ML19322D935

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:47, 1 January 2025 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Info Re Notification & Followup Activities for 750613 & 770924 Transient Events at Davis-Besse & Oconee, & Actuation of Pressure Injection Sys at TMI-2
ML19322D935
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse, Oconee, Crane  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/05/1980
From: Hart G, Simpson A
SENATE, ENVIRONMENT & PUBLIC WORKS
To: Ahearne J
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML19322D920 List:
References
NUDOCS 8003110268
Download: ML19322D935 (2)


Text

JSM ids.G "a***"an mm, g. yg,, gyggesag i

WDesuhD t. 48W9 Eft. haasuE ROBEWT T. STAFFONO. WT.

)

se T PETE W.

OdEA.

T.,..

.ER.

-m<,

"".',,.'"'i.*O*;-~..."""""*='""****"*

'31CnileD Miafc.s Mennie

.1..

...p

..=..cc "m, C*t,'",;;,'",'f,"", ',*,",,,,

couuirres ou cuvmonunur ano rueue woaxs C,

waswiuaron. o.c. 2csso

~9.f.je;.g.l::

==.

February 5, 1980 gi, gi El.!f55 E.5..A..d

=

The Honorable John F.

Ahearne g:lgg Acting Chairman

. ::.. ~~

+T Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.

C.

20555

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As part of~our investigation into the accident at Three Mile Island, we are looking at certain events which in some j;;. ;;gg way may have foreshadowed the March 28, 1979, accident.

l These events include the September 24, 1977, transient at

.3 Davis Besse, the June 13, 1975, transient at Oconee Unit 3, and

!;. Ef '

the four previous transients at Three Mile Island Unit 2 in which the high pressure injection system was automatically actuated.

fi' m

With regard to these events, it is currently our under-P 1-standing that, following these events, your agency did not in notify other appropriate utilities of the incidents or

.;;s advise them of the corrective actions to be taken in such an event.

Please let us know:

gi-if?:

p First, if our understanding is correct.

[%...

p:..........

r ~~-

Second, if this understanding is correct, why you chose

[.{. -JQ to take no such action.

i+

Third, if this is incorrect, what notification and pi.n##6j advice was given and to whom.

d E5f V:

"+*

r.=..

Fourth, what follow-up work was done with respect to

- ~.7 91 each of these events.

Please include a description of any analysis that was performed and your conclusions regarding

JJJJ--

the severity of the event.

Fifth, with regard specifically to the activation of HPI at TMI-2, whether you centemplated any actions that

! = =2s.

would reduce the number of actuations of HPI under non-loss-of-coolant accident conditions.

=

a

  • 6.g EE

=::

8@Q3 LcP268 9

. : 5.*!

~

~

~~

L"T:

=

'.'.**.::ll ~:

8

?;

e s

. It i+.

In addition, TMI-2 experienced chronic problems with Edm the condensate polishing system, beginning with an incident t.:ME*E:

on October 19, 1977 (which appears similar to the problems

  1. ?iE;=...

on March 28, 1979) and continuing until the accident.

With

=

regard to these problems:

"{.

First, was the NRC informed?

~

Second, if so, what follow-up actions were taken?

E==

Please include documentation.

g.: --

p n+::c Third, if the NRC was not informed, could you explain

-.. =.

the circumstances surrounding the failure to inform.

So that we may have this information for our investi-Eh=d;-

h"="

gation report, which is now in the final stages of prepara-tion, we would appreciate your providing a written reply to

~ ~

???

these questions as soon as possible.

We hope to have our

i=

first draft by February 22.

Thank you very much for your prompt attention to this

matter, w==4 Sincerely,

?- +iNl L-sn W

Alan h.

mpson Gary Har

~ ^

.4 Ranking Minority Member Chairma f.jgMiifl Subcommittee on Nuclear Subco ittee on Nuclear Regulation Regulatio

^

5

~ '39.

.~ 32 nr'n 4

[~~'"Z..

. ;;..=;..

,5::[ifik

~

3=.

...=

.p.m

.e

= 5

= = = = = = =......

.. =

={: ~"

. =.

=- :=:.