ML22020A133

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:22, 15 March 2022 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
11 Public Forms
ML22020A133
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 12/07/2021
From: Heather Gepford
Operations Branch IV
To:
Wolf Creek
References
Download: ML22020A133 (22)
v • d • e


Text

EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER Chief: C. Osterholtz Facility: Wolf Creek Date of Written Exam: 10/27/2021 U/I: M. Doyle Start of Op Test: 11/1/2021 End of Op Test: 11/5/2021 Written Exam Developed By: NRC / Facility Operating Test Developed By: NRC / Facility Due Date Description Date Complete Initials Notes For NRC prepared exams, arrangements made 2/24/2021 Examination administration date confirmed 02/01/2021 MD for the facility to submit reference materials 3/31/2021 NRC examiners and facility contact assigned 02/01/2021 MD 3/31/2021 Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements 02/01/2021 MD 3/31/2021 Reference material due for NRC prepared exams N/A N/A ES-201 Att-3 3/31/2021 Corporate Notification Letter sent 02/02/2021 MD ES-201 Att-4 produced by CE 4/14/2021 NRC developed written examination outline sent to facility contact 02/25/2021 MD ES-401-1/2 and ES-401-3 5/26/2021 Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due 06/03/2021 MD ES-201-2, 201-3, 301-1, 301-2, 301-5, D-1 Operating test outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided 6/9/2021 to facility licensee 06/24/2021 MD ES-201-2 signed by CE & BC Proposed exams, outlines, supporting documentation, and Exams prepared by the NRC are approved by 8/11/2021 reference materials due. 08/16/2021 MD BC and forwarded for facility licensee review 8/18/2021 Peer review of written exam complete 09/02/2021 MD Document review on ES-401-9 9/8/2021 Written exam and operating test reviews completed 09/02/2021 MD Document review on ES-401-9 9/22/2021 Feedback approved by Branch Chief 09/03/2021 MD Examination review results discussed between NRC and facility 9/22/2021 licensee 09/23/2021 MD 9/29/2021 Preliminary license applications & waiver/excusal requests due 09/23/2021 MD NRC Forms 398/396 9/20/2021 On-site validation & 10% audit of license applications 09/23/2021 MD 10/6/2021 Preliminary license applications and waivers reviewed 09/23/2021 MD 10/13/2021 Final license applications & waiver/excusal requests due 10/15/2021 MD ES-201-4 prepared by LA 10/20/2021 Written exams and operating tests approved by Branch Chief 10/21/2021 MD 10/20/2021 Request facility licensee management feedback on the exam 10/21/2021 MD Final applications reviewed and audited; exam approval and LA produces / BC signs Exam Approval Letter 10/20/2021 waiver/excusal letters sent 10/22/2021 MD (ES-201 Att-5)

Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with 10/20/2021 facility licensee 10/25/2021 MD 10/20/2021 Approved scenarios and JPMs distributed to examiners 10/25/2021 MD 11/1/2021 Administer Operating Test 11/04/2021 MD 11/12/2021 Examiner's document op test results on ES 303's 12/03/2021 MD 11/25/2021 Post exam comments and graded exams received 11/04/2021 MD ES-403-1 to BC Post exam written comments reviewed and incorporated and 12/3/2021 NRC grading completed 11/08/2021 MD Post exam operating test comments reviewed and ES-303-1 12/3/2021 updated 11/08/2021 MD Chief examiner review of operating test and/or written exam 12/10/2021 grading completed 12/06/2021 MD Signed ES 303's to BC 12/17/2021 Branch Chief review of exam results completed 12/06/2021 MD 12/24/2021 Waivers/deferrals reviewed for impact on licensing decision N/A MD 12/24/2021 License/Proposed Denial letters mailed; Facility notified of results 12/07/2021 MD 12/24/2021 RPS/IP number of examinees updated 12/07/2021 MD print Report-21 1/14/2022 Final Denial Letters mailed (if no request for informal review) N/A N/A 21 days after proposed denial letters mailed.

1/21/2022 Examination Report Issued 01/19/2022 MD produced by CE 1/28/2022 Ref Mat'l Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals N/A N/A 2/25/2022 SUNSI checklist complete and exam docs to ADAMS N/A N/A SUNSI checklist to LA Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 11, Forms ES-201-1 and ES-501-1 Rev. 9

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Wolf Creek Date of Examination: 10/27/2021 Initials Item Task Description A b* c**

1. AJS JK MD
a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N.

AJS JK MD W b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

I T c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. AJS JK MD T

E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. AJS JK MD N

JDB JK MD

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major S transients.

I JDB JK MD M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and U mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

O JDB JK MD

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R

quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, Specific Instructions for the Simulator Operating Test, of ES-301 (including overlap).

JDB JK MD

3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W among the safety functions as specified on the form.

A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s).

K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.

R JDB JK MD O b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

U (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.

G (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.

H (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.

JDB JK MD

c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

AJS JK MD

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G AJS JK MD E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N AJS JK MD

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams. AJS JK MD A

AJS JK MD L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

AJS JK MD

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Author 6/3/2021
b. Facility Reviewer (*) 6/3/2021 Clyde Osterholtz/
c. NRCs Chief Examiner (#) __ ______________________________________________ 6/24/2021 6/24/2021
d. NRC Supervisor _________________________________________________ ________
  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
  1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column c; the chief examiners concurrence is required.

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: Wolf Creek Date of Exam: 27 Oct 2021 Exam Level: RO X SRO X Initial Item Description a b* c*#

1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. AJS JK MD
2. a. NRC K/As are referenced for all questions.
b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. AJS JK MD
c. Correct answer explanation and distractor analysis provided (ES-401, D.2.g)
3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 AJS JK MD 4 The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than four RO or two SRO questions were repeated from the last two NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR/NRO OL AJS JK MD program office). [NONE]
5. Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate.

__ The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed, or X The audit exam was completed before the license exam was started, or AJS JK MD

__ The examinations were developed independently, or

__ The licensee certifies that there is no duplication, or

__ Other (explain).

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the bank, Bank Modified New N/A N/A N/A at least 10% new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution(s) at right. 9/8 3/0 63/17 AJS JK MD
7. Between 38 and 45 questions of the questions on the RO N/A N/A N/A Memory C/A exam and at least 13 questions of the questions on the SRO-only portion of the exam are written at the comprehension/analysis level (see ES-401, D.2.c); enter 37/9 38/16 AJS JK MD the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution(s) at right.
8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of AJS JK MD distractors. [NONE]
9. Question content conforms to specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination AJS JK MD outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified.
10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in Appendix B. AJS JK MD
11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple-choice items; the total is AJS JK MD correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Author Andrew J. Servaes 10/12/2021
b. Facility Reviewer (*) James ames P. Knapp 10/12/2021 C.Osterholtz 10/13/2021
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) _____________________________________________________________
d. NRC Regional Supervisor Gerond A. George Digitally signed by Gerond A. George Date: 2021.10.21 10:11:29 -05'00' __________

Note:

  • The facility reviewers initials or signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initials items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-401, Page 48 of 52

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Wolf Creek Date of Examination: November 2021 Operating Test Number:

Initials

1. General Criteria A b* c#
a. The operating test conforms to the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with JDB JK MD sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

[No Changes]

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered JDB JK MD during this examination.
c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s) (see Section D.1.a.). JDB JK MD
d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within JDB JK MD acceptable limits.
e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent JDB JK MD applicants at the designated license level.
2. Walkthrough Criteria -- -- --
a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: JDB JK MD
  • initial conditions
  • initiating cues
  • references and tools, including associated procedures
  • reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee
  • operationally important specific performance criteria that include

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walkthrough MD outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and ES-301-2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the JDB JK acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2. [No Changes]
3. Simulator Criteria -- -- --

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with JDB JK MD Form ES-301-4, and a copy is attached.

Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Author Joshua D. Bousum 10/12/2021
b. Facility Reviewer (*) James mes P. Knapp 10/12/2021
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) C. Osterholtz 10/13/2021 Digitally signed by Gerond A. George
d. NRC Supervisor Gerond A. George Date: 2021.10.21 10:25:58 -05'00' ______________
  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
  1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column c; the chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301, Page 1 of 33

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Wolf Creek Date of Exam: Nov 2021 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3 Operating Test No.:

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, JDB JK MD but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. JDB JK MD
3. Each event description consists of the following: JDB JK MD x the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated x the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event x the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew x the expected operator actions (by shift position) x the event termination point (if applicable)
4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. JDB JK MD
5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete JDB JK MD evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. N/A N/A N/A Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given. [None]

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. JDB JK MD
8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance JDB JK MD deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. JDB JK MD
10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the JDB JK MD form along with the simulator scenarios).
11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable JDB JK MD rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified JDB JK MD on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when JDB JK MD possible.
14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. JDB JK MD Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --
1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2/2/2 JDB JK MD
2. Abnormal events (2-4) 5/4/4 JDB JK MD
3. Major transients (1-2) 1/1/1 JDB JK MD
4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1/3/2 JDB JK MD
5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (> 1 per scenario 1/1/0 JDB JK MD set)
6. Preidentified critical tasks (> 2) 3/3/2 JDB JK MD
  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
  1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column c; chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Wolf Creek Date of Exam: Nov 2021 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3 Operating Test No.:

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, JDB JK MD but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. JDB JK MD
3. Each event description consists of the following: JDB JK MD x the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated x the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event x the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew x the expected operator actions (by shift position) x the event termination point (if applicable)
4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. JDB JK MD
5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete JDB JK MD evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. N/A N/A N/A Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given. [None]

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. JDB JK MD
8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance JDB JK MD deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. JDB JK MD
10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the JDB JK MD form along with the simulator scenarios).
11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable JDB JK MD rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified JDB JK MD on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when JDB JK MD possible.
14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. JDB JK MD Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --
1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2/2/2 JDB JK MD
2. Abnormal events (2-4) 5/4/4 JDB JK MD
3. Major transients (1-2) 1/1/1 JDB JK MD
4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1/3/2 JDB JK MD
5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (> 1 per scenario 1/1/0 JDB JK MD set)
6. Preidentified critical tasks (> 2) 3/3/2 JDB JK MD
  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
  1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column c; chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Wolf Creek Date of Exam: November 2021 Operating Test No.: Crew A A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E O I L N CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T N I T POSITION I

C A S A B S A B S A B S A B M A T L R T O R T O R T O R T O U N Y O C P O C P O C P O C P M(*)

T P E R I U RO RX 0 0 1 1 0 NOR 0 0 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 7 N+4 7 4 4 2 SRO-U1 MAJ 1 N 1 2 2 1 X

TS 2 N 2 0 2 2 RO RX 0 0 1 1 0 NOR 0 0 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 6 N+3 6 4 4 2 SRO-U4 MAJ 1 N 1 2 2 1 X TS 2 N 2 0 2 2 RO1 RX 0 0 0 1 1 0 X

SRO-I NOR 0 0 0 1 1 1 I/C 7 4 N+5 11 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 1 1 N 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 0 0 2 2 R02 RX 0 0 0 1 1 0 X

SRO-I NOR 0 0 0 1 1 1 I/C 5 3 N+2 8 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 1 1 N 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 0 0 2 2 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
4. For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 ES-301, Page 26 of 33

Facility: Wolf Creek Date of Exam: November 2021 Operating Test No.: Crew B A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E O I L N CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T N I T POSITION I

C A S A B S A B S A B S A B M A T L R T O R T O R T O R T O U N Y O C P O C P O C P O C P M(*)

T P E R I U RO RX 0 0 0 1 1 0 NOR 0 0 0 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 7 6 N+10 13 4 4 2 SRO-U2 MAJ 1 1 N+1 2 2 2 1 X

TS 2 2 N+2 4 0 2 2 RO3 RX 0 0 0 1 1 0 X NOR 0 0 0 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 7 4 N+5 11 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 1 1 N 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 0 0 2 2 RO4 RX 0 0 0 1 1 0 X

SRO-I NOR 0 0 0 1 1 1 I/C 5 3 N+2 8 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 1 1 N 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 0 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
4. For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301, Page 26 of 33

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Wolf Creek Date of Exam: November 2021 Operating Test No.: Crew C A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E O I L N CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T N I T POSITION I

C A S A B S A B S A B S A B M A T L R T O R T O R T O R T O U N Y O C P O C P O C P O C P M(*)

T P E R I U RO RX 0 0 0 1 1 0 NOR 0 0 0 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 7 4 N+8 11 4 4 2 SRO-U3 MAJ 1 1 N+1 2 2 2 1 X

TS 2 0 N 2 0 2 2 RO RX 0 0 0 1 1 0 NOR 0 0 0 1 1 1 SRO-I1 X I/C 7 6 N+7 13 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 1 1 N 2 2 2 1 TS 0 2 N 2 0 2 2 RO5 RX 0 0 0 1 1 0 X

SRO-I NOR 0 0 0 1 1 1 I/C 5 3 N+2 8 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 1 1 N 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 0 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
4. For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5

Facility: Wolf Creek Date of Exam: November 2021 Operating Test No.: Spare A E Scenarios P V 1 2 3 4 T M P E O I L N CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T N I T POSITION I

C A S A B S A B S A B S A B M A T L R T O R T O R T O R T O U N Y O C P O C P O C P O C P M(*)

T P E R I U RO RX 0 0 1 1 0 NOR 0 0 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 6 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 1 1 2 2 1 X

TS 2 2 0 2 2 RO RX 0 0 1 1 0 NOR 0 0 1 1 1 SRO-I X I/C 6 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 1 1 2 2 1 TS 2 2 0 2 2 RO RX 0 0 1 1 0 X

SRO-I NOR 0 0 1 1 1 I/C 5 5 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 1 1 2 2 1 TS 0 0 0 2 2 RO RX 0 0 1 1 0 X

SRO-I NOR 0 0 1 1 1 I/C 5 5 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 1 1 2 2 1 TS 0 0 0 2 2 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
4. For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Wolf Creek Date of Examination: November 2021 Operating Test No.: Crew A APPLICANTS RO RO RO1 X RO2 X SRO-I SRO-I SRO-I SRO-I SRO-U1 X SRO-U4 X SRO-U SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose Events 1-8 1-7 1-8 1-2 4-6 2,4-8 3-5 7

and Conditions Comply with and 1-8 1-7 1-8 1-2 4-6 2,4-8 3-5 7

Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control CRS CRS 1-8 1-2 4-6 2, 4-8 3-5 7

Boards (2)

Communicate 1-8 1-7 1-8 1-7 1-8 1-7 and Interact Demonstrate 1-8 1-7 ATC BOP BOP ATC Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply with and 2, 3 1,4 ATC BOP BOP ATC Use TS (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes TS compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3 describe the competency rating factors ES-301, Page 27 of 33

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Wolf Creek Date of Examination: November 2021 Operating Test No.: Crew B APPLICANTS RO RO3 X RO4 X RO SRO-I SRO-I SRO-I SRO-I SRO-U2 X SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose Events 1-8 1-7 1-8 1-2 4-6 2, 4-8 3-5 7

and Conditions Comply with and 1-8 1-7 1-8 1-2 4-6 2, 4-8 3-5 7

Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control CRS CRS 1-8 1-2 4-6 2, 4-8 3-5 7

Boards (2)

Communicate 1-8 1-7 1-8 1-7 1-8 1-7 and Interact Demonstrate 1-8 1-7 ATC BOP BOP ATC Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply with and 2,3 1,4 ATC BOP BOP ATC Use TS (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes TS compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3 describe the competency rating factors ES-301, Page 27 of 33

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Wolf Creek Date of Examination: November 2021 Operating Test No.: Crew C APPLICANTS RO RO RO5 X RO SRO-I SRO-I1 X SRO-I SRO-I SRO-U3 X SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose Events 1-8 1-2 4-6 1-8 1-7 2, 4-8 3-5 7

and Conditions Comply with and 1-8 1-2 4-6 1-8 1-7 2, 4-8 3-5 7

Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control CRS 1-2 4-6 1-8 CRS 2, 4-8 3-5 7

Boards (2)

Communicate 1-8 1-7 1-8 1-7 1-8 1-7 and Interact Demonstrate 1-8 BOP ATC 1-7 BOP ATC Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply with and 2,3 BOP ATC 1,4 BOP ATC Use TS (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes TS compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3 describe the competency rating factors ES-301, Page 27 of 33

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Wolf Creek Date of Examination: November 2021 Operating Test No.: Spare APPLICANTS RO RO RO X RO X SRO-I SRO-I X SRO-I SRO-I SRO-U X SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose Events 1-7 1-7 1-6 1,2 4-7 and Conditions Comply with and 1-7 1-7 1-6 1,2 4-7 Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control CRS CRS 1-6 1,2 4-7 Boards (2)

Communicate 1-7 1-7 1-7 1-7 and Interact Demonstrate 1-7 1-7 ATC BOP Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply with and 2,3 2,3 ATC BOP Use TS (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes TS compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3 describe the competency rating factors ES-301, Page 27 of 33

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 09/01/2021 to 09/30/2022 Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4

  1. Candidates Exam Site / Docket # / Insp Rpt # RO LSRO SROI SROU Type Exam Author Chief Examiner Examiners Assigned Week 09/19/2021 Wolf Creek / 05000482 / 2021301 FB-OR- Osterholtz, Clyde Doyle,Matthew CAC #: 000956 ONSITE Farina,Thomas VALIDATI Kirkland,John ON OF Osterholtz,Clyde INITIAL LICENSE EXAMIN ATION (OV) 10/31/2021 Wolf Creek / 05000482 / 2021301 5 0 1 4 FB-OR- NFF Osterholtz, Clyde Doyle,Matthew CAC #: 000500 INITIAL Farina,Thomas LICENSE Kirkland,John EXAM Osterholtz,Clyde ADMINIS TRATION (EXAD)

Sites: WC Orgs: ALL Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV 12/6/2021 10:13:37 AM Page 1 of 4

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 09/01/2021 to 09/30/2022 Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 Summary by Date RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 10/2021 5 1 4 0 10 Sites: WC Orgs: ALL Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV 12/6/2021 10:13:37 AM Page 2 of 4

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 09/01/2021 to 09/30/2022 Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 Summary by Site RO SROI SROU LSRO Total Wolf Creek 5 1 4 0 10 Sites: WC Orgs: ALL Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV 12/6/2021 10:13:37 AM Page 3 of 4

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 09/01/2021 to 09/30/2022 Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 Summary by Region RO SROI SROU LSRO Total Region 4 5 1 4 0 10 Sites: WC Orgs: ALL Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV 12/6/2021 10:13:37 AM Page 4 of 4

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML22020A133&oldid=3432696"