-03 0.8145 l.51E-07 6.39E-03
ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every day.
Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 7.2.2 Building Vents CALC NO.
REV.
N EE-323-CALC-005 00 For releases from Building Vents, no credit is taken for filtering (RFF) by the Standby Gas Treatment system. Credit is taken for the natural removal processes that occurs in secondary containment (RFsc).
This source term also has radioactive decay occurring for 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />.
Table 14 - Isotopic Depletion and Release for Building Vents RF1 RFs RFsc RFF RFR RFrotal g
Release
+ 0.25 hr SBGT Decay Total Release Form Isotope Sprays Secondary MWTh Fraction Reduction Con-Filter Fraction Depletion Ci/MWTh tainment Barium Group Ba-139 4.74E+04 0.0067 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.0808 5.99E-05 2.84E+OO Barium Group Ba-140 4.76E+04 0.0067 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9887 7.33E-04 3.49E+Ol Cerium Group Ce-141 4.39E+04 0.0002 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9956 l.85E-05 8.lOE-01 Cerium Group Ce-143 4.00E+04 0.0002 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9006 1.67E-05 6.68E-01 Cerium Group Ce-144 3.54E+04 0.0002 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9995 l.85E-05 6.56E-01 La ntha n ides Cm-242 l.12E+03 0.0001 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9991 7.41E-06 8.30E-03 Alkali Metals Cs-134 4.70E+03 0.1167 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9998 l.30E-02 6.lOE+Ol Alkali Metals Cs-136 l.49E+03 0.1167 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9890 l.28E-02 1.91E+Ol Alkali Metals Cs-137 3.25E+03 0.1167 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 1.0000 1.30E-02 4.22E+Ol Halogen 1-131 2.67E+04 0.1333 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9822 1.46E-02 3.89E+02 Halogen 1-132 3.88E+04 0.1333 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.2215 3.28E-03 1.27E+02 Halogen 1-133 5.42E+04 0.1333 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.8466 1.26E-02 6.80E+02 Halogen 1-134 5.98E+04 0.1333 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.0191 2.84E-04 1.70E+Ol Halogen 1-135 5.18E+04 0.1333 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.5915 8.77E-03 4.54E+02 Noble Gas Kr-83m 3.05E+03 0.367 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.1505 5.52E-02 1.68E+02 Noble Gas Kr-85 2.78E+02 0.367 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0000 3.67E-01 1.02E+02 Noble Gas Kr-85m 6.17E+03 0.367 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.4620 1.69E-01 1.05E+03 Noble Gas Kr-87 1.23E+04 0.367 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0656 2.40E-02 2.96E+02 Noble Gas Kr-88 1.70E+04 0.367 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.2941 1.08E-01 1.83E+03 Lanthanides La-140 4.91E+04 0.0001 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9176 6.80E-06 3.34E-01 Lanthanides La-141 4.33E+04 0.0001 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.4146 3.07E-06 1.33E-01 La ntha n ides La-142 4.21E+04 0.0001 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.1055 7.82E-07 3.29E-02 Noble Metals Mo-99 5.30E+04 0.0008 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9488 8.79E-05 4.66E+OO La nth an ides Nb-95 4.SOE+04 0.0001 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9959 7.38E-06 3.32E-01 Lanthanides Nd-147 1.75E+04 0.0001 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9870 7.32E-06 1.28E-01 Cerium Group Np-239 5.69E+05 0.0002 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9406 1.74E-05 9.92E+OO La nth an ides Pr-143 3.96E+04 0.0001 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9894 7.34E-06 2.91E-01 Cerium Group Pu-241 4.26E+03 0.0002 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 1.0000 1.85E-05 7.90E-02 Alkali Metals Rb-86 5.29E+Ol 0.1167 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9923 1.29E-02 6.81E-01 Noble Metals Rh-105 2.81E+04 0.0008 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9064 8.40E-05 2.36E+OO Noble Metals Ru-103 4.34E+04 0.0008 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9963 9.23E-05 4.0lE+OO Noble Metals Ru-105 3.06E+04 0.0008 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.4581 4.25E-05 1.30E+OO Noble Metals Ru-106 1.55E+04 0.0008 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9996 9.26E-05 1.44E+OO Tellurium group Sb-127 2.39E+03 0.0167 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9632 1.79E-03 4.27E+OO Tellurium group Sb-129 8.68E+03 0.0167 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.4549 8.43E-04 7.32E+OO Barium Group Sr-89 2.41E+04 0.0067 0.2780 0.4000 1.00 0.9971 7.39E-04 1.78E+Ol Page 24 of 34
ENERCON Excellence-Every pro]ecr. Every day.
Form Isotope Barium Group Sr-90 Barium Group Sr-91 Barium Group Sr-92 Noble Metals Tc-99m Tellurium group Te-127 Tellurium group Te-127m Tellurium group Te-129 Tellurium group Te-129m Tellurium group Te-131m Tellurium group Te-132 Noble Gas Xe-131m Noble Gas Xe-133 Noble Gas Xe-133m Noble Gas Xe-135 Noble Gas Xe-135m Noble Gas Xe-138 Lanthanides Y-90 Lanthanides Y-91 Lanthanides Y-92 Lanthanides Y-93 Lantha nides Zr-95 Lanthanides Zr-97 Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 RF1 RFs RFsc g
Relea se
+ 0.25 hr Sprays Secondary MWTh Fraction Reduction Con-tainment 2.39E+03 0.0067 0.2780 0.4000 3.01E+04 0.0067 0.2780 0.4000 3.24E+04 0.0067 0.2780 0.4000 4.37E+04 0.0008 0.2780 0.4000 2.36E+03 0.0167 0.2780 0.4000 3.97E+02 0.0167 0.2780 0.4000 8.26E+03 0.0167 0.2780 0.4000 1.68E+03 0.0167 0.2780 0.4000 5.41E+03 0.0167 0.2780 0.4000 3.81E+04 0.0167 0.2780 0.4000 3.65E+02 0.367 1.0 1.0 5.43E+04 0.367 1.0 1.0 1.72E+03 0.367 1.0 1.0 1.42E+04 0.367 1.0 1.0 1.15E+04 0.367 1.0 1.0 4.56E+04 0.367 1.0 1.0 2.45E+03 0.0001 0.2780 0.4000 3.17E+04 0.0001 0.2780 0.4000 3.26E+04 0.0001 0.2780 0.4000 2.52E+04 0.0001 0.2780 0.4000 4.44E+04 0.0001 0.2780 0.4000 4.23E+04 0.0001 0.2780 0.4000 CALC NO.
REV.
RFF SBGT Filter 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.3 Effective Dose Equivalent-Noble Gas Submersion N EE-323-CALC-005 00 RFR RFrotal Decay Total Release Fraction Depletion Ci/MWTh 1.0000 7.41E-04 1.77E+OO 0.6944 5.15E-04 1.55E+Ol 0.2786 2.07E-04 6.69E+OO 0.5625 5.21E-05 2.28E+OO 0.6905 1.28E-03 3.02E+OO 0.9987 1.85E-03 7.35E-01 0.0503 9.32E-05 7.70E-01 0.9957 1.85E-03 3.lOE+OO 0.8909 1.65E-03 8.93E+OO 0.9567 1.77E-03 6.76E+Ol 0.9880 3.62E-01 1.32E+02 0.9729 3.57E-01 1.94E+04 0.9362 3.43E-01 5.90E+02 0.6832 2.50E-01 3.56E+03 0.0000 4.55E-07 5.23E-03 0.0000 1.41E-07 6.45E-03 0.9474 7.02E-06 1.72E-02 0.9975 7.40E-06 2.34E-01 0.3769 2.79E-06 9.llE-02 0.7096 5.26E-06 1.33E-01 0.9977 7.40E-06 3.28E-01 0.8145 6.04E-06 2.55E-01 Spreadsheets are used to calculate isotopic concentration at the receptor and the resultant radiation dose to the receptor for each of the isotopes in the mixture.
For the example Effective Dose Equivalent calculation, the release point is the Offgas Stack at five hours since shutdown, and a gross concentration of 43.9 µCi/cm3 (this concentration was determined iteratively to produce 10 mrem TEDE). The secondary containment holdup hours is set at <0.5 because the natural removal process in the Secondary Containment does not occur with the Offgas Stack.
In Table 15, the column labeled "hEsoi Submersion mrem cm3/µCi sec," is the dose factor for air submersion dose and is calculated in Section 7.1.
The column labeled "Depleted Mix Ci/MWTh" is the "Release Ci/MWTh" calculated in Section 7.2 for each isotope.
The "Fraction" column determines the fraction each isotope contributes to the gross activity and is used to scale the activity for each isotope.
Page 25 of 34
t ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every day.
Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
REV.
NEE-323-CALC-005 00 The column "x;v Release Cone. µCi/cm3" contains a calculation that scales the "Depleted Mix Ci/MWTh" column to a user entered gross concentration based on the "Fraction". In this case, the gross concentration entered was 43.9 µCi/cm3 (4.39E+1).
Values in the "x ;r Receptor Cone. µCi/cm3" column are calculated by multiplying the release concentration by the applicable dispersion factor, the volume of the release, and requisite conversion factors. The basic equation is from Section 6.7:
Xir =
Xiv* v * (~)
For isotope 1-131, an example is presented:
Xiv Release Cone.
Flow l.57E-02
µCi 10,000 ft' 2.83E-02 m*
1 cm3 fAifl 1
60 Where:
(X/Q) fAifl 2.80E-07 5e 5e m*
Receptor Cone.
2.08E-08
µCi cm3 v = 10,000 ft3/min is the rated flow from the Offgas Stack from Design Input 5.8.
(XIQ) = 2.80E-07 is the Noble Gas Dispersion coefficient (XIQ) for the Offgas Stack from Design Input 5.3.
2.83E-2 converts tt3 to m3 Values in the "Submersion Dose mrem" (hEso;) column are calculated by multiplying the factors "x;r Receptor Cone. µCi/cm3", a time-units conversion factor, and the dose conversion factor calculated in Section 7.1. The basic equation for a one hour time period is shown in Section 6.7.
Dose== Li(Xir
- hEsoa For isotope 1-131, an example is presented:
xir h ESOi Receptor Cone.
Submersion 2.0SE-08
~
6.73E+Ol mre m m&
3600 5e m;
~
5e Page 26 of 34 Submersion Dose mrem 5.04E-03 mrem
CALC NEE-323-CALC-005 ENERCON Revised Gaseous Radiological NO.
I EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 Excellence-Every project. Every day.
REV.
00 For ease of comparison, the spreadsheet row for 1-131 is shown here:
hESOi Depleted Xiv xir Submersion Mix Release Receptor Submersion Nuclide g
Fraction Cone.
Cone.
Dose mrem cc gg gg
µCi sec MWTh mrem cm3 cm 3 1-131 6.73E+l 9.72E+O 3.582E-4 1.57E-2 2.08E-8 S.04E-3 Table 15 - Submersion Dose for Offgas Stack hESOi Depleted Xiv Xir Submersion Mix Release Receptor Submersion Nuclide mrem cm3 Ci Fraction Cone.
Cone.
Dose
µCi sec MWfh l!9 l!9 mrem cm3 cm3 Ba-139 8.03E+O 7.lOE-2 2.62E-6 1.lSE-4 1.52E-10 4.39E-6 Ba-140 3.17E+1 8.72E-1 3.21E-5 1.41E-3 1.86E-9 2.13E-4 Ce-141 1.27E+1 2.03E-2 7.46E-7 3.28E-5 4.33E-11 1.98E-6 Ce-143 4.77E+1 1.67E-2 6.lSE-7 2.70E-5 3.57E-11 6.13E-6 Ce-144 3.16E+O 1.64E-2 6.04E-7 2.65E-5 3.SOE-11 3.98E-7 Cm-242 2.llE-2 2.07E-4 7.64E-9 3.35E-7 4.43E-13 3.36E-11 Cs-134 2.80E+2 1.52E+O 5.62E-5 2.47E-3 3.26E-9 3.28E-3 Cs-136 3.92E+2 4.78E-1 1.76E-5 7.73E-4 1.02E-9 1.44E-3 Cs-137 2.86E-2 1.0SE+O 3.88E-5 1.70E-3 2.25E-9 2.32E-7 1-131 6.73E+1 9.72E+O 3.582E-4 1.57E-2 2.08E-8 5.04E-3 1-132 4.14E+2 3.19E+O 1.17E-4 5.lSE-3 6.81E-9 1.02E-2 1-133 1.09E+2 1.70E+1 6.27E-4 2.75E-2 3.64E-8 1.42E-2 1-134 4.81E+2 4.24E-1 1.56E-5 6.86E-4 9.07E-10 1.57E-3 1-135 2.95E+2 1.14E+1 4.18E-4 1.84E-2 2.43E-8 2.58E-2 Kr-83m 5.SSE-3 1.68E+2 6.20E-3 2.72E-1 3.60E-7 7.19E-6 Kr-85 4.40E-1 1.02E+2 3.76E-3 1.65E-1 2.18E-7 3.45E-4 Kr-85m 2.77E+1 1.05E+3 3.85E-2 1.69E+O 2.23E-6 2.23E-1 Kr-87 1.52E+2 2.96E+2 1.09E-2 4.78E-1 6.32E-7 3.47E-1 Kr-88 3.77E+2 1.83E+3 6.75E-2 2.97E+O 3.92E-6 5.32E+O La-140 4.33E+2 8.35E-3 3.08E-7 1.35E-5 1.78E-11 2.78E-5 La-141 8.84E+O 3.33E-3 1.23E-7 5.38E-6 7.llE-12 2.26E-7 La-142 5.33E+2 8.23E-4 3.03E-8 1.33E-6 1.76E-12 3.37E-6 Mo-99 2.69E+1 1.17E-1 4.29E-6 1.88E-4 2.49E-10 2.41E-5 Nb-95 1.38E+2 8.31E-3 3.06E-7 1.34E-5 1.78E-11 8.84E-6 Nd-147 2.29E+1 3.20E-3 1.18E-7 5.18E-6 6.84E-12 5.64E-7 Np-239 2.85E+1 2.48E-1 9.14E-6 4.0lE-4 5.30E-10 5.43E-5 Pr-143 7.77E-2 7.26E-3 2.68E-7 1.17E-5 1.SSE-11 4.34E-9 Pu-241 2.68E-4 1.97E-3 7.27E-8 3.19E-6 4.22E-12 4.D7E-12 Rb-86 1.78E+1 1.70E-2 6.27E-7 2.75E-5 3.64E-11 2.33E-6 Rh-105 1.38E+1 5.9DE-2 2.17E-6 9.54E-5 1.26E-10 6.25E-6 Ru-103 8.33E+1 1.00E-1 3.69E-6 1.62E-4 2.14E-10 6.42E-5 Ru-105 1.41E+2 3.25E-2 1.20E-6 5.25E-5 6.94E-11 3.52E-5 Ru-106 O.OOE+O 3.59E-2 1.32E-6 5.81E-5 7.67E-11 O.OOE+O Sb-127 1.23E+2 1.D7E-1 3.93E-6 1.73E-4 2.28E-10 1.0lE-4 Sb-129 2.64E+2 l.83E-1 6.74E-6 2.96E-4 3.91E-1D 3.72E-4 Sr-89 2.86E-1 4.45E-1 1.64E-S 7.2DE-4 9.52E-10 9.80E-7 Sr-90 2.79E-2 4.43E-2 1.63E-6 7.16E-5 9.47E-11 9.SOE-9 Sr-91 1.28E+2 3.87E-1 1.43E-5 6.27E-4 8.28E-10 3.81E-4 Sr-92 2.51E+2 l.67E-1 6.16E-6 2.71E-4 3.58E-10 3.23E-4 Tc-99m 2.18E+l 5.70E-2 2.lOE-6 9.21E-5 1.22E-10 9.SSE-6 Page 27 of 34
- CALC N EE-323-CALC-005 ENERCON Revised Gaseous Radiological NO.
Excellence-Every project. Every day.
EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 REV.
00 hESOi Depleted xiv Xir Submersion Mix Release Receptor Submersion Nuclide mrem cm3 Ci Fraction Cone.
Cone.
Dose
µCi sec MWTh
.!!9
.!!9 mrem cm3 cm3 Te-127 8.95E-1 7.SSE-2 2.78E-6 1.22E-4 l.61E-10 5.20E-7 Te-127m 5.44E-1 l.84E-2 6.77E-7 2.97E-5 3.93E-11 7.69E-8 Te-129 l.02E+l l.93E-2 7.09E-7 3.llE-5 4.llE-11 l.SlE-6 Te-129m 5.74E+O 7.75E-2 2.86E-6 l.25E-4 l.66E-10 3.42E-6 Te-131m 2.59E+2 2.23E-1 8.23E-6 3.61E-4 4.77E-10 4.46E-4 Te-132 3.81E+l l.69E+O 6.22E-5 2.73E-3 3.61E-9 4.95E-4 Xe-131m l.44E+O l.32E+2 4.87E-3 2.14E-1 2.83E-7 l.46E-3 Xe-133 5.77E+O l.94E+4 7.14E-1 3.13E+l 4.14E-5 8.60E-1 Xe-133m 5.07E+O 5.90E+2 2.18E-2 9.SSE-1 l.26E-6 2.30E-2 Xe-135 4.40E+l 3.56E+3 l.31E-1 5.75E+O 7.60E-6 l.20E+O Xe-135m 7.SSE+l 5.23E-3 l.93E-7 8.46E-6 l.12E-11 3.04E-6 Xe-138 2.13E+2 6.45E-3 2.37E-7 l.04E-5 1.38E-11 l.06E-5 Y-90 7.03E-1 4.30E-4 l.58E-8 6.96E-7 9.19E-13 2.33E-9 Y-91 9.62E-1 5.86E-3 2.16E-7 9.48E-6 l.25E-11 4.34E-8 Y-92 4.81E+l 2.28E-3 8.39E-8 3.68E-6 4.87E-12 8.43E-7 Y-93 l.78E+l 3.31E-3 l.22E-7 5.36E-6 7.08E-12 4.53E-7 Zr-95 l.33E+2 8.21E-3 3.03E-7 l.33E-5 l.75E-11 8.42E-6 Zr-97 3.34E+l 6.39E-3 2.35E-7 l.03E-5 l.36E-11 l.64E-6 2.71E+04 100.00%
4.39E+Ol 5.80E-5 8.05 4.39E+1 mrem Given a radiation effluent monitor reading of 43.9 µCi/cm3, and the assumptions of the scenario, the EDE value is 8.05 mrem.
Spreadsheet cases are run for all four release points. See Section 2.0 for results.
Page 28 of 34
ENERCON
&cel!ence-fvery project. Every day.
Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 7.4 CEDE and COE Thyroid CALC NO.
REV.
NEE-323-CALC-005 00 For the example CEDE and COE Thyroid calculation, the release point is the Reactor Building at five hours since shutdown, and a gross concentration of 1.22E-2 µCi/cc, with a Secondary Containment Holdup time of 0.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> per Design Input 5.7 (this concentration was determined iteratively to produce 49.8 mrem Thyroid COE).
In Table 16, the columns labeled "hrsoiThyroid mrem/µCi" and "hEsoi CEDE mrem/µCi" are the dose factors developed in Section 7.1.
The column labeled "Depleted Mix Ci/MWTh" is the "Release Ci/MWTh" calculated above in Section 7.2 for each isotope.
The "Fraction" column determines the fraction each isotope contributes to the gross activity, and is used to scale the activity for each isotope.
The column "x ;v Release Cone. µCi/cm3" contains a calculation that scales the "Depleted Mix" column to a user entered gross concentration based on the "Fraction" and is the variable X;v in the equation below. In this case, the gross concentration entered was 1.22E-2 µCi/cc.
Values in the "x;r Receptor Cone. µCi/cm3" column are calculated by multiplying the release concentration by the applicable dispersion factor, the volume of the release, and requisite conversion factors. The basic equation from Section 6.8:
Xir =
Xiv* v * (i)
For isotope 1-131, an example is presented:
xiv Release Cone.
Flow 1.63E-04
µCi 93,000 tt*
2.83E-02 m*
cm3 ffiffi 1
ft' Where:
(X/Q) 1 ffiffi 3.90E-06 60 5e 5e m*
Receptor Cone.
2.79E-08
µCi cm3 v = 93,000 ft3/min is the rated flow from the Reactor Building from Design Input 5.8.
(X!Q) = 3.90E-06 is the Particulate and Iodine dispersion coefficient for the Reactor Building from Design Input 5.8.
Values in the column labeled "Inhalation Thyroid Dose mrem" are calculated by multiplying the following factors: concentration at the receptor, the breathing rate, the time, and the dose conversion factor. The basic equation is shown in Section 6.8.
Dose== I/xir
- B
- t
- hrsoJ For isotope 1-131, an example is presented:
Page 29 of 34
ENERCON Revised Gaseous Radiological EA Ls per NE I 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
N EE-323-CALC-005 Excel!enu-Every project. Every day.
xir Receptor Cone.
Time
' 2.79E-08 t*G 1
rue
&m*
Where:
B Breathing hrsoi Rate Thyroid 1.20E+06
&m*
1.08E+03 rue mrem t*G REV.
Inhalation Thyroid Dose 00 3.62E+Ol mrem
= ----4---
hrso; is the thyroid dose factor for each isotope from Section 7.1.
B = 1.20E+06 cm3/hr is the breathing rate. This value is equal to 3.33E-4 m3/sec from Design Input 5.9.
Values in the "Inhalation CEDE Dose mrem" column are calculated by multiplying the following factors: concentration at the receptor, the breathing rate, the time, and the dose conversion factor. The basic equation comes from Section 6.9.
Dose = I/xir
- B
- t
- hEsoa For isotope 1-131, an example is presented:
Xir Receptor Cone Time 2.79E-08 t*G 1
rue B
Breathing Rate 1.20E+06
&m*
hesoi CEDE 3.29E+Ol mrem Inhalation CEDE Dose 1.lOE+OO mrem
=--------
&m*
rue t*G For ease of comparison, the table row for 1-131 is shown here:
h rsoi h ESOi Depleted Xiv Xir Inhalation Thyroid CEDE Mix Release Receptor Thyroid Nuclide Fraction Cone.
Cone.
mrem mrem Ci
!!Qi
!!Qi Dose
µCi
µCi MWTh cm3 cm3 mrem 1-131 1.08E+3 3.29E+l 3.89E+2 1.34E-2 1.63E-4 2.79E-8 3.62E+l Table 16-Inhalation Thyroid and CEDE Dose for Reactor Building hrsoi hESOi Depleted Xiv Xir Inhalation T hyroid CEDE Mix Release Receptor Thyroid Nuclide Fraction Cone.
Cone.
mrem mrem Ci
!!Qi
!!Qi Dose
µCi
µCi MWTh cm3 cm3 mrem Ba-139 8.88E-3 l.72E-1 2.84E+O 9.76E-5 1.19E-6 2.04E-10 2.17E-6 Ba-140 9.47E-1 3.74E+O 3.49E+l l.20E-3 l.46E-5 2.SOE-9 2.85E-3 Ce-141 l.71E-1 8.95E+O 8.lOE-1 2.78E-5 3.40E-7 5.82E-11 l.19E-5 Ce-143 4.48E-2 3.39E+O 6.68E-1 2.30E-5 2.80E-7 4.79E-11 2.58E-6 Ce-144 6.96E+O 3.74E+2 6.56E-1 2.25E-5 2.75E-7 4.71E-11 3.93E-4 Page 30 of 34 Inhalation CEDE Dose mrem 1.lOE+O Inhalation CEDE Dose mrem 4.20E-5 1.12E-2 6.25E-4 l.95E-4 2.llE-2
CALC NEE-323-CALC-005
- ENERCON Revised Gaseous Radiological NO.
~
Excellence-Every project. Every doy.
EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 REV.
00 hrsoi hESOi Depleted Xiv Xir Inhalation Inhalation Thyroid CEDE Mix Release Receptor Thyroid CEDE Nuclide Fraction Cone.
Cone.
mrem mrem Ci J&j J&j Dose Dose
µCi
µCi MWTh cm3 cm3 mrem mrem Cm-242 3.48E+O 1.73E+4 8.30E-3 2.85E-7 3.48E-9 5.96E-13 2.49E-6 1.23E-2 Cs-134 4.llE+l 4.63E+l 6.lOE+l 2.lOE-3 2.56E-5 4.38E-9 2.16E-1 2.43E-1 Cs-136 6.40E+O 7.33E+O 1.91E+l 6.57E-4 8.02E-6 l.37E-9 l.OSE-2 1.21E-2 Cs-137 2.93E+l 3.19E+l 4.22E+l 1.45E-3 1.77E-5 3.03E-9 l.07E-1 l.16E-1 1-131 l.08E+3 3.29E+l 3.89E+2 1.34E-2 1.63E-4 2.79E-8 3.62E+l 1.lOE+O 1-132 6.44E+O 3.81E-1 l.27E+2 4.38E-3 5.34E-5 9.lSE-9 7.07E-2 4.18E-3 1-133 1.80E+2 5.8SE+O 6.80E+2 2.34E-2 2.85E-4 4.88E-8 1.0SE+l 3.43E-1 1-134 l.07E+O l.31E-1 1.70E+l 5.83E-4 7.12E-6 l.22E-9 1.56E-3 l.92E-4 1-135 3.13E+l l.23E+O 4.54E+2 l.56E-2 l.91E-4 3.26E-8 l.23E+O 4.81E-2 Kr-83m 0.00E+O O.OOE+O l.68E+2 5.79E-3 7.06E-5 l.21E-8 O.OOE+O O.OOE+O Kr-85 0.00E+O 0.00E+O l.02E+2 3.SOE-3 4.27E-5 7.32E-9 O.OOE+O O.OOE+O Kr-85m O.OOE+O 0.00E+O l.OSE+3 3.59E-2 4.38E-4 7.SOE-8 O.OOE+O O.OOE+O Kr-87 O.OOE+O 0.00E+O 2.96E+2 l.02E-2 l.24E-4 2.12E-8 O.OOE+O O.OOE+O Kr-88 0.00E+O 0.00E+O l.83E+3 6.30E-2 7.69E-4 l.32E-7 O.OOE+O O.OOE+O La-140 4.SlE-1 4.85E+O 3.34E-1 l.lSE-5 l.40E-7 2.40E-11 l.30E-5 l.39E-4 La-141 3.48E-2 5.81E-1 1.33E-1 4.58E-6 5.58E-8 9.SSE-12 3.99E-7 6.66E-6 La-142 3.23E-2 2.53E-1 3.29E-2 l.13E-6 l.38E-8 2.36E-12 9.17E-8 7.18E-7 Mo-99 4.33E-1 3.96E+O 4.66E+O l.60E-4 1.95E-6 3.35E-10 1.74E-4 1.59E-3 Nb-95 l.32E+O 5.81E+O 3.32E-1 1.14E-5 l.39E-7 2.39E-11 3.79E-5 l.66E-4 Nd-147 7.18E-2 6.85E+O l.28E-1 4.40E-6 5.37E-8 9.19E-12 7.92E-7 7.SSE-5 Np-239 2.82E-2 2.SlE+O 9.92E+O 3.41E-4 4.16E-6 7.12E-10 2.41E-5 2.14E-3 Pr-143 6.22E-9 8.lOE+O 2.91E-1 9.99E-6 l.22E-7 2.09E-11 l.56E-13 2.03E-4 Pu-241 4.59E-2 8.25E+3 7.90E-2 2.71E-6 3.31E-8 5.67E-12 3.12E-7 5.61E-2 Rb-86 4.92E+O 6.62E+O 6.81E-1 2.34E-5 2.86E-7 4.89E-11 2.89E-4 3.89E-4 Rh-105 9.SlE-2 9.SSE-1 2.36E+O 8.llE-5 9.90E-7 1.69E-10 l.93E-5 l.94E-4 Ru-103 2.21E+O 8.95E+O 4.0lE+O 1.38E-4 1.68E-6 2.88E-10 7.63E-4 3.09E-3 Ru-105 5.SSE-2 4.SSE-1 1.30E+O 4.47E-5 5.45E-7 9.33E-11 6.21E-6 5.09E-5 Ru-106 5.07E+l 4.77E+2 l.44E+O 4.94E-5 6.02E-7 1.03E-10 6.27E-3 5.90E-2 Sb-127 5.SSE-1 6.03E+O 4.27E+O 1.47E-4 1.79E-6 3.06E-10 2.04E-4 2.22E-3 Sb-129 7.66E-2 6.44E-1 7.32E+O 2.52E-4 3.07E-6 5.25E-10 4.83E-5 4.06E-4 Sr-89 l.54E+O 4.14E+l l.78E+l 6.12E-4 7.47E-6 1.28E-9 2.36E-3 6.36E-2 Sr-90 9.77E+O 1.30E+3 l.77E+O 6.09E-5 7.43E-7 1.27E-10 1.49E-3 l.98E-1 Sr-91 1.SlE-1 1.66E+O l.SSE+l 5.33E-4 6.SOE-6 1.llE-9 2.02E-4 2.22E-3 Sr-92 8.lOE-2 8.07E-1 6.69E+O 2.30E-4 2.81E-6 4.80E-10 4.67E-5 4.65E-4 Tc-99m 1.85E-1 3.26E-2 2.28E+O 7.83E-5 9.SSE-7 1.64E-10 3.64E-5 6.39E-6 Te-127 2.39E-2 3.18E-1 3.02E+O 1.04E-4 1.27E-6 2.17E-10 6.22E-6 8.28E-5 Te-127m 8.84E-1 2.lSE+l 7.35E-1 2.53E-5 3.08E-7 5.28E-11 5.60E-5 l.36E-3 Te-129 6.03E-3 8.95E-2 7.70E-1 2.65E-5 3.23E-7 5.53E-11 4.00E-7 5.94E-6 Te-129m 1.46E+O 2.39E+l 3.lOE+O 1.07E-4 l.30E-6 2.23E-10 3.90E-4 6.39E-3 Te-131m 1.34E+2 6.40E+O 8.93E+O 3.07E-4 3.75E-6 6.41E-10 1.03E-1 4.93E-3 Te-132 2.32E+2 9.44E+O 6.76E+l 2.32E-3 2.83E-5 4.85E-9 1.35E+O 5.49E-2 Xe-131m O.OOE+O O.OOE+O l.32E+2 4.SSE-3 5.SSE-5 9.49E-9 O.OOE+O O.OOE+O Xe-133 O.OOE+O O.OOE+O l.94E+4 6.66E-1 8.12E-3 1.39E-6 O.OOE+O O.OOE+O Xe-133m O.OOE+O O.OOE+O 5.90E+2 2.03E-2 2.48E-4 4.24E-8 O.OOE+O 0.00E+O Xe-135 O.OOE+O O.OOE+O 3.56E+3 l.22E-1 1.49E-3 2.SSE-7 O.OOE+O O.OOE+O Xe-135m O.OOE+O O.OOE+O 5.23E-3 1.80E-7 2.19E-9 3.75E-13 O.OOE+O 0.00E+O Xe-138 0.00E+O O.OOE+O 6.45E-3 2.22E-7 2.70E-9 4.63E-13 0.00E+O 0.00E+O Y-90 3.52E-2 8.44E+O 1.72E-2 5.92E-7 7.22E-9 1.24E-12 5.22E-8 l.25E-5 Y-91 4.07E-1 4.88E+l 2.34E-1 8.06E-6 9.83E-8 1.68E-11 8.22E-6 9.86E-4 Y-92 1.37E-2 7.81E-1 9.llE-2 3.13E-6 3.82E-8 6.54E-12 1.07E-7 6.13E-6 Page 31 of 34
ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every day.
hrsoi Nuclide Thyroid mrem
µCi Y-93 1.87E-2 Zr-95 5.33E+O Zr-97 3.54E-1 Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 Xiv CALC NO.
REV.
N EE-323-CALC-005 00 Xir hE50i Depleted Inhalation Inhalation CEDE Mix Release Receptor Thyroid CEDE Fraction Cone.
Cone.
mrem Ci
!!Qi
!!Qi Dose Dose
µCi MWTh cm3 cm3 mrem mrem 2.lSE+O 1.33E-1 4.56E-6 5.56E-8 9.52E-12 2.14E-7 2.46E-5 2.36E+l 3.28E-1 1.13E-5 1.38E-7 2.36E-11 1.SlE-4 6.69E-4 4.33E+O 2.SSE-1 8.78E-6 1.07E-7 1.83E-11 7.78E-6 9.53E-5 2.91E+4 100.00%
1.22E-2 2.09E-6 50 2.37 1.22E-2 mrem mrem Thyroid CEDE Given a radiation effluent monitor reading of 1.22E-2 µCi/cm3, and the assumptions of the scenario, the COE thyroid value is 50 mrem and the CEDE is 2.37 mrem.
Spreadsheet cases are run for all four release points. See Section 2.0 for results.
Page 32 of 34
t ENERCON Revised Gaseous Radiological EALs per NEI 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
NEE-323-CALC-005 Excellence-Every project. Every doy.
REV.
00 7.5 Resultant Dose Summary A single spreadsheet was used to calculate EDE, CEDE, and thyroid COE. With the given source term, when the user changes the effluent gross concentration value, the spreadsheet calculates resultant doses.
Results and variables for the reactor building case are shown below. As can be seen here, an effluent release rate of 1.22E-02 µCi/cc at the Reactor Building will result in an offsite dose of approximately 50 mrem COE thyroid. This value corresponds to the new RA 1 EAL entry threshold of 50 mrem COE thyroid.
Dose totals are taken from the tabular spreadsheet data presented on the preceding pages.
Inhalation CEDE:
2.37 mrem Submersion EDE:
0.39 mrem
==
TEDE:
2.76 mrem Inhalation Thyroid CDE:
49.8 mrem Release Point:
Reactor Building SBGT ?:
off Effluent Cone.:
1.22E-02 Release: Hrs. since Rx. Shutdown:
Exposure Time (hrs.):
Hours w/ Sprays On:
Submersion X/Q:
Breathing Rate 1
2 4.30E-06 3.33E-4
µCi/cc Release Flow CFM:
5 Hrs. Core Uncovered:
Secondary Containment Holdup Hrs.:
cm3 per ft3:
sec/m3 Inhalation X/Q:
m3/sec
=
1.20E+6 cm3/hr 93,000 1
0.5 0.0283168 3.90E-06 Spreadsheet cases are run for all four release points and for decay times of five hours.
Cases were also run for all four release points for decay times of 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> in consideration of EAL entry thresholds that are mode dependent.
The output for all release points and decay times are shown in Appendix 1.
See Section 2.0 for results.
8.0 Computer Software No computer software is used in this calculation.
Page 33 of 34 sec/m3
ca ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every day.
9.0 Impact Assessment Revised Gaseous Radiological EA Ls per NE I 99-01 Rev. 06 CALC NO.
REV.
NEE-323-CALC-005 00 This calculation is based on "realistic" assumptions for the purpose of declaring EALs, rather than typical conservative "bounding" type design basis analyses.
The calculation documents the EAL threshold values for specific plan monitors to assist Operations and Emergency Response personnel in determining the new basis for EALs RA 1, RS1, and RG1 in accordance with NEI 99-01 Rev. 6.
Page 34 of 34
VI ClJ
.a ca -~
ca >
ENERCON Appendix A CALC NO.
NEE-323-CALC-005 Excellence-Every projecr. Every day.
Dose Spreadsheet Outputs REV.
00 Turbine Building: Modes 1, 2, and 3 Inhalation CEDE:
2.38 mRem Submersion EDE:
0.39 mRem
==
TEDE :
2.77 mRem Inhalation Thyroid COE:
so.o mRem Release Point :
Turbine Building SBGT ?:
off Effluent Cone.: I 1.58E-02 I
uCi/cc Release Flow CFM:
72,000 Release: Hrs. since Rx. Shutdown: I 5
Hrs. Core Uncovered: I 1
Exposure Time (hrs.): I 1
Secondary Containment Holdup Hrs.: I 0.5 Hours w/ Sprays On: I 2
cm3 perft3:
0.0283168 Submersion X/Q:
4.30E-06 sec/m3 Inhalation X/Q:
3.90E-06 sec/m3 Breathing Rate 3.33E-4 m3/ sec
=
1.20E+6 cm3/hr Page 1 of 8
Ill QJ
.c n,
- c n, >
ENERCON Appendix A CALC NO.
NEE-323-CALC-005 Excelltnce-Every project. Every doy.
Dose Spreadsheet Outputs REV.
Turbine Building: Modes 4 and 5 Inhalation CEDE:
Submersion EDE:
2.59 0.07
==
TEDE:
2.67 Inhalation Thyroid COE:
49.7 Release Point:
Turbine Building Effluent Cone.: I 1.30E-02 I uCi/cc mRem mRem mRem mRem SBGT ?:
off Release Flow CFM:
00 Release: Hrs. since Rx. Shutdown: I 36 Hrs. Core Uncovered: I Exposure Time (hrs.): I 1
Secondary Containment Holdup Hrs.: I Hours w/ Sprays On: I 2
cm3 perft3:
Submersion X/Q:
4.30E-06 sec/m3 Inhalation X/Q:
Breathing Rate 3.33E-4 m3/sec
=
1.20E+6 cm3/hr Page 2 of 8 72,000 1
0.5 0.0283168 3.90E-06 sec/m3
CALC NEE-323-CALC-005
- IENERCON Appendix A NO.
u, C1J
..0 ca "i:
ca >
Excellence-Every project. Every day.
Dose Spreadsheet Outputs REV.
00 Reactor Building: Modes 1, 2, and 3 Inhalation CEDE:
Submersion EDE:
TEDE:
Inhalation Thyroid CDE:
Release Point:
Reactor Building Effluent Cone.: I 1.22E-02 Release: Hrs. since Rx. Shutdown: I s Exposure Time (hrs.): I 1
Hours w/ Sprays On: I 2
Submersion X/Q:
4.30E-06 sec/m3 Breathing Rate 3.33E-4 m3/sec 2.37 0.39 2.76 49.8 I
uCi/cc mRem mRem mRem mRem SBGT ?:
off Release Flow CFM:
Hrs. Core Uncovered: I Secondary Containment Holdup Hrs.: I cm3 per ft3:
Inhalation X/Q:
=
1.20E+6 cm3/hr Page 3 of 8 93,000 1
0.5 0.0283168 3.90E-06 sec/m3
VI cu
.c n,
"i:
n, >
ENERCON Appendix A CALC NO.
N EE-323-CALC-005 Excellence-Every project. Every day.
Dose Spreadsheet Outputs REV.
Reactor Building: Modes 4 and 5 Inhalation CEDE:
Submersion EDE:
2.60 0.07
==
TEDE:
2.68 Inhalation Thyroid COE:
49.9 Release Point:
Reactor Building Effluent Cone.: I 1.0lE-02 I
uCi/cc mRem mRem mRem mRem SBGT ?:
off Release Flow CFM:
00 Release: Hrs. since Rx. Shutdown: I 36 Hrs. Core Uncovered: I Exposure Time (hrs.): I 1
Secondary Containment Holdup Hrs.: I Hours w/ Sprays On: I 2
cm3 per ft3:
Submersion X/Q:
4.30E-06 sec/m3 Inhalation X/Q:
Breathing Rate 3.33E-4 m3/sec
=
1.20E+6 cm3/hr Page 4 of 8 93,000 1
0.5 0.0283168 3.90E-06 sec/ m3
V, cu
.c ca "i:
ca >
ENERCON Appendix A CALC NO.
N EE-323-CALC-005 Excellence-Every project. Every day.
Dose Spreadsheet Outputs REV.
Offgas Stack: Modes 1, 2, and 3 Inhalation CEDE:
Submersion EDE:
TEDE :
Inhalation Thyroid COE:
Release Point:
I Offgas Stack 1.96 8.05
==
10.00 41.1 Effluent Cone.: I 4.39E+Ol I uCi/cc mRem mRem mRem mRem SBGT ?:
on Release Flow CFM:
00 Release: Hrs. since Rx. Shutdown: I 5
Hrs. Core Uncovered: I Exposure Time (hrs.): I 1
Secondary Containment Holdup Hrs.: I Hours w/ Sprays On: I 2
cm3 per ft3:
Submersion X/Q:
2.SOE-07 sec/m3 Inhalation X/Q:
Breathing Rate 3.33E-4 m3/sec
=
1.20E+6 cm3/hr Page 5 of 8 10,000 1
<0.5 0.0283168 3.lOE-07 sec/m3
Ill QJ
.c ra "i:
ra >
ENERCON Appendix A CALC NO.
NEE-323-CALC-005 Excellence-Every project. Every day.
Dose Spreadsheet Outputs REV.
00 Offgas Stack: Modes 4 and 5 Inhalation CEDE:
Submersion EDE:
TEDE :
Inhalation Thyroid COE:
Release Point:
I Offgas Stack Effluent Cone.: I 4.52E+Ol Release: Hrs. since Rx. Shutdown: I 36 Exposure Time (hrs.): I 1
Hours w/ Sprays On: I 2
Submersion X/Q:
2.80E-07 sec/m3 Breathing Rate 3.33E-4 m3/sec 2.61 1.41 4.02 50.0 I uCi/cc mRem mRem mRem mRem SBGT ?:
on Release Flow CFM:
Hrs. Core Uncovered: I Secondary Containment Holdup Hrs.: I cm3 per ft3:
Inhalation X/Q:
=
1.20E+6 cm3/hr Page 6 of 8 10,000 1
<0.5 0.0283168 3.lOE-07 sec/m3
Ill cu
..a nJ "i:
nJ >
ENERCON Appendix A CALC NO.
NEE-323-CALC-005 bcellence-Every project. Every day.
Dose Spreadsheet Outputs REV.
00 LLRPSF: Modes 1, 2, and 3 Inhalation CEDE:
Submersion EDE:
TEDE:
Inhalation Thyroid CDE:
Release Point:
I LLRPSF Effluent Cone.: I 1.SlE-02 Release: Hrs. since Rx. Shutdown: I 5
Exposure Time {hrs.): I 1
Hours w/ Sprays On: I 2
Submersion X/Q:
4.30E-06 sec/m3 Breathing Rate 3.33E-4 m3/sec 2.37 0.39 2.76 49.7 I
uCi/cc mRem mRem mRem mRem SBGT ?:
off Release Flow CFM:
Hrs. Core Uncovered: I Secondary Containment Holdup Hrs.: I cm3 per ft3:
Inhalation X/Q:
=
1.20E+6 cm3/hr Page 7 of 8 75,000 1
o.s 0.0283168 3.90E-06 sec/m3
u, QJ
.c ta ta >
ENERCON Appendix A CALC NO.
NEE-323-CALC-005 Excellence-Every project. Every day.
Dose Spreadsheet Outputs REV.
00 LLRPSH: Modes 4 and 5 Inhalation CEDE:
Submersion EDE:
TEDE :
Inhalation Thyroid CDE:
Release Point:
I LLRPSF Effluent Cone.: I 1.25E-02 Release: Hrs. since Rx. Shutdown: I 36 Exposure Time (hrs.): I 1
Hours w/ Sprays On: I 2
Submersion X/Q:
4.30E-06 sec/m3 Breathing Rate 3.33E-4 m3/sec 2.60 0.07 2.67 49.8 I uCi/cc mRem mRem mRem mRem SBGT ?:
off Release Flow CFM:
Hrs. Core Uncovered: I Secondary Containment Holdup Hrs.: I cm3 per ft3:
Inhalation X/Q:
=
1.20E+6 cm3/hr Page 8 of 8 75,000 1
0.5 0.0283168 3.90E-06 sec/m3
ENERCON Excellence-Every proj ect. Every doy.
CALCULATION PREPARATION CHECKLIST CHECKLIST ITEMS1 CALC NO.
REV.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
- 1.
If the calculation is being performed to a client procedure, is the procedure being used the latest revision?
The calculation is being prepared to ENERCON's procedures.
- 2.
Are the proper forms being used and are they the latest revision?
- 3.
Have the appropriate client review forms/checklists been completed?
The calculation is being prepared to ENERCON's procedures.
- 4.
Are all pages properly identified with a calculation number, calculation revision and page number consistent with the requirements of the client's procedure?
- 5.
Is all information legible and reproducible?
- 6.
Is the calculation presented in a logical and orderly manner?
- 7.
Is there an existing calculation that should be revised or voided?
This is a new calculation to support implementing NEI 99-01 Rev. 6
- 8.
Is it possible to alter an existing calculation instead of preparing a new calculation for this situation?
- 9.
If an existing calculation is being used for design inputs, are the key design inputs, assumptions and engineering judgments used in that calculation valid and do they apply to the calculation revision being performed.
- 10.
Is the format of the calculation consistent with applicable procedures and expectations?
11.
Were design input/output documents properly updated to reference this calculation?
- 12.
Can the calculation logic, methodology and presentation be properly understood without referring back to the originator for clarification?
OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE
- 13.
Does the calculation provide a clear concise statement of the problem and objective of the calculation?
- 14.
Does the calculation provide a clear statement of quality classification?
- 15.
Is the reason for performing and the end use of the calculation understood?
- 16.
Does the calculation provide the basis for information found in the plant's license basis?
- 17.
If so, is this documented in the calculation?
- 18.
Does the calculation provide the basis for information found in the plant's design basis documentation?
Page 1 of 4 N EE-323-CALC-005 00 YES NO N/A D
D
[8J
[8J D
D D
D
[8J
[8J D
D
[8J D
D
[8J D
D D
[8J D
D
[8J D
D
[8J D
[8J D
D D
D
[8J
[8J D
D
[8J D
D
[8J D
D
[8J D
D
[8J D
D
[8J D
D D
[8J D
- 19.
- 20.
21.
- 22.
ENERCON Excellence-Every proje<:t. Every doy.
CALCULATION PREPARATION CHECKLIST CHECKLIST ITEMS1 If so, is this documented in the calculation?
CALC NO.
REV.
Does the calculation otherwise support information found in the plant's design basis documentation?
If so, is this documented in the calculation?
Has the appropriate design or license basis documentation been revised, or has the change notice or change request documents being prepared for submittal?
DESIGN INPUTS
- 23.
Are design inputs clearly identified?
- 24.
Are design inputs retrievable or have they been added as attachments?
- 25.
If Attachments are used as design inputs or assumptions are the Attachments traceable and verifiable?
- 26.
Are design inputs clearly distinguished from assumptions?
- 27.
Does the calculation rely on Attachments for design inputs or assumptions? If yes, are the attachments properly referenced in the calculation?
- 28.
Are input sources (including industry codes and standards) appropriately selected and are they consistent with the quality classification and objective of the calculation?
- 29.
Are input sources (including industry codes and standards) consistent with the plant's design and license basis?
- 30.
If applicable, do design inputs adequately address actual plant conditions?
31.
Are input values reasonable and correctly applied?
- 32.
Are design input sources approved?
- 33.
Does the calculation reference the latest revision of the design input source?
- 34.
Were all applicable plant operating modes considered?
ASSUMPTIONS
- 35.
Are assumptions reasonable/appropriate to the objective?
- 36.
Is adequate justification/basis for all assumptions provided?
- 37.
Are any engineering judgments used?
- 38.
Are engineering judgments clearly identified as such?
- 39.
If engineering judgments are utilized as design inputs, are they reasonable and can they be quantified or substantiated by reference to site or industry standards, engineering principles, physical laws or other appropriate criteria?
Page 2 of 4 N EE-323-CALC-005 00 YES NO N/A D
D
[8]
D
[8]
D D
D
[8]
D D
[8]
[8]
D D
[8]
D D
D D
[8]
[8]
D D
D
[8]
D
[8]
D D
[8]
D D
[8]
D D
[8]
D D
[8]
D D
[8]
D D
[8]
D D
[8]
D D
[8]
D D
D
[8]
D D
D
[8]
D D
[8]
ENERCON Excellence-Every pro}e<.1. Every day.
CALCULATION PREPARATION CHECKLIST CHECKLIST ITEMS1 CALC NO.
REV.
METHODOLOGY
- 40.
Is the methodology used in the calculation described or implied in the plant's licensing basis?
41.
If the methodology used differs from that described in the plant's licensing basis, has the appropriate license document change notice been initiated?
- 42.
Is the methodology used consistent with the stated objective?
- 43.
Is the methodology used appropriate when considering the quality classification of the calculation and intended use of the results?
BODY OF CALCULATION
- 44.
Are equations used in the calculation consistent with recognized engineering practice and the plant's design and license basis?
- 45.
Is there reasonable justification provided for the use of equations not in common use?
- 46.
Are the mathematical operations performed properly and documented in a logical fashion?
- 47.
Is the math performed correctly?
- 48.
Have adjustment factors, uncertainties and empirical correlations used in the analysis been correctly applied?
- 49.
Has proper consideration been given to results that may be overly sensitive to very small changes in input?
SOFTWARE/COMPUTER CODES
- 50.
Are computer codes or software languages used in the preparation of the calculation?
51.
Have the requirements of CSP 3.09 for use of computer codes or software languages, including verification of accuracy and applicability been met?
- 52.
Are the codes properly identified along with source vendor, organization, and revision level?
- 53.
Is the computer code applicable for the analysis being performed?
- 54.
If applicable, does the computer model adequately consider actual plant conditions?
- 55.
Are the inputs to the computer code clearly identified and consistent with the inputs and assumptions documented in the calculation?
- 56.
Is the computer output clearly identified?
- 57.
Does the computer output clearly identify the appropriate units?
Page 3 of 4 NEE-323-CALC-005 00 YES NO N/A D
~
D D
D
~
~
D D
~
D D
~
D D
D D
~
~
D D
~
D D
~
D D
~
D D
D
~
D D
D
~
D D
~
D D
~
D D I ~
D D I ~
D D I ~
D D I ~
- 58.
- 59.
ENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every doy.
CALCULATION PREPARATION CHECKLIST CHECKLIST ITEMS1 CALC NO.
REV.
Are the computer outputs reasonable when compared to the inputs and what was expected?
Was the computer output reviewed for ERROR or WARNING messages that could invalidate the results?
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
- 60.
Is adequate acceptance criteria specified?
61.
Are the stated acceptance criteria consistent with the purpose of the calculation, and intended use?
- 62.
Are the stated acceptance criteria consistent with the plant's design basis, applicable licensing commitments and industry codes, and standards?
- 63.
Do the calculation results and conclusions meet the stated acceptance criteria?
- 64.
Are the results represented in the proper units with an appropriate tolerance, if applicable?
- 65.
Are the calculation results and conclusions reasonable when considered against the stated inputs and objectives?
- 66.
Is sufficient conservatism applied to the outputs and conclusions?
- 67.
Do the calculation results and conclusions affect any other calculations?
- 68.
If so, have the affected calculations been revised?
- 69.
Does the calculation contain any conceptual, unconfirmed or open assumptions requiring later confirmation?
- 70.
If so, are they properly identified?
DESIGN REVIEW 71.
Have alternate calculation methods been used to verify calculation results?
No, a Design Review was performed.
Note:
NEE-323-CALC-005 00 YES NO N/A D
D
[8J D
D
[8J D
D
[8J
[8J D
D
[8J D
D
[8J D
D
[8J D
D
[8J D
D
[8J D
D D
[8J D
D D
[8J D
[8J D
D D
[8J D
D
[8J
- 1. Where required, provide clarification/justification for answers to the questions in the space provided below each question. An explanation is required for any questions answered as "No' or "N/A".
Originator:
Ryan Skaggs 12/14/17 Print Name and Sign Date Page 4 of 4