:on 961219,breach of Containment Closure During Core Reload Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Inplementation of Outage Scheduling & Risk Management Requirements.Containment Closure Was Reestablished Using Alternate Isolation Points| ML18102A777 |
| Person / Time |
|---|
| Site: |
Salem  |
|---|
| Issue date: |
01/19/1997 |
|---|
| From: |
Hassler D Public Service Enterprise Group |
|---|
| To: |
|
|---|
| Shared Package |
|---|
| ML18102A776 |
List: |
|---|
| References |
|---|
| LER-96-015-02, LER-96-15-2, NUDOCS 9701270047 |
| Download: ML18102A777 (4) |
|
Similar Documents at Salem |
|---|
|
text
'f Nl~CF~M386 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104 (4-05)
EXPIRES 04130198 ESTIMATED BURDEN l'EA REaPONaE TO COIFl.Y WITH THIS MANDATORY INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS.
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
REPORTED LESSONS LEARNED ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE LICENSING PROCESS AND FED IMCK TO INDUSTm'.
FORWARD COlllENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE INFORMATION (See reverse for required number of AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (T.. =
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COWISSION~ASHINGTON, DC rlll 0001~D TO digits/characters for each block)
THE PAPERWORK REDU l"ROJECT c;'llCMHM),
E OF lllANAOEMENT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, 20ll03.
FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
PAGE(3)
SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 2 05000311 1 OF 4 TITl.E (4)
BREACH OF CONTAINMENT CLOSURE DURING CORE RELOAD EVENT DATE (5)
LER NUMBER (8)
REPORT DATE (7)
OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8)
YEAR I FACILITY NAME uuCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR SEQUENTIAL
'REVISION MONTH DAY YEAR NUMBER NU118ER 05000 12 19 96 96 015 00 01 19 97 FACIUTT NAME UQ1;;KET NUMBER OPERATING 6
THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: (Check one or more) (11)
MODE(9) 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) x S0. 73(a)(2)(i)
S0. 73(a)(2)(vlll)
POWER 000 20.2203(a)(1) 20.2203(a)(3)(1)
S0. 73(a)(2)(ii)
- 50. 73(a)(2)(x)
LEVEL(10) 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 20.2203(a)(3)(ii)
S0. 73(a)(2)(iii) 73.71 20.2203(a)(2)(il) 20.2203(*)(4')
S0. 73(a)(2)(iv)
OTHER 20.2203(a)(2)(iii)
S0.38(c)(1) 50.73(a)(2)(v)
~~In Abetract below or In C Form 388A
~
20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 50.38(c)(2)
- 50. 73(a)(2)(vii)
LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Ana Code)
Dennis v. Hassler, LER Coordina.tor 609-339-1989 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE ~*l:
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE TO NPRDS
~ "~~*
TONPRDS
- ~:
m~=
=:s:*=:::~*:-:::::~~~~= I SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)
EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR IYES XINO SUBMISSION (If yea, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE).
DATE (15)
ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16)
Containment closure was established at Salem Unit 2 at 2325 on December 15, 1996.
Containment closure was fully adequate at that time.
Salem Unit 2 entered Mode 6 at 0220.
on December 16, 1996 and fuel movement for core reload was corrmenced.
At 1005 on December 19, 1996 the Senior Nuclear Shift Supervisor (SNSS) was informed by an NRC Resident Inspector that valve 24SW223 was removed from the Service Water piping in the penetration area of Salem Unit 2. The SNSS initiated a review of the tagging boundary for 24 containment Fan Coil Unit (CFCU) which confirmed that valve 24SW223 had been removed from the Service Water piping and a pathway from the Containment atmosphere to the outside atmosphere existed through open vent and drain valves inside Containment and the open piping outside Containment.
At 1018 the SNSS suspended fuel movement.
Further penetration walkdowns identified holes drilled into the Service Water piping for 21 and 24 CFCUs, which constituted additional breach pathways.
The causes of this occurrence are attributed to inadequate implementation of outage scheduling and risk management requirements and inadequate review of work in progress as required by the Containment closure procedure.
Corrective actions include re-establishing containment closure, procedure revisions, and iroplementation controls related to the authorization and scheduling of work.
This event is reportable in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a) (2) (i) (B), any condition prohibited by the plant's Technical Specifications.
9701270047 970119 PDR ADOCK 05000311 S
PDR
NRC Fc>Rll 388A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4.96)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAllE (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 2 05000311 TEXT (If more apace la required, use additional copies of NRC Form 388A) (17) r
PLANT AND SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION
Westinghouse -
Pressurized Water Reactor Containment {-/NH}*
Service Water System {-/BI}
LER NUMBER 1 8)
YEAR I SEQUENTIAL NUMBER REVISION NUMBER 96 -
015 00 PAGE(3) 2 OF 4
- Energy Industry Identification System (EIIS) codes and component function identifier codes appear as {CC/SS}
CONDITIONS PRIOR TO OCCURRENCE At the time of occurrence, Salem Unit 2 was in Mode 6 with fuel movement in progress.
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE Containment closure was established at Salem Unit 2 at 2325 on December 15, 1996.
Containment closure was fully adequate at that time.
Salem Unit 2 entered Mode 6 at 0220 on December 16, 1996 and fuel movement for core reload was commenced.
At 1005 on December 19, 1996 the Senior Nuclear Shift Supervisor (SNSS) was informed by an NRC Resident Inspector that valve 24SW223 was removed from the Service Water piping in the penetration area of Salem Unit 2.
The SNSS initiated a review of the tagging boundary for 24 Containment Fan Coil Unit (CFCU) which confirmed that valve 24SW223 had been removed from the Service Water piping and a pathway from the Containment atmosphere to the outside atmosphere existed through open vent and drain valves inside Containment and the open piping outside Containment.
At 1018 the SNSS suspended fuel movement.
Further penetration walkdowns identified holes drilled into the Service Water piping for 21 and 24 CFCUs, which constituted additional breach pathways.
The initial breach of Containment occurred on December 16, 1996 (day shift),
when maintenance workers began installation of a modification which required drilling pilot holes into the Service Water piping for 21 CFCU.
This action established a breach of the Containment boundary through the open vent and drain valves located within the Containment and a pilot hole located between the Containment and valve 21SW223.
A second breach of Containment occurred on December 17, 1996 when valve 24SW223 was removed from the Service Water piping for 24 CFCU to facilitate replacing the valve internals.
This presented a second breach of the Containment boundary through the open vent and drain valves located within the Containment and the open piping where valve 24SW223 had been removed.
A third breach of Containment occurred on December 19, 1996, when maintenance workers drilled pilot holes into the Service Water piping for 24 CFCU.
This was performed as part of the same modification identified for the 21 CFCU above.
'.)
NRC FORM 388A (4-96)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (8)
SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 2 05000311 YEAR I SEQUENTIAL I REVISION NUMBER NU11BER 96 -
015 -
00 TEXT (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 386A) (17)
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE (Cont'd)
PAGE(3) 3 OF The work described above was authorized prior to Containment closure; however, the work was delayed due to scheduling and plannning conflicts.
The effect of the schedule delays was not reviewed for impact based on exist1ng plant conditions.
CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE 4
The causes of this occurrence are attributed to inadequate implementation of scheduling and outage risk management requirements and inadequate review of work in progress as required by the Containment closure procedure.
PRIOR SIMILAR OCCURRENCES In the past two years there was one similar occurrence.
LER 311/94-013-00 documented a containment breach which involved eight (8) open vent valves and eight (8) open drain valves on the Service Water piping of four CFCU loops.
The cause was stated as personnel error and the corrective actions addressed personnel performance.
SAFETY CONSEQUENCES AND IMPLICATIONS
The potential consequences of this event have been determined to be bounded by the results of an Engineering Evaluation which was performed to support irradiated fuel movement without control area ventilation charcoal filtration.
The results of that evaluation indicate that the whole body gamma dose, beta skin dose and thyroid dose at the control room air intakes are negligible compared to the respective limits.
Thus, the expected offsite doses after a postulated fuel handling accident in Containment would also be negligible.
The health and safety of the public was not affected.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
- 1. Fuel handling activities in the Containment were suspended and the Gate Valve in the fuel transfer canal was closed upon determination that a breach of.
Containment had occurred.
Containment closure was reestablished using alternate isolation points.
NRC FORM 388A (4-95)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION FACILITY NAME (1)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION DOCKETNUMBER(2)
LERNUMBER 8)
PAGE(3)
SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 2 05000311 YEAR I SE=~ := 4 OF 4
96 -
015 -
00 TEXT (If more space ia required, use additional copiea of NRC Form 368A) (17)
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
(Cont'd)
- 2.
The following actions were taken prior to resuming fuel movement at Unit 2:
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
a)
Procedure S2.0P-ST.CAN-0007 "Refueling Operations - Containment Closure" was revised to incorporate posting of the penetration areas to restrict work in these areas during Core Alterations, and to provide clarification of criteria for determining that a system is intact.
In addition, the procedure was enhanced to specify a review of any work in progress work orders to clarify the intent of the work irt progress review.
b)
Procedure S2.0P-ST.CAN-0007 was re-performed (following revision) to verify containment closure.
c)
The tagouts possibly affecting Containment closure were reviewed in detail to ensure there was no further impact on Containment closure.
d)
Wor'k was stopped, and the work groups were directed to obtain authorization from the Work Control Center prior to resumption of work.
e)
Shiftly meetings between the Senior Nuclear Shift Supervisor and the work group supervisors were initiated. The meetings provide a mechanism to review planned work for the shift to ensure that current plant conditions support performance of the work.
The Shutdown Safety Plan System Score Card has been added to the key plant schedules to heighten personnel awareness to equipment required to be available for plant safety.
All approved outage work will be re-reviewed against the requirements of the Shutdown Safety Plan prior to Unit 2 entering Mode 4.
Required reading on this event will be issued to Operations, Outage Management and Planning and Scheduling personnel by January 25, 1997.
Outage Management and Planning and Scheduling personnel will be required to review the requirements of the Salem Outage Risk Management Program prior to Unit 2 entry into Mode 4.
A continuing training program will be developed for Outage Management and Planning and Scheduling personnel concerning the Outage Risk Management Program.
This will be complete prior to June 1, 1997.
The Unit 1 Containment closure procedure (Sl.OP-ST.CAN-0007) will be revised prior to its next use to address the changes noted above for the
" Unit 2 procedure.
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000272/LER-1996-001, :on 960103,discovered Insufficent Thermal Overload Relay Heater Margin.Caused by Inadequate Design of TOLs in 1970s.Issued Calculation ES-18.007 for Sizing of Thermal Overload Heaters for SR Rotating Loads |
- on 960103,discovered Insufficent Thermal Overload Relay Heater Margin.Caused by Inadequate Design of TOLs in 1970s.Issued Calculation ES-18.007 for Sizing of Thermal Overload Heaters for SR Rotating Loads
| | | 05000311/LER-1996-001-01, :on 960109,TS Violation Occurred Re Failure to Perform Chemistry Sampling within Required Timeframe.Caused by Personnel Error.Personnel Counseled & Chemistry Dept Shift Turnover Process Improved |
- on 960109,TS Violation Occurred Re Failure to Perform Chemistry Sampling within Required Timeframe.Caused by Personnel Error.Personnel Counseled & Chemistry Dept Shift Turnover Process Improved
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000311/LER-1996-002-02, :on 960701,waste Gas Decay Tank Oxygen Concentration Exceeded TSs Limit.Caused by Poor Wording & Interpretation of Tss.Oxygen Concentration Levels Restored. Request to Resolve TS 3.11.2.5 Submitted to NRC on 960815 |
- on 960701,waste Gas Decay Tank Oxygen Concentration Exceeded TSs Limit.Caused by Poor Wording & Interpretation of Tss.Oxygen Concentration Levels Restored. Request to Resolve TS 3.11.2.5 Submitted to NRC on 960815
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000272/LER-1996-002, :on 960110,evaluation Determined That Motor Operated Gate Valves Susceptible to Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding.Caused by Inability to Meet GL 95-07 Criteria.Test Procedure Changed |
- on 960110,evaluation Determined That Motor Operated Gate Valves Susceptible to Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding.Caused by Inability to Meet GL 95-07 Criteria.Test Procedure Changed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(e)(2)(v) | | 05000311/LER-1996-003-02, :on 960515,failed to Perform Surveillance for Fuel Handling Bldg (Fhb) Ventilation Sys Auto Start.Caused by Lack of Adequate Controls for Surveillance Procedures. Added auto-start Capability |
- on 960515,failed to Perform Surveillance for Fuel Handling Bldg (Fhb) Ventilation Sys Auto Start.Caused by Lack of Adequate Controls for Surveillance Procedures. Added auto-start Capability
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000272/LER-1996-003-01, :on 960220,TS Radiation Monitor Sampling in non-compliance.Caused by Failure of Plant Chemistry to Fully Understand TS Sample & Analysis Requirements.Established Process for Controlling Analyses |
- on 960220,TS Radiation Monitor Sampling in non-compliance.Caused by Failure of Plant Chemistry to Fully Understand TS Sample & Analysis Requirements.Established Process for Controlling Analyses
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000311/LER-1996-004-02, :on 960515,failed to Perform Compensatory Radiological Survey.Caused by Personnel Error.Performed Survey,Revised Radiation Protection Schedule,Purchased Alarm Clocks & Counseled Personnel Re Event |
- on 960515,failed to Perform Compensatory Radiological Survey.Caused by Personnel Error.Performed Survey,Revised Radiation Protection Schedule,Purchased Alarm Clocks & Counseled Personnel Re Event
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000272/LER-1996-004-01, :on 960307,surveillance Was Missed for Salem Generating Station.Caused by Lack of Adequate Control for Development & Maintenance of TS Surveillance Procedures. License Change Will Be Submitted |
- on 960307,surveillance Was Missed for Salem Generating Station.Caused by Lack of Adequate Control for Development & Maintenance of TS Surveillance Procedures. License Change Will Be Submitted
| | | 05000272/LER-1996-004, :on 960307,containment Isolation Valve Missed TS Surveillance.Caused by Lack of Adequate Controls & Inadequate Design Review.Ts Surveillance Improvement Project Has Been Initiated for Plant,Units 1 & 2 |
- on 960307,containment Isolation Valve Missed TS Surveillance.Caused by Lack of Adequate Controls & Inadequate Design Review.Ts Surveillance Improvement Project Has Been Initiated for Plant,Units 1 & 2
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000272/LER-1996-005-05, Forwards LER 96-005-05 Re Surveillance for turbine-driven AF Pump.Commitments Encl as Attachment a | Forwards LER 96-005-05 Re Surveillance for turbine-driven AF Pump.Commitments Encl as Attachment a | | | 05000272/LER-1996-005-01, :on 960325,channel Checks for Average Temp Not Performed as Required by Ts.Caused by Inadequate Controls for Development & Maint of TS Surveillance Procedures.Tssip Initiated |
- on 960325,channel Checks for Average Temp Not Performed as Required by Ts.Caused by Inadequate Controls for Development & Maint of TS Surveillance Procedures.Tssip Initiated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000272/LER-1996-005, :on 971224,inadequate TS Testing of Containment Airlock Door Gasket Leakage Was Noted.Caused by Lack of Adequate Controls & Understanding of Development. Appropriate Procedures Reviewed |
- on 971224,inadequate TS Testing of Containment Airlock Door Gasket Leakage Was Noted.Caused by Lack of Adequate Controls & Understanding of Development. Appropriate Procedures Reviewed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000311/LER-1996-005-02, :on 960627,surveillance of Fuel Handling Bldg Ventilation Sys Charcoal Adsorber Test Was Missed.Caused by Inattention to Detail.Individual Involved Received Appropriate Level of Positive Discipline |
- on 960627,surveillance of Fuel Handling Bldg Ventilation Sys Charcoal Adsorber Test Was Missed.Caused by Inattention to Detail.Individual Involved Received Appropriate Level of Positive Discipline
| | | 05000272/LER-1996-005-15, Forwards LER 96-005-15, Inadequate TS Testing - Feedwater Sys Isolation Functional Test/Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger Service Water Flow Control Valves | Forwards LER 96-005-15, Inadequate TS Testing - Feedwater Sys Isolation Functional Test/Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger Service Water Flow Control Valves | | | 05000272/LER-1996-005-03, :on 960325,TS Surveillance Requirement Implementation Deficiencies Identified.Caused by Lack of Adequate Controls & Understanding of Development Weakness. Procedures Revised |
- on 960325,TS Surveillance Requirement Implementation Deficiencies Identified.Caused by Lack of Adequate Controls & Understanding of Development Weakness. Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000311/LER-1996-006-02, :on 960717,sample Flow to non-radioactive Liquid Radwaste Monitor Was Not Adequate to Meet Plant Ts.Cause of Event Is Under Investigation.Design of 2R37 Sample Line Has Been Revised |
- on 960717,sample Flow to non-radioactive Liquid Radwaste Monitor Was Not Adequate to Meet Plant Ts.Cause of Event Is Under Investigation.Design of 2R37 Sample Line Has Been Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000272/LER-1996-006-01, :on 960421,missed Independent Verification of Release Lineup on Waste Gas Decay Tanks (Wgdt) Due to Personnel.Wgdt Releases Suspended Pending Rev of Procedures. Procedures Revised |
- on 960421,missed Independent Verification of Release Lineup on Waste Gas Decay Tanks (Wgdt) Due to Personnel.Wgdt Releases Suspended Pending Rev of Procedures. Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000311/LER-1996-006-01, :on 960717,determined That non-radioactive Liquid Basin Radwaste Monitor Inoperable During Low Head Conditions.Caused by Inadequate Design Change Package.Design Change 1EC3663-01 Has Been Installed.With |
- on 960717,determined That non-radioactive Liquid Basin Radwaste Monitor Inoperable During Low Head Conditions.Caused by Inadequate Design Change Package.Design Change 1EC3663-01 Has Been Installed.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000272/LER-1996-007-01, :on 960524,determined P-12 Setpoint Above Tech Spec Table 3.3-3 Value.Caused by Incorrect Conversion from Standard Tech Spec for Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactors. Revised Procedures |
- on 960524,determined P-12 Setpoint Above Tech Spec Table 3.3-3 Value.Caused by Incorrect Conversion from Standard Tech Spec for Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactors. Revised Procedures
| | | 05000311/LER-1996-007, :on 980130,missed Surveillance of Containment Penetration Overcurrent Protection Devices Occurred.Caused by Failure to Tag 35 Amp Breaker.Surveillance Testing for Breakers 1ELC-1 & 1ELC-3 Will Be Completed |
- on 980130,missed Surveillance of Containment Penetration Overcurrent Protection Devices Occurred.Caused by Failure to Tag 35 Amp Breaker.Surveillance Testing for Breakers 1ELC-1 & 1ELC-3 Will Be Completed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000311/LER-1996-007-02, :on 960716,containment Penetration Conductor Overcurrent Circuit Breakers Had Not Been Demonstrated Operable Per Ts.Caused by Failure to Assure That Info Was Incorporated Into Sr.Procedures Reviewed |
- on 960716,containment Penetration Conductor Overcurrent Circuit Breakers Had Not Been Demonstrated Operable Per Ts.Caused by Failure to Assure That Info Was Incorporated Into Sr.Procedures Reviewed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(e)(2)(viii) | | 05000272/LER-1996-008-01, :on 960613,failed to Meet Tech Spec Requirement While in Mode 5 for Natural Circulation.Caused by Insufficient Technical Input for Development of Controls. Revised Operating Logs for Mode 5 |
- on 960613,failed to Meet Tech Spec Requirement While in Mode 5 for Natural Circulation.Caused by Insufficient Technical Input for Development of Controls. Revised Operating Logs for Mode 5
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000272/LER-1996-008-02, :on 960613,failure to Meet TS Requirements While in Mode 5 for Natural Circulation Was Noted.Caused by Insufficient Technical Input for Development of Controls. Revised Plant Operating Logs for Mode 5 |
- on 960613,failure to Meet TS Requirements While in Mode 5 for Natural Circulation Was Noted.Caused by Insufficient Technical Input for Development of Controls. Revised Plant Operating Logs for Mode 5
| | | 05000311/LER-1996-008-02, :on 960729,battery Chargers Were Declared Inoperable Due to Mfg Discrepancies.Unit 2 Battery Chargers Will Be Reworked to Design Specifications by 960915 |
- on 960729,battery Chargers Were Declared Inoperable Due to Mfg Discrepancies.Unit 2 Battery Chargers Will Be Reworked to Design Specifications by 960915
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000272/LER-1996-009-01, :on 960530,concluded Potential Common Mode Failure for 4 Kv Magne-Blast Breakers.Caused by Misalignment of Breaker Mechanism & Internals.Assessed Breaker Mechanism Misalignment for Each Breaker |
- on 960530,concluded Potential Common Mode Failure for 4 Kv Magne-Blast Breakers.Caused by Misalignment of Breaker Mechanism & Internals.Assessed Breaker Mechanism Misalignment for Each Breaker
| | | 05000311/LER-1996-009-02, :on 960808,determined Current Shift Schedules Deviates from License Condition 2.C(24)(a).Caused by Inadequate Review of License Requirements.Will Continue to Operate on 12-hour Schedule |
- on 960808,determined Current Shift Schedules Deviates from License Condition 2.C(24)(a).Caused by Inadequate Review of License Requirements.Will Continue to Operate on 12-hour Schedule
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000272/LER-1996-010-01, :on 960619,identified Pressurizer Relief Tank Hydrodynamic Loads Had Not Previously Been Considered in Support Design.Caused by Failure to Consider Hydrodynamic Loads Caused by Water Discharge.Supports Revised |
- on 960619,identified Pressurizer Relief Tank Hydrodynamic Loads Had Not Previously Been Considered in Support Design.Caused by Failure to Consider Hydrodynamic Loads Caused by Water Discharge.Supports Revised
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000272/LER-1996-010, Forwards LER 96-010-00 Re Inadequate Pressurizer Relief Tank Supports.Attachment a Represents Commitment Made to NRC | Forwards LER 96-010-00 Re Inadequate Pressurizer Relief Tank Supports.Attachment a Represents Commitment Made to NRC | | | 05000311/LER-1996-010-02, :on 960819,TS 4.0.5 Surveillance for Two Pressurizer Welds Was Missed Due to Insufficient Verification & Validation of Entry of Data Into Database. Exam of Pressurizer Spray Nozzle Was Completed |
- on 960819,TS 4.0.5 Surveillance for Two Pressurizer Welds Was Missed Due to Insufficient Verification & Validation of Entry of Data Into Database. Exam of Pressurizer Spray Nozzle Was Completed
| | | 05000311/LER-1996-011, Forwards LER 96-011-00 Regarding Missed Surveillance for Sampling Boron Concentration of Refueling Canal as Required by Ts.Commitments Encl as Attachment a | Forwards LER 96-011-00 Regarding Missed Surveillance for Sampling Boron Concentration of Refueling Canal as Required by Ts.Commitments Encl as Attachment a | | | 05000311/LER-1996-011-01, :on 951206,missed Surveillance for Sampling Baron Concentration of Refueling Canal as Required by TS Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Implementation of Tech Specs Requirements.Procedure Revised |
- on 951206,missed Surveillance for Sampling Baron Concentration of Refueling Canal as Required by TS Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Implementation of Tech Specs Requirements.Procedure Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000272/LER-1996-011-02, :on 960620,pressurizer Safety Relief Valves Were Found Outside of TS Tolerance.Caused by Minor Testing Instrument Error.Valves Were Refurbished & Successfully Retested to within TS Tolerance |
- on 960620,pressurizer Safety Relief Valves Were Found Outside of TS Tolerance.Caused by Minor Testing Instrument Error.Valves Were Refurbished & Successfully Retested to within TS Tolerance
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000311/LER-1996-012-02, :on 961005,two Potential Transformer Fuses Opened While Performing an Electrical Test of 21 Svc Water Pump.Cause Unknown.Work Practices for Specialized Electrical Testing Will Be Reviewed for Adequacy |
- on 961005,two Potential Transformer Fuses Opened While Performing an Electrical Test of 21 Svc Water Pump.Cause Unknown.Work Practices for Specialized Electrical Testing Will Be Reviewed for Adequacy
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000272/LER-1996-012-01, :on 960723,potential Loss of Residual Capability Identified.Caused by Inadequate Valve Design.Rhr Flow Control Valves Replaced |
- on 960723,potential Loss of Residual Capability Identified.Caused by Inadequate Valve Design.Rhr Flow Control Valves Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000272/LER-1996-013-01, :on 960711,scaling Error of Over Temperature Delta Temp Resulted in Inoperable Protection Channels.Cause Under Investigation.Scaling Calculations Revised |
- on 960711,scaling Error of Over Temperature Delta Temp Resulted in Inoperable Protection Channels.Cause Under Investigation.Scaling Calculations Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000272/LER-1996-013, :on 960711,concluded That Current Gain & Bias Settings Had Rendered Overtemperature Delta Temp Protection Channels Inoperable.Caused by Scaling Error.Licensee Will Revise Scaling Calculations.With |
- on 960711,concluded That Current Gain & Bias Settings Had Rendered Overtemperature Delta Temp Protection Channels Inoperable.Caused by Scaling Error.Licensee Will Revise Scaling Calculations.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000311/LER-1996-013-02, :on 961010,surveillance for Performing Tritium Grab Samples When Refueling Canal Is Flooded Was Missed. Caused by Inadequate Implementation of TS Requirements. Corrective Actions Include Procedure Revs |
- on 961010,surveillance for Performing Tritium Grab Samples When Refueling Canal Is Flooded Was Missed. Caused by Inadequate Implementation of TS Requirements. Corrective Actions Include Procedure Revs
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000272/LER-1996-014-02, :on 960717,potential Hydrogen Embrittlement on 4kV Breaker Parts Identified.Caused by Cracked Roll Pin,Due to Lack of Knowledge of Plating Induced Hydrogen Embrittlement.Cause Evaluation Being Conducted |
- on 960717,potential Hydrogen Embrittlement on 4kV Breaker Parts Identified.Caused by Cracked Roll Pin,Due to Lack of Knowledge of Plating Induced Hydrogen Embrittlement.Cause Evaluation Being Conducted
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000311/LER-1996-014-03, :on 961201,EDG Automatic Start Resulted in ESF Actuation.Caused by Defective anti-pump Relay in 23 Csd Vital Infeed Breaker.Defective anti-pump Relay Identified |
- on 961201,EDG Automatic Start Resulted in ESF Actuation.Caused by Defective anti-pump Relay in 23 Csd Vital Infeed Breaker.Defective anti-pump Relay Identified
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000272/LER-1996-014, Corrected LER 96-014-00:on 960717,potential Hydrogen Embrittlement on 4kV Breaker Parts Identified.Root Cause Investigation Being Conducted.All NLI Refurbished Breakers Removed Except 2B4D from Vital Loads | Corrected LER 96-014-00:on 960717,potential Hydrogen Embrittlement on 4kV Breaker Parts Identified.Root Cause Investigation Being Conducted.All NLI Refurbished Breakers Removed Except 2B4D from Vital Loads | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000272/LER-1996-015-01, :on 960722,inadequate Cfcu Heat Removal Capability Identified.Caused by Failure to Effectively Chlorinate Service Water.Cfcu Monitoring Program Developed & Procedures & Training Revised |
- on 960722,inadequate Cfcu Heat Removal Capability Identified.Caused by Failure to Effectively Chlorinate Service Water.Cfcu Monitoring Program Developed & Procedures & Training Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000311/LER-1996-015-02, :on 961219,breach of Containment Closure During Core Reload Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Inplementation of Outage Scheduling & Risk Management Requirements.Containment Closure Was Reestablished Using Alternate Isolation Poi |
- on 961219,breach of Containment Closure During Core Reload Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Inplementation of Outage Scheduling & Risk Management Requirements.Containment Closure Was Reestablished Using Alternate Isolation Points
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000311/LER-1996-015, Forwards LER 96-015-00,documenting Event That Occurred at Salem Generating Station,Unit 2 on 961219.Commitments Made within Ltr,Listed | Forwards LER 96-015-00,documenting Event That Occurred at Salem Generating Station,Unit 2 on 961219.Commitments Made within Ltr,Listed | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000311/LER-1996-016-02, :on 961220,missed Surveillance for Determining Response Time of High Containment Gaseous Radioactivity ESF Actuation Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Implementation of TS Requirements.Procedures Will Be Revised |
- on 961220,missed Surveillance for Determining Response Time of High Containment Gaseous Radioactivity ESF Actuation Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Implementation of TS Requirements.Procedures Will Be Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000272/LER-1996-016-01, :on 960719,missed Surveillance for RHR Pump Dynamic Head Prior to Entering Mode 4.Caused by Inadequate Procedural Control for Verification of Change Requirements |
- on 960719,missed Surveillance for RHR Pump Dynamic Head Prior to Entering Mode 4.Caused by Inadequate Procedural Control for Verification of Change Requirements
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000272/LER-1996-017-01, :on 960725,surveillance Was Missed for Plant Vent.Caused by Personnel Error.Lco Compensatory Action Was Immediately Completed Upon Discovery of Missed TS Requirement |
- on 960725,surveillance Was Missed for Plant Vent.Caused by Personnel Error.Lco Compensatory Action Was Immediately Completed Upon Discovery of Missed TS Requirement
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000272/LER-1996-018-01, :on 960719,potential Performance Impact on ECCS Identified Involving non-safety Related Refueling Water Storage Tank Piping.Caused by Design Discrepancy.Design Reviewed & Revised |
- on 960719,potential Performance Impact on ECCS Identified Involving non-safety Related Refueling Water Storage Tank Piping.Caused by Design Discrepancy.Design Reviewed & Revised
| | | 05000272/LER-1996-019-01, :on 960729,misclassification of Blow Down Sample Valves Noted.Caused by Flawed Engineering Evaluation. Review of Other Salem Piping Penetrations Performed |
- on 960729,misclassification of Blow Down Sample Valves Noted.Caused by Flawed Engineering Evaluation. Review of Other Salem Piping Penetrations Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000311/LER-1996-020, Provides Notification of Change in Commitment Implementation Schedule Re Potential for Thermal Overpressurization of Containment Fan Coil Unit Piping Per LER 96-020 | Provides Notification of Change in Commitment Implementation Schedule Re Potential for Thermal Overpressurization of Containment Fan Coil Unit Piping Per LER 96-020 | | | 05000272/LER-1996-020-01, :on 960820,containment Fan Coil Units Were Outside Plant Design Basis.Caused by Failure of Plant Design Change to Update Plant Design Basis.Mod to Provide Overpressure Protection Will Be Implemented |
- on 960820,containment Fan Coil Units Were Outside Plant Design Basis.Caused by Failure of Plant Design Change to Update Plant Design Basis.Mod to Provide Overpressure Protection Will Be Implemented
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability |
|