ML20205D698

Advises That ACRS Comments Re Adequacy of Facility Seismic Design Features Require More than Single Meeting & Later Deadline Due to Change in Approach from Context of SEP Review to Restart Decision

ML20205D698
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	11/14/1984
From:	Fraley R Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
To:	Palladino N NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20205D636	List: IA-84-885, Advises That Commissioners Roberts & Zech Do Not Believe ACRS Technical Review Required Prior to Restart Decision.No Comments Offered by Commissioner Bernthal.Comments Encl.W/O Encl ML20205D630 ML20205D656 ML20205D673 ML20205D698 ML20205D707 ML20205D729 ML20205D734 ML20205D741 ML20205D768 ML20205D801 ML20205D819
References
FOIA-84-885 NUDOCS 8510170067
Download: ML20205D698 (1)

Text

-

Octag'g UNITED STATES 4

1 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

,1 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

{c WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 g

% ((*[. #j g

l- -

1:.2 November 14, 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Nunzio J. P

, Cha'.an, NRC FROM:

R. F. FralW, Executive Dir or ACRS

SUBJECT:

ACRS CONSIDERATION OF SEISMIC DESIGN FEATURES OF THE SAN ON0FRE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 The ACRS members have been infomed of Comission interest in antici-pated ACRS comments related to the seismic features of San Onofre Unit 1 as part of the restart activities currently before the Comission.

The ACRS subcomittee review and related full Comittee activity on this r,atter were being planned in the context of the SEP review of the San Onofre plant, beginning with the seismic aspects, rather than the..._.

restart decision that is presently being considered.

In view of this d -

anticipated subcommittee approach, any. Comittee coments related to the afeWicy'6fthe" San Onofre plant-are-41kelpto-require more than~a'F"

~

single" ACRS subcomittee meetir.g and a period of time that extends beyond.the-DecembenACRSr meeting ~9The members have expressed no v'iEws

~

-- th a titigtjess tha t 5 tWrest att'deh.t'sion. need a' wait the _results...of..them ACRS SEP review nor 'is it the subcomittee's plan'to schedule ihtiittias on'a timetable thst]s ccmp3,tibTe.wi.tnMirstart~ dec'ision.for.thisg-p7a m

. a,. %.. d r

cc:

Comissioner Roberts C.,B)

Comissioner Asselstine Comissioner Bernthal Comissioner Zech S. Chilk, SECY W. J. Dircks, EDO ACRS Members Q

q u il JA *f tw L J A s..

8510170067 850926 PDR FOIA BELL 84-885 PDR f

i h

l

-