ML20205D741
| ML20205D741 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 09/26/1985 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205D636 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-885 NUDOCS 8510170080 | |
| Download: ML20205D741 (11) | |
Text
.
$Sf92&
9
(
2 i
i LICENSING ACTIVITIES SCHEDULE FOR RESTART OF SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT NO. 1 8
4 1
i I
0FFICAL USE ONLY CONTAINS SENSITIVE INFORMATION l
l 8510170080 850926 PDR FOIA 4
BELL 84-985 PDR
p.
r i
e M rJk Alts mit t
. yII L SFISMIC A;IALYSIS r,gy gg hESTART e
MODIVICATIONS SEISMIC SEh DiTEdhATEb DRAFT IlsAR ASSESSMurr 3gp TOI DiohT-rEht!
DIESEL INSIECTI0tl3 F E,,tilhENkIITS INSI ESULTS TDI ART 1000 Hft 1EST RtRI
.ECH S11C AME2IIMDIT -
HM MCTIONAL ALTTHORIZATION LICDiSE C0tlLITIONS -
Tit i hEwtllhEPDITS (52-1t & $3 37)
ELD REVIEWS SING ACTIONS COMPLETE RESTART SER IASS Oh!Eh 60VTU3E LICDiSUIG ACTIONS g
NESTAlfI RTB hEVIEW (83-28)
~~~
l EQ EXDiPTIori l
l COMMISS10tr EQ EVAL 13ATI0tl NEV IW j
IJ::AL bFdtilhDtDITS FQh hESTART IJEAL EVALUATION l
3
- NSHC=
HEARING (?)
FR NOTICE (?)
cg> IETITION (?)
5 41.I1MArlon hEVIEWS ALIJT,ATION &
INVESTICATION
-~~
STATtlS lilVESTIGATIONS l ____
T:014t!E !! SID:TIONS REUION READD 4ESS HODIVICATIOtt IriSIEfirloflS OIERATOR ftVQtf A!.IVlC ATION S AN OtiMiiE UN IT 1 A STAWING SCE MANACDtDIT 1 COMMITMErlTS
INTRODUCTION t
In an Order dated August 11, 1982, the f!RC directed that the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) maintain San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit No.1 (SONGS 1) in a shutdown mode until they complete their June 15, 1982 (as supplemented June 24,1983) commitment to upgrade the plant's seismic design capability to the new design-basis of a 0.67g modified-Housner spectru.
In addition, that Order directed SCE to complete plant upgrades to 0.67, which they comitted to in June 1982, before plant restart.
That 9
act' ion resulted from the staff's review of the licensee's reevaluation of SONGS 1 under the Systematic Evaluation Program (SEP); the staff concluded during that review that the analyses at 0.679 exhibited stresses so high as to question the validity of the original seismic design at 0.5g, without a suitable explanation.
Concurrently, 0I was asked to determine SCE had already undertaken a substantial seismic upgrade program for 50 figs 1 at the time the Order was issued.
Because of differences in analysis techni-ques'and design criteria, SCE concentrated on the plant upgrades to 0.679 rather than divert resources to establish the validity of the original seismic design at 0.5g.
However, after completing nearly $100 million in plant modifications, SCE concluded that all of the plant modifications to upgrade SONGS I to 0.67g in accordance with current licensing criteria would require almost an equal amount more.
In view of the other plant improvements defined and the size of the plant, SCE concluded that the scope of their seismic upgrade prcgram would not be cost effective.
Therefore, in December 1983, SCE proposed a scope of plant upgrades which would provide the capability to bring the plant to a hot shutdown in the event of a 0.670 modified-Housner safeshutdownearthquake(SCE).
In a related matter, the California Public Utilities Cornission (PUC), af ter reviewing the financial impact of the protracted SONGS 1 outage, has directed that SOf:GS 1 be renoved from the rate base if it does not generate 200 hours0.00231 days <br />0.0556 hours <br />3.306878e-4 weeks <br />7.61e-5 months <br /> at 90% load or 65% capacity for 30 days by December 31, 1984 The PUC also requires that SCE justify the cost of any new plant improvertents, beyond those already defir.ed. Therefore, SCE is strongly rrotivated to corplete plent
1
\\
k restart activities before about December 1,1984, and to resist any new plant improvements. To meet this schedule, SCE has planned completion of linited seismic upgrades and hot functional tests by the end of August 1984.
Shortly thereafter, the plant would be shutdown briefly to correct any startup problems that might arise because of the extended shutdown and partial mothballing. SCE has requested authorization to restart by mid-September.
This environment pyg( cause SCE to rush their restart program beyond their capability to effectively implement it.
Since the plant was shutdown in 1982, several additional licensing requirements and generic issues have evolved which must be resolved or addressed before plant restart could be authorized. Moreover, most of the licensing reviews which were underway at the time SONGS 1 was shutdown subsequently lapsed until a course for their resolution could be redefined. The scope of the restart evaluation should encompass all of those activities as well.
- (
LICENSING ACTIVITIES The scope of licensing activities that should be addressed for plant restart fall into three broad areas:
(1) license changes, (2) SEP, and (3) significant safety issues.
1.
License Changes The pending seismic upgrade Order, modifying the SONGS 1 license, is discussed in terms of its relationship to SEP below.
However, there are 20 other license conditions and proposed Technical Specification changes pending. Of these, four are essentially complete, awaiting the expira-tion of the notice period, and four are routine actions which do not necessarily have to be completed prior to restart.
However, the goal is to complete all actions before restart.
l 4
6 The specific licensing reviews pending are detailed in the SONGS 1 actions list. There appear to be sufficient NRR and Region V staff available to complete these reviews such that they could be issued by about September 1, 1984, provided that these personnel are not reassigned to other projects for significant periods of time in the interim. However, most of these actions will be completed in the period between mid-August and plant
' restart (goal: mid-September); therefore, there will be a significant strain on OELD and the ORBf5 licensing assistant to complete issuance of these actions (note: staff counsel for SONGS is also assigned to Diablo Canyon). Thus, a contingency for supplementary legal and administrative support should be provided.
The most significant of these actions involve a modification to the Order for the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS), to allow ccepletion to extend to the next refueling outage in early 1986 (interim procedures have
(
been provided); schedule for the dedicated shutdown system for fire
' protection (Appendix R), relative to their ex7 sting schedular exemption, also to be completed at the next refueling cutage; a request for schedelar exemption from 10 CFR 50.49 (environmental qualification) for no more than 20 components, to be submitted in early July 1984; and a determination of compliance for the August 11, 1982 Order to upgrade the seismic capability of the facility.
The 10 CFR 50.49 exemption request would extend completion beyond November 1985 and, therefore, will require Comission approval.
In theory, this action does not have to be completed until March 1985 (reactive planning); however, in view of the significarce of the restart decision, the staff's review of the exemption request should be completed and forwarded to the Comission before restart.
The determination of compliance with the seismic Order is dependent on i
the staff's findings in the seismic review (see SEP) and the legal form of the findings (see Hearing Activities). At the time these findings are made, a decision will have to be made regarding whether the Comission
~
(
should approve plant restart. The Commission was criginally informed of the basis for the 50flGS 1 shutdown; as a minimum, an information paper should be submitted to the Cornission to describe the basis for plant restart.
2.
.The staff's review of S0f:GS 1 seismic design under SEP formed the basis for the plant shutdown in 1982. Since that time, the SEP review has continued, albeit at a significantly lower level of activity.
In December 1983, SCE proposed to complete *he seismic upgrades to 0.679 for those systems required for plant restart. NRR endorsed this concept in a letter dated February 8,1984, and assessed the proposed design criteria to achieve seismic integrity.
(
SCE's seismic analyses to complete the design of plant modifications for restart will not be finished until mid-July. 'The staff review will be conducted between that time and the end of August, with technical support from EG&G and in concert with the Region's inspections of the seismic upgrades.
In parallel, the staff (SEFB) will conduct the integrated assessment for 50tiGS 1 in July and August, with the goal of issuing a draft Integrated Plant Safety Assessment Report for peer review before restart. That report would include a staff conclusion regarding the seismic upgrade program both for restart and the long-tenn. The relevant parts will, be extracted for a restart SER.
The SEP integrated assessment does. not necessarily have to be completed prior to restart. However, that integrated review can serve to coordinate the other licensing actions that do have to be completed before restart and provide a measure of completeness for the restart decision.
Inasmuch as the Operating Peactors Project Manager (ORPM) is also the SEP Integrated Assessment Project Manager (IAPM) for 50flGS 1, a supplemental
k ORPM and IAPM should be assigned to ensure that all administrative functions are accomplished.
3.
Significant Safety Issues At present, the critical path to plant restart is a determination of
' the reliability of the SONGS 1 Transamerica Delaval, Inc. (TDI) diesel generators. Although, the TDI diesels have been operational since 1977 and a complete overhaul.and partial (about 25%) inspection were' conducted in 1982 and 1984, respectively, additional inspections and replacement of parts may be necessary.
A complete sumary of the SONGS 1 TDI operating experience, inspection results, analysis results, and SCE's conclusions will be submitted on July 2, 1984. A decision to require additional inspections will
/
directly affect the restart date. Depending on the scope, additional inpections will require at least two months fo perform. Thus, a decision in this regard should be made as promptly as possible.
In view of the current demands on the TDI Task Force to complete the generic review and support the licensing activities for Shoreham, Limerick, Comanche Peak, and Grand Gulf, continued management attention should be focused in this area.
HEARING ACTIVITIES At present, there are no hearings scheduled for SONGS 1.
However, if a decision is made to notice plant restart, a petition for hearing from the Government AccountabilityProject(GAP)islikelybasedontheirpastinvolvementinthe Kent investigation.
If restart will be noticed, that decision must be made by July 6, 1984, so that the notice can be published in the July Federal Register j
so that the notice period will elapse before the first of September.
In addition, ELD will have to determine whether any specific licensing action will be necessary to permit the plant to go to Mode 3 in August for hot functienal tests, based on the specific language of the shutdown Order.
...._~._.
l.
If a petition for hearing is received, it will likely be conducted after plant restart because a "no significant hazards consideration" could be developed based on the new seismic design criteria being more stringent than the original design criteria.
The staff's evaluation will stress the plant's capability to safely shutdown following the new SSE, as modified.
INSPECTION ACTIVITIES The Region V Operating Plan should be able to support a readiness report by early September 1984. However, there are several conditions which may jeopardize this schedule:
[
1.
The Senior Resident at SONGS, AL Chaffee, has been promoted to a Region-based assignment and will not be readily avaflable for most of the time between now and restart. The Region should expedite the installation and assimilation of his replacement to ensure that the SONGS 1 resident, Tony D'Angelo, is free to perform the necessary inspections of Unit 1.
2.
There is not much guidance available to the inspectors (resident, region and contractors) for TDI, seismic modifications, and operator requalification because of the incomplete status of the review.
Careful coordination between the NRR review and the Region is necessary to ensure effective and efficient inspections.
3.
OI (Region V) has requested technical support from the SONGS 1 resident during July and August to support their investigation, because of his unique qualifications and experience.
Because this review could be very time consuming, arrangements are being developed to provide contractor support for the detailed technical work associated with the investigation and orly limited technical guidance by the resident.
No qualified NRR personnel are readily available.
~
4 At present, there are only four outstanding allegations which will be completed by August 15, 1984.
If a substantial number of new allegations are submitted before restart, there may not be sufficient regional resources to review the issues because of the support required for Diablo Canyon.
The' Region has scheduled two separate weeks for team inspections during the month of July and has scheduled site visits for contractor inspections by LLNL. As a result of those major inspections, there will undoubtedly be followup actions which will have to be resolved prior to restart.
In addition, a determination will have to be made in early August whether those followup actions suggest any fundamental problems in the licensee's organiza-tion and management, as part of the Region's determination of the licensee's readiness and capability to operate all three units. Concerns have been expressed in the recent past regarding trends observed in SONGS 2 and 3 (there is a pending $250,000 civil penalty). The licensee believes that these problems have been systematically resolved a'nd the lessons-learned will be extended to Unit 1.
However, at least two weeks should be allowed in the schedule to resolve any corrective actions related ^to SCE management effectiveness.
INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES
4
'To ter-
[
6 tJmes
~
SAN ONOFRE UNIT 1 gy/
STATUS 10/29/84 INFORMATION DUE REFERENCE
[.
COMPLETION OF RETURN TO SERVICE PLAN LTR. CRUTCHFIELD A. CERTIFICATION PLAN COMPLETE TO BASKIN 10/19/84 B. DETERMINATION FAILURES IN NON-UPGRADED SYSTEMS WILL NOT PREVENT HOT STANDBY C. CONFIRMATION OF MASONRY WALL AS-BUILT CONFIGURATION (RECEIVED 10/29/84)
D. CONFIRMATION OF ANALYSIS QA/QC'FOR 0.67G UPGRADES E. DETERMINISTIC BASIS FOR RESTART (IN 10/17/84 SCE LTR.)
- 2. ~ R90RT DESCRIPTION OF 0.5G EVALUATION TELECONS GRIMES TO BASKIN 10/24 AND 10/25/84 3.
TDI - EVALUATION OF CRANKSHAFT CRACKING LTR. CRUTCNFIELD (REPORT RECEIVED 10/29/84 - COMPLETENESS TO BASKIN 9/18/84 NOT YET VERIFIED)
AND MTG 10/22/84 4.-
REACTOR TRIP BREAKER TEST RESULTS GENERIC LTR 83-28 EVALUATION TO REs!ON V' 5.
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION AUDIT REVIEW 10/02 JC0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THRU 10/04/84 AND
[
MTG, 10/26/84 i
l i
I
i INFORMATION DUE REFERENCE l
6*
MASONRY WALLS - SUPPORTING INFORMATION MTG, 09/05/84 7*
RESUBMIT "0VERPRESSURE MIT!GATION SYSTEM" TELECON MCKENNA PROPOSED TECH SPECS TO RAINSBERRY 07/17/84 8*
REVISION TO LIMITING OVERTIME TECH SPEC LTR, PAULSON TO BASKIN 09/05/84 9.*
SEP INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT -
MTG, 07/10/84 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND UPDATE 9
10.* APPENDIX J TECH SPEC REVIEW TELECON MCKENNA TO SUPPORTING INFORMATION RAINSBERRY 06/29/84 11.2 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REY!EW -
LTR. CRUTCHFIELD TO SUPPORTING INFORMATION BASKIN 05/09/84 12.* ORGANIZATION TECH SPEC -
LTR. PAULSON TO SUPPORTING INFORMATION BASKIN 09/07/84 l
l
- NOT REQUIRED FOR RESTART EVALUATION I
I A FEW REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE CURRENTLY BEING PREPARED IN CONJUNCTION WITH OTHER ONGOING REVIEWS WHICH SNOULD NOT AFFECT RESTART.
l
' ~ ~
- * ~ "
l l
g
(
LICENSING ACTIVITIES SCHED LE FOR RESTART OF SAN ON0FRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT NO. 1 i t
(
OFFICAL USE ONLY CONTAINS SENSITIVE INFORMATION O
Revision 1 x
August 31, 1984 1
,m L
1 T.All Of.
Jfill I RF ST8RI Pf:0G!AH i
masonry walls intake structure repairs hot functional tests 3
soit backfill seismic analyses review seismic SER integrated assessment desit IPSA R T L1 requirements diesel inspections inspection r*sults review TDI. restart SE R -
o
-restart SER license condition reviews TH1 requirements (82-16 & 83-37)
E!'8 review (83-38)
TS changes a
PASS review PASS license amendment EQ evaluation EQ audit - EQ SE R l
_ restart EQ' extension actton t
restart legal requirements
~
Commission review notice resta'rt pe t it ion? -
l allegation 6, allegation reviews O! status investigation 1
readiness ro.itina inspertlong report team inspections
& commitments SCF. management l
en f'orcement conference operatur qualification & staffing
)
jut.Y AUGUST SE PitMBER OCTOBER noyttsrp 1
-r' INTRODUCTION In an Order dated Aug.t 11, 1982, the NRC directed that the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) maintain San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit No. 1 (SONGS 1) in a shutdown mode until they complete their June 15, 1982 (as supplemented June 24,1982) commitment to upgrade the plant's seismic design capability to the new design-basis of a 0.679 modified-Housner spectrum, before plant restart. That Order resulted from the staff's review of the licensee's reevaluation of SONGS 1 under the Systematic Evaluation Program (SEP); the staff concluded during that review that the analyses at 0.679 exhibited stresses so high as to question the validity of the original seismic design at 0.5, without a suitable explanation. Concurrently, JI was asked to 9
SCE had already undertaken a substantial seismic upgrade program for SONGS 1 at the time the Order was issued.
Because of differences in analysis techni-ques and design criteria, SCE concentrated on the plant upgrades to 0.679 rather than divert resources to establish the validity of tie original seismic design at 0.5g.
However, after completing nearly S100 million in plant modifications, SCE concluded that all of the plant modifications to upgrade SONGS 1 to 0.679 in accordance with current licensing criteria would require almost an equal amount more.
In view of the other plant improvements defined and the size of the plant, SCE concluded that the scope of their seismic upgrade program would not be cost effective.
Therefore, in December 1983, SCE proposed a scope of alant upgrades which would provide the capability to bring the plant to a hot standby in the event of a 0.67g modified-Housner safe shutdown earthquake (SSE) to support plant restart.
In a related matter, the California Public Utilities Comission (PUC), after reviewing the financial impact of the protracted SONGS 1 outage, has directed that SONGS 1 be removed from the rate base if it does not generate 200 hours0.00231 days <br />0.0556 hours <br />3.306878e-4 weeks <br />7.61e-5 months <br /> at 90% load or 65% capacity for 30 days by December 31, 1984.
The PUC also requires that SCE justify the cost of any new plant improvements, beyond those already defined. Therefore, SCE is strongly motivated to complete plant
..~.
..n
-2 l
s restart activities before about December 1,1984, and to resist any new plant improvements. To meet this schedule, SCE has planned completion of limited seismic upgrades and hot functional tests by the end of October 1984.
~
Shortly thereafter, the plant would be shutdown briefly to correct any startup problems that might arise because of the extended shutdown and partial mothballing. SCE is preparing a request to authorize plant restart; they would intend to go critical in early to mid November l'984. This environment may cause SCE to rush their restart program beyond their capability to effectively implement it.
Since the plant was shutdown in 1982, several additional licensing requirements and generic issues have evolved which must be resolved or addressed before plant restart could be authorized. Moreover, most of the licensing reviews which were underway at the time SONGS 1 was shutdown subsequently lapsed until a course for their resolution could be redefined. The scope of the restart evaluation should encompass all of those activities as well.
LICENSING ACTIVITIES The scope of licensing activities that should be addressed for plant restart fall into three broad areas:
(1)licensechanges,(2)SEP,and(3)significant safety issues.
1.
-License Changes The pending seismic upgrade Order, modifying the SONGS 1 license, is discussed in terms of its relationship to SEP below. However, there are 20 other license conditions and proposed Technical Specification changes pending. Of these, five are complete. ELD has required that two of the actions be re-noticed because of changes resulting from the staff's
. evaluation; two others were delayed until late September because ELD concurrence was not obtained before the monthly FR deadline. The goal is to complete all actions before restart. However, for four of the actions the staff'is awaiting additional information from SCE (one request being
,... (
~
e n,.-
prepared).
For two other acions (steam-generaterarvsi14ance and organization), SCE has been instructed to resubmit. The review of the heatup and cooldown limits has not yet been scheduled. Nevertheless, these activities should not preclude a restart decision.
The specific licensing reviews pending are detailed in the SONGS 1 actions list. There appear to be sufficient NRR an'd Region V staff available to
. complete these reviews. However, most of these actions will be completed in the period between mid-August and plant restart; therefore there will be a significant strain on OELD and the ORB #5 licensing assistant to complete issuance of these actions (note:
staff counsel for SONGS is also assigned to Diablo Canyon).
Thus, supplementary legal and administra-tive support may still be necessary.
The most significant of these actions involve a modification to the Order
~
i for the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS), to allow completion to extend to the next refueling outage in early1986 (interim procedures have been provided); schedule for the dedicated shutdown system for fire protection (Appendix R), relative to their existing schedular exemption, also to be completed at the next refueling outage; a request for schedular extension for 10 CFR 50.49 (environmental qualification) for no more than about 20 components, which was submitted on 7/31/84; and a determination of compliance for the August 11, 1982 Order to upgrade the seismic capability of the facility.
The licensee originally requested that the schedular requirements of the PASS order be modified; parts of the system were cannibalized to complete PASS for Units 2 and 3.
The licensee has requested that the completion date be extended until startup following the next refueling outage because, although the system will be complete in six months to a year, outage and startup time is needed to implement the procedures and train the operators. NRR and Region V instructed SCE to submit a letter describing the compensatory measures taken to achieve the NUREG-0737 requirer:ents in the interim.
ELD concluded that a modification to the Order is inappropriate and SCE was instructed to submit a license amendment request.
t The 10 CFR 50.49 extension request does not extend completion beyond November 1985 and, therefore, will not require Commission approval.
In theory, this action does not have to be completed until March 1985 (reactive planning); however, in view of the significance of the restart decision, the staff's review of the extension request should be completed before restart.
The determination of complian~ce with the seismic Order is dependent on the staff's findings in.the seismic review (see SEP) and the legal form of the findings (see Hearing Activities). At the time those findings are made, a decision will have to be made regarding whether the Commission should approve plant restart. The Commission was originally informed of the basis for the SONGS 1 shutdown; as a minimum, an information paper should be submitted to the Commission to describe the basis for plant restart.
2.
'SEP The staff's review of SONGS 1 seismic design under SEP formed the basis for the plant shutdown in 1982. Since that time, the SEP review has continued, albeit at a significantly lower level of activity.
In December 1983, SCE proposed to complete the seismic upgrades to 0.679 for those systems required for plant restart. NRR endorsed this concept in a letter dated February 8,1984, and assessed the proposed design criteria to achieve seismic integrity.
SCE's seismic analyses to complete the design of plant modifications for restart was completed in late-July.
The staff review was conducted during August, with technical support from EG&G and in concert with the Region's inspections of the seismic upgrades as part of their team inspection.
._.. 9.
In parallel, the staff (SEPB) is preparing the integrated assessment for SONGS 1, with the goal of issuing a draf t Integrated Plant Safety Assess-ment Report for peer review.before restart. That report would include a staff conclusion regarding the seismic upgrade program both for restart and the long-term. The relevant parts will be extracted for a restart SER.
.The SEP integrated assessment does not necessarily have to be completed prior to restart. However, that integrated review can serve to coordinate the other licensing actions that do have to be completed before restart and provide a measure of completeness for the restart decision.
Inasmuch as the Operating Reactors Project Manager (ORPM) is also the SEP Integrated Assessment Project Manager (IAPM) for SONGS 1, interim assign-ments will be made as necessary, to ensure that all administrative functions are accomplished.
3.
Significant Safety Issues 4
At present, the staff and consultants are reviewing SCE's report on the reliability of the SONGS 1 Transamerica Delaval, Inc. (TDI) V-20 diesel generators. Although, the TDI diesels have been operational since 1977 and a complete overhaul and partial (about 25%) inspection were conducted in 1982 and 1984, respectively, additional inspections are necessary.,
A complete summary report of the SONGS 1 TDI operating experience, inspection results, analysis results, and SCE's conclusions was submitted cn June 29, 1984. Based on a preliminary review of that report, the staff issued a letter on July 26, 1984, which identified specific inspection, maintenance, and preoperation testing to be conducted prior to restart.
SCE had already begun the necessary inspections on July 23; a commitment letter with additional supporting information was submitted on August 28, i
1984 f
4
- i The eddy-current test of the #1 diesel crankshaft identified surface cracks near the oil holes near three of the journals. FaAA and the TDI Owners Group are currently evaluating their extent and significance. The inspections for the #2 diesel cannot be started until mid-September when the #1 diesel is declared operational and they must be completed before restart. SCE is repairing the #1 crankshaft while the TDI Owners Group is reviewing the test results. Because the SONGS 1 diesels are lightly-loaded, the staff believes that the extent of cracking may be significant.
In early August 1984, the licensee discovered significant corrosion of the rebar in the intake structure while repairing the concrete surface. SCE presented the results of their inspections and their repair plah in a meeting on August 23, 1984. SCE intends to implement the repairs under 50.59. SGEB will observe the damage and repairs during a site visit in early September to review the masonry walls issue. At present, these repa, irs constitute the critical path to the hot functional tests (cooling water) and, therefore, to plant restart.
HEARING ACTIVITIES At present, there are no hearings scheduled for SONGS 1.
However, OELD has concluded that the licensee should request a license amendment to (1) modify the conditions of the August 1982 Order for seismic modifications, and (2).
extend the Ordered schedule for completion of PASS. The licensee submitted a request to modify the Order for the PASS schedule in May 1984 (see Licensing Activities).
i 1
If these actions are processed as license amendments in accordance with 10 CFR 50.91, the notice will offer an opportunity for hearing prior to restart (Note: both involve a significant hazards consideration by definition). A petition for hearing is considered likely because of previous intervenor interest and would, therefore, delay restart. Alternatively, SCE has requested thr.t the Orders be modified, which would require prenotice but the notice would not require a significant hazards finding.
- - = - -
l In view of the significance of this action as it relates to the August 1982 Order for seismic modifications and the considerations for alternatively lifting the Order, the staff has prepared a Commission Paper requesting their views on this matter. That paper was forwarded to the EDO on August 28, 1984; DEDR0GR has recommended a briefing to discuss the matter.
INSPECTION ACTIVITIES The Region V Operating Plan should be able to support a timely readiness report for plant restart. However, there are several conditions which may affect this schedule:
1.
The Senior Resident at SONGS, Al Chaffee, has been promoted to a Region-based assignment.
The Region will retain Chaffee at the site until his replacement has settled in, which ensures that the SONGS 1 resident, Tony D'Angelo, will be free to perform the necessary inspections of Unit I.
2.
There is not much guidance available to the inspectors (resident, region and contractors) for TDI, seismic modifications, and operator requalifica-tion because of the incomplete status of the review. Consequently, there will continue to be careful coordination between the NRR review and the Region to ensure effective and efficient inspections.
3.
01 (Region V) requested technical support from the SONGS 1 resident during July and August to support their investigation, because of his unique qualifications and experience.
Because this review could be.
very time consuming, arrangements have been made to provide alternate technical support (see Investigation Activities) with only limited technical guidance from the resident.
4.
If a substantial number of new allegations are submitted before restart, there may not be sufficient regional resources to review the issues because of the support required for Diablo Canyon.
The Region has conducted team inspections including site visits for contractor inspections by LLNL.
As a result of those major inspections, there followup actions which will have to be resolved prior to restart. Concerns have been
~
expressed in the recent past regarding trends observed in SONGS 2 and 3 (there is a pending $250,000 civil penalty); an enforcement conference was held the l
week of August 6, 1984 The licensee believes that these problems have been systematically resolved and the lessons-learned have been extended to Unit 1.
However, at least two weeks will be allowed in the schedule to resolve any corrective actions related to SCE management effectiveness.
INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES i
t 1
i n
i
?
O 4
(
Pi e rs t MH ONOFht UNIT 1 Pave 1 of 2
,o g
I1FN HC I Into Ohe..AN tuNf4Cf START INPUT fiESOURCES COMPLETE ISLUC C5 4K AT CPM O
I M iGMIC nuot 'r5iS hlV St F b Gill 40 COMPLLTE
//15/54 160 PH v/14/84 9/20/G4 Eu&O 95V
'J ha
' ' E I 1M I Nr.D IN 4 L Cl fiV j'ANGELO COMPLLIL 7/15/G4 20 PH 9/14/84 9/20/64 LLL 70K NG h5 h6 1. f oH I.Lle6 ati100 Ohb5 No. 6 Lf4NA 10/21/b4 40 PH 10/26/04 11/ 2/04 f r liG D
A bl'.InhI i i uni ht ia OEL D
- 1. HANDLER COMPLETL
.24 PH X be.
le t40Ilie hi s i e.h f Ohbb NLLLNtJa
//21/ 4 24 PH
"'/Za/34 O HL
'i eiehM1..leiN htVILW i uM C/31/04 9/21/84 9/20/84 Ob ici,
~
C-4 rtH iNr hv COMiLETE 40 PH rc., as C
- a ital kilnHT If4.P hEO TD16 bEhLINGER COMPLETE SCE MTG 24 PH COMPLETi 7/26/04 50/4 85 5C 1DI IN.5EtiION>
LCE COMI'LETC 9/2G/04 t,F NG b
SD 1DI INSPEC110N REV TDIO DEhLINOER COMPLETE 40 PH 10/ 9/84 Sr tra
(
SE IDI L/f PRO 6 REV TDI6 OEf Lit'OEH COMILLTE 40 PH 10/31/64 CONI 5F 1DI t' t. d T AR T SER 1 DIG DEkLINGER 10/ 9/84 16 PH 10/12/84 0 65
(
(.!.. e O 'MP ilh& PUS ORAb ALEX10N 9/ 1/84 24 FH 9/29/34 3 hs N
7A 3-J.<(2.1
': LIC)
ICLD DUNNING COMPLETE 7/ 1/84 9/ 1/04 6 US 7D
. :< - 2. ( L../. 3 )
Ohb5 NChENNA 7/ 2/04 IC5b v/ 1/64 6 HG V.
7i 5- -
~(3.1.1-2 LTC) hv JOHNSON 7/ 2/84 7/ 1/84 9/ 1/84 6 85
/D J-23(4.1 & 4.2)
COO ~
WRIGHf N/O ROUT 7F 3 - 's i 1.!)
LOD SHUM 9/ 1/84 ROUT l.
76 3-2O(1,2)
HF Eb T Of4D I SAI v/ 1/84 huUT R1b IN;FECllON FiV JOHNSON 8/31/84 60 PH 9/14/04 76 REAlnhPT e
10 EO C a IENGION orb 5 NCbENNA 10/ 5/84 7/31/64 10/19/G4 10A U-triA EO E XCMPT ELD REV OELD SHIELDS 10/19/84 24 PH 10/26/84 lub k
10D CnhiltTil EO D ENPT OhB5 NCAENNA 10/26/84 16 PH 10/26/84 huur 11 FAa LIC AMEND orb 5 MCbENNA 9/17/84 5/ 1/84 40 PH 10/12/84 12 f6 L
12 f A L LIC 6MD ELD fiEV OELD CHANDLER 10/12/84 16:PH 10/19/84 9/26/84 3 RO s
t, f /P 9111TDr4JN sri ASD FIORVANTE COMPLETE 4/24/84 160 PH C/30/84 9/ 7/34 3 h5 14 i/. - F/P CHED EBERLY COMPLC1E PC 136 80 PH 11/ /84 hour 1 *5 19 + tC PROCEth!NG Onit5 NCFENNA C ONF LETE 112 PH 10/19/84 60UT 10 mas *NRY WALLS 50E0 CHOLSHI COMPLETE 4/12/S4 320 PH 12/ /84 CorJ I 17 Dml F ILL COND SGED HELLER COMPLETE 5/17/84 32 PFf 12/ /84 s.,0N 1 6_
IU LIC COND - $/6 $URV Ofib 5 MO ENNA COMPLETE PC 138 24 PH G/31/84 8/31/84 3 RG t '> 1C AM' R5b LANTZ COMPLETE PC 71r 24 PH 10/31/84 11/ /G4 CONT 2n It W W.. (.;2 - 16 )
hv 2WCTZIG COMPLETE PO 127 180 PH 9/21/84 9/23/04 3 Rd L.
21 1 r MI' I A11FhY SEPb SCHOLL COMPLETE COMPLETE 4 PH COMPLETE COMPLETE O fis li DC OURV hV
/WLTlIG COMPLE1C PC 126 100 F H 9/24/84 C Ot4 T
't. GVLhTIML RV ZWETZIG COMPLETE PC 119 29 PH 11/ /64 CONT s
24 II-6L
-;/.582-16 0hAb FAlhTILE COMPLE TE S C 125 40 PH 9/24/G4 CONT 2'-
IlJ I LC.un1 Lis A. I.E50 SEFb MO ENNA COMPLETE '7/23/G4 2X160 PH 9/14/84 v/23/34 3 h5
.' t IC r oND - ILS Ofib5 MO ENNA b/23/64 PC 134 32 PH v/14/84 9/28/64 3 ha.
i.
27 IS - F.! P.
orb 5 MCIENNA COMPLETE PC 83 COMPLETE COMPLETE 3 h5 l
c: is OHi< RE b81t aDe nNC Y orb 5 MCF Ef4Na COMe'LEIE COMPLETE CUMI-LETE COMPLETE 3 h5 24 L I C t orJi r <ECUhlTY ONDS MCI.ENNA COMPLETE COMPLETE COMPLETE COMPLETE 3 h5 30 T1 - MP J C$b LI CONI LEIE F C 124 OFH v/14/64 9/20/64 3 h6 31 Vi rJ1 UntUE 1.IMI15 ASB DEMPSEY COMPLETE 20 PH CCrlPLE IC
,.,5 32 Yt N I VntVE LIMII; C5D FIELDS COhl'LETE 20 F H 6/31/G4 9/14/G4 3d s
1.
- Htni/ COOL MTED LLLIOT COMPLETE PC 137 N/5 h0VI
- .4 I N. L hV li. t FRUG hEb PAGE HAI N/S huUT
t N1 VnLVE UtiR IOB WRIGHT CONFLETE 3/30/84 9/ 7/04 huUl L
t *
- it ' H EOb LHLMAN..L 1 O/1//04 O/15/04 10/tv/e4 10/1//04 CUNI 37 li - G6 4.NIZAT!**H LCD DENEDICT CONFtETE PC 130 10/19/84 11/ /G4 400f
- u I -AUX Wt P uhAD Cont'LEIE PC 135 40 FH O/51/64 v/14/84 huut I
1 : - ni o it outs MClENNA COMPLETE COMPI ETE COMI'LETE COMPLETE J h6 I
N: Pt. t.
UhD5 hJ. b lune t C ui:l L L T L //a3/04 24 PH
// 1/U4 v / 2.? / 34 huul 1: I
/
V
- iitiN.ut4 7/ 1/84
//14/04. '/ 20 / c.e
,4 hL nio s o 6 s
-n.__..__.-
i
f C
Pierst SAN ONOFRE UNIT 1 l
Page 2 of 2 O
ITLM ACIIUN OR6AN CONTACf STHRT It4f U T RESOURCES CONTLETE IASUE CS'
$K AT CPfl 8-
~,4 s
s O
ai i F i.
.4.n2 Rv-soiiNSUN
//ai/84' 9/14/84 9/2c/84 76 RcADYRPr 4: INW Si ige 4110N O!
JOUI'OFF COMPLETC 9/14/84 3 85 4 :: O! - I L C H SUPPOli f RES GUlY COMILC'IE 120 PH 9/10/84 fRC 24K 3 liG
'O 44 iAL*E FIAINT RV NIRSCH COMPLETE COMPLE}E COMPLETE CLOSED ROur
(
45 INCOR e4NCHOR DOLTS RV&OI KIRSCH COMPLEIC RVG3A h 12/15/04 ROUf 46 CONintliNMION RV YUilAS COMPLETE CONPLETE COMPLETE CLOSLD liOU T
/
D 47 Dhons 01 SHACRLETON COMPLElE OI83A44
'7/31/04.
Ruur d
da PFMitJNEL SAr ETY RV LIRSCH COMPLETE RV83A51 7/ 1/94 ROUT 44 SECURI TY CHECK RV AIRSCH COMPLETE COMPLETE COMPLETE CLOSED Ruur D
SG F AL(L' I4eCl GROUND RV KIRSCH COMPLETE RV83A78 C/15/94 ROUT k
51 D6SINCTEf( bh0 FEN RV WENSLASKI COMPLETE COMPLETE COMPLETE CLOSED ROUT 52 At t 4 (. AIG LVAL RV JOHNSON 8/ 3/84 EST 30 40 PH 8/17/84 9/14/84 76 READYRPT C
m: mod t EstGtJ CONTROLS RV CftNTER A1A 49 PH 7/ 3/84 7/31/64 76 fiEADYRPI
- > 4 A; 44 t lLT PS ID'.> t. IsWG RV CAN1ER AID-D 24 PH 9/28/64 ROUT 55 hEtAI.it FRGuhart RV - RES PATE A2D 40 PH O/17/84 9/14/84 ?
OK 76 READYRPf b
56 MANT ATTENTION RV - RES CHAFFEE A2C 9 PH 9/28/94 ROUT i
5/ dreiniUP COMMITTNENTS RV - RES CHAFFEE A2D 32 PH 7/31/84 8/28/84 76 READ'vicPr S6' SECURITY PROGRAM RV SCHAEFER A3 30 PH 6/29/84 7/27/84 ?
1.2K 76 isEADYRPI s
U 54 TEAM INSPECTION RV - RES AIRSCH 7/23/84 A4 - C2 500 PH 9/14/84 76 READYl<Pr 60 RAD 1. EP RV WENSLAWSKI A6 10 PH 9/28/84 ROUT 61 EP WGktSHOP RV AUNIHIRO A6 48 PH N/A ROUT U
/,2 AFP R IMPLEMENTATION RV CANTER BIA 70 PH 11/30/84' ROUT k
63 NOD Fett_OWUPS RV - RES DANOELO B1B LLL 4K 76 READYRPf
/A OPO. FOLLOW 8 8PS RV - RES DANOELO D1C 211 PH 9/28/04 ROUT C
65 knD/EP/SEC FOLLOWUPS RV VARIOUS-B1D&2E 51 PH 9/28/84 ROUT E
- u. RESIN IN RCS RV - RES DANOELO DIG 4 PH 8/17/84 9/14/84 76 READYRP1 67 TMi INPLLMENTAr10N RV CANTER
-D2A 58 PH 8/17/84 9/14/84 76 READYi(PT L.
68 Ei, PROORnN RV DURIOIN D2B 70 PH 11/30/84 ROUT to EP LXERCISE RV FISH D2C 23 PH 6/29/84 ROUT 7u 11.F.I RV YUHAS 7/23/84 B2D 50 PH.
8/17/84 9/14/04 76 READYRP1 U
/t MC 2515 MIN - tmSIC RV - IsES DANGELO CIA-C 377 PH 8/17/84 9/14/84 76 READYRPI t
72 M?,b HP RV NORTH C1D&Eg CO PH 8/17/84 9/14/84 76 READYRPI I? M&la - EP RV FISH CAF 5 PH 8/17/84 9/14/84 76 READYRPI i-
'74 Mf.B CFOIRITY RV SCHAEFER C10 16 PH 8/17/84 9/14/84 76 I<CAbvRPf 7G M?D - UPS RV HAlst C1D 107 PH 9/ 7/84 76 litiADYRP T 75 READINESS REPORT RV NIRSCH 10/15/84-16 PH 10/19/84 3 RS L
k L
y L-D L
s t
_}
l
_w.
Hsr srd :r:.sct risnaser 2-5. 'S 4 5:30F Fsse t S Att Or10F:E UNIT 1 PESTAPT
'E,,
lit se t s
l t
I l
e t
l r
I I
f
~.
.l I
I i
i f
9 1
l i
6.
e.-
y =. r. :. 7.
f r
1 C.."
pa 4
?,
6-!:
k t *,,*
em D
i f
b
~
1
=
a_.
usr sed Fr: sect fis cis se c 3,
5-24 5:3?F
- sse I SAff CNOFFE UllIT 1 PE97 AFT 1
11 F
H25D H IF9ARFCO' 25C H,DIF5AFC0; ISE H EE:c Ei!CO F-t l
l 1
l 1
l l
4 m
l i
I l
l l
l l
8 G
f.
s.
l t,
I
.Har"5"d Fr: sect flanaser 5=El 5:34F Fs3e !
Enti Of40:FE UllIT 1 FEET,^,PT ia l
' E AD iF F T-WIF E l.1' le I
H
- e. n, m,
4 i.
.i
- 15
- r,dl.3. 5T AF T Ip=--3 f
")h il
- 17 0.';
O a
~2 I
il A
a fl
- 11
- I f
4 O\\
fk
-2 C t 'l O
. n,.
n
- 42 l
l-I
' - 25
- i i
4 -Ii,"-
- ll i.
n f -l ! '
l t-1 tv e
aw 1
-3 '
11 il i
1 -!:
- y I!
1
-:E 2
4 l
il n
L a
l
+
^!
e 4,
{
T www w--
g-w
~
y r- ?
g umru-1----TT'+8-T w'MPWw 9'-'-t-'wIw t-W-W8--
"P+"*
- - 1 "T 7*Pu'ir*
ek-e
Hae"se:.: rd.ect itsosser 5 54 5:!:P
- sse 4 E.:.N ONOFFE UNIT 1 FEETART i!
==12
>4 4
I
-2 5-H I
l
- 26 N
g me-e 6
4 e
I 1
1 1
. _ - _. = _
l t
{
"u.
src F
..e-.
Msesser
- :4
-:!7A
- 5.; e.
.e OflI. 1 F E :. T. F.T
- -mN v.ilt t-t
,n.
Ju, n, Ju. l 1:
d,.-
.N'.'
+. s 4 :-
I..
-)
- e, =
AA 19
- c..'
4 a
t.'
.:tset
+
1 c.
3h
...,l: PPT
?- t =.
.?
4 y
e O'
ir.
N r
u t
i.
.A.
.t.
1
.=
.e C
.uG W
- e. n r
c.**
m m
=..r.
a s
(
r..
l 4
p-i
(
i
.T c.,*.
......~:~~..*
4 s
s.
p.
n o e. : '.,
e
- t.
.. s- - T -
- =
- e.
a -
e.-..
s s c=
c * *.* M r3:t ;
-MI1 '$, I L' * " t gI,,l 1 PLOYMr!
-..e.
l Jue
.e.
3
- US YP e v i,.
m me oy h
4 e eme" e8I5 h
e e
T
{
1 e*
w e
.e' to
- h e
e i =
tm e
e D
- m. g e=
e e' e e
.L.
l.f >
-r M
=
ev
- . : T.4. :
.O eDe Dh g "6
@p1M"+
.' e:, e
- c. =
I
.M me 6
e@
p9
. e
- i M*I T
e
- &6 p
- e 9
9 6
h 4
- s
e.
a 1
i l
(
-.., =..
y3 3
c..
c
=. s _., -
a s..
.F l o,
( l !(., F e.- i.p 11. A F r....-,
n
- i mr i 1~C;
-, - + *
...J y;a.
1e 1
.m A R.
m,.
em
}-
m9 I
mo 1
e b
i e.'
s "3
a 9'
.F e,=
$II!
f b P'8
=,,
y 9
M A
ee e -
h
)
-.4 3
9 e 1 Mb O
M.M me i
eN O
e-*
eDm.
M h.-mrM
)
e b
t.
..?
se
& e'
=
"I
- R
.=
- 4
- M
- EF E.'.'
t.lr' P"
?-=
- m.
. O j
C*
e en W SWG G
.W.W-.
e o e
@ $6.
M..
m e I
5, O.
\\
l ia r..-4 r ri "reirc" 'Onaarr 9'
h/84 6: 52A i-r 4
+
Pr o i w: t Detail Report Project Data Nai::r.
Respons)ble Cajender
= =. = = = = = = = = = = = - = - = = = = =. = = = = = = - = = = = = =. = = = = - = - = = - - = = = = = = = =. = = = = = = = = = - = = = = = = = = = =
FR GR Ii'!ES Scheduled:
Duratien Co =. t Start F i n i sc h
:..===========,=======-========--=====_==r========-=========_=======
104.62 Ovc W O.00 oill/84 IT:(.u)F 11/ N S4 9: + %
Actual:
Duratien Cost 5 t,3 r t Finish
-==-=_======.,-======,============-================:===--=========-=-==-====
0.00 6e11/84 12:OOP EATJ ONOFFE UNIT 1 RESTART l
i t
.__._,_.-.,a_.__.______.__.
=,
i iter wr ci F:
i!3naner o/ 6/84 6:'i2A Fe c _
i r-No di:- Data 1 L.."?
Ih. mon s i b l e Sl scl:
Codo Eeri-St at t
!arl-t~. sii rh Subor o inct Late Start I.. a t. e Fint3h Sc hi-d' i l ed :
Durat2on Cost Start FiniTh 7.
Actual:
Duratien Cos: t S '. a r t-Fintth
- ----===::==============-==========:===-=====:====.:=====:--==.~n:.=-_==~_==:----
1i GR65 c8. < ;O D-e E 6<11e84 12:a"4P 7
6/G4 10:'.O' o/t7 94 :.;. a n p..
,1, s g 4 3 2: cui;.
25.00 Dvs E O.00 C<l94 12: OOP 10 12-54 12:@P 30 n.00 FADS LICENSE tai!ENDt1ENT 1.'
OEi O 10/12/84 12: 6'9F la<21eG4 1 : * 'O F 10/12/84 12: 00P 1'h 21-84 12: UCF 9.00 Dvs E O.00 10e12/84 12:OOF l t ' e 21/,8 4 12: 00F a
0.00 PASS L.ICENSE AMENDNEllT ELD REVIEW s
1T WR 51.GO 0"c E 6 /11<84 12: < P R -'i 64 12:AF s.- ! T;4 ! ?..;.Ol:
- Oz !
3'
- .
- :.n.-
2.70 N t-h E O.00 m/li/84 !?:
"+P G 11 !4 i '. '. - F 1
o..:.a
../t
. R4
,c:..?
CIFE PROTECTION SHilT 00Wil SiSTEl1
_ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _... _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _. ~
)
l O
C
(
l N U r
y :
y i.. i 3.09 tit h E
>.'*O 6 i! 'P1
' ? : ' ' -
i 1'.^-
.I l ;
1
.,.e s
4 e
i- !- I li E F. <. i i t'.,
El.
1 i
< 1 ll i!
f il if, - r E :,t l f.!- ! Fr ~
1 ii m '.1 0 '
I
\\
~
kr ad Prniec+ !1a n a.,.: r 7/ 6/84 6: 53A F wm ~
! f am. '
Pecporw i b l.2 5 '. =. c l.
Code Earlw $" wl Fari' F i n i t i. b fobprorect L a t e 'd t ;4 r t
!..> i: e F i n i s h 3cheduled:
De ir cit i on Cos t:
S t _ar t F 1 n i sli
.~
Ac l' o o l :
Ottr af. i on Cost StarL FiniEh
.==.========.===========================================-r.====:=:=======_===
1 EEPB 30.30 Dvs E 6/11/84 1T: 4 >0P 7,21/64 4: 4Pri 7/11rS4 l' : ! !. P M 21/84 I ?:i W F 39 tltb E O.00 6/18.'F4 1.: (aP G<28/G4
- 4. 4E.'
~
. 00 6't8/34 1Z: WP 9E[5t1IC ANALVSIS REVIEM Tc P'
vo. 0c. Dvs E 6/11.<84 12 : 'W 9 /~21 G 4.12 : 0+
7/1[<R4 12: OsiP
'O
'1 S 4 1 ~. : n' f
' '. 40 t1th E O.00 6/18/84 12: Oi>P o f '.?H / 9 1 12 : i Kd-en 0.00 6/18/84 12 : < oF TS AFWS ( 82 -- 16 )
l s
_.__________..________.._.__.______________.________r__.._____._______.______..______
'1 SEPB
--3.50 Dvs N 6/11/E4 12:OOP 5't1/54 4 : C.M; 9 c 2W,9 4
't :,.en F 2 ^., 3 4 ll: V 4.no Hrs W O.00
.i I 4. O D >.3 W
c', 0 0 6/11 51 ! 'J : c" @
s'C-11 i
'? 4:
TEt1P PATTEP' 2%
REFG 2';. 7. 2 Dm: 4 ac'.1'94
': 4F
- l 34 4;
IOe 8'G4 is i+-
'04
'~
-i,-
,,.p6
- f. ; [.- (d
,GQ Oj~
O.i, {
l.
s e '. [:
?
f
- ,1 e
-i e
, U c.
,. ;,..f,,h
.,,..c.,r.
i 3I g
I fe ah hh e
+* -
_ _ = - -
.~
3 9
% e I
f
'h
'i i.*
s e 4.
e]
e
,e lf,
t 4 l lb 1
t.
I 1
9 1 '
1 i
l
.j. r. s..- t.
.4 a c. a.. s.,-
- . - 04
.:40, s.
4 s-i.
Mll Ultu g gII., 1 g=a C:y eT r ** t. Ii iMr
' ~ 4 n,'c' fl 3 v 1-34 i
15
- D e,
- 1. :
p g6 5. **
e 1M* '
..k:
g-
.I e." t M.* :
N-C7 i
)
- E$
?.:.?m' g
?
(
9 6
4 4
1
}
\\
Hm F r ' i f r '. M a n a o.>c
- e.. ' M e.:%4A F
! J c ifw-fe-oensible s i c;0 C,d6 F. r 1
.; t..t i
Fri f :iii -ie
. iho t e i e.-i i M.- G t. w F i..t - F 1 i s i t.t.
. i, <,.1 i i,. 0.l:
.her A 3 on 2..
11
_*t
+t t
- h c2n1
- /.
s: i e 4 a l :
Dier-d 2 ori Cost SI w t Finith w = - = u.. = -.:. = = = : = =. = = : : = = =_.: = = = n = : = = = = = = =.~. = r- : = =. r. n.
- - =.: r : 2. n.... r.- : = -- - = - -.- 2 = = n.-
2DC MGMT
- 10. M D-e 14 S = ! 7 'E 4
.2: 4F
- ' T4<94 2: 24E c
- 9. 4 g ~,.,.
.c.
.,i.4 g.+...,,
,t 2
1.00 tU l'J A.00
.2,,..O COMMEllT CN OFAFT I F %P CST-EEFF
?.o. 2 n b >s E
!-E4 1 'i :
/~2 8 94 2:23
-' c 15 6 4
- ::A 0
~~ 9 4 J -2 : 6-
- 1. " 7 !! % E t.+. 0 0
-~
l'34 12: E F 5 1
'84
- 26 s :.".
c<:
v.ov i?
t, e. 4 FFEPAFE IFSAF DFAFT a
w s
O.t ne,
~~. 40 r.. a...- c-c'..J 1.'t / 4 i '. a '. " ' C' o
- c.. P. 4
. ' _ ~..,
c
~
_ - a w,_.,,
1 i ' :.1 - s, I
+
c a-
' '. t 2 lith E 0.OO A/11/51 12: t. " F 0.1E 81
' J ~~ r 70 6.no c.c 1 1, 5 4 : :.n.P i ! !~
~.s
- F_;t jf _
1l.
. _ _ _. - ~ _ - _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ -. _.. _ - _.
e-'*
+ [;.
- 8.,
- 7 g. p c_
{r.j e.
C
-^
m
.. j ;. C.. ; g.".,
,,,p
- Og i. e
- ? s .}
Q.
s.
-e 2,.l 8. Ill 'i @
e c,
4 3
_C J j ?....
1 8 4.
- f. '
s f
..,ss
_ 1 1
}
se
~ -=
e A ; ~'.:
[' E'I ?
- ~.. _ _ _.. _........
~. -
ie.
L-6 l
t: *
.s.
,t
.y 4... ti p.,..
I
.s-
~
l i Eg O 6
.C f j l i, -. q.~,.
c d '6 l q;.d, 6-t
' l ' * : f. - +
I-Ed i L Gl'10 k I* 1 =)
hl *.l
+e!A F+}
-I 49 8
~?
.r
.t t: e.
^--
- 1 l
- i t
'f*
!. !* i * *
'$ I.
l 6
f*
{ !'ll 4It
~4 3.- :, n < i. t 1....
.. r. t : i:
Co-1 58
.r t n ar.i
,. ; u l.
O. r H i ci' Coet 2:
.r !
Fii'sh
_._: __=-=.::-.:=_==.==.=
--===.=.==_-==.========.:n.=-=--_,_=-_:a..==.
7c OF U.5 70.E:' D-e E 6 1 1 E -1
'P 1~
11 1'
'c.
e.--n 24
.1 ;,, ti
- a ;
- '. 1 ~- iltfe E i ' "i 6 li '" !
- '"+C
? 1'iE4 !.
"CA ec.
.g,....
3 g 4 ;, s.;
,. H:
- ,.i i
! Ir Cel lD i T I Old 9? C t !P I T, i
_. _ _ _ _.. _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _. _ _.. _. _. _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _... _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. - _ _... -..
E
ti 9i I: :
~F
~
"2 id p+
t..
9.;
i p;. ;- rg.;
,/_cc..
t.,.....o c. rw.
- i...
m.
_..i ea
- t. p.. t.
r-r.,. e..u,
2_
s m
.:.. Oi, 7
1,. E.; i. :.
.P
' E I E!11 C f10DIF I C.; T I Oil I:!EF EC TI GI I l
e i.
.r.
v. T.
c.
-.. a
- r... -., u.
- g.,.,,.. o.; s.
. ~
.....c.
I n
q
- i
- 1 5
g 8*
g gv4
'1 H.!
D; }
I.e gI l
s as
' '.. '. - t-it h 8
- i.*,'.
J_
"i
- ':>4
.N 23,e5 J-M.,
e
. i. < f.
L. r a..r, r 3 4
r l '
e e<
- ~l k-ed l
q 6
1 i
r 2'
J e
- i*
t-Y f
3.
l 1
8 9
4 6
6-a b
9
l s
I w,-
.n!
ri ' 1 -- r -
-u :
F -l
'^
j
,..r,
.t,
t!.Ip
, j 3r I
(. q-t.,
[ -. r I
- I '- t -
.fi 8
~I-e
'i. i ?, r..,. I c.r-f.
!gf.
- F
,.t l
.t.,
3,,s g,
f.-
't-I' -<1*tj @j:
I + e r a t' t e tl I e, i-t-3t as t-
!! nj
-[,
s
~
- .r
- t t ;; ] :
Dt 9 de i 1 r.r, 1,~ o c; +
$ t c.r r F i o e r'-
r=mm,::.:=.=-==-_:.~===c_-=-:==.=--:-==-w..==a=-.--:.:==._---==.-~.. --.
- : 2 2 r :_----
N O P F -:
1, o.i>..:. e = E
.s. ; 5 <s.*
- .. P e i i. fSi ! :
4 7.1 i. :: 1 1 '..
C' I -' '
4 i; :
.,,t e.1 J
1.
TE -,.F C9 N r. {, p u l.'.
42
. oi..._
r.:_
._. t... u.
i.., p
.; c.:.;
a t.
c
-, c, c.,
. a F.
l ca ;..
o.
1. : -'. lith E O.00
/f
.c :. > +
.: I '5 G4 j
- V
.:..On
~
q s.1
- 2. a. +-
RESTAP' Lethe. RE *UIPEMEliTS t
l n p Rc,
,, 6a. nv.=. F.
3. c.;
...r.
- p. ;
~
'... f.:. ;3.; ;,.
-+
1 2.i.,
- c.. --
.L.-
.i.-.
c.
p..
2....e
..n 4,
~
.s
_s e e,. ne )
II$' I [I $E E k '[ }, ef-l h
I
-r t nyt t j j, _. ;,); j 1,, j,, r, = y 3 g e; ga g,,
, ~
i
.].
O c F l
t
.,u w n +.n..
g.
8,"
3 t
. lt e
- 5
[
1:
e V
I a
l i
- t., r n,. 3t M
o : %,.,
1
- c. c 4
r C. 2 f 1,1 s i a [,, ] U.
4l w-l l'. -j.?
E_
3 -l
-3 t
-te F ;-
L jgri' e
s.
- ec' t
-t is t t
.t.
F i ni gt.
2.
t:-
. i i. -d :
4.'r al 1 e n Cor
' a >r t
' tnt,
Ac t ol:
T/or at i or:
Cnet
- c. t r t F i re i r b
- =,.====-==.=:=====_====:==-========-=-==:==--__ :- - r = = - - - --
-.=:..c=-,-=
1_
O!
- <.c6 O's E o 11 El 1 ~':
"E
? ' i ~ J '-3 4 2': ? >1 F i
- 7. I c. ? ct
- Ic,4 i..
.1 64 1 :
>'Y j...-lith E F3
'39.I l.~ : ' ' F 0- ' 4 - C-I
!F i < u
_.T.>
g,;'
e.i ;
....p t
i
.: 4 l ' ' P. O... s.. e n y,L '..* P1 i-esq,p
-m I e., 3.
I 3..~,.,.. n.s E
a ' 1 i < 0 -1 i ;. " P
' Eu ! :"i I
r c 7 -- p:...., t,:.
c.. a.
l
... c5 ;11 h E
+'.%
5/)7MH m ".,'F
{
I 7:- ' f-
- 1
'81 1 1 : '. J F e m sa cI - TECH SUFFOfiT
.______.___..._._________.__.w.___..____.C.__....___.._..____._,..
(
I I
.M '
55
"? Dvs E
' 2c' I 1 ' 2:'* +
Go I: 50' c. i r. c,_:
- . :.jp n
c.
~-
/
], ' ' C, l-j i-h {
, - p o 's 29 {.{
j,,;[u.P
'* hj g
e*
'a
,e, e 6. '*
7 j-J ', l [;
a_ i d Ii'*
I[13IF C: I 2
'}b s'a F Ul
' i -
l e
a e
<L
~^
'l
..t.
4
,p' l
- ij l,
l s
r
.1 I
.[
=
i e
- I s
8
.(
.j
[~ 0 C j j ; '
[3fCl I'
' { l[ [ L L".*, : 1 T f' ' ? [' ' ' I m.
l 6
5 l
s a
a I
g 0 "
f
.l
\\
- ?..
3,-
t.-
,,.c i :- !,.... n.r 4
64 c; : '~ 7ri s
U - tu o : a bl -
~ 1 1 c l.
r,,<J e E., 1 I
,t E.
r
-+
9 but ci--et L. f. t' sf er i L
to T: r:'
l-
- ~ - l p. d t j.. ail.
Ist I t" a l_ ] (3!
Ce.E1 6f,,4 F g t, t -*, !
t Act i+a l :
Duration Cc=t Start Fin
-h
- -:==_=======..
r.:=--=-:-=:===:=====n======--==:--r:-=...-==r==:---2....-n=.c.
r r :-. --
5.D TD I f3
- 85. O E v e E 6 11 ea i.:,#
- 1e. ea
- : ii.
o..-
143 q 1: JcF '/i-0 'N f :
- i-2 t 16 Ilth E O.00 9/ 4/94 1 ' ': 6/ F 1**
'a GJ
^ : i 1. -
a, oc.
9,
.; e.1
] :..c.p TDT T W5PECT I.7tl FE'/I EW Sr. iLi 1 0.38 Dvn W 10, ciS4 7.114 g_
STAPT SF t
TOIG 9.20 Dvs E 10e t /84
": iin 1 * * /1 ? /8 i 1 1,-
t r. i t 9.ti;4 1
,,n.e 1,..
- .pq t.., -
-'. 0 0 pse E o.00 ;o, c,94 1.? :
4.. o p 1,i /1 * / 3a
'.it,.
.)
0 i >O ID! PE;T,ePT GEP
, g r,.E F
...... ~. v. 4. :. i.;
- ct; ; :...:.
erl.,..
e.
=
[-
s '
...F I ;.: a ti:
"',.p.
l-i-
a.
t i.
s, i : <.
.e
E
} '-
't; L.
I:
'r-
i, f
r
.r T,i
-t
! !c.n iii. r
^
'.w
.4 3!*mm I-
-x c.q E 3 h i.'
11 ac t Code E r!
';. t j o i F,
F 1:.1 :!
...r.;,,,.,c+
l., t.
.. ' a r r m F i n1 - t, act.,=diil m-!:
I o. r c. t. ) or i f.on t M ir t
' i ril 9 h
,;c + i t.a 1 :
ru ir + t.1 e n Cort
' t. :. r i i i nii 3 h
-=..-.=---=.--..==r==-.c:..:=..;u.=._:u_:===n=,.--.
---n.---=.===..-:==.=n.=.=:.-
2 T ',
I C. A 21.07 D.c E 11-' 1.i 2 : ' '." > F 3
1 A1 1 J': +1 '
e 2 84 1.. : toA
.OI 11:
- .t o f..O D s.t E n. O.'
7' 2 94 1 ' : *~ " i P
.,ag ry:n..
.s, o..
. e4 1,'....+
,. N L.. i t..
, F. 7- ! r-F.
e_..<-ce at r.
s
<.1.
c..-.
1...
4.-.
.. 4 4
t-
'. F O
I' 1. * > ) 0c E
. t! 84 i - : - WP
-* "i
-l
!.': ' W F T
..' 81 17 : c.or
~
'. A.1 I ?:in '
- 61. Vi Dss E t s, th i 7.
E4 12: e m F-2 1 84 1 T' : i " 4 o.On GE llEM I C LEr1EP 8 '. - ? 8 (7.. ?.-~.)
.k
.-+-*.m...
....--w++%
=..._m._.h.,.,.,._.w
- C F/
- !. O Dv=t E 6,!J*c4
! ~.:<.ai'
- !I ea 1 f : '. ",. r n.
.u tc g
.:1.L"'
D u +- F
' s 41 i C. 4 1 ': r F i d4 i.:*
1
.8
$6, 8 \\ $ _5 t
, y.l4g };.Y. p l.P * * { r, r,-+
-. C.
.j.9
?.
9 g
r
[
-e 3
i g
,.1' i
.~... _ -.. -. -..
_'t'.
,/.
[.,.
4 f.
U
.1
-y l
=
i.
s k
k*, J i F LJ' t... !: 'f i ! i t I'11F 1 '~ I ET-l e.
l
\\
l
'g h-g af =
- b' j
6 ) I I*
e e
'I,
}.
p
d
(
ri...-
.. ' ' P. c. - r - t et n -4.
ic Bi
, ** ei
~
'I.:..'
R..r,tf o n j *i1 0 51 7 i-
'~i*.t-E.. i t 1
- I I
t'
.i s. h,3 ; i
..t j. 4 1.
C5 I
C
,.rti 5 - h. <$ t !.i:
To r -dien
., t. t -
It.rt
^ i:
Ac t o +.1 :
D..t :. t i iyo,
t o -- t
$t r >
.2 i.h
-.. = : --- : r. _ = :.- _ -- -- - =. = = - u m. = :.:- _ =. _ :e = = - -.- - r - - m -- - - - = =- :- : :.- :.. =m-----.:
.-- - :. :- - - =. : : - -
F E rir?. Ri: 1 P '.'
25.
DI M c/?1 E4 l 'J : (~P
.4 c-4 F E (4 D Y R P l
/ _ ! c-3 1 i.. * : 1~> i- !.r S?
7 c. s-2 Dez N
...O 6/IJ 51
- 1. :.
.F 1..
1 RI
-'1A.
..; i r
EN nlj0 F F E litJ! T 1 PE/4r*Ii!F59 FEPOPT
- . 2
..,n..
p.5 W 11
- q c;....,_
c-11/ja.e4 ; ; :.. ~ ;: 1; 1.;
F E S T r4R I OL I
E ' 'CO 10.70 0.s W S c.h. ~ 8 0
- . : s 4 F
.u.
3.
OP4 I IF5sP PE'/ I EH cot 1F L ETED m.,..
..... r, a
.4
+
h A
5.-! :-
.+:t Ms.uaer 5, e 4 t:3:F c;3+ ;
Er!! O!!OFFE U!!!T 1 FEADP:E55 FEFGFT
r
"' 4 H
I.
i 73 H
2 s
I l
I
- -- 7 i H
i 1
l
,)
H I
I f.
I H
i 1
- 7 H
1 i
I
-3 H
l 1
i
_5, :
p i
I S
1 l
6
?
I
-$ b H
4 r
}
4 f
l e
t_:
W 4
8
- 53
>~
I i
I i H I
'F4 '[
h i
I
_1 p
t l
I l
l l
I
s
\\
.-- s.- i s r c : c : sect r!snsser o'
fc54 4:41P "53+
I E Ari OrlCr:E UtlIT 1 READINE55 REFORT
.i::4
.'.. r.
h '.
i, s.
da 2'-
-03 11 15 15 2
l,,a V
5.T AR T 4
5 4
4 M
'l
..v
.=. 7
- e. :..
==
1
\\
h e _:
=. ~.
dJ!
e i
1.-
e.
- p
n.
1
\\.
se~ arc =r
.e:: Mansser
- - 5 34 4;42F
'55*
=
a irn CNO:EE UNIT 1 FEADINESS FEFCCT 1:54
.e=
Oct 15 y.
3 10 17 24 1
t
.e,?.
- =
=c
/ Q 3
~e
' 9 g
"?;
o.
l W
g
.e g
qer 8
ab*
we9.
)
Eas C..R s
e i
E..
4 i
C.?.)
i.
- Q 4 8
"... ?.: :!.! 7 e
=
=
~.
. ~..
{
lbr'
- erd Fratect Mananer 9/ 5/84 4:4IP r
Pr o i ec t.
Detai1 F;ep or t Pro t ec t-Data Name Re=ponsi bl e Cal endar
====_.=======.:======e===============.=====.====_======._y.===.=u.=.m.,=.
_ _ =.
F. ear:FFT F V 1
3c h edt t.1 ed :
Durallon Cost St ar-t Fi n t 'i
================-===========:==============:=====___=._.._u.m..=.u=.=..=.
^9.62 Ovs N O.00 6,11.F4
': ~ 'P 0 2 -3 H.?
9 ' M-iic t ua l :
Diir a t i on Cost 3t ar t R tnish 2=======-========
_======.=.======.=.=_===========._..=.___.z._,=._____.=__=______,
O.00 7/16/84 12 : i a i;
\\
s 2AN OMOFFE UNIT 1 PEADINESS FEFGRT 4
I i
1 l
i i
f f
t
.,s-.e.
et, e.
(
6.r m i
.-h te.'
11 a n 40 L r
- '3/84 1.: l i! F t-os Norte O a t.=,
i lannin Rec $orisiblo 5 t ac!:
Cocio E ar ! ' S i c.r t E.riv ' !,1 = h Sibpr o iect Lato Start Latn Fintth Scheduled:
Deiration Cos t.
9 Fart F1n1=h Actual:
Osiration Cost-Et at-F Finte
=---=======p-=======.==-==._==========_.========-=-=-=========.n----:
=:=.
K.
F. V 20.00 Ibec E 6<It "N
i: :...P
. H B,!
a: u
', t rj q I ;.niip 7, 7 9, 5: a c: 7_,-
?.99 Nth E' O.OO
~'
194 1 ?: a iP 9 29 91 C: 7:F
. >, oo IEB 83-07 41 R b' 30.00 Ds a E 6<1i/24 17:DoF 9,
9<ga 9: 7e-7 / -'. t 8 4 1 ' : r,6P
',. 2 8 / 9 4 c': 7cp 1.08 Mth E O.00 7/71/84 12: O')F o 79/94 R: 3 c-F n.OO 7/31 84 1 ;. *GF f b b4"h '
+
1-F
'7 4. o ? Dts H
- c.,. ;I R4 1
.~ o f c.
9 / 2. 4 8 t
-? :. E.,4 aa 4 0. t :". Hr= 14 n.00 4/ TcI l~
.o
' c-
-1 o
....i ALL EO S I(3 E'.'(LL t li. T 10l'1
$,h g
gg g
'd i
l 4 *
- t. ej *
]..
?
33 1;,,. <.
[ j r -- it I
a I
I I h
I
(
?i e
} l.
I, J e.
F, ij.,,1 i
E4 g
g e
(
H-3 rs. a r ci Froiect Man ac or
'; / 5/E4 4:45P Fo I hee R.* ;non ri h i e SI sc f:
Code Esriv St 9ri E=ri I; i s i -:
Suboroinct L at e 5 t..p-t Lat e Fi.. i ch Scheduled:
Dueation Cost StarF F i si1 +1:
Y,c t u s l :
Di tr a t l on Cost 51erF 1 i ti nh
.=====================a==============_==._===.===_========.======-,=.=-
m p.'
5.
O E C.
'".i.
IL. c. W ~
6,< 1 1 / 8 4 l '. ' ' W W
t ~ i. O, i 1
c/25 84 06M l * ~'
i'R4
-r-
> in 32,oc H ~ t.:
W 8 *. GO c.
0 00 STARTUP COMMITi11ENTS 53 RV 75.87 Dvs W 6,' 1 1 < 8 4 12:nOP i5 G4 10: ("'a 7/25,3
! ; : OM *i
! Sa 7:9 -
30.00 Hrs W O.00 0
O.00 E :-...._, s,,
_ i.;n 1 ii r.R.O o-,., h.
rn 4
- n PU ' O E c.
94, ;O Dvs E 6/11/81 ! P : ': !F
?
'- < 0 4
~R-
?/ 4r84
- A 9
- c.
G 4
- : W i
- v. 8 3 Mtil E 6. 04, T '16J 2d !!: 6 4
- s, ! - /04 1
c i. J.O 7, t s f 81 i....,
- _
TEaN I; iSF EC T I Oi-i eC I
[
t
., s j ff s7 3 _,
i a
5 g
c,
- < aa
_ ag
^
Gi) a I,9 )9
'j !i ; ! I I! l e. - d ! !- ~~s l
)
<l t.
i e
.f
.11 6 -
T si o
g
& ~
k6 H r5 et d Freit-i 'laneoer 9/ 5/94
-1 : a /-F r,i'
- '.ine F>=ponsible 51 nck Code Earl Stare
,e !, F irii.s!>
r Eimor e iect L a :. a St'rt
- 1. + 5. o Fi nu cle Sc'iedu l eri:
Durstion Cest 31 ar F
. : o i s!.
Ac ho 1 :
Dure t 2 0:
Cnet Stari Finieh
-===2===============::
= _. = : = = = = = = = =.2 - u : : = = = :. = ~ r. 2 = : - :- : = = - = = = = = = =- : = :. u -= = 2 u - - m i-7 cU 7 2. ~' 7 D% W o ? ! !.' 8 4 !.2 : 00F
.O/@l Z:OOF
. tc,na
~. o<ip i..- i;e4
-: on3 58.00 Hee N G.On O.00 TNT Il-'PLENEN fn F T ON c'
54.50 Dvs E 6 / 1 1 /fi 4 12: 0-'P
- ;4 4
- ':%
0 4/R4 12: 0tA
-7 Jee54 0: 3s G.83 Nth E O.00 7 23,84 12: OoP
'3/1- /R 4 c 35A O
O.00 7,23/84 17:00P r.
IT.F.1 IN5PECTION i
%e 4
<W - RES 3?.50 Dvc N
,.1' R4 IT: 66F n - '
'a m ':.3 4 4....s 0
i 3,
-' ' ~..X Hr - kl O.On n,,. >..
.L 515 Mf!I le tw.2, i- [?l5FEC f f GHS
&;.. -- 7.
O /r Id
., !1 F4 i
'.*P I
r
. s a
.~l'
- 7 d
.*e
., g
,,j e
,e,*.e's
[h-il
, 4 'p e a
...i.,
q
=
[
.h 7-l i.
ll 6
i I'
r-o.a -b.v tbrv.rd Fra10-- tlancoor O
'#i/8 4 11 : 4 ~'P z
i.3 4 P.
P OInnn ?1 b } i2
$ l d.C k Code Edr }
M ni Eo I'i1:! di 31f!O D F O ! 5C l l.* h EF 3r*i tt I i l.1 '. I ?
S c-h edi t '. e d :
Dt ir a t i on Cost 9 '.w F ii si h
actual:
DurMion Coat S t ar I-
'~ i n i ' t
=================:===::=.=.--======--=.---=.=-~=~-~:====--==-~===---.rz:-:----.;=-:---:
- ~.--==--'=
pu
?~,e2 puu a
- j. 1 1, 9.)
.p
_ i i :...,
2 / 7 <s ;
o.... n 1,.
i 9. i.
.i w,
- 15. O A Hr c Ln O.00 O.00
'r. E.
- 9ECUP!Tv e
'5 M'
e,6. 25 Dvs N o i l 1 ' A.;
}Z-M P.-.
i.'
2,' t t -:M
- ,. 4
! ::14 o.
IO/.(H) H r =- W 0. '?"
- a 0, ih,
I
~.
h
').
[ I-:, @ j j j--
e]), Q,i { hp c: Lj Q. [p ~ !Q J
~ g'qp i
=
lI)- l'2 f I.}
C
~5 5
'M..
,6 u 6 M9;'E !WD il'IER3 UL PCP p
o c.. 4 :^. c., -- E
'1!
't 3
_j...3 I ;-
l'
. n '.i
.f-i.
.i.3
,,,e.
'i
$ 5 I' - b T I', r j {]p t
- i
- e l
l I
l
- - - - - - - -