ML20140D174

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:35, 12 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Application for Amend to License NPF-3,changing Tech Specs to Clarify Station Review Board Duties & Responsibilities
ML20140D174
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 01/22/1986
From: Williams J
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20140D152 List:
References
TAC-61468, NUDOCS 8601290203
Download: ML20140D174 (2)


Text

r APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT ,

TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-3 FOR DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT NO. 1 Enclosed are forty-three (43) copies of the requested changes to the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Unit No. 1 Facility Operating License No. NPF-3, together with the Safety Evaluation and the Significant Hazards Consideration for the requested change.

The proposed changes submitted under cover letter Serial No. 1235 include Sections 6.5.1.3, 6.5.1.6 a-j, 6.5.1.7 a-d, 6.5.3, 6.8.2 and 6.8.3.

By /s/ J. Williams, Jr.

J. Williams, Jr.

Senior Vice President, Nuclear Sworn and subscribed before me this 22nd day of January, 1986.

/s/ Laurie A. Hinkle, nee (Brudzinski)

Notary Public, State of Ohio My Commission Expires May 16, 1986 SEAL h

e .

Docket.No. 50-346

-License No. NPF-3 Serial No. 1235 January 22, 1986 The following information is provided to support issuance of the requested changes to the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Unit No. 1, Operating License No. NPF-3, Sections 6.5.1.3, 6.5.1.6 a-j, 6.5.1.7 a-d, 6.5.3, 6.8.2 and 6.8.3.

(For revised Operating License pages, see Attachment 1, pages 1-10.)

A. Time Required to Implement: This change is to be effective upon NRC approval.

B. Reason for Change (Facility Change Request 85-0329):

The proposed changes are to: (1) revise the responsibilities of the Stacion Review Board (SRB), (2) add a section to the Technical Specifications which delineates the requirements for the technical review process, (3) reflect organizational changes already in effect, and (4) to provide consistency to the other sections of the Technical Specifications as a result of changes (1) and (2) above.

C. Safety Evaluation (See Attachment 2, pages 1-3)

D. Significant Hazards Consideration (See Attachment 3, pages 1 and 2) 1

  • : 't t