ML20197E619

From kanterella
Revision as of 23:20, 8 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Summary of Program Technical Support by Function for Review & Comments by 820809
ML20197E619
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/05/1982
From: Turovlin A
NRC
To: Fitti C, Newsom A, Shoemaker J
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP), Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20197E584 List:
References
FOIA-85-334 NUDOCS 8605150289
Download: ML20197E619 (5)
v • d • e


Text

-

e en afc UNITED STATES /

[ o, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMiss!ON ,

y , ') p. ([ ;" k WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 (t# i y

15 l-h ( '

%;*-=fE J '; tvl AUG 5 1982  %'s'

$[f

(& L

/

MEMORANDUM FOR: A. Newsom, ACRS ,i C. Fitti, ASLBP , DM,'

J. Shoemaker, ASLAP ,d i 4.R /

J. Fitzgerald, 0I h '

N. Dube, ELD R. Hauber, 0IP B. Hull, OSP R. Becker, AE0D FROM: Alan E. Turovlin, Budget Examiner, RM/B0S

SUBJECT:

OMB SUBMISSION It's that time again folks; please review the attached draft and provide your comments to me by c.o.b. August 9,1982.

If the personnel numbers do not look familiar that is because they /

include Regional Operations. They are also subject to change and I will call you as soon as I have final numbers.

Thanks. -

P *

. .c.v. -

~

Alan E. Turovlin, Budget Examiner RM/B0S

Attachment:

As stated cc: L. Schaub, RM/B05 8605150289 860403 ,

PDR FOIA  !

ADATOB5-334 PDR j

> 1 y

(Dollars in Thousancs, exceot en31e dollars in narrative material) f NU* LEAR REGULATCRY COMMISSICN - continued

. P ro gram Te ch ni c al S u p po rt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 t?T191--

SUMMARY

OF PROCRAM TE*HNICAL SUPPORT BY FUNCTION l

1 FY 19 d FY 19F.3 FY198I* FY 1980 Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Salaries and Benefits 3tt;td2" S M T???- s t e-?!C- 3 M;t!O Program Support. W) h$te J.!..o 974(+ f; g -h347- 1::'.S' 0,000 Travel p.,TS' l 239 / s e a -k4E+ jy7e W mo ' J29 sudM nf a3sttit9t TOTAL s HTsts - s+esee-g (._,.,._.,I t h (MM-Personnel .l. HeiM- (.k (-GGH h-?d)" t3+b)

This buccet activity includes salaries and otner costs for the s*.aff offices that provide direc* program

  • eennical support. These are the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Scarc Panel, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel stne Office of the Executive Legal Director, the Office of State Programs, the Office of International Programs, and the Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Oata. The following narrative adcresses program su: pert and personnel recuirements for eacn k -- g., *- O *n c E L e f"Q- U b .%,

Adviserv Comittee on Reactor Safeguards #

FY 191Q,,= 320G .D o FY 19 6 = 999 M FY 198M= $270 W FY 198M 32?? UC)

(

The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards ( ACRS) established in 1957 by Statute. advises the Corsnission l ) C on ;otential hazaros of procosed er existing reactor facilities and tne adequacy of rocesed safety standards.

Section 29 of :ne Atomic Energy Act of 1954 also recuires tnat the ACRS advise the Commission witn respect to tne safety of operating reactors, and PuDlic Law 95-209 recuires an annual recort to tne Congress on tne NRC Safety Research Program. The ACRS reviews recuests for preapolication site and stancars plant acprovals, eacn acclication for a construction permit or an operating license for power reactors, test reactors, spent fuel reprocessing plants, waste disposal facilities, and any matter related to nuclear facilities soeciff-cally recuested by the Oepartment of Energy. Because the ACRS is a statutory body of advisors to the Coo-missioners, their in;ut and advice impacts on the federal responsibilities of the NRC.uThere ,is no similar gr.oup wn.ica would provide ooth the ince endence and expertise of this Consnittee. The'ihdi. effs in FY 1983

---.-,.,,<...,...,,,a 9 ,.

,y .-.w..a e....... a. . . . . . , < . >

.. - . y

. 1. < ... e -..t u<,- ,,,,..u .a .-4.<--a .-~.4--.- - ;;;;w 4.- . . .. a

, . . - . > m ID k l. .S tf

  • tyg ,,g o n,,g K rese. ... A. e,.,(,jg e d ag*,a gh* gog

, gf In the fi st ten months of FY 1981, the ACRS prepared three special reports for riemoers of Congress (Con-

.'% gressman Udall and Senator Simpson); the annual report to Congress on. Reactor Safety Research; a major report F' . reemmending the use of specific quantitative safety goals; special reports in response to requests from the (C

  • Cmmission or individual Commissioners; . reports related to 17 generic safety issues, regulatory policy matters, and Regulatory Guides; six reports' relating to nuclear power plant OL applications or prelicensing activity and four reports relating to licensed plants.

Atomic Safety Licensing Board Panel FY1983=4e'/M FY 198 M= SMC- I // I FY 1944f=' Mte- E C M@

FY192Q=He-@)

My ?., Wf*5 '-)

6MWl -

The Atomic Safety Licensing Boarokanel (ASLSP) conducts statutory adjudicatory hearings through its hearing boards wnich issue decisions with respect to granting, suspending, revoking, or amending licenses or authori.

Iations under the provisions of applicaDle laws or regulations. These decisions cover both the construction tt. trust issues relating to the operation of such plants. The and A SLSoperation P + --=--2 ~ _of_ nuclear

" ' - - -- *a power

?" _j-aplants a +- e md ag/'on-site board hearings, which deal with environmen well as matters of health and safety, rinancial qualifications and economic considerations. The ASLBP held adjudicatory hearings in accorcance with applicaDie provisions of the Admint,strative Procedures Act, the -

Atomic Energy Act, and the National Envirormental Policy Act. The increase in program support reflec*.s logistic costs associated with the rental of on-site hearing SDace which was previously funded by SECY and increased use of DOE lac assistance due to the increased activity associated with additional licensing hearings.

J- r\

' s n '-~~. r Q//For =Y 1981, represents -

eno-of-year 'strengtri; for FY 1982;1984, represe rts full-time'Ei' u TraTenfs.

s i 45 py

~

l

. . . . . . . .............,........--.................<me. a,,

{ ;ran Tecanical Succort - continued Atomic Safe *v and Licensino Acceal Panel FY19Pi=$2r. FY 1RS2 = $47'

  • FY 1983 = $4C' -0 FY 198?.5 340 (14) (laT';-$ ( M) " , Ht!" ,

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel (ASLAP) is administrative 1y estaclished, however any revisi'on ,

to ne organt:stional structure of tne panel recuires Congressional notification. The ASLAP reviews deci-siens of administrative law judges 'and the Atomic Safety and Licensing Soares and perfoms otner accellate functions in proceedings on 3:plications for ifcensing of production anc utili:ation facilitie' (under 10 CFR part 30) and sucn otner ifcensing proceedings as the Cocnission may specify. The 9, staffyears required for the ASLAP are :: De used for nree-memoer tribunals wnien review the cecisions of acministrative law-judges and the ASLSP. The ASLAP nolcs appellate reviews according to the applicable provisions of the Administra-

- - . Drocecure tive *

,,~ - ~~ s A c t.

Offile~o'f"Ee Executive Lecal Director FY 190 = !2C/[

' FY198}=S3?"h

FY 1983 Y = sac 9 O FY 19 b", SO N O *

(1.Mt ^ (-M4-). ' ,- c h 4M&W

'-.v. S ys t - .- .P131 -

Tne Office of tne Executive Legal Director (ELD) is responsible for providing legal advice and services'to "

ue Executive Director for Ooerations and the NRC programmatic and support offices which report to that of ficial . The diverse rt.s;on,sioflities of ELD are perfomed by four divisions: Hearing Division Regula-tions Division,Y #:M rndirifFeement Division and the Operations and Administrat19d 31 vision. ELD cessonstMMtiami+g-MG +t;", n-- " effortprovide legal representation of the NRC staff in acmini-strative proceedings involving tne licensing of nuclear facilities and =aterials, enforcement actions and rul emaking. In aceition. ELD is resconsible for providing legal advice and services with respect to such matters as nealtn and safety, envircrr: ental impact and antitrust aspects of licensing and regulation; re-staren programs; general agensy administration, including contracts, patents, :ersonnel, security and labor regulations; safeguares and waste management m '; -eprograms; and the execr*/1= cort licensing program. The Lacaeeee r,; d..~si;e in psrsonnel 11.for.14a. ::-*~ - ' ? m ** Y $ 'e- ?- " -- ' M m The increase in pro-gram su: ort is to'uodate s pra:tice an,,d procedures digest of all Commission, ASLAP and ASLSP cecisions.

'-~ kw Office of Inte-ational Pre;rz seb :Trct-T" c.

c< '.N* C. M".~.

G !.wp u u .u, ,-;q_-

FY19eQ=S/+/9 FY 19,8[= SMtJ- /d FY 198M= $1(r3" .YoC FY 198. [ $ M J /$ 0 T-tc) u*KM)

  • (M.) N6)

The Office of Intenational Programs (OIP) was estanlished in 1976 to develop and direct a program of coop-tration witn foreign regulat:ry agencies and to administer the Comission's resconsibilities in the areas of non-proliferation, international safeguards and nuclear expor*s and imports. OIP provides infomational suo-port to the Commission and staff on international matters and maintains liaison with otner U.S. agencies.

OIP parfoms a key function in facilitating the flow of nuclear health and safety related infomation between

ne U.S. and foreign countries. OIP has developed and refined the Conusission's export / import licensing pro-cecures, assists in the development of improved international safeguards and physical security arrangements and participates in the ongoing implementation of the Coermission's regulations in succort of the U.S./IAEA safeguards agreement. The increase in program support reflects the funding of a technical expert on assi _

ment with tne,LAEA. This ac*ivity was previously funded by the Office of the Commission. he. 6 c-r;n:.c.gn-.WA" V .+cI W ,.',* M et W T%e.,cgro cd f.seper4* N..'.G dcO % l .'c.-2 4 *. .

Office of State programs

! FY 1987'~' = St25- Y FY 1982

~~'

= 368C"* M FY 198 F= 58 M 7 8

  • FY 19 d 58t0~7 N 13&r/--Q 43# g g .4301 . A w F3C4N,- ._ T +'J Tha Office of State Programs was established in 1976 to develop and direct a program of cooperation and liai-son with states, local goverments and interstate organizations. The office administers the State Agreements "

Program which was set up under the provisions of Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.G OSP provides

[ guicance, training and assistance to state and local goverments in radiation control and cooperates with l otner NRC offices and U.S. Goverment agencies having state and interstate responsibilities. The rationale for th2 federal goverment's role is that the state and local goverments need to have a central organization to provide guidance and direction to tnete programs. The office requires 30 staffyears of effort in FY 1983, unenanged from FY 1982, to provide reviews of Agreement State Programs, regulation of urantuu milling, indem-nity and decommissioning studies of nuclear power facilities. Since the passage of the 1959 legislation, 25 Agreement States now acqi A is_ter about 12,000 licenses involving the regulation of certain classes of radio-i active materials. The 4nertese9n program support reflects .tha tranfee of indemnity and deconunissioning studics and generic financial analysesjecsF181tR. g 34gg, 1

o A9+

(Dollars in Thousancs, except uncle collars in narrative material)

Procram Technical Sucocet - continued N '

Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Omerstional Data

_ '_ L~ ',

s P 195T = 5500~ , 1 2 f

~ FY 1932 = sh 387 : . J

~

FY 1981-= $1,874 ? 2 ~0 R 1984 = $ @ 74 (2EP (22 b ' (37) (37) y, erm The Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data was established to analy:e and disseminate infor-mation on coerating experience from all EC licensed activities. AE00 reviews operating experience to identify significut events and/or situations that warrant cetailed evaluation and studies these significant even's and/or situations to detemine wnat pec31 ems snould be corrected. The office has the lead resconsi-bility for coorcinating operational data analysis cerfomed by *.ne program offices and provices' the Executive Director for Operations with an unbiased review of ne coerational incidents. The increase in personnel reflects the staff level of a fully operational office for the analysis and evaluation of operational data given tne numoer of on-line reactors and nuclear material licensees. The increase in program suoport reftr:ts-the * ='a e- :d =: ;f : i.Me ree E"?'uet'? Sepeet Rm.'. ;=-Seovence-CooW $rMez-- -M a*

will neirr-to-vdeettf7 s i ga . ." . c.n . werirTrontl'~4WeMis?.~0.% r a., , E4;.g *,5 Q ,. c q ,* M ,- g m n -4 C? $=A L eh 4 d

  • M6 .h utk *d s\ ', ,g 491 4 d ae n d *? e* h . U,.

f,p /Eq7 O d * * .$ y En .E * ~

Y emmy 9 e

ow A M-47

l

  • \

W 6"7 bP'f O bISD

~ 43 5d gg 0' - ,

j pa. RF% if %+1&s C Ak .s 3 se &

.% QS (W %. ) iCC*% e[*S j !i C- p CD ,

y jdc's ~ eL0 '

44 % ^L o -

., e.d OM] ] ,~ W

  • h g' )Y & t... b y \ NY'G . \t n.

u

} .% mns.. M A %.1med A. s _

sr% .An,. . . , . . . ..

f __aM5^ 10e.s Q imeecj e ns.. R C.o W yi E!.l.- M.

4 .

h . LO * '

  • b4 0-y -

h t

o

' or . , . .

. h - Q.b C M Pbt, h a,,M .

k 5

.* . 3 .

. I ! 5' h C. .f d s. .' . h , M. ) k. . Q-M. . . e.. ..k. .I. n. S. ;f.c. 'U ~

.m . . . .v. . :n . ~ v . ... .: '--A. ...

\

..- -- - .y.:}.. .',. a: .~ .,..

- .g4g. ..

} . -- u .

q .

.l...' 3~. 2

? .. - . } :

be.d '

. ~.'.. M. . . . - ;. : *[. .

~ = - .. .N . Vn . . -

.~. .-

-1 ld

...:~..

i *'

. . .a : *i. - " .= N N -l.Ck. b~ .* . ..

~

y-- ._M eg?%.g.<4; - <:.q: &..gzm.,'

~ -

r1 l

. .- U-

. . .v q- .,v - .x . . . ! , r.c .g%.. .~.

h 3--

%. M: ay; u. .-t+&M..

..m .

. ,. .y, ::. , , ... t-* . . .:n . ..y'

. , . . . [. k * * -

g , . . . . . , .

    • ,,g 3 . . . , . .. . .

. , , . h ....u....

% o;., , g .- ,

.'...j + . $ . **

  • i

+ .

.1 .

. .[. .

.e s-a , .4 ..u. .

.~.^

~

..;-g.

e

,. ~ .,G &*.

.! % ' ...M.

. . f. , , ,+y.J. '

,Q '.

. . * . . -==.

. . . Y. O .. p^.

. .  ;. *% .I* -

b,,.h. ~ ~eh,;a.

- - - - - -  ;'-.W **

6.,y=.-' M b .

-i n .. .. ,,g, -w+;. .;,.,.,. , * .

. ,.. . , , = .7 ..-s3,,,. * * ., ,.

- ra = . .  :..

,. .. m . , , ., .-. ,..-,r g Jg .* .. . ' . .M

..j;_ .r..~ . .,1. r . .

41 .) 1 ' .D 'j..:4?, *b.

  • U .3 . .. . -
  • n.

. .. - p ' .%  : ' .

.. ,. , .-:x , . . . , . '. ^~'. ,. i . *

.g. *.- , ..t>. ,

.- . . . s > , , .r..T.'

z

. v .. ,: -

/.L.

l

, "' .'.w, ,- .g-C.?. . 5 j'. @ .V ...:

u .;g, .

4 . .

. . ..;._  :. .. .' g.q :...

. , .' 6 - rb -2 ' _ . ' 5.i',.

C t I ,.. -

.q.:..: ,;. ... . .; , . . ' . .. '.u.:.y

..p

y. . . .

r .

.. . , .e .. . -

-, z *_ . i.

~

. , , , _ *v, .

3 ;

. . , . . . . . . .. 4. . ...l o , .;..,,_......

, ,4, ,

. .: 1. ., .-

_-.,....s,.;.

,4 L.,. .. *

.t *

a.*;.
  • - . . n t'"., l~ *
  • ,.~~

, *. . * .  ; ~. _.

  • k 'm' '. . ** W

^

. .," + w ~. . _ ?- i.p ., . ..;.c"-A . < - e' A. '. n r -r-  :

,.. .- i . . . - . - . ,. .~*:: a. w,'.. :. .

, 7. (g 4.s

. G ..p,' .y . ., . .- ., .. :.Ld c * *. r Z .; . *.Q *'. '.'.. ' . ' ' ; *. Q* ,,'* h '. ~. ~ .'3.. "*h. ,,J:f

..K. . . . . . - , . ~...,.,~.n:y'........... ~a p t = , .

.f

,,. a.. . ..., .

~..u.,.. <

g, .g * . . . ,.

I,

. r - .-

e r "

L . .

(. .

p.

4  ;, .

m 6

, e

[ - : .

% I 9

,e .

. -

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20197E619&oldid=3341844"